#dondondonki0390

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

icy hemlockBOT
#
Please be patient

Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.

Pro tip: you can rename the thread title with `.tr <thread name>`

Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.

pliant moat
#

destroyed by the bombardements

toxic basin
waxen linden
#

Yep

#

Détruire is the verb meaning “to destroy”

J’ai détruit

  • Détruit is the past participle

Détruites just makes agreement with the gender

#

Celle is used before détruites because it means “those.”

“… water treatment stations to replace those destroyed by the bombardments.”

shell cypress
#

You seem to ask this type of question a lot so just for that, past participles are technically adjectives and can be used as such.

toxic basin
toxic basin
#

Sorry

shell cypress
waxen linden
#

Another example is like:

“The photos destroyed by my father” (passive voice)

You can say:

  • Les photos détruites par mon père.
    or
  • Les photos qui ont été détruites par mon père.

of course the first one would sound better in that sense.

toxic basin
#

Ohh I see, thank you!

pliant moat
toxic basin
shell cypress
# toxic basin Is there a pattern for past participle?

(1) For -er verbs, replace the ending with -é
parler > parlé
aller -> allé
manger -> mangé

(2a) For most -ir verbs, remove the -r to get just -i
finir -> fini
partir -> parti
applaudir - applaudi
(2b) Some -ir verbs are irregular, particularly -oir which are… unstable
tenir -> tenu (pattern also followed by venir)
mourir -> mort
souffrir -> souffert (pattern followed by couvrir, découvrir, offrir)
voir -> vu
pouvoir -> pu
apercevoir -> aperçu

(3a) -re verbs are irregular but follow some patterns: most -re replaces it by -u
mordre -> mordu
rendre -> rendu
prétendre -> prétendu
(3b) prendre and its derivatives take take pris
prendre -> pris
apprendre -> appris
comprendre -> compris
(3c) mettre and its derivatives take mis
mettre -> mis
admettre -> admis
commettre-> commis
(3d) -indre takes -int
atteindre -> atteint
peindre -> peint
contraindre -> contraint
(3d) -ire tends to be -it
conduire -> conduit
dire -> dit
construire -> construit

toxic basin
#

So if I would like to differentiate which part of speech does the past participle act in a sentence, I would have to see if there is an auxillary verb or not and if the p.p. itself acts like an adjective?

shell cypress
#

If there’s no auxiliary, it’s going to be acting as an adjective