#Connor (corrigez-moi svp)
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.
Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.
In (3.) it says lavé not lavés as what DeepL says
And also in 3.5 why does Elle get 2 e’s but Elles gets only one?
DeepL is wrong
jambes gets 2 e's
"agreement with jambes, agreement with cheveux"
I thought hair is plural
Les cheveux
Oh wait it’s masculine
Sorry about that
Why is (2.) and (4.) not the same thing?
https://www.lawlessfrench.com/grammar/agreement-with-pronominal-verbs/
the pronominal verb can have a direct or indirect object
#2 is saying when the pronominal verb has an indirect object after it, the pronoun is probably a direct object
#4 is just giving pronominal verbs that are always indirect regardless
they cant have a direct object
so their pronoun must be indirect
Ah ok i think I understand, Do these two sentences agree or disagree (could you please translate these to french)
He addressed her
He addressed it to her
I mean it depends on the verb
Adresser
How would you make this sentence agree? “Ils se le sont donné l'un à l'autre”
Ils se sont donnés?
il s'est adressé à elle
il l'a adressé(e) à elle
"ils se sont donnés" means they literally gave themselves
this already agrees
I still don’t fully understand that. Why doesn’t this agree: Ils se sont donné leur argent? An adjective is a direct object so the pronoun becomes direct?
Leur?
Is the preposition in this case “le”?
I think at this stage I don’t understand what’s direct and indirect, like how can a reflexive pronoun be direct if there is no such thing in English?
in french, an indirect object is separated by a preposition in a normal sentence
and a direct object is not
e.g. donner qqch à qqn
à is the most common one
for indirect
yes, "au proviseur", à is the preposition, so proviseur is the indirect object
which means that s' is probably a direct object
Ah ok and my last question I have is why isn’t “à” the direct object?
it's a preposition?
Sorry for the late reply- I had exams, but why does the second sentence agree here?
And for number 3. 1/2, does it only agree when the object pronoun is direct and it’s behind the verb?
.
I don't know what you're trying to say here
In 3) there's already a direct object after the verb, so the reflexive pronoun before the verb cannot be direct, so no agreement
I meant to reply to this message
For 3 1/2 sorry
But I don’t understand why the pronoun isn’t direct like what you’ve said above for number 2
you can only have one direct object
for one verb
so if there already is one after the verb, there can't be one before the verb
Ah ok i understand now
3 1/2 just says that if there's a direct object pronoun in addition to the reflexive pronoun, the reflexive pronoun can't be direct, for the same reason
there can still be agreement, but it'll be with the direct object pronoun, not the reflexive pronoun
Alr so is that what you used in the 2nd sentence here
no
there's a direct object pronoun, but no reflexive pronoun
"Elle se les est rasées"
from the examples it provides
"les" is direct, so it agrees with that
"se" is there too, but since there's already a direct object, it can't be direct, so there's no agreement with it
Alr cool and which number rule does this go with?
Ah ok i will re-read it right now
So if les wasn’t in front, it would be “Elle s’est rasé les jambes”?
Nice I need to practice these, is there any exercise book that has questions with these?
not that I know of
tex might have something
lemme see
Tex's French Grammar is the integral grammar component of Français Interactif, an online French course from the University of Texas at Austin. Français Interactif includes authentic, spoken French language via digital audio and video clips, a French grammar reference (Tex's French Grammar), self-correcting French grammar exercises, vocabulary a...
this has a bit
Thank you so much man 🙏
Hi, sorry for disturbing you again, I’ve made my own notes so I can remember the rules more clearly, could you please check if they’re correct and if not what corrections should I make:
(1) When reflexive pronoun is direct (answers what or who) it agrees with the reflexive pronoun
(2) When reflexive pronoun is direct (answers what or who) it agrees with the reflexive pronoun
(3) noun direct= no agreement at all
(3.5) objects pronoun= agreement with object pronoun (les representing jambes) and NOT with reflexive pronoun
(4) there can only be one direct object so it’s going to be the noun after the verb so no agreement with reflexive pronoun
Basic rules :
- If the reflexive pronoun is DIRECT, the past participle AGREES with the pronoun
- If the reflexive pronoun is INDIRECT, the past participle DOES NOT agree with the pronoun
- There can only be ONE direct object. If one exists other than the reflexive pronoun, the reflexive pronoun is indirect.
(1) When the verb does NOT have any other object, the reflexive pronoun is more likely to be DIRECT (this is very much not always the case)
(2) When the verb is followed by an INDIRECT object, the reflexive pronoun is most likely DIRECT
(3) If the verb is followed by a DIRECT object, the reflexive pronoun is INDIRECT
(3.5) If there is another DIRECT object pronoun, the reflexive pronoun is INDIRECT (but the past participle still agrees with the DIRECT pronoun, as per usual rules)
all of these numbers are just tips on how to guess if the reflexive pronoun is direct or not
or how to know for sure, in some cases
That’s so clear bro thank you!