#jbbbbbb5483
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.
Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.
il faut -> It has to be/it must be
il me faut -> It has to be that I (I have to, Il faut que je...)
So il me faut = il faut que je but then what about il me faut du temps?
Theres no avoir in there
i need time
By the way, the object pronoun is indirect: il lui faut du temps.
Ohh
i must need more time
(it must be that i have more time
Another thing: il faut que is followed by subjunctive, so: Il faut que j'aie plus de temps.
"Il me faut faire" is super formal lmao
"il faut que je" is neutral
Not formal
Il faut | generic statement
- Il faut faire => x must be done - neutral
- Il faut [qqch] => x is needed - neutral
Il (COI) faut | directed statement
- Il me faut faire => I must do x - very very formal
- Il me faut [qqch] => I need x - neutral
Il faut que (clause) | directed statement
- Il faut que je => It is necessary that I - neutral
- ("Il faut que" must be followed by a clause, so can't be directly followed by a verb or object)
@umbral geyser
This is the other way around actually:
When a verb follows falloir, you have to options: indirect object + infinitive (il me faut me lever tôt) or que + subjunctive clause (il faut que je me lève tôt). The former is by far the more formal sounding and lesser used one. In speech only the subjunctive variant is ever used.
When a noun follows instead of a verb however, you have no choice but to use the indirect object pronoun, and in that case it does not sound formal and is perfectly fine to use in conversation: Il me faut du pain = I need bread
Ye

"il me faut faire" is basically the only inherently formal form of falloir, and it's so formal you'll almost never hear it
