#chocster
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Our volunteers look into many questions every day; sometimes it takes them a little while to answer.
Make it descriptive, including relevant context, but also to the point. This way you improve your chances of getting a more relevant and specific answer.
To clarify some more, why don't we see the base system below 60?
And is it because of the internet link to time keeping
I'm not confused about the base 20, I know its origins and commonality, this is more about the switch in methodology
So did the numbers below 60 used to operate on a base 20 system?
It would make sense if, as precise time keeping became possible and significantly more important, the numbers relating to it were simplified but the rest were kept as they were
Huitante*, not octante (it exists but is extremely rare)
And they don't exist in most french dialects
Septante and nonante are relatively common, huitante is pretty much just switzerland (belgium still says quatre-vingts)
And octante more or less doesn't exist in comparison
I believe it's mostly just because lower numbers were more common and thus carried over to the new system better but I'll have a look
Apparently no one actually knows but their best assumption was that they found it easier to calculate larger numbers in 20s
Kind of like if we suddenly switched to a base 5 system we'd have a harder time understanding 18x5 versus 9x10
Important note: French has historically used base 10 and base 20, but the 60 seconds in a minute thing relates to the Babylonians who used base 60
Related
It seems like I was on the right track, but the advent of the base 60 was much earlier than I had assumed
And was more significant astronomically than anything else
Though I wonder if it was in common use then
The article makes it sound like it was really only mathematicians and scientists who used the base 60