#survival score formula is wrong

18 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tawny sage
#

when you look at some of the scores, it looks like the formula is (exp)/(deaths+1) instead

solar folio
#

I think that's on purpose because if deaths = 0....

tawny sage
#

noone with 0 deaths is displayed on the list anyway

solar folio
#

Okay but, theoretically there could be and you would get a NaN error

tawny sage
#

which still makes the formula above the table incorrect rn

gray zinc
#

you need to be max level too

solar folio
#

There is no solution that can account for the divide by zero error otherwise.

#

You can just replace deaths with attempts if you want to be semantically correct, but the formula is right both ways

#

The description, however, differs somewhat trivially

tawny sage
#

what's written above the table does not reflect what the table actually shows, that was my point all along

gray zinc
#

Yea the formula is trivally off

#

I didnt even want to show the formula for this very reason

#

But it captures the general idea of the chart better than a sentence could

#

I see the point of wanting to see 0 in the deaths column tho

gray zinc
#

Ill see what I can do to improve readability

solar folio
#

Oh actually yeah you could just minus one in the column after the formula, I'm a noob

gray zinc
#

So the surivival death column was already minus 1 from the number, so it was your actual death count