#survival score formula is wrong
18 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I think that's on purpose because if deaths = 0....
noone with 0 deaths is displayed on the list anyway
Okay but, theoretically there could be and you would get a NaN error
which still makes the formula above the table incorrect rn
you need to be max level too
It's not incorrect. Many formulas in the world use n+1 for this exact reason.
There is no solution that can account for the divide by zero error otherwise.
You can just replace deaths with attempts if you want to be semantically correct, but the formula is right both ways
The description, however, differs somewhat trivially
what's written above the table does not reflect what the table actually shows, that was my point all along
Yea the formula is trivally off
I didnt even want to show the formula for this very reason
But it captures the general idea of the chart better than a sentence could
I see the point of wanting to see 0 in the deaths column tho
Ill see what I can do to improve readability
Oh actually yeah you could just minus one in the column after the formula, I'm a noob
So the surivival death column was already minus 1 from the number, so it was your actual death count