Hello people. I am trying to mount the Windows partition to support dual boot, so I installed ntfs-3g and enabled fuse in my kernel at File systems -> FUSE (Filesystem in Userspace) support to build as a module. But when running mount it gives me an error and asks to modprobe fuse, so I do, and it returns: modprobe: can't load module fuse: unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter and this errors on dmesg that I show in the picture. After that I tried embedding fuse in the kernel, but it still is unable to mount (see second picture), and running mount without -t says: mount: mounting /dev/sda5 on /win failed: Invalid argument
#modprobe: can't load module fuse: unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
So
Are you POSITIVE you are currently booting with the kernel that has fuse built in?
Second
If you are sure
Make sure eselect kernel
Points to your kernel
Then re merge fuse
Also actually follow the directions in the second picture lol
I’m like 99% sure the issue is that you are not booted into the kernel that you think you are
The version mismatch also means that the module for fuse is built for a different kernel than the one running
Oh. I think I'm not booting on that hahah i have to rename the kernel files. I forgot
I'll do that tomorrow. I just turned off the computer
relying entirely on or using ntfs-3g to mount an ntfs filesystem is no longer necessary for several years
the kernel provides ntfs3 filesystem driver support
the userland tools provided by ntfs-3g can still be useful however the filesystem type for a kernel supported ntfs partition mount should be ntfs3
It still doesn't mount, but doesn't give any errors about fuse
I didn't understand a word you said
Oh it mounted
Wait
Bro
The error
Tells you what to do
Read
Only
But I can't. How can i boot into Windows if I'm trying to mount the partition to boot into Windows
Cool
ntfs-3g filesystem type mount is depreciated
Why do you need to mount this to boot into windows
To rerun grub-mkconfig to make it accessable to boot
Nice to know
That doesn't run
Why would you need to mount it to do that
You didn’t build it into your kernel lol
Maybe i need to enable ntfs filesystem on kernel?
I guessed so
How can i boot into windows if grub doesn't identify it?
Did you use os-prober
did you make a custom kernel? ntfs3 filesystem is supported by the distro kernels
The partition needs to be mounted in order to identify windows
Yes it is a custom kernel
there you go
Are you sure?????
the fuse errors were an obvious clue for a veteran :)
Yes
🤷 what's the difference from the last two options?
if your custom kernel disabled partition type supports you'll have similar complcations
Press ? Over them
That's not a big problem
one of them is the very old read only ntfs driver
Whatever i choose it's gonna select both
It activates both automatically once i select one
also if by some chance you decided to not use any <M> module configratiuosn that kenrel build may malfunction
ot would be more likely to
Hmm, is there any reason?
booting a fully non modular kernel is akin to tube feeding an infant everything at kernel init 😅
Ohh i see. Interesting
I fear them
Same
Do i need to activate any of the 3 options that opened?
exfat support as a module also could be useful
there's another subsection with partition type support features you need some of
if your curious and wanted to study some of my older custom configs you can find several here
no modules means everything loads at kernel init and occupies a memory address whether or not that feature is used or useful
thats not really ideal
I paid for the ram I’m going to use the whole ram
That works now but not when i put in fstab
I need ram to run femboy porn in full hd
Oh ntfs3, not ntfs in partition type
Now os prober is active and it is not identifying windows
custom kernel grief :)
Never put something like this in my notifications again.
if you want some sombering perspective about your kernel config vs. the dist-kernel create a diff of both configs then read the resulting text file.
helped someone do that last year and they were missing 30k lines or something of similar significance
Thx. I'll take a look at that later
keep in mind that everything included in a kernel config file may not be every available kernel selection that could be used or configured. kernel kconfig covets many secrets until related features are available config selections
depmod can be your best friend or your worst nightmare ;p
At that point just use gentoo kernel bin?
at least very valuable reference
I can't
Why
Because I'm not lazy
Sigh
My kernel works >:(
I managed to dualboot
I manually edited /etc/grub.d/40_custom I think