#Y-DNA and mtDNA
1 messages · Page 3 of 1
How much stock should I put into this Y-dna match? This is the only “close” match and the only one with the same haplogroup. The time predictor estimates 950 CE - 1950 CE with the rounded average at 1600 CE. However, a lot of my more distant Y-dna matches show the same 950-1950/1600 timeline.
better not to take any y-12 matches seriously
Even people with vastly different haplogroups get 0 distance matches at the y-12 level
Which haplogroups do you and your match have right now?
My match and I are both R-FT273581 and we have 9 out of 600 differences between our Big Y-700 tests
definitely check out the TMRCA predictor for the y-111 STR differences then
Better yet, if you received your big Y results just recently, then there is a very good chance you will get another more recent haplogroup placement within a few weeks
That would offer a more accurate picture than any STR based predictions
However if you (or your match) have had your/his big Y completed a long time ago, then R-FT273581 (352 CE) is as far as you can get for now (until a new close match tests)
My results were posted in October 2023 but I’ve had the same 15 matches since that day. Below is my closest match
if your closest y-111 match has already completed his big Y then there's no need in checking your y-111 distance with him
Gotcha, thank you!
You are related to this match, but perhaps not within a genealogical timeframe/the surname era.
It is however possible that you share a common ancestor with them as late as the 12th century, and there is always a margin of error. As more test takers "test in" to your grouping, your TMRCA will be refined further and could change drastically.
If you simply wait for more testers, in a few years you will probably see a change. If you're impatient, you could track down distant relatives that you think you might be related to within a genealogical timeframe, reach out via email and ask them to test.
You could ask individuals you match with at a lower marker level to upgrade, you could find autosomal matches with a shared surname on other services and ask them to test with FTDNA, or you could simply reach out to individuals that descend from a common patrilineal ancestor on paper, like on WikiTree or FamilySearch trees
Just confirmed the biological parents of my 3rd great grandmother (who was born an orphan!) with mtdna!!!
Now I’m working on getting her sister’s baptism to trace her parents’ family tree
Apparently her parents recognized her as their child later in life
And she just never changed her name
I found out from a will written in 1909 👀
Congrats!
I really need to find someone to test their Y DNA at my family line where I also know that they were orphans, two brothers.
A larger pool is always better! I still have the same 15 somewhat-distant matches from October 2023
Did some digging and noticed that two of my matches both descend from the same ancestor: William Fleming. One match is a match at Y-67 (they only did up to Y-67), and the other match did Y-700 with 9 differences over 600.
I have a third Fleming match that is an exact match at Y-111 (they only did Y-111 test) but they did not list any earliest known paternal ancestor.
My closest non-Fleming matches are only exact matches at Y-37
Yoo guys
primarily exhibits East Asian paternal ancestry, particularly haplogroups O3-M122 and Q-MEH2. Maternally, they display a mixture of West Eurasian and South Asian lineages, suggesting assimilation with local populations. This contrasts with other Pashtun groups, which generally show more diverse and broader ancestry patterns.
Can someone explain this
Who I really am I don't understand
My people think that we are pashtuns
You presumably still are pashtun? A haplogroup is from only one line in your ancestry, someone a thousand years ago or whatever on your direct paternal line being from another ethnic group a long time ago doesn't invalidate the rest of your family being pashtun.
It's in 80% of my tribal members same haplogroups
Y-DNA % of small endogamous communities might not match well to overall ancestry
you should focus on autosomal DNA
Oh
your tribe probably has medieval founder effects on the paternal line from central asia or something like that, given you speak of O and Q. turks/mongols etc. but that doesn't mean that your autosomal DNA would have the same % from central asia as it looks from Y-DNA. its like how in sub-saharan africa there are some places (tribes) with 90% R1b haplogroup, but they have no noticeable ancestry from europe, even thats where the haplogroup came from
To add on to @naive shard, endogamy makes it easy for just a couple Y-DNA clades to predominate, but Y-DNA is just a small part of your whole ancestry as it encompasses just the patriline (i.e., unbroken line of male ancestors)
Plus, the Pashtun ethnogensis encompassed a huge diversity of groups, including Turks & Mongols
@drowsy crag is there any other ways to figure out a more recent haplogroup just from going through my matches or is buying the test the only option?
You can go through your matches on ftdna and check for who has haplos and descends paternally or maternally from your ancestor!
I've found some of this from various ancestors' descendants
One of my azorean lines someone took a big y for 👀
I wish my Y-dna matches all put their earliest known paternal ancestor in their profiles since I have three Brown Y-dna matches. And with autosomal clustering it’s becoming increasingly clear Charles Lockwood Ellis or his wife (“Eliza Ellis”) are descended from William Brown (1768-1846) and Zelpha Fuller (1770-1845).
I’ll message those matches later today to see if any reply.
This couple had sons and daughters. So they could be Charles’ paternal OR maternal grandparents. And they could be Eliza’s paternal or maternal grandparents.
⚜️ On the new MitoTree at https://discover.familytreedna.com/mtdna/X2b7b/classic we see they've adopted YFull MTree's branch name X2b7b and also found two branches, X2b7b1 defined by A10018G and X2b7b2 defined by T12879C, among many FamilyTreeDNA customers. 14 are in X2b7b1 and 11 are in X2b7b2 and they selected the flags of Canada and France to represent their maternal lineages. Here's the coolest part: the suggested branch formation dates can't be correct because the base level X2b7b as well as both of its branches are found among descendants of one person -- the 17th-century French woman Barbe Bajolet, daughter of Jeanne Baudinet -- in the Acadia Metis Mothers project's public mtDNA results page https://www.familytreedna.com/public/AcadiaMetisMothers?iframe=mtresults 🇨🇦 🇫🇷
MitoTree suggested that the branches could have been formed around 1100 C.E. and 1000 C.E. respectively.
and their 95% probability only got as recent as 1335 C.E. but Barbe was born around 1608.
and the branches obviously weren't founded by Barbe herself but by two of her descendants.
Is there any tool to analyze a full Y-700 match? I have my full 700 version and my closest match on familytreedna also has their kit fully posted on their surname project
A relative of mine, a direct paternal descendant of a brickwall, did a BIG Y-700 test and got the haplogroup I-Y84928. He's my only match with that haplogroup (at least on FTDNA).
Is there an easy way to tell how I-Y84928 would show up on less detailed tests? Is it simply a question of going on https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/I-Y84928/story and repeatedly clicking on the ancestor it branches off from until you have something?
I did that a couple of times and got to I-Y4197, the haplogroup of four matches (9-16 cM) who'd taken a Y-DNA37 test. What are the odds this is a meaningful lead?
Click on the list looking button on the left, if you're counting up from the bottom it's #6
But are the 4 matches sharing the same segment as each other with you? Might just be a weird coincidence that they share an ancestor of that haplo. Also, do they share the same paternal ancestor? Might be another indicator for this instead of against.
"match time tree"? Looks like you need to have taken a test yourself to have access.
I should clarify I haven't yet spoken to this relative, although I definitely will at some point.
You're getting a suspiciously 7 shaped 6 there 🤣
(I'm counting the info button on the bottom as #1 for clarity)
But yeah the ancestral path thing shows you every change of the haplogroup
Oh I see, thanks
That's the tree I used before (although I got it by manually clicking back as I said).
I missed something very obvious about the I-Y4197 matches I have - none of them share a surname
Pierson could derive from the same root as Perry, but it's unlikely. It does say I-Y4197 is over 2000 years old, so odds are we're related through someone else.
Yeah, it's likely unrelated, but was why I asked if the segment each shares with you overlaps or not
I think you need to pay an extra fee to see that on FTDNA (I tested with ancestry).
Thanks anyway. Presumably my closer relative has done quite a bit of genealogy research themselves if they were willing to pay £400+ for a Y-dna test, who knows what they found.
OH yeah you do annoyingly
(I forgot sorry)
@drowsy crag what would you suggest I do here lol?
I don't know of anyone having taken a mt test
(this is kinda about my broader brickwall, so I figured we can move it out of there so they can keep on the original topic lol)
I mean, if you donate the money to afford trying an mt test it'd certainly help some!
Just I would also worry about not having any useful matches 😭
wym donate the money
...I hate autocorrect
This is my own maternal line it'd be me testing 🤣
*do have 😭
Autocorrect is the bane of my existence sorry
I mean the cost depends on the test though, no?
And I do worry about what utility I'd really get out of it with a cheaper test
I mean, I think you have some experience with it? What have you gotten out of mt testing
I would think mtDNA would have a larger pool of matches since it’s passed from mother->child? Sure it dead-ends with men but that’s better than Y-dna
Well my understanding is that Y DNA mutates a lot faster
My 5th great grandparents don't have a marriage record I've ever found (but were married mid 1850s), her maiden name isn't known, and despite her first name being uncommon (actually just weird frankly) I haven't found anyone who could possibly be her in the 1850 census
Do you know their religion and town they were married in? Sometimes there’s 19th century church records but often you’ll have to contact them.
I think Dyer county Tennessee and I strongly doubt they were married in the kind of church that keeps records if they were even married in a church at all
I mean yeah it's about the same as a y 37, just (ime) a bit less commonly taken and slightly less genealogically viable than the y.
For my experience at least it's helped me confirm my research on direct maternal is right, and given me 3 lines from close matches to look into, but didn't yet break my brick wall.
(I could also try looking into a 4th match, of distance 1 who is also Azorean, to be fair, but her maternal line is from a different island than mine, even if most of the early settlers of São Miguel are from her island of Santa Maria.)
I am also suspicious of the age it gives the haplo given I suspect it's notably younger given all of my distance zero matches are Azorean from the same island and area of the island except for one, and that one has a surname on his direct maternal line brick wall (Brazilian) that on said island I associate with that area anyway.)
The haplo is just me and my distance zero and 1 matches 😂
What age does it give?
(The distance 1s are all azorean, a Brazilian with no tree, a Puerto Rican with a Cuban mother, and a Cuban with a Galician mother. The Cuban line is probably a canary islander and thus also goes back to Azores)
Am I liable to match half of Appalachia
This, which makes it a lot better for tracing dna!
But also that more people take ys than mts
Ca 2k years ago which uhhhh. Let's just say the azores gives my Mexicans a run for their money for endogamy, so I suspect all of the matches of distance zero have an MRCA in the 1450-1650 region. Distance 1 ehhhhh idk and that might be where the 2000 years ago bit comes in
But my distance zero matches are this:
- Shares maternal line in late 1700s
- Brazilian with brick wall in northeast in 1700s
- Someone whose maternal line ends one (1) parish over from mine in the same time period as mine, who also is probably the sister of the direct maternal ancestor of an hvr1 and hvr2 match
oh well 3 is helpful!
to be fair, I think I need to do more work with my autosomal matches to exhaust everything first
Yeah! 2 probably is also if I can get them out of Ceará or Pernambuco
2 years ago I thought I'd need a Y DNA test to figure out my Johnson and that turned out to be just me having no idea what I was thinking
Distantly? Probably 😭
I have a shitton of distance 2 and 3 matches that are just fucking everywhere bc my mt haplo is a descendant of H1 😭
(Most common mt haplo in Europe)
Would the haplogroup itself maybe help determine Europe or Africa
Close? Eh probably not unless unlucky
Oh definitely! If it's like L something then presumably sub saharan Africa at some point yeah
@dim mesa related question but for your or whichever relative took an mt test with a haplogroup L, do you have a lot of matches for it (close or distant) in the usa?
👀
Was like L3 or something
God I love searching for this brickwall's first name only in Tennessee on the 1850 census and getting an astonishing 0 🤩 results
I've considered tracking down direct descendants of my 1x's sisters to help with the direct maternal brick wall of his
most of my relatives are haplo L, but the L3 specifically was my father
he got L3e2a1b
his only other match is a cuban from the same town as him
i broke through that brickwall recently actually!!!
interesting
I don't even have a tribe for her she is just. "Idk she's born in Los Adaes and indigenous" to the spanish 😭
Wait, not even distance 2 or 3???
Weird
my dads great great grandmother was an orphan named mercedes. thanks to a will i discovered that her biological parents were quirino del junco and cecilia hernandez
it was an exact match! distance of 0
yea he has none
its just the one match
in my case i have a few lol
my haplo is l2a1n1. since my great great grandmother was a black woman born to a nigerian mother, i have several american matches at a distance of 2-3
with autosomal matches i determined that i am a matrilineal descendant of the igbo tribe
but i am an odd case
(Anyway for Anna: thjs is also why mtdna can be a crapshoot😭)
because i was able to test my great grandmother
and she has several 25-30 cm matches all from the same towns in nigeria
specifically abagana and nimo
so my family was most likely from there
and these are all predominantly igbo towns
so therefore... i am most likely of igbo descent
yea its really random, you either get lucky with close matches or you get nothing out of it lol
I have no idea what is going on
but yeah I got that lol
lol
Ill probably kick it down the road then
basically my female line is l2 and my dads is l3
he got a close match and i got more distant ones
Yeah very fair. It's not the easiest thing to work with compared to a y, too, bc it mutates so. Glacially. Slowly.
It's just insane that someone named Lucassa is this hard to find
(I do agree with what you said a min ago though that you should try doing some more stuff with autosomal first bc might help on that branch bc early tn is very
)
I have some big clusters that I literally can't place whatsoever
I gave up a hot minute ago on the one
Is one of them the Davis NPE?
Haha nooo that's also via this great-grandmother but that one is thankfully a lot easier to work with
I have that one ruled down to a set of brothers
Hopefully you have more success with mtdna! So far the only breakthrough I’ve had with ydna is coupling it with autosomal clustering to determine that I am probably not a biological Ellis pre-1841
Well my surname isn't mine biologically either even though we went into genealogy already knowing that
Oh man the biggest match from this cluster just passed away in March :(
Y DNA doesn't mutate a lot faster than mtDNA - 16569 bp vs 59 million bp just makes it seem that way 🙂
Did you do big Y?
Y-111
I’m still waiting so I was going to query you about wait times. At least his initial / non big Y stuff came in
Any surprises so far?
I ordered mine just after RootsTech on the offer they had. Still waiting on the mtDNA results I ordered in the same package
Not yet but I don't have time for much more than a quick view today
Not sure if you saw my post yesterday, but I got my Big Y results yesterday after they received my sample on 1/15/25
I'm learning a bit more about the test I got 😅
This means you’ll only receive a partial haplogroup from an autosomal test. Most customers can expect this haplogroup to have originated in the Metal Age (about 10,000 years ago). Comparatively, a predicted, broad haplogroup from a Y-STR test like the Y-37 or Y-111 will typically have originated in the Stone Age (about 100,000 years ago), and a haplogroup from the Big Y-700 will typically have originated in the Middle Ages or in the Modern Age (about 1,000 to 500 years ago)—within genealogical times.
The latest haplogroup I've been assigned originates in ~50 CE. Why might it be that early, instead of the 1,000-1,500 CE range the FTDNA blog indicates?
Blog link here fwiw
Perhaps this is a coincidence, but doing research on this line - both via records and via genetics - is strained. I have a hard time tracking them down in available records, and there's hardly evidence of them in my autosomal matches. And now this is telling me that there aren't enough Big Y test-takers to give me a more recent haplogroup.
Is it possible that this line historically has been thin, so there aren't many modern descendents?
In fact, the haplogroup story page says as much. I have one match in my haplogroup, and one other match further up the tree
Someone has to be one of the first, so that a new line can be discovered. 
I don't wanna be a trailblazer
Is it possible that DNA testing is just not popular among the areas where my would-be matches live? We're talking about Slovakia, Poland, Ukraine
Yes, DNA testing is not common in Central/Eastern Europe as a general rule of thumb. Let alone Y-DNA testing. So genetic genealogy is often a lot harder for those communities than for those of Western European descent.
Thanks. Are there any good resources in how to navigate genetic genealogy research with that in mind?
I have that issue with my big y as well, but in my case it's due to my y line going back to France, and France doesn't allow these tests so it's not widely done. (Some still do it anyway, but not at enough of a rate where I've gotten any matches).
Already?
even when they say you receive big y result it may take 1-2 weeks to get the proper position in the tree
for example the person i know most recently tested got result back it had him at 2000 BC TMRCA clade and then 2 weeks later had at 600 BC
might still be the same, haha, but it can still form more recent branches if they exist
one of my friends has been stuck at TMRCA 3000 BC since he tested, no matches at any level and no changes to tree structure 😆
same here
R-FTA69840 3211 BC
Okay this is interesting! I think. The guy who was a match with me in my previous haplogroup appears to still be a match with me in my new haplogroup, and that the new haplogroup is downstream from the old one. So that implies to me that the MRCA between my match and I should be more modern than the ~50 CE the old haplogroup estimated
yeah, you will definitely have a more recent TMRCA once the tree finishes updating
Why does FTDNA's Migration Map indicate that Y-Adam was in modern day Ethiopia, whereas the GlobeTrekker shows Y-Adam around Niger?
because its completely theoretical, its not like we have the ancient DNA of the person that first had that mutation 🤷♂️
We do not allow discussions about ancient DNA in this server, including services and calculators that primarily or specifically deal with ancient DNA. For more information please refer to the pinned post in #ethnicity-estimates.
@sick sinew
So, I hit my road block at my 9th great-grandfather, Edward Boswell (Gypsy leader), the only reason I’m researching the Boswell line this far back is because apparently the Boswells were popular back then so I am taking my chances.
1680-1747
(Continuing a conversation that began in #united-kingdom )
Yeah at 9 generations Y-DNA is really your only option, obviously autosomal matches won't be any use.
As I said I have no direct experience, but a couple of things to consider:
Are you sure you're even biologically descended from Edward? 9 generations is a lot of time for infidelity, especially when you already know it's in the family
Say you do get a match - what are the odds you'll be able to trace their tree back any further than yours? Maybe you have no infidelity in your paternal line (before Edward) but they might. Or they could descend from Edward as well.
I'll parrot some general advice I've heard from others in the server: start with a low-resolution test, if you get a match you can upgrade it. And wait for a deal.
Thank you Chris for helping with this, so it’s just up to whether I want to take the shot with the Y-DNA test. I’ll have a think and see what to do.
I have a short question: my Y-DNA test finally arrived, I am in Germany.
I now have the envelope that they gave me in the shipment.
But I guess I have to do some extra stuff so it can go from here to the US, right?
😭
I waited two weeks for the update to not provide much new information
But, a new TMRCA!
I have a question about my Paternal Haplogroup, I recently did 23andme and FamilyTreeDna and I got Haplogroup O-B392. Now I know what the austronesian expansion is, it gave rise to Islander Se Asians, Micronesians, Polynesians, and some others I’ve been following its studies for quite some time. FamilyTreeDna noted I had some rare connections to remains found in the Maluku (Molucass Islands) literally the same haplogroup as Gua Uattadami remains from the Kayoa islands in the northern molucass which played a pivotal role in the colonization and migrations into Oceania. I just want to know more about my haplogorup (O-B392) than I can find by just surfing online. Genealogists, help would be much appreciated!
I think just put your address in the top left and you’ll have to find a stamp, I assume?
Do you know if there are customs forms?
I do not, actually. Good point
I did an FtDNA test recently. I think international tests you are in charge of figuring out shipping. My test here in the US had the label already printed on the package.
So ship it with any postal service… how you would ship any international mail to the address printed on the package
Okay thank you! Just don't want to do anything wrong. The first shipment to me already had problems (not by me or them, but by DHL), so they needed to send me a second test.
That's odd, why does the envelope not include the word "DNA" after "FAMILY TREE"?
I think when my family placed our orders it said the company name completely.
Big Y results finally in! mailed in January
any hits?
Idk what to look for really! His matches all have the surname I expected. I had to leave the house before I could look around more
I've seen a few international kits not mention it. Which is good, since some countries' postal companies are wary of shipping parcels which say "DNA" on them. Probably the reason they removed it.
Now I understand! I'm in the USA so no int'l shipping was involved.
ydna from my mothers dad, hes serb from the south originally (vitina town)
r1b-z2103
This question relates to Kristofer Olofsson Gunnerfelt, a soldier born circa 1715 in Dalby, Värmland, Sweden. This is not only my ancestor but also Buzz Aldrin's. His parents are not know, but I have gathered documentary evidence that strongly suggests he was an illegitimate child of Olof Kristofersson Utriainen and Ingeborg Eliasdotter. Court records show Ingeborg gave birth to an illegitimate child in 1715 and accused Olof of being the father. Indirect evidence suggests a link between Ingeborg and Kristofer.
I would like to supplement this with DNA evidence. I have traced several possible Y-DNA test takers descending from two of Kristofer Olofsson Gunnerfelt's sons. Sadly there are no other known lines from Olof Kristofersson Utriainen or his father Kristofer Olofsson Utriainen. So before I start spending time and money on contacting these men and getting them tested, I'd like to hear your view on the value of potential evidence that could be gathered from Y-DNA. As I see it, the potential results that would support the hypothesis are:
-
A Finnish haplogroup: As the surname Utriainen suggests, the suspected father was of the Finnish minority. This ethnic group normally carried an N haplogroup, which is very uncommon among men of Scandinavian descent.
-
A match in Finland with the Utriainen surname. One or more matches in Finland with the Utriainen surname would support the hypothesis, even if it would be highly unlikely that a link with the Utriainen in Sweden could be proven documentary.
Would anyone be able to comment on my plan? Is it worthwhile? What test should I get? I'm thinking Y-37 could be a cost effective alternative as I would like to test 2-4 individuals if possible.
From Kosovo?
Ye serb
Autonomous Province of Kosovo and Metohija
However u wanna call it
That's the location
The Big Y-700 results for a promising close(ish) match of mine in my YDNA group came in! Turns out, as expected I form a new haplogroup clade with him: R-FTG51648. This means we share a common male ancestor sometime around the early 18th century (i.e., ~100-150yrs more recent than my previous identified haplogroup).
Plus, this guy's paternal line brickwalls around mid 18th century Knock & Branahuie on the Isle of Lewis. Which is only a ~15min drive away from where my paternal line brickwalls in nearby Aird Tong, also in the mid-to-late 18th century.
So that's a big plus for me, since now I know exactly which Morrison family in which village my MacKenzie paternal line is related to. I just need to tie up the loose ends on when and how.
Plus this Morrison family were in Uig parish on the opposite side of Lewis pre-mid 18th century, so there's the location factor of if the clan switch on my line happened before or after that migration.
Whoa! Awesome to have such a recent big Y match! I hope you will be able to use this knowledge to tie the two families together through records as well
Me too! It's actually so close that I'd reliably be able to find potential autosomal links, especially with my Grandpa's DNA tested already.
But the knowledge of which Morrison family in which village I'm related to is so immensely helpful considering how many unrelated people have the same surnames on this island.
A luxury 🙂 I have been tracing the male-line descendants of my direct male line and outside of my small group of 1st cousins there are no descendants of my ancestor born in 1687 😅
I can imagine 😊
What makes my paternal line all the more confusing is that autosomally I'm linked to the Gairloch MacKenzies, and the DNA connection is strong enough that I was able to be put in a Gairloch MacKenzie DNA group. But since my direct paternal line, despite being called MacKenzie, is not from Clan MacKenzie. So my actual MacKenzie connection is not only female mediated, but some weird endogamous mess on top of that.
I have a DNA match that is shared with these Gairloch MacKenzie folks, but he has connections to actual Gairloch-descended MacKenzies on Isle of Lewis, as well as the Pseudo-MacKenzies (i.e., Adopted Morrisons) that I descend from.
Does anyone know how long mtDNA upgrades on FTDNA are taking to get results?
one of my group member's took one and a half month, just for the legacy mtdna haplogroup
his mitotree beta haplogroup did not arrive yet
ordered back in march 31st this year
Omg okay lol, I thought it might be quicker because I’m already in the analyzing stage but I guess not 😂
My YDNA haplogroup on FTDNA is officially updated as R-FTG51648!
It looks like the haplotree will be updated in the next week or so
I was able to connect one of three persons that match the same haplogroup! A match 6 steps away with 67 markers (oddly non-match with 111 markers). Common ancestor was found from early 1700's through NPE on my side recent enough that I could confirm it with with autosomal tests.
So, the hardest one of the three matches done, though NPE actually helped to confirm it. Sound like the other ones could be doable too, maybe?
(oddly non-match with 111 markers)
May I ask why that is odd? I'm still learning the ropes on Y-DNA. I thought it was possible for matches in the less-detailed levels to drop off completely in the more detailed levels. I have a pretty small amount of matches, and frustratingly this happens a few times for me.
True, that could just be it. I though having the same haplogroup would mean it would be a match on any level, but I don't have much experience on that. I have just those three on same haplogroup. Other two are matches on 111, 67, 37, and 25 markers, while that one I solved is only on 67, 25, and 12, not on 111 or 37. Maybe the odd thing is missing 37, not 111 actually.
Got my mtDNA full results back, and I only had to wait about 4 weeks. My Maternal haplo is V-C16298T!
I also have a total of 2 closer matches and 2 further away. None of which have anything remotely helpful in their profiles 😅
That’s awesome! What date did you get your test? I got my dads on 6/15 still waiting so hoping only another week or so more
I received it in late May, and submitted the first week of June.
Oh awesome! Hopefully I get mine soon then
One of my mt matches that had very little info (in terms of "I can't connect the tree to anyone in Portuguese docs due to privacy laws") I only solved via autosomal matches in common 😭
(Mrca was in late 18th century, and she and some of her relatives match my grandmother)
Protools specifically for how if not obvious
I fear I may not be able to do anything with the matches I have on FtDNA. I do have some ideas where to look at records maybe now though.
Not sure yet. For some reason some of the information on my test is still populating 😭
and there's no identifying info about these samples below either other than they're modern people from somewhere in Europe -- from a study doing "testing in Caucasians", where they mean the race, not the mountain region:
- AY495109(European) Coble V-C16298T 07-JAN-2008 T72C A263G 315.1C A750G A1438G A2706G G4580A A4769G A5582G C7028T A8860G A15326G C15904T T16519C
- AY495118(European) Coble V-C16298T 07-JAN-2008 T72C A263G 309.1C 315.1C A750G A1438G A2706G G4580A A4769G C7028T A8860G A15326G C15904T
from which we know that V-C16298T! equals V-b on YFull MTree @ https://www.yfull.com/mtree/V-b/
people with English & German roots in that
also Irish, Uyghur, Spanish, Kazakh, "Russian"
There is a geni project with zero info other than it seems to be majorly people from Finland and Sweden. I have no matches at zero genetic distance, and only 4 matches total on family tree dna. I’ve been trying to collect information anywhere I can but it seems like there isn’t anything. It seems to be a relatively rare haplo… No wonder when I tried uploading to jameslick it freaked out. I was hoping to find information on my mysterious maternal line that disappears without a trace, but it seems it will remain a mystery for now.
Where/when does it disappear?
It appears 1860ish in Canada.
Maybe a little bit earlier
Anything prior to Mormon immigration to Utah is blurry and weird the brickwall ancestor has parents listed, but aside from church database records which could be just random family tables there is nothing. I do not believe the listed parents are her’s in any sense. I have a theory that I want to look into but I also don’t want to get ahead of something if it’s not a possibility. I want to be very careful with how I proceed.
My dads results just posted!! Just got the email
Less than 4 weeks for mtDNA
Still no mitrotree haplogroup, but regular one is H3
All of his top matches are H3gn so I’m assuming that’s what it will be
Exciting
If someone is an exact match within the coding region does that mean it’s fairly recent?
I'm gonna assume you mean exact match overall bc you can't view ones for solely the coding region (which mutates slower than the 2 highly variable regions, hence the name), but yeah an exact mtfull match should be fairly recent at least, hopefully somewhere resembling the genealogical timeframe?
Ftdna says it's about 3k years old though, though the ages on mt haplos are way more variable than for y. I will also note it shows 2 clusters of 2 and 5 identical test takers on the page for the haplo, hopefully you're the latter one? (More convenient lmao)
"It" being h3gn, for clarity
I will note it has a descendant haplogroup too so 🤞 that yours will be the more specific one
These are his top three matches. The first one is the “exact match…” is the sequence starting with F the descendant haplogroup? Or one of the clusters? Lol sorry I’m so confused
No, it's the H3gn+[whatever] that the site shows, the mitotree haplo is just for the specific mutation you have.
The first and maybe 2nd/3rd could have a traceable link to you so 🤞
Let me rephrase that oops
The F.....thingy is for the mutation
Got it! It looks like none of his matches have the same mutation that his exact match has so I wonder if it’s just me and this test taker in that mutation group so far…
Yes but hopefully the pair of F2992640 are still a close enough relation. Do any of the 3 have a useful tree?
Yes, luckily the 2 that are one step away have trees! It looks like their ancestors on the maternal line are both from the same area in Italy that my dads maternal grandmother was from
hey can someone help me understand my ancestors? Im trying to figure if they were Celtic or Germanic? I've tried searching up them on Chat gpt but find out it's just putting towards Celtic origins
these are my
- R1b1a2a1a1c2b2 [R1b-Z28 (R1b-Z348, R1b-Z9)] -------- likely
- R1b1a2a1a1 [R1b-M405]
- R1b1a2a1a2a1b3~2 [R1b-L421 (R1b-L433, R1b-L88)]
- R1b1a2a1a2b3b [R1b-S47] ------ likely
- R1b1a2a1a2c1a1a1~6 [R1b-CTS655 (R1b-L753, R1b-YSC0000083)]
im not really too sure
how to make of this
What website is this from? Just keep in mind, we don’t discuss ancient DNA
We do not allow discussions about ancient DNA in this server, including services and calculators that primarily or specifically deal with ancient DNA. For more information please refer to the pinned post in #ethnicity-estimates.
I used morley dna predictor
But i got different results on my true ancestry
So im not really too sure what my ancient ancestors were
It's just confusing
Mytrueancestry isn’t a recommended source. Morley can be accurate, but it would be helpful posting with a pic
We do not recommend using MyTrueAncestry or Wegene. Please use extreme caution and do your research before uploading your raw data to any third-party website.
We don’t deal with ancient dna either, just keep that in mind
We do not allow discussions about ancient DNA in this server, including services and calculators that primarily or specifically deal with ancient DNA. For more information please refer to the pinned post in #ethnicity-estimates.
sure no problem give me a moment
Here it is
But im just confused ive asked chat gpt and it tells me its either germanic or celtic
i know r1b is common but which one
from this source
https://discover.23andme.com/haplogroup/R1b1a2a1a1c2b2-paternal%23
its common in ireland and england
Discover the world of Paternal Haplogroup R-Z9, the ancient genetic lineage shaping the ancestry of populations. Learn about origins, connections, and impact.
R1b Z9
but doesnt state if its celtic origin
just among these population groups
here's one for southern franch
I looked up
Well if you could help me let me know
That seem right, what you shared from 23andme. The only way to get a more specific haplogroup is to take a Y700 DNA test at FTDNA.
My Y-111 just got in and I even got a match with the same surname! 
New Belarusian Big-Y ordered, now it's waiting time 🙂
All previous I've ordered, I've predicted the haplogroup +- correclty, but this one is a total mystery
How distant of relatives have you tested for these?
Up to second cousins of my grandparents
Awesome work!!
Just ordered an mt upgrade for myself and a new mt kit for my dad 🎉
Do upgrades typically process faster than new kits (obviously not considering the time to ship and return a new kit)
I am currently doing an update and it is not processing faster, so I guess no.
I got a mt upgrade for my dad and he got the results in less time than the time frame on the website
Sorry if I already asked this. But if I have an exact match, will my Mitotree results be the same as them? I haven’t gotten my Mitotree results yet but I have an exact match
Yes!
My exact matches and distance one matches all score the same haplo
H1cu or something like that I forget
I got a question anyone can help
what's the question
my ydna
I got r1a
z93
as 23&me says
anything I should know
I did upload my raw data file to the clade finder
and I got a region in russia
kabardino-balkaria
what does that mean
https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-Z93/story it's about 5k years old more or less, ftdna has a bit on it here
i don't know where he region in quesion is from but it's part of Russia immediately north of Georgia fyi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kabardino-Balkaria
Kabardino-Balkaria (Russian: Кабарди́но-Балка́рия), officially the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic, is a republic of Russia located in the North Caucasus. As of the 2021 Census, its population was 904,200. Its capital is Nalchik. The area contains the highest mountain in Europe, Mount Elbrus, at 5,642 m (18,510 ft). Mount Elbrus...
R-Y286321, I have gotten this subclade
off the clade finder after inserting my raw data file
can you check how old it is
at leas according to someone on reddit it's another name for R-FTC850
all 3 people with it on ftdna there have direct paternal ancestry in the northern caucasus, does that match what you know of your family?
no
i am from iraq
i dont think i can make sense of it
it's not horribly odd at least, could be someone moved south some time in the middle ages or something, do you know much for farther back generations on your direct paternal line?
im from the Deep South
bordering the gulf
teeeeechnically it could also be possible everyone else who has it and tested could have ancestors who moved north instead too i suppose
there is an ancient people that migrated from that exact region towards the region im from
but that’s the sumerians, related with hurrians and very ancient people
anyway a lot of closely related haplos are from gulf area and west asia, maybe it's just the caucasus and such ones moved north for various reasons?
https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-FTC850/tree
ALSO
regarding cladefinder etc, it's technically still a guess as to your exact haplo, even if it's probably pretty close
I thought it was Indian when 23&me gave me rz93
but apparently it’s caucasian? related with circassians
the only time in history caucasians migrated to iraq was the sumerian times
other than that iraq had most its contact with persia for the rest of its history to this day
I even expected it to be persian related
is there a way I get to know?
you could see if an actual y test gives you something different for one!
e.g. this line is related closely to your estimate, and has folks from Kuwait
also this cluster intrigues me bc i would be super curious if it was from an Umayyad era guy or something
(same group of related haplos)
intresting
I wonder too
where would you guess it migrated from
looking at groups, it's random untraceable neomexicanos for the 2 spain ones (a Martinez and a Martin)
so possibly some random morisco ended up enlisting or something
it might just be from the gulf area in the first place tbf
did cladefinder give any other good options for what it could be?
There still could be exceptions. Not everyone who moved must be part of a bigger migration pattern
I can't really track movement of some of my ancestors in the last few hundreds years, so I wouldn't be too surprised for times even more far away in time
that’s all it gave
there wasn’t much migrations recorded in history for iraq
but there was a Indian one
during the Abbasid times
brought in for agriculture
persians also settled iraq
but R-Y286321 is circassian
if it’s modern should I carry Circassian dna
https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-Z94/story oh no that's very common rip
whatt he's saying is it could also be one singular guy immigrating independently, e.g. someone on the server here has a Slovenian who ended up in Catalonia
definitely not any kind of unified migration pattern (or much of one at all) for those two
that’s also very possible
could be just a random person
im guessing that person was circassian also
is that right
i do know many people carry it also in saudi and nearby nationality’s
that’s what makes me think it’s a migration of people
rather than a singular person
Probably no way ti know but fairly possible
It being from nearby countries could also mean it's from there moving out north and northeast and west, though
the family that keeps watch over the kaba is also under the same line of r1a
so it’s a big thing
even they are onto it
prophet abraham might be r1a in that case
and he’s a father of saudis he was from iraq
saudi got it from Iraq
but it’s a mystery
I can’t be sure of it
I don’t see much studies on it to understand
@drowsy crag this could also explain why Abraham was so different ideologically from the pagans he came up with monotheism, could be he came from a foreign culture
then caused himself to be kicked out babylon
then that way it spread to other parts of arabia
through his seed
Maybe you can find someone on ftdna or other groups, who also have your haplogroup and to find out more stuff
I am currently waiting for my Big Y results. I have only one match with the surname afaik
Must be at least back to the 16th century
I have joined some before, they all resulted to one answer, and it was we are descandents of hurrians mitanni people
mitanni in iraq as shown
good luck brother
just as an fyi as you're getting a fair bit into the era in question, we're not allowed to discuss ancient dna stuff here
We do not allow discussions about ancient DNA in this server, including services and calculators that primarily or specifically deal with ancient DNA. For more information please refer to the pinned post in #ethnicity-estimates.
it's not, it's the one above that
and the TMRCA is 825 CE because the only testers with that are the ones from Adygea, I believe if @drifting lava tests he would make the TMRCA go back further
not a problem
exactly, the testers both are adygeans
Another factor to consider is that the Circassian Genocide by the Russian Empire in 1863-1878 killed/dispaced as much as 95-97% of the Circassian population in Circassia. So it's not improbable that @drifting lava descends from a Circassian ancestor who settled in Iraq, as the bulk of the 1-1.5M Circassians displaced by the genocide resettled throughout the former Ottoman Empire.
And since these Circassians were primarily Muslim, there wasn't as much of a religious barrier preventing admixture with other populations.
i did consider that, but I have 0% caucasian dna entirely from the whole region, so it’s pretty strange, it’s not related with the circassian genocide
its possible, but i think its just that the mutation is older than what those websites show because the only testers with it just come from the same place
only way to know is with Big Y
Your paternal line on its own is a tiny fraction of your entire autosomal DNA. Plus, if you only have say 5% of your DNA being Circassian across several smaller segments, that could easily be smoothed over into other related categories which 23andMe's algorithm does by design.
oh oops, ty!
The smoothing is made to remove noise in your DNA estimate, but the flaw of that is what an algorithm thinks is noise can actually be a correctly assigned region
i see, 23&me gave me only two nations in Western Asia, one was Qatar other was Iran
The country matches are different since that's based on your network of DNA matches. It's more so saying you have DNA matches with all 4 grandparents in a given region. Thus it's subjective and you have to take into account migrations pre-early/mid 20th century.
Since the metric of just grandparents doesn't take into account generations further back.
my clan does affiliate itself to an ancient caucasian group of people
hurrians
they hold onto the name to this day
that’s the only connection I know of with caucasia
they are all extinct tho
including the subarians later known as sumerians
Genetic groups on 23andMe are a better representation of your ancestry than country matches, as genetic groups represent defined & specific populations with shared DNA
my ancestry is different from my dna
my ancestry is caucasian my dna is middleastern
I’ve read throughout history it said people migrated from caucasia to mesopotamia and later adopted Akkadian language and assimilated overtime
those people where called sumerians
after that there was no connection to caucasia
it was mostly arab and persian rule in iraq
This is getting more into ancient archaeogenetics, and thus not a topic for the server, but there's lots of scientific studies you can read up on to fuel your interest. It's a rapidly growing and expanding field of research
i was expecting help ive searched myself and couldn’t understand anything about it
I don’t know much in haplogroups maybe some person in the server knows
I would point out again that Iraq has not been isolated from Caucasia since Arab & Persian rule! As pointed out earlier, Ottoman Iraq took in many Circassian refugees in the mid-19th century, less than 200yrs ago and in the genealogical timeframe. Iraq still has Circassian villages in the present day, as well as the Levant and Turkey.
R-Z93 branch in general is related to indo-aryan language group anyways, also a related clade on yfull has chinese
isn’t my clade not indo iranian
it’s caucasian
your clade is not necessarily caucasian
you just share a mutation with them
and generally the other people are not caucasian
only 1 small branch is
if you get Big Y you can see your TMRCA with those caucasians
otherwise too much speculation
best option is going for a big y
Yup!
appreciate your help