#[Official] Alteration Help
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
That aimed at me?
Yeah
Some of the verbs change messaging based on the coverage, so I figured that's what would happen? I mentioned in the bug that maybe they could have alterable messaging that references the eyes versus the lips
This one doesn't, it is blocked for full feature masks
I'm assuming the STRETCH verb is silent in 3rd person in full-coverage but I haven't tested it.
You adjust your featureless mask ever so slightly, fully aware that your countenance is hidden from view.
Ah, so just silent, well that's a bummer.
I must have just tested twitch.
Your fingertips trail over the edge of your featureless mask as your lips twitch up in an enigmatic smile.
third person is also static, just X adjusts his mask ever so slightly.
same, twitch is also static
Guess I can't really test 3rd person on my own.
Bummer that you lose a bunch of the alterable verb messaging in full-coverage.
thired person is "X's fingertips trail over the edge of his mask, right where his lips should be"
but we can look at fixing up the analyze, so you don't "waste" an alter that no one else will see
They can't just be modified to be different for full-coverage like the others?
So you can still alter them.
that gets complicated and more than a bug fix. The GM behind Peretta didn't when she coded them, she intentionally had this other messaging there
and she's no longer around. So it would take some other GM to take up that mantle that's more than just maintenance or a typo
Got it, thanks for the insight.
I've never had any alterations done so this is probably a really obvious question but I have a pair of custom boots that are described as "some... boots" that I would like to be "a pair of". Does this fall under what can been changed in alteration? Also would it be considered a 1 word change of "some" or would a single word alteration not apply? Thanks in advance. Cheers!
Yes! You can absolutely change the article from "some" to "a pair of" - I also think this would fall under the "just one thing" merchant type
Thanks!
The "just one thing" will probably be true, but it may depend on whether or not the boots are scripted, etc.
Each piece of the "base" has to be 15 characters, and there are three pieces -- article, adjective, and noun. This is also referred to as the 15/15/15.
If you have something in that article with "some" then it may not be a simple swap to "a pair of" because that could be more than 15 characters.
Example: "some blackberry,leather,boots" is 15/7/5, so it fits the 15/15/15 rule. However, "a pair of" is 9 characters and cannot then become "a pair of blackberry,leather,boots" nor can it be swapped to "a pair of,blackberry leather,boots" because in both instances the 15 characters allowed for article and adjective field are exceeded. The noun always has to remain the true noun of the item, so "boots" in this case (so you couldn't pop in 'leather' there).
The good news is, we have something called a long, and as long as your boots are either unscripted or have a script that is compatible with having a long (and most are), we can finagle it so the base has the key elements and the long has the rest.
Example: "a pair of,leather,boots" with a long of "a pair of blackberry leather boots".
Note that you can also use that long to add a bit more too. We like to keep it around 60-ish characters but will often go a bit longer depending on how it flows.
Example: "a pair of blackberry leather boots laced with silver velvet ribbons" which is 67 characters.
That, of course, wouldn't be a "just one thing" to add.
Always have a back-up idea, especially at just one thing alterers, in my opinion, because sometimes what feels like it's a quick and simple word change is actually more complex under the hood.
Also, let me say, that as GMs, we are always happy to help, and we do understand that you may not quite know what's up, so don't hesitate to whisper to the merchant when it is your turn and let them know not only what you are hoping to do but that it is your first alteration.
This is super helpful. The description is wordy as is so it occured to me it might be a character limit issue. Currently the exact description is "some opalescent white snake skin boots buttoned with opaline moonstones". In the long description you referenced... is that the part of a item description that appears in white text next to the clickable part of an item name, like I've seen on some other items?
Is that potentially something a cobbler could make and not require an alteration?
So with a long, you can have a bit more wiggle room, because the base could just be a pair of,opalescent white,boots - and your long be "a pair of opalescent white snake boots buttoned with opaline moonstone" so unless it was a weird script you should be fine.
But it may not be doable at a "just one thing" merchant because the base would have to be changed as well as the article field.
BUT... if they are cobbled, that's a whooooooooole other kettle of fish because those shoes have funky bases anyway.
anyway we can please get custom ship names to the sadie system? Id so use pp for it
^ this
How much did the last custom ship name sell for at Mania? That's gonna be a lot of premium points.
Not that I'm not in agreement, I'd use PP to name my ships too if was like a standard alter price.
Think that was a one time thing. Only seen it once
Da random namer-izer comes up wit some doozies tho! (I totally got lucky onna da ferst offerin tho!)
Hmm...thunk onna dis fer a minoot...
Dey should restrict special names to auction or raffles (rafflers perfered)... anna make it so's ye kin ADD to yer boat's name! sooo... if'n I won my sloop would be called " The Lustrous Blue Sprout of doooom! "
But... I'd also take out loans to win an auction to name Gutstorm's ship " The Plumber's Carrack " 😉
A middle ground could be not a fully custom name... but at least being able to hand-pick what you get out of the existing library of words.
But...copycats. 😼
I disagree with auction or rare raffle for custom naming. You drop 250 or even 400m on a ship you should be able to get a custom name no question. I don't need to compete for one.
Make it like the premium post and pre titles where it's 2500pp etc to get
If I use a Sadie scroll to put a show description on a weapon does the base charge include “something written on it” that can be read or is having something that can be read a secondary charge?
you can add a show to it with something written to read yes and its the same cost
thanks
If there is a an actual read, then "there is something written on it" shows when you look at it. If you just incorporate something written in a show (so that the words show in the SHOW when you look at it) and there is nothing in the read, you won't get that message.
No matter what, from the cost perspective, yes, you can add a read with that cost for the show addition.
I have a very weird question. When it comes to alter fodder pieces (wyrsilk, tassaet, ataela, etc) - is there any set rule about altering the fodder? For example, let's say I wanted to alter a bolt of wyrsilk to have a long or a show... is there anything against that?
In most cases, the alter fodder can't be altered. It's possible that special instructions may specifically allow for it, but that would be noted in the analyze. Otherwise, we run the risk of people changing certain limiting aspects of the fodder itself to circumvent rules
That makes sense, but ruins my plans! I was hoping to be able to alter a bolt to have a show describing the specific pattern for an upcoming class, but can figure something else out. Thank you!
You know, if you don't mind it no longer being "fodder", could likely use the fodder material to alter another item into what you want.
Maybe something like using a bolt of wyrsilk as fodder to alter a non-specific, non-worn fluff item into "a length of shadowsilk" (just as an example).
or even something like "a sample swatch of [material]"
I was originally thinking that... but the issue is the amount of ataela I'm going to have to sacrifice to make what I need, well it makes me a sad Riend. I was hoping I could alter the bolts to show different patterns on them. without having to sacrifice 2-3 pieces.
Maybe do a book of sample ataela swatches or something? And have the show being short descriptions of two or three?
That is a nice idea!
Oh, that's a spectacular idea!
Is it possible to have an alter that includes a word(s) that can only be read if you speak a specific language?
So manny wiki…thanks though!
Of course I just realized the character I was thinking about it for is human so that would probably be pointless…
What is "drakar" in reference to in a drakar dagger?
It’s the smelliest, too.
Raise your hand if you had a bad boyfriend in the late 90s who you think of every time you see the word 'drakar'.
(Probably just me.)
LOL ex-husband, but v. much so.
#socializing is that way!
a rolaren-edged mithril-edged whip-blade so edgy
So question on the new glass...
Avenglyr: Also known as "goldstone," this Sraeva specialty is a glittering glass often mistaken for a precious gemstone. This glass is used in mosaic glasswork, beads, and other decorative works.
- can we call it 'goldstone' in an alter?
- If yes, which would be more correct, "a goldstone pendant" or "a goldstone glass pendant" ?
They're likely the same thing? Goldstones (the gems) read as an "artificial stone", so I'm assuming they are, in fact, Avenglyr. And, the descriptions of both match up.
Avenglyr: Also known as "goldstone," this Sraeva specialty is a glittering glass often mistaken for a precious gemstone. This glass is used in mosaic glasswork, beads, and other decorative works. an oblong blue goldstone: Sparkling with thousands of tiny golden motes, the artificial stone is as blue as the sky and polished to a glossy sheen. Perfectly smooth along one side, it is carved flat on the other and etched with faded characters.
huh
okay, I stand corrected. my only excuse is I was distracted with my tabletop gaming when I read the request and was like "Waaait a minute"
how backed up is the sadie system?
Earlier today there were three not yet started animalistic requests, and everything else that had been submitted was in-progress at one stage or another.
If you want an animal thing done, it’ll probably be a bit of a wait still (as GMs are limited on those) but otherwise the queue should be within normal turnarounds.
thank you, appreciate the help
Has anyone ever worked on a bottletraption design that didn't show the type of alcohol/jelly in the bottle? Like are we able to do something that amounts to like "an octagonal <material> jar with a <custom lid>"?
i don't think so, because the noun of the item is the alcohol/jelly noun
so if you didn't have that in the description it'd be confusing
Yeah, is it possible just to do the noun, maybe? I'm trying to come up with a way of doing cute jars/bottles that don't end up being 10+ words long.
oh you can do just the noun for sure. i have at least one with just the noun
for jelly it means that you can't see immediately what's in the jar, but now that we have analyze that's not so bad
I am 100% ok with that for some things, I think. But this is awesome news 🙂
Might I get some clarification? I've been told that the alteration policy has changed so that you can no longer provide simply items that include rare materials as alter fodder. Instead, you need to provide items that INSPECT as being made of the material you're trying to use, or that are specifically coded as alter fodder.
I'd been saving up items for years that I picked up from merchant shops. All of them included some sort of rare material that require fodder, such as a rare metal or gemstone. Is my whole collection now just useless? They're from when I was last playing, well before items were consistently coded as having a material and before actual alter fodder items were a thing.
This does seem to be the case now. If it is a rare, very rare, or extraordinarily rare material, then the item being provided as fodder must INSPECT as being made/crafted out of that material. I ran into this same issue several times as well with older items I had saved.
The "rare gemstones" in items you have might be an exception, but would depend on the merchant. Gems all inspect as being made of "gemstone" so you might be able to pull off using an item that has that gemstone in it rather than having an actual gemstone. Milage will vary.
And as is the case with the ever arbitrary nature of alteration rules, cloth doesn't seem to apply to this rule as even rare/exceptionally rare cloth that requires fodder ALL inspects as being made of "cloth".
The gemstone alter fodder I have are jewelry items that are set with erithian agates. They weren't available for a very long time except in that form, so I was planning on using those for alters for my erithi.
What do you need? I probably have actual fodder (the new Fodder ™) you can just have. I try to buy a bunch of everything just for this reason.
I appreciate the offer! Right now I don't have any specific ideas, but I had multiple items of a variety of erithian stones. I wouldn't want to just take anything from you without something specific in mind.
Well, if the time comes and you are told you need actual fodder, track me down. I have all the agates en masse.
Thank you. I really do appreciate it!
I also have a full set of of the agates and agitas for reasons and am happy to share ❤️
So the answer is yes, but also not quite. ALTER 41 was updated regarding material rarity and does have a section covering what has come out as "alter fodder," that is, items that are specifically crafted to be used as alter fodder. These particular items will typically have specific instructions in the ANALYZE as to what and how much they can be used for, and may supersede other alter guidelines as a result.
A lot of older "alter fodder" items that were sold prior to this change may still qualify to be used as alter fodder, however that may be up to merchant discretion as it's hard to make a generally sweeping statement without the specific item in hand.
What's the use case for glyriss as alteration fodder? Because of it's strength, can it be or is there a plan for it to be used in weapons? Or is all the new glass basically just for fluff.
Fluff.
So perhaps not as a base but could a blade be glyriss-edged?
Or act as an accent on weapons and armor?
the newest glass materials are not on that page, btw.
I was wondering if it is possible to alter the worn location of a mourning doublet to undershirt from "over the front". Imagine removing some of the extra padding to adjust it to an arming doublet or such. I have been told it is both impossible, by a few, and that it would be easy, also by a few. Figured I would get a definitive answer here so I can plan the rest of my outfit. ty in advance for any clarity. 🙂
So, worn location changes are not an offered service outside of Duskruin HESS, and even then, there are restrictions in place for that, one of which is the item cannot be scripted. So essentially, it is impossible.
That settles that. 🙂 It is disappointing but I understand. I will simply adjust my plans slightly. Thank you for clarifying that so I can focus on the alterations which are less troublesome. 🙂
I have a mildly weird question that I'm not sure where to ask, so I'll ask it here: Is there any means, or could there easily be means, of making stayput items that work in private residences work in CHE and MHO structures? In my wildest dreams, we get to put up some Deck the Halls items for weekend- or week-long events or create fully functional kitchens with pantries.
Right now there's no mechanism that identifies a room or area as belonging to a group on the back end
It was really hard compiling that information for private properties, and we still get issues now years later for ones that are wrong but the person shrugged it off until they needed it
And the ownership would be based on officer status maybe? What happens if that's removed, how do we check for and recover things. Do we let other officers move other people's stuff
That all makes total sense. I was just thinking about it as a possibility, but you have done a great job of outlining all the challenges, which are varied and numerous. I would hate to sort through all that tangled code and officerships.
I appreciate the detailed answer. ❤️
I did try to sketch out a proposal but there's a lot of moving parts that make it complicated
I hadn't even thought about the complexity of access and officership. With a private property, there's just one person placing things; that would be immensely more complicated with MHO and CHE officers, and of course multiply that by the number of organizations, and then figure out how it would be handled if something had to be shuttered while people's items were still displayed... yeah, I can see some of the issues there! 😬
I will just enjoy setting stuff up for a special occasions and keeping an eye on it. 😄
Yeah, and then..."does this belong to the house or the officer of the house that put it there" sort of disputes too --- Officer A places it, Officer A ragequits and takes it with them, but Officer B lets me know that Officer A purchased it with House funds and it was meant to stay with the House and not with an individual, etc.
Now, if we can get past the actual coding limitations, I can put guardrails around the interpersonal shenanigans that may crop up like that, but that's a big "if" LOL
I get a headache just reading all that. 😱
Oh, that's a huge "if" indeed! The potential tangles there...yeah, Headache City. 😄
Would probably just be easier duplicate a version that stays put for X # days (+1 day/hug from whoever put it out) then it "poofs" back to the house locker than to try to manage all that! House dynamics with officers can get really weird sometimes.
Anyone know if "hood" would be an acceptable noun for a leather helm?
Yes *
*Only for ones that can cover head AND neck
Thanks!
Any thoughts on how to describe this with words? The barbute noun pretty much conveys the general shape with the opening in front like that. But what about the top? Ridged? Ridge crested?
A demi-horned barbute sporting a high center ridgeline
(turned ping off): Thanks! I hadn't thought of using the word "demi-". I appreciate the help.
In this peretta mask, if I had the ATTEND verb modified, does it only affect the targeted version? I kind of expected the non-targetted version to also take the modified verbiage.
From behind the perceived security of your mask, you gaze at someone with an unhealthy level of contempt.
From behind the perceived security of your mask, you gaze around with unfettered curiosity.
Unrelated, I was looking at the flypaper tattoos and noticed this design:
a colorful compass rose sleeve tattoo
I was denied use of the term "sleeve" when I created one of my tattoos within the last year. Would I be able to update mine at a future merchant to have this term now since this is publicly available?
If my item says:
It has been mainly crafted out of eahnor, a very rare metal. It would need to be supplied to be used in an alteration and may only be used as an accent.
The analyze specifies it cannot be altered, but I do not want IT altered.
I would like to know if it means it CAN be used as rare eahnor alteratiion fodder for an accent on another item.
CAN is wot dat means.
Shame to not melt it down wit a bunch more anna forge some full plate tho...oh...wait
Depends on the item. If it is from ore crafted item, no. Otherwise, yes, that would qualify as fodder likely.
Hah, I don't melt, smelt, or forge, so I am happy if I can just hand it to a merchant.
What in the world is "ore-crafted" ?!
Using the DR/crafting ores.
If'n sumpbody beat ye to da punch... anna made it demselfs
And what do THEY say?
The ores inspect with that same messege I think (its the default inspect material messaging), but the rules are the ores and items made from them can not be used as fodder. Ores analyze I think states it as well, but not a lot of the items crafted using it.
Rools are dum.
Eanor is fairly easy to come by though, if that can't be used for some reason.
I will be back to my computer in a short bit and should have some if needed.
Sent some via mail just in case.
Awwwww. ♥️
I know there is alot going on in game atm with rol and rw. But i was told to assist if sadie is taking longer than expected or post in a channel, is this correct? If so would someone mind pointing me in the right direction of where to post for a nudge? I submitted my sadie on March 18th just to give someone an idea of how long its been
I would suggest #premium as another place to put this out there. I usually see folks asking sadie questions over there and getting a relatively prompt response
thank you 🙂
She appears to be a Sylvankind.
She is average height and appears to be an adult. She has mismatched blue and clouded white eyes and a flawless, bronze complexion on her right side, while her left side is a mass of sallow, heavily wrinkled skin. She has long, brittle white hair that hangs down on her left, in stark contrast to the fine, glossy curls of deep cerise that grace the right side of her head.
She is wearing a small rose, a black velvet cloak lined with ivory silk, a black satin dress accented with two rows of ivory buttons running from the hem to the choker-like high neckline, an ivory slipper, a black slipper, and a shard of glass.```
Just appreciating this GMs description but I'm genuinely curious if the location of it in her inventory was meant that she stepped on a piece of glass.
Are adventurer's guild badges alterable?
These have a script on them that alters multiple fields on the item via the treasure master NPC, so no, they are not alterable.
Thanks for the info, its disappointing and really kills my last reason for doing anything with the guild. 😦
There are multiple options that you can choose from and the more points you get, the more options that open up. Also, you do not need to display the badge if you're using it for enhancives. You can either TUCK it or COVER it and it hides from people's view of your inventory when they look at you if the concern is that it clashes.
Yeah, i was wearing my old one tucked until i threw it away. decided to revisit the endeavor to see if i was too hasty. tucking or covering is nice but doesnt do me any good when "I" know its there. Weird I know but its how I am. I keep looking over the devices and pretty much all of them are deal-breakers for me.
Your input has been massively helpful to me and I am very grateful!
What are the rules for non-conforming things that the game still creates? For example, I can still loot "a length of felwood" from the monastery, which is a quarterstaff. Will I be able to make alterations that maintain "felwood" as the noun? Or once I hand it over to someone does it need to be converted into one of the quarterstaff nouns?
If it's being altered it will have to conform to alteration rules.
For specific details, I think this might answer your question: #duskruin message
Yeah it's not like an ancient alteration or anything, but the creature is. I'll just have a 10x mcw "length of felwood" and be cool with it lol
I was glad to see where it came from. Was gifted one a few weeks back and literally had no idea where it originated.
What are some ways to achieve interesting and legal effects for colors on items, like glowing via a dye? Does anyone have examples they've made, such as smoldering, smoking, etc.?
examples.. a shimmering somnis spear inlaid with pearlescent golvern striations, a glowing black ghezyte spear trailed by a polychromatic eonake chain
Glowing I've seen in dyes, how about the shimmering?
they both kinda worked out well.. the dyes tie into the least mood effects of both spears
the shimmering was originally shimmering purple, but i had purple removed
alchemy
How do they translate into least moods?
i can make you whatever you want, just lemme know
Is glowing the only alchemy dye option?
Ah nice
probably missing 1 or 2.. but yeah
How?
somnis spear has disintegration flares, least moods gives it a ambient shimmering effect.. ghezyte one has dispel flares, it gives it a glowing energry type effect
And those dyes are readily allowed to be used in alterations, as long as they abide by other alteration guidelines?
Dye additives have specific ways for use
While they do not need to be added to a color to be presented to a merchant, they DO need to be part of a color.
That is what additive means.
Oh I see, because of the flare messaging innately. That's a nice pairing.
Meaning I can give them the alchemy vial but will just need to say what color I want it to be? Would that color be limited to the dyer's tent colors?
we can make some colors not available in the tents
like rainbow!
It is not limited to dyers tent dyes.
Could I get some help describing this?
winged hat. JK
chatgpt said.. A viridian wyrm-bone helm with winglike crests and a snarling, draconic motif.
You see a menacing viridian helm shaped like a dragon’s snarling visage, adorned with twisted horns and glowing green wings.
kinda basic
Intricately designed, the helm has a strong drake aesthetic with ornate engravings, a beak-like nose guard, and winged extensions. Primarily a rich, metallic green with gold embellishments, the delicate filigree details have been etched into its surface with touches of electrum foil. Two imposing, curved horns rise from the crown, flanked by sculpted scales and ridges that suggest a hide. Something something ...
I mean at least put a little effort into it.
I always find it easier to design for other people. When it's for me ... blank
Preach.
Rough-hewn and ancient, the helm bears the unmistakable touch of something not forged, but remembered by the earth itself. Viridian mythril plates interlock like layered scales, dulled by age and flecked with siltstone and moss. Twin horns of fossilized wyrmbone rise in a slow, twisting arc, gnarled as if grown rather than carved. Jagged wing-crests of cracked green scale fan from the sides, their edges weathered by wind, salt, and time. Primitive runes — older than known tongues — wind across the crown like roots through soil, their grooves deep with earthen grime. The air around the helm smells faintly of rain on stone and old ash. When held, it hums with a deep, resonant thrum — a sound like mountains dreaming.
And if I'm at a merchant, forget it. I can't come with anything truly good on the spot if I run out of pre-ready alternative ideas.
i thought that was pretty cool.. would have to be touched up of course
I like the scent addition, nice touch.
chatgpt seems to insist its made of viridian mythril in all its shows
Ya'll are awesome. Thank you.
Molded faenor blended with gold creates raised designs upon a draconian helm fitted with angular aliform eyevents. Spiraled horns rise from the temples, while bold-veined wings with near translucent webbing decorate the occipital region. Resembling the tail of a wyvern, decorative filigree forms a labyrinthine tail over the nap of the neck. The nose guard, chin, and cheek are decorated in raised, scale-like patterns that accent the deeply cut edges, above, the prominent crown ridges echoing the design.
I didn't find anything on the wiki. I assume materials like Mithril and Faenor would have to be supplied in at least a small amount?
would one of the cloaks that do the alchemy stuff qualify as an "alchemist's" container?
Mid-life crisis sun shade.
This is where some things need to be updated.
ALTER 41 speaks to materials and rarity, calling out what requires fodder:
Normally, "Very Rare" materials may only be added as an accent (as opposed to the base material) to an item and must always be supplied to the merchant. "Extremely Rare" materials cannot normally be added even as an accent during the course of a merchant session. You may be able to APPRAISE an item to see if it is made of a "Very Rare" or "Extremely Rare" material.
Faenor is considered rare, so it does not require fodder: https://gswiki.play.net/Material/saved_posts#Material_Rarity_-_GM_Rankings
Nice to know! Thanks for pointing that out.
This wiki page also helps quite a bit when fodder requirement is in question. I use it as a quick double-check quite often.
https://gswiki.play.net/Alter_fodder
There will always be a reference to the pole and the banner upon LOOKing at this item. Please take this into account when composing your show description. The material may be changed to other types of wood at the merchant's discretion. ``` Random after the fact question for Mars (or anyone else who would know) about altering a standard.. I got the base and long altered, but wanted to the long to say the flag was hung from a spar (a ship thing), but was told that because the look references a pole, the long must remain a pole.
Long story short -- would a second alteration of the show be able to change this from a pole to something else, or must a battle standard's show always reference a pole and no other noun?
the "pole" reference is hardcoded into the LOOK description, so there's no work-around for that. It will always be there in addition to any LOOK you have added by a merchant.
it changes the "flag" part based on the noun, of which there is a specific list of approved nouns.
Ahhh gotcha thanks for clarifying
i like looking at descriptions of things to get a "feel" for what they look like and how my character is likely to interact with them. That being said, I am having a LOT of trouble understanding hand pylons from the descriptions provided. Am I alone in being a bit confused? I was thinking one thing but then the wear function at T4 really confuses me.
Is there a list of lockpick alternate names, specifically the under-the-tongue lockpick. but I'll take anything
I maybe misreading the alteration guidelines, and am hoping for some clarification. I have an item I'd like to have altered (currently it is an urnon-inlaid platinum wristlet).
Is this something merchants would be willing to work on? I can supply more urnon for the idea, but I don't want to waste time if it's something GM's are able/willing to work on.
What are you looking to change it to?
Usually if the rare materials is already there, they don't ask for more....but it always up to that specific GM.
I'm working on a concept where the urnon would be encased in, let's say a mithril cage... though I'm wondering about veil iron instead. Something that implies the metal is keeping it contained, but it's still in liquid form because it's near sentient life. If that makes sense?
As-is, there's not really a good indication the urnon is being... urnoney
So, I don't think it's not doable, but it would require a merchant who made sense to be able to work with/around urnon.
(I can tell you that Tiwlip won't work on it.)
I would never dare hand Tiwlip something so foul!
I would not personally touch anything made of urnon unless it was scripted to be as chaotic as urnon should be and the alteration coincided with the script's messaging entirely. Things like momentos from storylines are often scripted this way with the material only being allowed to be released with that in mind, and not otherwise.
But I guess it depends on the item, and what the original piece of urnon is. There are some older pieces in the game that really shouldn't exist, but I believe those are weapons.
This makes sense. I do have both a weapon and a bracelet and I wanted to keep the idea of it but lean into the chaotic nature of the urnon more.
Yeah, urnon is one of those cases where both official game lore and policy aren't ambiguous about how it can be used and who is skilled enough to work with it. It can be worked on but not normally used as fodder for other items, and is entirely up to the merchant (it's dangerous stuff). When I had my urnon weapon altered, I did so in a way that leaned heavily into the lore for urnon; it's impure, darker than pure, and doesn't shapeshift. As far as most the urnon weapons out there go, most of them line up properly with lore—being impure and just 4x with acid flares; with the exception of a few old scripted morphing type weapons that I'm not even sure still exist out there anymore.
if'n a sliber o' chicken bone aint on da list... life aint fair.
There is not an official list.
So because there is not a list, a sliver of chicken bone isn't on the list.
Well, I have a rolton bone lockpick, and a sliver of vaalin lockpick....so maybe possibly a sliver of chicken bone is acceptable
You know, daggers/stilettos that also functioned as lockpicks would be neat. Don't know if those are a thing, but they should be.
I believe some exist.
Hey all, could use some idea help. What would be a good name for a dual-weapon displayer which I use for just blunt weapons? right now it's the standard 'leather frog' but for something that carries blunts, is it possible to change it to 'mace loops'?
those usually have specific rules associated with them
the merchant will have to look at it, most likely.
unless it says in the Analyze
but in general, we don't specify a type of weapon a container is designed for when it comes to sheaths, scabbards, frogs, etc.
That's interesting. I mean a scabbard isn't just for any weapon though and won't allow certain weapon types, right? Or is this one of those moments where it's just like, "that's just how it is"? Because if that's the case, I got it. 🙂
I think one of the main reasons for that general rule may be that most scabbards/sheaths don't limit what sort of weapon noun you put into them, so they wouldn't always be "mace" loops; which is probably more poignant with a displayer. If there is some sort of limitation to a specific weapon type, then it would probably fall under merchant discretion based on the specific item.
Fair, but then what about a sword belt? (I'm not trying to be a pest either, I'm just trying to then figure out what's a good way of portraying an alter that might feel more accurate... maybe I'm missing something too)
Though you could maybe/likely do something like "some heavy iron loops with a vultite mace hanging from it", or something like that.
if it was scripted to only hold "sword" style weapons, that is different entirely.
a script on an item often trumps general rules when it comes to what can be done with that particular item
Thanks @warm steppe and @tulip wing This may help to better resolve the alter idea
Peanut butter filling inside a cupcake, acceptable? Automatic rejection?
Excellent! Thanks for checking. I had a vague memory of peanut butter in game
No problem.
Any ideas for custom design templates and custom adjectives for my charm Contraption/mechanism? I don't see any OTS design templates or adjectives, so it needs help.
You should talk to Laeli, she is an absolute wizard with the charm maker!
I'm curious, when having items with "sides" altered, does the material used to switch to the side actually have to be in the description? For instance if I had a "a makeshift wooden sign" Deck the Halls item, could I make the "gem" side something like "a makeshift wooden sign shaped like an apple" regardless of what gem I place in it? Then do the same with the other sides, like maybe a "feather" side would be "a makeshift wooden sign shaped like a chicken" whenever a feather is placed in it?
Mmmmmmmmm I don't know
@supple minnow
I don't know if it would error out or do it
I think it does, plus it sort of takes away from the point of adding X to the description.
a makeshift wooden sign shaped like a noun-studded apple
a makeshift wooden sign shaped into a noun-covered chicken
It still lets you get 8+ alters in one item
...the crafting server has a ton of examples and folks willing to help design DtHs if you want!
what came first? the apple or the chicken?
Using the gems/feathers/whatever bits as the design for each side is part of the fun and challenge of it, but I admit there are some I use more than others. I never know what to do with fishing items. I do know that I now want something that I can put feathers in to turn into a noun-covered chicken, though.
So on pup tents you can do a long then a show the show would be inside of the tent correct ? You wouldn't have a tent that had a long and an exterior show and an interior show correct ?
Also with a saddie scroll can you get a long and a show all in one and if so how many pp would it be ?
This will help a lot: https://gswiki.play.net/Pup_Tent#Alteration_Rules
A pup tent can have a base and long description, but can not have a show/look description.
It then has special rules for the interior (linked above) and parts require QC (so won't be available at most GALD merchants).
Getting the interior done is one alteration. Working on the exterior is one alteration. So to do both would be 600 pp. However, most GALD merchants will be able to work on the exterior base and/or long description, so you can save 300 pp by doing that part outside of a Sadie scroll.
Thank you this was very helpful
question.. if i bring the material, could my eonake arrow be changed to another metal? (granted that its not to rare to work with)?
No, combat gear does not change materials
10-4
I see new items for sale that are sea silk. I don't see this on the fabric materials list unless I'm missing it, but I think it's new. Will this require alter fodder to alter something to sea silk?
Sea silk isn't new and you don't need fodder for it.
It's available off the shelf in a bunch of the town cobbling shops and in Brisker's Cover, plus... probably elsewhere I am missing.
thank you. Wasn't sure
Think there is another term for it to - byssus (sp?). May have to Google or look at the wiki for that. It got used quite a bit around Caligos EG.
Byssus does look to be the material. KF has foot and hand wraps in both Byssus and Sea Silk
KF also has bolts of Byssus and Sea Silk for sale OTS
https://gswiki.play.net/Sea's_Crossing
Yes, byssus and sea silk are interchangeable. No fodder needed. It's also based irl.
that was **not **the word I thought you typed for a moment and I was terribly confused. Dyslexia is a terrible affliction.
When there is a Just One Thing merchant, how does a hyphenated portion of the 15/15/15 work? as one or two words? Because fixing up one of them could make the second word after the hyphen no longer fit.
Thank you.
hyphenated words are generally treated the same as compound words. They're a single word.
the character limit is in full effect still though
Yeah, what Vorlash said. Basically, you just count the hyphenated/compound word as a single word. So, "silver-washed" is a 13-character word, and "platinum-washed" is a 15-character word. The first would work as part of the article field, but the second wouldn't, though the second could work as the entire adjective field for the base description. There's not a whole lot of space to work with in the 15/15/15.
there's that owly site that makes this somewhat easier to work around, and chatGPT can help if you give it parameters
I understand about 15 ... my question really was how does a Just One Thing merchant count it.
If I need a silver-washed turned into platinum, the "washed" would have to be changed, too, making it two changes.
So I do not want to waste the merchant's time, or my spot in line.
Most times its just the single word and they will do that even if its a compound issue.
this is one of the things that makes just one thing alterations no less work than a regular alteration. So you either get "well, that is two things" or "unfortunately that doesn't fit the character limits, how about x?". And there are no hard and fast rules, one GM might do it and one might not. Just One Thing might not be Just One Word
I'll avoid the ... platinum problem then.
I don't think that was the intent, if its something you really like, by all means, but it never hurts to have an alternate if the first one doesn't fly
My contingencies have contingencies. Which is why I rarely know where I am, or what I'm supposed to be doing.
Miss Vanah, I do not like breaking a merchant's heart.
As a merchanting GM, I hate chatGPT with a passion. I would rather just work on a design with the player than have them form false expectations from AI and have me reverse engineer something it created with no context of our rules in ALTER.
I can assure you that GMs don't like breaking your heart either. Except Marstreforn,
💔
^_^
that's why you have to train AI with the rules, and not expect it to know what you're talking about.
but I already know the rules.
I do like it for generating what some of this stuff might look like and seeing it on a 3d model
I've been around longer than AI. :/
me to
^_^ they may have limited gifs here for reasons...
unrelated to me, I assure you
that's ok, so does my mom.
dang... well that's ok. I was raised by a Nintendo anyway.
me too
see, that's why we get along so well
we had the same parental figures
mario, luigi, toad, Dr. Mario, Wario
now I want to play sidescrolling TMNT again
I never lament having to explain rules and work with a player to get them what they want
glutton for punishment
There is just very little wiggle room with just one thing to hit that
no, she sends lightning at me when she gets frustrated, but she doesn't lament about it.
"Why is Vorlash a smoking crater again?" JOT merchanting again.
it's an "alteration"
I'ma just making my plans so they are bullet-proof when I come across a Just One Thing opportunity. Hopefully to make it a quick service.
There are so many lantern panes yet to alter, you see.
😄
I did enjoy those lanterns quite a bit, but I always worry about losing them. Call me a fuddy-duddy, but I hate things deployed at my feet. So much anxiety.
Only lost mine ONCE, when it was new and the URCHIN took me too fast to grab it. Or something. Urchins were further instructed by someone special, and all was well.
there would be one less urchin in the world if that happened to me.
Save the Urchin! Call Someone Special
Given the current premium festival. Would they be a sea urchin?
That is my joke for the day.
Give the GM a theme and some colors, and they make exquisite work
they tend to be maestros at the craft, that is for sure
I think i only lament when it's so far out of the rules that I don't even know where to start to unravel it
"Forgive me for not having a place to start with... this." <gestures helplessly>
Yes, they actually are
I giff 'em sumpthin dat I know aint gonna fly... den I gits all happy when dey meet me in da middle!
(Tho...rubber chickens should totally be a thing!)
mykal chickens!
I really hope more GMs feel the way that you do. I often have questions about why things won't work, and I'm not trying to argue. I'm trying to understand so I won't do it again. ( I have gotten a distinctly annoyed feeling from some of them.)
Some will always be more patient than others
Most of them are pretty patient, I'd say!
I don't think any of them intend for that to be the takeaway, that they are annoyed with you. It's just a super chaotic point in time and having to come to a screeching halt to explain alter 43 to someone breaks the flow. At the same time, I get it as the player being invested in the outcome.
I think you're right, and I bet I'd struggle not to be short with people if I were under pressure. When I ask in the moment it's because I'm hoping I can change something quick and still get the work done.
I trust these folks so I don't mind handing them something and saying "Make prettier please?" In fact I did that to Kaonashi earlier with something from Vorlash's stash of awful things. He knocked it out of the park as usual. That being said, there is no shame in asking to go last if your idea didn't pan out to give you the opportunity to regroup, and maybe crowdsource it here or in the room.
(psst... Kaonashi is a he)
Also, yes, if you need help prior to what will be a merchant heavy event like Premium Fest or EG Merchant Week, please ask around! If you fear your ideas are super horribad and don't want them out in public, ask for someone to work with you privately - I have no problem helping someone in-game via whispers or DMing to sort out alters or explain how things work.
If it's in the moment at the merchant... speak up! There are so many of us who are more than happy to help; I won't speak for others, but if I'm not frantically trying to work out my own idea and my brain isn't mush.. and you're not trying to hand me armor/weapons... Totally feel free to whisper to Traiva.
If scheduling allows, expect to see Elanthian Elegance offering some times before EG Merchant Week to help people get their ideas prepped. Even if you won't be participating with that, stop by to get alteration help anyway - I know I won't be tracking who shows up to Merchant Week and who doesn't.
I had several folks whisper to me that they felt bad taking up so much time, but I assured them it was not an issue and we would make a fabulous item they loved.
I would rather we take the time and make something you love than have you walk away feeling eh and never use it.
yeah, I mixed up my GMs and pronouns, thought I'd fixed it
Now is a good time to mention and plug THE GLOMP. At a lot of merchants you'll see us grouping a bunch of people (usually myself, Missoni, Rohese or Lissaya)... this is THE GLOMP. Not that it's exclusive to any of us... the glomp is just like a thing that got started back in the day with the elf-blob, but like with all great things, we in the west stole it and made it our own.
All are welcome in the GLOMP, regardless of who they are, who you know, where you've been... and within the glomp we plot... we plan... we talk about alters and OOC stuff to keep ourselves entertained while we wait. Some of the absolute best designers I've known join the group and we are all always willing and happy to tweak designs or help you come up with things.
So... join the glomp, be the glomp, love the glomp.
I've heard THE GLOMP highly amuses some GMs, too...
It's a glomp of wonderful positivity, and lots of creativity.
The glomp is love. The glomp is life.
In all seriousness, I really do appreciate being brought into the conversation during Merchant lines. It helped me come up with good alteration ideas, and it was wonderful to spend some time with people I don't normally get to know. It's one of my favorite parts of festivals, and it's responsible for some of my favorite alterations.
speaking of, I have a set of robes(armor) that I would like to change the noun of. I use a container with the same noun. In terms of look, I'm a plain fellow. They are currently indigo Elesine robes chased with pewter embroidery, and I am open to suggestions to make them fit the shabby theme I am currently enjoying.
IIRC robes can pretty much be altered into anything worn on the torso so if you wanted to alter it into a shirt/sweater you could.
hmm, some sort of knit sweater with food stains?
what color though
vibrant ochre?
What's your aesthetic?
a threadbare ochre <material> sweater smattered with indistinguishable stains.
not sure that's much better
LOL I mean I wrote that before I read through the wall of text, so that's pretty hilarious.
Will you continue wearing the waistcoat?
yeah, Kaonashi made that for me
ran it over with a wagon himself
vorlash doesn't like fancy things, makes him uncomfortable
I'd consider going with a shorter description and make it a shirt so you can layer the waistcoat over the shirt if you're interested
he's also ancient, so things don't fit
You could do something like a dingy ochre <material> shirt frayed at the cuffs - that way you're still giving it an old and worn feeling without reusing any of the concepts of the waistcoat.
I like that, we're sure shirt is an acceptable noun for robes?
Pretty sure I have seen robes with the noun "straps" so go crazy, my dude
I think I've seen robes with the noun straps sold at a merchant event, so.
That's CLASSIC Zardoz attire
also, immediately what I thought of when you mentioned Vorlash in straps
@gritty anchor has done all sorts of wild robe alterations I believe, she may know the limits (or lack thereof)
Yeah, the wiki page is right on this one.
we sell cloth (robe) armors that are shirts OTS at pay events, it's approved.
I want a wild robe
That would work
the problem is that the gown would wilt and wither if I walked too close by
muhahaha
it would be a droopy wild flower robe
a sad gown 😦
sad clown gown, it feature changes you into a sad clown
this is the "I'm not leaving the house and ordering more than one meal today" pyjamas
the flares order you pizza! got it.
Ice cream is recommended for emotional damage
what's the language for calm? It's like that but worse. You cannot muster the will to attack... or do anything, really.
oh right, the flares could make ice cream, even better.
ok... I have to be able to afford this via a sadie scroll 
and sadie has to not explode when I submit it
she pre-exploded already
lol
sum flares make ice cream... soup.
I ultimately went with this design, we'll see how it goes
Nothing in that should really flag anything.
Any suggestions for a Fash'lo'nae themed pin? So far I've got.. a citrine-inset ovoid dull grey pin
is there anything else special about the pin? Or are you just trying to get a Fash'lo'nae symbol type thing?
hoping the premium spell of the month pins are alterable.. seems fitting. If not, any old pin
A citrine-pupiled ovoid dull grey eye? Pins don’t generally have to keep the pin noun (unless there is something about that script that requires it)
if it doesn't need pin, that works for me then.. I'll go in with both incase next time I get chance
doesn't fit the 15 rule for the base, pupiled is too long. Also I'm not sure you can alter an inanimate object to a body part, unless you have a way to denote that it isn't an actual eyeball. But I admit that I am pretty weak when it comes to alters.
I may have to stick with my original idea then. Either way, I'll leave it to the merchant to decide. Appreciate the help folks.
also a great resource
just to try word combos
this was what I was using to come up with the original.. just swapped it a bit to a citrine-inset dull grey ovoid pin. Ovoid should negate the need to describe it as an eye anyhow
so the cool thing is... the base (15/15/15) could be any of the following:
an ovoid/dull grey/eye
a dull/grey/eye
a/dull grey/eye
And if needed, it could potentially be: a citrine-pupiled ovoid dull grey eye pin with the following options for the base:
an ovoid/dull grey eye/pin
a dull/grey eye/pin
a/dull grey eye/pin
this is why we keep you around. If I post enough wrong information, eventually you come in and solve the problem.
thank you both
i think having the pupil be citrine implies that it's not an actual body part, too, but that would obviously be up to the alterer's discretion.
you could change dull grey to like "hazy glass" if the citrine isn't enough to imply it's not a real eye. or shadowglass if you have some fodder.
yeah personally I would lean more towards something like "an <adjective> <material> eye with an <adjective> citrine pupil" or "a <material> pin set with an unblinking citrine eye", along those lines
Would it be possible to check in, please, on whether the term bonsai has been approved for use? Thank you!
#1057031066885558332 message
No update
Thank you.
a crumb-covered souvenir tote "stitched with embroidered" baked goods
should that be like that..? i was looking at it this morning and all i could think in my head it said was stitched with stitched baked goods..
but could just be my brain.. anyone? (moved over from Kudos)
I don't think it's incorrect.
embroidered with stylized baked goods would also work, or something along those lines
or stitched instead of embroidered if you prefer
The way I immediately read it was: The baked goods are embroidered. The tote is stitched with them.
Alternate example of structure: "a thin wooden box appliqued with onlaid colorful butterflies. "
But it would also be a separate alteration if you wanted to adjust it. We can fix typos, but not changed minds
not that my mind changed on it, it just seemed redundant in my brain after reading it a few times.. but hey, if it’s right it’s right and my friend liked it either way so happiness all around
sometimes the english language glitches in our brains and we're just left with something like this. It's absolutely correct, but continues to look off if we spend more than a glance at it.
Well,
embroidered with baked goods also sounds like actual baked goods stitched onto the item too
So let's say a merchant says they're gonna ask their QC team about a new noun (in this case I was looking to get a new finger-worn noun approved).. just curious is there any insight into that sort of process? Does it happen whenever, a few times a year.. would I ever know if this noun got approved or not?
ive had to ask about a few things before, kinda varies really.. some have been answered very quickly for the merchant when they've inquired.. some have taken a few weeks to get an answer.. just gotta check in every now and then
I holler'd dat da last time I push'd Gutstorm offa cliff... on da way down tho... he yell'd "Geronimooooooh!" 😉
can cloth armor (robes) be altered into a harness? I'd prefer a loincloth, but I'm pretty sure that'd be shot down even though the waist is part of the torso....
Loincloth is definitely an option, at least historically
Probably no to harness. It has to be something worn as clothing, not something worn on or over clothing. It also wouldn't be eligible for a container of pocket adding and it is confusing to use a container noun on a non container item
Loincloth yes. We don't have different classes of cloth armor so it can extend beyond the torso. I think loincloths cover enough to be valid enough
I could provide a lot of pictures of harnesses worn as clothing.... pretty sure at least a few are family friendly 🤣
just as soon have it as a loincloth though, so I'm happy
I would be more amenable to it if it also wasn't such a common container name
You could do straps of leather
Yes, straps work
can't do leather if it's cloth armor made of cloth though.
Yes, that, it has to be fabric/cloth
Or here me out... loin. Just cuts of meat
I HOPE loincloths cover enough
peppered jerky full plate
eat pl
the reality is that cloth armor barely does anything besides offer a platform to add padding, enchanting, and other fun things (like shamelessly plugging Twisted Armor). 😄
peppered jerky half plate
GIVE US THE TEASERS
Twisted Armor has already been released... it isn't news! :/
But I am sure they will let me tease something soon-ish...
In another channel, a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.
It's been cured. At that point, it may as well be pepperoni armor. /s
anybody with experience altering a daybringer who can advise me on the best way to do it? I see that the item description is composed mostly of customization fields
I can, if you remind me later when I have access to my notes - I’ve done a couple of them
Thanks!
But the short version is that, as I recall, it’s entirely built from those customized fields. Some merchants will modify up to 3 of them, so typically takes a couple sessions
Plus the original noun alteration has to get done at some point
If I cast raise dead on armor will it make undead pepperoni cows?
There is 0 reason why I should have laughed at that as hard as I did just now.
Your armor emits a strangled "moo".
The true animalistic spirit armor.
In Elanthia, jerkey digest you!
If we let Trallihn keep getting his dead vermin motif rounded out, could we then rez his outer shell and make him a meat gundam?
Stop giving him ideas!

Would raku-fired and stone-fired be allowed when describing ceramics/pottery pieces? I was a ceramic artist IRL for years and these two methods have a distinct appearance.
I just discovered that https://gswiki.play.net/Open-Close_Fun!_item are a thing.. definitely looking to acquire some more, but I am wondering how common/likely it is to get them altered.
With the barest pressure from your thumb, the lor-engraved face of the silver signet ring flips open.
Sliding your thumb over the silver signet ring, the lor-engraved face lowers into place with a soft click.
You analyze the silver signet ring and sense that the item is largely free from merchant alteration restrictions.
The creator has also provided the following information:
This is an Open-Close Fun! item. It may be altered by a talented merchant, though it must make sense for the manner in which the ring is opened and closed. A small handful of merchants may also be willing and able to customize the manner in which you open and close the ring.``` @knotty junco (I checked for CanTag so don't @ me!) this script feels like the dice pouch special service you did, if you have any insight perhaps?
This is not something that will be handled at a standard GALD merchant as the messaging should be QC'd and not all merchants will be able to provide that. The easiest way to handle this if you want to change the messaging would be to submit a Sadie scroll.
Right I figured it would get complicated quickly, and it doesn't look set up like other items that can swap out a noun/adjective. I didn't think of Sadie scrolls, so thank you I'll look into that! ❤️
It's kind of like EZScript lite.
So that would be like 1200 pp to do, right? (estimates of course non-binding conversation etc etc)
I got spikes once so all my pp are just languishing
Hard to say. I think so? I don't have one of those on me to look, but that sounds about right.
Xeraphina do you know if the two things I asked about above Duffield's comments would be allowed or is that a "check with QC" situation?
I'm working on a Veola item
I don't know off-hand. I want to say that stone-fired is probably allowed since the language, but raku-fired may not be if only due to "raku" which is specifically Japanese. But I'm not QC, so I can't guarantee this answer 100%
Okies... stone-fired is probably the better choice for the design I'm working on anyway.
This sort of item is what I provided at the Premium Festival. Slymie's ssservice at the festival afforded those selected the unique opportunity to work on items like this sold in The Six-Sided Grotto.
... that being said, this is a rare service, and not one I provide at my general merchants, like Xera said.
Got it. And since the 15/15/15 design is so heavily involved in the open/close, there's no way any old merchant could really alter it at all? So do you think a sadie scroll could work (I have zero experience on the backend process of sadie), or is it really just no way no how unless it was you offering this specific service?
This is an "it depends" answer. The alteration will be easier to handle than the open/close messaging, but without item in hand, I can't guarantee that answer.
ok! I'll submit and then see what comes back. Thanks to you both for all the information 😄
Delayed reply, but I'm pretty sure you've got the idea already. When I request, I just provide the merchant with a key-value pair of the customizations I'm looking to modify. So far that's been sufficient.
Customization
Color 1: magenta Color 2: amaranthine
Gem: a deep violet duskjewel
Inactive Weapon Customization
Article: a linden-hafted
Adjective: invar
Long (Post Noun): with a damascened blade
Active Weapon Customization
Article: a blazing
Adjective: infernal
Long (Post Noun): with flickering amaranthine fire
----------------------------------------------------
I assume the noun is a separate service
I believe I have done the noun and a few customizations at once, but I am not certain
Up to the discretion of the merchant ultimately, I've actually sneaked more than 3 customizations by accident because of a misunderstanding during the process.
Anyone ever tried altering arrow bundles through Sadie and if it is allowed?
Altering arrows can be a bit weird from my experiences with it (parts of the original arrow stick around in the combat messaging); it’s better to just get a new bundle fletched up IMO.
With the wood chopper box and the feather options from Jeepers Peepers, fletched arrows can be pretty unique these days.
The WoodChopper box is amazing for this. 😶
And if you don't have your own, I'm sure current owners will help you out until you get it
is that the animal companion fixer doohicky?
oh, you said woodCHOPPER... my mistake.
get-to-da-choppa.gif
Looking for some inspiration for how to alter some item descriptions for a ranger. I have these three things I could switch up:
a leather survival kit, some large eel skin boots, a hip-length fringed doeskin vest
Eel skin boots are probably the main contender. Archer ranger who relates to Kuon, prefers to kill undead things, but otherwise not super developed RP-wise
How attached are you to THOSE SPECIFIC boots? Because it may be easier for you to commission a new pair from a Master Cobbler (like me, shameless plug). (The link takes you to my commissions order form.)
is there a big mechanical difference in terms of weight/storage? I had it in my head that the eel skin boots were one of those older valuable things because of big pockets or something, but I honestly don’t remember
if custom boots are mechanically identical or superior, the custom route would probably be better yeah
I don't know, that's why I ask. Master cobbled boots hold VSA for 2 tiny items, IIRC
do an INSPECT and ANALYZE on your eel skin boots to confirm
You estimate that some large eel skin boots can store a small amount with enough space for any number of items.
You determine that you could wear the boots on your feet. The boots appear to serve some purpose.
analy my boot
You analyze the eel skin boots and sense that the item is free from merchant alteration restrictions.
You can tell that the boots are as light as they can get, but you might be able to have a talented merchant deepen their pockets for you
Can I just say that it’s amazing being able to log in real quick from my iPad while at work!
Bookmarked your site regardless for a few other characters, thank you!
you should be able to see what the boots can hold via the analyze and inspect verbs. I believe they are capped based on weight and slot, so you can use the chart available on the wiki: https://gswiki.play.net/Deepening
yeah looks like small any number. so worth keeping and altering I think
I was able to come up with neat ideas for my warrior and cleric back in the day, just not able to conjure up a lot of interesting rangerly ideas yet
Hi! I have a question about auroralaen and the colors allowed to be used in alters for it. I'm working on a 10-sided gown with auroralaen as the fabric and as I work through them I want to make sure I'm using approved colors.
I'm under the impression that auroralaen can be any singular color that naiquard is (because it isn't ombre like naiquard) so that would mean that it can be in these colors:
Sunset naiquard
dark cocoa brown
dark violet
terra cotta orange
warm apricot
**Sunrise naiquard **
dark mauve
dark lavender
light plum
light orange
canary yellow
**Orchard naiquard **
dark pewter
aubergine
dusky violet
Blue-green
light pistachio green.
**River naiquard **
dark antique blue
dark grey-green
medium teal green
luminous teal
If this is the correct list, how specific does it have to be? Can we use ianthine for violet, or jade for blue-green?
I do not think it is tied at all to naiquard in that way. The official lore states Auroralaen is as light as chainsil and as comfortable as silk. Soft and smoothly woven, the fabric is airy and breathable. However, it does not take to the dyeing process at all and instead maintains the pattern and semblance of the skies of Naidem. Indeed, the aurora-kissed fabric can even be different depending on where in Naidem it was produced. If the weaver was from the Winterbriar neighborhoods, then the fabric could have more of the cool cerulean and teal hues, while if they were from the Orchard it could have more fuchsia, violet, or coral hues. -- so I'm reaching out to the writer of the lore doc to get clarification.
Overall, it can't take a dye, period, but in general, it may have a bit more of a primary colour depending on where the weaver was, so cool cerulan/teal hues and then the 3 listed from Orchard -- it will still be the pattern and semblance of the sky, so think of it more like "hey, the main colour is more dark blue but it still has all these other Naidem sky colours in it because it is auroralaen"
So, it's never going to be a singular colour
I think maybe I might have misinterpreted the doc a bit, but also I would love some examples of how that could translate into practical usage. I want to make sure I'm staying true to the documentation, of course.
We're going to work on getting a bullet point for the OOC note to clarify
You're amazing, thank you so much ❤️
is there a list of container variations that are accepted..? like, poachers bag, courier bag.. shopping bag, etc..
What slot?
poacher or courier might not fly, as there is unlikely a way to know it is owned by a poacher or courier
Hi all, hoping someone can please help me finish up my custom spell prep design. I'm grateful to have won, but the process has been challenging, and I'd much appreciate some assistance with it:
I'm told by Valyrka that QC says it has to be "clearly not real" by using a term like "image of" or "illusory." Why my raffle-won, unique, custom prep is being significantly more restricted versus existing spell preps I don't understand, but I guess that's what it is. I'm really trying to work with it, but I feel like everything I'm suggesting is being rejected, and then the remnants are being cobbled together into something that feels clunky and which isn't what I originally imagined.
Here's essentially my original request, with the addition of "briefly" to show that it disappears, though this was rejected pre-QC and I was instead asked to include further words at the end to show that it disappears:
1P: You shiver as [a spectral vereri] briefly embraces you from behind, her soft voice echoing the (name) spell in lovelorn whispers.
3P: [A spectral vereri] materializes to embrace Starsworn from behind, echoing the (name) spell in lovelorn whispers.
Hidden: [A spectral vereri] briefly materializes, distraught, her voice wracked with loss as she echoes the (name) spell spoken in the shadows.
Things I've been told are not possible:
spectral vereri, ghostly vereri (OTC spell prep literally has "ghostly doppelganger"), vereri figure/form/shadow/silhouette/nightmare/dream/apparition/shade, spectral form of a vereri
I'm not sure why "briefly materializing" won't work versus ending with an additional exit message, but my suggestion for that was rejected pre-QC.
I had really hoped to keep this short, simple, and clear, but it feels like it's becoming wordy and clunky as a result of all these changes.
Any help would be very much appreciated!
also rejected: gossamer vereri, rotted lithe + figure/form/shadow/silhouette/nightmare/dream/apparition/shade (without "vereri" in case the issue was that it could be misinterpreted as a real monster)
I think the issue might be that it's not clear that YOU are the one doing the spell.
thanks for getting back -- that's not what's been communicated to me so far via many exchanges, it's been: (1) "it has to be clearly not real" and (2) "if it appears, it should disappear"
mostly the former; the latter has been pre-QC discussion, as i understand it
I think maybe you could get "As Starsworn whispers the words for <spell>, a spectral vereri briefly materializes to softly echo him in lovelorn whispers.
unfortunately, "spectral vereri" was the first thing that was rejected, followed by that long list of attempts afterwards
and i was also told it has to clearly disappear, thus adding "briefly materializes," which was also rejected
(the former via QC, the latter pre-QC)
Ok, sounds like you should ask the GM if they can help you get this into an acceptable to them shape.
i have, and i'm increasingly unhappy with the result because it keeps getting wordier and wordier to address these concerns, i was hoping someone here could suggest something in a direction that would address that issue
the 2-word description of the illusory creature is now 6 words, instead of a 1-word exit it's now 5
i don't want it to be one of these huge paragraph preps, the core idea was for it to be line a single, very short sentence
that wasn't communicated to me, either
I understand the frustration. I have a few spell preps that were hard to nail down.
if these were the issue, it would be helpful to know so that i'm aware of what rules i'm working with, this is why the process has been frustrating -- it feels like arbitrary rules are being applied and i'm not even aware of what they are, like how is "spectral form of a vereri" not clearly not-real, and how is "briefly materializes" not evidently temporary?
i feel like i'm being told that unless i say, "an illusory image of a vereri that's a cardboard cutout which vanishes completely after 2.3 seconds" that it won't work, despite dozens of preps that don't do that
anyway, i appreciate the efforts to assist, i just don't want to end up with something that feels like it should be character-defining that i'm unhappy with
How about something in a different vein, like just the ghostly blue arms embracing you.
i do genuinely appreciate the assistance but that feels like, significantly less exciting than OTS preps
As you murmur [Spell Name] into the air, ghostlike leaves appear and swirl about your form, encompassing your body in a cloak of muted autumn hues. You gesture upwards, causing the foliage to unfurl about you, scattering off into the unknown...
A quiet chorus of songbirds drifts along the wind as you call to nature with the [Spell Name] spell...
Cupping your fingers before you, the tips suddenly darkening to an inky black, you murmur a prayer to the dead, enticing them to aid you in casting [Spell Name].
Spreading your fingers wide, you hold your hands over the ground and draw forth the cold certainty of death. Shadows rise to your bidding, interlacing with your power as you cast [Spell Name].
Swaying slightly, you hum an ancient hymnal that causes the shadows to gather to you. Whispering in your ear, the voices of the dead lend their chorus to your hum and aid you in casting [Spell Name].
As you petition the spirits to grant you [Spell Name], diaphanous forms materialize and envelop you in a misty haze. (Restricted to Unpresence.)```
those are some of the examples of existing ones i sent
having a spell prep form a "vereri" is pretty much a non-starter. it's a creature that exists in the game. ghostly/spectral/etc do not indicate any sort of illusion that would suggest it isn't an actual ghostly/spectral vereri.
hence being very specific in it being an illusion
Ok, I had to have a VERY open mind about mine, and went through many back and forths with the GM in charge at the time.
Morning, Mars!
thanks for getting back, right, that's why i suggested as an alternative to remove the vereri altogether, and instead do "rotted lithe" + any of: figure/form/shadow/silhouette/nightmare/dream/apparition/shade, all of which were rejected as well, this is where i'm not following what rule is being applied
hi. also, just offering some insight. I'm not personally involved in it.
hi! thank for the insight, i had the same thought and have already tried to work with it, fruitlessly
I like custom spell preps. Please don't steal them word for word. But if they're helpful.
i would much rather have like "lithe rotted shadow"/silhouette/form/anything like that, than "image of a" or "illusory," those just feel neutered to me, but those were also rejected and i'm not totally clear on why
(without vereri, to be clear)
Shadows don't rot, they're incorporeal!
rotted things have shadows!
The shadows around you twist into an aged and withered silhouette of your form, replicating each subtle motion as you cast [spell name]. (maybe this will work?)
So like the image of a rotted creature
i like that as a distinct option, but it eliminates the appearance of the creature, which i had hoped to make sort of central to my character's backstory
You're not allowed to do images of "huntable" creatures tmk
right, that's where i went to like, "rotted lithe form"
so take your idea and add "illusion" or "illusory" or "image of" to make a clear distinction?
it has to differentiate between it being an illusion/image vs possibly being an actual ghostly version of a huntable creature
I've worked with Valyrka on a lot of customs, she is very accomodating, but it has to be within a very strict set of rules or what she sends over will just get rejected by QC and you'll have to start over anyway.
totally get that, and yes she's been great, my frustration isn't directed at her, it's at this process of three-way communication where shes the middleman ferrying rules to me that she isnt entirely privvy to, it's like a game of telephone where nobody is quite sure of the rules except the first caller
it isn't that complicated. you can basically take your original idea and work illusion/image of into it
there needs to be a clear distinction in regards to that
As you prepare [Spell Name], the illusion of an xyz flickers in and out of existence.
yeah even that would probably be ok.
Find a way to make the words she's provided to you work in a way that makes you happy
no other spell prep i'm aware of is required to say that it's an image or illusion, i feel like that hamstrings the idea, it takes all the "oomph" out of it -- someone reading that will view it more like a Polaroid than a magical prep
Do they use a "real live huntable monster"
they do if they involve a huntable creature/etc.
ghostly leaves are one thing, ghostly pookas are scary
right, and as i said, i offered to remove the huntable creature and replace it with "rotted lithe form" which is not a huntable creature, every varation of that was still rejected
a rotted lithe form is a physical thing, not an illusion/image
again, there needs to be clear distinction
the image of a rotted lithe form appears overlayed over character as they murmur the words for {Spell Name]
ghostlike leaves, ghostly doppelganger, shadows rising are all physical things, and all on OTS preps
by that argument, you see what i mean?
there are literally dozens of preps with physical things by that argument
so if it's a problem because it's huntable, i removed the huntable part, and it's still physical like dozens of other preps, and it's still not OK -- that's the rule i'm not understanding
I'm gonna bow out, but my only advice is that this not a winnable argument.
Yeah I have offered all the advice I can. Sorry if you are not content with it.
i appreciate the efforts to help, genuinely, i get the sense that my frustration is a bit contagious -- i think that how you are feeling is how i am! i feel again like i'm running a race in the dark, and being told that i need to run straight ahead, but then there's a river there, and swimming isn't allowed
i'll continue to work with it, maybe i can work in "vision" or "mirage" in a manner that still allows it to feel exciting and unique, thanks for the work
well... no. I understand the rules and have offered a way to make your desired outcome work by adding a single word or two
the clear distinction between an illusion of something, or image of something is a hard line when it comes to describing certain things in the context of a spell prep.
i'm not trying to be argumentative here, i'm truly trying to understand what you're saying, bear with me:
in response to that, i can paste numerous OTS preps that are not clearly illusory, e.g: ```As Character murmurs an incantation, his ghostly doppelganger flickers in and out of an unstable existence beside him.
Third Person: Character waves a hand through the air and cups it to gather a swirl of wind as he chants an incantation.
Third Person: With graceful motions, Clanmaster's fingers weave gossamer threads of energy into a weblike sigil.
Third Person: Clanmaster presses his palms together and slowly separates them as ethereal skeins of roseate plasma stretch between his hands before dissipating like smoke.
Third Person: Clanmaster's hands swirl with an electrified black smoke as he summons demonic energies into battle.
Third Person: As Clanmaster murmurs in an echoing voice, the very space around his outstretched hand wavers and distorts in response...
Third Person: Clanmaster's outstretched palm seems to shift out of reality itself as he conjures the power of the valences.```can you help me understand the distinction here?
in other words, why does mine have to literally say "image of" when nothing else does?
if the complaint is that it's a huntable creature, OK, totally understandable -- i removed the huntable creature
then you're again telling me it can't be something physical, which is not the case for any other spell prep, and so then i'm not sure what the issue with mine is, and trying to understand that next step
alastir linked >20 of his preps above, most of which were physical, though he seems to have removed it
What spell or circle you are preparing also has some play
thanks for chiming in, vanah -- this one is for all spells
It does have to be fairly generic
The valences one I would say is for sorcerer spells only or a specific one
right, that certainly makes sense to me
can't be communicating with dark valences while you prepare Bless
i know, i was thinking to myself, some sheruvian priest is muttering a curse at me right now
that can be arranged...
i'll take it, i have been thinking starsworn was a bit tentacle-deficient (wait, is that ivas?)
marlu! was on the tip of my tongue, thank you
theres a few tentacle friends
in my defense, ivas also has tentacles
Ivas, Marlu, and Ghezresh I think?
tentaceel
There are a lot of nuances and it is hard when you see some that look like they would be similar, but are either less restricted because they are restricted to a specific spell or circle, or was released before current QC rules were established, or slipped through during a mass review. We do have to keep in mind the rule in ALTER 9 that just because something exists elsewhere, doesn't mean it will pass QC today.
maybe not Ghezy
Animalistic gear is great for getting your tentacle on
parasite stuff is very tentacled as well. it is even sold in a Temple of Tentacles!
but I do find the kraken themed stuff for animalistic pretty neat
Grapple flares that are imagery of Tentacles wrapping the enemy up, is always a fun time
I have found the tentacle spell customization for Grasp of the Grave to be rather funny.
the rules are always evolving, I ran into that just the other day. sobs, stole-less
haunted stole? i love those things
if i could offer another piece of advice that has helped me: remember that the first person messaging doesn't need to be the same as the third person. i like to do my spell preps/ez scripts with longer first person messaging and fairly simply third person messaging. so it is possible you could see the vereri (or other being) in the first person because it's something that is definitely in your mind's eye. to an onlooker, maybe your character just cants his head to the side as if listening to a whispered voice, or a chill drifts through the area, or a shadow briefly contorts, or something. i think there is a little more leeway when it's something only you can see, and also i like how the first person messaging can be a little more verbose in digging into how you see the character interacting with magic in general. that relationship might not be obvious to an onlooker.
poachers pouches are sold ots in the advguild in vaalor, courier/messenger is allowed, i have a shopping bag.. ALOT is allowed, just wondering if there’s an actual list anywhere
i have a courier bag, and a poachers bag as well.. i like these things
courier pouch could conceivably be something with a standardized look, poucher's pouch shouldn't be allowed even if it is sold OTS haha
I linked a list of alteration nouns on the wiki, but as always with ALTER everything is up to the GM discretion at time of service.
For what it's worth I think the vereri prep is still cool with illusory added to it. Doesn't detract from it at all. We as players already know it's illusory because nobody gets to have a pet vereri help them cast spells. The word illusory goes without saying and if it lets you otherwise have the prep you wanted to have, I think that's a small concession to make
Thanks Missoni, good advice!
I ended up submitting with “vereri mirage” so fingers crossed!
I like that a lot, good luck ❤️
thank you!! i'm glad to hear that!
If I want to alter a forehead gem to something not in the normal treasure system, like an Evermore or Pennant Chase gems, would i need to supply the alteration gem?
It you inspect or analyze the gem it should tell you if it needs to be supplied
Would I be able to alter forehead gems through the new Sadie system or would I need a live merchant?
Sadie should be able to handle it.
Sadie would probably be better than a live merchant for that, tbh
Err.. what if it requires alteration fodder? Like a non-treasure system gem?
I would say, write it into the info and have the fodder on your character so the gm doing the work knows and can yank it from your inventory?
Yes. Sadie now requires you both be in the game at the same time and the item doesn't leave your inventory, so we can take fodder now if necessary. The item would be confiscated.
Ahh ok, now Sadie accepts fodder. That is a very welcome change.
Need a bit of help with my alteration because im not sure how to express it.
A deep verdant teardrop star emerald encasing an elven sigil
A crystalline elven sigil encased by a deep verdant teardrop star emerald
What are you trying to express? What look are you going for conceptually?
It's a forehead gem that have an elven sigil encased in it.
is the sigil a physical thing inside the gem?
I dont know forehead gems well but does the 15/15/15 need to be the emerald, and the sigil is part of the long?
Yes, its the long part.
But since there are two nouns, im not sure which goes first in the long.
Well... short/long doesn't say, only the show part says its a naturally white crystalline sigil.
The base 15/15/15 of a forehead gem should always be a valid gem, so the noun would need to be emerald, just FYI. While you can front-load additional details before the noun, if you do too many, it becomes grammatically awkward often times
I'm trying to help a friend who wants to alter an Animalistic Totem's "Veola" type customizations for the different sides. Can anyone who has already had one altered for them share what the analyze readout looks like after it's been adjusted? Specifically, I'm looking for anything in this part:
* Bone/Tooth Design: None [Default]
* Flower Design: None [Default]
* Gem Design: None [Default]
* Bug/Aquatic Life Design: None [Default]
* Miscellaneous Design: None [Default]```
Base design is- a scraggly kobold scalp fetish covered in dandruff flecks, so all these replace the "covered in dandruff flecks"
* Feather Design: matted with mite-infested <adj>s [Custom]
* Bone/Tooth Design: set in a crooked smile of <adj>s [Custom]
* Flower Design: sprouting a mildewed <adj> [Custom]
* Gem Design: dangling a mismatched trio of prosthetic <adj> eyes [Custom]
* Bug/Aquatic Life Design: bearing a crude <adj> tattoo [Custom]
* Miscellaneous Design: hopelessly tangled within <full> [Custom]```
I hate that I love it so much.
But also, I want to pay Trallihn to design me an outfit (not the gross stuff but I think he's just kinda a wizard at it).
Sometimes I'll show Trallihn something gross I've designed and he'll counter with the most repulsive alteration ever and I just go back to the drawing board
Not discounting his abilities, but it definitely works better when you have a strong theme.
It certainly narrows down the possibilities and channels the energy more effectively I'll grant, but I think his creativity is up there with some of the best.
He probably has a secret alt who is an elven nations barbie
squeakily clean, always proper, never passed gas in their entire life.
The idea that Trallihn is also Rohese amused me far more than it should have.
This is an admission of truth, right?
It certainly sounded that way
If I was going to be anyone else… Rohese is a solid choice. And also quite amusing to think of Rohese sliding down the pole Batman style and Trallihn emerging out of the dumpster at the bottom.
Likewise, if Roh was going to have an alter-ego, I think Trallihn would be perfect.
there are worse people to be I suppose.
They don’t come more “opposite ends of a spectrum!”
I can totally see this.....
Is there a character count max for room descriptions (like 511 for items)?
511, yes. Though GMs have available special tools to reference objects for a shorter number of characters, causing them to appear as hyperlinks.
for what's worth, when I wrote my major sanct I was told the limit is 511 characters
Presumably unicorn hide as a material would be a no, right? I don't think we have any way to supply it.
Stop trying to skin unicorns!!!
alter 42 is a little weird here, because there is not technically a category for unicorns -- they are mythical, non-huntable creatures that exist in elanthia. but I assume they are covered under "mythical non-skinnable" and so yeah you would need to provide unicorn parts, which you can't do
I didn't try though! My own unicorn is happy and healthy. 😄
Just... information is never bad.
Ok but... let's say you bought a unicorn at RW. What if you include its reins and just turn in the whole unicorn?
That should get you enough hide for multiple items, depending on what they are
Plus some unicorn steak for a basketifier
That could also get you a lightning bolt and require a Ravenloft Powers check, but maybe those things are worth it.
Hmmm does this include the "You also see" items?
It does not!
Those are not considered as part of the room painting.
Thank you, brain go poof
Is a chatelaine primarily a feminine item or would something like a shamanistic grouping of idols/fetishes hung from the belt also be considered a chatelain? All references I see of them online are worn by women but it describes kind of what I'm trying to make.
Can't find another word to describe that type of belt-hung decoration.
A chatelaine was an office held, usually by a woman, akin to the head butler. They were responsible for running the household and would have a keyring called the same that held keys for important rooms and allowed them access to areas otherwise restricted.
So, in this instance I don't think it would have the same connotation. However, I think I know where you're going with this...
the office and the key ring were called the same thing
I just can't find a word to describe that bunch of skulls/fetishes/feathers/etc. that a shaman would hang from their belt
medicine bundle, girdle of charms/fetishes, or incorporated into a pocketed belt you could have the belt be described as adorned with the fetishes/etc.
I have a question on the rats you find in the sewers at duskruin? I have altered a few rat from there and I'm doing another and noticed that's say you cant alter them now? I thought they could be altered with a Sadie scroll? I'm from Platinum and haven't really done any altering over here in a longtime so not sure if anything had changed over here? You analyze the ship rat and sense that the item cannot be altered in any way.
Ok thanks
This new Sadie update is interesting, is it normal for the tag to disappear?
If it’s a rat, yes.
Ok good to know!
We have one person who does most of the rat conversions (just because they like doing them) but if yours doesn't progress or doesn't update, please drop an Assist. We are still tweaking the new system.
strange individuals indeed.
I like to do enchants and spikes. I do a lot of padding.
I don't judge
@elder wind ok I’ll give a few weeks see if there’s any movement 👍
Pop me a DM with the character name and I'll just unofficially check on our end.
I'm glad our staff does Sadie scrolls based on what they like, and, presumably, are most familiar and comfortable with.
just for that I'm giving all of my rat alters to Vanah
I like enhancives. 😶
I am on the spikes train, don't bring that evil down on me. I grab tents when I see them
Still one of my favorite items to date (tents).
Only if you requested the service a week or more ago. We updated Sadie so she just hands you the tag for rats instead of trying to “tag them”. Please keep the tags on you if she doesn’t tag your item, it’s your way to interact with the service, send messages, and know when it’s complete. If the tag falls off, please grab it. If you don’t notice and lose it, that’s ok. Just request a new service, and we’ll cancel your other one. If you have any issues feel free to ASSIST.
@pastel burrow ok yeah my tag disappeared and it won’t let me get a new one.
@pastel burrow Itzel was looking into it
Gotcha, yeah it only allows on open service per type, thanks for reporting it!
@pastel burrow 👍
I don't know if we have any Private Property GM wizardy types in here but I have questions!
There is a line in the sitting room of my PP that I have been trying to find a way to change for reasons.
the elk trophy isn't an object so altering it won't work... We have been looking at ways to use various PP certs to maybe make this happen and before I go spending time/money/alters on it, can someone tell me if this is feasible?
I could alter a DTH item to look like "an immense elk trophy" then have an imbed item cert used. After that, come along with an alter and turn it into something that isn't a dead animal head but would fit the room description.
An alternative would be to use a forage item prop and alter it into said head, install it in the room then try and use an alter ticket on it (I don't know if you can) or maybe make it a plant type head or something.
Thoughts? Ideas? Please? It's a loft and that thing can see where she sleeps 🙁
If it's not an actual object in the room, it's part of the base room description. Which means it can be removed/rerwitten as long as the new description follows the guidelines. I don't know what the mechanism would be to facilitate this however. You could maybe try a sadie scroll other and see what the recommendation would be.
If you were to get a prop of some type made, add it to the room, imbed it in the room, and then alter it again via bungalow alter certs.. only "an immense elk head trophy" would be modified in the sentence. The rest of it, "Above the hearth, ... surveys its domain with a solemn gaze." would remain. Are you trying to get that changed, too, or just the elk head trophy? If that also, this service does not currently exist in certificate form.
I think it might have been made available at a super high end auction option once or twice before, essentially as a rewrite a whole room service, but I could also be misremembering a requested service
In a perfect world, I'd love to delete the whole sentence... but it could be turned into a statue, a topiary or anything... just not a dead animal head, please.
I feel like we're not going to see anything outside of the current cert offerings for PPs anytime in the near future... so trying to find a way to work within what's available is my next best step. I think I could make a room prop that looks like the immense stag head, imbed it, then alter it into whatever... I just don't want to drop like 75k-100k spookybux on something that won't work =p
(also getting rid of the oak panelling would be sweet, but yanno...)
You could assist and talk to a GM, they might have some recommendations as to how to get that altered.
but honestly, anything like that is going to hit QC and that usually means high end cost associated or a raffle/etc.
Yeah in that case, I'd do "alter x thing to look like an immense elk head trophy", put it in the room, use an embed cert, then use a bungalow alter cert.
Super pricey and convoluted
Do you think I need to use an item with a PLACE script on it? Or just alter any old item and use the embed cert
Or request the service for every single event til it's offered, heh
I know you're not the only one who has wanted a room redesign, either in whole or part
I want room additions to go back into the simucoin store, but I don't think we'll ever see that again.
Yeah, I pretty much love everything about it, but that elk head line so creepy.
it's a delayed service so i think it needs place...cause the item will need to stick in the room for the GM to be able to do it
That makes sense, I was worried if it was a DTH because then does that mean the script gets stripped when it's embededded?
i would looove an addition. a kitchen would be so great
Or will they decline the service because it's a scripted item... man my brain just hurts thinking about it.
I want a bathroom and a garden, I added the studio years ago.
forage props are scripted and they imbed but i feel like the DTH wouldn't work after...
Which I'm fine with, it's a means to an end, yanno?
As long as I can alter cert it, I don't care about the script lol
DTH items cannot be imbedded
Are there items that can be PLACE'd that can be embedded?
can a bungalow slip work on a forage prop?
Or maybe we can mail the item to be embedded to whoever is working on it?
I know that was done for adding stoves
They were not embedded for that process, just placed. Unless you also did an embed cert afterward, heh.
I mean that would work too, but there isn't a cert for anything but still/churn/stove I think
Got my childhood wood stove added that way!
I feel like this is probably a case of as soon as you figure out a way to make it happen within current constraints and then get it done..a more streamlined approach will be introduced. But in the meantime, it's just a waiting game and hoping that your repeated requests are finally answered.
Yeah, it kind of just feels like they're stepping away from PPs completely... and maybe that'll change with the 64 bit upgrade.. but like who knows when that'll happen or how long after that they'll circle back around.
I'm still sad that additional bungalow neighborhoods got axed due to complaints. They should be more available, not less :/
I absolutely agree.
I wonder if that contributed, along with the storage issues, to the lack of movement or improvement to PPs in general.
probably, I get the impression the pp properties and the stores were a bit more of a monster than they originally intended.
I mean, throwing whole properties up in the simucoin store probably didn't help that... but going from like 10-12 to like 50+ was mostly likely part of it =p
There were more than I expected
I bet. I'm totally fine with finding ways of working in the system to get what I'm trying to do done because continually badgering for something doesn't sit well.
So if you have any tips/hints/pathways, even if you're not sure but you think could work... I'd be grateful (but also understandable if you can't)
I don't think there is currently without winning a room rewrite
hmm, bummer
It is what it is, and I'll keep gunning for the chance to get that dead carcass out of my living room =p

For the record, I got this (altering an open-close Fun! item) done via Sadie and it only cost 600pp! Thank you Sadie's helpers (70% sure it was you)
(It was me)
Glad you finally got it done
Well... you COULD purchase the ARTWORK addition for your property. Then you COULD get an imbed an item script and have it replace the dead animal. but I don't know if that is what you want.
This is a great alternative! I've been considering commissioning a portrait of Hotu (my teadragon) in a smoking jacking, monocle and not-a-top-hat, and I could see him solmenly looking over the room in his dapper little suit. 🙂
But is this something we can do? Be like "Please replace that non-object elk head in the room description with this fancy artwork addition" and that's like acceptable? I kind of assumed it had to be like a word-for-word thing.
So the artwork add I'm talking about isn't really a single piece of artwork, it clusters portraits, maps, things like that on the wall.
Yes, typically, it should be word for word or share a base noun, but if the item being added doesn't change the sentence structure, then I think there could be some wiggle room. For example:
Above the fireplace hangs an ugly dead animal head.
Could easily be:
Above the fireplace hangs (several pieces of artwork).
But the below wouldn't work:
Above the fireplace hangs a series of artwork. Because its clunky.
I love the artwork script and do recommend it
I think you can also alter the base script add certificate so that the artwork appears as you want it to (like the base description and what not)
This is, unfortunately, the sentence I have to work with...
Above the hearth, an immense elk trophy surveys its domain with a solemn gaze.
Woah..
Yeah, it's very restrictive.
I've considered a painting, a statue, turning the animal carcass head into like... a topiary head of some kind
That's pretty awesome and evocative. I'd change the "elk trophy" part only and be super happy with it (obviously that's just me)
Yeah... dead animal heads on the wall is 100000% not my sylvan's bag.
A carved or cultural mask?
What about a foraged item prop.... Something like "a woven river reed and birch bark basket displays an array of living plants" Then the sentence could be "Above the hearth, (whole item)"
But would it make sense to have "surveys its domain with a solemn gaze."
No, you'd only put the item after Above the Hearth
So it would be "Above the hearth, a woven river reed and birch bark basket displays an array of living plants."
Huh... that is a much larger room text change than I anticipated I could make. (since the elk head isn't an item currently)
But it really isn't
We would just be putting the ITEM there and it would display its long description.
Oh hrm... I mean if I have this level of flexibility and if I could do something similiar with the artwork, I might go that route.
You've made this sound so much easier that I thought it was
I'll probably be raffling off (Trove at EG) other property modifications. So you can look for those, too.
I definitely want the artwork for another room so maybe I grab one and hope for magical auction wins
Thank you for the clarification and ideas ❤️ ❤️
I am looking for the script name associated with a series of fluff verbs for blunt weapons. Don't think the script ever got onto the wiki, and for the life of me I can't locate the weapon I bought/had the script added to. It was introduced either at 2017 or 2018 EG and may have been added by a merchant name Rimmah at CI Shop: Let's Be Blunt. Does this ring a bell to anyone?
it looks like the shop was overwritten with something else, so it's no longer available to check
I will say not everyone follows the "additives must have a color" so that was my reasoning 😅
May have found it in shattered? But the weapons are unscripted
Thanks. When I get access to my 2018 logs again I'll do some more digging, see if I can find it
any sort of messaging it had would help narrow it down to for searching!
Found some log deets. This came from EG 2018. It might not even be blunt specific, but that's all the merchant was working on.
Rimmah says, "It changes based on how much it weighs, if it has a flare, and what the enchant is."
Verbs include Touch, Wave, Rub:
wave my warmace
As you slice the warmace through the air, it emanates a deep reverberating sound.
rub my warmace
As you rub your warmace lightly, a tan wisp of light appears briefly before your eyes.
touch my warmace
You run your fingers over your warmace, admiring the weight and balance.
looks like that was an old Dhu Gillywack script "for noisy weapons"
Sweet, thanks for clarifying. Given the description it leads me to believe there are a lot of permutations for this script, and it might be handy with the flourish system. Is there a process to request it be converted to a flourish?
I do not believe there is a specific process to request that, but I believe there's a flourish discussion thread lurking around somewhere that you could suggest it in!
Will do, thanks again!
NP!
For bows, is there any restriction on mentioning a bowstring or what material a bow is strung with? I'm not sure if there are any scripts with verbs that string or unstring a bow, but perhaps that would just be a restriction for those.
I think there may be an older script that does that, but I would say for a regular bow you could mention it.
I want to make this katana. I would need to attend a gald, and get alchemy dyes for "shimmering" and "sapphire-blue". is that correct, or am I missing something?
a shimmering sapphire-blue mithril katana inscribed with mystical Vaalorian runes
why not the blue? there's a dye for sapphire blue. is it too long?
You shouldn't need a dye for the color
But yes, you do have length issues
15/15/15
a shimmering/sapphire-blue/katana
Can't include both the color and material
you could have a 15/15/15 of a shimmering/sapphire blue/katana and still have the long be a shimmering sapphire blue mithril katana inscribed with Vaalorian runes
i agree that mystical is probably too subjective to make it
if you are looking for a color that is "sapphire blue" but shorter, you might like "pavonated"
thanks all
sapphire blue would not be hyphenated
You might need a Vaalorian Elf merchant to get that part
there are vaalorian merchants? I've been searching the discord but haven't seen any.
there is no other noun for katana
also in my mind, does the common observer know that a rune is Vaalorian (honest question as like, I think most people would know if they saw hieroglyphics, but less obvious if you're seeing say Japanese vs Chinese vs Korean characters.. so idk where Vaalorian falls in this made up spectrum).
When I use AI to brainstorm ideas, I always throw in that descriptions need to be visual and make sense for a casual observer otherwise you get like "bearing a tempered edge quenched in the fires of Mt Doom" which sounds cool but like how would you know just by looking at it
also fun side note, I've been doing a lot of alterations with dye additives lately, and Id say half the merchants tell me that there needs to be a color associated with it, and half dont. (a shimmering blue katana vs a shimmering katana)
Also finally idk how you feel about shows vs a long long, but sometimes it really does make sense to have a clean 15/15/15 and "short" long that can be followed up with a really nice show
There should be a color attached to it but you don't have to have that color additive treated dye
Cultural adjectives are allowed even though what you said
Mystical breaks one of the ALTER rules about giving mundane things magical properties
But elegant, stylized, gilded would all work with the runes
And may I interest you in a deep garnet or dark crimson instead
thank you
And you don’t need a merchant of that culture to do cultural adjectives like Vaalorian. The rare merchant might RP that way but most will do it
can we figure out the maximum amount of hyphens that can exist in a particular item? For science?
A silver-sheened cloth-of-gold hilt-wrapped cat-o-nine-tails
Replace hilt with the applicable word
Thanks, I hate it
eventually just have your gear as morse code
Okay, into the feeder with 30 of those!

make sure you set the value above 25k so it doesn't get pawned automatically
and I would cherish one of these if I found it in a box, NGL
bind it to your hand so you can't get rid of it.
cursed? metal.
My next fest shop
My chaos goblin tendencies have performed admirably. My work here is done.
Hoorne can make you some truly authentic runes of any history. Truly authentic. Trust him.
totally historical, much accuracy
See, you get it.
Why go to the trouble of getting something authenticated or of questionable provenance when Hoorne can just make you one, easy peasy.
Is this the original Hoorne or one of his many, soon to be realized, clones?
it was the blurst of times?!
I was informed that a talon-ringed troll cross belt sounds like it is a belt made of a 'troll cross' material and might need to be reworked (the item has to have an animal part in it, so I'm imagining the cross being formed from talons).
How would you describe this belt potentially? I've only seen it referred to as a troll cross belt
a low-draping belt of leather cordage secured through a central ring? that is very pretty
a low-draping belt of leather cordage buckled with a troll cross?
working off missoni's beautiful work, of course
"troll cross" is that very specific shape, i'd think that would be OK?
A wide belt of interwoven leather cords converging on a circular rune
Google says it's modern
We got in game runes to choose from
Make it eelskin and feed it through a cheliborous
interesting! so it is! i had no idea
It's a bone shaman cloak closure, so I might be limited to a few words, but I don't know if that's true - could that be confirmed before I get to a merchant?
Great wording there, I'll work from it if I need to shorten.
I have to include talons or some animal part, but this helps.
low-draping belt converging through a talon-forged ring?
an iron loop with crossed ends? for the buckle part. talon-forged, they may say you can't forge a talon
Folk who kint read runes aint gonna know wot kinda rune. Da best rool assa always issa dont tell me wot it is...show me.
talon'd
talon-carved? carved of talon?
dat's gonna be a daggum big bird! 😉
I also dont see talons represent'd... I see loops.
I also see groin-focused-antlers! ew.
Well a phoenix is all up in my armor, so, we're not far off.
That is... something.
Makin stuff's haff assa hard assa Thinkin bout stuff! Ye'll git der.
I need some feed back on something I'm working if anyone has time?
Gallon?
By context, it sounds like you're describing a ship
Which would be a galleon
Yes that would be right
What sort of ship are you altering? A toy of some sort?
Sort of
Would changing the look of Sprite Armor robes be considered a General Alteration or an Item Customization?
For the purposes of cost, or...?
Trying to figure out if it's eligible if I get chosen for one of the General Alteration events
Or is that solely at the discretion of the merchant?
Sprite armor is a tricky one because the alteration is done through the customizations. Some merchants might not be able to work on them because it's tricky
So yes, sprite armor can be altered via GALD, but not all GALD merchants will be able to work on that item
Got it, I'll be sure to have a backup plan if the opportunity comes up! As a follow up question, if I were to use Sadie this would be considered an Item Customization and not an Alteration?
For tag purposes I think either is fine. If I was Sadie I would do 300 for one side either way, active or inactive, whether you submit as a customization or as an alter
I have to admit, these are on my radar to create in-game. I showed them to Elysani and Xynwen last year and I've been trying to figure out the best way to creat them.
Would these be allowed to include in an alteration then?
I don't understand your question
I was trying to include a troll cross belt in my alteration and it was mentioned that the term had to go through QC. That might be a bigger process than just asking here though, I realize.
Oh, I more meant I was going to work on the design as a scripted item, not necessarily the term.
If you wer etold it has to go through QC then it has to go through QC.
I wasn't contradicting that.
You personally? Were you approved or no?
I prefer not to say on advice of my attorney.
Can Veolas be plural? Like "a set of hairpins" as opposed to "a hairpin"?
Thank you! I even own those...
Can a GALD merchant update an existing ez-script if you just want to alter some of the messaging?
Negative. All EZscripts need to go through QC.
So essentially same cost as a new ezscript?
or would it be a Sadie 300 point alteration
Couldn't tell you that. We don't typically alter EZscripts after the fact, so your best bet would be to submit and see if it could even be done or is allowed.
Yea but which do I submit as, ez or standard alteration.
I would suggest the general "item" one.
If I have a grammatical/spelling error in a glamour tattoo should I assist, bug it or?
That would be an assist, please.
Actually... no, not an assist.... BUG
SEE HOW CONFUSING IT IS
I own them now, so I get it.
(also I wish I could alter/change it because it's.... I don't know what I was thinking)
OHOHO.
(yes, I got the bug on the shimmer trinket issue, and I'm still trying to figure out if and how to make it work)
Oh yeah, I kinda figured that one was going to be a nightmare.
But I'd looooooove to be able to sadie scroll some of that or something someday. But it's deffo a niche, difficult thing that has to go through QC so kinda assuming it is what is. 🙂
It's not something that can be sadie scrolled, tbh.
But the reason it's a BUG and not an ASSIST is because the fully custom ones are essentially their own script.
Yep, kinda figure, esp with QC. Just... you known pipe dreams of updating it from early days.
That makes complete sense!
locked into a geo-stable orbit around a black hole? Time flies in QC then.
sure, but then every minute in QC is 7 years to us 😭
This explains why I’m so tired all the time.
on the bright side, you'll outlive us all
I'm trying hard not to!
relativity doesn't care
Nor my liver.
So we might be at a stand-off.
And yet, this isn't about alterations anymore, so... I'll see myself oot.
Would either a vestement or surplice be an acceptable noun to replace 'cape' on an armor concealer?
``here is my question. I have this satchel I bought for 10m for the intention of the dachre symbol which I want to keep.
If at eg I get it altered to add a 511 character show is there anyway to keep this when looking at the satchel without ruining the original integrity of the item?
You see a glyph-like mark on the herbalist's satchel:
@
|
(|
o X
| |)
. | |
"Bloom" is written below the mark in small, light writing.``````
Probably just the long, if anything, but there's a GM typing.
Without having the item in question in hand, it's hard to say. I don't know how dachres work, and whether or not it has an analyze or additional details.
You could place an ASSIST to ask, though.
I'll do that. Thanks for answering
No analyze just the look satchel gives you what I posted above
Yeah, best bet is ASSIST.
I am pretty sure the glyphs are scripted. I don't think show descriptions take at all
Question! If you are getting all sides of a shadowplay gown, and need to provide a rare material, do you need to provide that material x 2 if you are wanting it for two sides?
No, because the idea is that the gown is modified by the magic but its still the same gown.
Oh, yay! Thanks 🙂
They were talking about alterations in the eg channel and someone mentioned that they got pushback for wanting to use "dragon" in their alter. Is this not allowed now? I just had one done in the last few months and was planning on getting more. Thx
