#transportation
1 messages · Page 137 of 1
that's what the races are for 😉
yes exactly
knowledge to use in manufacturing
Whatever internal parts are used are not fitted for rally because drifting requires very different technology. Maybe its slip-differential could be set up for rally, though
But the bumper won't hold
I don't get it what's so different?
The parts are tailored for its use
It's nothing much, just tires some suspension parts in front for the angle, the powertrain is changed in the process of making a rally car anyways.
Drifting happens on flat surfaces at low speeds, rallying requires a car to be able to absorb the force of flying in the air at 200km/h, land on any surface and continue without that force hampering the car in any way
It'll probably cost less preparing a car like this for rally than buying one and changing everything
You'll need new suspension, new turbo-infrastructure, new cooling, everything wheel-related new too, new aero, new reinforcements
Essentially redoing everything i imagine
The bumper of the car won't last a second, it has no reinforcement and if it scrapes it'll come off entirely
new turbo new cooling why?
cuz its gotta hold up to a rough beating
if the car flips n lands it keeps going
do that wit a drift car n its done right there
hit a wall n its a day
because they require turbo's that can give optimal boost when going 30 and when going 220 while maintaining its integrity
and how do you know the turbo that's already in there can't?
because they don't use FIA specified rallying turbo's for drifting
same reason they don't use whatever garrett turbo's they use in gt500
🧢
idk, that looks like a good car to make rally car out of
a normal person making one has to buy one and make from scratch anyways
not cap
In idea yes, in execution you'd rather just get a regular car and convert
literally acura:
integra is not an ilx the last time i checked
the resemblance is uncanny
No its not
yes it is
you're just blind
no its not
youreruruee*
i see nothing wrx about that
i see everything wrx about that
j bc the tailights r n headlights r the same doesnt mean shit
nah its shit
where tf did a wrx come from
manual transmission option is a plus, everything else about the car is garbage
You usually just buy a donor and send it to a shop
i can guarantee it will be disappointing
it hasnt even released? 
bold statement
hence why i said "it will be"
Fishe
u said is here
what
i'm referring to the fact that the car is going to be available with a manual transmission
wtf are you talking about
And the fact you said everything else would be garbage
yeah it will be
u said everything else is garbage but the car itself hasnt even released yet
Show us than
cant make statements about it when it doesnt even exist yet
Show what you think makes it garbage
yeah people said that about the wrx
"don't mock it if it isn't here yet"
it arrived, and it was a steaming pile of shit
i doubt it, new cars rarely ever catch the charm of the older models
if i was to have an integra
i'd rather spend upwards of 22-35k on a dc2 or dc5
I dont have a car
but i do have an intake
filter*
oh
Which hybrid do you want more, Toyota Prius or Honda CR-Z?
The prius has double the practicality and is more reliable
Not to mention Toyota has already aced the Prius formula seeing as they've been making it for like 25 years
Yea as much as the Prius has the grass eater tree hugging reputation and has stuck with it a bit too much, I’ve always liked the car for what it is since well ever
In 2006 a prius 1:64 scale car was the first thing I ever ordered online. It was only $2 but shipping was like $16 so my parents were like tf did you get
Turns out it was from Japan themselves
And took a month to get but it was worth it
Lmao
Do you know how much it's worth now? Or are you keeping it
I like the CR-Z more because it's faster and it looks cool
Prius
Similar opinion to epik’s
The CR-Z is more fun to drive than the Prius but I think the downside would be the fuel consumption
hot take
this is the best miata
Anyone watching F1? 
Mazepin gonna get himself kicked out of team 
SPEEED
fair enough
Fangio award to bottas lets fuckin go
ffs the one time I thought redbull are getting a front row lockout
Well and we thought Merc was gonna dominate COTA
kek
Pray for HAM/VER to Monza themselves for the remaining races and BOT to win all of them
Yes 
Well Brazil has a sprint race
Max has a 100% record of getting pole in the weekends that have a sprint
But also a 100% dnf record 
If Bruce McLaren is from NZ, then how come McLaren is a British brand?
Because he established the brand in Woking, UK.
Oh, so that's why
race day my dudes
bruh, childhood memory unlocked
in the old town i used to live there was always a parked rover 75 near our place
just found out that company kinda died in the 60's damn
for some reason the model was in 1998 through 2005
the hell has been going on in that company
Safety car shenanigans strikes again 
Someone's on softs
Max might go all out early on.
Perez's tyre getting better 
It is never his fault. Ever
Max 2.2s pit. Whew.
Suddenly 18 Lance Stroll on a pitstop forever ago
Bottas still stuck behind Ricciardo 
Nooo
Bottas fucked by Merc pit again
Sjznfbekwksbsb
Bottas fighting Russell again. Crash? 
FML I though the race was 2h later
Oof
Will need to watch the start later
It was eventful
Not a whole lot of interesting stuff happened after
Yeah, not much going on now other than Perez slowly catching up to Hamilton
And Bottas has been staring at Ricciardo's ass for 99% of the race
Imagine having to stare at the car that punted you all the way from the top in the first place for the entire race. 
Pulling a Sainz
When you're miles ahead of everyone behind you, and miles behind everyone in front of you
Yeah, no action left 💤
So no 1-2 for Red Bull
Perez got held up by Russell and can't catch up again
Unless HAM tyres go off in dramatic fashion
Unlikely. It'd be Leclerc first.
I like the dance between Verstappen and Bottas
Bottas slow stop again 
well, it's still a 1-3
Bottas fucked up big time lol
Wasn't really his fault
It was a race incident. Ocon got sandwiched.
But damn Max was on fire today.
Also, funny how they aren't wearing masks.
Well, not all of them at least.
That crowd is fantastic
Pepe celebrating with the flag is so fucking wholesome. 
And just like that, redbull are back in position for the constructors
Im talking about how he gave max the racing line at the start of the race 
Happy to see Perez seemingly finally settling into his RB seat over the last few races though
No more "why are you fishing DotD by sucking at qualifying and passing a bunch of shitboxes"
Ah my bad
He learned that he shouldn’t save tires in qualifying
And ngl seeing valtteri getting spun around gave me “is that Glock?” Vibes
man why does every Porsche 944 near me have to be so junky
If im gonna buy a car
im gonna buy a good one
thats atleast in good condition, with everything working
That's a fair assessment
Price Astronomical✅
this listing has a good price
5.8k isnt terrible(?)
Why is it rare for cars to have twinchargers? Twincharger has no turbolag because it's a combination of supercharger and turbocharger which eliminates the lag
Twincharger would probably be good for races before hybrid motors became trends
That's not how it works
and they aren't rare a handful of vehicles have different types of twin or sequential turbo setups
Del sol is cooler but the cr-x below has more practical space
Only issues i face are mostly rust and snow
Thats about it
Ok except space
i won't really be doing much
so
Headlights used by facelift Diablo ✅
compact skoda fabia is such a cute car
especially in person
I miss the old skoda grilles
Because it is complicated and expensive to mass produce
Also it's really not necessary for like 95% of vehicles
The more moving parts you add, the more that can break
So that's why many vehicles use twin scroll turbochargers, twin-turbochargers or biturbochargers to reduce lag
Or they just don't use forced induction
Which is common here
Here, only gas engines which doesn't use forced induction when it comes to modern engines
Modern NA diesel engines are virtually non-existent here
Yeah, cheaper to go NA because the power demand from consumer is not significant, and the environmental standard is not that high.
And NA diesel is just dumb, because youre just begging for limp engine that farts out more NOx than a cow farm.
Plus there aren't any ridiculous displacement restrictions in the US so forced induction especially isn't as necessary
How about a supercharged diesel?
turbo diesels are very common in Europe. Diesels already make up around 50 per cent of all combustion-based cars here anyway
Same
Superchargers are not common in Europe, SK and Japan because most cars rely on 3/4 or 6 cylinder engines. American cars are commonly equipped with torque-heavy, big V8 engines, which are very compatible to superchargers. Plus these engines are often designed to give ample performance when NA, as opposed to many european and japanese makes that already involve turbo's at the begin of the production cycle/chain. I mean AMG has used superchargers because of their V8s, but small turbocharged engines are still the standard.
Plus, turbo chargers decrease carbon emissions and increase fuel efficiency whereas superchargers do the exact opposite
especially when it comes to smog, which is additionally more a problem with diesels
and because the EU mandates emissions, as opposed to the US, more incentive is given to use turbo's for non-performance cars
i remember sitting in a supercharged na2 nsx
interesting approach to getting more than 300+ hp from the c32b
torque band/throttle response was understandably very good
superchargers are generally a better way to get extra power
relatively cheap too
they're simple constructions and the power gain is greater than that of most turbo's, plus you don't rely on mid to high rpms for flow
yeah
but the burden that superchargers carry is that they rely torque and are inefficient, which is why you don't see them very often in racing
that's true
come to think of it, i've rarely seen turbo's in racing too
maybe aside from older gen f1 cars from mid to late 80s
and group A skylines
I see them all the time
then again, i'm only really interested in the older VHS jgtc races, and most of the cars that competed in that area were na
NA rallying is unthinkable, DTM/Super GT use turbo for everything too (gt500 pushes 6/650HP on a 4 cyl), FIA Gt3 cars are often turbocharged too, LEM uses turbo's too
honestly the engines they use in gt500 are baffling
the turbo they use generates a pressure up to 3,5 bar
the super gt gt300 cars are just as impressive
those things are quick compared to european gt's
Yeah the FIA should really look at supergt as an example
instead of increasing costs while becoming more corpocrat
Your main mode transportation: Cars
My only mode of transportation: Buses
Yes
We dont shame ya
who wants to debate on which of these two Hot hatches are better
Mazdaspeed already won by basically in stock all the time
yo
Next 24 hours of Le Mans, if Glick will join again, I would bet my money on it winning 
nah
they could hardly compete with current lmp2
next year they'll compete with an upgraded gr010, peugeot and bykolles
So GR010, Peugeot, and hopeless despot who weasel their way to WEC. Ehh theyll be fine
3rd in 4 team class is good enough.
Just field a car, like any car
And theyll beat bykolles

yeah they'll beat bykolles
maybe peugeot if their cars suddenly explode
but gazoo nah
and peugeot is still extremely strong
0:04 was unfortunate...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fqh9uSDOJTs
Driver: Richard Westbrook
Car: Glickenhaus 007 LMH
Team: Glickenhaus Racing
Is it wrong for me to think that the Glickenhaus car brand is almost same level with Koenigsegg brand?
Yes
they're entirely different brands
glickenhaus focuses on making race cars while koenigsegg stuffs million dollar technology in million dollar cars
glickenhaus favours more traditionalist technologies to begin with
and koenigseggs, despite always being the ultra cars in any racing game, are awful on-track
neither are good
nissan sunny n14 hatch 💪
Donate to support our server and our infrastructure
• Developing, hosting and improving our bots and game servers
• Unlocking Community Goals, such as hosting events and giveaways
Furthermore, patrons receive benefits for donating to our server
• Unique role colors to show your dedication to the server
• Access to private text channel with other Patrons
For more details and rewards, check the server Patreon page. https://www.patreon.com/discordgamingnetwork
Requested by: @cerulean cobalt
I'm not sure if it's true or not but someone said that Glickenhaus thinks his brand is worth more than Ferrari
I wouldn't be surprised
but ferrari is bigger, has more racing heritage and success, is literally worth more than his brand and is significantly more future proof
But the thing is, while Glick built hypercars, he's new to the industry and only few people know about his car brand. In fact, the first time I heard of Glickenhaus car brand is during this year's 24h of Le Mans
I mean yeah
but he doesn't really have much to offer, aside from a pretty nice racing team
!ban 609099748200284161 phishing/scam bot
Banned gemeieitor666#3471 (Case #127160) (user notified with a direct message)
for a new brand like that to really prosper, you need a niche
koenigsegg has its technology + aesthetic and pagani its ''form follows function'' aesthetic and big AMG v12
both distinct cars
glickenhaus is a retro ferrari knock-off that tries to break through in racing
unless they start harvesting WEC titles, people won't be very interested
And if I'm not mistaken, Glick racing team's budget is not really big, at least small compared to Toyota GR team
I mean for an independent team that made their own car, they did very good
but from an non-relative perspective, glickenhaus didn't do too good and the decisions they made concerning the design of the car were stupid
They did good for an independent team and first timers in 24h of Le Mans but like you said before, their decision to relive the old glory days of racing made it harder for them to compete against other hypercars
If you watched this video, I'm still wondering why Westbrook lost control of the car at 0:04, oversteer?
That wasn't the fault of the car itself
He was zig-zagging because of the car that passed him
Oh
the constant change in mass distribution caused him to lose control (oversteer)
but I watched both glickenhaus and the gr010 live
the glickenhaus had to correct every turn because of oversteer and could hardly pass lmp2s while the gr010 had no pacing issues and ran butter smooth
GR had 2 streams that time, both for their 7 and 8
So in that situation, a GR010 would've still done better even if he's zig-zagging?
a light V6 and a hybrid drivetrainallow for good weight distribution. Glickenhaus had a heavy v8 in the back, which is bad for positioning and weight distribution
The Alpine didn't seem to be hybrid either, its engine is larger than the Glick's engine
Yes, the weight distribution is superior and they had a relatively complex 4wd system
glickenhaus is rwd
hence the oversteer, especially in combination with a big v8
So the GR010's drivetrain is not just an everyday AWD we see
it's far more simple than the ts050
The TS050 seems faster
Or at least it's lighter and the engine output with motor is higher
which had a v6 with a complex differential for the hybrid motor to deploy kers across all four wheels
Yes, LMH is around 130kg heavier and has a power output of around 600/700 hp
instead of 900/1000
I wonder what made the GR010 an upgrade if it's slower besides the simpler AWD
it's not an upgrade
Lmp1 was too expensive, so the FIA decided to renew WEC by implementing LMH and LMDH
LMH is heavier and less powerful than LMP1 and has a cost-cap
Oh
LMDH is essentially a renewed LMP2 where manufacturers buy chassis' from bespoke builders
mostly meant for american brands
the revival is quite successful, however
Is this also the reason why Le Mans race cars are slower than the 1980s and 1990s Le Mans race cars?
It's just that the Le Mans race cars in this year's race look slower than the stars of the 1980s and 1990s Le Mans
By 2023, Ferrari, toyota, bykolles, peugeot and glickenhaus will compete in LMH and acura, audi, bmw, mazda, cadillac, alpine and porsche in LMDH
You're referring to group C?
Yes
Group C was hallmarked by extreme power output and (in the end of group C and transition towards GT1) extreme downforce
you're looking at cars that weigh 900kg and have over a 1000 HP
and would consistently reach speeds over 380 km/h
The Sauber Mercedes C9, Jaguar XJR-9, WM Peugeot P88 and the R92CP seem to be the famous cars in Group C though
Sauber Mercedes C9 reached 400 km/h and the WM Peugeot P88 reached 405 km/h
the problem was that these cars were A) extremely expensive and B) too fast for the track
LMP1 was also getting too fast for le mans
Not to mention the Sauber Mercedes C9, R89C and R92CP's transmissions are only 5-speed yet their top speeds are too fast
the gear ratios don't really matter, it's just annoying for the driver
If the R92CP was used when Le Mans still don't have chicanes on the Mulsanne Straight, its top speed would probably be similar with the Sauber Mercedes C9 or maybe it would also reach 400km/h
The R92CP is famous in Gran Turismo community 🙂
LMP1 was faster than group C despite their immense speeds. The superior and smaller frames allow for better handling and the 4WD hybrid drivetrain for significantly better acceleration
Group C was also plagued with turbo lag
That too
And I guess the reason why Toyota dominated Le Mans now is because Porsche changed their category
but lmh is currently a lot slower
Porsche didn't enter the LMP1 and LMPH category
the gr010 was already dominant since 2016, but gazoo had very unfortunate accidents and engine failures in the last half of their races
they missed out on two championship titles because of that
Oh, that's sad
audi and porsche dropped out in 2016 and 2017 (2018 practically) because of dieselgate
but both are returning to le mans in LMDH
porsche might return in LMH instead, if they can get the funding
If Porsche joined using a hybrid LMPH, they'll have good chances of reclaiming the crown.
If they don't win, they would at least give Toyota GR serious competition
absolutely, but gazoo holds a better hand because they've consistently raced since 2018
as opposed to porsche that dropped out and will re-enter in 2023
meaning that gazoo has five years of R&D extra
Glick on the other hand should stop living in the old glory days of racing if he wants better chances of his cars winning
Well, his style of living in those old glory days made his drivers struggle by making them need to countersteer to correct oversteer more often
pipi motors made the infamous I4 for hyundai's WRC car, they're specialised in efficient I4s.
but they had to combine two of them to create his V8
which is braindead
nonetheless an amazing engine, but it can't compete against hybrids
Amazing engine at the wrong time
Glick's cars would've won if they joined the Le Mans 5-10 years earlier
eh maybe
well no because his design is lmh and not lmp1
but even now, his design is dumb
I originally thought that Glick's LMH car isn't hybrid because his budget is small
nah, he's just old fashioned
otherwise he would've used a 3.5L v6
or an I4 with a turbo pushing 3 bar
which pipo would definitely design
compare the gr010 with the glickenhaus
And since his car's engine is 3.5L V8 twin-turbo pure ICE, it suffered turbo lag too? Oh wait, his turbochargers have anti-lag systems.
Probably no anti-lag
anti-lag kills turbo's
hence why GT500 and WRC replace them every race
How?
anti-lag relies on external combustion, which puts massive strain on the turbo
So it can literally destroy the turbo?
Yes, if it's used for too long
I'm not sure if this video claimed that it has anti-lag or not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06bJTv7B2vg
#LMH #LeMans #Hypercar
In this video I have filmed Glickenhaus SCG 007 LMH (Le Mans Hypercar) being run up the Goodwood Hillclimb during the 2021 Goodwood Festival of Speed. Powered by a 3.5L V8 Engine developed by Pipo Moteurs combined with electric motors for the LMH series. This car will be taking part in the 2021 Le Mans 24H. The car also f...
Does anti-lag totally eliminate turbo lag or only reduces it?
does sound like turbo lag a bit, but can't find anything on it
anti-lag uses external combustion in the exhaust to generate flow. Of course, the combustion damages the exhaust manifold, catalytic converter (should it be equipped with one) and the extra heat damages the non-heat resistant part of the turbo
If properly configured, it can almost eliminate turbo lag
But with a hybrid motor, the turbo lag can be eliminated without anti-lag system if I'm not mistaken
GT500 runs amazing garrett turbo's that push 3.5 bar, which is an insane amount. That way, their I4s can run 650HP reliably for several hours
Yes, turbo's take time to spool up, depending on their size and material. The bigger the turbo, the more RPMs are essentially needed for boost
electric engines deliver power instantly, and thus can fill the boostless gap
There are 2 ways Glick can eliminate or reduce turbo lags for his cars, these are:
- Use bi-turbochargers
- Use twincharger
But these 2 would result in having less engine output
twin turbo's still have turbo lag and a twincharger puts a lot of strain on the engine
You win by planning and durability, not speed in le mans
hence why I'm sceptical on anti-lag for endurance
If I'm not mistaken, twin-turbo is having 2 same-sized turbochargers and bi-turbo is having 2 different sized turbochargers, 1 small turbo and 1 big turbo.
Not really, unless you don't have enough room for the original turbo and need to opt for a smaller one, but superchargers generate more power than turbo's
The supercharger part and its moving parts are the ones which put lots of stress on the engine?
not really, both just refer to ''2''
Oh
Yes, superchargers are directly mounted onto the engine and use its torque for activity
the problem is that causes extra strain and is fuel inefficient
And I don't know how but someone did say that supercharger can rob the engine of its power
I mean if it's not mounted well it can be very negative
and superchargers are not useful for cars that aren't torque heavy
they rely on torque for activity
hence why american v8s often use them
Ooooh
european and especially japanese cars rely on high RPMs, which is ideal for turbo's
pipo also focuses on RPM-heavy cars due to WRC, which is why a supercharger would be an ill-fit for the glickenhaus
And before we had this conversation, I had lots of thoughts about racing team using twincharged engines in the an endurance race even harder than 24h of Le Mans, 24h of Nurburgring

The twinchargers would probably make their engines stress out even more since it's a hard track
well, if you're driving around in a car with a heavy v8, especially around nurburgring, a supercharger would be pretty useful
But then again, Nurburgring has less straight than Le Mans
nonetheless an efficient 4 or 6 cylinder with a hybrid drivetrain is superior
Theoretically, an I5 twin-turbo hybrid engine could work
I mean yeah
but it's harder to configure since it's not been used much
other than by audi
Audi has a history of winning a 24h of Le Mans race using diesel powered car
Diesel engines are more fuel efficient than petrol engines after all
But diesel engines have lower hp and heavier too
It takes some power to gain some power, as it runs on the belts of the engine itself to spin
V engines are typically preferred since you can have a lot of cylinders in a small space, an I6, however, is very nice since it offers optimal engine stability
but an I6 is very long
so it's not really used
placement becomes even more difficult because of weight distribution
And I guess an I6 engine would be more prone to oversteering than V6?
Not necessarily
diesel is standard for WEC
not if it's placed well, but placing an I6 is more difficult than a V6
it's almost twice as big
If the engines are the same weight and have the same weight distribution on the same car handling would largely be the same
if anything, the I6 would induce more stability
H6 could work
They are more stable, but the fact that V6 cylinders fire at such high RPMs means the opposite-direction thing wouldn't have that significant of an effect, no?
But only few use H6, Subaru is one of the big users of H6
You mean boxers?
depends on how you use it, at le mans it would be useful since you're looking at high-rpm driving
Yes, boxers
Right
in a city or more tracks with more corners it's quite useless
H6 boxer engines should work in endurance races
I'm mostly only referring to racing situations where you're banging off the rev limiter as frequently as possible
And why are there no endurance rally races? 🤔
and designing a car that has optimal weight distribution and centre of gravity while having an I6 doesn't really make up for the slightly better stability
Like no 24 hours of snow rally race
Really? Wow!
Is Baja 1000 considered rally
And I'm still quite unsure why rally race cars have lower hp than race cars...
because death
They don't need 900 horsepower
They won't be going more then 160 in the majority of rally courses anyway
Track racing is safer since you know the track by heart and there aren't many variables, especially if the track is carefully tended to every day. Rallying occurs in any environment, and thus the variable are pretty much indefinite and the driving conditions significantly worse.
The margin of error in rally is exponentially smaller then that of GT1 or LMP1 for example
That's also why rally races have navigators who sit beside the drivers
an error in touring championships will result in minor collision or a car flying into a sand pit, in rally you have people going full throttle against a tree or into a ravine
If you mess up in rally, you're leaving the course at 110, possibly into a tree, off a cliff, or into something that won't move
or a crowd
That too
And I'm still wondering how come crowds can watch rally from really close to the track with only little protection
Plus, WRC is already really powerful
WRC doesn't really like it when you do that, but they can't stop everyone
Like there are only few ropes or small barriers between the race track and the spectator stands
Oh. I'm sorry if I couldn't explain it properly but you get what I mean, right? Like spectators are only like 1-3cms away from rally race cars participating the race?
Yes
If they get hit, I hope the driver won't get charged
Used to be far worse during group a and b
Back in Group B, mechanics would have counselors on site because they would sometimes find severed fingers in cars
That's gruesome
Severed fingers
people wouldn't leave the course until the car comes flying by
And rally races often have little to no grip, power slides are common there
anyway, 500HP is more than enough https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIK61AmU3n0&list=LL&index=1&ab_channel=RSeoltre
Yes, that's what rally is more or less famous for
So if a spectator gets hit because he's in the track or standing near track with only little protection, the driver shouldn't get charged for it 😦
unless they purposefully drive into a crowd, no
But if it's not on purpose, would it be fair to say that the spectator also has a fault for standing too close to the track or inside the track itself instead of staying in safer sides of spectator areas?
They are at fault
There are designated spectator areas (where if something went wrong, the organisation would be held accountable). Standing next to the track is your own fault
especially if people are dumb enough to stand near areas which are prone to driver-error
like corners
And then sticking their hand out to touch the car as it blew by
Fuckin dumbasses
in wrc it's fortunately not very bad
The left side of the Subaru seems unsafe for spectators to stand
eh that area is fine
professional drivers won't fuck up the entry like that
I'd be more worried about the inside
The longer banking corners are generally less dangerous
Or something with a wide trail like that
the spectators are in a relatively safe area
the inside and mid-section of the outside curve are more dangerous
Midsection as in Apex?
The area after the spectators
I'm unable to watch the video at the moment so
since the driver will try to cut the corner and can lose control and slip into that mid section or cut too and scoop legs
That dude on the right at the door slot is close, his view would probably be nice
Oops, sorry, I was just putting a link to where I got the screenshot
If he steps inside the track and gets hit, I guess the race organizers and drivers can't be held responsible for it anymore
No, they're only responsible for the areas where they designate their spectators
Would this be more dangerous?
I mean a driver wouldn't find themselves on that part of the road
but yeah nonetheless dangerous
Especially that he's in the inside turn I guess
eh he's relatively safe as a driver wouldn't be at that part of the road
since you'd take that turn in a very different way
but things always go wrong
I mean, its just a photographer
Rally spectators are a living proof that humanity is generally stupid.
Peak stupidity: Going onto the road
1st runner up: Standing on the outside of a corner
2nd runner up: Standing anywhere near after a jump
Honorable mention: Everyone.
I bet that if the spectators get hit by rally cars while they're outside the designated safe zone to watch the rally races near the track would sue the drivers or the race organizers.
Btw, how about using VNTs to turbocharge the engine in endurance races? Would it work?
A horrible accident happened in the 80's with Group B, 30 people were maimed and 3 people were killed. The driver was trying to avoid one group of spectators who were on the road, and subsequently plowed into a crowd of spectators who were situated on the outside of a left turn
As for lawsuits and legal damages, I don't recall if there were any
If the group of spectators were on the road, it means they're probably inside the track itself and if that's the case, then it's their own fault.
cant believe that this beetle with a radial engine only produces 220hp
anymore and you'd be wishing death
VNT turbochargers has reduced turbo lags, right?
Yes, but they're extremely complicated
and are because of the vv's a bit unreliable for high temperatures
audi used them in 2010 and won
at le mans
they were subsequently banned
Seems like the reasons why VNTs are not used for endurance races are similar with the reasons why they don't use anti-lag systems and twinchargers
VNT was too complicated, antilag is blatantly inefficient.
And twincharger setup blows enough heat that cooling will always be an issue.
https://www.gpfans.com/en/f1-news/72035/mazepin-turns-to-youtube-to-learn-interlagos/ @main cosmos @sage roost @dry sage
Clickbait Title: Nikita Mazepin to Collaborate with Jarno Opmeer for Brazilian GP

So it means users of non-hybrid turbocharged engines for endurance race cars will really need to "bite the bullet" and accept turbo lags in endurance races...
Mazepin plays F1 2021 with driving line confirmed??????

I mean if they can keep RPMs high turbo lag won't be an issue
That would be an issue in races with multiple medium and hard turns though 
Downshifting exists
Or just ya know, turn the deployments up during spool time with hybrid system.
Thats what MGU-H does.
Group C race cars suffered turbo lag
Modern hybrid engines for race cars may be expensive but they make acceleration better
https://twitter.com/SpannersReady/status/1459126345385000971?s=20 who would’ve thought…

Perpetually broke team takes one of the best-paying pay drivers on offer. Imagine that.
Also, didn't he say he doesn't want a 1-year drive?
🐐 🐐 🐐 🐐 🐐 🐐 🐐 🐐
what did everyone think of the integra debut
It's just cashing in on a classic name
Nothing groundbreaking or even interesting about it.
BREAKING NEWS: Mercedes sign Nicholas Latifi to drive alongside Lewis Hamilton until the end of 2023
It’s just a civic
agreed

they made it look so fucking civilian
What is this, FIA actually enforcing track limits against HAM
and if people want a 4 door integra they should just look for a db8, even if they're rare
Or the DC5
was their a dc5 4 door?
A rare event.
Perez in 8th 
Not fucking again 💤
Plus, there's still the Sprint.
And yes, that Integra, much like any other modern Japanese car with an iconic heritage is pure ass.
The Supra is a Z4. The new Civic Type-R will be just as chunky. The Z is weird so far, and I don't have any other high hopes.
the only modern-ish rework of a classic i liked was the civic fd2
that would've been better off marketed as an integra
Come to think of it, the rot started as early as the NSX.
The R35 GT-R was the only one that was worth a damn.... and Nissan hasn't been doing much to the GT-R either. Fucking R35 is older than some people here.
Well they did do that Italidesign version of the R35
Ew. Half-ass attempt to adapt the Vision GT's design onto the same old R35.
I can agree to this comment.
goat
Ticktum: Latifi is poo 🎶
Latifi: Guess I'll out-qualify Russell. 🐐
Uh, guys?
@ashen carbon @vocal tide
https://twitter.com/F1/status/1459283605990121473?t=Ughe-QWL_Mc44T95R6BYfQ&s=19
@surreal saffron @main cosmos You may wanna see this, too.

TL;DR - Hamilton's DRS was OP.
BTW, still no info yet.
I can just imagine him blaming his tyres over this.
According to Chris Medland
I do not negate the fact he can drive, but being respected is another thing.
I mean... if the tires were too efficient, that means the power was distributed better - which means the car would have gone faster due to OP tires.
That's why I dislike Hamilton. It's not that he sucks - but I feel like he wasted his respect.
Then again, Schumacher was far from a saint.
This is true as well.
But iirc, he was also the brains for his own setups sometimes. Correct me if I'm wrong.
(He also had Brawn to thank for the car.)
I do not know about others, but I find Vettel very suprising tbh.
I like his race style.
Yeah. Like how he knows very obscure things to exploit but be in the books.
To be fair, he was a lot more cocky before.
'17 and '18 crushed him.
When he was pretty close.
Kimi would be another racer I follow as well.
Kimi is just Bootleg Mika - but a very strong Bootleg.
He can be brass. But he is honest.

Just like 2017 - 2020, except with two likeable guys.
(Not that Bottas isn't likeable.)
Fr I really need to get back to F1. I kinda stopped after what I felt were too many regulations being imposed rather then actual manufacturers duking it out with their own cars etc
I stopped when Hammy was literally year 2 in the game.
But I have seen him become arrogant
Not hating on the people who support him now.
Is this Mazepin lad still racing?
I have a supreme court joke related to Mika, idk if this is gonna be appropriate here though 
I think everyone here is mature enough
It was the 45 G's
the new golf compared to the MK1 looks tired of shit
UPDATE: There will not be a decision until tomorrow morning #F1 #BrazilGP
218

Hmmmm interesting

what is it with car manufacturers making their sports range all look like ev's nowadays
Speaking of Suzukis, I just found out how cheap they are to buy new
What would be the best choice for a family car, Vitara or SX4?
I saw SX4 has more CP
mostly everything is better about the SX4 and in my context even the price
What's 2.5.1?
Wait a min
Max touched Lewis’ rear wing during parc ferme
And what could be the suspicion? Fixing his wing so that Lewis would have OP DRS? illegal substances?

Nope
Best case scenario he gets a slap on the wrist
Because even if max touched the rear wing, there’s no way he did anything to it
Yeah.
I mean, I get that you could smear something on parts to influence aerodynamics.
I could see penalty points for Lewis' license rather than an extra grid penalty.
I wonder if masi got an email from Toto yet
Michael this is Toto, I just sent you an email of the Reddit post that shows Verstappen clearly doing something to the rear wing of car #44 did you receive that?
Imagine they do all this but just end up giving a reprimand to both drivers
Did I miss anything?
fuck....
just found the SX4 is on petrol
god damn it
so is the yaris cross
is petrol really that much of a dealbreaker
we got a diesel logan, is it a good tradeoff for a new car with good reliability?
Anything?
Merc were given permission to use a new rear wing because the FIA didn’t return it
Not yet

Still nothing.
why do cars tend to be worse than others when fabricated in other parts of the globe?
is it the weather?
Ye, read it.
50K seems like a slap on the wrist.
Then again, touching a wing =/= having an illegal wing.
In other news...
https://twitter.com/BMWMotorsport/status/1459507121914056704?t=UOcCGwC_tt9Tzuk5xtK_RA&s=19
Welp, Merc can't use Verstappen argument now

TL;DR? What's their excuse?
that is still pertaining to Verstappen's fine
the stewards ruled that what he did was harmless
50k fine is fair for now
but they might go down with 5s or grid drops in future
HAMILTON DSQ from quali
In nutshell: it's 2021
inb4 lewis changes everything tomorrrow if they can't get more than 5 positions
Yo what
Wait, he's DQ'd from Sprint?
I already saw someone on twitter blaming Bottas for all of this
Toto’s alt account

This is so sad
?????????
Hamilton cheating lool
Verstappen sabotag!!!11!1!11!!!1
i have a question
since ham is having a new power unit and he is already taking a penalty now
will he still lose 4 places tomorrow
that's pretty messed up tbh
So if Hamilton gets P10 in the Sprint, he'll drop down 5 more positions.
It is.
But hey, Ferrari had an illegal engine.
and max got 50K fine????????
He didn't damage or affect Lewis' wing in any way.
It was still a breach of rules, hence the fine.
what he did?
If he did manipulate the wing, it would probably DQ him from even participating in the Sprint.
He touched / inspected Lewis' wing with gently.
Not like damaging it, but still.
Think of touching a VVS diamond without satin gloves.
ahh
Max Verstappen checking and touching his and Lewis Hamilton's rear wing which caused him to the FIA stewards afterwards.
Will he get a penalty for this incident?
#MaxVerstappen #LewisHamilton #BrasilGP #F1
lmao wtf
He didn't break it or anything, but still - no touchy the AMG.
tbh that was not like touching
he was inspecting ?
which is yeah that's a big deal considering they have been struggling with their wing and using duct tape
so after that he probably reported the FIA
Here's the thing, I'm sure there's nothing wrong with checking your own car.
But knowing what secret aero quirks your opponent may have is an unfair advantage.
So that's a no-no.
Looking is "fine" - touching is no longer fine.
And it's also important that the cars were not checked yet
Interesting from Merc: appealing decision would have meant Hamilton kept P1 on the grid for this sprint race (as appeal would have been ongoing through race), but then put all other results from the weekend at risk.
Very interesting from Merc
and being sensible
Maybe that's it - that AMG thought this caused Lewis' DRS to be too wide open when checked by the FIA.
Sprint hype
Landoooo 
Dude wtf Max racing Valtteri but why 3rd place and rest of the pack 11s behind :O
Hamilton is too fast
that lunge
20th to 5th in 24 laps
Duuuude that last overtake
And Hamilton gained 15 places in 24 laps
Peter telling him not to check any cars. 
P5 for the Sprint is pretty good. But P10 for the race is dangerous.
I sense a midfield crash.
You mean he'll come out of it completely unscathed and rocket his way up to P2 in restart
I will take a guess that it will be a pitstops chaos tomorrow
First of all, thank you to all of you as we have now reached 200.000 Subscribers. And to celebrate such an occasion we have put together one of our Best Of compilations, and here we put together some of the best Bike engine swapped machines we have featured through there last 3 years. Plenty of GSX-R1000 engines, Hayabusa units, some Kawasaki Ni...
What a guy 
this car
this damn car
Smash it with a tank
why are there so many offbrand copies of gta cars irl?
why are spare wheels so expensive 
https://twitter.com/F1/status/1459843553249665029 2022 prediction by F1 Social Media Manager
Mercedes just never saw those Papayas coming 🚀😆
#BrazilGP 🇧🇷 @McLarenF1 @MercedesAMGF1 https://t.co/Nmjctaprry


“hey max can I copy your homework?”
“Yes but don’t make it very obvious” https://youtu.be/3WZeoOkMf0Y?t=184
https://youtu.be/abFGhepdBWw?t=187
An incredible race with an epic finish!
For more F1® videos, visit http://www.Formula1.com
Like F1® on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/
Follow F1® on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/F1
Follow F1® on Instagram: http://www.instagram.com/F1
#F1 #BrazilGP
An incredible comeback, suave overtakes and more! Enjoy all the very best bits from the Sprint at the 2021 Brazilian Grand Prix!
For more F1® videos, visit http://www.Formula1.com
Follow F1®:
http://www.instagram.com/F1
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/
http://www.twitter.com/F1
https://www.twitch.tv/formula1
https://www.tiktok.com/@f1
#F1 ...
Interesting swap
@stoic marten yes
clean
And its stupid manual
That's a thing in a focus?
Yesh
My American brain can't comprehend engines smaller then 2 liters
its good to get a hang of that manual thang
because then you can drive any whip
and automatic would feel really easy to drive
I wanna learn to drift
scary
At the moment I have zero options available
You’ll commit a hate crime seeing that many manufacturers use 1.6L turbo I4s
I know they do
Turbo is ehhh
I don't even think they sell them in America
i'm not really into cars
NA is always better then forced induction imo
but i do wanna drive a low rider
But for NA to be actually usable the engine would need good torque, which typically means bigger displacement
lmao
turbocharged 1,5 or 2L I4s are standard here
I won’t be surprised if ford starts using the 1.6L engine for the eco boost mustang 
2.3 is small enough
The fiesta ST uses the 1.6L engine no?
If they put a V8 in the Bronco I'd be happy but
I mean the 2.3 is already expensive here because mini-market
but the v8 costs around 100K eu here
1.3L I3 tri-turbocharged engine 
Then 1.0L I2 quad-turbocharged engine 
I don’t see any 2.3 mustangs here
Either V6 or 5.0
What if they build a 1.5L I3 twin-turbocharged engine with 380hp?
Wtf
Will that destroy the engine?
that would be such a waste of engineering
Yeah like 2 pistons with a turbo
Engines are getting smaller after all
Then another one with a turbo
You use I4s because of their small size and stability, adding three turbo's would defeat that entire purpose and destroy the engine
WRC and SuperGT(500) already use small I4s with a single turbo
the 1.6L they use in WRC generate around 500HP and the 2L in GT500 around 650 (holy garrett turbo)
What we need to do is focusing on efficiency
Some company made an engine that doesn't need spark plugs for the second cycle
three turbo's is definitely not needed
yes, most european and japanese makes
korean too

1,6 and 2L are standard
There is also 1.8
Wait I mistyped that
I can only think of one company that uses more then 2 turbos
Actually 2
Kind of
Lot of them do
in the market, single turbo is the most common as most turbocharged cars are simply economic consumer cars which utilise them for fuel efficiency rather than performance
Can i slap a bigger turbo on my foccus??
Who
Current one is tiny
yeah you could, but unless it's the one from the ST I wouldn't advice on it
since turbo's do require stable engines
Small turbocharged engines are really not that efficient. It's possible for a vehicle with 2.0L I4 turbocharged engine to have almost same or even worse fuel consumption than a vehicle with 3.0L V6 NA engine
otherwise you'll suck in your insurance alongside cooled air
It's a 1.5L diesel 
Because the turbo lol
I do 5L/100km
Small turbocharged engines are the most efficient when it comes to diesel/gasoline non-hybrid engines. Most turbocharged engines are used for fuel-efficient cars rather than performance. Turbo's, if used correctly, can allow for greater fuel-efficiency in highways for instance.
But yeah, pipo's 1.6L turbocharged 500HP WRC engine isn't super fuel-efficient lmao
Yeah like never go over 2000rpm
Fuel economy is easier to regulate with a manual
then why would you want a bigger turbo?
because you're shifting at 2k rpm lmao
Car manufacturers test their turbocharged vehicles by deliberately setting their throttle in a way not to force the engine into a positive manifold pressure and nobody drives like that which can make them get same fuel consumption with larger NA engines with same output.
People do it with manuals
Around 2000rpm is the most efficient
It's how people with newer corvettes can get 30 mpg on highways
V4 mode and keeping RPMs low
turbo's require high RPM to activate. The more you push the more gas is released in the exhaust, which is used to spool the turbo. If you stick at low RPMs, you don't have enough gas (actual gas btw) for turbo activation
The bigger the turbo, the more force (thus exhaust gas) you need
You can also buy a more expensive turbo which uses titanium, but why would anyone fit a titanium turbo in a 1.6L eco
And if it goes below 1500rpm im screwed
I mean you can buy equip a new turbo, but I don't think your engine can endure a performance one and you'll kill your mileage
The turbodiesel powered van I drove before somehow struggles to accelerate whenever it shifts to a higher gear then it will go fast when it reaches a certain rpm while going forward...
Saw some shops offering to boost hp from 75 to 100
Didn't dig deep into what they do tho
probably ECU tune
Diesels get all their torque at low RPMs
What's the difference between twin-scroll turbo and twin-turbo?
Turbos are complex







