indirekte rede (konj.1)

[misty hawk]

Das Problem des verlustarmen Transports (konnte) aber bereits (gelöst werden)

Wenn man konj1 in präteritum bildet benutzt man das perkfet also hier habe gekonnt?

Und was mit gelöst werden

[compact sky]

No. You need a double infinitive, same as for K2 with modal verbs: [correct form of "haben"] + [Partizip 2 of main verb] + [werden] + [modal verb in infinitive]

If it isn't Passiv, you'll get [correct form of "haben"] + [main verb in infinitive] + [modal verb in infinitive]

[misty hawk]

Sorry for the late reply but can you please elaborate

@compact sky

[compact sky]

Look, Partizip 2 of modal verbs isn't used in writing (it's more of a dialect/regional thing) -> Why don't you just try to apply what I wrote? (Trust me, if you try yourself, you'll remember it far better afterwards than if I just tell you.) 🌻

[misty hawk]

Das problem des verlustarmen Transports hätte gelöst werden können ?

@compact sky

Should I ping you or do you get automatically pinged when I send smnth

Lässt sich ==> lassen (inf.) ===> lasse sich ??

[compact sky]

*Problem - This is correct, but it's K2 (could have been solved). I thought you needed K1? - Yes, please ping me. - Yes, K1 is "lasse sich..."

[misty hawk]

I used the form you gave me here

I thought it could be applied to k1 as well

[compact sky]

Oh yes, it can. I said: it's correct. 😄