#Autism diagnostic differences
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
No worries, sorry for my own late reply - i was asleep ๐ Halloween decor is important ๐
So, there's a bias in the way a lot of places diagnose autism that means that women and girls are extremely likely to go undiagnosed. For a long time, the way autism was recognised was by the really obvious outward behaviours that differed strongly from now neurotypical people behave. But "masking" is a thing where an autistic person figures out from an early age to emulate other neurotypical people and perform those neurotypical behaviours themselves to fit in, and this wasn't known/understood until relatively recently, so places that haven't caught up will miss all the people who mask well - there are a lot of subtler diagnostic criteria for autism that involve asking the person how they feel about things rather than noting how they behave, and its those that have to be used for people who mask. And the problem is, girls/women/people socialised as female mask way, way, way more than boys/men/people socialised as male, so they get wildly underdiagnosed in comparison. So much so that a statistic that's been floating around for ages saying that autism affects boys more than girls has been changing over time, the difference inching smaller in places where girls are getting diagnosed properly - and I, personally, am genuinely sure that it will end up with no difference: just an artefact of the different diagnostic needs.
(I say "socialised as female" because the differences seem to be due to the big differences in how people are raised and trained to socialise, rather than any inherently different brain structure/chemistry. I'm also certain that using the more involved criteria will also diagnose plenty of boys/men who are also masking.)
Now, by places I mean both entire countries and facilities within a country - here in the UK, most of the general doctor population is (or was at the time) stuck in that older understanding of how autism presents, so I eventually went to the Lorna Wing center for my diagnosis. I'd been seeing posts by AFAB autistic people that just resonated so much, and I was getting really goddamn suspicious of myself ๐ Lorna Wing had recently released their "autism in women and girls" diagnostician training module for free, so I went through it with my mother (it's useful if you have a supportive relative who knew what behaviours you exhibited when you were small, but it's not a dealbreaker if not) and we both sat there reading it like "well shit". Sadly it's no longer free, ยฃ30 I think, but here's their general page on autism in women/girls: https://www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/what-is-autism/autistic-women-and-girls
And about ADHD - it's speculation on my part this time, but I'm again seeing a lot of posts like I did with autism where the traits commonly used for diagnosis are these obvious, socially disruptive behaviours, but people with the diagnosis report a lot of subtle internal differences in how their brains process things (executive functioning particularly). And it's another diagnosis that currently has a mysterious gender gap, and I just strongly suspect that there's a form of masking going on in AFAB people again, and that that gap is gonna close in the end with better diagnostic criteria.
Anyway what was my point again? ๐ I think it was that if you see someone for diagnosis and they say you're not that thing, it might be worth checking with somewhere/someone that's specifically trained to look for how these things present in women/girls - or go there to start with.
Always best to get a second or even third opinion. I think doctors sometimes overlook ADD because they're expecting to see the hyperactivity that comes with ADHD, but don't quote me on that.
well even adhd doesn't necessarily have hyperactivity, it's a terrible name for it tbh >:
My understanding is that it's an abbreviation for Attention Deficient Hyperactivity Disorder.
Whereas ADD is Attention Deficient Disorder.
hmmm
ADHD is the official, medical term for the condition โ regardless of whether a patient demonstrates symptoms of hyperactivity. ADD is a now-outdated term that is typically used to describe inattentive-type ADHD, which has symptoms including disorganization, lack of focus, and forgetfulness.
https://www.additudemag.com/ is a nice resource
I've just been on the Mayo Clinic's site. ๐
They do still use the ADD diagnosis for adults, apparently, but the diagnoses has changed for children.
I'm glad to know this. I like knowing stuff.
i'm not seeing that on their adhd page; the only add reference there i see is an "adult add" page from 2014 with just a video on it
Right...that's what I meant. ๐
i think that might just be an outdated page rather than that they still use ADD as a diagnosis for adults ๐ค
i imagine it still gets used as shorthand for inattentive-type adhd though
Could be. ๐
And some people are just high energy people.
They seem to be like the Energizer bunny. ๐
well there's still a hyperactive type of adhd, confusingly
there's inattentive, hyperactive, annddd something eeeelsssse
inattentive type, hyperactive/impulsive type, and combined type
there we go
hmmm
so they're all adhd, but add still gets used to refer to the inattentive type
So....I'm also confused.
more layers of terrible naming ๐
/slaps desk in agreement
I have a nephew who's on the spectrum, and my BFF's younger son is also on the spectrum.
Plus, I know an adult or two.
It's interesting to see how differently they present.
i've seen some people say that adhd would be better named "executive dysfunction disorder" since that's a more relevant overarching issue
yeah! it's quite the.... ๐ spectrum
that's shit โน๏ธ ๐ซ
yeah, it's no fun.
I'm on good meds, but am still disabled because of it.
I would imagine that once you realize that you see/experience the world differently (with a spectrum disorder), it could be very frustrating.
in some ways, in others it's a relief to understand why nothing made sense before - even if it still doesn't
nodding
i'm sorry you're having to go through that >:
I'd been dealing with it since my teens until I just couldn't deal with it by myself anymore.
So, I had all the cognitive/behavioral techniques down pat.
Well, when I was a teenager, we didn't know about PAD.
We knew that some people were "nervous", but there was never any idea they had an actual disorder.
I didn't know that what I was experiencing were panic attacks until I was in college and read an article in a women's magazine which explained what a panic attack feels like.
It was like, "Oh! That's what that is!".
oh jeez, that must have been scary without knowing what it was
Well, I'm a practical person, so I just dealt.
It became more severe as time went on.
Which is why it got to the point where I couldn't deal with it any longer.
i see, yeah D:
i gather panic attacks can feel disturbingly like heart attacks at their worst
I had to leave a profession I loved and go on disability at 40.
The suckage was great.
that is pretty maximal suckage >:
And yes, people often think they're having a heart attack or that they're dying.
Your breath gets short, your heart pounds, you may feel dizzy or light headed.
The grand finale is bursting into tears and not being able to stop crying until it passes.
I used to have them when I was taking swimming classes in college. I'd have to come out of the pool for a few minutes.
Get out, sit on the side, wait for it to pass, get back in the pool. ๐
i was going to say bad timing, but there's never a good time, is there
nope
I can mostly control what I do, I just can't always control how I feel.
So, there's no point in people telling me to "just calm down".
oh god that is such a bloody mood
be happy, be normal, calm down,
lol
I once had a psychiatrist shake a copy of the DSM at me and tell me, "There's no such thing as panic/anxiety disorder in this book!".
wooooooooooooooow
I knew full well there was, because I'd read the entry.
omg what ๐
i thought it was going to be a "there are more things out there than what's in the book" and that it was a while ago, but he was just straight up wrong?
I was sent to him for an "impartial" assessment as to whether or not I was actually disabled so that I could get my state retirement benefits.
I didn't get them.
shit a brick
Oh yes...flat out wrong. He just figured it was people, especially women, who couldn't control themselves.
At the end of the appointment, he sent me into another room to "...get yourself together."
ass
i am so sorry you had to go through that
Was no fun at the time.
/incoherent noises of rage
yeah
the fng audacity
I think he was of the "hysterical female" school of thought.
stick him in a goddamn museum where he belongs
The two psychiatrists that I was sent to for "impartial" assessment felt that their jobs were to find a reason to deny me my benefits, so they looked for things that didn't support what I was saying.
They felt that they worked for the state retirement agency instead of as an independent lab of sorts.
that's disgusting
It is.
I appealed my case all the way to a judge, who wasn't allowed to rule on the preponderance of medical evidence, but only on whether or not the agency had followed protocol in my case.
oh wow o:
I hope that things are much different now.
I thought getting my federal benefits would be harder. ๐
I got those with no issues.
yes
well i'm glad one thing wasn't an uphill battle
And because of my finances, I had to apply for "early" retirement, so I won't get anything better when I get to 65.
it enrages me that these things are often still so difficult to get, for the very people who need them, for whom everything is already more difficult
nodding
It's one reason I offer to go into appointments with people who have mental health disorders so that I can advocate for them.
that's so kind of you ๐ฅบ
I'm like you. I get pissed when people don't get the treatment they need.
afrigginmen
I imagine that there are places where folks on the spectrum have a similar problem.
i'm in a related position to you in that i'm pretty shafted by chronic medical stuff at the moment and can't work, but i never really....got going? I've been employed, but not for....8 years? and never in a field that i wanted a career in. So one day when/if i hopefully get better, i'm going to be horrifically behind, which isn't great anyway, and maybe doubly so in technical fields like programming. :/ I did some small self-employed stuff in that, but I got too tired for that too eventually. But at least there's the outside chance that me sitting on my arse modding could be relevant experience for that.
definitely >:
which isn't quite the same, since there's a prospect of getting better - i hope that didn't seem like i was diminishing your situation
not at all
Wait, so.. literally everything "wrong with me" (not meant in a negative way), could literally all be interconnected.
yes
could well be, depending on the things
beans
the musical fruit
/toot