#Can archers get a better secondary weapon?
1277 messages Ā· Page 2 of 2 (latest)
It's not that, it's an oversight.
this wouldn't be an issue if bows weren't balanced by giving them to a class with extremely bad basic stats
Archers are treated much differently than all other classes.
Following typical game logic, more armor means less movement speed and greater health.
Chivalry 2's Archer does not follow this logic.
Actually. I think youāre on to something there
So basically imagine this, you pick the archer class, you spawn as an archer, and then you open the class menu and pick another class. You no longer count as an archer despite still being alive.
youre right.. so why can footman dodge around a ton. but archers cant.
Yeah, in mordhau I can run away as archer. You canāt run in chiv.
This is impractical but not impossible.
They catch up no matter the speed
there is no true light class in chivalry 2
there is just a weak class and a class who never skipped leg day.
archer skipped cardio day for 50 years straight..
I shiver from that
Compare it to mordhau, where bows are balanced by heavy point cost, lower damage, and vulnerability to other archers. Mordhau enables you to play as an actual light class with low hp and high movement speed.
And honestly, regardless of your opinion on Archery, they are a very hot topic and even if you are of the opinion that "archer is fine", a lot of people don't think it's fine and if it was a small minority, that's one thing. A large population of the game doesn't like Archery as it is and that's ground for something to be done.
I want chiv to follow this balance philosophy
50% approval rating is not high approval rating.
it would enable archer to become a legitimate melee class for people who just want to run fast
I don't think Archer should be nerfed into the ground or made unfun or horribly weak, but simply put, I can't even play Archery without feeling guilty.
i said it earlier.. archer is a very polarizing class.. theyre either OP. or weak as hell... there isnt really a sweetspot for them.
I've played Archer and it baffles me that people say that it's not strong.
as it stands, spawning as an archer, throwing your bow to the ground, and using melee isn't a realistic manner to play.
Yes, I can run away and fend for myself on equal ground in mordhau. Chiv, I have to be much better than my opposer.
because for some reason you move slowly while having less armor
to be fair... i had someone tell me earlier that skirmisher is strong becuase of axe...
Skirmisher isn't a weak class.
debatable
uhh... sure..
Axe and mace are insanely good one-handers and javelins can be very potent.
itās the second weakest
It is strong but itās not a power class like melee.
Infact, I usually see the highest scoring archers being skirmishers.
Not saying they're doing the best but, they do a lot
skirmishers rely on having teammates nearby to be effective. Once the balance is tipped against them, they become obsolete
Did you know? The highest level archer in the game is actually a javelin player?
I would think crossbow is better.
axe and mace are good choices.. but look at the counterplay.. javs can be blocked.. thrown axes dont exist... and you have lower health and stam compared to other melee classes. giving your less margin for error
For more stamina damage than a greatsword overhead*
Javelins are not that weak
They aren't the strongest option but they're not weak.
I wouldn't be surprised. Experienced players are more likely to be capable in melee, and the longbowman and crossbowman don't exactly encourage melee participation. However, that doesn't prove that skirmisher isn't a weak class.
i usually stay top 5. as skirmisher. but thats through a lot of target prioritization..
javs are in a good place. but theyre also easily blocked if someone is paying attention after you hit the first one.
Javelin players are very good, especially if they're braver.
The less they preserve their life, the more potent and effective they are.
That might sound strange but it's true.
the problem with being brave is that almost everyone on the enemy team will ignore your teammates and attack you because of your low HP
and a single heavy overhead or special attack from an angle you don't see is enough to instantly kill you
its risk/reward... but its HIGH risk.. with medium reward.
not to mention w a r b o w s
I would say it's not high risk, actually
90 hp
not high risk
Javelin archers have to be several times better than their opponent to be effective.
I would say medium risk with medium/high reward. I've played javelins myself.
I wouldn't say you have to be much better to throw a javelin at someone who isn't looking directly at you.
and even with this in mind, a single mistake is all it takes sometimes to die.
85 damage is 5 less than a greatsword heavy overhead.
i main jav/axe skirmisher. and if 2 people try focus me at once.... i can only stall for so long
And that's without headshot damage.
its also 5 less than your own hitpoints.
lets look at how many javs you have to land against a knight. vs how many times they have to land on hit on you.
I can sympathize with this. The weapon choices don't help either. Javelins might have enough reach to work in 1vX, but they can't slash. Throwing axes are the opposite.
Are you dueling the knight????
No offense ofc.
sometimes i am out of choice... most of the time its out of neccisity.
the amount of hits you have to land to kill a typical melee player as an archer can be anywhere from 4-6 and you'll die in 1-2 hits (3 if you're lucky)
If you're dueling a knight, you'd be better with your secondary weapon out.
Mace and axe are like, really fucking good.
and at that point. youre better off playing a different class
Mm, no, I don't think that's true.
yeah it renders the skirmisher obsolete
oh yeah. the secondaries are great.. but the health and stam arent.
Sometimes you just have to??? Itās not like you can just run away when you move so slowly on a ālightā class.
no point in using it for duels unless you use it specifically for the unique weapons (because as mentioned previously, skirmisher has flawed stamina, hp, and speed)
in a 1v1. the weapon choices can outweigh the hp difference to a point im comfortable taking a 1v1 with a knight... but at that point. im near enough to the frontlines that im surely drawing the attention of other players aswell.
If you're in a 1v1 with a knight as a skirmisher, you're right that you are generally in a disadvantage... But that doesn't mean "I should be playing as a different class" because whether you win or lose that 1v1, you'll be back to being dangerous and projectile-heavy when he's gone.
It doesn't really like, matter, and skirmisher is still like not HORRIBLE in a 1v1.
projectile heavy?.. bro, i got 5 javs and a dream.
5 javelins that can easily be recovered and are very potent.
5 javelins that get blocked
recovered... right?.. in the moshpit of greatswords and heavy maces.. right.. let me just chootch on in there and swipe those up..
this is another reason why playing as skirmisher is mainly useful when you have a team advantage. It isn't useful on its own
unless by recovered you meant, i threw all 5 and ran to the resupply..because i can do that
you can't recover thrown javelins unless your team is actively pushing back the enemy
or unless you're just really good with movement and spacing
If they're blocking the javelins, you probably aren't throwing them right.
sometimes you just get unluckly and they get parried.
That's true.
As yes, let me throw them ārightā through the block.
Well no beeg, more specifically:
Why are you throwing it at someone who can block?
You shouldn't throw if they're like, ready for it
haha
If someones fighting a 1v1 and you have javelin, that guy is a much more prime target than the guy looking at you.
you should be focusing on people who arent focused on you. i ALWAYS look for someone using a bandage first
then i start looking for people who are 1vX.. after that im looking for people who are focused on something else (footmans healing, etc)
If they ARE looking at you, that's a job for your melee.
And you might ask "why play skirmisher at all"
if they ARE looking at you... you turn and run
Because you have the ability to back up at any time and throw if the opportunity presents itself
3 seconds after you see the opportunity... its takes a while to throw.
Skirmisher is a melee class that has high power when the other person can't engage you.
most opponents won't just back away from you. Even if they do, attempting a throw is so risky that it's often useless
What Iām trying to get at is that being choosy like that doesnāt result in doing well, they donāt exceed normal melee or archers. Thatās why skirmisher is weak.
They don't have to.
skirmisher has high POTENTIAL... the damage can be blocked. and it takes multiple javs to take down even other archers.
You force them to engage you and put themselves in an unfavorable position to punish them.
I mean if you wanna buff javelins against other archers, im all for it
or you run out of javs..
I'd rather warbow get nerfed
Then youre left with some of the best one-handers in the game
i do.. 90 damage to archers, let the overhealed ones live (for fairness)
it makes no sense that it has higher damage than the crossbow
and youre left in the frontlines trying to get value.. with 90 hp and 70 stam.
But that would be archer counters archer??? That doesnāt solve anything.
it's still nonsensical
skirmisher has 2 modes..
"i have javs and im murdering these peasants"
"im out of javs and idk what to do with my life"
its less good but, its not "oh no its so much worse"
Right?
I struggle to call skirmishers proper archers
plus, skirmisher could be an archer alternative to hunt other archers
knight has the health to deal with that reduction. footman has increased dodges to stay mobile so youre not having to block/trade stam as much
they get a shield, a projectile that oneshots archers, stronger melee options
that sounds fine to me
i think if javs were made to deal 90 damage to archers.. they would be a very good anti-archer class
Yeah
as a skirmisher main, I'd prefer not
and a simple way to buff thrown axes is to just give you more than 6...give like 8
So, you want the archer counter to be javelin throwers?
Then the archer complaints will stop?
instead of making the skirmisher's main weapons more powerful, I'd rather see their main stats (more specifically, speed and stamina) get increased
in fact, I'd be willing to accept a nerf to all primary archer weapons to see this through
I actually have some other options for archer complaints to stop, even without addressing archers themselves
I wrote up a feedback post on shields, for example, to make them better and healthier
i would too, but giving the jav 90 damage against other archers... would be GREAT
I agree with your shield changes
you could also let people with two-handed weapons put shields in their 3rd slot (think throwing axes, throwing knives, that slot) so they can just have one
true, but it would disincentivize headshots by making them redundant
But the hit boxes on shields need to be adjusted
are headshots reliable?
and I don't think anyone likes the possibility of getting 1-shotted regardless of class or weapon
In Chivalry 1, all Knights and Man at Arms could bring shields without sacrificing their weapon selection.
A buckler blocking full body from projectiles is wacky
the entire archer class gets 1 shot by a lot of specials and charge attacks...
yeah I don't like it either
You could take the Maul or a Battleaxe on Knight and also have a shield on your back if you need it.
Archers were way better in chiv 1
but ranged one-hit kills are just so annoying to me
but youre playing archer
one of 2 things needs to happen...
either skirmisher gets its "archer status" removed and doesnt get 1 shot by warbow...
or jav does 90 damage to other archers.
yeah I don't like them
the warbow can currently perform ranged one-hit-kills
I think all archer weapons beside the longbow should one shot other archers.
I think Longbow should one-shot other archers too actually
I disagree
Itās rate of fire is too quick.
as fast as it fires... longbow would be too strong at that point.
and its range is shorter
it has the slowest projectile out of all of them with the most arc
it also is the only bow ive ever seen to actually have a damage falloff
every other bow has never reached damage falloff for me
Archer is only effective in close range right behind your teammates.
Long bow would be too powerful.
I don't think it is.
wait.. wait.. archer is only effective in close range, right behind your teammates... do what?'
If you are trying to snipe with bows, you are playing wrong and being a detriment to your team.
dude.. is snipe with javelins and stay top 5 on my team..
a bow would just make that easier.
(me, being shot by the warbow kd farmer who gets 70 kills in a match without dying because he never is out of position)
One shot with crossbow and jav would solve this?? Isnāt that what we were just talking about?
longbow is the only "bow" that has any reason to be closer to the action.. and thats becuase, as ziggy said, slow projectile and drop
1 shot with jav would make hitting the enemy archer with one a lot more productive, rather than leaving them on 5 hp and aware of you, so you have to play "dodge the warbow" till you can land another one.
Thatās what Iām saying.
Longbow ones hitting archer would be too strong because of its fire rate. Itās low speed doesnāt matter because all good archers will be in the front lines right behind teammates. Thatās why the crossbow has banner.
from what im gathering from ziggy... you just havnt played against a good archer that is capable of hitting the ranged shots... therefore youre not seeing the value of staying far enough away from the action that your team can react to anything that would threaten you.
If I can be honest:
Skirmisher could be exempt from archer bonus damage because it's way more involved in melee combat than other classes and also can be blocked by everyone without a shield.
Archers could take more sword damage and more arrow damage so they are actually countered by things and more swords have an opportunity to shred them at close range.
Crossbow and Longbow could both one-shot a non-overhealed archer more reliably to encourage archer vs archer gameplay.
To explain the last point, Archers rarely shoot at eachother (more than you would think) because they all just shoot at melee players.
If I play archer, if I don't shoot at other archers, they actually rarely shoot back at me.
Nerfing aim assist would solve warbow sniping.
Making archers one shot each other would motivate this
aim assist shouldnt be a thing in general... thats a whole different topic..
In mordhau archers always target other archers first because itās an easy kill.
Yeah, imagine if the thing archers were basically focusing on other archers most of the time.
We can bring that culture into chiv
Archers rarely pay attention to anyone else
they just shoot at melee players most of the time
the only time i pull out a warbow.. is if there are multiple archers that i need to kill... becuase jav doesnt 1 shot them. requiring multiple throws to kill ONE.
Theres also the issue of shooting other archers
A lot of the time youll shoot one, they get shot, then back up and heal
i always shoot other archers first lol
and you'll do this several times without a warbow
Actually there was also one time on lionspire that I picked up a warbow as a footman (there were just so many potent archers) and I hit about 8 or 9 warbow shots in a row on archers without actually getting a single kill.
Am I being ignored? I want archers to one shot each other?
I know
THIS is the issue.. and why jav should do 90...
crossbow, ive never seen as an anti-archer weapon. historically they were designed to pierce armor. and thats what they do in game.. so that makes sense.
Archer overheal is insane sometimes
Seriously like, 9 shots in a row on archers without a single kill
I must've been the unluckiest fucker on the planet
how did they ALL have overheal multiple times
i think overheal should prevent the 1 shot (unless a headshot) and this is to keep overheal actually worth something.
actually, to extend this
Warbow can oneshot an overhealed archer and the other bows oneshot a non-overhealed archer
even longbow (as longbow is forced closer range anyway)
This could work
See? I don't HATE archers
I might even play if it it was fun, it's just not engaging for me at all in it's current state
i dont play archer.. i play skirmisher, sadly its classified as an archer so it takes extra damage because tiny shield dont block worth a damn.
I never claimed you did. Iām just trying to make archery enjoyable for myself. Iām playing more mordhau that chiv lately because archery just feels better in mordhau and I have a hard time using bows in chiv because you have to hold the mouse buttons down for so long.
the issue with archery in chiv2. is that the counterplay is very dull. while the gameplay itself is even dull-er
when the counterplay is effectively "dodge around until you see a chance to close the gap... or hope youre friendly archers can shoot them first"...
and the gameplay is "welp, i hit him. he took damage... i hit that guy too. he was blocking.. still took damage..."
Why do you want to play archer anyway
Just like it a lot?
I didnt think this post would get this much activity when i created it.
I like archery a lot, I used to do it in real life but canāt anymore.
just dodge with bow and bow jab for free swap ez clap
archers secondaries shouldnt change. there your topic has been answered. back to the debacle of the state of archering.
Archer secondaries are fine.
Post doesnt say change maybe add more options. You dont like the post you can go back to #šŖļø±chivalry2 channel.
if you dont like what the post has become. because archer melees are fine.. that rough buddy.
What was your motive posting this truly?
Exactly what the title says.
Archer is fine. If you donāt like what we have to say, you can go back to #šŖļø±chivalry2
Didnt say archers werent fine but I can suggest a change. This is my post you dont like it leave.
Reminder Youāre posting in a public server. If you donāt like that, then thatās tough pal
this actually isnt your post. this is "deleted user"s post..
Oh really now?
Actually it is my post to my old account but thanks for checking that.
my point being. you dont have the right to be a prick aobut someone having an differing opinion..
I dont care bout u having a different opinion. You not telling me the topic change because you dont agree with my post.
"should get a better secondary weapon"... you didnt specify. add.. now get off your high horse before you get knocked off it.
What you gonna do?
im going to give you a reality check, you dont own shit here. this isnt YOUR post.. this is a COMMUNITY DISCORD.. you arent the godlike being you think you are.. you are a normal person like the rest of us.. if you think archer needs better secondaries.."
get better at the game.
š
dude.. stop typing.. you dont win this.
Yeah exactly not doing anything just talk. The post i created on discord. No one acting like god you the one trying to tell me the topic changed. The post is suggesting better options. You first.
and if you could read.. we were discussing WHY you cant give better options..
let me guess. youre still in your teens.
I dont care why your opinions are lol. No but let me guess ur a kid.
you created a feedback post and said "i dont care why your opinions are lol"
and no. im grown. but ive never seen an adult who is entitled as you are.
Yeah so grown that you have to insult user like a kid.
@echo abyss why you acting like a prick bruh?
so grown i dont mind pointing out when someone is being a whining child because people didnt come flocking agreeing with you.
Thereās a reason there was more activity when you werenāt here
Not doing anything just because I dont agree with your opinions.
You the one whining bout by comment and my post.
I am not here a lot because I actually have a life not stuck on discord all day.
no. your being a petty little twat because we're talking about something other than "oh yes. give one of the most oppressive classes in the game better options.. that cant go poorly"
if youre asking for archer buffs that arent skirmisher specific.. youre only showing that youre not very good at the game.
Yeah keep with keyboard warriors insults that make you really grown kid.
we get it. youre butthurt that i called you out. move on with your life
yet you tell people who donāt share the same thought to leave? Like what the fuck do you think this is? you posted on a feedback forum. FeedBack. Look at the fucking numbers lad! 103 people donāt feel so hot with your suggestion. Are you gonna tell them to go back to #šŖļø±chivalry2 for disagreeing? This is a joke lol
No one buthurt besides u. You first.
and you called me a child...gtfo off the internet its past your bedtime.
letās leave this clown @teal shard
I dont care bout the disagreeing lol.
Its way past your bedtime kid.
Bye
ya know. small children repeat what they hear the most.. i'd put money theyre not over 12.
You would lose money kid.
dude. jsut stop. youve proven that youre a child. i dont give a single fuck how old you are chronologically. mentally. you are a child
What you gonna if dont lol. You proven you are a kid with mentality of a baby.
Archer Main: Archers are fine.
My archer is š
I think they're fine. they just don't need to be stronger
I think they could be a lot better
I don't agree with the idea that @echo abyss presents that they should have better options for secondaries
I think they could be made less frustrating, such as making archers stronger against archers as suggested above
Yes but im talm bout the secondaries thing
Yeah I know
in fact, nerf Crossbowman by replacing Axe with Hatchet :)
did you notice they stealth buffed quiver?
they just didn't tell anyone lol
no explain
quiver is faster now
Quiver is like double/triple speed and it also instantly pulls out your throwables on use
Genuinely thought it was bugged but then I remembered I suggested it