lunar spire
2+ being 3-4-5-6 then or 2+ because it mentionned D3.
Or being a D6 on a 2+ means you can fail on a 1 but 2 would still be a 1 on a D3 and having still 3-4-5-6 ?
Asking as the second variant gives more gameplay, but its a rare case where I'm not certain about some phrasing.
Thanks for your input!
granite vortex
Treat it as if you’re rolling an actual D3. 1-2=1, so it fails. 3-4=2, 5-6=3
random stag
If you roll a D3, it's a D3. If you happen to only have a D6 on hand it changes nothing, meaning yes, it is a 2+ on a D3
rich yew
This is why I hate the ‘on a D3’ rule it’s completely arbitrary and unnecessarily confusing
granite vortex
Huh?
random stag
This is why I hate the ‘on a D3’ rule it’s completely arbitrary and unnecessaril...
It's not?
rich yew
It's not?
Imo, it’s quite confusing, the fact that the people above my message had two different opinions on how the roll works, it’s an unnecessary addition when rolling a D6 is both the standard and easily understood
random stag
Imo, it’s quite confusing, the fact that the people above my message had two dif...
Tho a D6 cannot return a 1/3 chance of failing, 1/3 chances of dealing 2 and 1/3 chance of dealing 3 without additionnal math. The confusion come from people not reading the rule rather than the rule itself.
granite vortex
We didn’t say two different things. We said the same thing two different ways
rich yew
I realised that after I started yapping yeah, though I still think for newer players the rule is inherently confusing, my friends who’ve been getting into AoS spearhead have found those rules the most difficult to understand out of anything