#Nvm
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
What type of is this? Is it A* or smth just wanna know
I made smth like A* before and it kinda worked
It was fast too
wheres the A*
this is a path follower on top & A* on the bottom, not that big or complex 👉 👈
||
||
nowhere even close
this is a free moving follower, A* is a pathfinder. Making a path & following a point are 2 seperate things
Ok
Literally what
wheres ur a* 
Um you forgot 464 circuits for the ai
My fault gng
pathfinder
Idk I wanted this to be a place where people could like expand on it depending on what they want
Like one example is a monster that doesn’t move when looked at
i made the best system for that, i can run 15 before i run out RPCs
Nice
[REFERENCE] The ABSOLUTE basics of making a Player Pathfider A*
This doesn't really serve as a reference for A* Pathfinding if the circuit in question isn't the one in the main post message, was posted by someone else, and the circuit/concept itself hasn't really been explained.
is not for A* tho, im just messing with em
its for " the absolute basics of a ai" ig
Ah lol
Either way, the "[REFERENCE]" posts are just a trend users here started that, while not enforced or anything, can be very helpful for lost or learning circuiteers. I think a [REFERENCE] post should be written by the person who well understands the topic, important images and information should be fit into the original post message, and it should explain the workings of the circuits shown.
This one has kind of been renamed based on an example that you showed, that as you've said isn't even actually an A* Pathfinding circuit. I do think someone should make a proper A* Pathfinding reference post though, i spotted one from a while back but that one also looks like the OP changed the post title after the fact, based on information other people gave them after first making it.
Nevermind the other post might be legit but it's basically just someone advertising their own A* circuits inventions not explaining how to make one i think, i've only skimmed through it because it is ridiculously late my time and i am tired 😅
i think they were expecting me to go into A* in this post as he was like open to collaboration n such 
mostly to press OP into A* bc its like best for pathfinding, but ye 🥱
also bc they a were around for a bit a bit back
Who knows, they may have really meant well, but i feel like the person who made and understands a circuit should be the one to make the post, it would be confusing/tedious for people to find and read through this post while looking for A*, only to find that it isn't the person with the little blue "OP" tag whose messages they should be looking through for an explanation on it.
i suppose, i feel like i could explain it well, but like, invention, idk 
i explain, everyone know so it not cool anymore, no one even try get my invention, like, knowledge is power 
ignited skibidis mass produce
Yap
I mean i guess i can understand, i've felt that way about stuff too... But also, like,
You underestimate skids' ability to completely ignore everything that requires reading ever
That's more of a circuit showoff thing, or a tool, than a reference. You should try and popularise titling posts [CV2 TOOL] or [PRE-MADE CIRCUIT] or [PRE-MADE] or something lol
This is NOT pathfinding
This is NOT A*
A* is a pathfinding algorithm that uses a bit of math and node connections to determine which nodes to path too
This is just a moving something towards a player
You should probably delete this if you don’t even know what A* is
You're being a bit harsh about it, but yeahhhh... These posts take a bit more self-awareness and structure and teach-y-ness sorry. It's not some official thing here, just a trend that a few of the more active circuiteers have been doing to help others (or when they get too annoyed at people asking about the same circuit a ton lol). But because it's done to help others, i think it's good to be careful that you don't accidentally affect people's trust in the whole [REFERENCE] posts system.