#lounge
1 messages Β· Page 982 of 1
I think it is a bit broad, so if you have the time - go. However, I think you can learn well enough by focusing more around your goal.
I could probably go straight to godot, but I've never done a pure-text code project, other than a flappy bird clone in java
There must be courses for that. The langs you will use are kinda too off I think: C, Python, and SQL plus HTML, CSS, and JavaScript
Godot is kinda Python.
It is not bad to have broad view of the others, but... maybe waste of time, except if you are really not interested in programming.
the godot site says its GDscript, c# and support for c++ I think
GDscript comes from Python.
ah ok
atleast i found them amazing, it covers everything possible, the other sites are just, skipping over a lot of working mechanism
Ok, I'll continue to browse the godot docs intro and whatnot for now. I'm just about ready for bed so I might not actually run godot today
Aye, there will be ton of info you need to learn about the engine itself. Time is important here, that's why my advise to focus more on your goal.
yeah, i often find myself changing the goalpost after building the skills, and that's terrible experience
ue4-5 for simple 2d feels really overkill to me
time isnt a huge deal, as I have no expectation of ever actually completing a project, or being financially dependant on its completion/success
It also depends on what kind of 2d you foresee. I mean you can have 3d played/presented as 2d gameplay for example.
make a short sweet game you can have fun playing first or something maybe
I've tried the 3d as 2d a few times, and had little success
if you hang a single project forever that will discourage you from making others and finishing that, actually, finishing stuff is an important skill i have heard
Long time ago, in a char far away, I did some Metroidvania - like play. There was a course on uuh... that site with the casual 90% discounts.
So... it ain't so bad. UE can fix even your movement on axes.
You basically put your world and then fix your camera.
UE4 has some 2d sample projects too
atleast did years back, they were quite decent
idk about now
Not to mention you have top down templates as start up projects.
I cant seem to stay focused on one project for very long, so I might do godot a week or so, come back to ue4, do something else... I dunno. shrugs
that said I don't even make games lol, so don't listen to me
^ if you enjoy the making process you can do it forever
I started a fairly small game the other week, but then started my job and been too tired to work on it.
nsfw spoilers
most relatable stuff i read today π’
Nah, Makoto is avoiding taxes. This is very disappointing.
that could be a good loading screen
perhaps they are busy compiling the tax
Took this a while ago. She's the right one.
The left one was Jimmy, he unfortunately passed away like few days after this photo
Wow, discord really had to try hard uploading that for some reason
name of other?
They did get along pretty quickly.
Jimmy came later from outside, being a stray cat. Probably he sensed that I took care of Molly pretty well. Took him a quick week to get along with Molly. He stayed for a couple of months until he and Molly got sick. Molly survived, but not Jimmy. It was heartbreaking to say the least
π’
ClownZ Update is now available!Clownfield 2042 is an FPS where you take a role of unique soldier, equipped with enough arsenal to fight anyone ahead and win the front. After 2022 crypto-crash caused by NFT's, majority of nations collapsed and a union of "No-Clowns" has been formed. You are one of them, arm up and get ready for war. ALL OUT CLOWN...
$0.79
2769
damn
that game sold decent lol
or it was gifted for fake reviews lol
mix of both probably
starts with C single word and has an year with 20, reminds me of cyberpunk 2077
Clownfield 2042... battlefield 2042 with clowns?
It's a shame that BF2042 has a potential of being an actually good game
(both)
In the light of recent events, I don't like 2042 being so close.
yeah, playing war games feels wrong
Jedi game was nice
But they used UE and they were a seperate team afaik
It Takes Two was also nice
Correct.
If there are good ones from recent years, it has to be third party (relative to EA)
We need P version of this gif
The thing they most challenge - the need to make decent games.
and questionable monetisaztion practices
what does nfts do anyway ?
ubi nft aka ubisoft quartz
scam people
in theory, proof of ownership
So it's like you buying an antique piece of art auctioned at millions of dollars
Even if it's not actually an art
you could say gamers in-game managed market can be with NFT
one thing that's strange about nfts is I have seen exactly 0 people that see any actual value in nfts other than that as an investment
like, nobody cares about the images, they all just want to buy it so they can sell it later
Most other investments actually have physical value, like real estate, stocks, etc.
Bit like cryptocurrency.
i was talking with Chromatic about it yesterday and they said it is only a text you own, so that's like a link to the image, not the image itself
and if what the link points to changes your stuff is like poof
HH
so all i need to do is draw an ugly monkey and i can get 1b $
Or stole somebody else's artwork and make the same amount of money
yeah but i might have to deal with law
Nah, the NFT scene is extreme chaotic in the spectrum
It's not in the lawful side of the spectrum
Screenshot multiple times like
100 or 500 or 1K
You're the only billionaire and surpass Elon Musk on the Earth
REMASTERED IN HD!
Best Of Rich Boy: https://goo.gl/6AWZfo
Subscribe here: https://goo.gl/vSYN74
Music video by Rich Boy performing Throw Some D's. (C) 2006 Interscope Records
#RichBoy #ThrowSomeDs #Remastered
π° π°
π₯
π¦
πͺ
π©
π°
I hate these with a passion
π΅

πΆ
π
π
π₯
π
π¦
π€
π
fyi every day i get this weird feeling where i start feeling fatigued, lightheaded, and weak knee-ed. it just happened again. i passed out. its tolerable but it interferes with my functioning. i have no idea what causes it. it was kinda bad this time... probably because i chose not to fight it
π€
π―
yea i got my blood drawn on friday hope we'll get something from that
that sounds serious or lack of something
idk i am of the opinion its blood related
low blood sugar, diabetes, liver issues, neurological issues
like, i can physcally feel it
I just know because I've had the same issues π
π€£π
do you take too much stress? or do you live in a humid place you sweat in a lot or something
but generally stuff like this ties into the liver quite a bit
it happens about the same time and duration every day
idk i am no doctor
because the liver is what converts food to blood sugar
liver damage?
doesn't have to be damage, could just be an infection
hard to imagine.i dont even drink
WTH
oooh maybe
what?
we had a nurse and medic here but getting a proper checkup with results is always better than guesswork anxiety
that emoji looks like ...... well yk
yea ive been googling symtpoms for some time
it's a wind chime
it rings on entering stores
π
please dont
ig my mind is just dierty
how does a liver get infected?? its not like you just get cuts in it
never google, it just causes more stress , and necemo effect
be aware when googling your symptoms though
meds rot your liver or kidney not sure
meh im not stressed
that is a distinct possiblity
through food, other infections. if you said you had an UTI or similar, that could have moved for instance
yea
not saying it is a liver infection
my meds arent that tough on the organs though
just knowing the symptom of something via google can cause it to show up, necemo effect, please be careful of google
i didnt know google could give my symtoms yikes ill try not to google π
google might give me symptoms of death
i have had really bad experiences with it, so all i can say is beware
just see a doctor
i intend to
the bloodwork will also give you a good indication of what's going on
in the mean time i just gotta suffer haha
do you live alone or do you have people around?
if you have people around do let them know you have issues if you haven't already
yes i do and no nobody except my downstairs neighbor
online classes
ill be fine ive not had any major issues with it. it first showed up when i was lifting furniture at work years ago lol
imagine lifting a couch and your knees feel like theyre about to go xD
ah, then could be sugar or something, or liver
agian idk
i am not the strong type so i can understand
dunno if anyone likes country but i love this track. https://youtu.be/FzQnml-plRs
Provided to YouTube by DistroKid
Chevrolet You Down Β· Ryan Waters Band
Chevrolet You Down
β Hey World Productions
Released on: 2021-07-22
Auto-generated by YouTube.
also what's up with the "won't lie" thing
its about the TOS
FYI TOS are complete BS
but who will teach\
yeah if you are going to use something you have to agree anyway, even if it's not to your favour
stating the obvious
not all teachers live there
I love this question. it implies that the university building is teaching

this is great
I'm not into country, but I like this one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9chF9gYZqI
Urban Country - Gonna Need a Grave
by Extreme Music
Featuring Michael βSmidiβ Smith & TJ Stafford
(All credit to original song creators)
(Working) Image:
https://images.designtrends.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/13071757/Free-HD-Gangster-Wallpaper.jpg
Genres:
Urban Country, Dark Country, Country Rap, Blues Saraceno, Country, Grave Digger B...
also it's worth not hating on school
not the building anyway
unless that's terrible or something
i dunno Luke Bryan made country rap pretty awful. but this stuff by Colt Ford and Kidd G is pretty darn good
ikr
and he gets all the awards lmao CMT is so out of touch
i don't even know who that is lol
I don't know either of them, but I like that one song π
you're not a country music listener I see
the one i posted?
yup π
I don't know Luke Bryan, Colt Ford or Kidd G
kidd g is rather unknown but the other two are kinda huge
FYI TOS against "misinformation" is a crock of
BS
what's that about?
so the new TOS have some pretty disgusting terms
the new TOS. first off. spreading "misinformation" aka LIES is against TOS. essentially if you say anything that isn't 100% true you're in violation. irritates the shit out of me and others like me. i dont know where these tech companies get the gall to tell someone they can't say anything that isn't 100% true in some particular experts eyes. other terms about "off discord behavior" is a disgusting over-reach, dunno how they feel they can regulate our lives like that or if thats even legal. and now you can't argue against trans individuals in principle or form. straight up its against TOS. our democracy in the states is in danger if one side literally cant speak up.
im half way between deleting discord
because fuck this
do it
i just might
if you don't agree why stick around
because UE slackers is here... π
and its hard to find support anywhere when everyone resorts to discord
its a catch 22
if we go to nuclear war i hope one of them tac nukes hits discord command servers mwahaha
let's just understand they do it to get out of legal trouble and doing whatever they want
yeah I dont understand this mentality. just either deal with it or compromise
ofc you are free to lie, unless someone reports you
they do it because it keep them on good terms with certain aspects of society at the expense of others
if they report, discord now has full control on what to do,
reported for enabling liars 
yup,
now as a tech company they can show others "look we stopped liers"
liars* or whatever
oh trust me its becomingmuch more common
i literally downloaded Hinge recently. said fuck that. removed it when the new TOS agreement appeared
i actually read my contracts
ofc they can't stop every other lie, but if you say something really controversial you should expect some backfire and discord can take action now, probably
you read these? well, that's quite admirable
they change so frequently i just skip it
it doesnt take a rocket scientist. its just when i expect to sign something i may not like or they pass an update... i am of course guilty of accepting EULA's lickity split like every other soul on this earth. just gimme software lol
arbitration agreements are the devil too. "Yea i wont sue you just gimme software"
for employment too. thats what gets me
yeah, for casual stuff I don't think it's worth reading everything now a days, it's all practically just so that you can't sue them like you said, regardless of what they do
like the treaty of versailles. contracts are negotiated not dictated but nobody told the software industry
π§
this month
What does Discord TOS specifically say about " you can't argue against trans individuals in principle or form" ?
let me double check
Because that sounds like bullshit to be frank...
vim > other ides
rider is for kid tho
not to get into historical (or modern) politics but germany was at a major disadvantage after ww1 when the treaty was signed. an advisor to the US said that. "treaties are negotiated not dictated" or something to that effect. he was right. germans hated being forced to sign it and comply with it. they had no say in the terms.
yup march 28
which is why ww2 happened. because of the humiliation germany felt.
ah right, i think i do remember that
That misinformation policy that's detailed on Discord's blog seems well balanced to me... it considers intent to mislead, malice, and history of posting content like that....
so claiming that you can't even say anything anymore is basically just scaremongering
so no more nitro scam?
but but muh freedom
like have you ever thought about these EULAs and TOS? They exist on a take it or leave it basis. you cant add anything to them on your part.
why do you care so much?
and I still don't know what the point about trans people was that BASED Engineer was making
because i disagree with it all
in the end people want you to use their products because that's how they make money you know
There's literally nothing about trans people in the misinfo related TOS
then don't use it. simple as
yes, because then you can kinda cheat these mutli dollar companies easily, some users can have bad intentions
software companies have all the power.
im not sure why you're telling me this
yup, to protect themselves, and well, ofc to be a bit selfish in some cases
wasn't fb in quite trouble for the whole selling data thing? yt has quite a lot of zuck vs senate vids
they dont need protection. theyve got lawyers on their payroll 24/7 for things like suits and stuff. at the same time your average user can be wronged by companies and if theyve signed an arb agreement they cant even sue.
Do not share false or misleading information (otherwise known as misinformation). Content that is false, misleading, and can lead to significant risk of physical or societal harm may not be shared on Discord. We may remove content if we reasonably believe its spread could result in damage to physical infrastructure, injury of others, obstruction of participation in civic processes, or the endangerment of public health.
This is the entire paragraph about misinfo in discord community guidelines... like... what's the big deal lol
π πͺ
because all you're doing is complain about a platform that you are using this very moment. either take a stance or deal with it. moaning about it does nothing. you're not going to change their mind
im not moaning
you absolutely are
He's trying to argue that he wants to spread lies about trans people but can't
I think that's it
:P
sounds about right
youve (all) been asking me why i hold these positions.
I certainly haven't
i am elaborating
just either deal with it or don't use it
im not shutting up but thanks
they can easily say lies don't protect the avg user..
Yeah I've been trying to learn where it says anything about trans people in the misinformation related updates
because I can't find it, and it sounds like you made it up
not asking you to shut up, I'm asking you to have a spine
oh i have a spine
what even is this convo going towards lol
and i dont appreciate being talked to like that
I remember him posting nonsense that he can't back up before as well
but they can't lie. surely that's all manufactured
now you're just being ridiculous
yeah same
Show me where the trans related bits are in the discord misinformation guidelines then
lol
ive been busy talking to others gimme a second
lol
considering I pasted the entire paragraph about misinformation above and it doesn't mention it I'm curious
sounds like they just want to be angry and moan about it
well if you read certain publications or follow certain content creators you would easily be tricked into that kind of thinking
no harm done if you realize your mistake though
nah it's not manly to back down
Is it popcorn time? π€
being manly is for girls
it does seem to be against stuff that causes harm, i am guessing it's against scamming of sorts, with the whole nft rising
whaat, a rational stance? no way, we must be against the TOS
Yeah, it's a clause to allow them to deal with people who are intentionally doing it to cause harm
Joke on you, some people like that.
tomboys
that's closer to what i imagined when you said moan
the british moan is more like complaining
but like, complaining for the sake of complaining
"**Do not organize, promote, or participate in hate speech or hateful conduct. Itβs unacceptable to attack a person or a community based on attributes such as their race, ethnicity, caste, national origin, sex, gender identity, gender presentation, sexual orientation, **religious affiliation, age, serious illness, disabilities, or other protected classifications." https://discord.com/guidelines its actually in these community guidelines. hate speech is protected speech in the USA. i dont understand why/where these companies get the notion that they must regulate it. do i like hate speech? No. do i engage in hate speech? no, and if either of these were true i wouldnt be here.
let people run their lives. dont put these draconian policies in place. if someones being a bully then block them. its pussified to expect someone else to handle your problems for you.
i am sure there was another word for that, it's at the tip of my tongue....
asks why i hold a certain view
explains.
claims im bitching and moaning
honestly I think you need to go away if you think we should allow people to be bigots
get real
this is not the place for you
it just stops harrasment, they want to look like they stop it in case someone reaches out to them for it
Seeing this image alarms me instantly now
free speech only works in public places
I'm calling the mods on you.
Like oh f, another free nitro
yep I thought it was a discord nitro scam link
haha same
exactly what i thought lol
MODS MODS MODS
i was this close to pinging mods
π
that's free speech now
never asked for your opinion. I said take it or leave it. you seem to want neither but to moan instead π
yea no im not responding to you any longer
This is not a place for people who think bigotry is ok
moan... :shy:
I suggest you leave or shut up
with your ad hominem attacks
exactly! misleading ...
lmao he blocked me. finally.
Btw, I found a good JS for making Discord blocking & hiding messages. It is really cool.
no wonder you never respond to me
Dwarves vs elves.
Can we make Discord hide "have you tried Rider though?" messages? Asking for a friend
not one of you have actually listened to what ive said. instead you keep putting words in my mouth with your awful takes
yes it's always everyone else's fault
yeah i know, i know but it's just ,, ...
Definitely... You see Rider, you post that meme...
there's no way you could ever be wrong
go away
'murica
So, on an unrelated note, I came to Windows from Linux, had a bad time with overly complicated point-and-click IDEs, recently found out about the Windows Linux Subsystem and Windows Terminal Preview. It's pretty pog, even has retro terminal effects
personal attacks dont make your arguments stronger fyi
WSL is cool
Yup, it's great
Buut I'm using another terminal.
wall street... launcher?
crypto for life
I actually somewhat agree with you, @zinc matrix, people should be able to think whatever they like - thought police is bad - but that doesn't mean everyone has to agree with them or let them spread their thoughts on their personal platform. If Discord don't wnat that shit on here, that's entirely up to them.
But does the other terminal have retro effects? That's what sold me
You can always go on Truth Social if you want to spread your bigotry Β―_(γ)_/Β―
I mean you can theme it up, but apart from showing off this to your drunk nerd friends, what is the point?
or whatever that thing was called
No real point, I just like it. It's basically Solarized with retro effects
But! It's so much better than opening up VS
Other things are cool, have one app for all the shells. Customize terminals, script them and so on.
But I'm also a big proponent of personal freedoms and having society deal with these issues instead of having it forcefully done via legislation, but that's idealism and I know in practice it will never work.
right. and discord users all have a stake in the platform. when one group of users asserts that another cant have certain freedoms on said platform i dont think thats fair. it may be a private company but that doesnt mean it isnt catering to certain parties.
Why do you want to let f.ex. nazis have any kind of freedoms?
And who the you to say which parties Discord should cater to?
Like... what possible good thing can come from that?
zomg: are you against freedom for anyone that thinks differently to you?
Freedom of choice? π€
@fleet tangle I'm against the freedom of anyone who abuses the freedoms to cause harm
Yep, also panes. On my linux system I use a tiling window manager so it feels natural. Nice to have that on windows
it's freedom of opinion more like
It's not about specific groups. It's about ideals.
@foggy path then you should step in when they actually cause harm, not instigate thought police.
when it impacts my freedoms on said platform--when others are allowed to have said freedoms at the same time? thats just wrong
You have no freedoms on any privately owned platform.
@fleet tangle it has been shown in many studies that allowing for example neo-nazis into a community the ideals start spreading which I think is pretty easy to show causes harm
Freesubs only
Freedom is not a right. Freedom is a privilege granted to you by those in power.
that reminds me of odysee
haha
yeah those in power being the people here in the states at least
it has very low moderation, it's like yt, we talked about it a while back
Yeah like I get the ideal that you want to let people to talk about what they want... yeah sure great, in an ideal world 100% agree
but this world is faaaaar from ideal
@foggy path If neo-nazism can spread to a community that easily, I fear for the human race. Though I already think humanity is basically a piece of shit.
Btw, I'm just getting - what is the root of that word? FreeDom -> Free from Dominance π€
Sad but true
You don't have to look far to see how easy people are to manipulate
maybe i used the wrong word. "rights" being the one i wanted to use. hell TOS even uses that word.
Wrong reply π
You have no rights either.
yeah thought it was a bit weird reply lol
people seem to forget this
do i? https://discord.com/terms see More Important Stuff
To think that what you personally believe should be protected on a privately owned platform is beyond entitled.
smirk
that goes both ways
@fleet tangle careful he might block you for having an opinion that differs from yours
To be honest, the only place I think should have such a protections are government run platforms, because they should represent everyne they govern, even the fucktards.
https://github.com/Multarix/Discord-Hide-Blocked-Messages You don't need to violate the Discord eulas, just enable the console and paste it. You can tune up the polling interval too.
i don't think they will allow highly anti govt things there to survive for long
What are you implying with this?
it can backfire and cause chaos
Probably, but idealism etc
Ooh, nice.
I'm a cynic because my idealism doesn't work. Because humans suck.
Hey, not everyone is into lolipops.
what ive been saying since certain parties asked me to explain. when one party is granted exclusive rights on said platforms that is **wrong. **
one is, and other isn't kinda thing
no? really? why is that?
You don't get to make the rules for this platform. You can't decide what is wrong. Discord does.
do you think these platform owners exist in a vacuum?
That's irrelevant.
It is fine, I mean, you just change the DOM on your client.
you just stated that it is up to private ownership to decide these things. social/cultural pressure is a very real force and legitimate concern
i think this convo is like what we discussed this morning, game devs decide what to do with their assets, even if players or modders don't like it, they choose how they want others to use it, because they made it
you dont get to decide whats relevant and what isnt bud
And so what if it is? That makes no difference. You may feel it is morally wrong to allow certain parties a bigger voice, but, in the end, it's not up to you how this platform is used.
"world is unfair" basically?
Pretty much.
oh but i am a stakeholder. so are many others. we are not being heard.
specifically because of things like the new TOS
a stakeholder lmao
The only way to make yourself heard is through money. If you don't like the system, don't put your money into it.
Create your own rival system or use another rival system with a more agreeable TOS.
again stating the obvious
You're the one paying for a service you object to, bud.
i havent given discord a dime
Then you're not a stakeholder.
i was thinking along the lines of stock investment or something when you said stakeholder
i am here. there are many others like me here too. you're missing the point. if you're using said platform you are a stakeholder.
Eh. Maybe.
publically traded companies have stakeholders
I'm not sure it's worth arguing that point.
then dont
also it's not true
i will, however
you're not a stakeholder for using a platform
You have a stake in discord because you use it. It's just not a monetary stake.
discord doesn't care about you specifically, it cares about its users as a whole
exactly. in SWE we talk about users and business owners as stakeholders.
some hold more stake/power than others but its there
this is a misnomer. the stake doesn't translate to a stake for/against discord as a company. it doesn't matter to them
yes
it only matters to the user
I'm more of a steak eater myself
so it's not a stake
tbh i have talked with a fair share of trans on discord, they do get harrased, and blocking doesn't works too well in servers, also, targetted attacks, it's just bullying at that point, i think those stakeholders would be happy
and with the whole deal of lgbt thing, i can see more supporting that
as for the misinformation thing, i am not sure but majority shouldn't have a problem because it's phrased that way
Misinformation thing?
they said misinformation clause or whatever of discord stops lies of sorts and that takes away certain opinions as well occasionally maybe idk (paraphrased)
Who gets to decide what is misinformation and what isn't?
some bigoted take on not being able to do hate speech
that's what they didn't like i believe, but discord phrased it like, "if misleading causes harm"
So they're against fraud?
They've basically made Trump illegal on discord π
Do you have recipes? Over #food we discuss some.
zomg pasted the clause above somewhere, but it probably drowned in this
i dont support forcing views on others or forcing others to call you by certain words (pronouns, etc. ) or ELSE which is a ludicrous proposition. like if you're gonna announce that you're of a certain category then you had better be prepared to deal with how others might react. thats just life.
discord is their platform. they can do what they like
I always liked the one "I identify as an attack helicopter"
discord moderating certain opinions out of existence doesnt help anything.
ah that, yes that can get weird, and friendly jokes are okay about that i think, tbh, that's more down to server mods opinion
Do you know that Helicopters are the souls of dead tanks?
or well, get different friends in that case, that is life yes, not everyone has to accept anything
tbh I think it's just about respect, but I can definitely see it being a bit entitled
Personally, I really don't care what people want to identify as. They can do as they like. I support their choices. But I'm dubious about whether their thoughts should be forced on other people.
not as entitled as "DISCORD NEEDS FULL FREEDOM OR WE RIOT" though
say some (hypothetical) legitimate neo-nazi walks into your pub and starts shouting about his views. what can you do at that point? if they arent threatening you or anyone else there's no point getting police involved. at that point its just a conflict of ideas (and character).
wait...
does this server not have...
a memes channel?
^
@zinc matrix the pub owner should have the right to refuse service and to tell them to fuck off.
i am not sure what a neo nazi is exactly, but yes, again, down to server mods
Call the police π€·ββοΈ
a nazi born after WW2
ideals are easy to forget, what were their beliefs again?
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
I think you need to sit through some wikipedia pages
π pass..
are you asian?
since we're talking hypotheticals what some of the pub patrions are non-threatening neo nazis? should they be allowed to tell you to get out and fuck off?
yup
But then you have the reverse situation, the common example being the gay couple who purposefully go to a caterer who is against homosexuality for whatever reason and asks they to make them a cake. Should they not have the right to refuse service as well?
pol pot?
TL;DR They claim their race is superior against humans and rest of the people either have to be a slave or some specific ones should die/suffer greatly
I'm not sure what you mean here.
Long explaination is not suitable for this server
if you don't know pol pot either I have no basis of comparison
I think these are the demons from DOOM
the japanese treatement of chinese prisoners during the internment period?
ah okay, ty
right alright, i get it i think
I think so. Most cases of that seem to be selfish people just fishing for a million dollar suite to ruin someone's entire livelyhood with. I don't think business owners should be forced to take on every client who wants.
that's adorbs
i think we can both agree that in both cases its their right to refuse service to certain parties. discord is a bit different as its a social media platform and has thousands of users who are all stakeholders. everyone has some stake in the platform. whereas a pub owner is likely a sole proprietor or business person. even then. patrons have stake, thats why owners kick unruly characters out. if this bar gets around as a neonazi haven all of a sudden you see more of them and less of the regulars.
But if they don't, it's illegal because they're being bigoted about a protected whatdoyoucallit.
Can too much toleration be a negative thing? The tolerance paradox claims that to follow true and pure toleration in a society will inevitably lead to an intolerant and dangerous environment. Watch as George and John discuss.
Full Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FwQZvZgZV-A&t=214s
Get the Philosophy Vibe - "Political Philosophy" - eBook...
I'm a big believer in personal and corporate freedom. I don't think a business, of any scale, should have to do business with somebody they don't want to, for whatever reason.
I think businesses that use that to discriminate against people should be socially judged not criminally penalised.
Thing is, we don't know if it's because they're bigots though. There could be darker things going on that us outsiders cannot see, so it's best to leave it up to the people who actually own and know the business.
we are beating the same dead horse at this point, friend
nah that's some kangaroo court ish
You can't really prove what someone is thinking. They just have to admit it if they choose.
CE: I know it wouldn't work. Just idealism.
why does it have to be though. can't people just accept other people?
We have laws because people can't actaully do this shit on their own without people in power enforcing it.
see also: that vid I posted
the tolerance paradox is why we need anti discriminaton laws
other people can be dangerous and evil, unfortunately.
@fossil bronze 'elo who this?
I'm sure a gay couple wanting a wedding cake aren't on the way to commit genocide though
Probably.
fupper has a slack pfp juh
Hi, I'm dad.
sounds like action movie plot
nah, but maybe, like I said, they are just fishing for a suite to kill the business of anyone they don't like.
lol, kinda
well yeah. because of anti discrimination laws.
you mean like a rival doing pr stunty thing?
again watch that video about the tolerance paradox
good talk friends
take care of your health bud
@verbal junco I watched the video. I don't agree with the outcome, though.
o/
yeah, maybe this convo is getting a little too political for this server...
you don't have to agree with it. it's true all the same
So you claim!
I don't
you just did lol
it's a paradox
it's not political unless we agree it is
It's similar to the impossibility paradox. If everything is possible, the only thing that is impossible is impossibility.
I'm not going to be act like 2 + 2 = 4 isn't true
if you want to do that be my guest
but don't say that it's my claim
now i am curious what that video is...
Well, it's Karl Popper's claim then.
There might be a metal ring below btw. Trees can grow around stuff in very interesting ways.
Basically the video says that unless you are intolerant against intolerance, then you can never be truly tolerant. Something along those lines.
i lived in a place once where the trees had grown through the fence next to them
it says if a society remains tolerant of intolerance it ends up being intolerant
Some parts of it, sure.
Sounds close to mind.
But is that a bad thing?
I would rather have a free society than a completely tolerant one.
Cakes too.
Government cakes.
cats too
C4 cake?
Send one to everyne on their birthday.
there's a whole meme series on the idea of anarcho capitalism and why it doesn't work
It probably doesn't work because people are arseholes, right?
just like everything else π
I definitely think a form of minarchism is the way to go.
But not total anarcho capitalism.
Minarchism is a form of government.
still some libertarian nonsense
tbh the best thing that could happen for humanity would be a benevolent dictator
ideal dictator yeah
I think people need government to preserve personal freedom, not take it away.
Minarchism is basically the idea that the government shouldn't step in unless a party is causing harm to another party. If you include the environment as a party in that equation, it could work pretty well.
better that than having a NAP that can be violated and have private nukes destroy large swathes of a country just because of a neighborly disagreement
people can't be trusted
why would you ever want to give them freedom
π€£ dunno if i can post this here
that doesn't sound too bad
so it's like mods of this server
well they do step in for occasional dad jokes too
Yeah, I suppose
nah it's one step away from ancap territory, see the memes above
oh, dad jokes, lol
the nuke of all young minds
Not really.
eggsactly
π«
I don't get the yolk, brother.
@fleet tangle see these two lines
context the lounge was filled with eggs a few days ago
Which 2?
well shoot
the one quoted and the following
I mean, not letting people have nuclear weapons is probably just a general rule of thumb for any government.
mm ^
who's going to stop them?
the NAP?
don't make me laugh
maybe not the right time but, you know... nap... π€
also include all other weapons addressed to "to whom it may concern"
there's also the issue of trading and managing country to country depts etc right?
and budget or whatever
I think one's addressed to "this one guy specifically" are okay though, so long as they treat it with the deadly respect it deserves.
@verbal junco I will admit, a straight minarchistic government won't work. As you say, nukes everywhere.
But it's a good basis for things.
people need government, and they need strong government
the amount of ish we'd see if people had the freedom to do whatever they wanted would cripple the world
capable govt yeah, with enough authority to carry out actions
something that ideologies somehow neglect to mention
Of ish?
I think, imperfect people means imperfect government, so seeking any sort of perfect ideal in gov will end up worse than any imperfect amalgamation.
you really use some difficult terms
I know what the term means, I'm just wondering what it means in that sentence.
das a fish
me?
To which definition? I saw like 10, all of them were about rough equality.
das af ish
ghoti*
no, CE, they also used a few other words i think with certain meanings today
oh, k
it's like a censorship
first page, 5th or so definition
Absolutely. As I've said many times, What I believe and what will actually work are entirely different in reality π
reality is terrifying,
I've literally never seen ish used that way.
certainly looking for perfection isn't what you want to do. but any type of libertarianism will bring us closer to extinction than not having it
If having freedoms brings us to extinction, maybe that's for the best?
well you've learned something new today. be happy
speak for yourself?
I don't want to be at the mercy of the nearest psychopath. if I wanted that I'd go to school in america
You're always at the mercy of the nearest psychopath.
Just, right now, you don't know it.
conversely you are of course free to cause self extinction if that's what you believe is the best course of action. just don't force your choice on others
I'm not forcing my choice on anyone.
.
I'm allowed to have an opinion, aren't I? Without forcing others to agree with me?
I think the lower the number of people there are with greater control over the populace, which comes with stronger government, the more their own selfish motives will play a role in the general reign. So moving to a more free and wider spread type of rule, such as giving back the right for people to control their own business, is better overall.
I don't make the rules and never will.
you're just going to see the same power accumulation but now there is no large body to restrict or oppose said accumulation
Yeah, thinking the government will have any affect on whether or not you're at the mercy of the nearest psychopath is not so well thought out.
it does. if a government bans guns you somehow don't have worry all that much about school shootings
funny how things work
The larger body IS power accumulation.
it isn't. if you think that then you need to do a reality check
What about school stabbings? Your neighbour can, at any time, knock on our door and just stab you.
the power sits with the money, not with the government
The government is a business like everything else, giving them or anyone a monopoly is never a wise choice.
You don't need guns to be at the mercy of psychopaths, they just make it easier.
it really isn't
the point of govt was to help us survive as a species right? and diplomatic relations with other countries help prevent outside invasions etc
sure. you can substitute guns with any type of weapon. but if you ban those weapons wholesale, then there's a less chance of those things happening no?
Yeah, it is. They taxes are their income and revenue, and the governing of the populace is their service.
you can ban whatever you want
also, with a proper power accumulation, if in the right hands, can stop the psycho at one person stab (or one case for that person)
simple business.
So you want to live in a world where there are no tools?
Every tool can be used to kill somebody.
Oh, and you need to restrain everyone because you can beat people to death.
right yeah so paying for the services they provide to the people isn't the same as having a company with stakeholders that is for profit
which ironically would be very much the case in any libertarian scenario
it boils down to whether the power accumulated is capable of protecting everyone nearly i think?
if it is distributed it can go into wrong hands as well, more easily, not to say it currently isn't
Power protects itself, not the people.
So, you're getting what I'm saying though. They aren't what you might consider a conventional business, but many of the same rules you would apply to others, still apply with gov.
hence why you need bodies of regulation. if you don't want to call that a government, don't. but the only way to ensure that accumulation is culled is to have entities that work against each other. e.g. political parties
yeah, again, ideally speaking that was the point, and everyone having power means more risk of going wack , more chefs ruin the food or whatever
Totally agree, @verbal junco
what's that?
the government has to pay for the security of its people. if you are a citizen, the government protects certain things for you. you pay for those, if you can, in return.
It's every person's duty to set the world to rights by discussing political philosophy with their friends.
it's less a business and more a TOS
You know wood, lumber, type of material.
to bring it full circle
tos?
terms of service
what is the meaning of a wooden philosopher though?
probably akin to armchair
or wood rank
Yeah, alike. Never asked for details.
I imagine something like not fully understanding the impact of what they're talking about or have the ability to back up their claims with sound arguments.
Oh, that's what I thought. All businesses have TOS's. It's a part of the business.
that does not mean that all TOS's are part of businesses
oh, gotcha lol
it was all about feeling secure, as a customer whether govt or a tos
no, it doesn't. They just are.
well leaving a country is harder than leaving a bad tos tho
They're legally required to have one.
you can have a TOS without a business
I left over an hour ago and just came back... this channel appears to be stuck in a while(true) loop
libertarians never give up
We're free to argue π
A TOS is literally a document explaining what a business does. The gov isn't a document, it's a business with a document explaining what it does. Declaration of Gov. or whatever each country calls it.
My ex left me a grapefruit tree. I'm kinda sad it may not live, it is too cold for it in this climate :/
it's a document explaining a service. a service doesn't have to be a business. there's plenty of freely distributed plugins and programs that have terms of service put in such way to shield the creator from e.g. lawsuits
Plants should not suffer.
so no. it is not explaining what a business does
She left the plant.
just different people now
If a body sells a service for profit, and a government does profit, it is a business.
the government doesn't do it for profit.
I mean, is that a common thing? I know so many women leaving their plants :/ Sometimes even pets.
but it would in a libertarian society
and yes, government would still exist in such a case
it would not be called a government, but a company
but it does profit nonetheless, that's how it's employees and ruling members are paid
govt did it to safeguard livelihood right?
that's not how it works. do you even understand basic business?
You haven't given up either, I note.
CE does have quite the stamina, my brain is fried
XKCD, god tier comics.
to be fair at this point I'm either dealing with incompetence or being thoroughly trolled
and I can't tell the difference
I believe so. I'd rather not banter at semantics about it though, if that's what you're offering.
if they were for profit, they would distribute that profit to whomever the shareholders were. there are no shareholders in the government. the income the government has gets distributed towards the services that they have to offer. e.g. helping the poor, defense, security, medical services etc.
if there was a profit it still gets distributed to these
plus, the government literally prints the money
The governed are the defacto shareholders in that scenario, surely?
no, I think we're simply both convinced that we're right and neither side is willing to budge. Trolling has nothing to do with it. Thinking us trolls removes from us the thought that our arguments are in any way even slightly legitimate, which is an extremely unhealthy way to have a discussion.
sure, but they are the same people paying. so it's a losing business for everyone since the government never turns a profit
nevermind again, that it prints the money being used
what company do you know is able to decide whether or not more money needs to be circulated?
Not all businesses have shareholders, my man. Ours does, though, in the form of votes.
what business operates on inflation?
Plus, business can still operate under negative net profit, though like was said, it's only a matter of time until it collapses. Then again, it could go on indefinitely so long as outside merchants are willing to collect debt in the form of negative credit, which is exactly what the US is doing by going a few trillion in debt.
nah it can't because it literally prints its own money
Banks? π
unlike any company out there
the banks don't decide this
in the US, it's the treasury, which is part of (you guessed it) the government
They heavily abuse the laws to create more money, though.
banks can't create more money
That is certainly an advantage for a business to have, to control the amount of money in circulation.
they cannot create value where there is none
A feedback loop of only needing to have like 10% of their lending power as actual capital. Something like that.
Then they borrow from each other.
I forget how exactly it worked.
But they can't decide the value. Only the open market can do that.
it's why the government isn't a business and why your fallacy doesn't work
it's close to an analogy if anything
It is a business, just not a conventional one.
lmao the market decides nothing
the people that are printing the money decide how much the money is worth
because they have an infinite supply
They control the prices of the things they sell.
and i have heard printing money doesn't makes value from nothing, every other printed item looses value to give it value, which causes inflation π€ or is it wrong?
irrelevant in the case of currency
because they are still beholden to the worth of money
Yeah, that's how it works, I believe.
correct. but banks don't control inflation. the government does
I'm not sure "control" is entirely the right word there.
Nah, you're right. So the government controls inflation by deciding how much money to print. When they print it directly takes value from the stores of everyone who owns it. Could see that as another form of tax and income.
it absolutely is. they can decide to print more money or take money out of circulation. they literally control how much inflation they want. inflation isn't universally bad either, some people get more out of it
for instance the poorest people in the country benefit from it because they get taxed less and get more money leftover, increasing their purchasing power
You don't need to physical money to affect inflation, though.
feel free to elaborate on that
Yeah, blanket raise in wages across the country, such as raising minimum wage, would also increase inflation.
who controls that though?
i read hyperinflation in some country helped people pay loans, because value to oay back got messed up
pay*
The gov, most of the time. They do in US.
and who controls inflation?
I already specifically answered this question from you just a few messages ago, lol. What's your point.
I just wanted you to do the realization yourself that these are one and the same
@verbal junco I'm just being pedantic, really. Regardless of how much money there is in circulation, the actual wealth of a country isn't in its printed money, or even if its physical reserves like gold, it's just all electronic now.
That what are one and the same?
I'm not saying printing more money doesn't affect it, but it's not the be all and end all.
the people who determine what a minimum wage is and the ones who control inflation
You can generate "wealth" without money.
point being, most of inflation is regulated by gov?
(it's the government)
dude... there's no realization there. It's the gov, obviously.
Again, point?
One of the reasons that increasing minimum wage doesn't help in the long run, because everyne has that much more money, the goods eventually catch up to cost more.
So you've got to keep raising the minimum wage so it stays ahead.
that's a fallacy
How so?
Also, because business have to pay their employees more now, that extra cost must be passed to the consumers.
Are you saying that people having more capital to spend will not increase market prices?
No. It's true.
no but you are suggesting an intrinsic link here
It's a knock-on effect of people having more money.
it may be that prices are going to be marked up, but to suggest a systematic markup to counter minimum wages is laughable. let's remember that not everyone is on minimum wage
Do you think that raisin minimum wage doesn't directly increase inflation? Because it does. That common business sense.
I'm not saying people "hey, the minimum wage went up, let's increase the price of bread by 20p"
I'm saying it's a contributing factor in market prices because people have more capital.
sure I've said this before. I literally made the example. but that doesn't mean either can't be tweaked independently. don't forget that not everyone is on minimum wage
again, not everyone is on minimum wage. you're literally suggesting that market prices exploit the weakest in society
Contributing factor. Also, wealth percolates to the top. If the people at the bottom have more money, they people above them make more money and so on.
contributing factor or not, this is at the discretion of the people offering the product
Talking of minimum wage and market prices, this was actually a reason given by the American government for not increasing minimum wage several years ago.
!8ball are you on minimum wage?
@deep copper, :8ball: Outlook good.
and that is likely under some level of government control as well
And when they see people have more money to spend, they will increase their prices. That's basic business sense.
Also, think. people who weren't minimum wage before, assuming their wage didn't change, could be minimum wage now, as it has risen. So any self respecting person would expect their wages to increase at least somewhat, elsewise nothing would theoretically stop them from getting an easier job that pays the same minimum wage. If the the business wants to keep the worker, they will raise the wage. I know the specifics of job mechanics are more in depth than my example, but the same concept applies.
not unless they are being prevented from doing so. again they are hitting everyone with market price increases, not just those on minimum wage. and if you're a business, you'd rather target the people with more money than the people with less. it's basic business sense
this is pretty much why the covid crisis of people not wanting to work came into existence? we're still globally reeling from this
My phone is doing strange things, lol. I've had to edit almost every message. I know y'all prolly could care less about typos and such, but it bothers me when I do them.
Some businesses do cater for the richer people. Places like Whole Foods and so on. I'm sure there are places with extremely fancy and highly priced bread. But some companies target lots of low price sales as well.
having the energy to edit messages, salute
I'm totally OCD about spelling and typos in my messages.
my point remains: it is at the discretion of the business, not the government
I never disagreed with that.
but I'm sure the government would step in if apples suddenly started costing $600
My point was that the government gives everyone (by proxy) more money, so the businesses put their prices up.
not true, only those at the lowest level. minimum wage does not increase wages for everyone else
you all are pretty much in agreement, just phrasing the same thing again and again a bit differently
See my earlier messages about percolating!
That last part is heavily dependent on the business, plus I don't think they actually care if a poor or rich person buys a product in the end, simply because they both pay the same price. Same profit either way. The only reason a business would target richer people is if they're more likely to buy the service or product, but the reverse is also true for the poor. There are services and product that poor are more likely to buy, and business that sell them would focus on them.
whether it percolates or not, a salary person receiving above minimum wage will not be affected by this from the side of their salary
Not everyone, sure, but a lot of people.
so it's not a universal change, which would also not be reflected necessarily in market prices. in fact it would shoulder their salary to be less, eventually putting everyone closer to the same bracket.
Damn.
America has a really shit minimum wage.
I was just curious exactly how many are on it and, fuck me, it's awful.
@ionic flame have one for free
US has huge wealth gap issues
such is the nature of discourse, lol. All tryna understand what the others mean in what they're actually saying.
US just has huge issues in general.
if you ever need pings ask me
It's an absolutely abyssmal place.
top earners earn a lot more than UK top earners
or the other brothers
but their lowest earn less
yup
Oh, I hate that, lol. Especially when it's actually deleted so you can't even search it up.
now with the possibility of remote work I need to look into getting hired by the US while still in europe
so I can minmax this life ish
or just straight up start asking UK employers for US salaries
i think intax pinged you
yup, it's getting worse too. It could be even worse though, so I try to be thankful about what I can manage.
for emilia waifu but that was hours back
Hi π
minmaxing FTW. You watch the spiffing brit by chance?
Did it took so long to find out? π
I don't watch anything
I'm just scheming and evilposting really
it's natural for them
Except the interwebs, to look for libertarians!
This possibility came to my mind but I thought Tank is a clever person and overcome this difficulty for the sake of Emilia-tan
the sad truth
Oh, welp
. It's a cool youtube channle.
π«
channel*
thats why Rem > Emilia
mainly because of the way stuff happens
let's not go there...
weebs
ep 15 or something of s2
some dude got banned for being a POS
ping first, ask later
POS
the same guy who a few weeks back blocked people with weeb avatars
oh nnvm nvm
and said he'd rather not be helped by them
got it
Also, they will if the company makes more money and puts their wages up. Or maybe the business won't. Shrug
No, he's back.
Different account, etc.
of course. which name this time? @fleet tangle
it is the most meme channel here
closest to it
then we had another dude in lounge arguing for hate speech on discord
Are we talking right now or just today? I thought we were talking about today (Cralpi)
yeah if he's back, under which handle?
that's a complicated name
He's probably back already, but I don't know who!
well i have anime pfp so I won't have to deal with them atleast
idk this dude made peps seem reasonable
Probably dragonHell.
Legends says Peps will return one day
what is peps
peps is an idea
Yo, @verbal junco , I enjoyed the convo and learned some stuff. Thanks for being civil and stuff. Just wanted to say that. Kinda funny that I felt the need to because civility should be common, but can't take nice stuff for granted nowadays. No hard feelings on my end 'n stuff.
I haven't blocked you yet so we good
Related, but not related. I always thought Pepsi should make a sleeping tablet called narcopepsi.
necro pepsi for death
do you have a link to HoJo's Peps chart?
It's the internet. Where people reveal their true selves under the guise of anonymity. And we all despair.
Mmm, yeah
Getting blocked by CE speed run %any
- sends a friend request
is it landscape on tick thing summary? the link takes me different messeges each time
wait what about somolia
somolia, the land of somol 32 gb data tables? π
somalia is a place or a username?
i should go to cpp more often, it seems like a fun place where ban hammer strikes often
that screenshot from today with the typos was gold too though
Banhammer++
and their response to being told to try again was basically "I give up"
That's so strange tho. It just supposed be a chat about programming stuff in c++, right?
Probably the blueprint and hot reload hate speech.
yes but programmers type so fast they can fit in 50 jokes in the middle of it , while someone types query
I thought we were talking about Cralpi at first
It was kinda cruel they encountered us in that time tbh. That guy could be guided to right direction easily
perhaps yeah. but I mean it was only typos preventing their code from working
also it has strange people from time to time