#lounge
1 messages Β· Page 76 of 1
It's a unity course, English is just being a weird language again
learn unity from zero
nani 
I thought you were referencing unity course, that has a title "learn unity from scratch"
Nope, i was referencing that course on the scratch "language"
I always said gamedev.tv was bad but wouldnt expect a scratch course lol
I assume their "Sales" are permanent because otherwise that price would be extortionate
yeah but for scratch
based on this price im expecting they will teach me how to make an OS in scratch from scratch π
i think its new but a few months ago it would be around 200$ or something too, pretty sure
because other mediocre courses were very expensive too
does anyone actually buy these courses
i kinda figured in 2022 people would just accumulate knowledge from le youtube tutorial and trial and error
maybe do some reading also
π€
You underestimate the amount of people who have lots of time and three money, who are so lazy they cant be bothered to look for reputable courses and just buy the first one that lands on their google ad listing
I bought C++ and multiplayer one, but it was my beginning days
And when I actually learned how things work, I looked back and waited a few minutes.. then screamed "wtf"
especially to C++ course
i guess its just people being naive
its literally demonstrates "how you shouldnt use C++ in Unreal Engine"
π₯΄

while on topic of C++ can anyone direct me to good (free) resources for how i should actually go about learning c++ for ue5
As you might know if you got to this page, I am quite an active member on the Unreal Slackers discord. Over time I noticed a lot of the same issues kept popping up, so I decided to write something down to save myself some typing time (hopefully). Table of...
This is from Dieter, a cool dude from #cpp
ok cool
There is a "learning resources" section
and since you mentioned "reading"
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/388242/the-definitive-c-book-guide-and-list
though I highly recommend learncpp.com first before paying for a book
I learned C++ years ago off some dude on youtube that had like 400 views per video in his series. Best damn tutorial I ever watched. No idea what it was called so I cant find it again π€£
It was an Engineless -> OpenGL course I remember
Then I started Unity, forgot all my CPP skills, and had to relearn once I came to Unreal π
it will probably be on libgen or archive.org anyway
but ill check it out in order you suggested
Literally forgot that headers existed when I came back to CPP on here π€£
its like being in stone age, right
Yup. Still think to myself every time I write a new class "Why am I still defining functions twice like a caveman"
I only did C++ and some lua, alongside with small erlang but that doesnt count because it was for just hobby
So I dont know how working with modern languages feel
not using pointers, being type safe all the time, using single file everytime etc.
its all too alien to me π
I have been bouncing between languages a lot, so I have got used to adapting to languages π
https://github.com/features/copilot This would help you out allot, the AI can suggest the code for you, if you describe what you want it to do.
Thanks, I was tempted to use it a while ago but spent my money* to something else π₯²
https://beta.character.ai/ Some AI bots here are also good, for answering questions on code and all that. You'll be surprised, The Linux bot even step by step explained me how to sniff/hack into a blue tooth device. Step by step bash lines.
These AI are becoming absolutely amazing...
its quite sentient π
Oh cheers, didn't know that channel
In all my years
Its actually created for the moderator Blue Man π
It's relatively new
oh hi BM 
I see
Actually haven't used it much lately, need new ideas for what to generate lol
They added remixing mode, basically allows you to modify the prompt when doing variations
I would be interested in an AI that created 3d models, you'd be able to sell them in the market. It would probably get uber flooded.
I don't think that's possible to do in engine in today's world
We can't even make programs to do that yet
We can make a database that searches for models
But I haven't seen any functional ai mesh generation tools
Have people been able to try yet though? I can imagine it is hard to get a populated training dataset for this
Maybe a future plugin for blender, I think it'll happen one day.
Yeah I think it's definitely possible in the future, just not right now
An ai image generator is a lot more simple because it's on a 2d plane and has a ton of refrences
We would suddenly have the most stunning characters and level of detail designs in games.
But for a mesh, it has to generate 3d AND it may have no references for the prompt
True
3d shouldnt matter for CNN based Ai generation
Its the training data that doesnt exist
Forgive me I'm not well oriented with ai, what's cnn
Convolution Neural Network, though I suppose 3d wouldnt work super well convolutionally
I first thought you meant an AI that does cnc fraising, 3d printing logic
But in a virtual space.
I think it's moreso about lack of computing power why we can't have ai gen 3d mesh
It would take a ton of computation to generate one mesh
New demo featuring the new Edit functionality.
For more: https://www.kaedim3d.com
This is one AI that can make 2d images into a 3d object
Platform for turning image to 3D model.
600 bucks for 30 generations
At that point I would buy a model on sketchfab
And be guaranteed it's high quality
but it is a neat concept
Yeah, it's overpriced
Soon someone will come with an open source project and they can suck it with their expensive payment plans
that would be awesome
Chances are, for 600 bucks you might be able to commission someone to build one of those
Right now i think people using it would be for novelty or research purposes
Well, probs more than 600, but let's say some rich dude pays someone 6000 dollars to make one, that's just the same as 10 ppl buying the cheapest plan for that site, and now everyone gets to enjoy it
One negative to that tho is that it would destroy the asset market
tech like that will plummet in cost once someone builds an open source library to handle it :p
I think a huge chunk of marketplace sellers make models
If you could generate the same thing just using the showcase image they would lose all their income
It's kinda scary when you think of it
Artists are scared of ai gen art, now modelers might have to worry
Im all for technological innovation, but I say trading human jobs (and ultimately lives) for money is unethical
who says programmers won't be next?
Same argument has been used against Green Energy, because "Think of the coal miners and power plant workers" so careful using the "losing jobs" argument
It is
we have a (few) AI experts in #gameplay-ai, I asked them about this
Is there an unreal engine plugin for it?
Soonβ’οΈ
Oh boy
One of them is working on "scene creation" plugin
literally creates 3D scene
with AI
not the same argument, green energy saves lives, ai gen removes them
Jobs were argued to be lost however, and arguably this is true that work will be displaced
I don't want to be one of those people that are scared of advancing technology, but something about ai generated works doesn't sit well with me
A lot of people that worked in the coal mine shifted to working on green energy plants
Replacing jobs with more jobs
Ai gen will remove jobs, without giving more back
AI Gen may remove artist jobs, but increase AI development jobs
Not if ai gen replaces programmers
Right now there are ai that can write essays and stories
How long till ones created to write code
Ai gen makes creating unique works smth everyone can do, no need for professionals anymore
Then that will move to AI trainers, and maintainance
It will remove much more than it creates
Artists wont stop making art, and people wont stop buying bespoke, human created art
Why?
If I can generate a unique work for free or cheap, why would i pay a lot more for a human to do it?
I've used ai art generators before, and their impressive, much better than anyone i know can do
The amount of artists will drastically decrease as the field is swallowed by ai
I think this conversation is too speculative to say anything with confidence tbh
I can say that ai will replace a lot more human jobs with confidence
Unless it happens we cant say for sure it will
The rest, sure
You don't think that ai will effect the art field at all? Don't u think that's a bit TOO naive?
No, but I am not saying that a reduction in artist jobs is gonna lead to deaths
that is a bit too pessimistic
Maybe not, but it will definitely hurt a lot of people
The value of art is already rapidly declining
And ai gen art is pretty new
Who knows what it will look like in 10 years
But I suspect the vision won't be in favor of artists
Industrialisation replaced hand-crafted work, didnt stop people from buying hand crafted products
Such as?
I heard some game developers already integrate allot of AI technology in world creation and such
also games that are "retro", 8-bit, "PS1" look are more popular than ever and not going anywhere
I know ubisoft does
There's a bot to generate art in all of those styles
Food, Clothing, Pottery, Furniture, Housing, etc etc
Anything mass produced was done by hand before
@zinc matrix on what games did it work on? π
Everything used to be handcrafted
Now almost all of it is made in a factory overseas
But you can still buy handcrafted products
Even the ones that claim to be "hand crafted"
The quality of hand crafted products also dropped due to industrialism
what?
that is just blatantly not true
bicycle frames used to be locally handmade, then moved to China, Taiwan, and now some are back locally again at a huge premium because of higher quality, people still pay for it
That's a very select portion of buyers
The handmade bicycle frame market dropped to industrialization
Sure, the new fad in America is handmade
But that doesn't undo the decades of decline in the market
I hate to bring in the tin foil hat, but I solely believe they are trying to kill people on purpose, since the elite want to Advance with AI tech and an autonomous work force which cuts out the need for the masses of people. You do the math.
aight im out
I can agree with that on a less extreme scale
They're not trying to kill the workforce, they just don't want to pay the workers
It's understandable
And it's logical
But it's also unethical imo
just eat the rich
w h a t
what does that even mean?
If that's supposed to mean "down with the upper class" it will never happen
Someone will profit off of the demise of the rich and then they get rich
If we kill everyone that gets rich we eventually kill everyone
The solution is government regulation of the workforce
What is a protected trade
To stop ai from taking human jobs
Ai should be used for assistance of people, not a replacement of them
Rich people aren't the problem. Most rich people do allot of good, they create jobs and provide services and benefits. It's the age old ideology of wanting power and influence over being a prospect for contribution.
but of course that sort of ambition can also be what kills the workforce
An ambitious entrepreneur would rather cut out the workforce to maximize profits
Ai does exactly that
Perhaps even the cute lady at the desk would be replaced with a stunning realistic looking cyborg
That speaks every language
That's how Hollywood plays it out to be, but realistically there would be no lady, no desk, no office, no building
All company data managed in a database, not by people
or even androids
I don't see ai as androids, I see it as the algorithms we see in the ai art generators
highly doubt that. more like a very small part actually do good...rest just profit off their workers or lobby to earn more and cause more problems for lower class
hate to break it to you but profiting off the workers is the good
Their building jobs
you can build jobs and pay decent wages
That's why minimum wage exists
not monitor workers if they take a minute more at toilet breaks
Like i said, government regulation is the answer
? If someone gets fired for this that would have grounds for a court case
The more you pay your workers, the more expensive your services would have to be to compensate on a return, which will further have to be correlated with a competitive market price.
Therefor Chinese goods are so cheap and they dominate the market
ok, but, a rich entrepeneur has thousands of workers employed. he KNOWS minimum wage is NOT enough now. Does he "wait" for government regulation while profiteering of the back of his employees, or simply increase his minimum wage out of good? While reducing the company's profit by 10-15%?
exactly, to maximize competition it would be easier to remove the workforce that you have to pay
no and that's the point, pay workers less and you can hire more of them, and expand
Yeah, and such a person is inherently not good
minimum wage is decided by how much someone needs to make to live, that entrepreneur is paying for their lives
I think that makes them good
Have you heard of amazon's working conditions?
Or at least much better than an entrepreneur that works on ai, and doesn't pay for lives
Is there someone like that yet?
There's an Amazon factory in my town, my sister works there. Gets 15 bucks an hour
Decent wage, works less hours than her friends (who mostly work in fast food) and for a better wage
And besides, it's much better to be paid to work in uncomfortable conditions than to just not be payed and out of a job
That doesn't sound decent at all π
thus why ai is unethical
I think you should be looking up not down
15 bucks an hour is 7 over minimum wage where I live
?
So the minimum is awful
No, the cost of living is lower
Workers don't need to make as much to live
That's how minimum wage is decided
In a perfect and harmonious place we would then use AI to lay off people to focus on their hobbies while getting a wage. Probably a whole different system.
I mean you're appreciating some scraps instead of being revolted that you/she SHOULD be making a lot more
Ai isn't going to help make more
Is it USA? How much is rent?
Depends where you live, like anywhere
Im in a relatively small town, but I don't live in an apartment I live in a pretty good house, was 230k when bought, worth 330 now
Yes to the USA part btw
Lovely, same here, small town... peaceful.
Can she afford a house mortgage or credit at that income?
Flsa min wage is 5.15, federal wages here are 7.25
she has her own place, payed for a car, and pays all her bills on time, so yeah I'd say so
I think she has a roommate or 2 tho
Single mom huh ?
I hope it wasn't Tyrone
All kidding aside
If she rents and has 2 room mates then no lol
We're talking about my sister here BTW, not my mom
Yes, meant your sister
That's a pretty good, stable condition
she has no kids
That's what people in those Honk Kong matchbox rooms also say π
Had she gone to college after hs, she probably would be in a better situation rn
They're alive aren't they? Also that's the downside of living in a crowded city, space is worth that much more
You'd never know, maybe she would be kneels deep in debt.
I think minimum wage should be enough to afford their own place, OWNED, no room mates and a good enough standard of living
I think that you think we should pay 10 dollars for a gallon of milk
Wages go up, prices go up
That's crazy. Are you sure YOU are not a rich capitalist boss in disguise?
So no matter how much you increase the wage, the poor will pay the same proportion to live
No I just understand economy
or i like to think I do
I'm kind of low middle class
People used to be able to afford a home and feed a family on a single income
What happened? Is this progress?
Jobs used to be in the u.s.
the US has weakened its economy by decentralizing it
That's why it's losing ground on economy's such as China
because we're paying China for their goods, rather than paying American workers for goods
And it still sucks for them because american factories are built in foreign land so that they can pay workers as low amounts as possible
In some places in east Asia American companies pay wages as little as 3 dollars an hour
So no, it's not progress
and increasing American wages won't fix it
Centralizing the American economy will
It will hurt at first, goods will cost more, but soon it would balance out and workers would be payed more, and the economy would flourish without being dependent on imports from God knows where
but of course that won't happen because the rich are greedy and seek immediate profit
anyways I'm done with my little rant
The Chinese social credit system and a digital currency is on the way, you will own nothing and will be happy, according to our lovely Klaus Schwab, who is said to plan the future of our world.
Europe will be the first western test subject
And thus why america is no longer the leading economy
And ai (which was the original topic) would make this even worse
The US is in a horrible shit show, it's insane.
Funny thing is the government can do smth about it, but is too busy lining their pockets from it
What a creepy president, shows you how Presidents never really controlled the countries's affairs
Not since after JFK
That which you call government is governed by the permanent powers, big banks.
See I don't wanna whip out the communist manifesto and say that mercantilism is what's best for our country right now, but I think we need to do smth about our economy when big business and politics watch the poor suffer and the government that was made to defend the people turns a blind eye to them for their own greed
"All men are created equal" these days it's now just a legend
I know the solution.... get rid of the federal reserve and the meddling of bank then get the dollar back legislated on the Gold standard.
But that will never happen, under our current banking cartel.
They own the industrial military and weapons industry, they'll kill anyone who is in their way.
I don't think it's that extreme
Sadly it is... but I admire your optimism...
I think that big business definitely has an influence on military, but I don't think it goes as deep as they can plan a direct strike without it being noticed
A lot of people would bring up the argument of the oil wars, that that was all influenced by big business, and it was, but big business was able to persuade the politicians because yes, the oil would benefit American economy
Truth is that at this point there is no solution. The poor and rich want 2 very different things, but only 1 has all the power
It's not a government of the people like it was
And don't forget that the military industrial companies reeked in trillions of dollars... war is profit, now they're benefiting from the Ukraine war yet again... having conflicts is profitable.
The economy surges come each war, and big business wants to keep it that way, and chances are that the u.s. will see a war again very soon, as we've been in constant war for decades, and the American economy has come to rely on it
It's a sad loop
I think it's important to make sure we cite our sources. Twitter is a great way to spread misinformation.
Yes, but I can assure you this is 100% legit
It's public data
The purchase of that drug followed Russian threats to American territory by nuclear firepower
The purchase of the drug was to make sure that in the event of a nuclear attack, America is prepared to defend the people
Or moreso the wealthy
By giving them a drug that has severe side effects, thanks uncle Sam
Chances are your better of with the small chance of a side effect than the chance nuclear radiation kills you
The most common side effects are with the very young and the very old, just like any sickness
That's like not giving someone cpr to save them because you might break a rib of theirs in doing so
Reminds me of the time top officials got briefed on covid and the pandemic that will follow and they invested in PPE equipment companies
To be fair it wasn't just top officials, many companies of that sort saw plenty investment opportunities from the start
but yes, as seen again the American government is more concerned with lining their own pockets then protected the people
Yup, insider trading at it yet again.
we got iodine tablets here because of the proximity to Ukraine's power plant instead of radiation sickness drugs π
Anyway, isn't it cheaper to have a strike team ready on Putin instead and avoid this whole WW3 thing? π€
No, as previously mentioned the American economy benefits from war
Big business doesn't want to prevent a war, so neither does the government
And they didn't so far, but I imagine things get way different when nuclear weapons are involved
Anyways most of Russian nuclear arms are cold War outdated, and the patriot missile system can take down over 50 nuclear missiles heading toward the mainland at a time
Big business isn't concerned
We'll see the missiles coming before they're even in their second stage
And at that point the rich are all nice and tidy in their bunkers
Just in case
But, as an adept conspiracy theorist, I'd say there would be insider elements in the US that would allow the strike to happen, without defense system intervention.
I think Russia's claimed war capabilities was the biggest bluff in history. Half their stuff barely works, and most of what is in storage is junk stripped for parts. Doubt they can put together more than a few nukes π
I don't think so. The rich wouldn't benefit off of the destruction of their workforce and factories
One interesting ΛΉ factΛΊ I've heard is SpaceX satelites can track all Russia's submarines. Not sure how true this is.
Even if their stuff did work, u.s. military arms are very strategically placed to defend against up to 50 missiles at once, and if it comes to it, they'll send air force to keep the upper class alive, deploying to big spots like D.C.
That's highly unlikely. Modern day submarines are tracked using sonar, not smth a satellite is capable of
At best it could see if smth is 3 ft away from the surface
Yes, but that's how it's allegedly with high powered radio frequency waves.
Idk...

Chances are they use SAR to detect disturbances in the water, and they can try to guess if that disturbance was made by a submarine
I tried to search engine it and couldn't verify anything, it was from a conspiracy channel.
Not spaceX, but the US government is definitely onto it
Grumman has been developing that tech i believe for years
And since it's not too deep in the SCS area, it won't be too hard to match the disturbances to a submarine
Because of course, they don't care about the Russian conflict, just china
The techs not a joke, but I don't see why spaceX would be interested in it, and much less why they would use it to spy on Russian submarines
ΛΉ Detecting submarines via satellite is a form of Non-Acoustic Anti-Submarine Warfare (NAASW). Lasers, infrared and other detectors and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) in space may be used as part of this NAASW activity. Satellites might see subtle undersea disturbances caused by submarines, watch wave patterns on or beneath the sea surface, or detect subtle variations in ocean temperature. ΛΊ
its over
i hope your ready to live in rust irl society
I dont think that's going to happen
But uhm, SpaceX is said to have assisted with UAV support to the Ukraine conflict zones
Any nukes Russia sends will be pretty much be automatically destroyed as soon as they lift off the ground, and the u.s. certain won't attack Russia with nukes in retaliation because 1. They don't need to, and 2. That benefits noone
probably nothing will happen because people do not want the world to end but the institutions seem to be bracing for something big to occur
which is not a good sign
The only thing that would stop Russia from not being instantly crushed is the Geneva convention
i do not think the united states has the ability to destroy russian missile launched from the middle of siberia before it reaches orbit
Maybe a little bit of an exaggeration, but none of them would hit home and the patriot missile system would barely break a sweat destroying them
can you provide evidence to substantiate your claims because i have a difficult time believing it
ICBM is very hard to intercept
even more so if there is thousands at same time and each of them has 10 warheads + fake warheads to throw off your countermeasures
Very simple knowledge
I would agree, the US couldn't stop hypersonic missiles, let alone intercept the UGM-73 Poseidon nuclear torpedo.
not even hypersonic i just dont think ICBMs can be reliably intercepted in great numbers even in idealistic conditions
i know of this system its estimated success rate is not so high
It's not just the U.S. they have stations everywhere to detect when a nuclear missile has been launched, and so do most of its allies
there is no dispute they could detect missiles but intercepting them reliably is almost impossible to do in great numbers
Interesting, the US asked Israel for the Iron dome tech and they said; No. Speaking of a parasitic relationship.
hey this line of thinking is not kosher please do not continue
Iron dome stuff couldnt do anything against an ICBM anyway
its for small rockets
Mmmh, I guess
I'm not quite sure where I got the information from, but i remember somewhere it said that the u.s. could defend against 50 icbm at once
guess it's nothing without evidence though
russia has 9000
on paper
even if its half that still cant do anything
even if its a 10th your still gonna be in big trouble
They have 491 deployed on paper
yeah i just checked you are correct
idk where i got that number from
With about 1500 warheads
Idk, but yeah it's still a lot more than 50
i think 9000 was how much they had at peak
in cold war
But would Russia really have the balls to do it?
Is putin that crazy
It would immediately result in military takeover, if not annihilation of Russia
Or just the destruction of the whole word, depending if other countries send nukes back at russia
Hes not gonna shoot nukes at america unless in retaliation its ridiculous to even assert that he would
tactical nukes on ukrainian frontline is much more likely
this would probably not have such grand implications
They don't, they just like to strong arm so they can get away with their annexations
Well i mean he kind of told the biden administration that he would
The US's TR-3B was spotted in Ukraine according to some sources. It's the super secret classified anti gravity stealth aircraft.
There was a direct threat
they have threatened nukes literally every day since war started on state tv
lol
But it scares me that the US is doing smth about it
Means they believe it
if you get atombomb dropped on you your problems are over so theres nothing to worry about
if you dont
your still alive
so nothing to worry about
π
There is plenty to worry about
You can't just drop a country off the face of the planet
That would have major political, social, and economic effects
Regardless if it's the US, China, Russia, etc
if the worst happens as your saying and theres a nuclear armed great power conflict between NATO and CSTO no political institution in any country will be able to maintain its existence through that kind of a crisis except maybe new zealand or some other irrelevant island nations
no see i don't think that will happen
there wont be an economic social political crisis there will simply be no economy society or political institutions left
but this is incredibly unlikely
I think the US has a rhetorical .50 cal aimed at putin's head in case he tries anything
so probably nothing will happen
I think that at worst a few loyal agents around Russia might be able to get a couple nukes off the ground
Before they are completely annihilated
But anyways I've been talking about speculative politics here for far too long so I'm going to head out
Stay safe.
u 2
the husband of a friend of mine worked on a hunter sub... when he got back from a shift he would complely freeze in place if she dropped a pen on the ground or something if it was silent for more than 10 minutes
dont think 6 months on the bottom of the ocean not allowed to make any sounds is good for mental health
I'm just wondering how many people hear it if you fart on a hunter sub now.
depends on the class and if they are allready listening in i guess
also war isnt good for the economy... or tech progress... those days are long gone
War is good for the economy if it's not taking place anywhere near you and is already accounted for in your budget!
nah it really isnt
I feel we'd need a proper global war for it to be good for tech progress.
nah we need to be downing alien ships B4 its good for tech progress
guys!
do you smell worn socks?
like sniff them
i think this should be a political topic.
sometimes when i washed em π
I don't sniff them just because they're worn. I might sniff them to determine if I've already worn them or not.
Yes it really is
why do u think amerimoto sat in afghanistan for so many years
spoiler it wasnt cuz it was funny it was cuz they could forcefeed money into places they otherwise couldnt
war is a huge business
military industrial bafoons will take any chance to sell guns
Hey, has anyone else here started getting copious amounts of spam emails that gmail isn't filtering out even though it's so super obviously spam? Think someone sold my email adress to spammers.
I flag them as spam every day but gmail doesn't seem to learn.
selling overpriced earplugs is big business π
war isnt that big a business in the grand sceme of things
even tho America now sells more gas and weapons to europe it really isnt good for the economy... its good for a few ppl most ppl lose
Murica got a boost when ww2 ended not by fighting it
you cant make much money off a burning country of poor ppl
Im not saying it was all sqeeky clean and for the good of mankind, but Saddam and khadaffi were not good ppl
Most leaders aren't good people.
people are people we are basically all the same just in a diffrent position
Not true.
Our genetics vary "wildly" causing us to be predispositioned to a wide variety of different personality traits.
And then there's our growth environment and current circumstances.
To view everyone as equal is absolute folly.
Nobody is equal, but they should be provided equal opportunity.
most personality traits come from external factors, not from genetics
That's why I said predispositioned, not "this guy is born to be a psychopath"
I.e. they are more likely to become X or Y when given the same stimuli as other people.
well, lets say nigerians have an exelent build to run long distances.. this now also is an external factor
for personality traits
But they also probably have genetic differences which predisposition them to the body type that is good for running.
Obviously external factors and lifestyle play a big role, too, I'm not saying otherwise.
well, there is genetics and external factors.. when all things said and done ... freedom of choice is just an illusion
its all 1 big chemical process
it's an illusion if you decide to keep being in the matrix
escape the matrix, and you shall find freedom
Don't forget the quantum mechanics!
yea we might be entangled with an alternate universe
Not quite the angle I was going for.
i dont know much about quantum stuffz
Lack of freedom of choice doesn't mean lack of responsibility, though.
well you act responsible or you dont
I don't mean it like that.
I mean you have to take responsibility for your actions, even if you didn't choose to do them freely because of the way the brain works (lack of freedom of thought.)
Your brain, in that instance, needs to be retrained so it doesn't do the wrong thing again.
well your action you didnt choose with free will becomes an external factor for your next choice
and it keeps repeating
Your brain, in that instance, needs to be retrained so it doesn't do the wrong thing again.
Well I feel like some people lack this part of the brain entirely, the one responsible for evaluating and judging their decisions
Quite possibly.
A broken neural net!
Or quite possibly the end results of their bad decisions is their positive outcome.
In regards to their brain anyway.
the variables have been set.. the outcome is unchangable
I am one of the external factors that puts you where you will be in 5 years π
sorry i had no choice
Compared to each other, we are all different.
Compared to all other things, we are much the same.
yea just a bunch of clustered molecules
lol no it isnt
Ik its not im just mocking
this probably isnt the best place to have that conversation tho
its evolution π
tribal stuff and ancient ways of life are super dope... they been doin it for 5000+ years
tried and tested
my wifi mobilephone way of life is in betatest phase and might crash and burn
This description on netflix is comparable to comments in UE's source code lol
When hasn't it been good for the economy and technology
The reason we have half most of the tech we have today is because of war
Cell phones were designed for war
Computers
Hell, even the internet
All military projects
And that hasn't stopped being true
Some of the more recent have to do with data technology, satellite, global positioning, even ai
And during ever single war in the past 100 years the American economy has flourished
That's why things like the great depression happen
Because the economy was so high during wartime, when it ended it caused a lot of jobs and income to be destroyed
Yeah at that point I just made another email
2 words war reparations. You definitely can make money off a burning country
That's why America stayed and developed Japan after ww2
To insert their hand into its economy
CUTE
war with Japan was not good for the economy.. peace and trade was π
the war was good for the economy
american wages hit an all time high at the time
industry was booming
industrial revolution
industrial revolution was 200 years ago
that shit started allready
not during the world wars
ever heard of the great depression
the economy drops between wars
wars strengthen the economy
or at least the us economy
the industrial revolution allowed industry to grow, strengthening the economy
but that doesnt mean wars didnt strengthen the economy
they most certainly did
most industry standard advancements we have today werent made during peacetime
yea but thats cuz we are allways at war π
European standard of living increased a lot cuz we have been relative at peace
not true, the european economy also was heightened in war time
then they dropped after wartime
lol no
great depression was worldwide
can you please use actual logic or reasoning?
lol no does not constitute as an argument
I have brought nothing but historical evidence to this discussion
can you try to do the same?
end of WWII in europe was called ... the hunger winter
we havent had it that bad since
no we were occupied
who is we
most of europe
Europe saw great growth post-WWII
many countries in Europe suffered extensive damage to buildings and infrastructure, so the end of the war was a time for intensive rehabilitation
growing industries such as construction and lumber
the end of the war also marked the beginning of a period of expansive growth for Europe
yea.. cuz we all said.. hey lets be done with war and trade a buch π
US, Europe, and Japan experienced amazing gains in the second half the century
no, the war allowed their economies to grow
no having ur buildings and industry destroyed in not good for economy
before ww2, there was a huge rise in facism and economic depression
it is in many ways
its also bad in many ways
but the historical evidence proves that it did help the economy
compare europes postwar and prewar economy
there is no competition
if the USA war against Japan would have dragged on for 10 more years it would have been really bad
nothing good would have come from it
except economic growth
many industries in the US got rich off of the ww2 wartime
they were planning on it lasting a few more years
thats why the manhattan project was completely federally funded
big business didnt want the war to end
they profit from it
if the war had dragged on 10 more years, it would have only further solidified the US economy
why not?
no ISS
the berlin wall would still exist
the middle east has been fighting for millenia
that wont and hasnt changed
a prolonged war with japan wouldnt have prevented the cold war and the space race
the allies and russia would still split germany
and tensions would rise from it
resulting in the cold war
you cant have a spacerace with a large scale war goin on
again, the war would end
and actually yes it could
vietnam didnt stop NASA from continuing its research in space
ever heard of project Mercury?
it prolly didnt help much either π
excuse me but its very annoying when you just say something will or will not happen, or just present statements as facts, without any evidence
sure, my argument is speculation as well, but at least it is based upon historical evidence that I present to you
?? Europe was in ruins, took decades to recover and USA, unaffected is still ahead even now. And Russia "won" over eastern europe stagnating those states for 50 years π«
look at the second half of the twentieth century following ww2
it was great for us, japan, and europe
yea cuz peace and trade
GDP per capita in Europe tripled
what makes you think that?
cuz it was broken
Economic growth would have happened regardless, but europe also had to start ten steps back
europe started 10 steps forward
Aw I had one just like that when I was a kid
technological innovation helped countries such as britain become a global superpower over the course of the war
radar, boats, aircraft, you name it
many industries were growing much more rapidly then before
Britain allways was a global superpower π
Since the years between World War I and World War II were rife with global economic instability, Europe had not had time to implement many of the advancements pioneered in the U.S. and elsewhere
not true, before the wars they faced massive economic instability
while yes, they were pioneers of movements such as the industrial revolution, they were rapidly falling behind
until the world wars happened
and afterwards Europe had the opportunity for catch-up growth.
cuz they fell behind other Europe countries that got destoyed during the war π
keep in mind im talking about europe, not any individual country
Americans had many advancements before and during the war such as nylon and teflon, while many europeans still heated their homes with coal
following the war, these technologies became readily avalible to most everyone across europe
so again, how does a war NOT help stimulate technology and economy
and please actually present some evidence this time
the james webb telescope wasnt made to look for any enemies
its goal is to find the first galaxies that formed in the early universe and to see stars forming planetary systems
but what does that have to do with the current topic
if europe had been fighting if would be looking at earth
Yes but what is your evidence?
or it wouldnt exist
^
^
^
Just saying something is not evidence lol
do you want me to present a gdp per capita chart of the last century?
also project mercury definitely counts as historical evidence that space innovation isnt paused by wartime
thats what the argument is about
there is no gdp chart of 300 year peace cuz it didnt happen
owninator says theres no prosperity after or during a war
exactly
also gdp hasnt been tracked for 300 years
that again has nothing to do with the world wars tho
they happened only 100 years ago
when gdp definitely was tracked
mayB look at the countries where the boots are on the ground... they are not making space stations man
There's no prosperity during a war lol..and a long time after for some countries
have you even seen anything ive typed previously?
how can you ignore all that? how are you that naive?
I think you're naive π
i think you have presented no historical evidence to back up your claims
and that I have presented plenty to show that the world wars heightened not just european economies, but many around the world
you presenting a statement as a fact and tying an emoji at the end doesnt count as an argument
what even is this debate about XD
that war stimulates economy and technology
that depends on the kind of war and its size
the war in ukrain currently is limited to ukraine
it affects the eu states and russia
generally we are currently experiencing a wake up call...
and i am definitly not having prosperity
it can happen after a war
im talking about the past world wars
This isn't a debate club lol. Also as i said, you're also throwing statements that are not historical evidence and there is more than one way to interpret charts
germany took 60 years to pick up the paces again
after russia took its grip of our throat
Eastern europe still suffers π
a tripled gdp does count as historical evidence, especially when following an economic depression, and guess what happened between the time of economic depression and heightened economy, a war! two wars!
wester europe is suffering from the current war and ukraine because of its dependence on eastern europe
eastern europe is suffering because putin is a mad man
all of europe is suffering because putin is a mad man
MOEX not doin great cuz we wont buy/sell with em anymore
are all at fault too
may not be a debate club, but if your going to have a debate at least have a debate
germany didnt ever think about these problems
everybody loses here man.. its not good for tech or economy
but it was
the germany economy suffered because they were on the losing end
"it" is reffering to war i believe
and again, "it" has strengthened economies all across europe and the world for centuries
it's meaning it is
Every country in europe lost WW2 at one point π
not true
politically, not true
A defeat follows surrender
why is that?
see, no historical evidence
Poland never surrendered... they got hurt real bad
just a statement meant to criticize me without even knowing me
while poland as a whole never formally surrendered, many parts of it did
Warsaw for example
after a month
the soviets and germany both claimed pieces of it
Netherlands did surrender after like 2 days... it was fine B4... GDP dropped cuz everything we would build would get stolen anyways
"germany"
you see
germany didnt exist when the nazis where there
it was founded much later
the nazi party was the german workers party
germany definitely existed
and it was called that back then as well
there was no name change between the nazi partys rule
technicly there was
Germania
The first nation state named "Germany" began in 1871
Owni did you smell your socks today?
thats a long time ago... the netherlands was part of it π
much before ww1 or 2
i smelled my socks today.
O-o
thats kind of wierd
bunch of germaniacs π
why do you smell your socks?
need to check what socks i will use for bathing
or i can walk bare foot tomorrow...
shit
why do i only have 4 pairs of socks
and why do i only know where 3 are currently
if you stop calling me a nazi then subconciously
if you only get 7 you will always be short one after the first wash day
excuse me?
socks
what?
Wtf Am I even reading
what are we talking about here?
i have a pair of sweatpants... if I pull em over my feet i dont need socks
the ends of your sweatpants would likely get dirty fast like that
w h a t
and now i have skin socks.
w h a t
u really need to watch a blender unwrap tutorial
you dont need to skin ppl for that
ok ill wrap it up
wtf
Rings of power was pretty great...season 1 finished
A great pile of steaming turds
is it good? i heard of it but was wondering if i should watch
8/10...but I think people nowadays are very quick to hate it
Do you like Tolkien? If so, don't watch it.
i thought tolkien was mid
I never knew him, so I liked RoP
anyways. i tight up my neighbor in the bathtub and he is screaming again... gotta go. cya later.
Hell even if you don't like Tolkien, don't watch it. Sloppily written.. and no.. let's just not.. π
That's what they said about the trilogy too π
My only peeve is that the dialogue takes itself a bit too seriously but it's fine. In no way 1/10
yall just have hills in your projects you cant climb over
like, struggle to even start on
most of my projects die because I get bored of working on it but this time its a little different
When that happens I usually just start a new project...wait...
Why do ads appear on my YT videos when I have them disabled π€
I don't need that 0.5$ that I would make but YT puts ads anyways...
Here I've been needing to make an inventory/GUI system for my game.. and I've lost count of how many days I've procrastinated it by doing nothing
LOL
lol
money well spend
Looks up how to improve at certain stuff on the internet. Finds a reddit post with this:
Successfully build pong in an evening, and now building an RTS.
Absolute legend xD
Talking to master programmer is kind of scary, it knows unreal engine really well and can give you c++ and blueprint examples lol
Naa, it was created by divine will.
Next thing you'll be saying is there isn't a Digital Heaven π
really hopes someone gets the ref
tron, I think?
I heard a lot of good about these birds and my previous bird died last week (had trouble flying and fell really bad and hit the head) so wanted to get another one
my grandpa saw his canary die... got up opened the door and passed out in the hallway
and here i am
you cant threaten people with blowing their heads to bits with a shotgun online anymore...
these days everyone is so sensible...
gotta say at the end
"I dont mean it"
were u holding a showgun in front of his door?
is there any free, kinda tech demos of UE5?
I have UE5 installed, but I'm really new to it all and just wanted to mess around with lumen lol
yes
havent tried the matrix stuff myself yet.. but there is also valley of the ancients
I'm currently downloading the city sample from the matrix thing
idk if that's the game or just a project with the city or what though
I'll look into the valley of the ancients, ty
I'm just really into the lighting aspect and how it can effect the scene
also, would twinmotion be a valid thing to mess around with?
reading the description for it, sounds like it's supposed to be really fast to use and simple?
i dunno , i think it wasnt for me... you can get twinmotion asset packs tho
Ur better off with the templates
They have tuts built in
You don't learn from the tech demo
If u can even run it
Need a high end PC for that
he wants to play with lumen... valley is fine for that
lumen aims for 30 fps for ps5 so yea kinda high end
it ran fine for me when i set the render resolution to 20% π
everyone is complaining about gotham knights being 30fps on consoles, but they are building their own custom unreal. the first 4 arkham games used unreal 3 and gotham knights is "unreal 4", but more then likely it's still their custom unreal 3 with some features pulled in and modified from 4. I think it's just a compatibility issue with their custom solutions that run on all their platforms, and probably not as easy as scaling things down
I remember when console players would argue that you can't tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps
wasnt this like a 15 years ago issue?
no1 is complaining about it right now
latest drama im aware of is the 200.000$ needed to max ur diablo character
get with the program π
diablo Immoral
also its all gambling and for kinds under 18
I got a timeout from twitch rivals chat for daring to comment they were advertising crypto investment services to an almost certainly underage audience
lol
well shame on you
your comment might make em miss out on the oppertunity of a lifetime
dont ur dads phones have auto login on their credit cards π
lol
kid of a friend of mine... yea he did take the credit card π
went all in on Smash
i have no idea what smash is tho
but he spend them $$$ π
Except Rocksteady wasn't the one developing Gotham Knights
Also it seems that Gotham Knights isn't considered to be part of Batman Arkham series.
this is a few days ago issue, i'm saying people are complaining because they think gotham knights is made with ue5, but i'm saying it's made with a completely unrecognizable ue3/4 hybrid which might as well be it's own custom engine at this point
true but it's using the same engine rocksteady has been developing since arkham asylum
wb montreal is doing the same thing they did before, which is making gotham knights while rocksteady (probably) works on the next unannounced batman game, same as they did before with arkham origins
Tbh, I wondered how UE5 would like in PS4, and did t.maxfps 30 thing
my eyes bled
And I swear for first 5 minutes I thought something was wrong on framerate smoothing etc because switching to it after 120fps was terrible
640x480 16 bit is plenty of resolution!
how'd you get a screenshot of my desktop?
still waiting for unreal engine release for this os π
do you know which os it is?
templeOS
god said the promised land is running on commodore 64
simple people, simple simulation?
"If I'm alive, and I do not have exactly 2 or 3 people near me, die. If 3 people surround an empty spot, a new person appears there."
void GameLogic(void) {
if(player1->DistanceFromPlayer2 == 5 && player2->DistanceFromPlayer3 == 5){
cout << "kill player1, player2, player3";
}
}
void playerMove (int player, int moveX, int moveY, int speed, int duration) {
for(int i = 0; i < moveY, i++, moveX++) {
if(emptySpot == true) {
cout << "new player was spawned";
}
}
But you would probably have to add the If player is alive check
... stop it
imagine a game where the player only appears near 2 or 3 npcs and otherwise wanders around unable to interact
wraith simulator
This is what you meant ?
void gameLogic(void) {
if(!(game->nearbyPlayer >= 2 && game->nearbyPlayer <= 3)){
player->setMovement(false);
}
}
`void setMovement(int player, int moveX, int moveY, int speed, int duration) {
//this code moves the player on the map.
Sounds interesting
not quite, more of an abstract puzzler, you can move, but only interact in the right conditions of npc presence
I'm confused what's this about
It seems interesting but idk what a wraith simulator is
or possibly other players, but surprise twist, you can only see players when able to interact
I'm making a joke by extrapolating conway's game of life into a multiplayer mmo concept
Joke? That's a shame, sounded pretty interesting
then make it!
First I'll have to read up on Conway game of life
Not sure what the rules are. I just know of the Google Easter egg
you know the rules already
this
But will this not die out?
it's literally that simple
How does it stay going
populate the playing field with cells, some alive, some dead, iterate each turn
Like you can only start cleaving when you got more then 2 npc's around you
it's a discrete-time discrete-space system with emergent properties
imagine a game where the player only appears near 2 or 3 npcs and otherwise wanders around unable to interact
yep
go to a concert, start working the crowd down from the edges
oh, and only in 2d
So in this version the player would be able to move around? That sounds pretty interesting, throw in the goal of ending the simulation and you have yourself a game loop
yep!
your state is dependent only on those npcs around you
see all, but only interact in some situations
add in interact with environment but not the npcs and you have a haunting horror game
arrange accidents
Isn't there more rules tho?
Sounds like you want an orgy until the party ends and the lights go out.
smth like if there's more than 3 in a spot they die
nope, just those 2, it's remarkably simple
huh, how do they die then?
If 2 or 3 are next to each other, wouldn't they just keep making more
yes, if living cell has 0, 1, or more than 3 neighbors, it dies
Oh ok
if dead cell has exactly 3 live neighbors, it lives
3+ dies, it can have up to 8
and 3 cells only surrounding a dead spot make a living one
4 X 5
6 7 8```
Oh diagonal counts?
yeah
Also how do 3 surround a spot? Like in a V shape?
int main()
{
int player1 = 5, player2=5, player3=5;
int newPlayerX = 2, newPlayerY = 2;
GameObject game;
GameObject * newPlayer = game->spawnNewPlayer(&newPlayerX, &newPlayerY);
return 0;
}
like 123, or 467, or 428, etc...
Oh so 3 in proximity of a cell?
I'm guessing 467 would spawn to the left or below 6?
And 428 would spawn at 5 or 7?
Wait no 5 or 7 wouldn't make sense
467 spawn in the empty (now X, edited)
Oh yeah i forgot that was empty
hence the edit
anyway, you can use a couple for loops and two 2d arrays (one for alternate steps) to build it in a couple minutes
set a time delay between iterations, randomly populate arrays, "play" (since it plays itself)
Yeah I could probably do that by tmrw night, depending how I feel after work
or just find one online
I don't see this turning into an actual game concept, but it sounds fun to play around with
where's the fun in that
my concept is you become able to interact if near 3 living npcs and remain able if near 2 or 3, then kill them all via the environment
That's usually what people are told, until proven wrong
unreal tournament?
proven wrong about it being fun or it turning into a real game?
Turning it into a real game
I'm jetlagged bad and overseas with no pc for 3 weeks, so I might make it a mobile game in not ue
I mean, if i find it rlly fun to destroy the simulation, maybe i could make it a bit cooler and throw it up on itch, but I wouldn't try actually selling it
fun too, see the tech demo that became goat simulator
Chances are it wouldn't turn much of a profit
goat Sim was a tech demo?
yep, nvidia physx demo from coffee stain studios to show what they could do with it, as I understand it
It's all about the learning process, In the end.
that's pretty cool. I never got goat sim myself, but played it with a couple of friends who got it, it's a pretty fun sandbox but gets boring a little too fast
Agreed
I made most my money from working on other people's projects, I rarely complete my own...
Yeah, same here
I don't know where things should end
I learned ue by going on fiverr and making other ppls ideas
I don't think I could make a good game idea anymore if I tried
I just get stuck on tinkering on different ideas, that's all I do
then take mine
I can't justify spending time tinkering with some ideas unless you think there's a chance it will turn a profit
Kinda sad how the gamedev dream changes out of school
Well, if there is a great concept you want to nail, tinkering is key.
Key note: great concept. It's hard to tell when a concept is really good, sometimes your sure of it, and it is, or your sure of it, but its rlly not, or same thing for if your not sure of it. It's all really risky.
Also I don't think I've had a great concept in a long time
I'll probably try to whip it out this weekend
you go ahead and do it
I may
Imagine a few thousand people buy it
or I may squirrel and forget
Tough thing with steam is that you can instantly get buried
then it can pay for the chicken feed for a year
I haven't tried releasing one, but I heard that it takes a lot of marketing to keep it seen
Still a really good return on a little simple side project
let's say it takes 2 hours to make, I'd trade 2 hours of my time for a grand
a couple thousand sales, free marketplace assets, a couple weekends' free time while an ocean away from my computer, it'd be a win
Well, writing code that exactly nails your concept requires some tinkering to make it work properly. Something that will happen along the way either way.
Yeah, but i can't imagine there's too much room for that to happen in a concept like this, with very specific rules
perhaps some hysteresis on the range function so you can get farther away after being able to interact
one thing I think you have some room to change it on is the scale
Ideally, conways game of life would take place across an infinite expanse
I guess fine tuning sounds better within this context
but that's not exactly possible
if unable and within 2 meters, be able
if able and within 5 meters, stay able