#Make all dinosaurs have subspecies, not a cloned one with a different look and species name.
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
What are you thinking a subspecies is
and the alt system is very efficient, no need to change it
as in basically camarasaurus grandis, camarasaurus lentus
should be one camarasaurus
and u can pick which species
cant really explain it
Subspecies and Species aren't the same thing
cant really explain anyways
like path of titans kinda
There are no subspecies in paleontology anyway
so ur sayin tyrannosaurus mcraeensis
doesnt exist
i mean like that camarasaurus ingame
has 3 species
grandis
lentus
and whatever the otherone is
alt species/genus used to be all under the same animal tab, but that made some players confused and because of it, they were all turned into their own individual tabs on the hatchery menu
i mean im kinda new
so i havent explored the features like that
It does exist, it's just not a subspecies
mcraeensis is a species of tyrannosaurus
then what is a sub species in ur terms?
huh
Where are the claims?
The genus is tyrannosaurus, the species is mcraeensis
what claims??
nvm ig i'm wrong, checked it
anyways
Sub species exists prob cuz think of it as a tree
The genus is the root
and the branches are species
So sub species is a creature that shares the same genus but a different species
It doesn't exist in paleontology, as in paleontologists don't make subspecies because it's too difficult to tell from fossils afaik
A subspecies is 'a taxonomic category that ranks below species, usually a fairly permanent geographically isolated race'
I guess kinda
aight
I'm pretty ill informed compared to a lot of other people in this server lol
now uh, u won't commit capital punishment on me for getting smth wrong like 99% of the paleo community right?
damn same lol
Just to clarify
Camarasaurus for example is a genus, in modern animals the best analogy would be the genus panthera, a species is what comes next like P leo( lion ), Panthera pardus( leopard ), Panthera tigris( tiger ), Panthera atrox( american cave lion ) etc. Theyre basically completely different animals. Now for example for tiger, we have 5 subspecies of which 2 are extant, P. t. tigris and P. t. sonadica are the ones that are still living, these 2 can breed with each other and make offsprings that can also breed so theyre the same species but have enough differences to not be considered the same subspecies
So the first name is referring to the genus, the second name is the species name and the third name if present refers to the subspecies
I hopw it was helpfull and aided you in understanding the naming system, its hard to understand at first
correct
well
I should say pre pleistocene paleontology since theres quite a few pleistocene species that have them
Including fully extinct genera?
ye
dire wolf has 2 subspecies; guiydayii and dirus
Interesting
I vaguely remember seeing the name Smilodon fatalis californius? Is that a thing?
if it is its not widely recognized; although you might remember that from Ecos La Brea; which uses that ingame
Thylacoleo most likely has one
another example (although less widely used) is a lot of the wild horses of the pleistocene; being mostly equus ferrus subspecies such as equus ferrus occidentalis
apparently woolly mammoths have a crapload of subspecies proposed
alot are chronospecies
M. intermedius, M. chosaricus, M. p. primigenius, M. p. jatzkovi, M. p. sibiricus, M. p. fraasi, M. p. leith-adamsi, M. p. hydruntinus, M. p. astensis, M. p. americanus, M. p. compressus, and M. p. alaskensis