#System Folders Feedback
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Requesting Feedback: System Compendium Folders https://github.com/foundryvtt/dnd5e/pull/2345
Looking to hear yalls thoughts on implementing Compendium folders for the system, this is the structure that I laid out, but curious to hear anyone's opinions on any changes (maybe just have folders for the document types? (Items, Actors, etc?) Also, keep in mind that these folders would only apply to newly created worlds and therefore will not impact your current folder structure, or lack thereof
**DnD5e SRD Content** #cd2c1e
rules
tables
heroes
**Character Features** #b72c1f
classes
subclasses
classfeatures
backgrounds
races
**Items & Spells** #941919
items
spells
tradegoods
**Monsters** #7d160c
monsters
monsterfeatures
tables being in items and spells is kinda weird to me, but no idea where else theyd go
They're mostly tables of items, so...
oh right
I'd change Character Features to just Characters
Also Items and Spells โ> Items & Spells
If we are committing to having spells with the items, and not with the Character stuff, yeah I agree with unsol
hmm, the & is on-brand for the system, makes sense
Items n Spells tho
Spells'R'Us
Characters sounds like an Actor compendium to me
feels more like a folder about character features tho, only one pact is focused on the characters themselves
This is why I named mine "PC Stuff", but that doesn't seem very professional ๐
subclass, class, feat, etc
Characters
... Progression
... Advancement
... Leveling
Oh yea we talked about pulling them out of that folder too
"Droppables" but plz no
Heh, the way you presented it in text is how id like to see it. Instead rules would be at the bottom.
Stay focused brother ๐
Maybe this is a dumb hill to die on but I'm hard against the starter heroes pack being in a folder called Character Features
Currently moved out with rules and tables
yea, but it's one Actor comp in a folder with 5 other Item comps, so it's the outlier, also yea I moved it to the top level, for now
Could also go the Monster and Monster features Route and do Characters and Character Features
oh shit I see your point haha, but thats only 2 compendiums
I still prefer "Characters" even with Starter Heroes moved out.
I'm cool with heroes being in the root
Kinda do too, but also with Features is fine if that's all that's in there
Yeah
(but yeah there's more symmetry with Monsters if it's Characters)
What about colors, cascading or just by level?
I like cascading for the differentiation.
Yeah, agreed. Looks fine as depicted there IMO.
Watch out for colours that might make it difficult to read
Do you think any of these colors are difficult to read?
Nope
Originally reported by mrkwnzl #1065764070680186930 message ALL MODULES DISABLED? true Short Description of bug: When using folders in a c...
PR updated while taxiing for takeoff ๐ซก