#šātech
1 messages Ā· Page 1010 of 1
means they can track and tax them
and of course a governing body wants to tax crypto, it's money

Nah.
You cant fake warrants and you can verify court orders by calling the court up
Good
its bad anyway
Great anime
Same
Filoni is love, Filoni is life.
Speaking of
new ep tonight

or well now but i watch it later
ooo, interesting
switch to Brave?
been using it the past week or two. It's not too bad
Brave opens .onion websites?
yep
has tor built in
when you open their "incognito" it's like "would you prefer tor? your ISP can still see your naughty shit"
but your naughty shit won't load on tor sometimes so you play the game
I read "ungoogled chromium batteries" š I was like software batteries, wtff
Only because the scale starts at 100%, not at 0%...
Smh why do so many people you could fit anything 3d in your pocket if it was 4d 
What
Only if you can move in 4D
Chevo
That you canāt put anything 3d, like fridge in a 4d pocket (with fourth dimensions being infinite) for imo a pretty obvious reason 
That would be acceptable
we already have points as a concept
dimensionless points
For me I just call the 4th dimension time. As it makes the 4th dimension less abstract to think about
Have not done much work with 4 dimensional mathematics, though. So might one of those methods of good enough in the field but not in its most technical sense
4 spacial dimensions is very different from 4 time dimensions
If something has no breadth into the 4th spacial dimension like all of our 3d objects, you could fit an infinite amount of them by just stacking them in 4d
What you could not do is put 1000 fridges in your pocket 
For example you have absolutely no trouble drawing as much as you want on every single page in a book without affecting the other pages
The problem wouldn't be fitting the fridge
It would
For a simple reason
Fridge has 3 dimensions
4 dimensional pocket gives you one infinite dimensions
You still need to fit at least two of the dimensions somewhere
You could 100% fit as many fridges as you want
You would need 6d to fix that
No
Yes
You only need 1 extra spacial dimension to fold a lower dimension object into it
Well I can give you an example why thatās not really right in this context
Letās say you have a 2d object like paper
(Not fully 2d but thinner than thinnest defined max dimension in this example)
Without folding it you canāt just put it into nowhere looking from bottom. If you put it vertically you may get rid of one axis, but you still have it horizontally and thus āvisibleā from bottom
Fold the paper
What if itās metal?
In the 3rd dimension
You canāt just fold everything without ābreaking itā
A 2d object has no properties in the 3rd dimension
If it does, it's not a 2d object
It's a "very thin 3d object"
2d object in 3d dimension is never fully 2d
It can have zero thickness
That's not true ikas
Images are actually truly 2d
Just like we have points with no dimensions just coordinates
The basic thing is that 3 dimensional object needs to be in 4 dimensions. If you have 4 and only the fourth is infinite what about the two others?
Ikas
Circle on paper
How much 3d space does it take up?
Aka how much volume
Say it has an area of 1m²
You need 3d to be able to actually understand what's going on
The thing is that you donāt need volume. You could stack stuff but only if you had at least one dimension right. 2d objects can only really be stacked on one place no matter itās base properties of two dimensions only in 4d
not enough information or if you assume the new dimension is 0 long then the volume becomes 0.
Even if you put the circle vertically it still has width
And you canāt just ignore it
No ikas
You can fit infinite circles in 3d
That depends
Not if circle diameter is 4cm and you have 2cm.2cm.infinite space
Circle is two dimensional, 3d with one infinite thus only covers one dimension
oh, if you give it anything more than the new dimension of 0 it becomes a cyllinder
That is mathematically incorrect
You need to take calculus again
It's one of the very basics of limits
Depends. It being in 3d space where two axis are limited is also kinda incorrect
No
Math ikas
This is math
That can be proven
If you took calculus you would know this
2D object in 3D world has to have the new dimension to be 0. Otherwise it turns into a 3d object. Is that the idea?
I know it's been 10 years since I did calculus but I remember my limits at least
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4EgbgTm0Bg maybe this will help as it's going at it from a very different approach but still comes with a good dimensional understanding if you can follow it
How to think about this 4d number system in our 3d space.
Part 2: https://youtu.be/zjMuIxRvygQ
Interactive version of these visuals: http://3imaginary1real.com
Help fund future projects: https://www.patreon.com/3blue1brown
An equally valuable form of support is to simply share some of the videos.
Special thanks to these supporters: http://3b1b.c...
Thatās also math. Also the thing is that itās not really possible to prove since you canāt get fully 2d object in 3d space or fully 3d object in 4d space
Mathematically you can
In mathematics you assume your life in the perfect world where it can happen
Well, sometimes it does but quite rarely
I mean usually not the core maths, but some simplified stuff has some assumptions, but yeah, the core does not
If it's actually a theorem it's making no assumptions
The thing that can be just an assumption is how to translate some values into other stuff
Mathmatics has to make assumtions to work. You cannot make a system of mathmatics that will never be able to be proven to be fully coherrrent with itself
Those two statements are opposing pincus
No
There is no assumption in math
I mean not in maths itself but in how people understand some aspects of it
Say you convert your unit into an actual measurement then you have to make the assumption that the unit functions
No, that's called physics ikas
There is no assumption in math itself but in the way people see it there is, different for each individual. There always are assumptions. You come to a number and assume itās something, you are wrong. Itās your assumption, not assumption in maths but still an assumption. But nvm, back to the point
Applied math is called physics
And an argument could be made that non applied math doesn't matter,
But non applied math exists
Dimensionality is a mathematical concept not a physical one according to calculus
What in calculus makes you able to fit 2d object with for example 2.3 into 1.1.infinite, or another example
Folding
I personally don't know the math because it is complicated but you can fold an object into a higher dimension
oh, its actually that mathmatics will have true statements that cannot be proven
No
The thing is that folding is folding
Of course you can fold
But without folding
You canāt really do it
Its proven that there are true statements that can't be proven, but those don't get inducted into mathematics itself at least not really
Ok so how would you be unable to fold?
And if folding into another dimension would or would not have effect onto the object is discutable. Not that it matters since you canāt get a fully 2d object in 3d
Well thing is you can
I mean that's semantics because anything 2d doesn't actually qualify for the definition of object
But 2d things can and do exist
Basically you donāt retain shape of something when folding is the point, itās no longer the same or even 2d object since you fold it into 3rd dimension. Itās just discutable, what I am saying is that you canāt do it with unchanged 2d. You could, but only in 4d most likely
That's not true at all tho
Again I am talking without folding
Mathematically a teacup is identical to a donut
And in the case of two dimensions being smaller
Than the ones of object
(Limiting dimensions)
Ikas
You do not understand.
I can't teach you all of calculus and theoretical physics.
But what I can tell you is that you have incorrect information
are you talking about practical use case of how simple it would be to put N-dimension objects into a n+1-dimension world, or just about the theory? because the theory is very easy and obvious
Quin the part ikas doesn't understand is folding in a higher dimension has no effect in the lower dimensions
yeah but I wonder if he didn't even mean that part and was just unclear in expressing what he originally meant
... seems pretty clear to me
This is also a simple common misconception
Basically I am talking about it without any changes, so also not folding, essentially altering dimensions. Even if it had no effect on other properties
Thatās what I believe the opposite theory to be tbh 
May be a misconception though
Yeah basically it's the uncanny valley, if you learn to little you think oh it's easy just push it in there
If you learn a bit you realize oh wait you need to fold
And if you learn more you learn that's not a problem (if you can manipulate in 4d ofc lmao)
It's very possible we have no way from converting 3d energy to effect along the 4th spatial dimension and then we are boned lol
I mean even the basic concept of 4d is so hard to imagine for humans
Yup
The playbox is fantastic
And there was another 4d demo that really helped me understand this stuff
Basically all the not hardest imaginations you can have are based on how 2d to 3d is
Actually donāt think I have seen many demos of anything like that, most of them just created in my head 
Which might be where the misconception came from
The toybox is fantastic if you have a VR headset
Well, it might, but I still believe it is not misconsemption and itās not really possible to prove so I guess itās a possibly wrong theory 
Well no
Again mathematics vs physics
Itās also definition of the stuff, and folding. The thing is that I counted folding as altering in some way. I am not saying itās not possible with folding, but without folding
Spatial dimensions exist mathematically
A 4th spacial dimension of the same variety as our current 3 would act this way
Again it's a misunderstanding of what folding in a higher dimension is
There's a fantastic video that talks about flatlanders that I can't find right now
there are some non-provable truths and such in math that is correct and I think this video did a good job at explaining it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HeQX2HjkcNo but otherwise math is quite clear on these things without "issues" and "wrong theories"
Not everything that is true can be proven. This discovery transformed infinity, changed the course of a world war and led to the modern computer. This video is sponsored by Brilliant. The first 200 people to sign up via https://brilliant.org/veritasium get 20% off a yearly subscription.
Special thanks to Prof. Asaf Karagila for consultation on...
anything beyond as carm says is physics at not math anymore
Well no
There are people who argue that those truths are part of mathematics, and there are those that dont
Anyways, enough of complicated stuff, letās go to something simple. How would a human vision work and how would you have to see to see properly in 4d 
I fall in the "don't" category
Human vision wouldn't work
We would require downconverters of some kind to rasterize the 4d world into 3d
And also all the physics stuff and properties in 4d
And the fact āthat basically allā things would have to be to some extend 4d in 4d space same as itās in 3d space with 3d things.
Those are a problem for us when we find a way to prove the existence of that dimension
There are experiments that suggest against there being 4d but nothing proven yet
Basically the fact that things don't extend into 4d is somewhat a proof that 4d doesn't exist
Because we can prove that most properties don't extend into 4d
Specifically electromagnetism doesnt
I mean even Iād it does not exist, question remains how would it look like if it would exist
And neither do the strong or weak force
There are just going to be situations where the rules might be known but the proof cannot be given
Because even world not being 4d does not mean 4d could not theoretically exist
But thatās all just theoretical and theories with no way to prove them then
We can prove that we can't affect a theoretical 4tj dimension
Prove that and it's pretty much moot if dim 4 exists or not
Thatās true. But we can imagine how would it be if it would exist which it basically very likely does not.
Yes but if we can prove it doesn't exist then we would be able to say it looks like nothing because there's no medium to convert information from 4d
If we prove we can't affect it I mean
But tbh my opinions are kinda, I donāt fully believe in schrodingers theory fully too tbh, just think that there are not yet discovered properties and dependencies, and only issue is that people have no way to calculate them since you would have to start ācalculatingā and observing everything in universe before it started to be able to get every information about t most likely, so I just kinda see schrodingers theory as ācoverā for people not knowing something and donāt really believe In alternative realities tbh. But may very likely be wrong here, just what I think 
unfortunately quantum mechanics is real and has been proven
if you are talking about the dead cat
because the dead and not dead cat can be physically proven without particularly impressive equipment
I mean, the thing is that there is no way to prove it completely since you would have to see the atoms from start, which was before humans starting observing them. But quantum physics is real since there is basically no way for humans to do anything else.
But also even though I really donāt think thatās the case, imagine if black holes were actually 4d, and that was the thing making them fit everything into it, making them dark and so heavy
But yeah that makes no sense 
Also again misunderstanding a basic concept
Observation is a physical phenomena
Which thing? The black hole thing is more of a joke and not something I actually think
observation itself
and black holes are just a thing that happens when gravity exists
a whole lot of it
well
when the gravity that makes 9.81m/s exists
Yeah, I know, thatās why the thing I said before was not serious
schrodinger's cat is a very fundamental part of quantum physics š¤·
it is a thing
More simplifies the concept of observation means change
More simplifies the concept of observation interacts to change the observed?
I mean that's not exactly making anything simpler lmao
š¤·āāļø You said you would use interaction. So thats a change to include that word
Observation is interaction, in physics they are interchangeable
When talking about simplifying why not to just straight up talk about how would it be 6th dimension instead of 4th to simplify 
Because it wouldn't be
Just the same as the volume above my screen is 3d is constantly changing but in 2 dimensions the screen is static
at least my work laptop lol
not my computer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjsgoXvnStY
this video is the one i was thinking of
My new book is now available on Amazon!
https://www.amazon.com/Start-Point-but-whats-point/dp/B08C8R9QBT/
For more info and other products go to tenthdimension.com .
Twitter: twitter.com/10thdim
Instagram: instagram.com/10thdim
Blog: tenthdimension.com/blog
Patreon: patreon.com/10thdim
Also check out Imagining the Tenth Dimension - 2012 http:/...
this uses dimensions 4-6 as time
Tbh donāt really think thatās the same, as just spacial dimensions.
this video doesnt include a 4th spacial dimension
however it provides a fantastic way to think about further spacial dimentions and that is "a fold"
watch the whole video
Lmao
Anyone use Roon for their audio?
The app is actually nuts, I can see why the lifetime membership is so expensive.
It's just flawless music player with integration piled on top of more integration.
Just like...
The Home Assistant possibilities alone are staggering, it's just so neatly tied together.
how i can change mouse click with L2 and R2?
Personally use strawberry, sure lacks the customisation of foobar but works well enough for my uses.
Ultimately as long as I can have my library album artist / original year - album I am fine. I just dump albums in a playlist and call it a day.
Editing metadata works fine in Strawberry and visually it's also fine if you use the system icons.
yo @hearty lake
YO š
so can you suggest me an adblocker for yt
and is the download speed for sites more in brave as compared to chrome
YouTube Vanced on phone
like chrome doesn't utilize my speed properly sometimes
ios š
Oop
I use it's DNS
oh
No apps needed
adguard is an app
like the download speed is prob the same but sites will load faster since brave just blocks the file srelated to analytics & trackers
it will probably eat my space and create cache again
It's an app but you don't need it
oh whats your personal preference
If you just want the Dns anywsy
can you suggest an extension for adblock on yt
Ublock origin
every extension for chrome works for brave too, it is actually chrome but with some tweaks
uBlock Origin is not an "ad blocker", it's a wide-spectrum content blocker with CPU and memory efficiency as a primary feature.
And?
it said this
It still blocks ads
on ios i use adguard too btw. but its not working for the YT app
is it best?
ublock origin is overall chrome ad blocker?
thank you
oh thanks
This link is for chrome
Firefox
i only use chrome
thanks finally no yt ads less go
it has some internal options idk what to tick and what to not
can anyone help
If you can change DNS on iOS
I suggest adding this one to it
Don't
If you ask for something that helps to solve a diplomatic rival. Me ordering saturating orbital bombardments on all their core planets will do that. It did the job as prescribed.
Why

It doesn't just block ads it can cause issues for public access WiFi or any WiFi you have to login to
And some apps break
Look
I only use mobile data
And it could be snooping on the traffic
Xd it's fine
can you tell me what settings to use on ublock i wll screenshare
Default is fine
Indeed!
interesting
Since DNS traffic is not encrypted yet most of the time. all the requests will be visible for the dns initially
If anything it reduces bandwidth
i don't want packet loss in my games
It blocks the requests ascociated with trackers and ads
yes ik
Besides updating the database doesnt take that much data
awesome
im loving it thanks
sad i didn't ask about it earlier
new role
With some minor perms
what are these modes at the bottom @pale sigil
Hmm
the only reason i uninstalled reddit
They understand the basic concept of UV radiation or not?
anyone knows about powecord here?
AMD Radeon RX 6000, RX 5000, RX 500, RX Vega series graphics cards, RX 480, RX 470, & all AMD Ryzen processors with Radeon graphics, if the minimum requirements of the game are met.
FSR support
Integrated graphics also support FSR
I would file a report to the EU if a nightlight for children was unsafe
That is VERY big for APUs
That means a below average APU can actually run more demanding games quite well
Wait they are suspected Infrared radiation? What kind of ovens are they running around there
@cursive summit Not first gen.
Interpolated animations look great if you donāt look too closely. FSR is the same.
Give it a few generations and Iāll agree with that statement.
Huh.
Apparently MS is dropping Windows 10 Home and Pro in 2025.
Presumably in favour of upgraded by then Windows 10...?
But Windows 11 is just an upgrade for Win10
So it's more than an upgrade then
Whole another version
windows 11?
Mmmmm, but didnāt MS say they were going to never make another Windows?
But they said that windows 10 would be the last
^^
I guess that Win10 is a plaftorm of sorts
That'll just keep getting updated
:/
And ditch the naming scheme every half a decade
That might be it.
AFAIK, MS eventually just want it to be called "Windows"
That's what 21H2 update will do
ooh
Win10 will become just "Windows"
im going to call it a waste of money
Yāknow what? Iād be fine if MS just updated the entire OS from the floor up and ditched X86 entirely.
If Microsoft designed macOS, what would it look like?
Introducing macOS Redmond.
Inconsistent Design.
Live Tiles on Mac.
Automatic Updates.
Notepad and Internet Explorer are now on macOS.
Fluent Design in some places.
Designed by Kamer Kaan Avdan.
This concept video created using Adobe XD, Adobe Illustrator and Adobe After Effects.
Music: ''Sp...
128bit lets go
Lol 128bit. Why
Because that also needs to be standardised someday
There is even a extention for hypervisors in the works.
But... 512bit will be needed some day. :(
Quad-precision floating-point has been ratified already
Get a beefy FPGA then
But 128 bit is accurate enough to pinpoint almost everything in the galaxy
In floating point yes
From the smallest distance possible to the entire universe
But floating point operations are computationally expensive without an floating point unit
Ken Hong, Head of Global Corporate Communications at LG Electronics, called us and we chatted for 15 minutes about yesterdayās video.
As a result, LG will be implementing significant change to how they handle monitor reviews.
105
1613
There's a whole chain of tweets from HU, so open twitshit
So basically this translates into āWe fucked up and said things too directly, weāll use a smokescreen from now onā. Cool.
Eeeh nah.
They overextended and fucked up with HU.
Nothing will change except their internals, theyāll be exactly the same but theyāll keep a tight lid on things for now until it blows over.
ok they said they are dropping using that marketing branch, what else do you want them to do? give free monitors to people? xD
I mean I would not complain if I was one of the people 
Think they have? Theyāll just collapse it into something else and rebuild it.
Thatās what companies do as a whole, they always just take a step sideways while calling it a step back.
ok but aside from the obvious needing to wait if it actually fixed issues
what else should they have done
if this is apparently not enough
Actually changed their policies and become respectable?
No company will ever do that, but you asked for the optimal.
sigh Maybe Iām just a cynic. That could be it.
but they literally posted a log of what they said changes going forward??
Yes, they posted changes.
Iāll remain sceptical until things actually do change, and more importantly Iāll watch for the upcoming bullshit.
No corporation will actually reign themselves back by choice, I think. Theyāll look for other bullshit to do, just like usual.
and wanting to see they do what they say is fair, but you can't really complain if there isn't actually any further step they can do at this point
bit weird to complain they dont have 5 years of trust build up after a day right? š
Not complaining about their current step, Iām extremely sketchy on their motivation to stay on the decent road.
And that implies I ever had any trust in them before. Hell no.
Trusting a corporation is how you get burned. Common sense 101 is to not trust those that donāt want to care about your existence.
Especially avoiding trust with entities that only care about your wallet. You hold them at arms length because anywhere else and out comes the shiv.
sure, but even a healthy ammount of cynism shouldn't warrant calling it lacklustre when they did pretty much all they could at this point
I donāt praise someone for undoing an obvious fuck up that shouldnāt have happened in the first place.
Thatās what I expect as a baseline.
Shit on my carpet and Iām not going to thank you for wiping it off.
not really expecting praise for it obviously, but both your and ikas comments really were more in a negative way than just acceptance
Yep. I donāt trust the other shoe not to drop. If they hold and stay good for a long while Iāll stop expecting it.
Theyāve proven to have a track record of trying to sidestep responsibility, that alone makes me actively not trust shit all they say.
and that is fully fine but dont express it sounding in a way that suggests what they did is lacklustre when there wasn't more they can do at this point š
Iāll give you that.
scepticism isn't equal to being negative about something š
They shat on the floor and got out a mop. Weāll see if they donāt feel the urge to do it again.
yup
I think the issue is way overblown
LG has the right to organise paid reviews/advertisement/sponsored content
Every reviewer has the right to accept or decline. It only needs to be marked clearly
Yeah, but LG tried to payoff media to cover up their own bullshit.
That doesn't fly.
If they were sponsoring some content with the express purpose of a good review? Little different, but still buying positive feedback.
but you know what's looking fly? new pictures of 10nm chips š https://twitter.com/AnsYuuki/status/1403699835883171843
But this was fair criticism that they tried to buy their way out of.

looks like 14+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++nm is still intel's best offering
the real reason for intel opening foundry for others to use: more 14nm+ versions in the world
Get up to 25% off your Ekster order for a limited time*: https://ekster.com?sca_ref=91918.Xp4SkLypfM
*By purchasing through my affiliate link, you're helping to support the channel.
Thanks to Ekster for sponsoring this video!
ā Liked this video? Subscribe for more: http://mjd.yt/subscribe
So Apple recently released the first developer beta of ...
oo
European..
they mean the more privacy respecting version
Some reason, thats the version I am already on
But the EU rom is not getting MIUI 12.5 .-. so I want to switch to global
Actually, if you use the China version but dont use any of th e default apps, it is more provacy respecting
In the global / EU version they stripped out a lot of the privacy features like clipboard paste indication, sending apps empty data sets rather than your actual data etc .-.
Cant have them hiding thought crimes from the state 
Hmmm, if they can detect and falsify that.. what stop them from just doing the same but under deception...
Could be they cannot implement the feature as the possibility has been removed instead by law.
Everybody is spying on everyone else by everyone I mean country
If China spies on you all the way to Europe df will they do
They do it anyway and dont try to hide this fact
Not hiding it
Just saying I rather by spied on someone across the world rather than in my neighborhood
They will brute force servers for every port and ip doesnt matter if they will be 80% of all unknown foreign traffic
Alright
If they shut down infrastructure would be bad
But even if let us say US spies only on US
The police does sketchy stuff
The fbi or whatever do the same
So even domestic authority or power can be sometimes even worse
At least in the US there is free speech
And some other natural rights
If you want a prime example: stingrays used by the police
Anyways it is all a big mess, I might be better off if everyone was busy spying on each other freely since then they would be fighting over it and spending less time spying
ios users be like š
no one uses iOS
But don't speak too freely and be marked as an communist. They end up, dead.. under mysterious circumstances. 
that shouldn't be protected if people will weaponize it
then don't allow it
Note: it only dictates how government should behave and towards its citizens. Like all constitution is about
I mean if you are politician or vocally put on social media or live in a very American political neighborhood yeah most likely
Bernie not dead yet
You think they can get away with assasinating him? They will call the CIA sus unless its 100% not due to natural causes
You can move to China or something no free speech dere
it's a joke
Ah alright
I just believe that everyone should have it, knowing it can be revoked with good reason
like spreading misinformation or hate
It does not necessarily get revoked
Dont poke a bear and go cry it responded
But mistrust and then ignoring happens while fanatics stay around or ejatevr
Alex Jones is still out there
He did not loose free speech necessarily
what we can do is cripple their ability to spread lies
and get less people tainted by them
That happens already
that's what we do, and that's all we can do
Facebook I think burned him to crisp
The only way he is able to keep himself from legal action is by telling the judges its all satire and noone in the right mind would take him seriously
the thing is that people out there actually believe what he says

there will always be a few oddballs out there
but letting them into the limelight, no
not good
Taken from JRE Episode #1255- Alex Jones Returns
I DON'T LIKE EM PUTTING CHEMICALS IN THE WATER THAT TURN THE FRIGGIN FROGS GAY!
Music & video editing by me. Subscribe for more remixes!
Mans a school shooter denier
song is so fire ngl
Ah I never heard that but it sounds bad horrible in comparison Lordus
he's playing to his main audience's fears of having their guns confiscated and conspiracies regarding the shootings being conducted by democrats to justify banning guns
more viewers = more money flowing in
It is a extremely bad idea though since people likely died( if it was to his friends then fine but throwing it up on the internet tsk tsk tsk)
He accused the sandy hook shooting to be fake and the parents to be some crisis actors. He got sued for that where he had the satire excuse lined up
š
how do you fake children getting shot to death?
Precisely
And if they were faked that person(people) would have been seriously arrested
That is one of the core principles of fascism. Some strong shadowy vaguely defined enemy that's also somehow incompetent and weak. Stir up some fear and collect on their irrationality
it's keeping him housed and fed
so it's clearly working
Doesnt matter if they cant do much with that while you swim in the money/fame
Just stay out of a jail cell and invest in some bodyguards. Should be fine, if you dont mind throwing away all your morals
Especially when you pray on the weak that will mindlessly spend everything they have on the hope
All you need to ensure is that it keeps spreading around to reach those people
I guess by what you say the best case is to just forget about him
Just not what he did
mate
he said people were trying to turn frogs gay
that's all I need to know that he is either completely nuts, or playing off of people like that to earn a living
aight chief
if you say so
All I know about Alex Jones
Is that HE IS AN NCR HERO
He's not an intellectual, he's a fake and a fraud. Seriously he only has a 4 in intelligence.
#newvegas
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Noobnut125
imagine denying death lol
i wonder if some of the parents were present
Some sued actually on their own
Weak country it must be then. Fearing the mere pressence of colours
read as āwindowlickerā, was confused for a while as to why would anyone remix aphex twin
i have it on vinyl
best cover tbh
yay another design aesthetic to make the control panels less usable and ui experience more changing
not even
It's pretty cool I guess if you work on Windows in an office or a house like I do.
Immediate access to the weather without having to do anything else. It's reasonably cool, but who actually is this marketed toward that has enough demand to warrant it...?
Yeah but not even that, weather pretty sure is just shown on iOS and Android on the lockscreen
You can add clocks in Windows as well... since forever
I don't know about clocks, I never used three or more
But I just found this
That's way cooler
Can do this too, it seems
Hell, it even tells you if the Sun is up there or not
And you can Pin all of those to Start
I don't know
Guess so. I found the menu to add two more clocks
Anyway, they offer superior alternatives, so that's kinda not an issue
For the five people who need more than three clocks specifically in the tray clock, there will be a ways...
Even Soviet missile launch sites found 3 to be enough
in forza horizon 4, only RT, LT and the joystick are recognized. Anybody knows how to fix this?
Additional details regarding AMDās first big.LITTLE design, otherwise known as a heterogeneous or hybrid core architecture have surfaced via a patent filed by the company. The patent explains the kind of approach the company plans to take with its first hybrid-core processor, codenamed Strix Point. We already know from previous leaks that Strix ...
That listing xD
seems like a scam ;P
YEP
does it have power pass through? maybe you can use a dongle?
meh, a little bit
They just got some rats to distribute the devices knowing the private keys to them all
Chinese scientists have set a new world record of achieving a plasma temperature of 120 million degrees Celsius for 101 seconds in the latest experiment on Friday, a key step toward the test running of a fusion reactor.
The breakthrough was announced by Gong Xianzu, a researcher at the Institute of Plasma Physics of the Chinese Academy of Scien...
Aw a bit of an older article
I think qled is the future for gaming monitors
So you mean, the future is already here?
I think mled is the future
Or maybe oled
Mled?
Its not here for gaming monitor, the refresh rate have to be high
Im also intrested in how the ghosting/motion blur is on those monitor, thats quite important
Isn't qdot literally qled?
Im not an expert in this
doesn't OLED have LED back illumination too?
How does it work
Enlighten me
Self lit?
I am not an expert on this at all
Isn't qled the latest monitor technology or something
But it is similar to OLED
So its not different from IPS?
What is quantun dot?
magic, buy samsung!
Apparently, it uses nanocrystals instead of liquid cristals
Wich are 1 to 4 nm in size and emit light instead of filtering it
That seems a panel technology leap tbh
our grandchildren will really enjoy MicroLED
QLED bypasses physics limitations of lcd tech where microled does not
This modern American/Japanes work ethic too.
MicroLED when?
I accept slavery for MicroLED 
Now i see. But you can combine nanocrystals with microled right?
Sure QLED is just a stepping stone on the way to qdel but it's an important stepping stone
Qdel?
Not nanocrystals
Nanoparticles
Current QLED is a layer of nanoparticles on top of a normal lcd
Some of the nanoparticles may be nanocrystals but that's not a requirement
Ok, and we now need also the lcd to be micro led
Well no
Also what is qdel
I'm pretty sure that every microled has had a qdef on it
So QLED means lcd with a quantum dot enhancement film
Or lcd with qdef
Next step is pure quantum dot
Nanomachines
With wich backlight system?
Quantum dot
How does that work
Qdel means electroluminescent quantum dots
The film is the layer wich filters the light, right?
Where you trigger the quantum dots with electricity instead of light
Well no
If QLED was just filtering it wouldn't be interesting at all
Ok, so no backlight, but instead the quantum dots produce the light themselves
What QLED actually does is it converts between different frequencies of light
But it takes light as an input
Yup
So it doesnt filter but takes the backlight LED and turns it into different frequencies
While IPS LCD only filters with liquid crystals
A qdef screen can be basically 3 layers, 2 for the TFT and one for the actual light part
OLED requires a minimum of like 7 with lcd requiring a minimum of like 15
TFT?
Light part, you mean backlight LED illumination?
The thing that brings the electricity to the pixels
Ok
Is called the TFT layer
Or you mean the part of the screen you see
Light part being the part that creates the image
The light part of qdel is 1 single layer
So the part nearer you the observer
Doesn't mean that
Just the part interacting with photons
Wich part is it
The quantum dots themselves
The one i tought then
So it will not even be microled, just quantum dots and electricity
This isn't necessarily true tho
Ok
Yup
Intresting. And it will help with pixels response time i imagine?
I suspect the final quantum dot panels are gonna be mirror, quantum dots, tft
Nope that's not helped vs oled
Qdel is just supposed to be cheaper oled but has the possibility of not breaking down
But if this technology is not here yet, how can you say it wont have better performance then OLED
Theoretical perfect of oled and qdel are the same
Qdel might be easier to get there but so far all we have is "probably similar for cheaper"
The limiting factor tbh ATM is the TFT anyways
And is it liquid crystal? How does that work
Ok, so its just electricity
Yup
And what about the crystals
Oled doesn't use crystals
It uses polymers
And polymers aren't durable
They break down over time
Would you say quantum dots are superior? Maybe we can improve quantum dots in the future, maybe they can be smaller or anyway different
The point of quantum dots is they are alot easier to manufacture
Yes
Nice
Qdel can have the perfect stats of oled without the durability concern
Mayeb we can substitute the current quantum dots and make then atoms with some quantum phisycs magic
I agree
Nah current quantum dots are just not great, we need something fundamentally better
And quantum dots are fairly easy to manufacture in bulk, where oleds have to be manufactured directly on the panel
Samsung is right now producing qd-oleds
Yes was thinking about that
They are speaking bullshit, because OLED has no backlight while qdOLES has?
Basically using the most efficient light producing oled for every subpixel regardless of color then using quantum dots to convert it to the correct color
Qdoled doesn't have a backlight
QLED has a backlight
Hownis the light produced? By OLED polymers?
An animated drive through Nanosys Quantum Dot technology roadmap. From QDEF to QDOG and QDCC to QDEL this video looks at how Quantum Dots are the platform technology for all future displays. Includes exploded diagrams of Quantum Dot integration with LCDs, OLEDs, microLEDs and QDEL emissive displays.
Oh, so it is an OLED enhanced with qd at the end
Yeah nanosys is one of the names in quantum dots
Yep
Well actually
No it's not enhancing at the end
It uses blue oleds only
Then some of the blue oleds get converted into red and green by quantum dots
This i guess
yeppo
no
the oled is the layer that is on or off
backlight means theres a light, then a layer that decides if a pixel is on or off
And it is on or off on different parts
Depending on wheter that area/pixel is black or not
yes
each individual pixel has 3 oleds behind it
and each oled has a different quantum dot in front of it
Microled and miniled are a step behind and are not on/off for every pixel, but for every area
Right?
miniled yes
microled can be per pixel like in the wall
and the wall doesnt use a backlight it just uses raw microleds
Ok. So we are at a good point with qdoled, just behind qdel
stop ping
K
Quantum mechanics should not be touched. All who enters, abandon hope
Eh, not quite. They are not slated to come to market until 2022 now.
They are still producing them now
I don't think they're mass producing already.
Otherwise, uh, they'd launch by say autumn.
Instead they plan to launch 2022
I miss those designs on the cards a little
And boxes
Was that a scam because if it is then it is quite alarmingly real
So the other day was the same text?
I remember people telling scam or whatever
yep
scam
the link is a dead giveaway
Vexxsie you troll xD
any link masquerading as a steam trade link with a .ru domain is a scam
RDR2 was actually good
don't click it ever
no shit
Pls click it for free RDR2
I clicked it so see what is up
Click all the links
But I am not signed in XD
but that's not what we're talking about
Or Steam literally asks you if you want to entrust your info to another website, and you as a retard accept
it
Or other sites literally do an XSS attack and just steal your credentials anyways
is targeted towards kids
who just see "free knife OMG"
and well
yeah
get their shit stolen
I mean I guess, but phones are sandboxed mate and I was not signed in
Tbh I like my Kaspersky a lot
Also android 12 uses iOS file systeming
being impulsive
Literally whenever I visit a site, Kaspersky scans all outgoing protocols
There is no free lunch - unless you are rich and famous
Antivirus is mostly a joke
They scan for names
It's quite often it blocks .js shit
Or files that is it, so if I changed the name of the exentensions and applications could go under the radar
Friendship with antivirus expired, VM is my new friend
you can do that with just ublock, no need to for a tool that slows the pc while doing it 
VM in VM in VM in VM in VM ...
Yeah that too slowing down PC using resources inefficiently
thats actually not true
now that you can pass hardware to a VM keeping most of the performance, that is kinda sensible now

Eh I know you can somehow do all the AV firewall stuff in the router but I can't be bothered
Snip the ethernet cable for 100% effectiveness
2000 iq right there
theres a youtuber who tests av programs, and randomly generates filenames for them, has them directly appear in the computer, then launches them, and the avs usually block all but 1 or two viruses out of the hundreds they grab
Well maybe then antiviruses have evolved A BIT but still some manage to pass was that explained
Easier to run it sandboxed and check its behaviour
Best idea honestly, because if it goes haywire start a new sandbox in fact windows offers one that upon closing clears all data
Windows Defender vs Malware in 2021: A follow up to our ransomware test, we put an up to date Windows 10 system against raw malware data. This is test 1 of the year with more to come. -- Important links below --
Windows Defender vs Ransomware in 2021:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbYx8V2RTjc
š Contact us for business:
https://thepc...
it misses alot but it also got a ton of stuff
Kaspersky scored 100% in that even with its main AV modules disabled
that was at one point in time
2021 test though
kaspersky has done very well tho yea
Kaspersky is quite good though as an AV
It genuinely scans processes for malicious activities
And actively blocks them
Well tbh
Why I'm shilling Kaspersky is cause I literally got it for free
I didn't pay a dime and it works wonders 
Learn basic security
And use linux
haven't used an AV in years etc
still wasted diskspace over defender 
blocks >99% of attempts paired with common sense
Linux security is to update the kernel, microcode, drivers. Security by nicheness
exactly
You could also build your own firewall and more
https://twitter.com/VideoCardz/status/1404181984612655108 guess that shows how its not just raw chips limitation that cuts supply short
NVIDIA reportedly to boost GeForce RTX 30 production capacity by limiting RTX 2060 supply
https://t.co/Cn3xIiXloP
it's also AiB production?
don't they have separate lines for different parts?
oh, could be general supply of basic materials and basic parts
chips are usually sold with the memory and that could be one limit
or just substrate when packaging the chip etc.
atm vrm components are getting expensive
well those would not be parts that nvidia would sell them thought right?
I mean that would make sense if the aibs complained and nvidia changed it based on feedback
but nvidia usually doesnt care about what anyone says lol
probably noone said anything
they just noticed a decrease in orders so they pivoted
hmm I guess that could make sense
rsync?
also allows you to copy with the ability to continue where it was stopped for some reason
i mean automatically every day
gonna be a while
archiving it
Also windows
Should be crossplatform as well
Because of the flexibility, speed, and scriptability of rsync, it has become a standard Linux utility, included in all popular Linux distributions. It has been ported to Windows (via Cygwin, Grsync, or SFU[15]), FreeBSD,[16] NetBSD,[17] OpenBSD,[18] and macOS.
Apparently you can also have it compress the data for faster transfer
Also great thing it does, is the way it treats the data transfer in blocks of data instead of files. so many smaller files are as fast to send as large files. in theory
That is not relevant, missing the underlying meaning of them having to shift production
If 2060s are useless I'll take a bunch. 
Can probably push 1GH/s out of my farm if I have a few of those cards.
20 or so.
ā¤ļø Check out Weights & Biases and sign up for a free demo here: https://wandb.com/papers
ā¤ļø Their mentioned post is available here: https://wandb.ai/wandb/getting-started/reports/Debug-Compare-Reproduce-Machine-Learning-Models--VmlldzoyNzY5MDk?utm_source=karoly
š The paper "Self-Organising Textures" is available here:
https://distill.pub/selfo...
Neat
that cpu usage when organising though though š
from 1.2% to 95% cpu usage haha
I am not a fan of RTX 2060
6GB on a GPU as powerful as the GTX 1080 is a joke IMHO
but it isnt useless
With all the money flowing into AI processor startups right now, trying to tell them apart can be tricky. Most are aiming for inference, others for training, and some are in the middle, all looking for that edge to put them above the rest. Tenstorrent believes it has the solution for both inference, training, and can be scaled from 16 chips to 1...
locke
why do you care
no one can "buy" an RTX or RX 6000 GPU rn
so...does it matter if it can run games?
don't wear em
crush the jewels too much
Just buy the gt 710, the best graphics card on the markt right now
Thats... symphathy.. nice
exactly
the one GPU you can get for less than $1000 rn

Checkmate, atheists
aw shit
Why is it in Germanic? Barbarian..
yeah because everyone cares about RT performance in nvidia optimized games 
I'll go and enjoy my higher fps for less money and less powerdraw in the other 40 hours of games I play a week
Why is it missing metro exodus enchanced in that list. š¤
Also isnt dlss made to help with that, still. Why the rage boner for 2060?
He's trolling 
Also you kinda don't want any kind of AA in a game like Siege
That's what you want in a competitive shooter
Just get a 4K display
"just"
4k non RTX is also looking good enough to not kill your eyes
AMD Radeon RX 6600M tested, competes with GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU AMD introduced its Radeon RX 6000M series based on RDNA2 architecture before Computex 2021 just earlier this month.Ā Initially, we have only seen reviews of the Radeon RX 6800M GPU which is now offered with ASUS ROG Strix G15 gaming laptop. The RX [ā¦]
Is this one also memory speed starved?
Can you FSR DLSS? 
5x the FPS
Double the filter for double the fps
yet it already looks better than dlss' first implementation
idk anything dlss before the 2.0 demo was just bad
or I guess anything before the 1.9 in control to be fair
yeah and it didn't get better in that time 
FSR probably won't be as sharp as DLSS 2.0 in still pictures
But it can't have temporal artifacting by design
Control, metro, and no man's sky
And that's not true because all 3d games from current gen use ta, which fsr could easily cause artifacts as an interaction
Then just turn it off
https://twitter.com/VideoCardz/status/1404461294347034625 sure hope amd are gonna work on that or else intel is gonna snack their gpu spot lol
It's not possible to turn off ta
That's not an issue with FSR though. That's on the game, then
It would prevent a ton of effects from working including most forms of advanced antialiasing and texture filtering
You've gotta understand that rasterizing is a very complicated process
Any messing with it is very very jank
If you told a film executive you could render their film in half the time but you couldn't use Houdini simulations you would hear their laughing even after you exited the elevator on the bottom floor
Why would you not be able to turn it off? I have plenty of games where it's an option.
Because sadly many modern rendering techniques abuse the blurryness of it to cover up for other effects
Like say reflections, they might be annoyingly noisy without the TAA blurrghosting
Well, I still miss the times of crisp, sharp graphics like Gothic 2 had
I hate TAA so much it makes visuals so fucking blurry and the ghosting artifacts are shitty to look at
And yet developers think it's a-ok because people seem to just accept it now?
After ridiculing FXAA for being a blur filter while TAA is 10 times worse
Most games just lower the back sampling to 1 frame when you turn it off
It's just like msaa
Force msaa off and the brightness of most textures will drop in half and transparencies will all become mega pixelated
I'm not talking about taa, taa is the older version of ta with less smarts and with huge backsampling
Have you played doom or any ue4 game?



