#🔌│tech
1 messages · Page 276 of 1
One day it be real again 
That’s actually cute as hell wtf 😳

i decided to return
lol
i found the same 4070 on the same board at same vendors and everything the same, only difference is the sku. is there some sort of difference worth 50 bucks?
Lotr? Nah they don't suck at all but the HD DVDs are good
@prisma crag basically avoid 4k blu ray
The 1080p one was fine
damn they forgot the color grade
anybody know some good black/blue 60% key caps?
Sam is not returning
But this is actually an absolutely trash hire
Ex-Twitch CEO does not have a good record

They sure fucking do, some dipship has registered my email to some marketing agency that are now spamming adverts via klaviyo
For random bands and shit lol, at least they get spam filtered
Ahahahaa
Microsoft definitely struck gold
Just poached some top talents
Although I am not too sure why they need Sam Altman
Guy doesn't have any technical background afaik, doesn't have even much of a diverse professional work background
Yeah his alma mater is dropping out of university, no real education
he seems to understand the concept and what teams and skills are needed to make the product
And also is proving himself to be business minded ignoring the safety aspect of it
He's half the reason OpenAI went ClosedAI
In technical worlds, you need people with limited understanding of the actual technical stuff as they are more efficient for a lot of tasks
not an issue for Microsoft
why would you think Microsoft would see that as an issue
As long as Altman stops prioritizing profits over safety of the product, he can lead whatever he wants
His moto is churn out products for people to buy, doesn't matter if those products are really ready
Last thing we need is a corporate mind using megacorp funds to release more borked, flawed models that actually might be dangerous
do you think Microsoft sees that as an issue?
Microsoft? Hell no
They are profits minded as most corps
Safe AI ethics people are probably very concerned with 2 questionable individuals becoming leading characters of 2 big companies
And I might be more pro-closed source, but open source is cute
so technically amd could commission intel to manufacture their products 
Gatling tater launcher 
Yo guys I bought a mouse couple days ago but it’s starting to lagg and bug im playing fort why is this happening ?
Don't play sand castles with mouses
💀
what mouse?
@old marlin do you know about any "gaming" digital pedals? how come no big brand has come up with that yet
Hello guys and gals, it's me Mutahar again! This time we take a look at what appears to be the Playstation Portal. I would normally be excited for a new Playstation handheld but Sony has dropped the ball and released quite possibly the most barebones device in gaming history. Thanks for watching!
Like, Comment and Subscribe for more videos!
Che...
Support our deep-dive testing! Get 10% off any GN Modmats, Solder Mats, or tools during the sale: https://store.gamersnexus.net/
This review and benchmark of the AMD Threadripper 7980X & 7970X HEDT CPUs tests for power efficiency, thermals, power consumption, Spec Workstation performance, Adobe Premiere and Photoshop performance, rendering, code...
Oh, how I love psycho Sony fans defending $200 piece of e-waste 
rip openai
Nope
Probably just too slim of a market
Just use rudder pedals lol
Zoom zoom
scythe made some
idk if those could be counted as gaming

very gamer
and ceesa makes his own ones
There are tons of productivity ones
are there?
elgato has a foot pedal
Wow
Support me on Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/der8auer
Music / Credits:
Outro:
Dylan Sitts feat. HDBeenDope - For The Record (Dylan Sitts Remix)
Paid content in this video:
- /
Samples used in this video:
- ASUS components, R...
64 cores doing 5.2 ghz
On water
Thrustmaster t3pa?
Analog
Wow ln2 was only 5.9
Also 96C doing 1600w on ln2 at 6ghz
all core?
Yeah
He got 5.2 easily on aio,but it would saturate the cooker
And 5.9 on ln2
Now we know why Asus put dual PSU and that huge vrm
1600w CPU only is insane
Sucks we don't have multi GPU anymore
Could you imagine a quad SLI bench on that
That sounds very expensive to run lol
business expense
Well yes but paying like 30 cents every half an hour (on full load) is pretty sad
not if the performance it offers more than justifies the cost
Fair
totally a 24/7 setup one would run
I mean yeah if you need th c
th c
At 5.2 with water cooling the 64c out runs sapphire rapids on ln2
The 96c will wipe the floor on everything in threaded tasks
Comment by u/paintboth1234:
To clarify it more, it's simply this code in their polymer script link:
setTimeout(function() {
c();
a.resolve(1)
}, 5E3);
which doesn't do anything except making you wait 5s (5E3 = 5000ms = 5s). You can search for it easily in
https://www.youtube.com/s/desktop/96766c85/jsbin/deskt...
YouTube caught doing illegal shit lol
Artificially slowing down Firefox browsers
"watching Youtube anonymously"... meh
run it on a vps and route it through tor, as anonymous as watching youtube can get
That is way too much work?
Ancient news.
A day old?
Why would I want to use some kind of third party anonymous client, run it on VPS and route it through Tor when that is just worse than just using normal regular youtube.com?
I don't care for anonymity, I hate Google doing stupid things like artificially nerfing browser performance
so why do you comment on "watching Youtube anonymously", when it's clearly possible
What
This isn't the first time this has happened. The whole "Google is intentionally slowing down Firefox" is like a year or more old.
read your messages
Why did you even link me an anonymous youtube client
That's literally not my point at all
I mean, sure
Seems they are on it again, and I would love to see Europe take action
EU has been my favourite law enforcement agency this year, they really been doing some good stuff
What the fuck is going on https://vxtwitter.com/WIRED/status/1726597509215027347
BREAKING: Nearly 500 employees of OpenAI have signed a letter saying they may quit and join Sam Altman at Microsoft unless the startup's board resigns and reappoints the ousted CEO. https://wired.trib.al/8qEaK90
💖 54
" Nearly 500 employees of OpenAI have signed a letter saying they may quit unless the startup's board resigns"... one of the signees being ILYA SUTSKEVER?
The guy who kickstarted this whole shit is signing a letter to depose himself? 
And go work with Sam at Microsoft?
This makes absolutely no sense
Looks like a field day for microsoft
This is actually one of the funniest things I have ever seen
all getting fired again in a few years when ai trend isn't big anymore
I think AI trend will stay with us for a while
- Sam Altman gets fired out of a sudden, rumours say spearheaded by Ilya Sutskever
- Some key people quit with Sam
- OpenAI says Sam is hard to work with, interim CEO appointed
- Microsoft tries to stay neutral but throws some shots at board members of OpenAI
- Board says that Sam can come back, but board has to resign in return
- Altman petitions at OpenAI headquarters lol
- Interim CEO decides to announce plans to hire Altman as CEO again
- Board hires a new CEO, ex-Twitch CEO, fires the interim CEO
- Altman and talent poached by Microsoft
- Ilya Sutskever signs a letter to impeach himself to go work with Sam Altman at Microsoft
What the fuck is this timeline
This is top notch humour
Is this some top level sabotage to completely derail the company so that it gets absorbed by Microsoft completely? Cause it sure seems to be going that way
This is actually peak drama
When you order a monitor for pc does it have the hdmi cable in the box so you can connect it?
normally yes
Should I order a cable just in case if it doesnt have?
Or DP. Depends on the model.
It's usually mentioned on the product page
Are you within driving distance of a store that sells them? Then I'd wait.
No im ordering from amazon
?
ye so?
I was talking to my friend he said that he had some issues with displat port
Though I assume your graphics card has a plug for it
So I have to order it?
If the monitor has HDMI, but the cable is not included? Yes you'll need to bring your own cable.
Though do note that if this is a +120hz monitor, you might not get full Hz with HDMI
Now I dont have a pc so I will use it with my laptop for a time and then in future I will buy one
And my laptop doesnt have displsy port cable
so you need to buy an hdmi cable then
What cable you can recommend
Wdym not full hz with hdmi?
I want to get that pixio one it has 165hz
get a cable thats atleast hdmi 2. 0
2.0?
yes
Whats the difference between others
Is this aleight?
Amazon Basics High-Speed, 4K Ultra HD HDMI 2.0 Cable/ Cord, 60 Hz, 2160p, 48 bit, 18 Gbps, 3D, Male to Male, 0.9 m, (2.9ft), Black https://amzn.eu/d/fGzYJDS
if the length is enough for you
seems fine
aint no way samsung deleted the one ui 6 roadmap
😔
ah TR numbers are out
Support our deep-dive testing! Get 10% off any GN Modmats, Solder Mats, or tools during the sale: https://store.gamersnexus.net/
This review and benchmark of the AMD Threadripper 7980X & 7970X HEDT CPUs tests for power efficiency, thermals, power consumption, Spec Workstation performance, Adobe Premiere and Photoshop performance, rendering, code...
It did just release for most folks
s21 was supposed to release today
s22 some days ago
but they just released beta for s22 then
and seems like s22 is getting stable today
I'm on the beta for the s21
And I don't think there was any road map that was down to the day lel
there was one
what country got the s21 beta
usa?
got the dead link?
nah
https://www.sammobile.com/news/samsung-one-ui-6-0-release-date-timeline-announced-compatible-devices/
found it
EU only, unofficial
hopefully its there next week
also fyi the updates often come later in the day
its later in the day
wouldn't expect s22 and s21 on the same day
especially when they released a test version today
any news when it will come for US?
its unofficial for EU as well
According to that my a54 should have gotten it last week
still by Samsung
they also mentioned it on some Samsung app info page
[citation needed]
it's what the news sites mention so I'll trust that
so link them?
I have exactly these, they feel quite nice and work well. Mostly use them for push to talk, with different voice channels bound to different keys at timed.
Ceesa has his foot button for fire
okay, thats not that is quite tje odd setup. for push to talk they are great, especially in cases where you use multiple voice channels, such as when I still played PS2 with a larger outfit.
My desk is my arm rests, my arms are long enough not to benefit from anything higher, they are the first thing I remove from any office chair I use.
Arm rests are for the week.
my natural position / my elbows at 9 degrees
Needing arm rests mean your desk/chair is at a bad height
Slight correction, was lifting my shoulder, this is a more natural 90 degrees
Btw Vio this is how I have it set up at work, the speakers salvaged are edifier S730s. I angled it using some packing foam from a laptop.
on screen is my eq profile I obtained from room eq wizzard and my measurement mic (not the best one but good enough)
Google slowing down YouTube on Firefox .-.
Aha
man about to be a cctv watcher
r
There is only one camera displayed on there, the one for the front door, even have a keybinding set-up to open the door
is that KDE plasma?
this sucks
That youtube thing seems delibirate but also something ublock origin can fix
it also seems like the internet jumping the wrong gun just to be outraged
unless chrome is suddenly firefox because I've been getting same issues on pure chrome
it is likely a result of their adblock checking thing, the offending code does not check for the browser user agent
also youtube loading the first time is vastly slower than the second time
i experienced this on chrome as well btw
yeah it looks like they fucked up some caching or something
be it as a mistake or a side effect from ad block fuckery we dont know
but its the internet so someone has to be executed
people want it to be true due to their bias against google
hanlons razor my dudes lel
this re-draw looks clean
seems obvious saying it out loud, but we all do it
the bias against google is even stronger on Lemmy, and people there are furious
www.youtube.com##+js(nano-stb, resolve(1), *, 0.001) as a filter in ublock seems to fix it
or should rather
If this type of thing becomes a bigger issue, Ill switch my youtube player to smplayer instead, maybe I should do that regardless.
yes, the default background kind of gave it away.
nice
I'm hyped for plasma 6
it seems to bring a lot of tiny QOL changes
So much stuff
P nice tho
This is not new.
Its just worse
Its the main reason i stopped using FF years ago, once they disabled the legacy site.
it is also not true
its not targeted at firefox
It's targeted at anything that's not Chrome , then?
setTimeout(function() {
c();
a.resolve(1)
}, 5E3);```
it happens in chrome
it's a bug in the adblock-checking code
idk if that's relevant
But Google apps have always had shite that runs horrible on FF
it is, but the code around it doesn't check for browser user agent
As i see
function smb() {
var a, b, c, d, e, h, l;
return t(function(m) {
a = new aj;
b = document.createElement("ytd-player");
try { document.body.prepend(b) } catch (p) { return m.return(4) } c = function() { b.parentElement && b.parentElement.removeChild(b) };
0 < b.getElementsByTagName("div").length ? d = b.getElementsByTagName("div")[0] : (d = document.createElement("div"), b.appendChild(d));
e = document.createElement("div");
d.appendChild(e);
h = document.createElement("video");
l = new Blob([new Uint8Array([26, 69, 223, 163, 159, 66, 134, 129, 1, 66, 247, 129, 1, 66, 242, 129, 4, 66, 243, 129, 8, 66, 130, 132, 119, 101, 98, 109, 66, 135, 129, 4, 66, 133, 129, 2, 24, 83, 128, 103, 1, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 21, 73, 169, 102, 153, 42, 215, 177, 131, 15, 66, 64, 77, 128, 134, 67, 104, 114, 111, 109, 101, 87, 65, 134, 67, 104, 114, 111,
109, 101, 22, 84, 174, 107, 169, 174, 167, 215, 129, 1, 115, 197, 135, 207, 96, 156, 234, 24, 157, 175, 131, 129, 1, 85, 238, 129, 1, 134, 133, 86, 95, 86, 80, 56, 224, 138, 176, 129, 1, 186, 129, 1, 83, 192, 129, 1, 31, 67, 182, 117, 1, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, 231, 129, 0, 160, 204, 161, 162, 129, 0, 0, 0, 16, 2, 0, 157, 1, 42, 1, 0, 1, 0, 11, 199, 8, 133, 133, 136, 153, 132, 136, 63, 130, 0, 12, 13, 96, 0, 254, 229, 106, 0, 117, 161, 165, 166, 163, 238, 129, 1, 165, 158, 16, 2, 0, 157, 1, 42, 1, 0, 1, 0, 11, 199, 8, 133, 133, 136, 153, 132, 136, 63, 130, 0, 12, 13, 96, 0, 254, 232, 120, 0, 160, 187, 161, 152, 129, 3, 233, 0, 177,
1, 0, 47, 17, 252, 0, 24, 0, 48, 63, 244, 12, 0, 0, 0, 254, 229, 106, 0, 117, 161, 155, 166, 153, 238, 129, 1, 165, 148, 177, 1, 0, 47, 17, 252, 0, 24, 0, 48, 63, 244, 12, 0, 0, 0, 254, 232, 120, 0, 251, 129, 0, 160, 188, 161, 152, 129, 7, 208, 0, 177, 1, 0, 47, 17, 252, 0, 24, 0, 48, 63, 244, 12, 0, 0, 0, 254, 229, 106, 0, 117, 161, 155, 166, 153, 238, 129, 1, 165, 148, 177, 1, 0, 47, 17, 252, 0, 24, 0, 48, 63, 244, 12, 0, 0, 0, 254, 232, 120, 0, 251, 130, 3, 233
])], { type: "video/webm" });
h.src = lc(Mia(l));
h.ontimeupdate = function() { c();
a.resolve(0) };
e.appendChild(h);
h.classList.add("html5-main-video");
setTimeout(function() { e.classList.add("ad-interrupting") }, 200);
setTimeout(function() { c();
a.resolve(1) }, 5E3);
return m.return(a.promise)
})
}
Regardless, google apps have always ran shite on FF
literally no problem for me on firefox atm
I didn't see it , but ur setup is Worth referencing
perhaps. I shitcanned firefox when it hit version 1.5 and never looked back LOL
Me when I can't comprehend my own hw
I used it when quantum came out for a solid three years or more?
I movd to Brave 3y ago when Google discontinued Youtubes legacy site.
use brave too, some annoying features but thankfully you can turn them all off
ironically FF works perfectly for me and chrome has the loading bug currently
i tried so hard to get FF issues fixed.
Hell i retried it again last year but no avail, different system etc
i envy their container system
I mean I'm just using FF on work pc so I'm staying on chrome for most things but currently it just works better lol
Thats fair.
what issues?
i cba to do this all again
But many sites i used regularry were just slow on FF compared to chrome and borderline broke, its not just me, nor is it enirely down to FF itself but shitty practices.
Point is no matter what, there was no real solution after many many many attemps to fix so i swtiched back to chromium.
only thing ever slow for me in FF is loading all my tabs on a reboot
Are you sure it's not slow because you're accustomed to it, and you might not recognize what 'fast' is? 
as long as you have adblock so you ignore the ad spam most browsers are the same
in terms of page rendering
2 seconds?
Thats an eternity
Jokes aside.
One of my biggest issues was YouTube and GDrive, again this was 3 years ago.
ads kill yuoutube even the page load
ive had red forever, and when im logged out the entire site is slower
When i originally had the issue i learned about googles whole bs code so i moved to YouTube classic but they disabled it and i could not cope going back to a shitty experience where my player would even buffer at times.
Again, 3 years ago.
Well 4 or so if you count pre classic fix
As for ads, i have premium too
tbf out of a control group of 2 browser engines.. well I guess it's technically true
i tried again a year ago and had similar issues but they were not as bad, but enought to not bother switching.
and why would you. just use the browser most useful to you
I will never understand choosing software for ideological reasons
unless you are RMS
I do miss containers though 
isn't vivaldi chromium blink
and safari is just blink's dad
I don't mind there being 2 major engines, both are open source and good
why is that a bad thing? do we need 3 more mediocre ones?
not as cheap as paper stickers
not as cheap as just no spreader
so glad I spent big bucks on a samsung 980 pro
still, fast enough for me to use as a boot drive/Alan Wake 2 drive
hopefully the latter
i just bought the 35-150 2-2.8
why so late
i mean the review
it just released...
ye but the camera released 2 months ago lol
did you watch the vid?
no
theres janky bs going on that they had to investigate
so what bit depth are the raws on this camera
heres the spec sheet
ill give you a hint its none of the bit numbers shown above
and for these medium format sized devices, it really actually matters
because throwing away the bits brings these cameras down to the level of full frame
but everything costs so much more money
its actually pretty hard
mechanical shutter only for 1
but the problem is the fuji is dropping to 12 bits for the raws
and it has a sensor with more than 12 bits of dynamic range
unlike the sonys which while they are brushing up on the edge of 12 bits, its still technically fully containable within 12 bits
is ddr5 actually worth the upgrade?
well you dont really have a choice on newer cpus
sorry, i phrased that badly, i meant from ddr5 4000 mhz to ddr5 6000 mhz, is it actually worth the upgrade?
https://hwbot.org/submission/5398462_hicookie_memory_frequency_ddr5_sdram_5824.2_mhz
could get a WR with 6000mhz ddr5 lel
haha, this is why i have a prebuilt 😅
i figured out how to upgrade my gpu but that was about it'
sounds good
damn bluray players are expensive
PlayStation 4? One of the cheapest BluRay players 
if you're using it for a living room tv, you'll never notice. MAYBE if youre going to use it on a monitor but nothing over 32in will be different
should atleast have 4k with dolby vision + atmos
and even so they have a 4k max version of the firestick now
Xbox One then
not even the series x does that
60$ one time purchase for pretty much every movie/show for free or spend hundreds on a blu ray player then 30-50 per disk
seems like a no brainer for me
bro im not cracking streaming services lol
Ones support Dolby Vision and Atmos
Series S and X play 4K on top of that
crack or not its hard to justify but its your money, use it how you'd like
not paying for stuff is cheaper than paying for stuff? what a revelation 😛
I dunno, whole Reddit says Xbox Series can play 4K BluRays 
why do u not want to pay for entertainment
yes 4k
but not 4k dolby vision
Now that's a simple question with a simple answer lol
having to and choosing to are two very different things
Because entertainment nowadays is corporations squeezing as much money with as little work put in as possible 
If you want 4K HDR player, it won't be cheap, is all
nah you have to support the already multi billion dollar companies.. come on man
That too
and actors who are too rich for their own good
then buy it...
Guess i gotta do that
Buy it, rip it, watch it from PC, it's legal that way 
pc 💀
then return it 😂
that is just piracy with extra steps then
whatever lets you sleep at night
cant someone just make a streaming service with bluray bitrate

They're trying their hardest to push 720p on subscribers with 4K plan, so they can cheap out on servers
And you expect them to serve BluRay bitrates
would still be cool
and im just over here bathing in all of this 1080p glory 🙂
just make it expensive then ig
Would you look at that, there 4K rip with all extras 
you can also buy movies only
why not have them for bluray price with bluray quality
4:3 2880x2160 10-bit HDR color x265 encoded
5.1 audio and 2.0 commentary track
There's also 43GB remux flying around
criterion is based
what I think physical media are really selling is the bonus material, and that often does not get pirated
ashamed to say I don't have that release
meh, most cars totalled in one scene was a more impressive record
jackie dislocating his entire pelvis with that iron pole stunt is probably my favourite bit, though behind the scenes
pretty sure Blues Brothers totalled a hundred cars
in one scene
the police chase
still a classic
windows hdr looks terrible
Watch the iconic car crash scene from The Blues Brothers.
As the Blues Brothers race to pay the orphanage tax bill on time, their enemies - including Neo-Nazis and the police - are on the chase. A record-breaking total of 102 cars were destroyed on this shoot, forcing production way over budget to create one of cinema's most iconic car crash sce...

love that movie
they keep improving it, currently id say its on par with sdr
i do wish they would allow you to have it on but sdr content bypasses it
but yea for hdr you need to max brightness on the monitor, and turn down the brightness to what you want in windows settings
thats technically how its supposed to work
srgb is supposed to be 0-100 nits
hdr can be whatever it sets itself to be often 0-1000
Handbrake now supports NVENC/VCN AV1 encoding 🥳 And more optimizations for Apple Silicon
It makes sdr look good as of right but it could be just the OLED panel 🤷♂️
wdym then?
Like it makes the colors look washed out and dull
in what?
And maybe everything looks tinted yellow
are you talking about the auto hdr feature?
Uh maybe
We've re-mastered and re-uploaded our favorite video in HDR!
CHECK OUT OUR MOST POPULAR VIDEO: https://youtu.be/tO01J-M3g0U
► INSTAGRAM: http://www.instagram.com/mysterybox
► INSTAGRAM: http://www.instagram.com/jacobschwarz
►WEBSITE: http://www.mysterybox.us
►FACEBOOK: https://www.facebook.com/mysteryboxdi...
Make sure to follow us on Instagra...
this should look insane
tho if you have an oled you may need to play it in a small window otherwise itll dim your whole screen
is this auto hdr?
no
Looks beautiful on my 1080p SDR cheapass $25 monitor 
Is this auto hdr?
🤔
costa ricans looking at this are going "meh, seen it"
Still prefer sdr for some random maybe it just pops more, or does youtube force hdr if monitor is capable?
thats for the value 235 not 255
take a pic of the settings button in the video
if its yellow tint do you have flux or the eye saver thing in windows on maybe lol
HDR no less
Nope
like a really colorful postage stamp
Maybe the colors are more warmer then I guess
What to look for in HDR monitors mostly?
certification or brightness
specifically minimum brightness
any of the true black certifications are good, however it can be a pretty awful experience if your ambient is even remotely bright
that is likely on your monitor
What should I look like for minimum? 400 nits? Most of monitors I see as "HDR" are 250 nits
yea thats lies
you either need an oled or you need the vesa displayhdr 600 rating
or better
if you plan on playing games in HDR, I heard support is spotty at best
that one is fixed
microsoft autohdr is excellent in games
the problem is that games that do support hdr you need to activate hdr first
It’s called the Honda Motocompacto
💖 165
i think you are looking at an issue with your monitor
putting winders' HDR over an SDR game sounds like a flawed idea
I wanted to try out how Plasma 6.0 handles HDR, as most who have tried it say it looks promising
And I'll have to buy a new monitor in like half a year, so might as well go with HDR one
No 
lawl. might as well wait
I guess I will check YouTube, I did not set it up or tweak it.
KDE guys implement it themselves on top of Wayland in KWin
welcome to hdr
the folks at xbox are currently the kings of making hdr work properly
the folks over on the windows side of the building took several years to do it, but xbox is in charge of the autohdr feature
that sounds meh, from several standpoints
hdr without oled or local dimming is kinda bad
just sdr but raised
like discrete led or something
again look at xbox
the best device to get for hdr is an xbox
the troublesome part is the conversion from sdr to hdr
and xbox understands that part
and microsoft has mostly fixed it, however it actually depends on the monitor
and you just need to make sure to set this setting correctly
automatic conversion from SDR to HDR sounds iffy. wouldn't that fuck with the artistic vision?
For once I'm surprised KDE guys did something before Gnome, HDR support in Mutter is experimental at best, while in KWin it's going to be ready in a few weeks
Still, I believe Volvo does best with HDR in gamescope, given they're so certain they have released Deck OLED already 
lol
you dont understand how color works i presume
every time you change mediums, you have a transformation to do
sensor to digital you have 1 transform, and digital to monitor you have another
the problem is that if you leave it up to the monitor (which is how sdr works) you really have no control over anything
with hdr, there is at least a way to choose exactly how your image is displayed
now most monitors tended to ignore that in the past, and would pick a random one of the 3 hdr standards to support
now tho basically everyone has standardized on hdr10 for general content, and dolby vision for DRM content
does autohdr have any calibration
How are you surprised, I mean KDE is backed by Valve and has been generally faster implementing new Wayland things than Gnome.
for the tonemapping?
so it's more accurate. I guess I'll know if I like it when I see SDR content autoconverted to HDR. my feeling is it's not gonna look right
thats up to your monitor
but it does perform the same conversion that the xbox does
KDE is backed by Valve for not that long, and Gnome guys usually delivered final results way before KDE, sure KDE was first to start, but Gnome was first to finish nevertheless
Also hdr on kde is going to be a pretty bare-bones implementation at the start
Hmm... Do 23~24" 1080p monitors with vesa displayhdr 600... even exist? Couldn't find any on vesa's website
The final protocol should basically have the compositor know the color output of every display and map everything to srgb by default unless the content asks to be rendered in a different color space, then map the color / brightess to that.
Easier said than done lel
Yeah... There ain't any in there too, smallest I could find are 27"
Not a surprise
Adding a ton of leds is expensive and large
Also apple has a few key patents apparently?
Bummer
Time to go with 1440p 27" I guess
I'd recommend getting a nice 4k rather than bad hdr tho
Cause 600 is the minimum
Doesn't mean it'll be great
So they can stuff 4K into 27" but not 1080p in 23" 
Not with great hdr
But they can make normal monitors that are good
https://a.co/d/2004COU
Here's some true hdr tho
Portable Monitor 1080P FHD USB C Laptop Monitor HDMI Computer Display HDR Gaming Monitor w/Detachable Stand & Speakers, External Monitor for Laptop PC Mac Tablet PS4 Xbox Switch Monitor portátil 1080P FHD USB C Monitor de computadora portátil HDMI Pantalla de computadora HDR Monitor de juegos con...
Innocn makes some bangers
Acer XV275U, 1440p 27", hdr1000 and not that bad of a price 
oh hey new update from rtings
While burn-in is inherent to OLED technology, manufacturers can compensate for it through software designed to improve the useable life of your panel. Fortunately for you, manufacturers implement this well, meaning that permanent burn-in isn't that big of a concern for most folks—unless you're using an ultrawide OLED monitor, that is.
In this ...
rtings would slaughter my monitor tbh
I will still use it at 60Hz tops 
Hi, I'm Abby from Ratings dot com
Yeah no. You're from Arrtings. Sorry. Y'all picked a dumbass name, and what it says.

Wait where does it say hdr1000?
You sure that's not for the more expensive model?
ayo wtf it's not completely trash?
Far, for very little content
But it's still yikes for hdr which is what we were talking about
it's as wide as my desk tho lmao
for hdr yeah it
isn't great
mainly the aspect ratio is convenient but other than that it's
Just get a 48 inch full size tv, it's the same price these days for (most of) twice the area
would scale games differently
No this is super convenient
for racing etc
but also
for workflow
and
actually it's very nice in amongus
because while you can't see the people from a certain distance
you could see vents open and close xd
but about hdr i don't really have a good hdr device
hdr is overrated
ehh that's depending on the content I'd say
It's been absolutely amazing for me so far in most games
well yeah hdr looking amazing doesnt mean sdr is looking shit
Hdr is highly underrated simply because of how awful our cameras are at recording data and how even more awful our monitors are at displaying it
and kinda how compressed data is for streaming video
although i don't think more peak brightness = more better
(compared to what we have now)
I've been talking with a dev and he proved me that the compression isn't really the problem
I thought it was but he was showing me actual serious differences even via youtube
It's not about the more is better
It's about the capability of the dynamic range
If a display could show 20k:1 contrast at only 100 nits in a ambient light room, then sure let's go
The problem is that oled and lcd both reflect light from the environment, so you need massively more than 100 nits to hit the target of 20k:1
why do darker areas still look so bad on yt and streaming sites
And lcd is alot worse since it also has global bleed issues
A nice va with a ton of zones can be pretty good, but you still get poor contrast
ye but that just sounds annoying af
Well that one is a limitation of 8 bits linear
i don't what most areas of a frame be at a couple hundred nits
?
sounds like the solution to the dynamic range problem is a increase in brightness from what you are saying
Nope
Its only helpful to increase brightness if your minimum brightness stays the same
Va is fantastic, 1/4 the minimum brightness of a standard lcd at the same max
Same for miniled, except miniled can go a bit further, or be poorly implemented and be completely useless
Like there are 10k nit field monitors that are awful for hdr
They are only nice because they overpower the ambient light so you get to use 100% of their dynamic range
does va not reflect light or whats your point
No it just stops light better compared to ips or tn
and compared to oled?
It still has the same reflectance problem, and has alot worse minimum brightness
My 2k nit va has about the same contrast ratio as my 400 nit oled (both peak numbers)
In general, the only problem i have with modern media on an oled are the dark areas
so how do we fix this
Here's how our eyes see light
Logarithmic brightness would do the trick?
More colours in dark areas, less in brighter ones
Bingo
Here's the competing hdr Standards
With the sdr to hdr conversion in green
Hlg is a dead standard that now every fkn camera supports recording in for some reason
Pq is hdr10/bt2020
what does code value mean in this
The number you put in the file/send to the monitor
ah
Like 0-255 for sdr
what's the reason for this
Now I really want to try to run CS2 in HDR and throw myself flashbang into the face 
Wdym
8 bits = 0-255
10 bits = 0-1023
We sponsored ourselves! FOR A LIMITED TIME, get 10% off of GN solder mats, Large Modmats, Medium Modmats, and tools on the store! https://store.gamersnexus.net/
This livestream features the AMD Threadripper 7995WX PRO CPU getting overclocked with water and with liquid nitrogen. We plan to set world records with both. The 96-core CPU will be over...
Your eyes see more detail at lower values, and srgb doesn't record relative to that
ln2 oc in half an hour-ish
looks like 0 and 64 is essentially the same
It's not
The difference is there just doesn't show up on a graph
But you can see it
your eyes are super sensative at low light levels
Not really
Dark scenes in television, YouTube, and streaming platforms all look pixelated and blocky. Here's why.
Animation by William Marler: https://wmad.co.uk
🟥 MORE FROM TOM: https://www.tomscott.com/
(you can find contact details and social links there too)
📰 WEEKLY NEWSLETTER with good stuff from the rest of the internet: https://www.tomscott.com/...
But double the light at low brightness is seen as the same change to your eye as double the light in high brightness
Are you sure that's ML?
the empty spot in the water green stood out more to me
That looks basically like content aware fill which is a classical algorithm

so ideally yt and all would be 10bit (hdr)
but without going hard on the Brightness
to atleast make it a bit better
You would want to set the brightness to be what it really is
Ideally we'd want for brightness to be logarithmic, since we perceive relative changes better
That's why those standards #🔌│tech message dedicate so much of available values for dark areas
Hdr generally just means log encoding
i would like having the 10bit benefits but still only going to like 100nits
Not in the recorded footagd
so it doesn't "look" hdr
You can set the brightness of the output all you want
But you want all the data encoded still so you have the option of viewing it
viewing hdr stuff now but going low on tv brightness does look a bit weird
Oh, I see what you mean. You are confusing HDR, the picture effect with HDR, the color encoding.
hdr stuff on sdr monitor with improper colour correction is always fun
Blacks are gray-ish, whites are beige and colours are washed out 
Because there is also the picture effect where you take multiple pictures, grab the high brightness areas from one shot, grab the middle brightness areas from a second shot, and grab the low brightness areas from a third, and then just squishing them all together.
im not talking about that
What content are you talking about then
can u set certain brightness values when editing hdr
or is it all just relative to the rest
You can edit in absolute brightness, and it's highly recommended
Same image with sdr scopes
Is normal hdr10 able to tell the screen to showcase a certain segment in a certain brightness
:/
Hdr 10 can as well
yt doesn't use that or
It's up to the content creator
like ideally i would want my tv to be at max brightness when viewing hdr content
See here
if it would be the standard for everything
but the content creator would probably have most things above 100nits
That's what this slider is for
Just because people are incompetent doesn't mean the actual tech is bad
ye im not saying that
And most people do it correctly
The target for hdr is 200 nits = pure white, anything above that is shiny or light sources
hmm
its just that most hdr content (not movies and such) on yt is just super bright in everything
i think yt shorts had hdr at some point and it was kinda annoying
Yep because bright things shiny
But there's very very little actual hdr content at the moment
so could we replace sdr with a 10bit version that has some sort of brightness lock closely to sdr xD
no problem on tvs
It's actually pretty awful on most tvs btw
im happy with ma c1 :D
Pretty sure your c1 has some serious glitches when it comes to brightness
Speaking of light
Look at my new toy lel
oh no
I got it, the incredible disaster
whats the range
live
God won't save you here lol
I can do a better manual job at that
Except content aware fill gives control to the user for parameters and places to sample from
Lol
Idk bub
Seems odd that there's 3 rocks all placed in a line all on a very similar looking pile of sand
the wind...
That multilens camera reminded me of those funny Lytro cameras, pretty clever tech allowed you to change focus AFTER snapping a picture. Too expensive for what you got though
You mean this lytro camera? 😛
also yes the light can also refocus after taking the picture
unlike the lytro it can take video
so im hoping i can sideload a custom camera app and use it without the multilens nonsense
the lytro is very locked down and painful to deal with, the light is supposedly somewhat manageable
but i wont find out until this charges up
You managed to get the big Lytro too, they were selling the smaller rectangular versions at a nearby store ages ago
yea the small one while cool wasnt too interesting for me
soneone was working on actually removing the lens array and converting it back into a normal camera
it has a 40 megapixel sensor and a constant f2 lens
but i havent seen updates on that :/
not long now i guess
HYPE
let me know how it is
as far as i know it isnt
never will
there are others who have copied the design of the zeromouse
then you have what i think is the original person who created this style https://www.reddit.com/user/Different-Title-424/submitted/
16g m2k
Ok so we got the ROG Ally, the Lenuvo Legion Go and the Steam Deck. Where is the Wooting handheld PC?
What is the Brand , I interested with it
dont bother lel
but its the light L16
its a complete disaster
buy a sony rx100 iii and youll be 10x happier
And this is lyto camera right ? This one is fixed with camera lenses like Rx 100viii ?
Yeah I somehow interested on the design , since I haven't see this kind of camera before
the lytro is also a disaster
it has a fixed lens kind of like the rx100 but its atrocious to use
Is nice to check it out
How much is the focal length and also f point
of the lytro?
If the mm is perfect , fixed lenses is also bearable
Yes!
its the equivalent of 30-250 f5.4
This kind of camera feat My taste
it doesnt take pictures
Because changing lenses is not a fun experience
it takes holographs
Oh I see
very solid
what do you have now?
Not a expert users , so something like a7c ii will be my Best dream camera
Currently I use phone , which is sad , sometimes phone is Good but sometimes not
Yeah , one of the reason I plan for a camera is because , in the future I Will create tons of content using camera
Old phone (s10e) , but is solid enough if the light is enough
highly recommend getting a more normal camera before jumping straight into the ILC life
My next phone Will be xiaomi 13t pro
That camera is good and is cheap also
Also for the future when I don't bring cameras
Since u r not always have ur cameras with
Yeah a6600 ?
definetly
might want to consider the ultra or the 14 tho
the cameras on the 13U are incredible
This is a suitable entry ?
no like a cheap fixed lens camera like the rx100
i mean the current model is relatively expensive, but the older models are sometimes better for cheaper
Compared to the actual mirroles camera
Oh u suggest me getting the old one
Lytro did at one point make a 40K camera, but uhhh
https://m.dpreview.com/news/6720444400/lytro-cinema-impresses-large-crowd-with-prototype-755mp-light-field-video-camera-at-nab
Lytro debuted its Cinema prototype, and footage shot with the system, to a packed showroom at NAB 2016. To say we're impressed would be an understatement. Cinema is massive, but the high resolution, low noise capture paired with depth-screening, simulation of F0.3 apertures, and perspective shifts in post mean that Lytro may just be poised to ch...
citation needed on them actually making it lel
Does the Rx 100 does the job ? I afraid the sensor is small and will effect the overall quality
Since pocket size stuff got a lot of letdown on features
(if u get what I mean)
its substantially better than phones for both photo and video
in the 6 they switched to a dimmer but further zooming lens, so id recommend the 5 or earlier, although the extreme zoom is nice
the 4 was the first to shoot 4k, but its really not nescessary to get 4k on these cams, its still a fine addition
theres also the rx10 but thats incredibly expensive
Oh
small sensor insane lens
yea its an insane camera
U tried it ?
yep
What mm that camera had ?
24-600
Maybe check for a used one? Used devices in these sort of interests tends to save a lot, is this the same with cameras?
this is all used
the pricing on these cameras is incredible
i have a 18-300 for my a7iv and the rx10 iv absolutely runs circles around it
https://www.flickr.com/groups/sony_rx10_iv/pool/
sample pics from the rx10 iv
But the thing is 30 to 600mm
And that lens feels compact
Sounds like it uses up a TB SD card in 4 shots
I mean rx10
what?
its half the weight of my setup
my mom is the one who uses the rx10, i have an a7iv
I somehow think that , this camera is an all rounder
yep
Animal photography confirm no problem ?
the rx10 is by far the best animal camera for walking around
Street photography is OK I guess ?
its highly competitive with the 200-600 and the 150-600s in terms of image quality
but look up the weight of those lel
I remember high focal length is Good for architecture photography ?
its definetly not a discrete camera, rx10 is better for that
Like u can capture the building lines ?
what
Ummm let me show u , I am not Good for explaining something
high focal lengths means you have to be very very very far from the building to see the whole thing
its good but incredibly inconvenient
define closer
Yeah I guess u r right !
the focal length thats great for architecture depends on the look you're going for
I will wish list that one if I want to get that camera in future
this
Tru
granted a lot of architecture photographers like using tilt shift lens
if you can take the photo with your phone and want it better, the rx10 can do that
it cant do special effects like that
I prefer 2 ways to capture the building if I want to architecture photography
-
The focal length is wide and can capture the highlighted buildings
-
Capture the texture on buildings
yea gotta do that if you want both high resolution and perfectly straight lines
rx10 or 100 is high enough res that you can generally just take the photo zoomed out and crop in post
cause you have to align the focal plane with the building, and if you are on the ground that means that half of your image is going to be ground
unless you want to correct in post
dealing with lens shifting is an immense pain tho
Oh means that u will having hard time when u capture it on floor ?
Ummm , a new knowledge for me , care to explain ? What is lens shifting
It's what a tilt-shift lens was born to do. Learn how to straighten up your leaning buildings with this simple technique and never have a parallax problem again. When shooting architecture, especially when you need to get up close to the building from the ground, you'll notice that the buildings all mysteriously seem to be leaning back away from...
read
captured with the standard lens on a phone which i think is normally 24mm equiv these days
Man this one is Good
Wish I can do that too
yep between 23 and 28 generally
this is with a gopro hero 5
When u crop the quality lost
take more pictures with the phone
your phone is pretty solid already
At least for my old phone
crop with your feet
Uhhh
ricoh gr2 which is 28mm equiv
🤔
but also if you do want zoom
get a phone with a telephoto lens
Nice !
i like the s21u but its locked from 3rd party apps
13 ultra is fully unlocked
Yeah but a lot of them is relying on digital ?
just get one with the right lens
Seen a lot of comparison , most of them are worse when zoom
50mm
Phone ?
theres no right lens or focal length
Canon RF 50mm 1.2
I see , ur capture I like it so much
Ok!
completely wiffed this shot
200mm
this one wasnt bad
U r architecture photographer?
Was Good with my perspective
17mm
The colour is nice to look at
nah 
Ummmm I don't know u like honest opinion or not
what do you mean ?
I see so u capture everything that u find it interesting
mostly ye
I mean my opinion will be straight forward
So I was asking u care about someone giving their honest opinion or not
Imagine u can captured well that "Bird"?
is it a selfie if its just my shadow?
Motion stuff is hard , since is not as Easy as u capture the things that is immovable
the main thing i enjoy photographing is street/travel
Can't see it
Oh , street photography
wouldnt have been great either way
i was hoping to get the bird and the moon at the same time, but i messed up the shutter, the aperture, and this lens is too slow to focus on moving targets
I haven't see travel photography yet so don't know what it is , But Street photography I like it
90% user error tho
I see! It will be insane if u achieve it
photography using a 50mm lens
the ef 50-100 on sony is just not a good combination
Not gonna lie , u guys are experience , for me still a long way to learn about photography
heres with my 300mm lens
cannot tell you how hard it is to manually focus on the moon with a canon lens meant for birds
Wow , 300mm looks close
iv been taking photos for so long now tbh
Oh , I see
moon shot
I see
yeee
photography is 90% taking bad pictures and having them not turn out well
this was a superzoom from my phone that i thought was kinda dramatic but it just didnt look like i imagined it
here i tried to get both at the same time, but this was far too dark for this camera, with a far too wide lens
this is about a 4x crop
alot better than my phone managed lel
^ key part here
just grabbing the best allaround camera will work, but its over 2 grand with no lens
nah you can get started pretty well for $1k usd
as a general all round setup
granted you're not getting any super tele lens at that price
its not a bad choice but its incredibly expensive
but it will serve you well
Yeah is so relatable , I was lien that when I taking photos using phone , 100 of photos only 2 or 3 photos that suitable for my edits (photo art)
i have an a7iv which is actually just a a7c2 with 2 sd slots instead of 1 and its an incredible camera but holy mackerel is everything expensive
no one gets 100% keepers when taking photos
heya heya
highly recommend upgrading the phone with software before getting new hardware or even getting a camera at all
phone?
gcam mods, mcpro24fps etc
what are we trying to do today
after successfully convincing this dude to not buy the joke cameras i bought as purely collection peices, we were trying to find out what would actually be good for them
i also say buy the thing you want since you will enjoy it
and if you enjoy it you will actually use it
instead of collecting dust
but also be aware of how heavy some camera and lens combos get they're deff not fun to carry around
^
even if its awesome to use
i really love the 50-100 but its pretty annoying
just buy a pixel or iphone for photos =D
current pixel maybe
and then if you're like a lot of people that do photography you end up going down the camera bag rabbit hole 
I prefer diverse , I like all kind of photography but if u wanna say , I like this kind of style more
I use two pictures (I captured from phone) and combine it into this
the new one is pretty unlocked
interesting
yea that definetly doesnt need a monster of a camera
how good is your editing skills ?
if you cant take a good photo with a modern smartphone no fancy camera is going to help at that point 
you might want to get like the rx10 6 because it gives you a ton more zoom, however i really say just spend more on the phone
xiaomi 13 ultra is incredible for photos and video, and and its got a bit better hardware than the pixel
pixel probably the better all around choice
Ignore the high grainy u see , this is a mistake I made and I don't have time to fix it , I will fix it if I have time
Is this what u mean the editing skills ?
i mean at that point its more graphic design work then photography
well if you are trying to take video moonlit, a fancy camera will help
yea lol
true but thats going to be a costly setup
Pixel got ai advantage , pixel didn't scale with the sensor instead they relying on software
i mean the a7c2 will do a great job
except on the 8 pro they threw everything at it
its got a monster of a telephoto, a monster of a wide/macro, and a huge main shooter
@astral haven
it's not unlikely tht the optane arrives today
still going to need a fast lens unless you like a lot of grain or having to go heavy on NR
not as big as the xiaomi but its definetly solid
fast lenses are cheap
fast lenses with autofocus or sharpness? no but eh
Yes , this is how I changed after a few years , I more toward using camera capture some photos and turn them into different things , but , this is one of my style, I personally prefer diverse , I not just only like graphics design , I csn say I like all the stuff that related to art
yea definetly better to just get a better phone
ya the nifty fifty is cheap
So photography is in my list
im talking more 1.4 and faster
I mean pure photography
while actually being useable and not needing to be stopped down to get a clear image
eh you can get the shot even if the lens isnt that sharp



