#🔌│tech
1 messages · Page 225 of 1
Lol, I'd be itneresting to hear how you say for the better
Better not be woke "Japan isn't woke" shit
They can keep their weird ass festish for fax machines 😛
And extreme level of red tape.
imo having a physical copy of music is nice
things get pulled off of streaming services for no reason, not to mention there's no guarantee the music will stay around long
One of my favorite

Duh. They use floppy disks.
lemme tell you about data rot
and drive failure
never hurts to have another backup
Optical disks actually take far longer to degrade and lose data
These days I carry around portable NVMEs for data transfer :sippy
compared to the average hdd which is about 10 max
I'll let backblaze do the talking
the first issue is you compare write once to R/W media. Secondly CD/DVD life spans depend very highly on how they are stored and cared for. HardDisks depend highly on how much you use them having MTBF values etc.
CDs can last a good century but only if you store it appropriately
CD's are good for archival media
HDD's are good for readily accessable media
Poor Fiber guy, it's a torrentional downpour there and he has to put up the new line
Bad itming all around
well
HDD's have data rot, if left unpowered for a extended period
HDDs, SSDs and such have the mentioned power issue
they need to be powered every now and again
HDDs also demagnetize over time without power
HDD's do too
it just takes a lot longer
also would guess the lube in the motor could get messed up when not running for a long time
I'd assume that applies to any hdd that isn't vaccum sealed, pretty sure
Tape > hdd for storage long term
yea tape triumphs everything for just pure archive time
HDDs still need to be stored in a controlled environment so temps dont fluctuate etc so that the demagnetizing doesnt happen any time soon
pretty sure the same goes for tapes
with CDs its mostly UV
CDs too
And you have to get the fancy cd/DVD/blu rays
Normal ones don't last long
yes
Mold
floppies are prob the worst media to store long term
Floppy's get moldy
gotta get them 80gb verbatim archive disks
optane is as bad as SSDs
The issue with flash/optane is the density is too high
So a single cosmic ray can flip more bits than you have checksum
But density on hdd is getting there
anyway all ways to store digital data are susceptible to degradation
its always a question of time and how they are stored
thats not even what was discussed
this was about storing it
aka no power or other cables connected
shove data on it
and then put away
basically what CDs do nowadays
Blu-ray
Blu-ray is the standard for archive
imo bluray is not worth it for most normal people
Time to start etching 1s and 0s into diamonds
as close to forever as possible
at the point you need storage sizes adequate for blurays you might as well directly jump to LTO
like even older cheap LTO formats are better than blueray
Lto is less dense and isn't as neat for desk use
Any Blu-ray player will read Blu-ray disks
Do they even make a USB lto8/9?
Got they have to expensive lol
Apple Says 128GB iPhone 15 Pro Limited to 1080p ProRes Video Recording Unless External Storage Connected https://t.co/WgwKbZeEE4
269
man
yes thats why i said older
lto4 easily beats bluray
Not for density
and unless you only wanna store audio, video and photos id say blurays arent as good
yes but last i checked most bluray players for your tv dont just read about anything
not to mention i dont even know anyone with any sort of bluray reader
let alone a writer
and density wise id say 1.6tb in the size of like 10x10x2cm
easily beats the 16 blurays youd need to store the same
which lto version
Almost every PC other than micros is offered with a bluray
45tb of BDXL cost you 5grand
Also
at that point get the writer and the tapes pay for themselves
Where is a USB lto4?
they come with adapter boards
Where
Only if you're storing tax records
You're quoting the compressed size
itll still be 45tb
Which almost never gets half thst
And can be applied to the data going on the bluray
It isn't some magic tape only compression
sure but BD doesnt offer it as easily imo
not to mention once its burned
its burned
imo optical media is best situated at DVDs
you can buy spindels for cheap
and if you make a mistake on one its not 10-15bucks you throw away
Also normal high quality bdr is already 20 year rated
So unless you are buying some unobtainium long life lto
It's not a good comparison to archival disks
i dont even know what id store 20years straight without any changes or just complete obsolescence of the data
Yeah old photos, music and game backups from when games were physical
so what i tried to send was:
I though LTO was rated for 20-25 years depending on storage conditions (just like literally any optical media relies heavily on storage conditions)
ahhhhh discord
Good optical is rated 100+
i dont believe that one bit
and thats how the discussion started
the whole just taking googles top reply isnt doing actual research
i do like to see this whole thing scientifically tested but i wouldnt outright believe anyone just saying its rated for 100+yrs
24 core 7960x3d with an x3d die and a siena die?
Don’t think client io die can do GMI wide needed for sienna
iPhone actually best console now
wdym, x is the 25th letter of the alphabet...
Xbox 360 anyone?
does it need it tho?
Otherwise it’s not sienna and just regular zen4c no?
wdym?
Did not watch the video yet but I thought sienna is just different tdp and gmi config of Bergamo
Yeah due to it using GMI-W instead of -N
Need to get back and watch so I can be sure I’m not mixing things up
niiice
sweet
I had 20Mbps upload before.
lol
Kinda unbelievable how fast shit uploads now
Like uploading a 5 minute clip was this whole 20+ minute waiting pricess
Now it's like 15s.
nice, now I gotta hope vodafone and go do get to this by like 2027 as currently planned at least
Ah, nice coincidence
Mention Blackwell, blackwell arrives https://t.co/qWrVXCiRZG
GeForce RTX 5090 rumors take shape Chiphell leaker who revealed the first details on NVIDIA’s next-gen consumer GPU lineup now shares new rumors about the capabilities of the new architecture. As a reminder, Panzerlied was the individual who initially revealed that NVIDIA plans to skip the XXX04-class GPU in their upcoming gaming product series....
Funny that we won't see Blackwell in action for another 1.5 years prolly
isnt even taped out yet doesnt mean anything
Yeah, they can change virtually anything in that time
Kind of insane to think that AMD will get a generational jump a full year before NV's next one
Unless NV refreshes their lineup
not a full year and its not a flagship so not really insane
Not a full year?
likely more like 3 quarters probably
and also if they are throwing away the flagship, what is the likelyhood of them actually competing hard with the 4090ti that nvidia already has in the chamber?
flagship(s) not just one config is gone
the 4090 is the most cut down flagship die we have ever seen
literally an entire 1070 or 480 worth of cores just gone
yeah but it shouldnt scale linearly
Depends when Radeon comes, but yeah about
idk if they even compete with the 4090
Also, was that fully confirmed that RX 8000 is without a top end card?
Like, officially?
as confirmed as any rumour till launch ever is
nothing official ofc
but theres nothing official about blackwell
Cause lots of things are said before the full announcement comes and then the unexpected happens
I expect AMD to release a full range
there are some things that can happen like rdna3 imploding, you dont suddenlt take a magic multi chip config out of nowhere
Do we know anything about the upcoming RDNA4 arch?
Architectural improvements prognosis, new features?
its more likely that nvidia has an ad101 die in the chamber than that rdna4 having a card at or over a grand
4090 being ad102, and lower number being bigger die
and given how unlikely a 101 is, yeah, N4X isnt coming out
think we know some snipped of rdna4 but nothing I remember on top of my head
Having usses using the other SFP+ Port to connect via my PC though
Keeps going from like 100Mbs to 1000Mbps to 2500Mbs, can't keep a consistent connection
looks to me like AMD is picking their battles where they can compete, which ain't at the very top end, but low-midrange
but amd could compete there?
they are picking time to market over having a "told you we can do this"
if they delay R4 to get big stick rolling r5 gets delayed etc.
and dGPU is not their main market anyway so that cant afford to delay gpu IP
rdna5 is needed for consoles, apus need to have working tech
I'll believe it when I can see it
295x2 for example
rdna2 did compete
well it certainly wasnt low-midrange
sure
I mean strictly this generation, though in the past they have been lagging behind NV as well
and this generation its again its a tradeoff
Counterpoint: AMD doesn't need the top end 4090 competitor because they don't have the technology to be interesting at that price point
what
Like, 4090 is not a gaming card, it's a Titan
what??
7900XTX is just great enough as a gaming card
man you got some weird takes recently
4090 isn't a full die though
vex please think for a few nanoseconds before typing?
Still room for a Titan or ti
Are you going to say that we need something more than a 7900XTX?
yes
halo product = normies see it and are like "wow this is amazing, so I can only afford the 300$ card but if they win there I just take nvidia at 300$ surely thats the right call"
I mean have you seen starfield benchmarks
The only problem with XTX is price, other than that it's performance wise, pretty good
And any meaningful rt load
if you dont have the biggest gpu to beat down at prices nobody buys it for, then people dont care if the 7800xt is a good value
like nvidia is closer to driving my monitor than AMD is, but both could easily make a gpu that is, and nvidia is closer to the reticle limit, therefore amd could have more performance increase available within the reticle limit
I'm sorry, what are you trying to say?
if amd doesnt have the biggest gpu, people wont buy the smaller ones
Ah, you were missing a comma
Again, why would that even matter
I seriously don't understand how a halo GPU is needed
mindshare is won by halo product
XTX is good enough for a halo for a good price
it doesnt win
It clearly doesn't like the Upload, it's rated for 2Gbps too, but oh well, I'll take it
I don't see why it needs to beat the 4090
it takes significant effort to find a chart where it wins
They beat the 4080 with the XTX, and they are way cheaper than it
4090 is a Titan, not a consumer gamer card
but consumers buy it
and there are monitors that even it is not fast enough to drive
its marketed as consumer card, it benefits in consumer workloads, it's cheaper than last years 3090ti
and if people look at to buy in gpu space they look at who has the best gpu because it's simple to think best card= best brand at any price point
I am not quite sure the halo product is needed at all times. However as it stands with vendor locked Nvidia features in games with no open alternative that is as good. It's tough. Ryzen didn't need to be faster than intel before getting market share and growing.
And is hoarded by companies and workstation enthusiasts
I genuinely do not understand the need for a halo product
I can buy it at msrp online no problem
There are far more important issues than matching the 4090
when you are spending 4 grand on a pc, an extra 500 for another 15-270% extra performance depending on the title is ez pz
Like trying to actually be appealing to professionals in general when CUDA is just faster than AMD's alternative at every single thing
Or trying to get FSR to match DLSS in quality and performance
Like, when AMD nails down the software and features part
Then we can start to wonder where are the halo GPUs at
doesnt matter, if amd had dlss and it was best but not the best gpu people would riot
features dont matter
they matter when you are even or ahead
nvidia probably spent more money in investments that allowed them to make dlss and geforce now than AMD actually has money on hand in general
I'll pull one from your book, and say that you have some weird takes
Features don't matter?
Like, think about what you just said
if you have the best raytracing but your card isn't doing the non RT fps that others do, it's still not being bought
That's why I said quality AND performance
you can worry about features after the rastererization beats the competition
AMD easily matches and provides far better value than any card that isn't the 4090
Even if AMD has a faster halo, they still seem like common argument.
I feel like for AMD to win it needs to nulify the arguments, for nvidia. Even if the practical value of DLSS and better RT is not always there. It helps a lot for mind share.
That being said if you have the raw performance crown it could counter it, but it's still an uphil battle.
Consistently being the better value also helps with market share.
The flagship that is what, 800$ more than the 4080?
doesnt matter
Pretty sure NV hiked that 4090 price to 2000$ or something like that recently
people look at it then buy the lower tier card for their price point
yes it's an uphil battle and having nothing else would make a hard sell but it's not a complicated market to push through if you have the big crown
Yeah I don't see it, sorry
just because you cant see air doesnt mean its not there
I mean thats how the market works, DiY space is not where most systems sell
Hi my wooting started making a really high tone, really not loud but its bit annoying. Why is that?
I still don't think having the flagship is the only way.
Consistently undercutting in price (and announcing your cards at the right price)
Better efficiency
Getting OEMS on board to ship your gpu's
Improving the software features.
Any of those will help a lot.
average gamer wants the best gpu and if you have to say "well under these conditions and if you look at the price and consider x" to say amd is the better choice, they wont care what you sell them
🤷 qlum thats purely theoretical
likely your LEDs at full brightness, try turning that down
and none of those individually work as those have all been tried
undercutting price is only possible if you have some insane cost savings method or think next gen is insane or are intel and need to somehow enter the market even at a near loss
OEMs will easily eat your entire stock if you have the best halo card to sell
Like, your argument that halo products matter, which is basically "prices dictate expectations", where Nvidia having the most expensive product somehow makes them more appealing doesn't work
Market segmentation is a thing
no vex, market segmentation is purely memetic
High end buyers more likely than not know how to watch or read a review
it doesnt exist in reality
And in mid-end AMD has the clear advantage, imo, in performance and pricing
thats was it, thanks
if nvidia sold the titan v for $500, everyone would have bought it instantly
but when amd sold the radeon v for 400, everyone laughed
"hey computer guy whats the best gpu"
"4090 from nvidia"
"damn thats insane, cant afford that so I'll buy a 4070"
that's the kind of thing how people decide on what to buy
Also, remember that RTX 4060Ti is in competition with 7800XT, some people still compare GPU model numbers if they know nothing about reviews or just the market, so there's also that
is that forever now or do they recover when i stay on low now?
"hey computer guy whats the best gpu"
"4090 from nvidia"
"damn thats insane, cant afford that so I'll buy a 4080"
"AMD has a better card than that for cheaper that's 7900XTX"
thats a fantasy world lel
usually means you are sensitive to high pitched noises so likely around until your hearing gets worse xD
i have mine set to reactive when im typing, and I dont notice it
ahh nice
replace computer guy with oem seller or random youtube video or marketing slides they see and then you dont have someone that would offer an alternative bc why would they
first thing to remember is consumers are fucking stupid
And why is any clerk going to pitch Nvidia over AMD? Perhaps mainly cause there's a major feature disparity between the two that's giving Nvidia free marketing as the far better option?
"Oh AMD sucks at RT" "AMD sucks at upscaling"
they just reinforce the "nvidia is faster" attitude
Well then why would you buy that?
no because halo winner means they can sell for more
AMD needs to fix their features first, that's the most important part
no
@cursive summit the difference between your scenario and quins is the difference between explanation and rationalization
quin (and many others) have made an observation based in reality, and provided an explanation
you have found a way you want the world to work, and have come up with a way that that could be true
RT is irrelevant yet it just gives Nvidia more mindshare
Cause Nvidia is hard doubling down on pitching RT as this big thing
They have the RT advantage, and they are the ones with hearts and minds
if a 6800xt loses only 5% for RTX features but starts at 50% lower fps than a 3080 already nobody cares
So Nvidia can easily push the narrative that RT is important, and we are the only ones with good RT, so we are the better company
they push features ON TOP of winning raster
raster is first and foremost
Where last I checked, AMD is performing very very well for cheaper
again rationalizing, this time from nvidias pov
but its the same argument you are making
Not efficiency front, that's where AMD needs to do better
performing well for budget does not matter if they dont win
thats just what people look at
But after AMD continues gaining in rasterization and fixing their features, while also performing well in value front
amd is second best option and has been for years
yea otherwise more people would own 6650xts 
Then they can start going "halo"
thats just not how any gpu market ever worked
yea well they are trying as hard as they can to become the 3rd lel
kinda. weird times, where we hope for INTEL of all companies to succeed, lel
that aint happening thankfully/sadly
🤷 as long as amd doesnt fade into irrelevance, we dont need intel
but amd is trying as hard as they can to avoid winning against nvidia
except for in the laptop space
no they are actualyl in the best position right now as they ever were
roadmap wise at least, not for current offerings
this is the most pessimistic roadmap i have seen from them lmao
maybe amd has realized how awful their projections were before and fixed it but that will need to prove itself
they have mi300 working, they are getting super advanced packaging down before nvidia does it to not run into issues for lower nodes and decided to not delay rdna5 by fixing rdna4 with brute force to have a massive win there, at the same time as the next console cycle
As for the hole halo thing, I don't think it's the only way but it could very well be the only way for AMD.
Nvidia could sell itself while being slower on other selling points AMD at that point really just has price and partnerships as an option.
Also for OEM's Cuda makes Nvidia more versatile especially in laptops sold to students / professionals as well.
can that plan fail? totally, but I think it's a much better shot than just hoping nvidia fails and you have some miracle uArch that wins
maybe dc market ill give you that but ive never really cared about dc market before 2 years ago
im talking consumer roadmap
amd has always had a path to way better than nvidia on the roadmap
until now
it always fails sure
but the plan was there
except they still do just at staggered pace
what?
I think the easiest win for AMD is to take a good hard look at their marketing department and improve on the messaging front.
rdna 5 is coming somewhat shortly after blackwell, it's not going after blackwell-next
nah i think amd has somehow managed to stoke the community into rabid fandom to their massive benefit, and if they mess that up, radeon at least is definetly dead
amd is probably better at that than nvidia
considering the arguments online seem to be about equal fervor
and nvidia has 4x the userbase
so them working out mi300 while nvidia is just doing grace-hopper and have some pcie issues on that already means amd should have the advantage of practical experience to make something not monolithic work whereas nvidia doesnt have big chips in productino that use anything like that
yeah but thats DC stuff, that's nothing transferable to client
who knew that in the 21st century, instead of console wars we'd get GPU wars
its pretty obvious that the only way forward is chiplet
N4X/N4C was chip on chip akin to mi300 just on different scale
and you can bet rdna5 is not going lower on that
mi300 chip to chip gets slaughtered by nvidias chip to chip
mi300s advantage is in chiplet
and nvidia doesnt have chiplet yet at all
yet nvidia is still winning
yes I meant chiplet to chiplet not mi300 to mi300
thats why I'm saying the currently have chance because they have knowledge on how to make that work and use it on client platform while nvidia is stuck making big monolithic
but despite that advantage they are still losing...
which I think is more optimistic than your average roadmap of some uArch being better
quin, they already have chiplets on gpu
yeah bc rnda3 got fucked but not from the chiplet part
if nvidia figures out chiplet, what can amd do?
yes but I think its more likely it takes them longer than it is that amd just has a superior uArch out of nowhere
thats why I think the roadmap is not more pessimistic than older ones (that never got met)
what?
amds only chance is if their roadmap is more pessimistic than their old ones
in fact is so pessimistic that it ends up being as pessimistic as the old ones were optimistic
now I just dont get what you mean
amd has a roadmap to losing to nvidia
I thought you meant you have a pessimsitic view on their current roadmap
if that's true, linux fanatics gonna need a lot more mental gymnastics to recommend AMD over nbidia lel
if this roadmap is correct, amd just loses
what roadmap maybe we should start with that
no shit we arent in 2025 yet
^
that's why we talk about "if this happens"
performance and efficiency leadership? that's optimistic
if they yeet 4x, they are done
at the time of that roadmap it certainly was what they expected
2020 shook things up good lol
ok so you are strictly looking at the current known roadmap im looking at including rdna5
has amd projected how good rdna5 is gonna be?
no but we dont really need to have that
before you say that imma say they need 2x over rdna3
if we assume like any generation it was supposed to beat the previous gen flagship aka N4C, and comes like 2 quarters after blackwell
actually let me use paint
I dunno, they have been promising it time and time again. I remember Polaris being marketed at this huge deal, and on release, it was like a midrange NV card (if memory serves). been permanently disillusioned with them when I bought a Vega. what a piece of shit!
it was competitive with the top of nvidias low end cards, maybe the bottom of midrange
I mean what marketing says to sell you something vs what engineers/leaks/rumours and slides on investor days say isn't always the same
but vega was targeted to win against nvidia, and it just failed to do that
raja curse, man just cant beat the 1080 ti
they overclocked the shit out of that card, and it couldn't even cross the finish line
🤷 perf just didnt scale well, they didnt clock it that high
yeah but I neither really was into hardware there so cant speak to vega nor does it really matter since I dont put my expectations on zen5 based on bulldozer either
sure but amd was at least optimistic about bulldozer before they fabbed it
just like rdna 3 
that's true. I don't see the course changing though
what are you looking at though to decide that
eh, maybe I am too critical of them.
here thats my expectation (relatively roughly) and witht those launch dates
oh fuck off microsoft I want to speculate and not read this https://twitter.com/wiz_io/status/1703759418507026663?s=61
kek, looks like a close up of a patchy beard

HAHAHAHAHHA
sure fair enough
and while you may be right, if amd doesnt have a plan for making rdna5 that much zoomier, it aint gonna happen
yes im basing it on n4c being massive, next gen likely improving so assuming nothing happens (again) its not a improvement over just N43 or whatever we get but over the original idea
my assumption is just with trying N4C and having mi300 onwards working, they are in a sport where they can use that to make a winning design by leveraging that over just monolithic IP
sure but i suspect if nvidia figures out chiplet, amd just loses
client blackwell no chiplet?
and yea i see good things for amd by making apple competitive chips
GB20x monolithic for consuemr GB10x DC with potentialyl chiplets
so no consumer gb102???
just a naming but there would be gb202 as the big one most likely
the precedent for naming starting with 2xx is pretty awful gpus on the nvidia side yikes
oh tho i suppose 980ti wasnt bad at all
eh its just if/because two different gens on same name
🤷 p100
thats a one off not a seperate uArch
Glass?
v100 also existed
Will we be able to see what's under the heat spreader?
no
watch dr cuttress video he mentions that
Could you just, idk, say it?
Oh come on
Replaced by a marketing exec
v100 to tu116 was as similar as p100 to p102 cores
Graphene is hella cool
I hope that eye tracking means we'll get those futuristic "Click where you look" glasses soon
Although how would you cram an OS into a portable format like glasses, idk
imagine that future for ad banners, geez
literally a year old now
"Accept Jesus and win a FREE Nintendo Switch!" click
They would really want that
Tech is progressing into more and more invasive practices
Which is sad
Hope that google chrome thing they are doing will not pass
whether wholesale taking people's attention away from what their doing is ethical is a discussion that society still needs to have
do you know how many ethical discussions for society that we havent done?
its incredible
I'd say at least a dozen!!!11
id add another 2 orders of magnitude to that lel
Beatlink?
on the other hand tho, the #1 application for glasses for me is facial recognition of other people and retreiving data on them
A what now
So, pretty much just popups
Zen 4c?
yep
how many times has that been explained to you? lel
but yea its just worse than the steam deck besides for use with the egpu
I mean you can cram all the shit an Apple Watch does into that format, glasses are just longer and thinner. It's doable.
Rough probably, but doable.
I don't remember if I payed that game or not
Wouldn't glasses be far more demanding on the GPU front than a watch?
I doubt it's doable, but maybe
But if it is, I'd be very interested in such device
Oh I'm not saying it'd be fast by any means, but the format is viable. That's more what I mean.
Tbf, let's be real, "Glass OS" would be what, FHD?
Though my bigger question is how you produce something like this while making it actually align to the average eye. Glasses are notorious for needing custom frames and sizing for literally everyone.
Something like Snapdragon 8g2/g3 could easily run FHD and support android/whatever
Just, where do you stuff the internals
read the article i linked to vex, qualcomm already did it
Yeah that feels a little cheap.
cheap???
That's like AR headset lite. I'm talking like actual glasses, not something that can kinda almost be glasses if you squint.
Just needs giga thin tech.
can somebody please explain to me why only the right speaker is humming when there's noise in the circuit
Your left ear is clogged
definitely not
bad sound card
They're the kind of glasses 13 year old me would have drawn if I was trying to imagine tech glasses in 30 years. 
DAC/AMP problem probably
Or just try twisting the audio cable lol, sometimes the contact is bad
well if you are currently 43, you would have been right
nothing wrong with those as well i'd imagine, it used to be that both speakers were humming
now it's only the right one
lol
it only hums when gpu gets loaded also
bad shielding
so it's just noise in the circuit
I am 25. 
Off by a good 2 decades.
anyways, what would be the best way to get rid of that shit?
do you have a laptop?
https://www.rayneo.com/products/tcl-rayneo-x2
here it is finally productized, and its only slightly larger than the glasses that just took pictures
Binocular Full-color Micro-LED Optical Waveguide Displays 100,000:1 Contrast Ratio, Image Brightness of Up to 1,000 nits Qualcomm Snapdragon® XR2 Platform Real-time, Multi-language Dialogue Translation Smart navigation with SLAM System, Gesture Recognition Map Showing Nearby Landmarks All-in-one Smart Assistant (Call &
no
check for grounding, and make sure your neutral is connected properly
Ngl
i'm almost completely sure there's no ground in this house
well that could be your problem
that i can't do anything about
Yeh you can.
thats probably not true
Power smoothing.
if you own the place, call your utility
i don't
if you dont own the place, call the landlord
it's an apartment building
The general way to solve not having ground is to introduce your own, fix the house, or set things on an isolated circuit and jank it.
gl with that
its their responsibility that you dont shock yourself to death
if you cant get ahold of the landlord, get ahold of the fire marshal
Remember, anywhere there's ground there's ground, run a cable. 
connect the neutral to a downspout I guess
^
please no diy grounding
or your radiator
What could possibly go wrong. 
esp if you dont own the place
so what's the best option to jank it then
$5 USB to jack adapter for phones (really a cheap dac)
pick somewhere to be the ground, and make sure you have zero resistance to all of them
my dac is isolated
it is the speakers that introduce the noise
no
To jank it? Find something connected to ground that nobody is touching and run ground into that. Needs 0 resistance.
I'm sorry what?
the noise is in both speakers, but its running through both wires on the speaker that doesnt have the noise, and running through just 1 wire of the speaker making the noise
i don't exactly want to shock my neighbors
all my water pipes are lead, like GOD intended
i mean they introduce it into the dac
via rca cables
Oi Hollow, do you have like a method to run a really thin cable down a wall outside the building?
230v on a good day so it's fine 
Something nobody is seeing.
yes, so if it is introduced equally to both conductors on the rca cable, you wont hear it on the output
actually i can
1st floor
put a note there asking for passersby to touch it for you. ez ground 👍
Well what you could do is the thing every single sysadmin does when designing a rack. Run one of these down to the floor.
Find one that's like the same color as the brickwork.
Straight into earth.
but also make sure theres zero other grounds first
It's not great and you'd need to very, very well secure it, but yeah that's possible.
if there is in fact another ground, you have just turned your grounding into a battery
^
Gotta be crazy careful with this stuff, small fuckups can and will stop your heart.
I have the SOLUTION
That is fucking awful.
10/10
Anyone happen to know a browser that still supports TLS 1.1?
This is actually so obnoxious. Explorer is the obvious choice and refuses to run on Windows 11. 
firefox i think?
Nope. Modern Firefox just refuses.
I'm trying to connect to my R710 iDRAC and since the lifecycle controller is so far out of date it refuses to connect.
lemme check, you can definetly install old versions of firefox
Firefox 91 ESR apparently supports it
Love to see it.
maybe an about:config option
firefox spinoffs like waterfox
91 ESR failed.
yeah the ones based on the time before quantum
shite
Waterfox somehow works lmao.
Righto cool.
Right now we get to see how out of date this is.
I heard if you get hit by a stray F-35 you get to keep it
How is it possible to lose the most advanced fighter ever made...? The thing calls home with an obsession.
Well that's idiotic.
Double idiotic. What?
they also announced they'll get rid of GPS and force their pilots to navigate via maps, sextants and star patterns
Very fooni
if you can use it to id and count planes, the enemy also can
The decision to turn off transponders makes some sense?
F-35 incident in china sea
World's most advanced (even though the chinese already stole information on the plane years back lol) goes down to the bottom of the sea
Better turn off that transponder or chinese will get it
Ok yeah that's true, but having one just vanish like this and get stolen is a LOT worse than the enemy being able to count your aircraft. Never mind that there are more high tech solutions than 'remove ID'.
yea its unlikely the competition will be able to locate it first tho lmao
For example, polymers that become transparent with an electric charge. Be fun to make tail numbers with that. Wanna go dark? Hit a switch.
if they lost it in the middle of mainland china or russia, sure but its in the middle of the us
And it's not like the material science for the F35 is particularly brutal either. The thing barely cracks mach 1.
which are transparent to specific frequencies of light, and the enemies just add hyperspectral cameras capable of that freq among others
Mate as much as that invisibility tech is cute, it's not getting implemented lol, too expensive
it's funny until they crash into the ocean and sneakily float their makeshift boat past pirate ships. it'll come in handy, you'll see!!!
Did you forget what this thing costs in the first place?
Many hundred a millions
nah you are looking at it right now most likely
Yeah that much is true. Different solution then.
problem is a retrofit is a pain, so itll just take a while
If anything the material science is far more advanced nowadays, we stopped bothering with speeds over mach 2 cause we realized that going fast doesn't mean shit
It's all about lightweight and radar resistant materials
Make that shit soak up those damn waves
Questionable why transponder wasn't turned on over the damn mainland U.S
If they were operating in south china sea, then I'd get it
practice in the same conditions as deployment
Oh yeah nah the 35 is great. And it doesn't flip upside down and kill the pilot.
Harrier.
35 is great
Well, lot's of people would want to have a word with you
I think the problem with 35 is that nobody needs it
wait 35 is vtol?
F-16 is good enough and that shit does the same thing that 35 does
Yeah.
hunh
It's kinda crazy.
An F-35B test aircraft completes its first-ever vertical takeoff (VTO) at NAS Patuxent River, Md., on May 10, 2013. While not a capability used in combat, VTOs are required for repositioning of the STOVL in environments where a jet could not perform a short takeoff. In these cases, the jet, with a limited amount of fuel, would execute a VTO to ...
Harrier 2 but it's good this time.
Prett sure that was the one that also went down to the bottom of south china sea lol
amazing
VTOL that actually works in a jet isn't that ancient.
What we had the harrier? Awful aircraft.
Ei ei, don't shit on the harrier
Shit had like a 30% lethality. I'd hardly call that working.
yea, and if you can do it without compromising hard on everything you have a big w
^
what on earth is the deal with that front unit?
That Rolls Royce Pegasus engine on the Harrier was bonkers
That's the second fan.
does it do anything in regular flight?
It has one behind the cockpit and it's for VTOL.
Needs it for balance.
Fires directly down.
is it purely mechanical or is there combustion going on inthere?
Yep.
wonder if they could use it in flight to do crazy maneuvers
Nah.
You need to open 2 parts of the top of the plane and one panel on the bottom.
Mid flight you'd rip them off.
Yeah that.
yea but thats first gen problems imo
they can probably make it so that you can just activate it at will
not on thisplane but on the f45 or whatever
Those damn americans stealing tech off of a Yak-38 from 50 years ago
Ancient relic, ngl.
yea but i was thinking oh shit missile inbound and it needs more gs than just the aero can provide
Also the first operational VTOL jet in the world, afaik, 50 years back
Lmao nah.
dump the clutch and shoot upwards or even downwards
Modern missiles you don't get to dodge. Once someone has a lockon your only hope is flares or ECM. If you lose both of those you really have no hope to avoid it.
Like there are some that will happily do like 70 degree turns.
What ya guys think, is a 4070 too powerful for a 5600x?
Just fine
But that CPU is aging, would always default on 5800X3D on AM4
yes and the more abrupt your movement change, the faster they need to turn
lol i bought it this year too😭
i was thinking of bying one used if I see one cheap
on the other hand yea the modern missiles that still are deadly even if they miss are a bit of a problem
Also if you are getting a 5600X, don't, get the 5600 non-X
You'll be saving money
i have a 5600x
it cost 120€
Python-4 will turn around lol and lock on twice after a miss
Yeah.
could have gotten one used for like 50€ but I was skeptical of the used market
Like truly crazy shit like that. Missiles are too stronk.
Too much BVR.
Python 4-5 are cool
right now im trying to build my dream itx rig and im looking for a used b550 itx board
I am REALLY not sure why the Israelis gave the damn Pythons to China ffs
I think PL-8 is basically a Python-3 clone
I do remember recently there were discussions to more trades or something? Questionable actions
sure but pulling a max g climb or fall is preferable to being closer to the missile
It'll just do a 70 degree turn and go after you again. 
By far the most effective way to chase away missiles is chaff or ECM.
Really not a good other method.
sure but the rocket can only do that so many times, it has a ton less energy each time it needs to do a 180
dm what
Don't
but why
Don't dm them
💀
You don't want them helping out lol
oh nah i dont even have parts yet
Oh this is true, but it's also a case of you can't dodge more than once or twice. 
im looking for them on online marketplaces
Got a pcpartpicker list?
sure but a chance to dodge is better than just getting hit even if its 10%
I have a barely used Asus TUF Gaming B550 Plus that I paid 140bux for, I'll sell for 100 plus shipping
nah bro
oh sorry that's an ATX
Higher chance to dodge is chaff or ECM. 
That's why it's not in doctrine anymore to attempt an air dodge unless you're out, in which case it's a yolo.
derp!
Not sure what you two are talking about, but AIM-9X is really unlikely to miss, an AIM-120 will never miss however much you want to maneuver
sure but if you had even more maneuvrerability, that wouldnt hurt
I mean with mechanical failure maybe.
AIM-9X has flare resistance, pulls like 50Gs
Maybe.
AIM-120 I have no clue how many G's it pulls, but it's prolly over 40 and it's active guided
If you have a fox-3 on you, you are dead
This is why we BVR and stealth.
Fuck getting anywhere near the radar of that aircraft.
Stealth is pretty important but of questionable value?
If it lets you avoid a lock then it's S tier for now.
Stealth science has always been struggling
Like not for long, if AI gets scary enough then self guided thinking missiles are fucking terrifying.
Radars are too effective lol
thats what they want you to think
Tbf I see the future of combat being laser hardkill APS on jets
lol we all just die the week someone tries to train an ai for guiding missiles
that being an ai and not a VI
Oh yeah probably.
The difficulty is powering that kind of stuff.
That's a thing already though
no the heck it isnt lel
BAE doing their thing
Y'know we're trying to apply that to the cardboard drones with rasPis? Very funny.
Their futility is highly entertaining
this is folks using systems using machine learning on top of classical intelligence
if someone actually builds an AI model for driving missiles, thats the end for humanity
I presume this to be more for guarding against the shrapnel from the plane next to it blowing up
What..?
You know there's a thing against sharpnel that we invented?
We call em sandbags
Also good against bullets
yeah but the mass is what stops shit
i guess this was what they had on hand
still funny
🤷 but also would prevent the plane from flying
superpower btw
i suspect this stuff would just fall off if you tried to take off
Secondary power* (in ukraine)
Can't roll a sandbag
try to scramble with a thousand sandbags on top, and youll sandblast your engine lel
or commit war crimes
i mean lets be clear that if they would just stop fighting that would be better
javelins?
also afaik tanks are often traction limited outside of sticky environments?
Beg your pardon, those would work just fine against panzerfausts
The cope cage memes were pretty fleck
It's funny that ERA could have been mounted on tanks as early as 1944 iirc
The famous russian brick was invented in the end of 1944 iirc, in Aussieland.
Brits didn't want it, americans didn't want it, so they forgot about it lol
Honestly it's so funny how overall useless a vast majority of tanks are.
Like what, the only tanks that are good at these days less tanks and more just rolling technology platform with a barrel on it.
well its a bigger barrel than most other platforms
Little reminder that Ukraine war is essentially the very first war that we are seeing that encompasses all new military technologies, as far as ground is concerned
Tanks are not useless
They just need to adapt to drone threats
Current tank doctrine is still not much different than the one from 1940s lol
they need to install really big fans on them to swipe the drones away
Honestly? I'm genuinely more scared of an APC with a bunch of shoulder mounted missiles than I am of an Abrams.
Like with a decently sized APC you could carry hundreds of missiles and a few launchers, not only is that more dangerous than any tank but has the fun factor of being able to carry basically any payload.
Absolutely fuck going against 40 dudes with 10 shoulder launchers and a few hundred missiles strapped to an APC.
F tier fight.
No thx.
sure but thats more expensive
Get AMP'ed then
American police departments beg to differ
a tank coating developed against a very specific type of mine
You can launch basically anything from the shoulder and there's some fuck off scary things.
that only the one faction used that applied zimmerit
Depending on your APC, it's nowhere near as scary as an MBT
those hundred missiles are 10 million bucks to rearm
rearming a tank is less than 100k
Now depending on the IFV, I would agree
Like you could take one APC and launch a Black Ops 2 Swarm on your enemy. That is so much worse than a single tank that costs as much.
For a foot mobile, I'd dread an IFV
IFVs are fucked, yeah.
That's just not a fight that you win.
The scary hybrid of an MBT and APC.
War is essentially a food chain
Soldiers use ATGMs and co to prey on MBTs, MBTs fuck up APC/IFVs, IFVs fuck up infantry
There's more cases to it
But everything has a role
Tank very much is not dead
also keep in mind if we start using the tanks as drone platforms, for scouting et al, that pushes the useable range of the tank forward
What's that silly name they gave this thing, Booker?
Honestly? I don't really see it.
MBT is dead, weird MBT that's like half tech platform very much alive.
MBT is very much not dead
Because they keep getting random tech strapped to them.
MBT is crucial to any military and it will adapt
I mean you already have to consider that not every tank on the battlefield is not some barely post ww2 abomination that has like the shitties nightvision etc
like the russians do
a modern tank can do a whole lot more
Wrong, it's now M10 Booker
Like at this stage I don't actually think MBT is a good descriptor anymore, that's why I say MBT dead. It's morphed into something distinctly beyond the traditional MBT.
yea im aware, but the capacity for expansion is still there on our current tanks
is it
most forces still have MBTs
and depending on the force you have a lot of other ones that you use
MBT will not change much even after the war
probably
Key technologies for preventing drone strikes are already available
overall not I'd guess
And any force that can afford it is trying to throw tech into it. I mean the Abrams alone is largely a tech platform now.
but some countries might swap their mbt
that is what an MBT is now
isnt the whole point of the m in mbt to be modern?
No.
Main Battle Tank.
what
they just have become modern
why would them becoming modern not make them an mbt anymore
i thought the acryonym was modern nvm
MBT is an umbrella term anyways
The acronym is a Main Battle Tank, the fuck?
yea
Not modern. 
I prefer U.S designations
m1 abrams is mbt
yea thats my mistake
KF51 is AI 
while something like a bradley fulfils other roles
Bradley's an IFV by all means, but also an APC
yea
Or I guess like americans call it, a cavalry vehicle
Tbf look at a Merkava
Right which is why it feels weird. We use MBT as a descriptor for 'armored box with big gun' which feels really stupid since that classes everything from WW1 tanks to a modern Abrams.
When what a tank does now is so fundamentally different to what they used to do? Umbrella term is kinda brain dent.
Merkava's an MBT by all means
Carries a crew of 6 extra soldiers though in the back
considering the US has a shitton of dedicated APCs
sure but it an armored box with a big gun, just with extra tech inside the box?
MBT has only become a term since the 1950s..?
if "zerg rushing" and enemy with infantry is something you want
having troops in your MBT could be effective
1945 specifically.
First "MBT" was Centurion, and that's a 1945 tank, that was only recognised as an "MBT" later
That's when Centurion came out, MBT is a later term
yea since in ww2 tanks were basically so "in development" that something like an MBT could not be named properly
No, I said we use it to describe anything from WW1/2 to now.
yea
Really absurd big umbrella terms feel... off.
but at the point they didn't know what would really be the main one 
Makes no sense?
That term shouldn't be applied to anything before 1950
Well no. It absolutely makes sense.
that is when the idea really took off
What?
Before, not past
before that you basically just split them into weight classes
oh
well
eh
kinda iffy
That's like saying any projectile weapon firing a shaft before 9000 BCE isn't a bow. What?
since they used them differently
yea but saying something is an mbt
when there is no clear mbt
Like, U.S STILL uses a far more efficient designation system than your typical "MBT"
is kinda difficult
What's an Abrams?
Tank, tracked, 120mm, M1 Abrams
Far better designation
Something like a Stryker MGS is I think
Tank, wheeled, 105mm, Stryker
WW2 Germany absolutely had the Panzer IV as their MBT. Like FOR SURE.
let's see you classifying ww2 era german tanks like that
Well, they didn't
German classifications were all over the place
yet the wikipedia article names the panther for that

That's a bit mixed.
Panther was your average medium tank
Which afaik germans didn't even categorize, I never heard it categorized at least
Like yes the Panther got use but it was overall less used than the Panzer IV, which was basically their entire workforce for tanks.
german ww2 tanks were stupid experimental
they built them with a specific purpose
so categorizing them would not really make sense
German WW2 was stupid experimental*
FTFY
at least not with how specific they get
fair
but categorizing something as "this is good against T-34s" would be kinda stupid
That's why I still prefer U.S military designations
you could argue the panzer 3 was the mt even
@ashen spindle
deckard copium pls
too bad it can be quite confusing
still same as last week, wait for meta connect end of the month
as it doesn't necessarily say what role it fulfils
when that is really the important part
when I slap a small gun turret on top of an APC you could assume from the designation that it might be a light tank
when it really is not
It does
COMBAT, FULL-TRACKED, 105-MM GUN, M1
...aight
Like, U.S classifies vehicles very to the point
Vehicle type, what it's for, what traverse method it has, and the armament
So yeah Abrams is officially called Tank, Combat, Full-Tracked, 120-mm Gun, M1A1
And this system was used since WW2 I think
call everything mark 1 and be done
U.S has too much money lol
US spends too much money on military
Abrams is too heavy, but hey they are getting around to fix that
they just aren't that good with money
M1E3 will be very pog
look at leopard 2 a8 weight 
Not a problem for Germans
Germans don't typically send their vehicles overseas unless it's a peacekeeping operation
Americans have.. uhm.. democracy-spreading needs, for why they need to have all logistics planned out in case they ship em somewhere
but looking at it
odds of it are low
to get shipped a lot after it got deployed
meanwhile the pzh2000 is getting BEAT in the ukraine
Getting beat?
