#🔌│tech
1 messages · Page 212 of 1
obviously not
yea my bad
smh cant even screenshot without the ui XD
speak for yourself
XD
i didnt even see it lol
i didnt shift fullscreen so it was only part of my display
and i didnt even fullscreen because im omega lazy
anyways point is even if they were the same fps, we could still say they are gpu limited if we know that the gpu is hitting 99.9% utilization
the game seems to like tight timings but the HUB video doesnt show timings anywhere
yeah but he linked gns memory test
and on gns gpu test at high/1080 4080/4090 got same fps
7200cl34 for 13th/12th gen intel
bound means no matter how much you improve other factors, x bounds your fps and prevents it from increasing
limited means improving it will increase fps and nothing more
Looks like 34-45-45-115
If they are only using xmp
7200 is showing more scaling compared to the 6000 that GN used
ive never heard it used like that
bound and limited are the same lol
used interchangably
🤷 and now you have a chance to learn
people use literally incorrectly quite frequently, doesnt make them correct either
also
both of your definitions mean the same thing
if something is bound
then making that faster will still increase fps?
if you think that is true, you misunderstood what i meant (and im pretty sure i stated it precisely enough to have said what i meant)
no i dont
because its something you pulled out of your ass lol
correct
but nothing else will be able to meaningfully make it faster (if it is bound)
show me somewhere that backs your useage lol
because ive never seen anyone use them differently
they mean the same thing
observe the differences
a thing can be cpu and gpu limited on its own, but most of the folks talking about being bound are talking about telling the difference
thats implying that bottlenecking is a unique point in the performance space
bottlenecking is a massive set of things
varying from the negligable impact on performance to the extreme impacts on performance
in fact its possible to have a bottleneck that has zero impact on performance
again find me someone else that differentiates limited and bound for cpu/gpu/memory
HWU and GN use them interchanably
thats just limited
and ian pretty carefully tore down their objectivity
?
they dont provide rational reviews, just (useful) subjective ones
they just pretend to be more rational than linus while making fewer errors
(and less obvious ones too)
that has nothing to do with thme using terms
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/locate-and-resolve-cpu-gpu-bottlenecks.html
heres a nice technical definition
Follow a typical workflow with Intel(r) GPA analyzing your application to find bottlenecks so that you can resolve them.
that only uses bound
no it just means that they are likely to make errors like literal vs figurative
you cant understand english or youre ignoring my request
find me someone else that differentiates limited and bound for cpu/gpu/memory
dont link something useing one term
some thing use BOTH and using them to mean different things
read
limited is used one time
if you ctrl f to limited, you can find a section on how gpu bottlenecks can be cpu limited
and isnt used to descibe something different than bound
also
that is using limited opposite of what you said
as its saying both gpu and cpu can improve
exactly!
i think you misunderstood what i meant by nothing more
i meant there was no more meaning you could attribute to it, not that no other factors could improve fps
so like the car being on fire means that you can tell it is going to have problems and nothing more
it could have few or many problems but you cant exactly tell what problems it definetly will have
if limited then increase fps by changing it (and maybe something else)
if bound then cant increase fps without changing it
🎥 In today's video, we're diving deep into Cinebench 2024, the one-stop benchmarking tool that now supports both CPU and GPU tests. If you've ever wondered how to get the most accurate performance metrics for your gaming rig or workstation, this video is for you!
#Cinebench2024 #CPUBenchmark #GPUBenchmark #PCGaming #TechReview
how long is this gonna last lel

last gpu bench had the 1060 outperform the 2080ti
looks like cinEbench-cores wont do well in this version, time to call it amd sponsored 
avx512 should definetly give amd a lead in anything rendering
amds avx512 is pretty fantastic for the lack of extra hardware they put into it
not just that but it's avx2 minimum and the e cores suck at even the vectorized instructions they have in comparison
i mean these arent independent
also id be shocked if 2 extra or even 4 extra p cores would offset the loss of 16 e cores
like on the one hand sure a single e core is worse than anything else we have
but 4 e cores vs 1 p core?
4 e threads vs 2 p threads?
taken to the extreme, 40e vs 8p?
no clue but I imagine funny numbers and that we see it used on zen5 release if it works that well in their favour again xD
wdym again?
amds better density has had them keep the advantage this whole time no?
intel removed it in favour of "real world" benchmarks and I thought amd also didnt show it for zen4 but maybe I'm mistaken
sure?
cinebench is an awful predictor of performance outside of rendering apps?
what is new?
I mean its not new, hence it will just be funny if we see it shown again after it was not used is all
possible
i suspect they both removed it due to community backlash not really out of any particular malice?
i can get the pg27aqdm for 930€ brand new, really considering it
oh yeah its not malice its the usual marking to just put whats most beneficial into the showcase, it's just a funny cycle nothing more
honestly i like the new superlight because no double clicking but idk if i like the sound tbh
easy to remove yourself
Real
awesome, managed to get my surface at work as an extended display "wirelessly"
lol
touch just works!
its a bit laggy when you are moving around large windows
kinda wish also that the size inside of this settings window of the monitor matched the scaling
5 is a 12 inch display and 6 is a 10ish inch display lol
they are barely different sizes
oops no 13.5 vs 10.1
also another big sad, after getting it working on one surface I tried to add a second one as another external monitor, however unfortunately 1 wireless display maximum 😦
Nice tetris
Today we're attempting to play Starfield without a dedicated GPU. The challengers are the dual core AMD Athlon 3000G, with Vega 3 graphics, and the 8 core Ryzen 7 5700G, with an onboard Radeon iGPU.
Thanks for watching :)

always enjoy this guy's videos
whats worse. a tree or a patch of concrete?
In this video we see if we can run Starfield without a Graphics Card oin the Most Powerful iGPU Yet! The Ryzen 9 7940HS has the Radeon 780M iGPU and its really fast but is it enough for Starfield? Lets find out
Buy The UM790 Pro Here: https://shrsl.com/44huf
Buy Starfield At BestBuy:https://howl.me/ckvPGd9n61I
Follow Me On Twitter: https://twi...
The more interesting test
3 years? my guy that's 6 years old
like 3.8 all core vs almost 5ghz
oh wait thats not the 13900k, nvm just 3 years then
but yeah, zen1 was not amazing after a while
its a great start not a long living thing
read this, mistook that name
and zen3 is like 3 gens after a do-or-die uArch
10900k was nice before they fucked up the 11900k
ahh the good old days of trying to get bexin to get zen3 and not the fucked up rocket lake 
But Pleasant. Apple good.
Surely this one is not on Apple though, Apple is far from perfect but this is based on devs, they may choose to use functions that were not available in a 7 year old device if not more
Seems like every other month this happens
I do have one unfortunately
I'll check for updates when I get home
I'll get a netgear next time
Or what's the router meta?
unifi, pfsense, asus still
cause asus is using a version of wrt which is very frequently updated
like the other vendors have these bugs we just never learn about them until all the routers have been taken over
True evil can never die! Wendell runs down a cheaper option for those of you who want to build your own FORBIDDEN ROUTER!
Forbidden Router Trilogy playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL10NWKboioZRzCsTw9WedxId9sa0GC7nx
Check us out online at the following places!
https://linktr.ee/level1techs
*IMP...
It looks like the release of stable Android 14 has been delayed by a month.
There were rumors that Android 14 might be released today, however, that didn't happen. According to Mishaal Rahman, the Android 14 source code release has been delayed until next month.
Google had pre-planned to release the new version of the Android OS on September 5, 2023, and all OEMs expected it to happen today.
Now, OEMs are being told that the vulnerabilities detailed in the Android 14 security patch list will be released on October 4, 2023, so that might be the new system release date. This date coincides with the Made by Google event date, where the Pixel 8 and Pixel Watch 2 are expected to be unveiled.
why the formatting
Was already there when I copied it
unsure how that justifies you just pasting it as is
im not. not like i really care about a new phone os
you say that as if its not the least sucky option
I'd rather a nokia 3310 with basic ass call functionality than an android phone
why dont you have a 3310?
lana if youd put the (for me completely unreasonable) passion you have for always NEEDing to run the latest phone OS into other aspects of your life
then maybe
just maybe
you know
haven't bothered to buy one
so what do you have instead?
that and I feel it won't fit in my pockets
just because of how thick it is
iPhone SE 3
it does everything I need without shitting the bed every couple days like my old android phone did
se 3 is 2023?
i have the 22 se
and its complete garbage
the camera is atrocious, slow to launch and fails to sync to the cloud
2022
ah so you somehow have the same phone as me and yet get somehow a vastly better experience from it?
or was the android you had previously just as much worse vs the se as modern android phones are better?
somehow
either that or I care about completely different things
I mean...I'm comparing apples to apples as much as possible
the android phone was absolutely unusable even a year after launch and one OS iteration later
became a space heater in my pocket overnight
my SE3 is still as good if not better than day one
i would guess that if you spent the same amount on an android phone as you spent on an iphone that you would have a similar experience, with the option to have much better experience
the one thing is with android you do in fact have the option to do more stuff, and if you in fact do do that stuff, it will slow down the phone
the custom camera apps that i installed have a ton more shutter lag as the tradeoff for taking better photos for example
did absolutely nothing unless OS updates count
I kept it bone stock because I really...just need my phone to do phone things
os updates on underpowered SoCs are the death of cheaper android phones
call, sext, occasional discord shitpost
this was a samsung that was top of the line during it's day
I...didn't cheap out
model?
yeah which one
that doesnt sound like an S series phone
ive serviced S3 and S4 phones for ages even
I’d be more inclined to believe if it was the exynos model but even then it shouldn’t lag that bad
S7
lol that wasnt a year old in 2022
and I am comparing the phone a YEAR AFTER LAUNCH
to a year after the SE launch
the S7 was horrid a year after
tbf the s7 was garbage for multiple reasons but lag i never noticed when handling any of my customers phones
the SE 3 is still going strong
the most horrible thing imo was just the shit tier edge detection
everything within context carmo
I'm not an absolute dumbass
well, I am
but not as much as you think
my s5 on current os update is currently as responsive as the se 23 except for in webpages and the shutter lag isnt great
but thats a fkn 9 year old phone
oh yeah webpages on any old android phone suck
the browser just struggles with too many updates and not enough ram
its not the browser itself that struggles
running stuff like the CRD website its snappy asf
but modern webpages are just too complex for that ancient soc to handle
from what i encountered modern pages just loaded the ram up
and then the browser struggles cause it cant do shit
again keep in mind tho that phones have progressed significantly since then
an iphone 6 was not a peachy experience a year on...
definitely
but from what I recall (this was a while ago)
it was no where near as bad
or maybe I got a lemon
now sure a 2016 android definetly aged worse in terms of battery life vs 2016 apple, but thats because apple got sued for intentionally slowing down their phones to retain battery life
modern phones have met a happy medium at this point
the battery degrades as does all lithium, and the processing speed somewhat decreases slightly over time, but its mostly the same between different vendors nowdays
tbh i doubt you got a lemon
but you are comparing a 2016 android to a 2022 apple
using a flagship apple soc
a fair comparison would be with a 2022 android that sacrifices the money spent on camera to get the flagship soc just like the se 22 did
the model name of my phone is iPhone SE
give me a moment
and I am not going to shell out money for a phone I'll never use
sure
pretty content with one
good to know that this was very much a "shit was bad back then"
but saying your phone is better than a 7 year old phone is a given
...from a "how do I feel a year out"
on the most basic crap
the only spec that a 7 year old phone has a chance to beat your current phone is camera quality
like
phone is not a pocket warmer
very good
yep
and my 2021 android phone meets those specs
and there are plenty of other android phones that also meet those specs
wonderful
anyways point is there are a ton of qualifications that needed to be added to this statement that we found out in this conversation
and I thought I made it rather clear a few seconds later
you specifically said you didnt
from perspective of "non tech enthusiast who needs functional phone for more than one OS iteration"
which I made clear
I'm glad to know that it was this and not what I thought originally
again that statement still needs more qualifications
i know that we have come to an agreement, you just havent said it yet
we've come to an agreement?
yes
news to me
whatever floats your boat, chief
i understood that you agreed that comparing a phone from 8 years ago isnt representative of phones last year
i know that we disagree on more stuff, but this at least i inferred from what you said
7 not 8 oops
and yet that isn't much of an excuse for "unusable a year later"
I've either got a lemon or phones really were that bad back then and I just got the worst of it
you dont remember the iphone 6?
not fondly, but it wasn't that bad
I don't remember anything fondly from back then
i was a phone repairman back then
it was awful
eventually after the release of the iphone 7 we learned why the iphone 6 and 6s were so often such complete disasters
wow turns out that aircraft grade aluminum was the actual lowest grade most flexible stuff not that strong
🙀
i didnt have a phone in 2013 lel
first smartphone was the cheapest lg burner you could buy in a grocery store, circa 2014?
actually shockingly useable, however extremely limited
actually tbh besides the webpages and quality of the camera, and the lack of expandable storage, my experience is pretty shockingly similar tho its been quite a while
im very happy tho that plastic screens are omega dead
My 6 was bent from the moment I unboxed it. Bluetooth among other things failed, dirt somehow made its way into the bezels and had to be replaced by the store lol
Been on iPhone since the 5s, the 6 was definitely the worst one for me. Others have been great though
yea that time was not good for anyone
galaxy s6 was not that great,
Microusb???
in 2015??? come on...
worlds most durable microusb from what ive heard but that wasnt saying much
Yeah micro was something else, I don’t know a single person who likes it lol
Just need something that plugs both ways and is somewhat durable
Hah fair
were there any advantages over miniusb or usb c depending on the app?
app as in application as in use case or as in software
use case
its more expensive than miniusb
no need to jumble with usb3 and the whole spinny part
also the entire host/client system got done away with
a microusb device was generally considered the client unless the middle pin was connected in some way to enable OTG
dont need to support that though
thats not true
a usb-c device can be both the host and client
minimum implementation for usb c 2.0 can be pretty barebones
the spec discourages using USB-B as a host connector
same for using USB=A as a client connector
thats an option sure, but you can (just using resistors afaik) force only being a client
now sure it is more expensive
but i said vs usb c or miniusb?
well micro was small enough
yea and being able to use it as both has many benefits eg my phone can attach to my standard hub
and the same one that i use for my computer
eh in bulk the pricing evens out
no
design is harder, but not insanely so
a few cents can still make the difference
while sure a single connector isnt more expensive by much
when you buy a few million
thats possibly thousands or hundreds of thousands usd more
oh definetly
and i think usb-c is now cheaper than ever
the question is will you spend that thousand less on warranty returns from the microusb breaking?
what warranty returns lol
or even your phone or email support staff having to respond to people with broken devices?
ive never had a successful warranty claim on a broken port
usually the reply was its caused by the user
my gmmk1's microusb port got flaky and they sent me a new board
i mean even if they say no, thats still support staff time
well i can tell you samsung didnt fuck around and wanted hundreds of euros for repairs
but tbh usb-c also has issue in that regard although less
also depends on if you go SMD or THT though
pretty significantly less tbh
same as with microusb
well usb-c has 1 small advantage which is just a bit bigger anchor points for ground to solder into the pcb
im pretty sure it depends more on how your casing is implemented
micro and mini both just had 5 pins and 2 tiny ass case pins
the high end shiz has the housing be the case just the same as microusb
samsung didnt use an off the shelf housing either
also btw you should guess how many pins are in a samsung s6 and s7 micro usb port
and im aware that those werent 3.0 type b ports, but they were also not 5 pins
this was most microusb connectors
(this ones reverse mound but same concept)
2 small dinky smd anchor points
yea but thats not at all what samsung used
you should guess how many fkn pins their microusb had
thats not on all their phones though
s3 s4 s6 and s7 all had 11 pins along with the notes of those generations
meanwhile their A series has 5 pins
ngl i dont even recall an s3 with broken ports
most of the ones i recall are s7/s7 edge and a series phones
and usually from more younger folk
although for the s6 and s7 phones we did have it was also ususally not broken as in ripped off
but
just the plastic ripped out
My father had a 2017 MacBook Pro a few years ago, first gen with 4 usb c ports, and in like 5 months they got really loose and nothing would stay in, and I think either the whole pcb or the whole case had to be replaced, though covered by warranty
yea if they designed the ports like modern usb c ports, where the port itself is integral to the frame of the phone we wouldnt have an issue
yea apple tho is well known for making major engineering mistakes on their devices
They claimed back then it was due to third party usb c adapter connectors being bad but never looked into it and if there ever was a genuine issue with third party cables
probably the ports
unsure about the early macbooks with usb-c but the pros ive seen had individually replaceable usb-c ports
2 on 1 board
yea apple claims a bunch of stuff but that was some of the more transparent BS
if you poorly attach the port to the case, and your port is not very structurally sound, then you cant rely on the case for the rigidity, and your port will break if used
Looks like it was a common issue so probably ports for sure
Oh that’s interesting so in reality indeed only one module needs to be replaced
But looks like multiple people got told case has to be replaced too
modern devices have the majority of the usb c port be part of the case of the device
photo credit ifixit ofc
tho i definetly prefer the framework usb c port mentality
$10 extender pcbs that you can replace with basically anything you want at any time
Guys if I can get metal finished really smoothly
Will it be worth it as a mousepad
I know there's been aluminium mouse pads
the advantage of glass is that its pretty easy to start with a flat surface, and put enough craters in it for the mice to be able to see without really losing the flatness
metal seems like it would be really problematic for the sensors what with it being inherently reflective
metal is really good for ball mice
purely flat glass super duper doesnt work for light based mice
I promise it won't be reflective
But if you need something really smooth that tracks like ass
I could also polish it to mirror finish lmao
by definition tho, any metal that is perfectly smooth will be a mirror finish
the question of how different roughing passes would affect tracking is an open question, you could run some experiments
Yes but not trackable even if it wasn't a metal
Right?
But I wouldn't get the metal smoothened by polishing it
you could theoretically make a perfectly flat surface with the tracking as alternating materials
or you could put a perfectly smooth layer of something transparent that is extremely thin on top of a not smooth layer
It's a different method. Shall I do a test piece soon?
I'd have to order silicone feet I think so the metal plate doesn't slide around
Inb4 I start selling desks with a part milled out and filled in with a metal plate
lel
Built in fucking mousepads
at a human level yes
at the physical level no
loads of aerospace stuff is built like that
the surface is 80-90 perfectly smooth
with pits in it
Get glass skates on metal for a very nice sound experience
they shot peen, cryo then grind them
Yes it's what i would do too
It's basically very advanced media blasting
so they retain thin fluids better
yes, but by definition thats not smooth...
you want a matte surface, not a mirror finish
Glass mousepads also don't be see through so they're also not 100% smooth right
and not just matte, you also want it to be irregular
they are often blasted somehow
It will be trust me
lasers, sand, who knows what
depends on what youre specing for surfrace testing
Idk how exactly they do it
yes
but on some level it must by definition not be smooth
Shall I just run a test soon and report back when needed
(I hope I can buy additional skates for my mouse)
i mean whats the harm?
yes but it can be prefectly smooth and in spec with the right tip size
I'll show pictures
ion we are talking past each other
in spec for smoothness doesnt mean you cant get a better microscope and see the discontinuities
its smooth enough
do you know the iso spec for surface roughness?
do you think theres just 1?
they are all specd for tip size
so it can be smooth at a 20 micrometer tip
and terrible for a 5 micrometer
yea and if your spec is 2 angstrom, all of those are gonna get thrown away lel
Okay so
If I make my own mousepad
It'll be stainless steel probably
Surface roughness Ra 0.3 micrometer
Question is is that good enough
And if I can find a nice way to put them on your desk, (i don't want high ass feet)
Should I maybe just start selling
3m has these adhesiveless "sticky" materials
probably insanely overkill for a mousepad nvm
you could probably just get some of that foamlike material that artisan uses?
hmm rounding off the edges of the pad probably wont be fun?
I mean I'd have to find it for sale first
Don't you think I got machinery to do that for me
Because I do luckily
yea obviously, and im no machinist, but finishing the sides of mousepads seems to have been a major issue for years
I could cut them most shapes,
Fuck maybe ThursdayIndustries' first product is going to be a mousepad wtf
I always thought I was going to make some custom automotive parts but damn maybe
Yknow what
If you have ideas regarding size, design and requirements (and the feet but maybe I just glue on a silicone or latex pad)
DM me
Note that I can offer virtually any size. But if I were to stock a few, what would be a nice size
I think maybe the resident mouse expert has a thought on this and I wanna know actually
Yamato if you read this, please comment on this idea
Like what? I have an idea to make something for a car as well
Why have i done this
I still have an open port left
Also this is a 1lpc (Lenovo tiny)
Also technically you could probably match me, 7 is a surface pro connected via Miracast so it's a bit laggy
i could do 8
Yeah I am out of desk space at this point
To do 8 I would need to do a double row situation or something else
Unfortunately max of 1 via Miracast 😦
Sure but this was originally a normal office pc
All these monitors were from users who didn't want secondary monitors or who moved to a different office and bought new monitors
#6 was from an exec who didn't like that the conference system was taking up room in her office so I'm "storing" it on my desk
also
the newest dell micros have 4 dp
they have 3 built in
and you can get dp/hdmi/type-c/vga as the option
though i think they are slightly larger than a liter
but 13700t+32GB
Got a pic of the setup?
Teardown of the new $389 12bit Rigol DHO800 oscilloscope!
Forum: https://www.eevblog.com/forum/blog/eevblog-1563-new-$389-12bit-rigol-dho800-scope-teardown/
EXCLUSIVE Unboxing and first impressions video: https://www.eevblog.com/2023/09/01/website-exclusive-rigol-hdo800-oscilloscope-unboxing/
Hires teardown photos: https://www.eevblog.com/202...
lol 800 vs 900 is like 6 smt parts
thats 6 more parts than they usually put for differentiation purposes lel
Check prices on Amazon below
SteelSeries Apex Pro Mini: https://geni.us/FwG2
Razer Huntsman Mini Analog: https://geni.us/dXwQ6r8
not affiliate
Wooting 60HE: https://wooting.io/configurator/wooting-60he#config
SteelSeries joins the Rapid Trigger squad. But how good is it? Can the Apex Pro Mini beat the Wooting 60HE?
Need a new wallpaper? I m...
prob posted already here
14hr ago
@vagrant pagoda https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/16awybk/5800x3d_starfield_3200cl14xmp4000cl14_optimized/
about 12-13% increase from the ram OC
fyi thats not just a ram oc, thats also a cpu oc, since IF bs
not every cpu will do 2000 flck
sure but if hes running desynced on the 3200 thats throwing a ton more performance out the window than desyncing at 4000
https://www.uploadvr.com/meta-quest-pro-2-lg-partnership-2025/
true high end meta headset coming 2025!
I mean I actually don't think it's too much of a problem
well people still mess up the edges of their mousepads, you may not make the same mistakes, but it doesnt seem obvious that metal wouldnt bring additional issues
It needs to be smooth
I have to see though how I will do it
A nice rounded edge won't hurt you
Yep but you also cant have the edge raised up at all, tho since it's all metal I suppose there's slot you can do that isn't easy or possible with fabric
I mean you want rigidity, but you also want it to not be super thick
Lots of thick mousepads are giant so you can line them up with the edge of your table
I've pretty much already decided to use latex as non slip surface.
I'll have a sheet of latex (you can get them super thin) glued to the bottom
Then I want the top edges to be well rounded
And the bottom edge should be a little less rounded imo I'll see how I can achieve that difference
I was more thinking of the issue of making the edges smooth with a repeatable process
CNC milling it into a rounded shape would avoid any issues
But the cheapest and fastest way to round metal is to fold it
The thing is for the metal
Too thick is unpleasant
Too thin is hard to round
And folding would make problems
No no
You're thinking wrong
There's way better methods
Looo at this for instance
Beautiful round edge
That doesn't look like an automateable process...
Yea I suppose on the scales of boutique products like this that's fine
Oh I won't produce much I think
But I will sell them I guess
I really want to give it a go
I want others to give it a go and we'll have an experience
If it works, good.
If it doesn't, we have to improve or reach conclusion it's a bad idea
Yea
I'm an artisan xsoft user
Somehow doubt metal is a good next option
Same
But if we don't try
I see it as a challenge
There used to be aluminium mousepads though
So I'm hopeful
And it doesn't have to beat glass or anything
I want it to be a good option that's durable and easy to clean
I used to have a metal mousepad, they just stuck a layer of plastic above the metal plate.
I actually have an aluminum pad
That is just a piece of anodized aluminum with a rubber backing
A steel pad could be interesting as well
Polished steel pad + sapphire skates
Is stainless steel okay for you?
I can make you custom mousepads to try
I think I would trust you most for testing, as you're the mousing guru here
I don't have sapphire skates lol
My idea is surface treated stainless steel (rougness Ra 0.3 micrometer)
thin latex bottom for grip
I'm afraid of glass on metal tbh. Afraid for the sound
I feel like ptfe will probably bethe best option
You want polished stainless and sapphire for friction properties
Ptfe would suck on polished pads though
It's not polished tho
Otherwise hdpe is prob the safest bet
It'd be a matte finish though
Due to how soft and maleable ptfe is you don't really get any dust etc
I can get it polished
But that's not as consistent as if i have the surface treated for smoothness
goddamn fucking chatbots, i hate them
as a support tool
ive yet to find a good one
The production of this stuff produces a lot of waste that then gets into everything. Lowering PFAS usuage overall would probably be for the best
Though a single set of mouse skates ain't gonna make much of a difference
Though you can wind up with a reverse tinkerbell effect.
The benefits though
PTFE is a really interesting material.
It's incredibly useful (I work in food industry machinery production)
There's no low friction alternative that's as good is there ?
For some purposes it's really the only option
Ideally it's usage should be lowered as much as possible. I mean teflon pans should probably be eliminated entirely
Actually it outgasses toxins when exposed to heat
Really useful stuff in stuff like ovens
💀 bad idea
Depends how much heat
It breaks down at a surprisingly low temperature
I mean we don't use it directly inside
Because that's mainly metal and we have a different plastic plating for that
Idk the exact material it's black but that's really no indicator
We can opt for PTFE when there's stuff like wipers, shutes etc
Depending on product and it's environment.
hey guys im new to this wooting thing
Although the average person hasn't received enough exposure to PFAS to cause problems, we are seeing it accumulate in the environment, it's almost literally a "forever chemical". It just doesn't decay and that's alarming, especially since we see this stuff does cause damage to those who involved in its manufacturing.
But tbh it's been a while since I've seen a full PTFE sheet here
Our goto plastic is HDPE
one that ships/delivers internationally
Wooting's store
I read immediately my bad.
But apart from the PFAS stuff. ptfe is very interesting in its use cases
But as I've spoken with Aeon yesterday (i think)
Purposeful use of material is super cool because it allows the use of cardboard for those drones xd
I know PTFE is really good at what it does, but I believe there should be some alternatives that do the job almost as good, but might cost more.
Like the issue as I said before is we don't have a cost effective way to remove PFAS from the environment, it just keeps increasing
That's the thing, purposeful use of material
Like of course you could have a house made of ptfe
Of course
But that's not purposeful
What is, and isn't purposeful use of material?
Where do you draw the line, especially if alternatives can do the same job most the time?
Like we need to cut back on this shit, just like we gotta cut back on carbon emissions. This PFAS stuff isn't causing mass damage YET, but it keeps increasing
Criteria are:
Environmental impact
Cost effectiveness
How well it does for the application
I think?
I don't want to give our kids a world where we need to inform them "Sorry Timmy, but because we wanted to use Teflon™️ pans and cheaper waterproofing on our cardboard we filled the environment with carcinogens we can't remove. So you'll be enjoying a substantially lower quality of life then I did, hope you enjoy half your friend getting cancer by 20!"
The poster story is of course the CFK one
Because that shit was kinda too serious
But yeah we shouldn't repeat this
We cannot outright ban PTFE production because it has it's uses
But we can limit the uses by exploring into substitute materials.
Most of the substitutes aren't yet mass mass produced and therefore numerous times more expensive
PTFE is an older material, kind of maxed out I guess. So it'll be cheap to produce, unless environmental impact tax
In some cases there just isn't a replacement (yet)
And in some cases the impact of ptfe is bigger than the alternative, but gives the product a much longer lifetime, so much that it makes it worth it.
It's a complicated matter, but I do think environment but also durability should be taken into account in more ways
An environmental impact tax would probably be the best solution to making the market follow through on fixing a lot of issues. Force them to use crap plastics and PFAS only when necessary
Product lifetime is important to weighing out alternatives.
I can buy one more expensive charging cable that lasts me 1.5 years
And I can buy a new aliexpress cable every 3 weeks.
In that case, it's going to be better to pay more initially.
Same with environment
If the alternative simply isn't good. It can be that the use of PTFE is more or less required.
But in a lot of cases, there will be alternatives that require more than 10 seconds of thinking
Ptfe has become a quick answer to a lot of questions, and while it's not a bad answer in two of these aspects, the third suffers.
Define unnecessary
I think it's a matter to discuss per application, and it should be weighed with alternatives based on the 3 criteria
Via taxation you can make it easier for a system to operate
If a company believes its necessary then they utilize material with the extra tax applied and pass on the costs. This means the market will look for alternatives, and apply them if they exist
It's not an or situation.
Environmental impact tax should be part of the thinf
The issue you got with that is that your phone is going to cost you an incredible amount
A simple household item like a fucking fridge is going to be more expensive than a good secondhand car
And a car
Well
A car would be more expensive than the entire spaceshuttle program
(jk but
You can't just tax more is one of the problems
In the Netherlands theres an idiot that says oh well tax the rich more to increase minimum wage and then people can afford their groceries again
No, of course not
If you the bakery staff gets paid more per hour, the bakery products....
More expensive
(short version it's more detailed ofc)
I saw someone summarise it very effectively, socialism is only fun until someone else runs out of money
But that's the tax part. The material part is that people use some materials just because they've grown to default to them. Which is wrong, but cheap.
not just low friction
also for chermical resistance etc
basically impossible to find a replacement
IDK, some League of Legends players seem pretty resistant to corossive environments, did you try using them?
Lol
Look
In the case of mouse feet
It could be worse
They could just give you a ptfe desk and cloth skates
I want a metal or glass mousepad yea
I am going to experiment with my own stainless steel mousepads
Lmao
Glass is dirt cheap
Mousepads is finished glass though
And that takes time and effort
Also textured
*as a resource
Yknow what's stupid
They're all HUGE
I told (idk anymore) yesterday
I use like 13cm of mousepad effectively
Square
Don't think my sensor ever goes out of its 7x7cm box tbh
Mhm I'll try
I want the ROG Moonstone because it'll look good with my new mouse
This is basically sex
It is interesting
In addition to that pad I will experiment with my own stainless steel pads
It's not as bad as some other tbh
Msi gigabyte etc 
I do like their design but that software on windows bothers me
BUT
I'm on linux
I have no issues at all with it tbh
Lana...
?
Long ago
oo
Unboxing the Infinix Zero 30 5G, a slick mid-range smartphone boasting the Folax AI assistant powered by ChatGPT. This hands-on review with the Infinix Zero 30 5G shows off Folax as well as testing the camera tech, gaming smarts with Genshin Impact and beyond!
For reviews of more of the best budget-friendly phones of 2023, please subscribe and ...
Using ChatGPT as the virtual assistant, interesting
I see no way this could break immediately at a whim.
LOL
I like the design but not that color
ooooo it has a purple version
I must see it
damn it, cant make art
creating wallpapers other than nature seems iffy at best
the amount of trash I have gotten out of even a quality model is a lot more than the average consumer is willing to handle
very rarely do you get something usable right out of the ai
For example these 3
Damnn
I prefer real art though
It costs a fortune but it's nice
And I've befriended a great student artist
Yea real art will always be better
I do like the idea of people creating ai art for commissions tho, works good when trying to describe certain things to a artist for commission
This is my latest commission
I mean it's not wallpaper type art. She's yet to master making backgrounds
Hello guys do you think its worth having double 24.5 inch monitors if i want to have one horizontal for chat and discord? Or is it better to buy 27 inch for that? Let me guys know… My main monitor for gaming is 24.5 inch
I mean something like this and i was thinking whether its worth buying 24.5 inch for horizontal or 27
depends on how often you use discord
it can be nice but at the same time as someone who has that same setup, it also is just sometimes easier to leave discord on your main monitor
if you do plan to do it, make sure the 2nd monitor is at least ips tho
Quite often to be fair xD Atm i have it set up the same way but the monitor is old 60 hz with huge bezels and takes up a lot of space so i am thinking of replacement purely because of the bezels. And was thinking just for cheap alternative 140hz kooruii
get a good and cheap ips monitor
As you see the bezels are huge since the 2 monitor is really old.
Deal: KOORUI 24 Inch Computer Monitor -FHD 1080P Gaming Monitor 165Hz VA 1ms, AdaptiveSync Technology, LED Monitors with Ultra-Thin, HDMI X2 /DP, VESA Compatible, Tilt Adjustable, Eye Care 24E4 https://amzn.eu/d/dRLPmk8
Hey Guys, I’m KOORUI TO PLAY IS TO CREATE KOORUI 24'' gaming monitor designed for game player, with the overall fuselage is traditional red and black, and the stand base with clear water chestnuts is like a traditional Chinese warrior. The three-sided nearly frameless screen helps you release the...
What about this one?
Its VA
Va's are better, but ips really gives you the best viewing angle
you don't want to have to move your secondary anytime you move back in your chair
iiyama G-Master G2470HSU-B1 24 Inch Fast (FLC) IPS LCD, 165 Hz, 0.8 ms, FreeSync Premium, Full HD 1920 x 1080, 1 x HDMI, 1 x DisplayPort, 2 x USB, 2 x 2 W Speakers https://amzn.eu/d/61YPo2q
So this one you reckon will be a better choice)
I am looking for cheapest options since secondary monitor i think doesn’t have to be the most premium xD
And the real question is if 24 or 27 inch xD for horizontal view paired with my main 24 alienware
VA isn’t that bad after having used one
Wouldn’t get it as a second monitor though, Glarxses is right
Get two 24+ inch IPS monitors and call it a day
Yeah i will go for IPS i only cant decide what size to buy. Since i just want it for horizontal view xD my main is 24.5 alienware for gaming
why though
I am not buying the 2 monitor for gaming only purely for horizontal angle and discord and chat and so on xD so idc
yeah second screen IPS is great, I had a TN once and man the viewing angles were a pain
again though its for a second screen youre not watching HDR movies in portrait mode
easy fix make it so the panel conforms to some radius
just put the monitor through this
ezpz
i think its something like 5000:1
great for blacks
in cinema context
no screenshots please
the only reason to get a va is if you're using it for content
smearing on va's is a issue, not really worth the extra contrast
BEST VALUE YET
It's just a 6800xt but a little better?
and cheaper
Well in some cases ye
YEAH HBM!
simple, rdna3 is not memory starved at all
N31 was supposed to have a SKU with 3d stacked memory
not happening with the cores being gutted and they cant even saturate the current memory
so making a bigger bus wouldn't really do anything if you already can fully feed the cores
no one uses higher then 1080p 😀
In This video we Pair the all new GPD Win Mini Handheld Gaming PC up with The GPD G1 RX 7600M XT eGPU to make a powerful AAA 1440P Gaming PC! Powered bu=y the Ryzen 7840U the GPD win Mini By Itself is an awesome handheld but GPD also added an Oculink Port so we can make it even better with an eGPU! It even Runs Starfield and Cyberpunk 2077 at 1...
lol
You do how the make smaller gpus right?
They design the GPU in units that they can stack together to make the gpu
Memory interface is part of that
So when you remove units you lose memory width.
well in this case its a different layout with 4 instead of 6 MCDs as well so things are a bit different from monolithic dies
Also 384 it has been the standard for high end GPU for ages
And has scaled perfectly will the new generations of gddr
I think only the 1080ti was the only flagship with less
Had to go up 2 titans to get 384
Also gotta remember that 1080p is half the pixels of 1440p which is half the pixels of 4k
It is actually quite fantastic scaling to have around half the performance at 4k vs 1080p
You need the CU to talk to the MCD
You can't slap 8 MCD to a 7800
That's not guaranteed to be an architectural issue on rdna3 or whatever it is now
It was definetly an issue on maxwell
I mean literally every other GPU has been like thst
But it's theoretically possible to make a GPU that doesn't have that bottleneck
Not a100
What is a cut down a100
And rdna2 had huuuuge caches
A100
There were a bunch of different a100s
Some were 5 stacks but a few were 6 stacks hbm
I think there's also the a80?
There isn't a GPU with a completely separate complete memory controller
A80?
A800 oops
That doesn't matter
What you are talking about is cus wired directly into specific busses of the memory controller
It isn't the cu wired to the memory controller
It's the io for memory being part of a block of cus
given that n31 could have had double the MCDs I think the N32 wgps are perfectly capable of having a bigger bus to use if that would have been needed
Which is the same on rdna3 as 2 it's just cache and controller are chiplet
Yes so if that system is designed to be fed from let's sty an aggregate of 1.6TB/s of l3, you could actually just increase your memory bandwidth until you match that
We aren't talking speed
We are talking bus width in mid range
They way GPUs are designed
The fuck did AMD think when they launched the 7800XT?
When you remove cus

You loose memory interfaces
Yes which doesn't matter if you are passing through the imc and that imc has the l3 controller
What gpus has a monolithic memory controller?
None
They have many controllers
Wether they are chiplets or ondie
No no no
With your question you're implying they thought in the first place.
N21 is phased out and N32 worked well enough is the thought there
Yes but they also aren't inside of the cus
The imcs are around the edges of the chips, and the cus need to have the ports on the cus sufficient for the cache bandwidth
I'm not saying they're part of the CU you're missing that
Well, it takes less power, but not significantly less and yet performs worse than the 6800XT
I'm saying they designed in blocks
WHY?
With cu cache etc and memory
it performs about the same and is cheaper
Yes and that means that however much memory controller they put on is a design decision
I won't upgrade this generation then i guess
They aren't going to do a major redesign for a mid range card
Ion just look at the dice they're very obviously not designed all tied together in One singular unit
I mean the thing is it acts like a 7700xt, the name being different doesnt make the product worse
it's not Maxwell
Idk what you're trying to argue
if it was a 7700xt, performance of a 6800xt then it would have been normal product release
They design them in blocks and stick blocks together
And the blocks are made of blocks
Think of the memory system like tiers
L1 and L2 on Radeon are attached to a cu
But above L2 there's a GPU bus before you go to l3
Yes but none of that is a singular unit
There is no way to take the blocks and build a low-end GPU with a full memory bus width
Exactly!!!
You're arguing the same thing that I am that's what I don't understand
How could that possibly lead to that conclusion???
Because that's how they design gpus
They don't clean slate every single model
They take their building blocks and just use less
uhhh
Be more specific
You are making a huge leap in logic
Which is why memory with scales exactly with core count
And has on every generation of GPU
It's also why you end up with a 3.5 GB GPU lol
Again making huge leap in logic
basically its launched at 150-200 lower msrp, so normal product upgrade cycle really
Maxwell and earlier did this therefore it must be the only way
??? Look at any modern die shot
You have multiple memory controller complexes with crossbars
Exactly!!!
You are missing the point or dumb I can't tell
Ion
What is a crossbar used for logically
You can't gut cus to srink the die and leave the memory controller with out a redesign
If you don't redesign you end up with a 970
A redesign to what?
Specifically
Where part of your memory is slow as fuck because of crossbar
A different core/cache/memory controller layout
That is just plain wrong
No it iant
Show me 2 GPUs in the same arch with different core memory layout?
If you cut cus and not memory, the die doesn't srink
6950xtx and whatever fuckoff mobile chip happened to use the same architecture
Entirely different memory system using the exact same cus
Mobile vs desktop are entirely different chips
You are correct that some individual part in here needs to be changed, I'm just making you say what exactly it is
Different die size and transistor count
Desktop vs desktop is also entirely different chips most of the time...
Your point?
No
Look at refresh 3090, 3090ti and 3080ti
Same die
Same l3
Same memory width
Same cost to manufacturer
And not a single one of those products shares a die with more than 30% of the Nvidia product stack
Exactly
To srink the die they can't just remove cus
They have to remove an entire design block
Also the 3080 is on the same die
With a block lasered off
Holy shit dude
You are the Usain Bolt of leaping to conclusions
How
It's common knowledge
That's how chips are designed
That way most of the design cost is shared
They only have to do the auxiliaries when they shrink
And what exactly are the part(s) that they need to redesign
Be specific or I will state examples that obviously disprove your point
I got lost what’s the point that you are trying to make
Have you literally never seen a BLOCK diagram for a GPU?
There's a reason they call it a block diagram
Please go read on of Nvidia technical related on GPU design.
The design blocks
Nvidia calls them graphic processing cluster
All of the skus use the same gpc
Like that’s all true but if the point is still about bus width, that can still be changed it’s not set in stone without having the option to change it at points in the stack
You'd run out of l1 to l2 width then
AMD can and does mix and match to use different parts fed with different bandwidth
That can happen but it’s not guaranteed to happen, depends on the design and what widths you are comparing
3080 has 6 gpc with 200gb of l1 per gpc
It has 760gb of memory bandwidth
So that's max of 1200 l1-l2 and l2-memeory at 760
That isn't a lot of wiggle room to srink
Sure it would help with latency
But making something like a 3070 with 4 gpc and still having full size l2/memory isn't going to make it magically faster at 4k
Mainly because you'd eat the cost with the extra die size and memory modules so the price would go up
And unlike a ti card in the middle, you wouldn't have more cores
Assuming this was true, radeons terabytes/s of l3 proves the limit for their current cu count is at least 3x their current memory BW
It has more cache bandwidth not more memory bandwidth though
What is preventing amd from adding more memory bandwidth if they wanted to?
be specific
The fact that they probably know it doesn't scale well with the cost
More memory width is more memory chips
And we are talking mid range not the high end halo
While that's true, if only that is true, it proves your entire argument up to this point is B's...
So what is your point that would make you say anything you've recently said
The halo cards work
And don't need more
They asked why MID range cards have weak memory widths
If the flagships do, the midranges do as well, and scales it quite linearly
I didn't say they needed more
I said why they don't have more
The block layout works
And everything is built around that
The reason that mid range don't get more memory width is the build in blocks. And the blocks can't/don't need more width
I mean in rdna3s case its more like it's already overbuilt with memory due to fuckups in shader xD
This is untrue
This doesn't make it true
Rdna3
Proof?
Wrong
7900xtx and 7800 use the same cus with different memory bandwidth
Did you fail math?
7800 is2/3 the die size
It doesn't have the same cu count at all
and?
even if you assume that theres a l2 to l1 bandwidth limit
the l3 bandwidth proves that it has plenty of room for a larger memory bus
I mean there were plans for a double stack N32 just like there were 0-1-2 hi N31 chips so they could have had 8 MCDs on n32
amd chosing to balance the memory bandwidth by going hard on the l3 bandwidth doesnt mean that they couldnt go bonanza on the memory bandwidth if they wanted to
Look at the xtx vs the 7800s core to width ration. It's almost the the same. The 7800xt actually has a better memory width to core ration
And still dose poorly
And because l3 scales with width on these
The 7800xt has MORE l3 and memory bandwidth per cu than the 7900xtx
exactly!!!
yep!
Also the 7800xt is lasered cu
thats why amd doesnt go ham on that spec despite their clear ability to
As the block for rdna3 desktop is 32
Or 16
But still 60cu midrange vs 96 top says snip snip with the laser
its not snipped its a different die, not a cutdown
far as we can tell 7800xt is full fat navi32
Nah
The block is either 32cu to 2 mdc or 16 tocu to one
Think 7900xtx is 96cu 96 l3
Why would it be 60 to 64
because those are independent variables lmao
4 mcds is 64mb
I'll put $100 on there being four more cues on the die when we get a good die shot
and ill bet $1000 they arent enabled and dont need to be
I never said that they were unable
I said that the 7800 got lasered
Because they build gpus and blocks
And our DNA 3 for desktop is built with 16 core blocks
if your statement is true, then they must be enabled
The rest of the block is enabled
I'm saying you can't go from a high-end GPU to a low-end GPU keeping the same memory bandwidth and shrink the dye
That's the reason that memory scales with die size
They build them in blocks
be specific as to what is preventing that
Because they build in blocks
blocks that contain what EXACTLY
It is not a coincidence that dies scales with width, minus lasered off ones
Everything
Literally everything on modern silicon is blocks
state one thing they contain and i will prove that wrong with an example
Scaled out
and i mean specifically that are contained in a block and are not available outside of that block
On rdna3 the block is everything from cu to l1
anything else?
Everything between those
exactly!!!
l2 and l3 and memory controller are not part of that
tho we dont know about l2
The cross bar is though
do different gpu cores have the same crossbar?
The crossbar goes between them all
cores as in n31 vs n32 vs n33
are they the same crossbar physically on these different chips?
I haven't looked at AMDs core layout in a while
oh so you dont even know if youve been bssing this entire time
holy smokes man you are a neutron star of density
And you haven't provided any proof either
proof of what?
different chips are different?
if you need proof that n31 isnt the same chip as n33 im sorry i cant help you
No that they are made of blocks that are the same core:cache: memory
i didnt make that claim
this rdna3 gpu has the same cores and l1 and l2, yet has zero available l3
oops my bad it has more l2
That isn't desktop and is a igpu
The argument is why midrange cards don't have more memory width
yet it still contains the exact same rdna3 cores
And the fact is desktop GPUs are made in blocks
They do not redesign the block for a mid-range GPU
An entirely different class of product likely has some redesign
true statement
true statement
But when they go from a high-end GPU to a mid-range GPU they don't redesign the block
possible statement
Without redesigning the block you're not going to get any benefit from more width
true statement
statement that requires proof
Cost/pref wise
entirely different claim
More cores is always better than more memory for mid-range
So why not do both

