#🔌│tech
1 messages · Page 210 of 1
but yeah for solidworks or such probably still an i7 if we stay on desktop
at least till early next year
whats happening early next yar
zen5
rpl-refresh gives you like 5% more sometimes later this year
i feel like intel will forever dominate solidworks
and for gaming both brands will work, doesnt really matter (i thnk?)
basically next amd gen is looking really great and intel is looking really bad next gens
next 2 intel*
the question is
will new amd beat the current i7 for solidworks
or in general tasks
assuming nothing goes wrong now (always could be tbf) it will win
atleast more efficient?
So it´s better for me to wait if i want to build a new pc
Also, when is novideo RTX 5000 going to launch
we know it comes out H1 2024, I personally guess CES in january will ben zen5 announcement
2025
okay so no reason to wait for that
kinda need a new pc in the coming half year
youre right
i will make a configuration
and i guess ill buy most parts then
mobo and cpu will have to wait until zen5 then
rest i can start gathering
I want a 4090 white
I will need to put more effort into it but
this gave me the idea
to get something like this
but I´ll need to actually make a proper file that can be printed
and I need to find someone to do it
How much more does the white cost
mhm but printed is extra cool i think
I could always sticker I think?
actually thats probably best solution
if theyre heat resistant
Dutch people that are able to print and cut heat resistant stickers hmu!!!
i mean not necessarily dutch tbh but would be easier i feel like
looking cool
I feel like this is them cheaping out rather than actually printing it
A friend suggested them to me too
But I'd rather sticker and best would be UV print like Mansen suggested
As soon as you introduce color and imagery
Not really unless white
Yeah but easier to print on a sheet than to remove backplate, print on it, put it back on
Also you'd want a light coloured backplate for best results
(i think)
Really?
So if i want my Violet Evergarden gpu backplate from a white gpu
What
Yes.
I consider the asus way to be higher quality
It looks and feels more premium
Bla bla frankly I don't really care
It looks good. End of story
If you want something nice, you'll have to pay for it usually
consider the cyberpunk 2080ti
Gonna say that was a better way to do it!
@young pecan
For solidworks, which is usually a single core high freq workload
The 7800X3D won't do it
Yes it's my consideration for team red
This isn't telling the full story since synthetic benchmarks like Cinebench can't properly take 3D cache into account.
But I think the i7 will be sweeter for my goals
well thats not true
Well, kinda but sorta no.
Ok get me a comparison solidworks 7800X3D vs intel i7
but this is also not true
^
In what aspect
I don't need to render much
Most of it is modeling
Solidworks likes to use one core especially
It will use others but afaik it mostly uses one
heavy use of a single code doesnt mean the workload relies on serial processing
Take the RAM into account, yeah? 3D cache means your timing can be slower without impacting perf, meaning you can do 24 gig sticks versus 16 gig sticks. In big workloads that'll be a direct upgrade.
With Intel the slower CAS will hurt perf.
Get me a solidworks graph
the ryzen cpus are higher bandwidth, where the intel cpus are better at serial applications
thats also not particularly true thanks to the immense bottlenecks of the ccd to iodie link
Huzzah for putting the cache on top of the chip.
Yeah that's true, though note I'm not meaning 'yeah just don't care', I'm meaning the fastest 48 gig kit vs the fastest 32 gig kit isn't going to have a real world impact.
intel can hit 100GB/s bidirectional on dual channel ddr5 and can hit that on a single core
7000 can max out at 35GB/s write and 70GB/s read on a single core
average across all cores 7000 can do 70GB/s bidirectional with 2 ccds but its still not a given that a workload using only a single core will benefit from the cache
And like idk, at the stage of like removing maybe a percent or two performance but you're pushing up 8 gigs of RAM per stick... not worth sacrificing capacity.
the real problem tho is that puget systems doesnt benchmark solidworks any more
The biggest tragedy.
This is true
I hate them for it
Ok but like... which tasks?
Doing your mom
Kek
But no, that only tells you 'yeah one is faster in tasks defined as work'. Ok cool so that's hitting any and all parts of the CPU depending on your task.
Can't work off that info.
I'm not seeing any actual data or named tasks. 
you have no proof, therefore my evidence that it came to me in a dream that you are wrong is equally valid
hedt is slower than msdt in solidworks
just wait for zen5
Also the i7 is already an 8 core wtf
We haven't had Ryzen HEDT since gen 2, no?
Once again proves Solidworks likes high clocks
It's all I ever experienced with these machines
WX are workstation chips.
I know
Lower core speed.
wrong
wx is TR pro
tr pro boosting is the same as regular tr
at the same core count and power limit, it clocks the same
tr pro is even closer to epyc thanr egular TR was
No but both are slower than Ryzen, I mean.
Nah. Do Pentium.
slower yes
but lower core clock? no
threadripper is slower because the ram latency to each individual core is worse
nope
Where you buy cpu and the tune for it
died thanks to modern boost
Wdym
deterministic boosting goes high depending on how good the chip is so it does the boosting based on how good the chip is
But there's still better and worse chips right
intel has lowered their variance on cpus to negligable levels, and ryzen you can just benchmark it directly to see how good it is and no tuning will get you a better result
This video is a new entry to our "Most Annoying Comment Benchmark" series, which last time featured the comment of "Too Much Thermal Paste." This time, we're visiting the complaint of sample size. We (and likely most reviewers) have seen this comment posted in comments sections for years -- mostly whenever the person's favorite CPU brand doesn't...
basically the same
the amount by which chips are better and worse is similar to the precision by which you can reasonably benchmark
also just hibernate for like 2 quarters and zen5 will answer your questions on what to get ez
That's the most expensive test ever lmao
Ngl threadripper might be a serious contender. Especially if zen5 is still retarded bad PCIe lane count.
Honestly stuff like that
That makes Tech Jesus worthy of saying LTT does bad research
name one benefit of threadripper for solidworks?
No
This
What do I need PCIe for
More lanes more good. Means more hardware in the PC.
Like anything fast lmao.
I need GPU, drives uhh
yeah but zen5 ST goes brrr
thats not a threadripper benefit
thats also not a threadripper benefit
Solidworks files aren't big either btw
ofc im not talking TR
HEDT has 64 lanes. More lanes is more shit that goes in the PC, yes that's a threadripper benefit?
Well, 64 minimum.
ah but thats not specific to threadripper
and threadripper has direct measureable disadvantages particularly around single thread workloads thanks to latency
When we're talking about the alternative being mainline Intel or AMD that're both on 24 still? Yes that is a direct benefit by comparison.
Honestly I'd gladly lose some speed for more lanes. Holy shit please.
why are you limiting to that?
Why do I need more lanes
Beeeecause both mainline Intel and AMD CPUs only have 24 lanes. 
GPU takes 16, each NVMe drive takes 4, put any more than 2 drives in the PC and you cut GPU performance by making it run on 8.
ok so you forget xeon and epyc?
thats not true
Yeah that's exactly the plan
And I'll use a harddrive for games
Neither of those are actual options for this for obvious reasoning. The context is comparing against mainline Intel and AMD.
And sata SSDs for art and music storage
but thats wrong, the context is against systems that can be bought
at the moment intel is selling hedt for the price of top end AMD msdt
Oh c'mon, that's being pedantic. Nobody is buying an Epyc for solidworks.
why not?
literally threadripper but better
and cheaper
and a gen ahead
or even cheaperrer at the same gen
You'd run into issues with single core for the same reason as threadripper, no?
The context is I'm considering buying a new desktop PC that will do everything
General use, gaming, but also productivity which is mainly solidworks
I have no reason to have 20398383 cores, but Solidworks likes high clocks
I am sure most processors will also do the gaming well
Gaming also doesn't require 10 million cores
why?
xeon doesnt do CCDs and IODies
Yes I retracted that for Xeon.
Talking Epyc there.
24 cores bruh
epyc is just better because its the same thing for cheaper or better
rolls eyes HEDT historically doesn't start at giga high cores. That's more server territory. Most HEDT has started aroundish 12 cores, though that's well before the nuts Epyc and Threadripper boom recently.
8 in some old platforms.
or current platforms
I had a xeon hexacore
for solidworks only genoa-x might do insanely well but wouldn't want that for gaming xD
Get old one though
Holy fucking mother of God
96 cores
1.3 GB L3
I mean thats just normal genoa
😂
that part yeah
My brother in christ in not rendering 8k Hentai
Ok so when are we booting Doom from the cache?
(yet)
again tho doubt since it misses on ST since solidworks doesnt seem to really be cacheable
in 1.3gb it might be
yeah idk how well solidworks splits it up
oops
anyway I just stay with take zen5 in 2 quarters and go sleep
Rn we have to see but more PCIe lanes is honestly better than slow shit components with nothing expansion and fast CPU.
I like all of my shit fast, not just my CPU and GPU until I need more drives.
obviously not well considering a 3995wx loses to a 32 core with less cache
if you want that, you go intel with the 2400x
Like yeah that's what I want. A single GPU and 4 NVMe SSDs and then if my networking breaks then I guess I'm fucked lmao.
or if you really need it 3400x also exists
Not when you have Solidworks PDM
Then you basically download the file from the server and upload it back when youre done
You only need 1 graphics card and one SSD
For modeling, go fast. It really matters
but $/lane xeon w 2400 wins big time
at least vs threadripper
epyc is a different story
And have 1 rendering beast if you need to render
Or endure it when it takes a bit longer those few times you have to render
Depends on how much you render, I don't often do
If the PC is for everything then we don't load down all of the shit on one drive. You said you wanted to actually get good perf for everything, that goes against that.
Split OS, game drive, work drive.
Then you want room just in case networking dies or whatever.
Likely going wsl2
Also
Loading everything onto one drive just means your IOPS start kicking your dickhole and everything crawls.
Gross.
2 big NVMe SSD
1 storage HDD or SSD for art and music
1 storage SSD for games
Is my honest reaction to your supposed issue
actually aeon heres a puzzle for you
i have a 4.0x16 gpu, a 3.0x8 nic, and 6 pcie x4 ssds
what is the platform i use given that i do not have a single one of those devices that is in any way bottlenecked
shrugs SATA SSD for games is dogshit for some things, especially if DirectStorage takes off.
Hmmm...
Do I get a clue as for how new it is?
the pcie 4 x16 gpu not being bottlenecked
Why is it not fine then
If its fine now
oh wait i also have another 4.0x4 ssd that isnt bottlenecked either
the fastest 4.0x4 ssd for that matter
Given what you do for fun is similar to me, I'm gonna have to eyeball maybe new Intel.
is that your guess?
~~new intel? raptor refresh for 5% more?
~~misread that
Explain me this Aeon
Why is games on an SSD a sin if I want it for my new PC
When I do the exact same thing now
Ok so how exactly is that not bottlenecking? There aren't enough lanes to do 1:1 and shit all boards support that kind of splitting.
How much did you spend lmao?
No no. SATA SSD bad, NVMe SSD good.
DirectStorage is an interesting tech and is probably going to lead into new developments, but the gist is that you need NVMe, can't use SATA for it.
the x570 ws ace has an x8 3.0 slot on the bottom that doesnt take away any lanes from the gpu
Bruh. That's got a PLX chip, I was right.
What if I just buy the biggest NVMe drives available today and back those up to a harddrive
with how its currently looking sata ssd still works but there is just no benefit to still using sata ssd really since they kinda cost the same
you were wrong you thought you needed a xeon
If you want to avoid fuckery with raid cards? Yes you need more than 24 lanes.
but not fancy platform BS
But yeah sure if we start fucking around with raid cards and logic cards then that's viable. Most people don't have the knowledge or desire to touch that, however.
this was 1 card that allows me to run all that i need on a standard consumer platform
Yeah but i don't have 40 NVMe slots on the mamaplate
ah but this isnt a raid card
Whatever, it's an adapter with a PLX chip.
and its quite capable of allowing each and every device on it to be run without bottlenecking without needing a xeon
❤️
Oh shush, the only difference between that thing and an actual raid card is that it doesn't actually support the firmware.
Also this is gold plated bullshit.
You should absolutely know better.
its $230 direct from china, $280 on newegg
The card is 8 lanes, if you have enough shit connected to it and hit them at once then you bottleneck.
thats an order of magnitude cheaper than a new platform
8 connectors, that bottlenecks the fuck out of 8 lanes.
PLX chips are a perfect solution if you aren't hitting things simultaneously. Or doing software raid for that same reason.
sure but each device isnt bottlenecked because my system and none of my workloads are capable of reaching the level of bandwidth it can provide
And if you wanted to run RAID for redundancy? Same issue.
or if you are hitting things simultaneously but not maxing out the bandwidth of the interface
It's a good solution in only some cases, but is by no means perfect.
the number of cases in which it doesnt work are quite limited
you will struggle to find someone able to construct a system which does run into those issues
Like running any advanced raid with NVMe drives that's using more than 2 drives? Like a RAID 5?
Or a RAID 10.
actually works fantastically with plx since its heavily bottlenecked by the cpu
you forget how fast these interfaces are
The lane limitations will still hit you.
they will not hit me
nor will they hit anyone building a reasonable system
keep in mind i have tested this
And somehow a RAID 5 is unreasonable?
Or say a RAID 1 for the OS and a RAID 0 for like a game drive or something? That's going to bottleneck almost all the time.
Or even 3 RAIDs.
ok aeon how about raid 0
Like these are not uncommon for work machines.
But uh yeah so uh
how much bandwidth do you think each of these systems can output via the network
The solidworks cpu question
threadripper with physical 1:1 lanes in my server vs the same drives in my am4
PC -> Network or PLX -> PC
crystaldiskmark on the pc
Right so PLX -> PC.
vs crystaldiskmark on the server
having moved over the same drives in a raid 0
windows software raid 0
literally ripped out of el pc and stuffed into el server
How many drives in the RAID 0?
Wasnt raid 0 dumb raid
6 pcie x4 drives tho technically its 3 pcie x8 drives
yep but it also maxes out capacity and speed which was what i wanted
Ah okay
And their PCIe version?
Afaik raid0 is very risky id one dies
Yep.
2
Bruh.
No shit that isn't bottlenecking, none of them can saturate that slot even at 4x.
quite capable of a million iops tho per x4 which is quite a bit faster than most modern nvmes
But here's the thing, it's pretty cool. We're on PCIe 5.0 now.
If I wanted to raid
ah but these drives are faster for most applications than those pcie 5 drives...
iodrives
Whatthe fuck is 50 or 60
iodrive 2 duo to be exact
Is that 5+10
5+0 / 6+0
Oooh
A 5 is 3 or more drives with one taken for parity, a 50 is two 5s with redundancy. So a full RAID 5 can die before you lose data.
Same goes for 6.
thats not correct
you are thinking of 51
50 is 2 5s, striped, doubling the speed
Yeah.
but anyways all of these are actually awful
raid 5 is dead, cpus are too slow
raid cards are also 2 slow
adding levels of raid on top is just compounding the slowness
nowdays we use ZFS if we want reliability or speed
and we just use mirroring and striping if we dont
zfs combined with tiered storage will be insanely more reliable and faster than anything that can be acheived with classical parity alone
So RAID is completely out the window nowadays
Ngl if you're doing this actually correctly you do 3:2:1 with a local ZFS store for backups and just RAIDZ2 this shit locally for speed.
zVol go brrrrrrrrrrr
except for raid 0 and 1
But they're dangerous!!!
RAID 1 isn't.
nah raid 1 is safer than raid 5
That mirrors the data across drives so you can lose all but one without losing data.
Oh raid 1 is 2 disks same shit?
Yeh.
ye
and raid 0 is only 2x the failure rate of a single drive
Not just 2 disks either.
and you get 2x the speed
you can do infinite raid 1 its just dumb asf
Ikr.
Now that's kinda stupid tbh.
Mirrored RAID 0 is where it's at.
ZVOL GO BRRRRRRRRRRRR
pure raid 0 with backups is better Imo
I mean one or two mirrors just to avoid downtime and backups, yes.
esp if you compress the backups to be able to keep more
Still, back to the point a PLX card is dumb stupid if you're trying to connect more than 4 drives that're actually modern.

That's valid. You'd get 8TB with one failure tolerance.
except its not
every single drive will be accessed at its full speed as long as you have 2x or more the host bandwidth available
Yeah and 2k worth of NVMe drive
Don't really have that kinda money fam
Also insane speed right
And this is not true if you're doing multiple RAIDs or all of the system drives on the PLX card.
actually no
raid 1 is 1x the write speed
^
RAID 0 and 10 give speed.
1 is pure redundancy.
But like 10 is expensive as fuck.
except as we have already determined, raid isnt the way to go, and again you still have yet to provide an example of a consumer example that will run into any bottlenecking
So id need 0
But I'd run risk
OR
no you should just use separate drives if you are running nvme
Back up the 0 drives to a NAS
raid is for slow sata drives
It's specifically a work PC and pulling the 'but a consumer probably won't see it' is a bad argument to make when this is designed to do a lot of high stress things at the same time.
You don't benefit from it anymore at that point or
except thats not the argument I made mr strawman?
the raid itself slows down the speed of the drives if they are nvme
Really
even raid 0 of nvmes is slower than the drives alone unless you have one of the very tiny number of true raid cards and even those crater your iops
??? You literally said "example of a consumer example that will run into any bottlenecking", yes this isn't common for most people, but this PC is intrinsically going to be under higher load. An overwhelming majority isn't doing WSL2, for example.
i meant consumer as opposed to producer
Also do I use an old PC to uh
as in server apps
Backup
Server apps are not the only apps that can screw with a system like this.
Let's say you run the OS and game array on the PLX card, if the OS updates at all and the game is running anything DirectStorage derived then that's instant bottlenecking.
wrong
windows os updates are quite severely cpu bottlenecked
and even on my optane drives, games are iops bottlenecked
That's a minimum of 3 NVMe drives being hit, DirectStorage should be able to saturate the bandwidth, anything past that is bottleneck.
8 lanes can't do that.
it cant
Do u like optane
Optane is funny.
windows updates cannot even get close to saturating a single lane of nvme
Optane were the cards right
They also had M.2 Optane drives.
Read what I said again.
again keep in mind tho that maxing out an nvme doesnt mean running out of pcie bandwidth
🪞
If the PLX card is doing it's job? Yes.
name a single nvme that can saturate its own interface in iops
We're not talking about a single NVMe are we? 
I actually have to ditch as well. Got a meeting in 20 mins.
Need to get ready. 
ok so find a single nvme that can saturate 1/4 of its interface that isnt the 5800x in linux
Your card has 8 slots.
Respectfully I totally forgot you had a job?
Then again PLX cards exist with 2.
and 8 lanes
I run a company. -_-
Game dev.
Ah what are you devving
Wait and see like everyone else. :p
What I will tell you is the servers involve kubernetes out of basic technological requirement.
k8s or k3s or what?
K8s.
oh boy
Running on Talos Linux because that shit is unholy levels of cracked.
Yeah I know.
What I will tell you is that you have servers and I need storage space to backup (jk I'll find a way to do it locally)
I did consider a more jank awful solution using K3s and Rancher or some weird custom setup with Kustomize that gets cancer and dies.
But like...
Says the windows warrior
Btw Aeon uh
For my pc uh
If I would use WSL2 as you rexommended
Like what does it look like
What environment do I get
Same as normal linux, you use terminal.
However many you want.
wtf?
what use would wsl2 be for solidworks or what are we talking about now?
^
Well you can run Linux apps on the Windows desktop using WSLg, but if you want to do random linux shit? Terminal like everyone else already does.
I'll just have arch but be able to run solidworks without booting to windows?
No.
Das gay
WSL2 runs inside Windows, it's like emulating but better.
wsl2 allows you to run linux terminal apps
Not just terminal.
anything more is jank
But most of those apps have a windows equivalent
terminal apps?
definetly not
Yeah basically.
I want linux that runs windows
Like yeah I want Linux that can't do Windows shit, or I can have both. Kek
That's called Wine and it's awful.
yea thats not fun
Time to run parallel
That's called WSL2.
But I don't want windows as the main
if you want the best of both worlds, you need 2 gpus, plx, and you run XEN
That is awful jank, holy fuck.
you completely run both linux and windows on top of xen
Like it'll work but the maintenance sucks ass.
actually nah
Passthrough.
friend been dailying it for 2 years now completely fine
It's less bad on Xen than it is on Proxmox, but fuck me it's really not fun.
Basically run a higher OS that presents you 2 sxreens?
its 1 time setup
and proxmox isnt bad either as long as you have a gpu per system
and not an intel igpu
Fuck it we're buying 2 4090s
p sure radeon igpus are fine
Xen is a hypervisor, Vio. It's an OS designed for emulation and emulation alone. The gist is you emulate Windows and however many Linux distros with the difference being you need one physical display driver per system.
What I meant to say
Or you just do WSL2.
I don't know the terms
And none of that problem.
I'll yank a quadro out of my old system for windows
P4000
wsl2 works fantastically
(jk they're not bad but ass)
Worst use of a P4000 I've ever seen. 
And windows sucks to use
p4000 is actually not bad at all lel
Tell me I have 2 I think
least shit option we have
I use arch rn
Arch is 100% a more shit option than Windows, just like all of Linux for end use.
Insecure hellscape that it is.
No
so like you may personally like an option over other options
my favorite desktop OS is actually samsung dex
but objectively its awful
The one exception to that rule is Talos because they literally don't even have SSH or anything. The only connection that it has is API.
almost as bad as macos
I have an S23U but I haven't used the dex functionality yet
^
I guess you like how the apps are displayed or
You can like something awful, but that doesn't make it good, it makes you good at tolerating awful.
That's what Windows is.
You're tolerating windows
Yes and I use Arch which is good
You think I want the new settings page? Fuck no, give me control panel.
Arch has it's problems like being an insecure hellscape that's asking for a virus.
What virus
Windows is just outright more secure where it counts.
@hardy idol consider all of the possible tasks that need to be done, windows works for on the order of a couple hundred million different workflows
linux in general can do a couple million
arch is slightly more limited but still fine
dex can do a million ish but is lower
and finally macos only allows a couple hundred thousand
Remember always, more eyes on Linux is not more better, Microsoft actually pays for trained eyes that actually find shit.
In the end we all agree macos is shit
Doesn't matter if there's a billion eyes on Linux if almost all of them aren't pentesters or cybersecurity.

heres the thing tho
I actually dont think its shit
i consider it like a rock
if it works for what you need it, it can be great, but on the grand scheme of things its only capable of a quite limited subset of all possible workflows
Yeah like honestly when OSx works it works pretty much perfectly.
That whole thing where Linux customization is shit because it gives me 400 ways to badly do my tasks? OSx gives you generously 2 but they've been thought out.
Can't we just adapt solidworks to run on linux
and windows gives you 1 good option, 10 mediocre options, and 100 specialized options that work poorly unless you have one fringe use
Lmao no.
POWERTOYS, HELLO.
I know
Love powertoys window manager
have you considered trying the other options 😛
That's the best application ever
Objectively correct opinion.
Actually.
Good software is good.
No shut the fuck up its THE BEST
i actually like the stock windows 11 window manager
Powertoys should be a standard app
^^^^^^^^^
Like fucking being able to make 10003 window holes predefined
in fact i dont even have powertoys installed on this computer only my work pc
I loved it when I had my superwide
enthusiast not techie
That's not better.
I had one of these
Mmmmmmm.
I would sooner die than give up my iPhone.
das a wide boi
Actually is I couldn't live without it
The window manager allowed me to use the screen
Fuck Android and the janky horse it rode in on, I get enough exposure to god awful UX design when dealing with Ubuntu.
i would sooner give up my iphone than step on bubblegum
Fuckin' Ubuntu man... sigh
You're extremely funny
but i have it imposed on me from work so i have to tolerate it
I've had no issues at all using my S23U and I've enjoyed it far better than I do when I fix people's iPhone issues
iPhone good. It does what it does near flawlessly, haven't had a problem or quirk with it in literally a year.
ive been on work iphone for 2 years and i constantly run into issues
how the hell is it considered acceptable that theres no way to customize the power button???
Holy fuck.
Wait.
freeBSD > linux > unix > a monkey and typewriter > windows
WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS.
Hahahha
What is bro crafting
gimme a shortcut for my camera
gimme a shortcut for flashlight
please
WHAT IS BRO CRAFTING
Agreed.
iphone users have time
EXPLAIN V
😀
What the fuck do you create
like in what universe is it ok that ios hasnt had a way to make buttons shortcut to that without hacking
why
heres a fkn crazy take
windows actually works fantastically for all of those, sometimes better than dedicated distros of linux or freebsd
main reason being that it actually is designed for everything to be interoperable with itself
freebsd and linux will definetly do each individual task better (unless you get into the serious graphical stuff like windows IOT or whatever)
but windows has the ability to do multiple things at the same time without clobbering each other
especially now with wsl2 allowing for everything linux to be used as a subset without running into the issues
thats an opinion that isnt supported by facts
for what?
like sure its a valid opinion but theres nothing factual about it
best looking windows yet
thats your own fault, everything is customizeable
One reason I use MacOS
and you actually have no idea how much your linux machine was using since it uses storage as ram (which actually causes problems if you arent paying attention)
can genuinely use 16gb and it works just fine
You're funny because when I boot my laptop on Linux it runs quieter too
Like very very noticeably
how is gaming on linux
On linux it mostly runs passive when idling
🤷 linux does less
Never got it to do that on windows
if you have your windows do more, it will do more
Works very well l
Talking stock vs stock
set it to balanced mode instead of max performance lel
And used vs used
No it's the opposite way
Linux is always on max performance
stock windows is capable of an insane amount more than linux lel
Possibly but I haven't run into issues using arch apart from solidworks
So it's all clutter I don't need
That's the simple conclusion that's to be drawn
are you sure about that?
or did you just forget the workarounds you employed?
I haven't
🤷 prove it
i had a number of issues trying to connect a monitor to my steam deck in desktop mode, and thats arch
I have a laptop
And I don't run extra screens
When I had the PC I had that Superwide
The PC was an old hexacore xeon btw
ah so theres a workaround
you stopped using external screens
might not have been causal or intentional but it still happened
No
I used it on pc too
Ive also used it when I still had the horizontal + vertical sxreen
i use 5 monitors at work, 1 of them a touchscreen, and planning on adding a second touchscreen soon
also planning on adding a wireless touchscreen 6th monitor
just gotta be hands on for drawing sometimes
2 monitors for me. Planning on 2 more and an ultrawide.
More desktop room more good.
thats definetly not true
you can mount additional monitors to existing ones
even if they are small
oh wait you wouldnt want to do that bc linux incompatibility with mixed dpi monitors...
not that windows is a whole ton better but...
Uh idk I have a small desk
And I don't need more than a superwide
The superwide gives me 1 16:9 screen in the middle and 4 quarters/2halves off to the sides to use for research or YouTube Spotify discord
I mean tidal nowadays
if you have a single 24 inch monitor, you could replace it with 2 13 inch monitors side by side vertically
and that you could replace with 4 7 inch monitors in a square
Thanks to @young pecan 💜
5 monitors 6 computers here
but all of the other computers are remoted into
Uhm I don't like emulating how it is to be a fly
but id also bet you could stack another 16:9 on top easily
I could but I'd rather stack another superwide or an ultrawide
and you probably also could replace the existing monitor mount with one that supports 2 monitors, and add a vertical monitor to one side without significantly impacting your space
any time you want a wider monitor, you could instead get a wider and taller monitor and get even more space for almost certainly the same price
downgrade
only exception is if you are an antidowngradeist who made the mistake of getting a 240hz monitor
i cant buy a bigger monitor otherwise i am downgrading my refresh rate 😦
You can fight @young pecan on this
damn so limited?
bandwidth
no just noone has made a 4k240hz panel over 32 inches
soon
if i want a 42 inch its 120/144
48 inch maxes at 165?
didn't they already announce on
nope
like gamescom
138hz for now 😦
Like I've been enjoying the journey with tidal tbh
great for you
:(
oh wait the odyssey arc is 165hz!
so if i go up to 55 inch i can get 165hz
but yea still a downgrade from my current 240 😦
Qobuz better
i would run out of ports on my work pc, and holy crap the price of a matrix switcher for that would be absolutely beyond my means assuming i could afford 4 27 inchers lel
bye bye
Awooting bye
hmm
Isnt that the more quality but terrible UI
get closer to your monitors then :D
also oled for reading text (which is half of my job) is cringe
my eyes getting worse 😦
its not on windows
oh
the monitors need to be able to communicate the pixel pattern somehow
no linux user making a custom preset yet?
Yep
macos gets around this by just making everything blurry but that is such awful bs
uh people make stuff that they say works but 🤷 never looked sharp to me
less music and grouping small artists into one person where my problems
looks fun tho when one profile has classical music and rap
ah sad
dont get me wrong its definetly less awful but i use text every day
at least 4 hours a day are spent reading
wondering if the professional oleds have that problem
yep
its still the same panels
actually hmm
I could set up an array of 13 inchers
use them all at 200% scale
who else is using the 24inch 4k oled Panel
still a refresh downgrade and my poor work computer rendering windows at 8k
p sure the 24 inch 4k is used for laptop 1440p panels?
16 inches?
well the existence of 1440p 16 inch panels implies the existence of 4k 24 inch panels
ye probably
oh wait nvm its 4k 16 inch nvm
Vivobook Pro 16X OLED brings you the speed and accuracy, with a 4K OLED display, DialPad, 11th Gen Intel® H Series CPU, and NVIDIA® GeForce RTX™ 3050 GPU.
but not the one i was looking at
Artists into one person i noticed
That's a shitty thing
only 60hz tho
BESTie (kpop) isn't the same as BESTIE (idk what that shit music is)
https://innocn.com/products/innocn-15-6-portable-monitor-pu15-pre
yea alot of 60hz oleds
Self-lit pixels technology offers this external display incredible color accuracy (100% DCI-P3), top-tier contrast(100000:1), limitless range of colors (1.07 billion), and real 4K(3840*2160P) for deepest blacks, richest colors, and most realistic picture quality. One of the best portable monitors available in INNOCN.
this is one of the cheaper ones that id be interested in for work
have u found anything else with 24 1080p?
wouldnt do at home tho
nah theres that japanese esports one tho
which one
https://blurbusters.com/joled-update-120hz-oled-monitors-coming-to-market-soon/
oop nvm looks like its 22 inches
ah
okay
oleds seems to be already kinda out in the pro scene
can also reach 1000000:1 contrast on lcd
shame JOLED is kill
theres really no need since a million to 1 (true contrast) is pretty hard for someone to be able to see, and its already beyond what consumer oleds are capable of producing (thanks to optical issues)
no real point in spending twice as much for a device that cant provide any benefit in the near term
tho with VR displays, we could probably get alot higher contrast ratios
and with very low power we could probably actually reach into the 20k nit range (that is actually needed to recreate the brightness of objects lit by sunlight (even matte objects)
paper can reach up to 50k nits at noon
Only because you are using it indoors
ye its kinda heavy
Nah even just like opening windows while watching videos
so people outside hear what im watching?
🤷 why not?
having everything else dark kinda nice
It's only nice because it has an advantage thanks to your poor screen
maybe for some casual yt
but wouldn't wanna watch a movie like that
only seeing the tv makes it more immersive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qieSLe6rLR0 i wonder if we will see Wooting use these in any new products
Arm has launched three new mobile CPUs: the Arm Cortex-X4, the Cortex-A720, and the Cortex-A520. These 64-bit, Armv9.2 CPUs will be used in flagship SoCs by the end of this year and into 2024. A phone with the Cortex-X4 should offer 15% more single-threaded performance than a 2023 smartphone with the Cortex-X3. While the Cortex-A720 and A520 are...
Those are a and x series CPU cores
Wooting is using m series real time cores
When LEG CPUs
Needs BODY interconnect first.
What about the BRAIN chip?
Shit you aren’t wrong. If we’re doing BRAIN chip we should probably also be doing EYE chip.
You’re absolutely right.
Here we go.
can someone who has a decent amount of knowledge give me some advice with upgrading my pc?
talk to me
so currently i have a i7 8700k, msi z370a-pro, and gtx 1080 ti and i just realized that my cpu is bottlenecking tf outa my cpu
i want to upgrade my cpu and motherboard in order to be up to speed with my gpu but dont really know what to go with
Ehh, 8700K was fine with the 1080Ti back when it released, your system is aging but CPU is definitely the weakest point
yeah when i first got it the 8700k was a good mathc with the 1080ti but now its horrid
get a 5700X
and a nice mobo to go with it
Do not
i was thinking of getting a i7 13700k
How much are you willing to spend?
Are you willing to wait like 6 months more?
yea theres no rush
There's some good shit around the corner next year
I'd wait for Zen 5 tbf
Will release in 2024
hmmm but i was also trying to get a motherboard that would be compatible with my ddr4 ram that i have right now
Buying Intel is also pretty bleh move, Arrow Lake is dead on arrival and the motherboards will have no upgrade paths
yeah thats the problem im having right now
You live in U.S next to a microcenter by any chance?
13600k or 7800X3D
i do live in the us but my nearest micro center is like 7 hours away
worth the trip
my nearest Microcentre is across an international border and I've still made the trip
7 hours is a lot, wouldn't bother
lol bro what
That is absolute horseshit
get a 3060 TI
for the USA, that's nothing
that's a trip within a state
maybe a state border or two
Don't live in that god forsaken place then 
3060 ti doesnt seem much better than my 1080 ti
It's not
It'll a bit better in most scenarios, but not really a worthwhile purchase
You'd be much better off just getting a new CPU
yeah dont really wanna spend an extra 300 for a 5% increase
thats what im thinking
and just buy a gpu whenever i feel like i need a new one
do you guys know what to look for when looking for motherboards
like whats good and what isnt
Best choice would be something like an R5 7600 and an A620 or a B650 board
Should be about 500$, and you get upgrade paths for the future
It'll be a top-performing CPU currently in the market anyways
uhh the bottleneck calculator still says the 7600 would be too weak
should i even trust the bottleneck calculator
You should not lol
If a brand new latest generation, top performing CPU is too weak, then nothing in the market is good enough
prob not
i mean the 13700k is good enough for the calculator
That just screams like Intel bias
What website are you using?
Anyways there's this https://www.amazon.com/AMD-Ryzen-7600X-GIGABYTE-Motherboard/dp/B0BV3C5GTL/ref=mp_s_a_1_13?crid=2G10ZA04VNS16
And you can add something like this to the bundle https://www.amazon.com/Crucial-2x16GB-5600MT-Desktop-CP2K16G56C46U5/dp/B0C2B7W1W4
CP2K16G56C46U5 is the Crucial DDR5 Pro 32GB kit consisting of two 16GB desktop modules that operate at the speed of 5600MT/s and has a CAS Latency of 46. It is an UDIMM and conforms to the industry standard DDR5 UDIMM layout of 288 pins. It is compatible with systems that can take DDR5-5600 UDIMM...
Man wtf are these links
time to sell my ram ig
If you plan to sell the RAM there're a lot faster kits available
Although no, most top up at 6000 that are cheap, this thing should easily OC to that
Yeah 7600 will cover your bases for a long time, B650 will give you a few generations worth of upgrades to later consider
just cut out the ref
And DDR5 isn't going anywhere
It was a lot worse before, already truncated it
still not as bad as ebay links 
Is DDR6 a thing yet?
i was using this one https://pc-builds.com/bottleneck-calculator/
We bring you a unique calculator for bottleneck and chokepoint problems in your computer. We will help you to choose most appropriate processor and graphic card for your PC. Our calculator offers you best solutions for reducing or removing bottleneck problems.
We just got 5, but 4 just overstayed its welcome
afaik DDR6 specs are not even a thing yet
should go in testing next year apparently
and then to retail in 2026
so we might see it on consumer plattforms in 2027 or 2028
I would suggest you don't use these calculators, and instead watch/read reviews
a bottleneck is dependant on game etc
typically most gpu demanding games will just bottleneck on that anyways
Also resolution you are playing at
and the ones that are cpu dependant typically get a lot of fps nowadays with a modern cpu anyways
Yeah it's really not much of an issue
R5 7600 is a really good CPU, it'll carry your 1080Ti
in the end it is very depedant on the exact title 
Not really much dependant when you have a 1080Ti tbf
It's an older part, it'll never get bottlenecked

If you have a 4080, then yeah, no CPU is good enough for that yet
whats the difference between the b650m aorus elite ax and b650m ds3h
even with curent day mid tier gpus
One's a "higher quality" motherboard with wireless module installed, other is without those features, might have less USB ports
DS3H should be good enough but depending on the price difference, Aorus might be worth considering
Wireless is worth considering, brings not only wifi but also bluetooth connectivity
i dont really use bluetooth
i am planning on getting a wireless mouse but those use a dongle right?
yea
Usually they have both dong and bluetooth
only thing I use bt on my board is for my controller
But nobody uses bluetooth for a mouse
yea dont really use bluetooth then
Unless you need battery life or something
not necessarily, but you shouldn't use it for gaming anyways
i also have ethernet cable so i dont need wifi
Only for battery life I would ever enable BT on a mouse
so i would get the ryzen 7600x and a motherboard because of their upgradability right?
Sounds solid
@old marlin thoughts?
Nearly thought I pinged the wrong person, wtf is a ninorp
would not be suuuuper reliant on upgradeability
pronin backwards
Ah
first gen plattform and all
we miss Yamatoklok
amd has an amazing track record with that though
since you prob don't want to upgrade to second gen cpus
hmmm so why wouldn't i just get a 13700k and a motherboard compatible with it? just curious
and third gen might have upgradeability problems
gets you a guaranteed 0% upgradeability
price/performance
13700K is so damn expensive for a 500$ budget
Like, 13600K is over 300$ usually
13700K is well over that, and you need a motherboard for 500$
Intel isn't a budget suited hardware maker
how is the 7800x3d? just curious if i ever upgrade my 9900k
X3D still kicks ass
Yeah, even if they handicapped it this generation
I like how you wrote x instead of 8 as if anyone has a chance of even getting a 5600X3D 
And they are steaming hot
most MC have them in stock
so you cover like what
30% of the us population
MC is in very few locations, and don't ship most of the things they have
whats the difference between an overclocked 8700k to 4.7ghz and a 7600x
Also, Americans only damnit
IPC
7800x3d goes for 420€ here in czech
Speak in layman terms

