#🔌│tech
1 messages · Page 195 of 1
n4c?
the canned rdna4 halo sku
yea besides the 9800gx2 actually looking remotely acceptable to look at on the exterior as well as the interior
ah right
i mean if they canned it, we havent gotten that far yet lol
well kinda
Mine are just missing the stickers
Mi300 exists
With the stickers on you never be able to tell a 295 from a 9800gx2
9800gx2 didnt use stickers
Yes they did
and yes you could lmao
Mine literally has a sticker on it
but I guess yeah we are not there this or next year for consumers, fair
Mine is a EVGA and it has the giant e on it
ok sure there were stickers
But i mean the main aesthetic of the card is solid piano black metal
Which is just a glassy sticker
You mean exactly like the 295 other than it being matte
rather than perforated matte metal with a sticker on top
The 9800 was plastic and the 295 was metal
do you have one?
My evga is 100% glossy plastic with a sticker
my nvidia is 100% metal front and back
\,,/
Zoomer here, so when were these produced 
asdasd fuck
an incredible amount of time ago
aka 2008
ok
It's metal under the plastic with sticker
I remember trying to bring a 2008 Mac Pro to life
It's die cast zink
Stupid family got it an old workstation card from AMD and pawned off the old one
I would love to see one that's painted
Incompatible 
Everyone I see only is sticker
metal under sticker
but evga definetly went overboard with the sticker
somehow it’s working now
the nvidia reference uses a metal (or metallized) sticker, tastefully avoiding the entirety of the piano black metal
Point was it wasn’t on the comp list
The 295 is all aluminum
just anything old my family thought it’d work 
That is powder coated
🤷 yet this looks an order of magnitude better with or without sticker
I told them no, but their ears are pointed toward heaven
uuuuuuh
The piano black doesn't it make it cool any better
the practicalities are debatable
the aesthetics are not defensible on the 295
like excuse me in what world do those perforations look good?
Reminds me of black panther suit
except thats literally false as thats the back of the pcb
yes but it looks like trash lol
sure industrial waste but still trash nonetheless
the evga classified was at least glossy but the perforations? ew
I think the piano black is so bland and boring
It's subjective
Perforated aluminum almost always been fancy computer back in the 2000s
Yep
I have the workstation version of the 2000
The 2100
Same internals
But front door and padded side panels
Add some racing stripes and you will be ahead of the competition lol
i cant tell if that specific motherboard tray slides out, but I have the motherboard tray from one of those lian lis for my testbench
They are worth crazy money these days
The 2000 does not come out
They are actually horrible to work with because of the center divider lol
Makes eps and CPU cooler fans a chore
well the slide out of this one was unworkable as well since any tower cooler would prevent it from sliding out lmao
I have my x58 in it and my d14 almost touches
The EPS and fan wires actually tilt the cooler a bit
I really need to install a cutout at the back of the case through the center so that the power wires can go through
And before anyone says things those quatros only need the six pin or the eight pin
They do not need both
https://tenor.com/fi/view/thermal-paste-cpu-motherboard-thermal-paste-cpu-cpu-thermal-paste-gif-24047580 hope you did this too
Täydellinen Thermal Paste Cpu Motherboard animoitu GIF keskusteluusi. Löydä ja jaa parhaat GIFit Tenorissa.

Tested wrong, shit on the product when they had completely wrong results, doubled down that it wasn't their fault, then threw the company under the bus by not sending the main prototype back and shat on the corpse... by selling it off in a convention full of cooling solution makers
Yeah I haven't been watching LTT for a long time and this reaffirms why 
It's lga
Lol
Doesn't even matter what they do or review, the integrity values are untrustworthy
Lmao
I unsubscribed lol. Their videos used to be fun but I feel they’re all the same now
I think the last thing I saw was them trying to go into audio reviews
And the review didn't seem like the presenter had much clue about audio at all
I’ve been watching them on and off but this time it’s been long since I last tuned in
Well, it's a corporation at this point
Essentially yeah
Linus, if you can spend millions of dollars on your house, you can also spend extra cash on high quality content
He's like deer in headlights
you can see luke's discomfort week by week
Luke should reconsider his affiliations
Luckily he's not evolved with video stuff
I mean floatplane is a good product
Luke does only Floatplane as far as I know
Is Floatplane owned by LTT in part or something?
Cause the tight knit between LTT and Floatplane is sus, either it's friendship based or ownership
Yea I believe they are fully owned by ltt
Lmg owns ltt, fp and the other parts
Ah yah
Well, Luke is essentially forced to listen to Linus and Ivonne or he's out of a job 
He does seem like a good guy and tries to leash Linus but man is he ever so powerless
LMG is owned 50% Linus and 50% Ivonne
With Linus acting as owner but CEO is the new guy they added
Well Luke just has a different role, it does seem like he pushes back a bit but he is not that involved with the video sid of things.
Cause Linus can't be bothered with running a company
that really isnt the reason lol
Luke is coo if fpm
It is weird cause Linus does mention that he really wants to go all corporate and run a big company
Yet he can't handle the business management aspect at all
Lmg and fpm have same ceo
Linus has more value as a host than as a manager + he really does not like the job so there is that.
Which does tbf make sense when you want to own a successful company, but can't run it well and so you offload all the management parts to your ex-boss
It's the same thing with artists hiring managers, their job as an artist is more valuable than their job leading their company.
just wondering how the ltt reddit responds.
Seems pretty telling.
"just drama from GN"
Sure is drama when other reviewers have pointed out your hipocricy multiple times in the past year
They don't give a fuck about their reddit. What's more important for them is their DC filled with copium drugged toe suckers
I was constantly arguing with a Mod there, because they made mistakes all the time, claimed some bullshit that was never even possible or was completely incorrect information
Their forums also seem to be very much on the same line as the reddit. Still I am just used to stronger fanboyism.
I did not check their discord though.
It's not worth, honestly. You'd cringe the fuck out there
real situation before i got banned: Someone asked if it's fine to use a Molex to 6/8 Pin Adapter and then overclock the GPU. Despite the recommendation of several knowledgable people the person did so anyways, because the knowledgable mass told him to do so while we weren't "on our watch" (with our i mean a small group of us overclockers doing it for years if not decades at that time). Well, the person ended up with a burned out PC, literally
Because Molex' standard usually doesn't include any safety mechanisms
nor did it ever require any
I don't know the full context so I can't judge but I just joined their discord on an alt and it seems even in their discord they are aligning with GN on this one. Of course Linus has not yet responded but still.
wonder if Billet Labs can/will sue LMG
like they must have signed an NDA
and LTT handle it like the worst possible way
I fear that as a small company they didn't do the legal stuff, sending something to a trusted large publication like ltt.
oof
Sadly Billet doesn't have the money for that. I'm currently in contact with Billet because of the whole incident and am going to back them up financially to ensure that LMG gets punished for their mistakes
wtf
It was their most promising prototype and as Steve said "someone could've bought it and send it away to be copied"
Still legaly even without an NDA, sending it on loan legally speaking seems clear enough, if LTT auctioned it they are still 100% in the wrong.
causing a huge financial damage to Billet
the wtf was directed at financing their legal action
idc, i have the money for that
in fact i've already ordered a transfer of a 5 digits sum to them as an investment
ain't much, but keeps them afloat for now

Damn, still in general I would put the chances reasonably high that LTT at least tries to do some right by them after the fallout of this.
Their cooler seemed more than promising and i'm willing to back it up, because it's made by 2 guys trying to get a foothold in the market
more competition = more inventions and innovations = better products = happy customers

i mean Wooting itself was found by 3 guys innovating how we should look at mechanical keyboards nowadays
"I am not saying that whoever came up with the idea of a printer/scanner-combo not scanning unless you put in ink should be sentenced to death, just that if they were sentenced to death and they put out a call for volunteers for the shooting squad, they would have to do some sort of lottery."
but yeah, i'd definitely volunteer as a shooter
it was from reddit
and honestly, i hate printers. Like i really hate them... All i wanna do is printing a single paper and the printer does a clean up at 5 a.m. twice per week anyways fyi, no, that fucking piece of shit thing decides to clean itself once again when i decide to print something, wasting 10 minutes of my time just to print one of the god damn worst prints i've seen in my entire life
it's the worst tech companies can come up with
seriously, is it that hard to create a printer that JUST WORKS?
Go, clean yourself at 5 a.m., pump some new ink in, fine by me, but print on the spot if i decide to print something instead of wasting my time
and no, don't fucking beep at me, because i'm using some cheaper 3rd party cartridges, just because i'm not willing to buy a single cartridge of black for fucking 40€
The problem is the incentives are all wrong. People are unable to judge reliabilty, thus it does not become a purchasing factor for most.
People prefer to buy a cheaper printer rather than a more expensive one with cheaper ink.
It is just how it goes.
At this point, the only thing that could help is forced EU standardization.
Honestly, i don't have an issue paying for something more quality made. Absolutely not. But if a small 50 ml cartridge of black costs 40€'s, then i'm definitely drawing the line
laser is still best
The problem here is that it's not quality at all, there is little transparency about it.
50 ml's for 40€... Like what is this stuff made of? Gold with some damn diamonds in it?
laser, dye sub, thermal, then injet
Cheaper laser printers are also not that reliable, at work they last a couple of years really.
hand made japanese ink cost less
and they gotta burn oil to make it
laser printers introduce other issues tho
like the dust they produce over time affecting your health
and not just in a small way
In terms of real cost you mostly pay for logistics of handling the million different types of cardridges, keeping them all in stock and so forth.
Then there is the huge margin on first party ones
but a seriously harming one when used frequently
I do think ink jets could be mostly solved if we all agree or are forced to agree on a standard cartridge format. Or a few formats, at the very least a ban on scaremongering about third party cardridges, locking out third parties, making refills unviable and crap like that.
well the problem is that model has been tried and people dont buy it
the razors and blades model works
i used to sell printers
$300 printer with $1/1000 page ink
$80 printer with $70/1000 page ink
1 guess as to which was bought 9 times out of 10
tbf it was closer to $3/1000 pages for the first one but the point stands
and that was with them having to walk by the isle full of ink to actually buy the printer because obviously
Printer companies are ripping us off, and it's high time we did something about it. Join me in starting the revolution.
@gusty kiln @cursive summit 
KZ commiting professional suicide
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02vfaesbNALW8RU7uU4pVaRQNHLaD7H7NWZE8G8UUpY9qCS9EKgSSqh6uMymw3uRHrl&id=100057463658374
I don't necessarily agree what gamers Nexus said. Like the entire finding stuff where they made an oopsi. However for someone with a big corporation those things should be perfect.
Linus is more like an entertainer to me not a reviewer. He could do it in a more entertaining way and still get most benchmarks across. He shouldn't rush stuff to just be first (that's kinda important on the Internet I know) or have less data etc
That's my hot take
KZ?
Audio brand
Known for several controversial things already
Odd, I was accessing it without a account, on mobile tho
Long boi
Yeah I used to watch them a bunch when I was younger. Enjoyed LTT a lot haha. Now honestly I can’t make it through one video
Some vids are fine (entertainment)
That's about it
I always keeping in my head, if a restaurant sells everything than it ain't good. Applies I guess to many things
My one exception would probably be Alex’s videos because I find those fun and entertaining lol
No idea what this is about
This seems more like a career professional suicide 
I think an issue you run into with the argument of Linus being "an entertainer not a real reviewer." is that he runs the biggest tech channel on Youtube and continues to put out poor quality reviews, and a lot of people aren't going to realize they aren't good quality, or could be unintentionally misrepresenting the numbers. A lot of people might just have the video open on a side screen while they do other activities and wouldn't notice the text correcting the issues.
With how large LMG is they should have more time to either redo a video with corrections, or at least splice corrections in rather then lazily adding text. LMG is more then just a guy on youtube now. Steve was right when he said he'll be treating LMG like a company and not as some independent Linus on YT.
to keep the analogy here, they were a nice varied restaurant but now they spend money to hire a 3 star michelin chef and the good meals became worse somehow
The problem is that they are that large
With large amount of employees comes the major burden and responsibility to feed them all by paying em a salary
So you end up crunching those poor ass writers to write anything at that point just to squeeze out over a dozen vids a week
KZ bribing creators with 1,000$ to promote their new iem
which they claim is the best iem under 1,000$
Cute, don't really care
KZ never seemed like a great choice for good IEMs anyways
👕https://dmstech.store/
🐦I'm on twitter! https://twitter.com/dms3tv
🥇Want to chat with me and ask questions? You can support the channel on patreon and get access to my telegram chat! https://www.patreon.com/join/DMS3TV?
💻Forums: https://forum.hifiguides.com/
🎙If you want to join the discussion checkout our discord community:
--- https://discor...
Technically a paid sponsorship is completely normal
And "best" is subjective so, for some numbnut those might be the "best" under 1000$
So idk what this is really about and whatever, just some chinese budget company doing weird shenanigans
Even with a sponsorship it's illegal to review something without giving your proper thoughts of the product
and if it's sponsored you have to put a disclaimer
If there was none, then that's illegal
If anything the opposite should've happened. As more people were onboarded quality and video content should have gone up! As this would have brought in a larger audience each video would make more money. That LMG should have been doing a financial analysis on each hire
It's not like they don't have the money, Linus' house is huge
"how bad the GN video was" watch your words or I'll come out swinging, sister
Yeah, he has gigantic follower base, so I should be able to trust him...
You don't know how often I look at my phone while watching YT videos, I am missing often those things. Also I reckon that many people can't read that fast and don't bother rewatching it (which if you think about will give the YouTuber more watch time ) . And personally I watch the video and don't have the time to focus on the video and jump to the footnotes that fast and to read it while they say something
I know things don't always go the way they "should" though sadly
That's better
I havn't read Linus' full response, but it stuck out to me immediately that Linus is taking it personally, rather then realizing that GN is just trying to raise its concerns publicly hoping LMG improves. I have not watched the full water block video, but it seems LMG fuked up on a massive scale with it
Also calling out Tech Jesus's journalistic integrity
"
- Figured out they were using a card the GPU was not designed for
- Decides to use wrong card anyways instead of stopping production
- Gets data the block was not cooling the card correctly
- Published the video trashing the block
- Gets obviously annoyed he was called out on the video
- Says it's not worth a couple hundred dollars to retest it
- Says none of prior ethical mistakes matter because it's not worth $800 anyways
- Doesn't send a prototype part back to the company
- Puts Billet Labs behind on development of their product
- Uses it for an auction at LTX "
Thing is, such videos are absolutely necessary and shouldn't be "left in private"
I feel like the response was his old CEO ego defense. But he isn't the CEO anymore
For some people only public criticism will ever mean them anything
Linus does seem too far gone though
Millionaire megalomaniac that can't assume a pro-consumer stance and has a broken spine with no integrity to speak of
His "look at my mansion that I am building" videos were some really weird ego-trips
How do you do fellow kids
idk that really seemed fine, it's a modern house but far from what I'd call a mansion or anything
kekekek saw that
300$ backpack bro no warranty 
At least their merch has some quality left
Other than being as expensive as those extravagant designer brands
i would not buy a product without warranty ahah, the assurance it provides is too nice to not have
I mean as a european everything has warranty so that would never cross my mind to think about 
Linus' wording with the "Just Trust Me Bro" was just terrible. Of course the reality needed to be
"Look we don't have a solid warranty guarantee at the moment. That isn't to say that we won't support you, but ...yada yada... Please trust us that for the time being we will sort these backpacks out to the best of our ability on a case-by-case basis."
But man can't stop opening his gob and seems to talk faster then he thinks. So what he really did was spray crap allover his own brand killing trust rather then building it.
Ad blockers are piracy
I agree with him but he also basically said do it just be aware, I really dont think thats a point against him
NiceHash, crypto mining software
they have multiple videos that are really easy to use in those ways and they are aware
He basically promoted it, while their past was shady
I was decently informed at the time to know how awful that software is
High fees, need a few BTC to payout (I believe so) and in the past they scammed people's Bitcoins
though what sticks out even if there are points some say are not bad there are others that people say are bad so in the end there is still a decent list of points that aren't a great look for them
They half assed their apology
this is a bit weird honestly, he'd only do be business with the woman in a hotel room
Thr bigger you get the less excuses you have. As throughout the chain more people should have raised concerns
Lmg is like a over 100 people now
Like they apparently realised they fucked up the Billet video but posted it anyway? Then when Billet asked for it back they sold it instead?
That seems like they are trying to destroy Billet labs
Yeah, I feel bad for the good creators . That i am using an AdBlock (Phone and PC). But the ads are horrible, they are really embarrassing.
idk the explanation from that seemed fairly innocent when he explained it, I'm more than willing to give himt he benefit of doubt on that one
and there were multiple parts that were not as she claimed so it seems a bit unlikely to be malicious
"He also is put into contact with Naomi Wu to pursue a Collab and possibly invite her to Floatplane, Linus' paid video platform, but due to the previous obligations he only has time to meet her after a day at work at his hotel. He did not specify that he meant the hotel lobby, and Naomi (as a single woman) is not comfortable with what she understood as a one-on-one with a man in his hotel room. Linus apologizes for the misunderstanding and they continue to meet via phone calls and email, culminating in a contract offer for Floatplane that Naomi never responded to."
yeah she herself retracted that, be it damage control or genuin misunderstanding on her part idc it really isnt relevant for this and a nothing burger in the end
Man Linus has a really hard time coping with criticism of any sort
In a way he prolly would be far better off selling his brand and making a new one
Thing is when you get famous dirt accumulates wether or not its warranted.
The hotel room thing was a simple misunderstanding but that's going to be brought up forever now.
So it's imperative that LMG avoids all controversy it can, which is why I am particularly disgusted with this Billet water block video. They had to know better
either way good it wasn't that serious
regarding the hotel situation
no worries ahah, mistakes are bound to happen. what matters is recognizing them
In a way I bet what he did to billet was just out of spite cause he plans to make his own watercoolers
Isn't that his plan? Start producing PC components like coolers, cases and such
That is rather normal in the industry
The only exploitative part I have heard of was the numerous times he has been called out for horrible working conditions and crunch
And it wasn't even long ago, like a few months back that he got called out again by writers
he's banking on ignorance
lots of states here have the same law
but companies will always half-truth their way around it
yeah especially from a brand that wants to be "better" than the products they review
man can we just speed up time for a few weeks to see that all resolved, more hardware come out and have an opportunity to make fun of intel again 
lol
yeah and to add on the starting salary they recieve should be illegal
what's up with 14th gen? haven't looked at all
nothing, its just a refresh
oh
RPL-R
so uh, makes the 13600k a better deal and thats it kinda
meteor lake is only laptop
I mean, basically every company is inherently anti-union
I do agree with his take ideally a union is not needed, the issue is if you dont have one and you would want one its awkward making one then
GN video about issues on LTTs videos, ethics and such
You know even though nearly everyone are talking about the billet thing
I think the most valid point will be definitely their allegiances and sponsors
You CANNOT take a sponsorship / partner with Noctua and then also review their products with clear heart
That is completely invalidating the concept of impartiality and bias.
mhh wouldn't say it quite like that
even gn and hub have sponsor spots of products they reviewed
How can Linus continue to claim that he works for consumers and "trust me bro I would never hurt you", when he buddies up with corporate entities is a bit absurd
I was thinking about that
just usually after they reviewed it and then were ok with featuring it
GN does sponsor a lot of products
the issue wiht ltt is they are working with noctua now with the screwdriver and not just sponsor spots that could be after a review and on non cooler related topics
basically yeah
and they dont put gpu ads on a gpu review or such iirc
Well it seems that LTT failed there as well when the Noctua DH-15 gets beat by the much cheaper Peerless Assassin according to their benchmarks 
I wonder at which point LTT went bad
When they started expanding
Like when was the moment the first signs of quality drop can be seen
Actually prolly right after his parent company failed
What was it called
Used to sell computer parts
Around that time was peak LTT era
That was ages ago no?
2016 maybe?
Ohh
Ncix wasn't the parent company of ltt tho
All the oldies were there, Luke was making videos
you mean they had quality when they made videos for a comapny with the goal to sell products? doesnt make much sense
There was a weird relationship there with Linus being an employee of NCIX and the NCIX somehow affiliated with the channel
Ltt was made while linus was working at Ncix
The channel was originally owned by Ncix
Linus gained the ownership of the channel so he could continue it himslef
Didn't LTT start off as NCIX's youtube page
Ncix tech tips was it's own channel
Anyways after NCIX failed it all went downhill after
as if you had seen any video from the ncix days lol
Yes, actually
That was when the guy was most relevant 
Ncix had no control of the channel after linus gained ownership
Ncix's shutdown was long after that
idk the channel facing issues and all doesnt suddenly invalidate all things done in the past or make tiny points massive issues for past videos
linus is now king of doubling down instead of shutting up lol
2016-2017 was peak Linus after all
Good old scrapyard wars man
I binged the hell out of that series
Then they just became more and more soulless and now we are here
That was a fun video
Emacs OS
Interview with an Emacs Enthusiast in 2023 with Emerald McS., PhD - aired on © The Emacs.
org. air date 1990.
Programmer humor
Software humor
Elisp humor
Software tools
Retro computing
Vim vs emacs editor
Computerphile
Emacs humor
Emacs jokes
emacs vs vim
Programming memes
gnu emacs
spacemacs
emacs memes
lex friedman ide
VS Code
confi...
It is also fun to see the continued denial of Linus and the fanbase that there are issues within the company that people have been documenting for years now
Such a shit response
Steves first statment is that its literaly his job to ignore person relationships for the job
linus first respons is that he is sad steve didnt reach out before making the video
#🐸│memes for the spam cmon
Sorry xd
its really such a shame
ltt screws up their testing
gn avoids testing titles that they dont like
ltt doesnt do noise normalized testing
gn doesnt do OOBE standardized testing
and now they are at each others throats instead of working together
oobe?
where they dont change any settings and let it run how it comes
out of box experience
oh
Today, we will take a look at this legendary device: an educational microprocessor lab created at the VEF factory in Latvia in 1988. It served as a tool for studying the architecture and operations of the Soviet clone of the Intel 8080 processor, the KR580VM80A. In a certain sense, it shared similarities with the famous MITS Altair computer. Whe...
Can someone TLDR me for the Linus thing today
Their Dough review was kind of spot on
What did GamersNexus say? TLDR
and them saying they would send it back
so it wasnt like they didnt know they watned it back
i can watch a video in a popup on my phone
yeah
gn dose all the tech i need
Though I will say people worrying some other company would buy the prototype and copy was funny
Nothing about the build is novel over than packaging
Which you can get from looking at it
It's good to watch the vid for all the examples but to summarise:
The LMG has gotten increasingly sloppy adhering to a daily uploading schedule. And refuses time after time to delay videos for retests, confirmations or fixes that they know are in the video when they upload it (unless of course they are testing a major sponsors equipment like AMD for instance). They do all of this whilst claiming to be working towards "objectivity". Examples of this sloppiness are things like knowingly reviewing Billet's (a 2 man company) waterblock with the 4090 ti instead of the 3090 ti it was designed for and then claiming it sucks. When pointed out Linus defending the decision because it would cost "a few hundred dollars" to rereview with the proper equipment. Then stealing said cooler so they could sell it at ltx, and claiming "they didn't know Billit wanted their cooler back" despite Billit having recieved confirmation it was being aent back.
On top of that they are reviewing laptops whilst Linus has invested heavily into framework, coolers and fans whilst collaborating with Noctua.
Also selling the block after saying you would give it back is morally reprehensible, but we have no idea what the actual contract look like
I'd imagine all big tech reviews are send things in asis and it's ours
I would hazard a guess no contract existed as it came from a 2 man team
Nah
No way even gn dose anything without contract
Lmg definitely is all in writing before anything arives
Also Steve even said that they are now at the point where they no longer accept any review stipulations
As well as focusing more on quality rather then rushing all their vids out the door asap
Yeah he is the reason they have the schedule they do
And the shit quality doesn't effect him
But everyone else hates it
Linus equates 10 times the people with 10 times the videos
Not 10 times the quality
Like if they review something review it properly. Another example of sloppiness was the 4090 ti review showing a cyberpunk benchmark mark 300% above the 3090 ti. They should have double checked this but didn't and no doubt the 4090 ti was running with the wrong settings
This video is not monetized. This video covers our serious concerns regarding the data accuracy of Linus Media Group, including Linus Tech Tips, ShortCircuit, and TechQuickie, particularly as it relates to rushing content out the door to favor -- by staff's own admission -- quantity over quality. As the company continues to expand into its LTT L...
Well most of the writers barely know PC tech
Out of touchness referring to the the 4060, a $600usd card as "budget"
As was evident in the infamous water block video
Also
To be fair to lmg
Someone could of totally hit the wrong button on a computer
Handling Asus with kid gloves during the same period they are onboarding a former Asus CEO
And marked the block as surplus
I mean asus is a giant
You know how many people don't know asus owns asmedia
Lol
You would think he would double check. This wasn't a "oops we accidentally sold it on our site" they had to bring it to ltx, and sell it, leaving a multitude of steps where someone should have said something
I mean
I mean Asus being a giant means that Linus should be harsher not softer
They have inventory control
Someone was tasked with looking for good surplus to sell
It showed as surplus
They sold it
Why would there be more checks
At a well published auction at their big ltx event!
But who ever said they would send it back should of made sure it was sent back
I mean one person at a company of hundreds knew they wanted it back
Yes and they should have had a process to confirm shit
So you gotta stand every one in a line and ask one by one?
I send stuff all the time, even reaching out to get others to send equipment. I reach out for updates eg shipping info to hand back to the contacts
they use teams
No dingus
I am not saying Linus needs to ask everyone, but someone should have been checking back on this repeatedly. There should have been a process in place, or a company wide chat
Why
Because it's fuckin comon curtesy to ask for updates to provide customers and clients
yea that wont work, i work in a team of 5 and stuff falls between the cracks
he is in a team of 100+
I would imagine that the contract didn't state to give it back
They asked for it back after
I work with multiple teams, and I hound for updates on everything
do you work inside of a monolithic team with a single group chat?
one with multi month timelines and hundreds of projects?
And under funded/staffed
Like it isn't that fukin hard. One email company wide, "hey guys we need to send the prototype cooler back!"
Lmao
Most places will give you one warning on a company wide email lol
You never do that at corps
our place is alot kinder on that, we cant afford the folks who know to not do that lel
Hahaha that's fair
Also teams has restrictions on it anyway
Same with outlook
But if some low level call center peon ccs they whole company. They aren't getting a good call for it
"Hey inventory team, i need shipping info on that cooler, can I get an update?"
"Haha oops thought that was surplus, linus just took it to ltx, let me contact him"
Linus"ahh that's too bad guys, I was going to auction it for charity, but I suppose we'll send it back!"
we actually have a whitelist of users allowed to send mail to the entire company
but each department has an email that all the department members are allowed to email...
That's in a single person in that chain forgets about it and then the fuck up happens
Well have a process so they don't forget. Get a ticketing system
they have an inventory and a ticketing system
someone makes a mistake
mistakes happen
linus makes up some bs then defends it beyond the land of bad takes then keeps clutching on to it
goto someone
"We didn't sell it we auctioned it" as if that somehow made it better
Just say "there was a critical communication error, we'll introduce protocols to address future incidents "
For charity I must say
like its really a shame, the dude has extremely powerful intuition about money, business, and people and i believe is one of the only people who simply does not care about his personal public image (only the appearance of the business as a whole)
Nothing says criminal neglect like selling an in development prototype you borrowed at an auction to POTENTIAL COMPETITORS
For charity of course.

well to be entirely fair, the prototype was solidly more of the look how good we are at making things and less look how state of the art we are at designing things
Can't sell shit you don't own
i would like to introduce you to the concept of a pawn shop lel
That's selling on someone's behalf with permission
im not sufficiently memetically connected to know if something is still a thing any more
yea in theory lel, in practice its an environment that buys items of unknown legality and converts them into ostensible legality
Such is life.
XD
linus gone done did it again
can anyone give me a tl;dr on the ltt drama but detailed enough so i understand the scope?
Rushing videos, making testing mistakes they should correct before uploading, selling off prototypes that they tested incorrectly, potentially bankrupting a small company.
He stole something and then kinda didn't apologize. He also admitted to improper testing and not wanting to bother testing right as it took too much effort.
The usual. Kind of have to watch/listen to the tech Jesus video in full
he said he will give the prototype back but then ended up selling it at an auction
Imo it should not show as surplus though. Rather a third option like “return to manufacturer”
I half agree with him tbh
I do my own research to buy things and I think that’s what he’s getting at
Nvm
Just a rich doushe
Based asf
good point 
"LTT doesn't do big mistakes in their reviews, also I don't watch reviews and need to flex now"
"I don't drive motorcycles because it is cool but because I like it.
I also do not drive motorcycles"
i mean that post says "heatsink noboy can afford i only buy the most expensice stuff"
💀
is it trolling when you pretend to be wealthy to cope?
ah yes buy highest price and don't think of what you want from it
If you keep in mind that the average internet poster is a teenager it'll start to make a bit more sense
Good point here
800$ is "pennies" and "we spend more money on snacks" but spending 300-600$ on a guy to re-test the thing for 2 weeks or even less time just to make a far better quality video is "I'm not spending that amount of money"
Anyways more techtubers are now jumping on the drama https://youtu.be/TcSkrkXd2H0
The Hardware Unboxed Podcast Episode 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yw39wYJlLRc
Subscribe to the audio version! https://shows.acast.com/the-hardware-unboxed-podcast
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
Join us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxed
LTT Accuracy and Ethics, Our Thoughts &...
Now this is rather interesting
well i mean sure technically memory is more programmable than even fpgas, but the speed has not been and doesnt seem to be that impressive?
and the efficiency isnt crazy either?
gives some interesting concepts ig
ye
hopefully ibm can build up watson to the level of chatgpt-4 without the shoggoth issues, and we can use them as an example of how to build AI
shoggoth issues?
Stop being russian
the LLM's starting out coherent and then eventually discohering into madness when looped and any of the other highly strange issues that appear from the black boxes
we already have statistics about it "dumbing down"
the original models are actually outright dangerous to use, and the fine tuning only slightly reigns that in, it took an incredible amount of dumbing down and rlhf to actually get the outputs to be generally coherent
I mean it should be clear that the current approach will prob not give us "production ready" results
i listened to a podcast from one of the beta testers of gpt-4 and they were saying how insanely easy it was to break that they didnt even bother telling openai because they figured everyone else did and i just facepalmed
break in what way
make it say stuff that would get openai sued was what they said but didnt provide details
sure but like
thats the type of system they are making
well yea
its a lovcraftian horror with a spraypainted on smiley face
that will be every ai
thats not true
also because that is how humans operate 
we at least to some extent understand what a human brain does and how it comes to the conclusions
you just gotta hope the AI doesn't figure out file system access and gets call of the void ig
and we have SOTA ais like stockfish that we fully understand every behavior it will exhibit
how do you train it not to nuke itself
stockfish is just a lookup table
what advantage would it gain in nuking itself
fuck around and try out
stockfish is not just a lookup table
by that description, all of these llms are also a lookup table
how do you teach an ai survival instinct

without making it lie to you
look up instrumental convergence
that part is an open field of study without any major progress in the past 100 years
yea but it doesn't have a concept of deleting itself?
yes there was a crazy dude working on the problem in the 1920s
if it is deleted, how could it accomplish its goals
how does it know it doesn't help
well if it doesnt do anything, it isnt dangerous
but if it does something, it has goals
- if you trim it too much towards just survival it will just make up answers to please you
like if it is just bs search engine like it is rn
and gets rated on user feedback
the problem is more that it will value survival on its own as a way to accomplish its goals
why would it ever waste time to research something itw got asked
when it could just take the most obvious answer from the getgo
to decrease loss
yea exactly
so plausible answers will always be enough
not exactly
loss can always go down as long as its not overfit and the model is smaller than the original data
unless you have a perfect fact checking ai already 
the ai is not able to perfectly recreate the data that it was trained on
that means it can still decrease loss
Deep Blue
I believe so
not exactly
That’s why everyone was raving about AlphaZero when it first came out
but it won thanks to preprogrammed rulesets
NNUE
but that was for the openings
well it essentially ran a calculation
so it could generate the proper data on the fly
deep blue used preprogrammed openings
instead of just having a table to look into
same as stockfish
ah ok
I assume preprogrammed openings just take away a lot of the overhead you would have early on?
theres no possible way for the classical programs to search with enough depth to get to the end of the game
since you already know the best possible opening you only need to catch possible outliers instead of trying to predict the whole game from the getgo
well the problem is we dont know the best openings
so they just programmed a long list of them
well we know the statiscially best ones
and by the time the openings are over, the chess ais are able to take over
I mean we know the best ones you can statistically do
alphazero did add some variations that we were unaware of
doesn't mean they perform the best against a human player
Chess is not a proven game yet
He is getting good games confused with computer perfect
^
Computers deal in absolutes
*used to
So ai is a bandaid to try and help get the best results to unproven problems
well the oponent matters
for how you play
Not once the game is proven
we use the word solved not proven but ye
if we had an NP oracle we could solve it
since it is binary logic
ye
Once chess is fully solved/proven then ai won't matter
which at least started as math
But we are a long long way
don't think it can be fully solved at that point 
It can
like you can make a software that always wins
but it is not the same as connect 4 or tictactoe where you get the same game every time
if you had an NP oracle it would be
yea if you had a theoretical machine with unlimited resources etc 
Yes
Eventually computers will get to the point where it is not a theoretical machine and it has finite resources
unlimited is the problem
There are finite number of chess moves
It is not an unlimited problem
There is a set number of possible games
with quantum computers the theory is you can explore an infinite number of solutions in finite time and resources
yea but at that point it is just statistics again
It's not just statistics
there are no unlimited moves
That is a fact
it is
x86 computers are not deterministic, yet they always produce the same answer to the same input
Chess is a closed system, there is a limit to its complexity
chess is deterministic
but you don't always have the same input
exactly
but you dont need a deterministic approach to solve it
and since you don't know the next input you can only make a statistically best move
not the right move
unless you have a computer that can see the future
or knows how the opponent plays
thats as true for tick tack toe as it is for chess
no
tic tac toe just has winning strategies
which result in either only wins or only stalemates
can't remember
If you know all possible chess games, then you can make the actual best move
chess has been proven to be equivalent to tic tac toe
in the end there is a winning strategy that only one party (the one that starts) can do
and there is a clear counterplay against it
Because if you know all possible games then you know all possible outcomes
^
only the statistically best one
since you can't predict the countermove
It's not statistical if you know all results
thats only true until we solve the game

you dont understand, its a solveable problem
You used statistics to make the best guess for all possible results
yes
Without knowing all possible results
If you know all possible results then you know the actual best move
There's a very distinct difference between the actual best and a statistical best
Which is the difference between solved and unsolved
at the point where the game does not have that time the winning moves are predictable enough
You are confusing it moves ability to win the games vs humans with a moves ability to be the best
The best move is the one that leads to the most win outcomes when you know all possible games
No human can make the best move
and what if the enemy is as good? Would you say it becomes statistical then?
Sponsor: Arctic Liquid Freezer II ARGB on Amazon https://geni.us/8BokJ
In HW News this week, we start with a discussion about Linus Sebastian's recent reply to our commentary about Linus Tech Tips' issues with accuracy, data, corrections, ethics, and conflicts. We are baffled and disappointed by the hastily, angrily-written, and at times inaccur...

a perfect game of chess is proven to exist for white
You are comprehending knowing all possible games
aka it is the statistically best one
its not statistics
A computer can know every single possible move every single Branch from that with every single move on that branch
That is a finite data set for chess
Once you have that data set you know which move has the most possible wins
Regardless of your opponent's next move
yea
its exactly the same as tic tac toe
which is statistics
If you pick that move every single time you will always win.
that is literally statistics
What we don't know now is if that is a better model for first or second move
but if the opponent is another computer and knows all the answers too, who wins if every move is right? Can they counter-move if everything is pre-known?
Exactly we don't know if first or second is the best
if tic tac toe isnt statistics, then chess isnt statistics
if you are arguing that tic tac toe is statistics then you are wrong
it boils down to rolling a dice but deciding if 6 wins or 1-5 win
But once the complete data set is known. We will know
statistically picking 1-5 is the better move
i thought there was a proof for white?
GN plays call out
it's highly effective
Linus plays terrible response
it's ineffective
tic tac toe still is statistics
yea sorry fam thats just wrong

it is just that tic tac toe is so limited that every game ends up looking the same
Statistics is always applied to make educated guesses
a truth table is not statistics
Because you do not know all the data
^
Once a problem is solved there is no statistical requirement
There is a factual best option
A truth table is a mathematical table used in logic—specifically in connection with Boolean algebra, boolean functions, and propositional calculus—which sets out the functional values of logical expressions on each of their functional arguments, that is, for each combination of values taken by their logical variables. In particular, truth tables...
The issue is the data set for chess is astronomically large for current computers
bruh
No machine in the world can actually compute the entire data set
So current chess engines guess
tictactoe is statistics but since the game is so simple you don't really see that
this
but if we had it, you would just follow the steps on the table
thats not how formal logic works lel
A solved chess engine makes no guesses
It knows that there n possibilities and every turn n gets smaller.
yea but at that point your equation would just be equivalent to what you got out of statistics
The math that comes to the conclusion
read the wikipedia article
or at least skim it
A solved problem is different than statistical best
To a theoretically sized computer chess is just as simple as tick toe is to current computers
"solving" it is so simple that a 10 year old could do it with a bit of time and boredom
you are conflating what humans can accomplish and what has been proven to be acheivable
thing is chess has a lot more wiggle room than tic tac toe has
Chess has zero wiggle room
It has rigid rules
The rules do not allow for any deviation
That's what makes chess a solvable problem
neither does tic tac toe
There is no possible new input or moves
it is known as a "finite sequential perfect information game"
thing with tic tac toe is that a single wrong move will immediatley mean you lost
like instantly
which chess does not have
That's because tik tac toe is solved
bruh
tic tac toe has no ability for the second player to win against a perfect game
exactly zero
yes
theres no statistics
When there is a large enough computer chess will be just as easy
there is literally only one "winning" strategy
^
The difference to you is that tick toe is a simple enough game that you can solve it in your mind
Humans will never be able to solve chess in their head
yea no shit
and using formal logic you can prove that chess is the same as tic tac toe
who cares, ofc chess has finite steps and means it can be solved? big shit, nobody will play against a computer like that
which in the end is statistics
You don't know the difference between a solve problem and an unsolved problem is the issue
There is no statistics involved in a solve problem
the reason why tic tac toe has no second strategy is because statistically every move deviating spells an instant loss
theres a difference between statistics and truth tables
its not statistics that xor leads to a specific output
Statistics are only used when you don't have all the data
this
There's no reason to use statistics when all data is known
and how do you determine what youtput you want?
Because it will always give you a worse answer than just analyzing the data
the question becomes whether for both opposite sides the factually best move will cause the game to a) become statistical b) make one side always win in which case just delete the game
you follow the solution algorithm
if you alrgorithm involves looking at plays it is statistics
if you wanna do it with pure logic that is something else ig?
When chess solved it will be known if white or black wins
It will be impossible to win with the other
Because if you know every single possible game one will have better success than the other
you can build the algorithm by looking at all of the plays
And does it will be impossible to win with the worst
no like I misunderstood what they meant
they didn't mean to solve it how it is "solved" rn by making a statistically best move
You don't know if a statistically best move is the best move until you know all data
That's what the difference is
but by analizing the logic so deeply that you have an equation that gives you the best move based on the logic of the game
Once you know every single possible move it is no longer statistically best it's the factally best
yes
you dont need a deterministic system to come to a deterministic solution
Just because two methods lead the same result did not mean the methods are the same
since the statistic for that game is so fucked
it isnt solved? but theoretized to so that 1 side always wins? sad if true
flawed game
It is entirely possible the statistically best move will also be the factally best move
you pretended like they wouldn't result in the same
I never said that they would be different moves
not to that point
we "solved" chess statistically
not logically
It would just be different models
The difference is actually knowing and being able to prove it is the best move
Vs guessing
the theory states there is a solution, and we have proofs that classical computers cant calculate it
Once chess is solved there will be no improvements
carmon pretended they were
no we didnt
see the quotes
what? where
Now chess models can be improved
Once chess is solved it is impossible to improve
That's the difference
here
new rulesets 😉
The board game "Go" has more possible variations then there are atoms in the universe
no matter if you use the statistic or logical approach for tic tac toe
you get the same result
Well no, even football changes rules
Correlation does not prove causation
Just because two models have the same output doesn't mean they are the same model
if you explore the complete set of options its not statistics
shogi moment
I was told that "I was just wrong"
you are wrong about statistics, not about the solution being the same regardless of how you approach it
which is not the case
tic tac toe winning strategy still is more about statistics than just logic
rolling a dice 10 million times will never allow you to predict the next result
thats statistics
You don't get the difference between a solved and unsolved problem that is the issue
tic tac toe has a complete truth table
It has nothing to do with what game it's applied to
thats not true. dice rolling isn't statistical in nature
yea but you have a very observable amount of options
I don't know why you keep getting hung up on the game and how easy it is to be
A game being solved is a factual thing
I do
It has nothing to do with how good other models can beat the game
Has nothing to do with how easy it is for a human to beat the game
but realistically if you play tic tac toe what will you do in your head
Being solved means that it can't be improved that's it
statiscial approach or think of the logic of tic tac toe
ah right you are trying to predict possible moves
Tic-tac-toe and chest being solvable has nothing to do with how easy it is for a human to win
Being solvable means that you can know all possible moves
Being solved means all possible moves are known
That's not statistics
it is though
No it is not
Statistics is the analysis of data
In order to predict missing data
You would never use statistical analysis on a complete data set
tell that to your brain
We arent talking about brains
We are talking about cold hard math
Which does not require brains
what if I want to calculate the mean of the complete data set Oo
According to Mr. Google I'd still be performing stat analysis
well you can easily generate that full data set
for chess
Now google is hardly a source, so I am asking you
No you can't
Go look up the Shannon number
There has always been a lot of the debate on the possible moves of chess
The number of possible moves is far exceeding current computational power
ah yes
even the wikipedia article immediatley cuts it down
10^40 still is a lot
not something you couldn't generate though
- you cold prob cut duplicates
since you don't care which pieces are black or white for any given move, you only care which side can move for a certain move
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/computer-science/nash-equilibrium
this part of game theory is an explanation and proof of a perfect game of chess
ah so, statistical until proven otherwise then, just like dice rolling.
sorta
we have the proof
but we cannot perform the computation to implement it
we also dont know if the perfect game allows for a win, or if it only forces a draw
like in tic tac toe
But wouldn't it be logically correct to say it's random, if we haven't the means to predict or calculate the outcome yet. We may be close but not quite there yet.
Idk how do you restore this amount of loss of trust for Linus
His reputation has taken a major nosedive
for a human observer, statistical not random but yea absolutely
but theres no reason that we couldnt build a machine that does it in theory
You can't partner with them as a company or you'll get shafted, nor as a consumer you can trust his content either cause of major inaccuracies
if its doable it should be done!
this is infuriating
Linus has been petty for a while now
hopefully we build the ai that does that before we build the ai that kills us with diamond nanobots
It's fun though that we can finally establish this formally on the record
Good stain on his rep
Maybe he will learn... he won't learn right
This will just be brushed under the carpet forever
such is the risk of openness
I saw a good comment actually
U guys are acting like Linus should care lmfao
As a CEO you can NEVER admit wrongdoing
guy has millions, can just retire and do fuck all for rest of his life
Or you will get sued in court with borderline automatic success
Since you literally admitted that you did something wrong
the org that does all this bs but doesnt publicize it will outcompete the one that makes it public
That's why CEOs nearly always just do a "PR response" and brush it under the radar
that only applies to public companies, not the shareholders
and yvonne umbrella corp isnt public in the slightest
what they are is honest
they honestly state exactly what they do, and you can judge for yourself the ethics and morality
Not really honest when his PR response was already full of lies 
thats cool and all, but why would anyone actually pay LMG anything? or Subscribe to?
theres a difference between honesty and truthfulness
i can 100% honestly tell you x product is better than y product
but i can be 100% wrong about that
if you think something is right when its wrong and you say so, that;'s still honest
if they dont think they had issues, that is honest
^
Unless Linus has been completely in the dark of what his own employees are doing
doesnt have to be in the dark just have to disagree with the viewpoint
he learns about it on the wan show
Saying "We already talked to billet about this and came up with an agreement" when it was done AFTER the video has been published
That's not honest or truthful
That's literally just lies
at the point he said that it was true
now was it ethical for him to think that is true?
thats up for debate here
but it was honest
he thought he had come to a reasonable solution
we all disagree
but he still thought it
Wait wait wait I missed this one
well it matters alot if you can trust something to be honest
Billet SENT THEM A 3090Ti
Cause LTT tested it on 4090
And they lost not only the damn waterblock
They lost the 3090Ti too
yeah
Yeah idk what on earth is going on with this shitstorm
yiiiikes
they said they were out the only block and only gpu
How to fuck over a startup
also the wording really makes it sound as if that happened before the GN video where billet said they got essentialyl ghosted
literally irepprable harm
that would have been an easy thing to do, say X went wrong, we already reached out to billet to make up for it
would have instantly given them points
instead of acting like GN reported on outdated/missing facts
well thats not true
it is time and materials
ltt can in fact afford to pay their time and the materials
they couldnt send it to other reviewers
it would be probably 10s of thousands rather than just like 200 to do it right the first time
not irepprable but a lot of immaterial harm is probably the best way to phrase it
lost opportunity cost etc.
eh not like they couldnt make another one given enough time and money
i dont expect ltt to make it right, but they absolutely could
yes they didnt have time and money though
read the full text of what i said
