#🔌│tech
1 messages · Page 94 of 1
I'm sure it's improved now software wisebut it was too much of a compromise with those god rays as that was one of the reasons to upgrade from the rift at the time
Spending 1k for a glorified beta tester and it wasn't that much better overall, in my opinion.
Before it was 300 quid vs 800 quid... similar experience.
One has a meta login, one doesn't.
well the whole being able to move your hands behind your back is useful
Well yes but like
as are the better controllers
especially when DNS blocking exists
or 1000 if you want nuckle things
as is the higher refresh
quest 2 has 120hz
the knuckles are quite worth it...
Had both an AMD and NVIDIA rig at the time both same issues sadly.
q2 was like a whole 2 years later, and the index is 144hz, brighter, and with lower persistence
Did this go down in price?
usd price has never changed
I rounded up in my head my bad, was £900 something
Oh rigth ye controller no sensors
I just think its abysmal pricing
Especially compared to a Quest 1
Back then
Quest 1 had OLED etc
q1 had trouble over 72hz lmao
Yeah this is the thing on paper I thought it would be great and then couldn't believe the end result. The rift s was legitimately 80 - 90% in terms of quality and performance for so little
it got 90hz about when the q2 released
that is the one ive never tried, so cant comment
oled smears hardcore
Point is 900 quid for LCD 144hz
and theres no way around it
Noice
The comparison at the time was index Vs rift s not quest 1.
The IPD adjustment
Headphones
Higher refresh rate
Improved tracking
Are the main pros from rift s.
Ok to be specific.... 460
and for the same tracking experience as the q1 you can use 1 base station
you only need 2 for behind the back tracking
no
Like wtf
You dont get base stations unless you buy max bundle
or seperate
which the sensors are 140 quid....
again for the same tracking as a q2, you only need 1 base station
I expected a big gap and missed the 144hz but it was acceptable to the 90hz or whatever I couldnt justify paying over double for it when there were more godrays on the important parts.
The tracking of rift s on launch was bad but by the index launch the update out significantly improved it so there were no real problems for me and I wasn't missing anything from the index.
In isolation if I didn't pick up the rift s in comparison I wouldn't have known they were so close
still 600 quid
yep
Now ill admit they are close, but Quest 2 for years was 300 quid
and quest 1 was similar....
add on nice headphones and some accessories to fix the strap of the q2
then a cable
thats about the same price as long as you get wands instead of knuckles
For the quest 2 yeah it's no comparison it's better screen, lenses and works on its own.
It's why valve really should have released an index 2 with at least an upgraded screen and lenses
can you even buy wands?
ye but it hurts to wear for more than an hour
ye but from htc not valve
I have no comfort issues with my quest 2, using bobo headstrap it works well. I definitely get the issue with the stock strap but it's £20
and the audio
Audio?
getting audio as good as the index is not cheap
THis price is just wand + headset +1 tracker
yes
and the index includes nice earspeakers
Already had headphones to use so it was ok for me. The audio isn't amazing on the quest but it's definitely serviceable
you must be joking
No, its pretty damn good.
you mean when using earbuds or something right?
yes
Strange, i still use it over my k612 pros and now HD6XXs
🤨
Its not bad I'd say but I prefer headphones.
When SIM racing if I get too hot or need to be listening out for the door I'll use the built in audio no problem
it has the impact of a baby with a pool noodle
Pool noodles hurt
add 100 for some headphones
you cant compare the tracking
another 50 for strap
at all
and 70 for a cable of equivalent length
50 for a strap o,0
audio isnt even the thing to compare for the two lol
o.0 15 quid anker
Oh its not a value argument, index loses hard.
You can get koss headphones that clip on which are the same as the cv1 so very decent for £15
approved by oculus same length
^
not as good as the index
Yeah but not £300+ worth by a mile
sure
Its still significantly cheaper regardless lol, if i get an index i do not want a wand
but you are paying for a pile of features
sure
Your argument is just stupid
but the point is there is in fact more that you get
Buying a Wand for the Index
vive/index tracking is leagues beyond the quest.
As the screen is worse, you can do 120hz on quest 2 now with a higher density screen and better lenses.
It was a hard sell but you could reason it at the time of launch but now it's long in the tooth that it doesn't compare really
But you literally dont, the biggest factor for the Index is purely tracking.
🤷 you wanted to compare like for like
the quest is good enough
the vive/index is perfect when it isnt occulded
I wont pay 500+ more for tracking
its lower density or lower fov
index lets you choose
you would if youre like me and get motion sick
this too
I dont think you are getting the point.
and the tracking is amazing
I mean the pixel density on the quest 2 is higher than the index, smaller or larger fov setting.
The difference in price is just not there
plus my vive controllers work as trackers
🤷 you get what you pay for
We are coming from a new person type of argument
no its not
not effectivly if you are playing via pc
If you have two trackers from vive and wand then ye... more reasonable
the quest looses some quailty over usb
the resolution difference is less than 1%
Wot
wand?
yea if you are moving fast you can see compression artifacts
I think you are like
its unfair to compare knuckles to touch
How do you come to that conclusion? The resolution per eye is higher on quest 2 and a smaller fov, pixel density is higher than the index.
yeah it isnt native displayort over usb
its sub 1% higher
index is uncompressed video
the index has lower density when the fov is higher
idk, 300 quid for pretty damn good vr vs 919 quid...
and the index has higher density when the fov is lower
that hasn't been a huge increase since vive other than contollers.
yes 300 quid is good
but the 919 quid is also good
I wouldn't bother which is why i skipped it
and you are getting what you pay for
if you want it as a novilty its fine to get a quest
Valve purists lol
the index/vive is something valve has commited to for a while
which means upgrades
all the vive and index stuff is compatible out of the box
i challenge you to use a quest as a monitor for more than 6 hours
One why would i? two i did a little when i was in bigscreen for a few hours.
the index i will admit does definetly need some adjustment and time to set it correctly, but once its set up, you can use it for 8 hours straight
But again, whyyyyyyyyyy would i.
quest 1 controllers dont even work with the 2
More than 6 hours? I don't even use my main one for 6 straight, I take a break haha
and same with 2 controllers on a quest 1
I wont deny the controllers could be better on the Quest 2 tho.
why buy an extra monitor?
where you can conbine any number of index and vive controllers and lighthouses
I just dont feel you get what you pay for with Index... only the tracking which didn't really update holds its value imo.
This is just, mind boggling.
i dont have space for a tv
way way better tracking
and upgradability
well the index is almost 4 years years ols so ofc now the value seems lower for the price
I mean tbf the tracking itself was its own product
if we talk about the headset itself
i mean
quest 2 is heavily subsidized also
valve made all the tech
Yes i know.
to be fair its only really a problem for competitive gaming
its a package
yeah but i notice it
i ahve a quest
for when people come over
Ill admit this one..
and i dont trust them with index lol
Quest 2 tracking in beat saber can be a pita.
I just wish I could play beat saber on the quest 2 without having issues lol
I still dispute your claim of pixel density being higher on index.
It's not possible?
1440x1600 per eye resolution
Vs
1720×1890 per eye on quest 2?
In a slightly smaller fov so the density is always higher?
I wish the sound on my Rift wasn't broken so I could just continue to use that
But anyway, the tracking is a product of a previous headset, im talking purely about the headset here mostly.
Even that on its own is quite pricy.
or well
controllers + headset
Since the headset without anything is 460
also i have a index and a vive pro 2
Damn son
and i really really wish vavle would do wireless
the index allows you to change fov...
Quest Link is great... quite demanding and not flawless ofc
you can go from like 80 to over 120
i thought index was software fov?
Idk but Windows headsets did a similar thing.
knob on the right adjusts
servo
The fov does not change the pixel density as the panels are still rendering the same you just a closing off part of the panel?
The lowest fov setting is still a bit more than the quest 2
you are thinking of ipd ye
yea and crash the lenses into someones eyeballs good idea
or glasses
Either way, only way i would get an index is if it was cheaper... because i wanted one, its just to much of an investment when you dont have any previous trackers etc
yep
all valid points
but it is hard to debate that the index is a more refined experience
And yes Quin you are right, price is lower because they can.
and the index also has the advantage of not being ad supported
But at the same time i ask myself.
Why do i care, one is insanely cheaper than the other and pretty close experience so why bother.
Quest 2 still isnt ad supported tho
and by ad im also including the user data grabbing
yes it is
Valve totally dont collect data?.....
Ad supported??? What?
valve doesnt collect pictures of your room
and you have the option to not send crash reports
What
because that shows why a difference of lets say 500€ wouldn't get you a difference of 500€ worth of stuff
should not have said ad supported
how about um
user data sale supported
for buying it it wont matter but it matters to see why the difference could be big
You dont get 500 worth of difference and i was saying pounds.
Meta account isn't tied to Facebook profiles.
Device processes images, not Facebook.
That's not the valid point to make, there are plenty of other things but that isn't
yes I said you dont get that ammount of difference, that was my point...
you receive about 300 worth of hardware differences
the question is if the user data collection is enough to tip the balance for you...
the answer for you is obviously no
Again.
Index is old and price hasn't changed, valve don't have economies of scale so charge a high price for low volume product.
Price has stayed the same but tech moved on, it has good pros still but is far worse value these days and it wasn't good value before it was just top of the line at all cost.
The data they collect is not on the same scale as say Facebook
are you sure?
Im pretty sure, especially since i dont post my life on there.
What if I told you that you don't need a Facebook account to use the quest 2? 🙂
Every single company collects data.
the relative value prop of the index has technically improved since the release of the q2
Especially Valve.
How?
yes but valve prompts you before it happens lel
the quest 2 increased in price and the index did not lmao
"Raw images are processed only on the headset and not sent to Meta or third parties"
"All the sensors on the headset (including cameras and microphones) are disabled when your headset enters sleep mode"
yes
and they follow that exactly
"Valve may share anonymous data, aggregated or not, with third parties."
Oh I see the quest 2 increased by $100 and doubled it storage so it wasn't that big of a hike.
You also ignore the big factor, quest runs without a pc and surprisingly well.
"Valve does not sell Personal Data. However, we may share or provide access to each of the categories of Personal Data we collect as necessary for the following business purposes."
yep but facebook does sell personal data lel
As the index released before quest 2 I don't think you can say it's value went up as the quest 2 launch really did kill the value aspect
They share data with Google Analytics because well coockies etc, they share between their own parties and partners.
Only thing they dont do is "sell" it
i said since the release,,,
But they still share and give access to it.
yes but that you do in fact have to confirm before it gets sent
I think people are just to tinfoil.
and it is possible to first party disable it
Yeah since the release of q2 but that's not true, the quest 2 launched and gave a standalone device that is significantly cheaper?
And thats me saying that lol
ah but its not capable of playing hla standalone
Trying to find it but i remember seeing something about the data being completely separated and not sold
😮💨
and its a signficantly worse experience in every other game standalone
And a lot of its opt in now
Aww I wanted facepalm but that didn't exist xD
Especially on initial setup
🤦
Im not denying there is data tracking, i think you're just going to tinfoil.
And that its no where near as bad as what they do on Facebook/Insta etdc
prove it
😛
No point trying.
only a quitter would say that
it was a rhetorical question...
I mean you can't say it doesn't play HLA standalone so it's not a value when it has PCVR wireless /wired AND standalone.
It's a valid value component. I can play beatsabre where I want without a fixed room or walking dead
I have no trust in meta, i just think its exaggerated with the VR aspect.
And its also why i waited for Meta account launches as i used Oculus Legacy account lol
You can't prove a negative.
Prove valve isn't selling your data?
because they dont have it
You can't, you can say they claim they dont
i can prove they dont have it
Yes they do.
They do personalised ads on their own platform.

that is the steam store itself
Oh my lawd.
you are not required to use the steam store on the headset
Which is part of the steam client?
its a website
valve only collects logs about your use of the headset when you send them
eg crash reports
But if you give that to them how do you prove they didn't sell it?
Doesn;t the steam client literally collect device data
there wouldnt be a way
Exactly
again you are prompted
That's the point
Not the survey
but they cant sell what they dont have
Survey is prompted to update data they have already.
or when it detects a change in hardware
ye they do fingerprint your device on login
So what does meta have?
You use the store... This is the same as you using the steam store
yep
never disputed that they collect some data
You did
what I disputed was that they collected user data
aka information about what you are doing
Oh dear
yep correct
But the steam client collects hardware data
I'm not being this pedantic, its just not worth it.
if you log into the store yes
Same
I think im done xD
Enjoy what you enjoy
like theres a big difference between knowing what computer a person is using and actually recording the physical movements of the user
if @pale sigil and @tropic nacelle both look through my messages, youll notice i never actually said what people should buy
i just explained that there is in fact a difference, and that difference does in fact cost money...
people should make an informed decision, and i will admit that for most people, the more logical decision is the q2
The cameras? Or the IMU? Yeah I mean your point was ad supported on the quest which is not true (you added user data as well), like I say it had pros but the value aspect has declined with age as the price hasn't moved and better headsets are out (not better in all aspects)
no thats raw data
they record estimated pos
But they don't send it as it's processed on the device, locally. As they stated many times over the years now
There is no ad supporting on quest 2, it is subsidised and being sold at cost no doubt but there aren't ads
again
they process the data first
before sending it
facebook is always rather careful about wording
They also specified its deleted after processing and that data is not sent...
they literally have a patent about using body movement data to target advertising
yep
the original unprocessed data
again its wording
read carefully
they just dont specify because people assume
🤷 they have many many many horrifically dystopian patents
They use the video, process on the machine to gain position from this and then send that on.
How is that bad? They aren't sending the photo or anything
I'll grasp your windstraws
give em a squeeze
loads of people do
and most aren't executed till they are
Soooo, till then you are tinfoil mode.
The video and images are deleted, you need position data.
Having a patent about advertising doesn't mean you do advertising ....
A patent has no bearing on what's on a device.....
They send post render captures
Many captures of your screens would include pictures of your room
Qed
A system and method is provided that drives microtransactions in multiplayer video games. The system may include a microtransaction arrange matches to influence game-related purchases. For instance, the system may match a more expert/marquee player with a junior player to encourage the junior player to make game-related purchases of items ...
Ye it's my mistake for saying ads when I meant data collection for targeting
pretty sure this is still not acted on yet either, just because a patent is made does not mean its used right away, if they ever do then ye fair game.
2 reasons to release a patent
It's an obvious idea that is near market but not patented yet
It's not obvious but you will release a product using it soon
You can't release a patent after there's an example already for sale
Many captures would include pictures of my room?
I feel like you are making assumptions here now.
My main point being its not in action yet.
Till then its silly to say it is.
I will happily jump on the band wagon if even activision used their patent
If you get a patent approved everyone can see it. Of course you apply for patent with an idea incase it becomes relevant and good later on
That too
Again prove it
They did already use VR headsets I forget which where they were testing advertisement effectiveness
"To improve the hand tracking feature, we collect certain data from your device when you choose to use hand tracking. This data includes your usage data, estimated hand size, and source image telemetry (e.g., exposure, contrast)"
Sounds like they don't get the image when it also says it's all deleted locally and processed locally.
The only bits sent on are extrapolated from that image which is NOT the image.
And yeah the fact quest 2 has hand tracking is another feature I guess heh.
Works ok, it's got substantially better with the later update last year
Haha early adopters tax, easiest way to deal with that is say you had X months of use which is worth Y difference
would be better if the boards weren't so fucking expensive
AMD claims cheaper board next month
same argument I had for buying an r5 3600 when I did
soon^tm
comparable intel CPU was actually a bit cheaper, and performed a bit better in benchmarks iirc
boards were a solid hundred or so bucks more expensive than AMD comparable at best
yeah AMD is in an awkward position this time around for mainstream CPUs
not counting threadripper
and intel noticed that and now its near the exact opposite lel
profits
pwofitsss
margins are related to profits
higher margin is what I meant
idk how much amd can influence board makers compared to how much intel can though
yeah that's an interesting dynamic we don't know about
is it like nvidia or reverse nvidia

amd definetly has the disadvantage of using 2 chips to match the features of one intel chip
and it is noooot a small chip
I shouldn't laugh
i got a 5600x at launch
xD
280 quid from ocuk
yeah and intel has the benefit of idm prices vs tsmc/gf prices
5600x didnt really have anything that was out 6 months later that lowered prices though
that tooka while longer
the 5600x itself dropped in price lel
are the new ryzen cpus good
well in the us it was 50 off relatively soon
yes but february is when the better ones come
there arent any bad cpus really
but define good...
With the talk about how they were splitting the board chipset into two chips I really thought boards were going to be cheaper then last gen
depends on platform cost
and yea depends on what you want it for
for what
solid no
intel slightly ahead in everywhere
so intel has better value rn ok
unless you need avx512
it depends on what you use it for
idk what's your budget and use case?
Board cost too high, only possible adcantage is in theory you could easily upgrade with the 8000, 9000, etc. cpus
so the chip itself isn't bad value, its just the board?
again, it depends on what you use it for
the chips arent cheap
the boards arent cheap
and they dont support ddr4
I remember when the z370 boards cost like double the prices of a b450
well yes
When people ask if something is good they usually want a comparison price wise with the closest competitors. Stip being pedantic
and you needed good cooler to OC
bad example lel
all those extra costs made me go for the 3600 xd
you need a muuuuuuuch stronger cooler if you want to oc amd
he still hasn't stated a use case
and several people want just as fast as possible
myself included
no one really ocs amd
because its hard and requires a ton of effort
I think performance increase wasn't worth the extra $
intel was relatively aloot easier to oc
you could easily push it super far on just air cooling
but then they kept adding cores...
AMD mostly maximises what you get out of a chip these days, there isn't much left on the table which in a way is a good thing for the general public but a bit of a loss for those who used to overclock heavily
yes cause the kcpus were pretty much meant for OC
wait you don't OC intel chips anymore?
"Hey I need help selecting a device, is this one good"
"Everything is good!"
"But like what is the best"
"Everything is best! Unless you consider the things!"
"What's the best for the things?"
"Well that depends, they are all good :::::DDDDDDF"
Like just ask for use case straight up and stop playing games
im not buying anything
"everything is best" is demonstrably false
Context is key yes, good products are relative to the budget and primary uses
still no use case
It's an exaggeration of the what the other guy said god damn
still is a strawman
Gaming, working, at what price?
cause back in the day you could literally answer "ryzen for budget, intel if you want to spend extra on single core perf and do all your OC stuff"
and you would be wrong if you said that
that was the answer back in the day though
"people said that" doesnt make it correct
The value component was valid for AMD from really 2000 series onwards.
For games of didn't being a "just get AMD" until 3000
ic, well I was just wondering what you guys thought of current cpu market
the 8100f slaughtered the 1600af for cheaper
Generally before you would say Intel for best gaming performance but AMD for value for money
ah I meant 2600/3600
in the US
cpu market is in pretty good competition and it's funny to laugh at intel for having so many delays in all markets lel
back when intel didn't lower their prices XD
which were beaten by the 8400f
the low end f series were pretty good deals
it was always a tradeoff
the deals came later, months after intel realized amd was killing their market
wait when did they add HT to lower end parts?
and they were only comparable in gaming
@gusty kiln then
cause their multicore perf was very very different
yes but they were the same performance for aloooot cheaper
I think now the 13th gen i3 and i5s are better value in general for gaming right now.
AM5 boards are too expensive right now but it's getting closer in total package cost.
buzzer noise incorrect
I remember when battlefield was not hot garbage and it was causing the some 8th gen i5 to stutter a lot
the 2700x smashed the 8700k in productivity
that was basically it
everything else same price got you the same perf
with intel taking a miiiiinor lead in st and amd taking a miiiinor lead in mt
i mean if you look at benchmarks, the 2600 is a lot better than the 8400f in multicore
and when the 3600 released
depends on the benchmarks
9400f wasn't comparable
9400f was extremely comparable lel
do a quick bit of ram oc and the 9400f was a screamer
benefited alot more from ram oc than the 3000 series did surprisingly enough
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxed
AMD Ryzen 5 3600: https://amzn.to/2NBu0nT
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X: https://amzn.to/2S2gKap
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X: https://amzn.to/2FYuttY
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X: https://amzn.to/2FYvja9
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X: https://amzn.to/2FYuCh0
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X: https://amzn.to/2RrkJx1
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X: https:/...
you can take a look at any 3600 vs 9400f review on tests like blender etc.
except the intel was noticeably cheaper
again depends on the benchmark
yes that was when they slashed the prices
no
which was like months after
again no
and at that point it was just comparable for gaming
the intel boards were cheaper
and the 3200 low cl sticks that were fantastic on intel were alot cheaper than the 3600 sticks you wanted on amd
heck with intel you could go way further down the stack and get a very solid board
buzzer noise incorrect
a good ram oc is over 50% at the high end
and intels low end with the tiny caches benefited alot more
and no i mean stock vs stock
with xmp 3200 low cl vs 3600 at same price
You didn't need 3600mhz for AMD it was just peak performance against infinity fabric clocks.
3200mhz with reasonable timings were fine
you get 50% more performance with good ram oc?
yep
Receive an additional $25 credit for Ting today when you sign up at https://linus.ting.com/
Use code LINUS and get 25% off GlassWire at https://lmg.gg/glasswire
Everyone knows Ryzen LOVES fast RAM.. But AMD made some tweaks to the 3000-series that make it less straightforward. So what should YOU buy for third-gen Ryzen?
Buy a Ryzen 5 3600:
On...
is this some extreme ram oc
from worst ram to best oc ram you can double your perf
yep
but the point is you can gain alot
and 3200 c14 was aloooooooooot cheaper than 3600 c18 at the time
do you have a link to an article/post
I don't remember seeing such perf gains in the past
even though infinity fabric did become a lot more important after zen 2
oh you mean 50% gains for intel
itll take me a while
wait I thought intel didn't care about ram back in the day
thats all I remember hearing
yeah my 3700X had trouble with 3600 a few times
what you heard wasnt nescessarily the truth lel
I lived in bapc for about 6 months back when I was building pcs for other ppl as a hobby
again same story
but then I stopped cause life yenno
bapc is not known for stopping to think deeply
ye but thats where ppl go to get builds from XD
🤷 doesnt mean the advice is correct
and also just because the intel was technically faster if you spec exactly correctly doesnt mean that people should buy it
well again its all about value
and use case
which is why ryzens were flying off the shelves
yep but we already figured out that intel did in fact have a value advantage despite their sales not reflecting that...
and ppl only bought intel for OCing high performance purposes, or because there was some sick sale once in a blue moon
well no
intel outsold amd alot:1
pretty sure it was between 3 and 4 besides in germany
I'd believe it 100% that intel outsold amd a lot
even back during the zen 2 boom
but back then most ppl only thought about intel
KingFaris10's Site
cause amd had been throwing out mediocre chips for the better part of the last decade
Definitely depends on the game, at 3200 cas 14 for both 9600k and 3600 they performed very similarly in TPU games, not much in it some wins and losses between them.
Intel was always known to be less latency sensitive so they gained less from ram increases and were competitive with 3200 no doubt. Just wasn't required for either though
and also intel has so many more pre-build deals
"mediocre"
buzzer noise incorrect
ryzen dgaf about latency
all that mattered was that the fclk be synced and as high as possible
yes from the piledrivers or w/e you call them to the first ryzens
4gb file
An example of windows copy being abysmal 🙂
first ryzens were decent at best but still lacked the single core perf that ppl wanted
they were not mediocre
they were atrocious
XDDD
Phenom was faster
I guess I should've said mediocre at best
Should have been more clear, because the fabric speed is 1:1 up to 3600mhz it benefited more.
The end result is yes it benefited more from faster ram being setup
Could not use teracopy sadly
Phenom was a beast, screw Intel did AMD so dirty.
Well let's not exaggerate here...
I mean paying for big businesses like dell to not sell competitor CPU was pretty dirty.
With a crippled income R&D suffers immensely
Phenom was faster than it's successors yes
A beast it was not
🤷 it happens both ways
Intel just had more money to throw around
Maybe I have a spot for it because I had an X3 and unlocked it into a fully working x4, those were the days haha
I took a look at the intel ram stuff
the avg seems like a 10% increase at best
between 3200cl16 and the top ram ocs
Nah it doesn't happen both ways, there is giving discounts and then there is telling them no money unless you 100% don't sell our competitors.
It's why they were fined but AMD needed the money so had to take the small 1 billion
I dont remember exactly how much ram costed back in the day but im pretty sure it wasn't worth it and thats why it wasn't being recommended XD
easier and cheaper to get more performance by upgrading cpu instead of paying 100$+ more for the best ram
That's not quite correct
But I bought my 3200 c14 for 100 for 32gb
And make sure you are looking at the auto
Because you can do a ton of secondary and tert tuning to make things faster
isn't auto on intel set at like 2133 or something
if you don't touch the xmp settings at all
but back then the cheapest and best value ram was either 3000cl15 or 3200cl16
2666 for 9000
i got lucky with my x3d
That auto is same thing for AMD, they are both low and you need to load the overclock profile for your ram as technically they are overclocks
That's incorrect by being a definite statement
The best value ram depended on the CPU you bought
she dosent complain running 2000 fabricx
ah yeah if you buy like 9900k and need some more perf, the extra $ you spend on better ram is probably worth
just cause ram is smaller % of overall budget
Buzzer noise again
High end parts had more cache
More cache = less caring about ram speed
ok but theres no way you spend all that extra $$$ for 4200cl16 ram when you're running a 8400f
which was the whole point of the intel vs amd convo for budget builds in the first place
yeah
4200cl16 zooming
avoid anything lower than a 13700
there are specific chips that overclock well
you buy kits that only have those chips
like bdie or something
yeeep
i got a solid kit of ewaste special bdie for partially free
micron chips are called rev-#
so micron e = rev e
my ewaste special bdie stock is 2400 c16
it overclocks to 3800c17
also quite happy at 3200 c14
i bought 3200 c14 bdie, and that stuff ive never managed to push to its limits bc the 1900x is my limiting factor for it
hmmm well since you guys want a use case and budget, what if someone wanted to buy a cpu + mobo + ram for 500$
assuming 16gb of ram
wait for new stuff to release
id assume not really
the zen4 vcache cpus are coming in a month
since gpu encoders can do the job for streaming these days
probably 5000 ryzen then likely
perhaps mid 13th gen ddr4 will fit?
ic
then if the budget were to be raised a little higher to like 700$
would you go intel?
ok
good to know
either way im not upgrading rn, but ill wait and see what comes out ig
once you are actually at ddr5 really the diff between the two is minimal, but then x3d will change that...
we'll have to see with the V$ cpus since some games will get 0 uplift and some could see a lot, so that will be a more situational thing probably
I feel like gaming is such an easy requirement for hardware these days
also for the 2ccd versions it'll depend on how well the scheduler will work
"170w" to "120w" is a big change
depends on the monitor lel
software used to take big hits on hardware but now everything can run x
more about how many extra frames you can get so you can appreciate the difference between 144 and 200 fps XD
I mean if we run 30fps@720 sure, above that we have games and resolutions that challenge that
oh yeah resolutions are a thing, but your gpu will die first def
ig in that regard we're not caught up at all
gpus are speeding up faster than cpus can keep up
we'll still need a much bigger performance jump though if we want proper RT implementations to run well
everything is cpu limited at 1080p on the 4090 and 7900s
1440p too
and in many many games at 4k too
not with heavy RT and such
At 4k? No
At 1440p? Depends on the game
This also assumes you are talking about higher than 60hz screens
also true
control on high settings is gpu limited for me lel
4090 and 7900xt
if your cpu was 2x faster, your fps would be signiiiificantly higher
well I guess with RT being partly limited by cpu due to the way it is, not wrong I guess
the point is that your fps can be gpu limited, but it is not gpu bound
the only way I know how to test gpu vs cpu bottleneck is to see if gpu usage is at 99%
that was the old method XD
if it was at 99%, then you're being gpu bottlenecked
otherwise, cpu bottlenecked
or just bad game design
yep and thats not always correct
usage isn't really a useable indicator anymore
much simpler back then
more power now
if your gpu power usage is 100% of its power limit, a faster gpu will increase your performance
i dont think anything else is particularly provable
Yes no upscalers or frame interpolation to wonder "what is a valid frame "
The old days were simpler better or worse in the games you play. Now it's a little more difficult to pick the pros and cons completely
no just ignore it until you are unhappy with the performance
Im perfectly happy with my 5700 xt
You are always going to hit a bottleneck it's just accepting a point you are happy with really.
Most mid range CPU is going to cover you for most games like the 5600x or i5 equivalent these days.
so ignore it lel
have fun until it starts being a problem
That is the best advice
yes but if cpus had increased in perf as much as gpus, our fps would be aloooooooooot higher
lowkey my rx 570 I had before wasn't giving me any problems, but I really just wanted a decent encoder
oops
Yeah it's a very different workload though sadly!
I guess playing with power/clock limit does make for a somewhat good way to see if the gpu is the limitation for a usecase
nope
but easiest way is probably just looking at reviews if another card goes faster lel
it may tell you if the gpu is A limitation
but nowdays both parts will increase your performance...
sure, but some obvious cases like if you have an AI heavy thing won't see any change if it's just hard limited by that
sure but thats usually not raw fps
huh
civ its seconds per turn for example
oh I dont mean something like civ, but if you have a crown in a sity cim, like cities skylines or so
i havent seen any graphs of cities skylines where a bunch of different hardware had the same performance?
I have no clue about it, it was just the best thing I could think of
most games like gta do crowd sim in a less heavy way
sim is probably server tick rate
huh, 30 is actually not bad for 128 players
and mp/s is probably pixels per second
could be I guess
it shows 3.6 which means it could go as high as what is that bit over 250 fps?
does 2042 have a local game mode or so?
so could be singleplayer goes as high as fps
think for solo bot matches
i mean csgo doesnt do that
internal sim rate is often limited for physics consistency reasons
yeah but this is EA and they are weird
but the legend above it says fps/ms as if its not a x out of y but the same in different units
idk how 30fps would be 3.6ms though
it takes 3.6 ms to calculate
and then limits it, yeah would make sense
and they wait 1/30 of a second after the previous calculation to calculate again
would make sense but just weird to display it like that
🤷 its how ive always seen it when both were needed
What makes it awesome compared to other all in one?
oh wow looking at ebay, I should sell my 6800 lol
you slot the computer in there
roughly 400
lol no, 500+
Oh fair, I did wonder why there was a power header and display port header.
How expensive are the upgrades?
its the price of a normal sff desktop
because it is their normal sff desktop
thinkcenter tiny's
Oh ok, maybe I thought too much. Is this just the "pc" part comes.off the monitor rear or something?
what SoC?
yup
Tiny little babypc
Fair enough, useful if you don't need the compactness of a complete sealed thing and gives you the upgrade path.
Never seen them in person, are the monitor parts just a standard hp monitor IPS panel or something?
yup
we buy generic 24 inch business ones
they are a bit more expensive than normal monitors ~250 but they come with camera mic and speaker built in
Shop & save on the ThinkCentre Tiny-in-One 24 Inch Touch Monitor & hundreds of other popular PC, home, business & gaming accessories at Lenovo today ✔️ Free shipping
oh wait this one is touchscreen????
we dont get touchscreens
thats awesome i want it now
That seems like a nice way to have thin client setups, clean desks.
Can't stand the idea of speakers for everyone though xD
these arent even thin clients lel
that pc has a 6 core 65w capable i7 and a very low end quadro
Do they not do low spec versions of them?
Well "thin" kinda lost its meaning these days, but yeah i7 is not what I had in my head haha.
I assumed i3 or something would be nice just for meeting room pc or as a client pc.
Cool eitherway though for a cleaner setup
anyone here wanting to buy a 6800 so I dont need to deal with ebay and/or people lol
found one lmao
Yeah that would do just about haha. I love how it says it has windows 10 over 11 as a feature haha
we use them as our main desktops
tho bc i do a quad monitor setup, i actually use a dp cable into the back of the monitor so i can get that sweet sweet nvidia functional drivers
my boss agrees
currently have around 300 of them deployed lel
lenovo overnights us replacement parts lel
What phone?
I just restored to oem rom
Lesson learned I guess lol
Yeah I am not so certain vanilla android makes much sense anymore, especially with the hardware available today
Whatcha mean everything is normal sized
Anyways you can fiddle with those settings if it really bothers you
And this is why you do not give a gpu drugs
gpu drugs is overclocking
Yeah it's privacy, it's to avoid you connecting to a random phone and potentially have the data captured over there.
So you must reset it to be on a different device, makes sense but a pain if you flashing ROMs!
i wish that was it lol. was just. a broken viewer gpu from der8auer
Graphene is cool just cuz you can lock your bootloader
heck yea
got the bad switch in my sensei ten swapped for a working used one I salvaged out of a broken deathadder
no more doubleclicking frustration
217 votes and 100 comments so far on Reddit
Looks like the hd560s are not a go-to recommendation anymore
Downgrade in materials and bass quality
Just they way she goes bubs
intel not giving event hose to the reviewers after the recent lower tier skus just got dropped at CES with no info is just not a good look lol
Yeah not surprising since the hd600 got some downgrades a few years ago as well
Hwu already got a review, barely even 5% faster than 13900k on average
im in a tricky situation. I have a 3080ti msi suprim x, that i can sell and with that money i can either buy a 7900xt or 4070ti (Asus rog) no extra money or i can buy a 6950xt tuf gaming oc and make 200 +. what should i do
why do you want to sell it
because i can have smth slightly better for no cost
or smth even for 200 bucks in my pocket
depends on the game
except few RT games

eh
draw more power sure, but alos beats the 3080ti depending on which game
look at some games that you play or reviews with simialr titles and see what would make more sense for your use case
wait til there's actual measurements, these are all subjective listening tests
if you play lots of CoD get the amd card no questions asked for example
Apex mostly
I mean, doesnt that have an engine cap at like 300 anyway?
which means it depends if you would even gain anything from getting a better gpu
What resolution on apex?
Yeah, but I can see the slight pad material change affect the sound. Hope Resolve gets a pair to test. Just like how he did the sundara pad change.
How hard do you dip in bang ult/smoke with a 3080ti? and what cpu
13600kf
idk tbh
i can test in firing range
If you play all low should be able to get 200 fps minimum even in intense moments
but im capped at 165hz atm cause my monitor cant do more but i wanna upgrade that aswell to 240hz
and i want the 240 to be as consistent as possible
1080p 240 would be ez
1440p enjoyer

i might get the aorus fiq27 x or smth
Is that the one with bgr pixels?
Blue green red pixel layout
Instead of red green blue
It makes texts look worse compared to rgb
there are settings for that
theres ways to fix it but it doesnt work for apps that use certain text rendering
Seems like something you could override in the driver?

Either the m27q-x or the msi 1440p 240hz would be my budget pick
After that go 4k or oled or go home
which msi
Which 1440p 27" monitor is good for 400
this is the best i can get here in germany
even the m27q is around 600
Damn
in offer, usually 649
Well just get whatever you feel comfortable spending
Installing plugins on the steam deck just got super easy with Decky loader!
Ever wanted to change the theme of your steam deck interface! How about adjust the saturation and color of the steam decks screen? What about getting better battery life out of the steam deck? All of this possible with plug ins and I. This video I show you how to easily ...
This is what I got recently
LG UltraGear QHD 27-Inch Gaming Monitor 27GL83A-B - IPS 1ms (GtG), with HDR 10 Compatibility, NVIDIA G-SYNC, and AMD FreeSync, 144Hz, Black https://a.co/d/f3Ylrpw
Immerse yourself in your favorite games with this fast IPS monitor featuring a 1ms (GtG) response time, wide viewing angles, and high color accuracy with sRGB 99%. See moving objects on the screen more clearly with a high native 144 Hz refresh rate and 1ms Motion Blur Reduction. NVIDIA G-SYNC and...
because if he is on 165hz 140hz would be a downgrade I would assume is the reason
Yeah but what do you need 240 for?
Like what does anyone need 240 for
Unless you’re a pro LoL or CS player, it’s virtually worthless
because we are not at 1000hz or so yet where you could actually argue it wont matter
diminishing effect, sure, but it's still something most people can see the difference in
if he plays one game that has an engine cap of 300 and people reach that cap
whats the issue with wanting 240hz then
Idk I tried a 240 on CS and I couldn’t tell a difference from a 165
have you tried to git gud?
I was GE man 😢
that could simply mean the 240hz screen had a slower panel or something
I doubt it
nah
or it was not enough of a difference for you to notice
its just you didnt know what to look for
oh if only cost was an indication of quality lol
^
What else
if you just tried it for a few mins, you definetly wouldnt get accustomed to it
raw specs?
reviews that are not from the person trying to sell it to you is usually a good way when marketing tries to hide stuff
it's unlikely a cheaper one outperforms a lot, but nothing stops companies from selling bad models for way too much and selling it lol
If a product bombs and gets terrible reviews people won’t buy it
very untrue lmao
I’d wager most people make purchasing decisions based on amazon reviews lmfao
and amazon reviews are like 90% bots 20% idiots who dont understand anything
amazon reviews are unrelated to professional reviews
That’s just wrong
they match reviews to show reviews for different products under the same category even if it's totally different specs without making that clear
they are absolutely useless
well most of the bots are also idiots that dont understand anything lel
🤣
do you know what amazon's return policy is?
ok, so if there is a monitor in 24 and 27" sizes, they could be vastly different, lots of people liking the 24" size and the 27" is trash but it gets the same review section so it looks like a good deal




