#๐ฎโgame
1 messages ยท Page 532 of 1
erp
You bought something - That was your first mistake ๐
And I couldn't be bothered making a new account
also afaik they confirmed they are going to rework some of the start things in ARR after EW patches are over so new players have a smoother start
if you really cant get through it now
and yeah, just make a new free account, expansion packs including everything go on sale quite often anyway
I've heard time and time again how shit it is getting through arr
They're cutting out even more?
And once you do it's good
I didn't say cutting out
I said rework because we dont know, so it could be anything
But everytime I thought about launching the game I just instantly couldn't be bothered and never launched it
Lol
Let's hope for that 40% snip snip. 
WIsh I could just choose to be ported instantly to newest expansion. CBA solo mainquest from lvl 50
And no im not buying a boost
I considered a boost but can't justify it
Of course.
40% snip of ARR wont ever happen because you would loose way too much story setup
Swtor you got a boost every expansion with purchase 
Oh please, you know it could be done.
Realistically closer to 20%, but it could happen.
Maybe don't make me run from character to character for fucking hours
the difference is it doesnt matter what the newest expansion is, you can still play the old content and isn't getting any worse
Jesus christ
Given that this makes up 40% of ARR, yeah. 
They should give the lore in other ways than solo mainQ. It's boomer style to enjoy a game in following solo MQ. It's suposed to be a mmorpg ffs
given that is what is literally the reason the game is exploding I doubt you are right
I math'd it, running around pointlessly is between 30 and 40% of ARR if you can combat slightly well.
then it's a different game
If you suck at combat then it drops to like 20%.
I'm not generalizing, I'm just giving you my humbly shit opinion
and if you dont like a game until it's a different game then you dont enjoy it but changing it would not make the game better
Honestly, worst and most boring experience I've had in my life gaming wise.
But everything else is so nice
Right?
When it actually gets down to brass tacks it's really good.
But it's horrific to get there.
Just can't be assed most of the time because I'm forced to do such a shitty story
It's just a limitation of them having limited time to rework the game ground up
Which is mostly made shit because of how it works
And tbh I don't even know what tbh fucks happening
so until now they didn't really have a chance to go back and rework that part
In which case the best choice is to just accept that ARR is fucking awful and give skips for it.
Make a new tutorial and let people skip it since it cuts out so many players.
Got even worse once I joined a guild
Or faction
no because skipping the set up for a story that really big then makes the story worse
following questhub mmo is so done
Then do a summery.
yes reworking is can be done and will/should be done
GW2 did that and it works fine enough.
but saying to skip is is like saying in a 3 part movie nobody should watch first movie so you dont know anything
I'd rather sit through a Lord of the Rings length movie about the lore than play ARR ever again.
Man I tried not skipping
I regret every moment of playing it, a movie would be better.
But the story is so badddddd
for other games that would work but in this case just cutting it just won't work
Idc if it's a random documentary or whatever.
TBH, I'd like to do the new expansion mainQ, bcuz I'd be getting relevant armor pieces and actually progressing. It'd feel more like a real game world rather than something dead. Hard to describe
I get the gist of the story tho
Could be a dev sipping coffee and mumbling into the mic with no clothes on, it's better than ARR.
it is NOT the same game as wow or gw2 so naturally doing the exact same thing that would help those games wouldn't work here
and if you skip I can 100% guarantee you that you will not enjoy the story as much
hence a change/rework is needed instead of a removal
I didn't enjoy the story to begin with, not in ARR or the expansions.
Apparently it gets good, but it was mostly unengaging nonsense for the entire time.
Id say swtor is amazing for building stories and presenting them but thay also cost more than any mmo in history ๐
That and Nero is a horrible character.
that's fine but vast majority people do so logically you would want to not cut out content that is making your game so good for the vast majority
Also the story falls apart once you hit the first expansion in SWTOR. Cause they couldn't afford the voice actors returning xD
Man can actually go die.
How DARE you call Spike horrible?

You mean third expansion?
if I don't like gunplay I also don't suggest Destiny should remove guns, that's the same here, in that case it's not the right game and it would be stupid to want them to change it to fit my preferences
@fringe salmon I wana enjoy the actually hard content because rest of the game is snoozefest
Fourth they completely went a new direction
I dont wan't a different game.
Different story and cast
False - The companions stories cut off immediately after basegame.
No amount of exploding Jabba the Hutt planet DLC will change that ๐
Give me actually something that my untechie gf couldn't finish
My gf soloes FFXIV with her 10 fps laptop
wtf
then get a boost and if you dont want to pay for it and not play through it to get there then it's not the right game for you, ez as that
He'll help you - And bill you for it. 
story content or ultimate raids? lmao
Sorry yes third
Guy, the point isn't to change the game, it's realizing that FFXIV is a genuinely awful experience until you're at the midgame at the earliest, if I wanna set up the story for myself and a basic combat tutorial like GW2 does, that sounds a LOT better than playing through the incoherent mess of FFXIV.
Doesn't matter that the story might get hurt, it's already so unengaging that it hurts itself by existing.
pff, who r you to say ffxiv aint the right game for me, I'm a FF fan ๐
shes a goddess
The companions did expand though... Eventually they just scrapped em in the third expansion
Agree with this
u misspelled OF
but cutting out the first chapter of a book makes the rest really bad and for very many players the story is that important
Again, it hurts itself by existing more than a tutorial would.
Your point is invalid.
if you say "Doesn't matter that the story might get hurt" you are in a vast minority
Does a quick google
Google disagrees. Shadow of Revan did not continue companions.
is this swtor talk?
They also brought back companions in later expansions... They had new stories and become part of the plot again
Pleasant's doing SWTOR apologism ๐
@orchid prism
swtor is garbage
Like yes, Quin, it would hurt the story, but it would do so less than ARR in it's current state. The best middle ground is to pull a GW2 and fix up ARR for a relaunch and you let the playerbase go back through if they want.
Mate I quit swtor but I know for a fact they expanded on companions
And made the part of the story
Nothing you could possibly do within reason is going to hurt FFIXV more than FFXIV hurts FFXIV.
still shit
Especially in eternal throne
Swtor was great as a story but not as an mmorpg
That's why it was pretty mediocre
cutting out story or making it worse when that is what like half the players care for as the only thing will greatly hurt it lol
And that's why you can solo most of the game now. They removed group stuff xD
isnt legacy of the sith coming this month
You don't cut the story, you let people do an overview by choice if they don't want to play ARR.
even more gabrage for the collection
I'd rather spend 3 hours watching the story than I would spend 15 hours spending 3 hours watching the story and 12 hours of needless fuckabout.
same thing though, reading a chapter summary can not do the same set up in a book than reading the first chapter
I think shadow of revan yes, doesn't do much but they have dialogue, however later expansions we lost all companions but again they came back with their own story and part of the cinematic story etc
Mhmm, so cut out the utter bullshit that is 12 hours of fuckabout.
And let players watch the entire story without the 12 hours of fuckabout needed.
nobody is going to care about a character if you get a summary that says "oh these are your friends, make sure you like them now"
Then skip them to expansions.
I never said that.
but that's what a summary boils down to
I said it'd be better to have a 3 hour lore video than it is to have ARR.
A full LoTR length movie about the story and world would do less damage than ARR does now.
If only because you remove 12 hours of boring nothing.
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ I think they are well aware of it and as was said they are working on it so I'd just wait on what they do
but going on it from a standpoint where you already don't like it is not a good direction to come from to change it
Bet you they try and patch it to the point of being tolerable but it never quite finishes.
Then at some stage 7 years from now they'll go in and start cutting shit out for a relaunch, probably for game upkeep.
Engine and graphics, that kind of thing.
@fringe salmon if we ignore the story are you agreeing that the game is a snoozefest for a average two handed gamer?
why cant they make it more interesting
if you don't do the hard content maybe
What hard content is there for lvl 1-60?
have to say that hard raids are def what make the game nice
talking pre-endgame here
Lategame raid stuff for both ARR and Heavensward?
ofc
the levelling is not hard yes I agree, but I dont think it should be
Ngl, I found the raids to be kinda gutless feeling in a weird way.
not talking endgame
Defo action there, but it felt... weirdly flighty.
talking about the snoofest
and lv 50/60 you can do raids that aren't as good but still challenging if you dont uncap the group
You're never going to have a "difficult" MMORPG leveling experience. That's... completely against the formula ๐
(Go away FF11)
@orchid prism We traded game difficulty for mental difficulty. 
go away ironman mode in osrs
so stop being a boomer and use discord or party finder
and not only try to queue up with randoms
You start up a static group for it obviously. Cause you're not going to clear that on your first evening anyhow xD
@orchid prism really now? The formula was started by games you couldn't solo you know ;P
Ah yes, that's always the sign of a well maintained set of content in an MMO, needing to hunt people down on Discord.
yeah..
Epic. 
๐
that argument you are bringing is on the same level as expecting League to have perfect matchmaking
Naw. WoW is what MMOs are sculpted from these days. Sorry Boomer ๐
literally not enough people on earth
I don't need to hunt down people on Discord for League. 
Yeah, the dark ages of 2000's and the armageddon that killed good games
Also League doesn't have optimistically 35 hours of fuckabout before ranked.
but the reason is not that too little people do the old content, is that people prefer to team up instead of doing it fully random groups
Yeah because, the stupid MQ has forced lfg queue bosses lolol
the content is there you can do it and people do it, they just prefer to not do the hard stuff with fully randoms
aside from the super hard content you can get queues for literally anything
The game is a snoozefest and actively tries to make sure I don't reach endgame
just for those things where you also want to talk usually people dont want to make a worse experience
It's made for babies that never played before
Ngl, GW2 has a way better gameplay loop.
Please give me some adversaries that make me not sleep
It's okay guys Nexus Forever has basic combat so soon(tm) all will be well
like I dont care if you don't like the game but there is hard content, it is just not the literal same setup as something else you might prefer
so play something else then
Quin, the point you need to get to hard content in FFXIV is literally 35 hours.
GW2 has you in hard content in maybe 5.
And that hard content lasts to level cap.
And then you start Fractals and Raids.
more because the game puts you sleep on your keybaord while u try to finish the mQ
so we're looking at 100h
yeah and in warframe it's like 1000hours for the fun to start? yet people still play it
WF took maybe 10 hours for me to get to the fun bit.
And that was mostly because I spent 4 of it wiki crawling. 
Also the dungeons you do during arr are pretty boring
people like to play korea grinder games where you litearlly just afk kite mobs with AoE for 1- level cap and people like it and I could never enjoy it
I'm a huge wf lover but that simply isn't true lol
doesnt mean they should change a core part of the game
Starting wf is awful xD
All MMO's are boring. That's kind of their whole point isn't it?
I found it fun due to modding.
But yeah, the start is boring af.
GW2 ain't. :D
Fully voice acted story is nice.
The intro story to Warframe is just as bad as arr but actually getting into wf in general is so dreadful
It's gotten better tho
Man u started FFXIV later so u don't know how it's to start again. I played when it launched, so it's so boring to do it again. I bet you couldn't do it either if u had to replay the shit parts.
I played ARR just before they snipped like 200 quests out of it.
20 hours of walking.
Never again.
I literally agree they should rework parts but suggestions that would literally remove core parts of the game are stupid
I would so pay to skip it but it's so expensive
Quin, the core game is awful.
It needs to fuck off and get replaced by something better.
again, if you dont like it that's fine, but changing what the actual active player base likes is kinda suicide for the game
Not even reworking, that's trying to fix surgery with bandaids, it literally needs to vanish and get replaced entirely.
Reworking is not a good solution.
Can't they just make a fancy missleading render like they always do to summerize the arr story 
Basically a GW2 tactic but do it better than AN.
Like a full scale high quality thing for the story and such.
I'd be game for it.
Gotta love God tier animation to show off your game
Put in some gameplay elements as well, Fable did some stuff like that.
remove the MQ completely and let me grind XP in high lvl FATE's that are harder. Like literally other good games let you.
^this
congrats now you made a game that is DIFFERENT into the SAME as other games, aka removing a big reason why people prefer it
Without the fuckloads of travel and fetch quests it'd be tolerable.
U dont want teleport questing too. Then people question why in the fuck
but it's already in the why in the fuck category
Nobody actually likes ARR.
It's unbearable running from quest giver to quest giver
It's massively considered overall an awful piece of game.
90% of your time is just running and walking
yet without ARR MSQ nobody would end up liking Heavensward story
yes but then why in the first place? just remove it fully @bleak pike ?
shrugs Nobody would give a fuck so long as the activities, story, and world are there.
YES
And just have a cinematic
Remove the boring.
good idea
Recapping the story
watch 2 hours a movie of when Quintosh enjoyed MQ
then why even have a game at all when we could just have only cutscenes and have it be a show
Quin, we like playing good story.
ARR is not a good story.
How is this hard for you to understand?
@fringe salmon Good idea. Remove the history. Time has passed in FFXIV world. You are starting in the "Now" not 100 years ago.
MMO's evolve. Each day in the world is like 6 mins in real life
Great... so... you have no idea what's going on for three expansions xD
Top notch.
how often do I have to say I agree they need to change it, but you can't make a good story when you cut out the entire prologue and introduction
So 100 years of history already passed in FFXIV
Cinematic
@orchid prism Read the earlier comments, 5head.
No amount of movies can explain that much plot in a sensible way ๐
Personally I agree.
making a recap for ARR is like saying watch star wars 5&6 and you somehow expect people to give a shit about Luke
It takes 10 years just to get a faction to be nice
Spoken like someone who clearly didn't finish it and pay a minimum of attention I see.
For ARR specifically I think a GW2 Living World style thing would be good.
If you're ever done a Living World then you know what I'm thinking of.
I don't like reading books when playing a game sorry
yes pacing is an issue that is what everyone says, hence why you still didn't get to a lot of it
I get the gist of the story
Agreed. If I want to read a book I'll read a book.
It's a complete and utterly boring mess
Actually...
How much better do you think ARR would be if it had voice acting?
Like full VA.
Everything done in VA.
yes that's the thing that threw me off when the intro scene did not have VA haha
Again.. I'd rather grind in korean grinder endlessly (which I am In BDO) than spend my evenings clicking quest giver and shitty rewards.
'Cause GW2 has a fucking great story, and a heap of that enjoyment was in the VA.
Taimi is great.
I agree but I also don't
I can respect questing
The reason there is so little VA is time and money budgets, hence I hope when they go back to changing things that includes doing more VA now that they have the money for it
given how good it has become in the later parts
Like in swtor everything was awesome, side quests were fully voice acted and cinematic sometimes.
But again budget xD
Some games I like questing some I don't
Xiv is just one of those j don't
Mhmm, so bare minimum take ARR and slice out the entirety of the fetch quests, replace them with something fun, and then apply a healthy dose of VA.
I would then consider ARR good.
Like I was at one place, spent ages going to somewhere then going back to that orignal place and repeating
Was fucking annoying
A lot more bearable with a mount but still boring
Dont they have horses in FFXIV?
and expand golden saucer by at least 200%
Yes but you have to wait till lvl 25
Duh
Iirc
Get fucked nerd, you don't get that for ages.
- FFXIV
Well game has a lot of invisible walls so I kinda understand
you have npc-horse once you go to places once if you talk to the npc for it
You'd just be bumpin'
and you do get flying for all of ARR at the end
Ok cool.
Better than staring off with a donkey like in bdo during its earlier days 
but that is something that also added later so some invisiable walls still
BDO honestly became tolerable after getting my 171% speed arduanatt
Haha
the old game sucked
The strat for GW2 is getting the Raptor in the beginning.
Then again i was ahead of most
Very fast land mount, super useful.
In a bit more of a favourable position
And I had tier 8 for a long time
With charge/two seater/drift, insta accell etc
With maxed out horse gear
I was also guru trader
Trading used to be the best thing In the game
I retired from grinding and not long I was out profiting everyone
Each journey would be like 500m
Back then
BDO is nice casually playing it but I'm insta gone when something actually good releases with PvE content that is hard. Tho BDO has hard content these days, just solo, no grp stuff
The the economy now is weird
Return to Minecraft, by far the best game ever made.
I also didn't like the combat revamp
nothing good exists atm
Mod library. <3
I'm waiting for crimson
Nothing good has existed for years
truer words never been said
Minecraft has existed for years. 
Nothing good exists inside the game.
Big F.
Reject MMOs.
Return to Steve.
The problem is the genre in general is stale
Because its too carebear
Not just that
Nothing is evolving
Everything is either going backwards or staying the same
Nothing can kill me anymore I became a god in the last decade
Boring mechanics
Tab targeting combat for example is a complete and utter joke
Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeell, that's actually interesting.
If you release it now
New World just turned out to be fucking awful.
are yous ure? WoW is quite well at killing their game 
And aside from New World when did we get a major MMO release of any kind?
@unborn spruce lolol NW theres a new exploit every day that kills the game how can something so dead be more deader everyday?
Game was dead long before the exploits.
yeh for sure
When Amazon decided to make 600 servers was the death knell.
I'm so glad that game exists now.
I played most of my time on it before they. Revamped it
Now there's no player population, game is dead because the economy is dead.
NW should've just been another survival game like ARK or something but they just had to add MMO on the side
Does that game actually kill customers? Or out of boredom? ๐
If the first I gotta try
130k rn
Still pretty healthy
I love watching the gsme burn
130k is loads, but idk how they can still play it without any content whatsoever and godmode bugs
But
There isn't enough driving force for an economy.
They'll merge
Personally, World Seed is my new jam for the next 2 or 3 days until I get tired of it
shrugs Assuming they do they'll have to deal with the bugs.
Heck, I'd rather play indie mmorpgs with 10k+ pops than these shitty games. I wish Project Gorgon was better and got more content faster.
Is Halo infinite in maint rn
I hope it's in permanent maint
Cos it's at 40k and 120k 24h peak
343 is just a bunch of incompetent fucks. I can't wait to see the shitshow that is the campaign
I hope to be surprised though
Agreed.
it's a dogshit shooter
Infinite is incredible, they just need to fix up the cosmetic issues and it's great.
Feels like a Halo 3 and 4 hybrid.
yall are out of your minds
what i have seen doesnt make me wanna play infinite at all
more like stay away even more
I hope Ashes of Creation and Pantheon won't suck. Basically the only western mmorpgs that have a chance to be good. Will see.
Personally I really like it.
Biggest gripe is the grenades, those are overtuned.
Otherwise it ain't bad.
Riot MMO will be like WoW. Snoozefest and maybe some little hard endgame.
It's just another console feeling shooter but it happs to also be on PC
We know ashes will
By the time it comes out it'll already be dated
It's free and well made, I'm all for it.
What's your other choice for competitive shooter? CS? 
it's free, sure I'll give it that
honestly? I find Cod to be better than infinite and I despise cod
KEK
Engines are very upgradeable these days, atleast public engines are. I'm not sure they'll be dated anymore.
Dude you are delusional.
It's not a sure thing like before
at least cod feels like a goddamn shooter and not some console bullshit
You are so, so delusional omg.
Current cod feels awful.
Even compared to old games it feels awful.
Generic as all fuck, poorly made.
I mean I haven't touched the new one. I last played...something not completely new
I msan
An excuse of a game, tbh.
Opinions
if u want something cool and competitive check out midair community edition
I mean I guess taking damage behind cover every game is Halo since it was an xbox title
Eeeeh, no. it feels like a Halo game.
but its prob too hard for normies
You probably either don't remember old Halo or haven't played in ages, it feels like Halo.
and on top of the bullshit they try to pull with their battlepass
at least they had Fiesta for a few days. That was tolerable
I can't blame them for the cosmetics, tbh.
and holy christ the maps lol womp womp
I just cannot.
of course you can't blame them for cosmetics it's free to play
it's the insane grind built into the battlepass and only getting XP from shit challenges
MP anyway
I mean I don't care for cosmetics
considering how shit 4 and 5 was that means nothing
But it does suck
Like let's say we have the 120k playerbase each in 12 player matches, this is 10,000 dedicated servers needing to run at the same time. Assume you can somehow push 4 servers per CORE and we're still talking about 2500 cores of performance that they have to rent.
That shit is not cheap.
5 was the worst halo ever and 4 was extremely meh
I hated 5 and dislikes 4
Agreed
yeah servers are hard to come by for the indie teams of 343 and Microsoft
Sure, but the game is free.
They lose on it by default.
I can understand battle passes, but nothing else.
Halo Infinite Grind was the official title, I believe
Though tbh I'd love it if the cosmetic shop fucked off and the cosmetics were on challenges, then have 50 level Battle Passes.
Once every 2 months or so.
Maybe 3.
Also free the color palette.
Just give like a photoshop color picker and let us use that.
Other than that I'm pretty damn ok with Infinite.
It gets massive bonus points for having the best vehicle in Halo history.
Honestly
<3
I just don't care about cosmetics, not like I did reach
Wasp is superior.
Vehicles are weird though. They're super weak and so easily countered
Wasp sucks
but I guess that's somewhat better than lasting all match
Fall over and stub your toe.
They butchered my banshee 
thankfully most people are morons and don't bother to shoot a vehicle
Help me reach 1000 subs! Thanks for all the love!
#halo #haloinfinite
https://www.twitch.tv/trippylel
halo infinite beta,halo infinite tv show,halo infinite soundtrack,halo,halo infinite,halo infinite multiplayer,halo infinite leaks,halo infinite gameplay,halo infinite live,halo infinite btb,halo infinite ost,halo infinite multiplayer trailer...
it's fun but the repulsor is my favorite for embarrassment
got a wraith shot? Repulsor don't care.
It's weak kinda.
You more than likely haven't noticed, but it fits everywhere.
And there's a weird lack of kill zones.
So you can just ambush spawns with it.

it doesn't fit between the two building on that horrendous map that's too big for 4v4
but too small for 12v12
Yes it does?
nah it gets stuck and then takes consistent damage
I was playing Infinite today and flew it through the gap.
It fits, but it's tight.
esp with their glorious ceiling height
not to mention their god awful spawning system
Pretty sure they don't have line of sight check enabled for matchmaking and ranked spawns
it's just an option for customs
Guess I'm weird
because the ceiling height is lower or the same as the top of the buildings so you can get stuck between the invisible ceiling and the two buildings
Cos I've been a major fan since halo ce as I grew up with it, halo is my favorite game or all time
And im liking halo invite so far mostly
We'll see how the campaign is I guess
Not the biggest fan of it being open world
Semi open world is still open world
Otherwise it wouldn't be called semi open world
:p
Not true open, I mean.
Hmm?
Oohh
Welcome to shaders
Especially the Nvidia RTX ones in bedrock
Everything is covered with a thin layer of plastic
So do barbies
My spartan is not one anymore, they are many

I want you on my fireteam
Well there it is a lot of consolidated proof to a single conclusion
This probably is the best explanation for the aim, the awful ping, strange frame behavior on very high framerates and gameplay vs theater.
On the plus side 343i also took notice of this today and really looking into it, so sometime soon I would expect this to be resolved.
343i did themselves a favor probably by releasing a wide beta
He is... Special
Aside from the fact that servers are crashing left and right... not bad for a first minute queue xD
That's kinda impressive ngl
Here we go!
Time to uninstall

Anyone use the gamepad movement in hunt showdown? It's useful for sneakypeeking or getting just the right angle in a building
Good to know.
I was surprised when it just worked but pleasantly so
I'll have to figure if there's a way to combine the two control schemes since there are things you can do in one and not the other
@unique bane they revamped classes again? (bdo)
Any csgo/valorant noobs here try to cheat their way to the top yet with the dks feature?
DKS instantly makes you LE in CSGO and you will unbox a knife on the first try 
"Minecraft set to be 30% faster on Linux with Mesa drivers | GamingOnLinux" https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2021/12/minecraft-30-percent-faster-on-linux-with-mesa-drivers/
Damn it....I need to get an AMD GPU so badly
mesa drivers are poor mans drivers right?
Now the question is less 'is the driver faster' and 'is it faster than Windows'.
Does it have to be? Minecraft plays really well on Linux already
Not my point.
I can definitely run shaders faster than on windows currently and I have a Nvidia GPU
My point is that is it an improvement over windows, or is it equal performance.
I'd wager improvement over windows, but it doesn't really say how much.
Idk how they compare in performance
I just know that I can get more fps using shaders on Linux than on windows
30% faster is good, but 30% faster than... what exactly? Lmao
Yeah but that's just comparing against yourself, kinda shitty.
I just wish they put some comparative performance in their thing instead of a useless 'it's 30%' faster.
You saying that there is no reason to get a performance boost unless it's to compete against another OS?
No I'm saying that saying 30% performance boost is meaningless unless it's compared against something that isn't itself.
Like a 60% boost in CS:GO performance is great, but performance on what against what?
It doesn't exactly say much of anything beyond 'some kind of number go brrrr'.
So....
If your computer could only run Minecraft at 20fps
And you saw that a new version of the driver will give you a 30% performance boost
You would not care, because it's not aiming to beat out a rival OS?
Read the above?
Pretty sure everyone would be happy with a 30% boost
Regardless of OS
Or game
Or whatever
Yes but the OS is irrelevant.
Ye
Reading through the article says nothing.
This is the entire thing, it doesn't compare against anything.
I know I read it
All it says is 'number go brr' essentially, there's no actual information there.
Ergo why should anyone with eyes give a shit if it's not actually comparing against something established?
But it's still a good thing that there is a performance boost
Not everything needs to be compared to something else
Sure the performance boost is good, but it's not clear whatsoever as to how much of a boost that realistically is.
Are we going from 90FPS to 120FPS? 2 to 3?
There's no comparison.
Oh yeah
20fps to having more than 30fps after this is totally not clear to see how much a boost that is
raised eyebrow And it's not clear to how many FPS is expected or on what hardware.
Mesa drivers are used mostly on Intel integrated graphics
So those players will get a nice boost
And also AMD users
I mean you donโt have point of comparison against other stuff, but if you already have the hardware you know whatโs the performance boost gonna be which is nice
Minecraft is not easy to directly compare to other hardware
Too many variables
This. No point of comparison doesn't really tell me anything.
Anyone on intel integrated graphics or AMD GPUs will get 30% better performance
What more info you need?
@fading spade
Doesnโt you, but does to people who already have it, and I guess they are the target audience
Did you see the Linux tablet
Apparently it's both Intel and AMD, so idk is it only for Intel? @fading spade 
The Jingpad A1?
I legit just explained that
AMD GPU and Intel integrated graphics
Cause Nvidia uses their own shit
Yes and now we're back to no comparisons.
Is the boost 30% on an iGPU and a 6900XT?
Will it 30% on mid end hardware? What about old iGPUs?
This is the information not in the article, and that's what makes it shitty.
Boost good, lack of comparisons and info bad.
Intel integrated graphics
AND
AMD GPUs
Also I managed to get half a funding for my deck
What's so hard to figure out?
rolls eyes My dude, that doesn't say much of anything.
Aha! โค๏ธ
It's taking massively broad statements and assuming the umbrella catches everything, you should know better than that.
Yeah
It's just to inform people about the new driver version and the main feature which is the boost
*APUs
Hell, what about APUs actually?
It's an iGPU and AMD, the boost must be 60%. 
Fuck I wish.
60% more perf on an iGPU would be so nice.
Only from your perspective of wanting everything to compete with other OSs
We operate on forum rules in a good society, low effort shit isn't appreciated. 
Xd
At least, at least put some performance numbers in there for popular GPUs and then estimated performance.
Then idk, maybe some info regarding release date.
What are we arguing about
https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2021/12/minecraft-30-percent-faster-on-linux-with-mesa-drivers/ Just this being low effort af.
Wow that's shitty
Aeon decided that the post is bad and would only be a good article if they compared Minecraft performance on mesa drivers to performance on windows
Ikr.
Though I agree with aeon I do disagree with him on Windows
No reason to compare windows
Yep
Disagree.
Exactly
It's an article about Linux improvements not Linux vs Windows
That's not the point of the article
Lol
Yes.. thisl
That's like making benchmarks everytime wine updates
Any improvement to Linux gaming is good
Always good to see performance versus things. With a Linux update I'd be interested to see how the update compares against both it's past self and other platforms.
It's really not
Past self..... Yes
This article compares it's past self
It's good to see what you'd expect on Linux and what you gain on the new drivers
Since its about new drivers in Linux
It really does not. It says 30% more perf than before, which is great if you're currently playing MC on Linux but not useful for anyone else.
And it says on Linux not 30% faster than Windows
Low effort post is low effort.
Ah, so now all Linux users play minecraft on MESA drivers.
Low effort post I agree but I disagree with your whole windows vs Linux :p
Yeah....
Usually people using Linux either have Intel integrated graphics or AMD GPUs
Because no one wants to deal with Nvidia drivers on linux anymore
So this post is incredibly relevant
Fuck Nvidia can't wait to not have a Nvidia GPU
Idiot conditions?
You saying using Intel or AMD is being an idiot?
Or using Linux
Assuming Nvidia on Linux bad, which it is, and then assume nobody with an Nvidia card is playing Minecraft on Linux.
This is pepega brain thinking.
And so the natural progression to this is making a low effort post that is only appealing to a tiny minority.
So very epic.
I'm still glad that Linux gaming is being improved for people with open source drivers
Any improvement to open source drivers is great
And hell, even then this could be improved relative to that tiny minority.
Why are there no charts for previous iGPU/AMD performance of various kinds?
Not like everyone is working on the same hardware, if I was looking at buying an AMD card this is kinda important information. Do the 6700XT be making more sense than the 6900XT?
This post gives me 0 good info, may as well go somewhere else.
I mean I read the post and would have assumed I would be getting a 30% uplift in performance if I was using the drivers as compared to before
Which is great if you're playing and will continue to play on your current hardware.
Which is amazing information to get if you run integrated graphics especially since you are most likely below 30fps currently
that's the point of the post tho
But maybe it makes more sense given the 30% boost to buy something new.
This new driver will get you above 30
Hence more info would result in a better post, if slightly.
Otherwise you would literally need to grab a benchmark set for AMD hardware and add a rough 30% onto it.
I guess you're looking at it from the perspective of someone who isn't using linux
He says, thinking I'm not suffering Proxmox. :(
in which case yes it is not useful info, you only know that Linux Mesa improved 30%
Why would you run Minecraft or any game on proxmox?
Proxmox is light af, my dedi server runs it and when I switch to Threadripper I'm probably integrating a LAN gaming system onto it.
You can run the Minecraft server but that doesn't need GPU performance
Mhmm, and if I VM Windows/Linux and game from that?
I thought you can't just a GPU in VM unless you did passthrough
I lose something nearish 20% performance because VM, this would be very interesting to a power user.
But oh wait, oh wait shit.
Useless low effort post.
F
You can't.
Yes
Fortunately I have 26 GPUs. :D

totally off topic but I somehow ended up with 64 gigs of ram in my computer, either of you know of a good use for it?
might set up a Minecraft server for friends or something lol
Or do some crypto mining.
isn't that GPU intensive rather than memory?
Iirc Chia has some acceleration shit you can do with plotting but it needs a lot of RAM.
lol chia

Does anyone even care about it still?
Can't wait for my Anbernic to arrive :D
Apparently not nearly as much as they did a year ago.
But it's still fairly expensive, so I guess.
Going by their last numbers, there would be approximately 1,396,640 monthly active Linux users on Steam.
Ayy
Linux gaming above 1% on Steam hardware survey
Wonder how much the steam deck will affect this
Not much
Wonder what percentage of Deck users will immediately install windows
And then complain about how the software experience is shit because the hardware and software are designed to work together using SteamOS
It'll be like running android on a Switch
Possible but not the best idea
No idea
no one will install windows on the deck
Yes they will
the people who buy it either know the limits or are sheeple
But tony how will people feel if they cannot see the insides
Or they want their games on the go
The ones that don't run from steam
And use anticheat not supported on Linux
Valve stated in regards to that
Even though battleye and EAC are on Linux now, the game dev themselves need to send a request per game to enable it ..... So not many devs will bother doing that
Might be worth circumnavigating it
Even if people start hacking on it
That is much smaller population
Most games have a report button anyways as well
Pretty sure they would get a lot less unban requests if they did enable it for Linux
Due to all the Linux players who got banned for being on Linux
Fixed my typo
Why would anticheat ban for being on linux
Well then may be even more worth to crack the anti heat then
There was a game a while ago that banned anyone who had a browser tab with "cheat" or "hack" in the tab title
....
I guess they may have been attempting to cheat
But that just sounds like the game controls your pc at that point
Well the likelihood is probably very high
Yes
But if anyone was serious about it, they'd probably know what to look up without those words on the title
But those terms step outside of games anyways
Anyway whatever
I do not see why valve just borks anticheat or something
So whatever people wanted to play it will run
They already have hardware and software control
Because then the anticheats devs would bruh and fix their anticheats and then bans
Obviously.
I just mean would they not want a larger playerbase
The difference is minimal.
I think they're just worried about cheating, even though I'm sure most cheating skiddies are real fucking scared of Linux
Yeah which makes it strange
I like ad blocker
They remove 1 in 100 people at very most, and in exchange the major publishers think Steam is safer than an alternative that doesn't enforce anti cheat.
The publishers are where the money is, so why would valve give a fuck about 1 in 100?
I know a game with no anticheat
And no one uses hacks or cheats in anyway whatsoever
I think a lot of it is feeling good from breaking anticheat
Activision doesn't want hackers in cod, so Valve enforces it.
And because of that Steam can get a shitload of players.
Remember, you're not the customer, you're the product.
New CoDs are not on Steam anymore though
The example remains stable.
Any major publisher holding on Steam is going to be operating like that.
Where are they now?
Battlenet
They don't want cheaters since it means less people want to play, which means less money.
For good reason, nothing happens there anymore. 
I remember needing to use it for BF3 and 4
Had to login to the web browser
Search for mp matches on the website and lauch the game that way
Buggy piece of shit
That's Battlelog
O.o
Bruh
Anyway I think the opt-in Wine/Proton compatibility for some anticheats is probably the best compromise Valve managed to make happen, and we should just encourage devs to flip the switch and watch the cheaters roll in enjoy all the Deck gamers playing the game
Yeah
It's going to make people less angry than if they forced devs to enable it
But now devs have the option not to enable it and a lot won't
"2% of players on my game use Linux? Nah, too much effort to enable this"
The core problem here is that Linux is shit to use for basically anything gaming if you're a dedicated gamer.
Now if you're a power user it's not an issue, but if you're just using it to game it's a god awful experience.
Nah, if games support it, just as easy as Windows
and a lot of games run mostly ok on proton, you just enable that for all titles on Steam settings
if a game is outside of steam...then you need to know shit
Just installing Linux to begin with is one of those things that bars a good 80% of everybody from an easy time.
Picking a distro alone is fucked a lot of the time.
I still go by the fact that the Windows installer is more difficult to use
1: It forces you to do partitioning
2: Doesnt show drive names, just each partition and "Drive 0, 1, 2 etc" beside it + disk size
3: Linux installers show the drive name + let you choose to install to the drive automatically so you dont need to know the fact youd need to remove all partitions
Let's be honest here if you're installing an OS you're already beyond the "average gamer"
if you have two drives of the same size, you going to be fucked
Yeah... most users tbh
Lmfao no.
Most people can't install Windows, the fuck fantasy land are you living in?
I'd say maybe 30% of gamers can do it.
When I had to reinstall Windows, I have two drives that are 256GB
I only knew which one had my Linux install on it due to the partition count, cause it has 3 partitions and not two like the windows drive
Optimistically less than 10 percent of the population won't struggle with it.
It's probably due to me naming them on windows
I won't lie to you, Lana, you're making a shit point.
I named Hell V10 on Windows and Games
Installing Windows is harder than installing Linux, yeah.
But.
Most people aren't even doing that.
Im aware
They're buying prebuilds.
HMMMM I WONDER WHY
yeah
Using Linux is worse by default.
Probably due to people being far more comfortable with windows & gaming being way easier on it as well
Personally I only partially agree.
I'd say most steam games yes.
But like...
Installing Java, I can't count how many people I've seen fail that task.
Imma boot into my windows ISO and check if they are named
I'd say all games. Not every game is going to work well with Linux unless they have specific builds
From USB
Oo... Now they are
I guess the version I last installed they didn't show drive name
Nah
You still are forced to deal with partitions
I'd say the nightmare of the Distros is worse than partitions.
I think we'll just wait for when the Deck is out, there's a purely gaming focused device with Linux preinstalled
Linux is pretty easy tbh for basic use
Every distro has a store
Most applications are just like using a phone or tablet
Problem is Windows users are conditioned to Googling for <software name> install which won't do
Installing Linux , you just need to know what drive you want and that's it
On windows, you need to know what drive you want, hope you have a drive name, have to be aware you need to delete all partitions and create a new empty one
This.
This is a massive problem.
You can
Not for everything.
Debian anyway
Of course that's thankfully being solved with things like flatpaks
Yeah
Debian based systems require you to hunt down Deb files online
Same as exe files
Most of the time
No
No
Unless you use flatpak
You don't
I've wanted to pull my hair out more than once because some fucking package was impossible to find due to some bug in package upload
Spotify etc is usually on the store or via terminal
With ububtu or debian packages
That are pre configured
Not packaged
Packages
What's the term
Repo?
Spotify isn't in any store due to it not being open source
It's either in the store cause it's a flatpak
Which require users to know what a flatpak is
I can literally do apt install Spotify
Right out of the box
Did you not know that, Lana?
You can just apt install basic apps.
Most have ppa already on
Well, in most distros.
Most debian distros have ppas pre installed with most used apps
Last time I used anything based on Ubuntu or Debian, you needed to add a PPA or use Flatpak to get Spot ify
Especially ububtu based ones
I mean you could refrain from using Spotify
I dont xd
I used to use it
I've been using apple music
Ew
Ngl, it's rather nice
Apple
Apple Music is like their M1.
I don't like apple music
It's the only good thing they've done.
It's app is a little... Annoying sometimes. Clicking library or whatever should take me to my song list.
Idk I like Spotify, if does everything perfect for me and is open, also I pay fuck all for it.
I have apple music though via family
And apple TV
Just choose not to use it
Deezer was great when j used that
But I couldn't justify it
Deezer hifi I mean
Can we all agree youtube music sucks"?
The nice thing about apple music is it's cheaper than most other hifi providers but they it also comes with any package you get
TBH, youtube music is best for me though I hate the UI sometimes
I use YouTube music on the phone and computer because adfree
Most tracks aren't provided in hifi no. Lots are but not every single one
And there are different levels of HiFi
I have youtube music via youtube premium
I like yt music because it works great with my mouse
I have my extra mouse buttons assigned as media keys
Wife likes it easy and our Chromecast and WiFi radio only supports Spotify. So that's what we have ๐คฃ
Chromecast doesn't support YT music? wut
wut?
I never use media keys unless I'm using the laptop
It at least supports YT itself?
Well I wouldn't be surprised with that knowing Google ecks dee
The radio is the weak link here. ๐
Poorly phrased on my part.