#streamchat
1 messages ยท Page 338 of 1
it starts the discussion with parelment
it aims to change/add laws to accomplish their wishlist tho
Sure and there's nothing wrong with that
Are any of them even game developers?
Yes, a couple of em are
in the UK they got a big "asked and answered" door slams
all of em are gamers according to Josh
do they have any experience working on live service games or developing them?
like, tht's the documented history, what am i supposed to do with a "k" response
i mean not wrong. anyone in gaming is technically a gamer. even devs
Probably? There's like 10+ specialists there, so I'm sure most parts are covered of being looked at/being refined
the parliament said "we've reviewed the petition and have already decided that this is a settled matter"
tht's what i said??
this is for EU
before covid
jan31 2020
either way, just as skg reserves the right to ask for these things, I reserve the right to think that what they ask for goes against what they say they don't ask for
well yea i know that
Brexit started Covid.
I cant even have a civil discussion with those people anymore. they made it impossible to do so. then i have to contend with lack of knowledge on their part, but cant really blame them as copyright law is a beast to explain and Dev work is nearly the same
I'm mainly watching for more information and to see the progress
If ppl wanna be flippant, that's on them
The best way I've seen it put is
They don't care about the process, they just want their toy
but moopsy all thy have to do is flick a switch and gamers get gumdrops and rainbows and private servers!
my uncle works at nintndo he told me so
at this point im just watching a runaway train eventually going to crash
Anything of note yet?
Devs not responsible for game moderation after support ends
If a feature is not possible to be brought forward with ending support but is not crucial, then dropping it is perfectly fine
IP rights remain with the person/company unless they sell/relinquish
A few of the legalitise answered
It's honestly a good watch
SKG has bi-partisian support across multiple politicial parties
Got it!
They are trying to build the lego Deathstar without instructions and started by ripping open the labeled packages and mixing all the parts together.
That sounds... Not bad
Why weren't we this clear beforehand
Because dramanoise
Because now, actual questions can get answered
EU also has some of the most batshit mental bureaucracy mankind has ever created - I swear shit's like freaking Ghormengast... positively byzantine
#nopolitics - I'm talking about the civil employees not the elected MEPs
the machinery of the EU is a nightmare for getting good stuff out of it - GDPR is okay, but has massive flaws no-one has bothered to fix in decades...
so I'm not hopeful tbh
but maybe it'll work out?
And unfortunately this is close to the hopium that was advertised from the very wording of SKG in the beginning, and unless there's been some significant edits that were made before it made to this stage, this is what a lot of supporters argue vehemently for and say that is what SKG is all about
To be real, the initiative isn't even at a stage where it's worth paying attention to. It's at the "Okay, we got the signatures, we'll talk about it" as far as any EU legislative process is concerned.
It certainly feels there's more to it than flip switchng
Seems to be that there's enough people involved for very serious talks and presentation to parelments
Which as discussed earlier up this chat, some of the things they want are close to impossible if they also want the game developers to be able to protect the things that they make
This is a normal part of the process. SKG is fluffing this aspect as much as possible. The hearings are what's going to start mattering.
def watching that
I think the only thing possible out of all that is just the always online drm aspect etc. nothing else is remotely possible without dealing with the other stuff
Because as much as we want fair rights for consumers, the rights of the developers of both the games themselves and the Software used to make them are also important, otherwise they're not going to make games available at all for the regions that can't protect them
i assume itll be addressed
RIP to Indie Devs
Why?
let's say it's a SP game. Dev ends updating it, the game is still accessable and playable.
multiplayer games are another matter that'll get addressed.
I think quite a lot of indie multiplayer games take advantage of steam play together etc.. when is steam going to die again?
when gaben dies
What's an NGO?
assuming Steam just keeps not doing anything special.... never?
When gabin dies prob
so placing an expiration date is off the table
they just do the thing they do and do it well and don't make a fuss about anything else
= profit ๐
I assume he'll be uploaded to the Steam sub-net and merge with SteamAI to become a ghost in the machine, cyberpunk voodoo style
so like glados
glados was the trial for him to do that
They seem to be in it for the long haul
Due to the massive wave of backlash, Discord is postponing its global age verification until the second half of 2026.
๏ธ๏ธ
๏ธ๏ธThere's discussion of future features like:
๏ธ๏ธ- more age verification options (credit card)
๏ธ๏ธ- new spoiler channels
๏ธ๏ธ
๏ธ๏ธPublic backlash works, good job everyone.
barely what people were actually angry about
It's an international non-profit advocacy group that pushes for legislative changes throughout the world.
Wasnt persona dropped as well?
ooof
NGO is just going to suck up all the lobbying money and funnel it into exorbitant executive salaries ๐
100% nothing-burger certainty if a full on NGO is being set up for it
game over boys, you may as well go home
Ah, well SKG has done that now
If the right people are in, unlikely. Perhaps I'm too hopium
making an NGO is going to destroy them
cause after some scandal happens no one will trust them again
Wonder who they're expecting to fund them 
Doubt any gaming companies will
depends how old you are - if you're young you'll learn
if you're old you should know better and might be on the hopium a bit
but
I do have an open mind - occasionally we do get good stuff out of the EU
occasionally ๐
insert Blame Thor drama
I'm 43. Am I cooked?
Medium well
Like, I'm hopeful, but if it doesn't pan out, I won't be surprised
55+ is stepping into the well done category
pretty sure the big players are responsible for most of the shadow money that's already been spent - if they end up with a load of complicated EU style regs that are expensive to comply with they kill the indie scene dead
Indie scene likely will never die
ooof you're older than me! you should know better than me not to expect nice things! ๐
/j
just not sell in the EU
You're right, lol
So after watching it, I do feel like Ross only handling the questions during the getting the signature portion probably wasn't the best idea
because things seem more refined now compared to what Ross answered months back
Well if its still playable and purchaseable, then there is no problem. But if the game has to be removed from sale because of repeating on-going "renting" of Licenses to Software that the developer does not own and removing it from sale means that the developer no longer has to pay for that license, then the developer should not be forced to continue making the game available if it comes at the cost of an ongoing payment to the Software owners
And also the consumer should not have the right to have the game being freely available if said costs are draining the developer of money for a game they no longer update.
And mandating that games be perpetually available means that temporary software licenses are going to be a non-option, which means higher permanent licensing fees
I'm sure that'll get addressed as well. there was at least one game dev and one game designer in the bunch
Pretty much all AAA games use some kind of paid license, like denuvo, so RIP I guess
And that's the exact problem a lot of us had with the proposal
"It'll get addressed"
Because it will? Expecting it to be resolved out of the box is whack
Expecting the proposal to have details?
With something like this you need at least 3 extensive details by default
Why do you think there's specialists working on it now, getting it ready for parlement discussion?
Because Ross said there was
He said he consulted with people in the industry about it
Well I physically saw them
there should have been specialists when it was first started
Oh wait I misunderstood your question
Again, go watch the conference. It gave me a better idea of what's going on.
My point was more that Ross said he's been consulting with industry specialists the whole time, and yet only now when it's going into hearings is it getting clarified
Supposedly
And this is the exact problem we've had
can't really talk on that as I have no idea. Up until this point, it's been messy
Every criticism about details and edge cases has effectively been waved off with a "We'll fix it in post"
but now that they have a foot in the door, things should get hammered out and made more clear
They've had a year to do that
Not really frankly, Still vague-splaining what they're purposing and hoping the politicians sort it out for them.
it needed details and a follow up answer to those details if questioned at the very least. which is why the problems started in the first place. It was basically a dartboard
One of the ppl doing the heavylifting is a member of parlement that handles digital stuff, if I understood correctly
there is a lot of digital stuff
People got mad at Thor for "doubling down" on his stance that the proposal had problems
And yet no one batted an eye at Ross doubling down by waving away any problems presented
"Doubling down" only matters when you disagreed with the person in the first place, it seems
this person
And other issue that has yet to be addressed in the conference video (still watching it) is what happens when the ability to even host a private server of a multiplayer game requires handing over IP protected code to the masses, and the game cannot reasonably function without Multiplayer?
That wasn't addressed. Likely it's been asked that'll be answered
they're setting up a separate website for that
But yeah, mainly unanswered questions still.
wait they are JUST NOW setting up a separate website? dear lord
Well everything is a go now. Doesn't make much sense to set up something up if you have no idea it'll pass a threshold
a year ago it wasn't a for sure that it'd meet the threshold
thoroughly detailed
"Don't make games that way!" - Far Too many SKG proponents 
it doesn't matter if it went through or not, if its this big you set up your framework
at the start

God I hate how many times I've gotten this response
Might be worth asking them then
Just tell them that "It is currently the most Efficient and Cost effective way to develop the games with our current technology" not that they'll understand
Games not developed this way end up lacking or not going through full development etc.
"What if I can't find a source of watercolour paints to make this art with as a watercolour artist?
"Just don't make watercolours lol"
Dont use a designated physics engine like physX you must write it by hand 
It's been talked about to death and I'm still expecting most of the proposals to get tossed into a trash bin. Think I need to do some Helldiving 
fight well helldiver
is there a tl;dr of the skg press conference? or is it just a "hey this is still going on" thing
"Don't use "Medtronic" for that medical equipment, build your own"(medtronic #1 med equipment brand)
I still remember when the talk about it was bigger, someone posting a meme about "This will kill live service games!" "You don't have to convince me, I'm already signing it"
On the server for my FFXIV raid team
Just... I really question if they think about what they're saying sometimes
I need to do chores and feed my lil one and then continue working ok qui
im reminded of the wwe image i read where they have a cheer track for wrestlers the fans think are boring, which causes the crowd to eventually cheer through manipulation.
Used quite a lot in politics
The tl;dr is nothing has really changed and it hasn't even been grilled in front of a meaningful political body yet.
Lol nah
Wrestling fans make no qualms about who they like and dislike
cool, ty. im waiting for that last part
Yea this could have colossal negative ramifications for any and all software if handled poorly
point stands that the crowd manipulation exists which has cought multitudes of people.
Malicious compliance would be ruled against
see what happens. im still waiting for it to bite them in the ass. but who knows, maybe they'll prove me wrong and come up with not only somehting meaningful, but good for consumers/indie devs
oh yeah this will definitely not apply to just games if any changes are implemented
That's the vibe I got which is why I'm more hopeful about it
i dont trust government too much. even less so recently for the UK. their whole 'push for ID / surveillance everywhere' nonsense
A tl;Dr isn't really worth it. You get a good sense of the direction forward with the press conference
and yet here i am, perfectly happy with the tl;dr i recieved
Or games will hide behind pre made coding bases that are modular and have a shell owning company that charges thousands a year to license the code as a game failsafe to keep their games.
i guess tl;dw
You just want the end result. I prefer the process. We are not the same
LOL
Law isn't made on the process
ok
good that you know me so well. i didnt know that about myself. i just dont care to watch an hour of them yapping pointlessly when it hasnt gone anywhere yet
I mean you won't watch the conference, so 
that doesnt mean i dont care about the process.
Wasn't pointlessly yapping, but when you have a negative mindset about something already, then yeah, I get it.
not even negative. just not so interested in it i want to see every morsel of it
One the points that was made by the Lawyer in the light grey suit was (and I'm summarising)
"All the company's that sold to and offered their services to the EU had to comply with GDPR and had to spent millions to change their legal terms to comply with it"
What I'm concerned about is an unforeseen consequence that prices out Indie devs, or make the process of making an Indie game unfeasible to begin with, thus making it so that only the big budget Publishers/Developers can front the costs of making games.
That would be a horrific outcome
I remember there was one interview pretty early in on Indiecember that was actually with the game's publisher, since the dev didn't speak English
And he talked for a while about how much of a nightmare it is to make sure the game is compliant with basically anywhere you want to market it as things already are
a lot of people are worried about that. and thatis what im interested in. the actual arguments in how they're going to make it better for us without screwing the devs
And this is just one out of an almost never ending series of branching bad ending paths that have been brought forward about the Campaign as whole, and its just been hand-waved away with a "We'll handle that later"
to this day, i still think people dont quite realize that licensing and copywrite isnt just a gaming software/code issue... its every platform, every industry. even the "old" one i work in. everything is license or CPU utilization based.
"Do you want [to keep devs unemployed]? Because that's how you [keep devs unemployed]."
to meme on that Archer quote lmao
yup, and thats the part im interested in. the hand wavy stuff they did; actually addressing it instead of the handwaving
It's like the above example of "making all software licenses perpetual instead of on-going payments so that the game can still be played after its no longer updated to comply with SKG"
Well if that happened they've now priced out a significant amount of Indie Devs wanting to make their own game, because they literally can't afford the perpetual Software license to even begin.
it's a whole mess.
im looking forward to seeing how they tackle it. (or watch it get shredded. )
And again this is just one out of so, so many holes that can be easily poked into the campaign as a whole, and its very easy to see that none of this was thought about before launching it if even a layman can see the issues
yeah. lets see if it gets communicated well
I'm hoping that some of the Lawyers on the side of the campaign can see the holes and think "Yea this isn't feasible to implement or will have disastrous implications"
i went to th store and back an we're still on skg smh
yea that happens
lol
It's kinda wrapping up
someone else will come in and give their .02 bet
That's their job, poke holes and then fix em or get rid of em
A lawyer that doesn't do that is just bad
I got 5 gold pieces on "ballista attack from the British"
"FIRE ZE MISSILES"
from the french
Cuban missile crisis 2 thermonuclear boogaloo
Well, unfortunately the only person to state only a few of the easily pokable holes in the campaign that has a decently sized audience got absolutely rallied against and made into a villain, so its up to people here (and likely in other spaces) who can take a step back to talk about it
'Cause there isn't an avenue we can link to and say "Here's someone else who has a sensible take on things"
yeah. the stuff that went down was insane. and what got me is like... i even heard it from a friend of mine that was like ... "it isnt the point to do that now, the petition is getting misrepresented"
and i was just like ???
Ah yes, the "misrepresentation" argument
rebrand to slop killing games ๐ค
As it turns out its pretty easy to "misrepresent" a campaign that is vague from the start.
We even pointed out and posted other campaigns that were succinct and to the point, with a clear cut goal and the methods of achieving it, way before they even made it to the discussion table at the EU
turns out having a opinion is "misrepresentation" who knew
thats what it comes down to, imo. not supporting it.
The best comparison I've seen is like
People are comparing it to owning a movie after the studio shuts down
But that's not really applicable here, if we're talking about live service games
The better comparison is a theatre performance
Something live that requires active upkeep and staff
A lot of what SKG has in their proposal is effectively saying you have to have a film crew to record the performances for posterity and make the script and props available if you ever stop performing the show, or you aren't allowed on stage at all
Yep and when you point this out, its "misrepresenting"
Like how can it be "misrepresenting" when we're reading directly from the words typed up on the campaigns own directive
the best comparision is how "gaming used to be" ... but gaming used have proprietary hardware, and support ended when they moved to the next gen console.
now, if they just...fully targeted always online stuff so that gaming goes more like how it "used to be" then that woudl be so much better.
but nah thats "too limiting"
And even then, there are a lot of games that by their own structure basically mandate always-online
MMO's, for example
yeah. mmo's should be fully exempt from this whole thing
Is there a problem with always-online single-player games? Yeah, and Thor said as much in his video
But that's not what this is targeting
MMOs already have an expectation that they aren't accessable beyond a sub, so are excluded
Except that's not in the proposal anywhere I've seen
yup. always online single player would have been targeted, concise, and an actual easy win.
And I've had several supporters argue they shouldn't be exempt
Since hey, some guy with a rental server can run a private WoW instance, so anyone should be allowed to
i've heard several supporters not only are ok with, but want mmo's to die, so
Also, what about MMO's that don't have a sub?
There are more that don't than ones that do these days
Funnily enough, if the campaign was about "We want Always Online Single Player Games to still be accessible after the developer no longer wants to continue" It would have been near enough unanimous in its viability, understanding and support
Except they didn't.
I suspect this is the plan tbh
all together now in best mafioso voice "nice indie studio you got there... sure hope the big boys don't lobby for expensive-to-comply-with regulation that prices you out of the gamedev space" ๐
Great way to kill the Indie renaissance
Force everyone back into the AAA sphere of influence with few alternatives
As it turns out we've been here before.
Anyone hear about a small little company called Atari?
which would suck. because AAA is so....unimaginative in the past 10-20 years, for the most part
everything is a scam
everything is a lie
there's a pattern to the blag
it's the same scam every time
once you see it you can't unsee it
it sucks
I would love to go back to blissful ignorance
i do like thor's point that the meaning of scam has shifted in a lot of cases. its no longer an actual scam, but rather just not worth the money
but it's like learning to read
you can never make the letters into meaningless squiggles ever again
i mean if i take off my glasses i can
Responsible for the video game crash in the early 80's because they pumped out any old slop, and they were one of the only companies that you could release games through?
in this case "scam" would be the big players co-opting the regulation to their own ends
rather than a traditional scam
you mean the hotel company https://www.atarihotels.com/
Own a piece of the first ever Atari Hotels!
who doesnt want ubisoft to take over all of gaming ๐คข
This is pretty much what I'm anticipating happening, especially since SKG has yet to create a concise goal. Lets the machinations that know what they're doing to steer the ship into the harbor they want.
what even is this!?
Like imagine if the only companies that you could release games through was Sony, Microsoft, Ubisoft, Tencent, and Nintendo
God what a lovely future /s
Atari is building a gaming hotel in Arizona
I don't think Atari is?
maybe someone using the Atari brand... but it's not Atari I'm 100% certain
even if it was, they'd probably spin off a sister company to run it. thats how that usually happens.
you know I was just saying everything is a lie? Atari aren't building anything - they just licensed the name
technically correct. the original Atari died long ago and went out of business.
the current day Atari is owned by other people. its technically Atari, logo and everything, but not the same people from the old days.
it's all corpo bs designed to give the illusion of a functioning economy
comedian had it right
it's all a joke
if this is correct, then the company currently using the Atari brand and name was formerly Infogrames...
that pains me as i remember infogrames back in the 2000's
from the very top of the atari wiki page
This screams "we can't find a way to be profitable so let's just do blockchain"
So its basically what the image i posted says.
Also.
yeah iirc Infogrames bought Atari's studios and ran them for a while before rebranding everything as Atari
Atari has been infogrames since... idk... maybe 2000 or so iirc?
yes im saying you can just go to the wiki page and the same info without the risk of hallucination
infogrames required Hasbro Interactive in 2001.
that's what it says
i enabled search so it can grab results and not spit out random bullshit. which is why in that 2nd image it posts links.
so... why do we need an Atari branded hotel?
seems a bit arbitrary
unless there's OG atari games on the TV and controllers plumbed in and that
that'd be pretty sweet - retro gaming themed hotel rooms... now that's capitalism I can get behind
ive litterally had it steal code from one website and link another(with no similar code at all) as the source, so i still dont really trust that
"risk" of hallucination ๐
it's hallucination all the way down until you hit the raw linear algebra
and then it's just maths
"just"
but you get what I mean
i think they said they are doing that?????
right in the FAQ
LAN party spread across hotel suites would kick ass ngl
that's code tho. what i'm doing isn't code its search.
i enabled search so it can look for results instead of spitting out random hallucination bs
its a lot safer and better
well for searching
how do you know though
it gave me the results from where it searches and finds results.
3rd image is the search queries
catching up on chat. Man yet another one. Every data collection in the name of protecting children were either shown to be incompetent or exploitative
okay i stopped catching up on chat
yeah no kidding
this is handy
is why I don't mind Brave's "AI" feels more like a search
it gives you a bunch of links at the bottom for all the pages that it's referencing so you can just skip the AI generated text and go straight to the source
don't need the AI commentary, let me at the OG webpage... I can read damnnit, why do I need a robot to summarise it for me?
"robot! read this page for me!" seems... lazy somehow
oh i didn't know brave's ai did that
That bit about penance and people doing better actually reminded me of something. OnlyJayus said the n word 11 years ago, and people remind her every single time she speaks. She hasn't said anything like that in 11 years, but it doesn't matter to people. They still insult her with it daily.
11 years...
how long before you forgive someone right?
is it permanent for the rest of thier life like
according to the internet seems to be forever
and i seemed to have stumbled across another hive mind
always blaming the other side, in perpetuity, which was exactly what was critisised...
this is in my comments box btw
mods, post that one image about us v. them explained in a medieval comic
oh i want to see that
josh himself isn't immunbe from the unreasonable expectation btw because he didn't play World of Warcraft the way they wanted him to play. Something about going back against his own principles to play MMOs the way it should be played?
it's been posted around for a loooong time
let me see if i can find it
it's a political cartoon by Tom Gauld ca. 2015
i now want to see a version of this with thor / skg
why do people treat him washing his hands of the topic as refusing to "educate" himself
he just doesnt wanna engage anymore lol
They see that as a surrender
As opposed to, you know, people having better things to do with their lives than respond to every single person who asks about it for the rest of time
I see a world where a moderator was flipping through channels just chillin... and next thing they know they flip to Streamchat and "250+ unread" ๐คฃ I can see why they originally didn't want the topic in the Discord. kek

I was personally at 268 unread since 9 hours ago
Anyway.. Maybe strim in 3 hour.. maybe no strim in 3 hour.. 
the only response ive seen to this are "nuh uh!"

best i can do now is just hope they dont ruin my indie mmos ๐ those are my favorites
I KNOW
im so happy for them
ive been pushing every way i can to get more eyes and support on gorgon for yearrrrs
both when i worked for thor and after
And yet there's no project gorgon category on Actual pirates, even tho it'd fit perfectly there.
whoa an indie mmo that's actually alive
Waterworld pirates? https://store.steampowered.com/app/2695490/Age_of_Water/
Become a sea captain on a post-apocalyptic Earth completely covered in water and go on an adventure in a huge open world. Sail through storms, fight and trade, capture other people's boats or build your own, extract resources from the bottom of the ocean, reveal the secrets of the Age of Water world.
Water post-apocalypseโฆ
$11.99
2760
it had its 1.0 release recently
im on the dreva server which doesnt have demo players rn but
download game
look past the graphics and at the crunchy meaty mechanics
and the funny sense of humor
what other game lets you discuss antique spoons while your offline with an NPC and get rewarded for it

Someone in genchat said they tried the demo and didn't like the movement
i mean i guess thats fair
the movement is just standard wasd
AD to strafe, WS forward and back
right mouse button to pivot camera
pretty standard
tab target
or mouse click
this is my issue. same thing with GW2. having to hold down right click to move the camera makes things really annoying.
gorgon has a cool mechanic where each combat style (you wield 2 at a time which is insane build crafting potential already) is limited to 6 active skills, so you to pick and choose which skills you want thats synergize with eachother
Always been on the fence with this game. May try it out during its free week
I generally play hotbar MMO's with both hands on the keyboard, and turn with movement keys
i play a weather witch animal handler build, weather witch is really powerful but all thier skills are interruptable channels, and AH can tank for me
Imo you'd have to grow up on Everquest to get the appeal of Project Gorgon, so likely it doesn't lend well to <30 year olds
so its got good stuffs
also in gorgon bosses curse you
and you have to kill the boss to lift the curse
but some curses are actually beneficial to certain builds
so i run around partially crystallized for bonus damage in exchange for less max hp
the skeleton boss that gives you a big head
lol
some are more detrimental
like a deer boss that transmogs you into a deer
deer do not have hands
hope your combat skill doesnt require a tool LUL
or you will be mastering the art of fighting as a deer
(or just get someone to help you kill the boss and uncurse yourself but thats no fun)
I saw this as a steam review years ago for Project Gorgon and had to save it because it's so accurate.
"It's like being a naked fat guy on a hover board, once you stop caring what it looks like, it's amazingly fun and refreshing."
"oh look you're awake"
Just woke up, Thor say anything about the gamejam?
5 games left to judge
Depending if his back doesnt make him shit and cry, he can try to finish them
Anyone know the code?
we'll miss ye
Jailbreaking AI for fun: https://youtube.com/shorts/GJVSDjRXVoo
no. Some things should not exist, ever
can we recommend/supply you with FurbyPics?
My inbox is ready to die with cursed Furby pics
Good thing Thor didn't see this card:
That looks like some Papa Meat horror
Caution Arachnophobia Warning!
The face of Evilโฆ
My OG Furby from the 90s, still hanging out on a shelf in my room ๐
It's gonna happen
See if theres a full art version
Your right, so much better. Added a black boarder to make up for the wrong card to blanket ratio
... what is happening here
History!
The end of it perhaps
hillarious
I tried this once...
... and the customer service rep got quite offended! 
badumph
damnnit I've reminded myself of something and I can't place it - someone telling the robot lady they want to speak to a real person and they say "I am a real person!"... damnnit... memory fail... that's going to annoy me all day now
Did someone say furbies? I have a few.
I have 9 :3
Oh no wait, i have ten. I have a custom plushie furby i sewed with a custom faceplate too.
Luxury my freak of nature :3
Is one of them... skinned ๐ฑ
Yep! That's nihilus. He has his fur somewhere, i made him a cloak and a nihilus mask too 
I also have a furby knife.
I painted furbies on the handle.
Thats the most unique Furby item I've heard of. I MUST SEE IT!
The back is supposed to be just one big Long Furby
I must sleep, but enjoy my special interest art 
This is amazing
that honestly
looks like something out of "look outside"
well done
and at this point, even Kingdom of the Dump 
I have a Australian buddy who is unhealthly obsessed with this character
so we have a 15 minute rant on how Diablo 2 remaster is poor value.
And then 20y old rerelease of a nintendo game is 100% okay? 
I remember an article about Russians forming a religion around Gadget from Rescue Rangers
and every time thor says bonkers and i hear it i try to post it but tenor has lost the gifs of the show.
why did we need a D2 remaster?
I've got the original on disc and it still looks epic today, especially now the pixel-art thing is in vogue...
all those little squares at the edges of things gives it a real old-school'y sort of vibe
I'll bet the remaster has really mid-looking modern graphics....? or did they keep the pixely charm?
We didn't, but Blizzard is now creatively bankrupt so they keep on releasing garbage that capitalizes on nostalgia.
did they at least keep the original available?
or have they replaced it with the remaster on their storefront?
Yes, but IIRC it doesn't run on all modern systems and hardware.
oooof it's delisted on GoG
I'll bet you can't get the original
how bad is the remaster?
is it actually bad, or just pointless because the original is just as good?
oh, you can run it with new or old gfx... okay, I'll let them off - Halo remaster let you do that on the fly in-game, it was pretty sweet
and you're right about not running well on new systems
it actually looks okay, maybe I'll file it along with the Halo remaster... completely unnecessary, but not terrible in and of itself ๐
probably still need an old copy for all the cool mods and total conversions
I played one, can't remember the name - was all sci-fi and that, but made in D2
banger - what was it called?
I wanna say Lazarus?
https://youtu.be/oRVm_iy2BOY?si=K2jLawOhVB6ASqs6
Talking about social media being parasocial media. Also critism against 24/7 media and constantly receiving bad news around the world
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4fsJyg7MMlwUrTKXATBTrE
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/joshstrifehayes
Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/joshstrifehayes
Discord: https://discord.gg/GM2sCUX
Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/joshstrifehayes.bsky.social
Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/joshstrifehayes
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/joshstrife...
Also how unhealthy the expectation to care about everything all the time always and if you don't care you're a "bad person"
Been in those situations in the 2010s
Only on the Internet, which is an entirely different world than the Real
Anyone in the real world trying to care about everything is taking frequent visits to the padded room
But university students carry that over into real life
Otherwise we wouldn't be seeing some of the circus going on there
So I guess they're visiting padded rooms
Like the biggest protesters of anything tend to be students, save for a few exceptions
Padded rooms would suck. Imagine having to clean it!
I think they have removable sections for cleaning
If they're not then they're certainly riding the line. I wouldn't be surprised if the "feeling of having to care about everything" was connected to higher levels of burnout.
It's... Actually you're real and right about this. Because i was there too, pressured into caring about everything in the world or else I'm a bad person
Bingo, and feeling bad about not being able to do anything to help "all the things" can lead to depression
Now I'm that older person who go 'nah take your crap elsewhere'
At some level i still feel the uselessness of not being able to help anything because of my own personal family life situation
Dysfunctional brother things
Well in some respects and to be fair to you, that's also his problem to solve
My head understands it, my heart however just crushes in the inside. At one point he got into a 2-3 hour argument with my mother about the terminology of what counts as "the first day of the new year", as in the Chinese lunar calendar
Which devolves into yelling and blaming that my mother used the term wrong all the while and so on
He's that kind of person
Well, if he can't look at ya know, the date that Chinese New Year starts and go "Oh, well there it is" it sounds like he has to work on himself if he's getting in multi-hourn arguments over it
My personal thoughts was "why is my brother so stupid......"
In Hokkien language the first day is colloquially called "chui iit", the first day. He was arguing about that terminology
And I can't even explain why he's arguing because it's like arguing the first day of the new year of january should be something else
Also since the lunar dates are not consistent with the solar calendar, every year the "first day" of the lunar calendar is different and he also has issues with that
Yea that sounds like hyper focus on something incredibly pointless
It's super pointless
So yeah when the whole "next new thing" happens and there were so many guilt tripping posts on social media to "spread awareness" I'm like "no thanks"
I've become embittered by the pressure to perform
I also became very annoyed when art blogs retweeted war posts
I don't think I ever bothered when I was a younger person on social media. I can see a cause and think, "Yea that's obviously bad and I support it ending" but also enough to know that changing my profile picture wasn't going to change anything
I bought into the whole "retweet/revlog spread the word" kind of thing. Which does work to some extent because i saw it
True, but not much tends to happen beyond that really
Now if all those people who reblogged/changed their profile pictures contacted the people that could do something, that would be different. But the % uptick on that is very rare
Yeah
It just turns into the next "thing to do just to fit in"
I can't explain what and which cause in this room because no politics so i have to keep it vague. It really put me off that a channel about laundry decided to Say The Line on his laundry video
Like cmon I'm there for laundry not politics
Hey actiondan what would you personally want to do to help stop game publishers doing things like shutting down games that are singleplayer but are online only and making them unavailable after selling them. What is your personal preferred actionable plan for something like that?
@jolly sky
I think a simple disclosure like an ESRB rating would suffice. "Online only" or "Offline play"
Well as long as the rights still remain with the developer/publisher, and that the act of removing the Online Only aspect doesn't turn the game into an unplayable state, then I'm all for just making it available to play and buy.
Like for example removing the Online Only aspects of Assassins Creed:Unity wouldn't change being able to play the game in any meaningful way
I get my news from one person that's pretty transparent about their views once a day and that's it. I try to avoid news otherwise. Im tired boss
In this case, assume the publisher will outright refuse to sell further, and instead will just shut off their backend, making the game unplayable. The game in question is single player and does not need the online connection. It is purely a drm system
That's the ideal scenario anyway. But there's also the part about whether or not the game has on-going license fees for the software/brands/music/etc in its game. For a big developer/publisher that often isn't a problem as they have multiple streams of revenue, but for an Indie studio the never ending fees could be crippling for them if its forced to remain available.
How does that work with single player games and licensing?
Like i know for GTA Vice City, they had to remove some songs due to not being able to renew
so I'd guess that stuff would get left out since it's not crucial to the game running
Well AFAIK at least in Indie circles, most single player games will try to get a perpetual license, or work with software that is free to use so that there is no on-going upkeep
And will typically have in-house music made for the game, so that the rights lie with them
So when does licensing become an issue for the game then?
When they use software/music/brands that sell the rights to use that in the game, either as a perpetual license (which typically isn't a problem) or if its an on-going license, thats when things can get messy
What software gets licensed typically?
Well in that case it seems to be done maliciously, and the game is old enough to where they've gotten most of the money out of it, so outright refusing to sell it further or making it purposefully unavailable is something that yes, that should be punished and made available. And lets also make assume that the licenses have been paid for perpetual use and there's no upkeep needed in that situation.
Physics engines, sound engines, the game engine itself in some cases (like Unreal for example)
And more
Okay. I definitely see the issue with regards to licensing then.
Yep. Large issue that has yet to really be addressed in depth from everything that I've personally seen
Remember a few years ago when Unity wanted to charge devs for people installing copies of any game that used their engine?
Stuff like that
Ah of course, when John Ricitiello was the CEO of Unity
Tons of games are built out of dozens of different licensed software. Or Intellectual Property. Or Copy Write material. All of these can have different liscencing agreements.
And even stuff in the same field can have different legislations covering them depending on locality
(The person that also broached the idea of charging people to reload their guns in Battlefield)
Maybe those companies will play ball?
A song from a US band isn't necessarily treated the same as a song from a European band, etc
that was a wild suggestion
Well the...issue? Kind of. Is that the on-going License fees are cheaper to pay for and use while developing a game which is why its a nice option for Indie devs, whereas buying it for perpetual use can get expensive, if its even offered at all
Definitely curious to see if that gets addressed during the Q&A
I wanted most of these things addressed a year ago
but it was always "the courts and politicians will figure this out, trust"
I think it's more so the lawyers and specialists that'll come up with ways to deal with it as opposed to the courts
massive chunks of the backend - usually physics - sound management - there'll maybe be some licensed game logic libraries or NPC "AI" code... all sorts of stuff
and that's before you have real world brands and music]
normally you go to the lawyer with a plan of what exactly what you want. no "something vaugely like this"
And the core problem is Governments (through taxes) and Businesses make a gigantic amount of money from how these systems work. You need to directly interfere with how these licensing agreements work in order for SKG to get what it wants or heavily restrict how video games are made. The former is dead on arrival, the latter is not good for game development as a whole.
just look at the logos at the bottom of the credits list of a game. those are usually from licensed tech
sure, but we're at today, so no point in saying "thy should of done this...". Better to now focus on the present.
Not a new idea tbh, world of tanks premium ammo is basically that
And we're not even going into the mess of multiplayer games that run on servers that the developer doesn't own, and their code is protected by IP/Copyright law as it should be.
That's a whole different mess
yuuuup
there's gonna be worms literally everywhere from all these cans peeps are opening
which is fine
but you know
that's how you get worms
it'll force those things to be addressed, hopefully
I asked over on the SKG server and one response wasn't great. "let the industry figuring it out"
Yea that's been a common "answer". That's how you get bad solutions
and there's the rub
is gonna be a shitload of new regs, all drafted with consultation with the big boys, just to make sure Indie gets squeezed out
yeah they've been on that train for a while. I'm sure Ubi would be all for filling out Long Term Support form SKG-500, filed with the local notary (and with filing costs). helps keep the competition out
And a very common "answer" to almost any hole that is poked in the Initiative.
I said yesterday that we all know something needs to change for the better, but doing so in a brash and throwaway manner is just going to end up in tears, and not for the big name publishers.
don't have to be mystic meg to see how this pans out
in today's clown-world?
we're on some serious hopium if we think anything like this that gains mainstream traction won't be co-opted and corrupted by vested interests
I hope all the indies teams have their legal council on standby when it comes to filling out the perpetual support paperwork
cause I don't see any way this would go, if implemented, other than more paperwork
And that's why Thor made his video on SKG. They're hoping someone else acts in good faith for them while their goal is upending the industry. Never let politicians drive legislation ๐คฃ
I hope the interest rates are in their favour when they need to take out loans just to even start.
"Well okay letโs say a developers/plushers got a licensing agreement and it last idk like 3 years. They donโt have to sell that game to new people just let people keep the ones they got"
Me: But sin't the entire idea to be able to still acquire games after support stops?
"Our movement is very unlikely change the laws around delisting. Weโre more focused on if the game is shutdown"
Me: aren't delisting and shutdown effectively the same?
"no, if you bought the game and it is playable after delisting, consumers can still enjoy their product"
bruh...
Grab ya popcorn, it's gonna be a show
so i guess if the license runs out, can't buy it anymore
which, to me, is the same as being shutdown
but maybe im wrong 
Problem with that first point right off the bat.
Are they expecting Software developers to give licenses away for free? The whole "They don't have to sell the game to new people"
Well where is the revenue to pay for the "3 year licensing agreement" going to come from?
I am preparing both popcorn and also celebration drinks - most likely I will be munching down on some tasty kernels...
but that said, I am prepared to see at least something happen that might be good?
is a massive roll of the dice, but look at GDPR, for all it's faults it does make a bunch of stuff better (but for every GDPR we get, we get a whole crapton of stuff that just doesn't make sense)
Seems like they don't care if it delists
and you already have cases of developers having to remove stuff from existing customers, like the music tracks in GTA. are you going to fight the entire music industry on this too?
I love the GDPR
So...they care about game still being able to be played years in the future (going by Josh's words from the Meeting) but don't care about delisting?
Fascinating.
Wait, is this the CURRENT wording of SKG? The one they're presenting???
"Unity and unreal are technically free if your not making income"
Its the words said by someone who supports it, so don't treat that as verbatim directly from the heads of the Initiative
I would prefer a delisting to a game not being downloadable or playable
Im paraphrasing, but delisting isn't in their goals
yeah... the cookies thing was one of the bits of GDPR that is... lacking in understanding as to what constitutes a reasonable cookie
ends up being more of a ballache than being tracked 
but all the control of information and you can demand deletion of data and that... all good stuff
GDPR is like the star trek movies - there's a few duds, but they average out to be pretty good
(the old ones)
not nutrek
nutrek sux
Also, devs havung the ability to cut someone off of their service isn't all cons. If someone is a bad actor for example.
"us and our 1000 partners care about your privacy"
which is exactly my point of why you should apporach these things with a solid plan in hand, not just "the user will have to consent, somehow"
Anyone have any examples of a licensing that's crucial for a game being ran?
That sounds like an odd thing to not be a goal, considering what their goal is. (If thats actually what SKG wants)
Some server technologies
so long as the game works, it doesn'tm atter if it's listed or not
Uma musume, they pay to license the horses
same for sports games. tho usually that just means they don't get new updates to the roster without paying
havok, physx, dma sprite (back in the day), a bunch of stuff that RAD game tools makes, sound utilities, video codecs... basically most of the backbone architecture of the game will be licensed from a tools specialist
most software houses don't make their own tools
but maybe some sports leagues have requirement that you keep paying as long as the game is playable
Prime example, The Crew which kicked this EU version off. An online only Single player game that had multiplayer elements.
The Licensing for the brands and music used in that game were on an on-going license as brands typically tend to offer. To turn that game into a Single player game and to have all the brands available would have cost millions.
Without that, the cars would basically be grey boxes on grey tyres.
the main game-over there is physics
you want physics in the game still, you gonna have to license something
need physics for a game
like need ๐
I still hope they narrow down to the "stop deactivation of video games throug forced online functionaltiy with no practical purpuse". doesn't really roll of the tounge to. like the modern Hitman games. which are singleplayer, 99.99% offline games that won't let you save progress without being online
Me: And what if the thing being licenses is crucial to the game running?
They (one of the discord members) pasted the following:
https://www.stopkillinggames.com/faq
https://youtu.be/qXy9GlKgrlM?si=ZXBu95GunJsdX0dL
This is a FAQ + guide about the Stop Killing Games movement, this time aimed at developers, written by developers, including the creator of an MMO live service game! Some concerns have been brought up on the campaign as to HOW games could start having end of life plans and this presentation covers many bases of it. It gets more technical as it...
casually rolls their own physics engine to match the functionality of havok just isn't a thing that happens
Or, another solution would be to have to pay developers to make Brands that "sound like" the real brand. So for example "Bamborghini" or "Lerrari"
All for a playerbase of around ~200 people
otherwise... why would anyone licence havok if you didn't need to? - 'snot cheap if you're shipping lots of units
at least it used to be
Off-brand games. It comes full circle! 
GTA already does that. but it's also deliberate so they can parody these brands as well, not just something they swap out
but there's cutouts in copyright law for obvious parody, so they can get away with it
Yep, but that has to be planned from the outset, which is what they've always done. But for Racing games in particular with the focus being on the Cars and Brands, players want the "real thing"
they just make sure they caricature the design on the ingame models and it's pastiche and thus cool most places legally
at the same time, it's often not worth fighting about it. so you just make "Bepsi" instead. because fair use and parody is legal defense you bring up during a lawsuit, not a shield against lawsuits
Many games did the same with the names of Guns. "Night Hawk .50" instead of the Desert Eagle in Counter Strike for example.
yeah, but your Bepsi bottle can look an awful lot like a pepsi bottle...
Also. Say a game that once used liscensed material still uses it after the deal ends. Won't that be like... Copyright infringement?
Well I wouldn't go by the FAQ as that is far too open ended and vague to really gleam any information on (inb4 it's meant to be vague)
yeah, but no-one brings that lawsuit
well, nintendo would (and do similar) but apart from them... I don't think any of the obviously referenced brands in GTA sued
did they?
which is usually why they get delisted then
Not as far as I'm aware
Hopefully their next public session answers questions like these
GTA does not use real brands, so they don't have this issue. they also get to come up with funny names
Like Cluckin' Bell is obviously a parody on Taco Bell/KFC
I hope they cooked more behind the scenes. Cuz it doesn't seem like many skg supporters in public know the consequences of these demands
They already did the ceremony in Brussels btw
It feels like they have but they're playing it close to the chest for reasons
time to stock up on all the original xbox games I don't have copies of
Well, its what a lot of us here have been saying, but we're Stonewalled/Strawmanned at almost every step
Link to it?
Tiago here!
Hereby the better quality version of our twitch stream from this monday! :)
Our SKG team is actually bigger than those that were able to join this Press Conference at the EU Parliament building in Brussels.
We all very happy to be a part of this movement and love your support.
I briefly mentioned our Community Discord, and wish to a...
Yea I watched that, there is no mention of how the licenses part work at all in that meeting unfortunately.
it was more of a "meet the ppl working on this" type thing
Yeah the moment you object the PirateSoftware dialogue in their npc programming activates and starts blaming
That's because no one has a concrete solution, and the exact reason Thor opposed it in the first place. You can't make laws with good intentions alone.
Oh then it hasn't happened yet. It's just soon
Anime opening character introductions
ngl, if josh wasn't involved, i probably wouldn't pay attention
Same
people that don't understand technology lobby people that don't understand technology to funk about with how the technology works while at the same time refusing to listen to any of the sensible people that actually know about the technology and how it works and how it is built who are saying this might not be the greatest idea in the world
I feel like he understands the goal better than Ross does
Yep, And it just turns into "It'll be handled later"
Like come on, this stuff that is important to at least have an idea about before going in, so that it isn't twisted around in favour of the big Publisher by their lawyers in court
The hell did I walk in on?
A good back and forth
it's the blind leading the blind whilst simultaneously denouncing the people who can see who are saying "mind out there's a big hole there" as liars
He explains it a lot better without all the annoying blame game drama lama going on too
Understandable. Iโm looking for context now
The "later" should have been handled "before" so you could answer questions with knowledge instead of vibes
what's being presented isn't law though. It's like the start of working on it to get it formed into law to get voted on
if im understanding it
We just wait with popcorn in hand to say "I told you so" Later
he's very diplomatic like that
Oh right Josh said that they cannot present concrete demands right away because the other side will automatically reject that as it won't be in their interest
It's legal culture silliness
Oh I see it now ok.
so i did understand it right
So they have to present it vague first to even get into the door
Oh, as above the SKG stuff has started again because the press conference for SKG got uploaded, and we're just discussing the nuances of it that aren't being talked about by the people that really should be
It can still be outright rejected if the conditions aren't right
It's not a good sign when your political strategy is procrastination. "We'll handle it later" Yeah, like the dishes you said you'd clean last week
!dishes
Just do them. Hey, you, yeah you, chatter, you've got dishes, huh? Why are you leaving them out? Do em now! Stop waiting. Go do them. Don't even think about leaving them on the counter or the sink. DO. THOSE. DISHES yarrRage
Many people were unhappy about the vagueness and then Josh explained how the law works. It's unfortunate but that is how it is
The problem is, is that there has been little-to no detailed discussion even outside of the proposal being delivered to the EU. It's still being hand waved away.
No I get that, if you show up with your full oomph its intimidating to the other side
But, at least internally, you should have answers to the common questions
Like anything outside of the proposal is free game to talk about and get into weeds of, but I've not seen that anywhere.
I wodner if the lawyer said don't talk about it
I don't think it's procrastination though
A lot of legal stuff is confidential
Isn't the point to show up with bigger demands and then compromise down with your opponent?
Showing up with vague demands and letting them clarify it sounds like a bad idea
They often do
Not even a vast swathe of the people who are involved want to talk about the details, in this case the supporters
it feels like a keep cards close to chest thing
It could be intentional. It could be sold to the highest bidder for profit.
That method will get rejected immediately for EU
it's a legal mindfield
Sounds like lawyer said "shhh" and not even the supporters know what they're supporting
I feel like the big publishers in the room are gonna control the flow of conversation
Yea but I'm talking about in depth discussions between the people that support it, but are not legally involved. Anyone wanting to talk about any detail just gets shut down and stonewalled
you don't have to get into legal paragraphs, but atleast agree on what you're campaigning for
I think there's too many voices to push back against the publisher
you can see other EU propsals, they had much clearer goals in mind
Glue, we campaign for glue
I can only assume the lawyers and other specialists are doing what they feel is required, even if it doesn't make sense to us
like, is this for singleplayer or multiplayer games? they seem to be going back and forth on it still
No one really knows
the aim seems to be more so to prevent another the crew/anthem situation again
AFAIK not for MMO's, but yea normal Multiplayer games are still up in the air
SP games are seemingly fine
And the supporters are still undecided on whether it should be for MMOs
Because I've had a lot of people tell me that should be on the table
so it's basically the same as one year ago
MMOs aren't included
And that they should be able to host their own private servers
Josh even said MMOs have a definedness
I'll believe it when it's in writing
but
they have an explicit MMO carveout? or just "it's been discussed"?
that leaves f2p mmos in the air
Oh so it's only for subscription games
Mmos have extensive infrastructure requiremenrs that a consumer wouldn't be able to manage by themselves after a sunset
I forget. Do the SKG team have devs among them? Multiplayer live servive game devs in particular
I mean they potentially could, but that's in the realm of like
Dedicated server computers and hardware that you're not using for anything else
from what i understand of what josh said, sub-based mmos have an expected end date tied into the sub, and thus are excluded
Yes
Okay so it's not exempt
Nothing in that says a single thing about subscriptions
Well, thats not really a job for Government. That's a job for the Publishers to not force studios with experience in only single player Story RPG's (Bioware) to make a multiplayer Looter shooter.
If you try to force that, then its not going to go well
Sub-based mmos would be. F2P mmos are anothermatter
A thing with that as I understand it, those who run private servers still will need to pay for licensing to IP owner
Again, I'll believe it when it's in writing
Agreed
that's still really vauge. so will server emulators be mandated? or just tolerated? and looks like MMOs are on the menu then
Then what about cases like FF14. Free trial of a set amount of content. Sub for the rest
Because at the moment, frankly I don't buy a word they say
alas, i have no answer
the deep in the weeds questions to be answered at a later time
this is not a deep in the weeds question. just a purely "what are you even campaigning for" question
F2p also have another hurdle which is monetization. If the system is built for offline play, they cant prevent a player from jailbreaking and giving themselves all the cash shop stuff for free
Or just running their own private server and unlocking everything for everyone
At which point why would you play on the official servers
Ngl, skg walking up to this court feels like a bunch of kids accidentally stumbling into a casino
Oh and in that example btw, "Several MMORPG's that have been shut down have seen 'server emulators'"
One of them being City of Heroes. The server code was leaked a while ago, and the developers decided of their own free will to let it go to the fans. Which means they willingly gave up the IP rights to their work. Forcing that to happen by Law is not the way to go about it.
which, to be fair, is all digital anyways
like for example "our goal is to make singleplayer games available for generations to come" there. defined
Digital or not, that's how F2P games make their revenue to keep operating
the issue is, the demand is not meetable given how the tech stack works industry-wide
it's a silly as "ban VPNs"... like... how are you proposing to do that?
I fear this will be the same, because there aren't solutions for these issues that the people with the actual ken have been highlighting - its an intractable problem
It would effectively eliminate f2p games
I thought they gave their blessing to run it? Is that the same as giving up the IP?
The game itself is digital
And we're still okay with charging for that
that's called a negotiation. and likely some kind of license
It also just came to me that I don't think they realize the private server parts? Like thats a security point. we already hate kernal level anti cheats for games but those private servers they want to be able to do can open systems to infection
Well to do that they'd have to give up the IP, so that the fans running servers can't be gone after in a court of law.
afaik, there's no kernel anti-cheat with current city of heroes
Yep! Private servers mean that people would have to be happy giving over their network information to some rando running the server.
This was brought up to Ross, and he basically said "If someone gets a virus from a private server, that's on them"
okay yup im done thats just messed up
but would inevitably be associated with the original studio that made the thing, even if they had handed off to "the public" many moons ago...
people will still blame the original devs
I mean, that's a risk with playing on any private server
which is part of why companies shut them down. it affects their reputation
even on WoW private servrers, you still risk yourself
Sure but unlike what they want there is a very limited number of them now
who runs the WoW private servers?
I just crystallised how I feel about it all
it's a great idea on the surface, but I don't think humans can be trusted to implement it without it ending up being really really really really stupid
There's still the question of monetizing private servers after end of life
If they're allowed, then that makes incentives to get the game shut down so you can pick it up yourself afterward
If it's not allowed, you need enforcement bodies for that
Which isn't even accounting for the fact that the studio who made it might not exist anymore at that time
keep in mind, i'm not speaking on their behalf or anything
since they supposedly gave permission?
And something thats worth reminding, this is a direct quote from Ross as well.
"If somebody does not have an alternate solution but they're against our solution, then they're against all solutions"
So anyone who can see holes in the campaign, means that they don't support any solution, by his words.
whoever feels like it. it's unregulated and unlicensed
well there are laws
but most servers don't care
with city of heroes, they run on donations and there's no cash shop, afaik
That is some cult leader stuff
It's also against IP and Copyright. Blizzard owns the server code, and to replicate it is against IP and Copyright.
And if private servers for big MMO's are allowed while the game is running, then that's even worse
Because why would people play on the official servers instead of a private one
Especially if that official server requires a subscription like FFXIV or WoW
Or if they make their upkeep money through monetization
if you're not with us you're with the enemy is the true enemy of mankind
acension wow, turtle wow 
Ross really should have a PR dude/dudette tbh
some of his answers aren't the greatest
Yeah, now imagine if anyone could start up a private server of the current build of WoW, and do whatever plugins or unlocks they feel like with it
I've heard good things about turtle wow. I hope they branch out and make their own MMO from it, cause they cleary have the ideas and the passion. but since they're using someone elses assets...
This is 100% what would happen. some group would definitely end up doing this not to mention game companies doing it to each other
i think ti's more of a cheaper option which i understand
which usually ends up with you getting sued
acension WoW does have their own cash shop, but none of it is mandatory
Well, it sure as hell ain't cheap when they're taken to court
which blizz attemtped but didn't get anywehre
oh it's still ongoing
interesting that blizz hasn't gone after acension yet
yup literally just said
i wonder if blizz deems acension different enough that it's not an issue
Turtle wow devs wrote open letter to get formal license for framework iirc
This whole thing is like, making a campaign for Free Water for Everyone, which is inherently a good thing we can all agree on.
But the campaigners didn't even think about the level of work involved. The plumbing, the laws of what pipes are needed, the storing of the water, the land that would need to be dug up, the design of faucets etc.
And anyone pointed out any of these future issues would just get stonewalled.
That's a good way to put it, I'm going to have to remember it 
gotta make it more inflamatory, like End Hunger Now. cause then when poeople disagree you can turn around with "you DON'T want to end world hunger?"
like building a Sewer system during the industrial era
that is one of my inital complaints about this movement: the name
Well yea I was hoping to avoid the imflammatory side of it, but that definitely did happen
well, no idea when the hand off is supposed ot be
next 3 months maybe?
Oh, there's an update
https://www.reddit.com/r/StopKillingGames/comments/1rebyrg/stop_killing_games_joint_press_statement/
https://www.reddit.com/r/StopKillingGames/comments/1rdvz12/ea_just_confirmed_they_are_globally_revoking/ oh look, EA being scum again
didn't they shutdown Anthem already? what would the license even be for?
they shut the servers off yeah
but I don't think anyone expected them to delete transaction orders
so they're not mad at servers being taken down, but about a license on paper?
I don't seew why EA would need to do that. but also no real difference
well they are mad about servers
Like when it comes to Anthem, while it looked pretty cool from trailers and such, my warning alarms were ringing when I found out it was being made by Bioware, a studio that has no prior experience in making Multiplayer Looter Shooters
but now erasing proof of having purchased the game at all
And I don't blame Bioware for that, I blame EA
well you never owned it. you had a license. like all software. like steam
What is going on?
It'd be like Hondai coming in and burning proof of you owning your hondai car
Chattin' and yappin'
no, that is a physical item. software is a different beast
Sure, but the idea is the same. If you're purchasing software, you should be owning it. None of this licensing nonsense.
Deleting purchase information about buying Anthem does feel like a really unncessary and malicious action however
Adobe is atrocious for this
Does erasing transaction orders will make impossible to get a refund?
the licensing stuff that is
you cannot "buy" a game. you can pay for a license to it. it's not like normal property. steam games cannot be passed down to your children, it's in the ToS. you can be mad about that, but that is a wider licensing issue
Effectively, yes
no proof, no refund
I don't care.
You buy something, you own it, period
were they giving refunds?
that's how it should always be.
oh, we're back here
If you buy a ticket to a stageplay, do you own the play?
this is the reality of software
we really are looping
software works diffrently than phyiscal items. this is reality
Buying a ticket to a play is not the same as purchasing a video game.
you first have to accept that before being able to discuss any of this
You cannot own software unless you make it. By making it, you own the IP and Copyright to it. The same with a game.
and that should be fixed because it's clearly a broken system
they're more alike than you think
When it comes to live-service stuff that requires ongoing operations on the back end, then yes, it in many ways is
that's not what this campign is for. that is HUGE fundamental isseue
Like I understand there's many layers to it
I'm not talking about the campaign though
not with this
even DVDs have licenses
the EA thing is seperate
Well, the same goes for CD's and DVD's. Sure you own the physical disk, but you don't own the movie or the song. And if you misuse it by going against the Usage rights printed on the back of the case, you can get taken to court and sued, of if the company who's sueing you is feeling really nasty, they can take it from you.
im probably getting all up in my feels tbh
if you want to talk "digital ownership" you have to talk licenses
This is a thing with software and digital distribution, someone should keep all data on some servers, even GOG for example
So if GOG will shut down tomorrow, you will effectively lose access to games you have on GOG account because servers are down, despite them being DRM free and you can just download them and keep them forever on your drive
Yep, sadly there is no way of avoiding that
Okay, so what about car companies that lock features behind subscriptions?
different, but shittty practice none theless
Not illegal, just a bad business practice
The car isn't a digital good, and neither is the feature. If you found a way to enable it without purchasing the subscription it would work just fine, but if the company found out you did it, they would go after you for it
I drive a 14 year old car
When does it become illegal? A sub to buckle the seatbelt?
should subscriptions be illegal?
When it impacts safety, which none of Sub features do.
Still technically not illegal, unless you get into the argument that it would prevent people from following safety laws if they can't afford it
Not sure why you're answering with a question.
And even then it would have to be argued in court
The short answer is that there isn't a defined line, because there's very little legality regarding subscription restrictions
becaues it's about where you draw the line
We see more of them these days because modern digital infrastructure makes it piss easy to nickle and dime everyone
I'm pretty sure that means the systems that auto-dial 911 for you if it detects a collision
Or Onstar or whatever
That seems like it should be free?
There's no legal mandate to have those systems at all, so there's no legal punishment for charing for it
It would be better if it were free, but that's a separate issue from legality
you don't have to have it, it's an extra you can pay for. and the call system does cost to operate
There's a pretty wide gulf between what's morally good and what should be legally mandated
And where the line gets drawn between those is generally up to opinion
if you start mandating companies charge nothing for services that cost money to run, you won't have companies around much longer
that ain't feasible
There isn't a single part from that particular screenshot that is car safety related. Especially since there's no details of what "Safety Connect" is.
car companies did just fine before locking features behind subs 
seat belts do not have operating costs, to the original point, which is why a sub makes no sense
I was more so asking at which point does requiring a sub cross a legality issue
and used that as an example
When it interferes with safety laws, and the actual operation of the vehicle
the heater and the SOS call are two very differnt things there. one is a system already in the card and the other requires infastructure upkeep and operators
Yeah, by not having those features in the first place
so then saying that there wouldn't be companies around much longer is just incorrect
Less that you won't have companies, more that they won't offer those features at all, sub or not
If something requires consistent upkeep and they aren't allowed to charge for that, then they just won't do it at all
If people don't buy the cars that have those Subscription models, the company will turn around on making cars with subscription features.
my point was about mandating systems with upkeep costs, like servers, without being able to charge a fee for it
I think the question is more about, "If you have this feature, it can't be a sub"
So then they won't have that feature
I don't know where this is going anymore
Same, we kinda derailed ๐
Yea mandating that by law is not the way to go about it. And to tie it back to games, no developer or studio big or small, is going to willingly allow a system, or something that has constant upkeep to be used for free that is bleeding them dry
yeah i dunno what prompted that initial line of questioning. My brain goes off on tangents
28ish hours till midnight early access ๐
I know the feeling 
so fun fact, UK's eurovision entry this year once made a Furby Organ
wich one
THE #FURBY ORGAN! tooooo many hours were spent on this project
Download the furby song and loads more songs and music livestreams here! :-
https://www.patreon.com/lookmumnocomputer
Next patreon livestream Jam and chat is on the 19th of july. all patreons invited!
CHECK OUT MY MUSIC ON SPOTIFY :-
http://bit.ly/LMNCSpotify
Paypal :-
paypal.me/...
Do you want the gates of hell? that's how you get the gates of hell
just send the furby organ
i need to be more apathetic
I linked this earlier here too and I like how Josh articulates nuance which is a very rare find nowadays. He's right on the money that students are the primary target to get recruited and farmed, with studetns peer pressuring others into caring about everything.
I was in that enviroment. Although I wasn't a student in a student group, my peers were college/university age and they were high on 'if you don't care about this you're a bad person'
What if the furby organ played a tritone? We'd be dooomed
this is where a touch of nhilism helps
not a lot... that way lies existentialism ๐
but just a touch
like maybe 10%?
๐
innoculates you against 'if you don't care about this you're a bad person' quite effectively
no thanks on nihilism it takes me to really bad places
that's why I make sure I only do a little bit of that
just a tiny taste
Everyone thinks the sky is falling all of the time.
Just make cool shit, eat good food, hang with good people.

And turn off the news as well! News media likes to fearmonger about ww3 every day
we should practice the milenary tecnique of not giving two flying ducks
Valve is Being Sued for "Illegal Gambling" In New York
#valve #steam #gaming
This video breaks down the massive lawsuit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James against Valve for allegedly promoting illegal gambling through Counter-Strike 2, Team Fortress 2, and Dota 2. We analyze the official state allegations that claim Valveโs lo...
we've been talking about it already. i shared the tweet.
Or at the very least, pick and choose your battles.
Not everything needs a response at first, or at all. Frees up [mental] energy for yourself and for when something comes along that does require action
How the hell does gabe do it? he sits there and does nothing an wins hands down.
the competition is shooting itself in progressively more vital areas
that and [anti-corporate rhetoric]
They would actually have a chance at winning by going after the people gambling on whether gabe wins a lawsuit or not.
Really great lawyers
ohhhhhh you mean in a lawsuit way not an economic one
yea idk
If for any reason this gains traction, it will be SO FUNNY for publishers to suddenly realize their lootboxes were outlawed because they tried to bite at valve
In the laws of New York it does pass legal muster to be classified as gambling, but technically it isn't being sold in New York.
Also the value of skins is a speculative third-party marketplace that Valve makes no money off of, so it's going to be tough to prove.
No yeah the thing they are trying to do is complete bs, i was just spitballing 
You would think that, but I'm willing to bet that the lawsuit succeeds, only for the value of the sold lootboxes and not the third-party skin values.
Attorney Generals are unlikely to proceed with a case unless they know they can get the result they want.
They also get to pick their judge which doesn't do the defendant any favors
"James' office alleges that Valve assists in the online sales of the skins either through an in-house marketplace or third-party marketplaces. "
This'll be the sticking point that'll make or break the result of the lawsut
I'm curious to see her reasoning for Valve assisting with 3rd party market place
It's probably the same as any authentication service
did they give any examples?
Yeah, a skin that sold for 1 million usd
"or by connecting their accounts to third-party marketplaces, the latter of which the attorney general's office says it found Valve "facilitates and even assists."" hrm
was it a valve product or was it another game that used steam as a store?
https://steamcommunity.com/market/search?appid=730&price_min=100000 are they talking about this?
yup
they do make mention of 3rd party though
does it give any advantage or is it just a skin?
which is weird but dont forget about the steam marketplace
cause CS has a lot of expensive cosmetics
just a skin
the reasoning is because the market exists, the loot boxes promote gambling as a way to profit
or osme such
wait, wats steam min age? 13?
think so
""In Valveโs most popular game [Counter-Strike 2], the process resembles a slot machine, with an animated spinning wheel that eventually rests on a selected item. The randomly selected virtual items have no in-game functionality but can be sold online for money, with one item reportedly being sold for more than $1 million. The lawsuit alleges that Valve has made billions of dollars luring its users, many of whom are teenagers or younger, to engage in gambling in the hopes of winning expensive virtual items that they can cash in on. With this lawsuit, Attorney General James seeks to permanently stop Valve from continuing to promote illegal gambling in its games and to pay disgorgement and fines.""
personally I dont think its right to make the whole internet a safe place for EVERYONE. we should put more responsability on the parents who ignore their kids all day
if you cant control or monitor what your child does, thats on you
it's easier to go after companies than go after parents
oh for...
are we STILL on this debunked theory?
They must still think normies believe it
Pretty much sums it up
oh so theyve just nullified their entire argument (at least in my eyes). this "theory" is the kind that immediately makes me stop listening
oh come on already
That last bit is funny to me.
America vs MLB. Baseball cards are gambling
Wait until New York hears how much Genshin makes on gacha
Wait til new york hears about piรฑatas
i think they know it but its like doing a meme at this point
Bad idea to meme on a lawsuit
"Your honor, I was just memeing"
exactly. i think they are just doing the tried and true course at this moment.
Now this is really worth watching
How a single hack infected the worldโs most important operating system. Sponsored by NordVPN - Get exclusive NordVPN deal here: https://NordVPN.com/veritasium Itโs risk free with Nordโs 30 day money-back guarantee!
If youโre looking for a molecular modelling kit, try Snatoms, a kit I invented where the atoms snap together magnetically -...
a shame
i missed most of the stream yesterday. did he actually say no stream today? i know its thursday, but he missed most of the week due to his back pain.
Apparently he played Windrose yesterday as well... when? timestamp would be nice.
at end of stream he said he wouldnt be on today, he said something about it being his day off and that when he got back it would be the end of mankind.
win or lose, lawyers get paid either way
if they can drag it out a bit longer by memeing and pretending to not understand how the world works... more pennies in their pocket ๐
Wouldn't MTG cards be the same as loot boxes in that sense?
Chat, reminder to bring your corporate translator to your meetings so you wont get lost in the corporate lingo 
Super Awesome Original: @mikemancusi
Animation by: @Plan3 DrCLLEmlon https://www.instagram.com/cuteloveloverakacll?igsh=eGtvZGFlbnp6cXRp
Me talking about this ridiculous story in which Youtube's AI System banned the entire English language from stream chats today.
0:00 What Happened With Youtube's AI Today
4:10 Reading Posts Complaining About It
7:33 My Stream Today And Reaction Live
10:37 Final Thoughts
Reddit Posts:https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/1rersij/youtube_live...
I mean statistically almost all slurs and gated words are in english so why not just block the language entirely
Problem solved 
To be real, this reminds me of that one joke from therussianbadger lol
The future
End of vote where windrose wins
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/2707180400?t=5h42m42s
piratesoftware went live on Twitch. Catch up on their Just Chatting VOD now.
it is thursday, so unless stated otherwise asume no stream
fun economics fact: overall unemployment should never be zero. if it is, Uh Oh
Wait, why shouldn't it reach zero? Is it because that would mean there nobody to fill new job offerings?
Hrmmm
