#streamchat
1 messages · Page 230 of 1
cos it's videogame youtubers amirite who cares
By choice
Making it a law requiring it absurd
you have a game - servers up and go, you own, you profit
someone DDOSs you, your company folds because players quit because of the DDOS and then the people that DDOS'd you now get to play your game for free and you make no profit from the game you made
how is it not just obvious that's what some people will do?
did none of you play EVE?
Are there real life examples of games that were shut down to DDoS?
I am curious
I've never seen the words "departure-banana" and "hate-shaped pillow" before. This feels like forbidden knowledge and I feel like I have grown stronger. 
we will see!
Because it has literally already happened without SKG even existing.
But what SKG wants would make it so the developers would then be forced to hand over the IP and copyright to their game, so that it can be playable
I can totally see that. channels I've left behind weren't because of recent events, more so that they were a constant stream of negativity and just something I wasn't enjoying anymore
new initiative - everyone should have to play EVE for at least 6 months to learn to not be so naive
Could you provide examples?
I asked Cones but I am very curious like a cat
That's why my friends call me Whiskers
This announcement was originally shared back on November 13th but for anyone interested, Dread Hunger is still available on Steam for a few more days before being removed from sale on December 1st. Then on January 1st the official servers will close but the studio has made the surprising decision to hand over its online
Yes
Thank you!
there's some earlier in chat but might have been yesterday so a bit of a scroll
it's the forbidden fruit
myke might know which if about?
Imagine this scenario.
You're drawing a piece of art.
I come over and rip your paper and break your pencils, and now say that under law, you cannot draw with those pencils, or make that same drawing again.
so with skg would they have to hand all the assets over to customers
is this you joking again
No. This is a metaphor
yarp - including proprietary third party code they don't have a license to distribute
The forbidden banana
and potentially leased assets and tools and that
No it went too far!
so that 3rd party license would end up getting them sued?
Damn my hubris!
Analogy* fwiw
Lmao yes thank you
it's not like every dev company makes their own tools - they do sometimes, but it's rare to have absolutely no third party code in a complex program or game
Metaphor is like saying "this guys is pretty smart, walking wikipedia"
is this supposed to mean something
is why games have "Autodesk" plastered all over them on the splash screens
this is a metaphor: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2679460/Metaphor_ReFantazio/
From the creative minds behind Persona 3, 4, and 5 comes Metaphor: ReFantazio.
Brace yourself for the next evolution of fantasy JRPG with Metaphor: ReFantazio, available now. Winner of 50+ awards, with a free demo that carries save-data to the full game. Enter the royal tournament to fight for the throne and for the future. Control your…
$41.99
20109
92
Nah nah they have a point
I have a take on that but it's cruel and selfish
i am not in the mood for stories
i.e.: tough luck
and "havok" to think of it
Better luck next time
a few othersx
I still want the game I paid for
like games done in unreal engine need to still have the persmission from epic games to continue to exist if a game gets delisted
Yes. This is what is happening when you force a DDOS a games server and force a developer to hand over their game because it is no longer playable because of SKG.
omg they are dumber than shit
Could we not
do that
Apply empathy and imagine people take screenshots of this chat and call people here dumb
and that matters to the consumer because...............
Would'nt feel very wholesome would it
action dan i came here asking to learn, and i have learned one thing. i will be signing the thingy
Because you are taking the right of something the developer made away from them. Like again, if I said that you could not draw your drawing anymore.
Don't make up your mind off the smugness of one member
But do sign it only because I said so
if companies can't make money off of their products, they won't make those products. Congrats, SKG just killed games
im betting on it taking a month after parliament gets it to see them throw it out
action dan does not care about people, but companies? why is that
Yes, giving all of these examples and taking the time to explain things is "smug"
wait, you had examples?
You talk in a very hostile, not very understanding way
Okay this is either a troll or genuinely upsetting
From a position of truth rather than a position of dialogue
Sure, sure.
and im being called a corpo dick sucker cause of my opinion
stories arnt examples
Dude have a Snickers and return when you've cleared your head
The marketplace of ideas die if you join conversation after inexorably making up your mind
This announcement was originally shared back on November 13th but for anyone interested, Dread Hunger is still available on Steam for a few more days before being removed from sale on December 1st. Then on January 1st the official servers will close but the studio has made the surprising decision to hand over its online
ip grab
Nah it's not, it's very sad, Dread Hunger was a cool concept
Companies (especially small indies) are made out of people.
It sorta is, but not in a highway robbery way
you would need the assets too, otherwise you'd be playing in an empty map
And that network stuff is their own code and assets, which is also IP and Copyright
You can't have one without the other
Sure, so in the case of a live service game, at the very least, the company has to hand over some form of functional executable that spins up a server, through a VM or natively on Linux (assuming here, it's the most used one) and a way for the game to run
At least not in a lot of games
people can host tf2 servers, but valve still owns tf2
what is your point
That's handing over your assets, in a way
Different type of game. There are thousands of different types of games that do not work the same way.
really?
I say we let it all die. Start over from the beginning. One dot on a screen jumping up and down.
Ah yes the roaring 50s
they made the game with that in mind, and it is possible for everyone, it is just extra work that might not be reasonable to expect from people
only Pong remains
The return of Pong overlords
at the very least that will make games more expensive and i doubt you want that either
Pong at 240hz would be sick
I see discussion of the SKG stuff seems to have left the community pretty divided....
I wouldn't say it does, but it adds an overhead where a studio has to prepare for it, and that preparation costs money
notice how action dan is too scared to reply to me
Honestly just kill the games so i can be productive with my life again
player-hosted servers are not possible in all cases, no matter how much SKG-supporters may say otherwise
The community can be divived on opinions as long as they respect each other
Historically what normally happens is someone makes a FOSS solution for either packaging that kinda shit or making distribution easier
This is all also not mentioning OS stuff over time.
Who maintains the updates for compatibility?
That's the best way to hash things out, tbh
I personally don't care about the developer, my relationship with them is strictly transactional. Unless the game is free I suppose
If it makes live service games less prolific, that's skill issue
And when those developers stop making games, because they can't afford to continue?
Well, then expect those transactions to go up if all that extra work is legally mandated
'cause it's going to be paid for somehow
And publisher sure wont tank those costs
killing games in the crib isnt any better than doing so on their deathbed
I don't hold people's opinions against them on things like how videogames are made because that's insanely anti-social
he's supporting SKG, not a Pirate hit piece, diffrent things
So long as people are not like trolling
my best faith interpretation would be that the developer would hand over the files at end of life and that would be it. no more support. then it's up others to pick up the pieces
but make it modern, with NFTs and microtransactions, like you have 3 lives which regenerate slowly over time or you can buy more for money, and don't forget skins (aka different colors for the dot).
Not really.
Folks are able to have polite discussions, explaining their perspectives, and so on. There's an incredibly small amount of people who are part of the community that is actually "divided" in any sense of it.
Folks disagreeing politely whilst discussing things isn't a division, it is a conversation. There are things that would be doable but a lot of people here, myself included, have criticised SKG because they don't seem to want anything but a hardline "apply a new law to all games making some games illegal."
Which... isn't good.
Oh yeah another youtuber for people to mindlessly hate
BEST case. Sure.
This already happens
That's a massive endorsement wow
when IPs are sold
Except that is what the wording is in SKG, and Ross refuses to change it.
Everyone relevant enough have some people that hate them. It's unfortunate
if the company chooses yes. my intepretation is thjat SKG would enforce it
you are incorrect in that. Huge swathes of the game industry moved on from easily replicated server architectures because they needed to in order to make the game they wanted. They would need to maintain two code bases, one with that architecture, and one that vaguely functions like it to appease the requirements
It is, sadly.
Yes, to either package it somehow, or sell it, rather than looking at the playerbase that paid for the game and going "lmao so sorry guys we tried our best 😢 "
It's fundamentally ignoring the conversation of IP and Copyright. Which is a conversation it will absolutely have to have.
And giving certain games over to the public means also giving them the IP and Copyright to the game, which means the game is no longer theres. It is an avoidable discussion that the Initiative just "hand-waves" away
What's crazy is going "Wow this youtuber disagrees with my favourite youtuber what a scumbag"
When like
It's one take
they could already sell if they chose. nothing would change there. only the part where they don't find a buyer
the initiative doesnt require devs to release server binaries, ive seen that alot but thats not a requirement, devs will be left to do whatever they need or want to do
Then package some form of executable and release it to idk the internet archive
And yet, what SKG wants requires handing over the server binaries for certain games.
There are a lot of examples of older games that have been handed over to their dedicated communities. Sometimes the code base is open sourced. It would be nice to have laws about that, in my opinion.
I'm not fond of the term server binaries
Don't binaries mean the source code?
where on the page does it state exactly server binaries will be required to be released, not pulling your leg or anything, just actually asking
Becuase they were made with server hosting in mind.
cause i can show you where ross has stated that they wont be
yeah, that's what my comment was
I am talking about new games. They still would want to use the more modern architecture, because it allows for things that can't be easily replicated through offline or self-hosted systems
not on the page but i can still show
It is retroactively by necessity for what it is arguing for. Hell, it states on the website that games that don't comport to it would have to be "shut down or grandfathered in."
Which means that any current game with any kind of online functionality can no longer be updated, or maintained as it is.
Through a logical conclusion of wanting the game to be handed over the the public.
For some games, you can't hand over the game over to the public without also giving away server binaries, and have the company keep the IP and copyright to the game.
Those two things do not fundamentally exist
What is the alternative solution for handing out server binaries for a live service game that went caput?
me when i dont read dragonrage's messages proving me wrong
then in those cases, those games cant be released in "reasonably playable state"
I don't see any. you'd need those to to run it
"grandfathered in" literally means that the new rule will not apply to them
With my newfound knowledge I can say that source code and server binaries are different things
I thought they were the same but nope
But they are in a perfectly playable state when the game is released.
i cant speak on the tech side because im just an artist but i see minecraft has things like realms or you can still run a server even without realms still
you've said nothing the last 10 minutes
It really depends on what SKG means by leaving a game in a functional state. Cause at some point you might need drivers that are not available, hardware that does not exist, emulator for a device that has been discontinued, rights to materials that are so old that copyright laws have been reinvented in 15 different ways etc...
If you are a consumer you could argue that if you need to put any effort into making a game run besides clicking an executable and that is definitely something the developer can't under any circumstance guarantee. This is why most of the TOS of those games are the way they are.
Although blizzard could definitely rewrite their TOS so that they can only terminate accounts for a reason lol.
Think broader, say, an MMO
but we are talking about after the life cycle of the game, we both know that
yeah, because it's architected that way. not all games are
"What is a functional playable state" is a very difficult question
there's a lot of answers to it but I believe the most you would need would be removing the account requirement to launch the game after EOL
You cant connect to servers if there aren't any
but the player can mod the game so they can connect to player hosted servers
Imagine tomorrow Albion dies and nobody wants to buy it, how to keep it alive?
The amount of creators making videos on this subject is pretty staggering.
oh yea that one is more complicated, i couldnt tell you myself you would definitely have to ask someone with networking or programming knowledge
Indeed, I thought binaries meant source code and executable was the correct term
The last ditch effort for the drama farming is working
Annoyingly
So the standing argument is server binaries
Correct. Only problem is that how laws work means that games that currently exist require updates. When an update occurs, legally speaking it is now a "new" product that would be required to comport to new laws.
To make an exception to exclude the updating functionalities would create the biggest legal loophole likely in legal history.
That's never going to happen without also making any law change functionally meaningless.
I had a person argue with me about how they should be able to play an MMO solo. Good luck with that i guess lol.
binaries also includes libraries
yeah the drama is really annoying at times
Yes, which means at the end of the life cycle, you are handing over the copyright and ip of your game to the individual. You are essentially saying to someone
"Oh is that your art? By law you are required to give it to me, and now it is my art, and I made this"
executable generally just refers to the file you actually run
thats why down the line, games could be architected down the line, again i dont want to throw devs into the deep end so im all for giving devs time to adjust to such a big change if they decide to make a new mmo (not ones currently in development)
It is sadly and jacksepticeye's video coming out and bashing thor today as well drove up it more
Jack made a video as well?
If the code is compiled aren't the libraries already part of the compiled code?
Software doesn't work like that. Especially in today's age where there are much more complicated architecture with services, libraries and licenses that depend on one another to work.
This isn't a sudoku game you made in 1 python script.
thats not how that works
What did you even prove me wrong about? You have spoken for about 25 minutes
and it would also depend on the company
well... the trouble is kinda that library can refer to both source code but also to the compiled binaries
Ross's Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HIfRLujXtUo
Sign the EU petition: https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home
Sign the UK petition: https://www.stopkillinggames.com/countries/united_kingdom
Or is the concern licensing?
Infact, that actually IS how it works.
Oh man speaking on that note of copyright holders etc, CDPRs INSANE work to get an old game going and the amount of sweat and legal stuff they jump through is crazy for GOG.
Even requiring they themselves rebuild stuff for the title with dev work as a third party.
you know what's funny about this. Anthem is still playable even tho it was a Live Service Looter Shooter.
But yes the servers are still up and the game is on Game pass so its technically free to play. So if you wanted to you could play Anthem. idk if i recommend that tho.
yeah I'm curious how Thor is going to take this one, as he's said on stream before how much he respects and owes to jacksepticeye in the past.
so games that have previously managed to do this, would you say they got hurt
That doesn't make sense to me. I'll have to look this up
And Jack just bashed him in the first 2 minutes
What is this thumbnail lmao
Slop
blizzard could hand you their server binaries, but I doubt you'd be able to run them. it's not a single server, it's multiple that have to work together perfectly. they have whole teams running that. they also run them on specialized hardware like this:
The current software architecture can be varied greatly. Those binaries could be calling an outside service. Parts of those binaries could be depedent on libraries which have license restriction
again, all the initiative is asking is to leave games in a reasonable playable state, if a game cant be playable cause it isnt possible, then thats fine
I agree with the general sentiment SKG has but the hate is actually unreal. I also feel sorry for thor receiving death threats n shit.
They're all like that, but it announces they're arguing in bad-faith right up front that way
Oh that's the developer's problem
You literally just make it worse for everyone involved
Those games were written in completely different ways, and used completely different methods of accessing servers compared a lot of other games on the markets
idc about that
I mean, we can agree Thor didn't have the best approach to dismissing SKG, and did miss some of the main points of it, the grounds for miss-information isn't unreasonable.
privates servers do exists. but these are made from reverse engineering and are not provided by Blizzard. there is a lot of effort to make these even semi-playable
Again, not every game is the same size and scope.
I wouldn't blame him for just repeating a sentence someone told him to say. I don't expect everyone to be correct with every single statement they make ever. Don't worry, he does not spend most of the video butchering Thor like most of the creators did.
i'm trying to wonder why Star wars Battlefront 2 on in the thumbnail. its like Act man is trying to say Thor is trying to kill SWBF2
god all these people just jumping on thor now, its been ten months get over it
source code is a listing of commands to be compiled or assembled into an executable computer program.
A server binary is the executable code of a server application.
The latter is the end product of the former
I feel like I'm missing something here... Source code would be 'human readable code' ja? IE I write out the game Maze on Demand! in.. Java, publish it with an exe that players buy which runs a client side interface to my server. That client is also written in source code, but the exe the player gets is a binary, because I compile my source code in binary executables to run since machines don't use human readable code, they use binary code... If I give the players both the server side and client executable, what exactly prevents them just decompiling both into the source code?
That's not how it works
basically... when you are making a program you can include a library where for example in C you include the headers and link against the compiled library file (.so/.a/.lib/dll file usually)
the compiled file is a binary file that contains executable code, but isn't on its own executable, it needs to have a program (.exe on windows) that calls to code in that binary
ofc it failed. Asking any and all devs to share their code base for free at EOL even when they may be making a sequel or even HAVE a sequel is asanine. That way you just wait till EOL why even buy a game??
Btw I'm not saying this is imoral to disagree with. If you're lazy or old and don't want to learn new ways of doing things because a law passed that gives your clients the right to what they paid for it's totally fair to disagree with the initiative
more or less
I geniunely think most stuff can be fixed but just having more than one database solution tbh. I would love to have someone show an actual example of "They this is literally impossible"
https://tenor.com/view/ogvhs-get-it-come-get-it-come-on-gif-18199469
ofc it failed. Asking any and all devs to share their code base for free at EOL even when they may be making a sequel or even HAVE a sequel is asanine. That way you just wait till EOL why even buy a game??
exactly, so saying its no possible is not an out, saying its hard, i would completely understand, and also i really dont want people to gloss over the fact that if a game cant be left playable because it literally isnt possible, then most people would accept that, and again im saying most people, of course there will be trolls but those are hella few compared to the majority
Nobody is asking this
You are literally strawmanning so hard rn
if a game cant be left playable cause it aint possible then thats fine
What's the issue of using such libraries?
you can't reverse the process. you can approximate what source code lead to what machine code. comments and the like are gone forever
I mean releasing them as part of the binaries
My god... I like Jack, he's awesome, but man I wish folks with no background or interest in politics would stop doing political commentary...
-.-
Sure let me call Todd Howard and have him send me the design document of Elder Scrolls 6
the initiative wants games to be left in a reasonably playable state
they got licenses
Most reasonable take goddamn
might not be allowed to reshare the compiled binaries
Kudos
"reversed engineered" aka someone at blizzard stole, i mean took, a wip snippet and they get it running somehow. Somehow = run with problems like crashes and bad performance.
If you're asking for it to be changed then you are asking game development to go backwards in time. When the technology and the way games are made nowadays will not run through those methods.
You are wiping out an entire genre of games by doing that.
can't all companies just say "it's not possible" then? would someone be checking it?
@candid shuttle
no man, for me id accept new mmos releasing in the future, not ones already in development
???
Is it impossible or impractical to use libraries with a possibility to re-share, or to use potential FOSS made specifically for post SKG server development?
It depends on the game, the libraries that they use and the licenses associated with the use of said libraries
bro...how dare someone talk about someone that effects them bro that's so political bro i cant how dare u talk about politics bro thats so uncool you dont even have a phd in political science u cant talk about politics.
cause it would be a hard thing to adjust to
I've seen reverse engineered servers for games, but those were based on guesswork at architecture, and the client code could be decompiled rather easily since it was C# unity, unobfuscated or il2cppd
personally, I think anyone thats going "Thats not my problem" or "thats the developers issue" ONLY cares about the game being playable, and none of the legal stuff that goes on behind the scenes, they also never seem to have any legitimate answer to how the games would even be able to run.
yeah, im coming in here parotting the same thing ive said before, but theres new people here, so its nice to get new perspectives on very real, very legitimate logistical hurdles people are saying "are up to the developer"
Yes, and you're literally not allowing a game to be developed in a certain way. Which means that genre dies.
so it's not impossible
people on the internet are stupid, but devs would pick up on it and start speaking out about it
It is the natural conclusion when you think of the implementation of such an idea. I have yet to see someone bring forth something that not this. Also, yes I also love games and yes, media/art being lost is something that should not happen and that we should stop.
well then you're possibly looking at subpar performance because of EOL support
Like I said, some games will pass whatever requirements this initiative will enforce easily, some games will require significant more work, some games will need to restructure the entire architecture, some games will be impossible to make as they currently stand
And who's gonna decide if it's possible or not? 'Cause devs, specifically AAA companies, will just declare technical impossibility of preservation and so the initiative is dead in the water.
And SKG does not distinguish between any of them
since the company couldn't use the best available product
when a game is at EOL why spend the money restructruring the whole game? its stupid and useless
That to me sounds like developer skill issue
i mean in case for the wow servers. those "reversed engineered" things exist since classic and it's always the same.
Is that supbar performance permanent and impossible to solve?
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Most signs point to yes, seeing backwards compitability issues for like FF14 with the PS3, 4, and 5.
Sorry if I'm treating you like a parent having to answer a million questions but you seem knowledgeable and I only ever made tiny server that weren't for gaming
Maybe? I mean there is lots of ways to make games playable after release. They could release a design document for the network architecture so players can write their own servers. They could release binaries which players can then patch. Thats how the first Minecraft Servers were made.
I mean even if it is possible, if it requires a huge financial burden then it's basically killing the game for all intents and purposes. So the SKG initiative as it currently stands due to it's vagueness may in fact be killing some games.
i feel like im talking to a wall, look whatever game you believe cant be made to survive after EOL/servers go offline, then those games are fine, the initiative is stating that if its possible to leave a game in a playable state, then try to do it (paraphrasing because we both know ive been here talking almost everyday
)
I think all of this boils down to "allow the to put an IP somewhere so I can use a different server"
The initiative isn't retroactive
What do you mean?
it's kinda like saying "all cars must only be rear wheel drive". you're now limited to that. wanted four wheel drive? not allowed
Killing new games
Killing innovation which is what Thor argued and has always argued
This is not even true. Making games is a design process, especially when you plan on asking for money for it.
Yeah and unlimited immigration was not supposed to steal jobs or distablize countries or make it harder for native the population to get homes but here we are. These EOL plans eventually boil down to software being made available at no cost.
Now if there was say a sort of foundation that games go to at EOL and any profit of the game still goes to the devs then I am 1000% on board, but thats not this movement in its current form.
Thats why grassroots movements are so important, because they can garner connections and request meeting with big publishers to show "hey guys, this is good actually, heres why." it happened quite a few times. The gaming company Digital Eclipse stem from such a movement, a company which does a new genre of museum games where the game is like a documentary that you can also play. Like a game package with many games, or versions of games inside including interviews with the devs both from back in the day and from today.
Sounds like little faith on people's sheer determinaton to realize a packaging solution
You completely missed the point....
well I don't know everything either, just mostly stuff about how software could be stuck together with dependencies, tho what I've only ever used was open source/ source available, but then you still had to keep the licenses in mind
if I was to make a game, and I had all the rights to the game, and people loved the game, and I decide I want to make a different game, and focus on that, why should I, as the game developer, either, hand you ALL the files for the game (which I would still own, so good luck changing anything) and why would I hand out all the server stuff, that would be an extra cost TO YOU, not to me?
"whatever game you believe cant be made to survive after EOL/servers go offline, then those games are fine,"
No, it wants those games to still be playable by the individual. It wants to legally enforce this.
Which is, in fact, creating innovation
please, can someone whos Pro SKG, please answer that.
most of the innovation if not all that ive seen have been single player offline games, im actually curious which ones you know, not being cheeky, actually curious
Love me some Thor but "OMG Guys we're like killing future IPs like concord!!!!! Oh no Scoob, don't prevent 10 clones of dead by daylight with cosmetic transactions who shut their servers down after 1 years STOP!!!"
why annoyingly?
what do you find wrong with the initiative?
no it doesnt
CAT
thats all i need to say
The one thing the initiative won't do is kill new games. It might kill some creativity and innovation, but its far more likely to just cause: Higher Prices or Removal of an entire Market Share for some games. And before people say 'Noone would ever stop selling to the european market!' let's review Sony this last year with purchase restrictions as they chewed through legal changes in the EU along with trying to drive up PSN accounts.
cause it isnt true
Releasing a binary is jsut releasing code with extra steps.
Holy if this is the type of conversation we are going to have I don't wanna talk anymore. You are going from preserving video games to the most racist argumentsI have seen in my life
Then you're ignoring what the Initiative wants from its own wording.
"Guys we need more IP clones that charge you for cosmetics and shut their servers down after 1 year STOP!"
how would this even work?
what was racist about it?
A SMALL 3 person studio does NOT have the budget for setting up an entire EOL pipeline
no. binaries are shipped around all time. source code is the secret sauce
We need more concords STOPP GYUS !!!
Sure it won't kill all new games. It'll just kill innovation of some games, it'll raise the prices of other games. It'll make game development way more restrictive.
Can't we all just consume product and get excited for next product?!?!
if an mmo cant be left in a reasonably playable state, like if its impossible, then those games would be excluded, are you saying its possible then? (and no thats not what the initiative states, it states to leave games in a reasonably playable state)
Don't sign anything just rot in your basement AS USUAL
Then elaborate to me how asking people to have EOL plans for a paid game is literally impossible to implement and kills games?
WoW update soon guys!
The biggest thing that would happen is that some games would turn into a subscription based purchase like WOW
Don't play free servers
The way I think of it, because I don't have that much knowledge besides webdev, is stuff like React, Laravel, Node, DBMSs and stuff like that.
Libraries, runtimes, framewors and other technologies that were created to fit a niche and are FOSS, and usable for comercial products without a license
A 3 person studio is more likely designing a p2p multiplayer like Rabbit and Steel, or single player game like Stardew Valley and neither of these types of games need to even bother worrying about the initiative.
I've already elaborated my points above. Kindly read it and respond to them. I'm not your tutor.
Companies like Blizzard and the gemlins behind Star Citizen don't have enough of 365 vacation days a year and 10th generational wealth
tPLEASE GUYS STOP SINGING
It's poor faith to think that a law mussing up the hair of one of the world's largest industries and that industry generating a solution is not plausible whereas a criminal DDoSing a studio to get their binaries is
most mmo cannot be not excluded most of them have some activities or raid that are made to have 10+ players
" it states to leave games in a reasonably playable state"
You just proved my point that that is what the Initiative wants. How can a game be in a playable state, when it is not left in a playable state?
pretty sure most of those need a license, or your use of the language/framework just comes with an implicit license
OOPS
It wont kill new games as in they will come out and they will die. It will kill them in their infancy. Because devs arent gonna want to deal with that crap. That's still killing games.
I don't think criminals DDOSing a studio to gain access of licensed binaries is an argument people made...or at least I didn't make that.
Why would it kill innovation? I would say it'd probably help some game development studios get their tracks straight.
Lots of games get released without being ready, maybe this will provide a legal reason to prevent that sort of behaviour.
like, you making an account to push packages you agreed that your packages would fall under a license to be used within that framework by anyone with commercial allowance or whatever
your missing the point, if a game cant be left playable, then that game would be excluded
Guys we need more alphas and EVEN LESS beta testers
I would appreciate it if you forward them or smth there is so much shit in the chat going on I can hardly find anything. My DMs are also open if you wanna copy paste stuff.
For the ones I mentioned you can kinda do whatever you want with them
The Initiative does not say that.
it wouldnt work, no company will EVER just hand out their stuff to random people, and random people, dont have the money to license it themselves
then that would probably be the unlicense
Thor made that argument
A permissive free software license is what it's called it seems
this is on the eu initiative website btw, to be transparent with you
Please stop we need cloned IPS with cosmetics dependant on servers that will shut down in an unreasonable amount of time PLEASE I DON'T EVEN WANT MY MONEY
^
Where does that say that what games are excluded? it doesn't
Thats the main docuement
It will kill innovation because it will restrict the architecture, the technology, the libraries and the services future games will be able to leverage.
that says nothing, not even a single word, about excluding any game
and where's the exemption?
SKG has a good core idea, but tries to grab too much. It needs a narrower, stricter definition to actually work well.
What Thor went for is an edge case, which is still covered by base SKG initiative.
Tucking the limitation into FAQ is bad design for a law, as is putting out a vague law and letting courts decide how it should work. The current initiative should be updated to be specific in what it requires.
it quite literally says all games
oop, screenshotted the wrong part lol
silly me
I don't think there is anything in the initiative that would impact early access games... Specially with all the warnings ands service terms you agree to in buying into an early access. Much like any investing strategy, choosing to invest in an unfinished product runs the risk of losing your investment... And that will absolutely be the track industry lawyers take with that.
A permissive software license, sometimes also called BSD-like or BSD-style license, is a free-software license which instead of copyleft protections, carries only minimal restrictions on how the software can be used, modified, and redistributed, usually including a warranty disclaimer. Examples include the GNU All-permissive License, MIT License...
"requires publishers that sell or licenses videogames" "To leave said videogames in a functional (playable) state" What video games? all video games? because it says games.
open software like React wouldn't be a problem. it's paid stuff like Easy Anti Cheat that would be an issue
There actually were because their argument was basicly like "ddos them so you can kill the game, run your own server and then make easy money"
Please we have to save games like concord
Guys I have the perfect solution
The game can be opened and run but cant connect to any servers when it shuts down
It can only access offline content if any exists
you dont need to give the players anything, or remove items from their library
Just take off the account verification after you shut down the servers
and Dating sims
yeah so ALLLL that code is licensed
It's a weak argument. There are better ones such as what I'm making and such as a lot of the other arguments Thor made
it still says nothing about excluding any game from being left in a playable state
I think license here is being strawmanned when in fact for the most part it won't matter
that still doesnt say whats excluded and whats not...
So then the game doesn't work if the servers shuts down
licenses ALWAYS matter
the word says reasonably playable state, if theres a game that cant be left in that state then it would be excluded, but look i realise me saying this doesnt matter
Wait I think I remember thor mentioning this, what was the problem?
Missed the planet and hit the moon
Guys we need more kernal side anti cheat PLEASE just take the dead for my house, IDC if the game is shutting down 11months after it came out
reasonably playable still means playable
deed***
Nah the game works
it opens and loads assets just fine
you just need to make your own servers to play online
it's just the same thing worded differently
that's not even the problem, how would your run binaries you have no instructions to, in a decade? Like, you have a Linux binary for a server (reasonable case), but it was built for a previous major kernel version and there's been a dozen versions of glibc since. Good luck getting it to run 
from a technical point that would be doable. the difficulty would be the licenses involved
No, license is part of the reason The Crew shutdown and a driving factor in starting all this. Ubisoft didn't want to purchase additional time on the licenses for cars and things in The Crew when they already had a sequel out and were spending for licenses there.
It's not a strawman, it's a legitimate argument to make because it's a big problem.
witness the white patch on my void
would you say then its reasonable for mmos to be left playable, i would say no if its impossible as people have made me aware of here
How can license restrictions be a strawman?
it would make more sense to say "if a game could reasonably be left in a playable state"
the void is getting old
yes its a "good" solution but if its not in the game at launch nobody will make that happen cause it takes ressource and people and cost money while everybody is moving to new teams/game
Yeah but these extra steps are usually the line between the customer is allowed to have this and the customer isnt allowed to have this. Thats kinda the entire issue. I think its fine that they don't explicitly say how they are supposed to do it because it lets companies pick the way they like. I think releasing the networks design document idea is great because you stop wasting peoples time having to reverse engieer stuff but at the same time dont have to give out licensed components. Also putting an IP address somewhere in a client isnt hard.
The kneejerk reaction of revoking the game from peoples accounts by Ubisoft was likely an overreaction of caution to avoid any risk of being on the hook for those licenses too.
yeah off brand servers solve the issue
When you put every license in a bundle, call it the license villain bad man and ignore the most software in the planet, in fact most of the internet at large, is built on software with licenses that don't care how you distribute it so long as it's clear the original creators won't provide a warranty for it, yes, it is a strawman
What if parts of the game dependent on online servers? Then if those servers shut down the game isn't in a playable state
Because I have to ask
even so, i would argue that but i dont know the innerworkings of private servers and such
Which licenses?
if you can get it to run, the game would be in a functional/playable state, so in theory, it sounds like SKG is just a bunch of SKill issue Gamers
that one wasn't sarcastic lol
This is coming together a lot faster than even I expected, it's almost time to jump back into TC1!
Support The Crew Unlimited: https://discord.com/invite/gUczTkphGE
❱ Subscribe for more gameplay! - http://sub.bpyt.me/
❱ Official Store - http://panthaa.store
❱ Support the channel! - http://member.bpyt.me
❱ Partnered with Turtle Beach - ...
We have been reading your comments, and it's time for an update: discover the latest news from Ubisoft Ivory Tower regarding the future offline modes coming to The Crew 2 and The Crew Motorfest.
Transfer hundreds of cars from The Crew 2 to The Crew Motorfest for FREE with the Collection Import. More info here: https://ubi.li/rHcEZ"
About The C...
that is... my point?
And why is software attached to those so important nobody ever will build anything else?
reasonably playable shouldnt be hard to understand
it still means playable
I can chuck a snippet of code in Go at you, can you build it?
Too little too late boobysoft I am never buying your products
Its not impossible for the community to create their own servers, for example, the ECHO VR community were able to make compatiable servers to replace Meta's infrastructure, as long as we're legally protected to do that, game developers have an easy out for allowing us to do so
but then what if a game cant be left playable, what then? thats where the reasonability comes in
But some of those licenses have restrictions. We aren't talking about all licenses.
I'm over ubisoft and treyarch or W.E
oh yeah I remember that, I made a modloader for that on quest
This is the fun of something so vague and broad.
So many takes on what x means while the initiative itself doesnt specify or clarify what it means itself.
never got much use tho
Good, thats exactly my point
or any updates 
No I gave the first example of the intention of something and the reality of something not alligning. One of my best friends had to feel London because of that shiet. I could have also given the example of the Cobra problem that led to cobra breeding.
What the heck do you mean racist? I never brought any race religion or creed into this I am talking LOGISTICS. If you have 10 houses 10 people and you import 15 you have a housing problem. No racism required.
Every time I boycott and come back to Cod... 3 times in the last 25 years I buy the CRAPPY VERSIONS WTFFFF IS UP WITH IPs having ten diffferent friggendevs
you're arguing exactly what i'm saying the problem is. their wording implies it must be left playable, you're saying things that don't exist, i've offered wording that would make it make sense, and you're just repeating yourself on the same mistaken interpretation
thing is, what im saying is completely valid and im even being charitable towards devs, how am i still getting push back by saying that if a game cant be left playable, then thats fine
Licenses aren't always software. If you want Coca-Cola in your game, you're gonna go to Coca-Cola and pay for the licensing rights to include it. If you want the Jets in your american football game, you're gonna pay their licensing fee. If you want <insert any car brand> in your racing game, you guessed it. You're paying the licensing for it! How those contracts are structured can vary wildly.
And games vary a lot and many games especially bigger ones may rely on restrictive licenses
Sorry I was like reading through chat which is going quite fast and reading stuff is pretty hard by why the heck did the word racist zoom by wtf
I had a course called binary malware analysis where we reverse engineered the binaries. That being said fair point.
Developer skill issue
"It does not seek to acquire said ownership of video games, or expect publishers to provide resources for the said video game while leaving it in a reasonably functionable playable state"
But for a lot of games, leaving it in a functional playable state would require them to hand over the IP and copyright over to the individual (Which means, the individual acquiring the ownership of the game) or to provide the resources (i.e. their code, assets, server binaries) Which is also handing over the IP and Copyright over.
You see how that screenshot makes zero sense?
thats not how i understood it, most people have understood it the same way
your actual stance on it is fine, but the words mean something different than what your stance personally is
i get that, but im trying not to argue about something i dont really know, like servers and such
You don't know anything about creating software then if you say developer skill issue.
you need those for stuff like music and cars. otherwise no Ferrari in the car game. music industry would never let you have an open license either
"Just create the next GTA 7 in python"
Do you have an example where that is the case? Because they can always just remove licensed cars for example.
the words must be what are upheld in the case of law, so if the law says "reasonably playable," instead of "can be reasonably left playable," then things will go very wrong
Easy task frfr /j
Yes, I do. When something doesn't exist, I make it, instead of wallowing in self pity
jesus theres a lot of skeptics here in chat
Whilst I agree with you in principle if anything like this becomes law (so I am talking beyond the initiative) then logically it will effect smaller studios to the point that they may not even be able to make their game. This is all speculation but I hope you can at least see where I am coming from.
Lifetime licenses exist. Need For Speed Underground for the PS2 still has branded cars
Did he address them well?
armpit white patch
Not wrong, I can agree with that.
You can make AAA games?
and it does just as poor job of explaining the issues away as the written FAQ
Let me try and find the video
Do you?
the way i see it is both sides are interpreting it 2 different ways, but then you might say "oh well its poorly worded if both sides take it in different ways", but honestly its more like 90% of people are getting it right, and then the rest is getting it wrong. specifically that wording
you guys stop puttiong up for thor. he is wrong. he needs to apologize and learn how to actually deal with this stuff before he looses his career. hes a great guy who just cant seem to own up when he does or says something wrong it dosnt meen hes a bad person everyone gets something wrong sometimes its ridiculous
Yes. Games like World of Warcraft as an example. You cannot hand over a way for people to run a server on their machines without risking or handing over the IP and copyright to their game.
what are you that dumb
Also licensed work can be removed when the license ends. GTA 5 did this a lot with their music to my knowledge.
Perhaps a threshold could be put in place to make sure smaller studios cannot be abused by this system
as someone who works in a software dev company, and who ran pirate servers for a couple of then-popular MMOs - running a server emulator is not trivial. Running an official server is very not trivial. Running a community server is a goshdarn nightmare.
I am all for online-"dependent" games supporting offline mode, if online dependency is not core to the gameplay. Like, I heard Little Big Planet is being archived, and there's a community servers of some sort - this is great.
But blindly demanding the game to be preserved is just stupid. You can't preserve a game like Helldivers or PoE.
Bruh
"Needs to apologize" the goal posts are non existent now ig
Tell us how he is wrong. We'll wait.

he apologized for being rude
I can't. It requires a team of developers, lots of money, knowledge of huge architecture, licenses etc.
I doubt you can either that's why what you said was ignorant.
the wording is what must be upheld, not the feelings hiding behind it. direct meaning matters in law, else it will be overturned or misused
I thought the problem in the first place was small studios
Yeah but this is the internet, so it just doesnt count obviously /s
Thinking a AAA company won't solve it is beyond naive
I never heard about this. Is there a specific law for this? I would love to hear about this so I can actually understand the issue.
I thought the problem according to you was developer skill issue?
PS2 was a different era. they likely have a time limited license that would prevent them from legally selling the game 10 years later. but since it's offline there is no way to remove it from the disk
chat, I know what the problem is
👍
it's the internet
Yes. Copyright and IP law. The developers have the right to own the things they make. Whether that be Assets, code, server libraries etc.
if Need for Speed Underground was to have private servers (I have no clue how the game works, so dont get mad at me) because they were to not want their servers up anymore, who would then pay to transfer the license? the person hosting the private server? who would they pay? the people who made the game? the car creators?
nah they'll just move to 80 dollar games with an excuse
SHUT OFF THE INTERNET!
The apocalyptic vision of a genre of games being detonated is developer skill issue yes
yes please
Mood
What is that argument? I have the right to keep the shit I paid for too?
Borderlands 4 my behated
His apology was accepted and acknowled by a few 'rage bait' streams whose covered this, but they're still upset Thor had missunderstanding about the initiative and didn't clear things up. That's the main point really.
* @serene valley has left the chat
the thing is i wasnt confused at all by the meaning of "reasonably playable state", but it seems like people are overthinking and misinterpreting that phrase, despite most people understanding it. its clear cut, games to be left in a reasonably playable state, if its not possible for an mmo for example to be left playable as people here have suggested, then those situations would be left out cause it would be unreasonable for the impossible to happen
Yeah, but not every license is lifetime these days. It's not just the feth'n software like adobe and microsoft office going to subscription models as everyone tries to squeeze everyone else for more money.
Explode the galaxy, no more problems
Its that easy
Now you're not arguing in good faith. That is not what Thor argued against.
clearly consumers have no idea what they want other than consuum
another slop video hit the feeds. And it's pulling numbers ~85k in 4 hours and the one that pissed me off this morening also had ~85k in 5 hours
I did say lifetime
You haven't had the right keep the media you've bought since like, the 70's or even earlier.

Good idea.
Provided to YouTube by Create Music Group
Get Off The Internet · Eliminate · fussy
Get Off The Internet
℗ Eliminate Music / Create Music Group Inc.
Released on: 2024-02-02
Author: fussy
Author: Nathan Merrill
Auto-generated by YouTube.
Bruh
Except that's not what's happening.
SKG is a political movement that has similarities to other movements, all of which if I were to talk about I would recieve warnings for since they would go into the realms of politics not allowed in this Discord. That's the point. This isn't about games, this isn't about preservation, it isn't about any of those things that Scott claims SKG is about; it is raw politics, propaganda, and him wanting to turn his baby (his slogan of SKG) into a political movement to ban certain types of games from being developed full-stop.
I can with clear proof demonstrate this, but again, this is going into full-blown politics. Something which most people aren't willing to talk about, because gamers and developers just like their own games and view this as "Oh, this sounds good - let me support this, and also the guy said it isn't about what it says it is about ... so I believe him! Why? Because I am a gamer and not interested in doing critical analysises of people's arguments or intentions as well as previous positions and stances going back as far back as a person has been active."
Let me put it in a way that makes it very clear why I find it annoying when non-politically savvy folks talk about politics: there's a reason why how politician's voted 20-30 years ago matter to their stance today.
Intention and growth matters to determine what underlying political or policy position a person holds, which is why every politician lies - because they have to. Ross Scott included, the only difference is that I don't think he's doing it intentionally - he's just not politically savvy and don't understand that no matter whatever he does, his initiative will fail, because even if it were to get the signatures it need; no law can be made to comport to his policy and political intentions.
This is why I keep saying that SKG is just a slogan ... because it is just a slogan. Much like most other political propaganda and political movements.
When people don't understand this, they shouldn't talk about politics - one can talk about other stuff, but not the political side of stuff.
* @frozen nimbus has left the universe
I am not entitled to the source code but I think I am entitled to keep my game after EOL when I paid good money for it. You pretend like these assets cannot be contracted out in a way the consumer can have it without giving up the IP.
Essay jumpscare
LookUp
Whilst I see where you are coming from. In network calculations and optimizations CAN require such R&D that they are part of company secrets. I had a course once were I had to do in network calculation for latency minimalization by making an architecture called mininet. Giving such an architecture can do numerous things. One is to help your competition. But if your next game uses the same architecture it can also help hackers and peopel writting exploits.
curious if it's the same 80k people
Just because I have a Pokemon Game doesn't mean I suddenly own Lucario
Bruuuh
What do you mean by assets being contracted out?
is it a perpetual lifetime license? subscription based lifetime license? whats going on BEHIND THE SCENES, its not always about what you see on your screen.
Highly context dependent
Precisely. You do not own the rights of the assets made by the company if you buy the game.
Nintendo can already do that with the Switch 2
havent looked into the conversation you two are having but im assuming he means outsourcing assets and such
probably not tho
ITT: People arguing who don't know the first thing about software development
just was nosy and poked my nose in
nintendo turnin switches into paperweights :3
Oh I don't care what's going on behind the scenes. Neither am I so precious that my car being called the Tenbley Geytanga X is gonna mortify me and stop me from buying a good game
Colorful paperweight
if I give Company A a "lifetime license" im not going to let Company A hand that license off to Random Person B because I dont know what Random Person B wants to do with MY content
Can't a license be attributed to a product, rather than a company?
and thats why im trying to avoid talking about programming 🫡
im going to make company A pay for either breaching the license, or make Random Person B spend A LOT of money for said license
Wasn't nintendo turning switches to paperweights already disproven? It's banning from their online store/system which may make it useless on its own but chances are if you're doing something to get that ban you don't need their storefront or online network anymore.
they're banning the systems so if you buy one of those you are also locked out of online, from what I've seen reported
Ah, I guess the cartidge being an online store check instead of a game is also the issue?
Sorta, but then you end up with stuff like Photoshop where to continue to use said license once it has been updated - you now need to subscribe to have access to it.
Which is a very differen type of license.
So old the paws are turning white
Which is why I'm not buying a Switch 2 anyways.
I can somewhat agree with the R&D part but I have never seen anyone outright copyright their network implementation because at the end of the day it tends to just run on TCP and UDP...
For the hacking part. Sure? But do you care as a company at EOL? Writing exploits and hacks isnt gonna stop just because they dont release a document/binary. Obscurity != security.
A lot of games that exist would require handing over source code/assets/server libraries for you even play it at "End of Life."
no online, no eshop, no eshop, no games, digitally
Actually a very valid point, I can definitely see that being a solution.
im an artist, im sticking in my lane and talking about what i can
Why is your live service packaged game have photoshop in it?
what
On licensing, wasn’t Spec Ops: The Line removed from purchasing because they didn’t want to renew some music license or other such asset?
Okay but can you show me an example where you don't already have these in binary form in the game that you already bought?
Rainbow toebeans
The person asked if a license can be attributed to a program rather than a person, and I just explained that you are closer to something like photoshop in that case than a game.
CAT??
What part of SKG suggests it wants to ban certain types of games from being developed?
I didn't find that in any part of the initiative.
Almost any game that uses match making to find games.
Because they dont wanna ban anything.
So the only thing stopping it is that it hasn't been done?
he moved from next to me to into my lap
While yes its a good solution, it still isnt a solution thats in the initiative currently. I think people got tons off good changes they think would positively help the initiative. If only they were added
there's also the fact that people do not have the program to access said files
SKG breeding inovation here
Aw
so fluffy
you like silent games?
Sorry Dev here, do you know at least 3 language models? Sorry we can't converse
lol
I think the only thing SKG breeds is drama tbh
what
Yeah good read, SKG is more like a statement rather than something concise. You can see this because everyone think differently, some want to make it so publishers have less powers. Some want no DRM. Most if not everyone want their game to last forever. Many things all at once but what the focus is is up to anyones interpretation and it will probably stay this was until actual law is made.
I'm sure that once SKG gets realized at some form China will jump ship because at no point they will make Gacha games a viable option for that (they're technically free but still somewhat require p2w in many aspects). Ubisoft will release a eol version of their games that only has offline mode. DRM and copy protection will still exist. Populism that demands 100% of something doesn't work as well in Europe as people think. There will be discussions and compromises during drafting all those new laws and rules.
i dont know the ins and outs but i play bo2 through a client called plutonium, makes it funnily enough safer to play cause of course bo2 has been abandoned (black ops 2)
I once tried to install a package on an old FreeBSD server. It had 7 years of uptime, and all I needed was to install rsync. I couldn't - I couldn't find the dependencies for the packages.
Even if you get the source code, 5-10 years after the shutdown you won't be able to just build it following instructions, you'd have to scour the internet for the dependencies. And doing that for a winblows program, which most of the game servers are? Good luck.
Even if it's Linux, there's a chance you can build it. But are you going to host a very out of date piece of software on the internet? Bad idea.
Yeah I don't think so either, but the guy I responded too says and him wanting to turn his baby (his slogan of SKG) into a political movement to ban certain types of games from being developed full-stop.
Eh, essentially yes - beucase it isn't profitable from a game's perspective. It isn't entirely accurate but it is the closest thing I can think of which would describe it in an easily understandable way.
It isn't profitable so far
Language models sorry programing languages same shit lol llms aka automatic programing languages
and plutonium allows you to play in private lobbies/servers
Ok? Lol
Again approaching it from an apocalyptic point of view is pretty grim
lifetime licenses arent profitable at all
Okay and if we just dont give them matchmaking and allow for direct connections? Like any other game with dedicated servers?
It's nice to be a bit optimistic
It's nice to be realistic
SKG is a very populist movement, it was designed to be simple and catchy, it wasn't designed to be a good piece of legislation
Those aren't mutually exclusive
both, both is good @wet storm @exotic forge
The only useful thing SKG movement has done is feed all the drama channels
Try approaching conversations from a point of dialogue instead of a point of truth
Lmao we cant converse because we dont know THREE languages models, such peasants we are apparently 
Or else idk touch grass
uh... okay. HUH, Nobody here plays stupid or lords over ANYTHING!
My biggest concern is SKG succeeds honestly... I don't have a lot of faith in the current organizers to properly represent their case to the EU commission against the industry. Which will make any follow-up attempts harder compared to just overcoming the signature hurdle. All the rest of this is just people arguing different opinions on what may or may not happen if anything happens.
Don't know what demons you are fighting but I hope you will win
Thanks
what musician do you know has made it big with a lifetime license to use their music?
what program do you have that you have a "fully transferrable no strings attached lifetime license" to? because I want it as well.
Why do people not care about licensing when its a very legit legal hurdle that would actively screw people over if not handled correctly?
just saying briefly, thank you for keeping the topic cordial folks
It's the same imaginary demons EVERY youtuber seems to be fighting
Oh yeah it won't do a damn thing
carry on
Yes I would, unfortunately, I am hundreds of miles away
just noticed this, thats why im trying to avoid talking about software development
WHERE are they EUHAHAAHA ahahhhhhhh swings at the air in this serveR
I think the most realistic thing that could happen is lawmakers seeing it, going "lmao videogames toss it" and moving on
If I ever went to the UK I gotta try some greggs
I mean I think Thor was hella unreasonable. He literally didn't seem to understand where Ross was coming from and instantly blocking makes you seem very unreasonable.
🫡
Every be talking bout it
SKG is 100% gonna get enough signatures now
well, at least the nitty gritty anyways
Is the searching 'from' specific users command disabled for anyone else?
It's really hard when people call you ignorant but I am free from the flu and just had lunch so I'm in a good mood
Which part did Thor not understand where Ross was coming from?
Always making sure we do
enough signatures or enough legitimate signatures?

I'm not particular on the political wordings, but isn't SKG an initiative, not legislation? Its to start the ball rolling to investigate the problem and find a suitable legal solution, no?
https://youtu.be/HIfRLujXtUo
Ross man an entire video just about that. You should really watch it.
The full scoop on Stop Killing Games! Covers past, present, and future.
Link to European Citizens' Initiative:
https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home
Link to UK Government Petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/702074/
Link to Video FAQ on the initiative
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEVBiN5SKuA
0:00 Intro
1:31 Why ...
"Hey man I know you just quoted the problematic text but here in the THOR server, we just interpret things in a way that matches our narrative so TAKE OFF DEMON FIGHTING SCHIZO!"
if there are people being rude/malicious/going against the rules of the server, we have the ticket system for a reason
I feel you can relax, any of this is gonna have precident cases and rules are made in babysteps
I'm sure that people will also advocate to ensure developers freedom of creativity which is protected in many basic foundational rules many countries in europe are founded on.
That's assuming they don't loss enough signatures to put them under 1m during the validation. And I've seen multiple people claiming to have signed multiple times and I wouldn't put it past some of the drama driven trolls to try and bot signatures on to it.
legit signature seems more prob jack and pewdi have spoken about it
Nah it's fine, it's not a huge deal
I watched the entire video already. Which part did Thor not understand where Ross was coming from?
id have to see their analytics
If it did pass, I think realistically that not much would happen. the commission would respond (they'd have to), but like most other initiatives they say "we understand your concern, but current legislation already addresses this. bye"
Every signatures went through vigorous screening like their security number or passport to sign for anEU petition btw
"the entire video" probably
No they didn't. That comes AFTER the deadline
thats not what I saw in here earlier...but ight
"Just watch the entire video"
My favourite one was saying raids would need to lower their difficulty for single player gameplay
yeah true but because they have high viewer number theres a high chance it pass
Jacksepticeye, Elon and PewDiePie join in support of SKG
Not yet. The screening is after, you can just make up fake ID numbers and names to sign it now.
Sorry but if the video can't explain it I doubt I can. He already explained what Thor misunderstood in his opinion and Thor did not engage it. I don't want to have a proxy conversation about this.
Wait Elon?
Pewdiepie did?
As in internet's worst meme to exist?
elon??
Gonna go check that out rn
roflmao, elon, what a joke. What's gonna do, pay more ppl to play games for him?
yep, he made a post on youtube
Elon retweeted PewDiePie tweet
"Just watch the entire 3 hour video, the argument is in there somewhere"
unfortunetly
Because the game was not created with locally hosted servers in mind. You would need to completely re-write all of the net code of the game itself. And to do that, making games hostable on an individual PC, would once again put the IP and Copyright at risk. And even if that all happened somehow, there would be a lot of parts of the game that fundamentally do not work anymore as a result.
So now we're back with the game being in an "unplayable State"
If Elon is joining it, then that should tell you everything you need to know about why you shouldn't support it
He needs to keep PoE 2 existing so peopel can play it for him
high view numbers doesnt mean anything when you need to be a citizen of the EU to legally sign it. how many of pewds' and jacks viewers are outside the EU, and BS'd the form, if possible?
Oh hey an intersection I think we can all hold hands and hate on the same thing at the same time
Hate that guy
From what I know, that's only after they pass the required sig count? Might be incorrect
Found it 👍
I did think that was an odd one. I can see how you could draw that conclusion, but it's a stretch
JUST SAYING Ross made a point that if it fails ITS NOT THOR FAULT
Hate for Thor definitely getting signatures
Anyway, SKG just breeds drama and it's doing what all the react channels wanted it to do
ah so got someone else to tweet for him. That tracks
I wonder if mark would say anything about the topic, idk much about Mark but I do enjoy his content. Would probably be a game changer whatever he said
SKG is an initiative for a legislation. They want an EU-wide regulation, which is... Legislation!
And instead of being a good framework for a piece of legislation, it's more of a wishlist written on a napkin.
It's passing dialogue on a stream, I think it was a random thought rather than an informed opinion
Yeah gonna need a villian in any story.
Oh yes, that's unfortunately what's happening
it doesn't
the issue is that some types of games will not be practical or economical to develop given the obvious implications of what the initiative is asking for
They want to ban games. Ross Scott has openly stated that he doesn't think some games should be allowed to be made in the way that they are made.
That's the entire point of SKG - any game that relies on a service or a license is something he doesn't view as acceptable.
Furthermore, he's not happy with merely a more accurate and clearly stated label of what you are buying - this means that he wants it to affect the development of a game, not the sale of a game. This necessarily means he wants to ban certain types of games that he doesn't approve of.
Then you can start going into Ross history as his entire website hosts all of his videos and every single "monthly stream discussion" going as far back as 2016 (I didn't check to any greater detail beyond that) states his opinions on various topics. From there we can see which games he supports and which games he has said he doesn't approve of.
In his last response video that reopened the harassment campaign, he also provides a handy list of games that he views as "designed to die." Part of that list includes MMOs, online games with competitive scenes, social games where duplicating items would be massively problematic, and lots and lots more.
We know he doesn't want certain games to be allowed to be developed. He has stated this and has repeatedly reaffirmed it for literal years.
Redemption arc when.
Calling Ross a used car salesman and saying he can eat his entire ass was something beyond anti-social and hostile
that would make sense yeah
also, why is the UK even part of SKG
I'm glad Thor apologized for it
or is that too much against the rules?
ngl, i hate the view that if someone bad/thats disliked supports something, that thing is bad too, i dont like elon but bad people can have okay takes (even tho i dont know any about elon..)
There is a separate petition for UK.
Rightio, thanks for explaining that.
Still, its not a bad thing. Its common sense that what you pay for you keep, less you know you're buying a service.
They have their own petition system
And yet most people still wont acknowledge it, "thor should apologize!" thor apologizes "thor still sucks!" 
ahhhh
that's not the problem. If it does become legislation, it can go very monkey paw, and that would be bad. That's what Thor is against.
You don't have to make it playable on an individual PC. Most communities that are dedicated just spin up multiple servers, host everything as its needed and people just join. I would love to see a case where you have to rewrite the entire netcode instead of having to replace like 1-3 IPs.
At some point I feel, but first wait until everyone settled down.
Hot take but it's because Thor is not very good at apologizing
no one ever needs to apologize
what?
<insert not sure if serious meme here>
I don't think it is. You even have people in here just baiting
Only apologized for calling Ross names instead of misrepresenting the initiative
Let's make that point again for everyone to read again.
"Ross Scott has openly stated that he doesn't think some games should be allowed to be made in the way that they are made."
"It's used car salesman garbage, you can eat my entire ass" when reading the initiative on stream
he didnt agree with something some dude on the internet said, he doesnt need to apologize for that, he didnt kill your cat, you dont need an apology, you will be fine.
it will do a monkey paw situation. What i'm affraid of is that games all turn to subscritption base purchase
You always gonna have people like that. I didn't see Thor apologize though. Would you be so kind and tell me where I can find it?
having an opinion is not misrepresentation
^
well it kind of is used car salesman garbage no?
ill say this, hes not good at apologising but im gonna excuse him in this case cause its a thing where both sides can be right
Which is why this is proof that folks are just engaging in a harassment campaign because they like drama, and Ross is taking advantage of that to turn his SKG movement into a GG-lite movement.
He did not misrepresent the initiative. He represented the initiative in a way you did not appreciate. Big difference. Nothing wrong with what he said.
I thiiiiink thor linked the message here
Let me see if I can find it
Its not that hot of a take, its just a choice. I don't know if its because he's egotistical, or simply feels there's nothing to apologise for, and it doesn't really matter.
But to most people who once respected Thor, its really damaged his reputation.
Would you like that I called you a used car salesman that writes garbage or that instead I commented on what you wrote?
Show some empathy
Normally I wouldn't. But Elon is a pretty specific case. Chances are if he thinks it's good, it has loads of negative repercussions.
yeah, i can see this about how the initiative is worded + the dumb reasonings Ross used "easy win for politictians"
I think that was specifically in reacting to how Ross mentioned that politicians would have this as an easy win and that they should pass it real quick
and I'm sorry in advance but what is the issue with ass eating?
if I tell you to eat my entire ass I have to apologize?
I fully agree that the current situation with "owning" games is a sh--show. You can thank American legislation for the most of it.
We would have a big problem if SKG is implemented 1 to 1 with how the initiative is written - it will clash with a bunch of things and games would suddenly cost a lot more money.
what are we smoking?
theres what? 200K people in here, SURELY theres a used car salesman that can explain how its akin to used car salesman garbage
I feel like unexceptionalmind is just here right now to trash on Thor
Ok he usually just links tweets, if anyone has Twitter can they link the Apology thor made
Yes and thats good? He doesn't want anyone to give up their artistic freedom. He just wants games to be made in a way where people can still play it after EOL.
you can eat my entire ass 🙂 /j obvs
Very poor choise of words
insert joker meme
Yeah I feel thats also part of the internet and a way to "get off some steam"? just an assumption. It sucks that people hurt each other over this. I'd just wait until actual lawmaking is made, obviously law making that is going to be this nuanced requires multiple viewpoints.
Sorry I have good taste
yah, no need for namecalling
His twitter
yeah, i agree, the initiative is poorly worded
I know. But the words you use are as important as the message you're conveying
i dont know man, elon is not a good person generally and i understand not liking him but im not gonna have a guy like elon be one of the reasons i dont support an initiative
So he doesn't want anyone to give up their artistic freedom by.....denying developers the ability to make whatever games he doesn't like the idea of
Did I get that right?
Don't be like that you're better than this
I think its not getting off steam anymore. It's part of their gimmick to trash on Thor now no matter what
that would suggest everyone else is bad because elon supported an initiative
Hating Elon doesn't make me wanna stop supporting the initiative
Idk why some of y'all are defending an insult Thor apologised for
ngl I have dropped 'eat my entire ass' three times IRL since I heard Thor say it and it got a laugh every. single. time.
it's not the insult people are making it out to be
asking again - what are we smoking?
that eat my entire ass is some horrible insult
but the problem with SKG, is instead of agreeing, going back to the drawing board and putting up a good framework, they're pushing through with an initiative that would be easy to dismantle and neuter, given the opportunity.
grow up people
Both cheeks?
These are not mutually exclusive. Make the game however you like. Just make sure its not inaccessible on purpose afterwards? Is this such a bad take?
Yes, but you aren't going to get any SKG supporter to admit that this is genuinely his stance as well as the stance of the SKG initative.
Grow up people? There's literally one person baiting on this topic 
only if you pay extra
To complete strangers in front of an audience?
Chat.
Chill.
How were you not punched several times?
In this economy? 
Yeah never let bad people dictate what you should like and not like or support.
sorry, am ranting at the internet a bit there, we've had lots of "apologise for the ass eating thing"
oi! You got a loicense for dropping dat entire ass?
and it's stupid
Chat was getting too freaky 😔
Who's baiting?
i wonder if my cats are getting tired of the 20 or so pics i take of them every day
Yes. Because people are allowed to make what they want to make, but consumers should be told what they are buying.
Ross is against telling people what they are buying and just want to make it illegal to develop games he personally dislike.
if it pass, for what we are given in term of info right now, i think it would be rejected immiediately
ok, so ill make a game, but the servers for said game cost 200 dollars to set up, and 150 per month for maintenance (these are just arbitrary numbers) are YOU going to be ok paying that? cause im not going to be paying that once my game reaches EOL, no way jose
I have a gallery with around 900 photos/videos of my cats
Thor's been called a million times worse by dozens of streamers and this individual in chat is fixated on Thor calling someone else a used car salesman and asking other members in chat to turn on Thor for this.
(Ive had them for only 3 years)
What makes you think its always on purpose? There are plenty of games that have died out because of malicious attacks, lack of sales, technology differences etc.
SKG and Ross does not distinguish at all with any of this.
Hence, badly worded Initiative.
Sure thing! Fair warning though, I eat asses deep-fried and stuffed with death pepper. 
I don't see why they'd be more expensive, although I preusme pressure to raise prices has been increasing for years and if anyone is to blame for giving an excuse it'd be Nintendo. But still the intiative would, ideally only affect the design process of a game early on, and hopefully make game studios more organized for what they're releasing.
I mean, similar design patterns already exist, such as disaster recovery, GDPR.
Its just making those processes more modular in order to be decoupled, which isn't hard at all.
have you seen the heat outside nobody is chill right now\j
almost certainly
LOL
this just makes SKG even worse then
Word its so hot outside
Hey pretty rude to refer to people in the room like that. Also, two wrongs don't make a right
And, again, Thor apologised for it
Jesus
solid point. it can be fixed with grass and cats though
wait, im sorry, but where did this even come from?
And if nobody bit, this individual would continue bringing this up to hopefully get someone to engage in this
Correct. That's why I don't support it, and this is why "just read what Scott says" isn't enough - you have to actually do the research to understand his stance and intention.
These has been his opinions for literally a decade at this point.
think hes trolling, cause that is outlandish (at least i hope so, cause thats not the initiative lol)
Honestly going "someone in this chat" when everyone knows who you're talking about is borderline trying to skim the "no pitchforks" server rule
Ross has been absolutely courteous, way more so than he has to be during this entire movement, such a shoddy attempt to try and pass blame onto him lmao.
I DO hope if it pass it turns into something good but the chance of it are small IMO
Even funnier that thor had apologized for it
You've clearly done your own looking into the initiative and have your reasons to support it (or at least I would hope so). I am not taking those away from you. As someone who does not support the initiative, seeing an Elon endorsement is like seeing one more nail in the coffin on something I already decided for myself is bad.
I think the reasonable side is just upset that he reacted like this. A lot of us just want Thor to address with reasonable arguments why this is bad and explain to us why. Maybe show a couple of good examples where its literally impossible, EVEN FOR A NEW GAME, to make the changes SKG would like and makes the game uncreatable.
which 99% of ppl are not doing sadly.
Anyways
HE DID ADDRESS, 2 VIDEOS, 10 MONTHS AGO
holy hell
Alright cool Thor apologized for it. I guess no baiters are going to bring it up anymore.
the first and simplest explanation is: licenses. Any game that has to license anything, usually opts for a time-limited license. If you have to comply with SKG, you have to license everything indefinitely, which is a lot more expensive, or simply abandon any piece of the game that would require a license.
do ppl seriously have a memory of a gold fish>
I mean ross is the one that brought it back up only a month before it was about to end, so he's not entirely faultless
My point is that Thor's apology skills need some more sugar. Even if he hates sugaring it
memory??? on the internet??? whats that
family and friends, but no not an audience
you are mistaking me for someone who is actually successful
my low subscriber count would disagree 🙂
but I''d feel pretty comfortable dropping it in the office for example
CAT
can you answer what I replied to you with?
i get that and wont argue of course cause you clearly have your views, at least we both can agree screw elon <3
We live in the idiocracy, people are moved by feelies, not logic
I really miss the pre SKG days when he was playing Noita, and everything was chill.
Okay but he never went ahead to actually have a reasonable conversation with Ross to my knowledge.
Thor literally did give good examples of games that would be uncreatable under what SKG wants, in his 2 videos about SKG on Youtube. 10 months ago
the f word got blocked when i tried to say it about elon 😭
Sure!
he doesnt need to?
does he have to?
Almost calculated you might be so inclined to believe~
the normal f word btw
braincell 🙂
my cats are failing
I guess I'm wrong. People in chat are still trying to bait other regular members into discussion about the one name-calling Thor did
I thought so highly of you but you're not succesful 😔
I shall continue to larp you as a beacon of knowledge
pre-SKG and pre-WoW classic
Theres not enough cuteness
did he not do any sort of podcast circuit or promotional events? that's usually how you'd promote your stuff
No, but if you don't then at least don't shit on something you not gonna add anything to in a reasonable manner.
Moving the goal posts. You wanted Thor do address points, he did, but nah, not good enough I guess
and people are gaslith
which is entirely within his right? i mean you put stuff out on the movement and he addreses it near the end of the movements life cycle without any naming calling or vitriol and he's supposed to be a bad guy? lmao
it's the push-pull of goblin vs troll - an age old cycle
I wish I knew chat in that era. I joined from the game jams
send a goofy fella
Yeah that is reasonable. Law making can always fall risk to having unforseen consequences as it often happens. Thats why argumentation on both sides would be so important here. I can say that it will happen once the CI passes. Its not a one sided thing.
doubt it stops today
Im somewhat similar as I a main reason I dont want to support SKG is due to the harassment and raiding from supporters off it. Yes I understand its not all of them, and many civilized people, such as some currently in chat, are discussing in a nice way. But it seems majority are deciding to bash anyone who disagrees with it
people fell for the drama bait
very wholesome
ross is the one that brought thor back into it*. it had been 10 months since it was last talked about here
If I didn't enjoy exploring ideas with the fine people there that do provide references to what they're saying I'd've left
What I want is Ross and Thor to sit down. Give eachother a big hug. Say they both love video games and then show eachother how to make things better. This is what I ideally want.
they're eating the bait like my cats eat churu
And the first thing is to scrap that vague initiative and work together on a new one
but..... tasty 🙂
doesnt help im hungry IRL 
is Ross a dev? if not, how is he going to "show thor how to make things better"
never not take the bait
NAHHHH you just imaginating things.... (be certain i've seen some random ass drama yesterday)
The law makers will do that after this petition not us
Seems rude for someone being so appalled by other unkind messages here 🤭
By giving a consumer perspective
no but he apparently has a bachelors in some legal sense
Ok I could be very wrong, so please correct me, but I think he also said he didnt want to talk to Ross due to him not condemning the harassment from SKG supporters. Again, he might not have said that and I could be thinking off something else
Thor has consumer perspective
Comes with a free Shamrock Shakespeare #shorts #gamechanger
Watch a few full episodes of Game Changer here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLuKg-WhduhknsLFxK4K5YDtGVJuCf51kY. You can watch every episode of Game Changer (and more exclusive series) by signing up for Dropout here: https://gamechanger.dropout.tv
It was a joke 😭
That’s more than I’m awake!
Hard to want to do when you've got several thousand people attacking Thor at every way he turns his head for merely giving an opinion that he was being hounded to give
And I haven't heard a single clip, or quote, of Ross denouncing these people doing that.
I sleep 14 hours!
well... guys,,, there is one thing i can agree with thor on...
Let's see if the initiative passes this step.
Hey man, you aint gotta call me out like that 
I am (cough) self-employed (cough) at the minute and I don't put that much gaming time in
Why not just append to this one? The ECI is just for kickstarting a conversation. When the EU looks at this I think it would be great to have Thor explain the issues.
greggs, is the best
https://www.dexerto.com/twitch/ross-scott-reignites-pirate-software-beef-amid-onlyfangs-wow-drama-3035149/
No, he hasn't been.
He wanted to avoid making enough overt drama to not have it blow back into his face.
But when his intiative was failing, he went deep into it instead. He's been been doing this stuff throughout the entire thing, despite Thor being quiet about it for 10 months - longer than Ross kept quiet about it, not to mention he knew he was responsible for a good chunk of the hate that was sent Thor's way. He never said a thing to dissuade people from doing it, and instead engaged with it himself. Even going as far as to dig back up a 10 month old video which had disagreed with him, to which he think he already responded to and clarified... something.
I feel thats also a good learning experience for both, reach out to each other, build bridged. From "eat my entire ass" to "lets support each other in some way."
not because of money or career reasons, I feel Thor could tank twice the harrasment even considering the way he talked about life. But because it also shows maturety and consideration. Maybe have a deep dive where Thor again pin points down or goes deeper into the issue, like what this chat here is doing. Maybe its naive of me but still it would certainly be nice.
^^^^
Oh no the beef has been re-ignited
my greggs message got devoured by links 😭
I mean, he's a consumer like all of us, which makes even more odd he'd dismiss the initiative, as its goal is to preserve games via the community
It's gonna to well done nooo
I 10000% agree with this. I think SKG should be denouncing shit like this and I asked people in the Discord to do this.
it's not bad
Dexerto gonna Dexerto...
Barbacoa in shambles

That's an article from the 20th of January this year.
greggs is a pretty solid bakery
exactly, its not bad, its fantastic /s
Sure, but the point is that it references where Ross Scott did this.
He did say something about the hate if the iniative fails
He did?
Bro if the initiative fails this chat is gonna be a wildfire of pain
there's some smaller chains that are better, but you have to be in the right place - greggs is everywhere and does the job 95% of the way - can't complain
I feel bad for the mods
waterfields (if they're even still a thing)
Im more concerned for the raiding that will happen for the server in general
yeah in a monthly vid about the skg
August is gonna be a rough month
Ye
and greenhalgh's
true, not just that but its hella cheap for what you can get, great for the price
Full clarity: I didn't read your post yet. I will go back and do that now. Just read the headline on the article lol
i can search it up if you want
other than them, greggs is where it is at bois
👍 thank you
They're driven by drama trolls. August is gonna suck regardles of the outcome.
Greggies provides
I used to work close to a greggs and the queue would go around the street corner
I forgot to say that since people say "the downfall of Thor" as a sort of story, why not make it a redemption arc of sorts. Cohh and the others that jumped on Thor when he is weak so to speak would also feel bad. The only ones that don't care would be the hardcore haters. Personally, I just want that things are good 
Nothing beats a cheese and onion bake with a sausage roll and a warm latte
actually I forgot - if you're ever driving down the M5 motorway stop at the farm shop services - their pies are out-of-this-world good
Gloucester IIRC
now that looks like a cat that loves greggs
because he also sees the flaws in it from a developer perspective at the same time. yeah, im all for it, I would love it if a game like HD2, or POE can be preserved after the game goes down, and while with those two specific games, there are ways they can go about it, a game like FFXIV, where a big focus is on community, it would be harder, even POE it would be difficult since the economy is based off of trading with other people.
No one wants their community game to be full of AI bots and NPCs, thats how you DEFINITELY kill a game.
it may take times
If you cant find it I can look on my own time
drama old and boring, cats good and soft
He's not afaik, but there are obviously things that bother him and if Thor shows him the reason why things are the way they are Ross seems like a person who would show understanding and maybe that's something we can take into account to make things better.
Being game master in HD2 sounds like a blast tbh
hes curled into my side
I'm not even a dev (last serious coding I did was Acorn BASIC using DMASprite to run the animations) and I can see the issues
It kinda felt 10 months ago that the vibe was "I'm not here to fix SKG" or something
Some announcements and commentary on the Stop Killing Games campaign. The announcements are at the beginning, then the rest of this is just answering various viewer questions about the movement.
0:00 Announcements on Stop Killing Games
11:30 Answering viewer questions
Link to European Citizens' Initiative:
https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/...
Everyone taking knives out of their drawers and stabbing him in the back over a nuanced and unique perspective that no one else had given at the time
Like good lord grow the hell up
Thor gave his points, Ross WILL NOT LISTEN, period
The main person who can influence it has not shown a great amount of tact so far, but there is always hope
Ross has been given suggestions, he straight up said "no"
i love that for you!! i could not right now, its like 40°C here
Anyway ima go Eepy deepy
Why did Thor not wanna have a conversation with Ross then

i was very pessimistic about the initiatives not reaching their goals but honestly, im feeling pretty optimistic about them now, and again im usually very very pessimistic about things
"if you aren't in favour of this initiative in it's form, you are against it".
no amount of cats is helping. ill be back when people are...well less crazy.
dont forget to drink some water, and take a walk if its not too hot.
I feel tis not 100% fair of Thor to be 100% tactful when people did all the crazy things he told us he did. Some even went after the ferrets I think.
I think it was cuz of the wording in the original SKG video
Oh yeah I saw that
It was super cringe
Because Ross refuses to change or modify any parts of SKG to actually make it make sense
If he stopped at all he would be vilified
I can't remember the exact reason. Doesn't matter though. there does't need to be a conversation. Thor addressed the points he had issue with.
I think we all know why lol
probs cus of that
its so hot in my room 😭 i need one of those ice AC's
Oh, and also, another direct quote from Ross.
"If you don't have any alternatives to our solution, then you are against all solutions"
Like
wat
my normal fan blows hot air :/
which there have been, which he refuses to take
I think Thor is usually the wall here in every conversation
I hadn't seen you post cats i just got done driving to work! Come back! 😞
moving is better than stagnant at least
I agree it's not 100% fair but standing on business just does not seem to be working
Yeah I wish things would be different there. I don't think everyone would take their knives out but certainly a lot of the hardcore trolls would do evne once things seem better.
Wait I have a message about this let me find it
because he doesnt need to? also, would you want to talk with someone publicly when people in their community have sent you death threats? I wouldnt
Freeze a tray of water. Set in front of a fan. Turn fan on high. Make sure no electic wires near/under the tray(fire/shock hazard). Enjoy the swamp cooler.
Him saying something like "If you're against SKG as it stands you are pro corporation" or something
Like cmon mate
Thor has outright stated to not send hate on anyone. He bans anyone that does and proven
Sorry but all hes asking for is for games to stay accessible after EOL. Is that really too much to ask for? I am gonna ask this again and again.
Yeah I mean that settles it then
Way to aggresively shoot oneself in the foot
Yes, yes he did immediately following the post and EVERY time it was brought up in stream at least over the 3 months I watched.
My god, that statement is even worse.
"I don't hate Thor, I just want to undo the damage."
The guy is sending more hate - because this is the type of non-affirming statement confirming people's opinion to hate and to send hate, as it is justifying it by blaming someone else for merely having an opinion and stating it.
thats actually a good idea, although i do have my pc next to the fan, but wish me luck soldier 🫡
Yes because on the developer side, it creates a ton of work
for what?
Also thank you gableking, it still seems like hes very tip toeing around it. But thats just how I see it
Yes, he did, and has done. On many occasions about many things. Including this.
But I've yet to see, hear, or read a quote of Ross denouncing anything
because pplare scared to lose games? big whoop
I see 2 people in chat are still trying to spread misinformation and hate against Thor
Counterpoint
Can we stop playing the victim for a like 5 seconds.
Developer skill issue
I play the world's smallest violin at someone complaining about more work
counter-counter-point, forcing devs to take on additional costs/losing ip/copyright is insane
yah but at least he doing something and not just watching.. he's the main starting reason of the hate
Stealing a product I paid for is criminal
why would they ever do that? ross knew what he was doing, he intentionally shit stirred to weaponize thors unpopularity with certain groups to farm signatures, he doesnt care that hes trampling peoples lives as long as he gets to keep playing his old games i guess
People are always saying stuff like "thor bans anyone talking about [topic]!", people only get banned for deciding to spread hate
Making this discussion criminally insane
@jolly sky What was thatargument about ip and copyright you keep bringing up?
people insulting or namecalling those in favour of skg have been banned. I've seen it happen live
Chill, I think that person stated they've made a tic tac toe game using chatgpt in java so they know what they're talking about
Yes becuase the methods that Ross wants to go through, and will not budge on, will directly remove the Copyright and IP from the people who made it.
Change the methods, then maybe there could be some conversation.
yeah he is. its still better than drama farming and cultivating the hate at least
Thats, abhorrent to say. The entire Civil Initiative is bound on vague set of rules that is made to be obviously changed during the drafting process where the experts meet each other. Kind of an oximorinic statement if its true.