#streamchat
1 messages · Page 227 of 1
do they count as "dies" for Al Bhed Salvagers?
ye
when they die - or no?
broken and mtg are the same thing, friend
yes
its the same as blood artist
it only cares about creatres that die
if everything is broken nothing is broken
anyone remember broken/unglued?
tokens still hit the gy then disapear
My fav card I never get to use
staying power
got a bunch of them and they are hillarious
thats funny
Is that the one with the card you ripped up and tossed all over the play area and anything it touches is destroyed
most are some are obserdly op
I mean, I only have one deck (red/blue), it's in Portuguese and it's insanely old, like 10+ years old
But I love it
ok, time for my daily errand to touch grass
it was a "expansion" way back - think it's the cards that were pulled from various expansions before release because they were obvs broken iirc?
mtg goblins would know more - but some of them are... questionable shall we say
don't think they're legal for tourney play
like this is the prime example of why the silver border should NEVER be alowed in comander lol
yes
cos that's cursed
exactly
within MTG there are "unhinged" or "unglued" sets aka the "un-" sets
they are jokes, not legal, and very funny
Is it possible to know how old a card is based on just the image?
Did you hear the story about the guy who used a card that said, "flip this card on the battlefield and every card it touches is removed from the game." and they ripped the card up and threw all the pieces on the coard\
board
if you know this or able to cross reference which this is then you can determine which set its part of
as a example of the bs you can do if you cast this and then you just cant loose with staying in play lol
everyone say hi to Steve
And “border” design
otherwise towards the bottom of the card there is copywrite info
so about that
Thats to commemorate that event 
think handcuffs is one of my faves tho
yep
is my favorate dumb unset card
I have this lol
I think I have two copies
(and yes its legal in black border)
if i dont like furries may i get banned ?
how is here ?
?????
bait used to be believable
and who can forget Bronze Calendar?
Yeah that's the one
i rember the video with this lol
https://draftsim.com/mtg-set-symbols/
this is a good article that talks about set symbols
also its updated for June
No idea have you been here before?
the orignal is chaos orb but the chaos confetti was made because the story was popular
no, why? but i saw all the drama and stuff about the games being destroyed
Still hilarious 2 decade's later
slightly more complicated than that
think I got one of these too
Oh thats cool would you like to discuss it?
theres some wacky ss nonsense you can do with this
im busy, give me 5 mins please
👍
They are old, veeery old
But it's all I have and I love them
my collection is pretty scattered, but I got a bunch
Some are in English, others in Portugues and French, it's a huge mix
I love that clip lmao
normaly form of the aproch combos involve using this to make yourself a card name lol
yes i think i will become grizzlebrand
Fellas, I'm trying to tie melee weapon types to elements for a project I'm planning.
What would you associate with fire, ice, lightning and shadow magic?
(i have a running gag with this card where i name "timmy the power gammer")
u there?
huh, an interesting way around the legend rule
Yep havent left
just name the legendary something different, then copy
very old indeed - legacy/vintage bois represent wut wut!!!
Wait, is there a doctor who series?!?!?
Gimme
all my cards 20+ years old
Yeah they had lots of crossovers
Ross is looking at things from the consumer side and Thor is looking at things from a dev's perspective
they are both right in their own way, but this is still a convo that does involve copywrite and talk of intellectual property which the base petition doesnt mention well

I don't want to discuss something I know is right 100%, like games should not be destroyed considering people pay for them 🫡
fire: something big and powerful like a hammer? ice:spears, lighting id say throwing wepons or daggers, and shadow staffs or something like a chakra
comander small set yeh
people want games preservation, but how this petition goes about doing so is weird and thus an issue
Okay
Gimme more Doctor Who!!!!
as well as a secret lare
Hell yeah
they have all 15 drs as of now
(2 of them are in a 100£ secret lare)
(no thats not a joke)
Ew
if you know it's right 100% then why did you come in here?
also no you don't. you assume you do, but if you're this locked in without listening then I don't think that'll change. being unmovable in your opinion does not make your opinion concrete and true.
proxys ftw
kinda off topic but i absolutely lost it watching this lmao, didnt know what to expect https://youtube.com/shorts/aa8bc0PsyYc?si=sC1Yjuk7Bb4r_nsO
And....now I remember why I can't get hyped with card games....it's a very expensive hobby
ignore the brain rot video
yeah...
meh i spend at most like 400£
on a deck
I'm tempted to get a box of Edge of Eternity but aaaaaa pricy
My group will only do precons for that reason
i play old reserve list stuff too
yall are 👀
hell yeah we are
yea and with all the good vibe, no hate, I will never be a friend of someone that agrees to destroy games
yes
How much would you say you expend per year?
ultra based
he isn't agreeing to destroy games, idk where you're getting that from lol
Luckily, no one is agreeing to destroy games
tough to say, sometimes i dont bother making decks
is not an opinion, is a fact that destroy games is wrong, people pay for it you know
and i have a bad hibit of making obscure weird decks
yarp - I bought a bunch at retail in the 90s, early 2000s - never bought singles, just decks, boosters, tournament packs etc - haven't worked it out to the penny but ballpark guessing I'm maybe 500% up on what they're worth now as singles vs what I paid
There is a comic and board game store close to where I live that they play every weekend a lot of things, I was thinking of going there and take a look
singles is for peeps who /need/ that card for the perfect deck
no one is arguing for the destruction of games. you are grossly misunderstanding this entire ordeal and I can tell you're not coming at this from a point of respect for the discussion, considering your current discord name and about me section.
Technically no, per EULA they pay for a license to use the game so long as it is online.
please, if you want to be taken seriously, drop the jester getup.
i meant anyone, like can be any person, someone, not any specific person mentioned, where u took that from?
i made a lathril deck completely myself and it came out great but i regret it cause of how much work it took (a new mtg player)
But they are hyper competitive, they even play Warhammer board game competitively, like on a national level iirc
ive now started buying precons and upgrading them instead
like this is in one of my decks
got the tidus deck and its a fantastic deck so far (final fantasy 10 precon)
no you didn't. I point to your name and profile. you're very interested in saying this about pirate specifically so don't try to pretend otherwise
fair
Well good thing you are in a group if individuals that agree on that atleast
respect? what? excuse me... what is happening with your statement is not in good faith,
can i say what i think? i am being always respectful
alright back up
🤣
we might have gotten off on the wrong foot
- is always respectful
yeah idk. respectful? again. your name and profile says it all
YEAH CONES, LOL
also a lot of us here have been arguing with people who just want to get banned
anyway, let me tell you about Grist the Hunger Tide
sooo we are on edge about people
So do people get IP bans or just account? I know you can get around an IP ban but it might help us lol,
oh no not him
bugs, bugs, bugs!
grist is scary
its an IP ban
oooh, black green? 👀
when i was banned due to some miscommuncation i could not access the discord at all
are u judging me and discriminating me because my name and profile? excuse me ?
even with creating a brand new account
I absolutely love those little texts that come on the bottom (they have I name I just can't remember now)
random silly fact he is the only pw without text that says he can play as a comander who can be your comander
the passive's wording makes it so this can be a commander
Me with Proton VPN™ (not sponsored)
I love it for that reason
yes I am judging you based on your display name
flavor text
I never get a good string of milling insect after insect to have Grist truly pop off, but fun anyways
its neet
Yes lol
ok, keep for yourself, no need to hate me for that
Do you judge me based on what i post?
no hate
its also kinda pushed doe
just making a judgement
your profile picture is not a good defense my friend..
the powers of observation are truly something to behold
something something scute swarm
No no no, that mustache is the ultimate defense
my name is an amazing name, if u have a problem is telling me something about you, not me
come back to me with that shit when you've got your face as your pfp
cringe lol
"JUDGEMENT"
I have some card that sooort of connect to make a story, is this still a thing?
well, scute is 1 card so it doesn't really benefit more from Grist's +1, but of course... it is scute swarm
yes but recently less
Game recognize game, and friend you don’t ball.
What is your name?
Sorry my version of discord is very old and nicknames dont work
green +insect so
Me irl
yeah I get that. any insect will do, it just has to be a string of insects at the top of your library.
there are cards that can let you bring things back from the GY to the top of your library, idk if any are in green or black
been a while since I had Grist built
Is Blue still annoying as hell and frown upon? I vaguely remember this being a thing
😨
im jsut here with sebastian from black butler a show i dont even like like haha this is fine
best golgari deck I ever had was Nethroi. YES, technically abzan, but his mutate cost had a hybrid selesyna cost in there, so I just ignored the white and made it green black
they keep printing more and more stacks/counters so yesnt
Display Name: "Kids, being an arrogant liar is bad"
Bio: "Kids, remember not to get manipulated by any pirate"
The server you're in: "Pirate Software"
Bro is unaware of the location or situation they have put themselves in
him rn
Blue is kickass and if you cast 'disagree' I will counterspell you into dust
Fascinating cause their display for me is sqlinjection_nmap_1433_open 
That's their discord tag
When thats the linux dev stuff?

Half my deck is blue and looking at it now it's just basically "ye, you are not gonna play this, and that, or that"
their status, I believe
Always tried to figure out whats wrong with this version oh well 🤷♂️
But is yummy
yes, I am the king of cringe
I spent yesterday photoshopping Thor's face onto random shit...
not sure what his point is to be honest?
allo mag
Am fish
🎣

but tasty, tasty bait
was not wanting to see pewdiepie supporting skg
He simply can’t fathom the craft
speaking of stax heres a stax that is imp true evil incarnate
But 🎣
I know. I'm a sucker for bait tbh
(it says if 2 creatures are in play every creature etbs and is exiled)
Been trolling from bites all day
indeed - cringe is an artform that takes years of practice
can't just wade in being all rude and obvious about it 🙂
if EVE taught me anything beyond how to spot a scam it was to never not take the bait
What can reach a creature that is set aside btw?
(eratted to say exile)
Provi-Bears represent wut wut!
I've got essential oils all over my hands from making that bugproof spray smh
Only a few cards can interact with exile
smells like lemon
and portcutus is ike a portable hole type card it exiles under itself those are gone until it blows up
or leavee
"but theres so mutch removal" you say, i cut it from deadpool because it was too agreegus it locked half the players out of the game
both jack and pewds made posts. they arent even that old
Good afternoon!!!
like 1hr or so
yall know thats just gonna be thrown out by the eu parliament
heres what jack said fyi
wdym, i dont get it
I would hope so, it reaches into too many things that could go wrong
its very poorly worded
I assumed that "set aside" was something new between the board and the cemetery
Some people dont have much faith in the government treating it well
It’s understandable, i dont agree but i get it
i know that, i just didnt get what the person said
Thank god he was very specific and only asked for EU members to sign it
old wording
Oh the subject was the initiative so “yall know thats just gonna be thrown out by the eu parliament (the initiative)”
Yeah its better explained that way
@opaque raven if you want a funny example of what they did as a joke likely because of old "set aside" wording well
you do realize he most likely never went through the checks and balances to get that initiative written. they wont even consider it with the poor wording
because when the debate touches on the copyright, it gets thrown out, at least that's what i heard
they have EA members in the group you think they wont throw it out anyway lols
Like i said i understand. Im not criticizing
Yall ever hear the saying "your rights end where someone else's begins"
well this applies here too
Developers/publishers aren't infringing on anyone's rights, they're perfectly within the law - yeah some stuff is hard to understand or obfuscated, which sucks.
However, what the consumers are asking for here may end up directly infringing on the freedoms/copyrights that developers/publishers have in the game industry
Some argue licensing games "MAY" infringe on consumer rights, but I have one question/suggestion for them - is it or is it not, show some legislation or don't mention it.
yeah, EU aren't going to have the appetite to step on copyright law
But any code someone writes for a company is owned by that company and falls into copyright
It's like YouTube when you try to fish the metadata of all videos of a channel and it separates into "playlists" and "unlisted-playlist-list"
so by default you are talking about the copy right of a project
memes
Hopefully theres enough pressure for them to do it
But who knows
sir do you know what gdpr is
Cause copyright is the only way I can see for the initiative to actually get what it wants
dude eu parliament is run by dinosaurs
or the copyright on internal tools, debuggers, asset packagers, proprietary formats for said asset packages, asset unpackers, rendering engines, netcode, going to stop listing things now because it's getting silly
Only one way to find out at this point lol
it's not just "the game"
anyone who insists otherwise is either shilling or gravely misinformed
"but MuH GAmES"
EU goes;
"Yea, you didn't really think about this too hard did you?"
And then more Thor slander gets thrown around without any basis
GDPR is about personal data. Not copyright.
and now its a 700k signatures
exactly, it's complicated and people who support don't realize, where all the copyright lies, unique to every videogame, not just author's copyright.
Btw, "dinosaur" is a derogatory term that those Silurians don't really appreciate
Be polite to reptilians please
"I want to own my games" then SAY SO, instead of using vague wording like "leave games in a functional playable state"
yes, GDPR is a perfect example of how EU legislation placed a regulatory burden on businesses that the big players could shoulder, but small business couldn't and had to shut down
exactly what i mean
Yeah I would prefer that approach personally
I know people who closed up because they didn't have the resource to put in place the systems to comply
personally
it's what bothers me about the "nothing bad can happen if we stop killing games" stance - it's just not true
100% this servay will if it eben reaches the eu parlement get thrown out
they dont care
even if they did they have people in there that work for ea
Yeah thats a ridiculously uninformed perspective
you know "suprise mechanics" ea
Theres always ways for it to go wrong
Considering the amount of support it has I dont think they can throw it out right away
you think they care?
If they do throw it out its gonna be after 2 years of deliberation
they dont care if 10k people suport it they dont care if 2 mill people suport it
Oh not at all, but I know burocracy is their bread and butter
So even if they want to throw it out right away, they still will play the game and then throw it out anyway
dose it make them money? no if anything it threatens to make them a loss
Gotta use wording like "maintain ownership of singleplayer or offline content after initial purchase in the event of a videogame being removed from marketplaces or online servers being discontinued"
Anonymous online signatures are completely meaningless until verified
at some point in the process it will become apparent there is a conflict with the entire corpus of international copyright law and the EU will just nope out - they don't want to mess with that, it's what keeps the wheels turning for all the big players in literally every industry
remeber that they dont give a single f unless it hurts there bottom lign
You dont understand the commitment of EU politicians to maintaining the appearance of civil debate and liberalism
They love it
<notsureifseriousmeme></notsureifseriousmeme>
Yes. It's about data collection. What data companies can collect about you, how they can use it, that they have to keep it safe and that you have the "right to be forgotten".
Ok ok, this one got me, lol
Finally the quality is rising, I waited so long for this
i garentee that since this isnt as public as other things they throw it out and say nothing
Seems like you guys are very confident on it being thrown out. Then sign to help it go to that stage so you can laugh about it when they do
If I could, I wouldn't, because I don't support it. 
nah, we do that Hubris'll get us
Even if they already know they are gonna throw it out, it will get dragged out for quite a while so the burocratic machine can do its thing and all the consultants and failsons they employ can get their wages for doing investigations and meta analises
Why would I sign something I don't support
do not the hubris
primarly yes however to say its not about copyright isnt 100% acurate gdpr is a protection for data so it deals with things like agreeing to cookies and so on
cookies != copyright, so I'm really not sure what you're on about
it has a breif section on what you can do to copyright stuff and even mentions copyright laws
Im not confident about anything, this is all pure speculation at this stage
i yapping
Remember Telltale? When company bankrupted/dissolved, almost every videogame was not for sale, because of copyright. It took YEARS to resolve so it could go back to the store. Can you imagine now, that EVERY game need to stay in store? That's a calling for a disaster.
You may have missed out on this little nugget of information
Aren't you gonna first ask if people are from EU before asking them to sign? Hmm
pewdiepie is a nice guy, confirmed 💯
uhhh well how to put this
Just commit identity fraud and sign it anyway
What could go wrong?
i am, I signed a moment ago
Brb stealing some brit's skin
lol brexit moment
Brit's aint in the EU dumbass
i know im a brit
Get with the program
Be nice :(
Stealing some polish dude's skin
unrelated, they just want that tasty tasty skin
weirdage
Thats much better
Freaky
What's better is if they used the right wording for the focus of SKG 💯
Yeah but we didnt write it so
fwiw, me saying this is not defending the whole SKG thing, but (and I'm saying this as a small business owner in the EU that actually has to comply with GDPR because we're handling personal data on multiple levels) the GDPR actually is a good thing. And it's honestly not as bad people make it out to be.
Yeah some american dude that married someone in the EU did, right?
If I had I would have added a lot more swears and threats to the lives of prominent politicians
But thats just me
Different taste in petitions I guess
imagine marrying someone in another country so you can make the rules in said country am i right /s
I dont think thats a problem to be honest
Ross obviously cares about this, I dont think its a hollow gesture
dont get me wrong I do wanna be able to play my games when online services shut down too
this just ain't it
Yeah and you have a right to think that
cat
https://x.com/LockPickingLwyr/status/1939712073056874654 on another note
yeah, but there were edge cases - there are always edge cases
I suspect (just a gut feeling) that there are far more edge cases here with SKG because game development is a very fractured industry - lots of licencing, lots of SDKs, lots of time-limited assets... and we expect EU policy wonks to get it right?
maybe I'm just too cynical? but I kind of agree with Thor in that you probably don't want government involved in anything you care about
Jumpy cat
Im curious, what game can you think of that you can't play that was a single player game with online only?
please let people run the servers locally/community and play even if they have to use hamachi...
I think overall its a good thing too, but you can't really deny the small businesses that couldn't keep up and afford putting that legislation into practice, and had to close as a result.
That basically the minefield that SKG is willingly walking into with Solo/Indie devs with what it wants.
So by "Stop Killing Games" actually ends up killing games. Curious
Oh yeah I cant think of like 20 edge cases just off the top of my head
And if this is ever gonna go forward it will have to deal with that
Which cannot be done for a lot of games as they don't run off one singular server.
Now what
might be a dev thing - edge cases are part and parcel of development - not part and parcel of legislation (which aims to be as one-size-fits-all as possible)
Minecraft would be one of those I had issues with
Couldnt launch the game because I was offline, couldnt connect to microsoft servers to verify my account is actually mine
Simply compress the servers into a single 1 cubic meter volume cube
Problem solved
We need smart, forward thinking developers who design new games with preservation in mind from the very beginning.
Long term access shouldn't be an afterthought, it should be part of responsible game development.
Cat
But thats hard
I dont wanna do that
hell, we write error handlers to catch edge cases in advance
"Design the impossible"
Wow.
ok, but is not fair expect people to lose their games they paid...
But an FYI, there is a singleplayer mode for that. I think the amount of single player only games people think this will cover is actually really small
lawmakers don't catch edge cases in advance, have to have court cases and set precedent for the edge cases and that's a shitshow
In our current system? Absolutely it is. You dont own any of the games you have bought, you have a license that can be revoked at any point
When you open a singleplayer world you are opening a server to run the world. If that server fails, the world crashes.
Nothing in the marketing or license agreements of any game specify a lifetime license to access a game
I see a problem there "license"
Is it a massive problem with how we sell and make games? Absolutely
all software is "licensed"
be warned there is a megathread on the gaming subreddit for SKG
even minesweeper
But as our system works right now, this is it
NO DOOBY NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
You dont own anything
now be happy 🙂
It's licensed to you so you don't do something dumb like modify your client to get an unfair advantage in the game, or use it to collect data/harm someone else
It also protects developer/publisher copyrights by not giving you ownership of the assets
Yes. Licenses is how every single artist, movie maker, music maker, actually sells their stuff while still having the rights to their stuff.
Welcome to like, 30 years ago
All those big walls of text we all skip through when we buy something says this explicitly
None of them give you a lifetime license to anything
It's for Saba!!! (New Gura) 🐟
The license can be revoked at any time
This is in every single software product you have ever seen
lmao - "hello... yes?.... yo, steve, the 1930s are on the phone and want their new legal ideas back"
My lifetime license for Clip Studio Paint 1.0 says otherwise
My friend, you did
Everytime you click that button you do
Now I think this is entirely broken and a horrible way to sell and distribute software
But this is the system
And just because you bought a CD, doesn't mean you now own that media. All you own is the physical CD. If you lose it, break it, abuse it, that's on you. You're not expected to get another one just 'cause you bought it once
You dont use the software, ez
Welcome to the modern world of tech and software
You don't have to buy it. Infact boycotting something has changed how a product has worked in the past
It sucks here and everyone hates it
can agree with you there - the choice to accept the license isn't really a "choice" if you want to run the software
but SKG as written won't fix that
Oh there definitely were edgecases. And I agree with you about the minefield. For the small businesses that went under that's mostly because they were WILDLY unprepared. Maybe they didn't have enough time, maybe it was mismanagement or procrastination. I wasn't part of one of those small businesses so I don't know. I only know that for me, we had enough time to prepare our whole infra and we pretty much were already privacy-focused from the ground up.
That being said, imo, the problem with SKG is pretty much that the idea behind it is good, but the execution not so much. I do want my games to be playable after they get sunset. And I do support being able to run private servers for say MMOs after they get sunset. But it has to be realistic. And there are some (definitely not all) things where I disagree with Thor, but that does not mean he doesn't have a lot of very good points and deserves to be hounded on like that. But yeah. This is the internet, people suck and are toxic, and the majority of people hounding on Thor are doing it for the clout IMNSHO. (edit: rephrased some sentences where I meant the opposite)
Obviously the other choice and what he is arguing for is to campaign to create a new choice
Welcome to artists get to sell their things for you to enjoy.
Of course and Im all for that
Then make a game that doesn't use a license but gives the end user ownership of the title
go on, then
yeah, but whether they were willingly or unwillinglly underprepared - the bloke I knew didn't have spare cash for the systems upgrade he'd need and couldn't get a loan to cover it - had to close his business because breaking GDPR = jail
he wasn't blase, just poor
💛
like most indie dev studios
Patent licenses are in both physical products and software and are a big part of how companies and inventors make money. A foundational patent is like the root of a tech tree and every innovation that uses that tech has to pay a fee
so.... extrapolate the likely outcome from existing examples...
SKG will unironically kill games
Not that surprised they did that, they were deleting threads before so having a space to talk about it is better.
Ok then, go and argue that that because you bought Lion King on DVD, you now own the rights to sell more copies, to make your own sequel, and to say that you own it.
You will get laughed at so hard.
I mean, I hate League of Legends as much as the next person but I think this is going too far
im all for general containment, but its still very much a warning to people here that yet another chapter of hate will start
It's a bit more nuanced than breaking GDPR=jail (iirc you get a fine first, then X amount of time to fix it after a warning, and after long legislation, maybe jail), but I understand your point.
ah ok
i would love to. SKG needs to be modified. they said they wont do that.
i would narrow the focus to something everything us consumers and devs can agree on is a terrible anti consumer practice. something like requirign an online login for single player games.
Same...I'm barely alive
The best way to start fixing it is with online singleplayer only games. SKG is being too broad in that sense. That’s why most of us here agree that the idea is good but its execution in the current form is not
As stubborn and "wrong" some people think Thor is, Ross is even more in the wrong for not willing to change, reword, or edit the Initiative to something vastly more sensible.
29C here inside, with the airconditioner on >_>
Impossible!!!!
then theres me with 36C temp on the average
yes, the jail bit is towards the end of the process 🙂
otherwise agent misspells client's name on the database, 30 seconds later interpol come and cart them off to the gulag
After EOL, ask devs to remove or disable the requirement for verification of an online account in order to use/launch a singleplayer game 
immelting oof
"it was just a typooooo" they scream as they are dragged off 🙂
Yup. If SKG started off with making Log-in based Single Player only games allow for people to play the game after the Auth servers go down, that would have been a slam dunk. Easy. That would have been the actual "Easy Win" Ross wanted
sooo in the US there is a zone in the Southwest US that is "high desert" aka both altitude and being very dry, which results in some high temps during the summer
do not pass go
Yes. Becuase you are asking for the server binaries, and code that leave that developer wildly open for IP theft.
And this surrounds Death Valley at -252 feet (-86 meters) below sea level
Maybe, but some of those companies use that as DRM. So now they are going to find another way to make sure they have DRm that works and it might be more invasive.
And also, for the future security of later games.
Ah yes, Lost Izalith my beloved
Let the MMO shut down, because it's multiplayer content and most if not all features are balanced or rely on multiplayer interaction.
The problem is being unable to access singleplayer content because of account verification failure, not keeping every game in your library regardless of genre
IP theft, different subsystems (people think "oh it's just a server hosted in a DC somewhere, but in most cases it's actually MULTIPLE servers and subsystems talking to each other), etc.
So yeah there are private servers for certain games, but in most cases they were either built from the ground up (which is a herculean task in itself) or it's just an empty husk of a shell where you can run around in.
Now you get into copyright and IP stuff
Again, see this;
Players can make their own servers if they want to play the game online already
the devs dont have to give you the binaries to do that
Stop asking devs to do all the work
It would be more nuanced, and would have to be thought about from the get go but it’s totally doable. Community servers for MMOs aren’t a new thing
If the devs have to do all the work it would be reduced down to 2 or 3 standard libraries at a minimum.
Which also again, not every games server is even possible to run on a customers own machine, or even if they somehow managed to own a few of them
i feel as though if this was done it would definitely be something that would have to be inacted years down the line to prepare devs who are making mmos and such to adjust
by the way, i agree
Also typically you don’t plan for EOL at the start of an MMO
iirc that’s the jist. It’s not retroactive
true true
Sure if you want to think of something that doesn't exist
then you keep some games from ever being built, thus actually killing games.
Not if the game is still highly popular
Imagine if there was a way to communicate to companies your unhappiness without the interference of laws and politics.
Damn, oops, I just dropped something kinda important
Which fails to account for the vast amount of currently existing laws, and the complexity of game development, from a AAA perspective, all the way down to the indie developer.
If you can only release a consumer predatory game, you should not release it
you expect gamers to have self control? /s
Given that it was the shutdown of the The Crew that provoked the ECI and The Crew shutdown for both server infrastructure AND LICENSING CONSTRAINTS, the SKG doesn't really show any way to fix the actual underlying issue there of licensing. Ubisoft absolutely fethed up revoking games off people's launchers but that was probably an 'Err on the side of caution so we're not held liable for licensing beyond what we contracted' move. And its extreme takes like that which will guide other companies actions around any laws that might end up passed.
People will continue to consume slop then complain when the slop runs out ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Is a concert predatory for kicking me out once the concert is over?
Devs don’t make that choice.
no cause you know when it will be over
thing is, not all of them are predatory. some games are meant to be played with a massive community, and lose their meaning outside of that.
those games literally require a server infrastruture to work properly. if you go to peer 2 peer or some other infrastructure the game just... isnt possible . And i do not believe it is predatory, as long as it is understood this is an experience; akin to watching a movie or going to a carnival
Yes, they have to let me stay in the venue and sleep under the seats 
Encores?
encores are a bonus?
Apply same logtic to a life time pass to a themepark would be more approriate instead of a concert
now, i will say there are a LOT of games that are going under the banner of "live service" which have no right to be that way. like...single player games that you have to log in to.
nothing wrong with that
true
We have different values on what's predatory, I think that's one thing we can take away from the conversation these days. That's fine
concert isnt a good example
Delays? Technical problems? list goes on
those you cant predict so that is not comparable
of cause the problem is real but SKG has nothing to do about games conservation.
That's easier said than done. That would require game companies to build EVERYTHING from the ground up.
A few things that would make this practiaclly impossible:
- Resource cost. Because you won't be able to use existing libraries and systems, you'd have to roll your own. More devs needed for the same task, more engineers (not only devs, I'm talking system engineers, network engineers, the lot) needed to get it up and running.
- Cost of maintenance. See above.
- No guarantee that these things would scale as well for millions of players than tried & proven methods. If you've ever played FFXIV, and you heard people complaining about "lousy netcode", you know exactly what I mean.
There are many things in game design that cannot be predicted
Ok you can’t predict development struggles either
Like when the "End of its Life" will be
You buy a lifetime pass to an amusement park.
The amusement park shuts down.
Well, you want to go to that amusement park again, but if you do, it'd be trespassing.
So what do you expect them to do?
yes but what you were comparing was a bad example, just like someone said a better example wouldve been a life time pass to a theme park
Like prime example, intentional DDOS'ing forcing the developer to abandon the game due to massive running costs, and now the game is in an "unplayable state"
and all 6 players were very sad about it
What ubisoft did was give people a life time pass to the amusement park, then take down the amusement park all the life time passes go void then make the exact same amusement park on top with the number 2 on the end and sell everyone new life time passes
this would be known out the get go if it was done, a concert tells you currently when it would end, a game neccessarily wouldnt need to, which is bad
Words alone don't make the thing happen
except only for people have have bought them meaning if you miss out they are gone
let the FOMO rise
This cannot be predicted from "the get go" with games
That's what we're getting at here
So where is the problem here
So far you have not pointed out the problem
You had a lifetime pass to Disneyworld. They then opened Disneyland. A few years later, Disneyworld closes.
I can see people, if SKG passes as worded, opening servers for an MMO or Multiplayer game and charging for the upkeep+profit. It would turn into a shitshow.
different park, different pass
Shutting down an amusement park for the sole reason of voiding life time passes is morally corrupt. And a loop hole of the law. Which is why i dont buy ubisoft games anymore or EA games.
Honestly my POV is we are just talking about this in this chat at this point not because we honestly think we will change each other's minds before the initiative deadline anymore. I think we all know that won't happen and we are nervous about the uncertainty of the topic for different reasons and want to cope.
This is more an emotion group share than anything else.
this convo is kinda moot because all of these problems could be solved with enough nuance and wording.... but that requires all of us to trust lawmakers to do their due diligance to figure out what actually is anti-consumer and figure out a solution that doesnt harm devs (small or large company) and the consumers.
that trust is not there across the board.
email your local EU representative and ask them what they think about video games. it is a shit show xP
thus, SKG needs to be targeted and specific with what practices are anti consumer. and exactly why its bad.
They made a new game. Different lot. Different amusement park. They shut down the first one because it would not be financially viable to keep them both up, and/or bring old players to the new game.
right but a couple messages earlier, i was saying to someone (not expecting you to read every one of my messages) that devs having an end of life plan is great but id want something like this to be enacted years down the line for devs to adjust to the change, i feel like thats perfectly reasonable
Nobody does that so don't make that a point of your argument. People shut down games because it doesn't make money anymore not because they are yelling FU to costumers
I doubt anyone here is literally worried about profit. They're worried about cost passed on to them.
but people dont look at my reasonable replies sometimes
Which again, is not possible to predict or account for.
yes it is, if you plan right from the start yes it is
thats why id want devs to be given enough time, years
People want to riot over games finally going to 80 dollars for a base game... If you add in all the costs of a full EoL plan with an undetermined data and everything that goes with it, costs could easily balloon and result in us the consumer paying 150 for a game...
cause mmos in development now wouldnt be able to plan for the change
cause development would be in too deep
you're generalizing this entire chat as being on the opposite side of your opinions. again, your name and profile says that out loud and every message you send in here reinforces your unmoving bias.
check yourself.
trolls do be trolling this time of the year
^^^
indeed
and i want games with basically real life gambling to not exist. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
No one has good faith discussion anymore :/
just calling the bait, bait
but its so tasty!
Then you will be causing Massive amounts of money that would be legally forced to be spent, and then that will just cause only the bigger companies to be able to front the cost.
Then they're going to charge you even more to recoup those costs and ensure that no indie or solo devs could ever make those games ever again
Do you see the running trend here?
is it a minnow? is it a worm? it's a billboard showing their true intentions!
@urban venture people just be making the rest of us look bad, ya know?
I prefer 'You can't agrue people out of a position they got into based on feelings'. But trolls do be troll'n.
All nice and good if we live in a fairytale land utopia where everything is free, but alas, it is not.
I'm not even talking about profit margins. I'm talking about cost of setup. Unless you would like to pour your time in a commercial MMO, working 40-60 hrs per week, without getting paid to feed yourself? And if you do, I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.
yuuuup
like I said the other day: you want $200 games, because that's how you get $200 games
i think i know how to scare Catgpt
can i be real with you?
yeh. the whole SKG initiative has had good back and forth in here over the last little while. today just looks like a collective disaster. and to be fair I saw at least 3 new videos on the subject pop up in the last 24hrs specifically calling pirate the guy who wants to kill games
do tell
it's lost most of its good faith
there are not alot of indie devs making mmos currently for good reason, its extremely difficult
super weird cat there
calf
||alf eats cats||
i dont believe it
oh yea, im guessing it will be people from pewdiepies fans and jacksepticeyes
I mean, there are still plenty enough to be worth playing. But with the above proposal, you would be forcing them entirely out of the market
server costs alone make me sweat thinking about it, let alone making a game that has enough depth to satisfy a large customer base interacting with one another
Hard to give basic consumer rights on a product that couldn't even go live to begin with 🤷♂️
I'd like to enter stream chat and not see discussion of skg
not to mention you need to moderate it etc.
you will probably need to wait another few months sadly
i understand that it will probably lock out tons of indie devs from even trying to make mmos and look i might be a bad person for believing this but because of how little people will want to make mmos themselves, its a worthy sacrifice to me, but i understand why for others it wouldnt
Kibby
but i dont think it would make as big an impact as what others are saying
actually i should correct, probably not tons, but the ones that do want to make mmos
his name is Hermes, and its like 30 min away from daily wet food meal
mmos already take a ton of funding to even make
Right. At this point I'm pretty sure you're just attempting to bait. 🙂
not proof, that is a breadcat
A sacrifice that ensures that only the big AAA companies get their chance to make MMO's/Online games is the opposite of what you want
Question, once the initiative passes, will we in this chat then be forced into the same team?
As in, then the situation will have changed to "this thing is happening", so it will be in your interest to collaborate with the SKG supporters with your energy and knowledge of IP/Copyright/dev advocacy problems, to make sure the dangers you predict are less likely, right?
With the passion in display, would be beautiful if our interests aligned
we have known this since they entered the server 
Assuming the get 1m and don't lose enough to invalidate their collection to under 1m, we'll likely see this subject for at least 4-6 more months while the EU invites experts to speak their piece on it and for the SKG to present their piece. I'm sure that'll be a bigger shitshow heh.
"EU invites experts to speak their piece"
not really. because no one is going to ask us here in chat for our opinions. i fully expect EU lawmakers to just look at it and throw it out
The experts in question:
Fair enough. Suits me right for being a people person and trying to genuinely explain what's wrong 
it wouldnt just be AAA, it would just effect the very small indie devs, although in reality, what we are both arguing is just what ifs at this point
you are to kind for this channel
They clearly aren't willing to actually listen, so I wouldn't bother
just going to point something out, there's 3 perspectives I can see here:
- consumer
- dev/creatives
- company
the creatives and the consumers are going to have the largest overlap of agreeable points. both want the art(game) to be preserved. the consumer wants it because they love the game, the creatives want it because it's their hard work, collectively turned into that game.
the companies on the other hand, are the profit motivated group. they are the ones with greater sway in their industry and unfortunately, greater sway in government.
to posit that people like Thor, a dev, wishes to hinder consumers, absolutely needs further reinforcement other than "he misrepresented SKG also he's formerly from blizzard soooooo". his entire point summarized was that the initiative is poorly worded and needs to be bolstered ahead of its potential hearing, if it reached the required number of signatures. that's it. you can argue about how he went about it regarding attitude towards Ross Scott, but he is correct in bringing up the challenges SKG will have to face if it were to go forward. especially with said sway that companies have in government.
im listening man, i just disagree
same.
Not even very small. Even mid-sized developer studios would crumble over the legally enforced costs
That sad to believe
I mean, yes. like it or not, gaming is a multi-billion dollar industry even in Europe so they're gonna ask the game companies that are HQ there. Maybe EA, maybe not, but there are other studios with headquarters in Europe paying EU taxes to boot.
nah I wasn't replying about you
yeah but bait is tasty and typing costs basically nothing 🙂
Im sorry you feel that way
that, we absolutely dont know
npnp
mmmm tasty
If Games are art then by the virtue of art government cannot enforce anything cause it would violate free expression.
another fun issue :D
I could go on a rant about the commodification of art as a whole but that will absolutely get political
so I won't lol
Games are also a service and also a product sooooo how are you cutting this cake?
xD
isnt it interesting!
and again, if something gets done, this is something that should be enacted years down the line for devs to adjust, cause i understand it would be unfair to sorta just throw devs into the deep end (as a dev)
games are absolutely art imo
games cant be a product or art is has to be something entirely new!
some games i consider to be art. some games i consider to be an experience that happens to be artistic.
Trying to just soapbox and shout your will into the crowd isn't going to convince anyone
SKG isn't the one and only push anyone can make to resolve this general issue, it's the one that is currently presented. albeit by someone who is handling it poorly and has now caused a litany of drama to cascade into this server
Some art can be a service, and all art is ultimately a product if its brought and sold.
Who is this "we"? You don't even know how many people here are from that areas effected
I remember the days when standalone servers were much more common. It feels like the practice really dropped off in popularity, preferring instead to have centralized servers (not gone, just not as frequent as it felt like it used to be)
So, I understand where SKG is coming from. But, nothing about the initiative gave me the confidence that it would be steered in the right direction - to make sure that anything that gets pushed through doesn't end up being detrimental in practice.
This isn't a "either you support the initiative or you want to kill games" - there are soo many levels of grey in between
The industry will always be predatory if companies like Ubisoft exist
yes we will. Thor actively encourges indie devs creating a massive influx of games those games are worth buying.
Local man was asked his opinion, and voices his concerns from a developer point of view in an industry he has knowledge and experience in
"BURN THE HERETIC"
i wonder how many people have actually gone and played all the games that has made because Thor encourged it
there are gems
INDUSTRY PLANT
and because of that, it should be clearly stated what a game is, currently a game can be shut down out of no where (unironically)
You've already started the conversation on IP and Copyright. You cannot hand-wave, or skirt around that conversation or argument
games are bigger now. people dont want to be in their own silo of a server, for some large games like mmos. and, the more traffic a server gets, the cost becomes exponentially large to run it.
That's kind of the thing, IMO.
The idea is there. The execution is TERRIBLE.
or we could stop buying fifas and triple a destiny2s and buy more balatros and monster train 2s
Yep and you would be anwsered by "Well to bad brah the law is the law we cant infringe others rights for your own"
I like you guys
nom onom tasty bait
Well, you see, Thor gave me a migraine personally, he came to my flat and smashed my head with a hammer and disappeared into the void. And now I have this migraine. How dare he! /j
i like me, too. and cats.
Florida Man just wanted to destroy League of Legends but end up hurting the whole industry
in my opinion, people should be given in all situations at least 6 months notice if a game is being shut down, currently there are games that do that, and theres games that dont, those games that didnt need to be corrected and made impossible
This is how he avoids gnomes too he just steps into the shadows and teleports to the nearest ferret
It's not a "basic consumer right" to:
1: Require developers to give users tools in order to run servers after EOL
2: Require developers not to license games to users (which they do to protect themselves from exploitative consumers)
3: Require publishers to shut down games that do not comply with new laws
You bought the game, you should have read the terms of service as well. If you did not, because "it was too long and used weird words!" then you should ask yourself, should I try to understand this language? Is this game even worth that much to me? Why are the terms written this way?
while it ends up feeling like a drop of water in the ocean, it helps to continue to spread this kind of message around. Balatro's success certainly illustrated our appetite for indie games, even something like Expedition 33 is now satisfying our want for great looking games, fully fleshed out to the expectations we have for AAA.
voting with our wallets doesn't always work but word of mouth, now that has power
except that people clearly do want the option to be in their own silo of a server
and that isnt possible for all games :)
Yes and someone who has no idea about the complexities, difficulty, or money involved in game development made a poorly worded and vague Slogan Initiative with a cool sounding name and ignored 90% of what games are.
the amount of promised minimum months or year should be on the buy button itself. make it extremely clear.
ALF!!! It's so cool, I saw some episodes recently
monster train 2 is one of the best indi titles ive played im not kidding also agree
truuuuue
I should give it a look over, never really bothered seeing what it's about
We aren't gonna get anywhere with a "whose side is a bigger expert". We already can tell there's devs with experience in both signing and not signing sides
and also i want to state, this should not be too much to ask from a dev or publisher at the very least ^
"law" and "fast" are the opposite of each other
Just a shame that the series ended on a cliffhanger and they basically shoehorned the "tying up loose ends" in a movie
That's on the publishers and the companies that run the storefronts, ot the devs. All this initiative will do is just be another excuse for AAA publishers to punish dev teams who support it.
you do not want law to move fast
I've been asking for steam sales recommendations for 2 days
maybe m wierd for this but imp there shouldnt be deadlines to make games, it should be "hey we will relese this game when it is done but i agree with the genral idea
Conversely, all these people saying its feasible, easy, and lucrative can go make games for us and prove it also. I wouldn't object to new game companies producing new games that aren't bound to live service strategies.
whether its on the page or not makes no difference, its the fact that currently companies dont really require to state it
The license exists so exploitative users don't do anything that could negatively reflect the company. If it is written to exploit the user, then don't use the service.
Question do you deserve to be happy?
They don't have the right to drum up incredibly harming Initiatives that will actively kill studios getting into game development, thus actually killing games.
crypt of the necrodancer is crazy cheap, good game
if you like card games mt2 is great
and also about it being on the store page, it could, it can be in the description
Consumers don't actually give a shit about the back end, they just want to consume
those are already being made. stuff like raft or valheim. but shouldnt limit devs to only have that infrastucture
but they should
I picked up Fields of Mistria and Tiny Glade on Steam Sales. Enjoying those.
I have Cadence of Hyrule on switch, it's crazy cool with the Zelda theme
Rimworld has an Xpak coming out. Should be ready in a week. It will give you over 1000 hours of playtime with mods
predatory* 
picked up shinmegemi v and rido remaster myself
Can I be real, I also think that some people are hyping game dev server side to be some insurmountable task to edit in any way and I find that just as dishonest as people pretending it’s a switch flip.
it wont change with poorly worded initiatives that bank on the government to write it out after the fact, with experts whom we know not where they will pull them from.
discussion about the legality of this entire situation should occur before the initiative is even written out and launched, but it wasn't. instead we got a vague initiative that needed discussion to occur, but got stifled early on and never went far for months afterwards.
should be noted that pirate did not kill this initiative, Ross Scott's own ineptitude did. the lack of foresight to write it out in further detail, to reach out to more creatives both in dev circles and in content creator circles early on, as well as fighting publically with thor when the initiative was on its last leg and barely at half the signatures needed. he needed a scapegoat to divert attention away from his own shortcomings.
I do not hate the guy, barely know the guy. but laying the blame here on Thor and all of us like we're purposely out here to kill games is ridiculous, and far from benign. the stress from this cannot be understated.
I love Loop Hero with a passion, does that count as card game?
You think you're being clever, but you really aren't. And still completely ignoring how difficult game development actually is.
i think they did a newer game a kind of guitar hero style one
yes but no ?
And Baten Kaitos
Remember everyone Thor has the power to single handily kill any European citizens initiative 
long lemon strikes again
Thor is the lynchpin
it's called mjolnir
Some people really think that
It's difficult, not impossible. Afaik other spaces in softdev already preserve their stuff I think?
Yep, crazy they got picked to create their own Zelda game. Still remember the announcement.
AAA and AAAA are investment terms that have no bearing on the quality of the final product
you can buy a AAA investment in oilseed fields or a salmon farm or whatever
Agree. Also kind of magnifying the amount of indies that would actually be affected and do a big live service game around when the law is implemented and before the standards and successful implementations are well known or even aided by the main engines
AAAAA when
more like AAAAAH
does that mean never?
we're throwing around all this terminology that isn't even anything to do with games
some triple A re good loook at balders gate 3
oh god lets not make AAAA an actual serious term now 
So far I only got
- Duck Detective and the Secret Salami
- Patrick's Parabox
oh you know what, you're absolutely right
it just depends on the thing
AAAA already is in investment circles
Thor, an american, can
not sure if any game studio is AAAA yet
duck detective is so funny
That’s another good point, yeah
but it's not a gaming term
and to think ubisoft started that... (i think if i remember right)
Erm actually Skull and Bones is a AAAA game
Cant wait for a S+ investment strategy plan
Whatever is a AAAA game?
You should also play Fat Princess
oh you know what, we have more AAAAA games. they're called gachas.
AAAA is the sound I make when I realize I hate the gathering mini game
oh geez how far rare has fallen
yarp - if you say Thor's full name three times in front of a mirror he appears and instantly nukes any EU initiatives within 1000 miles
Sadly it seems like a very short game
It's 3hrs average on HowLongToBeat
A game with giant budget that noboby plays?
Very very very very good idea to investment in
disagreee some gatcha good
Never heard of it
Supposedly
The other points though is that some people refuse to seperate from games is the IP and Copyright. They're unwilling to actually get into and understand that, when it is an inseperable concept
yea disagree. i've played the "good" ones. i still find them predatory.
buy IT NOW if you like point and clcik, horor
I think you'll find is that this server will be the first to call out thor. We don't blindly follow him
it fails to adequately define the specific problem, and leaves the solution sought completely unstated. That's vague
if AAAA ever actually happens i may have to quit game dev, im at least 3 A's behind 
Gatcha is never good and is used to trick people into spending more money. The game might be good, but the practice shoudl be shunned
Highly agreed
no, but I do believe things that Thor says that ring true with my internal model of how the world works?
it's this new thing, it's called critical thinking
you should try it some time
damn sometimes people say things that I feel the need to reply to but know it wont go anywhere
such is the case right now
id normaly agree but im a heavy master dule player
"and the details will come later, and that is not a problem, is necessary to be like that."
Except that multiple Initiatives have been accepted with fine detail and focus on what they want.
So its not a necessity whatsoever, and whoever told you that needs to check their sources
Wrap all the way around to Z
and the COMPOSER FOR OCOTOPATH 2 WORKED ON IT
looks like your bait was actually quite good 🙂
yes i love vdl
Oh man, I remember doing that once. I got bullied and threatened for not riding insert persons favorite slop content creator
Clearly didn't read what was typed
Dude in all honesty i an not angry or annoyed or anything to you and in fact respect you for willing to discuss things here.
But just because we hold a different point of view than you did not make us sheep
Try again
There is actually a game now
that entire response was so incredibly loaded, I'm having a hard time processing it. but clearly they aren't here for actual discussion and have consistently chosen to be the antagonist here
kinda gives me a maplestory kinda vibe
How is it, if you know, heard about it but never looked into it.
Maplestory ✨
I actually do want an 8888 page document describing exactly what the initiative wants.
you want to rephrase that in a way that doesn't make me feel like I'm having a stroke
shit, I smell toast
i met the head writter, male and female holy as well as mr hologram himself
RIP Maplestory 2 NA server
PLEASE, give us a long, detailed description of EXACTLY what the initiative wants
UNIRONICALLY I want that
"And the details will come later, and that is not a problem, is necessary to be like that."
Except that multiple Initiatives have been accepted with fine detail and focus on what they want.
So its not a necessity whatsoever, and whoever told you that needs to check their sources
Awesome! I'm still hoping they actually do release a new series. Actors aren't getting any younger
Do you want to address this?
twice
ok chat, it's time to put on our critical thinking caps!
Can you even vote on the initiative?
(says something stupid)
Guys we gotta remove the EU from the map

highly unlikley given the end of the last specal
abracadabra, alakazam, I turn the EU into a giant ham
Yeah, true 😦
No no no, I'm not a big fan of horror games, im easily frightened
if yall want an example of a good EU initiative that has had a lot of good impact for video games...
go look at the one for loot boxes. it was targeted and knocked out a predatory practice.
and most of the actors are old as balls (no ofense mr hologram is looking good for his age but male holly well uh
"And the details will come later, and that is not a problem, is necessary to be like that."
Except that multiple Initiatives have been accepted with fine detail and focus on what they want.
So its not a necessity whatsoever, and whoever told you that needs to check their sources
Can you address this?
Cool, I signed the UK one.
Genuine question, as the main hole seems to be about IP/Copyright, do you have an example of one of those detailed initiatives that passed where they were clear about how to handle an intrinsic, copyright related issue?
I saw a successful initiative posted but was not about copyright
critical thinking? never heard of it
Didn't they already throw that one out?
What's the temperature outside around your parts?
i am too its not primarly horor its uh well eldritch plese its ther best point and click ive played
It's where every time you think you have a chance to have an aneurysm
and the actors are all a bit old
Don't forget with ECI, its the intiative organizers that have to defend and explain their goals and objectives to the EU commission whose also gonna ask the Gaming Industry for their take on it. The vague information and ease of misinterpetion not to mention the lack of ability to push anything without a drama filled narrative is not gonna work well in a public meeting.
“The government” said that so who knows who actually did
They failed the first one because parliament dissolved last year, but now its open again the initiative has been put forward again
26 c
that sounds dangerous, i better not think critically 😇
It’s 26° here too, it’s kinda nice when the wind blows
Okay if youre so content why are you here?
i like when my licence can be revoked for any or no cause jokes on you :D
right because they are gona totaly make crunch disapear overnight lmao
My jaw literally dropped when Ross's pitch included that one slide about "easy win" etc. Being cynical about politicians is one thing, including it in a presentation that is meant to draw support, it felt like Ross was intentionally trying to push away those with the power to make it happen
i mean i also want fair practices. but i also want to be fair to indie devs
If it happens in a good way, we’ll all be happy to.
wind yeh that would be nice
!dishes
Just do them. Hey, you, yeah you, chatter, you've got dishes, huh? Why are you leaving them out? Do em now! Stop waiting. Go do them. Don't even think about leaving them on the counter or the sink. DO. THOSE. DISHES yarrRage
"Finally forced back to fair practices"
Name a point when it was ever a "fair practice" in your eyes
What?
?
you good lol
i think he finally cracked think his thinking thingy broke
he said something weird.... not bad????
I wonder what the odds are the the UK passes the first step in SKG's but make's it worse off in the end for everyone. They did vote themselves out of the EU.
he was asking if its warm theres a heat wave in the uk rn
Bro is trippin actually wait
lol
it is lunchtime
I'm sure it will.. I'm sure it will
Also, if you think that I am the biggest Thor fan here, oh boy does my chat history have something to tell you 
Has been 
Probably, I’m at work so I’m catching snippets
its great being on the receiving end isnt it
Its been wild
"The reckoning is coming, and I’ll be riding a flaming battle ostrich straight into your headquarters, dual-wielding refund requests and patch notes! NYahahahahahahahaha!"
The only person I'm a fan of is Beans.
Oh i love the ostrich knights jousting game
I agree with this!!!!!
I was equally puzzled about the overblown reaction to this. I don't know if you are European as well or not, but for me that slide is accurate to how politics works in Europe and just a cheeky way to put it that, if I'm honest, reminded me to the style Thor uses in those awesome shorts that brought me to like him in the first place.
Aka, what he described as the result of studying stand up comedians to become good at Twitch/communication
I like this one -> 
We got a phising link
holy scam link batman
I am fine with receiving, they could just be smarter about it 
If you're not actually willing to talk about it with a fair argument, why are you even here?
This message alone proves that you aren't willing to budge whatsoever
Yeah ive been wishing that too
can i ask a question 👉 👈
Are you allowed to be?
No 
Shoot
Of course
And the temperature question was simply to see if he will confidently reply in fahrenheit instead of celsius, thus not even voting on the initiative 
dear all trolls i hope you get stuck in a loop of bad memes rick roles and costume changes
To clever for you
Okay ya might pull that one back
lets maybe not with telling people to um yk
why did thor be so mean to the STK guy, and why he did´nt want to talk in stream like he does with healthy gamer and many others, thor does´nt seem like the person to just be mean to someone randomly 🤔
There was a lot of harassment I’m between the first and second video thor made however thor has since apologized for the behavior
What country do you even live in?
I'm gonna post an image that might not be acceptable here but I do believe it's very important anyway
Be aware
Be kind
Oh thank goodness
Let's not tell people to off themselves 
Op nvm
alright that's it. You come here rage baiting and not actually engaging with things, you're gone.
It's not that hard
🙏
frankly im surprised you didnt snipe him sooner xP
mods are busy on the live chat too
Inb4 they send their "friend" into the server to defend him 
I might have gone too hard on that one 
been a tad busy
(not raging at you, ofc!)
Thor apologized for his initial responses being rude, but to be honest, all of it was in line with somewhat typical bravado on the internet. It's not the first time Thor has said something should eat his entire ass
Its the _ s that give it away
discord new to the server leaf icon
looks inside
:
ya if you don't delete that, I'm about to
mods doing work today
It's gone
based
Apologies
"somemadeupname is writing" 🍿
I'll rephrase this cause I didn't get any backlash.
As a casual observer, I found the "Politicians like an easy win" slide from Ross on the same vein as some of the out of the box humourous lateral thinking statements that I loved from Thor's shorts. So I was really surprised to see a big reaction against that. I perceived Ross and Thor as having much in common before that shrug
no complaints - means we get to play a bit before they get yeeted 🙂
goblins love bait
Today's just been a lot
Basically what this said. Ton's of harassment before, during and after the upload times of the 2 videos he put out. Ross made no attempt to denounce those people doing so and just saw it as "free advertisement" and didn't want to get involved with that crowd
Its all good just try and keep composure i know its rough
Woke up late and basically all the day is gone for me so that's great
Many thanks as always Maggie.
Which I don't understand. IF they want to really go far they need a better spokesperson then him.
We all are kinda at the limit im at the flagged for rules pvp atm
One thing that's a bit sad though. I did thoroughly enjoy Freeman's Mind, so Ross being this toxic for clout does leave a bad taste 😦
Well after knowing how his supporters behaved the first time around, he did it again last week with 30-ish minutes of placing the blame for it flagging squarely on Thors shoulders
How is Ross being toxic for clout?
I get that is the way politics works in reality, but the humour was lost on me. If anything, it raised doubts for me, as it was hinting that the details required to make sure whatever is passed isn't detrimental in practice, may not be sufficiently followed up on (if the sentiment is that the politicians don't know better anyway, why bother?). Sure, everything might work out - it's not like an initiative needs to iron out all the details up front - but it is still risk
Dude was basically just baiting us into explaining everything wrong and what the actual focus of SKG should be to fix the vague wording while simultaneously telling us we were wrong and should rethink our morals, that they'll laugh when laws favor consumers even if it infringed on dev/publisher rights
I understand the frustration but there are some lines we don't cross 
And at the end was just saying effectively “im on the right side of history” he was definitely going
Thor's shorts are meant to encourage people to be more creative and act on the atuff that interests them. To put that line into a political initiative is both pandering and making concessions to politicians before they are even involved.
That's why it is extremely telling and to anyone interested in political discourse a tell-tale sign that the initiative isn't fully honest.
Another initiative that has passed was the "clean water" initiative, because everyone need and deserve clean water. It'd be like saying "everyone deserves and need it, but it'd be easier to get it to pass if we pretend some people don't deserve it."
why is roast beef sandwich on an onion bun with cheese sauce on it so good?
these are the real questions
ooh that does sound good
Ok thank you for the explanation. I can't say I manage to understand it, but I appreciate you giving your POV
man I kinda want arby's now, it's been a while
i was craving arbys, but didnt want to buy fast food. so i made it myself
where can I learn this power?
we don't have roast beef sandwiches at wendy's and I believe it'd cost me about the same amount to get the ingredients to make the sandwich
with the power of the grocery store (and maybe the internet if you arnt sure whats in whatever you're making.)
ew, someone's viewbotting thor, gross
I'm still on a quest to find fast food recipes to make them vegetarian
Well for one, not denouncing anyone going over to send harassment Thors way after the initial SKG spark, and from what I can see has never even mentioned or has said "Sorry but you don't deserve this hate"
And then a week ago, ranting for 30 minutes about Thor putting the blame of it flagging directly on Thor's shoulders.
Unfortunately this hail Mary is working
its like arbys
To believe that this legislation would be an easy win shows that the person making the statement may not understand the full gravity of the fight they're getting into. Just saying that it won't touch copyright law doesn't make it so
They had months to speak out agiesnt thor but decided to do it right as SKG is dying out.
i think im going to throw some tater tots in the oven
They are doing it to make him look bad and report him for doing it. Saw some BS on Dropped Frames were people were spreading lies about him activaely doing it
Exactly. Trying to hand-wave away that this discussion won't also be a discussion about copyright and IP law is someone who is woefuly unprepared to face it
I was thinking of getting some cold roast beef from the deli meat section, some cheddar cheese sauce and if I can find some, put it on a pretzel bun
Ah yes, cause this will obviously help support SKG

never understood the logic of viewbotting a large streamer as an attack vector. Like, do they believe twitch wouldnt have the analytics to determine that it's harrasment
Ok this made me actually understand the concern, thanks. Do not agree with the conclusion but I can see how that comes about for sure
Guess what thor reports abnormal veiw counts preemptively specifically for this reason as its a common tactic and twitch knows it
Thor has to be the one to tell Twitch, otherwise Twitch would think he was viewbotting on purpose
it's more the people who have been after him for years, same people from the Warcraft drama. There is just a group of people who hate him and will look for anything to take him down,
ussualy you expect someone to viewbot themselves, so if someone viewbots you, then there is a chance they ban you for a crime they are commiting XD
thats more or less what i did, but did onion buns
wait, what is "viewbotting" exactly? I'm not that familiar with the whole YT/Twitch thing
(other than watching people's streams)
It's a bunch of fake viewers, that are bots, that drive your numbers up. Makes it look like more people are watching you but it doesn't add more ad revinue
viewbotting is causing a network of bots to load the stream to inflate viewer numbers
Well if they're either the same people who have tried in the past, or know them, then they would also know that he always tells Twitch firsthand that its happening. So what's even the point other than wasting shitloads of money lmao
Paying a site to send a bunch of fake accounts to your stream so analytics go up
And what are they trying to accomplish by viewbotting Thor's streams?
To get him banned
trying to get him banned for it
oh. jfc
From what they said on Dropped Frames, a Twitch employee said they know who bots and who doesn't. They have a way to see it and have been ignoring it in general
Yeah...
Bots (robots are fake or artificial entities) that are used to do various tasks in this case “watch” the stream to bring up artificially, the view count. they do this to report and try and slander the individual.
Did they have a Twitch employee on the podcast itself? And did they say that Twitch ignores the people who viewbot their own channel?
Pretty sure Thor has a video on a similar topic, referring to botting - WoW knows who's a bot and knows it's an issue, but they ban in waves so it becomes harder for the botters to figure out where they went wrong
It could also be Twitch is trying to figure out what the issue itself is that allows botting to occur
I think JP has a source who he talked to. I can't remember which one mentioned it. It wasn't Cohh
Not gonna lie, I don't buy that as the sudden massive amount of viewbots cost a shitload of revenue against Twitch
Think about it
If you ban a bot, they'll just make a new bot
You gotta figure out what allows the bot to be made or used in the first place
People are swarming pewdiepie now about making a video on SKG. Luckily no hate from what I can see in the comments
was gonna say, that's the same pic twice lol
it depends on if the bot is getting the video. streaming the video does cost money
Anyway, the viewbots have been removed it seems
From what they said, view botting doesn't add Ad Rev to the streamer, it just sets them higher in the Twitch ratings
I wonder if the drama farmers are gonna try and fake being pirate fans to make more strife
So it just makes Twitch look bad for saying that they will ban you for it, but they don't do anything about it
and as soon I say it....
It comes back
im going to assume its going to be a quirk for today
I dunno, still not sure I buy it (That Twitch employee admitting that they ignore people who viewbot their own channel) and then making the connection that Thor does it purposefully
anyways, Summer Games Done Quick is next week
That sounds like another wild-ass conspiracy to me
Catch DROPPED FRAMES LIVE every Sunday 1PM ET on https://www.twitch.tv/itmejp
The use of GenAI continues to grow in game dev, viewbotting is increasing on Twitch, is streaming video games dying? Our thoughts on Stop Killing Games, Dune Awakening's end game, Death Stranding 2, Lies of P and of course the Horse Girl game.
0:00 - Intro
1:20 - The...
it starts at the Twitch stuff
ah the bots are headless and just add to the counter/make the chat list longer
so yeah. just makes the streamer show higher on the list
They do make a joke about Thor and I got angry and posted about it being in bad taste to Cohh. He didn't seem to care
dont worry too much about it
This seems very biased.
I feel that Thor making a react to a Ross video was described as a reaction and an opinion, while Ross making a react about Thor video was described as a rant.
While if you compare those two, the Thor one was pointedly trashy / more ranty than the Ross one was, by a lot.
On the "sorry" part, I'm not sure if you mean "sorry, this is my responsibility" or "sorry that is happening to you, wish it wasn't"? Because if it's the first, I'm pretty sure I have seen Thor insist to not say sorry for things that are not your fault. And I don't think it's Ross's fault that people are horrible to Thor.
And if it's the second, I'm pretty sure Ross has indeed said something on those lines.
I am also biased in the sense that I'm not going to go out of my way to crawl for clips of what I believe to be true to prove it here
it will blow over in due time
watching a video just now and its pretty interesting so far, the guy is a networks programmer and has good experience in game dev in general it seems. seems like a small youtuber but actually interesting hearing this guys take https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zb7euiV-Dw
Support stop killing games:
https://www.stopkillinggames.com/
Join my discord:
https://discord.gg/xG2vNjyWPC
Amazon Affiliate Link:
http://amzn.to/2qxx9G1 (affiliate)
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com an...