#streamchat
1 messages · Page 220 of 1
the actual best starting point the gaming industry can do, is to target games that require you to always be online yet have no multiplayer functionality.
Don't know the details of law making process in the EU, but won't the developers and publisher and any other stakeholder on the topic be given chance to also put their opinion on the law.
Was me highlighting how EU legislation isn't a perfect cure for everything like people seem to think it is
SKG movement is just to get the ball rolling
I remember just cause 3 having DRM
Despite having the narrative foresight of having that be the enemy faction in the game too
Ah, well, that I can get with
Yes
And how people head canon what stuff means that is totally different to reality
that ball is rolling in to a crowd. that ball is strapped with explosives
Ofcourse the end isn't 100% guaranteed to be all good, almost no law is good to everyone
Knowing very little about gdpr, what are some flaws that it has?
I was under the impression it was a generic data transparency regulation
It was made in Belgium /s
simply put the initiative AS IS, is incredibly vague For the massive amount of work needed.
So many excuses built into it for companies to keep on doing as they were already doing
Baldur's Gate 3 developers rehabilitating their entire country, one game at a time
you also cant forget that companies by pass the laws to target political persons to "buy a vote" essentially
I have been following you Thor for a long time, even though I like you, but I cannot pretend anymore, sorry, I must say it... 
Basically I'm a dev too, with over 22 years in the industry (my father has been in the field too), and I can say objectively that sadly Thor you have been wrong this time. Not only that, no reason to be dishonest about SKG (not sure why you did that man, maybe being defensive or being stressed? You may have a reason that we don't know).
You sound really reasonable and convincing to people who lack experience in the field, but the truth is, as I see it with all my experience and knowledge, you are just not right in this case. That’s my honest take on it.
As devs, we have several creative ways to address the possible issues with a low cost (at taking what SKG actually is and not misinforming with hypothetical unrealistic issues that you made up). Also, gamers concern is logical and fair, I believe we all are aware of recent bad practices from some companies in the gaming industry.
I wish things were different, like we were in some parallel dimension or something, but hey, it is what it is, guys. I hope with Thor we can solve all this drama soon and it all works out 👍💪 keep the good work
and sorry all the hate you got recently, that was not fair imo.
Will not mention more for a while about the topic, maybe all will calm down soon, see ya guys, have to go 👋
They can still collect what they want as can just deny site Access till you agree and can flat out refuse to remove PII as can claim they still need it
Given how far reaching this bill would be, I'd rather it be well cooked and not raw in order to best serve consumers, devs and publishers
except it wont - as worded, it is vague enough that it risks introducing a significant amount of regulatory burden. EU regs generally have a minimum timeframe of product support expectancy, because otherwise it would remain permanently in effect - case in point machinery regs, cosmetics regs, biocidal products regs, medical device regs etc. The requirement to be left in a playable state is very likely to be translated into a minimum timeframe for support, which based on other regs released would reasonably be about 5-10 years. Thats an extreme amount of additional work to heap onto indies and will only marginally affect the big corpo groups. Think of how many hardware updates, software refreshes etc that have happened in the last 5-10 years, and you see the risk
Pay to reject personalised ads is the clearest example I've seen
not an airport, off you pop
I feel like too many people miss the entire point. Get the ball rolling? When you are talking about government involvement, and yes, this includes outside of the US, you cant just "get the ball rolling." You have to have stuff more ironed out than that. You can just roll the ball into a burning house and go "Well we got the conversation started! :D"
Hey there!
Let's separate the points:
- "An artist has every right to take their artwork off the internet". The analogy does not really work here as the artist can't go to my computer and delete the artwork. (The use of the artwork is to have it/look at it/use it somewhere else, not to play it). If they could, however, come to my computer and delete it, after I paid 50 euros for it, I don't think they should be allowed to (bought as goods).
Now, the more apt analogy, if I paid for a license to that artwork (like I would in the Unity Asset Store for example), that has a ToS, and its a license in perpetuity as long as I don't break that ToS. Sometimes the asset goes unsupported, so no new people can buy it and** I will not receive support or updates for that asset**. However, I can still keep (in fact, in this case, I can still download, as long as Unity servers run) the last version of the asset that I paid for, because it was left on a usable state.
I think we could agree that if Unity stopped letting me download the last version of the asset, or if it was not left on a usable state, I should be able to complain about it, and the rules should be that the asset provider should not be able to do that, right?
That's a better analogy in my opinion.
- Museum Tickets. Part of the reason for the petition to exist is that these games / access to game licenses we are buying do not specify until when the service will be available (am I buying a ticket for 1 day, 1 week, 5 months?), or how long of a notice they have to give us before deciding to stop service. I think if you bought a museum ticket at 10 am and at 11:30 the museum said "Oh, you know what, we just realized we cant afford the electricity to keep the museum open the whole day. Please exit the premises", you should be entitled to a refund, wouldn't you?
I was told an analogy yesterday that I really liked
You buy an album in apple music
Apple goes "oops this album no longer licensed to us NERD give it back"
And thus it vaporizes
Then some dork on the internet says "weLL yoU LIcEnsEd IT NOT bOUGHt It"
What games have you worked on? Just curious
Then won't the best course of action is to actually converse with the movement so when the actual hearing comes (if the petition even passed) the perfect points could be proposed in the hearings.
Like this is a good time to just flesh out what everyone worrying about the petition and actually clear it out before the hearing comes. Instead being hostile to each other like whats happening recently.
Would this be a better approach?
Game companies must provide a grace period of (lets say 1 year) before EOL. until then you have a license(following ToS) until EOL.
The hearing themself can be used to explain more about the issue
Pointing out that last part: the last minute shutdown will never occur like you explain it to. Games will usually announce ahead of time when their services will shut down, so you can cancel your subscription, or enjoy what little time you have left.
Did some searching... Would either of these help with the YouTube unbanning thing?
(Could even add the liveChatBans insert/delete commands to the bot idea from #streamchat message to log which moderator is doing what, if that info isn't too outdated or something...)
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55721986/how-to-look-up-youtube-live-chat-ban-id-to-delete-it#69802935
https://developers.google.com/youtube/v3/live/docs/liveChatBans
1 year is a bit of a stretch, I would say 2 or 3 months prior to shutting down, as that gives users time to see the message and cancel their subscriptions, or continue playing.
It would have to be shown in game, rather than just on social media.
yea time could be adjusted. its at least something you could require all game companies to have listed
I think most already do it
Nice idea, but its too late here
the time for discourse was before the initiative was released. To be blunt Ross made a mistake in not reaching out to impacted stakeholders before he published his initiative.
Now, combined with the vitriol around this subject online, has made it unworkable to do
not saying a well crafted initiative couldn't make a resurgence though.
This actually reminds me of the Mojang -> Microsoft account transfer that occurred. That didn't happen until 2 years after the initial announcement, did it?
id support a version of this that was reworked to take into account the concerns, and was far more sturdily worded and phrased
but i agree, it has to be a new one after all this has died down
I think thats what a lot of people would prefer. the current one just has too many problems inside and outside of the initiative
People kept complaining "I JJST SAW THIS FOR THE FRIST TIME!" at the last second, because they weren't paying attention to the game with an account that they paid for.
The other day, I was talking to someone about Minecraft, and they complained that their account was deleted because they didn't transfer it.
That's the beautiful thing about petitions: if the first fails, a second can be made
Yes, and then they were notifying more and more when the deadline was approaching.
problem is that the messaging right now from Ross isnt helping: he is saying that if this doesnt pass it will never happen in future. Not constructive, and guaranteed to ramp up the tension
EU portal petitions are not meant to be an extensive proposed law draft. I don't even think character limits would allow that. They are meant to say: I am a citizen / group of citizens concerned about this. We think this is breaking the law / its causing a problem. We ordain you to take parties from both sides of the issue, discuss it, and tell us what you concluded.
Of course we do need a lengthy period before anything gets brought back up
The only vitriol I have seen towards the initiate was from Thor and while it caused all these discussions it definitely brought a lot of attention. There are still plenty of stakeholders who can work with it.
You could ask any influencer , or maybe also thor to actually discuss it with SKG and bring up the issues opposition has so it can help refine things for the hearing (if petition passed).
Theres no such thin as too late
Fair. but I don't think this was Reiterated correctly enough in the first place
not towards, from the initiative. SKG's supporters have a large vocal minority that has been incredibly brutish and nasty
no the initiative is certainly dead
and I don't think any talks can be made for a while due to the Vitriol etc.
Most people shitting on Thor due to SKG are doing so because they like shitting on Thor. I would not be going around labeling SKG's supporters as such - especially with a "large vocal minority ".
He's just a stressor tbh. He knows he doesn't want to go through the process again if it fails now but saying it will never happen is ridiculous
everyone needs a breather and learning classes
Dang it, I read it as incredibly british 
Just ignore them, if the big voices actually sat down and had conversation we wouldn't be in this shirtstorm.
Dangit, my wording got me again
What the hell does "large vocal minority" even mean 
We cant ignore them. content creators are going to drama farm
Probably a loud minority
take one look on any social media platform discussing this topic and it wont be hard to find
well, i am british, so....
Again, people doing so are doing it because it's Thor, they may not even be part of the SKG community.
I'd argue SKG screwed up when Ross put out that video saying it was "easy to pass", how it'll breeze right through, and give legislators a break from other things. That was where Thor snapped.
You cant even sit down with Ross to discuss it because he has no extensive knowledge in the subjects
oh, nothing personal man
same for other creators
And rightly so, because that kind of wording insults legislators' intelligence and downplays the meaning of the initiative.
thats a convenient dismissal of the reality - these people are citing SKG. If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck...
I can understand the emotional part, but i still don't understand why theres no head to head discussion
And they are citing mana gems for other dramas. It just fits right now.
They just need an angle to attack from. Bet these guys are still left over from the OF WOW classic drama
its just going to be a teaching course
Exacly my point.
no no, none taken! im just multi track drifting - this is a brief distraction from reading the latest working group minutes from the Machinery regulation working group 
How would you know tho?
Because the way Ross put it out, and how people are responding to Thor about it, makes it impossible for a discussion to be had. Both sides think they're right.
So about the whole "sit down and talk about it" thing that everyone LOVES bringing up... I want to remind people that Thor was asked for his input almost a year ago and gave it. And now everyone wants Thor to have a conversation and offer fixes to the initiative...
Since when the hell was this Thor's problem to fix? Why is it on Thor to fix Ross's thing?
I know nothing on the intracacies of being a Doctor. How am i going to have a discussion with a Doctor about a subject they are knowledgable in?
do you see what you are doing here? you are excusing the actions of others because it marrs the argument you are making. You cannot cite the speck in someone else's eye without also acknowledging the plank in your own
SKG has a vitriol problem that is hampering any beneficial discussion around it
Then the best thin is to just talk it out no? like really is it that wrong to just sit down, have a talk, give it at least 30 minute to start, dont even need to record it.
What sparked this 100% hostility isolationism act , i really dont understand
the Masses are just immensely Ill informed on the subjects in the first place.
What? Where am I excusing their actions? I am just saying that SKG has likely little to do with it, as these people like to attack Thor with anything that is currently relevant.
This would also apply to Thor not having knowledge on how law is passed / EU petitions work, wouldn't it. I think both sides could have benefited from doing a talk back then, then could still go separate ways at the end
both would benefit greatly having a talk now
Yes but he is at least knowledgable about Dev work etc. so you cant just have Thor only talk.
even if both disagree it could lessen all the hostility going around
Ok, so the people coming into Thor's chat every 30 seconds calling him a games killer, or a corpo shill to kill games, or "the killer of SKG" is somehow unconnected?
I think after the "this is ass" moment there was a line drawn in the sand where that just isn't going to happen again.
and i honestly would love more developers to talk than Just Thor
Bridges have been burned, Ross even mentions in the latest SKG vid he doesn't want to talk and feel Thor doesn't either
I like to be more mean/ being a shitter as a joke to both laugh at, but idk how much can i be in here, idk what's the limit
ThePrimeTime already did, 10 months ago, shortly after Thor did.
more
I work with EU regulations on the daily and thor is not wrong on this - look at any other successful initiative proposal that became law and you will see that they clearly detailed their intentions, how it would work, any mitigations required, and cited similar regulations that could be used as a pattern
about 5 in each subject would be a start
thor has this in some of his tweets to outline what he thinks isnt reasonable, is the original of this still up? the skg website doesnt have much on it, mainly an faq and i couldnt find it in there
Read my message again and try to understand it, please. The point is that they are using anything currently relevant to attack Thor. It is SKG now, it was WOW before. It is connected to SKG by name but those people care less about the initiative and more about attacking Thor. That is what I am writing.
I'm sure there's more, though I personally am not too deep into dev youtube 
I'm an artist that watches Minecraft and Horror videos
Devs don't always equal Publishers right?
how do you not see the problem here? These people are here, and none of the leading voices for SKG are stopping them. Theres no condemnation of their behaviour, no messaging to say they dont represent the movement. They are being tolerated, and i dare argue being encouraged by, the movement
of course not.
Developers are often a different company/studio entirely
And both sides have rank smelly kobolds that never bothered to learn how to respectfully argue
As somebody who's not a boomer and has seen plenty of vitriol online.... What exactly do you expect people to do?
Separate want and would, and problem is they both are leader of 2 clashing community right now, showing that they acn still talk would really chill down the hostile feeling, and it would out the shitflingers from the actual fans/supporter of either side.
this specifically also says "Publishers" which is another Vague point (replying for the image not what you said sry)
simple; speak out against it. Which in this era is more easier than ever
but all we have is silence
I made a point about this earlier... it wouldn't. Go look at the replies to Josh Strife Hayes in his recent video addressing it. EVERYONE is saying "No Josh, actually Thor deserves this"
They don't care about lessening hostility. They care about making him the villain in this.
question, as you seem to have personal knowledge on that. Is your concern that if it reached the 1m signatures that the "wrong laws" would pass or that no laws would pass and it would remove opportunities for the issue to be talked about later?
I was going to bring up Josh's video but it looks like someone else already has.
That's how trolls work
Back in my day we ignored them
yes, absolutely. I am certain that being left in a playable state will translate into a minimum timeframe of support that would rapidly increase regulatory burden on developers that would be more keenly felt by smaller studios than the AAAs
Do you have an example I could look into? I'm curious like a cat
That's why my friends call me Whiskers
But we** dont know**, there has been 0 attempt of direct talk, its the internet people will fling shite for fun, but if either side head figure has no hate anymore, it would out the actual fans from trolls.
It isnt trolls when it is the entire comment section. Nearly EVERY comment is a hateful one. Theres a difference between trolls and a witch hunt.
gimme a sec, will go and find a successful one's original initiative proposal
sorry, I pressed Enter prematurely and accidentally, I editted the comment to add the full question
No, that's because your mustache is stiff
My understanding is that there is mainly one official voice for the initiative and that is Ross himself. I do agree he should call for people to calm down on the attacks on Thor but Thor did call both him and the initiative some very hostile things essentially unprovoked so maybe he is not doing so due to personal feelings. 🤷♂️
it just reads like it would require studios to provide private server tools, for example it would require FromSoft to develop a "Seemless Coop mod" if they ever were to take down the Elden Ring servers
Luckily users were able to do that easily
which i dont think should be done with regulation, but i'd like to read the whole thing and not just the first 3 paragraphs
was it easy?
I'm curious if a version of this initiative could possibly exist, any wording, that would result in the intended outcome that people would support?
Also yeah seamless co-op as notorious for being made within the first few months of every from soft release
For the most part.
Yes it could. but the people drafting the initiative needs input from all aspects of said industry
https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/initiatives/details/2021/000006_en heres one for you - theres multiple others but tbh im also trying to read a few things for work at the same time so a little distracted 
but the initiative itself if worded correctly is like playing a new game on insane mode first. not a good starting point
it didnt exist for any of them until elden ring
there absolutely could have been, but it would have required stakeholder input prior to submission - this issue would have been identified and mitigated had any collaboration occurred
Saying rude shit isn't the end , like cmon we are all adult here, why would calling someone ass be the last straw, if thats how really the world run we would all be in nuclear fire right now.
after that the dev made versions for AC6, dk3, and dks1r
A perfect starting point is always online DRM etc.
which gives a live service initiative some backing
regardless
Maybe I'm misunderstanding but, the points there also feel like things that would have been called "vague".
"1. Protect and strengthen the cosmetics animal testing ban. 2. Transform EU chemicals regulation. 3. Modernise science in the EU."
In which you could also combine EOL and authentication DRM into the base initiative
check the annex
god damn, these skg guys are going feral, my reddit feed is like 1/3 anti pirate software posts where they're just throwing everything they can gto discredit him, where was this level of energy in promoting the skg proposal in a normal way
you either die a hero or live long enough for muppets on the intertubes to make you the villain
the entire WoW Hardcore era really poisoned people thanks to all those streamers being reaction content streamers. I think.
(btw sorry if my messages seem short, im also working)
I did, a lot of that there too, no? "Put in place concrete steps. Ensure that test requirement deadlines are not applied at the expense of scientific rigour or human and environmental safety by allowing a default fallback to reliance on unreliable tests on animals. Initiate legislation to strengthen and broaden the cosmetics testing bans"
The concrete parts I see are things like:
"Immediately implement the existing EU bans. Clarify that the requirement to rely on non-animal data for the safety assessment of cosmetics ingredients must be applied and animal data rejected, regardless of the location and purpose of animal tests conducted after the cut-off periods described in Article 18(2) of the EU Cosmetics Regulation."
The SKG petition had similar points, didn't it?
Any way, I will shut up about this part because I'm not versed in this stuff, just wanted to say that I genuinely don't see the problem
Law stuff is like that lol
Because it's uncalled for?
The moment you start flinging shit, you lose the argument.
ESPECIALLY when you start telling people to off themselves or that any losses you get are deserved
Was Thor rude when he made his statement? Sure, but he apologized for his rudeness and stood by his statement.
What the people attacking him are saying isn't just rude, it's threats to his own life. Thor said nothing of the sort, but they're acting like he killed their cat.
I actually feel like the response would be a lot less right now if people weren't still stuck on that meaningless fiasco
and the poor ferrets were a target
Thanks a lot for giving the example and the responses Trev
the example i gave it explicitly citing which regulations it could already tie into, as well as directives that exist that are already aligned with some of its intentions. It lays the groundwork clearly that meant the outcome law was very much in line with the initiative
As someone who played WoW for 18 of its 20 year existence, I can tell you that WoW players ruin everything. Kinda like league. But with possibly more basement dwellers.
I was there during the WoW stuff and checked the other streamers out and just felt " This all feels like reaction content. I thought thor dislikes this"
if you dont see the problem that's fine, each to their own etc, but i can see a wild difference between the two
Ok, I appreciate it
Ross does not deserve a talk in any way, shape, or form. Thor could choose to talk to him about the Initiative if he wanted to, but there is no benefit for him to do so because the Initiative does not affect him. Thor made his statement, and he stands by it.
perhaps, but the guy I'm currently talking to accepts that wow was dumb, but to say thor united all of europe on this is is dumb
anytime! you were respectful and inquisitive - i have all the time in the world for that mindset, even if we dont agree
anyways, this document im reading for work is being rude and not reading itself and is demanding my attention
, have a great day everyone
Let this be yet another reminder that the CHAT came to Thor about his opinion, and he chose to give it to them. He did not have to, but he may have felt pressured to do so because of the volume of people asking him for it.
lmao, bye 
And Thor then chose to respond in the way he did (calling both the initiative and Ross shit) and with the hateboner that exists for Thor on the internet it backfired down the line. Chat "forced" him to respond but not the way in which he responded.
Can someone explain whats happening
And while Thor is definitely entitled to his opinion, he could have expected the outcome.
I already mentioned that Thor apologized for the way he responded, and a reason why he may have done so
…..
He didn't have a "hateboner" for SKG, he said it was disgusting because of the way it was presented
just skg stuff. the current convo is dwindling down
He difinitely did and that's good on him. It still happened though and the apology was after the latest outcry.
So do you believe he apologized because he was called out, or do you believe he apologized because he felt bad for the way he spoke?
Both.
some people disagree with Thor about a subject
other peeps with a hate bonner or nothing better to do use that to form some sort of hate brigade believing they are moraly right to do so
Internet 1O1
No seriously, i rarely see this pop up but now every gross sad neckbeard channel has a video talking about pirate software, whats been done, if anything to upaet so many people¿ or is this just twitter being….. twitter
What was the opinion¿
My youtube is heavily curated, I haven't seen anything 
the current initiative is ending which is culminating into a hateboner bubble that will pop soon.
before this talk actually died down
that he believe the Stop Killing games Iniciate has flaws in it and is dangerously vague as it stands
he does believe in the concept itself but that sadly got lost
It's funny cus when you asked what was going on I was gonna make a comment about Thor being on trial in the Twitter court of lul, but I decided against it.
SKG could end up damaging games instead of preserving them because of the way it is written. He also did not like the smugness in how it was presented by Ross. He (Thor) focused mostly on multiplayer games as an example of those that would be affected by the current wording.
Im sorry i dont know what that is
So…. He doesnt think games should be taken offline indefinitely like the crew¿
I'm trying to fix my bathroom door but seems like the wood absorbed some water and inflated a little bit and now the door isn't closing correctly...idk if I can dry wood like this, maybe I should have put some varnish before, hmm.
Oh, you meant on chat? Idk ☀️
stop killing games was an initiative by Ross(idk full name) to preserve live service games. the wording was incredibly vague and his video misrepresented things without much knowledge. Thor said his opinion 10 months ago and receive hate and death threats. the initiative is dying down now so the talk has been reignited. he has not stopped recieving hate for an opinion.
think i summed it up.
someone doesn't agreeing with someone else (and said something perfectly reasonable about eating their 'entire ass') so the interweb lost it's minds because it's 2025, nuance is dead, and the slightest hint of not being part of the current groupthink is obviously a reason to brigade and send death threats
The Crew was removed from SKG as one of their arguments, actually. But he does agree that games LIKE The Crew should be able to be played entirely offline after EOL, because a significant portion of the content was able to be experienced in Singleplayer.
It's people that are mad he used MMOs and MOBAs as an example of games that could be harmed because of SKG's vague wording, they think it is somehow misinterpreting the initiative.
Okay so…. Getting to keep and continue to play the games you paid for is the opinion here…yes¿
How could an mmo be hurt?¿
that is a simple take on it. it was all so vague and thor pointed out the difficulties.
Before my "outsider" opinion (I have watched Thor quite a bit before this stuff, and participated in a Pirate Jam), let's be clear here. Thor (or anyone for that matter) does not deserve death threats, harassment, or even annoyance to the level that he has received it.
That said, while yes, a lot is drama farming, I think the drama farming continues to have legs because I do think people perceive Thor's given reasons and actions to not align with someone that does strongly believe in conservation of games / gamers / game devs. I do feel he could have and could still do better in his communication and attitude towards this topic.
But again, the obnoxious stuff, I condemn that any day, towards anyone.
Because SKG asks that all games have an end of life plan, as in leaving them in a Functional Playable State, which is impossible for a game whose experience is entirely multiplayer.
the way live service games are made makes it incredibly difficult and the initiative wants the government to join in making things even more difficult
See i dont condemn that behavior, rather just ignore it because those aren’t people. And having a presence on the internet is going to get that sort of attention no matter what you do
Being upset by it is just wasting time and energy towards something or someone that is already pretty close to the bottom of the barrel in terms of sentience and what we should care about as people
Thank you for answering my question though. I assumed this was something dumb i just became a little concerned with how much attention it was receiving in a negative light.
Aaand comment's like this are definitely not helping anything or the vitriol some people might have towards Thor.
Turns out, it was dumber than i had thought
incredibly dumb
Yes, very much so.
Yeah, what an out of touch comment
I know your correct i just dont understand why
Sorry
We're not particularly upset about SKG, just the danger behind the vagueness. We are upset about people threatening Thor's life/lifestyle, because they don't like how he pointed out SKG's flaws.
What I assume they were expecting was for Thor to smile and give a thumbs up, saying "Yeah, this is great, no problems at all, ship it to legislation!"
People got mad because even though Thor didn't really say anything wrong he also did not fully explain what the entire purpose was, making it seem like the SKG was only doing bad stuff. There is some truth to that but the response they have done is even worse, intentionally portraiting Thor as a con artist.
And a sizeable chunk of creators all jumped onto this issue and continued to do the same.
Claiming they are starting the drama in the name of SKG, as an advertisement of sorts. It's kinda pathetic.
It's important to mention that the haters are a small portion of the people, and has little to do with the actual SKG. They are just people that live just to do hate and take part in drama.
Just like it is not fair to paint Thor as a con it is not fair to paint SKG as an attack on the industry.
Thats what i mean
I don't know if I'm being baited but I'll take the bait. The moment one finds it easy to think of others as "bottom of the barrel in sentience" and "not people" is a moment to take a break and look inwards and see if everything is well there
I dont know what i said wrong but those people are sad
Do you see twitter wagon burners as people¿
They do their best to ruin lives and careers because someone doesn’t agree with them
Thats insane
yeah. and they probably think of the people they are attacking as bottom of the barrel in sentience and not people
this is some heavy talk but easy to think these days in the US
They are still people, though not mentally well.
We have to believe these people are redeemable or we are as bad as they are
Yeah ironically everyone except Josh Strife have just done exactly what they found wrong about Thor's response back to him and they think they are justified.
Need to make up their mind. Either it's ok to talk about things or it's not.
christ that's a hell of a name to pick
It brings laughter
"Thor didn't really say anything wrong" - he said that the initiative and tactics Ross was using are "disgusting", said "this is shit", told Ross to "eat my entire ass", "all of this is shit", and more. Let's not pretend Thor was a saint in his analysis of SKG.
We're not, though
I mean, thats just a way of speaking.
Those are things that Thor already adressed and apologized for.
Yeah he was not a saint.
But everyone does exactly that back to him and think they are justified.
I am literally quoting what the person wrote about Thor not saying anything wrong. What do you even mean.
alright, gonna go, everyone have a good day. Hope the vitriol on Thor stops and the SKG initiative succeeds 😂
Or is telling someone to "eat their entire ass" not wrong? 
I mean what the person above you just said
Alright, i mean i think i got the answer i was searching for, thank you all
That is just how Thor talks when he believes something is wrong 
no that sounds pretty civil to me
Try writing it in Thor's twitch chat and report back, please.
@outer cobalt Your message is being held because of cursewords, remove them
worse things could be said that have been commonly said before
ah ok
This is the text submitted to the eu proposal
This initiative calls to require publishers that sell or license videogames to consumers in the European Union (or related features and assets sold for videogames they operate) to leave said videogames in a functional (playable) state.
Specifically, the initiative seeks to prevent the remote disabling of videogames by the publishers, before providing reasonable means to continue functioning of said videogames without the involvement from the side of the publisher.
There are multiple problems with this wording.
- Sell or license covers almost every method of purchasing/playing a game. So, it refers to all games.
- What does it mean to provide "reasonable means" to "leave said videogames" in a "playable" state. If the hardware is deprecated, does the game dev also have to provide for hardware? etc etc etc
The proposal itself is way too vague, way too open, way too liberal, way too naive, and obviously done with little consultation with the game dev community at large, instead cherry picking companies that already practice this at a niche gimmick.
People initially supported the initiative imo for "fun", but when Thor began listing examples of how this is bad, people started to treat this seriously. that is how the initiative died.
I'm still trying to get it out of my vocabulary myself 
People still want game devs to make games. Making it hard for game devs to make games and distribute them, benefits no one.
A gift for you all
I am confident this violates at least several rules
To be fair. SKG absolutely brings an actual issue that should be solved. Avoiding the issue is not a good way to handle things. We need to find a compromise that works for everyone.
Booooo
someone was faster than me with the mod ticket
nope
I looked away for 3 seconds
no ticket, mod here
or there's mod active in the chat
muhahaha
Definitely. but it needs to be done by people knowledgeable in the gaming industry. not a random content youtuber(trying to be nice)
Jake is here somewhere too
ohh hi, sophie
Technically you can challenge TOS of games and do a lawsuit against a firm that has unfair TOS and probably win that lawsuit.
Can't guarantee that though.
not sure if game devs are fine with their IP, especially art and music, essentially pirated.
also, refer to the RO community of how that will end up, eventually private servers will all require monetisation, and how would that be legal or let the original game dev also benefit from it?
Wait...hmm...Shaye works with Thor but afaik isn't a mod. So by definition Shaye can have some bread, right??
Good
GOOD
don't forget that a Lot of Devs License stuff or make heavy changes to an existing game engine which further complicates matters
Shaye makes the bread
you cant be asking a game dev to work hard for 2-3 years with minimum pay, make a decent ish game for 100+ people who don't even pay to cover server costs, now have to make their art just free for people to pirate and plagiarise.
Dont tell thor of this discovery
Shaye can hide bread from Thor
Shaye = Bread God?
we should allow game devs to choose whether they want to resell their assets to someone else to recoup costs etc and start a new game instead etc
I don't know much about Ross so i have no idea whether he is knowledgable enough to deal with it.
But i would imagine once the initiative comes though (if it does) it's going to become a community effort. I don't believe they will just pass that as a law as it is written at this point 1:1 with no changes.
game dev already pay very little, making it even harder to monetise it is not going to benefit anyone
it officially ends on july 3rd i think
a month before this it was passed over in the EU
Hence the reason for a law, not a market solution between parties ☀️
Now they don't have a choice, yey
31st of July
its just market economics. making a law doesnt solve the problem.
games are not meant to be consumed only by the rich
there are always multiple ways to achieve a thing in law. the fundamental issue with SKG as it is written is that it mandates extra behavior of game developers, which will be an overhead cost, which will make the development of certain video games less likely.
an alternative angle would be to, say, decriminalise the preservation/restoration efforts of video games, which don't come with overhead costs for developers, but still runs into massive challenges with IP laws (which in my opinion need a massive restructuring, anways)
"he could still do better in his communication and attitude towards this topic" is the bit that bothers me about the discourse on this issue
there is a lot of "Thor communicated badly" or "Thor had the wrong 'tude"... who decides what is bad or wrong?
I understand Thor's PoV having listened to what he said, and for me his "attitude" doesn't change the content and any any event
disregarding the content because of the presentation is an intellectually weak move
hell, thinking further on it, even "attitude" is subjective is it not? I'm pretty sure if someone proposed a new initiative that had elements that would likely harm grassroots DJs (the "indie dev" equivalent for my industry) I would probably say they can eat my entire ass too... and I wouldn't lose any sleep over it
I'll say it now in fact: anyone who pushes for vague legislation that I believe will harm grassroots DJs can eat my entire ass
okay UK = july 14th and EU = july 31st
if they want the game to be preserved, they should be proposing to buy the ip. in this case, skg folks are not even asking to pay for servers.
Ofc not, I'm being sarcastic. My career is in economics, this whole thing pisses me off more thn you can imagine
People complaining about his attitude don't have a leg to stand on because he already apologized to the people that mattered.
also I exhort y'all to try "eat my entire ass" IRL - it always gets a laugh
I may or may not have claimed it to use as my own on the regular 🙂
whats wrong with his attitude anyway? there's nothign wrong.
I believe it's important to ensure developers are protected in cases where they can't cover certain costs due to unforeseen circumstances in the process. At the same time, gamers deserve protection too, especially when they're spending real money on games. Striking a fair balance between both sides is essential.
They're riling him up and making him emotional so they can clip it and use it to justify their hate towards him.
also true, but that comes down to the problem that even a dead IP is usually valued in the millions for sale
we do agree
i think Thor's proposal to make it clear that you cannot sell a game if its meant to be a license is pretty good and actionable.
but we are holding a poisoned apple at this point
yes, because that's the amount of effort that went into it. we can't be complaining that game artists dont get paid much but then gamers dont want to be paying for art ip
Problem is usually licenses have expiration dates. Most games do not
I agree. However, in my view, the way 'licenses' are currently handled tends to be unfair to consumers.
Yeah IP laws and copyright laws are horrible. Constantly being used against people that do nothing wrong, by big corporations that just have the power to shut down everyone.
how so?
You end up seeing all the precursor problems
it may be beneficial to divide the types of licenses that are being referred to
it depends on the license
cause that itself is vague
if you bought a chrome book but internet is not included would you be mad?
No expiration date and licenses like Blizzards that can be terminated at any time for any or no reason
#metoo
we aren't in that timeline though
It's 2025. Certain things should just be guaranteed by now
I keep having the """very funny""" thought that you coulld probably nuke copyright out of existing by bringing up that fandoms exist, outproduce the IP holder by a factor of at least 100, are easy to find by nature and are walking copyright violations, but I'm no lawyer so what do I know
yeah, abuses will be done on both side. dont buy games from game devs you dont want a cooperative relationship with
Do u know of an example of a licensed game with a duration, cuz i genuinely can't think of any besided subscription games, which are not covered by the initiative
every game is covered under the initiative
From what I've seen, some companies use the 'license' model as a legal shield for practices that feel abusive, for instance, revoking access to a game the customer paid for, which raises serious ethical concerns.

Answering honestly: unless the chromebook was advertised to have internet included, or the box itself says it has internet included, then I have no right to be mad. Can I be mad? Sure. But the box says what it says.
Ross has stated that subscription based games prob wouldn't be covered, since they state when service ends for every individual payment
i honestly think we need a better framework for revoking access to players who abuse games. some sort of refund is needed imo
but thats another topic
FOR THE BREAD MODS!!!
This initiative calls to require publishers that sell or license videogames to consumers in the European Union (or related features and assets sold for videogames they operate) to leave said videogames in a functional (playable) state.
this is what they said in the eu proposal
they can claim whatever they want in youtube, but this is what they uploaded to be voted on : https://eci.ec.europa.eu/045/public/#/screen/home
And that's why they havr discussions to clarify such positions afterwards. I am going off what Ross has stated
you cant just clarify afterword
"Probably wouldn't" is just interpretation and hope
What matters is what's written
at that point imo they should just agree that SKG is a failure, it was stupid of them to start a proposal on things they dont understand and just start a new proposal with a better legal team.
the EU has support for consumer protections, including drafting initiatives
Probably wouldn't because Ross wants to save all videogames, but he does not see how it legally could be protected like other games
at this point they are spamming every legal system that accepts citizen initiatives with the same WRONG proposal
So dont write the initiative and draft it like it did
They're not supposed to draft the entire law tho. They're raising a concern
I agree that abusive players shouldn't have access to online features. However, fully revoking their ability to play the game, even offline, can be problematic. A better approach might be to allow limited offline/online access that doesn't impact other players, especially for games designed to be online only.
if they understood that what they are proposing is wrong, dont spam every initiative with the same wrong proposal
a Plumber trying to do brain surgery
that may be possible imo.
It's a very silly and childish way to see an initiative to just throw broad ideas and see what sticks with the concept of "we discuss this later"
dude coulda start talking on youtube, asking for help, and then draft it properly but no. for the sake for fame he just went ahead and did it anyway with the same provocative stupid statement everywhere
They do understand. It's just that the initiative page has a character limit and is thereford not designed to outline every edge case
this isnt about edge cases.
And also they obvi don't think it's wrong
the general case of making EVERY game available FOREVER is what they are saying in the proposal
where can I get a laptop with the internet pre-installed?
I have to connect mine to my router - and pay a company to send it down the pipe to me...
it comes pre-installed now? 🙂 🙂 🙂
Why not?
Wanna make a serious video on YouTube about it?
Ok, first remove monetization from it, now I will take it seriously and not just drama/view farming
dude coulda say "So and so law stated here is undefined when so and so happens. This is what we propose."
Yes, and the majority of games already can do that with no problem
But I only saw one person so far doing it....so....ye
No, they cant LMAO
I wish, haha
game devs arent going to be just giving away art and music ip for free.
Yes, they can. All single player games with no online connection can
Because the damage is done
🍞
what does it mean to the artists and musicians that made them?
Who said they have to?
to leave said videogames in a functional (playable) state.
What damage? This is directly from the EU site:
*This meeting is held within 1 month of the date when the organisers submitted the initiative.
It consists of a structured discussion on the content of the initiative, to ensure the Commission has a clear understanding of its objectives (including any clarifications needed), before it prepares its answer.*
I...I don't wanna do this anymore...
I think you confused me
read the proposal. there's no point in discussing further amendments if they dont want to take down the original proposal.
YES, so people can PLAY it. They don't get all the assets and such
there this
you are suggesting people play the game without any art or music involved?
are you serious lmao
what if the licensed stuff was used to create the game engine
like the game devs just build a game with everything zeroed out, white rectangles for everything, music all zero'ed
No, obviously not, but games are already made, so u can download then locally and play them offline with no problems
how will we play without the assets? and say there's a bug with texture mapping or alpha channels or whatever, and all the assets are bundled up in a proprietry "WAD" style format - does the company have to opensource their internal data management tools to allow the game to be maintained after "sunset"?
The entire initiative/collecting would have to start again. They can still clarify the existing initiative with the Commission after enough support is gathered.
and do with think that EU lawmakers will bother to ask any of these questons?
For those game nothing would have to be done to leave them playable except making sure they can be downloaded for at least a period of time after shutdown
then you are asking them to give away IP for free. i think you, like the original proposer who made SKG simply did not think this through.
the general worst (or best) case is that all the art and music goes to public domain
oh i see i forgot to mention they would have to restart the initiative. my bad
I swear to god the Dunning-Kruger curve should be pinned on the channel
what gamers could have done: paid for the game so the game devs could sustain the servers
Oh dear god that means all game assets would be able to be used in genAI
I'm sorry, I may be mistaken, but isn't all of these already accesible by the user, if they can download the game and play it offline?
what gamers are doing: asking for game devs to let them play for free after the initial buy-in which may or may not even exist, for f2p games.
yes, but it is protected by existing copyright laws and licensing laws. you cannot resell a game without approval.
Exactly, it’s possible, that’s why I mentioned earlier that it’s not impossible. We can find a way to let players truly own their games while also keeping developers protected and satisfied.
Will it be easy? No 
Will it require smart, competent developers? Absolutely. 
It will also require creativity and extra effort from devs, but I believe gamers truly deserve that. 
At this point I just want AI to take over and end the world as soon as possible
Yes, that is literally their job. In any case they have experts they can (and will) turn to for opinions - if it even goes that far.
Yes, and the initiative doesn't say u can
I sure do love video games
yes
Take a 1000 piece puzzle and put it together. each piece has a different owner with their own permissions. taking some out will ruin the overall puzzle.
Make it quick
Prove it
you have too much faith in the system padawan
at some point this may even mean you can pass a compiled game into LRMs and have them learn how to make the game.
DMCA has entered the chat
If you really love video games show many hrs you have on League of Legends and Megaman X7
The system will work like this no matter if you believe in it or not. The outcome is what is not certain (as always).
its already possible with some compiled binaries.
People are skipping too many steps lol
Yes, gamers wanna be able to use a product they've paid for
define "product" and "paid for" then
gamers didnt read the fine print that they are buying a license on game advertised to be online
the uncertain outcome is kind of the problem for me - vagueness and legislation are unhappy bedfellows
Yes, and the argument is that thise licenses may be unfair
I agree, and that’s precisely why governments need to provide protections for developers and companies when necessary. Each case must be handled carefully to ensure no party suffers unfairly, with fairness being the priority throughout the process.
MAY be
so are they or are they not
and if they are unfair, then how?
Everything is just so entangled. like trying to Fix a slinky.
what i think is that modding a game shouldnt be illegal. so allow users to mod the online parts out of their game.
let them reverse engineer servers via modding.
Please, watch the FAQ Ross put out as a initial response to some of Thor's concerns. It would answer a lot of the questions and concerns u seem to have
TF2 and Minecraft enter the room
now, "single player games requiring authentication via publisher servers must take steps to ensure there is a workaround in place for when the servers are no longer up"... I could get behind that all day
but the issue is the language - "all games"?
and how do we define "playable state"?
are we really gonna leave that down to the EU to decide?
are we mad?
the first part is fine but the second involves IP stuff
no. i will only follow the eu proposal, and thats what they submitted to the eu iniative.
Gamers want the freedom to play their games whenever they choose, and companies need to sustain their business.
I’m confident we can find a balanced solution that satisfies both sides.
yes this should have been the initiative instead
this thing about art and music having to be given to everyone for their own use is weird.
Package the assets in a client executable/ folders in the same way as now, provide that.
Package the server needed stuff, provide that.
When sunsetting, provide a way so that the consumers can tweak where the server requests are sent to, so the game can be hosted by someone else if need be.
Art and music would be no different to how they are now when you download a game, would they?
allow game modding after games are sunset.
But...what about all the arguments around running on monetized social media??? Those that are not covered but explained on monetized videos?!! You can't ignore those
until assets need to be modified in order to keep the game "playable" after some unreal engine update breaks something - then what?
devs open source their internal asset packaging/editing tools?
Alright then discussion is pointless
what if they have an internal custom IDE they use, should that also be opensourced?
where do we draw the line?
I don't trust the EUj to draw it cerainly
exactly
*certainly
I'm not a lawmaker, but I trust the EU will aim to get it right, after all, maintaining a good reputation is crucial for them, and I don't believe they'd want to risk damaging it.
In the EU, plastic bottle caps on single-use plastic bottles are now required to be tethered to the bottle
the EU will only look at the proposal - they won't read the FAQ either
No reason to
are you also concerned they would make manufacturers of games in cartridges and DVD's to provide their cartridge manufacturing machines? 🙄
In case theres an update to Unreal Engine
Exactly
we should force nintendo to allow modding.
A problem created by consumers, forced to be fixed by manufacturers...
pssst, got a top notch bridge here, only one careful previous owner, dirt cheap if you're interested? 🙂
I just don't think Live service games can be preserved without explicit permission from the IP holders.
Its better to focus on the other aspects in the gaming industry and then start to define terminology regarding live service games like further exploring licenses etc.
The people behind the FAQ will get to talk with them to expand upon the initiative. That is how it's supposed to work. The page has a character limit
*This meeting is held within 1 month of the date when the organisers submitted the initiative.
It consists of a structured discussion on the content of the initiative, to ensure the Commission has a clear understanding of its objectives (including any clarifications needed), before it prepares its answer.*
who is going to preserve my favorite gacha simulator? I pull the lever DING DING DING I get a girl, who will preserve this?
While the EU may primarily focus on the formal proposal, I believe these discussions typically involve thorough analysis of all supporting documents, including FAQs, stakeholder feedback, and impact assessments. Given the complexity and potential impact of such regulations, I believe they will carefully review all relevant information to make a well informed decision.
At first I thought this was crazy weird and "why the frick do we even need this?" But honestly, it has been around for a while and it's pretty good in many senses
Yes, and?
Like REALLY good
the most likely outcome is that they will defer or delay to a date in the future that is unspecified.
the eu does not trust its citizens to do the right thing
not trying to be difficult on this, but I am directly impacted by DMCA (specifically the subsection regarding "digital DJs") and it's a bag of wonk
to comply with the rules, I must keep all of my digital tracks on one single harddrive - I am not technically allowed to put them onto memory sticks to plug into the decks...
that's that way because the EU/UK politicians pass laws about shit they don't understand using technology they don't understand, in an industry they don't really care about...
I speak from personal experience here
As the copyright holder, the company will still be attached to everything people do with it's IP, which will leave it vulnerable. I've previously outlined a possible scenario: #streamchat message
Okay, that's just silly
yeah, when i was visiting the UK and the Netherlands i thought it was really neat
i didn't need to carry the lid around in my hand while holding the bottle
no, EU citizens do not trust the EU to do the right thing 🙂
the CCTV cameras paint a picture
I do the right thing and have a reusable bottle 
We mostly still do. You just decided to leave and see how well that went for you 
Have you been to ||insert countries and cities that I can't openly name but you can imagine||?? It's crazy how much trash and plastic it's on the streets
Exactly
spolier alert.... it's not going well 😦
That’s a valid concern, as regulatory processes can often experience delays. However, considering public interest and pressure around consumer rights in digital goods (1 million signatures), I believe the EU will prioritize advancing this matter rather than indefinitely postponing it. Moreover, delays might risk political and public backlash, so a clear timeline and decisive action would be in their best interest to maintain credibility and public trust.
better to be inside the tent and try to reform it than be outside looking in going "noooooooooo"
obligatory I miss Greggs
I really dont think gamers and game devs are in anyway a “substantial part of society”
both gamers and game devs are fringe communities.
gamers wanting to making it hard for game devs to make games for gamers is a dumb self-own
Idk how it is on the US but at least here on the north recycling is a big deal, and honestly the cap being attached helps a lot in not leaving plastic behind. Be it by mistake or anything.
I totally understand seeing it as silly, I also thought so at first, but now I see it as a big help for all sides
Thats actually a very cool point and worth discussing about, thank you.
I do not think this is what people were saying with "you'll have to give the art and music to the consumers" and so on. Seemed more to be that they would force developers to give raw assets or otherwise it would not work
Also we had cases on ||some countries|| where plastic caps were clogging the streets during rain...it was...icky
Gamers wanting to be protected by abusive practices is fair and reasonable
Well, the gaming industry generates billions in revenue annually and employs millions of people worldwide, contributing substantially to the economy and cultural landscape. Moreover, gaming has become a mainstream form of entertainment and social interaction
, reaching diverse demographics across age groups and regions. So, while they might once have been considered niche, today they are very much a substantial part of society
.
thanks, you reminded me of this.
lmao
i dont see anything that contradicts any of our claims
If this conflict between developers and consumers continues (dev
vs
gamer), it won’t benefit anyone. It’s like buying a car and the seller refuses to acknowledge that we want to keep the car permanently. Finding common ground is essential for a healthy industry that serves both sides. 🤝
you are counting mobile gamers ig
which is why im suggesting modding.
gamers get to mod the game they bought
devs get to keep whatever ip they have
i dont think you are aware of the many ways they can discuss it so that it gets delayed
aka "not take action"
Yes, I’m including all types of games, including mobile, although I recognize mobile presents its own unique challenges.
or "take action in a much later date after discussion with yadayadayada"
bu t that requires learning how to mod, and we don't wanna learn!!1! That takes effort!
The Commission is not obliged to propose legislation. Even where it responds positively, the most appropriate follow-up to an initiative may be non-legislative in nature. There are a range of other measures that may be more suitable.
All good, thanks for sharing. I was mostly just curious, my horse is already in this race.
the initiative covers all games, including mobile. i really think modding is the best way to do this
I'm pretty sure people meant the same I did, just worded it differently, 'cause the only way to avoid potential legal repercussions is to give up IP rights, so that company has no legal attachments to anything people do with the game.
I am firing lasers at your direction
force companies like nintendo to allow modding so their games can be played once bought
mind you nintendo is the real culprit behind all of this
That could be a viable solution in specific cases
. It would require a thorough discussion between both parties 🗣️ , focusing on collaboration rather than conflict. 🤝
their games require online updates, but they can shut down online services whenever they please.
People already disable telemetry on Microsoft products. Do people really think they won't be able to remove the server requirement from games?
they also litigate modding in every way or form
as long as modding is legal.
but scummy game devs like nintendo sue modders
within 1 month they say they are not going to take action. end of story
OR
within 1 month they say they might take action after further discussion. end of story
I just hope the best solution emerges soon, as ongoing tension isn’t beneficial for either party involved
in what perfect world do you expect them to ALWAYS give a sastifactory answer
is this transforming into an argument of "I don't trust government to pass good stuff so I won't engage with it?"
which is why i think the entire initiative should have had input from game devs from the start. ¯_(ツ)_/¯
They're just jealous I made Braixen hotter.
I mean- 🫢
one needs to first provide a clearly worded, actionable initiative
but if you did word it perfectly, they could still decide to not act in the way you described, right? so I was not sure what was the point of that line of discussion
for example, "modding or modifying a game after its bought should be legal as long as its within fair use"
simple. easy. the perfect solution.
only company that would raise hell: nintendo.
Then the problem comes with fair use...
fair use is very well defined.
dont ask for money.
dont monetise it
dont assume copyrights
we have a very well framework for protecting ip via fair use
Devs absolutely must be involved
, they are the ones creating the games
. But we also can't forget that gamers are the customers paying for them, so input from both sides is essential for a balanced approach.
🤝
But muh react streamers
but thats not whats going on here
This initiative calls to require publishers that sell or license videogames to consumers in the European Union (or related features and assets sold for videogames they operate) to leave said videogames in a functional (playable) state.
Specifically, the initiative seeks to prevent the remote disabling of videogames by the publishers, before providing reasonable means to continue functioning of said videogames without the involvement from the side of the publisher.
The initiative does not seek to acquire ownership of said videogames, associated intellectual rights or monetization rights, neither does it expect the publisher to provide resources for the said videogame once they discontinue it while leaving it in a reasonably functional (playable) state.
does any of this work with existing legislation?
That last paragraph kind of contradicts itself dont you think
at some point people are going to ask for deployment docs, server setup etc etc etc. where are all of these documents hosted?
what about human expertise required to run some of these custom systems?
its just a dumb proposal either way
It doesn't seek to claim ownership of the videogames... well what the hell are they claiming ownership of?
It doesn't allow IP or monetization rights. They can't have the game, which means no assets or servers.
the last paragraph is basically saying that they want games to be left in a state where they can be self-hosted and functional at time of sunset
It says it doesn't "expect developers to provide resources" to host servers. That's what's tripping me up.
What happens if the game devs decide to sell copyrights to another company and said company changes copyright to never allow any usage or modification
Does that make all private servers illegal
🤣
It is obvious that people who started this proposal have no idea what a reasonable proposal is
I see why it might seem contradictory at first glance 🤔
What the last paragraph aims to clarify is that while the initiative requires games to remain playable even after discontinuation, it does not claim to transfer ownership or intellectual property rights to consumers, nor does it obligate publishers to continue providing ongoing support or updates.
The focus is on preserving access, not on extending the publisher’s responsibilities indefinitely. 
Note: I am not a lawyer 🧑⚖️ , is just my take on it.
I mean sure they could leave the game as is on the hard drive
but wouldn't that be giving the end user ownership of those game assets as well?
Preserving access is extending responsibility
Someone has to host or make available these binaries
Who is going to do that?
Store it on ethereum?
I guess you could argue "it doesn't seek to do this", but it ends up becoming necessary in order to fulfill the request
Say there is a huge security issue in the original games that let attackers take control of your computer
Is it the game devs responsibility to patch it for you?
That's a valid point, preserving access does imply some level of responsibility. 
However, the initiative encourages finding practical solutions, such as requiring publishers to provide necessary files or enabling community driven hosting options, rather than mandating indefinite support or costly infrastructure from the publishers themselves. 
Behold, the 2b2t of (X) game!
Just allow modding and pretty much most of these issues are solved. There is a technical solution to have games survive
The requirement to provide implicitly requires some form of hosting
May have to elaborate on that one
Allow modding SPECIFICALLY for the purposes of removing online restrictions of game content
Allow modding of ANY form as long as it falls under fair use
including emulating said game
nintendo again, is the main problem
It’s similar to selling you a car, even if I stop providing support, I still give you the necessary tools and instructions to keep it running in **reasonable **condition. The idea isn’t to force publishers to maintain ongoing infrastructure indefinitely, but to ensure that consumers can continue to use what they’ve purchased in a fair and practical way
it would not be the devs responsibility. I imagine there would be a big range, depending on dev wishes.
From just a package that is equivalent to what buying a DVD game was, which is, a fixed version that is only guaranteed to work in some versions of a specific console / OS.
To other devs giving away all the source files so the game can be maintained like open source.
Each case would have its own possibilities and desires, as long as the base is met. (Functionality at sunset)
My main concern is the plugins that could be used to exploit vulnerabilities in an online game
Maybe my suggestion is too strict, but the concern is still there
The responsibility to install plugins and mods lie on the user. We dont govern what users do
but we expand the “right to repair” to games
Whose responsibility is it if the provided manuals have a security flaw
Developers could provide a fixed version of the game prior to purchase, along with clear instructions on how to run it. This would ensure functionality without requiring ongoing support. Also, depending on the developer’s willingness, some might even choose to release source files for community maintenance, but the key is that a playable version is guaranteed at the point of sale. 
Security is always evolving. Requiring the devs to also deal with security means they would be responsible indefinitely
exactly yeah, we are saying the same thing
Maybe an addition along the lines of "so long as the modification does not grant the user an unfair advantage above other users of the software, or violate their legal rights"
I know it's already usually in TOS/EULA for online games but I feel that would need to be clarified if we're modding games in general
that removed the reply oops
responding to this
it would have to apply specifically to user hosted servers, because of course people would be fine using it singleplayer
Single player tho
Developers can offer guidance and assistance regarding security, but ultimately it is the customer’s responsibility to maintain their own security and protect their systems. Clear disclaimers and best practices should be provided, but users must remain fully vigilant in safeguarding their own environments, especially since developers will no longer provide support, so gamers need to be smart and make the best use of what’s available.
Is like the car is broken or unsafe 🏎️ , so customer check the manual and try to fix it
with the community. 
yes I'm aware singleplayer would be fine, the addition is SOLELY for online servers
this is where it starts to get muddy in creating legislation
Man, this Warhammer game looks crazy cool but...looks like a LOT of lore around it, might not be healthy for me to get into it
Lore and games and books and (...)
Developers’ creativity must be protected to allow them to work as freely as possible. Genuine gamers appreciate and support this freedom and do not wish to impose unnecessary limitations on developers. Is what I think... may I be wrong?
warhammer is a bundle of eggs I dont wanna mess with in terms of lore 
I played Mechanicus, I'm happy with that
I feel like what Thor just said was extremely important
I wouldn't even know where to start and honestly...might be better to not dive on this pool
I have 2 friends who play the board game, like, competitively, if they realize I'm getting a slight interest in this I'm screwed
Oh we're talking warhammer?
soooooo much lore
Warhammer 401k.
There's two types of people in this world. Those who know normal life knowledge, history, how society works, etc etc. And then there's those who only know warhammer
more lore than if a bunch of lore writers invented a lore-making-machine that just spooged lore everywhere
Hand jumpscare
This book is 20 years old
Look at the tasteful thickness of it
I got it for £50 on ebay, near mint condition
Thor just said what was talked about an hour or so ago: The negative things people are saying about Thor and the Ferret Rescue is absolutely vile and he doesn't want anything to do with the SKG initiative anymore. He doesn't support it, and it's at a point where he feels he can't even have a discussion about it anymore.
I just asked if the weapons are based on technology or "magic" on chat and I got sooooo much lore out of nowhere
There was an ork that really liked his gun
He liked his gun so much he went back in time to kill his past self and have two of the same gun
(the book I shared isn't 40k tho)
I also learned to not call Warhammer StarCraft 🔥
Don't call warhammer fantasy WarCraft either
cat
I wish I clipped what he said because that was powerful, showed evidence since people were claiming there was none
I'm not, someone did
FUNNY STORY Thor's dad is the coolest dude
I asked on his stream
He was playing warcraft 1
you still can in a VOD
"Hey mr Thor's Dad you made this game, was it or was it not inspired by Warhammer, and did you guys have like a licensing agreement that went south?"
Apparently he wasn't aware of it then
cant clip it live on YT mobile afaik 
I'm calling it Doom + Helldivers
shit, didnt know that
There's a unit on Fantasy called the Doom Diver Catapult
It's a goblin on a slingshot
At least thats how this game looks
Space Marines 2
Look at 'em go
I'm used to Twitch on PC, where you could clip it live and edit it and such. But my internet is also slow to the point it can't handle clipping in 1080p
Ah thor is playing spehss mehreens
Oooo this sounds so cool
Aren't the other games like this one?
I stopped using Twitch because I don't have the money to pay for a sub and I somehow haven't gotten an ad on YT mobile for the past year or two
I mean, multiplayer, pew pew pew, helldivers style
https://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Grizgutz
"Grizgutz is an Ork Warlord who launched a Waaagh! into the Morloq system.
Using warp travel, Grizgutz and his Boyz unwittingly travelled back in time and emerged back into the materium shortly before they departed. A noted kleptomaniac, Grizgutz killed his earlier self so he could have his favourite gun as a spare. However, the resulting confusion caused by this turn of events threw Grizgutz's Waaagh! into disarray."
I don't have YT Premium, yet I don't recieve ads, it's odd
OI DA BOSS KRUMPED DA BOSS
I know for a fact I'm not getting charged for it
On the Topic of Warhammer, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_28PFlQGhU
Watch a Warhammer expert react to your 40K questions! How would you explain Warhammer lore to someone who knows almost nothing about it? Well, we got Arbitor Ian, a Warhammer 40,000 master, to answer a mix of novice, adept, and expert-level questions. Ever wanted to know the difference between a Space Marine and the Deathwatch? Do the Chaos Gods...
Not that I'm aware, there's no over the shoulder shooters in the warhammer universe
Besides Spehss Mehreen 1 and 2
ad blockers?
Are the guys in armor humans?
Nope!
huh. interesting
No ad blockers for YT mobile without using a separate app, which I don't have either.
yes... mostly...
oh yea i was assuming PC
Sorta like supersoldier humans
They undergo very intense biotreatments through drugs, and surgery to implant a dozen and a half organs to make them stronger and faster
IIRC ultramarines are like clones or smth
Then they put them in power armour
PC absolutely has tracker blockers
But there are other humans in power armour, just smaller. It's much rarer too, only the bigwigs have those
Can they survive outside the armor after the modifications?
It would be odd for astartes to not survive outside the armor... but I can see a world where the armor is made into part of their body, and it sounds extremely agonizing.
POV from a Chaos Space Marine
Oh no, it already exists
Plague Marines couldn't remove their armour if they wanted
Obliterators literally fuse with their armour
There's a record of someone infected with the Obliterator virus and it's...pure horror
I sort of assumed they were build and modified to be soldiers and that's it, that's their life from now on
Thousand Sons are technically only their armor are they not?
So no reason to remove the armor
Drafting with extra steps
It makes you fuse with armour and weapons and have them come out of you when you need them, but slowly makes your joints stiff and mechanical
@idle hill Done.
https://www.twitch.tv/piratesoftware/clip/SeductiveTenuousTeaPanicBasket-wygTH5vZ6Kz_Qz2G
It depends on the chapter. The game THor is playing is about the Ultramarines. They're kinda practical and such. Marines exercise, pray, engage in games and recreation.
Those they do without armour
Also if the armour malfunctions, gotta take it out for repairs
THANK YOU!
Yes. If they're sending marines, that planet is FUBAR
Normally they'd send the imperial guard, or the planet's own Planetary Defense Force, which is also normally former Guard or just conscripts.
Marines are for truly messy endeavours
Mostly because there's so few of them
This looks like a very violent universe
Oh yes
Dude's melee weapon is a chainsaw
It's violent to the point it's ridiculous. I love it
Why is it called 40.000 tho?
now I'm motivated to get up and edit that clip
maybe grab the part immediately before it for the full context
Because it's set in the year of our lord 40000
Oh
The 41st millenium,
So there is also a bit of religion goin on, is that it?
There was this dude, the Emperor. His goal was to end all religion, as belief materializes in the Warp (basically hell), and empowers the gods therein
He got murderboned by one of the big wig marines turned traitor
which browser you using? started using Brave a while back and have managed to forget that youtube even has ads 🙂
Except he didn't die, they put him on life support, and started worshipping him as the god emperor
So there's a massive galaxy spanning cult worshipping him
Warhammer has everything a perfect dystopia needs. Corpse Starch.
So hell is a place where belief gains form, ok, let's nuke hell thn
(they didn't take notes from Dune, they stole the entire thing)
Problem is that hell is infinite
I recently switched to Waterfox, it uses all the same addons and settings as Firefox, with a little more privacy focus I may have forgor
the galaxy-spanning god-emperor thing does feel a bit "dune"y
If you read how the emperor unified terra the entire thing is just Dune haha
Dune with the serial numbers filed off
Please, PLEASE don't kill me for saying this but...
**Just like Kingdom Hearts ☀️ **
So we don't have to worry about filling it with Heretics! Wonderful!
LOL
I'm not sanctimonius, it's just a make believe story
but I give them a pass - orks are basically tolkien orcs in space - eldar are space-elves, there's space-undead...
they tick all of the high fantasy boxes, repackaged in a sci-fi grimdark setting...
love me a bit of 40k lore
I was a DM for tabletop games for Dark Heresy (you play as the inquisition), Rogue Trader (you play as a space billionaire), Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay, all flavours. The setting is massively well developed
Can you get to hell? Physically go there
Yes
Or better yet, is hell that important?
The chapter master of the Grey Knights (a space marine chapter) is stuck there
It's typically a bad idea and useless to go there to begin with, 'cos it's endless. Usually they just prevent hell from coming our way
40k is almost older than I am - they've had time to weave it - bit of retconning here and there, but for the most part the lore is consistent afaik
Except, of course, for FTL
hell is where the gods are, and it gives people psychic powers
I can feel the exhaustion in Thor's voice. I hope he's been getting proper rest... can't help but feel I've been contributing to the arguments after he said "don't talk about SKG in the chat, that's not what we're here for. My chat is not your soap box."
The Imperium travels faster-than-light by taking a shortcut through hell
Was thinking of expeditions to understand it
They open a hole in reality to literal hell, enter it, and hope they come out the correct way
just like minecraft
I hate that I just said that
OMG I NEVER THOUGH OF THAT
But maybe this universe is too aggressive for learning expeditions
The tricky thing the Warp doesn't want you to leave
There's people that try to commune and they end up possessed
Think Diablo
When one of the prime evils (I forgot which) possessed the guy
I think it was Baal?
The """Waaaarrrppp""" can't tell me what to do!!! Karen Marine 40K deployed
erm acktually you only move 8x faster in Hell because 1 block in hell is 8 in the overworld! 
you stare into the warp and the warp stares back
40k is the pioneer of the grimdark genre, a genre where there are no "heroes" just protagonists and everyone gets a sad ending at the end of the day
That's part of the story between the two Space Marine games, but I won't go into detail 'cos thats spoilies
Hmmmmmm dune
The deliciousness of the setting is hopelessness
Idk how old Warhammer is actually
personally not my cup of tea but I seem to be surrounded by people that like it over the years so I've osmosis'd some knowledge
But dune is very, veeeeeery old
Can't win, make the most of it
unless you're a chaos god, then it's just one big "torment the corporeals" party
they're having a good time
Your productivity human, is lacking.
and I reckon the Tyranids are loving it too
Is the universe in any form of grave danger or is it more about races/creeds fighting?
and the Orks in fact - they love a good bit of war
@worthy ivy I'mma about to rain on your parade
The chaos gods themselves are tragic
They're not sentient
If i were to guess, i would say it came out in the 80s
They're forces of nature shackled by their own natures
Khorne is physically incapable of calming down
And the Tyranids are running away from something worse
ah, that changes things then....
but the Tyranids are doing well - or are they not sentient either? i think they'd have to be?
Hey, I used to have a headset like that!
Before it BROKE at that swiveling joint 
1987* 40k is indeed from the 80s
nah, that's just what they say to make people feel sorry for them
Ok, the Orks yeah
They're having fun
waaaaaaaagggghhh!
Got me a pair of gaming headphones that dont do the dumb swiveling thing that breaks on every set I buy
I think there's an ork stuck in the warp fighting khorne daemons for eternity
Tyranids. The cosmic hunger. Highly adaptable biomorphs with a single purpose of consuming every bit of biomass there is. Their fleet is larger than entire galaxy.
He's having the best time
imperial guard have a bad deal tho
get in there, get dead, then let the space marines sort it out after you're all eaten
bad deal
They're a hive mind
Segregated by the hive fleets
The hive mind is sentient
And just wants to live
Dune Awakening got a wicked update I see 
Then you hit the warp and hope that you don't get gobbled by daemons
And instead found by some manifestation of the emperor or one of the dozens images the Imperium worships
I woke up to see that I missed a rare Shaye stream. Dammit.
Which are themselves daemons but don't tell the local inquisitor I said that
Wait, question, if belief is bad since it makes hell stronger
What's the deal with all the "heresy" thing? Sounds like the space marines are very religious now
Heresy invites corruption
It's half and half control and prevention
The Echesiarchy (religious body) controls a lot, and fear is their weapon
What would happen if you believed that believing... made Hell weaker? Is that a paradox? Is it covered? Or does it do nothing?
Now you're thinking like a true Emperor of Mankind
That's what he tried to do
No way 
Are the marines seen as heroes on some planets? Like savior freeing them from demons and heresy
Oh yeah to complete this thought, someone going heretical like "hey the chaos gods aren't so bad" is a lubed tobogan straight into mutation and possession
They're seen as angels
Or do you have to constantly enforce on minor parties your believe?
Wow
Wwooooowww
Now I'm intrigued, what was the result?
Angels of death but angels nonetheless
Like Old Testament god of sorts?
He made the space marines, 20 legions. 10 of them turned traitor. His favourite son, Horus Lupercal, fought him and mortally wounded him.
He was placed in life support and is now a skeleton, worshipped as a god, exactly what he tried to avoid
I'm not gonna go into detail 'cos I'd spend like hours typing
yarp - first sign of chaos possession is heretical ideas - maybe they're not possessed? maybe they just have a new idea?
but we can't take that chance right?
burn the heretic!!!!
I can imagine it worked initially, but it backfired in the sense that his own belief worked
Theres like 10 novels from the Horus Heresy series that go into detail
Was hell discovered, invented or was it always there?
Oh
So a gagillion years ago, there were two very cool species
Correction: 9 of them turned traitor, 9 remained loyal.
The Old Ones, and the Necrontyr
The Old Ones were immortal frogs, the Necrontyr lived in a horrible irradiated planet. They didn't build houses, they built tombs
The Necrontyr were jealous of the Old Gods because they were immortal, and the Old Gods shunned the Necrontyr 'cos they were stinky
My mind is so rotted I immediately went to "DID THEY DO EACH OTHER???"
Thanks internet 
The Necrontyr noticed there were some cool star eating celestial fart gas eating the radiation from their star. So they lured it into their planet and shoved it into a giant mech suit made of living metal with a supercomputer inside
They then did it to the entire species of celestial fart gas
Turning them into the C'tan, the gods of the Necrontyr
Being now supersmart and supergiant, they calculated that souls are much more delicious than radiation, so they ate all the Necrontyr souls and turned them into robots of living metal, now called the Necrons
These guys
They then thought, hey, those Old Ones must have much more delicious souls, so let's fight them and eat them
Uhum uhum
Reading, learning
The Old Ones, being frogs, couldn't fight, so they biologically forcefully evolved two races. The Eldar (space elves) and the Krorks (GIANT GREEN MEN THAT LOVE FIGHTING AND WINNING)
Massive war erupted, called the War of Heaven
The Old Ones won, by somehow (I forgot) making the C'tan infight and destroy themselves from within. But many lives were lost
All those eaten necrontyr souls, bitter and angry, and all those dead Eldar and Old Ones poisoned the afterlife known as the Realm of Souls
The first Daemons emerged
Turning it into the Warp
The Daemons had the same thought where the Old Ones must have delicious souls
So they got attacked AGAIN and all but went extinct
The Necrons went to eepy eep because the megabrains controlling them went dead, the eldar decided to bone indefinitely forever and do each other in ways best left unspoken, the krorks were left without someone to fight, shrunk and became orks
Hundreds of thousands of years pass and man leaves a cave after discovering fire
That's the genesis tale of Warhammer
Thanks for reading remember to like and subscribe
Damn I monopolized chat, sorry folks hahaha
Eldar literally murder-boned a chaos god into existence 
Probably my favorite part of the lore
Alongside orcs
They're the only happy people in the grimdark of 40k
Uhum uhum
Reading, learning
My headcannon is some space elf edged for a hundred thousand years and when someone tapped them in the shoulder to ask a question Slannesh simply exploded into existence
I'm also picking the most important things and looking at something called Lexicanum
Wait. In which universe the orks are basically mushroom?
Lexicanum is great but it will ruin your life
40k
There's so much content in there it's easy to keep reading for hours
I'm already there
It's your fault
Shame on you
Thor says it's for cooking and foraging but in fact he's keeping the ork population in check 🙏
So they come out as adults?
Yah
Just like in (...)
So do squigs (weird bipedal boar like things) and gretchins (goblins)
It's a self sufficient organism
yup, fully grown and ready to waaagh
How does their conciousness come to be?
My favourite bit of lore of orks is their currency is teef. So orks will fight each other and knock their teef out. Like sharks, they keep growing new teef.
So the richest orks are the ones that win more fights because they have a huge pile of teef.
Teef also rot so the currency is immune to inflation 'cos they need to keep fighting to produce teef
LIKE ORCS FROM TOLKIEN!!
there..I said it....
I mean how do they learn it all?
They just show up fully fluent in hooligan and swinging
You're gonna have a great time reading on daemonculaba. 
I'm actually very interested in the hell part
The very beginning or the discovery it
Fully fluent in hooligan... Lol
cummon boyz, dis shorty is bringin' sum ring 'ere wants to chuck it in da furnass, let's get ova dere and show 'im sum dakka yeah?
My second favourite part of ork lore is how they have a gestalt field that turns what they believe in into truth through reality warping. This extends to colors.
Because everyone knows the red ones go fasta. So painting a buggy red increases it's top speed and acceleration.
Purple is the sneakiest color. Ever seen a purple ork? Didn't think so
It wasn't always hell, it became stinky after the War in Heaven (the aforementioned conflict between the C'tan and the Old Ones).
Humanity discovered in the tribal times 'cos the gene that turns you into a psyker (psionic dude that's basically a mentat from dune that can shoot lightning) started to express in shamans during those times, and it made them vulnerable to the horrors of the warp
I have a thought...
how does it play out if say Blood Angels are fighting Orks? do the marines get the speed boost too?
they are red
and thus must go fasta
So a bunch of shamans gathered together, ended their lives in ritual sacrifice to fuse their souls into an overbeing, accelerating evolution by hundreds of thousands of years into a superhuman with perfect psionic control, charisma, strength, and all qualities the best human would have
or is that a house-rules sort of call?
In short, they made the emperor
That's a good question
yeah, empy got some rizz, no lie
heimdall's popping off, 14th kill
I'm reaching the lore of the screaming vortex....
is that visible somewhere, remember something about heimdall levelling up?
The most hilarious part is that it goes both ways. Details elude me, but I remember there being a commissar(?) who ran out of bullets fighting orcs and just started doing gun noises and it freaking worked! 
noice
it pops up on the left side of the stream as a big number when heimdall pops someone
Sorry to dig this up again, but does anyone have the apology-post from Thor to Ross? Can't find it and I don't have twitter or social media in general 😅
taking out whole battallions with "pew pew" noises
It isn't the same as something like GDPR, which mandates requirements in order to provide a product. This would mandate additional effort to stop providing a product. That isn't something I can predict I'll be in a position to comply with if/when the time comes. Maybe I'll get cancer. Do I want to risk a SKG lawsuit because I can't comply? No. So I judge operating an indie live service game in the EU would be an unacceptable risk if it passed.
It's a parody but it's hilarious and plausible
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNjUiDpLvlQ
Animation by https://twitter.com/a_tenno
Bit is from ORKS! ORKS ORKS! Adeptus Ridiculous podcast episode https://youtu.be/L1jaXGkV3rs
https://www.patreon.com/AdeptusRidiculous
https://www.adeptusridiculous.com/
https://twitter.com/AdRidiculous
Story about Imperial Guard soldiers using orkish power of belief against the Orks with uh, mixed results.
Or did he apologise personally?
1s
there's a clip somewhere
Also understand: the apology is genuine, he just adds context to explain his reasoning for why he acts the way he does. He isn't trying to justify the bad behaviour.
Another was when a warboss realized red goes fasta, so he told his orks to write things in red to learn faster, they became geniuses and even thought about stopping fighting to contemplate life but that got Barbog all depressed and he ||krumped 'imself|| so now da boss sez we aint allowed to read no mo'
If you want to understand why I say this, I would recommend the HealthyGamerGG stream where he talks with Thor about the way he talks
https://www.youtube.com/live/7jDPsBh2AyQ?si=Wn-5w1Z7n605na2c
Check out Healthy Gamer Coaching designed by Dr. K: https://healthygamer.gg/about/coachingDon't crash out! Join our May Resilience Challenge: https://explore...
Thank you! 
I know, I watched that. In the way he acts he resembles my brother a lot, so I have a bit of a different view on things
thor tries to be logic first emotion second. Whenever he has to be emotional, he also likes to add logic. to others it looks like justifying the behavior, which is a matter of perspective
See, I get how he feels too
I do the same thing
Orcs are the best. Everyone else is just depressing. 
I'd argue that we need more people like that. too many arguments on the internet just go off vibes and no evidence
Same thing, that's why I didn't see the 'issues' on Thor's end
Honestly I've met dozens upon dozens of Warhammer players and not one of the ork ones are ever salty
It's a shame orks are expensive
unfortunately it seems not everyone can understand or handle that though. I personally appreciate this type of communication.
I reached the coolest thing ever
🔥 The Eye of Terror 🔥
That's the birthplace of Slaanesh
Eh, tbf, everything 40k is expensive.
very, I would describe it as a… stoic way of thinking
With orks the problem is it's so many minis
Lots of minis, lots of paint
Lots of money
From what I'm understanding the Eye is the consequence of the birth
Some ork player shows up and you know you're about to see like 40 plastic boyz on the field
Or a single 3d printer...
i wonder if there are people who make their living just painting the 40k minis for other players to use
probably is
Correct
It's the super highway to hell that the forces of chaos use to invade the Materium (i.e.: real world)
There is a store on my neighborhood that have a workplace for you to make and paint your mini figures, it's pretty cool
I gotta get up and get ready for work later 
Stayed up all night modding mc and chatting
https://www.stopkillinggames.com
you guys should sign this if your in the EU
what "bad behaviour"?
I mean that as a genuine question because all I see is a man forced to apologise for something really he shouldn't have to
he told someone to eat his entire ass? they can eat /my/ entire ass
described a bloke that gives me myself major used-car-salesman vibes as being like a used-car-salesman? they can eat my entire ass again
we've become a planet of Karens
where did it all go wrong?
https://www.stopkillinggames.com
you guys should sign this if your in the EU
How the FRICK can you even try closing the Eye???
Oh no...there is also the maelstrom....
Should sign it only if you agree with it, which is fine. But don't just sign something with a, "Just because"
Don't spam it makes the thing look bad
Why
thing makes itself look bad 😉
Ok, the real world is screwed permanently
'cos spam sucks
Do you want to keep killing games?
Why
He had an emotional reaction, but I agree, it was totally justified
I think it was a bit far to say the entire initiative was shit because Ross' presentation of it was shit, personally
look, I get you're passionate about it, but it doesn't justify spamming a message over and over
Yes, I would love to have a way to destroy League of Legends
aaand gone

Not what I said. I simply said that someone shouldn't sign something just because they were told to.
Besides I can't sign it. I don't live in the EU
I mean, honestly at least they are evoking
I don't think it's been told it's possible
It's the very first time I've seen anyone asking specifically for Europeans
So kudos, great, people are learning
With eyelids, ofc
They are evolving
A silver lining for sure.
So easy. Why didn't I think of it. Let me get on that real quick
Better yet, get a time machine and make your parents move to europe so you're european by birth
🧎♂️ Will you marry me? 💍
that's the whole problem in a nutshell...
"sign it only if you agree with it"....
"so you want to keep killing games?"
reason is dead, long live reason
it's all over
time to go back to eating our meat raw and sleeping in trees
Go back far enough and they wouldn't need to move...
As long as they aren't british, perhaps... but still not signing it
It's a troll
For sure. Big or small wedding?
kind of the entire internet these days
I remember when trolls were funny
it's been a few decades since then
Man..:there are soooo many names and concepts on each page of lore that feels like I'm reading Destiny 2 or freaking Karamazov Brothers
Trolling used to be an art back in the day
Big brain plays right here.
We're playing chess while the world plays mahjong
I'm....I'm kinda siding with the space marines here....
Everything from the Warp is horrifying
And world ending
Read into the Salamanders
The coolest dudes
Space Marines can be pretty horrifying too
Thor's talking about ferret software now, cool
Apparently the streams arent monetizable on YT, so he's planning on doing clips and videos there
some of them get up to some really weird culty shit
Not everything. Granpa Nurgle is very chill.
I'm just reading about the warp for now, I will move to the dark side of the lore of the marines soon
He brings relief to all plagues and ills
But he's also the dude that creates them
Kinda like when developers manufacture inconvenience in MMOs
Creates the problems and the solutions
Just like Apple
There's a story where a squad of plague marines (space marines corrupted by Nurgle specifically) got cut off from the warp and Nurgle's numbing influence
They did not have a good time
Nurgle is Tim Cook
I mean...in comparison to other 3 he's like....ultra chill and wholesome. 
thankfully we have people clipping things every day
The one born with the Eye was the last one?
Yes, Slaanesh
