#streamchat
1 messages Β· Page 102 of 1
the much easier thing to reach for is 'disable phone-home authorization in DRM'
That's 2 hours of an intern's time
that is in reach for everyone
I'm from Finland, thats a part of EU, or I live on the island out in the Baltic Sea called Γ land, We are a part of Finland, but treated like we are not a part of EU.
Finland are allowed to use Sonys PlayStation Network, we aint. According to Sony.
So how shall we stand against this EU thing then?
if the game still doesn't function with that, well, the game's just plain dead, because it was genuinely reliant on those online servers
EU is generally regarded as European union, not geographical europe.
Are the majority of games released on steam offline only games that do not need dev support to run?
When my internet dropped and i couldn't play Gran Turismo 7 and only 1 race i genuine was upset, this is not needed if you ask me, PlayStation disks have their security and my account too, look at Netflix for example you can also download series for offline use...
Thor is gone for a week? Time to bring up old sh:t.................Like how the UI used to look at one point
Netflix is not compelled to offer you that
Netflix chooses to
and no, I don't actually think it's reasonable to compel that games not connect to the internet
I happen to be a fan of some online games.
thats dec time i think
Yes, why can't game studios not be more customer friendly, they make more money as the music and film industry these days...
before the ferrets blown up
Some smaller game development studios manage to be more customer friendly then the giants...
Not a matter of legal principle or generally a place we compel things by force of law
December 16th 2:18am CDT
Same with Steam, Origin and other launchers, you can play them in Offline mode for like 30 days, then you have to sign in again to "verify" that you still owns the games in your library. But some games won't be able to play offline even if it seems that it's OK for Steam.
Dont mind me getting channel points and hype trains while watching on YT LOL
I understand after a certain time the online player from Grans Turismo will stop, but it's in general played by most people single player, then i expect them to be clear their lisences expire and this is put on the boxes of games...
but its not up to you
I said this before: It is not a consumer protection matter that you do not have a 100% accurate forecast of the life of a thing
Again: It is a consumer protection matter that games that are dead have DRM checks and the like disabled.
There is a notional right that can be reasonably well protected, and I would agree with
there is a notional right that is broadly not going to be considered justified
Ok but in the case of Gran Turismo they actual already state a date when it's going to stop working... Why was this not told to me as a consumer because in EU laws you need to state something like this because it can make you decide not to buy a game
GT games also needs to buy there own license from the car manufacturers to be able to legally put them in the game, if they don't (like the crew) buy a new license for them, the car manufacturers can legally sue them for this. So then it's better and easier to just kill the game, specially if no one are playing the game, people don't pay for it to stay up. So the developers just bleed money on it
I fundamentally do not believe you that a service needs to have a completely defined end date in EU law
because if that were in EU law it would already be done broadly
you cant define end date of a life service game when its released.
Each game that comes out with a new game like every year, have already planned on an end of date for this game.
Just look at F1, NHL, FIFA, CoD and so on
A lot of businesses and services have a planned end of service date
this isn't something that is disclosed to consumers as a matter of law though
EU doesn't have a law that you must know when a game will end you have to advise of a server shutdown that is the EU law.
It's not actually germane to the consumer's rights
what can be germane is a minimum of service, or similar
they dont have a definitive end date, they have a works case scenario end date, and thats different. If the game is a huge success and is making a lof of money, no company will shut it down.
The biggest problem is that each game launcher or XBOX or even Sony says "buy this game" not "buy a license to play this game" when we pay money for it and add it to our profiles
No, the terms of service are pretty clear
you're buying a license
you're just not reading the terms
but on the store is says buy the game, not a license.
which terms are you looking π
I wonder who's got streamchat and who's got general_chat.. I had no idea streamchat was warm, thought it would be dead in here..
then this entire SKG are stupid and needs to be out down
I agree, but there is one point they themselves raise where I'm sympathetic. They just... fundamentally don't understand what we as a society do about art
(There are consumer protections that should be strengthened here, IMO, which is part of why I find them infuriating)
lailah sorry i just got here which side do you fall on π
loaded question tho
it shouldnt matter.
none of this matters
Does it still? Because carefully reading through steam UIs a bit, I don't see the store saying we're buying a game. Probably it does on a sale's ad copy, but the closest is that steam gift cards will let you give the gift of game (Which is true whether they sell the license or the game.)
To compare things, when i bought in 2007 a Office packet i also bought a license to use that software, after 10y they removed the support for the product and the limited online functionality is removed
Why can they do this with games and then i'm not talking about online games, they even do it with games that are perfectly playable single player...
its their product and they decide what to do with it.
okay so lets address this first which game example?
Well, in the sense that regardless of my opinions I'm at worst discussing an opinion on a largely irrelevant forum for it, over an initiative doomed to irrelevance even should it reach basic success, with people who I will likely forget about within a week, yes, I agree, but I do think the ideas raised have some basic relevance
I largely find the idea behind stop killing games wrong-headed, and think it's more likely to distract from vaguely plausible consumer rights goals. The things they want are broadly things we do not do (despite having had the ability to do them, in society at large, for generations), or rights we do not grant, and most of the questions they raise are going to be rightly mocked because they do not know these things.
I also don't believe they've raised any novel reasons why these questions should be answered differently, because they don't seem to realize they're not new questions at all.
Let's take for example the way Gran Turismo shut down games https://www.gtplanet.net/gran-turismo-sport-end-of-life-20230929/
I think this is a fair deal to me, there is a EOL strategy, in reason this is just what Ross Scott asks, how he worded it is another thing that blows my mind, i don't agree on his take to make publishers release server code
okay thank you both π it helps to see where chat is
right so with that being said your complaints are around that the servers in Live service games are not mentioned but the EOL Stratery in Gran Turismo is a good way forward?
Gran Turismo announced its end of service 3 months before game end, same as The Crew
okay lets discuss
im not attacking here
just i have been dealing with both sides all week
There are in fact relevant protections around End of Service, yes. That is a substantially smaller ask than what you said before
Which was "I should get to know what the end of life date is on game purchase"
Which is not a thing we do. It's not germane to consumer protections
what is germane is if the thing is going to be here in a couple of months
And in this case i'm more on the Thor side of the conversation, he made valid points where i stand behind, it just becomes tricky when you know new version of games are based on their old engines and backend in most cases, asking game developers to releases that code could harm their new products and is just unfair, i even told Ross maybe he should start asking to build an open source game backend and put in examples of React, where companies and users get mutual benefit from and that way they can implement this on game creation (10y after is just insane to ask them to rewrite the game) but idk if he misunderstood me but as far as i understanded he only cares about "The Crew" if you ask me...
I actually think The Crew would be an amazing example for him if he realized it was one of the worst possible examples
there's a lot of very specific problems with a lot of broad asks that he could address with exceptions for why this specific thing would be fine
EG "Yes, actually, the licenses likely do render this one a huge problem, so we would want to create a framework for specific exceptions to maintenance..."
Steelmen are sometimes genuinely useful in their own right (In addition to being useful to understand in general)
Now in the case of "the Crew" i asked some people to show their disk version box, i think it's not fair to customers to withheld the info the cars in the game are only licensed for 10y, stuff like that should be on the box so consumers know this...
Nah
that's exactly the kind of thing you don't get to know as a consumer
If a club has rented their building for 10 years, you don't get to know that
If it's something that would steer a buyer away from buying the game then it's mandated be EU laws
No, the relevant EU law specifies some kinds of information That would change the consumer's mind
Because theoretically, anything could change my mind
I wouldn't have bought the game in 2021 if i had know the lisences where only valid until 2024 if you get me...
I might really hate it if you had the place decorated by a bald guy
and never have come to your club
but I don't have a right to that information
I would argue that it should be a practice done instead of hand waving saying it isn't germane or relevant. Having a stated EoL isn't a bad thing. Informing consumers of their purchases isn't irrelevant to consumers.
You can always push back EoL too
That's exactly what makes it nonsense noise to mandate though
"We plan to have this game for 5 years"
they're still gonna kill it if it totally tanks
they're still gonna extend it if it's doing gangbusters
Mandating this information by law is largely irrelevant
Extending it is fine. I do think there should be repercussions for not delivering on stated products.
Then everyone's just gonna say 1 or 2 years
Meaningless noise
If you mandate that they give a minimum target, it doesn't mean jack
Hell
they could say "We expect to close this tommorrow"
and then "We're pleasantly surprised and announce it'll live for oh let's say three months"
No, no, silly of me
"It'll live for oh let's say six months"
As a rule, don't make meaningless laws
Why would I purchase a game from a creator who is being as scummy as that, however?
I don't know, darling, you were already buying their games in this framework
What I'd rather have is a small but real minimum time of service from date of launch. somewhere between 6 months at the low end or 2 years at the very long.
Does that mean i'm not voting for the initiative, no, i know Ross his crazy demands will never become any law, are there players on the market that deceive customers i must say there are some, the initiative only puts something on the agenda, then there will be a investigation and then Game Developers will be notified and asked to comply with laws, like Thor said clear labels might be needed these days...
Along with an announcement on end of service and a suspension of further payments
Id rather change that framework. Having more information isn't bad. If the developers choose absolute minimums to undermine it gives me better insight on my purchases. I don't see this as a net loss
You don't have a generalized right to this information, so you need to create an actual reason you should be told that
"I want it and it might theoretically change my buying habits" is not actually a particularly good one
If I purchase something I want to know how long the product will last me. Even if it's a under projected target.
"Withholding nutritional information prevents consumers from making informed decisions about their own health, meaningfully costing them years from their limited time on this earth. It also makes it easier to obscure information on the actual makeup of the product."
Okay, but why should we societally do that
laws are blunt instruments
you employ them because you have to
You need to construct an actual argument on a very basic level
I already have
Well, it's poor, and not generally something society has viewed as legitimate. Good luck convincing literally anyone who doesn't already agree with you with it.
Just because you disagree with what I desire doesn't take away what I find value in.
You are the one trying to convince people that they should find value in it
I haven't?
his voicing his opinion
And i respect Thor his courage to step forward as a game developer because in a way it could harm his company, because you will always have nutjobs who think everything is free.
I would even encourage him to go more in depth why things are not possible, because there are good Game Developers/Studios who bring good products and this side should be shown more...
which is allowed
You Say "you need to construct an actual argument on a very basic level" is very disrespectful as hasn't made an arguement
I've voiced what I want to see changed. I question the vague handwaving you've so far contributed
Step away from the keyboard
this is not how we talk in here
i know its a hot topic
i know it gets under peoples skins
That's not an insult. It's a genuine and sincere guide on how to try to argue the topic broadly
No its belittling
I don't believe I need a guide on how to state my opinion
I have done so quite well, thank you
Whether you sign it or not is your personal choice and as a human i respect your choice...
It really is. I find both "camps" to be taking odd stances with weird vague language and niche situations. Said camps being SKG and Thor.
No, that's the thing, it's not belittling. I mean that exact thing, sincerely. If I want to change something, that already has societal force, I need to construct an argument, on a basic level, on why the thing we're already doing is wrong, or why the thing I want to change to is just inside the margins of what we consider acceptable, or similar.
I'm in a discord channel discussing an ongoing topic. I'm not here to change anything. I'm here to discuss.
Narrow your view and expectations for discourse
Do have any intention of broadening your own or someone else's horizons?
then what are you trying to achieve with this? If you don't wanna change anything, what do you want the results to be?
Or slightly more aptly, your own or someone else's understanding of the topic at hand?
I'm here to state my opinion and discuss it. I have no intentions beyond my own growth of information. I'm not here to make sweeping changes and upturn an industry. I'd like to state my opinion, which I already have, and not have it be handwaved as irrelevant.
what is your thoughts on the SKG?
as whole
My only comment to the topic at hand is I want EoL timelines.
I think it is flawed and vague
Sorry, yes
no its okay dont worry π
TLAs, my beloved~
Know you didn't ask me, but my thought are, let them die if the developers want them to die. Let them live if the developers want them to live.
And don't release games that they want full price for but still needs like 3 more years of developing before they are "done" to sell
Yeah that's another topic the selling of incomplete games these days...
I do stand by my statement that both camps have made odd statements. I don't feel good about some of the points Thor has made either
to be honest deveplopers are being misrep in this whole thing
I more just want them to be forced to announce their end of life with an offramp. A company will always, with some measure of sincerity, believe the game to have legs to a significant degree.
and that is true until a second game comes out
Ok, lets say all the games from now on, are only PLANNED to live for 1-3 years, will you ever by one game again then?
(I also genuinely think a minimal offramp could be reasonably compelled by force of law within existing beliefs)
Ark Original - Ark (now)
I'm failing to understand your question to begin with
I agree developers are not the ones to blame what the company strategy is
By all games do you mean all live service games, or all games in general?
Wel in EU the game only has to work for the standard period of the warranty, today that is 2y...
whats you favourite game?
currently playing
that you believe would need a EOL?
In general, as it seems a game often only lives between 1 - 5 years now anyways. So lets say they are PLANNING to only support the game for 1-3 years, and if they see it profitable to keep it going for longer as long as it's giving back money to the owners, developers and all that
Didn't know we had warranties on games
Dark and Darker. I would feel more comfortable knowing how long the developers intend to keep the servers running, seeing as you can't play the game single player.
I'm not sure this is what was being asked, right?
I think the idea of a law would just be to set guidelines on a minimum/require a level of communication
Maybe something like "refund transactions that occurred within 3 months of the kill date"
Laws are for things that are required.
Then yes, I would still buy games under this guideline
it sets a minimum for behavior
okay so let me to see if this would have this issue first π
I think, using end of life as an example, it would perhaps be admirable to say "We intend down service within a year."
it is better behavior
Well, that is also a difficult thing to state, in an ideal world a developer would like their game to be the next GTA V and they keep earning money from it to keep it running, the question is when you buy the game what is the time you get when you buy it?
but that there should be a legal compulsion to stop taking money in the last 1-3 months, and a legal compulsion to give an announcement at this time
(Probably 1 month for taking money, and 2-3 months for an announcement)
What do you think of a law just requiring them to refund all transactions from the 3 months prior to a kill date
I agree on the announcement, I'm iffy on the sale part
So if they take money they end up having to return it
In EU they have to refund you in the warranty period of 2Y
I'm not clear on why this is preferable to forcing an end to transactions.
Oh snap really
So even today when a live service shuts down you get all your spend back?
Side comment, what occurs if that studio goes under?
this just ties the money up where neither of us can use it
I expect he is mistaken on this exact statement, or Suicide Squad would not have been terminated in 3 months
Yeah, that is another thing, but in reason they have to refund you the full amount you paid
or at least, on its applicability to games
So they can't earn money from an other game they have made, to be abel to make the "next" game then with your logic?
A good example was Paragon from Epic Games, they shut it down and refunded all players all their money even outside EU
I don't understand how that follows.
I'm super curious because a 2yr money back on kill policy would probably stop the "killing of games" but also kill studios pretty fast
Just curious, I don't know how EU handles it. I do think refunding if expectations of game do not match at purchase time expectations, in relation to EoL
show me the law pls
Another thing they are allowed is to do you a proposal for compensation, like the new version or something...
Me getting screwed over by Elite Dangerous for them making a new version of the game >:(
you can decline the offer and ask your money back
Only three months. Most of these kill decisions occur as the game is dying, and if it was dying, the three months of refund doesn't among to too much
well if they have to refund everything you spend in like the last 1 year to 3 months before the game are killed off, the developers of said game, would have been working for free then, or even had to payed to work?
If the studio went under, who will pay then?
Then as a consumer you are mostly the last in line to get paid out and get nothing...
okay so the devs are working towards creating dedicated servers is that correct?
It is more I bought the game early on with the statement I would get future updates. Instead they made a new version of the game so that I no longer do, without paying for the new version. The version I paid for still exists however, it just doesn't have the new features.
It has dedicated servers currently via steam.
When they stated that before you bought the game it could fall under false advertisement
So then we just say we went under as a studio, kill the game, start up a new studio, make a new game, went under, kill the game again, and yes make a new studio, make a new game, and so on. You see the problem here?
I'm still waiting for the co-op in Cyberpunk that they promissed that they would release after a year...
I do in fact think there is a point where you should stop taking transactions, by force of law, on a game, yes. The offramp is mostly there so is a minimum time to enjoy what purchases you had. Yes, server architecture should, in the majority of cases, be covered by the prior purchases, not 'for free'. In general, if a company genuinely goes under, liability ceases, because there's nobody to compel to force.
okay so in that case the server codes are already out there like pal world so it wont fall out of EOL π
Full agree. I'm more miffed I did nothing about it and venting now I know EU warranties and laws and such regarding games
in most cases indies have dedicated servers π
Are they?
yup π
You might could get away with it once, but in general they look at those things when a company goes bankrupt to see if it isn't fraudulent and prosecute you if you do in most countries...
plus i see devs are making a active push for them π
I didn't think steam hosting servers meant that those servers are around forever
I'd think a three month refund window would encourage the communication, where possible, and offer force remediation where it didn't occur
(I actually don't know the system in place for steam multiplayer servers to remain up)
So how would Rockstar do with GTA Online then? Were people get there DLC for free, but many of them buy shark cards for money, will Rockstar ever kill GTA V Online? When will they then end to sell you more digital currency in that game? Now when they already have announced GTA VI or when that game are released? 1 year after? When they release it for PC in like 3 years from now? Or never?
A 'refund window' as the primary means of handling it just ties up money
prevent the transaction from occuring at all, issue refunds as the secondary source
Just change leadership of that studio, rehire the same developers, you are fine. Nothing they can do
They will stop selling shark cards 2y upfront, then they can shut it down...
There are substantial costs associated with declaring bankruptcy
True, but the alternative is to announce, shut down income, and hold the servers open for 3 months
That is my intention yes
Changing leadership doesn't wave the depts away, it has to be foreclosed and then a revisor sells all of the company assets, you could rebuy the name but i don't think that would be smart...
interesting, but wrong website...
Server has problems and don't work as intended, you can address it. If they can't fix it, you can ask to lower the price. To Refund / Terminate it you must stay to what you agreed in the games TOS. If they say they don't do any refunds, you can't force a refund at all.
Also, if some MMOs shutdown quickly after release, they often refund the players.
And here is the link: https://europa.eu/youreurope/citizens/consumers/shopping/guarantees-returns/index_en.htm#inline-nav-4
I do not understand your questions after "How would Rockstar do with GTA Online then?". Literally. I am sorry, but I am genuinely trying
Depends on many things, I worked for a company that changed owner like once a year for like 15 years in a row, each December the previous owner declared bankruptcy and the new owner bought up the company, re hired the same workers, and then repeated this the next December
TOS doesn't trump law, they can put in their TOS you need to have a kitten to get a refund, the law overrules that
wtf
What kind of company? Because if ubisoft declares bankruptcy, ubisoft loses everything it cares about and makes money off of
it's in the law. The law says, refund/terminate just in some cases
losing assassin's creed as an IP is significantly more expensive than server maintenance for 3 months
Where doesn't it state "in full"
A company that made concrete, that had like 4 sister companies, a bunch of side deals that the "original company" still had after all the ownership changes
if they revoke the license the contract is terminated...
have a nice day and keep cite the wrong site dude π
That sounds like a huge risk. If those deals were legally transferred, then all debts were as well, and I'm not sure what the owner thought they were accomplishing. If those deals were not legally transferred then other companies would be free of their obligations if they so chose
I think earlier in the law they actually excluded live service/online games from being covered by this
Specifically the "games that you download once" part
Regadless, that is not what would happen to UBisoft if it filed for bankruptcy
they would lose their IP
take a look at my link, there is a disclaimer explicit for digital goods like video/music/games ^^
it would go into auction unless a seperate plan could perhaps be made
Most of the 'obvious' hacks here are varying forms of fraud
No i contacted the government, had 2 lawyers on the line, i'm pretty sure they know the law if they tell me how to claim my money back from Ubisoft...
and unlike the concrete company, there are going to be stakeholders and regulators from many, many groups who are going to be keeping tabs here
Because Ubisoft is a multibillion dollar multinational corporation.
is there any search result that states less then 2y
I dunno man, until you actually have a refund I'm pretty sure you're misinterpreting or misreading.
yep
What constitutes a single download? Do updates to a game count?
It is very easy to misunderstand the relevant law
Any digital good in EU has a 2y warranty...
The can state something different in their TOS, doesn't mean that's lawfully...
But if you're genuinely correct I welcome it.
I dislike how broad these websites state these things too. I always felt a certain way when the statement or similar statements to "in a reasonable amount of time" is used
When it comes to a law, you'll have to bring a lawyer to court and prove this law applied and a violation occurred
I agree it's vague but I think it'd be very hard to claim a live service as a "game that I downloaded once"
That's where lawyers find opportunity
And a jury comes in to decide "what a reasonable person might interpret"
Well, in a US context yes, but the US is unusual in how much is expected to be done by individuals
(I'll admit I'm unfamiliar with EU court, my statements are based on US Court)
I take issue with that by the aspect of me not having the funds to get a lawyer for the 60 dollar game I bought I wish a refund on
Or reduction for
In EU every country has a free service that midigates for you...
It's called ECC
Lawyers will very often take cases for free if that are confident of a certain level of gains. Other times they might take it just to garner reputation.
I can say you will spend way more then 60 dollars to get the lawyer to court against that company and get a refund for it
Not actually for free
but for no up front cost
But also - yes
there's no chance of doing it for one game and one refund
But you're not entitled to a refund in the US anyway
It would be a class action
so good news on that
Sadly not every EU country are the same as the next are. Belive me, I'm living in one of them
I have a list of them...
I would more say "GO to a lawyer in your own jurisdiction"
Me crying in the capitalism wastelands of the US
Ok, look up how we on Γ land are treated even from our "main land" of Finland then
I will repeat: I do not believe Longhouse is accurately representing matters for this in the EU. There are a lot of regulators who would love to slap major tech companies upside the head with easy fines. There are a lot of other watchdogs. I fundamentally do not believe he's found One Weird Trick To Save Games, ftr
It's definitely the high risk, high reward of economies
Freedom to try wildly different things with less restrictions, but far less stability for the consumer.
Lots to gain, lots to lose
You can also get rich fast doing the same jobs, but lose everything just as fast in a layoff
Well Γ land aint even listed there, we are an autonomy part of Finland, we are excepted from so many EU rules that we sometimes are a part of EU, and sometimes when a company have something to gain from to not see us a part from EU
I agree with this take
Being able to be fired or laidoff for no reason is scary, I agree
Lmao the disrespect on the "one weird trick" π€£
i'm not saying ECC is the watchdog at all, that's the EPC...
I'm saying there are a lot of organizations and groups in the EU, both fundamentally part of the governments, and outside them, who watch for large violations
Bless the EU at times
or ECP or something, they do publish their mails even they send to game instances...
If it were this easy a loss, the corporations would probably not do these things, and if it were this easy a win, someone I've heard of would have hue and cry'd over it 5 years ago
Yeah. You need to be always ready for the next interview, unfortunately. Sharpen the skills and keep them ready.
On the flip side you can profit from a layoff if your ready if they give a severance
Theoretically this is true of the US as well, there are just generally fewer rules in favor of the citizenry. But the EFF is primarily an NA org, for instance.
I have never had a job where severance is within the scope. I've actually only been screwed over by doing the "right thing", such as giving my 2 week notice
Fair. I'm just glad that some EU laws impact the US too
I wonder why unions aren't a bigger thing in the tech industry
It's starting to become a thing, but the tech industry is younger than most other industries. It doesn't help that there's been a lot of anti-union nonsense out there
we are getting more unions in general, especially in the us with reccent changes leading to it being way easier to unionize (you still gotta find the people but it is easier to get past the big corpo folks)
i know why thier not bigger in general in the UK
They used to be
They're still common in many labour industries like construction. As well as government jobs like teaching, medical staff, police, etc.
But not very common in software, etc.
There was a time where unions got waaay too powerful and started running closed shops (where they would monopolise whole industries and only hire members of that specific union), it got a bit messy.
did some more thinking on what I said here #streamchat message
the example of private servers being a major net positive actually goes way further
gacha games which have died have been revived thanks to them (think stuff like World Flipper by Cygames, Dragalia Lost as well) with people being able to re experience, or experience the story for the first time, without the paywalling of gacha elements thanks to these revivals. City of Heroes has been brought back with a MASSIVE playerbase thanks to the private server project for it, and has even gotten the blessing from the original dev teams to actually develop new content for it.
I still stand by saying that after watching Thor's videos on SKG, as well as finally watching Louis's response to Thor, I can somewhat see where Thor is coming from. But I do think Thor is in the wrong on his stance on situations like private servers.
They do not "keep a game limping on with no players". They allow newer generations to experience these games for the first time, to re-live memories if they're returning to it, or otherwise allows folks to experience things which would have otherwise been lost to time.
I do hope what I've said makes sense and that I've worded it well. For a writer, I can be surprisingly bad at wording things lol
i might also be the best case of this, i never would've gotten to experience SMT Imagine, Toontown, City of Heroes, etc without these things
the problem with that though is legal side battlefield 3 is playable without EA Servers and the Modding communities around it do a stella job hands down. But to play on them servers you need to mod your game to allow access to them and its legal under EU and UK and US law until you use the EA-owned Assets then EA will come a knocking which is why all the assets in the game on these servers are all custom or fair use . And WoW (2006) does have private servers these on the other hand are not modded they are mainly dev servers that have been leaked and are usually buggy (had to reset mine every 30 mins because it was crashing like hell) And the same with SWG (2007). And I had 300 people across both and I said hey guys mind giving me 1 pound a month to keep the servers maintained. And before I had finished the sentence, I had 2 letters 1 from Blizzard and the other from Sony.
ill give you a hint I wasn't we love your work.......... im just happy it was sony and not the mouse
ill give you this might help with the understanding from my point of view https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/1254/why-are-private-game-servers-illegal the second answer on this will give you a run down on it.
but i also think you are misunderstanding thor's take on the servers his talking about the developers running the server. if block game died would you expect thor to carry on running it no i would expect him if some one ask in the community to run it he would pass it on.
its why i love indies most if not all do dedicated servers. i have a few running now for my family and friends to have a safe space while gaming. but i unfortunately understand the IP side a little more now days due to my job and yeah its annoying
also your writing was good π
However, every server I gave an example for has never once asked for money.
Every WoW server I've tried, the servers for stuff like CoH, SMT Imagine, etc have all been done for the sake of letting the games live on, and in the case of Toontown or CoH, absolutely thrive since they were shut down by Disney and Nexon respectively
And I agree 100% most of those I presume are modding communities? And I would imagine quite small?
Most of them are reversed engineering the servers
Or running emulation
And probably flying under the radar. Unfortunately for most myself included I saw the sun and my wax wings melted
Shouldnβt be like it
And I would even state I would prefer the whole preservation side was not playability but after 5-10 years after the servers have closed allow code to be available on the public domain with registered downloads and and TOS like we have no responsibility for you using this / donβt make money etc etc
So people could check and make sure they are following the TOS
Toontown servers, the main two at least (Rewritten and Corporate Clash) are regularly in the 10-20k player range each
If not more
City of Heroes Homecoming, the CoH server, has 50k currently
Single servers or multiple groups?
One
CoH notably, recently got the blessing and support of the original devs to continue development of content for the game as well
Lemme find it
Go on the modders great people modders and the support from the developers is always nice
Less what I originally stated, but still
This being an official license from Nexon to host the server
both of you make me wonder... what should be done in terms of law then, for the preservation and private servers argument? should anything even be done at all? explicitly allow reverse engineering and use of copyrighted material for non-profit use? heck, are there already laws that allow that?
or should we forget the legal side of it and encourage more discussion between players and developers for preservation after end of life?
In the case of Toontown, while nothing has been said from Disney, they haven't gone after the servers at all
And the original devs of Toontown have given their personal blessings to the server devs of Rewritten and CC
I think the point I idea I had earlier would be a good solution to most problems like it
And while the case for Shin Megami Tensei Imagine is more messy than these two (TT and CoH), the current biggest server is always populated and dev work on it is being done in a legal go-ahead from Atlus and Sega
To the point of allowing new content (if given the go-ahead under various situations) to be made and added to the game
I know some people paint all developers as bad people but this helps me remember why I want to be a developer
I would say that a more positive outcome of SKG would be less legal route, and more opening a dialogue between players and developers
yeah I hope so too
I never would have gotten to experience SMT Imagine, Toontown with the content which was originally locked behind a paid sub, City of Heroes, etc if it were not for these communities which have strived and labored to keep them alive
Like the global agenda game we found on stream the other day one potato server running
sorry, which idea exactly? (not trying to be rude or anything, just trying to better understand here)
And to see Thor boil all private servers down to "keeping a game limping on with no one" or to only do harm really sucks, and I wholeheartedly disagree with his take
This one @hazy tendon
ah, okay
also as an aside
I still think thatβs a miss read I think he means the developers themselves
private servers have actually helped learn how to, if only slightly, learn how to handle code and manage my own databases and servers so I could play the original version of FFXIV which shut down
Go you
Be data architecting in no time 
Btw before I watch the Ross video is it anything special?
Or more talking to me like a baby
It's definitely a topic I'm very passionate about. Documenting dead games, keeping them alive through server projects, etc
Which is why I didnβt like it
I'd say it's worth a listen to know all sides of a hting
thing*
Same for Louis's video
I mean the wording wasnβt great but it was more oh I would rather play Minecraft that rubbed my the wrong way
Louisβs video is great
Also primes take on the topic is also quite good
Will need to see that one
I think the places I do agree with Thor on is just. Advertising for games need to be better, but even that would go poorly if someone drops (let's use the canadian dollar here, being a Canadian) 91 full ass dollars after taxes on a game only to be greeted with text saying "You don't own this game, you have purchased a license to use it"
And that saying all live service games should be shut down and made singleplayer
That is dumb
However
I also know that everyone yelling that are also just the people who've picked up SKG to yell about something for the sake of yelling about something
honestly, I can sorta understand that Thor doesn't wanna talk to Ross, but maybe he'd be more willing if Louis is between them and hosting the discussion...? did Thor comment on that possibility already?
See I disagree with that slightly. itβs in the TOS and I get it we donβt read the TOS we gamers but itβs they to protect us (amazingly I know) along with the development.
He did and said he was up for it
oh, alright then
Wait, to be sure Xi
on him being up for it?
He said he would be okay for a conversation with Ross, if Louis were there as a middleman to keep things cool as a mediator?
Oh that yeah I was typing that out sorry on my phone
Louis is the linchpin
I think his take on right to repair is very aligned with this subject
His been fighting for it for years
And I feel he and thor are very similar in character
So for all three possible scenario
Thor and Louis yes can see it
Thor and Ross I would rather be betting on a mouse in a horse race
All threeβ¦β¦ maybe
it seems to me like Louis' stance on the topic is more in between the two, so I do think him being in the discussion is a must. not to mention his experience with working on consumer rights legislation.
You said Thor would do it if it were him, Louis and Ross
Yeah Iβm sorry I miss read it
Thatβs my bad
where did Thor say that? on stream? in a tweet maybe?
Yeah that's why I confirmed what you meant
Yeah thanks for that been dealing with a lot of people screaming about this subject today and think I want to kill games and I donβt care
So appreciate that check
I think he mentioned Louis in a few stream
Do I think it should be much more specific about what it wants/change from a legal route/not let folks yell about "all live service games dead"? Absolutely
The idea is sound the wording isnβt
But the sentiment behind it, absolutely. The amount of games that have been marketed as single player experiences yet eventually shut down due to server reasons is far too long and I want it to stop.
Yup
And I agree, as I've stated, that MMOs should be given a means of surviving beyond EoS
The one Iβm running with currently is i bought a disk not a expensive coaster
Yeah
Idea sound
Wording is too consumer oriented which isnβt wrong but you need a developer input
and I canβt see that
One big example would probably be Overwatch 1 and Overwatch 2
People paid for OW1, it was a full priced video game.
It was then shut down and replaced with OW2, a fundamentally worse version of the game.
Exactly thatβs my main argument currently
Overwatch was amazing
Blizzard wanted a new game so re skin the old the original devs said no itβs wrong and they were fired and younger developers got bought in
It sucks the big publishers get that much power
Same could be extended to Counter Strike: Global Offensive and CS2, the lack of backwards compatibility on modern consoles, etc
Sony and Nintendo being the most eggregious there
And I know they are people too and they are making money but god damn
Tbh you know the one publisher that surprised me
Honestly I think the OW1 to OW2 example would be the best to give as an example to Thor on the reason why the core of SKG is a good thing but me spitballing
Being Blizzard and all
Oh thatβs who I got it from
He heard about it happen from a friend
And asked around
But yeah Microsoft surprised me
From the investigation I was doing with all this I saw Rare was allowing dedicated servers
And users could get the host stuff with their clients
Mhm, that stuff is cool
I think the best thing to come from SKG would be a more open dialogue between players and developers
Yup agree. I donβt like the developers hate players statement because most βdevelopersβ people see arenβt the developers
Being able to preserve and/or allow these games to exist beyond these years is a good thing at the end of the day. Will it need to be handled appropriately? Sure, of course it would. But it's the same mindset of someone still owning an NES, SNES, N64, etc and dragging it out some day, showing their kids stuff like Ocarina of Time, Mario 64, Mario World, etc
Even that part extends to stuff like Louis. Being able to repair and keep these things going,
Wanna see something cool?
Nope that is a public domain
Especially with something like this when the only way some companies allow you to play older games is through subscription services or through lackluster/inaccurate versions with NSO and PS+ Premium game streaming respectively
Itβs a nonprofit group I think they run the way back
Yeah no, Archive is great
I'm just worried direct posting an archive with hundreds of games may be an issue lol
I don't think it would but that falls to the mods at the end of the day. I absolutely do agree though, sources like that are incredibly important and I'm glad they exist
But yeah totally agree with you on the perspective of saving the games. I do have a slight problem with the fact the topic is pushing preservation and consumer rights together
It feels people are jumping on this bandwagon with the you turn off server me no play game me now angry
Attitude and itβs jarring
I want my kids to play games like I did growing up and have a safe space where they can
I think everyone can agree there.
I'm really glad at how positive and hopefully productive this convo has been, it's a subject I'm very passionate about and seeing how Thor has taken has had me fairly sour in how he's worded and gone about it personally.
There's true good that can be done with SKG. The megaphone needs to be tuned, though. Focused in and refined.
Yeah I get it honestly I do. Everyone has a different opinion on this I was talking to someone about it earlier in the screaming and they just wanted to know if it effected their game
People shouting or belittling is not going to help move the conversation forward
yea I haven't said much but I do appreciate the level-headed discussion here. there are way too many people getting really emotional over the topic.
Opinions are subjective not based
Iβm too old in my day for fighting like I did on Reddit
Lmao
Two other good examples came to mind btw
Havenβt got the time havenβt got the energy havenβt got the crayons
Bloodborne, to a lesser extent
With it's lack of bringing forward/updates for newer hardwar
And PT, for Kojima's Silent Hill
That game is now tied to eventually dying hardware of those who downloaded it and kept it downloaded, or pirates.
Given there's no way to redownload it or acquire it now
That's a piece of art now that is on a strict timer
Yup although I have been told bloods servers got reversed engineered unfortunately Sony are being very aggressive with it
So maybe we can hope
BB at least you can still download and play, even if it is with limitations like locked 30, frame pacing issues, etc
Yup
actually
now im curious
Would PT fall under the banner of piracy if you were to download an upload of it?
It was a free game which has since been delisted, that is a purely single player, offline experience
To the point of not even being able to redownload it if you DID have it in your library officially
I think it'd fall under the case of abandonware personally, in my view of it. But I'm not sure 100%
How long has it been out of the house so to speak
10 years since release
I think there a 2-3 grace period before abandon ware but you could run into them owning the IP and recently registering it again
9 years since removal
Then yeah check for the IP if itβs still there gray if not then maybe abandoned
But still legally speaking better to be safe than sorry
Thatβs fair
Right going to bounce need to sort out some stuff. Lovely chatting with you. It was nice not to be dealing with the screaming and shouting like early
So thank you
!spoilers
If you know the truth, no spoilers only smiles :) :)
!quote
- I remember throwing up on a lawn - Thor
hahaha
::)
donut soup.
π©
that look
"how dare you!"
"What has you done to my climbing fun"
Such a simple yet perfect (hopefully) solution
This is the face of utter disappointment. Bless him. He's thinking *"how could you Shaye?" *
Yeah, hope it works.
I love the fur baby exploits.
Nice classical painting there
the distress π
Eepy mocha
I love watching this so much
#ferrets message shaye pov of the adorable
Does anyone know here to find the stream where thor played NMS?
I haven't been able to find it anywhere.
piratesoftware went live on Twitch. Catch up on their Software and Game Development VOD now.
Yoo, thx man.
Very random question but I seen a clip on tiktok a couple weeks ago, something about finding a purpose, and mental health or something similar, it was off of a random account so I can't find it again, does anyone have the clip or know how to find it?
Most of the life-advice-type things Thor says are in response to TTS questions, which means that they appear in #answered-tts with links to Twitch timestamps. However, Twitch VODs only go so far back, so anything older than I think a week or two won't be valid anymore
But it's a thing to try, to use Discord's search to find keywords in that channel
youtube keeps them longer, try to find that VOD in youtube by date and search for the timestamp. It is usually a few minutes off though
No Pirate stream today either?
#streams message
It appears I overlooked that. Thanks. π
^^
?
@brittle rune
Interesting one
and the odest place to put that as well
yeah i was thinking that myself
please mention Moderators instead of a specific one tho!
if I wasn't here this would've been slower to notice
what is the general mod tag?
@ Moderators
oh ok it is not sortend got it
Is Thor already back tomorrow or did he forget to remove the stream from the schedule on twitch? I thought he would still be at def con by then?
Stream is back the 13th or 14th
he doesnt really touch the twitch schedule
one of the hobs we used to have many years ago, he used to like jumping into the flip lid bin. We ended up taping the lid shut to stop him.
one of the jills also could open the fridge door, we ended up screwing a piece of lego into the fridge to act like a child lock to stop her from doing it.
!quote
- I remember throwing up on a lawn - Thor
@sullen adder -> The bot commands for this channel are available at https://nightbot.tv/t/piratesoftware/commands
!bajo
@bajo has worms.
!ghostcar
No such thing
!commands
@earnest mirage -> The bot commands for this channel are available at https://nightbot.tv/t/piratesoftware/commands
!hints
NO HINTS!
!peeled
Always peel your hotdogs. NODDERS https://clips.twitch.tv/EntertainingCoweringOwlTwitchRPG
!hotdog
Watch at your own peril! https://clips.twitch.tv/VenomousFineOctopusSeemsGood
so much regret
!Human
Once Human, which Thor is playing on stream, is available for free! Download it here: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2139460?utm_source=entwitchpirate
The apocalypse changed everything. Human, animal, plantβ¦ all are infested by an alien creature β Stardust. As a Meta-Human, you can survive the contamination and use the power of Stardust. Play alone or join others to fight, build and explore. When the world is in chaos, you are our last hope.Survive in the wildernessYou wake up in the middle of...
Learn about the Pirate Software Game Jam here: https://develop.games/gamejam
!lurk
notstretchcraft Chills out to some sweet jams, the jelly's are nice too. yarrLurk
!mc
You can play our MMO built in Minecraft Java 1.20.2 here! https://blockgame.info You can also check out the community wiki here! https://blockgame.piratesoftware.wiki
!mememes
The community here is a bit weird. Here's a folder of Thor's face on a bunch of stuff. https://nav.steets.tech/thormememes
broken link
almost all of it is on https://discord.com/channels/162034058736435201/654955494460358656
you may need to select the "enjoy dank meme" role
ohhhh
the cats are mad at me, because there's no ferrets on the ferret stream!
surely this coulda been better in the chat of the stream? This is streamchat, which is usually for people to chat about the stream, as the stream's chat is too full :)
This chat works for the ferret stream too
it works for both streams, but it's true that informing us in chat directly is the better option
And we tried that but no luck so i went here because everyone else was just debating doing it.
Because im the same user, im just to lazy to change my twitch icon
behold, the perfect mod bathroom
@minor nymph
Hi, anyone know what the "moderation settings" of teh Ferret stream are? Subs only? Would be great if twitch would actually tell one why regardless of content anything apparently conflicts with them...
I can literally write "hello" and get "Your message wasn't posted due to conflicts with the channel's moderation settings." but other apparently can write exactly that. I'm so confused right now.
Try refreshing, it does that sometimes
The only moderation (besides the general Twitch ones) are only clip links unless you are subbed.
Nope, even happens after refreshing the page...
Are you banned in Thors stream? They share moderation afaik.
Not anymore. However if you're banned twitch actually tells you that you're banned...
No idea then, you will have to check in with the mods I guess.
send a #mod-ticket perhaps
something it might be is that it requires 2fa on your account
What happened to Thor's recent VODs on Twitch? #answered-tts shows messages from August 6th but they link to 404, and the last stream on "Past Broadcasts" shows as 13 days ago
I'll have to use YouTube for now, but I feel it's still worth asking
They expire
@astral shuttle after 2 months when the vod isn't avaiable anymore.
@fringe fractal During the last few Streams Thor had some issues with his TTS. The timestamps sometimes don't work as intended.
So he had to remove the VODs completely?
Oh I know about that. But what I'm saying is, the most recent VOD on Twitch is 13 days ago but the most recent stream was 5 days ago
something went wrong, there is no vod on twitch π
the last 5 streams are missing
just take the timestamp and try it with the Youtube vod i guess
Yeah that's what I did. Luckily it was before the 12h mark
should work for the first 12h. Everything later is gone
It could have been claimed, then someone would have to manually publish the vod.
Could always at least check the YouTube VODs
And scrub to roughly the time in the TTS
Streams could also just have been removed by thor i suppose? But thatd be a bit weird
@earnest mirage probably twitch auto detected some potential DMCA issue and set them to private. At least thats a common issue for other streamsers even if they bought the licenses for the music they use...
...
I'll admit it's diving into conspiracy mode..
But anyone else find it odd that the streams with missing vods, just so happen to be the ones where the initiative drama kicked up?
You mean the vods that are still there on youtube?
Dunno why the twitch ones are missing, but the Live tab on youtube still has everything
Yeah I know it's only on twitch that they're missing
Just saying the timing lines up weirdly so conspiracy brain wonders if there's SOMETHING going on
Does anyone think Thor has seen the news about Hi Fi Rush
https://x.com/AUTOMATON_ENG/status/1822785069766910151
Tango Gameworks taken over and "revived"Β by PUBG publisher Krafton, with plans to expand Hi-Fi Rush IP
https://t.co/KK6qyToL8I
If not when he's back I'll probably TTS the link to him this is great news
AYOOO
infinitely soggy bread
I remember that Thor once was talking abt educational yt channels that break down complex topics? What were some of the channels he mentiond
Now I kinda wish I hadnβt slept on the MYM streams, I just caught the βAI Friendβ video and thatβs definitely something that happened while I was legitimately asleep. MYM can be interesting, to a point. I feel like after a couple hours tho, it starts to feel repetitive as far as stream content. It would help if I was interested in the game, but my current stance is that another game isnβt going to help me with choice-overload.
Itβs actually entirely possible that they were taken down pending legal action. I wouldnβt put it past thatβ¦guy..to try something dumb against Thor for emotional reasons.
is a stream starting soon? thats what twitch is saying
thor is back tomorrow
where the goblin go?
Defcon, the hacking convention
I do find it sus as well...
But Thor is also smart enough that if he was going to try and scrub the videos from Twitch that he'd also get the Youtube ones too.
Like, everything aside that's my reason for doubting it's that kind of situation.
I'd suspect that even in the case where these two events are related it is more of the lines that Thor was too fed up dealing with manually re-enabling the stream archive on twitch. Assuming he also has the issue that twitch keeps auto-disabling them until you prove innocent...
I can at least confirm that the situation applies to people subbed to the stream, as I am. So it's not a 'paywall'.
just noticed the situation himself, when going to check recent streams to find the one where Thor is talking about Carl Sagan, Bill Nye, and other famous educators...
His comments reminded me of an old meme that I finally found...
This started on the 2nd iirc. The previous stream is also missing, so i doubt it.
Haven't been a part of the community long myself (less than six months), but have seen a couple vods taken down for specific problems.
Given that the videos discussing the initiative are available (in edited form), if they were taken down, it may have been because of specific behavior that couldn't simply be moderated out?
Note: more than a few times I've seen twitch crap the bed when I wanted to go see what Thor said on a specific TTS.
Thatβs only happened once in the 8months Iβve been here, you may be thinking of the FerretSoftware stream which used to have that issue every single day but Thor reported that Twitch βfixedβ the issue.
Itβs very rare, Iβve only seen a VOD deletion 2-3 times in the last 8 months. 2 specific times were because someone got racial slurs across the live broadcast. The only other issues Iβve seen in the time Iβve been here is a desync issue where the timestamp is a couple minutes off, the API used to generate the link goes down and no link gets generated (happened twice in particular) but Iβve not seen any other issues, if your having a lot of issues with the TTS timestamp system maybe there is an issue within your network.
*maybe
yeah i mean we can hope
Yea, but jet lag is 2:0 with Thor as far as I know lol
You could call it 1.5:0.5 cuz Thor streamed the first day he got back from TwitchCon EU, but fell asleep on stream and took the next few days off. So half W
Not like we're going to starve if Thor takes an extra day off to wind down
well im thinking thor and defcon he dont sleep soooo im thinking 14th
nope not at all
Stop stealing all of chats brain cell bits

could you smell the burning
It makes too much sense, it has to be a gov conspiracy
the birbs are watching us
Ah the days when chat only had one braincell. Those were good times
yup
I miss naturally slow chat. Itβs so much chaos on Twitch chat now that an entire cities worth of people watches Thor for 12 hours a day
tbh im just happy all the arguing has died down i was losing my mind
The jet lag shouldn't hit him as hard this time around. If anything he'll probably be more tired from the challenges at defcon.
I donβt think it has, thereβs just been no stream to do it onβ¦.
My bones are ready for the story of how PirateSoftware Ligmaβd ThePrimeagen at DEFCON 2024

You and Xi had a better moment to enjoy slow chat. It didnβt seem slow at the time but it definitely seems slow now. December 6th was the first stream I watched after his Shorts hacking their way into my feed for the first time on December 3rd. Was gifted a sub on December 9th and the rest is history.
I didn't start watching his streams until maybe a few weeks after my algorithm started to get flooded.
The flood happens after you interact with it once (watching it for even 4 seconds is an interaction) idk why his shorts got pushed so hard to users who donβt have the categories his content falls under. Like never in my life have I interacted with programming or game development content in any way. When I saw a short by him for the first time my entire shorts feed was conspiracy theories, politics, and YLYL. Nothing even remotely like his content.
The first 3 shorts I ever saw from him were definitely more in the life advice category than the gamedev and programming categories tho, so maybeβ¦but idk.
This is why for the first 3 days I knew of his account I didnβt even know he was a game dev. Found that out when joined the first live stream.
I think I was in one of the first waves with his classic short about his dad
ehh, it was released earlier than i though, i joined like oct-nov ish
Because I remember running out of content and finding him live
slightly spicy take that might be contrary to what's currently being discussed:
I'm glad that we get pants now, because chat gets stupid often, and even otherwise, I feel that the streams are often just distracting me from actual gamedev. the pants are the (usually) better parts of the stream put together into a shorter video.
that being said, should I think of it differently, or is this one of those things where it's "to each their own"?
although I guess YT comments can get just as stupid lol
Also, I thought about the SKG thing a little more and now I'm kind of just confused... and maybe Thor is too?? Maybe he was too pressured to quickly put out a statement, so he didn't take the time to organize his thoughts...
I know Thor said that he doesn't like Ross' attitude or something like that, but the way I personally would've responded is "I strongly disagree with how Ross thinks it's going to be an 'easy win', so I'd like him to explain to me directly what led him to think that way". I myself would really like to know what led Ross to think that way, and the way Thor is dealing with it at the moment comes off to me as "I don't want to better understand the opposing argument because I don't think he'd understand me". How'd he know that if he didn't even try talking with Ross directly? Am I missing something?
Some of the ways Thor disagreed with other parts of SKG is somewhat inconsistent with Thor's past statements too (regardless of whether or not I agree with Thor). That especially made me think Thor didn't take the time to organize his thoughts.
I'm saying this because I really do wish the best for Thor, as I do respect him for sharing gamedev knowledge and being motivational about it, and I think Thor's handling of the SKG subject at the moment is attracting more negative attention to him (and perhaps this whole community) than necessary. Sure, his videos on the matter are technically doing well because it's getting him more subs than he's losing, but it could still be better.
Basically what I'm saying is, that Ross-Louis-Thor meeting needs to happen. And this time it needs to be well-organized.
As Louis said, "We could all learn something! It doesn't have to be this adversarial throwing s**t at each other thing." https://youtu.be/TF4zH8bJDI8?feature=shared&t=1593
https://youtu.be/mRAvQwZ8XVY?t=37351
π Merchandise: https://store.rossmanngroup.com/memes-dreams.html
π΅ Cheesy mugs & t-shirts: https://bit.ly/rossmannstore
π Rossmann chat: https://matrix.to/#/#rossmannrepair:matrix.org
π Recording equipment used upstairs:
π΅ HDMI capture: https://amzn.to/4bcXEFL
π΅ Camera: https://amzn.to/3VVkSLW
π΅ Black AT405...
From what I've understood, Thor didn't take issue with "[Ross's] attitude or something" but with the list presenting the passing of law as easy because Politicians are just pandering opportunists who would take an easy win, don't care about videogames anyway, need distraction from more serious topics.
Also the claim that the initiative would get us closer to being in line with existing consumer protections in place. This is incorrect. Technically, currect practices are in line with those protections. You could argue that current protections aren't good enough(which I am inclined to agree), but Ross wasn't arguing that when calling it easy.
The Issue I personally feel with the initiative is that it's trying to pass law based on what I perceive as a vague but emotionally charged premise.
If they'd say "We don't want to be hoodwinked into thinking we're purchasing a game when we're merely paying for access to a service", I'd be right there. But that's not what's being asked.
It's asking for something that has so many follow up questions, that I'm severely concerned in the entire process, bad law is gonna pass.
Example: The initiative claims that providing means to keep a game playable is easy. That's.. how do they know that? Is everyone making games the exact same way? What of games made by inexperienced teams? What of games that fail?
The initiative is asking for something way to big. I've talked to several people, I've read dozens of takes. I've scrolled through comments and responses, and supporters are talking like the initiative WILL do a specific thing they want. Like keep their games running, kill live service games, historical preservation, make private servers happen. People talk like law is magic. Like this will fix their personal issue (which most a valid issues), but it won't? It might! It could. It also might make them worse. Who knows! Legislation is a complex and long winded process, and for good reason, but this process can backfire harshly if the base it's starting from is so muddy and unclear in what it's asking.
Well okay, maybe not Ross's "attitude" but simply his "easy win" statement.
But yeah, all that's why I think a meeting needs to happen. Ross could better explain, directly to Thor, why he thinks it's an "easy win". Thor could explain how things work inside the industry. Louis could chime in with his past experience trying to get laws passed, as well as keep things cool. Again, we could all learn something.
What Ross should imo say is to admit that it's just not an easy win. What he's doing is gonna cut into the profit of a multi billion dollar industry. Sure, the initiative might go through, but the lobby still exist. What he wants is simply. not. easy. to achieve.
Which is fine. Good change is rarely easy. And while I personally don't belive this initiative has a high chance of causing good change, I don't belive Ross comes from a place of malice. Naivete maybe, but not malice.
We don't know what Ross (or Thor or even Louis) will say unless they actually have a conversation. Simple as that. I want to hear the direct conversation between them.
That's fair. I'd be curious too. I just don't think Thor would change his mind.
I just don't think Thor would change his mind.
I disagree, but not in the way that "I think Thor would change his mind". I think we shouldn't go into it with any prejudice.
Hm. Let me rephrase: I'm not confident that with the initiative the way it currently is worded, Ross can make an argument that could convince Thor to support. I still think they could have a productive discussion and come away better than before.
That's better, but still, who knows how it'll turn out.
Thor did express interests in talking to Louis Rossmann so we'll see
Entirely up to them in the end.
The only con is that the moments you get in the YouTube shorts and pants are much more numerous on stream, itβs the community on the stream that decide which clips become shorts, the pants are decided on between Sunder and Thor.
meh, I feel like a lot of the same moments happen repeatedly, or the ones that don't make it into either shorts or pants aren't really that significant. I guess there's the funny TTS every now and then, but that's about it that comes to mind.
again though, that's just my opinion.
also again, should I think of it differently, or is watching the streams maybe just not for me?
Well this also depends on what time of day you tune in and for how long, or even how frequently your there. Because itβs really hit or miss, some days you get really insightful TTS that make a bunch of βclip-worthyβ moments and other days itβs just repeated memes and etc.
I havenβt really paid attention to what time the best ones come thru but Iβm an all 12 hours watcher, I clock in and out with Thor lmao. (Sometimes I take a nap somewhere in the middle of stream)
I'm in Japan, so I often catch the very beginning of the stream at 4pm JST and watch it for the rest of the day until either I go play games later that evening or go to sleep.
so pretty much somewhere between the first 4-8 hours
You donβt have to conform to thinking a different way but maybe try catching the tail end of the stream closer to early morning time if thatβs possible for you, the end of the stream is always very different from the beginning. Different parts of the world are awake.
I see, but the stream would then end at like 4am JST, no way I'm staying up for that lmao
lol, I hadnβt thought about where it would be, but also I forget he changed the schedule a long time ago so that he would be playing video games at the end of the stream, so idk if that would be any more interesting to you.
The last 4 hours (sometimes 6, rarely zero) has been game time for a while now.
even if Thor is playing a game that catches my interest, I just do not want to ruin my sleep schedule for it.
now I understand why I haven't really enjoyed the streams though, so thanks for the insight.
There is always VODs of the stream you can scrub through, and the shorts and pants.
Twitch vods are purged by twitch after a while, and YouTube only stores (effectively) the last 12 hours of stream.
You also now know which part of the VODs to skip to in order to see if Thor played a game that day, Twitchtracker.com/piratesoftware is also a good place to see what games were played and when
30days and lol (11h 58min π)
isn't it only the first 12 hours, not the last 12 hours?
yea so the game part might get cut off too
Well there will always be 30 un-cut VODs available on Twitch with a new one every day but Thursday
3 months on Twitch if you're partnered
when is Maldavius Figtree going to stream
is he gonna feature Wingless Emoto one day
What happened to the last two weeks of VODs? I donβt see them on twitch or yt
Vacation?
Are they now also gone from YouTube? My guess is still that the SKG guy is trying to DMCA the VODs with his video in it, itβll just have to be appealed as falling under fair use guidelines and itβll go back up, I think.
Sigh
SKG guy?
accursedfarms? doesn't seem like him, but who knows
Thereβs a video that explains it on Thorβs YouTube channel. Called βStop Killing Gamesβ
This...
Thor's 'take' can basically be summarized as "You have no plans for implementation, which means implementation could be a catastrophe, and I cannot support it."
Just a guess, it is weird that all the twitch VODs went downβ¦then a couple hours later all the YouTube VODs went downβ¦according to the person in chat above
if it turns out to be him then I'll have to have a think about still watching freemans mind 2
You mean this maim one? Yeah never heard of this, must've been a twitter exclusive
i must have missed that subscription
Maim is the guy Thor tells stories about working with when he was younger and making very poor financial decisions. The guy who open sourced their work and put them both out of business
i still think the biggest point where I disagree with thor on the SKG stuff is just the stance on private servers, and wholesale disregarding the project itself. while the project has issues that need to be worked out (legal route being bad, knocking off the people just shouting "live service bad tho", etc) it can be a good thing if we move with it in the right way. opening a dialogue between players and devs, making thoughts known, etc
this maim stuff is a whole blindside though. i aint heard shit till now
yeah isnt that the 30/70 story?
possibly, he has repeated it MANY times
like MANY MANY times
wonderful thank you Nevy, are you having a good day?
how is your day Sherpaorc all good?
pretty alright. went for a walk earlier, spent some time in the garden of the place i live at
but anyway, apparently at the time some small articles framed that situation as if Thor ripped that guy off (when it was the other way around) and I guess somehow also alluded to sexual stuff which is WILD and now people have dug up the article
sounds lovely
Started sharing it and haters gonna hate, they took it to the reviews section of Heartbound and Twitter
well i mean after the last few month i would be amazed if it wasnt on the "charges"
what in the loaf of stale bread in a desert is happening? the internet has gone mad right?
member when we came to the internet to escape real life? where that went? also that gifs encapsulates how my brain is feeling
the internet is always on fire
trying to find more info on this but /shrug, can't find anything of note
tbh im just tried of the arguing and react channels
join the club
you get deep antisocialism and you just sit in discord 18 hours a day 
no need to call me out like that
ow
currently im playing in a sand box and keeping away from the rough housing
goan get Sand on your computor 
but thats what the soap is for my neice said
true story
i was pouring sand out for weeks
just want a spaceship so i can be in the stars
So people are mad at Thor cuz of SKG take and now they're trying to find shit to defame him? Is that right?
sounds like it
welcome to the internet
While I still have personal reasons why I think Thor handled the SKG stuff poorly, using it to extend to trying to defame him is hella dumb.
its the internet if you throw something i throw something bigger
no talking just arguing
not you @lime laurel its just others
thats a good one
its the
im going to have you
oh hi frank
im going to have you
so 14th for the stream returns is looks like
Sadly, yes.
imagine being mad at something the 2 parties involved have solved years ago, PEAK internet
The ridiculous amount of negative stuff that's come out in the last couple weeks is too sudden for it to have not been prompted by his SKG comments... In this case the correlation feels genuine.
i swear to god YouTube if you send me one more "we think you might like this" for a channel i don't want to watch and i click don't recommend im going to be very angry
Not to mention something Thor has talked about himself already many many times before live on stream.
It has a lot of followers. And where there's lots of people there's always a few terminal idiots.
ah the VODs were removed by thor #general_chat message cause they were being used to stir shit up n stuff
I guarantee you that the copycats were re editing his vods to make him sounds much more hostile. Generates clicks.
not sure whether that's the best move cause now they're gonna say "he's hiding what he said" n stuff like that I guess...
thats the internet for you
but leaving them up might also not be great so it's like Β―_(γ)_/Β―
They'll find a reason to hate either way, so take the one where they got less "ammo"
did you guys see theo's video
that was funny
I saw primeagen's too
primes was good
@fringe fractal @fresh ginkgo @last summit VOD Deletion reason
The one were he straight calls gamers entitles a-holes?
it was funny how primeagen basically came with pretty much the exact same points that thor did, independently
Theos was just "wanna see my call you out ....... ok"
yup that one
Yeah, I consider myself a "gamer" for what it's worth. And I couldn't agree more with him.
Just throw a pebble in literally any steam discussion forum
i feel like calling people who want to preserve games "entitled" is a little far, personally. the people yelling "kill all live service games"? sure, they ain't great
those guys are the real bad ones
his not aiming that at you it was more the death threats
i see preserving games a good idea
but this is more for MY GAME NO WORK
Yeah. Historical Preservation. By people qualified to do so. WIth curators and museums and shit.
Ah, makes sense
Not Timmy from over there, wanting to keep playing game 450858 forever
like for sharing younger players like my kids
100%
i want private servers
but make it controlled
No he called the initiative entitled because what you want is what you want, not whats possible. The ask that games with live service should be made playable after sunsetting is not feasibly possible
i do wish i could send it in tts next stream, about my personal feelings regarding private servers as we discussed, to thor
but money is unfortunately Not Plentiful Enough
I'm one the fence with Private Server thing.
There's a lot of thing to clear up for that to be safe.
While they can be used for harm and there's tons of examples of it, the sheer level of good they have brought about for a lot of games cannot be understated.
Whole games have been revived and are doing better than they ever did officially because of them
true but the saying one ruins its for the rest is unfortunately a thing
anyways lets not debate
im to tired of it
While this is nice, that has to be within the wishes of the parent company to make the game able to be privately run in that way, legally and financially that choice has to be made
ive been called every name under sun recently
and its mentally draining
i have quit 3 discord over it
Just a last thing to add to that: Yeah games cna do better on private servers, and because that is true, I want refer back to the point Thor made about someone torpedoing a studio and taking the game. Food for thought.
That sucks man. I'm sorry.
its okay
Not to rehash the whole topic, but you can search up my message history for my full thoughts on it
I feel like the good which has been achieved with private servers outweighs the negatives as it stands currently, to sum it up.
when you defend a dev saying i dont want to release my game that i spent 6 years on for someone to say, "well your s*** out of luck" i gets old really quick
at that point his entitled
I dunno, someone potentially getting hacked and having their life potentially ruined isn't worth a number of people being able to play a video game. Scammers are gonna flood that space if it becomes legal and easy to do.
i really felt for the dev
Oh this discussion again...
its winding up
Sorry, I'mma stop.
Yea, also we got an official reason for the VODs...
#streamchat message
we will stop promise
It's pretty late for me to form coherent thoughts, but it feels like we live in a strange time, or is that just me?
What was it?
i added the link in edit
yeah, i'll bow out. if y'all wanna see the summation of my stance and thoughts, just search my message history here in #streamchat
from uhhhh
last week. i think
yeah
time is an illusion and my grasp on it slips by the day :V
Like in general? I get that feeling.
the fact 2024 is already almost over is still throwing me for a loop like. holy shit
Oh, was too fast then π But yea, that was one of the things we suspected.
For I guess it was the realization that world is not that nice stable unchanging thing I experienced during my childhood, and is in fact, and constantly shifting and violently changing thing.
tell me about it
yeah, i think that's where a lot of time perception gets messed up, box
What are you talking about 2020 was yesterday
What do you mean it's not February anymore? 
True, and I haven't even taken any paid leave yet...
we're so used to time feeling long while we're young, only for us to get older and it just slips us by.
hell, i ain't even as old as most here, being 23 as of this year
I remember this quote, I'll cut the end off as it may not be appropriate. "We were born too late to explore the earth, too early to explore space, but born just the right time to explore..."
most would consider that a baby when it comes to "old folks" lol
exactly lol
I'm 34. Don't feel much more "mature" that I did 10 years ago. Just different.
bloody kids back in my day we shouted at people on my lawn
and that was yesterday
it was my kids
Back in my day our after school activity was goin down to the creek and skipping rocks
jumping around the woods and climbing into trees
see that sounds fun i wish i had a creek
Well you don't need to cut off anything. This is a template statement. the last part that you cut off is basically a variable anyway...
not to own obv
I remember going into a nearby forest with my buds, picking out sticks and having straight up tournaments.
i find myself thinking back on older summers when i was younger. going to the local swimming lake, having a fun time
and just those rides back
wet hair, music, the sunset and breeze from the window
now you just write a cancel post on twitter dot com
im 36 and i joined the internet in the beginning. dad coming home with the boxes for the phone lines
I remember the dial up noises too
picking up the phone because it rang
mid 2000's internet for me
Ok, but where is the creek and the trees now? These places basically no longer exists in any satisfying way. It is very depressing going back there. 0/10 would not recommend. Don't even look it up on google maps...
and you shouldnt
dial up noise 
It was artificial but not like the city, natural terrain with inlets and outlets to direct the water, but at one end was a little pond-like area and I would throw small boulders into it and watch the water go everywhere
sounds like bliss
the days of
let's just say limes and some random wires i found. i shudder to think of the viruses i had
I did go back one to a lot of those places in my hometown. It was all so tiny. Or locked off.
No, all in the same place still. Just a bit dirtier than usual
oh you mean Surpirse EXEs
those were fun
exactly
Man I learned english with games that I.... found
good ol linkin park - in the end.mp3.exe
Way back when.
I only recently left the area, I was in Virginia, it heavily wooded and hilly. You cant exactly errect big flat dead concrete jungles there.
Same but not at home. The dial up modem was silent btw. And the first one I had at home was a 6000 dsl limited to 3000...
I tried so hard, and got so far...
or downloading a film and getting a skinny man feeding a fat man spaghetti
These days it'd be labelled loitering/trespassing, and the owner would call the cops to get you off their property.
and now they call the cops if you look at the road funny
having to run it on all hyper low
and even then having to play on trade servers running minecraft custom maps
I played Minecraft before it had a Survial Mode
god i miss them days where being a kid wasnt so dramatic
i used to have those acer aspire 1 mini laptops and it was hilarious to run games on it
oh god those things
Thats the beauty of public property. they cant lol. I get the points being made but in this specific case the area is still the same and unchanging because it cant change. the plot lines were drawn way too long ago and everything is far too rooted. I grew up my whole childhood there and only ever saw 2 development projects over the course of about 16 years.
i don't care for my uncle much anymore, he's the equivalent of an american from texas let's say, in canada
In 7th or 8th grade we had a kind of autoran inf trojan at school and basically wrote a kind of vaccine for these computers by writing a more spreadable trojan that did nothing except for delete the files of that trojan off of every drive and replacing them with write protected noops...
but he's absolutely the reason I'm so into tech now
too bad I was forced to move because I was not the property owner and the property owner didnt know how to be a property owner. House totalled
watched him mod an og xbox when i was a kid, with mechassault 4 iirc
had a ds lite from him with a flashcart
Typical Emule stuff π
a Texan Canadian how does that work?
let's just say its because of his stances
love me a good emule torrent
and i cant go deeper cause rules
fair
My dad bought a modded xbox from a work colleague, and around 200 disks. Of those, only like 5 worked. I played Ninja Gaidens first 2 Missions like 100 times because it never loaded further 
what was everyones first machine PC or console?
Technically here you can't even do that with private property if it is a forrest at least. As wandering the woods is considered a fundamental right.
i've modded my wii, 3ds, wii u, ps3 and a psp so far
mine Sage mega
It's called Alberta.
The very first was an NES.
but nah, NB
As for how it works... Not very well right now, lol.
But I was too little to play. The first game I played was The Settlers 2 with my dad. It's how learned to read.
Sonic 2 playing for hours
Games were kinda put into my cradle.
As an American I like the woods and Owning property so IDK how to feel about this LMAO
Dope. My neighbour had Sega Saturn. We'd always go over and play Sonic games there.
Or was it a dreamcast? I can'T recall
If you have a wii also get into dumping the firmware using an IC-clip, once you know that you'll be able to protect against accidentally bricking it even without the boot2 stuff.
first game i ever finished was sonic 2 left the console on all night for 2 days
no saves
just pure game
I remember the weekends when a new Zelda game came out. Me and my brother were always forbidden from playing games before my dad had beaten them. Because if we did beat them first, we'd horribly backseat him. LUL
dont got my wii anymore sadly. never backed up my saves either, so rip my og launch ac:cf save
ahahhahaha
i wanna get my wii u going again but i gotta get a power brick and charger for it again
For me it was bricking windows 95, as I wanted to know what all the configuration options did and without being able to read I just tried each and every one of them. Which back then wasn't a good idea. Nowerdays windows is more or less padded. I don't know of a single setting that you're able to change in the GUI (without edditing files or the command line) that would make the system unable to boot or reverting it...
I think the only thing I ever truly bricked was an android phone......A 3 year old could brick those things XD
me favourite memories of my dad me and my bro playing LAN age of empires 2
OOoooof. Yeah. Those old system kinda expected you to know what you're doing.
You still own it. You still can put up fences for your young trees. However if you want to put it over any of the forrest trails you'll have to put a gate there that everyone is able to pass through...
now my dad thinks games are for wasting time
Oh hell yeah! I'd play that so much with my brother and my cousin every time they visited! THey parents would bring their pcs over as well.
just fell out of love
used to spend hours
was bliss
Get a lab power supply, esp. if you also want to tinker with other things. Then you'll just have to put some jumper wires in and set it to the right voltage.
Yea see in America thats not owning it, if it comes with restrictions, anything I cant do with or on MY property it isnt mine. So people walking through is like.....no.
Maybe its calm enough in your country for that to be okay but that would lead to infinite domestic violence cases and breaking and entering cases
yeah sounds like the UK rambling laws
I'mma head out and make dinner. Ya'll have a wonderful [your current time of day]
Happy Timezone
Oh it got worse. After it got "fixed" aka reinstalled for me the first time I and started to be able to read I wanted to know what all the system files did and I launched them in alphabetical order just to see what happens π
happy timezoneing
sound like my brother who wanted more space so deleted the program files so you couldnt uninstall or reinstall
REFORMAT THE DRIVE
Well he's not wrong. That's literally one of the reasons for playing them... Distracting yourself from all of the stuff around you and having some relaxing time to calm down and not think about any of it is also nothing to be taken for nothing. It is literally selfcare and if it is e.g. an MMO it also is social interaction...