#streamchat
1 messages · Page 100 of 1
oh boi here we go
This won't just settle down. We be hearing about this for weeks.
oh 1000%
A week in one day
its aged me weeks
more like months
It feels like the supporters of the initiative really don't know what the initiative wants to actually do? So yeah, this'll self perpetuate as the understanding of it constantly shifts cause no one has unified talking points.
Which is great for legislation, you know 
it's like people can't read and just want to yell.
o repeat what i said before i see both sides and I'm not against it because i hate games im against it because its poorly worded i know it the "first part" but people dont hear i support the idea but hate the wording of it they hear. "YOU HATE GAMES BECAUSE YOU ARE A IDIOT AND blah... blah.... Blah....."
most I see in support seem to just claim the initiative does what they WANT it to do rather than what it actually says
I think people are just emotional over their video games and latch on this expecting something they're just not entitled to have.
Which I kinda get. I really like some video games. So much that not being able to play them makes me sad. I can emphasize with that feeling.
Can someone ping me if/when he starts playing MYM?
will do 🙂
Chat, you just lost the game
dammit, lose it everytime

wasn't here so i didn't loose.
how long does it take steets to port heartbound to the OS of the Fridge?
Can't lose a game I've already lost 
oh yes, all i have heard from people that initiative was created to do A, B, C, D, but they are not being mentioned in the initiative, which for me is weird, everyone can interpret initiative however they'd like, same goes for the government I think.
but again, don't quote me on this, I am not part of EU, I do not kno wfully how these things work, though from context I unbderstand initiative gets changed when government talks about it and when it is actually being discussed and what not, though still to me leaving initiative itself vague makes me believe government would find a way to f this thing up in whole extra dimension 😄
I'm from Germany, and if this goes before legislators, there's gonna be research. Tons of it. They'll dig deep.
i should stop writing in chat. I write a lot of Denglish (mix of German/Deutsch and English) xD
They'll find stuff like the video that says "politicians like an easy win" too btw
No better way to learn though!
And hopefully they do, but giving directions in what to dig to is IMO important too.
I mean i saw people say that if because of vagueness of the initiative it makes it so that live service games are gone forever and never developed is a good thing. :d
tbh this is far more civilised then i was expecting last time there was pitchforks
Live service games are a huge industry. Legislators usually don't want flagranty pass laws and hamstring huge parts of economies. EU is already unpopular, stuff like this would make it worse.
but the day is still young
the only good thing will be less costs of development because most of them will use region locks and need less servers, translations, etc.
Whats the ban score end of the stream in twitch or YT
what is that skin
new cursed thing
ban score? you mean heimdall?
so uh, what happened to thor's fiber install?
needs another bit of hardware
audible groan
delayed, once again. I would guess within a few weeks it should be done
yup that was thor at the start of stream
I don't think that would actually cause costs to go down. Ideally the whole world would consume your service exactly the same way, so you would architect it like a nearly-uniform scalable blob. If you have to carve out a bunch of exceptions then you have to add lots of stuff to manage those exceptions.
i think he said after defcon it should be done BUT ............ we will see
I hate that new mic NGL. Makes him sound more nasally and less deep.
That's his real voice. The whole second puberty thing was a lie. /s
I think they’re both Yeti, I don’t remember the model.
Yeah. If someones tells something is gonna be installed on a certain day I plan at least 2 extra days for it to be actually done, speaking from personal experience.
okay I have read 6 comments on the video and I've seen enough. have we really stooped to "You're Wrong your take is wrong unalive blank you piece of blank"
Is the video on his YouTube page?
yeti is the model, they only do recolors of the shell
Maybe some tail wiggles from vinny will cheer you up: https://clips.twitch.tv/SparklingProudBeefRaccAttack-rphA_A3Hq1YKAA2K
what's missing is that he doesn't have the windscreen on the new setup
thank you
which usually will filter out some high frequency tones
awwww look at the tail
Oh yes, these wonderful recolored identical shell microphones...
rare wiggly tail ^^
always funny to watch
they renamed the blue snowball ice to the yeti orb
and I forgot the yeti gx, which is a horrible new product so thats my bad
god they really get their miles off the blue acquisition don't they
wait are those new yeti products?
I remembered before blue got bought by logitech, you got the yeti that's thor using, and the snowball ice.
Using a used blue yeti, that thor has, for like 6+ years aswell. Still working perfectly good
After looking into the website, Looks like Thor's old mic is a Standard model Yeti mic, and the new on at the new house looks like the Yeti X
English grammar my favo xd
ok this is starting to give me headache. Time to shut internet off.
yea the yeti x is the same yeti body, but with a shorter wire cap on top
im tipping the mods they deserve it for dealing with the idiots
after the acquisition, logitech shrink the body down and we have the yeti nano
I also have the Blue Yeti Blackout. The only issue is that the Power port is a bit fiddly and doesn't take much to accidently disconnect if the cable is wiggled
Why does it sound so bad? Is that ALL in the foam?
I wonder if the mods also do youtube comments on the videos
The yeti orb looks... horrible and yeti gx is just a yeti that just glows in rainbow vomit
given how close he is to the mic, could be, proximity effect is strong here
or could be the new room acoustic
I remember him saying he does those on his own. Could misremember but thats what I believe
I would put this to the new room's acoustic tbh, a windscreen will alter how a mic sounds, but not to the extent that you mentioned
UGH. Hope he gets a little bit of acoustic treatment, its SO nasally it feels like the voice is super THIN compared to how it is now
He'll figure it out once he actually Streams from there probably.
Can't adjust without any data
FFS the trolls are coming in
Was the Blackout a separate model at one point? on the Logitech store the Blackout is just listed as a color option on the default mic.
im going to go deal with work stuff while this carrys on. Haven't Got the time the energy or the crayons for it
IIRC yes, Blackout is also the one that Thor has. It had/has multiple microphone pickup options.
I think the standard yeti is a multi pickup pattern mic as well
finally i feel validated that i shower every fwe days too because i work from home, and my hobbies are at home xD
i shower when my head gets greasy which is every one day on one day off
i try to do that too but i like to excercize every day sooooooo TT
ahhh see there's your problem i eat me problem 😂 🤣
ahhhhhh fat joke at my expense
dealing with the poop flingers
probably focusing on damage control
This ^
most likely. Been raining sh.. a lot i assume.
i mean see the youtube comments some are very colourful
for someone reason i've got frank sinatra in my head now
no i stopped my head got hurty ill go home soon and no web rest of the day.
isn't today jakes day off?
Man what a coinsidence, I started doing ADF and had a refeed day and have insane diarrhea currently 😄
disapointed
lovely
I AM WRITING AS I AM PISSING FROM BUTT, i will not elaborate further
thank you for sharing i guess.
you're welcome
YOU DIDNT NEED TO ELABORATE THAT
sharing is caring lmao

I love how Thor has his stream sound track made from songs from the heartbound soundtrack, but any time anyone asks for the playlist order, He just says where the music is from 🫠
Like, Thor, love ya dude, but that's not the question half the time. There's 100 songs in the OST and he dosn't play them all
no he does
What is the playlist order?
it nots suffled its the order on the soundtrack
probably random?
100% no
what does it even matter?
He explicitly plays the same songs in the same order
He's been asked to shuffle and his OCD says hell no
i think it was a general question
He's been asked a few time, and his playing the music on and off right now has me thinking about it
just a question that's been stuck in my craw
yeah i bought the soundtrack the other month and its pretty much that order in the soundtrack and only diff if the hype train music goes
sometimes i find myself humming the next song before it starts
that's what made me think of it. I walked away from the computer, finished the song in my head, and started the next one, but when i got back, he had paused and not finished the first song
so gyped
think he should take ludwig to defcon https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oDOFZPy2rlY
WATCH LIVE ON TWITCH - https://www.twitch.tv/cdawgva
Twitter - https://twitter.com/CDawgVA
Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/cdawgva
Managed by Tizen - https://twitter.com/Tizen99
#CDawgVA #ludwig #trashtaste
Defcon: The highest tech place you need to turn your tech off to visit
nah
that clip blows my mind everytime
Someone can explain this, just a bug on twitch because is happening all channels or is something else?
must be a bug for you
And I think my streak counter not updating
could try reloading your page
ok looks like is just me
tried that and all channels the same
thanks
WOW just realized the PC had the time I turned off, now I corrected it the stream is fine
I hearby attempt to dub the shitpost thumbnails in the style of Thor doing MS paint: "Thornails"
Maybe I'll just let the streams be on mute for a few days...
just f5 the stream should fix it... i often get the emote only mode randomly
i mean, not dead but some images are definitively not responding at first attempt because of the hug of death.
also chat there is this website to https://interfaceingame.com/ @minor nymph
i wonder if you can add images to the gameuidatabase yourself as some seem light on the info
I imagine Thor says to the Rock: You rock (fingers pointtting at it)
And the rock says: You rock too! ( fingers pointing back at thor). that is why he has a pet rock on his desktop
it dose not look like you can login and edit things yourself and if you go to the about you can see were to donate so he is doing this all by himself with the help of a select few contributors
Ah man what is chat on about now? 👀
I'm at work I can't tune in rn
still on about the Initiative/EU game thing
y'all he posted a video about it didn't he??? Chat y'all gotta let go of it I prefer the days when we spent the whole day sending Thor computer mice lolol
unfortunately for us that are sick of it, he likes to debate and teach, so when people bring it up he launches right back into it
I heard him earlier tell folks to just watch the video he posted and he was done talking about it 😅 he even released it early but I guess folks don't know how to let it go. Hopefully they get it out of their systems soon
That is something I appreciate about Thor though, the fact that he will explain stuff for folks who weren't there when he originally explained it
not mine, found it in steets memes
Thor is down for a talk with Louis rossmann?
yup sounds it
Probably bc chat won't stop telling him he "needs" to until he does (in my opinion at least)
both communties are the same
One suggestion: “Thorbnail/Thorbnails”.
“Thorb” sound more like “Thumb” than “Thor” sounds like “Thumb”
This makes me consider Ponder the Thorb
Somebody gotta paste a Thorface into that Palantir
erm, Intel offering a 3 year warranty. 13900k was released about 2 years ago. In addition Intel extended their warranty for 13/14 gen by 2 years.
He should definitely open an RMA after moving to the new house.
🟥
Yes, excellent. 
@reef thistle For some reason I remembered this from the aether of the rest of the day, but it's about to be MYM time
MYM TIME @reef thistle
Thank yoouuuu!
Yea
I might tts that next stream
i would try to get a new one in exchange and then get rid of the mobo/cpu/ram.
Is there someone in the community that could possibly help me with my resume? I am looking to switch jobs but find it hard to get any call backs on applications. I have been with the same company for 18 years now and do not have a degree. I have been accepted into a BS degree program, but would like to find something before I complete my BS.
apparently his claim got denied?
i feel like he showed the article for the 2 year extension few streams ago
yea, but he said something about his cpu being too old
and not rma able?
No, he just said that its too old for rma
which is not true anymore
sometimes when I scroll, it stays frozen on the last stream, so I have to scroll passed and then back up again to even see whatever it is.
I am stealing this gif to weaponize against my boyfriend
WEAPONIZED AFFECTION

I just watched the new video and my biggest takeaway is that Thor agrees with the principle and it, but in it's current form it's toxic
A better example of the principle would be when the GTA 5 servers are finally killed, the single player campaign should still be accessible
New random thought input poll for the chat, derived from what Thor just said.
What is your example of a game that you agree is objectively terrible yet you utterly adore it and play it a ton anyways
shit that's hard
most of the time a game feels terrible for me is because I play it with the wrong input method
I would say F1 Challenge 99-02 for your question. The physics is jank, the handling can either makes me feel like i'm slow or I pushed too hard, kerbs are a death sentence. But the sense of speed when you go side-by-side with another car, the sudden overspeed when you are in the tow of the car infront, it's something special for me.
For me, I'd probably say it's this:
Many are the tales of heroism and grandeur, of saving the princess and being rewarded her hand and half the kingdom in marriage.This is not one of them.You are Sir Whoopass, a valiant knight with a heart of gold!…and also the accidental architect of absolute anarchy and chaos in a once-perfect world.Through a series of poor life choices you mana...
$16.99
871
Now granted, it is terrible by design
But still
It is just so dumb in the best of ways
Damn, that hit me like a truck.
?
the tts
TTS from someone who lost their husband.
Oh
curious, wy does thor stream past midnight (us time)
Wrong
He starts at midnight
And streams for 12 hours
As he has stated numerous times
And he does it to cover both US and EU crowds and to ride the wave from US peak into EU start.
Yeah, they should be getting the late bit, and then the early bit in reverse order
get IPDT and test your CPU.
That is a tool AMD don't have.
ah no I don't have an intel cpu thats in the affected range.
Thor thought his cpu was out of warranty range, but he forgot that intel just extended the warranty program for 13 and 14th gen
but he can't be out of range, because the cpu came out in Q4 22 and intel grant you 3 years ( now extended 5yrs just for 13/14 gen)
He thought so, he's gonna check it again. I doubt that he actually checked it before. I asked him in chat and he said he's gonna check it again now that the warranty got extended
yeah intel said to "just keep trying" regarding the RMA which.. points to some severe communication issues internally for their RMAs
Has he mentioned about streaming tomorrow or are we into Defcon time after today?
new here, so not aware of this
Fsir
I see
Thor fixed my schedule. In Germany (GMT+2) he streams from 9am to 9pm
it starts in EU morning, so it's EU first then when the americans wake up later
midnight pacific time is 8am in the uk and 9am in western europe
yeah, I meant the other way around
don't worry chat. I'm sane, very sane right now.
Didn’t get any better than that
Devs: now we don’t think anyone will ever find this secret but thank you!
Thor a week after launch: 👋😃
A bit late on the reply, but Unturned and later 7 Days to Die drag me back in every single update even though both of them have always felt cobbled together, playing exactly the way the devs intend because otherwise it barely feels like a game at all. Guess I'm just a sucker for PvE sandbox zombie survival games.
cursed
that's just mildly cursed. I tried to make thora bunny.
To blend in thor's face i need to remove the original eyes and mouth....
This looks so horrifying i stopped making it.
Oh god
why did you click it!
:)
Hey, anyone know if Thor covered his thoughts on the Bungie layoffs?
Catch DROPPED FRAMES LIVE every Sunday 1PM ET on https://www.twitch.tv/itmejp !
Cohh is on vacation this week! So joining JP and Zeke, this week are unofficial 4th seat Rami Ismail and returning special guest PirateSoftware! We get into the major news of Bungie firing 17% of their staff as well as relocating another 13%. What does this mean for...
There ya go
it’s a good thing you stopped 😭
how do I get the heartbound steam key? I just redeemed the points
a mod will message you about that
so be patient
As a long time player of Phantasy Star Online 2, we cannot get the original experience back but its ok.
It had its lifetime and grew because of 2020, now that PSO2: New Genesis is the new game, we have a new experience.
I know and understand that both PSO2 and PSO2:NGS will never get back to its peak but that's because the pandemic settled down.
Thank you, Thor.
I do still think Thor is missing one of the main points of single player games being preserved.
For instance, 99% of the Forza Motorsports series is now lost media outside of physical copies because of expiring licenses.
This happens with music licenses, car licenses, etc
Games like the older Guitar Hero games can no longer be purchased, with no current legal means of playing them due to this fact.
Louis Rossman is not Ross Scott, c'mon man! lmao
What about RubberRoss, is he any of them?
He's over there, making mario levels
Maybe we could convince him to do MyM levels
Hehehehehehe
the best thing of this it the possibility of thor talking to rossman, this would be a great crossover conversation
^
100% agree
been following Rossman for years, gave me the confidence to fix apple products. rossman and thor are very similar so i would love to hear it
we are sliding down the same hole don't we
next week the internet will get mad at other things and we will move on
as you said mate we are going to be on this slide for a while
still mad respect for Thor not getting heated at saying the same thing over and over again, I do truly like him not being a gatekeeper with all of this
once i heard thor say "we're dealing with government here" i fully understood where he is coming from about this
i don't think a discussion between ross and thor would actually be productive
I think he does get heated, it doesn't get to the level where he just go duck you
i think outside of the stream his screaming
unfortunately stop killing games is operating on extremely bad faith and the movement itself doesn't really understand what it's fighting for
perhaps he's more PR trained than I might be currently
nah thats just years of twitch
Also the big thing I've been thinking about this topic is all on the "feeling / feelings" of nostalgia, it feels like the drug between the for and against here and how deadly of a substance it can be for players wanting to keep those feelings alive
he is stream trained, burned by the ashes of online 4chan forums, and blizzard
Those I had forgotten about honestly, makes perfect sense 😅
there you go that was a little heated
I give it like 2 weeks and we will move on
That's the hope, I do think it could pass the initial petition, but will get destroyed when looked at in detail
Instant gratification minded people are losing hard here by not thinking in the short, long, now timeline
people have forgotten how to argue about things in a respectful matter, things aren't black and white, there are nuances, and for things to go in a good direction, various opinions need to exist, we can't be a hive mind
Yeah, hive minds don't work too well on human subjects
if i want a hive mind ill be a borg
like the underlying motive is a good thing
the way they go about it, even if this is just for a calling for action for lawmakers to look at the thing, is not good
if I want a hive mind, I get a farm, get into bee keeping, and become the queen bee keeper
so borg
"The whole valve team thinks you're stupid for not understanding this" was one of the statements. I highly doubt he works for Valve or know anyone that does. Fascinating behaviour 
Yea, if he actually works in Valve, he will have a good day tomorrow.
lol if they can back that up with a source I'll believe it
the ones who are in position are the quiet ones
Given how few people are employed by Valve the chance that they work at Valve is pretty slim lmao
they know valve stores the save data on their servers ??
I'd have loved to see what he thought would happen if Dota 2 went offline 
lol I DON'T CARE WHAT THE SERVER SAYS I'M ALLOWED TO DO, I CAST FIREBALL!!
I CAST UNO REVERSE AND ITCHY BUTT CRACK
server check didn't pass, it's on cooldown
how longs the cooldown asking for a ...... friend
idk ask the server
but wouldnt asking the server also make the server cooldown more ITS A NEVER ENDING CYCLE
sorry, but the server is now being restructured to be able to be passed to people to keep it living forever in their local server, try again later
kinda makes sense why Elden Ring has those online features, granted I know it's existed for many other FS games, but just dunking on cheaters bypassing normal gameplay vs learning movement, tactics, etc.
oh boy
You are being rate limited
damn we successfully steer the convo away from the volcano
thank goodness
until someone else steer it back
I may need literal popcorn now 😅
can we steer it to ferrets?
i mean i think we can all agree we hate sony more
I like to steer towards the ferret too
absolutely
ferrets might actually be better driver than whoever being real nasty right now
Hey, is there a way to have a conversation with Mr. Software about his stance on the stop killing games stuff? I have some questions I feel aren't getting answered on stream and it seems very challenging to keep on topic in a room of a few thousand screaming people.
the noodlessss
I love those ferrets
what are your questions?
have you seen his new video on the subject? perhaps we can help answer these questions too
I see a lack of conversation about private servers.
Yes, I have
I was not on stream earlier today it's 8 AM 
watch it back
Thor is wrong on Tsushima, actually
he talked about it, made a whole blackboard about it
The PSN account is JUST for Legends, the multiplayer mode
Do you have a timestamp I can reference?
You can do single player completely offline and disconnected from PSN
Go back about 10-20 minutes from now
but you require it at start up dont you?
Nope
I'm on mobile it's really challenging to get precise scrubbing lol
it's still banned in all those countries regardless
The PSN account linking is just for Legends.
This is bad, yes
that would be all good, if sony not also just outright blocked it from being purchaseable for any countries that can't create a PSN acc
But to say the game wholesale requires PSN is wrong information
Okay I think I found it.
I'm not defending sony blocking the game for sale
I'm saying that Thor was wrong on GoT needing PSN
GoW:R does need one, unfortunately, which is very dumb.
I agree.
But is not the point I am making here.
is sony still dumb? absolutely
GoT he talked about being blocked to sale in other countries
yea, but got required a PSN to play single is not true, that specific detail is not true
Is SKG initiative solely focused on making single-player games that require online connection be made playable offline? Or is it also advocating for other things like allowing private servers?
I went back. The first thing he brings up is "how do they get back your data"
- I don't think they would get back your data for you and I don't understand why this was brought up as a point in the first place. No private server I am aware of lets you import your character from the main wow servers. In the case of a player hosted server, the server host could just unlock the stuff players had before though so.. kind of a moot point imo.
The second point he mentioned was that running a private server makes them give up their intellectual property. I do not understand this - how does allowing a player to run a private server for a game that they purchased after the game is no longer functional giving up their IP?
The original rights holders still hold all the rights, yeah? Like I can host a Team Fortress 2 custom server but I don't own any of the associated intellectual property for that lol.
i think thor is doing a blank piece of all sony games so its understandable that something would get hit i mean Until Dawn requires psn as well. GoT unfortunatly i painted with the same brush as SONY
from what i remember of the original video, laggy
I'd love to have an actual conversation with him on this
I am not a popular human though so chances are low lol
the point is single player games that require online to play
the server itself is IP
but your point is then dismissed due to God of war no?
the original example was The Crew by Ubisoft, which is a single player story based racing game that has an online mode where players appear in the world and can do races with them, but is otherwise a single player game
I would not call that a live service game
That is a single player game with multiplayer elements
Explain that stance a bit further please
When you say "IP" that stands for "intellectual property" - just because they release a version for players to use does not mean that it changes the holder of that IP legally speaking
I understand the server code is their intellectual property but releasing that for public use doesn't change that
They still own the IP of the client half of the game too
well if you're forcing them to provide the source, that's giving up IP
Seems I will be forced to skip chat as well.
if you're forcing them to make a binary to run in the architecture, that architecture is also IP
afaik
speak of the devil
What are they giving up exactly in this case lol
but it can if the server coding is changed and something untoward happens it wont be the server owner attacked first is would be the owners of the IP
I think if the movement was focused on only on single player games with this issue, then I could see it having a higher chance of success. But I am seeing a lot of other people trying to include multi-player games which I think will hurt it.
What are you talking about
IP as in intellectual property
Not IP address
im talking about intellectual property
The original base of the movement was that exact point. But people hating live service games jumped in
laws of copyright say if you don't enforce it you may loose it. A lot of companies sell those IPs, and are recreated in a later time. Creating your own server means one of 2 things: you have a publish agreement (this still make the company that made the game liable of what happens in the server) or piracy. Thats what I've understood
And then there's the grey area of companies calling games "with multiplayer elements" as live service games, I.E. Ubisoft
its why WOW private servers are illegal because it cant be maintained
and could damage the IP
In the case of stop killing games taking effect the game is going to die anyway though
now see, me personally, I'm full sale a fan of private servers
Server code being available doesn't make a difference in that does it lol
It's revived games that would otherwise be dead and lost media
Original FFXIV, Shin Megami Tensei Imagine (the SMT mmo), etc
Hell, I actually learned a bit of coding and server hosting to run my own personal server for FFXIV 1.0
I kinda have trouble with the crew as an example tbh. I watched racing creator playing the crew growing up, I remembered how it feels like another Need For Speed, a single player experience.
But Ubisoft promotes this as an MMO, which is why you see in wikipedia and reviews from journalists, they listed this as an online - only video game
In the case of a game being offline entirely how is it being playable more damaging than people saying "man I wish I could play this"
games die, I'm from the arcade era, and flash games era, I'm used to loose games, I do feel like single player experiences should not stop working because theres in no internet. But I don't know if I feel the same of live services in general. I'm in the middle of all this, I'm learning new things
That's why I said there's a grey area of companies referring to their games as a live service or "mmo"
Flash games can be run using an offline program. Arcade machines can be emulated.
Those things aren't gone
By all means, The Crew is a single player game
Crew 2 less so, but the topic is the original
but wasnt the crew sold as a online only?
There are some devs that share information with the community that allows them to run private servers. Battlebit is an example of this. From my understanding, if the devs stop hosting servers, other people still can. But when you think about the state of the game when it reaches the point of devs no longer supporting it, the game will be unplayable since the playerbase will be gone.
Treyarch/Infinity Ward don't support Black Ops 1/2, OG MW2/3, etc
But people in the hundreds of thousands still play them
Yes
But even though they said that and regardless of how true it is I think that if they're going to kill the game they should provide the means for people to host their own servers (even in reduced capacity) with the final update of that game.
Idk if you play any old server reliant games - I play one and it sucked when the server died, but thankfully community modders were able to revive it in a limited capacity
now as a legitimate point of complaint on thor here, holding up asmongold as a voice of reason feels incredibly disengenuis given how often he ends up being transphobic
seeing asmongold as a "good guy" feels hella wrong
he doesnt see him as a good guy
don't care to talk about asmongold would prefer to remain on topic to why private servers would or would not work in this context
Can someone be right, or a voice of reason in one aspect of a discussion, but be wrong in others?
he sees him as a Avg gamer
I love emulation, its great for keeping old games alive. But you think all games were kept? There was a publisher of flash games that made the transition to steam, but the games died for a while, but most of the catalog that existed is gone. A lot of them exist only in the memory of those who where there to play it
given its wrong in the case of hating a minority group, that does sour the bunch of apples
like me personal dont care for him
And it sucks that not all of them were kept! That's a bad thing!!
We should try to prevent that from happening lol
I haven't seen a whole lot of Asmon on the whole trans topic, do you have some examples of him being explicitly transphobic?
but i understand looking for differnet view points like his unfortunatly is needed
Are they playing the single player or multi-player? If it's multi-player I'm curious who is hosting the servers? Do you happen to know?
agreeing with Those Types Of People in regards to the new Fable game, calling the protag of it "a man" being a big one
no, not at all, a lot of devs were created on those games, and keep the mechanics and inspired newer games
Is it possible he's not making commentary about the trans community in any way, especially since the character hasn't been discussed as being trans, and is merely making dumb commentary about how the character looks ugly, and has more masculine phenotypical features?
not defending here, just legitimately wanting to know
This is the kind of attitude I love
except those are the same talking points of every transphobic person online, how they "transvestigate" women who vaguely look like men
yes i played Matrix online and Ark when those servers died and among others it hurt but from my view point the multiplayer side was dead i still have videos to look back on and memorys. do i wish the game was still here GOD yes. but i understand why the devs decided to end it
Orignal Ark not remastered
thanks for sharing, love to see how people are able to apply this kind of change
Good on you and I'm sure your players will be happy to know they can play their game forever.
i have ran private servers for years and i know the pain involved in it i ran a WOW server and got hit will a stop it now
thats wrong
it falls into the example of online - only for the sake of online only while the game plays out more or less as a single player. and thor's stance is that the movement should call out specifically those behaviors, instead of what's currently on the ECI site using the broad "videogames" term.
He wants the movement to be specific from the get go, right from this initiative.
I think there's a portion of him being used to how the US law system operates which contribute to his fear of EU lawmakers will work on the basis that "videogames", any "videogame" should be left at a functional state once the publisher/dev decide to sunset the game. If this is what the law will be, future MMO games would require more resources set aside to document, curate that functional state, and this might become a barrier for indie studios who wants to make an indie MMO but might not have the resources to do such thing. Then you left with only big studio/corpo MMO games. That's my read of what thor afraid of.
I have been told that EU lawmakers will only look at the proposed motive of the initiative if this gather enough signature, then decide to work the specific out, but personally I would side with thor and I think a specific initiative won't hurt anyone
totally agree
but the wording dont say that
Oh sure, that happens, but is that what he's doing? I'm fairly certain that at all points of discussion, he's been pretty supportive of the lgbtq+ community, including trans people. I feel it's more likely that he, as a voice for the average player, is just being critical of what he perceives to be a stupid and pointless change in the industry that no one asked for. Sure, you can look at it in a way that's transphobic because saying a female character looks "Like a dude" is something hardcore transphobes use as an insult. But I think it's a lot more likely that he's just saying the character just looks ugly.
I just watched his reaction. He says "they did her dirty" because the actress is rather attractive, and the model doesn't look as good. Is there always discrepancies between models and real life, yeah, but that's all he's talking about.
and there is the magic words if all partys sat down i think we would have something we could all support
true
Yeah, see, that's what I remember. Sure Asmon can be a headass a lot of the time, but I think it's a very large stretch to say he's transphobic, at least in this instance
im currently having to deal with the BS in the UK (not going to get into it) but its the same POOP THROWING Everytime
HA the irony of a pirate making things acessible for prevent piracy, love this
Sit down Talk about it
"No YoUr WrOnG"
Havent got the Time
Havent got the Energy
Havent got the Crayons
I feel for you, hope things over there get back to a point where people can sit around the table and talk
yea.
This is my take, I would like single player games, games that offers you a single player experience, to not be tied with a server that will kill the game when the server went down. That's what the motive of the initiative, that's what I agree with the initiative.
But with the current wording submitted by the movement to the ECI, I would like a more specific wording on that issue at hand, even if how this work in europe is that lawmakers started to look into and work out the specific after it gets through the signature round. I agree with Thor's demand of the initiative needs of specifying about single player game that has no element of multiplayer's lifespan being tied to an online server.
exactly im hoping Louis will bring both parties to the table
as we can see, with the current wording of "videogames", the mess of "what are we fighting for exactly" is completely up in the air for each person to choose
I hope so too.
Consumer and Dev. Louis has been fighting this kind of thing for years with right to repair
his the best for the middle ground
he is
cant have streamers involved because its like pooping on your doorstep
chat. is twitch down?
no
not for me
okay its not just me
but I also get if thor just moves from this
what happened
uffff
could be a local outage
ooooooooooof rip
its nearly always a "local" outage
I'm in a different country and i still watch his stream fine
internet services are distributed to load-servers across the globe
i'm just listening the youtube stream
the servers are local tho
just went and checked, Twitch is working for me
you need to send 1 image a second for the guy to watch
christ.
can you see anyother streams?
no dear not you
this works perfectly
okay thats strange then
yea that's weird
Wait
huh ok
can you send all the good food?
thats not thor?
ehhh might not pass customs tho 😦
thats deffo not thor
:D
that reminds me of what youtube behaves sometimes on my machine
i was like ooooooooooooof
No wait a second
works for me now.
that was real strange though
if i switch to a different video too fast, the comment section will stay on the previous video whereas the title and other stuff would be for the new video
both youtube and twitch live streams have been tempremental for me for years now....
where you based?
also, we actually steer off the active volcano that is SKU. somehow.
UK
north or south? im midlands and im not getting issues
I think you've spelled it wrong like 5 times already lol
that makes no sense maybe provider i know virgin likes to argue with twitch servers
English is hard y'know 
Virgin is super stupid when it comes to traffic :D
on virgin I used to have my internet drop like once a day for 5 minutes nearly exactly around 7PM.
rest of the day was great
you have no idea i have disylex
I MEAN WHY THE FUDGE MAKE A WORD I CANT SPELL
dyslexia
stupid bloodly word
I blame that to 2am brain 
reminds me of... dang what was that word...
hippomonstrosesquippedaliophobia
I should have slept from 11 but here I am
nah your good
you can keep that one
all to yourself
was bullied for years because i misspelt Farm to Fram
sounds like you might have some hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia 
I got merch!
https://www.hoodieguy.shop
Follow these if ya want!
fb: https://www.facebook.com/DanielThrasherOfficial
twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/thrasherplus
insta: https://www.instagram.com/danielthrasher
twitta: https://twitter.com/ThrasherDan
second channel: https://www.youtube.com/@thrasherplus
PREVIOUS VIDEO: this jingle WILL get s...
Why can't we have medical terms that are easy to understand like swiss cheese brain or something.
Oh wow, its actually a real word
its more of a compound of latin than a real word
because they like to F with the people they effect
It's the fear large words, no?
yeah its abt as ironic as calling dyslexia dyslexia, which is... hard to spell 
Ain't that the fear of long words?
correct. its a the fear of long words
lol
thats great
like Scopophobia what the hell kind of word is that
Always wondered what the need for all those complex greek and latin names for medical terms is. Is it a unified vocabulary across "common" languanges? So that say, a french doctor and an english or german doctor could communicate more easily?
👀
It's only to make it easier to look down on us peasants put on tin foil hat
But that's just Scope-o-phobia smushed into a single word.
yes, that, its cross-language terms that are also descriptive
Makes sense I guess. Doesn'T do much for laymen accessibility though.
but why...... cant is be beingwatchedphobia
Google gives me plausible explanations but I'm not sure about its accuracy
once you know what the sub-words mean instead of guessing what "hyperkalemia" is you can just be like. oh. hyper-kalium-emia too much - potassium - pressence in blood
lol, there's one called "nomophobia" It's the fear of not having a working smart phone XD
i thought that was a SDT not gonna lie
Cuz you can say "Fear of being watched" just like we earlier said "Fear of long words". There are common terms, they're just not always readily apparent, unless you already know the meaning of the complex term
Took me years to finally internalize the difference between Hyper and Hypo
I hate hyper and hypo.
they're bad words to use because they're homophones. they need to be changed.

Inter=between/across and intra=inside/internal... right?
kind of like the whole mess with miligram and micrograms. don't abbreviate them because 1 microgram of copper is cool. 1 miligram copper is deadly. (well not really but you get the idea)
can you guys break down Ailurophobia i know its the fear of cats but hows it broken down?
well milli is mg and micro is [can't find how to type the letter for micro]g
I'm not familiar with that one
µgram.
enjoy copy pasting
you can just use the letter u most times. ugram µgram. basically the same
Yeah, my teachers in vocational school said the same thing. Use u for microgram, everyone will know what I mean by that
Because the default range for common usage in capacitors is microfarrad. A capacitor rated 1 farrad is huge (in terms of IT electronics)
some units of measurement is so silly sometimes
like pascals is basically useless its such a tiny measurement
Nibbles, bits, bytes
Nibbles will never not be funny to me
some computers have 6 bit bytes :/
The Ur IT nerds had a sense of humor.
Remember InstallWizards? Before those you had manually install all the files of a program. Then they made a program that did it for you. It was like magic. So they were called InstallWizards.
Was the first bug and actual bug that died on a coil?
Sounds fair
Bruh 
Imagine calling it decat these days, what with cats inside cases
I once had an internship in the IT department of my local powerplant, and the guy who ran the serverroms had some antiques. He took out this roughly footlong on the side cube that inside had like hundreds and hundred of thin copper wires strung in complex matrices.
unfortunately those don't really cause computer problems that much
but you know what does?
🎶 cosmic raaaaaaaaaays 🎶
It was a very old RAM. It was like, 24kb
reminds me of the comparison of the apollo flight computer and a modern smart phone.
the phone turns out is 100 million times faster
A cube I needed two hands to hold was a 24kb ram. At home had a small ram stick that was literal magnitudes more memory in a fraction of the physical size.
Just joined hello everyone on the stream!
o/
we now have 1TB micro SD cards... and like.
I can't even fathom how you get something that small
I'll never forget how nuts that it. Computer tech is one of the fasted advancing things we every made. It fascinates me.
Hello!
and also 20 years ago we were joking about "computer, enhance" and how that was silly and would never happen. and well...
it happened...
We were getting to the point were you couldn't fit more transistors because of molecular bleed over and subatomic forces interfering with the function of the transistors. We're making them SO small, subatomic forces prevent us to make them functionally smaller.
yep. and they're still making it smaller anyway
because if you're smart enough you can work with the charge leak/quantum tunneling and make it a feature
didn't they make a single atom transistor or am I high?
or 60 really but whatever
I remember hearing something about that
A single-atom transistor is a device that can open and close an electrical circuit by the controlled and reversible repositioning of one single atom. The single-atom transistor was invented and first demonstrated in 2002 by Dr. Fangqing Xie in Prof. Thomas Schimmel's Group at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (former University of Karlsruhe)...
WIkipedia really not the best source, but hey
this is just Goblin brain 
Am I the only one that when he raids someone my stream just says it has ended and kicks me out?
I think you have to opt in to a raid
Or at least there used to be a setting you could set so you don't auto join raids
Interesting that the raid system is a part of chat, so when you have chat hidden it doesnt include you in the raid, this is a PC problem btw.
It happens when i watch it on my apple tv. so chat isnt open by default
ahhhh it could be something that isnt supported
thats extremely weird but kind of not surprising
Yea I switched over to using Chatterino a couple days ago and Im discovering all the things about Twitch interface like this. I click the gear icon on Twitch chat and choose Hide Chat and I resize Chatterino to fill that part of the screen. Never raided after install, I just unhid chat for the first time and raid worked fine.
My Twitch experience 😄
all the yellows are first time chatters, its wild how many there are on a daily basis
huh?
the Tabs at the top of the page
Yea their all min width 😛
idk that word
first thing that came up, is that him?
dont think so
heey am in the picture letsgo 
but i remember something about it because yourtube chat sucks
the tagged responded
Chatterino is a Twitch only...
then what chat am i thinking of
🤷♂️
meh never mind is it any good?
by the looks of it. it stores every chat which tbh is a nice
Max is 5000 messages per tab.
I keep it open 24/7 so its always full and its never taking more than 250MB or RAM, which was the primary reason for downloading it. Its really nice if you want to superuser your Twitch chat, you can filter messages into other tabs and you can color messages by any criteria you want, get notifications for any criteria you want, see banned messages...
i mean 5000 is better than current
thats very good
and RAM usage was my primary interest in alt twitch chats, because Twitch front end interface likes to shoot up to 2gb usage when chat is spaming
seems like it give you a slight mod view
you can see deleted messages, and when users are timed out or banned, but not much else (you can log chat to a file tho)
interesting ill have a look into that thanks for the input 🙂
the only reasons non-moderators would want to log that to file is creepy reasons but its possible
i mean its information at the end of the day
build a profile on someone in chat
then boom ads
have to deal with it in my line of work all the time
not the ads part build breaking the building
I feel like this qualifies as a creepy reason
Anyway, here is official site. Can read all about it. https://chatterino.com/
cheers dude 🙂
In context of that citizen initiative Thor talked about entitlement of players. Well in that regard this Readme is even toping that: https://github.com/NilsIrl/dockerc
Anyone ever seen something like this?
I've seen that reddit post in the readme yeah
the guy has a point but also should've been nicer about it
Uh, wouldn't a binary be in the release section if it has a compiled version? I don't see how he has a point, not every project on github has a nice binary for you to install.
This is a fundamental misunderstanding of GH as a developer's website. If you want to use the software that bad, either learn to compile it yourself, ask nicely for someone to do it for you or, failing that... Just wait.
to be clear the guy in the reddit post and the guy who made this repo are seperate people
I understand that.
and yes to some degree the reddit poster has a point, sure github is more of developer social media, but some devs also use it as the sole source of their projects
and sometimes they don't provide binaries directly and expect people to compile it themselves
which is not ideal
to some degree, yes that is really annoying
depends on the audience it's intended for and its use cases, really 
I've wanted to try out zed (that new IDE) but I run windows and it's not windows focused (tho can be compiled for it), and idk how to compile allat
so I haven't tried it
i thought you can't compile Zed for windows yet, huh, is it at that stage already?
at least, I think it was called zed
Concerning the actual project. It's a tool to track down social media via username. It's a CLI tool.
iirc it said it could be compiled for windows in the readme
maybe I am misremembering something
but whether it actually runs on windows is besides the point
and aside from all that, this is a pretty cool project
turning a docker image into a single executable
Concerning Zed IDE... https://github.com/zed-industries/zed/blob/main/docs/src/development/windows.md
Its not THAT difficult looking at the guide. If you were really looking to try it.
Its not native to windows though. Need the use of MSYS2.
people not uploading binaries to their repo can also just be because of limitations with github actions or other build automations
looking at that .md I can kinda see how setting up automation for that would be a pain
TBH, I don't think the reddit op would understand how to use Shelock. Given the tone of the post, I'm pretty sure they were looking for a quick way to snoop on someone through the use of that tool
I'm just being cynical, though.
well I do it when I do not want anyone except devs to compile it. Mainly because I do not want scriptkiddies just running stuff that may hurt when used incorrectly...
WSL2?
I tried this same thing but github actions gave it to them anyway, then people took credit for my work (" I fixed it! " when all they did was download the in-dev version of the mod)
that combined with people misappropriating my work into cheats (rather than equal playing ground mods) made me private a bunch of repos
wsl doesnt do windows (like, a window on your computer) does it
that's why I don't use it. But most of the things where I did such a thing was for scripts and I just put placeholders like <insert xyz from abc output> into it 😄
However some people still kinda stalked me just to ask about how to use it... (Not kidding, they went quite an extra mile when they could just have replied to the reddit post where I talked about it and where they found it...)
It should do it by now. They added an xserver.
it's just so nice to have your mods automatically compile checked (as well as for when you receive PRs)
as well as automatically packaging them for installs
the mods are for the oculus quest and we package some metadata n stuff into a zip file for that
but aren't you offering "a binary" at that point then?
so automatically doing all that makes builds reproducible and less annoying to do
I would hardly describe build artifacts as offering it for mass download
nor a way for people to say " I Fixed it " when all they did was download the artifact
I'm more used to gitlab ci/cd and there id doesn't save stuff you didn't explicitely tell it to. Nor is it necessarily public
yea, I don't understand how that fits either...
Except maybe if they think the lack of a download link is a bug and discovering it is fixing it? But I don't know.
anwyay it was my code to do with as I wanted and I single handedly basically killed the quest modding community for that game
because the people claiming to have "fixed things" didn't actually have the knowledge to "fix things"
oh no they were reuploading it to discord
and also someone turned some stuff into cheats, and that was just the straw that broke the camels back
that person apologized like 4 times to me about it but I'm also slightly petty
I'd just have DMCAd them then tbh...
yeah so what I don't like about DMCAs is that you have to put your real name on em
which I was (and still am) not comfortable with
Not necessarily. You can have hand the rights to DMCA to someone else (e.g. a lawyer) and they then have to put their name down. Sony does the same thing btw...
eh, taking away everything was the choice I went with ¯_(ツ)_/¯
Scorched earth wouldn't be my first choice however I can see the appeal of it :p
it happened over about 3 days to a week or so, it wasn't just "oh you share my stuff and take credit" BAM
yea, I probably still would have (tried to) DMCA first. Just to make their lives miserable...
nowadays the PC version is just filled with cheats so it's not like I regret yeeting all that stuff
However that said most of my stuff is GPL or MIT, so that wouldn't apply to that many things and cases though.
not to mention even if they had the original code (if they searched hard enough they could've found it I bet) they haven't even be able to do the base things that are required to even kick off things in all this time
this is now like 3 years ago
This is the project of mine that I talked about before btw: <removed link>
It is quite small and should be self explanatory to everyone ever so slightly familiar with software development. However until today there have been multiple people that tried to reach out to me over sometimes quite obscure channels asking how to use it...
It's a script to generate config files and a patch for aria2...
if I saw this repo
I'd probably run the ps1 file there
I would say though your readme could be just as simple as giving the instruction to run that file
Then you're already way further than anyone of the people that contacted me because of it. However you'd still have to compile a patched version of aria2. The ps1 only generates the config files and a startup script. It doesn't compile aria2.
That was within the reddit thread though...
As well as why aria2 has to be pathed (they for some reason don't accept these changes upstream...)
To be fair, it would work with the regular aria2 version but performance would be massively impacted...
but revisiting that repo I probly should have put the text from the reddit post into the readme too...
Pinned a comment on the latest vid.
People are getting absurd as hell in there.
Give it a read if you get a chance.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioqSvLqB46Y
Here is an easy breakdown of how I feel about this initiative.
I cannot and will not support a vague and potentially dangerous start to this conversation.
Call out the specific business practices that need to be resolved, not just games in general.
Watch the stream here:
https://piratesoftware.live
Join the community here:
https://discord.gg/...
It's actually kinda crazy how many people are so quick to discount your opinion as a gamedev. Really stupid us vs them mentally I think
really liked your response about the private servers on asmon take i asked some days ago i really thought it was a good response and important and made me realize how it was bad ( sry about the bad eng i'm from brazil
) but some ppl use it as a nice way to solve some of the problem and u didn't talked about it on the video and i tough it was a really good take from u back then.
If you've got a clip of it we can make a short!
i can try to find it but was a week ago when someone asked about the stop killing games, but i will try to find it
Very well said Thor!
Was it a TTS? Try searching in #answered-tts ?
wasn't a TTS i asked in chat
i liked the part that Thor says what if people try to down servers from live service games to run it themselves
Wrote a response for Asmongold on his video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhVsyhjcndw
by @PirateSoftware https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioqSvLqB46Y
► Asmongold's Twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/zackrawrr
► Asmongold's Twitter: https://twitter.com/asmongold
► Asmongold's Sub-Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Asmongold
► Asmongold's 2nd YT Channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/ZackRawrr
Channel Editors: CatDany & Daily Dose of Asmon...
trying to make the clip found the response on 10:17:10 on the vod
He's completely correct about why I feel the way I do but I disagree with him on private servers being allowable for anyone once the studio shuts down.
I think the only thing I would want to debate out is allowing people to run private servers after end of life of the game.
The rest of what you've said I entirely agree with and your take on what I said is correct.
Some questions about that scenario:
Who would be the party that enforces non-monetization of that server?
If it's the government I feel like we're making an insane amount of red tape.
If it's the original company then this doesn't work if they shut down.
Who is going to pay for the hosting if the servers cannot be monetized?
If they cannot be monetized then these servers will also eventually shut down due to cost.
We don't up preserving games like this we just shift their death down the road.
This also leads to a really weird attack potential if people can monetize the servers.
1. You make an awesome game that has a small community.
2. I want to monetize that game and run my own servers.
3. I create a shitload of bots and constant exploits to erode the game and your business.
4. Your business closes and now I can monetize your work without anyone stopping me.
This isn't unlikely as we've seen mass attacks such as with TF2.
We actually see echoes of this in the mobile market already as well.
The only defense right now is DMCA or other takedown measures.
Devs legitimately have very little protections as-is and this would erode that further.
The reason why I am so intent on language is because I have had an entire career dealing with tactics like these in the industry.
I'm very well acquainted with how bad actors abuse studios through cheats, bots, or IP theft to in the pursuit of money.
It's why I'm so cautious on this and why it matters to me how this is approached.
exactly what i was trying to clip 😁
Your responses in both videos are very well said and clear, I don't know why so many people are getting so hateful over this
Happens when you go against the grain in a mob movement.
I do it a lot because I don't care about the standard take lol
Based tbh lol
I'm not a regular at all (I mostly watch your clips on yt lol), but I really can't believe how a community can turn around so fast into being aggressive and even sending death threats, whether or not they agree with what has been said. So sorry for how it must be feeling for you.
idk why twitch don't let me do the clip but i found on the vod i sent before at 10:16:05 u say about what u just wrote on asmon vid and i think it will show atleast some of the viewers why that is a bad idea and it have a nice timing for a shorts
I keep saying on Reddit that the whole Stop Killing Games question ultimately boils down to money. Are consumers will to pay the dev time to make a game single player or the bandwidth cost for hosting a server Battlefield style? I keep getting down voted.
What is really 'interesting' to me is that if the EU pass a law like this then it isnt just the Good games that get saved, but all the trashy ones too, because the law cant discriminate. Yay, for 'E.T. the game' also being forced to be saved.
I keep getting down voted
well there you go. I say, don't even try to have a serious discussion there.
backtracking to the good old days of when games used gamespy
"Stop Killing GameSpy" i might be more on board with that one
I feel like it should work the way patents do, once the time is up the material/code should just become open source. Anyone can host a private server or mod a game to become a purely offline experience. When the final server gets shutdown for say League of Legends (should it ever die someday). Unless the company plans to revamp the code and make League of legends 2.0, the server-side code should just be made open source and allow people to host their own private servers - if the game or code is deemed unworthy to profit from. Similar to how the original Dota was made in Warcraft 3.
I call that "getting Asmongold'd". It's when you make a level-headed argument, or take a level-headed position, that is antithetical to the majority of the opinion at the time, and for not agreeing with the majority opinion you will be attacked on the Internet with name-calling on Twitter about how dumb you are for being wrong, only for you to be proven right in a matter of time.
Examples ranging from:
"Horse armor DLC bad"
"Artist's opinion doesn't matter"
"This game is gonna suck"
Patent time limit is 20 years. Halo 2 was released in 2004 and would now be eligible to be distributed under this plan. The servers were shutdown in 2010. I dont think this idea is going to satisfy anyone.
It's more the general online community.
So in 2010 it was deemed unworthy to profit from, so in 2010 it should have just been open source, that is what I am saying.
People are quick to mob mentality against anyone that goes against the grain, attacking the individual over their actual points, facts and debate- online it's just...that much worse.
doesn't matter who it is (sorry if my message was misunderstood as saying that this community specifically did it), you shouldn't be this aggressive towards anyone, especially with this motive!
Though I personally think the reason the response to Thor was so vitriolic was, frankly, a misunderstanding of Thor himself.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Thor is very specific with how the community should address itself when speaking to QOL changes on Twitch, right? That's because Thor understands a rational speaker can start a conversation. I feel Thor had the same mentality for this initiative as he does when asking for changes on Twitch.
It might be misunderstood as that so good to clear it up, but nah it's just a sad, but obscenely common part of the online world.
I think if it would ever go that direction it would be Disney Race 2.0 to extend the timer into infinity.
the mickey mouse/steamboat willie trademark loophole 
Trust me, the billion year patent is to protect the image that Walt Disney would've wanted.
Slightly unrelated to the current conversation, but each time "private server" is mentioned I basically remember the private servers of Club Penguin 😭
Never played it, but heard terrible things from it.
I agree with your sentiment that the initiative wording needs to be more precise and I understand the reason you want it more precise to set the tone right for the conversation with lawmakers later on if this goes through. The FAQ on thie site does answer all the concern that you pointed out (wheter you agree with all of them or not is a different story), yet what's being put forward to go through the petition stage uses a very umbrella term. I feel like a lot of people only read what's on the SKG website, find the answers in the FAQ satisfied their own concerns about the initiative, then go to the ECI page to sign the petition and don't take a look at the initiative on the ECI site itself. And now when you point out the difference they think you are being defensive and corpo shill or whatever.
I hope more people do their due diligence reading the fine print when it comes to this stuff, and I wish this whole debacle ends with the compromise it desperately needed.
Getting sick and tired of this topic by now. Feel like this will be going on for weeks whit no end till some one in EU will look it up sees how much politics will loose money and say "not going to happen in anyway"
I wouldnt be surprised if game companies did this if the EU law actually passes. Keep 1 server for 5 people and have a queue for everyone. Officially the game isnt dead....
Because they don't picture upcoming MMOs, or other live-service games. They're only thinking of Suicide Squad, Call of Duty Warzone, WoW (retail, not classic) and whatever other modern game you can think of. To them, you defending your game dev friends is actually you defending WB games and those other crappy publishers that whip their studios into the GaaS pipeline.
The internet passes through drama and drama. Unless something surges that causes a relapse, people online, especially in places like twitter etc will hop onto the next 'big thing to push hate upon others on' - the amount of people that genuinely care enough to push forward the initiative and stuff are miniscule compared to those hopping on the train - and they'll hop right off at the next station. Time might be a help, - it'll leave those genuinely invested in the matter, rather than those just joining in to spread things that contribute nothing.
It's also why they're comfortable saying that if they never make a live-service game again, that's a good thing.
People online like to make large statements that they won't really agree with in a months time. It's...eh. It happens. The initiative is a neat thing, and naive parts of me would think that regardless of the vague nature of the initiative, it'll do good, to bring attention to European lawmakers and they'll appropriately consult the people involved- both the consumers and the producers/publishers/developers/etc to find a good outcome. But I dunno the European...law climate or whatnot enough to gauge whether or not that's a good wager to have, though. It might not be.
Agreed
Games with a ToS have an end clause in them. If people dont like the fact that their game has an end clause, then dont agree to the ToS and return the game for a full refund. If the gaming community agrees with that sentiment then the game companies will conform to market pressure. This is highly unlikely to occur though, because the vocal minority is just that.
I think that's why a patent style system would just be a good middle ground to protect the rights of Companies and Game Developers and the rights of the consumer. A lot of companies through either monetisation methods or contracts are trying to reduce the rights and ownerships of consumers. I agree with Thor's take on the EU issue, it is vague and it looks like a can of worms. A very general idea I think would work is; If a company makes game 1.0 and wants to keep the IP (intellectual property) to make game 2.0 that's fine, put a hard cap of 20 years on the first game's IP within which there is plenty of time to make a profit and they have a legal basis to protect their IP from pirates over that time. Should the whole series be scrapped and the company cannot decide when to release the IP, 20 years max from the last patch. Should companies try to skirt this by endless patching as Thor may suggest... well. I will continue this shower thought into the evening 😄
Don't give that much hope for EU lawmakers. They will only look it up and consider doing something whit it if they see potential to get money or politics out of it. There's most likely more people who will loose whit this then gain. Worst that can happen is they will add there own rules and regulation to gaming, development and publishing. Trust me they will find a way to do so if they want it. But that's just my view as I'm not big on EU or there politics.
I think the entire point of SKG is indeed to kill off live service games; while this may sound bad, there hasn't been a satisfying argument as to why killing them of is a bad thing, and in the eyes of common gamers it mostly isn't. And the SKG initiative is not vague on this, they clearly state that they want there to be a way to play games you purchased even after support ends. The idea comes from the notion of allowing players to host their own private servers, adopting the same model as FPS games from the late 90s to late 2000s like Quake, TFC, TF2 and Counter Strike which allowed people to host community servers that are still active today.
I think the issues overall from what I've seen thus far about the drama is that;
There's some dissent on whether the consumer should own the game or have a license for that game. As of current legal precedent...basically everywhere, most games of online nature, live service, etc (if not all?) sell licenses, as to pave way to the makers of the game being able to enforce action against cheaters and whatnot. It's possible that if people did own their games, some other method might be involved to prevent people from being able to just...cheat or whatnot with little recourse on the developers side. Ownership might demean the ability for developers to keep their game communities cheat-free or other matters that I'm not in the know enough to know of.
As Thor has stated or so, not that I claim to really be able to summarize their points eloquently, there's the matter of a lack in clear market 'advertising' - live service games are not required to state outright that you're buying a license, contrary, they word it in such a way that you'd feel it implies that you are buying a product. It's in a grey area between 'am I buying it, am I buying the license?' aka it's unclear to the consumer (when they're purchasing the license/product), which is very bad. - in addition there's no clear statement of when a service like that may end, sometimes there can't be.
I personally feel that I'm in agreement with the idea of end of service clauses, plans, etc, would be of clear benefit to the consumers. The issue is really in how these plans take place. I feel a good first step would be any possible claims of...game lifespan. A minimum of when the game may undergo serious consideration of shut-down or otherwise. But...I can't rationally find a way for most games to figure that out. Live services games are heavily reliant on community- a community that often doesn't exist when you're first starting the game servers up. There's no way to truly gauge lifespan like that.
I think the issue is really what you are told first-most, implied first-most. Live service games should - really, either be sold as games/a product, or sold as licenses to access the game, and clearly marketed and labelled as such to consumers long before they purchase- not after/when they read the TOS (Let's be honest, most people...don't.)
Thor got a few facts wrong on The Crew because it clearly advertises itself as a single player game on its page. To my knowledge, The Crew's content is primarily single player and there isn't anything in it that justifies it being a live service game, especially since it does not advertise itself as such.
I've read some comments that say that dataminers even found a disabled offline mode for The Crew around (I have not verified this, so please understand it's just something I heard, not verified), but honestly The Crew ultimately just serves as an example, nitpicking the example won't...lead to anything. It's just people trying to undermine eachothers arguments rather than face the points of their arguments and debate them. Getting the facts right is always good but it's...- I feel its getting...weaponized? Like, y'know. 'Oh ho, they got these facts wrong, they're bad!' sorta...thing.
So, on the end of service clauses. I think a big reason why game companies don't already do that, is because by informing the consumer that they are purchasing a license of the game, that has a shelf life, they fear that will drive down sales. Because the reality is, a large portion of the gaming audiance DO treat buying games as, well, buying a product. Not purchasing a license. And if laid out up front, I imagine many people would much rather save their money for something else instead of a "license" for some upcoming game.
It's fine for Thor to have gotten the facts wrong but where I feel he's really beginning to be kind of antagonistic is that he considers Ross Scott "not worth talking to" and won't let him elaboraite his points. So Thor is deliberately being wrong and not allowing a chance for him to be corrected. I agree that Thor's viewpoint is unique since he is a veteran gamedev but I think he should strongly consider whether or not he's engaging in a type of protagonist syndrome because of it, because that part is where I don't see eye to eye with him.
That's why it's on the government to enforce it, not the game companies. Game companies aren't going to do something that might be ultimately necessary for consumer benefit, but drive their sales down. It's important to note the potential impact enforcing such things can have but some things like this aren't..- really debatable? People should get a clear picture of what they're spending their money on, as a solid line in the sand, I think.
Things become obsolete. Did you know that if you turned on an iPhone 1 right now that it couldnt connect to the cell network. The phone companies have discontinued the use of the 2G network. Thus, you couldnt actually make a call with an iPhone 1 even if you had one that worked.
But hey, no one is batting an eye over this obsolescence. And an iPhone 1 was a lot more expensive then a video game.
What does that have to do with anything?
Things do become obselete, but that example is way out of wack, I feel. The 2G network was shut down because...there's literally no reason to have it? It's societial infrastructure, not...entertainment. The following G's are just plain better? Iirc 3g is getting shut down here in Australia pretty soon lol.
That is physical obsolesence, that's not the same as manufactured obsolesence or a dev arbitrarily saying "you can't play past this date".
How is me saying "I paid for my iPhone 1 and I still want to use it 20 years later" different from "I paid for my video game 20 years ago and I still want to play it." Both had their infrastructure retired. With both you had time to get your use out of it
Games don't really... always run on infrastructure?
Like my copy of Star Fox that I bought years ago still works.
When I bought the game I bought an indefinite license to play it.
You bought the phone. Access to the phone network is a whole different can of worms. It's - in example terms, someone already 'bought that game', but the servers shut down. You can still play offline, you can still use your phone to all its functions besides the phone network- You can start your own phone network if you want, but good luck getting the permits, I guess?
It's comparing physical infrastructure with impact on the basic function of society to...entertainment. The variables, the needs are totally different.
If you buy a car, you don't own the manufacturing rights to the make of that car, but you still own your car. Its parts may degrade, but that's just natural. The car manufacturer isn't allowed to come up and destroy your car with a pipe bomb because its past its ten year warranty.
Yes, it would cost money to recreate the infrastructure. It is cheaper to do so with video game servers, do you believe consumers are willing to pay for it
Yes they are.
I mean going to the example of late 90s to mid 2000s PC games, they were already using that model. You can find tons of community servers in Team Fortress 2, Counter Strike 1.6 and several other old games that are still active today.
The fact that we can't do this mostly comes from introducing online to console games, which is different from online on PC games since you have to connect to the console manufacturer's server and they don't allow private servers.
Video game servers are not cheap to run. Basic games, basic servers for 'basic' games can be run fairly inexpensive, but if you're talking things like MMOs, running them to the same level- or anywhere near the level of quality a proper server-farm etc can do so is...unrealistic. Most community games running on private servers are super outdated, they're outdated enough in basic terms that it's inexpensive to run the games on those servers.
Bingo. It needs to be in the actual initiative. Not just on an FAQ unrelated to the page.
It's like verbal agreements vs your contract. It's not in the contract. It's irrelevant.
So you would be willing to pay %20 more on every game you will ever now purchase to make sure it is single player? Even the bad games, because that is what this EU law will cause
It is cheaper then building your own phone network
It's not even really about MMO vs other kinds of live service games.
Nearly every mobile game is a live service game.
Something people don't realize is the Google App Store is where player data is stored for these games.
They cannot store and recall player information without that app store in a very large number of cases.
AKA without the store, they die, they are live service.
So when I'm talking about Live Service games that means ANY game that needs infrastructure outside of your personal device.
Which is a massive amount of the industry.
People would get the game without their user data. Most likely.
Beyond that those games cannot function without access to that data store.
AKA you need to rearchitect the game to use a local data store.
The games would have to be redesigned to store player information locally, whi- yeah.
%20 extra cost is being generous
This is where the problem lies.
Having to divert resources in development to fit this needless end of life goal.
When games either won't need this or could use that money for better features elsewhere.
That's why it "kills" live service games.
Because why make a live service game and jump through so many hurdles like this.
No point.
Just make a single player offline game.
No more financial obligation as the game already fits the criteria.
Now we're in an environment that makes social games fall away
GG
But people focus on the FAQ and that this initiative doesn't directly attack live service.
They aren't looking at how games are actually developed lol
Not to mention this elephant in the room
- Are you going to allow monetization of these servers or not?
If we don't allow monetization - Who would be the party that enforces non-monetization of that server?
If it's the government I feel like we're making an insane amount of red tape.
If it's the original company then this doesn't work if they shut down.
If we don't allow monetization - Who is going to pay for the hosting if the servers cannot be monetized?
If they cannot be monetized then these servers will also eventually shut down due to cost.
We don't up preserving games like this we just shift their death down the road.
If we do allow monetization - This leads to a really weird attack potential if people can monetize the servers.
- You make an awesome game that has a small community.
- I want to monetize that game and run my own servers.
- I create a shitload of bots and constant exploits to erode the game and your business.
- Your business closes and now I can monetize your work without anyone stopping me.
This isn't unlikely as we've seen mass attacks such as with TF2.
We actually see echoes of this in the mobile market already as well.
The only defense right now is DMCA or other takedown measures.
Devs legitimately have very little protections as-is and this would erode that further.
Since all of those live service games will need to be playable
And some will need player run servers to be so.
Enjoy tackling the hell that is this hurdle
Sadly I think a lot of people are short-sighted in that they see killing off life service as a win, when many people have grown up in live service game communities. I think people forget what it means, or don't know what it encompasses, like I didn't know that the app store worked like that. People might not equate live service to places like FF14, to roblox, to the biggest MMOs of yesterdecade. They equate the genre term more to battle royales, the 'latest round of failures' etc, the branches that fell off, rather than the whole thriving tree. - let alone the more 'esoteric' examples like mobile apps.
Yep
I don't see this initiative turning into any kind of real legal change because of that section I posted there.
It's just demanding distribution rights while opening avenues of attack.
The biggest gaming market in terms of money per year, is the mobile market by a huge margin
Yep
It's a wild fact yea, but hilariously true. It makes sense when you kind of realize that the investment into gaming on PC, console etc is just a lot higher. You already own a phone for basic life necessity though, anyway.
Honestly, I think this is why the holes that are in existing copyright and trademark laws exist, along with related laws. Jurisdictions are going to vary. The grey zone of abandonware and server emulators for games that have been closed hasn't been successfully tackled in court. At least not that I'm aware. I haven't followed it close enough
Unlike normal grey areas this creates an incentive for abuse where the abuser is protected as they are within their legal right to operate said abandoned games servers.
This is a -serious- flaw
And a dealbreaker for me.
Thor coming back on a Tuesday/Wednesday
The Universe is doing this to me on purpose, I'm sure of it.
Whit all this i see no need or point to bring back or keep such games alive after 10 or 20 years. From my own life i use to play 1 Korean MMO what had 10000 players at it's peak time. It was shut down and was dead for 10+ year till old fans got it back up running after 3 years of building server. They never told how many players where was in the redone game but around 400 people. It never felt the same. So why would games what last 10 years and have maybe 100 to 300 players at end must be preserved and continue forever.
And I will absolutely agree with that fact, and it is a fact. There's been the multiple times corporate espionage has killed companies. Winding down these lines is part of the reason i went into computers, not law.
NCSoft was surprisingly kind to the people that hacked their code to run City of Heroes, since they later gave them the source code. But even though that game is now free and in the hands of the fans, the server cost per month for them is $5000+.
I'm making a game that will have online capabilities, and I think I'll give players the ability to keep it going if/when I have to stop.
But that should always be the choice of the developers.
I'm pretty sure SKG stipulates that if a game is to be sold as a live service it must be clearly advertised as such, which The Crew was not, it was advertised as a discrete single player game you owned once you bought it.
I always understood it to be a racing mmo.
Like that was the entire draw of the game.
It said "single player" on its store pages.
Are they're being allowed to recoup costs from players, though? The Everquest Project 99 group are running at the blessing of the rights holder (Daybreak Games), but aren't being allowed to charge, even collect donations, for costs.
City of Heroes is purely funded by donations now. And since it is, you can see the bill for the servers each month
I'd like more devs to do this, but I don't ever want it to be mandatory.
I think in this digital age people want everything to be indefinite, and not live with the fear that something might disappear eventually, when in reality that is just not possible
Wow, looking at the wiki entry for City of Heroes, the Fan Team didnt actually get a license to host the game until the start of this year. I thought they had gotten it sooner then that. Still the game was release in 2004, and the fans didnt officially get legal control until 20 years later.
Upon release, The Crew received mixed reviews from critics who praised the game's world design but criticized the always-online aspect, which created technical glitches and other issues, the difficult-to-understand user interface, and the presence of microtransactions.
for no other reason than people want to? if you want to play a game you paid for 10/20 years ago you should have the right to. There is no legal stipulation or precedent for not being able to enjoy a game you bought that long ago. If you bought a car 10/20 years ago and it still functions why shouldn't you be allowed to drive it? People still do this with hot rods from the 1940s. It's your car. You don't own the manufacturing rights but you still own YOUR car.
Games don't really have a "statute of limitations" and I don't like the idea that they should.
In the case of online games, you're buying a license to play it, though.
true, online games are the monkey wrench in the gears.
so if i buy piece of cheese for 5 euros i should be able to eat it 20 years later. If not there maker or maybe the cow who's milk was used should be blamed that that it isn't edible anymore ? I payed for the game what was online only and played it 5 years or more. I taken far more out of the game then the 59.99 i payed.
And in the sense of the car analogy, what people are asking for wrt private servers is the right to manufacture and distribute the parts themselves.
I interrupt this discussion with a picture of a sneaky Mocha in a tuna can.
Yes, congratulations, you understand the analogy. Some games age like cheap cheese, sure, but other games are like emergency rations that have a shelf life measured in decades and still are good to eat decades later.
But your right to play those games shouldn't be infringed on. What if I want to play Sonic the Hedgheog 2? I like STH2. Just because some people think it's "old" doesn't mean I won't enjoy it.
Things being old doesn't mean they're bad, just like things being new doesn't mean they're good.
Isn't this discussion about online only games though?
It is.
Old being good is mostly because of how human memory works. Our nostalgia only remembers the good parts, but really for every game that was worth the $50 spend on it, there were 10 games that were not. And SKG wants to save all of them because any EU Law passed cannot discriminate between a good game and a bad game. Games like Babylon's Fall would have to be saved.
I feel like the discussion actually got sidelined a bit, because while Thor brought up live service games (with examples of mixed quality), SKG is talking about all games. There was one particularly egregious thing that happened recently that got memory holed, which was the shutdown of the 3DS nintendo eshop and all the games that were on it, none of which required a constant live connection to play, and many of which that would have become lost media if not for the efforts of people to archive them, like the Completionist.
I do think that what we ended up getting with the Crew didn't need to be an MMO, but there are features woven throughout the entire game that wouldn't work without a server.
That's something that's considerably harder to defend
Why should Nintendo have to maintain the servers indefinitely? They announce these things well in advance so you can download any games you might want to play later.
Japan doesnt have fair use laws. Nintendo sees ownership of their IP as absolute. Much to the dismay of their fans.
They don't have to but there needs to be some kind of method that doesn't result in the erasure/loss of games.
Why?
Why not?
That's a terrible argument lol
Because we don't have a right to own a game that we didn't own before it stopped being sold/supported.
If I want to play that game and have no methods of doing so, what do you think happens?
Until such an answer impacts Nintendo's bottom line, nothing is going to change. They are the market leader in mobile console gaming and until the gaming community votes with their wallet, it is what it is
Piracy. Which is exactly what SKG is asking for - they just want to rebrand it.
How are they "rebranding piracy"?
They want eminent domain of software code by the EU
They want to be able to play previously not free games for free.
The thing is, code is copyrighted.
Wether they want to or not, they are asking devs to give up their IP rights in order to allow for private hosting
I'm pretty sure they just want to play games that they paid for
Well, yes, for now. Not if SKG has their way
And what stops others, who never paid, from doing the same?
or the big one, What stops people from ripping off their old design to make a new game
I don't really think that's on them
isn't that what all art is? next generation ripping off the last, walking the line of plagiarism in many cases, in others creating something sublime?
This. ☝️
If the code is made eminent domain then people, including rival companies, could take the code and build a clone over the top of it. This is a terrible idea.
I haven't really read what they're proposing in the EU but I'm only familiar with SKG's general stated goals before this thing happened.
There is a difference between inspiration and tracing. And if they use the same code, that can be proven to be stolen.
The gray area is too big for a vague argument ppl only thing about their part of the history but don't see that it will influence them...
Overall, the SKG has some valid points about how badly the industry treats the idea of abandonware, but force legislating an answer to this will not work and is doomed to fail.
^ This. I am 100% in support of preserving games if possible, but enforcing it by law is not the answer
its sad to don't be able to play old games that u liked but also if we put a restrain too big on the companies the new games will never be like the old ones we loved
The problem is that big devs cannot be trusted to do it, they will not elect to do something that has a consumer benefit if it threatens their short term profits. So it seems government intervention is the only option.
Plagiarism is a lot more subtle than just tracing. I'm not an expert on the matter, just know of a smattering of cases that were eye-opening for me.
It terms of gaming, it's based on the squint test.
The skg also doesn't seem to have any understanding of outside licensing or digital distribution. The clearly showed they don't understand backend coding for servers either.
I think it's perfectly reasonable to say that the law simply needs to expires after so much time, much like a statue of limitations to bring suit against someone that wronged you, a patent lifetime, lifetime of a copyright, etc. That in itself brings a whole load of complications, but it's our past standards
WRT The Crew, which was the main point for SKG, what they want would require it not be an online game. The leaderboards, the seeing other people around the map, it would all need to not be there. That fundamentally misunderstands what Ubisoft was going for.
And the only "solution" is private servers, which should always be at the discretion of the devs.
You're right. They can't be trusted. The thing to me though is while it is important, I personally support game preservation, I don't know if I support it to a degree where there are laws that potentially affect the game development landscape in a negative light. And the teams that would be the most affected by this law would most likely be smaller studios that would, relative to the rest of their budget, need to financially support this, when they may or may not have the money.
That's another point I don't get seen brought up enough. This law would primarily affect smaller companies more since those are the companies that don't typically have the big budgets to spend on things like supporting this law
That depends on the type of game smaller studios are making. I am a fan of Ross Scott so I did email him about this for clarification and it seems all he wants in the case of my games (as an example) is for me to be able to provide a way to play them after I "finish supporting them", and I suppose I'm okay with that myself, but I didn't consider that other devs might not be. I understand Ross's indignation here but at the same time I think this practice is far too ingrained for us to just tug on it because it might unravel the game industry as we know it.
Devs should be encouraged to provide some way to play games after they're no longer viable for the dev/publisher to support, but it should NEVER be a legal requirement. The unintended consequences of such would be catastrophic for the entire industry, but especially for indie games.
Shout out the guys who make this sort of thing easier, rather than demonising those that can't or won't.
Yeah, the issue is there are so many different circumstances that devs might be in that can affect whether or not they want to support it. Like, not every game is successful. If a studio spent money to make an online game, it flopped, and they are already out of money, they would need to find more somehow to abide by this law.
I'm going to say, no, they won't. It's a bankrupt entity. Maybe the courts can force something, but they aren't going to force more financing, free labor, or violating other trademark, copyright, licensing, or patent laws
My train of thought may also be completely off the tracks, too
One other quick thought on that: At least, I can't think of any examples of this with the exception of when the company was found to be acting in an illegal manner, civally or criminally
I don't know bankruptcy law enough to speak on it, but there is a possibility that those costs could drive companies close to or into bankruptcy. Admittedly low chance that the amount specifically to adapt the program to follow the law would be just enough to put them over the edge, but it isn't 0%
Also, for studios, if they make a multiplayer game that flops (which sometimes even good games flop if they just happen to not get seen), that additional cost to preserve a dead game might disincentivize them to make future multiplayer games, which goes against the preservation of games potentially since games that could have existed won't
An indie team could absolutely be bankrupted by the process. I'd even say it is likely if the game flopped hard enough.
Oh yeah, true, because of the wording, they would HAVE to pay for servers and stuff until the preservation change is done, and on a small team, who knows how long that could take
There's that, but also depending on how deeply ingrained the features are it could cost tens of thousands (or more) to "fix."
The team need to be paid for the preservation work they do, while also paying to keep the servers online in the meantime.
Awr, bantha poodoo. I did all my chores today and still no stream
I beg your pardon? Poodoo was used long before the prequels
It's used in Return of The Jedi by Jabba himself
Ah dangit
No stream tonight.
I had a TTS prepped and everything
Was gonna recommend a quake-style shooter with modular gun crafting :|
Also this is a miracle; thor actually acknowledged the discord streamchat
Ross actually went over the argument of "how would this work on MMO's" by asking someone that ran a server emulator how games like that would work at the end-of-life stage. These were the conceptual solutions. The emulator dev also said that the effort required by the original devs to materialize these options definitely varied by the game's complexity, but ranged from an hour to a few days of work.
I think a lot of people are only watching his most recent videos about the initiative when Scott actually addressed this in a video 5 years ago. Granted, the video was an hour long so even on release a lot of people decided it wasn't worth the effort to watch, but he made a lot of good points in it.
1 week no Stream yarrBluh
dang, i didn’t get the @ and was wondering when stream would start
no stream for 1 week 😦
it’s gonna be a hell of a drought folks
I can't find Thor's response on asmond's video
I keep scrolling and scrolling, even having text find going..
And it just doesn't show up
From what I've been told though, youtube comments are highly susceptible to flag abuse.
So...
If it's gone then there's a decent chance, if this is true, that the hatemob got it taken down
there sure is a hateflood yeesh
The worst thing is that people jump to personal attacks over someone's opinion. OHH NOO SOMEONE HAS DIFFERENT OPINION THAN ME, I MUST INSULT THEM IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE. Like whaaat.
Welcome to the current year. If your not whit me then your against me. No grey just black and white. 
it’s never even that deep either
Yeah people just like to hate
i mean i’m a professional hater but i’m not going to pretend i always have the moral high ground, u kno
lmao same, i can accept when i’m just being a huge crab
@idle iris. Minnimum effort will be implement VPN protection (ban system) and just set a region lock to all countries this garbage go through.
A few days... more like 2 weeks to a month with a couple of devs. Who pays them?
With a hundrets of players this is a slightly bigger fan base than usual. Typically it's way less than 100. Are you and everyone of the players willing to pay 500-1000 bucks each to make the server work?
In this case you also need new licenses for all servers. Who pays these?
If you don't like MMOs, than just don't play them and stick to single player and local co-op games....
Being a crab and hating is so much easier then listening and maybe understanding the other persons point.
f personal growth tbh
i think i can also understand when i’m feeling a strong instant reaction and that it isn’t indicative of truth or reason so i’ll let myself be a hater but then mull it over and come back and be less insane
I never said I hated MMO's. I actually dropped out of college to play EverQuest (something I still regret to this day 24 years later).
That said, there are, as people pointed out earlier here, private servers for EQ that fund themselves, with the blessing of the current IP holders. It's certainly a better option than just killing the games permanently because a dev doesn't want to take the effort to release the server binaries to future players.
At this point, games are the only kind of art that doesn't deteriorate like most other goods but yet can just be destroyed when the creator stops providing a service. This isn't something inevitable, it's artificially happening by design, which is the entire point of Mr. Scott calling games as a service "fraud".
maybe, but this is and should always be a thing between the playerbase and plubisher/ ip holder. Not by law!
Correct. But if the industry won't fix this issue themselves because they don't see any financial reason to do so, then you're kinda stuck forcing their hand with laws and regulations.
Is it? So you support planned obsolescence?
the game is dead... no obsolescence...
Given the example I'm using is a game that's still very much running on paid servers of the IP holders (EQ) and the community servers use vastly different, earlier versions of the game (Lazarus and Project 1999 being examples of such)... just saying "it's dead" isn't really accurate.
That said, there's certainly problems with those smaller populations which is why I don't play EQ on Lazarus anymore. In it's heyday you could always find groups of real-life players to join and go through the gameplay loop of killing mobs, getting loot, completing quests, etc. but with smaller populations the game is now full of people "multiboxing" (running multiple characters through multiple clients on one system and chaining them with AI scripting) so that they can emulate the 4-6 player group experience rather than actually playing with other people, which isn't really fun for me, so when I realized that my options were either playing the game solo and dying a lot (since it was never designed for solo play especially at higher levels) or multiboxing, I just stopped playing.
read that again, slowly, and think about why this servers are maybe crap...
It's still better than the "Let's just kill the game and destroy the product" like that live-service game that literally didn't even last 72 hours.
The reason they left that whole initiative so vague is because they know that implementation is often complex and they wanted to leave that to the companies themselves and the tech industry to do it themselves, not to hamstring them by saying "Do it this way specifically because the law says so"
As I understand it, the way the system already works allows the best solution to exist
We just need to tackle it at a different angle
Let's run the game forever. You will never have the same experience from back when you played it with thousands of other players. Almost no players gives everyone a bad experience, beside a lot of server side issues. But let it run forever and ever. 

