Hey guys.
How about Thor and Scott get together in a stream, to discuss the things?
I see both as people, that are willing to talk about the pros and cons.
My opinion is, that this NEEDS to be handled. That far, Scott is right, but Thor makes some arguments, that are valid.
SOME OF WHICH i could already answer and debunk, because Scott clarified some things in his videos, but this makes things clear, that the text on the Website is not clear enough.
Scott said multiple times, that:
a) He doesn't want the rights to the IP.
b) This would only apply for the time of EoL, so the question of "What if it doesn't run on modern systems, some time down the road?" is completely pointless.
This just takes a snapshot at the games shutdown and also does not apply to games retroactively, that are already dead.
c) AS LONG AS the game is NOT EoL, the DEV/Publisher is allowed to do anything they want with it. This includes the shut-down of 3rd party servers, if they so desire.
d) He fully aknowledged, that the law is not conclusive here...which is one of the main points of his movement. He wants clarity.
e) This clarity then would also give guidelines to devs on what to do, to make this transition as easy, as possible.
This is also to prevent devs from SPECIFICALLY putting in services, that prevent this from ahppening.
People are asking: "Yeah, but what if...what if that...this isn't clear" and that is one of the points he made in one of his video.
He also stated, that IF the law decides against games, then...well shit, we lost, but at least we know then.