Good in-game but mediocre in aim trainers

[final tree]

Hi, I am new to the aim training stuff and I have done a few benchmarks and I am getting very bad scores for my expectations, I have been told that my aim is really good throughout the years through peers in multiple FPS titles but more so in CS and VALORANT. I don't know if this is a coping mechanism or is my brain just not accustomed to the whole aim training scenarios. Also I am not sure about the whole sensitivity changing thing, I play usually around the 70cm range and I am reading that its suggested to use multiple sensitivities to train better.

[severe oasis]

CS and Val are not super aim heavy. They are mostly crosshair placement + micro adjusments.

Aim training tests everything, so just more than that and especially the areas you are weak in.

And yes ussng different senses are recommended given you cannot force 1 sens into every category. 70cm wont work for a whole lot of scenarios.

20-35cm for tracking (often 30-50cm is used for tracking benchmarking), 30-50cm for dynamic and switching and 40-80cm for static

Also, you aren't getting "bad scores". Nothing is good or bad given that your aim training journey is incredibly subjective

[final tree]

So would using 70cm for static and lets say 40 for dyna and tracking work

[severe oasis]

I would use something faster for tracking but yes

[final tree]

Can I still make good progress if I am only able to "train" on weekends 😄

[severe oasis]

Very little. Aim training is something you need to do much more frequently

Yes, you improve still, but very very slowly

[final tree]

Because I haven't got availability through the weekdays so maybe I just pause my journey until summer where I can do it daily perhaps

[severe oasis]

You can still do it if you want do them, but just don't expect any crazy jumps (not that you should expect that anyway, given that aim training is a marathon and not a sprint0

[final tree]

So for each task you go into settings and type in the sensitivity each time?