#What is better - a sensitivity that is slightly faster or slightly slower in certain aspects?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

limpid terrace
#

Hi I got a question in terms of sensitivity. Before anyone says that "I shouldn't overthink it", know that I am aware of that, I just would like to hear other opinions on this.

Figured that my preferred sensitivity-range is somewhere between 25cm/360 up to 45cm/360. 45cm is however too slow for my liking and 25cm can be a bit too fast for my liking unless I play very fast-paced games. I am mainly debating between using either 30cm/360 or 35cm/360 as my "main/sweetspot sensitivity", and the reason is why I am debating it is because they both feel quite different to me, even with just a 5cm/360 difference. The main games I play at the moment are Battlefield, COD and Destiny. Using a G Pro Wireless on the Skypad 3.0.

With 30cm I can do very smooth 360s and have good reactivity/speed for many situations, but it hurts accuracy a bit.

35cm on the other hand helps quite a lot with accuracy and with accurate target switching, and is still decent enough for 360s (although a little extra effort is necessary), but I notice it starts to lack in the tracking-department (mainly during ADS-ing in games). Quite often feel like I am playing "catch up".

So what do you think? Is it better to stick to 35cm due it's accuracy benefits and just learn how to get faster, or should I stick to 30cm and deal with that fact I am less accurate?

Again, I want to re-iterate that I am aware that I shouldn't overthink it too much, but given the fact that both sensitivities have quite a drastic-enough difference for both better and worse, I have a hard time picking between the two.

worldly scaffold
#

Have you considered 33cm/360° or maybe 32cm/360? Even +/- 1 cm/360° can be a big change with distances that “small”.

limpid terrace
worldly scaffold
#

Just try it out and see if you’d like it, you might find your sweet spot in between the two.