#off-topic
1 messages Β· Page 182 of 1
someone's angry they've never gotten laid and still can't
damn bro im sorry
they just don't want you
you know not all anime has underaged girls, right?
HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
ah yes, is this the famous cry of the debatelord
who's debating u
told u to shut up and its not working so i guess ignoring u could work too
the thing you should've done from the start instead of saying stupid shit lmao

Binmagine
Tips to getting laid regularly: watch anime, have m'lady vibe texts in your info.
just get laid bro
I mean, not knowing song lyrics and trying to make fun of someone for their pfp is big small diick energy
can't imagine any of you in this chat get laid very often
Bin

creatively binkrupt
well he is once again right
Living in angola
hard time getting laid properly for me
this has nothing to do with anime being shit tho
anime 
anime 
Ill have you know that I never got laid and I donβt make fun of peopleβs pfp
Is this an anomaly?



cringe fight
lol
BIN

Bin weeb
The OS for skyhold users
Michaelsoft

YOOOOO
@warm forum do you still raid
sadly yes
What are you on, slg/sire?
Bin bugs
rofl
@sterile wharf How do you feel about capitalism?
I feel like most people don't understand how companies work
No system is wholly good or bad, if there were a flawless one, it would probably be in use somewhere
We live in a society
the wise man bowed his head solemnly and spoke: "theres actually zero difference between good & bad things. you imbecile. you fucking moron"
the bin man binned his head solemnly and spoke: "bin actually zero difference between bin & bin things. you bin. you fucking bin"
π
:bin: :bin1:

That's 200million dollar less in my pocket

lmao
Based Archi 
stop smoking donkey shit
that's donkism
bin
Yes. Every time I see a new post on wow subreddit about "muh Blizzard ceo get money from firing people" "blizz bad firing people"
I just roll my eyes
yikes
paying your employees slave wages but "compensating" it with in-game items
just how companies work lol
obviously it exists everywhere and not just blizzard but saying "just how it is" is completely retarded
min wage
If it doesn't require anything like a diploma
THen yeah they're not gonna be paying you a shiton of money for no reason
This is common sense
ofc not
Company can afford massive bonuses for top boss but not swapping in-game item rewards for actual monetary remunerations 3head
definition of bin
just how company works bro they dont have to pay employees looohl
it'll all trickle down soon
They didn't just compensate them with ingame items, they also got severance packages and something else I can't remember
let me know when you can remember
ok lmao
Video game reporter for Bloomberg News, co-host of @tripleclickpod, author of Blood, Sweat, and Pixels and PRESS RESET, out May 11, 2021 (jschreier@gmail.com)
10443
275818
must be fake news
wait wrong link
More on today's Activision Blizzard layoffs:
- Dozens of people at the whole company were impacted, not just in live events
- In addition to 90 days severance and a year of health benefits, laid-off staff received... $200 https://t.co/2AtmAWTUNz gift cards
https://t.co/lkzUO33kXi
773
4340
200$ battlenet gift cards can sure pay the rent poggers
Oh yeah, it was a year of health benefits I forgot
i suppose having healthcare for a year when youre homeless is good
So you don't think any of these people are gonna get another job? lmao
just get a job lol
If you want to live and not be homeless, you're gonna have to get a job
It's that simple
if only i was as smart as you
i bet bobby has a pet, bin animal abuse
see, this is why it's hard to have a serious conversation on the matter, because a lot of people are either
A) Clueless
B) Biased
C) Unwilling to see any other perspective
Oh well i guess all the articles, reports and blizzard employees speaking out is fake news my bad im clueless
I didn't say anything about fake news, nor did I say you were necessarily clueless
anyone with bin in their name is clueless
Cant see how big boss getting paid while normal people are barely able to pay the rent is a different perspective, maybe if youre bobby kotic
Well first off, Activision employees aren't "barely able to pay rent" nor are do they all work in Orange County where the cost of living is exorbitantly high
By the way, I lived there for about 5 years, so I do in fact know exactly what I'm talking about
But let's take your $200 gift card as an example -
Yeah, laid off employees got a $200 gift card
- Tongue in cheek? Sure
- Insensitive? Sure
- Lacking compensation? Nope
They also got (at least) 90 days severance and a full year of health benefits (arguably much more important)
And by the way, the state of CA doesn't require any compensation for laid off employees (individual contractual agreements notwithstanding)
so that was all extra
Does it suck to get laid off? Absofuckinglutely - no argument there
But they were compensated, and fairly generously, all things considered
What about employees that arent laid off but get in game items as "bonuses"?
There's also things like unemployment, etc
none of them get "in game items" as bonuses, they get battle.net bucks as a perk of working there
but that is just a perk, and frankly it's a better perk than they used to get, which was game time cards
Pretty sure stuff like that happened, could look up in google and find plenty examples
I am intimately familiar
I wanna say it was around 2015 or something they stopped giving out game time cards (used to all employees got a 25 year wow sub card for themselves upon joining Blizz, and 2x 1 year cards per year to give out to friends) and switched over to annual bnet bucks, which are objectively more useful
They pay for may useful stuff like food and rent
Now, I'm not going to try to argue that the economic employment standards or industry payscales are necessarily fair, but these people
A) are not broke and starving or unable to pay rent - yes some of the lower payscale people struggle more (QA, etc), but that's the nature of any corporation which employs non-skilled, non-experienced positions
B) Are not being given these "perks" in lieu of their regular pay
You're acting like instead of a paycheck, they're given bnet bucks, which is not only outright wrong, it's laughable
Yes, they're given bnet bucks in addition to getting paid twice a month, just like I get free wowhead premium as a perk, but also still get paid
I could bring up examples but theres no point
You could, but I'm telling you I have first hand experience
Your experience might not be the same as other employees
π
Everyone who works there gets a paycheck my dude
and nobody's paycheck is skimmed in order to give them bnet bucks
first off, that's illegal
second off, it's beyond stupid
Now, can we argue that some people don't necessarily make "enough" money (although what constitutes "enough" is up for interpretation)? Certainly, but that's less of an Activision problem and more of an industry standard problem
Note: that doesn't make it right, but it is the fact of the matter
Sure
Ok, so now that we've agreed that
A) The laid off employees did in fact receive fairly decent compensation packages
B) The current employees do in fact get regular paychecks
We can move onto C) the egregious bonuses given to CEOs like Bobby K
No one is suggesting that current employees don't get paid a salary
Employees at Blizzard, a long-standing game developing giant, are less than happy with their pay. Recently, an internal survey among Blizzard revealed that a lot of their employees are unhappy with their pay and feel unfairly compensated. This survey prompted Blizzard to say that theyβd complete a study to ensure fair pay for their...
no, the implication was that they're compensated through "bonus" bucks, rather than actual money, which is a falsity
The suggestion is that whilst the guy at the top gets $200m stock options and those at the bottom get nothing, there's a moral disconnect
And by nothing, I include in-game items and fake money
That would fall under C, which we were moving onto, thanks
That's not what is being moved onto, that's the entire point from the get go
and fwiw, Bobby K also gets that "fake money", so technically the employees aren't given that 'instead" so much as "also"
Define the fake moeny ol' Bobby gets
stock
no
and assets can be "fake money"
no
Fake 400m
Oh so assets
but not as fake as Bnet balance
holy shit let me talk
You said
And by nothing, I include in-game items and fake money
Bobby K gets that too, all employees do
How many paragraphs have you posted shilling?
So again, the lesser employees aren't given that "instead"
they're given that "as well"
In that case, that detracts from lower employees getting it
I'm not shilling anything, I'm explaining how shit works
If the top boss gets what every other employee gets then it decreases the inherent value for the lower employees
no it doesn't, it just means they get paid less than the CEO, which while we may think that's horrendous, is a pretty standard part of our economic structure
It does when he gets massive monetary remunerations to boot
Now anyway, since we agree that all employees do draw paychecks and their paychecks aren't docked in order to give them bnet balance instead
not to say they're necessarily paid "enough" (however that much may be)
Omg why are people arguing about shit thats none of your business, doesn't affect you and you have no clue how big corps work. Big corps have always and will always "exploit_" employees, especially low rank ones.
Bobby K draws obscene bonuses - fact
Virtually all big corporation CEOs do - fact
Is it egregious? Yup
Is it horrendous? Sure
Is it fair to everyone else? No not really
Effects the videogame i play π
But Activision isn't really doing anything any other company doesn't, that's how our economy is designed - he is paid what the market will bear, therefore (in economic terms) he's paid what he's worth
again, not to say it's fair
Would it be nice if all those bonuses were taken away and funneled back into the employees? Hell yeah, I'd be all for it
He'd still be well off, but everyone else would be a whole lot more well off too
He's paid what others deem he is worth, his actual value is extremely arguable
Sure, but that doesn't change the fact
he's paid what the market deems he is worth
however abstract you want to make it out to be, it's still a fact of the matter
Some of Actiblizz' shareholders have disagreed
And?
And not all investors believe he's worth that
Sure but that doesn't change the fact
So no blanket statement can be made
My point is that if it wasn't Bobby K in the driver's seat, it'd be someone else, and they'd be drawing down the same (relative) bonuses
Because that's how much the company is willing to spend on a "good" CEO
Potentially, doesn't make it acceptable
That's fair, but everyone has a different definition of acceptable
I'm not arguing right or wrong, I'm explaining why it is the way it is
It's no different from athletes drawing down obscene amounts of money for relatively little work throughout the year
or movie stars, or hell porn stars
Sure, it's subjective but we're talking about a $200m stock option extra vs something that is arguably nothing when the person gaining that stock also gains the extras other employees get
So your argument is what? The CEO shouldn't have access to extra bonuses that regular employees don't?
On top of previously delayed bonuses of $20m cash
I'm not arguing anything, besides that Kotick is a disgusting subhuman pos
I agree CEO bonuses and salaries are egregious, but more so the amount than the fact that they get bonuses
I mean ok, but why Kotick?
Why don't you hate athletes and movie stars for the same reason?
Because he's the subject of this conversation
I feel the same way about anyone in his situation or similar
Ok so your issue is more that nobody should be making that much money?
Not so much that Kotick specifically does, yes?
No, not nobody; people should earn what is deserved based on effort and result to a point
And who decides that?
I do believe that billionaires shouldn't exist; there is no need
Gov
Hence minimum wage and tax bands
ok well... I hate to break it to you, but that's exactly the situation we exist in
lmao, I'm just trying to understand your viewpoint
It obviously hasn't happened unless Blizz employees only deserve blizz bucks
Except Blizz employees don't only get blizz bucks
We're talking bonuses
I don't know why you keep going back to that clearly false point
Blizz employees get more bonuses than blizz bucks
We're talking extras--salaries should be negotiable during hiring/employment
they get profit sharing on new releases (games/expacs)
Their salaries are negotiated during hiring
the bonuses are given on top of that (and are not even part of that negotiation process, again I can tell you from experience)
You keep going back to this blizz bucks point like they're being given that in lieu of other compensation, but that's simply not true - they're given it in addition to
Not saying in lieu of anything
bin β Today at 8:32 AM It obviously hasn't happened unless Blizz employees only deserve blizz bucks
I mean, this is semantics, only/in lieu of ain't the same
I literally just told you the other bonuses employees get
they also get profit sharing on new releases (games/expacs)
some of them do get stock options (higher ups mostly, for obvious reasons)
just like pretty much every other giant corp in the country
But I go back to the point you made, Bob gets the same virtual currency/items so I struggle to see how they're extras for lower employees
they're extras to everyone
Except they're not if it's standard for all employees regardless of position, especially when figures like $20m are thrown around
You're conflating these things
I didn't say "all employees all get the same bonuses"
I said "all employees get that bonus"
I mean, I'm not, I'm being pretty consistent
I didn't say you were inconsistent, I said you were conflating
Then I've been conflating the entire time
you have, which is why I've been trying to explain it to you
Let's look at it from another angle
- You and I both work at a restaurant - I'm a cook and you're the owner
As a "bonus", everyone who works there get 5 free meals a week or whatever
except as the owner, you also get an extra bonus of profit sharing based on how well the restaurant does
I mean, that's a bit apples and oranges... free meals have actual real-world value
the fact that you get a bonus I don't doesn't devalue the bonus that I do get
I mean strictly speaking, if you were going to spend money on battlenet, then bnet bucks also save you money
Sure but if it's a choice between food and bnet stuff
only if you're so poor you cant afford food
which they aren't
and again we're operating under the premise that they were probably going to spend it anyway
anyway, the point was that the fact that you get an extra bonus I don't doesn't invalidate the bonus that I do get (we both get)
https://www.gamepressure.com/newsroom/blizzard-frustrated-employees-fight-for-higher-wages/z02176?
In the 2018 conversations, there are even tips on how to survive to the proverbial "first" on the money paid by Blizzard. There is talk about skipping some meals to pay rent, or using free company coffee as a way to prevent hunger. One of the employees mentions that he decided to eat oatmeal for a whole month and avoided lunches with the rest of the team because he could not afford the food sold in the company canteen. Another person admitted that due to the poor financial situation, they had to abandon the plan to enlarge their family for the time being.
you get an extra bonus because you have a higher position which commands increased compensation
Yeah I'm not going to address every random unsubstantiated thing people may have said, everyone there draws a paycheck and nobody is paid so little that they can't afford to live - whether they can adequately manage the money they do get is another matter entirely
Its weird how you started this whole thing about people might be biased while you work/worked for blizzard and make money off their game
I've seen plenty of people paid very good money who handle it irresponsibly to the point where they can't afford to live - that's not their employers fault
and again, am I saying that Activision employees don't get paid "enough"? No, I'd love it if they got paid more and I'm sure they would too
Military is a good example, it doesn't pay particularly well, but provides a lot of perks (such as housing, medical/dental, & meals) to the point where service members generally have very little expenses
a smart one can pocket virtually everything they make... and yet an alarming number still manage to go broke by Monday simply because they have zero financial awareness
very true 
It's rampant in the military, lol
and there's a lot of reasons for it - not all necessarily due to personal failures
to be fair they could get payed more if activision wanted but they would rather cut corners,fire people,hire the same positions for less and keep dumping money on bob
trueee
I mean I'm not disagreeing with that, but that's also virtually every big corporation in the country (or world, really)
i dont see how can you defend anything they do at this point. and just fyi i dont mean you specifically i mean anyone lol
big facts
I'd imagine the extra perks you get in the military (same here in the UK--you get "free" education and the chance to work towards degrees and higher if not just NVQs and GNVQs) is to encourage people to sign up because, let's face it, the military is not a nice thing to be in
you can explain things without defending it
just because other companies do it
the effort to explain things as draconic as this leaves a sour taste tho
I mean yeah the fact that other companies do it kind of does justify it, I'm sorry to say
because that sets an industry standard
that's literally what the term means
good 1
it's shitty, for sure
did they ever mention the positions of the people that " couldnt afford to live with the wages they were given" ?
i mean if they were something like game testers. i can see if they lived in high price areas
Not in the artciles, but it's mostly QA
because yeah, they're unskilled and untrained employees
and they're simply not going to command high salaries
yeah thats what i mean. its cherrypicked scenarios
I mean seriously, people would give their left nut to "play games for a living"
they would literally do it for free if they had the chance
The salaries should be offered at a living wage
and that's exactly why they don't command high salaries
yep but in reality they arent
because if someone says "i'm sorry I wont do this for less than 40k a year", the company says "that's ok, there's a dozen people over there who will"
and again, that doesn't make it right
but it is the fact of the matter
Which loops back to the original point of grossly disgusting extra bonuses for the top and very little, if anything, of substance for the bottom
the only way to stop it would be if every person in the country (or world in this case) collectively refused to work for less than X
to the point where the company couldn't find anyone to do the job for less
bin we all know activision is a scumbag company what he means is that all companies do it. blizzard is just in the radar
(which is more or less the basic premise for work unions and governmental mandated minimum wages)
Standardised minimum wages
but that's a much bigger conversation
One that's not gonna happen over your side of the pond for a long time, now
because it gets into all sorts of other issues, like the cost of living in NYC versus rural Kentucky, as @silent dove brought up
it simply isn't that simple
when a company can literally shut down a whole warehouse to stop unionizing. then we got a bigger problem
I mean yeah, kind of a tangential to this conversation, but I agree
look at amazon last big union attempt
they just fired everyone
hired new people in days
walmart/amazon shrug
but yes, that's definitely a thing, and again why there's no real good solution to this problem
Well, that shows how depressing a situation we're in if it's likely that both Amazon and Wallmart did the same
With seemingly little to no recourse
I mean you're right it is, but it's the way the world works lol
anyway, getting back to the topic at hand
It's all kind of the same topic at this point lol
Capitalism bad, no really it actually is
I agree with you @brittle pike, it is egregious that Bobby K gets millions in bonuses when his employees get, for simplicities sake we'll say "mediocre" compensation
yeah like this is capitalist mecca here. if its gona change. it will change in other countries first. usa will probably resist for the longest
but the piece of the picture that most people miss is that the two things aren't really related
CEO bonuses aren't drawn from salaries
to be fair archimtiros. there is alot of links with the firings and the bonuses. i know its speculation but they literally always happen right besides the other.
No, they're drawn from profits, which could go straight back into the company to improve working conditions, reward staff properly, etc., etc.
salaries and employee compensation is mostly driven by that industry standard that I brought up earlier (with a little wiggle room, sure), but no company is just going to pay everyone 2x because they can (even if they 'should', ethically speaking)
na man
I know it looks that way
but its' really not true (and I was just getting to that point if you give me a sec)
First of all, the layoffs were reported a few days ago
Kotick's most recent bonus went into effect at the start of the month
I think we all know the cycle of hirings and firings is linked to the development and then support thereafter and is an attempt to show consistent growth... the fact that cost cutting will be tied to director bonuses is a link, albeit indirect, to firing staff
it's not though
first of all, Koticks bonus wasn't out of the blue
it was written into his contract five years ago
and hinged on a sustaining stock performance for a period of 90 consecutive days
There'd be clauses written into the contract
In its entirety?
i thought being a construction worker was bad. remember job stability? christ..
TLDR: If incentive kicks in if the company sustains a 90-day stock price which more than doubled the average stock price during Quarter 4 of 2016, when Kotickβs employment agreement went into effect
At the time, the company's average stock price was around $38, requiring a sustained stock price of more than $77 over a three month period in order to trigger the incentive.
You can see that here
And what impacts stock value?
and that didn't happen (those 90 consecutive days) until just this last three months
so if you're telling me that the company engineered the situation just to give him money
why the fuck didn't they do it any time in the last 5 years?
No
I'm saying that the stock value entirely depends on profitability, which is impacted directly by cost of sales
in fact, it almost triggered in 2018
Sure, and it shouldn't be any surprise to anyone that Activision has been extremely profitable
And admin expenses, but I'm getting at empoloyee salaries here
In-game item and currency is zero cost to them
I mean not techincally
presuming that "currency" is spent in lieu of real dollars, it does represent an opportunity cost
That's debatable
no it's not
e.g. if you were going to pay a wow sub, the company is losing revenue by giving you one for free
full stop
It is, in the same way that piracy isn't out and out opportunity cost
if you weren't going to pay a wow sub, but the company gave you one for free, then it's neutral - nothing was gained or lost (arguably you might gain some by other associated purchases, but we're getting into a whole other ball of tangentials)
But anyway, my point was that this recent round of layoffs had zero impact on triggering Kotick's bonus
If you're given something for free, you'll likely use it but if it's at your own expense then you're less likely--given these people work for Blizz it's understandable they're Blizzard product fans so will likely already be playing or start, sure, but it'd be impossible to work out direct cost to the company
I didn't say it wouldn't be hard to work out
It's not just recent, though, is it? If this is a clause from 5 years ago, it'd be any cost cutting and revenue increases from then
but by your own admission, they were likely to spend, and so by the company giving it to them for free, they lost revenue
Sure, but the cost to the company is zero
loss of revenue is a cost
if you're going to call cut salaries profits, then I can call loss of potential revenue a cost
Anyway, it's recent in that the clause was triggered by a sustained 90 day stock performance
e.g. Dec, Jan, Feb
Considering that the layoffs weren't even announced until March
it's impossible for them to have factored into the stock performance months prior
Now, could past layoffs (and hirings, keep in mind they did hire quite a lot of new developers over the last year and a half)? Sure
But Blizz stock hasn't only gone up either, it's ebbed and flowed, the way most stocks do
speaking frankly though, unless it's egregious, layoffs generally don't impact the stock market
like you fire half your company
which ATVI has never even come close to
THe double value is based upon stock price at any point between Oct 16 and Dec 21, the 90 days just refers to the period it has to sustain that value, so previous layoffs between these dates to count
no it's based on the average
but again
it didn't kick in until March 1st, as a result of performance i the three months prior
So it doesn't just apply to the recent redundancies
Yes that's what I said
I also said that past layoffs (and hirings, keep in mind they did hire quite a lot of new developers over the last year and a half), "could" be factored, but they were so long ago that it's impossible to draw a straight line from one to the other
So you can see that making employees redundant is a way of decreasing costs/maximising profits and therefore increasing stock value?
yeah, except like I said, it's not really that black and white
first off, they didn't just lay people off - they also hired a ton of new devs
It's a major contributing factor
not even
Of course it is as the employees aren't hired and fired in the same financial year
I mean some of them are
Some, sure
But second, the last big round of layoffs were in Feb 2019, and I'll go ahead and post this picture of their 5 year performance and see what the stock did during that time
But the majority of the huge amount that gets announced won't be
Won't be hired/fired same year
context
And the graph, stock slowly climbed during 2019
Yeah it did
but where did it start spiking?
And how coincidentally does that line up with the release of Black Ops Cold War, CoD Mobile, WoW: Classic, Shadowlands
Crash Bandicoot, Tony Hawk
how many others do I need to name? lol
Sure, game and expac releases--what will be interesting will be that little drop and the coming value from these redundancies
Theres tony hawk on bnet?
it's not on bnet, but it is Activision
Point is, think that a relatively small number of employees being laid off had a significant impact on stock performance two years later is silly
next to the extreme success they've seen out of their core franchises (mainly CoD)
I mean, if you don't think cutting a large portion of fairly paid salaries won't impact profits then that's for you
large portion is debateable
I think waht we're coming down to is that you think Bobby is fairly remunerated, at least in the sense of deserved bonuses per contractual obligations
I didn't say that
I said I think his bonuses are egregious
and even unfair (to the rest of the world)
and I agreed, nobody needs that amount of money
No but it's what I've inferred from this discussion--you can think that an amount is disgustingly high but also that it's deserving per contract
And that's where I disagree
I mean, it's a legal document, I've shown it to you
Yeah but I disagree with the deserving part
it's in writing, if they didn't give it to him there'd be an epic lawsuit which he would assuredly win
No, you disagree with the existing part
I do think it shouldn't exist, sure, but no I truly think Bob isn't deserving of it
If I sign a letter agreeing to sell you my car for $1, then you deserve my car for $1
whether it's fair to people who have to pay $30k for the same car is irrelevant
you deserve what you were promised
That's not an agreement based on performance of other people
honestly that's irrelevant
It's not
yes it is, it was part of his contract and it was fufilled
hence, he earned it - whether the contract was "fair" to everyone in the world is another matter entirely
Based upon the performance of the company that isn't solely defining of his contribuitions
it is as far as that part of the contract is concerned
And I believe he doesn't deserve it
Doesn't matter what you believe, it's in writing, signed and agreed upon
I don't believe you should have to pay to see a doctor in this country... but you do
I can't just pretend it doesn't exist
I'm not arguing the legality, never have, Bob doesn't deserve $200m stock options on top of deferred Β£20m cash bonuses
I mean, he doesn't deserve the cash bonuses, either
It is
He has done nothing deserving of that amount of money
He does if he fulfilled the contractual obligation
you just don't think they are fair
I also put it to you that he never will, eithr
TBF, you don't really have any understanding of what he does
Sure
most people wouldn't
But you do, ofc
that's not an insult, just a fact of the matter that people who don't engage in that kind of business don't really have any idea of the going ons
so what does a ceo do in a gaming company
I have a slightly better idea, since this kind of research is a big part of my job
does he actually give any kind of guidance to game developers
like to the WoW devs or whatever specifically? no
he is far and away divorced from making WoW or any other game
i legit have no clue what he does. i just imagine him foaming at the mouth while yelling " more lootboxes " to the sky
Yeah, no
xD
By the way, if all of this pisses you off, you should also know that he's on the board of directors for another big company as well π
Maybe you've heard of it, Coca-Cola? Yeah, no profitability there
isnt he like on a shit ton of boards
He's ultimately responsible for the way the company is run and will be answerable to shareholds and board of directors, basically
yes, but that's not really an explanation of his day to day
yeah i get that but how does he affect the gaming developtment
It affects the way the company is run, financial controls, etc., less so about how a product will turn out
besides shit canning teams that dont perform or buy out other companies that get absorbed
but anyway, my whole point was that thinking a relatively small number of employees being laid off had a significant impact on stock performance two years later is silly, next to the extreme success they've seen out of their core franchises (mainly CoD and box releases)
The extreme success will mask the impact of redundancies
e.g. the 2019 layoffs were ~800 people, out of a company that employed ~15,000
and many of them were temps and Destiny expats who had no reason to work there anymore, considering Bungie split
it really feels like hes just riding the gravy train down. like i know there are intricacies that he probably deals with but like. id like to see a list named lol
what makes this man actually be worth 200million bonuses
they also used that freed up money to hire new devs to increase content, which is frankly good for everyone - it's good for the company and the gamers who enjoy their games
what deluge did he avoid that the board keeps him there
no company lays people off to give their CEO bigger bonuses, at least no company that remains profitable long
werent they hiring for far less wages after the firings tho
no
or was that just coincidence
not even
The bonuses are a biproduct of redundancies, which are a cost cutting procedure
no they aren't
idk where you heard that from, but it's not true
first off, they laid off mostly lower tier positions, but hired more devs (which generally command higher salaries)
but my memory still there
people applying and getting offered so and so with pictures of contracts and such
and then comparing to usual standards for their professions
e.g. they laid off a lot of marketing, temp QA, etc that they didn't need anymore with Bungie gone, but hired a lot of actual game devs
again this is all twitter
I mean yeah that stuff happens sometimes, like I know some temp QA people who were let go and then applied back for permanent positions
or moving from like regional marketing to global
but for the most part, they got rid of positions they didn't need anymore, so those positions weren't just refilled
anyways where do we get to the point of being unbiased and working for blizzard
Not sure what you mean
unbiased means you can see both sides of the position, such as how I can agree that yes Bobby K makes way too much damn money, but I can also recognize why the company offered those bonuses, put them in his contract, and then paid him - they didn't just maliciously decide to fire a bunch of people and use that money to get strippers and blow
heh
Because that's the way people try to frame it
"they fired people so they could pay him $200m"
well no, that's an obscenely fucking stupid way to interpret it
im sure they got enough money to get strippers and blow without a corporate handout
I didn't frame it in that way what so ever
I'm the only one who has spoken on that and by wrapping it in quotes suggests it's a quote
imagine them putting that in their tax deducts " thats kandy with a K btw"
see, that's an example of bias - stop tryin to make it about yourself lol
if I wanted to quote you, I'd have actually quoted you, the way I did two or three times already
I mean, I'm not
like this
It should also be pointed out, that while the bonus that Kotick got is obscene, it's not "really" $200m either
No, it's $200m in stock options
they gave him extra stock shares, which are currently valued at $200m
So potentially way in excess of $200m
depending on what the market does, sure
but it would be completely fucking impossible to move them for anywhere near that
Yeah he's definitely making money off it
but the point was that they didn't cut him a check for 200m
or hand him a briefcase full of bills
they didn't take all the salary checks from those laid off employees and sign them over in his name
im all up for discusion but stocks are pretty much cash in hand. its not like cripto. you can just trade it into money in a moments notice. at least in the small sums i deal with
Ofc not, same with the $20m cash bonuses previously, they'll be deferred over however many years
unless the SIF decides to buy a shit ton more ATVI stock, he really can't move it (nor would he want to, since it would probably bankrupt the fucking company, but still)
Does Actiblizz pay dividends?
they buyma
That is absolutely not how stocks work
thats what i said
If you try to sell 200mil in stocks at once the price will fall significantly
well yeah obv someone that get handed 200m worth of stock options wont literally up and sell it all
How much is the net worth of actiblizz
also he already had ~4mil shares (and went up to 6 iirc)
I mean, you'd not sell anyway, they were free
8bil apparently, company defo wouldn't die but they'd take a hit
Bobby fucking bigbol Kotick has enough money, doesn't need a cash injection atm
in 2021 i think 20 bil
yeah they skyrocketed over the last year, but then again they also had several big back to back releases
in fairness, the same thing happened between 2017 and 2019, and then they sunk loooooow until ~ mid 2020
Most successful entertainment companies went up a lot during covid
wrong
Yeah, but I wouldn't chalk it all up to Covid
Sure
how could he buy gold plated yachts without bonuses
I mean absolutely yes, they did better because of it
TRUE
but it's really hard overstate the huge success that the numerous releases they've had this last year
as well as the explosive results in their new CoD initiatives
True, the angle grinders he must go through to keep those horns flush with his greasy, slimy scalp must be pretty expensive, too
in fact, most analysts declared that online entertainment trends were already declining around last August
and declared that gaming had declined back down to pre-covid levels by Nov of last year
and yet ATVI was hitting numerous all time highs throughout Dec and Jan
you can say whatever you want against the company, against Kotick, or anyone else employed there
but you sure as shit can't say they haven't been wildly successful
who argued that
Depending on who you ask, a lot of people might
people who still say WoW is dying (for the 15th year in a row)
ok but in this specific discussion
I mean
why bring it up
you referenced data
doesnt matter
because I was making a point
pointless point
Sure but it's fine for him to ask for a source no?
correct
whats the point of saying that in the discussion
it was simply a turn of phrase; saying "they most certainly have been successful" would have meant literally the same thing
ignoring everything bad but
they make money
ok and?
maybe im missunderstanding ?
You must be
the point was that whatever anyone in particular may think of Activision, Kotick, or anyone else at ATVI, the company has done extremely well, for reasons other than just "because Covid kept us indoors"
Which is ultimately the point of most business - to put out new products (or continue current product support) in order to bring in new customers, retain old customers, and increase profits
im not sure how this matters to what i was saying at the start, maybe you moved on to a different topic while i was away
funny how that happens, we've been in here for like 3 hours
seems like a bit of mental gymnastics justifying what blizzard does because its an industry standard and other companies do it
Not really
Yeah basically
instead of a specific person or organisation
but you arent really
sure we are, I said several times that it was shitty, but that doesn't change the fact of the matter
maybe you missed that while you were away, idk
but you simply can't expect a company to go against the grain in such a way that would see them loose success and profitability for no good reason
yeah it would absolutely be nice if they did, but what's the incentive to, other than.. altruism?
they are increasing profit to feed it all to the boss
but they're not
wrong
at all
They are increasing profits to feed it to shareholders
I'm sorry but that's such an ignorant take, especially after all that's been discussed here
That's just downright ignorant
Giving skilled CEOs stock options is an easy way to incentivise them making the company grow
Although you can argue that in some specific cases the companies long term gains can be damaged by it
But this is something the owners of the company decided
Or at least their representatives
If they're dumb they're only shooting themselves in the foot
And lot of increased profits (whether the result of market success or eliminating redundancy) go back into the company, in order to increase profits further and remain competitive in an active environment
Well yeah it's dividends or reinvestment
And that's a decision that most corporations make annually
successful companies don't throw away its profits in people's bank accounts
I mean yeah, people will make money off of it
I mean usually they throw away some of it
they don't lay people off in order to pay a bigger bonus to their CEO - it may seem that way, but it's not the reality of the situation
lmao
such as in this case, where the layoffs occurred after his bonus was triggered in the first place
Sure, but it's also the reality that that money could have gone to pay the employee's salary
oh absolutely
It's never going to
but at the same time - why are you going to pay people to do a job you don't need?
Yep
That's the real issue people have
A lot of people get up in arms over downsizing, and while I sympathize that it sucks, there's usually a reason for it
Just because a company employed you once doesn't mean you have a job for life
doesn't mean you necessarily deserve one either
I think it extra sucks because unemployment in the US is a big deal
These recent esports layoffs are a prime example - it isn't necessarily the fault of anyone working in that department, but esports simply haven't been profitable
maybe blizzard should move all their offices to 3rd world countries to increase profits even more
sounds good to me π
so why are you going to continue to pay people to do something that isn't making you money?
I know this is a meme, but that doesn't work that way
^

although it does raise an interesting side point
so why dont some group do something about this. like say " people wrongly generalize bobbys bonuses with firing people because they are kinda one after the other. why dont we move these firings to some other date or the bonus to some other date " public relations just dont matter anymore? do they not give a fuck what the public believes ? im sure the general population just ties one with the other and the general consensus even though wrong becomes the answer
Honestly, because people will make the association anyway
Because unionisation is "bad"
they could have announced the layoffs 2 months from now
and people insistent on disliking ATVI would dig this back up
i mean
people are still referencing the 2019 layoffs
apple doesnt make profit from factories in china?
Fuck man this basically ended the whole thread
Yawn
That was basically the start of it, lol
Yeah and everyone kept it going for no reason
then theres the whole firing. are these just giving without warning? or they literally tell you a month in advance that the project youre working on will be ending in a month and youre gona have to most likely find another job
I'm having a slow morning
clothing companies having factories in vietnam and indonesia isnt profitble?
It's friyay
big difference between textiles and tech
I mean you're using a computer that's probably involved in slave labor too
Your phones everything
if we are gona go down that rabbit hole we might as well grow or own clothes and food
although, strictly speaking, while it sucks that local jobs outsource to cheaper labour in other countries
it's also why shit is cheap
well youve described some of the jobs at blizzard to be disposible as textile workers
Free markets and global economies drive down the price of goods
It's like the people wanting jobs back in america as a whole not just USA, when you give them the price tag of non china made stuff they won't buy it
that's not much solace to someone who loses their job when their factory boards up and moves to indonesia
but it's a whole lot of solace to the whole lot more people who can buy clothes, food, electronics, etc for a tenth of the price because of it
But that's again just kind of the reality of the world we live in - most things don't benefit individuals, it's impossible to
decisions are made to benefit the greatest number of people
ehh
just sucks if you're not one of them
we all know the injustices of the world and how the bottom line holds everything together. no point in saying shit like https://gyazo.com/f2c07ed20a102a88fa815a0bbd2eb65c
I mean it is though, it does justify it
it doesn't make it right
but if there's no incentive to go against the grain, why would you?
If you try to get a job as a QA tester at blizz and demand a "fair livable wage" of let's say 45k in Irvine (which is frankly still on the low end)
they're going to say fuck no
mfw made a tongue in cheek comment at Archi and made him waste 3 hours of his time
because there are THOUSANDS of people willing to do it for 25-30k
i think improving the conditions of your employees so they dont have to skip meals isnt really against the grain
sounds like socialism
Again, I can't comment on the unsubstantiated reportings of every random story, but I'm fairly confident in calling bullshit on that one
they easily get paid enough to afford to eat
whether they necessarily manage their money well enough is another story
i dont think its just one story but sure
or whether they have other factors
David
I'm laughing too hard at this
???
I didn't say he was making it up, but there's simply not enough evidence to make an argument about the claim
David fell victim to the lefty site known as Reddit sadge
the world is build on the back of injustice at this point. someone has to clean the floors. someone has to pick up the trash. someone has to farm the rice and whatnot. what we can do is make the work fair and livable. we might raise our prices more but at least well have a clear consciousness. now that might be wishful thinking and beyond the range of our conversation. and it might not even happen in this generation. but how do you even flip over the layer of corpses we built upon without a full on revolutions and end up having to deal with all the maggots under em
but I'm a leftist

idk i guess people saying they cant eat is made up for internet points
I can tell by what I read above no worries
I knew a girl who worked in QA who was on her fourth round in college, had student loans up the ying yang
she got paid plenty to live, but her finances were already in fucking shambles before she got hired
It's like doing crossfit I need to remind ppl
is that the companies fault? should they pay her more in order to make up for her previous failings?
In a perfect world... maybe
but they're not going to
It was pretty widely reported, not sure I'd call it unsubstantiated, https://time.com/5875371/blizzard-wage-disaparities/ there's bloomberg articles, etc
HAHAHAHAHA
There was the other link I gave earlier, too
ty mr well read british man
Should call yourself binforged
this
I didn't say the fact that they were paid a relatively low amount for a high cost of living area was false
I didn't choose this name Archi did
I said the "paid so little they were skipping meals part" was
You're welcome, Mr Nihilist Danish man
It me
There was also one constantly shared on reddit of some QA who went dumpster diving to eat.
Then read the same article for riot games
I've read all of them
Like at this point it's just a smear campaign imo
I reported on most of them
I don't really care?
Hey man 20 years of socialism gives you a black suppository

Should try it
SCANDY ANDY WHAT
kinda goes back to my point about bias
Wat when have I argued for capitalism
people believe what they want to believe
I dunno dude the riot shit is kinda yikers
Yeah I mean not falling into personal bias is hard as f probably zen level human beings can idk
I'm sure someone did skip meals, I don't believe it's because they were paid to little to live
They may have been paid too little to live in whatever financial circumstance they were in, but that's not the companies fault, and nobody forced them to take that job in that high expense area either
It's literally impossible to avoid bias, you just need to be aware you have it
yeah they should just move lol
5head
if theyre hungry why dont they just eat
I knew plenty of people from bumfuck Alabama where the cost of living is zilch who moved to Irvine to work for Blizz and suddenly realized they couldn't afford to waste as much money as they did before
because their rent was so much higher
Libertarianism at its finest
Me after moving away from the city
or, like that person I mentioned earlier, people repaying 3 rounds of student loans all at the same time
I mean, why don't they just try harder at life?
You think people aren't just going to sell their homes and move?
- Benjamino Shabingo 2019
Crazy how irl works
the fucking merman will buy the houses anyways
There used to be a belief in many countries that people should be paid more based on the number of kids they have
since they have more mouths to feed and support
(still exists)
well, yeah the belief does, but it's not really practiced anymore
Pretty sure most EU countries have government support for people with kids
Aaaa right right
im going to live in a cabin in the forest growing my own food and livestock and generate electricity by bike peddaling bye
In Norway you stop getting it after the 2nd or 3rd
Well so does the US actually, which I was getting to
And actually in Germany a company is supposed to prioritise parents with children for holidays
Yes
power the pc while pedaling and playing wow at the same time
The private sector used to pay people more based on the number of kids an employee had
Gonna be fit as fuck now
But then they realised that's less
so they didn't
yeah so if i want food ill just get it lol
well it's that, but it's also unfair compensation
Unfair in what way?
if you work harder than me, but you're single
and I do the bare minimum but have 3 kids
Should the company pay me more for less work?
Like there's absolutely no fucking way you think companies are actually directly compensating people for the value they generate for the company right?
Precisely
I do
I mean perfect world that's what they're designed to
Find a better company 5Head
It's an estimate at best
Depends on the company tbh
or the sector, sure
but yes, still doesn't change the hypothetical
all else being equal, and with demonstrable differences in performance, why should a company pay me more for less work because I have kids?
Now, government welfare programs, that's another story entirely; I'm speaking purely from the private perspective
cant afford to live? just dont
I dunno, maybe they think people with children are less likely to swap jobs
or something
youre not legally obligated to be a live
TRUE
I think the better point is that you should live within your means
and an alarming amount of people don't (by choice, not circumstance)
What do you think is a good regulator of a person's "means"?
Are constantly crying about being broke
just MOVE 
I mean cali is an expensive place to live
But I see their stories every day drinking expensive starbucks
ok so how does a random boy born in a 3rd world country just move and improve his life and get a job
not only is the cost of living high, but so is the lifestyle
and those do factor in
omega
Like that's certainly not helping lmao
lul
like the people in manhattan crying because they dont have their jobs cuz of covid and cant pay their 10k a month appartment and im like ... " oh no poor you better move to bronx then "
You just do it :l
Sauce: I did it
There's a difference in saying you're broke and actively skipping meals to save money
it goes back to the military example I made earlier - most people in the military have virtually all their expenses paid for - housing, clothing, food, health, dental, etc
and yet an alarming number of them are completely broke
I'm not broke but I skip meals to save money anyway AMA
and it isn't because they don't get paid enough, it's because they tend to be young and don't know how to manage their finances
Yeah well you have a chemical inbalance so
OOF
yeah I'm lacking nutrients because I didn't eat
also a lot of predatory business, like car dealerships with insane markups, preying on the ingorant
no offenszx
That's how that works
The loan sharks here in south america oh boy
why dont you just eat lol
Don't you have rly terrible veteran benefits in USA?
They live and breathe poverty stricken areas
It was a joke
Not sure what you mean, but not in the military no - virtually everything is paid for
oh neat
though just because it's paid for
Eat your words, you disgusting pasty boy
doesn't mean people take advantage of it
Eat them
i know people that literally were unable to pay rent last month and they got their stim check last week > posting pictures of new car. im like ....bitch save that for rent or food
Why are you so angry
e.g. they can go to the chow hall and eat for free, but they'd rather go out and pay out of pocket
so fucking dumb..
Ikr fucking hell it happens EVERYWHERE
they can walk to work, but they have money now, so they go buy an expensive car first thing
Then the same dude probably goes to reddit someday and will shill for socialism
they don't have bills to pay, so they frivolously spend their money instead of saving
Probably a strawman again but this is why I don't argue ever lmao
Shilling for socialism
it's extremely common, again mostly because they tend to be young and kind of ignorant - a lot of them it's their first "real" job, first time they've really had money
whatever money i got in my bank is literally " im 5-10 months ahead of rent " lol
Ok but why do you think these people suck at finances?
not " oh look at all the wow tokens i can get "
Me
Shit education system imo
I'm not sure veracity, but I heard once that if you have a thousand dollars in the bank, you're richer than 90% the rest of America, because so many people are so far in debt
Shit education? Just move schools, bro
student credit cards
and sometimes that debt is through not fault of their own (school, etc)
Instead of saying "just get better at finances 4head"
that's not always the case though
just
Pretty sure everyone here agrees to an extent we wasted some varying amount of time at school or college even
the amount of people in college who don't take advantage of grants and programs available to virtually everyone would astound you
That I will go full activist for
yung bin
how to be good at finances step one : dont get a credit card. and if you do opt for like the 250$ max credit
Literally every person's actions are influenced by their socioeconomic status
No
Yes
Wish it was
Give me an example
Influenced maybe, doesn't mean completely dictated though
Oh right right
Except do get a credit card in order to increase your credit rating to be able to afford more credit so you can buy more stuff
I worded it the way I worded it for a reason
nw
I know, which is why I was clarifying for those who didn't understand
Thank you
Tfw no nitro
I like some services are now adjusting cost depending on where you live
Makes my life easier for such things
like my dad grew up poor as shit, and although my family was fairly middle class (certainly not rich, but not dirt poor either), he still maintains those same tendencies



d