#Real talk
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
no
Lol
wdym 🤨
But really, you think that they will change a lot of things like the jump from pre gavel to gavel, or is this just a regular content update
this is smaller than 1.20
Are you sure about that though?
yep i am certain
Proof?
They surely have warrants to call it something as extravagant as '2.0' simply saying that "your a veteran" would not be a form of proof. I'm looking more for leaks, word of people involved in making it, or if there is a beta out that things can be took from.
More ambitious than extravagant
they have no warrant this is 1.21
There should be an arrest warrant out for these fellas.
@vagrant vault am i right
This guy is also a veteran
you
They say "significant improvements" to "core gameplay"
.
this is a lie and 19ks can back me up on this
@next ingot you can back me up on this too
@arctic oar
Ping yourself lmao
Lol
What makes you think it's big, Poor man?
@somber garden What do you think of this?
It depends on what's truly being added or changed, because if they are adding like a new province, that's not huge, but it's big, however if it's something as simple as "freshening up the trade system" or "improvements to backend systems" then that's them saying bs
After reading this through I'll say although I'm mostly indifferent on the topic the update doesn't look all too exciting.
they're improving backend systems
@dense fulcrum you can back me up on this, 2.0 is small.
The only way backend systems is big is if it makes the way players interact significantly different.
@dim pike you can back me up on this, they're making small changes right
By a province ain't huge, I mean that it's not going to be changing to a degree in Wich it makes everything different, ex. Huge to me would be if they completely overhauled the provinces to make them all intertwine.
@past lynx you can back me up on this, the province will not happen and if it does it will be small.
Salted said 10 new classes, he might be memeing
@next ingot you can back me up on this, what he's saying is false right
*probably memeing
@next ingot you can back me up on this, the update will be small right?
huh
ok well depends on your definition of smol
you can back me up on it, right??
@oblique topaz you can back me up on this update being small, right?
i would back you up if you wanted to start trafficking children even
what i care about though
is the item balancing
bc that's gonna be intense
wrong server to be saying this!!
huh
@obtuse dune you can back me up on this, the update will be tiny right
If they overhaul all the weapons/armor that's pretty big since that would kinda screw everything up
But I highly doubt they would do something like that since they did it once already somewhat recently
yessir bro
@grim lava see?
they gonna add one new quest and call it 2.0
@signal tree you can back me up on this, there wont be any overhauls on weapons/armors right
To me, I think that it's still up to what they decide to actually do. Nothing is officially confirmed nor denied so there is a chance this has Merritt to being '2.0' but there is also chance that there is no Merritt in it being '2.0'
It's like Schrodinger's cat. When you don't know something for certain it is all possible outcomes at once, but it will only be one when you discover what it truly is.
@north wind you can back me up on this, there is no merritt to it being '2.0' right?
they said they would change the "core experience"
@soft basalt you can back me up on this, we know for certain it will be the worst outcome right?
but i don't think wynn thinks the core experience has much to do with builds
it's probably about mechanics
it'll be like
1.8 to 1.9 in vanilla
And with the last few updates being small, it could mean that they were using them to prepare for the big update, (or more or less just trying to keep players) BUT that doesn't mean it will be that way, once again, we don't really know if it's horseshit or truth until facts are revealed
@cerulean patio you can back me up on this, it's horseshit and not truth, the facts are already revealed right?
i am fairly confident this update is not nearly as exciting as they make it out to be
@grim lava this is the facts of another veteran.
its probably going to be mostly backend reworks with some flashy stuff
hopefully enough backend reworks to make updates not take over a year
but who knows with wynn
"facts"
Yeah, are you insinuating pontosaurus is not being truthful?
Its still been all opinion thusfar, and by no means am I calling pontosaurus untruthful
@urban cloak you can back me up on this, all of this is fact not opinion right?

@wanton scarab you can back me up on this, the facts are not meant to be in quotations right?
it is not opinion that there has been a backend rework, there has been one that is a fact
huh
whats 2.0
huh
squid is a 2.0 non believer
whats a 2.0
i meant "the next update"
the point is, it's small and you can back me up on this right?
Considering it me discrediting them is wrong, because I'm simply stating that what they have stated is not fact but opinion, giving the context of saying it probably will be infers that it's a future tense statement, something that, while probable, is possibly not the correct senairo.
whatever it may be
small as in it adds little content?
Where are you?
And I'm so sorry
I cannot sleep, I cannot dream tonight
I need somebody and always
This sick, strange darkness
Comes creeping on, so haunting every time
And as I stare, I counted
The webs from all the spiders
Catching things and eating their insides
Like indecision to call you
And hear your voice of treason
Will you come home and stop this pain tonight?
Stop this pain tonight
hi squid
@hidden sable you can back me up on this, it is the correct scenario right?
mic up
hi cal
small as in small
lets make this night last forever
Not that I'm attempting to cause an uproar, I'm simply stating that there are uncertainty a clearly conveyed in the way they worded their sentence. In order for it to be facts, it would be in the form of: "This update will provide mostly backend updates, because (insert your evidence here)" saying "your a veteran player" is not a form of evidence since being a long time player doesn't mean you know everything regarding a particular subject, in this case the update.
@nova pollen you can back me up on this, this guy is wrong and I know what i'm talking about right
Evidence also needs to be concrete. Because saying "This update will only be backend updates because in the past they have talked an update much bigger than what actually came." Would not be truly concrete, as it has the chance that this case is an exception.
Yeah
@spiral sparrow you can back me up on this, this case is not an exception right?
what
However, a true fact would be this:
"This update will mostly be backend updates because Salted, owner of wynncraft stated that this update will not have much frontend work, and mostly will be backend."
This assumes that the evidence provided is in fact true and has happened.
I've brought in about 2 dozen people to disprove you and you still don't believe, how come?
Probable, does not mean Definitely. That is the point I'm trying to make
but we're definite
why would this update just be backend updates
Hypothetically speaking
Even if everyone, discluding people who hypothetically have been to the sun, we're to say that the sun is cold, would that make it definite? If you didn't know the sun is hot, you would say that it's probably true. Not definitely.
This case is not on that extreme, and we don't know the final outcome for certain
@drifting spoke you can back me up on this, this is a bad example right
yeah that is an awful example
the sun is definitely hot
you do not need to visit the sun to know that
yeah but you can tell the sun is hot from all of the light it emits....
.
Correct, but then if everyone told you that was cold, what would you believe?
what......
i cannot personally measure the suns temperature...... i am not an astrophysicist........
if everyone else in this scenario also includes astrophysicists i would believe them ......
i am
i live in mars and go to the sun every week
its hot can confirm
I'll simplify the example. Imagine your flipping a coin. You have about 500 people telling you it will land on heads. Is that definite that it will land in heads?
@near agate you can back me up on this, this isn't simplifying the example this is just getting a new one
i can just flip the coin myself and check if it lands on heads all the time these are some stupid examples
It still won't effect the probability so how does it become 500/501
why the fuck am I here
I do not care enough about this argument why would everyone believing a coin is heads change the coin. the coin does not care about you
I'm trying to explain that a probable circumstance does not mean it's definite
This is a irrelevant point anyways
@next ingot you can back me up on this, this is a terrible explaination right
However point is no matter what, there isn't a definite 100% chance it will happen
anyway everyone used the argumenet that it was possible dream didn't cheat up until he admited he cheated
which was funny
Yes this is a horrible explanation
its possible I am not going to read the entire conversation to figure out what everyone is talking about, and for that matter is a fact
That's not the same as right now, that was a calculation that brought the fact that his run was impossibly lucky, however true, there was still that 1 in whatever billion chance that it wasn't a fake run.
Still not 100%
i will say that humans are inheritly stupid so if everyone told you the sun was cold you would absolutely believe it by the virtue of you having no means to base any form of disagreement on. People believed rats could be formed from rotting wheat and no one disagreed because no one could prove otherwise
Guys stop arguing it's pointless
The update, most likely will not be anything big, however, until it's proven to be just that, it will never be a 100% chance that the update won't be big
@trail pebble you can back me up on this, this is wrong and a bad explaination of definite and statistical probability right
does it matter whether the update is big or not it will bring people back from the dead for awhile reguardless
like me
I will be back from the dead
The arguments you are making sound like you think you are Albert Einstein and everyone else is a simple minded peasant
Yes please
here you go
Nevermind
Not trying to explain probability but if I must because your lack of knowledge in the subject makes it impossible for you to grasp I'll explain it.
@dim kelp you can back me up on this, the update is 100% not big right
the funny
I swear to god this guy thinks he's like megamind
i don't care who is right or wrong but I have been invited so I must sew the seeds of chaos
And to be certain I will probably forget this entire thread given a few days
boxed like a fish
If you want catgirl lari so bad just search wynncraft on r34
Yeah you right
i don't have to
i have the gif saved
Oh god
I like the example of Schrodinger's cat. It's a philosophical and theoretical point of view on how the branching linear timeline could and possibly does work
No
schodinger's cat is what people who want to sound like they understand quantum mechanics
almost exlcusively
its like, the first thing that appears when you google quantum mechanics
I will own up to not knowing quantum mechanics but I will definitely own up to knowing what the different interpretations of Schrodinger's cat is
Ok y'all are trolling I get it now
whhen I have ever not been trolling
👏
What is the troll
I have made it very clear from the start that pinging me in a private thread will only bring chaos
you only have yourself to blame
anyway the nice thing about being irreputable is that I can just say based shit every once and awhile and people can't tell if I'm suddenly going to change my ways and stop being an idiot
only to tear away their expectations
be the disappointment you want to inflict upon the world
Be the rage and anger you want to incite in others
Like sirkiddo often incites rage in me
i'm very good at it
either I will have fun or someone else will have fun, and I don't really care as long as either requirement is being met
real talk
ideally both but i'm not an idealist
See the real real talk, was that wynncraft is coming to smash brothers
lari smash brothers class
she can't damage enemys but she can prolong the match till its always a tie
Lol
You can back me up on this, the new update is definitely small right
based kiddo
Why is there pseudo philosophical shit in this thread
idk man but I was pinged
and if someone pings you in a private thread you can't just let them live it down
Dope thing is you never even mentioned the person who pinged you, you just berated this non credible source spewing guy for no reason
i would have attacked anyone I saw
i was out for blood
I am kill you
i dare you to try i'm from chicago
if it was that easy to kill me I would be dead already
Detroit
we actually passed detroit in crime rate a few years ago
we are working our way towards st louis now
Gotta shoot for them high scores
every american city has half the city literal warzone
Yeah
chicago has a higher murder rate then new york and la americas two biggest cities combined
but its probably only half the city
a cop was shot in down town chicago in front of 500 people, considered one of the safest area's of the city
I mean hey you gotta make the baloney somehow
you think it is that easy to escape the great chicago bean?
wtf bean
the great chicago bean.
huh
the great chicago bean.
it is the source of our power.
you think chicago wants this crime rate? if we do not fight each other the bean grows bored
lol
Where did the bean come from
Rebellion against the bean!
we stopped asking
we just listen
it tells us the secrets
Did the beam make Chicago pizzas
Dang it I was just about to ask that
what the fk
who published that btw
Real talk: how can we overtake the world with alligators?
chicago murder rate is actually 42.9 you can't use the bullshit thing chicago tells the press
chicago heights and other high crime areas got cut out of chicago for being too high in crime when they almost border downtown
while other low crime area's got included in chicago
????????
bruh
OH THE MISSOURI
we literally rigged out crime statictics and we are still one of the most violent cities in the nation
anyway anyone want to get into a knife fight
its been a few weeks so I'm a bit rusty
you only use a glock as a side weapon? my side weapon is an ar-15
their population is an arch
st louis is hilarious the crime rate is decreasing because everyone is leaving
Lol
anyway guys chicago had 800 homicides in 2021
we've only had 185 this year so a bit slow
but it always goes up in the summer
C'mon man do your part!
i've already done like 5 other people are slacking
https://graphics.suntimes.com/homicides/ here is a fun map of this years homicides
Then just motivate them a little
we might not hit a 1000 at this rate
anyway guys i have to go to work y'all have fun with whatever this thread is/was
hopefully I derailed it enough that no one will remember
Nice
real talk
(real)
hey wait
theres a specific group of peo-
🤨
@clever birch
you are always right Drip
^
Yes..
.
.
i see
i see
@coarse valve hello good110
hello the canyons colossal nuts
shoutout to twinkletac for being the first ever asshole i met on wynncraft
@Adr7890 fight me you bit ch
for real...
ibt thieves
I def think theyre cooking up something
IDK if it'll be worth the wait though
it's hard to measure what "changing the core experience" means
like I doubt they're updating every single quest, in which case questing will still be boring
Ok lavaplanet gaming
& if they're still making quests the same way they have even if they did it'd still be shit
fake talk
real talk
why are u so stupid
facts
Hello CHrysitis
I am trying to focus
U ghost ping me @dim pike
I didn't.
you are not that good at sucking anyway.........
Sam
what...
u heard the man
I'm high like a bird, man, but don't got on Lugz
hello gladionus
was big, very big
fake talk