Disclaimer: I'm not disabled nor do I speak for disabled people, what I'm about to say is but my own opinion. Also, I just reached Mistwood, so please don't spoil me.
I know this is like my third post in a row about Fruma's writing but i finally get to sit down and really think about one thing that has been bothering me throughout the story: Zeph's speech quirk. I know that he will speak less later in the story, and I know that it's because the writing team think it'd be nice to have a character with a speech impediment, because I was told that.(#1490815820404625638 message)
But my problem isn't really just the presence of the stutter, it's also how it's not acknowledged in the story at all. It spoils the reading experience, but it somehow doesn't hinder communication for the characters. So get this:
This might be a take that will have me burnt on a stake but imo, if you want to have a character with a major disability, it has to have a story presence + there is a certain balance you have to hit. You are depicting a disability, something that makes your life harder and you have to learn to live with. You can't just make the character act like they don't have it, ts is not the wind; if none of the characters and especially said disabled character doesn't even acknowledge it/are affected by it then what is even the point? You're not representing, you're just asking for diversity brownie points.
On the other hand if the disability somehow spoils the audience's experience, then it does more harm than good for said disability. You can make the argument that "oh but that's how it is in real life" but brother this is fiction we are talking about, if you make people don't like a character because of their disability hindering the audience's experience then you're just doing a bad job.


