#memes
1 messages · Page 123 of 1
💀
you didn't have to share this
Morph stardust
this the typa shit to get caught by a moderator 3 hours after being posted
thats what you hope
🛐
me when I declare that only mongolians can look at my art that I post publically
??
and sue anyone who isn't mongolian that does so
Ai “art” is theft.
I sure hope you aren't gonna look at my art if you aren't mongolian
cause that's theft
begone, troll
fr
find another cave to squat in
not even trolling, I'm just actively losing hope in humanity
bro you are the problem
there's valid reasons to be opposed to the development of this technology
and for some reason, this logically bankrupt one is still there
There is literally no point in debating you, because your mind is made up
that's one way to avoid refuting my point
it's not like you have to
you post a file publically, people and machines alike can analyze it and download it
scrapers aren't like actively hacking your computer or hacking websites to access restricted content, they're literally just taking the stuff people posted in public
glad you changed your mind
Bait used to be believable
wait yall actually believe they're hacking websites?
Nobody mentioned hacking
I did.... you literally responded to that message calling it bait
The statement was true, the conclusion was silly
okay, I don't see how my statement is bait if you agree with it
They are not hacking websites ✅
It's an image that is found publicly, therefore it cannot be stolen ❌
the copyright in question:
what do scrapers do that makes it theft, that humans don't do?
Training ai is absolutely commercial purposes
You taking someone’s art because you like it and want to print it out or use it for a background or avatar is not the same as training an ai only to “replace” real artists jobs
It's using art in a commercially sold product
humans learn by looking at art and analyzing it, and so do the models
A facsimile of human effort claiming to replace it, completely soulless
it's as if you downloaded a piece of art and then learned to make your own art from it (and many others), and the original artist claimed you used their art for commercial purposes without their permission therefore you're a thief
A. You don't sell humans.
B. Ripping off an art style isn't good
C. Copying and then selling that copy isn't good
Traced art is literally one of the biggest sins in the art community
^
Tracing is fine for learning, but to trace and pass it off as your own art is incredibly dishonest
A. thank goodness you don't, on the human side you hire artists instead, with a computer program you don't have to hire it, you just make it and use it
B. yeah, but it's not theft
C. models aren't copying art, they are generating based on their current parameters
I used something as reference == I used something to directly profit from it and replicate it
A. Which requires stolen art, or a stolen conscious as you argue
B. It literally is
C. With the intent to copy the art and it's style
Expanded B - In the case that it isn't "I like this style of shading, I'm gonna use it", it's literally "I'm going to copy this exact method of execution"
ai doesnt learn to draw art it learns how to make pictures that look like art other people made
Reminder: We're not talking about an artist wanting to improve or doing something different. We're talking about a commercial product
So it learns to draw basically lmao
also imo ai art looks ugly and uncanny
always
Yeah, it's superficially good
Ethical debates about ai art are funny
ai music is even worse tho
Always messes to details
That's why it's in #memes :]
America will fall in 30 days
A. you're trying to prove it's theft to me right now, you can't just assume it's theft to prove it is
B. no... there's a lot of artists who do that, it's often coming from a place of respect (e.g. fanart in the style of the original game)
C. as mentioned above, reading this one kind of broke me. We could copy art since forever ago, in fact you still can, copying data has been around as long as computers have been, you don't train a massive model just to do what could've always been done. They're learning with the intent of being able to generate images that some people would like to see, it's really that simple
expanded C: the whole POINT is to make it possible to generate content that has not been made before
i dont think im going to the cinema again for a while
in fact, if a model produces results too close to training data regularly, this is seen as a major development issue
petah, the horse is here
Maybe in a year or two ai will be able to generate Fruma
i wish there was ai that did the dishes for me
There are probably "human assisted" robots that could
A. Was permission given for a piece to be used in another commercial work? No?
B. As mentioned, it isn't "I want to try this style", it's "I'm replicating this exact process for profit and completely without the artist's permission or knowledge.
C. There's a difference between little Timmy using an image he found on Google for his 4th grade book report and taking an artist's body or work without permission or compensation and using it to replace their style
"You know what the biggest problem with pushing all things AI is? Wrong direction. I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes."
love that quote
In fact, this is my point.
me too
surely it can't be your point. You would be arguing for AI to get better as fast as possible then
again, overfitting is literally an issue
Yeah. Cuz it's stealing
it goes against the whole point of AI and engineers work day and night to overcome it
Hey guys, look at my new car!
It looks like my neighbor's brand new car, it runs like it, I don't own any paperwork saying it's mine, but it's okay, because I found it on a public street
Therefore it's mine
Actually, their car is rendered moot, as they have a taxi business
And now I'm using that car for mine
And getting tax cuts from it
Don't forget, this is alllll a commercial product
I want to specifically focus on A, cause I see this all the time and it's an insane double standard. A properly trained model will use existing images for training. All it does is "look" at the image, and adjust parameters in its neurons based on it. Kinda like an aspiring artist looks at an image and adjusts their neurons based on it...
have you heard of a neural network
Copying is a sin in artist community
"In its neurons" 🥀
it's not a literal neuron, it's a data structure called a neuron
that's just pedantry cmon
there's a reason that AI architecture is based on how a brain works
That's why it's one sentence and not the many, many, like those before
I don't think this is your argument, because I don't think you're opposed to AI only when it very closely copies training data
depends on the algorithm but modern ones are trained to make a function that converts noise into images and it gets judged by how close it is to making the training images
yes, diffusion models
The entire point is that I argued it as stealing from artists
So yes, yes it is
those ai search results suck
so you're fine with AI image generation when its results do not closely resemble training data?\
ye they do
i think the point is they should no be allowed to use copyrighted materials for training at all
No, I'm fine with it when it doesn't steal an artist's work without their permission or compensation
why are humans allowed to do so, then?
can you look at your neighbor's car to learn how to make your own car?
Not if it's the same car
Or used a patented system
Which AI doesn't do, and struggles to do anything different. Like you yourself said
can you look at a copyrighted image to learn how to draw better?
so, again, so long as the AI doesn't make images that closely resemble training data, you're fine with it
No, I'm fine with it when it doesn't steal an artist's work without their permission or compensation
you literally just said that an artist can look at a copyrighted image to learn how to draw so long as he doesn't trace over it
My favorite part of talking to @fading zealot is when they put words in my mouth
No? A person still needs taught skills to make a car, but lets actually get this straight, you're defending AI stealing art?
-# I was expecting slightly funny memes, not a bunch of smell tbh
The strawmanner
I really like having my points misconstrued and twisted in bad faith for the sake of their argument
Yeah, which AI doesn't do
I'm arguing that AI image generation software cannot logically be considered theft if you do not consider human artists thieves when they learn by analyzing others' art
It makes for healthy discussion and definitely avoids hostility
It literally used the data from it. You can't trace more than that
AIs look at copyrighted images to learn how to draw
it uses the data for training
AKA modification of its own parameters to get better at generating
kinda like you look at art to better learn how to draw
It IS literally even more expropriation of artists
why are you arguing for this
again again again, if AI models actually copied training data they would be hundreds of terabytes instead of a couple gigabytes
it does not copy
it processes images to modify its parameters
it copies and compresses it into a neural network
oh my god
please
I really really don't wanna say you have no idea what you're talking about but, you have no idea what you're talking about
legitimately it's straight up not how it works period
the neural network is effectively just a compressed representation of the paths taken to get from random noise to a given image, there's no spice of originality anywhere.
like, genuinely, what do you, you specifically, have to gain from this technology and defending it
it's a weird way of phrasing how it works, but that is an objective sense what it's doing.
there's no compression in the entire process, and there's no copying of the data
if you want me to explain how backpropagation works, I can do it
do it!
for one, real artists don't need to see every image ever created in order to make a mid replica
like hell there isn't
I was talking about compression in an abstract sense, but there is regular bloody compression involved to
Even if it was not literally infringing on IP, the results are disastrous to artists
bad argument, cars were disastrous to horses.
they really weren't, horses were not benefiting lmao
artists aren't benefitting either
Horses are not artists. Also what?
one of the major issues people were eager to get rid of with the car was the frequency of horses literally dying in the streets, the art industry is not worried about artists keeling over their desks
horses also weren't getting paid wages
artists are
^ Thank you
Better example: People used to write every copy of every book by hand, just because a new technology is bad for the people its trying to replace doesn't make it inherently bad. AI is shit in a billion other ways, but this is a bad argument against it.
tl;dr, and very simplified:
- neural networks start with neurons organised into layers, with some values
- you feed the NN data, and a label.
- NN leaves the label for later, and processes the data (attempts to generate something based on it)
- NN compares its generation to the label: sees how different it is and calculates an error value
- The error values is propagated backwards through the layers of the neurons, modifying the model's parameters to next time generate something closer resembling the original image. This is controlled with hyperparameters such as learning speed to make sure every bit of training data influences the model's methodology very slightly (basically to prevent copying of the training data)
- Repeat for a gazillion bits of training data
On an example:
- let's say you have a binary classification model that you want to train to tell apart pictures of cats and dogs.
- you feed it a picture of a cat with a label 0 (for cat, 1 for dog)
- the model takes the picture and processes it through its entire structure, it's left with a floating point value e.g. 0.632
- the model looks at the label (0) and compares it to the result (0.632). It calculates the error value.
- then it propagates it backwards through the model, modifying every parameter to be able to slighlty better call that image a cat. And since cats have traits in common, doing that slight modification makes it also slightly better at telling apart other cat pictures.
- Repeat a gazillion times and you now have a model that can tell apart cats and dogs
I gave the example of a classification model because it's much easier to understand than generative types, those have obnoxiously complicated architectures but fundamentally work on a similar level
end result, the data on what an image contains is translated from a marker on the image to a neural network that can infer that data automatically with decent accuracy, therby compressing it
also, shit explanation, go watch 3Blue1Brown explain it or something buddy, because you know infinitely less about this than you claim
What happened to my memes?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/807809192537882647/1265360606526050458/image0.gif
Pretty sure this is a good argument against it, considering the system we live under right now. Those are tangible people that are affected by this? Like, that is actually doing harm.
I've actually built and worked with AI models before, I stopped when I realized it was negatively affecting my ability to program, but I understand how they work and have created multiple fundamentally different types of neural networks before.
backpropagation is basically the idea of taking the error value calculated at the end and pushing it backwards through the model, changing the parameters. It calculates the change based on the model's previous values (basically the reverse of how the image was processed forwards) and... math
Folks came together to create a delicious banquet for the troll
troll is when I disagree with you
True! I was expecting something else, not this mess.
This happens every once in a while
expect massive meme dumps from Wet Entity on the horizon, though
troll is when you pretend you understand how AI works and could possibly comprehend if it's infringing on intellectual property, cya.
I don't claim to be an expert on this topic, I assumed you meant compression as in "the model is taking the dataset and compressing it, it still has all the training data inside it but it's smaller in size now"
believe me I've heard equally stupid takes
I'm saying it's a jpeg on crack and nothing more
I wonder why it can generate things that weren't in its training dataset if it's literally a compression algorithm
what AI "artists" create with it is just exploiting the articats
over-abstraction
it finds* patterns in artist's work and abstracts that into a dimension of the neural network
basically yeah
kinda like a human artist notices certain patterns and adopts them into their style
humans are just infinitely smarter
how in the world have people gotten to ai
linear algebra
Are you paying wages to the artists then?
wdym
damn no need to write an essay I just wanted you to clarify your question
If you may direct your attention to the graph
#memes message
Not really different from asking someone to explain their thought process, is it
?
It's pretty arrogant to assume that their thought process is automatically less complex than what you had to explain
I mean
admittedly the "wdym" is kinda vague
but I just meant I didn't understand the question, please clarify or reformulate
doesn't exactly compare to "please explain this complicated process to me"
but fair enough I did get impatient
my bad
there is a difference between labouring and creating art and just relying on ai, and like, i'm for automation, but ai companies are negatively affecting artists and infringe on their ips
it's automation for the sake of automating rather than for benefitting humanity
i'm fairly tired tho i might be making a flawed point
id argue theres a difference between ai companies and people who just use ai art now and then altho im not sure how relevant that is
ive seen like writers use ai art so the audience has something nice to look at now and then for instance which is cool
or people use ai art for ocs so their like idk lore or whatever i dont make ocs is more fleshed out
I think it is flawed, yes - I haven't used AI image generation to generate anything besides memes and/or absurd images for a situational joke, but I can assure you that these images would never come to be if not for AI
in other words, I would not be able to get an image like this done by a human artist in a timely manner
nor would I want to pay $25 for a little joke, I'm not exactly wealthy
I would like to separate entirely the topic of whether AI itself is ethical, and the topic of whether certain people are using it unethically
oh of course ai in and of itself isnt unethical
me when I learn what a pencil is and that memes looking DIY just improves them:
I meant specifically the distinction between training an image model on all publically available content vs. people using it to generate content extremely similar to existing content and claiming the image is theirs
to your second point, that very much depends on the meme and/or joke
to your first point, that's kinda inconsiderate?
like you don't know who you're talking to - I could have a hand tremble, or painfully little time, or a myriad of other circumstances that makes it not worth it to try and become an artist
besides - would you make the same argument for any other profession?
if you had to fell a tree, but only had a type of chainsaw that infringed on a patent, would you seriously just try and learn how to become an amateur lumberjack to safely fell it with an axe?
do you need to fell a tree (i mean make an ai image)
.
I don't NEED to have an image, but then again most people don't need images, and yet they commission art (which is great don't get me wrong)
You're talking to someone who lives in constant physical agony and has hand tremors. :)
well, I'm sorry to hear that
i find the metaphor puzzling because like, needing to get wood or remove a tree is just not the same as generating bloody images
but that means you should certainly understand why you can't universalize the argument of "just pick up a pencil and draw"
I love it man, it just makes the challenge of drawing more interesting.
well, good to hear your tremor is not as bad as it could be
bro
point being, you can't argue that I'm hurting an artist if the crap I generate from time to time has to be made under conditions that cannot be filled by a human
they cannot?
as I said, I really only use AI image gen for the sake of a timely joke between me and my friends
if you can't make me a full-blown image, with color, of some absurd crap that my deranged friends laugh at, in up to 40 seconds, then you're not making the cut
and as I mentioned I'm not some millionaire to commission entire art pieces and pay 25 bucks for them for the sake of one little joke to be forgotten about 15 minutes later
and no, i can still argue that artists are still hurt by the innovation and that maybe the system needs to change
-# which is the point i was trying to make
-# edit: hi im tweaking and was pondering and edited stuff to correct a grammatical error
what I'm essentially saying is that there's a niche
the system certainly needs to change... by which I mean IP
I've seen it said a couple times here and I haven't addressed it yet
people were talking about infringing on IP as if IP law is like at all salvageable
only when its like used to hurt them
credit is absolutely super important, but I can't imagine someone honestly defending the current IP law who's not like a megacorporation that gains billions yearly on patent abuse or other crap like that
damn the ai arguement still going?
intellectual property is just yet another private property relation, and i know the various inovations are unraveling the whole property relation system and leading towards a better tommorow, but i'd still protest ai as long as it's doing more harm to people than any meaningful good
maybe ai art lmao
ai in general? no way lmao
and yeah, I won't argue that artists aren't hurt by the development of the technology - they certainly are
but equally
knocker-uppers have been replaced by alarm clocks
the number of employed lumberjacks drastically decreased when chainsaws were introduced to the industry
the whole point of technology is to make it so humans have to do less work to achieve a desired result
You're describing people that do manual labor, art isn't really comparable to that
why not?
Art is human expression, its value isn't a static thing
humans can still express themselves
value in general isn't static
would i be banned for saying the solution is communism
i hope not
I think these aren't good arguments, as you're neglecting to still consider the broader reality (capitalism)
its not like artists would go away
- if artists go poof where is ai gonna get artwork to steal? checkmate openai
I don't know if I want to get into this discussion
ai inbreeding 🔥
not worth it
yeah I don't think so either
sponsored by austria-hungary
We won, Reddit 🥹
or rather, I don't think it would be a productive discussion given what was said at the start
-# marx analysed something like this will always keep happening under capitalism
should I say it
not sure what's coming but now you have me curious
Art isn't something that people should have to do less work to achieve a desired result
Like akimbo said, it's human expression
It comes from people putting in the time and effort to create something
If a computer generates the image for you, there is no time and effort
art isnt entirely about the time and effort tho- the end result matters too
if it looks good is most important imo for instance
?
And the more time and effort people put into it, the better it is
disagree
The more people learn and test the better the result is
you cant see the time and effort put in very easily
if art is important because it lets you express yourself, AI isn't stopping you from making art
if art is important because it's pretty, AI increases the availability of the end product
^
unless one is an artist
art shouldn't be commodified i think
Your points contradict each other
no they dont lmao what
nah, they just provide two answers for two viewpoints
that's what the word if is for
Ai not stopping you from making art is true, but you said if art is important because it's pretty ai increases rhe availability
im not thinking about it as a commodity, more as something nice to look at
If ai makes it more available
(art)
marx said the 1860s was late stage capitalism bro
because then you dont get the satisfaction of making it?
There's no need to learn it
if its about satisfaction there isnt wrong with "oh someone added photos to their book" or whatever
okay I'll say what I wanted to say back then - Marx also theorized that derivatives in math are not real
I don't consider that man to be a particular authority on anything
the desire to learn art still exists as the natural human desire for self-expression still exists
I think people nowadays are already proving it wrong
The one positive side of the AI panic that I wholeheartedly endorse
is the push for human art
It drastically goes down though, it's a trend between convenience
Which is why I don't understand people saying ai is good
the desire for self expression is unchanged
i think the fact that there is any fear that ai could ruin art is proof that our art is soulless and can be replaced
i think ai art has a role but i think the onus is on us to make better art that uplifts humanity instead of being on the same tier as never goon buff minion
well, it decreases the population of artists who produce so they can be popular, clearing the way for artists who produce because they enjoy it
Voiceover meme. artist humanity perfectionism i dont know i dont wanna write a funny description today heres the song - Dry Hands Played On An Old, Out of Tune Piano https://youtu.be/gtW2ObSz3p4?si=Hj3Hw1HsD1pACJJU
curious where you found that
tangentally related
Note on Mathematics
It's soulless because it can be reproduced by a computer
our art is soulless because it is soulless
that's... harsher than I would put it.
there's also another upside
AI is not capable of doing qualitative analysis
i think calling art soulless is kinda silly and just personification to try and make an argument
this is worth millions
this is soulless
this gives me nothing
i do not feel anything
We alr3ady had a discussion on "modern" art
i am not impressed
the value of art is what one derives from it
You can't liken money laundering to actual human art
Most logical people understand it's shit
i agree
We can ignore modern art
the point is that we are left with only amateur artists and soulless artists
im not sure the point you're making tbh
not art related but
tbf people say "art made by an amateur is better than anything made by an ai" which is really silly
My hate letter to modern cinema.
Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer: https://bit.ly/SolarSands2
Futo Contest: https://contest.futo.org/contests/artistinresidence
The Kino Corner Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@UCcGlif61mMV6soFSiN2QHoQ
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=3356654
Se...
movies
like this i made for #your_work is NOT better than ai lmao
Even an amateur could produce something better then most modern art
cap on Gobb
I'm sorry but there's a middle ground between "amateur artists" and people who launder money
false dichotomy 👍
we dont produce any michaelangelos is my point
yeah, humans make cool stuff still
and probably will never be (or at least not for a super long time, we'd need to philosophically understand what beauty is objectively)
the result of this is essentially that AI is doomed to be forever mediocre, ergo, good artists will not be replaced
I'd shake on it
i feel the ai discussion is just forever tainted by the fact that we do not produce any more truly uplifting art at the highest level
I'm very glad that in the wake of AI image generation people still support human artists - for being humans, and for making things on their own that inspire them
This sounds like an opinion piece
^
I could collect thousands of people that disagree with you
Jtrillo should be placed into a barrel of wet concrete
JTrillo should be revered to high heavens
i do not value the artwork in museums nowadays and i do not value modern AAA movies or games
they are worthless in my eyes
they could be replaced by ai and i wouldnt notice
Ai games are being made
https://youtu.be/MNlOD-HvRLs?si=9MzpUbYcZBhJm3yt shit like this is what really gets me to believe in the raw humanity of art again
Norman Rockwell’s War Stories (1945) captures the bittersweet return of a Marine who has come home from World War II, now surrounded by friends and family in a familiar workshop setting. Holding an Imperial Japanese flag, he sits in his uniform as the center of attention, yet his expression suggests unease rather than pride. The men around him...
the average amateur artist can make great art that has actual soul
Ai is being used for voice acting, writing etc
AI minecraft was a fucking banger ngl
my pfp is commissioned
Don't worry m1 ai will make your games in the future
because people disagree ig
the point of this art is to highlight the water pollution issues, since it was in Chicago it was focused on the midwest particullarly, the soul in this is the problem it is highlighting. please dont use it as an example of soulless art
It's shit
Walk into any hoarders house and you'll see the same thing you see in that photo
correct, and it was in our water
all of this was sourced from the water directly
I don't care what the message is its not art
Don't need some thing to tell me that, I can just look outside
Interesting argument actually
idrk if I have a concrete view on that
if i have to be explained why i should like art
then i dont like it
Cause yeah, it's important to highlight problems in society and whatnot
that's gonna be interesting, because from what I've seen most consistent definitions are not exactly ones that most laymen like
better used as a form of protest than an art piece for a museum
yeah i originally disliked that image but i can understand that there is meaning behind it now. i might not appreciate it but surely its important to others
but is doing that through the lens of physical media art?
that I do agree with
im not saying you should like it, im saying it has a purpose, the person who made it put their beliefs into it. its not just there to make money or make them famous. you aren't meant to like everything, some things are meant to be upsetting or make you think
whatever bro. i could replace it with an ai generated image of a polluted river with a plaque reading "this is modeled after chicagos river in 1950"
the thing that is gained or lost is the explanation
it was at an exhibition in Chicago that lasted 4 days, it may have gone somewhere else after but it wasn't originally made for the museum
art ought to stand on its own because we derived something from art that is impressive
you go to an old vatican church and you feel something
sometimes you need context to derive meaning
we're getting there!
I don't
makes me feel like I'm wasting my time
different stuff makes different people feel different things
the difference is one is modeled after, the other is made up of stuff found IN the river. as in "if i didnt get this out it would still be polluting the water you are drinking" (at least for the chicago citizens who saw it)
^
you see the walls and you arent at all impressed?
Art is in part about the effort we put in to making something objectively useless, and taking that effort out of it strips art of one of its fundamental pillars.
I disagree actually
If people need an art exhibit made up of garbage to get their brain thinking rather then the eyes they use everyday while going out there's a problem
we're doing the definition of art debate!
I personally don't care what went into the art, I don't care about the journey, I care about the destination
effort imo is just not a huge deal
true ngl
^
i can find blank canvases at the store lol
just put a plaque on display call it a day
I can recognize that it takes a lot of skill and it's impressive, but in an age where everyone is constantly one upping everyone else, inventing technologies that redefine the way we see aspects of our lives every other month, spending a bunch of time making a big space look pretty just isn't very up there to me
you can film yourself making art and release the film with proper cinematography as another standalone art piece - but I don't think the effort itself, the effort alone, adds meaning to art
Yeah there is a problem your right, but if there is should we let everyone just... drink polluted water and get microplastics in their bloodstream? Like i've visited some of the mentioned rivers on trips and I have never seen this pollution, particularly the Chicago river. the issue with the chicago river is the river floor is made up of materials that make it hard to see into the river, HIDING the pollution from anyone who doesn't go in. so maybe people should use their eyes but not everyone can go visit the clear water rivers to see pollution
tbf a "message of art" is pretty close to the like "art made by a human is more pure than made by ai" or whatever
I mean people do argue that so
yeah and its stupid lmao
did you know that there's a plastic spoons worth of microplastics in your brain
i should clarify, mentioned by the artist as sources for the garbage
If people don't do anything before an art exhibition like this gets made why would it do anything after
People already know about it
This is... every week??? Urgh
imagine how convenient it would be if you could just take that bad boy out at any time and use it
so true
i should scoop my brain with my resident plastic spoon
MIND SPOON BATTLE
lets go
because its kind of like a missing stair. everyone is used to the inconvenience until it is presented in a different way
microplastics are overrated, it's time to eat macroplastics
if they didnt know, now they do. assuming everyone knows every issue automatically is flawed.
And even if they are what are they gonna do about it
Thr government doesn't give a shit
also art is expression and if there’s no expression the art feels daft….
that’s my take
It's extra money they don't want to spend
can i just mention
eh, not that it changes a lot
a plastic spoon is very large
which is why i mentioned initiative
yeah initiative is a much bigger deal
"be the change you want to be" and whimsy
yes
I bet my mind spoon is bigger than your mind spoon
one thing about art as protest is that it stands against something. it doesnt uplift. it makes you feel negative emotions. why cant we have art that looks good, that depicts great successes, great people, great places?
no fr that's absolutely true, I feel like too many people think that by voting they're changing anything
we have that too
in my room i have art scattered about and the purpose is to make me feel good
that's honestly extremely rare
for the garbage water, the person who made it gathered the garbage themselves. if everyone got that much garbage oyut of the water it would be a significant amount of garbage, we dont need the government always
Why can't we only have good things that are nice and never feel anything bad at all (?)
Already have numerous organizations and groups of people attempting to spread awareness about problems like this, attempting to fix it. It's outweighed by the increasing stupidity of people who don't care about their waste because it's more convenient to them to just throw it away
we do, why cant we have both?
You might temporarily het people to do something big. Then it goes back to being normal
(me saying that) is kind of a bad faith argument, but the devil's advocate is a fun role to play
I don't think that's exactly the best argument? Even classical art often depicts evil beings, demons, etc
WRONG
if we didn’t have the government there’d be no garbage for people to grab
The people need the garbage!
sure
but there was plenty of art dedicated to uplifting
just because the odds are against you doesn't mean you should give up. if that was the status quo most of us wouldn't be here
a lot of american art that has withstood the test of time is propaganda related stuff
We're actually several layers deep of ironic arguments arguing against ironic arguments
based around wars we fought and won
I can see the point that you'd prefer more art to be about pursuit of greatness rather than negativity towards the bad
I think this worldview is beyond defeatist and kinda depressing
yes
Nothing ever happens
but I also don't think that makes the other type worse in any way really
And yet it's sadly the truth
it doesnt, but my view is that we have a very lopsided view of art
no balance
thanos would be upset
There are too many people in the world who don't care compared to the ones who do care
i feel like taking on a defeatest attitude in response to this just worsens the problem.
bruh
BOOOOOO
the american revolution was done by like
BOOOOOOOOO
More people care than you think.
BOOOOOOOOOOOOO
10% of the population
Do you know the 7 rule?
YOU STINK
LOL
REAL! THANK YOU!
rude
ok lets say this art outreach stops. what is art to you? i consider writing a form of art, it takes effort to write, and you have to think, and sometimes ytou need to learn new skills in writing to move forward on your journey. speech could be an art, persuassion is a skill you have to learn. so lets say the art stops. the organizations sdont put out posters, dont write letters, dont say anyuthing. how do we know about the issues now? where is the awareness. dont assume everything you dont like happened after the stuff you support. someone had to start it all, and someone has to keep it going. and im just going to say ok to the second statement cuz sure yeah i guess you can say that, i dont want to assume everyones just an idiot. sure people dont know all the time what happens with waste and see it as just a convenience to be able to throw it away, if only we could show them what happened to it with say a sculpture made of it at an exhibition in a major US City
YOU TAKE A SHOWER INSTEAD
did you just reply to yourself
The 7 rule is essentially that if you take any society (that wasn't recently like massacred or otherwise felt a significant worsening of their circumstances) and ask a sample of people how happy they are on a scale of 1 to 10, it will always average to about 7
I tell people to clean up after them selves, I dispose of my stuff properly, and yet I constantly see more of it,I don't say otherwise to be defeatist but simply practical
i wanted to skip the wall of text...
I'm not gonna ignore the problem and pretend it can get better
That's just being dumb
oopsie
nah it's fine
i'm not saying ignore the problem or pretend it can get better....
People need emotional stability, and they often feel similarly regardless of the scale of issues plaguing them
So what we need to do is make them feel a significant worsening of circumstances
major changes in recent memory are the things that change the average
peak end rule my goat 🔥
and changes in the average are the things that get people to be more prone to acting
bruh
lets tally
ill bet most of you here feel worse than 7
Tbf we are not representative of the whole population so like
I'll legit answer 7 and I honestly believe it
Eh
Its a fundamentally flawed rule though because it depends on the period of time
you're not supposed to be an accelerationist-
You may exist in a point or period where there's not any drastic problems
I BESET YOU WITH A ROCKET BOOSTER
What about the next generation
again the point is that people's happiness is relative and not absolute
A lot of people simply ignore most problems
ANXIETY SUCKS MAN
i genuinely dont believe that we have it any worse than our parents or grandparents do, but our mentality has gone down the shitter en masse
They want to be happy so they ignore anything that might make them unhappy
The Music of Nature proudly presents "American Woodcock," a video portrait of an American Woodcock giving it's nasal "peent" calls at dusk. Notice the subtle throat sound that immediately precedes each peent. At the end, he takes flight and you can hear the high-pitched twittering of his wings, a sound made by modified wing feathers.
© 2009 La...
IF I SPENT EVERY DAY WORRYING ABOUT WVERYTHING I’D HAVE OFFED MYSELF BY NOW
alright guys I have to prove that if a sum of the digits of an integer is divisible by 3, the integer itself is divisible by 3
like
I’M NOT DOING THAT TO MYSELF
suicidal thoughts are normal for my generation
what the fuck has happened to you guys
Honestly not really, we live on the times they built and the struggles they went through
Our lives are in most cases a lot better
But it also means we are free to ignore a lot more problems
this is such a crazy take when you can look at statistics that say the exact opposite
tbh I definitely have it way better than my grandparents because they lived half of their lives under a dictatorship
you don't even NEED the statistics though
you can also look at statistics that say its better too
Just because someone has different problems than someone else does doesn’t make them irrelevant..
you can literally just ask some questions
numbers do not speak for themselves
but clearly
my generation is absolutely fucked
because mentally speaking
I think it's too general and vague to be worth analyzing tbh - we certainly have it better in some aspects and much worse in others
i'm telling you, most people don't "ignore" stuff out of malice or nature, they're driven to try to ignore the ills of the world because the ways to change it is complex and overwhelming if you don't have a good worldview
what's the average income vs the average price of buying a home
everyone fucking hates life
Counter point, previous generations living through times of starvation, war, poverty, inhumane working conditions. Current generation, oh no I can't use my phone
yeah its high rn but historically speaking not unprecedented
youd be shocked
ive crunched these numbers before i am partially an economist
Historically yes, but within the last generation?
Those are still things that happen to current generations dude
tends to hover around 4-8 in america
terrible strawman
has for the past 80 years or so
The baby boomers had a free lunch
Not in most first world countries, mostly
a free breakfast, lunch, and dinner
The countries it does happen in its been happening in for a long time or simply hasn't stopped
yeah their houses were also on average twice as small
so youre getting more house per dollar
minimum lot sizes yeah!!!!!!!
plus dont forget your income peaks when youre about 60
I'm not getting any house per any dollar, because 10% of the population owns 90% of the wealth
does poverty not exist in the first world
you have time bruh
Yes and we basically created it
you are CRUEL and BORING
you've said that a couple of times now
I'm practical
YOU LACK EMPATHY FOR YOUR FELLOW MEN BECAUSE YOU ARE TOO BUSY THINKING ABOUT THOSE WHO ARE ALREADY DEAD
YOU'RE CRINGEEE
LIVE IN THE PRESENT MOMENT
THIS IS WHERE WE ARE MEANT TO BEEEE
I have to correct you here: we didn't create poverty, poverty is the default state of man
It's not defeatism to look at the facts
i would like to shake hands with you mache
I think you mean we're destroying the prosperity we built
I'm likely not going to be able to own a home until the market crashes
MY MAN 🤝
I possess sympathy for those who are having problems, but I'm also not gonna ignore that they were created so other people could live better lives
until then I'm going to work
BOOOOOOOOO
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
mache is so real even if they're so loud
Greed is most times a common trend as to why these problems exist
cya later akimbo o/
-# that's Right, text is loud
greed is honestly more or less stable, I'd say high time preferences are the real issues
youre probably looking at household income
byyyye I have to write paragraphs for a class instead of for #memes now
people wanting stuff now even if it hurts later
which has not grown because households are going down in size
Why do we have so many homless people in recent years? Oh right the government cut funding to support shelters and as a result not many of them can afford to stay open, as a result people can't get the help they need
greed is the only reason there is a single person who isn't fighting tigers in the jungle
personal income chugs along
Because taxes are raised
Because rhe cost of living and groceries is spiked higher then it should
why did the government do that
that's a very confrontational way to phrase it... but you're not wrong
whatever honestly trying to convince you guys is rubbing your depression off on me
ill get out of here
you won't stay even for me? :(
oh fair enough
im not going away forever
^^^^^
Honestly I'm happy with my life, but I'm also not gonna ignore everything just to make myself happy
https://youtu.be/ne6nj9AgY7M?si=8dBdbI0HNk0f8_tk have a woodcock! they are good for the soul
This male American woodcock has some glide in his stride and some dip in his hip. Here he is performing an early morning "sky dance" to woo the woodcock ladies in springtime at Moosehorn National Wildlife Refuge in Maine.
Love funky birds dancing on public lands? Join our E-network and stay abreast of the ways you can help protect wildlife, wil...
they vibin
nature is art
ong 🔥
"I'm happy, but I'm not gonna make myself happy"
make it make sense if not happy
also housing crisis, minimum lot sizes, 90% of some cities zoned for residential housing and like almost none for apartment complexes
What are you trying not to ignore that others are?
turns out you can't buy a home if the only home you can buy is super expensive because you can't just buy a flat like a normal person
like, either you're unhappy with the way the world is (real and true), or you are actually fine with it
the greed to emotionally satisfy yourself by forcing you will upon the entirety of humanity makes the greed of the worst robber baron seem tame. and i'm not entirely sure how much this is a joke.
I honestly hate how the world is going, it has so many problems, but I already accept that so it doesn't make me unhappy, just annoyed
I get annoyed at people who cause the problems
And j get annoyed at the people who ignore them
And what do you do to solve that
like, you dont have to need to be out there trying to convince chuds and the like, and really guessing here and idk, but it might be helpful for you to find ppl who think the same as you
I think I'm following
like, personally, knowing ppl who are against problems is quite freeing and eye-opening
Glorp species violence 
A lot of problems simply can't be solved by just caring because they aren't as simple as just doing something. Unless you can actually find a politician who cares about their country and doesn't become corrupt and out for themselves
Which in that case good luck
Because when you do find one they are usually stuck fixing the problems the last one in charge caused
how are problems not solved by doing something
Reduced and solved are different things
like, doing something that won't fix the problems? yeah that isn't gonna fix that
but people can fix problems and they try because otherwise a self-wallowing self-defeating cycle
lets get into the real life for a second
do you think literacy programs shouldn't be tried because they won't 100% solve illiteracy
illiteracy
thank you
somehow i misunderstood your sentence as program machines who couldn't read and thought of heuristics
or maybe i'm using that word wrong
Well I like to think most people learn how to read in school and that most people should be allowed to go to school. Which should cut down on the literacy rate by mostly all of it
LOL
(something to learn, yipee)
But at tye same time a lot of people aren't allowed to go to school for a lot of reasons
...incentives are overwhelmingly against that
but that's not gonna do 100% literacy
so we shouldnt do them then
you get how this logic is self-defeating?
A lot of times illiteracy comes from people who don't know the native language fully yet
Or people who weren't taught
(its this if you're interested)
thanks
Reading is complicated, yeh you can understand how to read but understanding it without thinking is another topic they choose to not teach you? Maybe that’s my situation, but how do y’all read ?
yeah reading is pretty tough
when i read english i can recognize a word by the shape of it
meanwhile I'm here at the side reading a dozen books a week
i have the literacy of a 2nd grader for arabic though, and i have to individually decipher each character when reading
We a bit slow hey
I mean I don't stare at a phone all day, and I was taught to read and write in school so, I'm pretty good
And I usually read a good amount of words in a day
I read books for enjoyment so I also am pretty good
it's like a psychological pitfall because "why try to make stuff better when the situation needs massive changes, nobody cares anyways" when people are able to talk to people and discuss why stuff has to change, and perhaps, maybe actually change stuff??
the school systems need to change, for sure. They didn’t care in the past but they realised they gotta induct these people to another level, or we are doomed
i sadly don't read as many books as i used to but instead i've gotten into this rabbithole of thousand chapter long translated chinese novels
i think like
everyone will agree stuff has to change
that's the first step i think idk
-# "stuff" being super vague because there is a lot of stuff that needs changing
Would learning chinese be a life changer, since you know more then one language?
That's fair, I think those count as several books in one in my opinion (I consider like 500 amazon kindle pages equal to one book)
so like long series not sperated in amazon series, are basically just series not separated
hmm chinese would be very hard for me to learn. the ones i read are already pre translated but it'd be cool to learn so i wouldn't have to rely on machine translations if the human translations are behind :)
i know how to speak arabic, but only a certain dialect, so its hard for me to read it
Honestly though, I personally don't like chinese fantasy work because... well, they're basically all garbage
all speed no quality
LOL they have quite a reputation
thats why i love them
i just want to turn my brain off and read something i can enjoy in the moment
there's so much face slapping and convoluted plot points and revenge and i love it
What sorta books, do you enjoy?
there's pitfalls to this approach too though
correction: "similar to", not "because"
the self-defeating doom mindset is sad and needs to be done away with
it might be objectively bad writing from one perspective but i enjoy it
too often people find A solution and conclude the problem is solved now when it really isn't, it just got better
mostly revenge/time travel/reincarnation stories. i like rooting for the underdog of a book :)
completely agree here
Pin of shame type beat
i love the concept of time travel, and futuristic stories telling. They all have it in them, but the ones that stand out have massive potential for us
It really is. It's amazing how heartless some people can be
I thought about how you should actually approach stuff like this and I concluded that if a politician wanted to apply this approach properly it would result in really funny campaign slogans
or legislation names rather
"Barely Functional Economy Act"
In my story, heartless people are the motivation to get rid off them. Yeah some are there to make you stronger, but the others they’re just vile
"Not Completely Insane Fiscal Policy Bill"
"Hanging by a Thread Advisory Policy"
yeah
like you'd have to show people you're making changes for the better
but also that you should by no means consider the topic closed
You could always make changes if you want to get better. But you gotta remember it’s the people, that need to change their mindset to make this world a bit peaceful. Stemming from the government to the people of the world, that’s what it comes down to. Or like, we sit stagnant and live in fear for a long time
you'd probably enjoy regression stories then
Truth be told, I also enjoy them, but really mostly because I really like a skilled mc having a proper chance
true!
i really enjoy stories where a character knows how to balance their knowledge of the future w/ changing it with their new choices
i've dropped a few stories when i feel like the main character doesn't have much say over their life despite it being their goal
Did anyone give you a hint or do you still want help?
onion headline type names
Noo it's okayyy I was mostly just saying it to hold myself accountable
admittedly I would understand school better if I studied more
This for discrete math?
Yeah
that, cryptography, and the sieve of Eratosthenes is what this assignments about
cool things I think
Very cool things! I've taken intro to proofs and history of math, but not cryptography.
Honestly, history of math sounds interesting
It's super cool, you get to learn about ancient numbers systems and how people solved algebraic problems without algebra.
yeah, there was one I read and dropped where the mc quite literally just was like "I shouldn't have been sent to the past, and I'm just going to help the person who should have as a side character"
ughhh thats such a common trope
and they just refuse whatever evidence that proves the contrary that is in front of them
Yeah that sounds like it could be a fun class
It was crazy to learn that people were keeping track of time with sun dials in 1500 BC, but it makes sense
We got to see how Newton did calculus before things like limits were formally codified.
"The Method of Fluents and Fluxions"
You may enjoy a story on Royalroad.com and amazon known as "Apocalypse Redux" where the mc came back as the sole living survivor of earth and does whatever he can to prevent the destruction of earth again
Heh, fluxions
Be the change you want to see in the world
nah, imma take twitter's approach to it and just scream and cry about it until politicians do something about it
or maybe I won't
that's for me to know and for you to find out
thank you
funni
just so you know the ones on royal road are not yet on amazon, and the ones on amazon are taken down content-wise from royal road, resulting in amazon holding some books of the series, and the rest of the series not on amazon yet to be on royal road
which is why you'd see a couple hundred chapters missing on royal road for that story
How did people solve algebric problems without algebra?
They were smart : )
Usually by using geometric arguments
Such as the Egyptians when solving for the volume of a truncated square base pyramid
Although their exact approach isn't yet known, most suspicions point to geometry being their MO
It is honestly fascinating what people used to do to solve problems
The world would be so much better right now if people had 8 fingers on each hand.
unfortunately not everyone has spare fingers on hand..
we should rectify this....
well we've got programmers who like doing base 2
just be glad ternary machines didn't become widespread, because then computers would be using base 3...
not for lack of trying, they did exist
Forget 8 fingers on each hand
Give me two more arms and hands and then I'll have ten extra rather then 6 extra
Lpl April fools videos are always so good
coil head
Gelato in JoJo's Bizarre Adventure
NFT's deserved to die from the begginging
cope
i mean they basically did die from the beginning lmao
Nft's and crypto function based off the concept of the greater fool falicy
do you think you sound smart, you didnt even spell it right
i'm dyslexic words are giberish to me
and yes I'm statistically smart
Skipping electrodynamics... since you didnt ask about that... but Its basically charge, and electromagnetic fields... And the wavelengths of energy... Basically waves and particles and they interact in different ways...
First space and time are in truth one thing, these in turn create the vacuum dimensional plane... which we can view as a flat 2d space for simplifiction.
Gravity on the other hand is another force, that warps this plane of space and time, and the heavier an object the bigger of a weight they have on it, causing it to lower down into indent into the plane.
Inside these gravitational wells, its harder to escape from, this can be seen from earths perspective by looking at terminal velocity to escape the earths gravitational pull.
Next When gravity reaches points of mass aproching infinite known as singularities/black holes, the indent becomes for all intents and purposes infinite.
Meanwhile energy is also on the dimensional plane of space time, and if you reach the speed of light everything is instantious, the universe cant travel faster than that.
This is a very brief summery of both kinds of relitivity... Also known as the world of the very big... will bring this back up later.
Quantium mechanics on the other hand relates to sub atomic particles,
Which are broken into 17 sub atomic particles. It dosnt include gravity.
These particles are forms of energy that make up all atoms, and from here mass is formed...
There 4 kinds of these particles known [more hypothosized]
First there is the electron and 5 other particles like it,
next is the 6 particles, top and bottom ones make up most atoms...
There is also a negativly charged varient of these 12... [which make up antimatter atoms]
Next is the catagory of photons, which serve as force interactions, like photons and electromagnatism, and 3 more... [2 bozons and 1 gluon for weak and strong forces respectivly]
Last is the higsbozon creates a field that all other particles go through, which is what defines mass, as everything is simply energy.
These 5 dont have negativly charged varients and dont have charge.
Now I can talk about quantium super positions, the part that false vaccum decay relates too.
First the truth is there waves and particles, the particles we observe have 2 different properties, light for example is both.
But they are all in a state known as a super position, where they are present and not simultaniously. [swardingers cat]
Basically in a atom the electrons are always in a super position around the atom, but its position isnt fixed. In truth it exists in a rough area/field that isnt at a finate point but encompasses a general area.
When we try and observe them they undergo a process known as decay which forces them to collapse into a positon, as either "alive" or "dead" as in the cat thought experiment.
We cant find anything smaller as its impossble, as to go smaller requires more energy exponechally and at a certain point it would create a black hole.
Simply put all energy and subatomic particles are on a state of energy, that decay when observed. For this reason they are in a rough location but constantly fluctuating in terms of super position.
This in tern leads to what is known as the vaccum, which is the lowest state of energy, and what all particles strive for, its known as energy. [basically point at where all energy is equelly dispersed across the universe] which creates the passage of time, as time is created by particles trying to reach this state.
But False vaccum decay is if the particles are at a false vaccum and not at the lowest state of energy. This were to mean if the particle were to fluctiate into a super position where they find a lower state of energy known as the true vaccum, that it would "move" to reach the lower state of energy, and a chain reaction would follow at the speed of light. Causing what is known as false vaccum decay a possible end of the universe.
basically the grand question in physics is trying to unify both the world of the very small, [quantium mechanics, and electromagnatism] and the world of the very big. [relativity, and neutonium mechanics]... Our current attempt is the standard model which manages to combine nearly everything from both, but the 4th fundemental force known as gravity... and the reason the graviton is talked about...
Another issue is dark matter, but its possible they are one in the same as gravity..
string theory, and loop qunaitum gravity are some hypothisis of this.
One purposed solution is the gavaton a 5th bozon particle.
There also possibly is a 5th fundemntal force...
I did skip explaning partical physics... But just consider this a butchering of the fields in an attempt at simplifying the key points of these subjects...
cope all you want you nft shill It changes nothing how they have all nearly lost 99%+ of there value
tldr
well you dont get much simpler properly expalining relativity and quantium mechanics
u just copied and pasted wikipedia, not that smart imo
nope I copy pasted my explenation to someone else 2 days ago
and No 95+% is stuff from the top of my head... the last remening stuff is things I forgot the name of and had to look up
#🌎wynncraft message
#🌎wynncraft message
Meh cant win arguments but I can atleast tell my side of the story.
also the one thing the typos prove is I wrote it all myself XD
Yes that much is obvious
how are people arguing again smh
Eternal watched a bit too much PBS Spacetime and tried to explain QM and the Standard Model.
eternal is not the bad one here
... I have actually watched lectures.... and studied physics...
(also whats with the pbs spacetime hate smh)
really helped me get to sleep on time a while back
I have a degree in physics, currently pursuing a masters. There's many small but important errors in your summary.
I didnt even touch the standard model. I dont even know where to start with that mess... without talking about all 4 fundemntal focres, electordynamics, qunatium mechanics, and both forms of realitivty...
Standard model, loop quantium gravity, and string theory all go over my head curently
I mentioned how I was butchering it and skipping most of it to explain it briefly to someone who has no background in it...
I skipped so much complexity since it would go over their head...
Complexity isn't my concern. It's getting things wrong.
"also yes this is basically as brief as I can go... scientists would butcher me for skipping stuff like, asyncrinization between antimatter and matter and stuff...."
which things... I skipped sections and took shortcuts since I didnt want to explain other sections...
Also this was at 10 am for me... [was up since 6am that day] and trying to stay within the message limit... and not double checking everything I myself see several errors rereading it
vacuum dimensional plane...
Is for example the complete wrong terminology... Its the 4 dimensional planes of space and time... 3 space 1 time dimension.
Gravity warps spacetime, creating wells of gravity.
Which require exponechally more energy to escape from until it becomes near if not impossible to escape, at black holes/singualirties. since the speed of light is the fastest things can go... Energy is a complicated thing but I skipped talking about electordynamics intentionally.
from a photons perspective their entire existence is instantious.
This isnt even talking about dark matter, anti matter and its asymetry, or even talking about the equatiions. Let alone talking about factors faster than the speed of light, atomic forces, and how they impact stars... [and so many other things]
Basically me throwing everything on the top of my head at the wall trying to briefly summerize it without double checking or rereading it all to allow them to understand what false vaccum decay means...
you can either try and focus on points that relate to your argument or try and explain everything, the second option takes forever...
And I think, if someone asks you something about physics, you should respond with focus points. Throwing everything at them all at once will only confuse both you and them.
fair enough... I will concede on that point... its best to focus on simple things... because otherwise you will both confuse things and make a mess...
Background information is important, but equally important is recognizing which background information to cite.
Problem with adhd is once you start you cant always stop
yeah.
Meanwhile I cant even say I understand the standard model only adiquate understanding of special, and general realtivity and quantium emchanics...
Even then I still have sections I lack knowledge on... For example I dont fully undersand all the bozons yet... I can undersand the principles behind them but I dont properly understand them yet.
I also generally dont just focus on physics, as I am someone who is intrested in nearly every field leading me to mixing up temonology and information.... [reason why papers take me like 30 hours]
Then there is string theory... which is what the hell am I even looking at... your telling me the entire universe is 10+ dimensions, and vibrating strings...
and yes about pbs spacetime... I did watch there videos but that was me in early highshool... helped me undersand the principles to a degree... But they are wrong in so many other ways... Like for example, based on what again, your listing random names without explaining what they meant. please do things in order instead of randomly. Second no that is a massive oversimplication and is wrong, Third, you pulled that out of nowhere sources please otherwise your talking crap.
I am somsone who does use youtube videos but I generally watch entire lecture playlists from universities. [40+ hours minimum generally]
in case your wondering why string theory goes over my head simply skim read the wikipidia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory
In physics, string theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. String theory describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other. On distance scales larger than the string scale, a string acts like a particle, with its...
I cant understand/imagine 3 dimensions well let alone 4.... You think I can imagine 10+ when I lack a visual memory... I need to see visuals...
sorry for my rant... plain and simple anomaly is right dont just listen to youtube videos and think you know a subject...
I will admit currently my understanding of subjects exeeds my mathmatical capabilities but that stems from me not doing any math courses in nearly 2 years now...
man every time i open this meme channel theres people chatting about random garbage or i see the most brainrot unfunny memes like holy hell when will this be a decent meme channel, YIKES
@supple idol
Sorry to ping you but have you read this series?
https://www.amazon.com/The-Theoretical-Minimum-5-book-series/dp/B086YBGTWJ [cant undersaand it all despite reading them all several times]
@raven wyvern yo im js curious how much money u got ingame
rn? or networth.
cute cat
or raw
cat memes always good :3
.... rn my networth is ~1500-1800 probably... But most of it is illiquid, due to them being collecables much of it being things only i'm intrested in.
~100 stx liquid in mythics and raw
about 65 stx raw rn.
~700 stx in liquid collectables.
rest illiquid collectable items from festivals and other discontinued things
what are stx?
The one area Im best is comprehension.
64 le.
stox, basically wynncraft stock market
ohhh
u can invest in cities and guilds
I basically will never be a true expert in anything...
I am an information sponge, but will never reach professors of level... But I can reach a level below expert in many fields
wait so r u saying ur like richest or
1.5k stx is by far not the richest :P
not studying phycis, in fact I am studying philosophy because I couldnt decide what to study... I'm basically intrested in everything but I cant remeber specific details well enough.. language, numbers, and pictures are all giberish to me... I cant naturally understand them
probably top 50
just curious whos the richest in the server then?
or so
but I do have the largest collection... not the most valuble since I am missing 5/6 most expensive things
no idea
no idea... but some people guess its the person with 13+K hours of playtime
ohhh
ik bluethesniper has >3k stx
therss no way to like check ?
nope
I basically liquidated my networth to get the biggest collection possible...
and now i'm near broke
unless I sttart lootrunning or stooping to buying shares... which I have done twice now...
since tm flipping isnt viable anymore.
atleast for mass profit.
tm flipping but my methods are dead.
only one left that is stable is share flipping even then its less so than pre 2.1
basically 2.0.3-2.1 killed most of my money making methods
whats tm flipping?
ohhh
flipping mythics kinda works if you know whats good and whats bad
but it can be risky
less effective than what it used to be... as markets are in flux]
yeah
is it okay if i add u in a gc w a friend? his tryna become rich thats why and he wants ti like learn more i guess
with balance changes like every month
yeah
can i also be added pls
i made a decent amount off of heroes
I sadly dont have the time rn...
midterms
add me ill add u in it
its better this way, lootrunning has made mythics more of accessible to normal players instead of being an investment for the 0.01%
2.1 killed gxp armor crafting market which I used to hold a monopoly over.
Also killed t3 mat flipping
And ingrident flipping to a degree
mhm
then share flipping got killed last year... profit dropped from 2x to 1.5x but still the most stable method left.
so basically my money making methods got killed.
add me back so i can add u in a gx if thats okay since a friend tryna learn how to make money fr @raven wyvern
arent you ashamed, youre not even doing any work
just stealing money from those who dont know better
to a degree yeah but I mainly did it due to low playtime
Also I see markets as full of fools look at the stock market.
never going to try on the stockmarket since that also has forces of psycological manipulation and stuff...
also if you dont buy something that someone put up for way cheaper than usual then someone else will
basically wynncrafts tm is a very simplified stock market I guess
web3 is just 100% rugpulling imo
at least stocks have an actual real life value attached to it
Its all about the greater fool falicy
true
also about manipuating how people percive your stock... cough cough tesla.
its safe to say some stocks are way overwalued, especially in the tech sector
Doesn’t that make it worse?
valued
yeah web 3 is worse
market and supply manipulation
yeah... illegel in our world but still done... More backhanded now unlike wynncraft which is more simple.
if you want something closer to real life check hypixel skyblock...
i wish it was banned in wynncraft but not really any way to enforce it
