#Huh?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

cobalt crater
#

One of these is a historic track, beloved by drivers, full of iconic, fun, and challenging sectors - A true test of car and driver.
The other is Albert Park...
wtf is this brainrot result

cold lark
#

we need more braking zones in suzuka tbh

#

it just gets boring

cobalt crater
#

Oh no, the track is about driving and not divebombs... how boring!

cold lark
#

yes we need on track action

#

thanks

cobalt crater
#

When the spectacle of the best drivers in the world taking on one of the toughest tracks isn't good enough

#

Let's have more chicanes and race like Mexico every week

cold lark
#

ok

#

atleast mexico was interesting

#

overtakes are better

#

look suzuka isnt bad

cobalt crater
#

If overtakes are the reason one watches f1, they are watching the wrong sport ngl

cold lark
cold lark
#

im confused lol

#

isnt that the point of racing

cobalt crater
#

To see the best drivers drive the best cars and enjoy that for what it is

#

Overtaking is part of racing but not the point

cold lark
#

okay but seeing that plus overtakes is awesome

#

not everyone can just hop in an f1 car and drive albert park while sleeping it also takes skill

#

with the same cars

#

and same drivers

#

atleast thats my opinion

ancient wing
#

It had its own history throughout its span in many categories, albeit once a year

dusk brook
#

Suzuka produces boring races, idc what anyone says, quali is dull, race is dull, and its not even an outlier

ancient wing
#

Albert Park has been exciting in pretty much every gp it’s held

shadow cove
#

the overtaking is what makes its exciting

#

monoco is such a hated race because of this

grave pagoda
#

suzuka is great if you're driving on it

#

Albert park is more exciting to watch

cold lark