#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 33 of 1
Whats with the fuel being at a certain temp and how do teams keep it that temperature
what do the engine settings actually change
How do they raise the car when the pit crew has to change the front wing?
since the famous party mode from Mercedes was banned since Italy 2020 and only one engine mode for the entire weekend now is allowed, the only variability I can think of is in ERS usage
Ers passive mode usage can be increased as well as the active overtake mode usage.
Ers usage and throttle mapping possibly
Yep
What are you a recruiter?
No I need some advice 😂
What would you like to know? I do engineering
yeah
Is mercs instability related to the sidepod design? Due to it increasing the flow a lot around the bottom but lessening it around the sides?
Will the 2022 F1 car make the Spanish GP great?
No
It’s like polishing shit
The track has no heavy braking zone
It’s all just high speed to medium speed corners
no exiting overtakes?
is Redbull gonna be invincible again ?
Lmao
Guys is there anyway I could contact a team for technical and engineering advice??
For context, we are gonna build a scaled down wind tunnel in class, but I know there’s some specifications we need to meet in order for it to work correctly
Now, it has been really hard for me to find enough information in research papers around the internet
So I was wondering if I could email or something to teams like Ferrari, Red Bull or Mercedes, that are known to have their own wind tunnel
Btw, any help from someone else would be nice 👍
Hi there
@opaque mulch I think looking for someone on LinkedIn could be good idea. I've searched sites and you can contact only corporate. Always worth trying but I doubt they will be interested in helping you since corporate probably thinks it's forbidden knowledge
there are also private wind tunnels that some teams like alpha and haas use that you might be able to contact
think the one some teams use is based out of california
dont remember the name though
How do they raise the car when the pit crew has to change the front wing?
Lewis Hamilton hit the back of Alonso's car and Brock Front wing of his car.
I am not sure why I made this. Just a bit of fun during lockdown and to satisfy my natural curiosity!
It's an opportunity to try to photograph some cool images of airflow in different situations. I am not expecting to make any new discoveries!
I have already found that the slo-mo feature on my smart phone takes interesting shots of the smoke but...
If that doesnt satisfy you, consider shooting Adrian Newey an email
Quite likely it’ll end up in Spam
But he did the same sort of thing back when he was a student, writing letters to Gordon Murray
So if anyones going to reply, its probably him
Oh thanks for the vid and the info
Thanks!
does anyone know the gearbox’s gear ratio of McLaren MP4/4 IRL?
cuz i need those data for one of my game
you could email mclaren
outside of general info, a lot of the technical stuff would rely on you having to get in touch with the team, or possibly other game developers who've already made one
During ImolaGp commentary Crofty and Horner discussed about 'overtake delta' or pace difference required to make a pass. How can we calculate this metric for different circuits?
I'm taking Miami circuit as an example to calculate the overtake delta. The total circuit length is 5412m and the maximum length of car is 5.76m. I'm considering the fastest lap on the circuit as the reference, which is 1:28.796s or 88.796s.
The average speed = Circuit length (5412) / Fastest lap time (88.796) is about 60.949m/s.
Car length + gap length = 5.76m + 1m = 6.76
For calculating the pace difference, it is (car length + gap length) / average speed = 0.111s.
But I know this is wrong, because cars can't overtake at several parts of the track, so how do we calculate mathematically?
is it impossible to get the data?
Take historic, extrapolate as per your understanding of the new cars
Add correction factors as you progress from 1 race to another to understand and get better at predicting car dynamics around corners and straights
Your score should improve in the longer run
Almost feels like deja vu though, didn't someone try that on YT
Could you please find the youtube video? I searched on YT for 'formula1 overtake delta' 'formula1 overtake pace difference' but couldn't find any relevant results
By that logic it is a slow overtake throughout the entire lap, inching up a few centimetres a second through the whole lap which doesn't happen. Would be better to compare minisector times in overtaking zones and more specifically the ability to carry a pace delta through the corners leading up to the overtaking zone
I think its just better off using speed difference and gap between start and finish of a straight
In this post, I explain the pace difference between mediums and hard, also how hamilton lost out to George due to safety car
Last sector is definitely Ferrari
ok thanks
Well, the whole reason why Barcelona is such a good test track is that its fairly balanced between high speed, medium speed, and low speed corners
So in theory, cars of equal overall pace should be equally fast around it
And that the main differences between cars of the same “class” (i.e. championship contenders, midfield, backmarkers) is likely due to better setup over one design being outright better than the other
Where can I find data on the brakes of f1 teams, such as break temperature and quality? I’m thinking of writing an research paper on lockups
Hey sorry I am replying a little bit late
I couldnt find the exact vid, might spend some time later
But I found some beautiful links
I used this data in my post here: https://tracinginsights.substack.com/p/who-is-the-best-over-taker-of-the?s=w
Thank you for sharing, looks interesting
What do the new changes for this year actually change about racing. Like I know closer racing, but how do bigger wheels mean closer racing. I'm new to F1 so explain in stupid terms lol
- No, no stupid, no
- The aerodynamics are simplified up top, with cleaner surfaces, and made to be more developed underneath. The topside of a car primarily makes drag and turbulence because it's in the way of air. whereas underneath the airflow is allowed to primarily expand and follow a clean surface after being contracted, so it's downforce is alot more efficient
This not only makes the cars more slippery, their wake has less of that turbulence/dirty air which would stall out the aero components of the car behind
- The tyres & wheels have been made taller and lower profile predominantly to copy road car trends and F2 and whatnot, however having less profile means the tyre deforms less, which is better for drag as the tyre won't balloon as much but is worse for mechanical grip as you don't have the slip angle
slip angle referring to how much the tread can twist to still follow the direction of the road/car, when the wheel is turned slightly more or less
So they're able to be less of an inconvenience to the air, so they're less of an inconvenience to eachother
Oh wow, thanks thats very helpful
why the smaller wing, is that to do with simplifying of the top for drag?
What will happen to a constructor if the FIA decides that their whole car is illegal?
Sainz getting overtaken is incorrect he lost 5 places in Australia then he crashed. Sed sainz
Oh wait first lap unavailable
if that happens, the team might as well not exist
o
if I'm not mistaken, in current times, the FIA has access to CAD drawings to determine if things abide by the regulations or not
can they enter with a new car?
that, I don't know
k
but if a team screwed up that hard, then it's either a bad discontinuity in the regulations or a team was just being really stupid
What would've happened if in the last race of 2021 max and lewis dnfd
max would still have won the championship
so there are 2 cases there. if they dnf when lewis was in lead in the last lap or dnf after max overtook on last lap
there could be a case where the dnf at turn 5 where the overtake happened
what if they dnfd at turn 5 with classification as ham and then ver. in that case due to some cars being one lap down, the race would end with carlos winning. if carlos sainz overtakes danny ric b4 completing the final lap. in that case ric would be classified as a lap down of ham and max making ham p10 and max p11. that would have given ham 1 pt
and hence the championship
check out wtf1's video on that
Oh right
Congrats @blissful yarrow, you're now on lap 5
max 384.5 P
ham 382.5 P
in saudi
they were 369.5 as far as i remember
each
well that’s wrong
max finished the season with 395.5 points
based on the image you sent that would mean max scored 11 points in Abu Dhabi
and the whole talking point before the weekend was that they were level on points
that seems incorrect or fake
check f1's website
for real ones
i think sprint points are incorrectly added
resulting in the increase
possibly
so like it's wrong @prisma dome
okay yea it is sprint race
here instead of 3 the winner gets 8 points
so they implemented this years sprint race points system into last years standings
apparently.. very strange
if a car is illegal, then it will be determined whether it can be deemed accidental (like merc rearwing drs) or on purpose. If its accidental then they will get disqualified from the session the car was illegal in (theres some leeway for crashes of course). If it is deemed on purpose the FIA can disqualify them from the constructors or fine them. The whole car will never be illegal because the FIA has access to p much every data surrounding the car, including design stuff like CADs and they do frequent checks (iirc after every session). Teams also usually ask if something new they came up with is legal. They can inquire with the FIA at any time, Merc did that for DAS for example. Usually if a team cheats its done in a way that they are in some kinda grey zone, so they get a slap on the wrist and nothing more. Or obviously, "cant" get caught at all.
If it’s within the season, the FIA will request the team to change up / correct the irregularities (see RB in 2012 Monaco or RP in 2020) and charge a fine and/or points
If it’s after the season, idk the team might get DSQed but it depends on the FIA leader / Liberty (idk)
In 07, for eg, McLaren was DSQed from the WCC for getting classified info from Ferrari but Bernie (role similar to Liberty Media of that time) didn’t want to DSQ the drivers since the title fight was Close
Now what if you also add the circuit and corner the overtake happened
You can also categorise the corner as a high medium low speed corner for example
Now you have the trend of a whole year
Now compare it to the next year
Anticipating the change in cars and see if you can build a correlation
You don't have huge banks of data, which makes this a bit tough
And you will have to run a separate percieved driver skill prog
That might also factor in, although you can do the whole package tbh
Just ignore mid year driver changes and similar stuff
what does this winglet do
direct air
The new aston looks very similar to the redbull
Aston martin has even copied RedBulls split fin design at the front of their underfloor veins
Seen in picture above
I really don't see any difference except the sidepod inlet
no longer the Asston Martin
hmm, that's a good question
I personally don't think so as Aston Martin independently copied the design, so they had to do they own development to get the package to work with their car
however, Red Bull is known to protest things, so it's more than feasible
Yeah, this is also the reason why I am so curious.
it does look like they took something which was known to be working very well and adapted it for their own car
so it remains to be seen whether the Aston Martin actually becomes a good car to drive because of it
That's a good argument
well, I am still angry because seb doesn't get it for the Spain GP
the interesting thing is that teams protested the 2020 TRacing Point because of the brake ducts rather than the aerodynamics of the car itself
Wait, they have not protested because of the aerodynamics???
"After the Styrian Grand Prix, Renault lodged a formal protest against the legality of the RP20, suggesting its brake ducts (a part teams must design themselves) may be too similar to the Mercedes W10's.[10] Brake ducts of the RP20 were impounded and stewards requested Mercedes provide brake ducts from the W10 for comparison."
Oh, I guess that I need to get informed better.
so yeah, if Aston Martin independently (as in designed their own models, tested parts, manufactured parts) developed the new parts on that car, then the car will more than likely be out of any sort of allegations
but if they attained drawings/CAD models from Red Bull (somehow, I wouldn't have a clue how though, maybe Spygate 2.0?) then Aston Martin would be in some muddy water and legality would very much be in question
💀💀💀💀
I do not hope for this.
same here
Hopefully, they have been designing everything on their own.
more than likely, they have
yeah
they independently developed the RP20 (besides the rear brake ducts) after all
Yeah
I think in this case, the only way to become competitive with a “shitty” design is to inspire yourself.
essentially
Well, that automatically means that everyone could “inspire” themselves by looking at the rivalry
I personally think they could've adapted things from the Alfa Romeo in order to be more similar to the prior design
since Aston Martin and Alfa Romeo have similar starting concepts
Yeah, I also think, they did a radical change to the car
I honestly hope this radical shift in design philosophy works out for them
Same here
but to consider it, Aston Martin is actually one of the most ideal teams to do such
as Force India and Racing Point, they were very efficient on funds, so design changes and adaptations were feasible
Exactly
but if they get it wrong, then it'll end up like the 2021 Aston Martin
.
Guys is Red Bull bringing any updates to the car in Spain?
Just weight reduction, sources are saying 7kgs.
I've heard that it's largely weight reduction, but there may also be some aero changes
though that does remain to be seen
Any alfa upgrades for spain?
we don't know the full extent, but there definitely is a package coming in Barcelona
What we know so far is a new front wing and floor.
O
alfa have brought 8 upgrades to spain
3rd most
mclaren bought 10
aston 8
merc 4
alpine 4
ferrari 3
williams 3
RB 2
alpha tauri 1
haas 0
according to motorsport.com*
I just got a tought
If yuki and ocon come 1-2
Will ocon be higher on the podium than yuki
Yuki 1st ocon 2
Ex RACING POINT Designer explains the Aston Martin AMR22 B with a Red Bull like bodywork and floor.
Why did they copy the fastest car again?
What are the risks of copying another car?
What does that mean for other teams during this season?
Let me know your thoughts of the new AMR22 B in the comments below!
Pictures:
www.auto-motor-und-sport.d...
What's up with Ferrari's tyre deg. In the beginning they were good on tires
maybe its the track 🤷♂️
It has happened 2 races straight 
Hello, I have a question. Since this season all teams have to inform FIA about new upgrades they will bring for the grand prix. And list of these upgrades for each team should be available somewhere, but I cant find it. Does somebody know where to find it ?
Thank you so much
mechanically, why do V6 engines sound so much worse than V8's, despite making similar revs?
These V6's would, if Naturally Aspirated with the single exhaust exit sound almost like baby V12's, as those exhaust pulses would work 6:1, however even so, straight 3's which have the same noise can sound way better simply because they run more revs
For example I don't believe I would complain as much anyway if these V6's were able to get to 13.5-14.2, let alone actualoly hitting the 15 mark they're hard capped by but never reach due to fuel flow
I recall hearing part of the reason was the MGU-H?
So because that is sucking in the thermal efficiency
Part of the reprocussion which gets rid of resonances that would make it sound better, it muffles or just dampens the noise
Recently IndyCar tested their new 2.4L V6 at the Indy road course, which is only 200cc more than before, however it sounded a fair bit deeper or more complex
Do you think if the current power units were V8's with the hybrid systems, they would sound similarly poor?
But I would posit that if the cars could run N/A or with a very basic/low boost turbo with the single exhaust, they could sound along the lines of the 911 GT3/RSR at 12, or almost like the T.50
Depends, because the MGU-K doesn't change noise other than adding it's own whinyness similar to the gearbox
At the same revs well... We have an example
Onboard with Sebastien Bourdais during the 2006 Champ Car race at Surfers Paradise.
not quite as good as their 2000 peak
yeah that doesn't sound too bad
Every cylinder you go up in a row or bank, your harmonic split goes up by 3/4 semi-tones
So for example, a basic Flat-Plane V8 like that has a 2 Octave split between I guess it's two defining notes
A V6 has less, a V10 has 2 octaves and if I remember correctly 3 semi tones, and a V12 is 2+7
So I think the V6 is like 1 octave and 10 semi tones? idk whatever half the V12 would be
Of course when you join the zhaust the reonances of each side produce the one you would have
can someone explain porpoising
When you increase your speed, your downforce increases, which further increases your speed potential
Your downforce pullls down the car, and the suspension compresses
The floor gets too low, the air gets throttled underneath and stalls, and so the car loses downforce and comes back upward, and the airflow re-engages
Compound this with suspension that has mechanical heaves which I'd assume are more susceptible to resonance
And also you have alot more flexible bodywork in F1 which can also resonate, you've got yourself an issue
this isnt related to porposing anymore but i thought downforce would decrease speed potential due to drag?
also sorry that i cant spell keyboards got me tripping up
While yes, underbody downforce is much more efficient than overbody, and also if you have more downforce to get a high speed on corner exit, then you might be able to get a higher top speed or average speed than if you had a drag rocket
YEah, downforce and cornering speed is all about preserving momentum
why dont teams just have the floor curve upwards so it wont stall under it? or does that cause other problems?
... That's the profile of a venturi tunnel anyway
sorry bro haha i am quite new and i am trying to learn alot about the cars
But you want some point to be the lowest point as right above the choke point is the peak downforce
isnt this something to do with ground force or whatever its called or is that something completely else
like ground effects
idk what its called
@edgy anchor btw not f1 but is there any difference to 2 stroke and 4 stroke ik one has 2 strokes and one has 4 but they look literally the same on an animation or is that just it
A two stroke only does 1 revolution, so 1 up stroke, one downstroke, to intake, compress, ignite and exhaust
A 4 stroke takes 2 revolutions to do that same amount]
so then do two strokes perform better? or does it depend on the rpm?
2 strokes tend to be more powerful but like...
For example a 500cc V4 two stroke will make the same power as a 1,000cc V4 four stroke, just about
But use just as much fuel
wtf lmao
sometimes engine smake 0 sense
or is it with how it has to be injected
idk anything about fuel ima be fr
Because it takes half the time to cycle the engine
It has double the amount of power strokes
Which means double the amount of fuel intake... However for an engine half the size? They even out
Theoretically anyway
wouldnt it need more then? higher intake/injection or something like that?
Wdym?
if it cycles faster it would need more fuel delivered to it to maintain right
so how come the 4 stroke needs a higher amount to go the same?
a higher amount of what?
Right
yeah but i dont get this wouldnt the two stroke need 1000cc to keep up with the cycles
No, the two stroke is smaller and can rev even easier than the four stroke
oh alr so it has nothing to do with its cycle but its just smaller so it takes less from it?
by that i mean its full well cycle so say in a stroke the whole process of it once
ik im a bit dumb rn when it comes to cars i need time to learn bro trust
Two strokes take half the time to do their full cycle
You're not dumb
You're learning and I'm confusing terms
yeah thats what i mean so then how would the 4 stroke need a bigger tank if the two stroke completes it earlier wouldnt it need more fuel as it does the full cycle faster or is it smaller so it balances out?
i thought cc means the size of the tank
No, cc is the volume of the engine's cylinders
oh shit that makes way more sense now
lmao
Yea
thanks so much for talking to me btw rn all i talk to is wikipedia
The fuel useage... At least on paper would be about the same if a two stroke was half the size
And they were like identical other than that
so the only difference between 2 stroke and 4 stroke is its cycle length and its size
good to know
do cars use this because i only hear about it in motorcycles or so
Well the size isn't an inherent difference
They just tend to make them smaller because it's more convenient
yeah but as a power comparison they are generally smaller right
Yea
man how do you learn all this
haha im british too
Things that're highly technical I like anyway so I guess I got ore-disposed
im in year 9 rn and i want to do motorsport enginering in the future
i overall wanna do f1 car design
Should've known
Ayo same... I'm a bit older tho oof
yeah lol
but im trying to learn as much as i can rn
i might make my own go kart chassis but if i do make one i want to make it perfect so itll probably take ages to do
Bruh that'd be sick
i kinda got a chassis designed but i got no clue if it would actually work
I need to apply for mclaren work experience again
oh shit bro u just gave me a great work experience idea for like next year or whatever lmao
Congrats @short ether, you're now on lap 20
the main idea was to make it smooth by creating sort of a suspension by the shape and the idea was to make a space frame on a flat area so basically triangles supported by the general frame in the front and rear which would also be support by just a square frame sort of picking up the main shock then delivering it into the rear and front into those frames leaving the centre untouched basically
but like i said idk if it works in practice
@edgy anchor what do u think taking in consideration my idea? the wheels would go in the slots and this isnt like very scaled but yeah
I have to say I'm not into karts so I wouldn't know much
But in the cnetre there's not alot of strengthening going on
yeah that is the point that all the shock would balance out in front and rear and if it goes the other way that is strengthened too
so it would be still smooth and maybe save some weight than making it all strong
but idk
Well torsionally that's... A bit iffy I'd say
i think what i will do is get it 3d printed in small so like idk a 15cm version or something and test how it holds up then change however i need to
its broken and small but u can also order online
Ah
Why do they get the cars into the pitbox after qualy stints? Why not letting it out on the pit lane?
Heat
If the DRS doesn't open on straights, you can race anyways or you have to DNF?
if it doesnt open its no issue, if its loose u have to pit because then u loose a ton of downforce
or if its stuck open
but u wont be DSQ unless u use it to set a time in Q, during the race its just a part failure
what exactly does drs do?
its a flap on the rear wing that opens up to create less drag and downforce for top speed
DRS zones are usually on the straights
they're always on the straights
yep my b
more like you're required to pit
because if it gets stuck open, you are now a danger on track.
black and orange flag
How did red bull rear wings stop working exactly during the last seconds?
Yes, and the boards on track have the flag with the name of the driver in question accompanied with it.
it enables wind to cut through so that the cars can reach a higher speed in a slane
my wording is prolly not right but it is used to gain speed in the straight
Do teams need to pay for fuel and tyres??
No
Ok
Sir, do you read the future??
what happens if a driver skips a gear accidentally? does the car shit itself or can the engine take it?

It depends on the revs of the engine at the moment, surely, the engine will take in most cases it because they are really powerful, however that could damage the engine badly
are last years halo wings banned this year?
No.
It's just that most of the teams do not use them
AlphaTauri has the,
them*
Well technically, they can't skip gears because the gearbox is sequential
DRS opening comparison down the Barcelona main straight
i know but like it was a general question
if you skip a gear you can overrev the engine and blow a valve, it happened quite frequently in the 70s and 80s
Red bull wing should be closed
Ah ok sry
All very different, wow
why doesnt redbull add like an insert which goes into the side pod which creates vortices, if the drs is fucked they can atleast help it by closing that
unless its some regs shit
Yep very illegal. Can't have active aero other than drs. Also why would vortices inside the sidepod do anything other than limit flow to the radiators
williams moment
Apartnly 2026 rules will have active aero🤞
Interesting aero wise aswell
You could also do this, which shows all the similarities 
Obviously they took inspiration because of the pace of the redbull, but it’s definitely not a carbon copy.
Its the exact same thing
But different
f1 fans when they find out physics apply to every car the same
not really possible with a semi sequential box
yeah in F1? it's a paddle shift so its not really possible to get from 5th to 7th without going through 6th
Leclerc has double tapped the upshift from 6th to 8th once, didn't kill the gearbox or anything
just accelerated a little slower, as expected for skipping a gear lol
If it does accidently do so it probably would jump to a neutral between gears and then either seize or just kinda nuke that fork
Lyn St. James used a sprung loaded sequential in her Lola in 1995 for the Indy 500, which is not the same now because it's far more mechanical, and putting preload on the lever before shifting meant it dropped into a neutral and just kinda had a box of neutrals as the barrel just decided to misalign
Over one year into this server, and the amount of tech-related knowledge of some people in here still amazes me
thank you for sharing what you know and even explaining certain words so that non-native speakers can understand it
what are control electronics and what do they do?
I mean tbh
They had fia investigators checking
Purely just a wild coincidence.
I think someone can fact check this but they are responsible for communicating with the sensors and stuff. They would also be responsible for driver mfd.
ahh yes so its the cnetral nervous sytem somewhat
Yea
Is it possible for a team to have 2 different car designs running at the same race? I've read that sainz is used to understeery cars, unlike the f1-75 which is a more oversteery type of car
Can Ferrari create 2 different car concepts, a more understeery type of chassis for a driver while the other driver has another type of chassis?
Are repairing costs after a collision also accounted for in cost caps
Yes
Cars have same pu and aerodynamic bod but customisable driver settings
Like steering resistance for example
Or the seats height
There's more to it ig
very powerful engine that allowed for the downforce to be cranked without losing top speed
plus, the low rake concept let Merc have quite low drag overall
kinda hard to explain the why without getting into the engineering part, and that is something no one active in this discord knows
that is fair
Merc were just the superior team
Pretty sure if the rules didn’t change they would have had a car in 2021 that was able to fight for the championship without any changes
Even banning the party mode at the request of rb who didn’t have it didn’t change a thing
Wdym without getting into the engineering part?
you sure?
We've got some comprehensive aero bois here
I mean, it depends on how deep you’re going
If you’re asking how it works, that can be googled. If you’re asking how whoever made it work came up with the idea for it, then its a different and likely irrelevant (in the sense that its a long detour that doesnt really add much) story for answering why the end result is so fast
ah yes, the typical armchair f1 aerodynamics engineer (like myself!)
If we werent armchairs we’d be working at a factory in England or on the way to Monaco rn lol
Yes but in the context of the W11
Planes arent particularly relevant
You dont get underbody ground effect or deal with vortices anywhere near the level on a race car
Nor do you have to consider sidepod cooling
But back to the W11, 2020 was basically the peak of an era of relatively stable regulations from 2017, and Mercedes essentially evolved their car for 4 years
So the end result is what you’d expect out of an era’s dominant constructor in the final year of those regulations, at least before targeted nerfs
Like Red Bull RB9, Ferrari F2004, Williams FW19, McLaren MP4/4
Theres nothing particularly specific about any of those cars that made them super fast like the double diffuser on the Brawn, they were just end-of-era halo cars
das
.... My guy
That's just kinda wrong
that's a cool gif
Okay you don't get the same ground effect as the high pressure side is toward the ground as opposed to Low pressure
Yeah but you dont need to create them to specifically seal the floor
... Elaborate
The vortex you’re seeing there, is a simple consequence of wing design
You cannot tell me its the same as what F1 does with even just the floor.
Oh right, yes, however those vortices going down is good for lift
I thought you were saying cars don't need vortices to seal the floor
For example, you don’t get stuff like Mercedes doing wavy floor edges the past two years on an airplane, you just don’t
For the past 30 years, all advancements there have just been in raked wingtips, winglets, and most recently scimitar winglets
Like I get your reason for your point but I guess I still disagree
Other than using wings (for very different purposes), how is the 787 useful for explaining why the W11 is so fast?
The 787 isn't the only plane out there
Nor do I see that response of bringing up the relevance of planes to be a good response to where they work... Aerodynamic principles work the same way no matter the direction of the body if the flow is the same
fluid-flows and vortices visualised always are cool as fuck
I had a lab class today where we looked at Karman vortices in a water tunnel
link doesn't work?
lmao that exact picture was used in the instructions as an example
well, ours didn't look exactly that spectacular, especially in the pictures I tried to take
Isn't that part of the coanda effect as well but symmetrical?
Nevermind that's cavitation
yeah coanda is about the flow not separating isn't it
whereas the vortex street is the flow (and the vortices) separating periodically
Coanda does happen on stall, but floats above it
hm
it was a change to the floor
which meant that low rake was horrendous
or not horrendous
but it wasnt the wave
aswell as the ban of DAS
it hit merc hard
they had a essentially worse w11
But he's talking about the W11
W11 is the 2020 car?
Aerodynamic principles being applied in completely different ways for a rather opposite purpose. Thats why I didnt find the guy bringing up planes to be particularly relevant, especially in the context of answering why the W11 is so fast
... That's his point
Oh, sorry
come to think of it, there actually isn't a good comparison of W11 and W12LH at all
the rocket engine went in for Brazil, and was used for that, Saudi, and Abu Dhabi (Qatar used the Turkey engine)
the W11 never went to Brazil or Saudi, and Abu Dhabi's layout changed between the years
I mean that’s literally what f1 have planned for the 2026 regs
Also there practice limits as to how light the cars can be
All the safety stuff plus heavy pu and large size means the cars have to be heavier
Nah he said that about road cars not f1 cars
Read his interview
Clickbait be wilding
Anyone willing to explain importance of gravel traps. Why some tracks have it while other don't?
Iirc its mostly in fast corners, to slow down the drivers
But in the the French gp its rough asphalt
Blue slows you down a little
And red slows you more
But most drivers when crash in it and stop, then they have to retire whereas in case of asphalt they can continue
Should asphalt be everywhere then?
Yea, but you can still recover from gravel with skill
there's often the cases of tracks where MotoGP also runs on. gravel isn't good when you fall out of your bike and slide, while asphalt is the best apparentlky
I think its because of costs
asphalt shouldn't be everywhere because drivers abuse of the possibility to get away from the track
Might be technology as well, old track have more gravel I guess
Makes sense
gravel is very dangerous because a body moving at 100+mph hitting gravel... doesn't end well. In full pads, asphalt is basically just an ice skating rink with friction, very rarely will you get tossed up on asphalt
most Moto deaths or major injuries are either collisions or gravels
didn't know it caused deaths tho
now, there's also sand that's a possibility, i have no clue how good or bad it is for moto
some tracks had sand traps in the 90s
it was perfect for cars
look at marquez's crash in 2020 where he goes into gravel, barcelona
if it was asphalt, he likely would have slid or maybe tumbled once depending on orientation
I don't think so it's gonna be possible for an f1 car to come out of sand under any circumstances
yes that's the idea
🇧🇪 F1s contract with Spa is not likely to be renewed due to the lack of support from the Walloon provincial government.
- Their maximum capacity of 75,000 also makes it impossible for them to produce the numbers that F1 want.
- The Commercial Director of Spa was in 🇪🇸 to discuss, but the word is that the promoter is not keen on another deal.
🇫🇷 F1s contract with Paul Ricard is also likely to not be renewed due to them struggling to meet the financial demands from F1 (entry fee).
🇿🇦 South African Grand Prix is unlikely in 2023 due to the political instability in the country and the constant bickering from the African National Congress party.Williams will not kick Nicholas Latifi out for Nyck de Vries before the end of the year.
- There is no guarantee de Vries would sign for Williams for 2023 either, as de Vries is no longer a youngster willing to grab an F1 chance at any opportunity, but rather a 27 year old that wants to make decent money from his career and can live without F1.
Domenicali met with the team bosses in Barcelona and once again explained that he would like to regionalise the calendar for cost saving and overall efficiency.- There are also problems over the next could of years with Ramadan, so 🇦🇺 might be the first Grand Prix for a year or two to ensure that Bahrain and Saudi Arabia do not upset the locals.
- There is a desire to have a Grand Prix in 🇰🇷, also no interest in getting 🇲🇾 or 🇻🇳 back on the calendar.
More changes are expected at the FIA this week, as an affect of the new leadership cleaning up the messes and structures left bu the ancient regime.
A new "Chief of Staff" will be appointed in Shaila-Ann Rao, who currently works for
as their Special Advisor.
She was previously with the FIA as a Legal Director in 2016, but then left to join Mercedes and is now going back to the FIA.
-Slendis (yes I am stealing your summary.)
ok
well most of the decisions/plans/rumors regarding the future calendar suck imo
but well thats how this sport works
Punishing going off the track is the global purpose
Gravel specifically is some 90s era nostalgia
I think they were phased out for asphalt because it was safer
But naturally drivers would take liberties with track limits
The way they grooved the gravel in the 90's would sometimes just make cars skate on it and ramp
no more Belgian or the French GP? ffs why
oil country and shady dictatorships offer more ig
I hate it
I can live without the French GP but Spa would be sad to lose
how do ducktail spoilers work wouldnt they technically create lift
the compute is not computing
But there's a low pressure zone behind the car
The ducktail just extends that influence
oh ok that makes sense
I would assume anyway
what happens to the air does it just go to the backrooms or what
🤨
well yeah but i mean it makes sense regardless
I'd assume it's like cupping over the drag zone at the back so instead of just pulling it back, it pills down too
maybe the edge spins it or smth
but it makes sense eitherway
BRM H16
This engine is just
v12? i dont know my engines well
or v16 i guess
8 carburetors on each side or whatever they are
H16 engine
wtf
thats so cursed
Yeah
do they work atleast tho
Yeah
They used it in f1 in the 60’s I believe
Or maybe before idk
idk where to post this, but man F1 cars have gotten huge
it seems like a solid design ngl air flow would be easy
yeah man the old ones were literally go karts with a big engine
I know its for safety and what not, but man, no wonder GP’s feel boring
Qualifying is fun and the actual race at long open tracks is fun, but these cars are just too big for these tracks
Pretty sure it’s for safety and to give it more downforce
And I’m not saying we need to get rid of the tracks
as far as i know downforce hasnt much to do with length
I’m glad the 26 regs are aiming at reducing the cars size
its all about the vortexciescs and angles and shit
why do they make it so far ahead is it like mini eras or smth
F1 cars with a v-twin engine
🥵🥵🥵🥵🥵
opel 4 cylinder 🙀
1967 BRM H16
Also they have to make it very far ahead so they know who to nosh off when a constructor has a problem coz they believe they can't win
@edgy anchor ik this is a bit silly but how is it producing lift and downforce at the same time
lift and downforce are the same thing
I'd say that's making more df
Coz the bottom bun is trailing upwatd
And the wake is slightly less stalled at the back
yeah agreed because it has an angle u see
yeah ik that
AEROBUNGER
yeah but it makes vortexes doesnt that play a part in it
or nah
Well that's what I meant
yeah
The vortices are made coz of stalling/turbulent flow
aerodynamic cat
... Try to keep it somewhat more sensible
me starting at the neighbourhood cat ( its gonna make a perfect spoiler for my mustang )
ik this is basic but the way to avoid this is vortexes right it pulls the air down
The H16 was used between 1966 and 1968
That's some prime stall right there
ik but u fix it with vortexes right
I think someone discovered that a lobster is more aerodynamically efficient than a jeep wrangler in that program
Yup
what do you mean fix?
the stall is a problem that needs fixing, basically?
i can see where it happens, but having no big aero knowledge, i've no clue why it's a problem
basically the problem is it doesnt do what it does when its stalling, in this case its on the up side so it wants to create lift, but because the angle is too high the air doesnt naturally suck itself to it anymore due to low pressure, but using vortexes it should sort of spin the air down down and keep it down
so if it stalls it wont produce any lift pretty much because the air wont stick due to the angle of it
that should be right
ok 😄
you see how the air is basically falling off the wing in this picture
oh yeah i can see
But the Vortices are the result of stalling
Also I'm pretty sure that's an image to specifically shoe stalling characteristics from using too high of an attack amgle to show the Coanda effect flow on top of the stalled flow
Like myar
nice image mate
You fix that with more wing elements
was the sd version locked behind a paywall
isnt that just turbulent flow
as you can see its clearly pulled more
Yeah but I don't see your poijt
because i asked if the problem with the stall is because it doesnt have enough vortexes and you said its caused by it but clearly the vortexes pull it more so i should be right and that is just turbulent flow
But the vortex is caused by air which doesn't have anywhere to go but forward
So that makes a vacuum back there
Pulling more air towards it
that sort of makes sense but why doesnt it pull it down tho
It does
You just said how it does
The vortex is flow air being pulled to fill the space because it's lower pressure
yeah but then why doesnt the rest of the flow get pulled
is it because its pushing it forward then?
Because it'd have nowhere to go
bruh idk if i am not being clear
you can see clearly from the coanda effect a vortex pulls the air closer, so then why is the air going above the vortexes, is the vortex too big or what
@edgy anchor its kinda weird that to cause downforce the air needs to like go up and with lift it goes down is there some sort of explanation for that or is it just physics is physics
What?
Can one of thge proper aerodynamicists please help
That example of the Coannda effect there is just to show it attaching to a surface, that'd pull the surface upward
like this i just a general question how does it work that in a plane it pushes the plane up even tho the air goes down and opposite in a car wing
is there some legit explanation or is it just how it works
Yea
If I push against you, and you're stronger than me, I'm just gonna push myself backwards
An object pushes against flow, and directs it one way, itself is gonna push the opposite way
oh alr so its not some fancy engineered shit it just is what it is
the laws of physics?
hes...playing a weird game of chicken or egg
what he originally presented was an airfoil that is at an angle of attack beyond the stall angle
so it stalls, and the air over the suction side is turbulent, as you can see in the pic
in it's turbulence, vortices are also present
the part where he's gone full chicken and egg is that he thinks the vortices somehow "fix" the flow (back into laminar? re-attaching to surface?) by....dragging it back down onto the wing
i was confused what he meant by fixing
cuz as its shown theres nothing wrong lol
stalled airfoils are supposed to look like that
I think he means that stalling is wrong
what were you trying to explain lol
Just the principles of Aero and I guess the Coanda effect to this d0000d with the proper terms because I'm working off of inference and I'm more of an engine guy
yeah hes....acting as if vorticies are a feature rather than an effect
that's why hes confused why they're not "working"
If you did wanna help them not exist tho you gotta have that entry flap and more elements to get that Coanda REALLY goin
the vortices to not exist?
listen bro i am constantly trying to learn
sorry if i make any mistakes
that's where you've been going across the gravel lmao
i understand its an effect but ive only understood it so far as something that happens due to generators being used @civic fern hence my confusion. but i get it more now that its turbulent flow and low pressure and etc
Vortex Generators are basically using said vortexes in a way to help the rest of the flow
i know but i though thats all how they worked
which i understand now its not
Oooooh
F1 pancreas
🤔🤔
do you have a question to ask?
How easy would for a team to implement this designs to their cars (as ferrari photo is also out), or would it not work due to different aero philosophies
are those two metal blocks made of titanium
Most probably
the floor seems to complex and i think it would only work on car who chose high rake concept
well, images of the floor have released before now, and only Aston Martin copied the floor design from what we can see
What’s that second thinner pipe coming into the big exhaust pipe??
We can’t
wastegate exhaust
I think previously they were separate to the main exhaust but this year they were mandated to join into it
Ok thanks
What is happening with the drs, it isn’t enabled, right? Why is it not, and when will it be?
It was enabled after this question, probably wasn’t earlier because of “safety”.
DRS isn't enabled when the track is wet, even if there is a dry line, the full track has to be dry for drivers being able to use DRS out of the racing line without any risk of crashing because of the high downforce and acceleration on wet track
i got a question
so i was at a race today and the cars wing just fucking blew off in the straight for no reason and was literally on a direct path to me i pissed myself so hard
why did that happen
there was no contact or anything
A rear wing failure?
ill show u the livestream
i was legit pissing ymself so badly
this part completely fucked itself out onto the straight
oh nvm he hit barriers
💀
i didnt see it irl
i just saw it compleely go to the backrooms
but bro he was literally like 3m away from me
scariest moment eve
what series was that?
Also sometimes parts do just fail randomly without an apparent cause
i rewatched ithe hit barriers but irl it jut looked like it blew off because it was too far to see it
How different would f1 cars be if had no planks
The plank generates Venturi tunnels so without the plank how much extra downforce would we gain or lose
are you referring to the vertical strakes?
because they do not create the venturi effect
the shape of the floor created the venturi effect
the vertical strakes try to keep the air following the path
because the low pressure fast moving air wants to spill over the sides to a higher pressure
Ye sorry wrong phraseing
this shape creates the venturi effect
what you want to do is take the incoming air and accelerate it to lower its pressure
purple is main downforce area
green is the edge trying to prevent the low pressure air from spilling over the side
So doe that mean a bigger intake at the front smaller middle section that compressing the air and a large out take to maximize performance
Is that why they used the rubber skirts on the old lotuses
this is what the air wants to do
yes those side skirts are the best solution for trapping the low pressure air beneath the car
and yes this is the basic principle
Is there any way of doing that artificially like with the fan car design
yes the fan car achieves the same result except the air is quite literally removed
Very interesting so if you close the gap of more the air whil have too speed up to get through
Ye, as far as I know there still are loopholes to get a fan like that in your car not as big but still loopholes
yes, but if you reduce the "gap" too much you lose all downforce and you will have a big accident
there arent any loopholes to do it right now. thats why nobody is doing it
Ye isn't called the air stalling and that is why there's proposing
im not sure stalling is the correct word
stalling refers to the AOA of a wing/surface being so high that the airflow delaminates (aka stalls)
Ye
this is not what happens when you basically bottom out the car
and no airflow is possible
this is also why cars will have small skid plates underneath the car which will prevent the car from bottoming out
So the car compresses to the ground and it bottom outs
so a complete lack of downforce can be avoided
Why don't road cars use aero like this though
to achieve what?
I mean like Ferrari
Better fuel economy
If it is better shape won't I cut through the air better so less drag
there’s safety concerns to take into account
I may be wrong though
True
But even just make the shape more like airfoil
Like a bus it's literally just a rectangular prism
Have active aero
So it will be nice at high speed and low speed
production costs
True
people who really care about fuel economy likely don’t have the means to buy fancy aero bits
But even for super cars don't effectively use it
because owners can change the ride height of a car which will impact the performance
it can be really dangerous
It isn't the companys fault if the end user changes it and gets hurt though
what do you think will happen when a hotboy slams his ferrari which uses ground effect and then he bottoms out while showing off to his friends at 200kph+
a very dead dumbass
nobody wants that kind of reputation
and there are cars that use it
no, but ppl dont understand that and its reputation. if 10 guys kill themselves in a short period of time there is no way you will ever sell those cars
Make it clear you can not modify the car
that never works
I understand where you are coming from though
we thought nobody would ever modify a ferrari
Yea
I mean if I bought a fiat 500 though put a v12 in it and it spins ou and I die it isnt fiats fault
no, but just lowering the car isnt the same as putting in a different engine
@prisma dome btw what is this car
thats a mosler
look it up I think only a handful were ever made
35
💀
how do mfs be consciously bringing that to races
feast ur eyes upon the british gb3 / formula 3 car engine
they were made to go racing
it wasnt meant as a street car
you buy it. enter a race series. drive it to pieces.
thats incredible
it was gapping ferraris in the race
i got soo many pics from yesterday
where were you at?
theyre usually pretty chill if you dont get in their way
yeah
donington* btw
it is like watch dont touch and feel free to ask as long as we arent clearly working
pretty much same thing
After a two-year hiatus and a venue change, people from all over Europe made the trip to Raceway Venray in the south of Holland for BimmerFest 2022. The venue itself was pretty unique being a banked half-mile oval track. For me, it felt like a small Speedhunters reunion of sorts, because Ben and Ryan were also …
speedhunters covered this event I went to
I couldnt bring my camera and only had my phone with me 😭
bmw
also thats sick
i had a few races it was like gb4/formula 4 3 hour gt classic car race then gb3/formula 3
also they cover the fucking gb3/4 seats in tape
😭
i would not feel safe driving that
wdym?
Scrapes and sparks would be brown trouser moments
What is the smoke machine engineers use sometimes when driver is in the cockpit?
the smoke is carbon dioxide that just turned into gas, liquid carbon dioxide is used for cooling in F1 cars as it is very, very cold
solid carbon dioxide (dry ice), it just directly sublimates into a gas after so no liquid to have to clean up but still good cooling
That right there's a bellhousing and what yer lookin' at is rear SUSpension
And on the right of the housing I think you have s dry sump gearbox pump
Dry ice, cools the engine
Got a question about diffusers. No diffuser at all, is basically the same, as diffuser with 90 degree angle? I'm trying to understand how diffuser work, and apparently most of explanations are contradictory with each other
Hmmm?
A diffuser is basically that portion
Thats about as simple an explanation as it gets
It trades fluid velocity for pressure
A 90° Diffuser would be like a wing with a Gurney flap, it'd have a little effect but not a huge amount, unless it was really tall and top flow wasn't there at all
It’s the same picture
Could you just circle in the pic where the gearbox is?
It isn't visible
The rear suspension assembly is now in the Bellhousing
When did they change it
Idk, Pullrod suspension rear ends becoming commonplace with longer cars
I remember Scarbs mentioning a regulation change this year with the gearbox or smth
It’s positioning
I dunno about that
"mm"
why does the HAAS car split in half wehn crashing?
the new 2022 cars were designed to split apart so that the engine breaks away from the car
oh so all cars split like that
that's the goal, yes
the point being?
safety reasons, i guess 
also in the event of a crash, if the engine goes on fire while the car is split in half, it wouldn't cause the whole car to go on fire
but that's just a theory of mine
ohh the romain grojean crash
they dont want arepeat of that
so when the engine detaches the driver is away from th fire
+1
They're all meant to. To just be pedantic, cars were meant to split apart before 2022, however they lowered the required energy to do so, because in the Romain crash, those bolts didn't break and so tore the back off of the tub, and exposed/pierced the fuel tank
But i. The mock crash i dont think the Engine split right?
It was a very small section of the back of the car
What?
Why do F1 cars of the 70s look so outdated today
yet Fighter jets from the same era still look modern
For instance here's a Ferrari 312B from 1970
and here's an F14 from 1970
makes sense, thanks for the further clarification!
the biggest reasons is that the military has/had a WAY bigger budget and they didn't have to follow any regulations on how to make a jet
^
and that airplanes had been around 70 years by that point while wings had been on F1 cars for only 4 years for the car you showed as an example
absorbing energy
With just mechanical grip, yes
The back end will want to slide out
Well, assuming we are talking edge of grip here
Design a car?
How deep are you going?
Its not cringe at all, but it really depends on how much you want to design
Even something like this is not a one person job
Yes
Thats my school’s car actually
I mean, you’re still essentially building a new car from the ground up
Even if all the parts used to be part of 1 Beetle
Emphasis on a lot of time
The car i posted took an entire school year
And parts were outsourced as well
Well, by outsourced i mean we just ordered them from sponsors, parts that are legal to be done so, because we dont have the capacity to make it ourselves)
(Before anyone who does FSAE here pulls a Christian Horner and files a complaint lul)
But yeah, ground up car is no joke
Also it takes like 50k+
$$$
I mean, for you that number will depend on where you get your parts
But its not gonna be cheap
I think most teams do that?
Outsource manufacturing I mean
When I was in FS one of the partnerships with a company basically was that we could use one of their huge CNC mills (5 axis) for a few days.
My team's shop was super small, with only a conventional mill and lathe (literally from soviet times)
The university didnt even give us any actual support
depends on quality lol
i guess
i looked it up
a new one would be 40k
which seems about right for a car with every part thats fresh tbh
but i guess on a budget 5k will do
just don't cheap out on safety lol
I mean, if you want to make your own modifications beyond what comes with the kit then you’ll need to understand how everything you do affects the rest of the car
1: holy fuck I thought it was younger!
2: makes sense. Military does not follow regulations or budget caps when making planes or tanks
I mean, the Abrams is from the same era
I thought the new cars are smaller than the cars from last year. But they are pretty heavy. If they could make the cars smaller, will it solve the problem at Monaco?
smaller? Yes, but significantly smaller? No
smaller, lighter, less draggy cars are the plans for the for 2026 regs as it stands right now
whether it solves Monaco remains to be seen
Smaller in length only, if at all
monaco will only be solved if f1 goes back to 2000s size cars
which will never happen because safety
yes, but with the reduction in development costs expected and the increase of standardized parts, it's much less realistic
New material, plus a weight increase plus x and y which manages to give it more momentum
If the FIA finds a way to cut of 60cm in the length then it would be the same length as a formula e car, and the racing with those cars at monaco is pretty good.
Yeah I think so too. But Monaco is reclaiming a lot of land. By 2025 the Portier Cove will most likely be done and maybe they will be able to expand the circuit?
Although I have no idea how everything will look like at the end of the project. I am not sure that this is even a possibility, but it would be pretty cool
Has any F1 or former F1 driver died on track, but not by colission, debris or anything like that? Example, Denny Hulme
niki lauda died after a period of ill health, one cause of that period was that he was having kidney problems
he almost died in that firey crash on the nurburgring but otherwise whatever i said
Every single new WDC ever since Hakkinen has won the Monaco GP at some point in their carreer, could Leclerc break that streak?
He still has a long career hopefully so I don't see why he wouldnt win Monaco at some point
I hope so, but I fear a Dale Earnhardt Daytona bad luck
Monaco might not be an F1 track in the future...
It's like removing Indy 500, it's ridiculous to even consider having a conversation of removing it
and while you can argue "oh but it doesn't have good racing" of course it doesn't, but its still the most prestigious and unique event to F1. and unlike indycar or endurance series, F1 isn't all about racing. I think it still has a place on this calendar that it deserves
Oi the racing this year was fire
I also think it's perfectly fine to have a race like this where qualifying matters a lot more.
There are so many tracks with different characteristics; we don't need to only have tracks where overtaking is super easy
I agree, I think it's a completely different race compared to the rest and it's pretty interesting to have in the calendar. However, that changes nothing. We can debate it and say what we think but it's up to F1 to reach an agreement with them or not
Monaco is being a bit cocky rn, but I think that if F1 tells them that they have to do as they're told they will oblige. I don't think it will be like the boycotts of Spa or the Nürburgring in the 60s.

as their Special Advisor.
