#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 22 of 1
yup
it's safer to refuel with Biofuels too
Yes, but their burning characteristics is different
Of course it depends on the mix but...
Petrol has a propensity to be like a backdraft when lit
even if they use bio fuel, they might add a certain amount of alcohol to it.
So...
I don't know much more about this
... Alcohols are Biofuels bruh
I knew something was off about what I said
lol
Unless you meant making synthetically derived, or regenerated Petrol from Plastic breakdown, which... Is just Petrol again
Oh
I meant that they might add something to the alcohol to make it more combustible.
why would you want to add alcohol to biofuels
Biofuels are already highly combustible
wow this chat is cursed rn

more power.
Right, two facts:
- Alcohols are... Inherently biofuels. You make them by fermenting natural material
- Alcohols tend to burn quite rich due to oxygen content in their chain, and also their energy density isn't huge
Alcohols hardly help in combustion
But they tend to make this up with just raw Octane levels
it doesnt burn quickly
thanks skippez
Correct, Alcohols burn more controlled
Which is beneficial in alot of cases
higher octane levels decreases the quick burning
Yeah you... Don't want it detonating chief
what alcohol would they use?Butanol?
Also that's not really the kinda relation, but there's a reason there's always a maximum Octane rating for rules, not minimum ones
I'm really into IsoButanol, yeah
wait whats better then, Butanol or Ethanol?
But something interesting is with first tests, FIA tried out a mix of Ethanol and Toluene, and Toluene is the RoCkEt FuEl used by TAG-Porsche McLaren in the 80's
I'd say Butanol
Octane's a tad lower, depends on the type
Energy density is higher, stoichiometric is leaner as it's a longer chain, not nearly as corrosive
If at all
Ahh Butanol can be completely blended in any concentration of gasoline
My mix would Ideally be IsoButanol, Toluene and IsoOctane
Which fun fact: F1 already uses IsoOctane derived from IsoButanol
But isnt Propanol like the best?
Or Total did
cause they use isopropyl in rocket fuel
hence I'm assuming its far more efficient
Hmm, Isopropyl seems to have an energy density a tad lower than IsoBut... Physical density is fair, idk how to find Octane or Stoich dow
Oh wow 120, ding dang
120RON
It comes from a Patent by ExxonMobil to use Isopropyl in Gasoline/Petrol blends
Oh crikey the patent is from 1955
Why?
Ethanol depending on who you ask has an Octane anywhere from 108.6-114-127
Methanol 108.7-114-135
I see
IsoButanol the only figure I have is 113, which is rather noice
you heard of VP101?
Yeah pump fuel Octane doesn't usually surpass 100ron because you're dealing with racing fuels
just found out about it
And sometimes for the road it's... Not so useful
Its Octane is 114
What's it's mix?
Yea
Actually leading to a fairly basic advantage of Alcohols and whatnot
The mixes are usually very raw
You don't put pure alcohol as fuel do you
You can
It depends what you want
Indy ran on Pure Methanol from 1965 to the mid 2000's
Okay you can't have 100% pure Ethanol or Methanol because of their unstoppable want to absorb water, but
It's more like 96-93% unless you add something to denature it to make it 99%
Petrol and whatnot is made up of a ton of different constituents, whereas when you deal with Biofuels, you make the raw stuff to blend in, so it can be more consistent
Yea that makes sense
Hey guys what do they mean by chassis exchange? Between lewis and bottas? any info? thank you!
I mean you kind of answered it yourself
It means they swap tubs
Lewis and Valtteri swapped chassis
nah how does it work? swap cars?
So Lewis is using Valtteri's chassis and Valtteri is using Lewis' chassis
Like the Monocoque chassis
i dont get it
yeah
Lewis is now using Valtteri's chassis for this weekend
They swap this bit
And Valtteri is using Lewis' chassis
Plus maybe the engine and gearbox
But how does this effect performance
Chassis can crack or whatever without anyone noticing and then have an affect on performance
I think that happened for Vettel at Ferrari last year that he was struggling for performance
Even tho these cars are produced very precise, one chassis will just seem to suit, or be faster to another driver
And then they changed his chassis and his performance and car feel improved
This cuassis thing is alot more significant in Indy when sometimes you can just have SCS - Slow Car Syndrome
Where the same setup on a different chassis made to what appears to be identical specification seems to breed two different handling and performing cars for, in this case, Indy
So what I assume the hypothesis is
Mercedes feel the chassis characteristics of either car are suited to the other driver than the one they're allocated to
So they're swapping to see if it improves performance on one or both
(btw Bottas getting Lewis's chassis was always planned it is not a case of Valterri asking)
no also its explosive as well
i think electrolytes
how do they drink
through a tube
RacerThoughts now has a website.
My goal with this website is to offer you guys more formula 1 content in a less time-consuming manner. Make sure to pay a visit and drop your email.
Check it out here: https://racerthoughts.com/
That’s so interesting, now I wanna try it lol.
It's usually very warm
They have to drink it right
Depends on their thirst given that they lose 2-3 pounds of body fluids per race
Has anyone heard any specifics about Merc complaining about Red Bull pit stops? I can only find the articles about Marko talking about it, but nothing on what Merc might actually be complaining about?
Nobody is complaining about their pitstops
Red Bull's Helmut Marko has accused Mercedes of targetting the team's pit-stop equipment,
i dont see where Merc accused Red Bull about their pitstops
Yeah lol
Yes, my mistake it indicates equipment. So has anyone heard any more on that?
am I missing the shit stirring
@near ether you think Marko is just causing noise?
One of the Swedish commentators said that he has heard from other journalists and people in the paddock that some teams are really doing something really sketchy with the tires, where some teams are basically having a "controlled puncture" to let air out of the tire to make the pressures go down below the minimum tire pressures.
Anyone have any idea how this would work, or if there is any truth to it?
Hmmm, not sure how great that would taste while sweating in a hot car lol
anyone have any info about that glowy painnt they put on the car sometimes to look at aerodynamics? i forget what it's officially called
FlowVis?
yes, ty
FlowVis is just short for AirFlow Visualisation. It's basically a flourescent dye put in some sort of solvent or Oil, that's then generously sprayed onto leading edges of aero components. As the car runs, that fluid is dragged back, and as the fluid evaporates, the dye stays behind, and marks how the airflow behaves on the wing surface
ty!
Here you can see not only the flow vis showing clean airflow, but also separated airflow
On that top wing plane it gets a tad globby
do they just wipe it off with a rag later?
Yeah, or spray some other fluid on it like soapy water or something then wipe it of
Well... Maybe
Some I assume they might send back with the dye on it to show it fully to aero geezers
They usually take photos of it
right i was asking abt later bc obvi the flow vis doesnt stay on forever lol
I appreciate that attention to detail
Bro that's wavy. I'd assume you'd make a hole in the tyre that's very tiny at a high pressure so when the tyre deflates it seals back up
Like the opposite of making a hole and stretching the surface the hole's in
Not sure if anyone saw this but it’s about the Baku pirelli tyre disaster https://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/12333511/pirelli-reveals-cause-of-azerbaijan-gp-high-speed-tyre-blowouts-for-max-verstappen-lance-stroll
why did the 2014 ferrari sound like it was in a tunnel
the 2014 merc was growly because of log exhaust iirc
They just take photos
Right
I have to say these 2022 cars are very aesthetically pleasing. Reminds me of the 2009 Brawn car compared to the old 2008 cars.
Except the 2008 cars were chaotically Elegant and the 2009 were chodemobiles that were weirdly anorexic in presentation
I don't have my years mixed up do I? Brawn was 2009 right?
Correct
I'm just... Staunchly against the regs from 2009 onward, bar 2017's changes from 2016
Yeah ok
I always thought that the 2008 cars looked like something a 9 year old would draw with all that bodykit stuff. They were fast but ugly as Fuck. Then Brawn came along with that simple, smooth design. It was truly elegant
I was 9 at the time and not following F1 that closely so I didn't have that period where the chaotic looking bodykits were cool
Simple and smooth looking design has always been the way to go for me. It has a maturity to it.
Oh I can appreciate smooth lines
But... it can be as smooth as you want. If it looks disproportionate, it does regardless
Yeah that's fair. I get what you mean
I just love this style of chaos aero as it looks like they moulded the body bits after watching how rain peels off of it
Which... Rain makes cars 4% sexier, at leasrt
Not for the drivers I imagine 😂
W- WELL MAYBE
NO
ikr
yes chibi car
makee them wheels bigger and put them in mclaren tooned
why do the slicks from those time look so weird
What kind of education does the car designers have? Also what kind of education does the engine guys have?
some sort of stem degree prolly
"Newey gained a first class honours degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from the University of Southampton in 1980. Immediately after graduation he began working in motorsport for the Fittipaldi Formula One team under Harvey Postlethwaite."
"What qualifications do you need to be a motorsport engineer? Entry requirements: You'll usually need to complete a university degree or a degree apprenticeship. At university you could study an Engineering Foundation degree, Higher National Diploma (HND) or relevant Engineering degree."
as a rule of thumb, the 'average' technical background will be a B/MSc or B/MEng degree in something like mechanical, automotive, aerospace engineering etc.
Just to be clear, meng is mechanical engineering?
Ye i see
there will be outliers on either end of that, a few people with PhDs or no degree at all
But Spielberg is less downforce no? Almost everything full throttle
yeah
It’s a fast track
It is but with much downforce it's not much faster
most of the turns are highspeed
In the game you run 2-4 1-3 wings something like that. The thing there with level 4 would let you run 7-9 something like that and that's not fast i can tell you
Full throttle 79%
That says racefans but f1 says 65
Well that's data from 2016
why are you comparing the f1 game to pirelli's press docket?
spielberg's altitude also dictates the wing you run more than the average circuit
that's not even in this server, why are you posting it in f1-technical?
Seriously man
So basically any sort of masters that is relevant to the position I am applying for is good enough? Isn't it anything about where you take your studies too?
the degree frankly isn't going to be the single deciding factor
your relevant experience will be just as important when applying
But t6,7,9 and 10 are super dependant on downforce
And even 1 too
So you can gain a lot in the corners
And due to all the drs zones most of the extra rear wing you have is taken away when opened
Only extra drag from the front wing will make you slower
Spielberg is full throttle but alot of the corners are fast and wonky cambered
Super hard track
well some universities may stand out more eg ivy leauge etc, but if you have good grades and put in the work, ur sure to land a good job
Ah cool, well I'd rather go to the university I thrive in than going to the university that I dream of.
yeah, some unis will look good on ur cv but in the end, it's the work u put in
Yeah exactly. I am kind of unsure what I want to try to become and if F1 is a career for me, like there is no life outside of F1 if you are inside.
well not really, if u work at the track u have a very busy schedule, if u work at the factory or at base u have more time, since ur always where u live but then again wtf do ik
True, but you know, it would have been damn cool being trackside too. But, at the same time idk really. I am mostly interested in aerodynamics, the engines and eventually management. I don't think being a strategist would fit me.
well engineers are still needed at the track lol
Yeah, but not that many and not so many aerodynamic persons. My guess is that when any bodywork gets messed up they replace the parts.
Bro I thought that was a bad edit of something lol
yeah, but like ppl like Newey get to come so idk
Yeah true. What kind of engineers work trackside?
i dont know lol sorry
Ah, ok. Thank you anyway
They're 1.6L V6 Turbo Hybrids
Generally, engines with smaller displacement rev higher
But we have to remember that in the V8 era cars managed to rev up to 20.5 k rpm with a bigger displacement engine
Because the thing that limited the engine was only the displacement and boar, while now there also is a rev limiter
https://old.reddit.com/r/formula1/comments/o5f0qs/the_scope_of_hondas_exit_from_f1_and_redbulls
Anyone went thru this
1,281 votes and 167 comments so far on Reddit

He meant the higher whine which is usually a result of smaller displacement engines
Yes that's true
The V10 were 3L
This is a stupid question. And I have no idea how I don't know the answer but will the 2022 cars have DRS? Coz I'm looking at the new rear wings and trying to figure out how it would work if they do
yea they'll have drs
As I understand it all cars will be equipped with DRS but they might not use it
They just want it on the cars in case it is needed
Ok, thought so.
Now the only question I have is how it's gonna work. Looking at the shape I'm guessing either the bottom plate will flatten or the top plate will retract
That makes sense. The way these cars are designed so that the turbulent air is less consequential to following cars, slipstreaming will become far more powerful.
The top one will go flat, makes more sense to me
The lower one is almost completely flat
Yeah but it's already so flat it doesn't seem like it wouldn't change the profile too much. If it retracts under the bottom plate somehow though it would effectively halve the aerodynamic surface area of the rear wing when active
At least that's what I'm seeing from that shape
I think they should use it even if it's not for overtaking. You should be able to use it on the zones no matter where the car in front is just to keep F1 fast without much cost
Nah I like the one second rule means you have to earn it
If everone used it without restriction then it would be rather pointless
^^
Why pointless? It keeps them all faster without cost
Yeah but it's supposed to be an overtaking tool if you can defend DRS with DRS it becomes redundant. Also, if cost is the issue then no DRS at all would be the cheapest option
The overtaking one second rule is the best but even if they don't need it for overtaking and they don't take the 1 second rule, they should still have it for better straight line speed in general
But they’re not slow without it anyway
Just adding outright straightline speed in general makes the racing less dynamic though
By having this system set to a specific purpose, it helps keep it interesting
Totally agree
Then what's your point exactly? If it ain't broke why do you want to fix it?
What did i say though?
I said if they don't want it for overtaking anymore they should still keep it for general speed
You're saying the use of it should be unrestricted like in practice and Quali
Yes if they don't want it for overtaking anymore
They should use the drs in quali imo
At least yes for general speed
Well I imagine early in the new regs it won't be as powerful a tool anymore. But teams will eventually find a way to develop their DRS systems to these new wing designs and it will become a powerful tool once again.
Don't they allow it anymore?
Just googled it and yes they do
I didn't think they removed DRS from Quali
I mean they do but what I’m saying is let them use drs for quali and not for the race U know for closer racing
They've removed qualifying engine modes
The DRS helps with closer racing though coz it allows people to overtake eachother?
With how turbulent the air the current cars throw off is, it's very difficult to overtake purely off slipstream
Yeah so if they are saying that the new cars don’t produce too much dirty air they can just use the slipstream instead of using the drs
Yeah they will. But I think the reason they've kept it is because as the teams develop these new cars they'll find ways to counter conventional slipstreaming and in response to that they'll also engineer ways to make the DRS more powerful again. So it might not be as needed for the first couple of years but will eventually become as important at tool as ever
Yea
So it's still the right move to keep it. We just won't see DRS overtakes like we saw in Portimao last year for a while
So on how these new wings would work. I'd actually be super interested if teams were given free reign over how the DRS works on their car. Some would make it to do with the bottom plate somehow, others would make it the top plate and we'd get to see two different sets of innovation battle for supremacy.
Areo departments would have a lot of fun with that I think
DRS bad
Thank you for such a meaningful contribution to this discussion
You're welcome
In all seriousness, I'm not a fan of DRS because it's a push to pass that's not organic in deployment
It's just... Wow you've now made tracks have a guaranteed pass here here and here, but it then means those passes feel meaningless
You say it's not really skill based overtaking, right?
Yeah, at least to me
It feels very gimmicky
It's not like actual push to pass or something like the hanford device that is used at all times and therefore requires on strategic useage
I tend to like for road courses those fights where maybe only one move is made, but the build up and following and whatnot is just pressure central for one decisive blow
When you have ding dong battles everywhere it feels like it kinda invalidates the meaning of position defence if you can just take it back later
I guess there's an argument for that. But there is still some skill involved in passing with DRS. Though it's more about getting to the DRS Zone than the overtake itself. Like you have to stay close enough to the car in front for it to be effective enough which means managing the areo loss of being in turbulent air and getting your corner exit absolutely spot on to avoid letting your opponent pull away far enough early in the DRS Zone to be able to defend
Like, last year's Mercedes had a glaring weakness (its only weakness really if you can even call it that) when it came to following which hindered it in traffic despite its massive pace advantage. Not being able to follow well limits your ability to pass with DRS
Which makes the skill of following much more important
I wonder how much heat the engine can endure due to the high rpm....
If F1 use the normal engine oil
Will it survive?
Nah they have specialised engine lubricants and cooling
Also the current engines are actually lower rpm than previous generations with the regulations against fuel flow rates
Both
I listened to the beyond the grid podcast episode with Andy Cowell who has been Mercedes' engine guru right up until the end of last season, he explained in depth the differences in how the power is generated between the V8, V10 and V12 eras compared to the Turbo Hybrid era
Right I'll listen to that podcast later
It's a fantastic podcast. Covers so many different areas of F1, both current and historical
I don't know the exact answer. But in terms of lap speed no
Straight line power output, maybe. But not on overall pace
That make me curious which era is the fastest
But all I know that they use V6 before the V12 era
Right?
I mean the 70s 80s F1?
Oh. I think those were Flat 6, and only used by a few teams
Engine restrictions were far less standardised back then
Huh how about that. I thought the Turbo era used Flat 6 engines. You learn something new every day
define 'fastest'
1987-1988
In term of top speed?
in terms of top-speed it was 2015-16 of the V6THs
This is what I found
Is that with party modes? Or race modes only?
either/or
What an idiot of me trying to compare which engine is the best between F1 and MotoGP
bottas set similar speeds in both the race and quali in 2015/16
Ah ok. Though of course that was back when you could increase engine modes in the race as well as quali
I have a YouTube video you might enjoy watching about comparing different discipline's paces. I'll find it
Formula cars, GT cars, Prototypes, Stock cars and Super Bikes. Different racing disciplines produce very different machines, all with different strengths and weaknesses.
➤ iPad Drawing sponsored by Concepts, you can get an exclusive free trial here! - https://concepts.app/driver61
But how do they stack up? Which would win in a Quarter Mile dra...
Covers all various kinds of pace measurements
👍
But still, huge respect for engine manufacturers to create engine that can endure extreme speed and heat
Yeah. The innovations motor racing comes up with are massive for society.
I've seen this
very good vide
.
If the v10s had drs they be pretty close if not faster than the v6's imo
but what about drag racing rockets? 😄
If they had slicks they probably would too
Early 2003 Michelin construction and slicks on 2004-2005 cars would be devastating
Yeah probably not
faster in the straights and sliding in the corners
Just like Vettel and some issue with his Chassis in 2019
Or so I heard
Although that being said... TCS
Basically the driver himself
I understand
ah you mean TCS in that era
I understand now
Yeah then it's ok
Ok I just now noticed, Norris has more points than Bottas
Yh recalled as I typed that
xd
Hey guys can someone tell me why at the end of the Race the drivers are asked to "Pick up rubber" ?
to be sure to be overweight
marginal gains, but F1 is based on marginal gains anyway
oh wow.. I thought it has maybe something to do with the heat, durability or something.. interessting
do they actually get that close to being underweight or is it just tradition at this point?
It’s just to be safe
This might be rather offtopic, but I'm very much interested in talking about the race marshalls' equipments
Like how the French marshalls used tactical, high cut bump helmets with railings that can attach ear protection
The Monegasque race marshalls catch my eye the most
The ones with pilot helmets and cowhide gloves
They look more like helicopter pilots than guys who overlooks an F1 race
is the diff in those small fins
lmao yeah
anyone knows the dimension of next year car?
The 4th dimension

Dimensions, no
But here's a comparison
Not sure how true this is as I found it on soem random Instagram page
Yeah i still doubt if its legit or not
i think the 2022 is smaller than 2021 but bigger than on picture
Its significantly shorter, which is sus because i doubt they'll fit the powertrain
Don't know the accuracy of this so don't quote me on this image
this is 2019 Renault vs 2022
Nice to see we're seeing more images of stuff for the 2022 F1 car the closer the get
I think this one is somewhat more accurate
Of course we'll have to wait until Winter to see the full thing from each team
Yeah cant wait to see how it looks
can anyone tell me the difference between mgu-k and mgu-h?
Mug-h/Motor generator unit-heat what it does is it recovers and stores energy in the form of electricity from the gasses which spin the TC plus it can also use that recovered energy to make it spin the compressor for more power.
Mgu-k/Motor generator unit-kinetic, what this does is it harvests energy from the brakes while braking and it can store it plus use the energy for more power
Functions are pretty much the same
@amber elk
seems like they're making the car more stable by reducing it's lenght
also, the fronth and rear wheel dimensions are different right?
why are F1 cars not AWD
Too much weight
It wouldn't be beneficial at all considering how much weight they were adding
interesting but it gives more traction
Yes but overall considering how much downforce these cars have it just isn't worth it
The beneficiary gains are not much compared to how much they are losing
the more grip you get the more speed you get tho
on turns they could be a lot faster
i say it is a pretty good deal
hmm and it would take the sheen away from wet races
drivers will prolly have less work to do
Isn't most of the powertrain in the "fat" part of the bodywork?
the power unit doesn't take up much space at all
https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/crash.net/styles/large_article/s3/hires/1868716.0036.jpg?itok=V149I7Yp e.g. in this pic (honda from 2016; but I don't think the PUs suddenly massively increased in size or are much different between the manufacturers?) most of the parts in the rear seem to be part of the exhaust system
Yeah that is all gearbox housing and exhaust
That's a longggg exhaust
thanks to the smol engine
the geepee2 engine
its its participle for shine
xD
McLaren specifically asked honda to make a very small engine and that was part of the reason it was so bad because they had to make the engine fit into the car rather than design the car around the engine like other manufacturers
McLaren were unable to compromise so the MGU's would overheat due to lack of cooling area
What's this I'm seeing about the FIA limiting how quick a pit stop can be? (Though that was on Instagram so I have no idea if it's true)
in free practice, what are the top priorities for the teams and drivers?
is it just getting the right setups for quali?
or is there some thing else
I mean it's hard to say
some teams run on lower fuel or higher fuel setups
that also effects a lot
@abstract pawn can help you I guess
eh it just confuses me to see daniel in p2 and valterri in p12
I mean no driver is looking to impress anyone in practice
Practice is just for the teams and drivers to, well, practice for the race and qualifying
then on saturday it goes the other way round xd
Also for the team to gather all the necessary data about the tires etc heading into the race
And for the drivers to find a good setup and to get into the groove with the car
Also what was already stated that some teams tend to run lower engine modes and higher fuels in practice and keep their cards closer to their chest
While some do it the other way around it really depends on what kind of approach and program you have during the weekend
Does someone know why the Merc crew told Bottas NOT to use Reverse when he spun in the Pitlane? (Gearbox wear?)
ohh.. allright easy then.. thanks
np
Its fucking bullshit is what it is
How on earth does the maFIA police this pit stop rule?
They did this for safety
Plus there weren’t that many incidents in the last decade or so
By an automation system that is used by everyone anyways. It depends from team to team how they gamble but some teams are turning the nut twice and then let it go green because they then after the 2 turns still have time to do more but the process of letting the car down and then giving the driver the green light has already started. They want to stop that because it is dangerous for the mechanics like to still be on the wheel nut when the car goes so every wheel nut must be completely on and after that has been acomplished, 0.2 seconds (Human reaction times) will be put on the automation system to see that the wheel is on to start the process of letting the car down and giving green.
Just... Send out another car with a set of mechanics driving it
Like midair refuelling
YES, THAT
Mid-race refuelling
Change their tyres on the track with a lorry instead
just curious does hard compound slowly become medium quality tyres?
What do you mean?
yo guys~ any1 know whats is pneumatic pressure?
Pneumatics pertain to gas
Hydraulics pertain to fluid
So pneumatic pressure is just air compression
what exactly is a one-stop strategy?
stopping once for tyres
Ah negative. Medium is faster than hard obviously and if you drive a hard set it will degrade and because of that will get even slower (except tyre warm up for a few laps) .That's with every tyre. But you could say for example: Soft tyre 5 laps in is as fast as a fresh medium set because it has degradet the advantage away. (Laps depending on circuit)
Can we expect more stomp of Red Bull next race in Austria hence there will be softer compounds ?
It seems that the Mercedes car works better on harder compounds, so perhaps more interesting
Yeah that's what I was telling
Definitely they need to work a little more next GP
Mercedes seems to fail on softer compounds hard
Max after the race said to sky germany that the softer tyres will play even more into the hands of them because of the better deg
Well… I think it’s just that the softer compounds last less on Mercedes that’s why they can’t get a good lap in
Wonder if they bring a update in the upcoming races
Toto said they are done
but we all know it's a lie
maybe nothing major but I am expecting something.
Could be a tactical one from Toto
I’m not sure they will… but they have to do something because otherwise the Red Bulls will run away with the championship
It's so early in the season that's why i don't believe what Toto said, too many ones to go
Yep
Mercedes is a kinda team known for longer plans
maybe in the upcoming races
they'll just accept RB era
and focus on 2022 car more
Their logic is that Red Bull will have to pour a lot onto this season, which means time spent not working on 2022
With Adrian Newey planning their 22 car RB is kinda safe I believe
also engine freeze
Honda will def help them behind the doors
But their head of aero is leaving
Mercedes PU team takes a big hit this year
Yea but don't you believe they have someone to step into his role
I think they've got someone in the backhand
Obviously but their current head of aero has been with them since 2006
And played a big part in their success
With Adrian Newey there I doubt they'll have problem with aero tbh lol.
Hard hit for them but maybe better payment, makes sense
He's a genius but he also needs someone to look after him and oversee his work
Worst case for RB will be PU problems in 22 I believe
I also wonder what's going on with Ferrari now
Their PU will be updated next year ?
or will it get affected by engine freeze ?
They will all absolutely push the maximum out of the development
I need to check again but my head says engine freeze till the end of this season, new engine for 2022 but after that freeze to 2025
ExxenMobil must have a nice oil there
Allowed RB engine to run on higher mode
or RB just managed to burn oil as Merc level lol
It's a little aged but from this one i can see no new PU's for 2022
„The introduction of a freeze on power unit development from the beginning of 2022 leaves teams scope to further develop the engines they will race this season. Red Bull and AlphaTauri, whose power unit manufacturer Honda will leave at the end of this season, were key proponents of the change, and are expected to now seek a deal which will allow them to continue using the engines next year.“
Development except reliability is already banned from now so this is a little aged but from this i see these engines to 2025 but maybe we will see development tokens again or so. Won't make much sense because of the new chassis though.
Don't think so no
ok ty
No
You mean the PU for 2025 onwards?
yes
yeah there are no info about that yet. iirc theyll have carbon neutral fuel or whatever by then
How would I become a tyre gunner?
become a mechanic first
What mechanic jobs are there for before you get into F1
Well, ideally something in the feeder series I assume
K
Or other motorsport wouldn't be bad either
any experience in general
most mechanics didn't do anything formula related for a long time, they did regular cars, different types of motorsports until they eventually got into formula
it's a road with many paths
just be a mechanic somewhere and try to find the right people
because a tyre gunner isn't just a tyre gunner, he's a mechanic too, he repairs the car, he knows how it works
with dedication, you can do it, maybe not formula 1, but something you enjoy still
KnowYourMeme displays the origin for the "Yes" meme answer as 2016 but I've found here on the second message of this page to have the same meme 6 years prior to it.
https://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8180
So the discussion in that page is, does the abundance of power or torque spins the wheels?
That's an age old question tho, should have been a public conscious by long ago.
Torque usually
Because power is torque at revs. And you may say oh well what if you use it in gear 1 then you've multiplied your torque by using such a low gear
Because if you get a 15,000rpm through one gear to a wheel for 1,200rpm/100mph, you've now multiplied your torque by 12.5 times
But for example if the engine spins 10% faster but the torque is 5% less you'd apply torque multiplied by gearing more often in a time unit. And with that RPM increase if you want to keep the shifting at same speed you'd have more aggressive gearing. So more RPM and shorter gearing, that's simply 2 bonuses for acceleration.
Yeah, it's Torque bruv
Torque is just a turning force, if you lean on a 1 ft wrench you could generate 130-160 lbs/ft torque for example
Idk why you're telling me this when you asked the question
Like I've told before, this is an age old question but I've seen people debate this so often, so I guess I'm doing the same right now.
It's wheel torque
You have enough torque force to overload the tyre grip coefficient or whatever
For that it could be raw torque for sure like you need certain amount of torque because how friction goes. Basically the rolling resistance should be overcome. For example you need to apply the minimum required force to push an object on the ground. Could have have too low of a torque to move the tyres even a little bit for example a 1.000.000 RPM engine with 1 lbs/ft of torque. It could at least have 190 HP if the torque curve was flat all the way up. What would happen then, would the car not be able to break the friction of the rolling resistance, would the clutch be burned then.. Well this has been a long typing and answering, we could just let it go but I appreciate if someone could answer.
If we theoretically could do that and gear it down then... You'd have 833.3ft/lb to the wheels
Ignoring losses
this is a ass load of math
Honda Research and Development: Technical Review 2009 in full report, 376 pages
describes in intricate detail the development of honda's 2009 car, later being purchased by team principal ross brawn, and leading to a double championship
Looks like it shouldn't twitch if the effective torque/ force at the surface the tire is not enough to overcome the static frictional force threshold and the clutch should slip, but I still can't visualise it confidently somehow.
how the race is bullshitting in their videos
ooof I think they made that video right after quali in Imola
and were like huh Lando without getting his lap time deleted was super close to getting pole
it was also 2 races in so like
yea way too early
Probably needed content
yea
for this weekend btw
Not really, you might see Merc/RB pull one though
most of the teams will go for one stoppers but if the team ahead has a very big gap they'll certainly do it
Like RB?
Vettel to be summoned by the FIA about the Incident with Alonso
absolutely incredible
slam dunk penalty for vettel but this is ridiculous from the FIA
Explain
cars slowing down and potentially impeding one another on out laps has been an issue for years
but the FIA have just gone ahead with controlling t9-10 for some reason
and lo and behold, that just shifts the problem a few hundred feet up the road
Provisional Classification, without possible penalties
everyone is just pissing about at 20mph on a live track, because the FIA are letting them
this is going to kill someone eventually
Did the FIA not set a minimum time for this weekend?
only between SC1 and SC2
And did they not say "do not slow down between Turn 9 and 10"
which nobody was doing
they just did it before t9
Ah yes right
everyone in that queue of cars was following the event notes
absurd
mandate a minimum speed across the entire lap and between marshal posts, and be done with it
get rid of this gentlemen's agreement as well
give the drivers hard and fast rules for what they can do on out-laps, and we'll see this sort of thing almost disappear
What the hell man, this is just insane
What are they doing
Why is this allowed
because the FIA actually don't know how to write reasonable rules
this is the sort of thing that people should be furious about
You'd think that the pinnacle of motorsport's governing body would ideally not have real slow moving cars on a live track
But nope
it's the FIA
for every thing they manage to get right, they utterly fuck it at something else
Will they do something about this? I hope they do
It's so dangerous, I wouldn't feel comfortable driving there when another car is going like a snail
i've said it for ages, just have an effectively reversed VSC
give drivers a minimum speed to stay above for each marshal sector
Bro can we bring back single shot quali or whatever like 2004?
drop below that and it's an automatic summons to explain yourself
it'll be at least something from 2004 I can clamber on to
treat it like a V/SC infringement
i have a theory that the FIA's f1 team have a sweepstakes going on who can make the dumbest decisions possible at any given weekend
i genuinely couldn't explain it otherwise
lmao
Maybe instead of complaining of Michael Masi's warning towards Max, people should look at this
Bottas has been summoned to the stewards for driving too slowly at Turn 9 in Q2 #F1 #AustrianGP
A mess really this whole thing. I would like to see the VSC idea
I mean yeah if he did it
Penalise him
If he has actually done it, give the appropriate action
Wouldn't the tires play a more significant role in all this, if they drive at a certain pace the risk of not having them in the optimal window and therefore a good lap goes out the window.
So... All weather tyres?
no no, Mike... Subtle
Uh, what is Red Bull good at?
bingo

Is this some sort of marshaling system ?
McLaren have changed the Front Nose assembly on Lando Norris' car
I think that's to signal when a driver in the starting grid has a problem right before the start?
it's dual purpose
the reverse side displays the appropriate car number to help drivers line up in the correct spot, and after the grid is 'safe', they switch to displaying green/yellows for any stationary cars
Motion of the Formula 1 Starting grid light panel. For more info visit emmotorsport.com
Does it only display the driver numbers on one side ?
Because I have only seen it on the side of the pit lane and not on the other side of the grid
I think so yes
Okay.
All penalty points on F1 driver license given out this weekend
When combustion cars are banned, what will F1 do to keep it's road relevancy?
The time for the ICE bans are said at 2030. Do you think that synthetic fuels are sustainable or economically viable for the end user?
I think Honda made the right choice to pull out of F1 for the engineers focus on future power units, still I think it's for the worse for advertising, since Mercedes has supposedly made billions in F1. The thing is Euro 7 rules are going to start at 2026 and the ICE cars will be banned in 2030 if all goes according to plan so only 4 years of sales will benefit from F1 R&D (4 years isn't too bad tho, I guess). Will F1 get away with using environmentally friendly fuels while still carrying large amount of things with planes which actually produces way more. In fact a single jet plane travel can produce as much as CO2 as all of the F1 cars a year.
I think F1 needs to go in a different direction but the we race as one message is making it hard to do. F1 is the pinnacle of Motorsport and going electric would kill the sport for me. F1 needs to make engines that are more emotive and special. I like the new regs proposed for 2025, the v6 turbos are great but they lack some emotion in my opinion.
Oh, and biofuels are the way to go for Motorsport
question : will Lando penalty points be ZERO when he get the 1Race ban ? or Will there be more severe precautions if he continues to get penalty points ?
(sorry for the english)
yep, im sure someone else will correct me if im wrong but once you get a one race ban your penalty points go to 0
ok, thx
It's definitely gonna be interesting how not just F1 but motorsports as a whole will develop. The ICE "ban" only affects new road cars afaik, old ones can still be driven and resold.
I do think that E-fuels/synthetic fuels are the only option to keep ICEs in professional motorsports in the long term; however they need to be produced using electricity from "green"/renewable sources to really make sense.
I think this ban on ICEs is daft without a big plan to recycle used batteries
I really am a big proponent of Biofuels, now I guess E-Fuels because everything from the future has to have an E in front of it. The bans on ICE's also only concern Petrol and Diesel, with F1 at least going to something like Ethanol, then that circumvents that path
But imo... Majority Ethanol? Sucky
Even so, whatever new fuel blends F1 goes to, unless they crack down IsoButanol to something like IsoOctane almost exclusively, will have to be run with a greater amount of fuel allowance
Petrol has been pretty unique in the fact it has a 14.7:1 stoichiometric ratio, and while it can be fiddled around a bit with coz no blend is the same, things like Ethanol have a 9:1 Stoich, Butanol 11.1:1, Toluene 13.5:1
So the only way to balance it out would be IsoOctane which has 15.1:1
Then you'd probably have slightly less power dense fuels, but the Octane would get the compression up to compensate, but the FIA is the FIA
I should've paid more attention to chemistry last year to understand this
all I can take out of it is that the FIA probably will do a dumb move
Very interesting statistics
Oh this thing

thanks for that excellent and valuable contribution
i like the f1metrics site, wasn't their work the basis of that 'official' driver rankings autosport (?) put out a couple years ago?
The Inevitable
@loud matrix was here
Just found this off some Instagram page
Looks like this is a move
Just use a jet engine instead, they don't care about fuels being banned
very detailed and in-depth discussion..
So I got a question:
Why is having a low rear wing more beneficial than having a high one?
Is it just because the airflow is more optimised to suit a lower rear wing? Or is there a deeper reason
is it outright more beneficial though?
Isn't high rake more beneficial?
you get a COG benefit from having it lower, but also generally start to run into more issues with it interacting with overbody airflow
are you thinking of front wing instead?
So why did cars transition from high to low rear wings
Was it just better for them to do that at that time with development in f1
iirc that was a combination of packaging and aesthetic reasons
Why would a lower fw help?
More downforce?
lower to the ground means that you can exploit ground effect more
because you're accelerating the air under the FW more
which is another benefit of a high-rake concept
I see
You'll see tubs are actually tilted upward at an angle so they sit flat with rake angle
these statements sound contradictory to me lmao 
Hey, welcome! Please post classic images in #classic-motorsport because this channel is for in-depth technical discussions
I like your taste in cars
Am I the only one who liked the 80-90s f1 cars. It was when engineering was at its peak
I don’t think anyone disliked them?
They are very popular. But I don't think it was engineering at it's peak: There have been faster and more reliable cars after the 1989-1994 period.
I adore the 1989-1994 cars due to the 3.5L engines and Active SUS
And the start of the decade with the ground effect era, with cars between being hit or misd
the 1993-1995 era cars were beauties
So how will Ferrari be implementing their underbody development? Will this stuff be more of an experiment for this season to maximize performance for the rest of the season until 2022 with the new F1 body, or will they take it to the ‘22 season despite smaller cars with the new, heavier software?
Wdym?
Just quickly bois, can I have people send their favourite F1 cars from the side, mainly about their Wheelbase bias
Ohhhh boy
I've found a thing
About the golden ratio anyway...
I think it'll factor into what designs we like alooot

Sorry I'm just noticing like the length is like 1.6~ the wheelbase and stuff like that
The tyre height looks about that to the car height, etc. etc
Is there any reason why Williams prefer separated screen and steering wheel rather than integrate it like other teams?
It allows for lighter wheels, and idk the preference for a static display rather than a moving one
It used to be alot more common to do so, like with the Red Bull's in the V8 era
Lighter wheels so that they are slightly easier to turn?
Yeah, and allows greater feedback response
You go through multiple steering wheels a year, so it saves money to not have to replace the screen each time
in an episode of F1 tech talk from this year they also said it saves 0.1 horsepower something like that, i will find it again
Because of hydraulic something
Yea so the dashboard weighs 130 grams + screws and cables. If you turn the wheel, you require power steering, which requires hyrdaulic, which requires engine power. That's why they want to save weight from it, to not stress it further. They did not say a number of horsepower, but it is a small small amount under 1
You know F1 cars have power steering?
Yeah but it's a very special power steering, it function it's the same as conventional ones but doesn't make turns sooo soo easy as road power steerings does
why would the weight of the steering wheel itself affect load requirements on the power steering?
the spool valve on the power steering setup responds to the torque going through the steering column
that torque is the same regardless of the mass of the wheel
It's not from myself this, they said it. It's the Portugal episode minute 34 it starts. For those who have F1 TV
So, 2022 cars aerodynamic changes lead to this:
Less overbody Aero -> Less drag -> More straightline speed
Less drag -> Less DRS effect
Less drag -> Less slipstream effect
Less overbody Aero -> less reliance on overbody Aero -> less disturbance by turbulent air -> more downforce while following a car
Less overbody Aero -> Less influence by wind
Less frontwing and rearwing -> Less methods to control understeer and oversteer -> Harder to drive cars
Pretty much all of that is just wrong
-2022 regs are more draggy (CD ~1.21 vs 0.9)
-front wing and rear wing are both more influential in 2022
-influence of wind is largely due to car length and side area
-you cannot draw a direct relationship between car drag and the magnitude and behaviour of the tow and DRS
Wind effect also dependent on yaw angle
That's... Untrue
How?
Right
By 2025 at the latest, Formula 1 wants to run on climate-neutral fuel. The four manufacturers have already been allowed to test a first prototype of the petrol. The first impression: significantly less power, but also advantages in the combustion process.
While the engine manufacturers are still arguing about the drive concept of the future, the roadmap for the fuel is already set. In 2022, Formula 1 will switch to E10 petrol. From 2025, only 100 per cent CO2-neutral fuels are to be used. In order to show the mineral oil companies and car corporations that it is possible, the FIA has had a fuel produced from biological waste and distributed it to Mercedes, Ferrari, Honda and Renault in 200-litre barrels each.
The first impression was not surprising. "The fuel has less energy, which leads to a loss of engine power," one engineer tells us. The figures vary between 60 and 80 kilowatts (80 to 110 hp) loss, depending on the manufacturer.
Formula 1 engines burn more efficiently than a diesel engine, but they also need a special brew that is not available at any filling station. If one were to run one of the V6 turbos on standard petrol, there would also be a significant drop in performance.
For the manufacturers, the first step is to exploit the advantages of ethanol blending and eliminate the disadvantages as far as possible in order to increase the compression ratio under certain circumstances. This becomes more and more difficult as the proportion of climate-neutral fuel is increased. That is why those responsible also abandoned the original plan to start with E20 fuel. Instead, they decided to make a hard cut to 100 per cent by 2025.
Engine guru Mario Illien had the same experience in a self-experiment with a Swiss start-up company. Unlike the FIA, his fuel came entirely from the laboratory. With this production process, it is still difficult to achieve the octane number necessary for high-performance engines.
But research is tearing down boundaries here too. "The first batch had 91 octane, the second already 95," Illien reports. His suggestion for more power: "Increase the compression ratio! It's possible with ethanol." At the moment, a maximum of 18:1 is allowed in Formula 1.
If the octane rating drops below 102, the engines would have to be redesigned at considerable expense. "These engines have been trimmed for efficiency. Less octane means a loss of efficiency and therefore less power."
In the end, engine engineers don't care whether the fuel comes from the lab or is waste-based. "For us, only the properties of the petrol are interesting. The process of its production makes no difference. Purely synthetic fuel is perhaps a little cleaner in terms of residues, but that is minimal."
https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/formel-1/e-fuel-f1-versuche-ergebnisse-leistung/
WHY ARE THEY TALKING ABOUT OCTANE REDUCTION
Is DRS remains in 2022 car?
Yes
Does anyone had a video on how the 2022 drs will work
Why is everyone so confused about DRS on the new cars?
the new rear wing looks like one piece
yeah it's not directly obvious how it's gonna activate
Yeah the drs flap where it is on the 2021 on the 2022 car looks like one piece
why does the 2022 tire look so flat
idk all ik is its 5 inches wider in diameter
and yeah ive been looking at pictures and the rear wing just looks like its all one piece
i think they are trying to remove drs in the future but
It'll look like one piece but where that top element goes flat it's still probably hinged
The 2022 tyres look so flat coz they don't have the sidewall ability to baloon
i mean it has to be there somewhere so
the first time i saw the wing is like DAM BOY THAT IS A VERY THICK WING
yeah
well yeah, Chain Bear explained that a year ago
this means the tunnels don't change with ride height of the chassis and this means they can't just simply collide with the ground and potentially break.
The rear wing might be shaped like that to decrease the amount of drag...so cleaner air
But it'angled to some level to keep enough downforce (so a little bit of drag will be induced) and that's why they might keep it
U all know what DRS means
But the rear wing is more dragy
@granite tundra
That 's what he said
So.
Maybe there is a DRS system somewhere
Yes there is !11 because it s hydraulic activated
Normally u should see 2 bars actuators
That ''push up " the wing upwards
Unless I'm wrong and it's for stability reasons
I'm not a aerodynamicist

Why wouldn’t there still be a DRS mechanism
no
Eh I really doubt that they'll go with hydrogen
Grosjean-crash with hydrogen 🤔
For one thing, the technology for hydrogen isn't as developed as there will be with electric cars, which already have a very effectively proven system which can deliver power and torque enough for racing, and of course the battery life of this stuff—and other advancements are always constantly being made
It's also against the market trend to do this, because with the amount of stuff some manufacturers are pouring into EVs, I doubt there'll be too much demand for hydrogen
hydrogen is basically a very inefficient way to store electical energy
It's also really difficult to transport in large quantities, or rather transport cheaply or in an effective way
plus the hydrogen must be in liquid form, how do you cool that?
Yeah that's the biggest issue with hydrogen vehicles
I think F1 will eventually go with EVs because they're a proven technology which can be (relatively) easily implemented
well, next season F1 will steal food from people that are hungry for their fuel instead
hydrogen has 3x the energy density of petrol
why is this a relevant comparison? the fuel cell in grosjean's crash stayed intact and there's no reason to consider why that wouldn't also be the case with hydrogen storage
Yeah the main issue with hydrogen is transport and storage
..the same way that FCEVs and HICEs have been cooling it for years?
As well as EVs already being a reliable technology that's proven to work, like the hybrid systems right now and Formula E
pretty much all of what you just said is wrong
It seems unlikely that they'll do hydrogen
keep in mind you can also develop hydrogen EVs
which is a potential workaround to range issues
I didn't know those were a thing, so if that's a possibility to combine both then that would maybe introduce hydrogen to F1
although from the article it looks like brawn is talking about hydrogen ICEs
Tbh they should keep the hybrid, connect that to a V10 and give 100% e-fuel
Well... Not... Entirely true, what it does mean is they can still run alot of rake if the tunnel profile allows
Yeah that's the main thing—I don't think Hydrogen ICEs will come into the picture
That's gonna just make the cars sound good and crazy quick
Hydrogen ICE's suck tho
wait what
of course the tunnels will change with ride height.. they're part of the floor
it's the brake ducts/diffuser/skirts that are less susceptible to ride height changes
That's what I meant to answer to Nickname oof
yeah
O
that doesn't make any sense either 
What?
It can be a solution but I very highly doubt that F1 will go that direction, to bigger engines with hybrids
The electric part of the car already is a big component of the f1 engine, so I only see that increasing in the future
We can still imagine. A 2022 car with that V10 and 0 worries about emissions
Well yeah you can imagine, but with the direction F1 wants to go with it will not happen
Yeah
how would it have no emissions?
If they at least increase the RPM the cars will sound wayyyyyyyyyyyyy better
E-fuel
Or whatever the synthetic fuel is called
I mean especially with their focus on reducing emissions to help with global warming, and what's going on around me (I live in Germany, and there's floods here after huge rain showers) I don't think there will be any going back to that era ever
those still produce emissions?
Yes
Combustion of any fuel produces by-products that go through the exhausts—emissions
Yes but the same emissions r used to produce the fuel
you still have emissions at the tailpipe
Water
especially if you're pairing it with something like a big v10
... Uhm
Biofuels are net neutral by nature tho
Water is the only emission plus any of the oil
Using hydrogen
neutral when considering production, not at the point of use
Hydrogen sucks as a Combustion fuel tho
What?
The thing is
Seeing grojean's accident
Is making me think
Exactly. Which is why they won't have to worry about it
But
It could still be applied
It's making you think hey that shouldn't have happened anyway? Because the tub shouldn't have an exposed fuel tank?
With a reinforced aluminium titanium fuell tank
... What
Biofuels burn cleaner than gasoline, resulting in fewer greenhouse gas emissions, and are fully biodegradable, unlike some fuel additives.
They still do emit (source is energy.gov)
Of COURSE THEY EMIT
I mean yeah if you burn a fuel then they will emit
but net emissions creation is currently only one facet of what is considered, especially if you're drawing parallels to the compliance OEMs have to demonstrate in the consumer market
it's not just a case of "oh nice, zero emissions" and carrying on blindlny
Why not?
We also need a fuel that delivers enough power
With the new regs
Cars could end up slower than the 2019-202 cars
That's not exactly bad for the sport
I suppose so
Most biofuels, unless derived further will have less energy by mass, however make up this somewhat with Octane rating which allows beefy compression ratios
And also their stoichiometric ratio is alot richer coz they have shorter chains per mole
because the last couple of years have emphasised how much value the OEMs put on alignment with their road car programmes
Didn't know about hydrogen + electric, that sounds interesting.
Also i remember seeing some solid hydrogen galets that you'd burn and it would release energy slowly, not like Zeppelin Hindenburg style
and e-fuels just haven't gained enough traction there, and also consider that a lot of the current emission regulations target emissions at the tailpipe
Biofuels still need land to be made, thats my concern about them.
Countries like Brazil will destroy rainforest to free the land for the required surface.. that's not a gain
(that's not exactly the scope of the channel)
So... What nose are they going with?
guess we'll have to wait next year
The full one sucks oof
i'd be surprised if it ends up looking like that
i get the feeling both are unnecessarily wide
I wonder what the story is with this model then
Coz this has a much more realistic looking nose imo
2009 noses are ew
I found this which is apparently three variations that the FIA/F1 did
To show that Formula 1 is not becoming a spec series for 2022
Showing three different possible variations between the cars
Yeah coz they were talking about spec parts
Man people really care about those McLaren sidepods
Interesting that the blue leans into the outwash
All three of the nose designs in the pictures you sent are apparently possible solutions
Because there is some freedom in length and design
the red one is the most likely design
if teams can get it to pass crash testing that is
Would green be a likely design too?
Well that's the nose we were on about so...
Both are options
But teams will design their own too
I don't see how it would be likely unless crash testing requirements overpower the aerodynamic advantage
i'd be surprised to see the noses much wider than they are now
i'm not aware of the regs in that area mandating minimum dimensions, so it will likely be dictated by the crash tests
Does Turbo configurations affect the size of the engine? I've always wanted to ask this becoz how Split turbo engines looked visually smaller compared to Ferrari and Renault's design
Yes, because they can fit that turbo housing almost in the block on bith sides rather than shove it to the end of it
Did Adrian not criticize the new regulations?
Saying they were boring or something lol
He said it's too restrictive
I know but
I mean, we had very wide noses before
Why did they pick 0.8 litres per second for refuelling? Why not 1.0 litres?
Yeah but that's hot
I know this was in Media but Horner seems to agree with muh sentiment
.
agree with wolff on this
I've just realized.... if some countries are going for full electrification and banning gas powered cars in the future, would it affect the schedules of racing as well?
It can, we'll see when we get there
I'll keep an eye on the development of hydrogen powered vehicles if I were them
So, Hamilton mentioned Red Bull has been able to "extract more performance" out of the race starts and that it is something Mercedes have to work on.
But how do you "extract more performance" out of a race start?
Is it clutch-related, how your clutch release works or whatever? Or how you prepare the tires and brakes giving you a better launch?
Because I know at the start of 2019 for example, Hamilton had a couple of bad starts but then he changed the design of his clutch paddle and that fixed it.
But I have never heard anyone refer to it as "extract more performance" out of a race start, so just wondering if it means something specific and how you do it.
My friend mentioned something about LMP2 cars having "throttle maps" where like 30% throttle input gives you like 20% torque, and said maybe it has something to do with that.
But I do not think Formula 1 cars have "throttle maps"? At least I have never heard anyone talking about it, I just know they have torque maps.
F1 cars do have throttle mapping
i think
wait whats the difference between throttle maps and torque maps?
No idea, hence why I am asking these questions..
The torque map is probably the single most important reference map used in Formula 1 engine management. It is the fingerprint of an engine and of critical importance for engine engineers to help optimise the on track engine performance.
So they banned wheel covers because it made it harder to overtake
but they're returning for 2022 🤔
You don’t question fia 
Throttle maps are I assume the same thing as Torque maps, unless you mean Braking maps. These are part of engine modes where even tho the engine throttle response must be directly proportional to throttle input, there is some wiggle room on how that power curve is laid whether they need more even or peaky torque curves
I don't understand how wheel covers make it harder to understand
Harder to overtake you mean?
Speaking of the wheel shrouds, are they considered more a part of the brake duct system or the wheel ?
What I'm suggesting here, is that are going to have an exploitation like Ferrari did back then since they were used to be considered a movable aero device.
I've commit to memory that they were solely removed because of them coming off at high speed.
Did that ever happen?
