#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
like lmp1 cars had 8mj of energy and needed mgu-h and yet f1 has the gall to push 9mj of energy and not have mgu-h
Wasn't it 7mj before, for f1?
and now they expect cars to get 8.5mj solely from braking
But no, let's let the (ma)FIA strip it OFF AND INCREASE THE ENERGY
good idea fia!
Engine braking is going to be vital
But wait, what do they do knowing there's going to be a ton of heat from that too?????
hm... if only there was a thing that could capture the heat from the exhaust and turn it into energy...
Indeed...
i wonder if we have something like that...
You'd think they would at least add a motor-spool for the turbo, to really lean into the hybrid
yeah, and to make race starts more exciting...
But no
I tried the electric spool trick, and it spools up in accordance with the throttle opening
if only there was something to keep the turbo at optimal rpm at all times and cash in the extra rpm to make more energy
It is a near instant response, and it makes the cars harder to drive
Hmm, maybe we should invent something like that?
At this point I might as well bin off on trying to get into aerodynamics, and just somehow become the person that designs the regulations
These cars are so poorly made
knowing how advanced f1 is, they probably would have already made something like that...
Energy is wasted on hazard lights, when it could be going through the engine
i wouldnt say wasted because
yk
visibility stops crashes and less crashes means less deaths
and also better racin
but certainly the fia could manage the new pus better
Better racing, assuming they don't still consume power when the lights are off
If it was up to me, I'd go for a 90 degree V4 Engine, higher revs, 18:1 compression, MGU-H and K, 6MJ output, 10MJ harvesting, motor spool turbo, no fancy aero tricks and so on
Think 919 hybrid, but as an f1 engine
i think either 6mj or 10mj output and harvest and let the teams have any cyl config but limit them to a displacement
but i'm not really fond of uneven output/harvest
Harvest is higher than output to then compensate for extra usage, like the turbo
the turbo uses energy??
mgu-h spins the turbo up and then exhausts keep it spooled right?
It depends
and then mgu-h moderates turbo rpm
You can’t possibly think you know more than the people who made the regulations
I'm going off what people who have made the engines are saying
I'm just a student
You two do realize that the Motor Generator Unit Heat was a bit of a misnomer and didn’t convert heat energy to electric energy but, just like the MGU-K, worked by converting kinetic energy to electric energy, right?
That's right
The MGU-H mainly handles exhaust energy
The MGU-H is a device that converts the kinetic energy of the exhaust flow into electrical energy (regeneration).
No it isn’t
But it did convert heat energy to electricity, what do you mean by this?
I'm all ears, maybe my understanding of the MGU-H has been wrong.
Could you please, if you don't mind, explain (or link to an article/video/any other source about) how it converted thermal energy to electrical energy?
It’s how a regular turbo works too - the gases expand in the turbine and exchange thermal energy for kinetic energy on the blades, and the MGU-H is just an over expanded turbo. Unless you mean the intermediate step of the kinetic energy in the blades, but then you could argue that coal power stations are actually converting kinetic energy to electrical energy instead of chemical energy to electrical which is obviously a misrepresentation. There’s an impulse part of the conversion too which is kinetic energy straight into the blades, but that’s half or less.
Again, I don't see how an electric motor/generator can convert thermal energy to electrical energy.
You said it yourself, the exhaust gasses expand, impart energy onto the turbocharger/MGU-H/turbine assembly and the energy from that rotation can then be recovered.
And yes, the generator in a power plant converts kinetic energy into electrical energy. The chemical energy has previously been converted to thermal energy, the water gets heated, either to a boiling or supercritical state and that high pressure medium then gives off it's (kinetic) energy to the turbine(s), losing thermal energy in the process as well.
Yes.. that’s.. what I said?
Because the ‘thermal’ energy is the internal energy in the gas. When the gas is expanded it creates a pressure difference which exerts the force on the blades which spins the turbine by exchanging some of the internal energy in the gas for kinetic energy in the turbine. If it were purely an exchange of kinetic energy from the gas the recoverable energy would be far, far, far smaller because it would only be the difference in velocity at the exit vs inlet.
Nothing is purely a single energy transfer, obviously. The fact remains though that a generator can’t extract energy from heat directly.
A radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG, RITEG), or radioisotope power system (RPS), is a type of nuclear battery that uses an array of thermocouples to convert the heat released by the decay of a suitable radioactive material into electricity by the Seebeck effect. This type of generator has no moving parts and is ideal for deployment in r...
And a thermocouple is a motor/generator now?
..you can use them as a generator, yes
So, which part of a thermocouple is spinning and is attached to the crankshaft of an F1 car?
i dont care about that argument (even though beam wing is right)
i'm saying that "a generator can’t extract energy from heat directly." is wrong
I‘m sorry, this is getting silly. We‘re talking about the F1 tech, not any kind of generator.
You got a point that I could have been more clear that I‘m not talking about any kind of generator, I simply thought this was obvious, considering the setting of the discussion.
yes. i do know that. by "heat" (which is in itself a misnomer on my part) i mean the exhaust flow
a generator CAN extract energy from heat directly but because of thermodynamics it's really inefficient
ARE YOU STICKING AN RTG IN A FORMULA ONE CAR
sorry about the pings
Switching away from the heat/kinetic energy discussion:
Does a higher compression ratio lead to better/stronger engine braking and would stronger engine braking help with Recharge (to use the official 2026 terminology)?
higher compression ratio = higher pumping losses on closed throttle
so stronger engine braking in a mechanical way
i don't think it could theoretically help with recharging the battery
recharging depends mainly on how the power limit and control maps is built in the MGU-K's electrical
Thanks for confirming what I thought, I just wanted to make sure I‘m not going insane now that one F1/motorsports journalist keeps blabbering on about how much of an advantage that would be for Mercedes, especially since it “helps so much with energy recovery through engine braking.“
From F1‘s new opening titles: This wouldn’t be legal, right?
I don’t care that argument
What an oversight!
Well technically I think it could be because it only has to be in 2 modes and activate in less than .4 secs
Nope, I wish it was legal but that arrangement wouldn‘t maintain the geometric relationship between all parts of the RW flap
Ah alright
im no expert
but I looked at the thermoelectric effect page from this article
it states this
doesnt that mean that thermoelectric phenomenon like seeback-peliter effects are also not direct
the heat difference creats a kinetic difference which then creats an electric difference ie voltage
or did I misunderstand something?
dont you kind of HAVE TO move particles in order to generate electricity
in almost any form
even if the charge carriers move very small distances
Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator: A type of nuclear battery that generates electricity using the decay heat of radioactive materials and is used to power space probes and other vehicles.
RTG → A device that directly converts decay heat from radioactive materials into electricity
⚫︎Heat → Electricity
Seebeck effect → Direct conversion of thermal energy into electrical energy (voltage/current)
⚫︎Heat → Electricity
Peltier effect → The phenomenon of creating a temperature difference (absorption cooling/radiation heating) by passing an electric current
⚫︎Electricity → Heat (cold)
im not talking about f1
I dont understand your point?
Isn't this chat room the place to discuss F1 technicals?
I thought you talked about the seeback effect in relation to F1.
oh nah mb I was replying to the other guy who was talking about direct conversion
I see. I replied to you by mistake.😭😭(´°̥̥̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥̥̥`)
its alr lmao
how do teams change the angle of attack of the front and rear wing elements?
anyone watching on multi veiwer, i am trying to do the team radio replays but it says luive timing not avaiable. anyone else have this isssurw?
What's the difference between this battery thing and ERS? or are they the same
i was but i didnt have any issues except for my bad wifi, i was able to use multiview for alonso and could hear his radio
Same as Drs more or less
Well batteries are bigger I think but the deployment now is using the battery so much now it's just a battery management
On the front wing, teams like Ferrari, Haas and Williams use more or less the same kind of flap adjustment seen in previous year, while teams like Mercedes, Red Bull and McLaren switched to a more elegant solution in the nose.
The rear wing' AoA usually doesn't get adjusted at the track anymore but instead they have different wing for different load conditions. The most they might do is to play around with the gurney flap, either trimming that down, running a narrower one or removing it entirely.
The battery is where the electrical energy is stored (hence why it's referred to as ES/Energy Store in the regs) and ERS (Energy Recovery System) is the whole thing together, so MGU-K, ES & CE (Control Electronics).
damn gemini has taught me something today
And this is why LLMs suck, there is so much wrong in there, it's incredible
LMH cars are only allowed to recover energy at the front axle, LMDh only at the rear. Neither of them can harvest at both axles at the same time, the last car to do that was the Toyota TS050 (LMP1).
Regarding the LiCo in quali it's not wrong, however they did have to use it in the more relevant LMP1 era.
never use ai to learn something its total shit
good to know
using ai in general is bad because it gets so much wrong
and has a very high impact on environment and etc
apparently another point is due to the restrictions of how much energy they are allowed to recover per lap right? I think it's around 4 MJ
I'm just trying to figure out the difference
The maximum amount of energy they're allowed to recharge per lap changes from track to track and session to session. It also depends on the mode they're in, if Overtake is used, they're allowed an additional 0.5MJ per lap.
The base Recharge limits are 8.5MJ per lap in normal operation and 9MJ per lap with Overtake enabled.
The 4MJ you remember is the maximal allowed difference between the maximum and minimum state of charge any time the car is on track, say the car has 4.7MJ in the battery upon leaving the pit lane, the battery wouldn't be allowed to drop below 0.7MJ charge.
can someone explain the mercedes 16:1 compression ratio loophole to me
If I knew what exactly they are doing, I'd gladly try to explain it 
The rumours say that they have a very small chamber that is connected to the cylinder via a tiny opening, so they achieve the 16:1 ratio when the engine is cold. Once the engine heats up and expands, that small aperture is said to close, effectively blocking that small chamber off and therefore the engine only uses the "real" compression ratio.
it should be noted that they're not massively tricking physics here, the advantage is smaller than the originally circulated 18:1.
Realistically they're said to achieve roughly 16.2:1 or 16.3:1 while others suffer a loss of compression ratio and are around 15.1-15.3:1 at operating temperature (no guarantees on the accuracy of the numbers but they're roughly in the ballpark).
which races were cancelled? my dad told me bahrain and saudi arabia were cancelled for now, is that true?
are there any others?
also, if they’re cancelled, are they getting replaced with new circuits or will there just be a gap between race weekends?
its very likely but still not confirmed
there shouldnt be any issues with other races
maybe qatar and abu dhabi but thats much later
The last we heard is that there would be a gap but there were no official comments on that matter yet.
Wrong channel though, there's not much technical about the potential cancellation of events 
I don't understand the Aston Martin car design? Surely even Newey can't come up with something so great
how much faster on the straights is the ferrari 180 wing compared to the normal wing?
it was apparently 8-10 kph
and how quicker is the merc on the straights compared to ferrari?
i do feel like if ferrari optimize their battery and software related things
along with the macarena wing
we can fight mercedes
Were they aware of how the electrical system will bear against the heavy load of 50/50 split?
If they heavily degrades in just a single race why they allow on 2 of these things PER SEASON?
They were setting up all of these fantasy rules without being aware of how these new EXPERIMENTAL technologies last
And these things will cost you 10 place grid penalty for each replaced
I am looking forward to drivers taking 10 place grid penalty just to remain competitive
are F1 teams allowed to use the aero rakes during free practice sessions or only in pre season testing?
I think I previously saw rakes during a practice session.
According to some Williams post, they're limited in size of the rake during the race weekends.
Post from 2023, so a bit dated
i’m not too technically versed in f1 but what could ferrari possibly do to “upgrade” that rotisserie wing from testing?
Make it robust so it doesn't break
is that why they didnt run it in australia?
or was there not enough of a performance benefit for it to be worth it?
in melbourne most of the straights are relatively short and the wing takes quite a while to rotate
so the performance benefit for them was pretty much 0 from what i've read
unlesss theyve managed to make it very reliable i wouldnt use the macarena wing just yet
shanghai has 4 straight mode zones meaning the wing will open/close 8 times per lap
with 75 laps (gp+sprint) thats 600 times
and theres still fp1, sprint qualifying and race qualifying
i really hope ferrari has made the macarena rear wing very reliable and well functioning🙏🙏🙏🙏🧿🧿🧿🧿
The fact that they didn't use it at Australia, a rather power heavy track with a ton of AA zones shows that it probably doesn't have significant gains. I think the reduced downforce and added lift of the wing causes the rear to rise and the rake to increase causing added drag vs normal DRS.
You are also added a ton of weight to the car to overcome the forces involved in rotating the wing and making the rear wing draggier with the extra mechanisms required to rotate the car. You are also adding more weight very high up on the CoM.
There is also the parachute effect but thats offset by the parachute effect in the braking zones presumably.
I any case I think Mercedes advantage is a mirage. Most teams had massive software difficulties in qualifying leading to the gap we saw. Those will get ironed out very quickly and cheaply with the test data they have. I think the PU advantage that Mercedes has is really only in the MGU-K which will be less of an advantage in most races.
Theres also the compression ratio which I am tired of talking about atp because there is so much speculation. If true, Mercedes' engine will probably be worse than Ferarri's on raw horsepower after Monaco. Also on mediums at the start of the race, Mercedes was unable to build a gap which in theory should be easier without DRS.
On the other hand I will say tho that I think Mercedes' cornering speed disadvantage has been overstated. Mercedes and Ferarri were running different setups and different energy recovery modes. Looking at the data at the end of the hard stint, Mercedes was definitely controlling the pace of their cars. If this is going to be a two team fight, Ferarri is still well Ferarri and their in season development has been consistently mediocre. They threw a lot away on their development last year for this car and they are still clearly huanted by strategy.
I felt that the strategy in isolation was better for Ferrari. Worth about 6 seconds for them over Merc. It was just everything else. It is entirely possible (and quite likely) that if Ferrari pitted at the same time they would not manage the tyres until the end. Ferrari usually gets hate for their strategy, but I think this time it wasn't a bad call.
they weren’t able to pull a gap because of overtake
the nature of overtake allows you to hang on even if you don’t have the fastest car
it’s similar to drs in austria, but it should work everywhere now
I think the engine drama is just that, drama.
Clearly the strength of merc is in their motor, not the ICE itself.
Best ICE appears to be Ferrari, RBPT has decent electric power it seems
Audi is decent performance wise despite reliability issues
And Honda does not need to be mentioned
I think all the ICEs are the same pretty much
Even MGU-K most are the same
could that little wing in leclerc's halo function like those spoiler-ish things seen on a few helmets?
how much would this affect overall in the car like speed, fuel, tyre deg, drag
maybe even engine temps since it does seem it could direct airflow to the airbox
Could it be to create less drag from the driver?
Since now I think the driver would be in a lower pressured zone
.
I am thinking of starting a project to bruteforce a race circuit for a proper racing line on irl tracks is there any programs anyone can think of that does this already
Yeah people already do this. It’s usually called optimal racing line or minimum lap time optimization. Stuff like TORCS or Speed Dreams has AI research around it, and a lot of GitHub projects try it with genetic algorithms or particle swarm. Pure brute force usually isn’t feasible because the search space gets huge, so most methods optimize a spline line using vehicle physics.
What's the difference between "boost" and "overtake"? (In the battery thing)
Boost is to gain horse power and overtake is to pass some one like Drs whitin 1 second
Call me an idiot, but what do I do if I'm having an inequal brake pressure in a car
The rear left brake is about 40 degrees hotter than the rear right
You already have a driver assigned for the Chinese Grand Prix, it is Liam Lawson.
Is there any engineer in here?
You already have a driver assigned for the Chinese Grand Prix, it is Fernando Alonso.
Boost allows the driver to deploy the maximum allowed power (according to the graph below (Base - Standard)) from the MGU-K at a given speed, overriding the ramp-down for battery management, if that already started.
Overtake simply changes when the maximum deployable MGU-K power ramps down when the following car is within a predetermined time behind the leading car (so far it was 1s for both races we had).
apart from building a new engine/waiting for the new fia compression ratio check, could ferrari do any upgrades to their power unit to have more power before miami? if so, what could they do?
for me it does still feel like ferrari has battery and software issues along with the less powerful engine
I feel like the phrasing of overtake confuses me. It could totally be a me issue, but I feel like a different word/phrase may work better. Overtake sounds too similar to what DRS was doing to me. I know it's filling that void so it is similar, but to me it sounds like it is adding extra speed rather than extra threshold power over the lap.
Maybe I'm not making sense and just need to get used to the new phrase. But "boost" and "overtake" are too similar to me and I think that's what's leading to most of the confusion.
In very short and simple: Boost lets you use full power at the push of a button whenever you want, Overtake lets you use that power up to a higher speed when you follow another car.
Why didn't both McLarens start in Shanghai? I mean, as far as i've heard from the race commentators yesterday they had some issues with the power unit (or something about the electrical thing). But what happened to that rocketship from last year in general? Why are they P5-P6?
being constructors champions they do have the least time on the wind tunnel but i highly doubt thats the only thing
Rob Marshall is not an aerodynamic designer, but he is a specialist in mechanical design (such as chassis structure and suspension) to maximize aerodynamic performance.
Therefore, I suspect he might be good with ground effect cars but not so good with hybrids.
This year, it's more important to maximize the performance of the power unit and energy recovery than to maximize aerodynamic performance.
• Boost Mode
This function itself existed before 2025.
Drivers could manually adjust the deployment (release) of the Energy Recovery System (ERS).
In 2026, this was officially defined and named the "Boost Button."
Purpose: Defense and offense
◉ Defensive Pattern: When being chased by a car behind, use boost to pull away.
◉ Offensive Pattern: When wanting to catch up to a car in front, use boost to accelerate at the corner exit and pull alongside on the straight.
⋅.˳˳.⋅ॱ˙˙ॱ⋅.˳˳.⋅ॱ˙˙ॱᐧ.˳˳.⋅⋅.˳˳.⋅ॱ⋅.˳˳.⋅ॱ˙˙ॱ⋅.˳˳.⋅ॱ˙˙ॱᐧ.˳˳.⋅⋅.˳˳.⋅ॱ
・Overtake Mode
A new feature for 2026
Purpose: Overtaking on straightaways
"Overtake Mode" and "Boost Mode" are additional power modes that use the same battery energy (MGU-K).
Since both use boost, people don't notice the difference, right?
🔆The difference is whether or not an additional 0.5mJ of regeneration is possible.
◉ Overtake Mode: Allows for an additional 0.5 MJ of regeneration.
◉ Boost Mode: No additional regeneration is available.
✨
Normally, the amount of energy that can be regenerated per lap is limited to a maximum of 8.5 MJ.
(This regeneration limit varies from circuit to circuit and may be changed in qualifying and sprint qualifying sessions if the FIA deems it necessary.)
◉ Overtake Mode: An additional 0.5 MJ is added, bringing the total maximum usable per lap to 9 MJ.
◉Boost mode: Charge is reduced from the normal 8.5MJ by the amount of boost used.
No, the 0.5 MJ additional Recharge in Overtake is not the only difference.
The additional 0.5 MJ charge in overtake mode is indeed true.
I never said anything to the contrary, your text, which honestly reads as if it was written by an LLM, just omits important aspects of what Overtake allows the driver to do and presents it as if the 0.5 MJ were the only difference between the two modes.
I'm not a native English speaker so my writing may sound unnatural.
I don’t copy and paste LLM.
I sometimes use a translation app to translate my own writing into English.
Therefore, I'm not good at expressing myself or communicating effectively.
˚✩∗*゚⋆。˚✩ Sorry if I made you all feel uncomfortable.
No, not at all uncomfortable, just a bit confused maybe.
I got a bit hung up on the 0.5 MJ (which I in turn forgot to mention in my replies to the original question tbf).
Anyone know of somewhere I can find the characteristics of each circuit? I'm looking for information like top speed, number of corners, track length, stuff like that.
racingcircuits.info for the track length and so on
There won’t be a good resource for top speeds, as that greatly depends on the cars and the specific circumstances (i.e. at many tracks we‘ll see higher top speeds this year, so any speeds you might find could be far away from what the 2026 cars can achieve).
Thanks! Was just looking for rough estimates anyways. Just want to see if the information will help me tell who may have advantages at specific circuits throughout the year.
Is active aero controlled by the drivers or the car?
The car i think
I could be entirely wrong, I'm too lazy to research
But in theory it makes sense for it to be the car
Yeah, thatd be way too much to keep track of over a lap. I know they do a ton, but not changing the mode 6 times over a lap
oh yeah, no way you could do that
The active aero is driver activated, so yes, for every Straight (Line) Mode zone, the driver presses the SLM button.
Apparently they are allowed to arm the system prior to the activation line, so they don't necessarily have to press it the exact moment they cross it, like they had to with DRS. Unfortunately I do not know how far in advance the system can be armed.
Wow. Fascinating. We need the buttons on the wheel guy to ask the question again. "Do you prefer more buttons or less?"
It's not specific to each zone. The active aero has exactly two positions between it can be switched, which also has to happen within 400ms, so relatively quickly, to avoid exploiting the change between the modes (which Mercedes arguably already started doing in China, as their front wing SLM deactivated slower than the regs allow at the end of the longer straights (they apparently said they had some sort of failure, lets see how quickly it deactivates in future races).
In Mercedes' case: the yellow button in the top left corner, where the DRS button always was
Ferrari is faster in slow stuff, while mercedes in faster sections no?
Read a few articles and my teany tiny brain is thinking of ferrari destruction in monaco and a mercedes engine masterclass in monza
pls correct me if im wrong, idk if i want to live anymore
Mercedes is faster in straight than Ferrari
But Ferrari is faster in all types of corners
particularly in the lower speed corners
So, is it actually tuned for each corner then, because I'm hearing that it both is and isn't
No, it‘s not.
Corner Mode has one position and Straight mode has one position.
Those can individually be tuned to the desired load but that‘s it.
You can slightly alter the activation/deactivation speed of the active aero, as you do have the 400 ms window but you can’t tune the two end positions per corner.
Any good videos going in depth with the new regulations?
really? all corners?
i saw an onboard where george pressed the sm button before the back straight in china out of the corner but not entirely sure
man the boost button i think is just hidden out of view
below mark
that's where the overtake button used to be
anyway, i learnt how f1 teams compute pressure drag by integration
pretty interesting
and if drag coefficient of an f1 car is 0.9, how much will it be in straightline mode? 0.4-0.6?
I would say that yeah
I need to see some data again but from what I saw yeah
i thought it would be low speed only. and mercs were faster than hadjar everywhere in melbourne
low speed, mid speed, high speed, straights
Not low speed
Not sure how much I trust the hadjar numbers though because it’s so much higher, and it’s the same in China.
you can ‘preload it’
it’s just my guess…..
in the case of this year’s regulation in those low corners, it’s difficult we know whether the car is slow or they drive slow down intentionaly for charging.
✨
⚫︎The Lift & Coast or ⚫︎The charge mode setting that converts the ICE's engine energy into electrical energy using the Mgu-k and stores it in the ES.
They might lower the gear for charging intentionaly depending on the situation.
Do they calculate the value through testing with a model which doesn't have the drs on
Or whatever it's called now
High df configuration
Why was the MGUH deemed more expensive and complex than MGUK?
Will active aero be allowed in wet conditions because last year DRS was disabled due to rear instability but this year both the front and the rear wing are low drag/low downforce
Yes but only the front wing SLM will be allowed to be activated, most zones will start a few meters later and SLM zones through curves will be removed entirely, see the circuit maps below for reference:
can anyone explain what this new controversy is surrounding merc’s front wing? i’ve seen it making the rounds online
they can now change angle for straights vs corners but they’re supposed to switch really quickly and in a more controlled way
people noticed on mercs car that the front wing doesn’t always move at a consistent speed. like sometimes it looks normal, but other times it kinda transitions slower so the theory is they might be using a loophole where part of the wing moves first (so that it passes the FIA tests), and then the rest finishes moving slightly later on track. if that’s true, it could give them better speed on straights and smoother balance into corners
nothing’s been confirmed illegal yet though. Ferrari basically just asked the FIA to look into it so rn it’s more like “suspicious and clever if true” than proven cheating lol
Yeah I believe it closes up to 0.8s seconds instead of 0.4s or smth is what they are saying (updated ty)
(up to) 0.8s instead of 0.4s
Yeahh thanks I knew it was smth 0.8 lol
ended up being McLaren asking
ohh ok I was misinformed than 😓
no worries! i was informed ferrari first but legal documents showed mclaren
is merc illegal
Cleared by FIA nope
Kind of. If the wing malfunction (it's the official explanation, so we'll go with that for now) had been spotted earlier, the car would have likely failed scrutineering but now it's too late for that. Essentially, they got lucky.
For this weekend it is/has to be fixed, so everything should be fine.
Could the way the floor of the McLaren is designed help it with its good pace? Im tryna compare the RB and the McLaren
Also, whats scrutineering…
Scrutinizing is when they check the cars and make sure they're within regulations
Thank you
No, but it will likely lose pace compared to others in august with a new engine compression rule
They will also probably have a new rule to force merc to change their front wing
the TD will be put in place in june
apparently their front wing was a technical error
Ah ok
dont know how much of that I wanna believe
I believe they lost lap time because of the wing though
maybe a little bit, but theoretically would be more intended to regulate the balance of the car under braking smoother when the active aero closes
Agreed
i don't buy that merc has an engine compression trick
Hey everyone, hope you're all doing well, I'm a student studying electrical engineering and I have an assignment where I need to interview a practicing engineer outside my field. I was wondering if anyone would be open to a quick interview, it shouldn't take more than 10 minutes and I can work around your schedule completely🙏 please let me know if you're down for letting me interview If anyone's down to help me out, please just drop me a message
RB22 upgrades
DM?
this is just on verstappens car I think
hadjar has the old spec
Didnt know that was legal to have different cars
Does anyone feel that the new regulations have made things less safe? Bearmans closing speed on Colapinto was ridiculous due to the harvesting.
It happens a lot of times
Like when a driver crashes the car he loses the upgrades
Because they only had 1 spec for him
And he gets the old version
Here’s Japan. Take everything with a grain of salt because public data is pretty poor. It’s more a fun exercise.
They can only transfer so many upgrades, and want to test if the upgrades actually work before giving it to both drivers
Ive been looking for this kind of data. Thanks for sharing!
Lap 19 (IMG 1) vs Lap 20 (IMG 2).
Ollie Bearman - Grey, Franco Colapinto - Blue.
Looking at speed data.
From this raw speed data it seems that Ollie Bearman's computer malfunctioned and assumed that they were at the next corner and deployed the battery. Drivers are usually not deploying at this point in the lap. An additional piece to the puzzle in my opinion. Doesn't detract from the fact that Franco seemed to move unneccessarily to the left during the corner which left Ollie no space to pass on the outside.
I can't find battery deploymement telemetry anywhere, I don't think that's been made public yet
It sort of looked like he was moving aside to let Ollie through
You should rewatch it
It still in a way looks like Franco shifted back to bearmens side then realised he was there and tried to go back
Electrodrome :D
What's the best setup for Mario Kart worlds open world race? 
.
It’s not true it was a gag for April 1st
Ty god
btw what do yall think of my suggestion to the fia? (this post is already up btw)
Why are duracell aa batteries better then redbulls battery?
Swear redbull is made for giving energy.
HIGURUUMAAAA
has there even been a fast car that handles so bad the driver has to fight it
Ferrari uh
I think 2014? Idk..When Alonso drove for Ferrari really
<@&781898349006684170>
didn't ollie use boost?
i don't have CAD i need an approximate value for sm
The car gets mapped in straight line mode and cornering mode
It’s the same model just with the wings open
Im backk
Has anyone heard about any news about what technical changes from the teams we might see for Miami??
aston
only team that i know of that is bringing major upgrades is ferrari
mostly to reduce drag and close the straight line speed gap to merc
not f1 but can someone explain how this works?
How what works
Im pretty sure its just dark magic
The pattern (and the fact it almost immediately wears off) somehow allows the tyres to warm up quicker
Also I’m pretty sure it’s partially just to show off the reusable materials they used
The pattern doesn’t allow the tyres to warm up quicker, it’s all down to the compound and the tyre‘s construction.
It‘s basically only there for marketing purposes (“it looks cool“).
what stopped the FIA from adding a front axle generator to these cars? was it just weight related problems?
since that could fix most of the battery related issues with these cars
it doesn't even have to be a motor like the MGUK
Ferrari, Mercedes, Honda & RBPT 
Audi has great knowledge about it with their LMP1 and Formula E experiences
It's different to f1
everyone who's name doesnt start with an "A", and ends with an "udi"
whether its a generator or motor there will still be some resistence on each axle and the resistence at each wheel can be variably adjusted the same way how introducing a motor allows the motor effect to actually happen at each wheel and teams can adjust torque at each wheel that way too and yeah the audi expertise factor also plays a role becuase of their pevious LMP1 programme
The new upgrades for the RB22
The bodywork is definitely interesting
Jesus Christ that's aggressive
Is it?
Max is so cooked this year in f1 but absolutely cooking in nls
Uh neither actually
haha i love that we’re still getting bigfoot image quality 
the sidepod looks very interesting
Double macarena, double the trouble
anyone able to give a quick answer? is Ti‑6Al‑4V a good alloy for race engines?
Short answer is yes
But has a low melting point
On what do u plan to use it
Hi everyone!
Subject: Team radio clips unavailable via the end-point of F1
I've been working on a personal project and wanted access to the team radio clips of all the drivers for the project.
I was able to find and access them via the https://livetiming.formula1.com/static/ endpoint which gives team radio clips from 2018 to 2025.
For audio clips prior to 2018, when tried to access it like this: https://livetiming.formula1.com/static/2017/2017-05-28_Monaco_Grand_Prix/2017-05-28_Race/TeamRadio.jsonStream, it returns access denied.
Similarly, for the Ausie GP of 2026: https://livetiming.formula1.com/static/2026/2026-03-08_Australian_Grand_Prix/2026-03-08_Race/TeamRadio.jsonStream
Another way of doing it is fetching the YT video posted by F1 and clipping it into parts and including it but that would take a lot of work and secondly those personally edited clips would need to be stored on a personal CDN server to be accessed by other users. This may/may not lead to F1 putting a copyright strike on this (depends on fate).
I primarily wanted to get the team radio clips for 2026 (prior-2018 is not particularly necessary). Thus, wanted to know if it is available/can be accessed elsewhere for 2026 data. Or has this endpoint been moved behind a paywall or will be posted after some races or the end of this season.
In some very specific parts, yeah. Intake valves, connecting rods, etc. It can't be used in parts that rub against another, as the surface tends to stick. It also doesn't sustain high temperatures very well.
A connecting rod is the best example of where to use titanium, it doesn't rub against anything, it's not exposed to much heat, and it really badly needs to be lightweight.
alright cheers
im a massive idiot needed the alloy for an engine block and submitted an assignment whilst almost passing out from exhaustion 😭 😭
aka im failing that thing
spent a crisp 1hr looking for engine block alloys and couldnt find anything but that without clear reasoning on why to use that alloy
It's not good for an engine block. Too much heat and friction. In engine blocks aluminum is king and will probably be forever.
upgraded sf-26
i'm no aerodynamicist at all so if someone could explain this it would be a big help
i tried to find an image in a similar angle to try and find any differences
better one even
Here you can see the new parts much clearer in diffuser including
︀︀- Vertical wing on sidewall (similar to mercedes)
︀︀- Compleatly reshaped diffuser fence
︀︀- Tail wing / diffuser extension looks to be changed but unclear how
︀︀
︀︀You can even see the new winglet on the front endplate
Quoting CL16 inside 🇲🇨 (@CL16_inside)
︀
🔴 EXCL : Some INCREDIBLE PICS of the SF-26 EVO ON TRACK AT MONZA!!!!
︀︀
︀︀(You can see that they reworked the FTM. You can also see the appearance of a vertical element on the footplate. New bargeboard. New RW…)
︀︀
︀︀(📸 Leonardo Boschi)
Sidepods lookk just a bit tiny much diff maybe just me
All of these things together just looks like they were having trouble getting enough inflow into the rear-end. Adding vertical elements, especially at the front, hints that either (1) the car was too sensitive to something like yaw angle (car's direction in relation to air) or ride height or (2) they found that overall the vortices were not stable enough to be maintained throughout the car and were dissipating before then more than what they otherwise could impede.
They're going to need more extra stuff around the car to make the diffusers functional enough as the floors are far simpler when compared to last year. The fact that they increased the center of the diffuser makes it very likely to me that they're having problems with yaw angle specifically, that is, downforce disturbance when the car is cornering and air is coming at an angle.
Holy speculation
@chevrolet my car goes kaboom
Guys, Redbulls doesnt fully rotate. It just makes a Bigger gap with the i (i cannot spell this word) in the middle. Anyone wants more like details. I recommend these videos. Probably more sources, yeah.
Ferrari is bringing a significant overhaul, described as a "package and a half," to the Miami Grand Prix. This major upgrade for their f1 car will be showcased on April 22nd during their filming day at Monza. We'll dive into these crucial f1 updates and what they mean for Scuderia Ferrari's performance.
Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 o...
Ferrari's innovative upside down rear wing has caught everyone's attention, but guess who's joining the game? Red Bull! 🔥 With major upgrades ahead of Miami incoming Red Bull also seem to have a unique rear wing design that could be about to change the race 🤔
#shorts #f1 #formula1
--------------------------------------------------------...
In short redbull = Upsidesown
Ferrari= SpiNny wooo
For anyone confused about the two
Is there a way for drivers to not deploy as much battery so they dont lose it all and super clip?
Im sure there is but if there is it probably isnt optimal or else teams would be doing it
The side is different
Nop
F1 unchained 🔥 🔥
He's one of like 3 f1 youtubers i follow i rly like his vids
Actually, does anyone have any other reccs for f1 youtubers that are more on the tech side? I follow him and chainbear
LawVS is the only real bearable guy I can sit through LOL
(sry somehow missed this) oooh i have seen his vids a couple times, thanks for the rec!
100% recommend! He speaks like you’re kind of there and is known for his attic and ladder 🤣. Very nice to watch
Info + Fun great combo
where can I look up the regulation changes inbetween Japan and Miami? I've heard they'll change something
Any youtuber who covers F1
Or the official F1 releases
P1 with matt and tommy! They are freakin best
So apparently they've been working on this wing since the middle of last year wtf
It's not a copy of Ferraris at all and apparently more elaborate?
QRT: Aperta
Come home to see the RB22 has that macarena wing.They've changed so much on the car with this upgrade. This shit better work
this is funny
Yeah Its not like Ferraris wing theyres doesnt fully rotate like Ferrari just makes a bigger gap nth crazy
Idk whats funnylol
it’s a year older design not a copy that’s funny
Inseety
it doesn't "just make a bigger gap"
it appears to rotate the other way compared to Ferraris (and all other DRS/SLM wings so far)
I just simplified it for everyone ik
All n all its different to Ferrari’s that what what I was saying
actuator in the middle is interesting considering the ferrari spinning wing doesnt have it there
they better use ts, pierre gasly aint ready
Word I was lookin for LOL yeah its interesting
whats also interesting is the fact that when the flat rotates, it ends up higher than the rear wing endplates, which im not 100% sure is legal tbh
very excited to see how it ends up tho
Probably is since when Ferraris rotates it kind of does as well, I think the main thing is just if it closes and opens in time without being slow
Yeah true
Although it does look like a massive difference
The gap it makes is so much bigger
Thing is it looks even less reliable then the Ferrari one
Looks like the chair you get at the family cookout Vs the Family gathering
True
Yeah tbf with the way it looks in the open position it seems like it’s a 50% chance of it flying off
True
Yeah it's not gonna finish a whole race
Structure looks and probably is way too fragile
I mean you won’t know unless you try
Sidepods look really interesting as well, basically a new car atp
Although tbf I do think having the actuator in the middle provides some stability, opposed to the Ferrari which is holding on for dear life on the sides
So ridiculous
thats so hot
has pierre washed cooked for the first time since 2023?
It’s a very.. creative reading of the rules that is gonna get protested very hard
looks like alpine 2023 (or 22 not sure)
I seems everyone but Aston and Mercedes have basically brought a new car
Turns out Haas and Audi also barely brought any upgrades
Does anyone know why some teams opt not to have both vertical and horizontal outwash and upwash some air from the FWEP? I'm making a 2026 car as a personal project and I really want to sort out air distribution before the front wheel.
Very unrefined and basic endplate design but I wanna ask why this isnt seen more often--- 1 hori and verti element on the fwep
so turns out red bull made the wing i thought of lol
<@&781898349006684170> ^^^^
And I‘m surprised they did it this way, for the aforementioned reasons.
I‘m still waiting for better photos of the wing, especially the hinge area.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/article/former-f1-driver-and-paralympian-alex-zanardi-passes-away-aged-59.5ZkbE4nhnJnG43M4J6aHXq. 😢 rip to bro 😢
`“I feel like a V10…if I ask any of the manufacturers who are in F1 now if they produce any cars with a V10, an era that many of the cars had, but now, no,” he said.
“The most popular and easiest to work with is the V8. You get the sound, less complexity, lightweight.`
can someone explain how 2 more cylinders adds such complexity and weight?
quoted MBS from: https://www.motorsportweek.com/2026/05/03/fia-confirms-timeline-for-f1-return-to-v8-power/
The halo in crashes like Gasly’s today in Miami does not impact it much at all am I correct in saying that
While it will have effect it just isn’t a major saving point
Correct, it doesn’t impact the survivability in such incidents much, if at all (it does usually impact the ground though
)
Ok good cause I was saying that it was then I relised that I am house going off the fact that anti roll hoop was amazing before and halo may touch ground but the driver head wouldn’t
Halo didn't do anything for gasly's crash
Only thing was the anti rollbar if I'm right
At the top of the air intake
yeah the roll hoop did its job perfectly in that crash
The Tyres being more secured as well compared to old cars.
In older cars Tyres wouldve exploded and fleww off
is aduo coming after monaco or before canada?
ive read on a few places that the fia changed the first aduo check from monaco to miami due to the cancellation of saudi and bahrain
but lately idk if its miami or monaco
What’s the difference between having an extended endplate vs non extended rear plate (just not a long end plate) ?
Can you show examples of both?
I‘m not entirely sure what you’re referring to.
Like non extended is
And extend might look like
And also why do some end plates curve/taper in
In the case of F1: regulations
No team would have created a rear wing like that if they didn’t have to.
As far as the other two go, I‘ll let someone with actual aero knowledge answer that.
😭im dead
Is there a reason why an end plate would be that long ?
No damn clue but theres different endplate designs for different outcomes which each ever design the designer thinks is better. Or the best. Dunno how to rlly explain it
-An extended endplate helps keep airflow from forming vortexes when being propelled up
without an endplate, airflow can spill out the sides which creates vortexes
this then induces drag as well
Yeah but look at the 2 end plates I sent. Ones longer than the other
I’m asking what’s the difference between those 2
1 is a normal, more conventional rwep design
2 probably is large due to the incoming wake of the nose(prolly) or perhaps thetr are more than two rear wings or a very steep one in between the end plate, requiring more guidance from the rwep to work properly and generate downforce
take for instance this very similar design,
the slope is very steep, which therefore needs more guidance from a vertical element so the air is pushed upwards more directly, rather than spilling out to the sides
hey is anyone on here in the f1 industry and would be open to answer some questions about college and working in f1? (i'm starting to apply for college soon)
I’m a current F1 aerodynamicist. If you want aero do an aerospace degree and try to do a student placement (but not the end of the world if you don’t, I didn’t). Do extracurricular things. Learn CAD.
Basically ground effect side pods
thank you !!
@tall wyvern does taping the panel gaps really make a car more effecient? just about to try that with the current prices 
From a technical standpoint. Which f1 car would you consider one of the greatest
From any era
Ez
F2004
Ih wait
Technical
Safety wise technology probably later cars like Modern 2010+.
HMmmMm
Brawn Gp car
Might suck later on
But
Rare beauty
W11, FW14B, MP4-1, P34
Hey Folks, I wonder if I could get a bit of feedback I have been working lately on my side project https://formula-telemetry.com
W11
What's the difference between Aerodynamacist and Aerodynamic Engineer?
Same thing
Can someone help me with the rb techic im stuck
There is a gap here
And I think their shouldn’t be
Where the hell has the light grey part come from?
The white piece w the hollow x is near nothing in the instruction booklet but it's in between two pieces in your pic
Can i ask questions too lol
1.Do you draw things to make the design of the aero part and then later materialize it to test if it's feasible?
2.Is this job stressful?
I mean I'm going to engineering so I'm just exploring things
The aerodynamicists draw stuff for CFD, but always trying to keep stuff physically possible. Then model designers take the bits that the aeros release and make them into real parts, then the full scale designers and composite designers make those into real car parts eventually, for the bits that make it onto the car.
In other words, the designers set rules the aeros are supposed to follow so that parts won’t break etc.
In my opinion it’s more exciting than stressful in the sense that you are tested all the time so it doesn’t feel like busywork you get stressed over so much as a challenge you are competing for
So like u give the drawing to the modellers right?
So I have to be good in sketching for Aerodynamacist? 😭
You draw everything yourself in CAD, or get a surfacer to do it for you, then what you draw goes to CFD. If the results are interesting then it goes to a model designer who uses your CAD and adds in stuff like wiring, sensors, bars for strength etc. then those parts go in the wind tunnel. Eventually all the best bits go onto the real car.
What's cad and cfd
Sounds interesting
I have a last doubt for ya
Now u can't shift from F1 Aero to Airplane Aero right?
Cuz u have to relearn everything
The parts are different from an aeroplane

anyone here a software dev and looking into the ERS systems? I've been working on a project since the start of the season now and have made alot of progress, was curious to see if anyone else has looked into it
No, not me
Did that help
Noob question what's the ERS system
I am a dev btw
Energy Recovery System, but more specifically im talking the deploy/harvest of the battery
What have you found so far?
i've tried alot so far, too many to detail rn unless u really want to know;
what i'm doing rn is extracting every bit of f1tv graphics data overlaying it ontop of telemetry and then seeing what that gives me
I think with throttle telemetry + speed trace + good priors you may be able to reconstruct using an NN or something, but still very difficult
the big question for me is wether you can take previous races data to analyze a new race with no label data
so far i have trained a model in australia that is able to predict battery SoC within 8%, but not sure it will work on different tracks
thus why im extracting more data rn
A lot of that sounds foreign to me, but keep up the work. Would love to see some infographics someday.
CAD stands for computer aided design
It's what engineers use to make models of stuff in computers before you manufacture them
CFD is computational fluid dynamics
It's simulation of fluid in software
It's useful because there's certain things you can't test in wind tunnels due to scale
You don't have to be good at sketches but it's not a bad habit to draw from time to time
Helps in brainstorming from my experience
The people who work in F1 aerodynamics and aerospace go through the same education
Though a lot of people take mechanical engineering because it's more broader
But you can absolutely shift between ground vehicle aero and aircraft
Though highly specific roles like F1 aren't as open to that
The physics stays the same, how you apply it changes very vastly
F1 deals with low speed aerodynamics
While aircraft deal with low speeds to much faster regimes
Id say knowing both aircraft and motorsports aerodynamics is pretty helpful
A lot of concepts are used by both
U have any tips for CAD? Cuz I will be having it at school next year
Kindly asking
Good Sir
I personally use onshape but its not hard at all
You just look up a certain thing you wanna do and 90% of the time there will be an old guy on YouTube who made a tutorial that's 2 minutes long on it
It's hard to give advice on it because it's really simple to use and there's so much to do that it's better to just learn on your own on the fly
i had autocad in my first year of uni and it's very fking easy dont worry
Oh ok
I'm in 3rd grade high school in Poland (idk which grade it is in the US or UK system) and I will be having it in 4th grade
Why do teams run horizontal elements on their FW end plates that seem to be pretty mild when deflecting the air?
My diagram is what I think airflow would sorta look like... I'm making an f1 car myself and I cannot for the life of me figure out why teams use the designs they use. I tried using a very upwashy element, like a small extension of the front wing basically that generates downforce + upwashes the air to the top of the tyre, but I'm feeling skeptical about my design. I need advice!
Eg. Aston martin having a very mild winglet that goes down only slightly
Is it to keep airflow energized because theres no point in deflecting or?
i could be wrong but it looks like that's for the brakes to cool down
/avoid suspension arms to reduce drag
Btw have you used any CFD software
Idk eaither tbh, it's weird because that would probably generate lift instead of df
Maybe it was mainly to direct air
Btw in your diagram the air would follow the curve/camber of the airfoil more closely
Hitting the tyre lower than where you drew it
I've seen aston martin front wings where the airfoil is inverted
That'd create df and upwash but idk whyd they want the opposite in this case (this is australia if I'm correct?)
I have in the past but i got lazzy in cleaning geometry so id have to spend hours making sure my chanes to the geometry works fine enough that i am able to simulate on simscale for example.
This picture is from the lates (as of posting) video from F1 Unchained talking about the new upgrades coming into montreal.
https://youtu.be/k_cyjX-T1ho?si=3XIidMpvAiLM8jPr
timestamp is 2:26 if you wanna see the full picture.
Every F1 Team's 2026 Upgrades for the Canadian Grand Prix – Full Breakdown!
The 2026 F1 season is on fire as teams arrive at the iconic Circuit Gilles Villeneuve for the Canadian Grand Prix! Who’s bringing the biggest aero packages, floor upgrades, suspension tweaks, and performance gains in Montreal?
In this video, we dive deep into every s...
RN I feel that this type of design is a balance between downwashing and keeping air energized enough...
i will experiment with different designs tho..
RN my next few steps in development will be adapting this piece and adding more vertical outwashing elements (Like the merc canada fwep upgrade) but in a much more bold fashion
That's nice
What the name for this
Halo ?
The thing on top of the halo
Halo winglet
it doesnt really have a name but
its mainly used to streamline airflow
Around the driver's head
I think this goes in technical
Did the upgrades redbull install really make that big of a difference in canadian gp?
So far it seems like they are keeping up/outpacing the ferrari in the race atleasy
It might be too early to say but current rankings have got me curious
I guess the end of the gp will really tell then
Yeah
Now that the race is over i have a question for our techys
What happened to the rb during the race?
In the beginning it seemed quite fast i mean verstappen was pulling away from lewis and hadjar was keeping up with leclerc
Then in the second half hadjar got speedmogged and slowly hamilton caught upto verstappen
I heard verstappen complaining on the radio about cold tires but is that the cars fault or is that not his fault to not drive in a way to heat them up?
ive been trying to spot this out on every weekend but cant seem to figure it out
are these regulations's rear wings still changeable (for example they would have a high angle for monaco and the skinniest angle possible for monza) or its just a default one
Redbull def has improved, they had issues with bouncing at the beginning.
But fixed, they def have pace but they in my opinion seem to struggle defending it. Maybe just me.
But i think hadjar wasnt gonna catch lewis either way. charles had active aero and was able to pull away from Isack isack struggled to stay within that zone
@smoky lynx
.mute 1508410839093481492 parlay scam
Member "1508410839093481492" not found
Honey pot i assume
Weird that the message stayed
Afaik it should probably still be changeable
still changeable but teams have a lot less incentive because active aero strips all the drag down the straights
what is porpoising
basically as car goes faster the ground effect gets stronger and pushes the car down more but at some point the car starts touching the ground which breaks the stream of air that caused downforce which makes the car go back up and the cycle goes again which makes the car "jump" on the straights
watch some 2022 footage, focus on the straights and you'll see it
<@&781898349006684170>
Making an F1 Car for fun and I need to know if my design is legal. The blue object is an S-Duct, with the purple organic-looking segments attaching to the engine cover (green) so that it directs airflow down to help keep air going down more attached. Is this engine cover design legal?
Another view
Not sure why F1 teams do not add the highlighted components;I also need to know if the highlighted parts are legal...
Red Bull's 2020 F1 season was another story of failing to live up to pre-season hopes, then coming good late in the year once Mercedes had already wrapped up the championships. So what did it get wrong this time? In this video Scott Mitchell explains the car trait Red Bull was stuck with in 2020 and why it couldn't get rid of it. And is there ca...
Can I trust this??
its the race
i'd ask our resident technician TooLow but he's not here
@granite tundra
actually he is.
Yes, the race is formed by former autosport journalists mainly.
Oh ok
i'd say that's a pretty reasonable analysis tbh
the one thing i'm iffy about is them supposedly using the wastegate exhaust to feed into the airflow downstream of the diffuser
i'm personally not convinced it would converge in any meaningful way, and like they said, the wastegates are only in sporadic operation so i doubt that was the main reason why the exhausts were relocated
it's a pretty sound explanation though, the fundamentals are all correct
yes
if you get a pitlane start when will you have to start accelerating the car?
When you press the gas
do you have to instantly go when its lights out
"cars may then join the race once the whole field has passed the end of the pit lane for the first time after the start."
so to use bahrain as an example, the pit exit lights will go green when the last car is past this point
I think it's best you watch Albon in China
His start was from the pits
iirc he had to start slow and the had to pick up speed
Like a standing start from the pits
But he was dead last there
That was probably his best drive in F1
@abstract pawn join us in #formula-1
100% his best drive in f1 from last to 10th
I saw that
e'
I'm still confused, '' how does the DAS system at Mercedes work? ''
if anyone knows just dm me
The DAS system is controlled by the driver either pulling or pushing the steering wheel, hence the name "dual-axis steering @short ether
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_uKHNJLSQs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=giWg44Uprb4
@short ether check these videos if you're interested
The six-time champions brought a new innovation to Pre-Season Testing as their "Dual Axis Steering", or "DAS" for short, sent shockwaves through the paddock. Here's why...
For more F1® videos, visit http://www.Formula1.com
Like F1® on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/
Follow F1® on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/F1
Follow F1® on ...
You guys wanted to know how an F1 steering wheel works! 💭 Hang on, we know a guy... 😉
Which bit of F1 trackside tech do you want to see next? Let us know in the comments.
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel to never miss any of our videos! http://bit.ly/12EFRRD
okay thanks a lot
I hope they ever make at echnical explanation of how the system works
whats a good f1 game for computer
f1 race stars
does williams even do steering wheel molds?
where is the drs button in the williams wheel?
they dont overtake
Too slow to activate
These car's are fuckin' computers LOL
"Sebastian told us, he had to start his car like a computer"
i would be confused
"Can you repeat the question?"
On the back
I don't understand why they kept this design, I personally think as a driver it must be a bit information overload, the regular designs other manufacturers use seem a bit better especially because you could tell what button you're actually pressing
Congrats @twin ridge, you're now on lap 5
thanks carlbot
You can tell what button you are pressing on the Williams wheel too?
If you look at the steering wheel below it though, like all the buttons are spaced out and have a different design, so without looking at the steering wheel you can kind of tell what button you are pressing, whereas I don't think you could tell as easily with the williams steering wheel
maybe I'm wrong, I've never used a steering wheel like that tbf
The picture he posted is Kubica's special wheel
Since he has a damaged right hand they put most buttons on the left
Ahhh
And how many buttons a wheel has will usually depend on the team and driver
the Williams wheel just looks so outdated
but the williams wheel is my fav wheel
They're the only ones who haven't put the screen on the wheel directly iirc
Didn't know they did that
Still mad respect for Kubica for still having driven F1 cars even after his crash
IIRC he was barely even gripping the wheel with his right hand
Most of the time he was just resting it
Mad
So he did everything with his left one, jeez
Mostly ye
Polish Formula 1 driver Robert Kubica is returning to the sport after a serious accident in 2011 partially severed his arm.
why is shark fins in F1 2021 removed?
Shark fins in modern F1 were only used in 2017
do drivers need to remember 'all of these' ? or most are just programmed before the race
2014 Lotus F1 Team driver Maldonado has a miserable practice session. China 2014
that guy was just.. different
yea
any normal examples? 😅
They need to remember most of those yes
Hulkenberg got like a whole book from Racing Point last year about the buttons and switches
That he had to read and study the night before he hopped into the car at Silverstone
Russell asked merc at sakhir about where buttons were on the wheel,
Williams still no screen
I think that's an older wheel design, before the hybrid era
Wait no, judging from the buttons, I think that is Robert Kubica's steering wheel
Yes, but the DRS is on the back.
I really think the render artist who did this could've added the screen separately on the Williams one
The traditional style screen display really fits Williams imo
isnt the williams wheel very light compared to for example the merc
It is said to be, yes
Well according to what laws of physics and technical engineering... without the electric components and the weight of the screen to the wheel, the steering wheel will give you more car feedback since it's gonna be lighter
me: can we get Hamilton in China 2007 at home?
mom: we already have Hamilton in China 2007 at home
Hamilton in China 2007 at home:
the incident when he was adjusting buttons on his steering wheel reminds me of myself playing F1 2020
Red Bull and Alpha Tauri look exactly the same
bruh Williams still sticking with a early 2010s-looking wheel
Whatchu expect from teams who are owned by the same company? insert spider man pointing meme
Ferrari and Haas too
They do but there are a couple differences, Red Bull and Alpha Tauri are exactly the same
Merc looks like a wide chicken
Well the HAAS has a higher hanging part so it's a bit different
the mercedes wheel always looked so cool
the haas wheel looks like a ferrari wheel
its looks like a dtm steering wheel
the williams wheel is the best
McLaren best
I think williams and red bull have the nicest ones
separate dashes are super nice
I dont like either of em
I prefer the Mercedes wheel
Ah the silver
lovely
the front part was 3d printed at the time which was really cool
+1

gamer wheel
It's as long as any other wheel lol
they need to attach screen to wheel
They need to, or you want them to? 
yh
It is lighter and therefore it gives you a better feeling of the car, apparently..
rlly?
Yes that is apparently why
its funny russell complains a lot
ohk
i like the merc wheel
not ferari
also alfa and red bull wheel kinda mad
In what year was the pit lane speed limiter first used?
Fairly certain the rule was a thing in 1994 but was that when they made the first speed limiter as well?
pretty sure they brought it in at the 1994 Monaco Grand Prix after a pitlane incident at the San Marino GP
something else happened in 1994 San Marino GP?
too many things
I think the pitlane incident was that someone lost a wheel and that wheel hit someone? similar to Webber 2013 at the Nürburgring
Yes but I'm talking about the car's speed limiter, not the regulation.
oh
renault said in 2019 that they were the only manufacturer of engines to get over 1000hp
V12's 
lol
v12 twin turbo double hybrids
I am not sure that second point is correct
Any driver who uses a set of tyres of differing specifications during the race may not complete more than three laps on this set before changing them for a set of tyres of the same specification. A penalty under Article 38.3(d) will be imposed on any driver who does not change tyres within three laps. For the avoidance of doubt, a set of tyres of differing specifications will not be considered when assessing the number of specifications used during the race.
I would assume that applies to using not your tires as well
F1 2021. Same chassis, same cars, same story, right! Not quite... 😉
There are some BIG rule changes coming for the new season, and plenty of challenges to overcome in '21 ahead of F1's radical rules shake up for 2022!
So listen up as James Allison talks you through the big changes coming for F1 2021 🧠
Don't forget to subscribe to our channe...
Anyone here involved in F1 want to give me a job in the states? As an intern or laid job that can give me F1 experience
nope

You should consider emailing teams
I think it’s on their website
that's not how it works
there are very few placement/graduate intake opportunities in teams, let alone in america
right now.. i'd say there are a grand total of 0 f1 team placements in america
what about Haas?
haas don't have a particularly big manufacturing/design presence in kannapolis
plus i've seen absolutely nothing from them in terms of internships/grad intakes
and if your tactic is to try and find a placement through discord.. you won't get anywhere
It's better to try something in like, actual American racing series
honestly as a designer/engineer, it would probably be more reasonable to relocate to europe and just go through an f1 intake
Congrats @granite tundra, you're now on lap 20
aren’t most of them in UK
and i remember checking out some interns they hired
the common thing is they all did projects worth mentioning during their education as you might guess
aerodynamics and software engineering was the two areas that stayed in my mind from the job adverts of teams
also try doing a summer internship at rolls royce or companies like that
it’s in america, right?
it says the head quarters is in UK
Basically 70% of them yes
Only exceptions being Sauber/Alfa Romeo, AlphaTauri, and Ferrari
Who are all in Italy....
Sauber is technically Switzerland
It's just a glorified sponsorship
it is still glorious Sauber underneath the Italian facade
Sauber is still Swiss based but Ferrari has lend them their facilites for testing their cars
Sauber is Switzerland yeah
but ferrari supplies alfa with their fiorano test track cuz alfa is powered by ferrari engines
And because Switzerland doesn't have any racing tracks 
Well except Formula E tracks
Reason; all racing is banned. not kidding. you legally aren't allowed to host a race in Switzerland, has been that way since the 1964 Le Man's disaster
A few years ago racing with electric cars was allowed for Formula E, but no other racing is allowed
Fuck 55
All my homies hate 1955
Hillclimbs are allowed i think
Yeah
I bet hammond knows that
Point to point racing with timing is allowed
So rallye?
Well that Hillclimb actually was in Croatia and not Switzerland 
Nah can't be lol
Was it actually
Rally and hillclimbing is allowed
Imagine they banned Motorsports cause too dangerous but allowed group B
Lul
Nevermind it is in Switzerland @obsidian abyss
For some reason I had heard Croatia
But yeah. Hillclimbing and rally is allowed
The car Hammond was driving was from croatia
That's an interesting question I'll check online
AH that's why
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rallye_International_du_Valais
A rally in Switzerland
The Rallye International du Valais is a yearly rally in the canton of Valais in Switzerland. It was founded by Philippe Simonetta, a local wine dealer in 1960. Since 1980 it has been part of the European Rally Championship and in 2007 and 2008 it was an event of the Intercontinental Rally Challenge. In 2009, it became a top category (coeff. 20) ...
Drag racing also is allowed
Since it's point to point
Also there has been actual swiss f1 GPs in Switzerland, last being in 1954 since it was held in August, while le Mans was in july.
And then these weird swiss gps held in Dijon, France
Lol the Swiss Gps in Dijon were just because someone else held the French GP name and Dijon wanted a name so they picked the nation closest to them
a strategy a lot of tracks used like Imola with San Marino and Nürburgring with Luxembourg
They should allowed motorsport in Switzerland again, the safety has been heavily improved since then.
they'd probably have to do another referendum to repel that of 1955

They were the first to confirm they make 1,000hp, of which idk... Mercedes could be like 80hp up
switzerland does have karting tracks
i think mercedes had denied that at the time
Oh wow. Believable
Renault have hinted that they have broken the four-digit horsepower barrier with its ‘improved’ 2019 Formula 1 engine. That is despite the fact that, just two weeks ago, a Mercedes engineer denied that even the championship-winning engine has broken through 1000 horsepower. “No, not even Ferrari,” the engineer told Auto Motor und Sport about tha...
THAT'S DOUBLE UNTRUSTED
also hitting 1000hp isn't particularly hard challenge
i'd be more surprised if there was any team in 2018-19 which wasn't hitting 1000hp in quali trim
iirc there was promotional media from merc back in 2016 putting their ICE at 750-780hp
which puts them very close to the 1000hp mark already
yes.. 750 + 160
cause their overall car is shit?
also if mercedes being the best engine has said to not cross 1000hp
idk if Renault can do it 
here's skippe with his rant on why the placement of the tunnels is wrong
continue ahead
Well I... Get it more now than I used to, because the downforce on the rear is further back, which'd have more torque effect
But you have a whole ass tunnel
And you make the most downforce at the front
Bruh
Why does it confuse you
Because the point of a Venturi tunnel is to make the downforce either throughout it's length or after the bottleneck
But it seems the 2022 cars have the biggest expansion zone in the front
Which seems like a bad idea because you want it more centralised towards the centre of mass, no?
without looking at the actual numbers, i don't think we can say whether or not that's the case
there might be a region of lower pressure towards the front of the floor, but it's happening over a small area of the floor
whereas the pressure downstream is higher, but seems to be a lot more consistent heading back towards the rear wheels
Yeah
plus you've also got the work from the diffuser at the opposite end
eh i couldn't really say
but it's following a similar pressure distribution to what we're seeing on the current cars
Is it? There's alot more on the rear on the currents
Unless this doesn't take into account the sealers... I... Idk
my understanding of that is that it's still work done by the diffuser
with the new one drawing the air further back and up
but idk what the actual numbers behind that sim is
also keep in mind the amount generated by the FW will be decreasing as well
so they could well be generating less pressure at the beginning of the floor in 2022, but the decrease in downforce from the FW will (possibly) help prevent the balance getting shifted out of whack
Well in any way, I'm sure Brawn and Co know more then us and that it works
actually there's an interesting point about the pressure on the rear of the current floor
because to me at least, that looks a little too messy to be all coming from the diffuser
Well we know there's alot of fins on the rear wheel hubs
yeah i think some of that is just going to be air from above spilling down
isn't the tunnel just supposed to imitate a reversed wing-shape?
ehh, not really
well, sort of i guess
you might be thinking of bernoulli's principle, which exhibits the same behavior for an airfoil as it does a sculpted car floor
i.e. accelerate one side of the floor/airfoil to generate an area of low pressure, which produces lift
... Negative lift, that is, before we get confused
Which is what pretty much all previous executions of Ground effect have done bar... I mean even the BT46🅱️ technically
What's the role of the 3 find at the entrance of the tunnel
Fins
They're Vortex generators
Why do you want this?
With the aid of the slightly rounded floor edges, it creates a Vortex that spills into the tunnel, creating an air skirt
my understanding was that they were for sealing the floor
Which stops the air in the tunnel from spilling out
Afaik those vortex generators started with CART after the BLAT Gurney Eagles were beaned
potentially trying to tidy up some of the wake from the front wheels as well
but i'm not too sure about that
Ok
hm maybe
doesn't look like it'll do anything for the outwash, but it looks like it's feeding some of the inboard wake back towards the floor
No because they... This is the thing I actually dislike
They obviously know Outwash is worse
Yet they try everything to, keep that damn front wing 40m wide
It's so damn annoying
And... Well ugly, the front of a car shouldn't be the widest part
idk, maybe they've tried to keep it wide to help the wake coming off the top of the tyres?
potentially trying to get it to work in conjunction with the deflectors
Chief if you wanna bend down the winglets so they might as well not exist
Why make them exist?
the bright sight is that although actual maximum outwash width isn't changing, it drops off a lot more aggressively past the end of the car
Also fun fact, the rear tyres are getting thiccer still I think
Yet the fronts are getting a tad skinnier
diameter or width?
my theory is that they didn't have much option to make the FW smaller
considering they're putting more focus on it as an actual downforce generating device
maybe to help with balance issues like you said
From 660
The rear tyres I think are going to... Uh... I'll need to check
Coz the mounting widths won't be tread widths
ah i had this saved
i remember the diameters were changing, width.. i can't remember
Yeah so 725mm diameter tyres with 18" rims
... You've... Got the screenshot my gamer
that's a rim thing, not a tyre one in the regs
i didn't have actual width in front of me
The tyre mounting widths are like... Uhhh, gimmie a sec
that's current tyres?
Current tyres are 305mm/405mm tread
Right so
Current Front: 305mm Tread, 348mm rim mounting width with a total width between 370-385 mm
Current rear: 405mm, 429mm, 455-470mm
2022 Fronts: 335mm mounting width, with a complete between 345-375
2022 Rears: 429/450-470
So I was wrong, the rears are staying about the same tread width wise, but the fronts are dropping to say 275-285
So we returning to the 70's style where the rears are huge as hell than the front?
hey i wont complain
Lol
that thick ass bro
Step ladder
this version of the Ensign had even worse cooling than the one without these radiators on the nose
imagine some rich guy buys a load of these cars and makes it his staircase
did u see the " /s"
