#f1-technical
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
le castellet: "Am i a joke to you?"
track limits: "Ah shit, here we go again"
Yeah "fake gravel" is a bit of a misleading term
i was gonna say, thats just coated with gravel glue
How long does it take to fix a gearbox?
Few hours so max should take part in fp2
What happened to this first 2021 concept?
It looks quite bad but I don't think there was ground effect
It was introduced during the 2019 Singapore gp
I think
Nvm 2018
tbh
its looks like poop
the 2nd one which they introduced was a lot better
simply
simplier FW, RW, sidepods compared to that
(compared to this)
Yeah the first one looked very complicated and prob more vortex n shit
2nd version looks almost like the complete opposite
It was just potential designs that meant nothing other than just to generate some hype
why are the red bulls so quiet compared to the over cars?
Sometimes you can see a electronic device with the driver names with leds for each of them, what is that used for? Its something behind the scenes. I can't find an online pic of it..
are you talking about the pit wall
Can teams replace say the rear tyres and keep the old front ones if they are the same compound. Idk why a team would do this, maybe it suits the driver more but are they allowed to
Like maybe the driver thinks the fromts and fine and prefers the understeer or something idfk
No
No, the tyres are not just front and back, its a set. When you hear that they come in for a new set of tyres they change all of the wheels. In 2020 in bahrain there was an interesting moment, where mercedes with russel and bottas messed up the sets, so they needed to come in the next lap too to switch them back.
Yeah I onow im not stupid but theoretically if the tyres are the same compound like soft/soft would they be able to change it from like ORR/ORL/OFR/OFL to like NRR/NRL/OFL/OFR if they are the same tyre compound (soft to soft, medium to medium, hard to hard)
Like I get its a set of tyre
But like theoretically
Say they forget the front tyres
So they only replace the rears
Is that allowed
No, it isnt, they need to come in again to not receive a penalty from the FIA
And i didnt called you stupid
they do it on the super bikes but it would be interesting to see how something like that would work in f1, altough i dont think it would
what does a TD do
can someone explain what beam wings do?
the fake one is glued to the ground the real one not
it changes how the car should be run
How are the cars restarted after they are off on track, like Tsunoda did?
i dont think yuki switched off the car
im not sure tho
Beam Wings work two fold in the case of F1 cars here. They first extend and add an element to the Diffuser exit, increasing underfloor downforce, and secondly increases the efficiency of the main rear wing elements above it
I think he did, then they told him to restart the car
does the q2 fastest lap tire compound rule still exist
not anymore
Congrats @gilded wave, you're now on lap 5
2022 and onwards, you can start the race on any tire regardless of what you set your q2 time on
Doing a rescearch project, does anyone know where to find CAD files for the 10 original sidepod designs? The regulation mention teams publishing open source materials and I’m wondering if they’re part of that
likely regulations
With the hybrid system this year every car should be abled to restart
T'was banned
The F1 solution was ElectroHydraulic
As Pneumatics can't react quite the same way
Where did you see this?
Why F1 cars doesn't have ABS brakes...?
Without abs you have more braking power therefore being able to brake later
Making lap times quicker
I also think it makes the sport rely more on skill
than machine
someone let me know if im wrong
U dont
those open source materials are on FIA servers for F1 teams for use
not for the general public
Ah, ok. Thanks
what does it mean when people say "the williams is slippery on a straight"?
It simply produces less downforce than other cars so has less drag
Not necessarily, otherwise the red bull wouldn’t be ‘slippery’
It's different for each car, but in this context, Williams have the least amount of downforce, and also don't have much drag, so they are zooom on the straights
aight thx
The only thing you can know is low drag, that’s it

Guys can someone explain how does lock up work?
when you apply too much force on the brakes
the disc stops or rotates slower than the speed of the car
so instead of spinning the tyres slide along the ground
When the brakes apply more force to the wheels than the tyres apply to the road
Loss of grip can result in a lock up because bascially less friction
or when you turn and brake at the same time, the inside tire will lock up because it has less load than the outside tire
Hey guys! Can someone please briefly explain this flowchart?
Or just let me know what CU means?
MGU-K control board, you seriously couldn’t go to 5.2.2 yourself?
💀
Dnf like 5 races
It’s the hybrid system of the engine
Can you drop the link?
Just Google f1 regulations and open the 2026 PU technical regs
Damn AM really got wings for both extreme levels of downforce
Also, why are we seeing teams cut out a piece of the rear wing this season, first done by Haas I think?
Was it just a small innovation thought up this year or did some rule change this year allow stuff like that
Easiest and cheapest way to reduce the downforce produced
Yeah but was something like that not allowed before or did they only just think of it this year
It's hella crazy to see how pointed down the wing is compared to what they use at Monza
During the start of the 2010s, adrian newey found a genius way to place his exhaust at the edge of the sidepods such that the exhaust fumes are directly blown towards the rear diffuser, redbull designed special throttle maps and engine clamps with the help of renault promoting flow of exhaust fumes; and although it resulted in low acceleration top speed compared to others the car was pretty hard on tyres and rear produced a tyre squish effect.
The exhaust positioning paired with double diffuser produced a lot of downforce from the rear to the point that the rear wing could be designed to produce really low drag and downforce as most of the performance was coming from the diffuser and not the wing at that point and the v shaped front allowed the drag reduction on the car to compensate for the underperforming renault engine
With the introduction of hybrid powertrains the exhaust is placed in between the two beam wings but it's positioning angle may vary depending on the concept of the chief director of the cars design thus resulting in a bit of df from the beam wings but not as much as ones from the older exhaust concept
The blown diffuser is now banned entirely
is that for hillclimb?
LMF1
damn the thing looks sick
F3?
It's explained in his book
They went for a coke bottle type design
i know it's fucking crazy
newey is an AI designed to create the best aero
Genius
the redbull runs so much higher and is still so much faster, crazy
Adrian Newey slides underneath Max’s car and just pulls air underneath, then sneaks away on the last lap, that’s the only explanation for the gap
Lmfao it already was a discussion about newey
I didn’t even realize until I scrolled up
Control unit
Still dk how this works, isn’t lower always better?
(Without porpoising)
wat
this whole fuckin season
all ive heard
rb best car on straights
tf is this
Ferrari=Redbull After Monza for force points
Rb ran a lot more rear wing
I wouldn't say a lot more but definitely more downforce than other teams are Monza
It looks like evryone is like running much higher wings than last year
Is that just cus the cars are wiser and bigger
I think with the cost cap they use one for Spa and Monza and just cut a bit of the wing out
also because there isn't much downforce being produced by the rear wing vs last year
It was a lot more lol. The wing was massive compared to Ferrari, Mercedes, Ferrari, Mclaren etc.
You can use vortices to seal the floor and play tricks on the flow, meaning you don't have lower it as much.
Floor edge sealing works like Skirts
Yeah, the bargeboard were good at this. But I still wonder why Red Bull in particular run it so high.
There is literally no benefit in running it that high.
They can run it lower and not porpoise.
they likely have a good reason to that us simpletons simply do not know about because of our lack of data
Well one possible reason is they're manipulating the air from the floor/diffuser to stall the rear wing at high speed. Hence why they had great straight line speed despite having a huge wing compared to everyone else's non existent wing.
Totally wrong, lower is more suction as a fact, ‘sealing’ the floor has nothing to do with it
And that’s also not what bargeboards were for primarily, they’re to inject high energy air into the low energy tyre wake
bumps.
If your car is higher, you can attack the kerbs better.
We’ll soon be going to the USA again, and that track is very bump as we’ve seen last year. Cars that can run high yet still be very fast will have a good advantage there.
does anyone have a breakdown of the RB18 dash
doubt it but
wanna know what all this stuff is
image isn’t mine trying to find out for a modder for AC
Can’t find the RB18 display but this is from the AT so I guess it’ll be similar
https://twitter.com/drivenbydata_/status/1532414392729477121?s=21&t=4qMx0IzPBRv8HzuLWJ8WvA
Had anyone got a picture of all of the monza rear wings?
Much appreciated
aston 💀
copied red bull, expect great straight line speed, even tested a low drag wing at Spa, still nowhere at Monza

So much drag
I don’t think red bull ran that wing in the end. I think they just ran their normal one.
Correct
Yea perez ran that wing in fp1 and fp2, but then he had the issue with his drs flap oscillating, so they went with the normal wing
hmmm, not a very complex floor at mclaren
Does it need to be?
You can if you want more downforce generated with the floor
No wonder the top speed is lacking
If only they asked here before they designed the floor,
Yeah fr we can design a championship winning car right 💀 💀
Red Bull ran their Canada spec wing.
is there any reason this part of the car is made jagged?
guessing it's not anything too significant
vortex generators come to mind but idk why they'd be used like that
I was thinking it was to direct airflow above the halo and onto the body of the car, but then it shouldnt be jagged
iirc they are vortex generators to break up the air to create a low pressure zone in the cockpit, this is to minimize the amount of air going onto the driver's heads and pushing them down
[My assumption was that] they're vortex generators for when there's rain, to direct the droplets up and around their helmet, away from the cockpit
Yeah, if you zoom in close, you can see that they're only on while the cars have Wet/Intermediate tyres
#f1-hq-photos-and-videos : #f1-hq-photos-and-videos message
#f1-hq-photos-and-videos message
https://twitter.com/danielealofan/status/1569635235335217152?s=46&t=cPqIVINBSOfiJ2HjUhNzug
Vortexes bro
Yes genius that’s a vortex inside the diffuser, not ‘sealing’ the floor
Sorry that was a bit harsh, point still stands though. A diffuser has a pair of counter rotating vortices, one from each sidewall. Vortices induce a low pressure and therefore suction on the surface to which they are attached. They are mostly fed from outside the floor. This is what this poster is referring to.
I'll understand these interesting funny wiggly blue and red traces soon
The blue line is supposed to be the road, the red line is supposed to be the underfloor roof
hiii idk if this is the right channel to put this in
but i’m doing a school presentation,, and it’s about how mathematics has been used in F1
pretty broad,, but i need resources (books, research papers, even youtube videos and documentaries) but i’m struggling to find things on the topic 😔
if you could share any relevant resources that’d be really helpful for meee 🥰
extremely broad, there's nothing in f1 that isn't maths
^
I'd recommend focusing in on one part of F1 to get a higher chance of getting pertinent sources
Wind deflector
Yes thank you
yeah i agree 😅 i want to move off from the strategy side (so like points and scoring system ) and focus on something more technical,, perhaps the usage of CFD
well, if you want to explore that maths of CFD itself, you can look for equations or guiding principles that CFD uses
Who is girl??
interesting
ty!!! :))
If it’s for school, I wouldn’t do that…
why not?
Because it’s way too complex
Maybe you could do something about downforce more generally
This is the base equations
Talk about the fuel calculations, how the cars weight affects the performance, how the drivers need to stay in shape and how they calculate how much fuel do each driver need based on these conditions
Not sure if people had forgotten this but the Ferrari SF7H had a powerful PU. The SF71H was a hell of a lot quicker than the Ferrari SF70H, especially at Belgium where it breezed past the Mercedes with ease. I'm wondering if the SF71H's PU was essentially the precursor to the SF90's insane "Warp Speed" engine
yea ferrari found a loophole in the fuel flow sensor
rather cheated in it
Is it a myth that f1 pistons seize below their operating temp?
When the starter motor delivers its RPM to the flywheel, how fast does the oil system travel?
yeah i think its at below 80 or so celcius
the oil and stuff need to be at a certain temperature to work which is why you see them warming the engine up before turning it on
during a race the engines run at around 2500 celcius
so if a driver spins or is stationary for too long the temperatures can plummet and cause the pistons to seize
it doesnt happen too often though
idk about that but i do know the cars are limited to 0.6 liters per 100km or something around there in terms of oil consumption
they don't 'run at 2500 celsius', the gas ignition temperature is around there, but the actual engines are absolute nowhere near
Water tends to be 90
Oil 110
Tolerances are too tight on things like Piston Rings and bearing surfaces that they cannot move, like how Pistons iirc are Inserted after being dipped in Liquid Nitrogen
They’re not actually seized seized btw, it’s just that the tolerances are so tight that running them on low rpm without the correct oil temp causes bore scoring and stuff.
For a piston to be seized, the pistons would have to be oversized and a different molecular construction where it expands less than the cylinder block under high temp, which isn’t the case.
It would be cool to see a vid of the pistons dipped in liquid nitrogen
this is so helpful tysm
you're welcome
whens this due lol
Because if you need a list I can generate one
i have lots of time,, till like, february
OMG that’s so helpful 😭😭
Guys
Why is it gold?
There doesn’t seem to be any centreline cooling on top of the engine
Yea even i thought that the shiny surface would keep thermal radiation from escaping
It’s heat shielding gold foil
Like this
at room temperature they are slightly larger than the bore of the block if i recall corectly
its one of the reasons why the oil and the block have to get warmed up before use
heat shielding
Oh wow.
Ah, like the McLaren F1.
But how come teams don’t use it anymore?
Btw do F2 engines have to be heated up 30mins before? Similar to F1?
And do the engines have similar tolerance and ignition technology
They use ceramic heat shielding now, rather than gold foil
Situations like that aren't that uncommon in engineering, but for a car it's very very rare and basically limited to race cars
What do they use to make it fit, whilst assembling the engine
Liquid nitrogen?
usually with interference fits you make the larger part hotter
the amount of interferance is very small the the point where hoenstly you could just warm the block up and have it shrink and cool without too much problem
Apparently the ‘seize’ and oversize thing is a myth. Of course there’s small tolerances and the metals expand, but not where the pistons are oversized.
There’d have to be a lower coefficient of thermal expansion for that.
Idrk.
I’d love to hear from an actual F1 engineer…
Forums are a land mine
maybe the piston head isnt larger than the bore in a normative sense
but in reality could still be the case due to manufacturing tolerances
so its just best to warm things up so things clear each other anyway
As far as I was aware, the inner parts are bathed in liquid nitrogen for high up builds, as heating elements may heta treat them
The whole engine being seized when cold thing is a myth. It causes wear if running when cold which is why they warm them up as in f1 longevity is key. HPacademy has spoken about this in their videos. Engine assembly wouldn't be viable as the crank needs to spin to assemble the pistons and conrods. I too thought it was true for years but unfortunately not
Does the mgu-h work as an alternator also?
Could you send the video link?
Yeah it sits on the turbo shaft and recharges the battery. So if you mean like an alternator in the sense of converting mechanical to electrical energy then yes, with the added bonus of being able to act as a motor and spool the turbo
I meant that it slows the car down. I know the MGU-K does that.
Yes.
It will slow the car down somewhat as under engine braking it will cause a resistance to the turbo turbine shaft and create backpressure. However I can't see this as being much under engine braking conditions when the turbo has spooled down from load
It also doesn’t because the exhaust side is overexpanded aka it extracts more power than needed to run the compressor side.
What would happen if F1 cars drove with Flow vis and aero rakes at the same time?
Wtf happened to the lower image 
Not sure what you mean by ‘what would happen’, they serve different purposes.
williams have discovered a loophole in the technical regulations which lets them noclip through the earth thus gaining time
No wonder they're so fast on the straights
yep
To really understand the race course, u have to become the race course
Exactly
How does the MGU-H create electricity?
Is it only when the turbo has reached its max peak of 150k rpm?
Also, does the MGU-H deploy power in any way?
It’s not connected to the crankshaft.
↑?
Is that it ?
The Mgu-H
It produces electricity using the motor which acts as a generator
And Ig it produces electricity the entire time until it reaches the limit
I see it that way
The faster the turbo runs
The faster the battery recharges
It's basically controlled by the control unit underneath
So
It deploys power
While not being connected
To the crankshaft
Simply because it's to "reduce turbo lag"
it can either harvest or deploy, not both. the motor-generator is attached to the turbocharger spool. in harvest, the exhaust gas spins the motor-generator and stores electricity in the battery, in deploy, the motor-generator goes into motor mode and spins the spool and thus the compressor.
That's it
Yeah. I’m wondering how it generates the resistance though.
The MGU-K is resistance against the wheels, slowing the car.
For the MGU-H in harvest mode, it doesn’t seem to be slowing or ‘resisting’ anything down, or is it in harvest only when the turbo is in max rpm?
Am I conflating between ‘slowing down’ and ‘resistance’ here?
well it's 'resisting' the rotation of the spool from the exhaust
will a sidepode like this give more downforce?
Not in a vacuum
Does anyone have pics of DLCC coating on metallic elements?
Or any good still images of f1 pistons and cylinder blocks. (V6)
Congrats @final dust, you're now on lap 10
What’s the second pic
idk
you asked for DLCC coating on metallic elements, i got you a metallic element with DLCC coating
Ok
Thanks
I know the engine stuff is super secretive but if anyone has V6 pics that would be nice
Resisting the pressure of the gas against the turbine... But here in lies the complexity because you wanna g3t the most lut of that without it stalling
The exhaust manifold shape is so weird, coming straight out the cylinder block
Honda did so I assume coz of the whole oh we're leaving
Yeah so it's actually a Jet
The piston engine does nothing
Air straight frough
I forgot why the Merc plenum is so much thicker, something to do with the trumpets?
does anybody have a clear picture of the rb18 dash?
meh, sidepods aren't really meant for downforce
some even generate lift on their own, but the airflow they direct into the beam wing means overall it will give more downforce on the car
Are they sitting right on top of the battery pack, then?
it's slightly behind the driver's seat
(below + behind)
Beneath the fuel cell
Beautiful
Location : Silverstone Museum
The one right next to the track
What a beauty! 
it is isn't it
that's the fuel cell behind actually
and further back is a cosworth ford DFV
Why doesn’t Mercedes use a high rake design for their floor
There is no reason to have high rake with these cars
ideally, yes
but apparently Red Bull sees a reason to use more rake than the rest of the teams
Adrian newey has always, at least since joining Red Bull, sought to use high rake concepts because he knows how to use the floor edges to seal them efficiently enough to pull using the extreme diffuser angles
They also run their car higher off the ground than the rest of the grid, if you didn’t notice.
I am not an aerodynamicist, but they’ve figured out how to make their car less reliant on being as low to the ground to generate downforce
A bigger expansion zone I assume is better than a tighter pinch point
Maybe not on paper initially
Because they can run the car higher
Mercedes can’t.
Running a car with tunnels low is important for two reasons:
- wings in ground effect produce MUCH MUCH more downforce.
- far from the ground, the vortices produced by the curves vortex generators at the inlet roll around each other. The closer you get, the more they unroll and follow the tunnels parallel, inducing suction on the roof.
Red bull have just worked out how to make their vortex structure stable and distinct enough to not roll up in the tunnels, even at higher tide heights.
The main function of rake, contrary to popular belief, is to counteract the constriction of the tunnels due to boundary layer build up.
Unroll as in from each other, not burst
Elaborate
Excuse the terrible photo; I had to dig out a textbook. In the tunnels, the vortices rotate the same way, so they roll up around each other. What you want to happen is for the vortices to smoothly follow the surface, like C over the plate. In our case, it’s the roof of the tunnel.
This is what happens with the tunnels too high from the ground, roll up. If you go lower, the vortices can’t roll up so they ‘stick’ to the roof.
what book did you get that from?
Race car aerodynamics by Joseph Katz
thank you
Does anyone on here know of a good media source for constant deep technical analysis of the cars and updates? I love 'the race' however looking for something more technical and with semi constant content
Tbh i wanna learn more about aerodynamics as there vital for motorsports
👍🏽
start with drag
what
It'll be a backfire from incorrect timing, component failure, etc.
Thanks
What is the best way to learn about aerodynamics I currently have a textbook about it but is there any other ways to learn btw I'm only nat5 in maths and physics at the moment
3pm apparently but I don't think it sounds like
Nvm timetable says it ends at 19.10 but I'm not 100% that's right
Which textbook?
Local time?
Here😂 ....or even looking for ressources online
The race started at 16:00 (or 4pm local time). Verstappens time was 1:30:17.345 . So the official time (still local) was 18:30 (+17.345 sec)(6pm) when max crossed the finish line at the end of the gp and winning his first title. (For the lazy ppl out there, the time zone there is GMT+4)
If you want a tattoo, wait a bit, bc there is still an investigation on Red Bull breaching the budget cap in 2021, putting verstappens title in risk.
||source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Abu_Dhabi_Grand_Prix ||
Race car aerodynamics got it for my birthday
That’s all you need
Race Car Aerodynamics: Designing for Speed
Book by Joseph Katz
Ok
Couple this with some CFD software
Don’t do that it will confuse you
I meant like
Just read through race car aerodynamics start to finish
As an experiment base afterwards
CFD is an entirely different skill
I do a bit of 3d modelling already but I agree with you I should read it through first for sure
Btw does the cost cap thing have any chance of effecting this season
More like a software know how than aerodynamics study
the skill in cfd is knowing what physics to use for a certain problem, the software part is just knowing how to use whatever platform you're using to access those physics, and what quirks that platform has. that's the reason some people use old openfoam releases, because they know the quirks.
Star-CCM+ ❤️❤️
sup guys, got banned on the another f1 discord server, cuz i got hacked, any ways to join again (my account spammed links)
how does the ERS system work?
i know it allows the car to get to ‘higher’ gears
but like how
iirc ERS allows the car to use more kinetic energy by charging itself when under breaking and using left over power from the engine
I'm not a expert but I'm pretty sure that's how it works
thank you my man 😎
whats the difference between pre-chamber ignition and HCCI? And which one deos F1 use? or both...
is there an f1technical separate discord server?
is it a good book?
Hcci is just what diesels do, it's compression it to auto ignition, at least somewhat
Pre chamber ignition is where fuel is sprayed out of an injector into a pre-chamber which has a spark plug in it
Ye explains stuff quite well I haven't fully read it though
The last like 5% of fuel has the spark go off and so as the injector sprays, it goes into the chamber on fire
aight thnx
does f1 pre chamber still have the 1 spark plug? or one in the pre, and one for the main
The former as regs mandate 1
ok
thanks
does anyone reccomend any good f1 technical books/journals, relating to engines and f1 tech?
Grand Prix Engine Development 1906 - 2000 Performance & mechanical analysis over 95 years by Derek Taulbut BSc (Eng) Hons. DMS
Thanks a lot
Are there any updates on RedBull exceeding the budget cap, and if it'll affect Max?
Wednesday.
Any good resource on learning race craft?
Uses 1 spark plug to ignite the prechamber system. Then uses the subsequent flame caused by this to ignite the chamber mixture. Creating an outside-in flame front rather than an inside-out one
when they say the engine needs to be preheated with 'coolant'/'anti-freeze', isnt that an oxymoron?
Coolant doesn’t necessarily have to be cold, the coolant is warmed up and fed to the engine block to warm it.
For racing IRL?
idk if this would be better for irl racing but,
how about this, instead of making cars produce cleaner are
make them produce dirtier air but then make the cars better with dealing with the dirty air
kinda like nascar
where on oval tracks they increase the dirty air for slip streaming
that only works because on oval tracks you slipstream for most of the track anyway
That only works too because NASCAR up until this point hasn't produced a particularly large amount of downforce which affects Cornering massively
Also dirty air isn't just the existence of turbulent air
It's a lack of air too
Does a driver that usually take more risk during overtake and turning better on the track?
For IRL and, maybe, sim racing. I mean like a book or something to learn about.
Im not too sure about a book. A lot of racecraft is learned on the track, or during a race. Generally speaking, @upper hull when you overtake you will often need to take a worse racing line, but be able to gain some kind of advantage within that turn or the next turn, that will put you in front of the other car.
For example if you are going into a right turn, the best racing line will be from far left before the turn,
then hit the apex on the right inside corner, then from the apex point your car towards the left outside corner.
To pass someone into that corner, you will want to be at least side by side to the right of the other car going into the corner. This will be a slower racing line for you, but it would block the other driver from the apex, so you should pass them fully by the end of the corner.
There are tons of variables though
On a Formula 1 track, drivers will be cautious in some corners and attack in others. This is due to some corners having higher risk, such as tight, medium speed corners. Although you have to have balls of steel to drive an F1 car, you also can’t loose too much time overtaking a car. If you can overtake in a faster part of the track, you will loose less time than in a slower part where it may take@m longer to execute the overtake.
I can't answer the first one..but I feel like the second question is pretty easy to answer
i was asking so i can tell the fucking fia

Understeer can happen when you run a low wing or your tires are just worn
They can't bite into the ground as easily and it'll just slide
but short answer just means your tires no bite in ground
As explained by Top Gears Richard Hammond in Season 2 episode 5
It's also suspension, aero and whatnot
Would you rather
HVe understeer car or oversteer
oversteer
depends on the driver
depends on the track
street circuits more oversteer
oversteer because you can’t see the tree that kills you
No you as the driver
Inside the turbo
And no, cars are built to be understeery and then made more responsive from there.
oversteer probabl
Oversteer
In the first few years of F1 you didn't get a choice of understeer or oversteer
You got both
But for my race vehicles i prefer a little oversteer.
Understeer can increase likelihood of front wheel lockup, creating a scenario that can become increasingly difficult to correct. With oversteer i can feel where that edge is and adjust my driving accordingly.
Oversteer all day
Just so wrong.
what's wrong?
Can you please explain a bit
Oversteer by definition is that the car turns further into the slip angle. Understeer by definition is that the car turns away from the slip angle.
This means that any slight disturbance in the heading of the car gets exaggerated, sometimes dramatically. Gusts of wind, bumps, other cars passing, walls etc etc. the first step is to make a stable car, and then you can tune the response.
The FIA informs that the conclusion of the analysis of the 2021 financial submissions of the Formula 1 teams and the subsequent release of Certificates of Compliance to the Financial Regulations will not take place on Wednesday, 5 October. The analysis of financial submissions is a long and complex process that is ongoing and will be concluded t...
So.... what's wrong then

An oversteery car being desirable
ideally you want neither oversteer or understeer.
but if i have a choice between my car not turning when i reach the corner (understeer),
or being loose exiting (oversteer),
im gonna prefer a loose exiting corner.
You have a chance of correcting oversteer, you don't get a second chance to correct understeer
although all of this comes down to driver preference and driving style
It’s not all about corner turn in, stability is an equally important consideration. Like I said, an oversteery car (another word for a laterally unstable car) will exaggerate any disturbance to its heading.
🤓🤓🤓
A car prone to understeer is also laterally unstable, and can be affected by other external disturbances.
(Lateral instability is not synonymous with oversteer) Laterally unstable just means it is easily affected by external forces.
No you’re wrong. Lateral instability is synonymous with oversteer. By definition.
source
You will notice that there is a reference for both understeer and oversteer conditions under §Lateral Stability
I will notice you didn’t actually read it.
When this condition is met, then the moments (in top view) tend to rotate the vehicle into the slip direction (understeer) and by using the previously defined terminology, the vehicle is considered to be stable.
understeer, stable
The vehicle in this case will be turned away from the direction of the side slip (oversteer), and will be considered unstable.
oversteer, unstable
Understeer is undesirable but usually more predictable so at anything with aerodynamics involved it's usually the lesser evil
Tho I can never seem to get rid of it
I'd rather have oversteer
The common bias consensus at least for Indy drivers is Mechnically loose/over and aerodynamically tight/under

It really comes down to the car, driver, track conditions, etc., whether understeer or oversteer is objectively better
You don’t know what this means
Less stable than in the linear region is what it means, not unstable. The only unstable condition is oversteer.
I agree with you here. Lateral instability relates to the undesired fluctuations in lateral position. Which only oversteer changes
You're failing to interpret the significance of textbook theory and how it applies to real world racecraft. Understeer vs oversteer is not black and white when applied to real world applications
Horrible argument, hand-wavy ‘textbook actually wrong’ nonsense.
By making a blanket statement that understeer > oversteer in racing applications, you're saying that a faster car should never slide in a corner which simply isn't true.
My argument is that in some racing applications a car that understeers is faster, and in other racing applications a car that oversteers is faster
I didn’t say that
I said cars are designed to be stable and then made more responsive from there
You didn’t accept that an understeer condition is stable.
Solid job there quoting the exact message I just repeated
In reference to racecars or street vehicles?
Nobody wants a street vehicle to oversteer
Both
Critical velocity is a direct result of cornering stiffness, mass, wheelbase and centre of gravity. If it’s too low, oversteer happens in low speed corners. It needs to be designed out of the vehicle.
But some race vehicles, racing under certain conditions, perform better with oversteer right?
Totally depends on the driver and the track. Is the track gusty? Oversteer bad (oversteery cars force the car away from the wind). Does the track have medium-slow corners? Oversteer bad (critical velocity lower meaning more spin). Is the track predominantly traction limited? Oversteer bad (demanding longitudinal and lateral grip at the same time).
In motorsport such as WRC and Outlaw sprint cars, hillclimb races, etc,
some oversteer is almost unavoidable, and driving slow enough to prevent oversteer will create poor track results.
That is definitely true, but it’s more a function of tyre grip on loose surfaces, and for WRC AWD correcting yaw, rather than oversteer being strictly faster.
This has been a very interesting argument to read
Given that Newey technically works for RB Technology, and that RB and AT ran the same chassis in 2007, why don't AT use the same car as RB as a whole to just rake in more results and cash, and see what juniors are like in a senior car, in a junior team?
because there are parts that, as specified in the rules, the teams HAVE to make/design themselves
Is that the same rule that caught out force india in 2020 about their brake ducts?
yup
to be more specific, the compontents in question are classified as "Listed Team Components", and each team must design those themselves or at least have the exclusive "rights" to use them (e.g. if they outsource the design to a 3rd party)
Does anyone else find the cars from like 2006-2008 were just so cool to look at? like im glad that the simpler cars this year has created some better racing but at the same time i want to see how complicated these teams can make their cars and the downforce etc
the current cars are too big and look fat
iirc they are planning to decrease the szie of the cars
Newey has requested it for years now but it’s really hard
Do they glue on the plank?
RB mechanic was spotted with sealant gun working on the underside
I completely agree as also the car's aesthetic is better as they're chonkier and also I think the big help is the Rear wheel diveplanes, which kept there from being dead space. Also
Along this topic, if F1 evolved 2008 to now
I'd love to see how a car would look with the entire body looking this batty
As opposed to what we ended up happening with hot spots of clashing design regulations
Each Formula One team have to design their own car, however certain components can be outsourced from different teams. For example, For 2021, Alpha Tauri had to make their own chassis, but for example the gearbox and Hydraulic components were sourced from RedBull Racing. The power unit was sourced from Honda, the same as RedBull Racing, meaning their race car was a mix of Redbull components and Alpha Tauri components. Mercedes however designs and produces all their components for their race car, without sourcing any components externally.
Is there a publicly available list of mandatory self designed parts?
You can look in the technical regulations, on the FIA’s site, should be a section on that
tight, cheers
These are the full 2022 technical regulations.
this should directly jump to the relevant section
(Appendix 5)
👍
Why are RB running relatively high rake in ground effect era?
What is ‘brake glazing’?
F1 race cars use carbon fibre brakes, and to get them to work efficiently they have to be within a certain temperature range. If the F1 car brakes go under 400°C the brake pads and discs can create a shiny surface, the shiny surface creates inconsistencies in the braking.
Is this only for carbon fibre f1 brakes
Yes, although it differs from compounds. Road cars for example can overcome glazing quickly, F1 cars can not.
Thanks.
If anyone knows good things to read on brake technology that would be nice
E
Two reasons:
- to counteract boundary layer growth, which would otherwise constrict the tunnel momentum
- to increase the diffuser expansion ratio, which increases the mass flow through the floor
The only way I feel like teams would now just jam the cars to floor is if, like the 80's or now for certain cars, there are reliefs for boundary layers
Could someone clarify for me what article says if the race is restarted full points are awarded?
I'm really confused
That's the base rule. Race is finished with a chequered flag => award maximum points.
If race is ended from being suspended then the partial scoring system comes into place.
All of this only matters if a race is suspended and cannot be resumed.
How do i make this more aerodynamic
Just put mirrors on the sidewings
How is that gonna help
What about now?
I made the wing up side down
Downforce
Less lift
It will just drop off a lot quicker or even plummet
It will make it more unstable when it's in the air
Is there any conditions you may overtake during a vsc? Such as if you will have to stop to make sure you don't overake?
Put small vortex generators at the end of each wing
Can you give me a example?
Viewer Submitted VG design in the wind tunnel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wOIALPBrwk
Some more thoughts as I think of them:
In short:
What they do:
They help air flow around things (shrink the wake/separation bubble) and help air stay attached to wings at large angles of attack.
How they do it:
They "energize" the boundary layer by mix...
Is that the wastegate on top of the exhaust?
I thought they removed the split wastegate
Also, what intercooler/radiator type is that?
Thank you ver much
No problem i am a nerd 🤓👍
I an trying to become one
Becouse i love the engineering aspect of Formula1
This is vortex generating
What parts of suspension geometry and tyre pressure/setup increases deg?
Thay is the wastegate pipe, yes
to be hoenst the only way to be able to tell is with CFD or see if you can do some basic CFD study with pen and paper
so 2D
I did a foam airplane competition on my very first of school and honestly for optmization, id would just try to see where the center of lift would be and the center of gravity/mass is
often on these types of design competitions they're quite far from eachotehr so you end up just having a plane that just wants to somersault
stuff like vortex generation and etc... you need a solid base understanding of your model not only from CFD and lab data to see if it will be beneficial
So. If my calculations are right, RB needs to get 18 more points than ferrari in austin to secure the Constructor championship too.
There is 4 races left. The current difference between ferrari and rb is 165 points. The maximum available number of points (after USA) is 147. (P1+P2+Fastest lap point) (I addded the sprint race too, where the max points is 8+7=15, no fastest lap point in sprint) Therefore rb needs to get 18 more points than ferrari in the next race.
Correct me if im wrong
So what do you call an F1 car? Just an F1 car?
As an example of what I'm getting at. You have genres of cars like Sedans and SUVs. What is the appropriate name for the cars used in F1 and other similar divisions?
Open wheel?
Open wheel single seaters
More generally, a “race car”
Then like said above, there are open wheel race cars 🏎️
I mean, it works for Mercedes
Thanks
Wtf is a clutch pipe
Does anyone know of generic CFD softwares for non-aerodynamicists, just to play around with simulations?
... Hydraulic lines
They need to actuate the clutch in order to release the grip
Did anyone else notice that AT were running 2 diff types of wings at the japanese grand prix?
why would they not have like for like specs?
I don’t mean to get too technical, but looking at the hyper probability of the hypotenuse in an astronomical sense, after hovering over the analysis, i think max verstappen won the championship
To compare both specs?
Either that or they could only manage to make enough parts for one car
An F1 car is a race car, -> more specifically an "open-wheeler", or a "single seater" race car.
Btw, open-wheeler and single seater is the same thing, just different names. In America they call them one thing and in the UK they get called the other.
an open wheel car certified by the FIA as being a f1 car
Good to know 
What about a single seat, closed wheel car then?
For example the FE cars.
Not sure what they call them around the world, and I don't remember if it was America or the UK, but they do go under the name of "single seater" (in America or UK, don't remember which).
Well I meant more like a Solus GT or
... I guess late 70's Can-Am is that
Yeah like Porsche 919
Does the 2nd seat actually exist in there?
what does aquaplaning mean?
The ride height of the car is too low to the water, stalling the underfloor aero to where the plank is just sliding.
no, aquaplaning is where the tyres don't dig into the water so the car loses all grip and just slides straight over the surface of the water
With how stiff and low the cars are now, most likely.
Aquaplaning is more dependent on tread pattern and water dispersion, so ride height has little to no impact on aquaplaning itself. It is where the tire does not break the surface tension of the water and loses direct contact with the road
yall -
soo
how do the teams come up with aerodynamic changes in bw seasons
like quickly
lets say Mercs or Rb they changed their car a lot in terms of aero
and how big eacch team could be appx-
Deep thoughts
Wind tunnel, and engineers lol
real eyes realize real lies
i was wondering why only Pirelli makes tires for F1? why is that?? also i’m asking this because the topic of rain came up and someone said wet tires now only exist to clear water for intermediates but back then around Bridgestone time they were made to race on rain? does that make sense?
why is the whole purpose of wet tires to clear the track but not race on it? like who decided they should clear track??
Pirelli obviously didn’t intend for this, it’s just that the molecular structure and operating window of the wets is so small. They’ll have to make them better for the next years.
Also wet tyres bring up a lot of spray.
but why only Pirelli makes tires for F1? what happened to others?
find suboptimal behavior from lab, practice, race data
generate ideas that could potentially mitigate or solve it
evaluate with CFD
if possible confirm acracy with testing
if it try a different approach or give up on that goal
aerodynamic development is far, far more exhaustive than it is technically challenging for most things which is why wind tunnel howers, CFD time and such are more important than necesarely having an army of PhDs that army have come up with a new niche turbulence model or something
all F1 teams of course have PhDs but not as the entire crops of engineers
the Pirelli wet tires are actually pretty good at clearing water from the track. problem is, they throw it all up as spray so the guy behind can't see anything
what is up here
the way water is launched into the air is so cool to me
except when it comes to visibility
its probably alright after the first few laps and the field spreads a lot
then again, no race made it that far
if its just one car trying to overtake another, while the cars ahead and behind are much further away, its not impossible
problem is you do throw the other cars ahead and behind in there much closer, and all you see is a wall of water
Does the aero play a part in launching the water into the sky?
like the diffuser and rear wing
yeah sorry that was a dumb question
Tire technology is at a stage where competitive manufacturers would be able to create a tire with high amounts of grip that can last a whole race. This would reduce pit stops and potentially eliminate them altogether meaning F1 loses one of its most interesting components, the strategy. Pirelli purposely manufacture tires that will create good strategy, essentially all for entertainment purposes. So basically its because the tires would be too good
basically Michelin and Bridgestone kept making tradeoffs for structural stability/safety in favor of outright speed until you got disasters like Indy 2005
so after that Michelin pulled out of F1 after 2006
and 2007-2010 saw Bridgestone being the only manufacturer
however because tire tech (has been for a while now) at a level where a tire could be made to last a whole race (pit stops were banned in 2005)
strategy was mostly based on fuel loads
and in 2010, refuelling was banned
so you had cars on bulletproof Bridgestones that could go entire races without stopping, and strategy was basically out the window
that didn't create very good racing, because even with a pace advantage of a faster car it wasn't enough to overtake slower cars in front because DRS wasn't a thing yet
ask Fernando Alonso about Abu Dhabi 2010, he'll tell you everything there is to know and more.
No
They both like rotating the car with a very sharp front end (oversteer) and iirc since the senna Era cars were hard to control he used engine shifting to help get the car rotated
I dont think anyone has a driving style similar to Senna
Max is the early braker over anything else
Senna’s thing is he hits the throttle and lets off repeatedly mid corner
In turbo era, the purpose was clear, to keep the rpms high
But he continued to do it even after turbos were gone
Some things are just hard to unlearn
In a way hes lucky it still worked/wasnt detrimental with the NA cars
well yeah and also it helped the turbos to stay spinning so he had better accel off the corner
Yeah
But yeah, take Sebastian Vettel for example. His trick that he did better than anyone else was to floor it the earliest, especially as when the car would start to lose traction, he had to do the counter intuitive thing and press the throttle so the exhaust gasses would blow the diffuser, give him more grip, and regain traction. Its something Webber never managed to do because its just so ingrained in the styles they spent their entire developmental years mastering
Kek the best drivers always rise to the challenge and will do well regardless of their driving style
There’s so many drivers that made transition from so many different engines and cars types over the years
So its not entirely surprising when hes battling Hamilton in those Ferraris, and in the heat of the moment “dont think just do”
He steps on the gas early and without the blown diffuser he just spins
Its what he essentially trained his instincts to do
Theres few that had to adapt from totally counter intuitive styles like Vettel
🇼 👍
You say that, but having more accurate turbulence models (as per your example) is functionally equivalent to getting more cfd time, since your results are more valid. In fact, teams tend to use LES, so they’re only modelling the finest scales, but simulating the larger scales.
Cause it’s six points..? The between the legs one is actually two.
can someone explain how the 2026 engine will reintroduce turbo lag?
Because you can’t have the turbo constantly spooled up anymore without the MGU-H
With a reduction in fuel and therefore engine power the Turbos won't be big
So that means we can maybe see the senna technique once again?
Probs won’t come back, there’s still good anti-lag. But now the there won’t be direct control of the turbo
No, turbos have evolved a lot since the 80s
can't they still electrically spin the turbo
if thats not outright banned in the regulations i think every PU manufacturer would go for it
You can’t spin it electrically without the MGU-H, that’s exactly what it is. Anti lag is horrible for fuel consumption and engine wear so I’m not sure what they’ll do.
You dump fuel into the exhaust
what
turbos run off exhaust gases, more fuel gets dumped into the exhaust to keep the gases going which helps spin the turbos
You dump fuel, it eventually lights, all that lights and wants to violently expand
Boom, exhaust pressure
Was wondering
Why is the slipstream so much stronger at certain tracks like Spa, Imola, Monza, etc
most antilag systems are basically afterburners
higher speeds
higher speeds is the right answer
oh mb then
Because of the way the cars are setup.....mostly at Monza I think because of the cars tend to adopt a low drag setup which diminishes the difference with the DRS
yes but even then, the cars have a lot of drag since the speeds are so high, ironically enough
typically the force of drag increases to the square of velocity
monza wing set ups give you less drag at a given speed, which then allows you to aceclrate to a higher speed where the force of drag catches up and matches the force of the engine to set a new top speed
anyone can explain to me what that 56.0 number means on lewis dash?
Isn’t that the brake bias
Yup
👍🏽
It stops the floor flexing so much
Name ?
Floor Stay
I agree it looks cool, I love the wide, low floor on the merc
yeah
Lmao
the things which hold the front splitter in place?
Ngl to, those rods/wires/whatever you want to call it on race cars look really sexy.
what were the causes for the silverstone 2020 blowouts?
maybe something to do with tire pressures
What caused the 2013 punctures?
what 2013 punctures
At Silverstone
silverstone just might be a high deg track
Ye I get all lot of deg on the F1 games
tyres being too soft for the track
Like what happened in Baku last year?
If I recall, that was the reason that there was a compound change mid season
Well Baku last year was because of tyre pressures
¯_(ツ)_/¯
dyu guys think too low pressures caused the baku blowouts last year
i think Max should just drive better
interesting
i've always just thought that it was up to the track or something to do with the location lol
Well, it is up to the track. Monza rewards higher straight-line speeds so the teams configure it accordingly
@quick palm
In Mexico you do that
so does that still give you downforce?
Does anyone know a website in here with all the Regulations (Safety etc) from every season?
Like the documents n stuff
About 20% less, further reduced by the fact you need to fulfil greater cooling requirements at altitude, losing you more downforce.
Here is 180 pages of solid 2022 FIA F1 regulations for you
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/formula_1_-_technical_regulations_-_2022_-_iss_9_-_2022-02-18.pdf
Not me downloading the tech regs
2021: https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/2021_formula_1_sporting_regulations_-_iss_5_-_2020-12-16.pdf
2020: https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/2020_formula_1_sporting_regulations_-_iss_9_-_2020-06-19_0.pdf
2019: https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/2019_technical_regulations_-_2019-03-12.pdf
From 2018 those are all downloadable, if you search up "f1 **[year] **regulations"
i ned them from like 1995-now
where can i find the older ones?
give me 5 minutes
Technical and Safety regulations from
1990-1999: https://www.f1technical.net/articles/62
2000-2009: https://www.f1technical.net/articles/27
2010-2019: https://www.f1technical.net/articles/12497
Not a full, 180 page documents, but here the pages lists (i think) the changes in the regulations
An overview of the regulation changes and several yearly statistics about this period in the history of F1.
An overview on the regulation changes since 2000, including weekend formats and technical innovations.
Hope its good for you
thank you
if you want more information from anything about the technical part of f1, look more on the website https://www.f1technical.net/
why do you need them btw?
writing a 20 page article (research article ig?)
about the evolution of safety in f1
but theres barely sources online
interesting
The FIA's archives only go back 10 years
yeah
How much horse power did 2019 Ferrari have?
good read
‘Probably used to create out wash’ lol not at those sizes
My (captain obvious) guess from that angle is to smooth the flow. Like vertical diffuser plates
Obviously its not going to be substantial on its own, but them again nothing is
any pics of the new mercedes upgrades>?
I haven’t seen any.
interesting interpretation but apparently also not a legal interpretation after all
They said the CAD was legal which means the fia done messed up
The location is actually relevant too.
The temp and the air density (which is heavily affected by the height of the track) have a direct effect on the engines and the surface of the car it self.
any opinions on the 25% wind tunnel penalty rumour and its impact on RB?
nice
Nice
If the breach really didn't affect the car too much for the 2021 season and the 2023 season a penalty of 25% less wind tunnel time is a bit harsh. Though, at the same time a cost cap breach is a cost cap breach. How much it is with don't matter and a harsh penalty may be needed to scare off any other team from the urge of doing it?
I agree
Why do we not see aerodynamics in road cars as often?
Because they save fuel economy and usually make a them look much nicer
most consumer cars are designed to eliminate as much drag as possible, on faster sports car they will introduce some lift features such as spoilers
Ye I meant drag reduction and this may be a stupid question why do they have flat backs?
often its the simplest way to do it
most car body panels are made from stamped steel which doesn't allow for a lot of form freedom but is the cheapest way to manufacture a metal product if available
also they're often have the least drag as well
hopefully this answer the question
@radiant elm
Ok thanks
most of what F1 teams are trying to eliminate is induced drag from vorticity in flow
it doesn't really exist to a alrge degree with a normal car
when it comes to that stuff, unfortunately I can't really help, my fluids and CFD classes didn't really get that far
i think thats more of an ergonomics condition over anything else lol
interior space is prioritized, and have a cube on 4 wheels maximizes that
when you try to slope that down (think SUV vs a sedan) you gain in drag reduction but lose a lot of interior space
SUVs are crushing sedans in sales
^
This is not true, you cannot eliminate induced drag. It’s pressure drag (and to a lesser extent friction drag) that can be designed out.
If you mean flat backs as in hatchbacks, it’s because if you have a slope you generate massive pressure drag as vortices form on the sloped surface. Above about 30 degrees is fine, but it goes down more and more up to 90
because its not that big of a deal. theres issues road cars have just by existing, and theres no point trying to cut corners in other places when the limits are already reached in certain parts.
If you look at cars from the early 80s and the cars now you will see a massive change in the aerodynamic design. I think it was during the 90's where some Australian cars started being developed using wind tunnels (I'm sure other countries started even earlier) because efficiency gains were there to be had. They are aero designed its just not as obvious or extreme as the speeds are lower and there are other factors that need to be designed for
Ye true
Aerodynamic design goes into every single car, hatchbacks being hatchbacks is aerodynamic, shooting brakes are aerodynamic, tonnes of cars have vortex generators on their roof now etc etc. wheels and bodies generate enough lift that cars can become quite unstable even at motorway speeds, so often spoilers and dams are put on cars to make them more stable.
fair enough, i really don't know much about indusced drag concepts as it was towards the end of my CFD class and I was only a year removed from a life threanting brain injury so it just went over my head
do endplates not effect spillover?
They do, because the more finite a wing is, the more span wise flow you get and the stronger vortices, aka the higher the aspect ratio, the less drag. Endplates have the effect of increasing effective aspect ratio as a function of the wing span and endplate height.
The takeaway is that the only way to reduce induced drag is to increase aspect ratio, ie shorten the chord or lengthen the span, since induced drag is a function of lift and aspect ratio.
Hello f1 fans
i always wonder how pit stops crews work
like this one ok 3 on each tire 2 for lifting but what is the job for the other 4 (2 side , 2 front)
i saw one time they clean the front wing but here just unknown
The battle for the Fastest Pit Stop was a close one at COTA. Just 0.01s separated the top two, powered by DHL.
For more F1® videos, visit https://www.Formula1.com
Follow F1®:
https://www.instagram.com/F1
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/
https://www.twitter.com/F1
https://www.twitch.tv/formula1
https://www.tiktok.com/@f1
#F1 #USGP #MomentsTh...
another one
how did they change the front wheels while the front wing is broken
https://youtu.be/ti3ELIlAGlk?t=277
High-intensity, quick and a need to be error-free, pit-stops are a critical part of Grand Prix racing, as it can mean the difference between winning a race and losing one. However, there are times when they can go horribly wrong, especially in these ten chosen confusing moments!
For more F1® videos, visit http://www.Formula1.com
Follow F1®:
h...
i know they lift the car from front and back and then put board with wheels under it in normal parking conditions
but here they did the same?
if i had to guess, the other crew in that mclaren pitstop are there to keep the car stable
there are jacks they can use on the sides of the car
the front/side mechanics can do many things such as:
-clear debris
-adjust the adjustable part of the front wing (front)
-take tape off of the brake ducts if the brakes need more cooling
-switch steering wheel (side)
-switch headrest (side)
the side mechanics are also there to help stabilise the car and keep it from wobbling to much while balanced on the jacks
iirc
For everyone whose curious to look at the data of Vettel vs Magnussen last lap battle here you go!
key points from this graph:
- In the last few corners Vettel out brakes Magnussen by quite a margin
- Vettel has DRS and the speed advantage can be seen.
- Vettel with newer tires consistently has better traction out of the corners and gets better corner exits.
intresting THX !!
pit stops is really one of the most interesting points in the race , 18 on the car, one goes wrong timing goes wrong
I have a question (this regarding flags and may be a stupid one but whatever)
Are white flags waved and shown to drivers when vehicles like the tractor are near/on the track? It's the whole point of those to warn drivers of these?
i assume an exception is made at Paul Ricard as that is simply the French national flag?

but fr tho, usually its double yellows from what i've seen
Isn't the White flags purpose to warn of a misc vehicle on track?
There's enough people to wave yellows and whites
What’s aspect ratio.
span divided by chord
Yes span/chord, or span squared / wing area
That is awesome to see, can really see the key differences. Where on earth did you get this data though?
well when a tractor is on the track then that's a Safety Car anyway + there'd be another hazard in first place (stranded/crashed car), so the white flag would be a bit redundant in that case. Also the tractor isn't really driving along the track, it's pretty much at one small section only.
the white flag is more of a general "slow vehicle on track" which will be used pretty much only for an F1 car slowly driving back to the pits. Any other vehicle on track will be an immediate Safety Car nowadays
Unlike e.g. in NLS, F1 doesn't have a situaion where some track vehicle would drive along the circuit for a significant portion of the lap without yellows
the only situation in relatively recent years where that was the case was that "rogue" fire vehicle in Korea, where the white flags also were (appropriately) used for a few seconds before Whiting called for the Safety Car because of that vehicle.
You can easily do it yourself with the fast f1 python package
how did drivers in 2012 see much much KERS they have left?
like cars that didnt have dashboards (redbull)
Red Bull had theirs mounted to the cockpit.
now i am no technical expert but how much downforce is expected to be lost during this week's race?
Autodromo Hermanos Rodriguez is at an elevation of 2200~ meters, which is a stark contrast to the 150m elevation of COTA
Approximately a fuck ton
Gary Anderson did a podcast this week and gave a figure that the air is around 80% the density of a standard track. The most interesting thing to look out for is how the engines perform with less air. In theory they shouldn't lose power as the turbo can just work harder. Fuel is the limiting factor not air. But if engine designers have designed a responsive turbo it may not have the headroom to work harder without exceeding the turbo rpm limit. Of course the MGU-H masks a lot of these differences so I am keen to see how teams go here in 2026 when it is just a standard mechanical turbocharger
Probably loose a lot of power
From what I remember honda engines have headroom on the turbos which is why they seem better at Mexico
why does merc have this wing as it doesnt look very legal
I think that it just doesn't have all the elements attached yet, no way they can (or would want to) run only the mainplane
especially in Mexico
You’ve heard of Monza rear wing, welcome to Monza front wing

oval course type front wing
has nobody noticed the "kinky kylie" text at the edge of the cockpit???

No because that was the name of the car 
lmfao
i have a few questions about the wind tunel
is there just one wind tunnel all the teams can use
or can you build your own and use it to the maximum you want
they were taking the austin wing to the fia i imagine
as i saw on twitter they've been allowed to test it for FP1
its legal mike elliot said they had only one and didnt want it damaged during qualifying and changing it will get grid penalty
but they have enough for mexico and they will run it
Some teams have their own wind tunnels, some use the wind tunnels of other teams. You can have your own but you can only operate it according to the rules, aka maximum speed and scale.
why do they limit the time in it?
Cost
isnt it FIA that limits the time you can use the wind tunnel?
pretty sure?
Yeah, there's a benchmark time amount, and the teams get a certain percentage either above or below that benchmark depending on their placement in the constructors the previous year
Same with CFD time pretty sure
with CFD it's basically the amount of operations that's limited (FLOPS)
so whether you have a super fast computer or not doesn't matter too much in theory
not a f1 but still a beauty
What is it
Btw, is there a cap on the voltage of the ES?
not too sure, a gp3 or something near that
U got any more pics?
Could someone explain the ‘chicken’ wishbone in greater detail?
Impressive, very nice.
Coming back to this. The ferrarais new power unit looked to suffer due to the altitude. Maybe the mguh struggling to regulate boost when working outside it's normal operating range?
how many Mj is a F1 car allowed to deploy in one lap
4MJ but only 2MJ can be recovered per lap
yes
so if you use 4mj you have to harvest for 2 laps to deploy 4mj agai
As far as I understand, yes.
The energy store can hold 4 mega joules for any amount of time, although the output is limited to 2 mega joules or about 30 seconds maximum across a lap. although it’s not necessary to use the ers system, that’s why you may see a car gain 6-8 tenths in a lap, and then drop back a few tenths when the car is recharging. It’s a little more complicated than this, as the ers system is basically comprised of the the MGU-k and MGU-H, which gathers energy via different means.
Does anyone know if they are going to be testing the new tires fp2 again next race?
Believe all tire testing is completed for 2023, believe the Mexican test was supposed to be the cancelled Sazuka test.
Thanks
No, output is 4MJ per lap to the MGU-K, unlimited to the MGU-H. It’s 2MJ MGU-K harvesting and unlimited MGU-H harvesting.
So is the Ferrari split turbo?
Their design isn’t split turbo as far as I know
I am probably going to be spending most of my time in this chat because imma try and build a scaled down version of the Mclaren MP4/5
Only thing is I haven’t got a damn clue on how to build one
All I got is some decent CAD skills and a OSHA certification
I'm sure the OSHA certificate will be useful for this
But seriously, sounds like a cool project. Are you 3d printing?
Yes
I got a ender 5 plus and I have been using it for the past couple of years
And I am 100% going to print a bunch of parts
Actually the steering wheel is going to be a modern Mclaren wheel that I found online
I have gold filament right now but I am going to get silver to a be the contrasting color
did this removal of the front wing help at all
It was meant to just reduce drag as the tunnels did most of the work
I got some of the math done
I am going to scale the car down to 68.275% it’s original size
Because length would be exactly 3 meters
And width would be 1.457 meters
Now I just need to do dimension for the nose and back wing and figure out how to not scale down the pilot area
Congrats @silver jewel, you're now on lap 5
Might have to cut into the side pods
how does the modern f1 wing help
Wdym?
He means how it generates downforce
So all that about the mass airflow rate, speed and pressure differences. Maybe also how the two elements work? I only gave a very vague explanation to him in #formula-1 , waiting for one of you to give a more detailed one. I’m interested in understanding the two elements too
Air flow pushes the wing down and thus the car into the ground creating grip allowing them to take corners faster
Higher the airflow the higher the downforce
Aerodynamics is a complicated topic and will take a few videos to cover.
Here we look at the very basic elements of aerodynamics:
- the effects of pressure
- air flow
- balance of forces
- how to manipulate air
Please do support these videos on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/chainbearf1
Twitter: http://twitter.com/cha...
Basically watch this series
i learned a lot of chain bear
lol
and other youtubers
chain bear is a great way to touch the surface
how do the wings on the side of the wheels work
i cant
it’s
confusing
to me
i’d rather have someone just say the simple stuff to my face
Where?
These?
These?
Just cleans the turbulence generated around the wheel. Hence probably a slight reduction in drag
yes
oh
The top side keeps the air close to the tyre to stop the airflow just spreading up and out, and thye lower side has a curve to it to channel/skirt air to the floor
It's more a Flow Conditioner, that is to just change the air aiming direction than to be raw downforce makers