#classic-motorsport
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
I'm jus wonderin bc when I looked up the B191A & B191B it jus shows the same car lol
Ik that in some races early in 91 they still had the low nose but it looks like that's the only difference haha
Not rlly enough to be a proper B spec car bc the rest of it's still identical to the B190
Like the Ferrari F2001B is a proper B spec car bc it had F2002 parts on it & u can tell by how different its engine sounds from onboards
isn't that what a B spec should be?
what's the difference between the MP4/2 and 2B
between 2B and 2C
technically it just means you have the same tub
Canada 2012 was a heartbroking one for Alonso
yes monaco was the time that many people thought to stop f1, after karl wendlinger's crash
in sauber
the nose is wider also
mansell only did two races in 1995. couldn't even fit in the car
between fw15 a,b a and c too
they continued development
from 1992 to 1993
That's Damon Hill during the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix
Damon believe Ayrton Senna's Fatal Accident was because Ayrton took the Corner Too Fast and referred the Car had just restarted the Race with Cold Tyres
what lap did it happen again
Lap 5 was actually when Senna died
Lap 7
It was the only second lap of actual racing though, the first few laps were under a safety car
oh
this car is actually so fire
Random Fact, Despite finishing first and second in the 1997 standings, Jacques Villeneuve and Michael Schumacher never shared a podium all season long
Was it also fire when it came to its performance?
it wasn't too bad, but clearly Williams was struggling without Newey
oh, and Zanardi had a shockingly bad season.
I see
jos and max racing suitsss
Another Random Fact, Niki Lauda never achieved pole position with McLaren despite winning the world drivers championship with them in 1984
Actually, Lauda never even started a race from the front row in 1984! Even more impressive
In todayâs video I talk about an F1 driver who showed amazing speed in qualifying, taking pole positions three times throughout his career but he was unable to even lead a lap, never mind win a race. He is one of the unluckiest drivers in F1 history in that regard. Enjoy my video on Teo Fabi
My Instagram: https://instagram.com/nedzo_f1?igshid=N...
This guy has to be 1 of the most underrated drivers ever
apparently one of sennas struggles with the fw16 was the smaller cockpit, in previous cars he drove he had enough room to move his arms and wrists more freely
And then they did the thing with the steering column and we know what happened
That's not known as being the main or only cause of his crash tho
The cause of his crash is still unknown
There is the theory of a slow puncture as well
what was done with the steering column again i forgot
is it?
Williams attempted to increase the length of the steering column, though the way it was made and soldered seemed way handmade
And in most of the onboards you can see the steering does have some wiggling
Honestly, what makes it more tragic is that before Imola, Adrian Newey and Williams already understood what was making the car have some bad moments early season and what they should do after it
about the suspension geometry or sth?
Nope,aerodynamical instability
ok! i remember it had iffy handling, but forgot where it was from
As Newey said to German Auto, Motor & Sport in 2015:
"[The 1994 Nogaro test] ... confirmed that the car's side pods were too long, which meant that the aero was split from the diffuser when the nose of the car dipped and the side-pods got too close to the track."
Citation needed though,though there the video of it:
"In addition, at a television program on the 20th anniversary of Imola 1994, Gerhard Berger recalled a conversation he had with Senna at the race in which Senna said: "We are now finally aware of the problem with this car and in two or three weeks from now the problems should be solved."[9] The FW16 indeed became more competitive after this timeframe"
oh
I mean it jus seems like rumours & speculation bc it ain't been confirmed by anyone
Hill thinks it was the car bottoming out, some say it coulda been cold tires
meh, the car stopped turning completely, that can't be either
I heard it also coulda been a suspension failure which caused the arm to pierce Senna's visor
i think Newey's stance that it was the bad welding of the steering column works out
Ye but none of this has ever been officially confirmed by anyone from Williams or the FIA
I mean fuck it there's even 1 rumour that he was assassinated
but what did the italian justice conclude
Idk tbh there's so many different theories out there that no one believes or agrees on
So Idk which ones could be true or notđ
i'll trust whatever the justice concluded
they did a 3y enquiry, no need to claim they're lying because THIS is the reason
(THIS being whatever exotic theory)
I donât trust the Italians
Took them 13 years to actually come to a conclusion
One that is still debatable as is
Ayrton and Roland
What team did roland primarily drive for
Simtek
oh
Guess the Team and Driver that seen in the 1995 Australian Grand Prix
Blud thinks it's hard to guess
yeah
benetton, michael schumacher
3 poles, but never led a lap
2 of them yeah
He basically couldnât even remember the previous day before the start of Germany 85
HEHEHEH IM GETTING THE NEW F1 CITY SETS
#1 benetton so it has to be a champion... jos verstappenđ„
https://youtu.be/l2R_Gf2LH34 ads with f1 drivers are always bizarre
1994ćčŽăăăźæćă·ă§ă«ăźCMă§ăăFïŒăă©ă€ăăŒăźăă«ă»ăăăăăłăăăăăŻă©ăŒăŹăłă«äčăŁăŠç»ć Žă§ăăMcLaren Mika Pauli HĂ€kkinen F1
1997 European Grand Prix depicting the Collision between Williams Villeneuve and Ferrari Schumacher
Michael was stripped from his 2nd Position of the Drivers World Champions as a result of the Incident, Giving Williams a 1-2 Drivers World Champions Finish
its crazy how good williams was from 1991-1997 and 1998 and onward was just completely garbage, never the same
early 2000s were good but not as good as it was during the 1990s
They may feel Slow but sometimes they will find Good Pace
in that timeframe they were works renault team and had newey
probably because adrian newey left the team and all
head took a while to restructure the technical makeup
in an effective way
you mess up the new regulations and all of a sudden are years behind so it is in that context very understandable
i mean even then williams still finished in top 5 of every wcc from 1998 to 2005
to add to missed opportunities in 2001-2003
but those were particularly competitve years for them
it more mirrors the cooled period after they won at least one of the world championships in 3 consecutive years from 1980-1982
and only won 2 races from 1983-1984
yeah probably why it wasn't so good thereafter...
Must say it is impossible to argue Fisichella is a better performing driver than Trulli at any point post 1998
Wurz is closer to Fisichella in 99 than 98 and Trulliâs gaps to Panis improve
Very strange he wasnât much faster than such a poor qualifier (Wurz)
he should have been disqualified from 1994 also
i am listening to luciano burti's beyond the grid. i havent properly seen his crash, i saw it now and man, it's scary. the tyre barriers failed. it's a miracle he got out alive. it's scarier than grosjean's crash
Why
If they had any reason to disqualify him in 1994 they definitely would have
The FIA and Stewards were handing out incredibly draconian penalties all season
Heck it continued into 1995 like he got a suspended race ban for his defensive masterclass against Hill in damp conditions at Spa
they literally found launch control in the benetton
and what about his tactics at adelaide
legally speaking this isn't even contestable because they didn't find any proof it was being used
it strikes me odd that one bad hill start is the point to which people start having serious doubts about the benetton
most of michaels starts in the first part of the season are average
and they removed the fuel filter which caused the jos verstappen incident
they didn't
the fuel rig supplier did
they even sent a whole letter to max explaining this
and adelaide
even damon has later admitted his move was late and poor judgement
if he had backed out he would have won the race easily and become world champion
we will ignore the race ban for overtaking on the formation lap and then the clerk of the course and stewards totally screwing up the penalty that michael was to serve
they even said you can serve it later on and did and he still got dsq'd
this banned him from 2 extra races for no necessary reasons
also the dubious way they calculated plank wear on the weekend of its frist use at spa
which cost michael victory
what was dubious about that?
the rules stipulated that if it was worn in places by more than 1mm it had to be taken off the car and weighed
if it was less than either 90-95% (from memory) of the original weight then it was deemed illegal
the plank at spa never got taken off
they just straight up banned him for gouges to his plank caused by off track excursions
add to that the missed italian and portuguese gp's it totally changed the picture of season where williams now had a faster car
i mean they should have won again in jerez on pure pace but michael managed to get ahead on the stops like usual after some issues williams had
Beyond the sounds, what made the V10 era so exciting and special?
It was just ferrari dominance during that era, F1 in general is exciting regardless of car specs
Even though 2003 proved to be an exciting and memorable season, not to mention 2005 being the year that Renault and Alonso scored their first world championships together?
2000 also saw Hakkinen and Schumacher go head to head once more, with Schumacher finally winning his first title with Ferrari
2001 spa?
yeah
oh yeah i saw that one on f1 channel, it was insanely scary
because the car got embedded and was like half flipped iirc
Japan 1991. The race where the Ferrari 643 turned into a "horrible truck" due to a failure with the shock absorbers
It might be a truck, but itâs a helluva beautiful truck
The image feels so defined and the track so smooth for its time
By the end of the 1990s, Mugen had established itself as the best of the rest when it came to engine supply, only for Honda to come back in 2000 and say to Jordan "hey, we're giving you engines now"
Honda then dumped Jordan at the end of 2002 to focus on BAR, despite Jordan beating BAR two years running. Jordan disappeared 3 years later.
But h...
I'm pretty sure it was a pretty bumpy circuit for the 1990s
Especially Turns 3, 4 and 5, the Esses...
Michael in the Sauber C17. Albeit in a test
yeah
was that kind of testing he did to choose the team for his brother to join F1?
livery wise it resembles the C16 a lot more
Question,was it common for teams in the 90s to use engines from suppliers that have quitted the year prior?
You know, i was thinking,wouldn't be possible for McLaren in 93' to reuse or reporpuse the 92' Honda V12 for their car?
this picture makes me smile.
I donât think it would be possible considering Honda left F1 due to the bubble economy bursting back in Japan.
And for Mclaren to continue using the RA122E would mean Honda continuing their work with Mclaren in F1, which would negatively affect them in the midst of Japanâs economic situation
And I should mention that the economy bursting was also a reason why the Yamaha OX99-11 never made it to production
Mugen Honda was there
Well, yes, but I donât think the RA122E would be rebadged as a Mugen-Honda engine and have Mugen-Honda engineers be present at Mclaren
The thought of Mclaren continuing to use the RA122E would be unrealistic, and in a way, impractical, considering the V12 was heavier than the Ford HB engine
And secondly, I doubt it would be competitive for a second year running
But still at least more powerful than the Ford and maybe more reliable than the Lamborghini V12?
Possibly, considering the RA122E managed to produce over 740 horsepower
You have a fair point there
But still, continuing to use Honda power even after Honda left the sport (despite mugen honda being present) doesnât seem right.
they could have gone to mugen instead of honda as a transition engine, would need to see the specs of the v10 footwork used
The V12 was already a mistake the idea of using it without any factory support and thus development during the year would be an insult to McLaren
I think it was Steve Nichols who was supportive of the step to begin with
Before he left for Ferrari in the aftermath of 1989
Come to think of it the only Mugen Honda deal would be on the V10 that was by then a couple years old
So the V12 I doubt was an option to begin with
the design yes, but apparently it was rated at 720 bhp at 13200 rpm in 1993. which is still some 40 more than the Cosworth HB
That is like still 60 or 40 hp down on Renault
Heavier and no support from Honda just Mugen Honda as a tuner
well, yes but the Renault was a mirage for McLaren
People forget but McLaren had the best chassis in 93 the issue was they didnât have parity with Benetton until mid season, didnât have familiarity with running the active system and their development budget was cut
Because they were paying Senna 1 million every world championship event
Williams did know how to run active and because of the power from the Renault could run more wing
but it was more sensible in terms of handling wasn't it
Prost struggled with that early season
Even then if you look at the latter half of the year McLaren were out developing them
and then they went with a french manufacturer that was making a V10
shame Ron couldn't see that Peugeot was nearlyu not as involved as Renault to develop their engine
him or whoever was the engine bloke at McLaren then
Oatley probably
Doubt it was Oatley
Probably David North
And Boudy of PS
That car did okay in 1994 but of course McLaren were not going to accept that they had just lost the best driver in the world and that was the reason they werenât winning at least a few races
Is Hakkinen/Brundle really a good enough line up no probably not
they also had quite a bit of DNFs, 7 engine related ones in the races
Yes well
I think initially because of a flywheel
And then some other niggles
Jabouille was of constant annoyance to them too
Trying to shoehorn Peugeot drivers into the car
I heard the Peugeot compared to the Renault was like you said about the Mugen. Heavier and less power
Alliot etc
haha ye fucking Alliot
By 97 though Peugeot had a decent engine
That they then proceeded to spend no money on for the following 3 seasons
yeah, clearly the Jordan in 97 was fire
Just when the new regulations dictated the importance of weight at the rear of the car more than power
Which is why it is always laughable that Peugeots response to Prosts criticism is their power output
Just when Prost took them :]
But yeah the thing is as heavy as it was a few years ago and the packaging is horrendous
shame, Prost's best season was their first... with the Mugen
which they exchanged with Jordan... who went on to win a race the year after (ok, with a fair bit of luck for that first win)
then they lost Trulli to Jordan
đ
a big shame, it could have been a great industrial success
and it was a Ligier car
the only reason I think it did that well is because of Bridgestone though
luciano burti says that the 2001 prost didnt have power steering
wouldn't surprise me, the team was on it's deathbed and would've compounded the car's poor performance
look at Jenson at Malaysia in 2001; car's power steering failed and he was nowhere
I mean
they were attempting to make an All-French powerhouse team
the main issue always was trying to get multiple different French companies to work together, while securing continuous French government support
there's a reason why Renault of the 1980's never won a world title, and why the Prost team never got anywhere
like a lot of his 2001 then
because the Benetton was horrendous most of the year
Fernando Alonso scalped them a few times early on in qualifying
which was already impressive
the support just had to be through facilitating connections, not money backing
thatâs because of internal politics
also renault back then was a public company, more fragile to public opinion
yeah they even fired prost after 1983 even though he did well
2001 benneton was bad also
they fired him because of his criticism of the internal components of the turbocharger
it was really unreliable tbh
i mean there is also that thing with Larrousses wife which is alleged but we won't go into that
blessing in disguise really because although Tambay says he thinks the 1984 car was quick enough with the level of driver like Prost to win multiple gp it still had reliability issues
he'd have likely had another 1983 season
or one similar to 81-82
yes clearly
The Tyrrell 019, the first car with a raised nose
"Raised nose"
Yes?
high-nose
elevated nose
Etc
I think the 019 should give a lot of its credit to Migeot as much as Postlethwaite
its touted as a Harvey thing only?
I think people perceive Harvey as aerodynamics
Along with a lot of other things so it moulds him into the main genius of that car and many others
But Migeot did some neat things like aero mapping which potentially allowed it to be as good as it could be
Let down by funding, engine and tyres
I think
Harvey and Jean-Claude Migeot probably
Atleast thats what it says online
âIt's impossible to apportion how much of the 019's [Tyrrell] performance advantage was due to its aerodynamics and how much was down to aeromapping, because they were inseparably intertwined. Several technical directions were taken with the car in order to support the aeromap program. The move to a single front damper was made in order to separate the heave and roll stiffness of the front axle. The fundamental problem that we were trying to fix was that drivers want the car to be comfortably neutral with perhaps a trace of understeer in high-speed corners but want it to be âpointyâ for low-speed corners and chicanes.â - Nigel Beresford
âŠ
âAerodynamically, these were pretty much mutually exclusive requirements, because the former required a nice rearward aerodynamic centre of pressure whereas the latter required a forward aero balance. Migeot's brilliance was that he created in aeromapping a tool to predict the aero balance of the car at various rakes and ride heights, and in the mechanical packages of 018 and 019 Harvey created the implement to exploit this ability.â
âŠ
âThis was done by adjusting the stiffness and travel of the front and rear axles, via springs, packers and ride heights. The car would be set up with a relatively high rake so that at low speeds it had the âpointyâ turn-in that the drivers needed to be able to attack chicanes and low speed corners. At speed the car would settle on to the front packers and lose rake as the rear continued to heave down, thus moving the centre of pressure rearwards and giving the driver the benign high speed aero balance that he wanted. The mono-shock front suspension meant we could independently adjust the front vertical stiffness without making the roll stiffness unpleasantly stiff for kerb strikes or riding chicanes or hurting the tyre performance. You can't really credit the 019's performance purely to the high nose; as with many things, it was much more subtle than that.â
ohh interesting
the first car with active suspension, the lotus 92, was in 1983 right?
wait was it the lotus 92?
ok yes it is for both questions
the work of Peter Wright yeah
Dernie was the one who made it happen at Williams later on
Yes
Though,Williams was the team who really understood and used it as it could be intended for maximum performance earlier than others
Williams also first tried it out in 1988 right?
82?
Wait I think it's the '84 McL
Because it has the shovel rear wing
It's probably Dallas 1984 then
Oh I was actually right lmao
So his 3rd championship winning car then
His Final Championship to claim that Year
By half a point, mind you
When Alain tried to push his car across the line after running out of fuel on the last lap
If he had given up in Austria...
Actually Williams tried it in 1987
And it was a great help for them, because they could run a more aggressive aerodynamic setup while maintaining the car as close as possible to the ground
They had to ditch it for 1988 till bringing it back in 1992 due to the active suspension having issues as well as the increased weight from the electronics and the underpowered Judd engine
dont forget Lotus in 87 tried it again, with better results
they ran it in 1988
it just wasn't very good
Yeah,i know.
But still in a very archaic way
i am still shocked they got beat by leyton house to 6th
everyone else above had a turbo so fair
but poor really
They only used it to maintain ride height stable and not as a aerodynamic element
mansell was outstretching himself to the ability of the car too often
as just a na engine i think the judd gets unfairly shat on
williams had other problems
losing dernie to lotus was one
Well,given that the March 881 had the work of Adrian Newey (even if he wasn't a big figure in F1 yet), it totally had a best overall package to Williams
Williams had what today would be the Ferrari 2019-20 treatment
it set the template
as for the pure pace over the season
i doubt it
williams left points on the table
The FW12 totally looks boxy
it was like 0.5% faster as it turns out
not shocking
added to that mansell and patrese is just far better than capelli and gugelmin
it was supposed to be doing the low line engine for 88
that the mp4/4 did
which is what pissed them off so much when it was found out it had to put nakajima in if it even wanted a customer deal in addition with mclaren
but that all had to change of course
Seeing the stats,damn
Mansell had 7 consecutive retirements at the start of the season
yeah i just think it is a team completely demoralised by losing honda and not keeping itself knitted together
that prevents them beating the highest place na team
actually benetton had v8's in 1988 didn't they
from what i remember byrne and other people weren't that impressed by that first ford v8
Yep,it was the Cosworth DFR which had more horsepower than the Judd by 20/30hp
Though Benetton could've maintained that V6T TEC engine for 1988
yes they already ditched their turbo V6 by 88, and thus were the highest NA outfit that year
From wiki
''When the FIA announced that turbos would be banned after 1988, Ford made the decision to halt development of the V6 Ford TEC turbocharged engine used in the B188's predecessor the B187, and instead concentrated on the development of an engine for the new 3.5L rules. As Benetton were under contract to run the Ford engine (a contract they did not wish to break), the teams designers were forced to design a car to take the naturally aspirated V8 rather than the turbocharged V6.''
makes sense, if you can get a headstart rather than maybe doing better than in 87 with the same engine
well, in the end they did do better than in 87, with a new 3.5L engine
well, new. idk how new the DFR is compared to the DFV
Really new
The DFV is a engine from the 60s that got a lot of updates through the years
The HB series just came a season after Benetton brought the DFR
ah yes the HB arrives in 1990
but HB is a totally new architecture it seems. 75 degree angle compared to 90 before
oh ok, it is still tagged as the DFR for some reason on my source
yet "Benetton finally launches its B189. Rory Byrne designed an evolution of the B188 that made even better use of the integration of the air intakes above the sidepods. The gearbox was still reversed. The suspension was pull rods at the front, push rods at the rear. This "chubby" looking machine was armed with the new 75° Ford-Cosworth V8 that delivered 630 horsepower. Only Sandro Nannini drove it, Emmanuele Pirro being content with the B188."
Well,it was pretty common in the 80s and 90s for teams to use different engine configurations or versions in the same season
I remember something about Renault testing two different versions of the EF engine during the 1984 season
Michael Schumacher and Mick Doohan
We need this with Mick Schumacher and Jack Doohan
imagine mick schumacher has a kid called jack
Paul Stoddart's epic rant about the 2005 USGP (One of the most infamous races in modern F1)
Interview with Paul Stoddart, teamprincipal and owner of Minardi, during the 'race' at the Indianapolis GP 2005. There were only six cars on the starting grid because the Michelin-runners had several problems with their tyres the whole weekend and so they decided not to race (e.q. Ralf Schumacher and Ricardo Zonta crashed their cars because the ...
McLaren in 1998, Their Last Time winning the Constructors Championship as they would wait for another 26 Years Later in 2024
Guess the Driver and the Circuit
Mika Hakkinen in Suzuka?
Mclaren in 1988 at Spa
Ayrton Senna
Throughout 1988, Senna copied Prost's car settings, believing that the Frenchman better understood how to set up the McLaren. At Spa, Prost decided to change his car's settings at the last minute by removing some wings for more straight-line speed to gain an advantage. Unfortunately for the Frenchman, this negatively impacted his car's balance and handling during the race, whereas Senna, with Prost's original settings, reported no such issues.
mika?
and where?
the best f1 season in history ever was 1982.
McLaren's?
nah mclarens best ever season without a doubt was 1980
I wonder how much of Hoshino's performance at the 76 Japanese GP was due to his Bridgestone tyres, he was the only one with them, it was their first race and he was racing an older Tyrrell 007
but then he is japanese, so he probably had extreme knowledge of that track
Look at his career in Japan though
The guy is winning championships in the 90s
Pretty sure he is top 3 the year Ralf wins the Nippon
no.
not mclaren's, the best f1 season in history
oh, well if you can find one tense like that but without drivers dying or having career ending injuries
đ¶
yeah 1982 is tragic. villeneuve and paletti died, pironi had a career-ending crash.
but there were 11 winners, 9 winners in 9 consecutive races, the person who won the championship only one one race that season.
then there's the drivers' strike in south africa and the last three laps of monaco.
true.
alain prost's debut season!
Yeah. He was 3rd in his last ever season in single seaters
Letâs not forget Hoshino won the 1992 24 Hours of Daytona with Toshio Suzuki, Masahiro Hasemi, and Nissan
top
David Coulthard making his F1 Debut with Williams in 1994 Spanish Grand Prix
how come not?
they finished like 7th in the championship that year
guess the driver - https://www.instagram.com/p/DFbEmYChMYz/
the hand position is a dead giveaway
Not to mention the onboard of a 412T2
didn't watch the video
The old school 10-2
as you learn at the driving school
yeah... alesi.
yeah exactly
Because the M29 was poo
haha same with ferrari!
Can't blame McLaren
Pretty much everyone was running the Cosworth DFV (except Ferrari,Renault and Alfa Romeo)
And Ferrari being Ferrari and screwing themselves with the ground effect with a V12 car
I mean Williams, Brabham and Ligier were regular challengers
all running the double four valve
hardly much of an excuse
their understanding of the seal created by the skirts was just poor
this is why Coppuck didn't last long once Dennis had bought the team
if it was a normal v12 it would have been ok, but it was a flat-12
But even with a turbo in 1981 they still had an overweight car with nothing like the structural rigidity the following years 126C2 would have
Also they actually run okay in some 1980 races
Jody has completely given up by mid season sure
Gilles never gives up
Just the same thing as 1981 really with a weaker 2nd driver
Not in terms of ability
But bothering to turn up
Jody beats Didier for ability every day
That is for sure
Pironi was maybe more technically skilled than Villeneuve, but slower overall?
Depends who you listen to
I listen to you đ
If you look at it statistically then he was nowhere near Gilles in qualifying
one thing is for sure, his 81 season was trash
Worse than Jody Iâm pretty sure
By like 0.001%
And 1982 he was as far back
Worse in fact
He was a 1% slower
In races people say he could be as good
There is some things to support that like in the races where Ferrari somehow leap to the front because their poor handling is not yet evident with big fuel loads then he can be close to Gilles
Or about to start challenging him until a car failure
I havenât particularly watched these races for a while so idk
It might easily be Gilles just completely mismanaging his races rather than being slower
And Jody has a healthy 1979 gap
To stand on
Like 0.2% which is way closer than it would be in 1980-1982
Imola, Zolder, Silverstone, Monza etc
I think the majority of the 1982 qualifying gap could come from Brazil where Pironi is recovering from his stuck throttle crash and resulting knee injury at Paul Ricard testing
Actually scrap that heâs like 1.3 seconds slower than him in just the opening two rounds
Like heâs 1.2 seconds slower in same San Marino GP he would go on to challenge him for
Honestly Iâd need deep context on possible misfires and issues because they had the two long sessions format
Certainly Villeneuve had elite running pace though and I donât think I can deny this
It is just as a driver heâs completely useless for a grand prix team
Heâd never perform a season like Alain Prost did in 1986 for example
Not even anything like Sennas 1991 season a driver who probably had less ability to rein in his pace for the greater good
But learnt it I suppose after Prosts departure
he still managed 2 titles after Prost left
or maybe i misunderstood what you meant
No not at all
yeah it's odd, only in USA West was Pironi quite close to Villeneuve in quali
Though I think he still almost screwed up 1990 with drives like Brazil, Mexico, Spain and Japan
The last of which is just him being very annoying
And he does also randomly crash from the lead in Australia
Doubled ended rear wing idk
Villeneuve was all over the place in that race
And finished 3rd before DSQ yes
yeah true, he was also slower than "usual" in Q
well he missed his braking at T1 quite dramatically
i know it's Gilles but still
Not sure the merits to that device at the back of the car
Forghieri said it was something so blatant to get a reaction basically
But he still thought theyâd remain 3rd
were they in the rules or they twisted it to get the dsq?
They were all fed up of the FOCA teams running underweight cars with false ballast
Like the water cooled brakes
In Brazil
The funny thing is Renaults protest in Brazil just being against the cars in front of them
The rear wing was like totally illegal and sketchy lmao
Even if it is wasnât specifically stated I think they rightly disqualified that monstrosity
it could have been legal die to a loophole, they accept the result but ban it immediately after
a bit like the fan car, except they banned it for the next season
Potentially a wasted race
Not that I think Gilles had the ability to hold it together
I mean heâd won the race there in 1979 so it is not completely out of the question
Standard non turbo win on a street circuit where the power delivery kills the tyres and also you
Probably Michelins too helping Lauda
Okay well Forghieris view is that it was legal but was almost breaking the spirit of the regulations
It for example respected the maximum size
Which was about 110cm
wasn't it made in protest of the water cooling brakes of non-works teams?
^
sorry forgot to read chat
BMW POWER!!! First car in F1 during the V10 era to hit 19,000 rpm. Piloted by Ralf Schumacher and Juan Pablo Montoya, the car had great qualifying pace but only won one race in 2002, courtesy of Ralf in Malaysia. Enjoy!
List of onboards in the video:
0:00 - 1:29 Juan Pablo Montoya, Magny-Cours.
1:30 - 2:52 Ralf Schumacher, Monaco.
2:53 - 4:14 ...
An oldie goldie from the old box: Ayrton Senna and the High-Nose McLaren Experiment at Monza in 1990⊠đđź
In August 1990, McLaren conducted a private test at Monza, introducing a high-nose design on their MP4/5B, inspired by Tyrrellâs innovative 019 model.
The design aimed to enhance aerodynamic efficiency by allowing better airflow beneath the...
14727
boomerang wing boomerang wing
w h a
which car?
Onboard with Howden Ganley (BRM). Hearing Jackie Stewart narrating his lap around the NĂŒrburgring is mesmerizing.
đïžđšđłđżđŽó §ó ąó łó Łó Žó ż
#F1RacingLegends #f1 #formula1 #formulaone #motorsport #racing #grandprix #motorsportphotography #motorsportimages #historicracing #jackiestewart #howdenganley #nurburgring #nĂŒrburgring #nordschleife
1809
it's called the green hell for a reason
thats the Tyrrell 012 in 1983
guess the circuit (weirdest in f1 history):
Avus
correct
Saudi is marginally weirder
Avus circuit
1991(ćčłæ3)ćčŽ1æ26æ„éŽéčżă”ăŒăăăă«ăŠæźćœ±ă
æăăŹăäșæżäžăăă
#F1#ăăŻă©ăŒăŹăł#V12
Kimi could've gotten the championship in 2005. That was until...
he lacked reliability a lot
correct
yeah
Only retired from the lead with a mechanical twice and one was arguably his fault
add a non scoring finish in Malaysia, only 1pt in Australia
Another factor is the no changing tire rule from 2005
what did it change for him, who had the same tyres as Alonso?
Well,the rule stated that the drivers had to use the same tyre from the qualifying during the whole race
I think Kimi's tyres had a small flat spot from the qualifying or during the race which caused vibrations to a point his front suspension broke
5 Shocking Ways Active Suspension Impacted Racing History.
A solution designed to overcome the limitations of springs and shock absorbers, it was borrowed from vehicles that transported accident victims and patients to and from hospitals in the UK.
News, curiosities, analysis, history and technical data on Formula 1, motorsport and the world ...
he had a flat spot during the race for sure
Radio Failure VS Prank War in Melbourne 1997
The Benetton Frenchman was having a great race at Albert Park, but ran out of gas along the way.
A breakdown in the radio system was the cause, but the matter became an inside joke with Brazilian TV technicians who then asked the driver himself to join in the fun. And he agreed!
News, curiosities,...
the whole country made fun of him, poor Jean
Raikkonen got a flat spot while trying to lap Villeneuves Sauber
it is totally self inflicted and I've never had much sympathy for him
Webber really should have won that race considering he had the most ideal starting strategy on the grid and just needed to be ahead of the Toyotas at the start
also because Mark was excellent at the Nurburgring
big shame Williams couldn't win anything in 2005
probably their chassis deficit started showing by then
At the 81st Members' Meeting presented by Audrain Motorsport, we had a really special Formula One car as one of the demonstrations. Niki Lauda's final win of his career was in this very McLaren MP4/2B in the 1985 Dutch Grand Prix. We were privileged to have Chris Goodwin, former McLaren Automotive Chief Test Driver, entertaining the Goodwood cro...
The Judd engines. Arguably the main customer engines of their time
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgRnOn_7ppI&ab_channel=AidanMillward
I think this concludes the 1990s engine suppliers now, and then we can move on into the return of Honda between 2000-2008 or something along those lines. There's still enough to cover with all this.
But Judd is the often forgotten engine manufacturer. Unlike Hart, it made it out the other side and continues to supply engines to this day, while ...
you had to see the the reaction of the benneton mechanics
the lotus 56, the only f1 car to race with a gas turbine engine.
makes sense why
it was terrible
was the first car that Colin had to enter under WWR at Monza though
a year after the disastrous weekend involving Jochen
It is just like the 4 wheel drive thing though
That ended up on a 500 car too
Clearly they wanted to do something beyond the standard DFV that everyone was using
Nice trick but beyond wet running I think it was just poor on track
1971 is a interesting time for Lotus because as much as Fittipaldi was not very good as it turns out he was basically injured and refused to tell anyone about it
So my conclusions on him always have to factor in such events
But regardless I think heâs lucky he was there and stayed to begin with and 1973 just sort of illustrates the point
Spent the whole year moaning while being soundly handled by a new teammate
Well,at the time the gas turbine was able to pull 500-600hp in a time where engines where doing only around the 450hp area
The issue is that the engine didn't have a gearing
Wow I saw a recap show of like the 96 italian gran prix and it is sick
So hardcore I love it. The cars are sooo loud.
Free F1 channel comes through in the clutch
they retired 3 laps from the end i guess
really? didn't know
Francois Cevert during practice at Walkins Glen. The race where he had his infamous fatal accident
Fernando's Minardi days
Black nosecone Ferrari?
Pope John-Paul II had just died
Oh, I see
rip. he died during qualifying right?
tyrrell should have won the 1973 constructors' championship
jackie stewart retired early, with 99 race starts
yes, although it was just called practice then
he died due to the improper fastening of the armco barrier
There's tarso Marques
Which got replaced by alex yoong
yeah because Marques had 0 money
like the only reason he was picked was because he was preferred to morbidelli and the likes of gene and mazzacane either lost their backing or took it elsewhere
gene far as i'm aware lost his telefonica sponsorship
couldn't get any worse than alex yoong though
big fan of him being like 4% slower than alonso in race trim at suzuka
You know, it was extremely lucky that Riccardo Patrese didn't get launched higher into the air than he did. Otherwise there was a high chance that he would've hit the overhead gantry
I always worry about those 'overhead gantries'
if a car ever goes airborne
Wouldn't be a pretty sight to see a car slammed into one
Yep
i believe webber slammed into a smaller advertisement board during the valencia incident but i donât think there was metal
There was actually a freak accident where a car did went airborne and slammed into the overhead gantry at Fuji Speedway. Not in F1 but in Japanese F3. The driver's name was Takashi Yokoyama. He unfortunately didn't survive the accident
Paul Warwick (Derek Warwick's brother) testing the Arrows A11 in 1989
Lewis Hamilton driving the McLaren-Mercedes MP4-19B V10 in a Testing Session 2004
Ralf Schumacher testing the McLaren MP4-11 in 1996
Cool helmet...
yeah these bell helmets in the early 80s slapped
think that is a simpson bandit helmet
driver in the car is norbert haug
yes the very same one.
ohhh ye maybe. i think Elio had Simpson on his helmet
i love old helmet designs
Itâs a damn shame that the racing world lost Paul Warwick so soonâŠ..
yeah i've asked about that
talent alone he should have got to formula one but beyond that you can't exactly plot a course for his career
in terms of brothers it was probably a great shame Marc Gene got to F1 but his brother Jordi didn't
Definitely. We wouldn't be sure if he'd start off with a backmarker like Brabham or a midfielder like Footwork Arrows in 1992
knowing his name, he could probably get a nice word from his brother to jackie oliver
Possibly
Considering the equipment he had, and how often it fell apart, Pedro didn't do so badly, all things considered. He was average at best, but might have eeked out some more performance had he started a little earlier. It'd be like a 40 year old trying to learn how to be a concert pianist.
I guess this is another case of stats not telling the whol...
The 7UP Jordan
7up and Pepsi haha
7up is from PepsiCo
äžć¶æ/Tyrrell ăă©ăŒăV8æ°ç
éŽæšäșäč
é/Espo Larrousse F1 ă©ăłăă«ăźăŒăV12æ°ç
I thought it was from Keurig
"Pepsi was more popular in Japan than 7up."
jordan 191 in japan?
this is one more of the weird sponsorship deals of the 1990s, just like simtek and MTV in 1995. MTV didn't pay simtek, but provided a slot for simtek's sponsors to display advertisements in MTV's TV channel
throwback to the time the bin laden family sponsored williams during their early years
they had a lot of saudi sponsors at that time aside from the bin laden group. their title sponsor was saudi airlines, or saudia
yeah look at the pic above
wait whatâs MTV again
music television, a tv channel that used to show music videos.
the 7up looks better on it
wait is this sarcasm?
nope, iâm just young
i'm 14.
I dont mind the look, I think anything on that chassis would look good
Oh iâm older but uhh yeah no idea how i didnt know that bef
The irony of getting hit by the Safety/Medical Car
that wasn't a thing
Jacques has said he had an offer for 1999
it got suggested again for 2001 but Coulthard's peformances were fine
and then Jacques made a decision to stick to BAR when it was likely he would leave for Benetton
out of loyalty to Pollock
it was a 3 year deal with performances clauses that despite having a pretty poor car in 01 were likely met with podium finishes
far as i know the only things that actually were suggested or explored were these
Damon Hill
Greg Moore
Michael Schumacher
Ralf Schumacher
Olivier Panis
the hill story is fairly known
he would only be paid for race wins and this was dennis way of saying to newey that he did offer damon the seat but he refused
Moore was an attempt to cater to the American market from Mercedes but Hakkinen decided to stay
M Schumacher had a Ferrari contract and their respective 97 peformances is never going to make him leave
R Schumacher as far I know was just a suggestion that was never really explored and Panis had some brief convo but dude is damaged goods so not happening
For the 1999 season I meant. It was in an article but in french
"I actually received an offer from McLaren," he said. "Adrian Newey had called me to ask me not to sign with BAR and to join him instead," said Villeneuve. "He liked me because he had seen what I could do with his cars at Williams and there was enormous respect between us."
Let me call Newey real quick and see if this is legit
Greg Moore...
really wish we saw him make the switch
really interesting book though
definitely recommend that read!
Rather he didnât
He was very inconsistent
Quick for sure
But a guy who had like all his ability rested in things like car control where a lot of his driving would look amazing and he would pull it off on occasion
His real career trajectory was a few more seasons in Penske in CART and then likely moving to Nascar
I donât think heâd have been better than Gil de Ferran so winning a title unlikely too
i saw an image of a crash that really traumatises me. it's helmut koininigg's crash at watkins glen at 1974. he got decapitated by the barriers. his head was literally in his helmet. it's so traumatising to see. i suggest you don't see it.
1974
overshadowed by the championship decider
between Fittipaldi, Regazzoni and Scheckter
Surtees I think got informed of it but I can't even remember if it is in the Motorsport Magazine race report at all
I'm pretty sure François Cevert died at the circuit almost the same way
yes, give or take it was because of an armco barrier
yeah, both improper fastening of barriers
typo
Alonso and Marques
Fun fact: in the videogame f1 2001 Murray walker doesn't mention tarso Marques name whenever you finished different finish position or the starting grid
I was wondering why Murray didn't mention Marques name in the game
The 1988 Formula 1 season was expected to be a close fight between the turbo powered and naturally aspirated cars. In reality the turbo cars, and especially the McLaren-Honda MP4/4, where miles ahead of the competition.
The Williams team had selected the Judd CV 3.5 V8 to power its FW12 and the duo of Nigel Mansell and Riccardo Patrese to pilot ...
12 dnfs in 14 races đ
14 DNFs in 16 races đ
Managed a podium despite running out of fuel
Cause he pushed it lol
mansell is overall one of the unluckiest drivers in f1 history
Chris Amon would like a word
^
Did bro use chat gpt or did the inner chat gpt wake uo
Oh nvm
MB I'm slow
IGNORE THAT
Cba deleting it
andrea de ceaseris' 1987 season: 15 dnfs out of 16 races
he only got that one finish because he pushed his car over the line in belgium after his car ran out of fuel on the last lap
de Cesaris had a lot of bad luck if we look in retrospect
because most of his seasons were with bad cars and he didn't crash that much
Since he completed over 90% of the race distance at the Australian Grand Prix, he was 8
It was a mobile chicane
Add Prost GP to that statement
only the 2000 model
the others at least could qualify well sometimes, or score points
sadly their biggest issue was what they wanted differently from the others, the engine
which ended up bankrupting them in the end anyway
The English speaking broadcast, mostly BBC, had Fleetwood Mac
The Japanese broadcast had T-Square
æ ć㯠1994 F1GPă6ćčŽćă«ç·šéăăă”ăïœăćç»ă§ăă
11ćčŽćăźćç»ăă€ăźăŸă«ăćŸ©æŽ»ïŒäŸżäčă§UPïŒăȘăăȘă§ăă
11ćčŽćŸăźăăŁăŠăăźăăȘă
All F-1 Fuji intro from 1987 to 2006 except 1999, 2003 and 2004
and they had epic 3d intros
That start of Imola without Ratzenberger, then the restart of the race without Senna in it... and the cheery music... that stings
The Chain will always hit different for me
They even replicated it in the official SNES F1 games
INTRO ... music: T-SQUARE - Truth
SFC - SNES - SUPER NINTENDO - æ„æŹèȘç - 1994
F1ă°ă©ăłăăȘ PART 3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-1_Grand_Prix_Part_3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F1_Grand_Prix_(video_game_series)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_System
super cool
And they performed it live
'97 F1æ„æŹă°ă©ăłăăȘćć€ç„
Guiter:ćźè€ăŸăăČăăKeyboard:ćæłćźéăDrums:ćç«čèŁäčăBass:é è€æșăEWI:æŹç°é
äșș
The back of the F1 grid in the 1990s would often be populated by chancers hoping to somehow scrape their way into the race with under-funded, sometimes under-prepared, and definitely under-developed machinery.
As F1 grew and the teams at the front became ever-more professional, the gap to these no-hopers at the back increased, eventually to the...
back when pre-qualifying existed đ
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maki_Engineering
Worst f1 team ever ???
Worse than life and Andrea moda ???
Maki Engineering was a Formula One constructor from Japan. A small team founded by Kenji Mimura, their entry into the 1974 Formula One World Championship was Japan's first since Honda had withdrawn at the end of the 1968 season. They first entered the 1974 British Grand Prix, with New Zealand driver Howden Ganley driving a single Maki F101, pow...
nah, they genuinely tried to take part. they just couldn't produce a chassis that was good enough
Andrea Moda is just???
An italian mafia member trys to run a f1 team = Andrea Moda /s
Yeah. The overall structure was a mess. Canât respect a team that try to kill one driver.
The Ferrari F310B, developed by John Barnard and later refined by Rory Byrne, was an evolution of the previous year's Ferrari F310. It was powered by a Tipo 046/2, a 3.0L V10 engine, producing approximately 730 horsepower at 16,050 rpm and reaching speeds up to 340 km/h.
In the 1997 season, Ferrari was able to compete for the world championship...
The first Ferrari driven by Schumi to fight for a title
Ralf Schumacher Big Crash in 2004 United States Grand Prix
His Crash led him to missed 6 Races of the 2004 Season
He won Monaco in that year with that car
A teenage Rubens with Ayrton
Skeletor Facts â ïžâ ïž
#skeletormeme #skeletorfacts #ayrtonsenna #senna #sennaforever #alainprost #lewishamilton44 #maxverstappen1 #f1fans #formula1 #f1memes #formula1memes #f1 #f1racing #f1driver #f1meme #f1news #formula1sport #maxverstappen #lewisham...
Join this channel to get access to special perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWhJW2RwQ6po6LhQ4IOGBpw/join
Over the past 75 years, Formula 1 has travelled to all four corners of the globe. 77 circuits in 34 countries have hosted a Grand Prix, on every continent except Antarctica. 46 permanent race circuits, four temporary race circuits, fi...
Check out this video by Peter Brook (Make sure to show him some love :)
i have heard this before
one of the best championship finales in f1 history is 1964 ngl
Some Niki Lauda Remembering Picture
1950s f1 history is weird
haha ye
Oh itâs Laudaâs 75th birthday today?
woahhh
Yes
wheres 2025 scheme`?
retro
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RXv0E8u1Ejk goes quite hard
Suscribanse al Canal para mas contenidos
TranscripciĂłn
Sigue el contenido con la transcripciĂłn.
Orange Mclaren
Oop
Nannini
God knows what track it is
Hockenheim or Magny Cours would be my guesses
Yeah i think it is the hockenheim
Yeah. 1991 started the usage of Camel liveries
yeah the reason it started being less colourful is because the team wasn't being bankrolled by the family as much as it had been
Briatore already got the likes of sanyo and mobil 1 onto the car
and then RJ Reynolds having enough of Lotus and signing a big deal with Benetton in addition to a small one with Williams
Ligier was a favourite of mine
prolly hockenhiem
The FW15C didn't have the performance advantage in 1993 as the FW14B did simply because other cars now had similar or the same gizmos it did, but that doesn't mean it's not probably the most advanced formula one car ever made.
ABS? Not found anymore. Traction control? Gone since the end of 2007. Aside from the hybrids nothing comes close today ...
Active Suspension, Traction Control, ABS, SemiAuto Transmission and Newey's aerodynamics
if cvt came...
Also, adding drag reduction system thanks to the suspension
Lotus 39 was originally intended for use in Formula One, to be powered by the Coventry Climax 1.5 litre flat-16 engine, but was later changed and raced in Tasman Series with a Climax 2.5 litre engine
Ralf Schumacher crashing into Barrichello, Australian Grand Prix 2002
Ralf Airlines
Debut season, home race, points scorer
he handled the pressure really well
think it was Brundle saying that
It was Patrick Head actually
the mechanics must not have enjoyed the coming days after that đŹ
Sacked if it is was Colin Chapman in charge
But what about Lauda! You cry. You forgot Lauda! That was a flat 12. The difference is... About 25 to thirty degrees of cylinder bank angle or whatever it's called.
But in 1991, Honda decided to add 2 extra cylinders to their V10 and after staving off a fightback from Williams and Nigel Mansell, Senna took his third title and it's argued that i...
No Ferrari?
Yeah Lauda's and Schekter's Ferrari's used flat 12's
They didn't go to the V12 until they dropped the turbos
you disagree with that terminology?
it wasnât a boxer after all
It wasnât a boxer no
The opposing pistons are on the same crankpin and move in the same direction
From an outward appearance it looks like a flat layout though
I take the view that technical wise Forghieri accepts the term Flat 12
Also the fact it was a very wide engine and much different from the conventional V12 despite taking infrastructure from a previous V12
https://realmofmotoringhistory.wordpress.com/2024/07/24/tom-pryce-the-welsh-dragon-y-ddraig-gymreig/
i always think brise stands out by far of the lost generation
Pryce was pretty good while with Williamson and Birrell it is really a guess at best
he had quite a good 75 season iirc, but aside from that idk him
He went unbeaten in qualifying and that included against future world champion Alan Jones
Bernie seems to agree he was the real deal
If you read Lost Generation by Tremayne my main takeaway is the Brise parts seem most genuine
There is also some ideal details like Tony Alcocks atheist funeral
"Tony Alcock's was the only athiest funeral I've ever been to. We all sat down, the undertaker eventually came in and said we could stand, then two minutes later said we could sit again and that was it" - Ian Flux
Pryce I think would have had at his peak been on the level of a Jones or Andretti
I am always staggered Tyrrell wanted to replace Stewart with Birrell potentially
So random
Clearly an Elf and Ford connection
I mean he was pretty good driver but there was far better on the market
Donât mean to be rude but godsend Jody ended up being in their lead car
But Birrell was seen as a promising driver, he just had no money for the single-seaters
I have one of my articles speaking about it
I'll publish it soon, it's on the old page
Birrell got in cosy with Ford though
So there is a good reason to assume this relationship striking a chord
His results in EF2 are like okay
Chevron was a good builder and it was more some isolated events against the established status quo which caught attention
But I can see why he is omitted from the lost generation quite often
Tyrrell moved on to probably better targets far as a seat was concerned but of course it was to be a 2nd car with Cevert still around until his death at the final GP
So Gerry wouldnât have been the natural team leader all is well for 74
There isnât a solid amount about the whole of the discussions from any books or other material
I canât say Iâm enough educated on his career to say too much though certainly Iâve heard well about his mechanical understanding and hard work
I just donât see Gerry being anywhere near the level Jody was in the 007 in 74
As basically a rookie effectively
First full season at least for Jody
we never got to see just how good any of them wouldve been, but Pryce i think had the most "evidence" simply due to the increased time he spent before he was prematurely taken away. Would have been very interesting to see Pryce if he had got his move to Lotus in 78
yeah it was the most likely outcome until he was killed
i'm good just motoring through life tbh
Pryce kept getting linked with Lotus in previous years for agreed swaps
with Ronnie
eventually that happened between March for Nilsson instead in 76
when Chapman refused to pay Peterson for the whole year
presumably Pryce would have happened in 78 because of Ronnie's decreasing stock within Formula 1 in difficult 76 and 77 years but then again they dropped the whole idea of Arnoux once Peterson became available so idk
wonder how Tom would have felt about agreeing to all the things Ronnie had to
like having no spare car, no qualifying tyres and having to stay behind Andretti if both were circulating the track for a win
issue is Tom's stock in Formula 1 was falling away by the time of his death too
Colin usually liked to go back to people who he knew
it would fully depend on the deal being put together and the timing
the Ronnie thing was late on
I mean it is a by product of Ronnie wanting to leave that gets Pryce linked rather than Lotus actually wanting him
they try out a few people with the vacancy of Ickx too in 1975
Henton, Watson, Evans and Andretti even is a one off until Parnelli folds
then he does sign for them in 1976
i wonder how Patrese vs Pryce might have gone too
one thing for certain is that Alan Jones' career would have been much different
I'm sure Gerry wouldn't been on the same level as Jody, also Jody had more experience driving the third McLaren in some races, plus the F5000 background he already had
But I understand Birrell was highly rated by many, not only Ford, that's why they thought of him for that place
This is not really true. He was still young for F1 standards then and having strong results for a deteriorating team. Such as running in 2nd the race before he died, in the previous year's car before blowing up. He did much better than Jarier in the previous year (76) who himself got some one off drives with Lotus (in 1978's carnage) before going to Tyrrell full time. Its hard to know if he would have accepted the terms Ronnie did at Lotus but it's also true that ronnie's deal was extremely late on which meant many things couldn't be negotiated in time
i've asked about
it was certainly true by then
there was a lot of early hype that faded away
he was in no doubt very good but the reasons he got linked with Lotus is all true
Jarier I'm pretty sure challenged for a win again at Interlagos in that same 76 season
in addition to having done so in 1975 and been on pole at Buneos Aires
Pryces finishes in the points got him the higher position in the world championship though
so I'm not sure he did much better really
both were very good in a promising car
I respectfully disagree with you, but we could go to the ends of the earth citing specific races and sessions etc.
like otherwise they both hover around in the top 10
Yeah they weren't exactly far apart
i mean there is a reason he ends up replacing peterson and then goes on to nearly win another race
in said appearance
there's also a reason Pryce was the main choice for Peterson's seat before he died
reutemann was already signed though
nilssons
aye
anyway
he was a choice that is for sure
he'd have been ahead of Keegan and Arnoux
and probably Mass who was favourite until Peterson was available
it is whether Lotus make a decision so early in 1977 that ignores a contracted Ronnie at Tyrrell
i mean if both are available then Chapman would have gone with Ronnie I'm almost sure
for the reasons i've said above
Pryce is virtually just the best option of those available prior to Ronnie agreeing to all the No2 stuff and breaking from his 2 year Tyrrell deal
think the only other places he could have gone for 1978 was remaining at Shadow or Surtees
Peterson?
ahhh yes, Pryce could well have stayed at Shadow, after all they were race winners
yes, and Regazzoni
i do like when Theodore bought Shadow
Theodore and Ensign overall is like the best rabbit hole in 70's-early 80's f1
Clay had reputation so yeah that was a no brainer
think the key part to the change there is basically Ambrosio leaving for Arrows which is why Patrese ended up there
who had been picked to appease Franco when Zorsi was removed
because he was Italian
Yes, it was a great team
and Arrows also ahd a great line up with Nilsson and Patrese
yes well
shame Nilsson had cancer
he was I think rightly not renewed by Lotus though
Chapman often had arguments with him
do wonder if Lotus really saw that as a stop gap that lasted longer than it needed to but of course in 1976 to 1977 they had no business going for the top drivers
only once the car delievered in 1977
I think so
did it turn Lotus back round to the status quo
It was a pity Bob Evans didn't stay
I like Henton
don't know much about the others
Andretti was the right choice though
Yes, to be number 1 Andretti was the right one and he deserved his championship
well yes
as the long after Ickx full time replacement
ideal the people they dropped in
to Chapmans logic yes I suppose
I do have to praise Andretti for the development of the Lotus 78
but the measures they took to stop Ronnie do stain 1978 for me
I think he was stronger than Peterson, even if he wasn't faster
in fact it costs them pole position from Watson at France that year
and I think he would would have always beaten Peterson in equal conditions
simply because Chapman refuses to let Ronnie do a lap
Peterson knew he would be the second driver
oh yes of course
but the measures are ridiculous for the time
and Andretti went on to be slower than Reutemann and Giacomelli
worse than both I think in those seasons too
Yes, it wasn't properly enhanced sometimes
i mean people talk about Gilles in 1979
with Jody
but it isn't the same
even at Italy Gilles basically refuses to accept the team order and Jody just decides to step up because he knew he would
1978 is pretty deliberate and Ronnie was such a cool customer and respectful of Mario he didn't care
obviously best option he had anyway so understandbale
At Ferrari the team orders were enforced by mid-season when Sheckter had an obvious advantage, plus Villeneuve's destrucutive tendencies made him lose points and commit mistakes.
it was only enforced when a championship could be won
which is why it never was enacted in San Marino 82
as much as Gilles thinks he was done wrong
that was just a weekend where Forghieri hadn't attended and Piccinini screwed up the communication
Peterson had more experience and was not so cash-prone and Lotus wanted the title as soon as possible, so Chapman decided to make sure Peterson wouldn't risk it
Sure it was, it was confusing
but even so
Gilles knew that team orders just weren't a thing for an isolated race
he was too naive to think of that
but he played it expecting there was no race on to a certain point in the race
otherwise I think he'd have beaten Pironi quite easily tbh
as much as I have a lot to say about Gilles his elite running pace is undeniable
it was purely because he felt Andretti had won it
having developed the cars
I am led to believe from what Roebuck has sort of said about it
a shame I think because it sort of coincides with Peterson finding his best form since 1974 again
the thing to say is an equal fight might have been irrelevant with his death at Monza anyway
amazing it was actually a fight at that point still
yeah well the M28 was horrendous
watson said it had the structural rigidity of a paper napkin that he picked up in a motorsport mag interview once
it would have been Peterson and Tambay for 79
likely Peterson Prost for 80
from then on I can only speculate
Yes
great read, thanks yall đ
The 1994 Australian GP Schumacher led Hill be one point entering the season-ending Grand Prix in Adelaide, Australia. Their collision midway through the race gave Schumacher his first championship win, in another dramatic twist to a season of extreme highs and lows.
photo courtesy: Damon Hill, Reddit
#F1 #Formula1 #FormulaOne #F1News #DamonHil...
7112
they one only one race though
i think it san marino 82 should also be remembered as the race which foca boycotted.
it was a really big point in the fisa-foca war
which boiled over anyway in 1982 (south africa drivers' strike)
FOCA barely cared about that in fact
jody won it fair and square, gilles was more crash prone. but he only lost it by three points
Was more a driver led strike because of clauses dictated in a late 1981 deal that threatened the driversâ autonomy
Which only Lauda had realised
yeah
All the other drivers decided to go along with it for some reason
bro goes on strike the moment he rejoins the sports
yeah
Yeah well
He got on the phone to Pironi
To make light of what was actually in these legal documents
The funny thing is FISA declaring after the GP that its position prior to the GP was the exact same after it
And no deal had been agreed
This basically meant a cancellation of the Argentine GP
in the immediacy
1982 is a really interesting season â tragic, yes, â but interesting
both on and off track
11 different race winners
9 different winners in 9 consecutive races.
And in addition Pironi and others such as Patrese and Prost got massive fines
Which the drivers wanted the teams to pay for
Eventually it got all sorted out
The reason FOCA decided to not attend San Marino is a different issue
Relates to the DSQ of non turbo cars in Brazil
For the water cooled brakes
And a perception that FISA was basically siding with all the manufacturers
I do like when Ferrari decided to show up with a split rear wing at Long Beach in protest at the way garagistes were taking every step to circumvent the rules
yeah
Sort of a payback for Spain 1980
what happened there?
Which was declared not a world championship event when FISA aligned teams refused to take part because Balestre was basically wanting to fine drivers for not attending his briefings
The Spanish organisation was having none of this and hurriedly just got the race to go ahead with Balestres promise
But it was later declared non wc out of spite
so it was declared a non-championship race after the race finished?
Yes
Well those who took part thought it would be
Jones maintains he won 13 gp to this day
His version of events is rather funny because he doesnât quite understand why it wasnât considered a wc event
And thinks it is because Balestres wife didnât have the correct seating
Happened in 1981 too at South Africa
Horrendous tbh
All cars ran on Avons because Michelin was aligned with FISA
and Goodyear quit the sport out of amazement at the political struggles
wow, the fisa-foca war is much bigger than i thought
Yes well