#classic-motorsport
1 messages · Page 19 of 1
At Dallas yeah
Should have won
No idea how Rosberg won in that awful Williams
That was rather a message of what was to come at Williams
Rosberg blasted Mansell in 85 like Nigel had bare amount of results until the last 3-4 GP
He is quite frankly more lucky than he believes he was
1986 mansell performed good though. he should have won
Yeah
I mean you say Australia but I think of him needlessly battling Senna on the opening lap of Rio
While Piquet won
Also Mexico where he stalled the car
Piquet similarly took himself out of the race he was easily going to win at Detroit
prost winning that championship is like kimi winning 2007
I don’t think so
not expected, to say the least
I think most expected Raikkonen to win 07
Tbh
Ferrari had the better form coming into the year
He actually was underwhelming to what Ferrari expected
Marginally quicker than Massa in just 07 and also didn’t work as hard as Schumacher
i think 1986 has a lot of parallels to 2007
the fastest team having intra team rivalry
The Ferrari was a competitive package that was honestly pure pace wise quicker than the McLaren
3 drivers going for it really is the only comparison I can say
the person from the other team steals the championship from under their noses at the last race
Benetton and Lotus were additionally competitive enough for wins and good results
There was no spygate
And Prost won in a car genuinely inferior to the Williams
Don’t think the Ferrari was inferior to the McLaren at all
Kimi I don’t think extracted near the best potential out of that year
Prost did
Definitely less expected than how Ferrari won Brazil mind you
Mansell was driving to 3rd but Piquet would have won without their car having more usable downforce that hurt the Goodyears
Ferrari were always winning Interlagos
but why did they pit piquet?
i know it was a precaution
but they could have tried their luck knowing that if they pit piquet cant win
Because they didn’t want him having an accident at like the kink before the back straight or anything
Not worth it
Piquet never gave Patrick a hard time for that call or anyone
Which I think says a lot about his professional attitude
He was a good driver to work for
"I guess if Ronnie Peterson was the best team-mate I ever had, Nigel Mansell was the worst" and "I had a lot of respect for him as a driver, but not as a man" - Mario Andretti
given Mansell complained about that in his F1 career
very funny
I mean seems legit
yeah apparently part of the Surtees' team issues was the fact John Surtees was a pain in the ass to deal with
Can't have been any worse than Ron Dennis tho😅
Like goddamn it's a miracle ppl like Hakkinen & Senna could even tolerate him given how fuckin arrogant he was
that's because for a decent amount of Dennis' reign, McLaren had a championship contending car
you will put up with a lot of shit if it gives you the oppotunity to be immortalized in F1 history
Even then tho howcome Raikkonen was as loyal as he was😅
Couldn't tell you
maybe it could be because Dennis trusted in Mika's insight and gave Kimi the oppotunity at a front running team
when after 2001 Kimi didn't really have any ties to a big team
Well Idk if this is true or not but apparently it took Mika to convince Ron rlly hard to sign Kimi bc Ron was initially pretty reluctant to sign Kimi
well he was a rookie with barely any experience in car racing
If you want to win, pick the fin
if you were to look at Kimi in Melbourne in 2001 and someone told you in 2 years he would be fighting for the World Championship
people would've laughed at you
Montoya and Alonso would've been your main picks for aspiring rookies
Ye but he did prove himself pretty good like there was a vid on YT of him chasing a Williams at Silverstone in that Sauber
which they were, even if Montoya came up short
yes as 2001 went on, it became clear why he got that Sauber seat over Mazzacane
but initially, the only two people who had faith in him were Peter Sauber, and Michael Schumacher
Idk Alonso did have some luck tho bc he had Briatore backing him the whole time & he was already a Benetton test driver
So he had way more security than Raikkonen
And Montoya was almost untouchable in Williams as he was basically their number 1 before Ralf even signed
Montoya was definitely the golden child out of the rookies; he was being hyped up as early as 1999 with the Zanardi-CGR swap
Alonso wasn't that hyped until that F3000 race at Spa
he made a lot of people pay attention with that drive
and also yes Briatore was in his camp, but Webber was in the same position
Alonso and Webber both got the test role at Benetton for 2001
Alonso definitely deserved the 2002 Renault seat way more than Button
between the two yes
ideally it should've been Button-Alonso for 2003
but Trulli had a contract
Espeically bc at that time Button was still kinda trash
there was a lot of potential that was being hidden under the fact he was in a piece of shit car in 2001
and then had Briatore just eating away at him in 2002
You look at his performances in 2003 and he was really shinning
Nah he's admitted himself he only got good by learning from his teammates
In his Beyond The Grid interview
yes he did
Like that 01 Benetton was unreliable but it did have its moments
yeah that was something he mentioned
like people were shitting on him for his performances at Malaysia that year
ignoring the fact his car didn't have power steering
At Sepang of all places
it was a physical struggle to just get to the end
He did have a bit of luck from Villeneuve's DNF's tho
Bc ppl forget in the 1st half of 03 Jacques actually kinda got rlly good again
Villeneuve gets a lot of shit for his late career stint
not really that deserving, other than the Renault-Sauber stint
even the end of BAR was still good
he just started to lose ground to Button and also in the team
Apparently the electrical & mechanical DNF's along with Dave Richards apparently being a ass towards him jus demotivated him in 2003
Even then in 2005 he was still pretty good
Like he had some pretty decent battles with the Williams's & even sometimes Alonso's Renault
I wonder how things woulda gone for him if he did either
1 - take Coulthard's seat at Mclaren like he was offered for 99
Or 2 - jus been patient with Williams & waited for the BMW deal to come into effect
Probably would've done a far better job than DC did in 1999
would be have beaten Mika? 
He was pretty poor that year so I dunno
Staying at Williams would've been good
He woulda 100% been a big threat to Mika
however i think Montoya would've still ended up overshadowing him
1999 is the weird championship where Mika was mid, Ferrari's hopes were on their paycheck driver, DC was just not there
and Jordan made a unforseeable title bid
It's kinda weird to think that at 1 point him & Montoya were technically teammates
Even tho Juan was only a test driver
And I reckon if the Stewart was more reliable that coulda been a title contender car
Bc that also genuinely had some pretty good pace & it was capable of being a proper front runner without needing luck to give it good results
The car was probably good enough
but as per usual, the Ford engine was a heap of trash
Well it's weird bc it had a pretty good amount of power
But it was jus unreliable AF😅
Kinda similar to how the BMW & Merc v10s were from 2000 - 2005
1990?
Wasn't Herbert there for a while in '89?
Yeah
I seem to remember him talking about Brazil where basically the only person who congratulated him for scoring points for Benetton himself
….even though Moreno replaced Nannini after his helicopter crash
Before the Lotus 49 had its iconic Gold Leaf sponsorship. Also the final race won by Jim Clark
Just 6 gp weekends
Didn’t qualify for Canada that was the final straw
Collins crusade to put Herbert in was rather a silly misstep
He was never going to work that injured
He says he struggled anywhere with heavy braking but there wasn’t too much of that at Monaco or that config of Mexico
And he was nowhere to Nannini
Only at Rio
You know a lot about f1. I thought i knew too much till i joined this server
The BMW V10's were alright reliability wise I thought
Just... Williams
Well apart from 05 coz oops respec'd engine
They weren't as bad as Mercedes but in 2001 - 2004 they cost Williams a lot bc of gearbox & engine problems
They were the fastest, but not the most reliable
Mercedes was worse though
After 2001 and before 2005,Williams actually finished the season ahead of McLaren
Williams main issue was not having that much of a nice chassis and aerodynamical package as Ferrari and McLaren (and later BAR and Renault)
hey who has watched rush f1
yes
you have watched? Is it good?
It's pretty good yeah
I always wonder what it woulda been like if Montoya stayed at Williams in 05
Bc while the car didn't have as much raw pace as the Mclaren or Renault
It was still good enough to consistently finish on the podium
And Webber while he was good, still had a tendency to over drive especially as he was fresh outta basically constantly doing that in Jaguar
Heidfeld was good, above average but he was overrated AF imo & wasn't consistent enough
Well,Montoya was easily cooked by Kimi and even without being present in two of the races (where he got replaced by Pedro de La Rosa),he still would be very below in points against Kimi
And Williams was already at the start of that phase where they were starting to swing back to midfielder positions and having to use underpowered and slight decent engines in their cars again
Sam Michael always said Webber should have won Europe 2005 I think
Might have a case with the problems Kimi and Fernando had
“I couldn't count on the help of the drivers, because Giancarlo Baghetti was relatively inexperienced in F1 and Phil Hill, despite being pleasant in human terms, was no different from all his colleagues: he would never admit that they won the previous year due to the engine.” - Mauro Forghieri
Ye but that was bc Montoya was driving a car built for Kimi who had a completely different style to him
Like Juan had a pretty traditional aggressive style but Kimi had a kinda half smooth, half aggressive style that drivers like Hakkinen & J Villeneuve used
Like there was no way Mclaren were gonna give Juan a easy time, especially being 1 of their main rivals since 2001😅
And Kimi was their clear number 1
I mean like if he stayed but only for 2005 & then woulda left after
Ye in 2006 Williams were 100% going to shit & there was 0 way back for them until 2014
But remember Mclaren wanted to get rid of DC for a while, like they tried in 99 with Villeneuve but failed & in 05 they finally got that chance again & capitalised on it
Brundle should've won a race that year
Belgium was really Schumacher outplaying Brundle by pitting a lap early
but Canada was really a lost oppotunity
what about 94
I can't think of a moment in 1994 where he had the ability to win
The McLaren-Peugeot just wasn't in that front end fight and it was usually a Benetton or Williams winning
he had 2 or 3 pods that year
Adelaide might have been his best chance
although still, Berger being 2 and a half seconds behind Mansell compared to Brundle's 50 behind Berger
where he announced his retirement
hmmm what did the channel say..
I was 3 at the time, i wouldn't really consider it modern
🤷♂️
“Surtees did not get on well with his British colleagues, partly because of his prickly personality and partly because he came from motorcycle racing.”
“On top of that, he literally lived with Ferrari, with which he identified himself. He never ever left the group, which was unique for a driver…”
“In my opinion, the two [Surtees and Clark] were equal as far as speed is concerned, but some times John was colder than his rival”
- Mauro Forghieri
the two, him and Clark? and Hill?
ah thanks!
I mean tbf u can kinda expect it from 50s & 60s drivers
It seems like most drivers up until the late 70s - early 80s were jus naturally pretty arrogant & ego driven bc of the greed most of them had to win
And probs also paranoia that they were driving total death traps but jus had to literally grit their teeth & risk accidental suicide😅
nah surtees is just one of a kind
hard taskmaster like graham hill but less of the fun side
Stewart says there was huge camaraderie then
you know people shit on inoue all the time
but how the hell did max papis only outqualify him 4-3 in their head to head
for that i might arguably say he is the worse gp driver
Bruh are u srsly tryna call Max Papis "the worst GP driver"
dear god man there is worse people than those two in the 90's
belmondo and adams come to mind
After seeing VCARB's special livery for the Las Vegas GP, I had flashbacks to the Red Bull Petronas Saubers
Deletraz?
100% there is ye bc in CART, Max was 1 of the guys who made shit difficult for Montoya😅
I mean CART wasn't exactly easy tho like look at Montoya's battles with him, Castroneves & Kanaan in 1999 & 2000
Like especially Cleveland 2000 that was 1 of Juan's hardest races he drove
Also proved how good Moreno was & how fucked over he got in F1 after Briatore booted him
well he was in backmarker teams before Benetton
he had an opportunity at a very good team, did a good job with it, got sacked and couldn’t find another great seat. he didn’t even finish the season with Jordan did he
Exactly so the fact he got a podium during that time jus says how much he deserved more midfield & front running seats
deserving isnt a verb that belongs in the sports sadly
Well a guy like him with his experience & also getting a podium in the pre high nose Benetton
He definitely didn't deserve to be at Andrea Moda, Forti & all the other shitty Italian backmarker teams that he used as a lifeline😅
Like he shoulda had a seat at somewhere like Ligier or Jordan
F1 isn't about deserving and never really was (maybe in the era of gentlemen drivers?). There are many reasons drivers get places that do not have to do with skill, the most common one is having money.
About Max Papis, the fact still remains that with the same car as one of the worst f1 drivers of the 90's he barely managed to outperform him.
There are plenty of drivers who perform well in another category but poorly on F1.
Moreno was definitely decent
But being kicked out for Michael that is like totally fine
Shame Eddie didn’t think a lot of him but it is not like 1992 or 93 were great for them anyway
Papis career is funny though his Indycar career has like no business being that good considering what he had done before
Ok in all fairness tho it was literally his first full year in F1
Bc he was literally only a test driver the year before & as far as I remember he barely even had that many races in 94
who, Papis? he did 0 race in 94
In F1, unless you have certain advantages, you have to take the opportunities you get. There are promising drivers that don't even get the chance to try and prove themselves
I remember there being a onboard of him at Adelaide
Ah no ok my bad that was Christian Fittipaldi
Jordans wing from Monaco 2001 totally goofy
Also Arrows front wing from Monaco 2001
“There was no time to think, I just reacted on pure instinct. I lifted off and made a big move to the right and […] missed the guy by this much. Tom was running right in my slipstream and he had no chance.” Hans Jochim Stuck
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uj0yt_FuTzM&ab_channel=CiaronSmith schumacher 06 mugello testing
Man it never fails to jus look so weird seeing Michael testing for Ferrari post 2006
Also the fact that he wasn't even meant to retire & end his career as well
Like he was full on supposed to compete in 2007 but he jus didn't wanna be Raikkonen's teammate
Is that why he retired? because he didn't want to be teammates with Kimi?
That & also Kimi's manager got him out of renewing his contract for Mclaren & somehow got him Schumacher's seat before he renewed his contract for 07
I don't remember the exact details of it bc it's been a long ass time since I saw a vid on that but in very basic words that's what happened
Well,people say Montezemolo forced Schumi to retire to open the door to Kimi
Ye and Kimi was probs desperate to leave Mclaren bc of how much disappointment & anger he had from losing tons of races & 2 titles to engine & gearbox DNF's
Though it can also be attributed to people like Todt,Brawn,Byrne leaving to seek other teams or retire and go for another area of work
I was always surprised by how Pat Symonds never joined the dream team
Always stayed loyal to Benetton right through to the end of the Briatore era
Pat never got invited to join in a role he wanted
he was just going to be race engineer for Michael again at Ferrari and he didn't fancy that
which is fair because he became TD after Brawn left at the end of 1996
Benetton in 96 - 98 were underrated AF
were they?
maybe 96 the car was good enough to win with a driver like Michael
but the FW18 was flatly destroying the compeitition
Imo Alesi & Berger did way better than ppl give them credit for bc they were basically having 2 Montoya 2005 seasons
The B196 was designed for a weird half smooth half aggressive style that only Hakkinen, Schumacher & occasionally Jacques Villeneuve had tho
thing is montoya in 2005 for bits here and there could actually claim a challenge to the world championship
berger and alesi missed opportunties
although Alesi only because of others misfortune prior
such as at Monaco
when Hill was easily winning the GP
berger germany
Well ye bc the half smooth half aggressive driving style wasn't as new in 2005
but like apart from that they were meh
Alesi had a pretty good year considering
but it was a mistake to get those two
Like by 2005 ppl worked out how to use a style like Raikkonen & Schumachers
Ye both him & Gerhard had completely different styles to Michael & they had to drive cars that were both built for him
Like u gotta remember in 95 only Michael & Hakkinen were mixing smooth & aggressive driving styles consistently as their default style
Michael didn't like this car either
that started from the B194 btw
it wasn't a B195 thing
Alesi & Berger were jus straight up aggressive drivers
but he being the talent he was
just drove around the problems
i don't feel sorry for Berger or Alesi
Berger was over the brow of the hill in terms of his performance at that stage of his career
Alesi had a good 1996
but he was frustrating
more so in 1997
like when he completely forgot to do his pit stop entry incorrect
Debatable bc Eddie Jordan has admitted "I would love to say I hired him for talent but that wouldn't be true. I just needed money desperately and he had it."
and gave the win to Coulthard
nice because it is not like he ever actually got much money
from Schumacher at all
the original sponsor placements and deals Michael wanted to have on his overalls and car got rejected by EJ
and he didn't have any legal contract past the 1 race
Eddie Jordan talks so much shit and I love him for it
Idk he was back on form in 97 bc he got pole at Monza & comfortably led Melbourne until that moment
already explained monza
he screwed that race up
Yes bc of a radio problem
from what was a good chance of a win
they put out pit boards and he missed them
this was clearly on him
he must have known everyone else had stopped so he needed to as well
i think the defending here for Alesi is a bit over the top
he had a good 1996
but 1997 was littered with typical Alesi mood swings of performance
and he was barely quicker than an aging Berger
i think this was rather set in stone in 1991 mind you
everyone expected him to go to ferrari and be as quick as prost
he never was close to him at all
prost crushed him
Idk abt "good" bc allegedly he had a mental breakdown in that year & whenever he had mechanical or electrical problems he always looked insanely pissed😅
Either way tho Benetton as a team still weren't bad even in 98
two top 5's in those other
yeah
i mean they were
quite bad
the car had problems
i think ideal for them was at least having bridgestones but considering how good those tyres were they were underperforming
Nah the 98 Benetton was a underrated AF car like the fact that they were still clearly somehow developing their engines & making a way better car than Williams
That car was comfortable AF being pushed rlly hard
The 98 Williams is probs the most unstable car I've ever seen
wasn't really better than the williams
considering they had the goodyears
and bridgestones for benetton
the better tyres
and they finished behind in the wcc
Fisichella was amazing at Monaco but that is about it
they relied on him dragging the car around
Ah but why were Williams consistently behind at most races
That engine onboard sounds identical to the 94 - 97 Renault engine
i've read the Benetton rebels book
they describe 98-01 as a complete shock to them
from where they were
all the interviewed staff of the time
mostly symonds who after all was TD for all of those latter cars
and quite clearly says they had issues
particularly with some of the things Nick Wirth put on the car
Ah yes and the issues were so bad that the 98 Benetton was the main car consistently battling the Mclaren's & Ferrari's for 4th & 5th at almost every race😅
While the Williams was sliding around getting overtaken by Saubers & sometimes even Stewarts
And they had Newey's aero to play around with when evolving the 97 car into 98 regs
It took them a entirely new chassis & wheelbase to fix their problems
While the Benetton was a straight continued eveolution of the B197
nah it was different
if you take a look at the cars it is wirths first stamp on post byrne benetton
Looking at the sidepods, airbox, nose & wings ye no😅
stub nose
Especially the sidpod shapes & the fact they painted the bottom of the airbox black to try & hide the fact it was unchanged
tapered sidepods
i mean it was new set of regulations to begin with
the b196 and b197 leant from the 95 and 94 yeah
but not the 198
From 95 - 99 they always used pointed tipped noses tho
No the B194 was the final evolution of the 89 & 90 car
Totally different airbox & nose design
Looks like it even had a shorter wheelbase as well
errr
The B195 - B198's airboxes is so much less steep towards the rear wing
this is not how bryne describes it
they did a lot different in 94 and that is why he says it is his favourite car in his time there
or just in general
Bruh they all used Ford v8's and literally look at the 92 - 93 cars & the sidepods & airbox of the 91 car
he didn't care a lot for the 95 by comparison
back to 98 however most of the interest in benetton came off track
like those two podiums in succession were good but fisi added like only three further points after canada
it was a step down from 1996-1997 as it had been a step down for benetton in late 1995
like the williams was already the quicker car
Michael won Aida purely on strategy rather than pure pace
as an example
in 99 they tried this torque transfer system as well
which just disturbed all the aero and the consistency of the system was poor too
worked well in testing but didn't during the year
Nick Wirth was a smart guy but he didn't apply things in exactly the most sensible ways
and this is something his career is littered with such as the design of the 2010 Manor car being literally done only with CFD
which is is just insane and didn't work
these are all key things that are like diametrically opposed to Byrnes line of thinking with cars btw
centre of gravity/weight and aerodynamic balance
i think high nose
yeah about it
maybe airbox but i swear the intake went to an ovular shape in 98 or 99
b194 lends itself to some Barnard ideas but quite frankly he never actually properly designed a Benetton car because the B191 which Symonds and other guys returning from the failed Reynard project after TWR took over engineering hated was just a Gordon Kimball car really
and no one rated Kimball
bits here and there but the Barnard and Benetton adventure almost killed the team
B190 i think is far removed from B191, 192, 193 and 194
it had this prost nose characteristic which Barnard hated
Oh ye the race that Fisichella literally led a massive amount of & made Schumacher struggle to catch up to him during
They literally had no support from Renault for engine development
Again the bottom part was painted to make it look like a full circle
Bc they were tryna hide the embarrassment of using 97 engines that had fuck all development
so what
they still had fundamental issues with the chassis
why do you think they made all the changes they did
that is just a sorry ass excuse
once it did have renault support in 2000 and 2001 it didn't do a hell of a lot
They were faster than the literal reigning champions from 97 who had to already adapt the 96 car during 97 bc Newey left?🤣💀
Like that car was comfortable with being pushed insanely hard & had multiple wheel to wheel battles with the Mclarens & Ferrari's
The Williams's best chance was at Hockenheim
they weren't
they slightly benefited early from the better bridgestones
but it didn't last long
more clear chance of anything than benetton performances in 1998 tbf
Hmmm Monaco 98 Schumscher vs Wurz but apparently "they weren't" battling the Ferrari's
Canada?!?!
that was a virtual lead
Fisichella leading tons of that race?
Howcome Michael was right behind him & struggled like crazy to pass him for ages
Bruh u need to desperately watch the onboards of 98 Williams's tho bc that car was not good
It took them literally redesigning the entire floor & wheelbase for this shit to happen
And even then they still were nervous AF abt Benetton catching them
Jacques admitted it & Patrick Head even admitted it in a interview during the 98 Canadian GP
He had to say "it's not quite a complete redesign but the car is definitely not the same as it was"
And again they had Newey's aero to adapt which they successfully did in 97 bc they won that title
Newey had 0 input on the 97 car
it wasn't good no
but the benetton wasn't either
it wasn't that good in 1997 to begin with
that car had issues unless it was in the low downforce config
hence poor qualifying results in the early part of the season
I mean it was pretty comfortable being pushed bc there's several onboards of it being driven pretty goddamn hard & the balance never goes off
and peaks at germany and italy
i think that is the difference in drivers
giancarlo was smooth
but also a driver who prefered a front ended car
it is why he struggled in 2005-2007
On throttle yes but his steering inputs & downshifts were pretty snappy & aggressive
And Wurz was 1 of those guys who mixed smooth & aggressive steering styles with totally smooth throttle & gearshifts
So I guess it woulda been easier for them to use similar setups for both cars
it got worse for sure
98 was by no means awful
but senior people at benetton felt they had just fallen back to where they had been
yeah engine this and that
but it wouldn't have put them with ferrari or mclaren
even if it was developed
But it did like during most races the Williams's were behind
Most of the time they only got through by luck bc of Fisi & Wurz jus racing others way too hard & allowing Frentzen & Villeneuve to catch them
Like Williams had the same engine but massively struggled to follow other cars & the Benetton had a piss easy time at getting a tow up to the rear of the Ferrari & Mclaren
Even when they were in front of a Ferrari they tended to pull away pretty decently as well
.
Schumacher and Ferrari arrived at the start of the 1996 season with a car that was... Er... A bit all over the place. It didn't get into the window that Schumacher liked, it wasn't to Irvine's tastes either but even still, Ferrari managed to get 2nd in the constructors' with Schumacher dragging it into a position where he could take advantage of...
i like how bizarre the 310 looks
It looked worse with the high nose compared to how it initially looked
yeah
When the Italian raging bull ambitiously took part in F1 but ended up being rubbish
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yG-cf-iK5w&ab_channel=AidanMillward
Lamborghini entered F1 as an engine supplier in the late 80s and supplied some of the back of the grid teams with their V12s, hoping to get onto the same level as Ferrari after Chrysler bought the Italian brand in 1987.
And while they had flashes of brilliance, some of it was luck but some of it was on pure pace, and when Lambo had its own team...
Mauro mentioned
The only Italian backmarkers who never signed Roberto Moreno
Ye but there's no doubt the F310B, F300 & F399 were better😅
Like the F310A jus looks like the 412T2 going through puberty in a awkward ass way🤣💀
i like the detached sidepods actually
the awkward most thing is removing 2 cylinders and changing red hues 🥴
Michael always had a good car in Ferrari since 97
Forghieri my beloved
Ye the shit ppl say abt him "having the worst car" is BS bc both Ferrari's tended to always be in the top 5
And the Mercedes engine still wasn't powerful enough jus yet like that years Mclaren was inconsistent & underpowered AF
i mean in 97 they were more unreliable
of the lost victories i think michael only fell foul of his own misfortune before the mclarens did once
which was at silverstone with the wheel bearing or whatever it was again
the 1997 and 98 ferraris were pretty good but also too on the understeery side for michael
The 97 Ferrari was not a bad car in the slightest, it just had the two issues of being based on the F310 which was mid, and the fact that overall, the Williams and (imo) the Benetton were better
Ye ppl forget that when u see the positioning of the sidepod intakes, airbox & also how the front & rear wings are barely changed from the F310A
The only major differences on the F310B was basically jus a new body shell & reliability patches to the engine & gearbox
Also holy shit how did Sauber fix all the reliability problems from the 96 Ferrari v10😅
Like that 97 Sauber seemed like a pretty goddamn reliable car
Schumacher helped Sauber with their balancing engine issues
the williams yes
the bentton no
Milk-carton
Not really,but again Schumacher won 5 races and ended the season with 78pts (would be 2nd in the WDC without the DSQ) while Irvine had no wins and finished 8th with 24pts without Schumi DSQ
its better than checo in 2024 though
But, one is Schumacher, the other is Irvine
Irvine was basically there to get a paycheck and be a bona fide Number 2
Ferrari gave up in 1999 when Michael broke his leg; it was only after they saw how much of a bottle job Hakkinen was doing that Irvine actually had a chance did they take some of the 2000 upgrades and slap it onto the 1999 car
but there is also the conspiracy theory that the Nurburgring tyre change debarcle was intentional to basically ensure he couldn't win
not that it mattered anyway; Michael did what Michael does in Suzuka that year by letting Hakkinen get away and then doing a half ass attempt to catch up to him
Wrong channel??
Uh……
the message has been deleted since
1999 Ferrari Car driven by their Last British Driver, Eddie Irvine
Lewis will be the next British Driver to drive for Ferrari since Eddie Irvine
Eddie could've won 1999
It's his Last Season with Ferrari overall
Yeah, really close
Ehmm, actually 🤓
It's Ollie
Yes Eddie almost had it
I think it was Japan that made him lose it
Mika finished 1min ahead of him so yes probably
more to it than japan
where he wouldn't have had a chance to beat hakkinen anyway
he gained at least 30 points on mika purely from mechanicals
surely that would have been enough to win a wdc for your typical 2nd placed driver
he had 2 wins handed to him by his teammates as well
I think he was just inexcusably slow in most of the GP he didn’t maximise
Barely any mistakes beyond Hungary
Qualifying in Japan and I suppose colliding with DC at Montreal but he ended up 2nd anyway because of HHF’s brake failure
3rd actually
So maybe a lost chance there
So much has to go right for a driver of that calibre to be close or win a wdc
Down to even the possibility you are the favourite like Damon Hill in 1996
So then it is inevitable because the car advantage trumps the inherent talent gap
Ralf was sure flying off the line.
Literally
did everyones race results get shifted up 1 place after schumi got disqualified?
Nope,only championship position
No change
ah
Our old friend known as The Michael had a Ferrari that was best of the rest, if a tad unreliable, and he was able to stretch it out a little more so that if the two all-conquering Williams cars of Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve faltered, he'd be in a prime position to steal a win. Or three, as he did in this season.
But having a car good in ...
the race that gave him the nickname ''rain king''
That Formula 1 season showed that my confidence in the Ferrari was well-founded. But I had not been able to foresee the events that would torture Chris Amon GP after the GP. It was grotesque: the world of motor racing doesn't accept "bad luck", it only speaks of "something that was not foreseen". But in 1968, Amon started from pole three times and eight times from the front row of the grid, obtaining just a second place in Britain. He was in the lead in Spain by over 20 seconds, but in the finale the Bendix fuel pump broke, a component used by the aircraft industry and well-known for being indestructible. When Giulio Borsari went to retrieve the car out on the circuit, he hit the errant pump with a tool and it started to work perfectly again: he even drove the 312 back to the pits!
- Mauro Forghieri
poor lad
ive never seen his bad luck described that accurately
he made the impossible possible
against himself sadly
@quiet radish
Schumacher testing the F2007
I think he would've won the championship that year if he didn't retire
yes most definitely
1985 Williams Car driven by Keke Rosberg
1985 is where Keke Rosberg win the Australian Grand Prix in Adelaide
Ah yes. The Yamaha engines
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkyjR-R3DdU&ab_channel=AidanMillward
Underpowered, unreliable, and Tyrrell used up 50 in half a season. Because the stop-start nature of practice and testing meant that the engines were being ruined.
But either way. Yamaha came in to F1, teamed up with some teams that weren't exactly going to hit the ground running, and only had a handful of points and a couple of podiums to show ...
no
yes
The last Yamaha engine from 1997 was literally only better than the Tyrrell, the Minardi and Mastercard Lola supplied Ford and Hart engines
Underpowered,overblown and also underrevving
wonder how they would have fared, had they paired with Toyota as they often do
maybe they did when Toyota finally joined?
I think it was described by Stefano Modena as a sewing machine
It's important to note the Yamaha engine had a part to play in why Damon didn't win Hungary that year
The tyres did 99% of the work, but good ol unreliability gave it to Jacques
but what broke was on the engine?
and the hydraulic pump is part of the engine? or it's out of it

All i could find is they said there was a leak in the system somewhere
and once it ran out, the throttle and gearbox started to seize
ye many things are operated by hydraulics
1996 Ferrari F310 as seen in Hungarian Grand Prix
First Season to see Eddie Irvine driving in Scarlet Ferrari
and mclaren fans say the 2015 car had the worst engine in f1 history
I mean Damon almost won a race with a Yamaha engine
Life W12 engine would probably be the worst F1 engine in history
Who saved that brabham brick 💀
Dont even know lol 🤣
Sir Jackie tyrrell my beloved
Hell yeah
What could've been
Irvine being swollowed by the car
Because it's more Bigger
I’d say it’s due to the raised cockpit openings that were implemented for ‘96
Hard to even tell that there’s a driver in there lol
what museum is this?
What place is this from?
Its from a museum in Donington
Well it's weird bc he wasn't actually supposed to retire in 06
He was supposed to drive in 2007 but didn't want Kimi as a teammate
I guess u could also say the Prost/Ligier was on a similar level to the Benetton & Williams
Also I gotta say Mugen were pretty fuckin good for making that Honda v10 as powerful as it was
hard to say when their best driver was Panis
in 97 for that particular team he was
Trulli was fast but still too inexperienced
his Austrian race was great, not gonna lie
He was quicker than Panis
Pins or no pins in his legs
Doesn't seem awfully surprising given Herbert with one GP made him look poor and he nearly lost his drive for 1996
maybe trulli got really unlucky in 97 then
Well
In the GP he didn't finish he would usually destroy him in pace
But those not being accounted for: Silvestone and the Hungaroring make it appear as if Nakano was quicker
The previous year, we had to lose Chris Amon, which was a disappointment for me both from the human standpoint and for his sensitivity that would have been useful in testing. I remember that he visited me in November '69 and he was rather disheartened. He had signed a pre-contract for 1970 and I suggested he should be confident because the development of the 312 B was going well. Instead, he confessed to me that he was tired of Ferrari. Unfortunately, he had been negatively influenced by the first test of the 312 B at 8 am on Friday 5 September at the Modena Autodrome. His general impression was excellent, but at the time we were still solving problems caused by the bronze bearings and the test ended with a breakdown. There was nothing I could do to make him change his mind, yet we only needed time: initially, the 312 B was a hard nut to crack, but later the fulfilment was a great feeling.
2006 Honda Car seen in Hungarian Grand Prix driven by Jenson Button in his First Grand Prix winning
I forget was this BAR/Honda's 1st win?
Or did they get one in 2004
Jenson Button First Race Win actually back in 2006 Hungarian Grand Prix
That is when Michael Schumacher and Fernando Alonso out of the Race Both
yeah they took their first win in 2006, they didn't win in 2004
Goddamn it's kinda crazy they didn't get a win in 2004
Bc they got a few poles that year right?
At least he got a podium at Indianapolis
True
I always wondered if Jordan coulda recovered if they still had Honda engines in 2003 & 2004
Bc the BAR was still clearly a evolution of the 2001 & 2002 cars
And let's be honest the 2001 - 2002 BAR's weren't exactly the best cars😅
And from onboards they didn't look that stable either at least compared to the Jordan's
This is what cause Michael Schumacher to lost his Race Win in 1994 Belgian Grand Prix as the Skid Block is found to be Excessively Wear
Michael's Disqualification was the Last Time we had a Race Winner gets disqualified after the Race until George Russell 30 Years Later at the same Circuit
Technically speaking Schumacher and Coulthard were both briefly disqualified from Brazil 95
But they get reinstated to their Position though
12 days of classic F1 cars
Day 1: Williams FW25 (or 2003 Williams F1 Car)
In my end 2005 or below is classic
baffling
12 days of classic F1 Cars
Day 2: Jordan 198 (or 1998 Jordan F1 Car)
Michael Schumacher (Ferrari 126 C2/B), Fiorano 1999
It was the first time Michael had driven a turbocharged F1 car and it took him by surprise: "I did not feel very comfortable as I was scared of damaging what is in fact a piece of history," he said.
"But most of all I was terrified! These cars struck me as terribly dangerous. They are only 16 years old, but they seem to belong to another era."
12 days of classic cars
Day 3: Williams FW14 (or 1991 Williams F1 car)
Interesting modifications to an early 1976 T2 being presented
Semi faired front-wheels
wonder why they didn't keep it, it reduces outwash so that's good isn't it
Been thinking, if he lived or survived the crash at Spa 1985
If he got a good seat in F1, could he have been a threat to drivers like Mansell, Senna & Prost?
very likely
Supposedly, he had a contract with Ferrari
That's a big supposedly
If that's true it woulda been interesting to see if he had enough patience for them
Bc as we all know they didn't get good again until like 1989 - 1990 & again around 1993 - 1995
they weren't bad in 87 either, just not top of the class
Berger managed to snatch wins at Suzuka and Adelaide
Eh, but they were still plagued with many dnf’s leaving them 4th in the WCC
bellof was going to ferrari
his death is the only reason johansson remained
very much an enzo type driver
Martin Brundle driving in a 1994 McLaren
Is this about 5 seconds before his car blew up at Silverstone?
No actually
ngl I love the MP4/9
Looks wise anyway
12 days of classic F1 cars
Day 4 (oh boy here we go): Ferarri F2004 (or 2004 ferarri F1 car)
I swear that has to a be a record for the quickest DNF to ever happen
And I ain't counting cars that stall on the grid bc that's a DNS
1999 Australian Grand Prix
the race didn't even start before both the Stewarts blew up
It seems like that was a big problem back in the v10, v12 & v8 era
Engines overheating on the grid
DNS like Prost spinning off the formation lap at imola 1991
Welcome back to The Ecclestone Grand Prix Collection!
In this episode, we explore a deeply personal and iconic part of Bernie Ecclestone's racing legacy: the Brabhams. These extraordinary machines have been kept under Bernie’s care since their final races, making this walkaround a truly unique and special opportunity to see them up close.
A...
ohhh
Alonso driving Ferrari F2004
Warning: Flavio Briatore detected nearby
Do NOT tell him who makes the engines
Otherwise u end up with Mugen Honda engines that are actually meant to be Minardi's the following year
pretty sure Minardi starts with a M
yes
I have been summoned
The Ligier JS29 with the Alfa Romeo engine. Which they didn't use instead opting for a rebadged BMW engine
The BMW engine that no one knows how much BHP it rlly had
Bc like Aidan Millward says, it seems to keep growing in HP numbers😅
Oh Minardi were always taking L's tho haha
Like when they got scammed for a "new" Ferrari engine which turned out to be a year old
And then a goddamn Ford v8 ended up being better than that Ferrari engine the year after😅💀
I think Arnoux criticised the engine and then its parent company Fiat decided it only wanted Ferrari competing in Formula One
But it was a deal up until that point
Ligier didn’t exactly choose to go with the Megatrons in the first place
It's weird tho bc I swear the Marlboro Alfa Romeo's were pretty good right?
Like Idk if they were ever capable of titles but some of them were definitely front runners
Ye but De Cesaris led for ages in Spa
I forget the year but that was 1 of the few times he wasn't shit😅
I remember now it was 83
ye he led for about half of the race
And the best part is he did it from overtaking at the start
And he even qualified at the front as well
So it was all merit with 0 luck needed
The Ducarouge car was good
Engine was far from ideal initially
It had decent results but not consistent ones
The V8 turbo was one of the first engines to hit the snag with fuel consumption figures
And that was part of bigger problems it faced from 84-85
They weren’t front runners across a whole season even in 82-83
So u mean they were more like how Renault were in 2003 - 2004
Kinda half front runner but half midfielder
First person to reply to me with a pic will be my pfp for a day
Well Renault got more podiums
Top 5’s
2 wins in those 2 seasons
And between two drivers rather than one
Hmmm
Imma ping you in F1 general
I wonder what you're gonna pick
prost could have been an 8 time world champion
1983, 1984, 1988, 1990
if the renault was more reliable...
i would wager he had more chances of that in 82 than 1990, cause the Ferrari was reliable
but it was a bit slower than the mclaren outright
I'm wonderin tho would he have had a chance at 82
If Gilles survived the Zolder crash & lived
Bc I like to think if he survived then he coulda potentially had that title
we’re adding even more ifs ontop of ifs?
12 days of classic F1 cars
Day 6: Lotus 107B (or 1993 Lotus F1 car)
Halfway through yippee
I’d say on the balance of things Prost had his fair share of mechanicals in 83 that Piquet also had during the season
But he made more mistakes
appparently, later in the season, when Brabham started cheating with the BASF fuel, Renault tried to catch up on power which made the car less reliable
had they not done it, it's likely Prost would have won by doing what he already knew best: nursing his car and letting his rivals drop like flies with fuming engines
as usual though, ifs and buts
Allegedly
At the GP’s official testing on the fuel the octane level was within the regulations
yeah right. allegedly.
Lol no
ok
even if pironi didn't have the crash, he could have won it
Man here's a interesting alternate reality scenario
Gilles Villeneuve survives the Zolder crash & competes all the way until let's say the early 90s
And Bellof also survives his Spa crash
Idk if they'd be able to compete for titles from 86 - 88
But I'm wonderin would u have seen a rivalry as intense as Senna & Prost around 89 - 91?
Villeneuve surviving Zolder would take an ounce of self preservation
Something he seemed incapable of most of the time
I actually don’t know if Bellof was that great technically speaking so at Ferrari it is basically a fight against Alboreto who slowly fell out of favour with the Scuderia when the likes of Migeot and Postlethwaite left
I mean he isn’t winning world championships in any of the Ferrari cars in that period
The odd grand prix perhaps
I mean in this scenario is Pironi avoiding his crash or recovering from a slightly less serious one?
Because it is sort of the same thing again
All of that prevents Tambay and then consequently Arnoux too
Villeneuve had a contract till the end of 1983 but they wanted Alboreto the moment his Tyrrell contract run out so that whole year was Tambay vs Arnoux
That collection of instances in 1982 just influences everything else to a great degree that means it is hard to make a conclusion
Well from what I understand Bellof had tons of natural talent
Like on the same level as G Villeneuve & Senna
But he had the same problems Gilles Villeneuve, Jacques Villeneuve, Sato, Alesi & Montoya had
In that he had a tendency to overdrive & jus got over excited too easily
I mean that's what cost him his life
Also I jus realised
Does Roberto Moreno have the record for the longest career spent at backmarker teams
Like even Benetton in 1990 were only kinda midfielders bc it wasn't till 91 - 92 that they rlly became kinda part time front runners
probably
i mean the dude drove for Andrea Moda
And Forti
the only thing worse than that team is Life
and, well the less said about Life's driver line up the better
Like in Imola 1995 he was 7 seconds slower than Schumacher💀
Like this is Forti's whole time in F1 summed up
Basically any of the delusional ass Italian backmarker teams from the late 80s - early 90s
U can safely assume he drove for them
and then the one time he finally got into a decent car
Britore turned around and went "Yeah Roberto about the whole contract thing"
Ye but that was only when he got to CART right
And also he deserves more praise for that win at Cleveland 2000
When he moved over to CART he showed decent results
Like he was up against some rlly tough competition in CART
when he was at Benetton, the car was decent although he was never going to beat Nelson
it's just that as he was settling into the team, they found a German kid they wanted more
Dude competed against Castroneves, Kanaan, Montoya, Paul Tracy
Like if he could win against them
He definitely had some talent to do that
And also Briatore wrote the dirtiest loophole into his contract
We don't have to give you a car
That he was only signed for a chassis & not a complete car
just the chassis
and then when Piquet complained about it, he told the reserve driver to suit up and sit in his car
i forget who it was
Tbf Piquet might not be the most polite guy
And he might also have some racism problems that come from South American culture
But he was a real good friend to Roberto
Haha I was jus tryna say it kindly
I'm wonderin tho were there any drivers like Moreno before him
Like in the 70s or 80s
Who jus spent years at backmarker teams
Never rlly getting a chance with a good midfielder or front runner team
Do we ignore Moreno's CART career?
for the sake of the question, i think it's acceptable
Nah we went over that earlier
O
he seems like Zanardi who was excellent in CART after going to F1 and failing
I mean I'd say it's more than that haha he drove for a non front running team & managed to win on 1 of the hardest tracks
Like ppl write Cleveland off as "oh it's just some chicanes & 2 right handers at the end"
He’s a victim of circumstance
Nothing about losing his seat to Schumacher is that bad
But Cleveland Airport track is so much harder than most ppl think
Like cars in the race Moreno won were DNFing bc of suspension damage from the bumps
Zanardi was really stellar in CART in one concentrated period when he had Mo Nunn as his race engineer
But if you look at his previous F1 stint and European Junior career he was fairly average
Says a lot about the standard of CART to F1 in general even if lets say it was as good as it could have been in the early 90s
He jus had the same problem Andretti had in thinking that he could drive F1 cars as hard as CART cars
Which honestly I rlly wish was doable
Bc CART cars can take a hell of a beating
Like they can literally hit a wall & still be ok
I mean if you take a look at him at his earlier stint nothing about being easily being beaten by Schumacher is that shocking
He was on a hiding to nothing for sure because they wanted Montoya anyway for later
But don’t get it twisted apart from the two CART titles he wasn’t ever that brilliant
And he had to beat Jimmy Vasser to get them
Vassers 96 is so tinpot though
He wins it by virtually finishing every race
Andretti and Zanardi are within 25 points despite retiring from like 6 more events
I always thought maybe Fisichella shoulda ditched F1 around 2002 & gone to CART bc he coulda got a title or 2 over there
Plus it'd be interesting to see him against drivers like Castroneves & Kanaan
Don’t think he was that good really
Well he was good in midfield cars but for whatever reason jus flopped in front runners
Like Castroneves career is totally saved by Greg Moores death and although a great oval driver the frustration of not being able to execute any title campaign and mistakes annoys me
2013 is an abomination
Literally needs Will Power to take out Dixon for him
To even stand a chance
Fisichella that is
Ye but Helio still had tons of talent
Like he was 1 of Montoya's hardest opponents
I think Gil De Ferran is overrated AF
Also weird bc he was 1 of the only CART drivers to use a smooth style
Well I can't remember any wheel to wheel battles with him banging sidepods & wheels against other cars like Montoya & Kanaan had
I do like how Castroneves being involved in the IRS stuff is direct consequence of his 2000 contract
Because someone for Penske just rubbed out Moores name
And put Helios in
Forgetting like they needed to draw up another completely different legal document
But even in 1999 Montoya struggled to overtake Helio
Like in that early part of his career he was a major threat to Juan
Well u do kinda prove ur self by actually being able to race & battle other drivers
De Ferran got most of his wins from jus leading most of the race without ever rlly having to fight his way up the grid😅
Like that Valvoline car was always a front runner
And it was 1 of the fastest there was at the time
I think he won both his championships while the grids were still decent though
Not saying he’s better than Montoya
But he is than Helio
No doubt ye it's jus that he drove a bit boring & kinda cautious
Felt like he didn't need to put as much effort into his wins
I mean a fine argument not that I agree it matters
The same way it is said about Prost
Like I always love seeing drives like Moreno's win in Cleveland
And also Montoya's charge during that race
Moreno's Visteon car was not a front runner at all
But Roberto spent most of his F1 career driving garbage
I concur
Well he knew how to outperform a car well
I just think using CART as a measure of true ultimate potential is pointless
Like he spent mosta his F1 career tryna get within 107%😅
Like he did a respectable job at Benetton
But Michael Schumacher was available so it was a no brainer
Bruh its 1 of the rawest & purest forms of motorsport
Reminder that the 1990 Benetton was worse than the 91 - 94 cars
Eurotard detected
I think that is ridiculous
Well Michael is easily 1 of the most overrated drivers of all time
Kanaan was tough for Montoya to beat
BAR had him as a test driver in 2004
Montoya was clearly better
Ferrari invited him to test multiple times
And he found a place for himself behind Ralf for 2 of the first years at Williams
Montoya was only that amazing in 03
When Ralf kicked the bucket
In 04 he got matched by Pizzonia in Monza
Bruh Ralf wasn't forcing Michael off at T1 in Brazil with 0 TC
Like I think people doing the argument that American based drivers aren’t that poor and using Montoya as an example is ridiculous
Montoya was also pretty underrated in 2002 since he got a ton of poles against Michael meanwhile Kimi didn't get shit
His junior career was spent in Europe and he is overrated
Well watch how they raced him in CART & watch how Montoya never took Schumacher tryna push him off
Schumacher managed to break his front wing failing to force him off at Malaysia T1
And spin at the Dunlop hairpin at Nurburgring 2003 by also failing to push Montoya off
To the point of embarrassingly getting the marshals to push him out
There is more to it than wheel to wheel
But wheel to wheel is a big part of skill as a driver
Like there's a reason ppl make fun of Trulli
Good in quali
Good trope
But shit at actually racing
But it isn’t true
Like if you look at his German F3 title there is many examples of his wheel to wheel racecraft being spot on
By holding off challengers
What can you expect for extracting more out of his car than others in qualifying
And then they are usually useless in the races
The idea that he rattles a great wheel to wheel artist in Villeneuve in one of his first GP’s at Hockenheim in a slower car says enough
But he didn't do that at Benetton tho like Michael was simply getting what could be expected out of the 91 - 93 Benetton's
But people say stupid shit like “oh Jacques was held up by wet lettuce race pace Jarno Trulli”
Highest running Bridgestone runner at Austria wasn’t he
Led the gp until the second stint
Engine failure
Eh Idk Jacques did manage to do pretty good at Hockenheim in 2 pretty underpowered car
Which year was that?
Bridgestone?
Oh right Trulli
Trulli was alright at Prost I don't think he was as good as Panis tho
Everything points to the opposite
Like I still think if the crash didn't happen Olivier coulda potentially had that title
Besides Trulli wasn't always in that car bc he was Minardi's driver
It is just that he had few races vs Nakano and those were he was much faster than him they either both retired or one of them did
So it distorts a picture
I respect Fisichella for being able to push almost the same cars Jarno drover harder & again he's more memorable for midfield battles which do need skill to do well in
To be putting in similar performances like Trullis earlier season ones simply on the weekends where Bridgestone had an advantage in his first season says a lot
Trulli at Toyota is like as good as anything Fisi did from 97-00 though
Like Gincarlo was insanely good at braking late & outbraking other drivers
In similar cars with the exception of early 05 and 09
I think ur forgetting tho that Fisi wasn't at good teams around that time
Main thing is Trulli got way closer to Alonso than Fisi ever did and that is why they sacked him
Neither was Toyota in 07 or 08
And not early 06
They genuinely use Bahrain as a test that year it is so bad
Also I gotta say Fisi did pretty goddamn good in Canada 1998 like he was on Michael's ass for 3/4 of the entire race
I see
And IIRC even led a few laps
Benetton highlights of a pretty downhill year
Those two gp’s
Where Michael crashes into Wurz or whatever at Monaco
And Montreal
Bruv please fix ur memory
That was a wheel to wheel battle where Wurz tried to push Schumacher off
Then Michael fought back at the 2 corners before the tunnel
It wouldn’t be the first time Michael might have been uncompromising
Also that reminds me
But yes well anyway
The suspension damage both cars took from such minor bumps
That's 1 of the main things I hated abt the groove tire era cars
Suspension on them was pathetically weak
Nowhere near as strong as it was on the 80s - 97 cars
Yeah watched it
Which IIRC had steel in them
Well ye it's his fault entirely for retaliating to Alex
He didn't have to return the shove at all
He was doing a job for his team and to add to that he was actually racing him
Fine I think
But holy shit it had so many good aggressive battles like that
Again it's not their fault Renault pulled out
You sound like the opposite of 60s Ferrari people always going back to the chassis as the inadequacy
Besides that 97 Renault/98 - 99 Supertec engine doesn't get credit for lasting as long as it did with very minimal upgrades bc both it & the Mugen Honda were revving to 17.5K RPM in 1997 way before those revs became standard