#monaco-gp
1 messages · Page 241 of 1
in fact
BRO
finna
u actually stupid
u cant think lance can beat seb
Its literally a fact?
Hulk thrashed Sainz in his Renault stint.
williams
who the hell is this
ah yeah P2
top is seb bottom is stroll
Teammate?
Massa.
lance has had nearly 7 combined wdc between his teammates
massa😭😭
vandoorne
Vandoorne.
what...
Boi got penalty for 2 races.
should've been given 2019 smh
but nooo zak got rid of anything that had rons touch on it
well
tbf the norris signing
aged extremely well
norris is 92
89
with leclerc being 92
43?
maybe higher
idk
like
L 92
S 88
O 86
P 81/2
F 76
ye
bro got an ocon ahh penalty
"With due respect, we inform that Fernando Alonso won't be racing with us in '19 championship."
-Zak Brown.
[Well, he was planning retirement, but... Oh, well.]
S 65
Congrats @fresh pike, you're now on lap 5
max 100
norris 92
leclerc 91
hamilton 88
piastri 87
russell 87
fernando 87
sainz 87
tsunoda 85
albon 85
perez 84
bottas 84
hulkenberg 83
ocon 83
stroll 82
gasly 81
ricciardo 80
magnussen 78
zhou 74
sargeant 73
based on a higher based overall system
Better than whatever EA was overcooking.
nah I got my points from my knowledge and the sources that RPM mentioned, I ain't gonna get points from an rpm vid direct 💀
so i was right
RPM mentioned
and u looked up the sites
then you're conveniently ignoring all the reasoning I've given, all you've said is 'because?' 'so?' 'and?'
I've given reasons to back up why Williams was likely who made the illegal part
where?
You've yet to make one
please dude, try to be reasonable lol
some random shit about Williams testing with Stroll is hardly a reason
I know it's from RPM but try to be better
How are we having a full-on conversation based on a RocketPoweredMohawk video 😭
At what point did anyone start taking anything he said even a little bit serious
Nah bro kmag should be 200
Lance stroll got this in the bag
We have Lando winning at Miami, Charles at Monaco, will we have a different winner at Montreal?
That is the question.
It’s all over my screen
yes, Max
Montreal looking rather wet this weekend atm
canada
It’s quite sunny for now, but it looks like it’s gonna be rain (as usual) for the weekend
Redbull be teasing the announcement they gonna make
@urban marlin
Esteban Ocon will replace
Max Verstappen 2025
In Redbulls first seat 💺
💀
finally
a good driver in red bull
gotta save that image
Source: Trust Me
Congrats @soft matrix, you're now on lap 5
Who are you?
Lets hope for a similar race to the 2011 Canadian GP 🙏
it's not gonna be monsoon levels of rain
And Esteban will win it to fuck up Alpine in the best way possible.
Well as long as it rains then dries up and later rain again it will automatically be good rave. Or if we get unexpected rain that is also fun as long as it doesn't get red flagged.
is perez staying next year?
If he does, can we stop talking about Carlos going to RedBull.
no
You guys know he’s been there right
And the reasons why he left haven’t changed
Who?
Yeah so redbull
Carlos
Ah.
Carlos to williams?? 😭
Yay checo for 2 more years so excited🫥
I think that they chose him because he don't challenge max
And he’s a team player
i mean he doesnt really need to be a team player when max is faster than him by 22 seconds
Literally Schumacher-Barrichello all over again, only that Max dominates more extremely, and Checo is a worse version of Rubens
so.. Lewis-Bottas?
Yup
Bottas is better than Checo
.truth3
Sainz > Leclerc
Bottas > Perez
ah well, if Carlbot says so
Bottas challenged Lewis way more than
whatever Checo has done
so if Barrichello > Bottas > Perez
If i remember correctly, on their H2H stats since 2021, Checo has not beat Max in quali, or race, even 10 times
Having 74 races together
No surprises there
redbull wanted to make sure there is no fight in the team between drivers so they chose checo
sainz or other driver would fight max
Sainz would fight Max even if he's lapped lol
those two camps are like cats and dogs
and I would disagree that other driver would fight Max, you can't fight Max if you're 30 sec behind
nah we will never see max lapping sainz in the same car
only drivers that can be lapped by max in the same car are zhou, sargeant, stroll, perez
bro forgot about Kmag
nah kmag will crash straight into him
bottas is fine ig, but that car is undriveable
he is more comfortable with a faster car
not that shit
it's terible
Apparently not.
Perez? Has that actually happened?
Didn't Lando once lap Ricciardo in the same car?
I get why you'd say that
and it's fair to say that about other things he's said
but rpm only made me aware of what happened and my points are only from the sources he used not what he said
that's like a tiny bit of my overall point
which is?
idk why but i have a feeling that redbull will do with checo the same barcelona did to xavi

play him as a midfielder and coach?
not that :)))
sacking him after they just said that he will coach the team next year too
ah yes pride server photo
i missed it
but the circuit in the photo is barely visible
not unless Lando comes over smh
too damn bad
lawson to redbull ftw
my point if you want it in one msg is:
- lance stroll was dsqed for an illegal part suspected to be from the Williams F1 team
- i believe that it's highly likely (but I've never stated that it's been confirmed or that we know for sure) that Williams produced the part because: Lance was a Williams test driver, Lawrence has essentially infinite money and we have seen on many occasions that he will throw huge sums of money just for his son's career, lawrence financially supported Williams hugely and he's a smart businessman, he wouldn't do that if he didn't have his own demands to help his son, THEN a Williams mechanic and development car were present at the track with prema, owned by stroll
Im not saying it's confirmed and I don't claim to have sources that 100% confirm it
man pulled up a list of arguments
nah this has just been what I've been trying to say all day but it just got twisted or ignored 💀
suspected by who?
all I'm saying is from the wealth of external knowledge we know its reasonable to link the part to williams
source?
history of what
Lawrence buying out prema
Williams never supply anyone in F3 euro
mike krack confirming that Aston Martin is centered around lance stroll
so?
that means Williams make illegal parts now?
bro do you even try to understand another person's arguments without making them extreme and twisting words
Red Bull really wants to prop Max up huh 
sorry how does Mike Krack confirming AM centers around Lance Stroll means that Williams make illegal car parts lol
this is a perfect example of taking someone's words and twisting them
do pls try to explain
you literally said this
as an argument
are you ok blud?
lol
i dont agree with this
yes he gets preferential treatment
but its not centered around him
what is the best part of circuit gilles villeneueve
because I'm explaining how we know Lawrence will spend a lot of money on purely benefitting lance
that's not linked to the part
that's just background knowledge
so?
my bad I think krack made a comment something similar to that?
that means Williams make illegal car part?
about the am project being to do with lance
ok there's actually no point bothering if you ain't gonna understand bother and all you wanna do is take the piss out of me
as someone who has been on the track before i would probably say virage senna or casino
wall of champions is overated
Ok bro lmao
this was an example
like
one of many
of Williams making illegal car parts for Stroll in F3 euro?
ic
to show how Lawrence will throw lots of money just for lance
dam uve been on the track
he would buy redbull(if possible) for lance
to make illegal car parts for Stroll in F3 euro?
what is this 💀
its open to the public except for when f1 is in town
like rn
mate this entire conversation you've just been toxic asf
it's a discussion about motor racing
and I've tried my best to be chill and patient and explain my points clearly
what points
I just ask which evidence that of Williams making illegal car parts for Stroll in F3 euro?
lmao
stop yapping RPM bullshit
not a single source or shit
and I clearly said there's no concrete evidence
no one knows where the part came from
so you made it up?
so you know this how?
The track being setup in April
I've tried my best to be calm but all you do is be toxic
when did I state rpm as a source? Never
come back when you have a source to back it up lil guy
when have you provided a source where the part came from? never
so you don't know where the part came from any more than I do
keep yapping lil bro
because there is no good journo would report on bs rumor lol
exactly, zero prove it's from Williams
& hairpin 🙂
yeah because I didn't send an autosport link
that didn't say anything about it coming from Williams
cool story bro
are U sure?
yes
nothing about Williams producing illegal parts
illegal part thought to have come from williams
thought by who?
by people at the race clearly
who?
is this all you gonna do? idfk it was 2016 I was like 8 at the time 💀
ofc, I call out on bullshit lol
why's it bullshit
people yapping RPM shit is bullshit lol
no source
no nothing
just RPM horseshit
that article was in 2016
way before rpm
This again
This whole thing is straight up rumours, nothing of these things has a base
The only thing that happened was Stroll being disqualified because of infringements
which didn't say anything
learn to read lil bro
nah this is crazy
if you can't even have a chill discussion
No no, RPM said
uve attacked me all day
it's clearly facts
For instance, take the situation with Haas being disqualified
there's a completely unrelated article that prove it lol
Infringement on rear wing elements, does that prove that Ferrari gave illegal parts to Haas?
there is nothing to discuss when you're only yapping RPM shit lil bro
when the part wasn't even illegal
the method to put it in is
Welcome to #monaco-gp where none of that shit matters
source?
I get the feeling that Stroll's words were kind of ironic, but since then people try to downplay not even his F1 career (Which there is not much to be downplayed, but anyways), but now his junior career as well? Nah this is too much
why would autosport say it's an illegal part if it wasnt
"All suspension components may however have sections with an aspect ratio greater than 3.5:1, and be non-symmetrical, provided these are adjacent to their inner and outer attachments and form no more than 25% of the total distance between the attachments of the relevant member.
"All measurements will be made perpendicular to a line drawn between the inner and outer attachments of the relevant member."
The stewards' verdict into the scrutineering findings read: "Suspension members aspect ratio more than 3.5:1."
Williams Formula 1 protege Lance Stroll has lost his two pole positions for the Formula 3 European championship round at Zandvoort after his car was found to have a suspension irregularity
same as why Lewis was dsq in Brazil, the part is alright.The way they set it up is ain't it
a suspension for that has to be symmetrical, even if it's not (and it would rarely be). When measured no section or elements can exceed said ratio more than the distance bla bla you can read it yourself
that time, they exceed that ratio the way they set it up
nowhere in the steward statement it said that the part itself is illegal
Suspension irregularity
That should clear it up, this feels like the whole "any does not mean all" discussion
Bro should learn to read the rules instead of listening to RPM lol
it's not a literal illegal suspension
smh
correct me if I'm wrong but it states that the cross section of every member of the suspension must be within a certain aspect ratio
no
it clearly said you can exceed it
Provided they are adjacent to the attachments
but it has to be adjacent to the attachment bla bla distance and all that
see reading ain't so hard ain't it
so the measurement of the ratio would be within the bit where ratio is confined then?
what
does that even mean
the stewards said that the ratio exceeds 3.5:1
yes
he wouldn't be dsqed if that was adjacent to the attachments and within the 25%
so clearly the ratio was 3.5:1 in an area where it's not allowed
of the cross section of the suspension member
no
that's not how it works
how does it work (genuine question)
it's greater than 3.5:1
also it would be great if you'd like to be respectful?
that's the whole point of it
sorry I meant greater
yes
greater than 3.5:1
how though?
because the problem is the measurement to the attachment
not the part itself
bye bye
is the measurement not about the part though?
no
relative to the attachment
inside and outside
wait what
what?
there is no mention of cross section?
there is
The overall cross-sections of each member of every suspension component (with any nonstructural shroud for wheel tethers included) must have an aspect ratio no greater than 3.5:1 and be symmetrical about its major axis.
not to the attachment
the whole point is you measure it to the attachment
not the part itself
the cross section?
relative to the attachment
perpendicular and all that
you can put it wrong, you can put it right
isn't aspect ratio simply the ratio of the length and width whatever
so length cross section should be 3.5x as long as the width/height
relative to the attachment
you measure it, from the perpendicular line of both the attachment
that's never mentioned in the article in the regs
........
what
literally the 2nd paragraph
all it states is that the cross section within the restricted area should be 3.5:1 and symmetrical across the major axis
c'mon dude
nope
read again
"All measurements will be made perpendicular to a line drawn between the inner and outer attachments of the relevant member."
you're not measuring the part mate
in itself
The overall cross-sections of each member of every suspension component (with any nonstructural shroud for wheel tethers included) must have an aspect ratio no greater than 3.5:1 and be symmetrical about its major axis.
and measured perpendicular to the attachments
very important detail
perpendicular to a line drawn between the attachments
one that Prema and thr Steward acknowledges
correct
so if you draw a line between attachments that doesn't measure any ratio
what
why wouldn't you
drawing a line between the attachments doesn't measure a ratio
to measure the aspect ratio of the cross section you have to measure the height and width of the cross section
perpendicular to the line
no
jesus
no
just no
yes?
PERPENDICULAR to the attachment
jesus christ mate
learn to read
"All measurements will be made perpendicular to a line drawn between the inner and outer attachments of the relevant member."
not perpendicular to the attachment
same thing
different shit
I ain't typing the whole rule that you're too lazy to read lol
mate if you can't be respectful imma get a mod here cuz all day U been attacking me
chill out
it's an F1 discord
lmao
chill dude
don't get so worked up
Ive been chill all day
c'mon
I am 100% hydrated
I took a break all day at school and I come back and this guy's telling me 'learn how to read' 'stop ur bs' 'aint so hard to read'
I just want a normal discussion
yup
yet you refused to hear the facts that me, pirelli, gucks, and many other has said lol
there is no proof that Williams bring thode parts
or those parts were illegal
the article specifically said irregularity
I'm just saying it's not unreasonable to believe perhaps it may have been from Williams
source?
irregularity could mean anything
exactly
you don't know
so stop acting like it is lol
the source is logic, that's simply why i said perhaps
Ok so it seems like what it comes down to is you guys having 2 different interpretations
ah yes logic lol
And I don’t think you’re going to agree anytime soon
seeing how much Lawrence has poured into lances career
because you can't brinf a good source lol
so that means Williams make illegal parts for Lance?
never will
it's a potential possibility
because?
Right so let’s just drop it maybe
aw
just when it's fun seeing someone scrapping the bottom of the barrell
otherwise it's just knocking heads for no reason
Yeah once you’ve both said your piece it just leads to frustration
what is this meant to mean?
mate it would be great to be respectful
damn this still going
that's all I ask
Yeah let’s just
I don't mind if u don't agree
Don’t make me mute you now stop riling them up just for fun
ok ok
I just would prefer if you hadn't attacked me multiple times
leaves a sour taste imo
but let's drop it
Whats this chat for
Dont canadians speak english
and French
Real personal attacks like this one are tolerated. Imagined attacks are cause for bans. 🤯
😭
oh well it's happened can't do shit now
Mate you still haven’t moved on
For what it's worth, I don't know who was right in that debate but I agree with you that Trigger was unecessarily rude.
Yes and I just told them to stop it or I’d mute them
There’s a difference between calling someone lazy and being a bigot to them ffs
doesn't really matter it just spoils the point of discussion, I just hope trigger doesn't do it in future
but let's all leave this now 🙏
Agreed.
part of Canada speaks french, GP of Canada is in Montreal, a french speaking city and province

Australian? I think.
yep
But why?
And I think it's spelled 'Aussie', isn't it?
I know of it.
do u actively follow it
It's like baseball, but even more boring. Right?
if not
u cannot be joking more
its actually more fun
no joke
which country
Aren't the matches like, 2 weeks long? Or something?
BRO
um
new zealand?
australia?
Just tell us.
India?
oh shit mb
sachin
do be kinda goated
if ykyk
bro
tendulkar...
bro
i was refrencing him
nothing deep
I'm Canadian, and I don't speak French
Baseball is not boring
cricket be clearing baseball
both are unique
i meant some canadians speak french
dont project
right?
There's not a lot of French speakers in the west part of Canada
dont project the faults of baseball onto cricket
makes sense
right
I hope I don't get banned for having that opinion. 😉
true true
5 days if youre playing test
I'm from Alberta and I barely know any Francophones
but thats only for certain elite nations
ODI/t20 moment
such as england india australia nz etc
Test: 5 days
ODI: 8-9 hours
T20: 2-3 hours
somehow test is the most fun lmao
esp when they play aggro
ipl pissing me off
cuz englands strategy has fixated on aggro scoring
IPL?
yeah IPL
Indian Premier League
whats that
no no
It's not a test
indian t20 league
It's T20
hmm
its that level
There's no promotion and relegation
oh yeah no i just meant in terms of popularity
and like the fact theres sm money in it and its filled with the best players internationally
If the league is played in a country with a billion people, it is popular
cursed af
Popularity, of course, is relative.
I'm still trying learn cricket, don't players play everywhere
no but like
baseball worldwide has got nothing on cricket
wdym
thats true
More countries play baseball than cricket
you americans tend to over-dramatise everything
popularity wise
alright lets calm down
cricket is better
ye
cricket is basically the most popular sport in asia
That's plausible. I have no idea.
and up there in oceania
A. I'm Canadian
B. I'm not over-dramatic
C. I'm telling actual statistics
You mean: you prefer it. Right?
not u
like
i was talking to chris
and i was spekaing in general
dont be offended
and very popular in the uk and growing in various other european nations as well as the americas
I'm not American either. And how was I dramatizing anything?
and africa
I sometimes see players play international, then BBL, then PSL, then IPL in a single season
so id say its more popular than baseball
It is
Pro tip: When you call someone "over-dramatic" they are likely to be offended.
oh yes, but in terms of leagues, not international competitions, the IPL attracts the best of the best
its the biggest cricket league
i am not wrong
americans literally make stuff over-dramatic
like all the time
its unnecessary
agreed
you arent wrong but the tones unnecessary
Can you play an international match and play for an IPL team on the same week
Stop being pessimistic
if
I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying you're disingenuous when you say you didn't mean to offend.
cricket matches take place on any day so yes
You guys talk about America a lot more than America ever does
americans couldnt care less
So why bother them?
lets not generalise please
i didnt mean to come off as smug or offend canadians when i was talking about USA
yep mb
You just meant to offend Americans?
We are brothers, so we always look out for each other
no
ive had enough of disrespect on this server for today so can we please just chill 🙏
it was just a comment
Well, that means nothing at all. 👍
More like an invalid opinion
trigger ripped u apart
jk
jk.
it wasnt directed as hate
i didnt mean to offend
it was rather an observation
i mean there was no substance behind the stuff he said
It sounded like it
@atomic oracle
ik
buddy, i just said i was not intending it as hate, idk y ur escalating

Let's just get back on the cricket topic
thats vettel's iconic index finger poitning thingy
💀
thanks
i think it was just a comment made out of dislike for the way american sports are often extremely loud and over the top
Index finger*
Congrats @supple bolt, you're now on lap 5
You made it sounded like you don't know the actual word for it
...
fine
anyhow
who
do u think
will win
at canada
rn
Fair enough. I myself don't like American sports coverage either. But that's just my opinion. I don't think anything is gained by expressing my own personal opinion as supposedly objective observation.
this race
My friend says Lewis Hamilton
indeed
which friend made such a correct conclusion
Honestly if you don't watch it
What do you mean "which friend"
listen, i didnt mean to come off the way i did
dont escalate
move on
life flows
...
they were replying to me not u dw
like irl friend?
Yeah
All good
I don't follow.
LH will win
Why hate it if you don't follow it
I know, I'm talking about the city where the GP is held, and its province
he dislikes it
doesnt actively hate it
he doesnt watch because he hates
hes just disinterested
Or unless he's close-minded
i dislike american sports
I don't know, ever been to Montreal
bro rly had to stir up the pot
no im saying
i dislike them even though i dont follow them
What other sports do follow other than F1?
lmfao
That sounds ignorant
f1 aint a sport...
ooooh no 😭
My bad, motorsport*
yep
should f1 be a speck series
like
genuinely
would it not be fun
i only really directed it at nascar mb
bro do not get there
ull just offend more people
js dont
Makes sense, what about MLB, NFL or NBA?
i dont know enough to say
all very localised
im not interested in basketball or american football or baseball
Just motorsports?
no other sports
but not american central sports
i follow cricket, tennis, international football, snooker and a few others
'snooker'?
What do you mean?
whats wrong with snooker
I still don't follow you. I've watched enough of it to know I don't like it. Now I watch it only very seldomly. Is that confusing to you?
meaning not many people outside the americas watch
Where are you from? The UK?
what is that
yep
where from
I could tell based on the sports
Let's start making assumptions. Can I go first?
cue and ball game on a table
dont open a can of worms
lmfao
I follow most sports, my favorite sport is hockey
principal wise they r the same
like core principle
completely different rules
pool is based on potting your set of balls and then the common 8 ball before the other player
snooker is based on potting a red ball followed by a coloured ball (all of which have different point values)
you win by scoring more points in a frame instead
Any of you guys follow hockey?
nah sorry
for us pool users, we first either clear the stripes/solids and then hit the black ball in
Do you know which hockey I'm even talking about?
bro
NHL?
Yeah
probably ice?
i dont follow field or ice hockey
ahhh
same but
ah ok
ice. hockey just cooler
You follow it?
yeah not sure if ice hockey exists much here in the uk 😭
yeah not sure if hockey exists much here in the uk 😭 either
GB was in the World Championship
aint popular
GB won?
No, they got relegated
also its not GB its UK (sorry OCD moment)
All good
no one ik heres ever talked about GB in ice hockey
its not popular essentially
GB and UK are diff
yep
My team made the finals
the country that we colloquially refer to as GB only constitues england,wales and scotland
while UK is GB+ Northern ireland
irish skill issue ig
yh
they are just separate
Why is England, Scotland, Wales, N. Ireland called countries though?
BROOOOO
they are individual countries
but they form the island of great britain
the UKs full name is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (smth like that)
nah they probably just didnt know
no harm in explaining it
they are self autonomous territories, but when presented infront of international bodies like the UN they form UK as a country
England merged with scotland in 1707 act of parliament to form the country UK
so as such England,scotland,wales,N.I arent fully independent
its
complex
but
not?
idk
its stoopid for
sure
the uk is the union of the countries in gb and ni
welp
UK preceded GB
cuz of 1707 act of parliament
and british nationalists wanted to exclude irish rebels
so they came up with GB
well yeah but purely in the present
cuz of the IRA
its the uk of gb and ni
thats the easiest way to think of it tho
ye
the uk is the union of the countries
i was just explaining history behind it
yes!
all good
union of self autonomous territories
cant rly call em countries
yes
but
the countries dont have full independence
but cant be disregarded as states
its like an in between
lmfao hope that made sense
ye thats why its an inbetween
its like self governance
like states
but not states
wait
like
austria-hungary?
yep
I thought the "countries" were England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The United Kingdom is a, hmm, I don't know the word. A confederation? A commonwealth?
no no no
england
is not a country
it is governed by the main parliament
You sure about that?
💀
welp its not fully independent
but its not a state
no it is a country
There is no English Parliament, only the UK parliament, right?
@atomic oracle
kind of
for other countries in the union there are
but not for england
its stupid
england is kinda like the main ig
That's weird.
it is
but england can have different laws to the others
because they have other parliaments
Governance
Politics
Main article: Politics of England
Photograph of rectangular floodlight building, reflected in water. The building has multiple towers including one at each end. The tower on the right includes an illuminated clock face.
The Palace of Westminster, the seat of the Parliament of the United Kingdom
England is part of the United Kingdom, a constitutional monarchy with a parliamentary system.[86] There has not been a government of England since 1707, when the Acts of Union 1707,[87] putting into effect the terms of the Treaty of Union, joined England and Scotland to form the Kingdom of Great Britain.[64] Before the union England was ruled by its monarch and the Parliament of England. Today England is governed directly by the Parliament of the United Kingdom, although other countries of the United Kingdom have devolved governments.[88]
holy
copied from the wiki
its a nation
@thorn herald read the last line
its just complex
its so stupid
Interesting. I didn't know that.
oh no 💀
So what kinds of powers to the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish Parliaments have? They can't go against the UK Parliament, can they?
not gonna happen
they have different governing parties and they can make different laws i think?
they have power for their own lands, but ultimate power is with the main parliament
like
they cant succeed
succede*
So long as they don't conflict with the UK laws?
Secede?
Didn't Scotland vote on that recently? Or maybe they were considering it.
they did
its like the state govts of the USA and the main federals
quite a few years ago now actually
a poll, not a referendum/plebiscite
and iirc that was for brexit
So if it had passed, it still wouldn't have happened?
That was something else.
wait no
cuz the parliament would not enforce
it
if it had passed i think scotland would be independent
UK parliament would def prevent/veto/find a way/loophole
theyd try fs
u know them knaving scathing schemeing politicans
the scottish rebellion
I have only vague memories of that, but I recall the UK politicians (James Cameron, I think) saying they would respect the result but that he really, really hoped the Scottish voters would choose to stay.
u really think
its like biden promising not to have dementia
ffs
I vaguely remember that because it was such a contrast to the issue in Spain when Barcelona wanted independence but the central government wouldn't even allow a vote on it.
Well, that comment is not helping your credibility.
...
its a half joke man
just let go
i dont know how else to explain this
the british parliament would have no incentive to let scotland independent
haha david cameron
james cameron may have been better 
avatar way of the brexit
yo lmfao
cameron
with the pigs
sorry
'lord david cameron'
Obviously, I have no idea what would have happened if the Scottish voters had voted in favor of independence. But the "no incentive" argument is not persuasive. Presidents and Prime Ministers often have "no incentive" to comply with laws or court orders they disagree with except for that little thing called "legal authority." Again, I don't know enough about UK law to know what would have happened, but I do recall the rhetoric of people in the UK government suggested that the referendum would be respected.
i was 8 when he resigned 😭
Yes. Unfortunately, I get it. 😦
idk much abt david cameron as pm
like the democrats rn
yo no way
search up
umm
piggate
rn
Yes. And Biden (and Obama before him) had to do plenty of things they didn't like to do because the Supreme Court or a previously enacted law said they had to. Incentive isn't the end of the story.
i am not talking of that
biden
made
the texan mayor
make a decision
to send the texan national guard in
such a stupid situation which could be preempted
lmfao
Texas Governor, you mean?
?
No politics 👹
oooh yes
It's not like anyone is trying to talk about the Canadian GP. If they were, and we were "in the way" we'd stop.
.rule 5
No Politics
Country-specific politics are not allowed. (1d Mute)
i think it strayed from the uk
It’s literally a rule
: )
lets leave it
sorry