#SOP and UCMJ Overhaul (Pending Community Feedback before Merge)
1 messages · Page 2 of 1
wdym
yeah nothing serious, slight ego boost to mps who will valid hunt people they dislike
just minor things
wear your hardhats into the garage sop đ
LOL if only we had mil grade hard hats
Why are we marines being forced into a safety hazard of a garage holding ground and flight viechals?
this aloen should designate said places as hazards
hell we shouldnt even deploy
take away these maps until we put in good safety inspections
what would the osha say of this
i dont see what you're arguing atp :/
my argument is simple
this rule only exists so mps can stroke their egos for memorizing SOP and neiche laws that no one will read
and will only be used sparignly and when used most likely to target individuals the mps already has a meta disliek of
and your argument of their existence is not convincing,
why are your sop updates leaving our crucial safety standards, smh
if we are going to talk about realism
no one spools any tihng indoors
or in garages
so if we are being realistic we shouldnt even have these veichals in the first place
the commander should not be ordering people into hazardous areas such as the flight deck
jsut delete them for the sake of safety concerns
vtols cant move unless spooled
this is my point
Yeah and no one will ever spool anything indoors
let alone in garages
hmm a conondrum
also, where are the fire marshals? there are to many people in the ship
what is it that we do
apply arbitirary safety changes to the sop that only exist for mps to abuse
and wasnt it rules written in blood
are game maps being too small so we park vtols next to humvees an excuse
no no rules are written in blood
if you think an MP is just being an ass just ahelp it
sir,
im a woman
i call everyone sir but okay
I call everyone sir for equality
and
i wanst calling you a sir
i was going to say sometihng and i quote talkign to my self here
-sir sir you dont get it, the punishment is small just a njp i dont get why you are mad over adding a law against breathing air while leaning to the left-
it does not matter what the punishment is or how small it is
when the crime it self or said crime is not comprehensible or reasonable
i dont care if the punishment is being told to spell air, or taking 1 second to breath or any minor thing, if the crime it self is incomprehensible
Do you know, what would happen, if a vtol actually spooled up inside an enclosed garage? or a crowded parking lot? the heat or downwash and what it would do? let alone the ships we have?
I do not get why you are applying that logic ONLY for why you should wear hard hats and not berets,
any ways this entire thing is just a response to this i am going back to studying
and this point is useless to be even mentioned, and?? does that change anything to the fact that this does nothing but add another thing mps who want to valid hunt to valid hunt about? i dont get why this is being metnioned or how its even releated to any of my arguments,
and what do i ahelp about? an mp enforcing sop? -admin admin help This mp was litirally doing his job and that hurt my feeling-
changed it to verbal warnings
what is the point behind this?
wdym
I mean isn't this already against the rules?
admin rules and stuff
But it also doesn't seem fit for SOP purpose
idk...?
it got put in SOP because you can ASK for DNRs
or get them after rightful trial
per troy
i will leave this here because i have an exam tommorow
Negligent Use of Resources đ„
5 min punishment, saluting in a grage is seven min if you do it twice 
i am the ds and i will suck 90% of req points
And the thing is if there were mechanical things such as hats or berets acting like FOD and being sucked in breaking vtol ruining the operation and youre gonna be the guy that delayed op by 10 min these changes would be fine and understandable, if they exist to solve mechanical problems it would be amazing,
but lets see we are introducting restrcitions and laws for the sake of muh realism, While we hmm have vtol jet engines inside enclosed crowded garages near humvees where marines stand inches away asometimes crowding the entire place in a large amount and our concern is... adding saluting and helmet laws for the sake of realism?
if we want ot be realistic indoor engine operations shouldnt be allowed, infact if maps are too small to make it realistic we shouldnt even have vtol,
yet we break realism to play normally, yet also use realism to add arbitrary SOP micromanegments that does nothing but add friction between players and give mps mechanical excuses to valid hunt or power trip over things that have zero impact on roleplay gameplay or actual round safety,
but you see its only a verbal warning to its totally fine, mps only get to verbally warn you and feel good inside, no longer is it a njp to feel good inside
1- Why do grooming standards not apply to Synths
2- Why is NEMO allowed to issue DNRs?
3- Why are Combat Synths even allowed with SOP
4- Can you make Rank Authority a bit clearer? It reads that captain DPs can overrule JOs, etc
5- If this is going into the guidebook, go through it with a spell checker, save yourself some stress.
- Synths cant change their appearance (suggestion by @vale walrus )
- Same reason why Provost currently can overrule UCMJ where they see fit, plsu its admin intervention
- This was removed, the message in channel isnt up to date
- Just did, ref image attatched
- no
physically cannot or is it against their programming
because if there's nothing physical stopping the baldening then the baldening should be allowed
They can and will, in-fact they're an HRP role so we'll probably OOCly make them follow it imo.
physically cant prob
synths haveing unique hair colors is like the one thing they got going đ
If you are a such a bad RPer that the only thing you have going for your character is neon hair, thats a problem smh.
LOL
lemme have pink hair in peace bro
Lowkey if someone wants to make a system that forces SOP grooming standards for GOVFOR/OPFOR I'd speedmerge it.
Well no, because more than half our roles are civilians.
So obviously civilians can have long and colorful hair.
they dont have rights anyways troy
It'd probably be really easy to do imo, I'm just lazy.
I know goob already set it up at one point.
you can restrict uh
certain hairs
per job
and species
its a wizden componet iirc
also couldnt we argue the same for synths
some of our GOVFOR Synths are also colony sold
They are adjusted per market clearly.
its really not that big of deal imo
I always thought anime hair synths looked stupid as hell
Most synths in cm13 use normal colours and hairs
wait is my sytnh hari even pnik
one sec
nvm we're good
shes just another soulles read head
đ
I feel like its a bit crazy not even the CO can order DNRs
thats a @solid plinth call
Itâs to give orbital legal something to do. If you want to execute someone you have to hold a trial.
Hmmm
@dusky moth The entire point of adding SOP concerning saluting in the proper places is
-
Whether it's likely to happen or not if it is a safety hazard then it is going to be in SOP. For example, leaving a pallet standing on its side is a fine under OSHA guidelines of literally thousands of dollars because it can possibly result in someone getting hurt. Combine that with the fact that vehicle mechanics are very clunky, then it's not crazy to see why discipline and standards are being enforced in RP
-
To cultivate a much more RP centered environment I think it makes sense to integrate roleplay inconveniences as long as they aren't significant. This is no different from enforcing things like Enlisted not calling NCOs Sir, it doesn't matter if functionally it's harmless, the Roleplay is the most important part of the game and it is my understanding that with this fork we want to cultivate an even more RP centered gameplay loop than other CM style forks.
I also think it's denigrating your point that you approached the discussion by trying to be very disingenuous out the gate with poor analogies about safety precautions
also I don't know lack of discipline and respect in GOVFOR players is not good for RP and enforcing SOP centered around being self aware and responsible is valid in roleplay
if you ask me disrespect of a superior isn't enforced strictly enough as is

the proper response if you get told off for a minor violation is "Yes (Rank)" and then you correct yourself
@solid plinth Can we make escapes from your cell/brig area DNRable
the lack of it means literally everyone who isn't GOVFOR acts like the worst kind of shitter once they're in brig and ignores fear/pain RP to punch down their brig doors while under gunpoint and just sprint into the MP's loving bullets
Like, I say that ONLY for escaping brig while jailed
I couldn't imagine being in the shoes of an MP because of it lmao
we need some kind of nerve stapling tier shit for prisoners like this
it's like god fucking damn, not even a straitjacket they can't bust out of OR any solitary confinement
Not to mention IF they see they can deal damage to the walls, they will spend the next 10 minutes to break it so they can die again
It leads to so many shit situations where I'll hear crazy stuff like MPs just straight tossing lethal frag grenades into the cell once the fucking crackhead inside busts down the door like he's Jason
And I walk into brig and none of the doors are present
If I was MP I'd have blown my shit off
People like that DO NOT add to the RP and needn't exist in the round at that point
In fact it brings everyone's experience down
The answer is no
It gets to the point where not even those people who are really shitty to cops in bodycam vids don't even act likt this lmao
I'm talking to Troy
They'll sometimes IC just straight tell the MP to shoot them once they're about to get out and it's like NAH BRO SORRY I CAN'T 
Again hereâs his response, the answer is no.
@mighty ginkgo
I typed my whole thing in direct response to that message which, yes, yes, I have read with my eyes to point out cases like this that just straight take away from the round
I see no issue with IC punishing people who just don't roleplay once they get into brig by removing them from the round, there's all the reason to do so for people who just spend their time breaking jail once they're in there, and nothing of value to the round lost by doing so
Personally I've seen far more roleplay value from people who actually make an effort to request the counsel and be civil instead of the guy who opts to bust everyone's balls because he got jailed forever for mass murder
I get troy's thinking but all I agree with is this and still stand with my point, like it adds no value
Add cryo to cell areas, make rule regarding violent prisoners and DNR
Issue fixed
Hell if its a larp thing make it a forced cryo mechanic
In that case just instead actually give us viable solitary confinement on every map
Even for Bush your options are lock down every cell or nothing
Uh nah solitary is ass
Stable Garrison has one of the worst because no podlocks, the only half serviceable one for planet maps that I've seen is Barker's because it gets podlocks and window shutters
Honestly I feel like gameplay wise executions on mass scales would be preferable
Prison RP is just so ass
Thank God the only time Iâve been imprisoned here an ERT broke me out
But it was NRP perma
I've only had one of them so far but I was genuinely just thinking of gassing them to get me extra time to handle the incoming prisoners
Tear gas
The tear gas grenade straight into cell
Whether it's likely to happen or not if it is a safety hazard then it is going to be in SOP. For example, leaving a pallet standing on its side is a fine under OSHA guidelines of literally thousands of dollars because it can possibly result in someone getting hurt. Combine that with the fact that vehicle mechanics are very clunky, then it's not crazy to see why discipline and standards are being enforced in RP
Kit argued and i quote "Our maps arent big enough so we vtol in garages, that is why i added this minor safety point into sop because we vtol in garages"
there is a much bigger concern here then saluting on wearing beret in this you see this right??
We unrealistically vtol in garages and so we will realistically enforce arbitrary safety standards, in said garages because we unrealistically vtol in them, I have no problem what so ever adding these changes but realistically the salute will only exist on the flight path and within veichals, well why is it expanded to garages when actual soldiers salute in garages just fine? and why is it added to active parking lots when soldiers salute in active parking lots?
Well you see because we vtol in said garages,
wearing a beret in garages or active parking has more punishment time then NUR, a ds can swallow 90% of req points and gets 5 min in jail but god forbid you wear a beret,
(You can happily look for one yourself, but again due to us storing air vehicles in garages, of which must be spooled to move, the rule was written
also because currently our air vehicles (liek vtols) are also stored in the same garages and parkign lots as ground vehicles
due to lack of mapping
so again)
lets be real here, 90% of people will not read or see this as a thing, and thier only interation with this addition will be is an mp giving them an njp because they saluted, and if tehy argue because to thier knowledge that is stupid as shit, they can get extra punishment,
So even in roleplay you get a net negative
except mps mps get an amazing tool in thier pockets,
i feel like this is redundant.
just give standard equipment regulations
for all shipside personnel not deploying
I wonder how fast these rules would get downsized if one or two MPS just enforced them all every round
not even RMC had this level where they were only allowed a pistol while unchambered
like what.
this feel like it goes against free modification.
"Sorry vros the CO wore his blue colored shoes instead of his black, which is a 5 minute jail time service, due to blue shoes only being permitted for ceremonies."
this doesnt need to be SOP
this can be used as a murder charge
or etc.
Do we not realise that SOP and UCMJ are the same? this is redundant.
this goes directly against self preservation laws.
/ is a lil lrp anyways
case by case in round basis, this is rather redundant.
I also do not believe they are desingenuous or poor analogies, they are anlogies that point at the absurdity of these changes when they are based on absurdism
Alot of this is just redundant
and some of this has content that is not in
yet approved
@hollow condor why would military command report to civilian law enforcement.
it doesnt make sense.
Manslaughter I'd think because no ill intentions(?)
etc
yeah
anyways
tldr its redundant
Ill do a proper review on github
i have multiple concerns with alot of the SOP stuff.
Not CMB
provost
Specify that.
anyways i listed some concerns just above of what i picked apart
my beloved
Giving a -1 until rather large alterations
The kinks need to be sorted out because thereâs rather pain in the ass issues.
A commander shouldnât be arrested on the field because govfor spawned with rifles instead of an smg
They also shouldnât get arrested for having a preloaded firearm
Itâs a bit stupid to ask for players to follow that.
âDonât follow sop thenâ the point is that itâs for rules they have to.
Also the fact that synths can go into the AO alone freely is a bit insane
And itâs specified that itâs 10 minutes?
Well thatâs already allowed as of rn
Because we have no rule against it
You can argue itâs against self preservation laws
Shrug
You could, but still not listed
I agree entirely, just telling you itâs not there
Enforcing something thatâs gone unenforced for months is also like a duche move too
Enforcing roleplay standards are up to interpretation, of course itâs up to the adminâs discretion,
Anyways
Itâs enforcing something that SHOULD be there
Specified for 10 minutes comes with an issue of âhe said she said they said, etcâ
Elaborate
So synths canât break UCMJ or it becomes a whitelist issue
Due to their roleplay standards
Mhm
So if a synth or command breaks UCMJ it becomes an issue thatâs handled for admins because itâs a rule break
Iâm getting a lot of these issues as petty, in terms of enforcing.
Like imagine someone getting reported because they have a rifle instead of an smg
I cant find the part about berets
No reason for shipsjde staff to have long arms on the ship
It says in the field
I brought this up above
Itâs redundant, it should be a generalised shipside procedure
Like
No it clearly says while shipsjde
Smgs are also contrary to this because smgs are the main gun on half the govfors
On the ship or in the field
Thatâs about having it chambered
This should not be handled by a player, especially game rules. Leave it to the hosts and the staff team
I kinda got permission BY the host to write this :/
Twinkle was in VC helping me with this
Ah
Same with Troy and Jasen
I honestly see no issue with most of this, but it does need tweaks for sure
Agreed
This is why PRs are reviewed
Specifically
I think the sop referring to content needs to be merged first like
NEMO
Nemo doesnât exist yet
Or like vehicle sop
Technicians are not allowed to deploy
Because they are support personnel
And it says solely that technicians are in charge of vehicles
Is there any SOP that prevents command taking heavy weaponry thats NOT from req?
Req or vendors
It states req or vendors
So yes
Instead of making a command specific equipment sop
It should be generalised
Long arms are restricted for shipside personnel, with the caveat of pistols.
Just remember that anything for synth or command needs to be considered with the potential of rolebans and dewhitelists
Like imagining getting role banned because youâre using a rifle while deployed
LOL
once we get a full major update, ranks will determine authority, NO question
ranks will matter
@hollow condor has Troy talked to you about changing the Synths cant give orders shit
They already canât?
he wants them to
I can add it then sure
Thatâs another rule change though
with his idea for the new ranks, he wants them to have actual authority
ok im reading this again, you MUST wear a helmet in vehicle areas
ok so
thats to much
thats reaching in the HRP+ area
no ones enforcing that unless their an asshole
No
You can just take off your hat
And hold it in your hands
thats like, so uneededđ
Current Ranks, SOP its a Big shit whoever its writing them its making a shit job
Bias ranks and SOP that help more shitters than players, ok Bro i know you LOVE being pilot theres your MAJOR rank and fuck off the Commander â€ïž
I Guess i can be LRP/NRP in the brig and make everyone Life miserable because if the MP DECIDES to do something he IS the one getting noted or banned đđ€©
this was changed
and with the major GOVFOR change coming they will be lower
i will adapt his in my rule rework but i wont allow it to be added in full as a PR no made by me
from there ill see what i want to change up
I only changed rules that contradict changes in SOP
ah wait read it wrong
thing is
we dont want CO's to deploy to the Area of operatons
I changed to XO
From CO
after talking with Troy
In HRP Wl
also wrong rule change
wdym
we have two tabs
we one for Area of operation and one for FOB
one is under High roleplay rules
the other is in roleplay rules
idk which one your tryin to change
No, but weâre going to make it so you canât punch down doors.
Plus theyâll be permas problem up on the orbital.
yeah rn if you deploy as CO you're breaking the rules
SOP doesnt matter
thats how we're supposed to enforce it
@hollow condor thinking about @dusky moth's issues with the saluting regulations,
I understand what you're going for and would rather propose reducing the broadening the section to refer to Traditional Conduct and Honors and include clear provisions about Saluting in general as well as the use of honorifics, perhaps even just move it under the charge of Disrespect of a Superior
Avoid saluting in any area which may require heightened attention to safety, have hazardous materials, or have moving equipment which can injure the body including firing ranges, vehicle work areas or motorways, surgical suites, chemical handling rooms, cargo lifts, maintenance access shafts, reactor facilities, artillery batteries, etc.
Avoid saluting in any area with a hostile presence such as within an area of operations, including secure checkpoints or outposts outside of the FOB, as well as during any situation of duress such as a breach of security.
Head Covers in Vehicle Operations Area (HCVO)
Wearing a non-strapped head cover (i.e. berets, patrol caps, beanies, etc.) on flight line, in garages, on designated vehicle travel paths, ACTIVE parking lots, is forbidden for personnel safety.
NJP
Second offense: 7 minutes.
wearing a beret gets you 7 min, using 90% of req points gets you 5 min 
and like i said even if we add this jsut for the sake of the larp and ignore the very clear valid huntable aspect of this addition,
in real life this law only exists in veichals flight paths or veichal paths,
why did kit extrapolate the rules to include garages and parking lots when that isnt even in real life ie the saluting and the beret
(zyadRole icon, GOVFOR/OPFOR Player â Yesterday at 11:43 PM
okay great not hard to bring me a real life source of salutes being banned in motor pools or garages or active parking lots
Flight line salutation being banned in understandable,
Kit (Leah Kaiminski) #1 Prodigy [RMC], Role icon, Contributor
OP
â Yesterday at 11:44 PM
you can happily look for one yourself, but again due to us storing air vehicles in garages, of which must be spooled to move, the rule was written)
because and i quote we spool air vehicles in garages, Which if we are going to be realistic about this, this shouldnt even be a thing if we want realism we should just delete the air vehicles or map a place specific for them can you imagine actually spooling air vehicles in closed parking lot with a bunch of marines?
also because currently our air vehicles (liek vtols) are also stored in the same garages and parkign lots as ground vehicles
due to lack of mapping
so again
polus first offense is just an NJP)
Now why is the fix of us unrealistically storing and having air vehicles in the same garages and parking lots as ground vehicles which kit admits is due to a lack of mapping being fixed with arbitrary sop changes that will not result in a single net benifit in any thing not roleplay not game mechanics not actual safety,
so we fix unrealistic matters that we just ignore to play normally because - that is what normal human beings do- By adding arbitrary SOP changes under the guise of realism,
As far as i know most additions should be a net positive, you shouldnt add things just for the sake of adding things let alone when these additions are net negatives,
any normal mp will not enforce this sop, any one that does will very clearly be a valid hunting shitter, and you can not report that, what do you do? report an mp following sop? Really? and what is the admin going to do? Please dont follow sop?
lets be realistic the average encounter will be either following orders while opening a ticket and wondering why the fuck is this mp asking you to do a njp or giving you a verbal warning for wearing a beret or saluting the dead corpses of your comrades brought back, and be told oh thats just sop, Or you just think its an ic rp thing and they are just giving you a warning nto releated to sop, and then get surprised wen you get 5 min jail when you do the same action again,
i just do not get what we get out of this, if its realism then it should stop at it being in flight pathways and in vehicles, why extrapolate it to garages or parking lots? to get the largest amount of violaters? i truly fail to understand the point of any of this,
the military salutes officers but sometimes it's dangerous to salute an officer so to make sure people get hurt we don't let them render salutes in places where it's dangerous
as i said no problem what so ever
not saluting in battle not saluting in veichal pathways
real life laws copy and pasted
no item or feature or map is removed or changed
and Marines have to be more aware of their surroundings
But kit extrapolated this to add garages and parking lots because i quote "also because currently our air vehicles (liek vtols) are also stored in the same garages and parkign lots as ground vehicles
due to lack of mapping
so again
polus first offense is just an NJP)"
why is this being fixed with a sop change? why include garages and parkign lots because we unrealistically have this due to a lack of mapping
if a vtol is spooling an inch away from 2 squads of marines we have bigger problems to talk about then wearing a beret or saluting 
NJPs can be anything including getting chewed out, the NJP has to fit the spirit of the law when issued, and furthermore I doubt it will even be issued unless an argument commences
the solution is to just not argue with an MP or superior and submit an ahelp if you feel they are wrong about SOP
"Put your helmet on or leave your head uncovered here it's a safety hazard"
"Okay"

again
like i said this is adding a friction points betwen the playerbase
do you not have any issue with enforcing grooming standards because how is that any different
yes it's military RP bro
that will most likely the nnot result in a negative result and opinion
this keeps going back to my poitn of
i ahve no problem with adding these 2 points
no one is ever forced to play as a military character to take part in roleplay or combat in this server
i have a problem with kit extrapolating to include areas which arent included in real life
why is this law enforced in parking lots or garages?
Because we spool air crafts in them,
Why are we spooling aircrafts in them?
because vehicles are moving in garages or parking lots
this law in real life is applied when driving or riding a car
not when stationary
Hold on bro hold on i am going to just see something real quick
also because air mobile vehicles are vastly more utilized in the aliens universe and the Blackbird must be transported by a dedicated drop ship or Aerospace vehicle so in frontier worlds with minimal infrastructure units deployed with Blackbirds have to make due with impromptu staging areas for it
as well as there is no need to have grooming standards on hair and face or refer to officers as sir
nor is there any need to actually wear helmets since their armor rating isn't accounted for
LOL why
I think we should add features and operating procedures which incentivize playing a role regardless if people trip up on it because we are roleplaying
I don't know, half of all feedback posts are about LRP
(here are a few threads referring to SOP and RP issues)
#1513907067000459395
#1503044493908381806
#1514319852398182582
I have searched, and multiple tiems at that
GOVFOR war crimes, CLF war crimes, round removing, violating SOP, disrespect of superiors
as kit told me to feel free to look it up my self
only times where you are exempt from a salute is if you are a passanger or driving a car,
Guard gates must salute vehicles,
outdoor garages or airfields must salute,
Indoor garages you can choose to not salute,
But its not a -you must not salute-
Not a single militairy paper or g uideline
if you or kit can find me a single source about this i will concede completely,
per Marine and Army regulations including AR600-25 use broad language to refer to work and hazard areas as places exempt from salutes
Because the Blackbird is sporadically issued and not an Aerospace vehicle many FOBs lack the infrastructure to support a dedicated landing pad for it so parking and garage areas are used
therefore the garage and parking lot can become a hazard area
this is regardless of in units with vehicle operations in FOBs the garage and parking lot is no longer a place used for static commuter vehicles but for constantly rotating military vehicles with poor visibility and large silhouettes
I don't even understand why you are hung up on a source because the point is that "we have special procedures for our vehicles so garages and parking lots can be hazardous areas" so it's not really analogous to the real world in that way
the analogue that we are drawing is that you shouldn't salute in a hazard area
we never see a garage or parking lot not in or near an operations area in game
as far as i am reaidng its when you are doing something that is hazardous can you please cite a source on the hazardous area
come on man
Kit told me to feel free to search it up i searched it up didnt find it
cant find it man
tanks and VTOLs are staged and often moving in these areas
that's what makes them hazardous in game
and what i am reading is engaging in an activity where salutation are by nature hazardous
(okay great not hard to bring me a real life source of salutes being banned in motor pools or garages or active parking lots
Flight line salutation being banned in understandable,
Kit (Leah Kaiminski) #1 Prodigy [RMC], Role icon, Contributor
OP
â Yesterday at 11:44 PM
you can happily look for one yourself, but again due to us storing air vehicles in garages, of which must be spooled to move, the rule was written)
i seem to be unable to find such a source, perhaps i am missing something,
ar 600 doesnt mention hazardous area, and only mention of baning salutes is working as a member of a detail or engages in sports or social functions where saluting would pre sent a safety hazard,
at the beggining of this entire argument i asked simple question, as you see rules are written in blood right,
are there any in real life sources? if there is, then this argument ends right? but i cant find one, all i am asking is for any one here to find me one,
because if you cant then it stands that this is an arbitrary change
I feel we should take a step back because I don't understand your point, is your point that there is no source we should not salute in a hazardous area? or that the garages and parking lots in game are not hazardous areas?
if you can then my argument doesnt need to exist
okay great not hard to bring me a real life source of salutes being banned in motor pools or garages or active parking lots
what i asked kit,
you can happily look for one yourself, but again due to us storing air vehicles in garages, of which must be spooled to move, the rule was written)
What kit said,
Then there should be sources from real life where salutes are banned in motor pools or garages or active parking lots,
cant find them,
i am not arguign wheather or not its not a hazardous area i am asking where in real life are salutes banned in such places
rp quality isnt gonna increase because of sudden changes to SOP
I didn't say it would
litirally not a single problem with this sop change if its even realistic
or comes from real life
especially such retarded changes like "ermmm no fixed headcover in hangars and parking lots please or we put u in a jail!"
its only gonna decrease the rp quality matter-of-fact
But why is it extrapolated to garages and active parking lots, No idea
because people r gonna be more bitter about MPs and officers
the punishment isn't to put you in jail unless it is done in disregard of a previously informed order
this surely SURELY will most definitely NOT be used to valid hunt,
as i told kit before nad i will keep repeating it
it does not matter how small the punishment is
if the crime it self is incomprehensible
almost no minor SOP violations will result in jail time unless you do it repeatedly in disregard of prior warnings
the punishment is literally written down and its 5-7 minutes in brig
@quick portal youre forbidden from breathing while looking to the right, the punishment of doing so is blinking
but you see i dont get why you are mad
you only need to blink
why are you so mad over this
if u expect MP playas to not be hardasses over le ic rules then ur very wrong
come on guys
its not like you are being put in jail
Remember sop breaks for command lead to admin intervention
I really don't feel like this is very genuine @dull lance @dusky moth
Breaking a law as command = admin intervention / punishment
you do not solve disagreements with come on guys,
i wholeheartedly dont see a reason for those 2 articles to be added to the UCMJ
i just deadass dont
was kit genuine when all i asked for any real life proof or source for why she extrapolated this law that only exists for drivers or riders of a car and got told to feel free to look it for my self
we already cut out hair regs (which made the most sense btw)
and when i do look it for my self i am being told its not very genuine
hmmm
I wonder
hair regs are not removed they are planned to be enforced mechanically
except for synths
i wonder why that is
ok and when that will be
(never)
also mechanical enforcement kinda sucks
it lessens le player interaction
.
Why is this law added to garages or parking lots, - because we vtol and have them in teh same areas due to lack of mapping-
is this a problem to be fixed in sop?
.
so these laws are extrapolated to parking lots because of an unrealistic standard that exists due to a lack of mapping
the lack of VTOL infrastructure on FOBs is not unbelievable because they are not standard issue vehicles nor aerospace vehicles which require dedicated landing pads
My favourite njp to issue is "fill one hundred sandbags in the rain in your pjs." I only use this on hardcases
Do you not like do you not see or think or believe that if youre vtoling in closed garages you have way more to worry about
like way more then saluting or wearing a barret
like way way fucking more when it comes to realism
literally no the point of the VTOL is to be able to operate and land in rugged and unprepared terrain with little maintenance cost on the vehicle itself
nevertheless the only thing that matters is the community's feedback on dis
and i think most people will outright say this is retarded
spooling does nothingi n closed garages filled with marines

I don't know why adding a provision that you shouldn't salute in a hazard area is retarded for an RP game
I don't really see what the point is of playing an RP game if you don't want to RP
at least an MRP dedicated server
spooling in closed spaces does absolutely nothing and is not a problem, BUT GOD FORBID you salute or wear a beret - law existing because they can be sucked into engines-
I ainât reading all of that
and that isn't to say we shouldn't listen to or accommodate the community
but
I think it's in bad faith to say that GOVFOR shouldn't have provisions about discipline and operating IRP because they have friction points
@quick portal sure i want to roleplay, i feel the idea of vtols existing in closed garages or parking lots filled with marines and not dedicated areas - due to mapping issues- is extremely unrealistic and the spooling of these vehicles alone is extremely dangerous to marine and personel, i feel the existence of these breaks my rp, and is lrp, we need to either map them or remove these vehicles until this extreme problem is fixed,
my argument here isnt rp
and y ou keep strawmanning it
i have no problem this law being introduced
But my problem is a very very simple one,
so this law is added to garages and parking lots, hmm i see i see why is that? because vtol spooling, i see i see, and rather then care about any of the 100 possible hazards taht come before saluting or wearing a beret, we add a sop law for berets and saluting because its a hazardous area,
i see, very HRP very sensible and understandable and it makes complete sense,
Do you legitimately not see a single issue with this line of thinking
like do you not see a single issue with these steps that we took to conclude why these sop addition was made?
The issue is on that front is that we're getting pop from rmc and ss14 hub with only a thin stream from arma/roblox
or more accurately why garages and parking lots were added to the sop change
We need more roblox players
which again i have zero problem with if it was flight paths or clearly hazardous area
I mean I don't think we should be a hardcore Arma milsim game but minor provisions should still be enforced and I think saluting regulations is a minor provision
but like honest heart to heart bro, is there not a single slightest bit of issue on the steps that we walked upon to conclude why garages and parking lots are hazardous
Very true
I see your point but I feel like the situation you are thinking of doesn't really exist, in the sense that we essentially never see core military infrastructure, it's either vessels or frontier outposts with limited infrastructure, that is the RP reason why garages are included
as well these are areas with high activity levels and so garages and parking lots are exceedingly active compared to traditional commuter lots which is another hazard to account for, that is the RP reason why we probably shouldn't worry about rendering a salute there
we don't have an IRL vehicle equivalent to the Blackbird in the way we are discussing
last I checked IRL VTOLS or helicopters donât HAVE to spool to move anywhere
The Blackfoot has to spook to move
Even then irl fixed wings are nicked by buggies (still NSZ)
@hollow condor I reviewed it, here are all the changes I need you to make for your PR:
Add periods to sentences that are missing them.
Grammar pass the entire thing, there are quite a few misspellings.
Detainment Authority should not be in SOP as its already outlined in UCMJ.
DNR should be moved to a section under UCMJ.
Attack dropship needs a definition and should be renamed to 'gunship'.
Every instances of "Commanding Officer" needs to be replaced with "Acting Commander."
"The Acting Commander may issue special equipment on a case by case basis, such as special headsets or special weaponry for certain personnel or units as long as it does not violate the UCMJ or a specific ban as stated in SOP" should be changed to "The Acting Commander may issue special equipment on a case by case basis, such as special headsets or special weaponry for certain personnel or units as long as it does not violate the UCMJ or SOP."
Remove "Synthetic units are exempt, unless their users manual states otherwise" from grooming standards.
Change "OOC Note: Character appearance is a significant part of roleplay and can greatly impact a player's experience. For this reason, if you choose to enforce grooming standards, you must allow the player to either adjust their own hairstyle or choose a new one for themselves. If they deny any hair style AHelp an admin for advice." to " "OOC Note: Character appearance is a significant part of roleplay and can greatly impact a player's experience. For this reason, if you choose to enforce grooming standards, you must allow the player to either adjust their own hairstyle or choose a new one for themselves. If they refuse to choose one or select one themselves, you may give them any haircut/facial hair within grooming standards."
"Only Technicians may operate APC's, Tanks, IFV, and similar vehicles." should be changed to "Only vehicle crewmen may operate APC's, Tanks, IFV, and similar vehicles. In the absence of vehicle crewmen, they may be operated by any combat arms personnel assigned to the vehicle by the vehicle commander or officer."
"Humvees are exempt" should be changed to "Light vehicles are exempt".
"If a vehicle is to become INOP or unsafe for use it is to be returned to the installiation and may only be redeployed if authorized by an EO." should be changed to "If a vehicle is to become heavily damaged it is to be retreated to a safe position for repairs, before it is redeployed."
Rank Authority should be changed to "Authority is determined by rank. The highest ranking individual present is the acting authority and holds final decision making power, unless command is explicitly delegated by an individual of higher rank. Department heads have sole authority over their departments and may only be overridden by the acting Commander or Executive Officer."
"XO and CO hold final authority on all department decisions including dismissal of a Department Head if found to be in violations of SOP or health standards." should be changed to "XO and CO hold final authority on all department decisions including dismissal of a Department Head if found to be in violation of SOP or UCMJ."
Remove the paygrades in () from the chain of command.
Fireteam leader needs to be made higher than the corpsman on the bulletpoint list on the chain of command.
Failure to Attend Combative Briefing needs to be changed to "Failing to attend briefing as a combative personnel (i.e. sqaud members, vehicle crew, intel personnel) without a valid reason (waiting in the requisitions line, gearing up after late wake up, etc)"
Also change all instances of "INOP" to inoperable.
because the provisions in question are just a cut off part from the general military etiquette

Okay man agree to disagree i gave my piece
you may aswell include the parts where you do not salute indoors or without a cover on
Ignore the dm I sent you

I just need to save it since Iâm not home lol
Did you look over #1514031680372084826
No changes in assuming then
Since it is just alienied GC
I didn't see anything of note really, seemed fine.
I didnât want to make people read a 224 page document with 64 articles if we were gonna enforce it
I think 32 articles each being 1-3 sentences is fine
Definitely.
my final comment I have to say is MPs are first and foremost supposed to follow the spirit of the law and maintain cohesion and discipline, MPs who are hunting to issue punishments are not following the spirit of the law and should be ahelped
as well, the only way I could foresee an actual punishment being issued for this is if you are told not to do it and then you do it again out of smug disregard, it's the same as if any military leadership gives you an order as a lower enlisted, you just do it
The point of SOP isn't to keep the unit parade ready either it's to flow smoothly and allow superiors to enforce smooth and orderly flow, keeping people safe and aware in hazardous areas is a part of that and our issues vehicles can be hazardous
Only MP synths donât follow spirit of law
that's true
If you feel that military police culture specifically targets your or others I would say open another feedback thread about it because that is not the intention of the military police
I would also say perhaps simply not picking fights with MPs and leadership may help
Synths will pretend this doesnt exist
AHelp
Synths are only allowed to sentence if thereâs if there no other MPs
show me where thats said
Check the actual PR
Itâs in there
One sec
thats not in the game rn
No
ANYONE can proccess a arrest according to the current SOP we have
Equipment SOP Changes
Standard Issue Equipment
- The Acting Commander may issue special equipment on a case by case basis, such as special headsets or special weaponry for certain personnel or units as long as it does not violate the UCMJ or a specific ban as stated in SOP
Firearm Handling Regulations
- Under normal circumstances, weapons may only be fired in the firing range. (Unless for cermonial purposes)
- If no firing range is available MPs may be asked to designate a temporary safe area for weapons to be discharged.
Synthetic Operations
- Synthetics are not at any point authorized to weild a firearm, synths may hold firearms in one hand for transport or safety reasons.
- Synthetics are allowed to carry knives, tools, and other simillar equipment if needed to function in their job at optimal levels.
- Synthetics may conduct arrests but are not allowed to sentence due to not being able to understand spirit of law. If MP or CMP is available, the Synth may sentence.
- Synthetics designed for specified tasks shall be expected to conduct those tasks with minimal supervision, if a synthtic is assigned a task outside their defined purpose in their user manual, they shall be supervised by an experinced personnel.
- Synthetics used in a combat capacity must be monitored 24/7, if remotely monitored if any connection failure is to occur the synthetic shall be declared rogue and marked shoot to kill until a reset is performed fully.
- Syntethics may be sent to their manufacturer for examination if a represenitive or alike is on or near installiation. If the units user manual says not to allow access by other companies, it must be respected.
- Synthetics may be dismissed from the current position if ordered by the Department Head of their specialization (General use synthetics may only be dismissed by CO or XO)
- Synthetics may perform operations alone, but should not be sent off installiation for longer then 10 minutes unsupervised.
LOL
thatâs dumb
Hereâs new synth SOP (we never had SOP on synths)
Synthetics may perform operations alone, but should not be sent off installiation for longer then 10 minutes unsupervised
why
Mainly to fix comms
Since COs do it anyways
This shouldnât be a thing, like at all
no one has stopped them
Even CM13 had that as a rule
COs will send either both synths or just one to repair comms
Sometimes theyâll send a fireteam escort
Yeah synths shouldnât be allowed to move around all alone, that like goes against Synth law 1 inherently
id say just readd the CM13 rule for it
Dont run off alone unless its to get to a safer area, rescue, or gather with a group.
But itâs not my call, though it would help with Synth players who try to get converted purposely
Ahelp�
Itâs not a specific rule as of rn
I would send a fireteam off as SL with a synth IF there was someone who can lead the ft (near impossible)
in real life, NSZ are certain parts, painted or with a helmet sign,
why not make certain specific spotso f garages and parking lots NSZ? that would be good right,
Why do we make THE ENTIRE garage a nsz?
Honestly my simple problem is micromangement, specially when its micromanegment in an inherently unrealistic scenario that we should treat as an accepted break from reality for the sake of gameplay, why are we creating hyper specific sops for the sake of realism or roleplay when lets be real here, an unventilated active jet engine blasting 1500 degree exhaust into an enclosed garage or parking lot with marines and other vehicles is enough to kill us all,
instead of just okay lets paint or designate certain areas within garages or parking lots as NSZ its just a select all,
i just feel that simply, this is unnecessary friction, SOP fundementaly is not made for roleplay sake, unless i am mistaken, Its made to deal with OOC rules in an IC manner and taken more seriously with important roles as commands because SOP inherintly is a branch off of server rules
marine laws is not there for my roleplay, its there to keep the round stable and running, To stop marines from disobeying orders and to stop command from being shitters, IC problems with IC solutions, the first line before youre being bwoinked, i just dont get maybe i am mistaken on why we even have SOP perhaps SOP here is just purely there for roleplay sake, where admins just happen to intervene if command breaks from it
SOP is there for roleplay and round flow
SOP violations are either fail rp or impediment to round flow
@solid plinth doing fixes now should be ready in an hour
Anything need to be written for specs?
Not really.
Cool
@solid plinth changes added
In reference to the saluting shitshow I feel like a much broader definition like this or however you would want to rewrite it achieves the purpose a little better and may be more understandable
@hollow condor
and same here I implore you to rewrite or modify this but I believe it is in everyone's best interest if position takes a little bit of precedent over rank
unless you have integrated these things or it was flatly decided they don't matter I dunno
I donât think it matters
You get 4 chances before you even get a actual punishment
so itâs genuinely whatever
peak sopchangees