#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 4508 of 1
I completely disagree with you that there are too many scout vehicles for the awkward situation Bolt is currently in. It is stronger than a scout vehicle and weaker than a tank, so DICE should add a column for light armored vehicles to satisfy the Bolt.
Bolte should be in it's own category along with the hovercraft.
In fact, 2042 currently needs a specific classification of carriers. For example: reconnaissance vehicles, light armored carriers, tanks, helicopters, jets, and large transport carriers.
Also jets need to be separated from choppers
bf just needs to go back to preset vehicle availability. choices can be nice but their division is ass
Yeah, this system could have worked if we had many choices for vehicles (where some would fit a similar role/function) and/or if DICE knew how to categorize vehicles
The current classification of carriers is really too unbalanced. Bolts are with tanks, jets are with helicopters. It's obviously not right. And the current map carrier count is doing pretty well in 64, 128 is surprisingly about the same as 64, apparently more like infantry BF for the big battlefield.
Among other things, I think the current specialist equipment needs to be categorized (into four types of equipment). The current game's equipment can be chosen at will, resulting in every player carrying an M5 or Stinger, which is not the "teamwork" 2042 wants, right?
not to mention the inclusion of the stim and armor plates... gadgets that do nothing for one's team
hovercraft i s trash my guy. only reason why its good its for the granade launcher
Yes, I quite agree. Battlefield 2042 should be able to be renamed ...... Battlefield: The Experts? (A more individual heroic Battlefield game) Because everyone is using a version of a stronger character + stronger weapons + stronger equipment, no one would choose to play like the Battlefield of the past.
That is why this game should be called Apexfield2042
I just finished a rush match in bf4. got 6 medkit ribbons and 5 defibrillator ribbons. I'm here reviving people and getting nothing in return while the average 2042 player has probably never dropped ammo or a medical bag and instead opts for a grappling hook and armor plates that help only themselves
Ok
Hahaha, nice name. Secondly, I'd love to know what clever person set the starting speed of tanks and troop carriers so slow that maneuverability is almost non-existent and turret speed is pathetically slow. (In the context of the great increase in mobility of specialists, tanks really look weak, except when shooting from the rear of the battlefield, although they may also be blown up by Sun dance+C5)
Sundance is just a movement based game character
It's almost like a Titanfall pilot levels of traversal speed if you can master it well
Yes, because the current scoreboard also prefers that people not choose medkits or ammo boxes. You just have to choose Angel or Falke, don't you think? The scoreboard only shows how many people you have saved, not how many people you have contributed to. So I think the scoreboard should just go back to the old days where experience = points, instead of the current kills + assists + first aid + occupation = points.
yeah the current point system is stupid
I do say it's rather nice to know how my team is playing and the current scoreboard showcases it well.
you're saying that bringing a tank down to 1 hp and ending up with an assist is worth the same amount of points as doing 1 damage to a guy and also getting an assist? bruh
Assists are worth less than kills for points on the scoreboard
They give the same amount of XP though and imo they shouldn't especially given how many assists you can get with Casper on Breakthrough
Bring back assists-counts-as-kills
So, isn't the best way to keep score, experience gained in this game = points?
spot assists being worth the same as kill assists is 💀
That is a great way, you can also show those numbers as a result, just don't have them actually add to the 'score'
This is how it used to be in all the BF.
Technically yes
Remember, leveling up/progression wasn't always exactly a thing with Battlefield
I just resent the current way of keeping score. For example, when I play helicopters, I do 99% damage to the opposing transport helicopter and my teammate kills it, but I don't get any assists. If you convert the damage into points, I don't know how much more I contributed than my teammate.
Dedication should be matched by a sense of accomplishment, and points for ranking is what everyone cares about most.
Not my intention with that message but I agree
what is the best muzzle in general
i just run heavy barrel
ok
decreases your firerate so you might end up losing more gunfights at a close range, but its more stable
Honestly, I just use the muzzle brake that lowers vertical recoil
On basically everything.
ok
Whoever said they use the grenade launcher/shotgun attachment on the sniper, thank you. It's hilarious 1 shotting someone that's trying to push you
You're welcome
Morbin time
was never funny
my comedic mindset is just superior
Bahhh I completely forgot about the existence of damage numbers.
Damage scoring numbers.
That genuinely made a difference in gun fights.
It’s morbing time
lmaoooooooooo
nah it can be fixed i cant stand the jets. the bases need some sort of auto AI AA gun to kill the jets that like to hover behind base then once you spawn in heli they just fly down and kill you
super annoying
im curious to what the gameplay will be like

gameplay will be like call of duty
so, bad?
or they just replace f-35 with another US 5th gen jet that doesn’t have vtol
like f22
if they want to be really classy they should think of adding warthog or b2
f22 is better than the f35 anyways so idk why they decided to give the us f35 instead
plus, the condor is already another bump above the hind, so idk
we need a b-2 bomber in the game
Ngl, bf1 style operations would've been a good way to communicate a story to people who don't read lore posts n shit
Idk
Based
I am gonna be real, the first time I saw that it was funny because it took me a sec to realize it was actually Jared Leto and the bizarre acting of it made it funnier
This game could have really used operations in general
lmaoo i guess so i played WZ for two weeks and quit couldnt stand the recoil
from a battlefield game i will expect battlefield type gameplay not mario kart gameplay
interesting
I'm curious if they'll ever reimplement this or if it's too late for something like that
Even SWBF2 had a proper score system, which is super ironic now lol
Considering the rushed state of this game I'd be surprised.
the lack of destruction in 2042 compared to bf3 is fucking depressing
I have bf4 + bf5 lined up to play on steam but I only have access to bf3 on ps. I’m craving playing on pc like nothing else.
I'd say BFV and BF1 are a better comparison, they have the best destruction in the series
the only destructible things are just set pieces that don't change the level in any way
All this news on discord only adds fuel to the fire.
i wanna blow up walls n shit when people camp behind them
i don't get why they skimped on it so hard with 2042
Bad level design is the biggest culprit
They look like battle Royale maps due to how open they are
i haven't played many BR's lately but i swear BR maps have more cover than these ones
I won't be surprised if this game originally was going to be a battle Royale.
that's what tom said i believe
I take that guy with a grain of salt but honestly I believe that theory
If it's true then it's true but there's no way to confirm it.
"Oh it's true cause it came from a verified leaker"
Yeah and they can talk out of their ass.
he said DICE was trying to copy warzone but then changed their minds halfway through development
It's funny playing bf3 and bad co 2 maps and getting those cheeky shots off at people.
who else can we trust? EA?
We can trust the actual developers if they come out and say it but it means they'd be breaching an Nda.
yea no one is gonna do that
I'd say that's near the truth. Due to how different this feels than previous battlefields. No advanced damage numbers and squad-supportive gameplay, yeah this sure was a lone shooter or battle Royale or something before
unless they get canned and just say fuck it
I don't understand why they want BF to be Apex, we don't need 2 Apexes 🤦♂️
because warzone
I do love that you can slide down hills.
SWBF2 level designers worked on this so I'm not shocked they're so poorly designed
Just wish the hills were steep enough so you can go on forever.
COD doesn't have 2 of them though
really? never played battlefront so i wouldn't know
Wheeeeeeeeee!
they don't need 2. warzone has set them up for life
SWBF2 has some of the most poorly designed levels I've ever had the experience of playing on
Treyarch experimented with their own but because of warzone it was canned.
They brought it out as an ltm.
i've seen some gameplay of battlefront 1 and 2 and from what i remember it seems pretty similar to 2042
I thought the BF2 maps were OK, then again, I liked them off the basis of them looking very much like the source material(as shown in SW shows and movies)
If this game was given until march to release instead of the holidays with a second beta things would look less bleak.
But you need that Christmas money cause that's the market these days.
Blackout, right?
but how are EA execs gonna afford their 30th yacht without holiday sales?
Nahhh not black out.
In cold war they had their own.
The maps from outbreak were battle royal maps.
That weird nuke mode.
Goddamn, they really need more after getting stupid amounts from FIFA, Madden and other sports games.
they don't want a lot of money, they want all the money
How did I miss this?
that honestly sounds fun
It was in the beta too i forgot what it was called. It was interesting actually.
Detonate these mini nukes that'd emit radiation and make parts unplayable.
That was official but not the other royale tho.
Yeah when you shut your brain off and just think "star wars" they become far more bearable in my experience lol
and for DICE to take this long to copy and paste basic cover just for one map
that's fucking sad
I almost wonder if they're doing it intentionally so they can delcare it as content in the seasons
i don't know anymore. it feels like a total nightmare
Level designing doesn't take this long, playtesting could, but at that point why not start a CTE?
i think because all the veteran dice devs who knew how to work with Frostbite left
Don't think that would be related, they have in-house documentation and learning an engine is not as time consuming as it's made out to be
i heard frostbite is a total bitch to work with regardless of experience
idk
Not true. Talk of that comes from developers who were making games it wasn't designed for (Such as Need for speed, fifa, anthem, Mass effect, etc). Those same developers even said how great it was, for Battlefield. Their difficulties stimmed from having to make everything they needed from scratch.
If the leak is correct we'll have info tomorrow at least about what they're doing for season 1
Better be substantial at this point
7 months without any content for a "live service game"
I wonder how many maps BF4 got at this point....
i think i heard bf4 got 12
I just don't get it, if there's like 5 different studios supposedly working on this game (no fucking way tbf), how come we're only getting one map? The same people who improve the gameplay, the balance aren't the same people making maps and guns anyway.
it's a total mystery
It's just a skeleton crew working on this game at this point
No doubt. Which is why I sadly don't have much faith in this update
i mean they said they still have like almost everyone still working on it but you wouldn't notice
I don't want to be disappointed again
I'm sorry, but how tf is anyone supposed to believe that
All they've done so far is fixing bugs and removed features
That's not what all the people at DICE and the support studies does. And they've gone about it slow as heck too
I genuinely don't know. After BFV PR debacle (I personally never cared about that drama and thought it was overblown), they should've at least taken feedback about what they could do for a new "nextgen" modern-era BF gen that could be the new BF4 and bring the franchise back
But they apparently didn't for god knows what reason
it's so simple from a conceptual standpoint
like for bfv. just make Battlefield 1 but with a WW2 paintjob
it's that fuckin simple. you don't need to revolutionize anything
For better and worse, DICE seems to have the tendency to not rely on what they made the last time and just do shit from scratch?
Tbf, it's for the worse at this point
Instead of iterating and improving they go "let's do things differently, let's do this etc*
they have to be insane
At least it seems so, because BF4, 1, V and 2042 plays so differently and clearly had different design goals
I'm glad BF isn't CoD with everything being too overly familiar with every entry , but jfc, no need to throw the baby out with the bathwater
I guess it's them chasing trends with every game? Which to me is dumb, because they have a perfect formula that they should stick to and improve/iterate on without having to constantly check what the shooter industry is doing at large and second guess their own formula and instincts.
Sorry for the rant, but it's all so confusing why BF is in this spot atm
glad you said sorry
@sour meadowyou look very confused in the photo
huh?
huh? yes]
?
the pfp
lol
Oh
🤔
press the gadget button twice to switch from shield to aps and place it on the ground.
nope, it's used to destroy projectiles, like grenades/rockets etc
any news on june update?
Expect is broken atm, died multiple times to Carl Gustav that the APS doesn’t destroy, once even got the xp for projectile destroyed and still died.
ok see you in 2 weeks when its out
what's your worry about the S1?
I'm not expecting much in the way of improvements when it comes to specialists and the like
I'm not expecting many guns being added (new or portal ones)
isnt the specialists visual update season 2 anyway?
yeah, it says vehicles and guns but probably just 2 each
They said they were gonna overhaul the specialist system somehow
i have seen leaks of a boat and helicopter for each side
i dont know what to expect with a "overhaul" can be just ballance pass, can be giving each specialist a classic class
After 7 months of nothing
i do wonder if they will just slap 2042 attachments on bf 3 and bad company guns
I'd be okay with that
I doubt that. The new BF game will already be in development
what would be ideal is if they take the old model and give it a new 2042 design, same reload and fire rate ect
Like anything to improve the abyssmal weapon selection is welcomed imo
someone tried to tell me that next battlefield game will be in unreal engine
Highly doubt that
but i highly doubt they will not continue using frostbite
if anything they might be updating current frostbite to make it easier and faster for devs to use
They should
They should be taking at least 5 years before they release a new BF game but they wont
at this point i would not be suprised if there is a dedicated team at dice only working on engine updates
That would give them time to update it and get the new devs at DICE time to properly learn Frostbite but you know EA will want a game in 2 years
probably was a huge struggle trying to optimise engine ect in the first few months to not struggle in 128 player matches
They're is a whole team/department who work on frostbite https://www.ea.com/frostbite/team
Yeah this game needed at least another year or two of development
track record is battlefield games have 4 years space appart
really hope ea stop forcing games to release before they are finished
eeehhh........contracts
It's been 2-3 recently
battlefield 5 came out in 2018
BC2 - 2010
BF3 - 2011
BF4 - 2013
BF1 - 2016
BF5 - 2018
BF2042 - 2021
2-3 years apart from each release
just dont get your hopes up for the new season I guess
I forgot Hardline also
i mean, bc2, bf3 and bf4 were very similar
majority of dice is already working on the next bf
hardline is a good game, it just is not really a bf game
Yeah
hardaline was a spin-off made by another dev house
would much rather them just add to 2042 and portal
Forgot it was another Dev
would be a shame to create this portal system to remake the old games in one big collection and forget about it
But looking at the recent releases. We can probably expect a new BF game in 2023 or 2024
EA Would rather murder the entirety of DICE than let them leave Frostbite lmao. The engine is not the problem at all, I mean if they succeeded in the past, they can do it again.
oh rumour says 64 player conquest will get portal maps thrown in
already has, it's the "Exodus CQ playlist"
oh i have just been waiting for s1 to come out
was only added last week 🙂
one of the actual 2042 problem was (according to the rumors and assuming they are true) that they updated the engine during the game development
i already made jokes that season 1 will release at the end of the month
during development? 
The MW2 reveal is probably going to overshadow season 1... DICE picked the wrong week of the month.
mw2, dont you mean the 3rd reskin mw got?
They should have revealed it last week or after MW2 reveal
It's like the Shazam movie struggling in box office because it premiered the same month as Avengers Endgame.
True
Well MW19 was quite a breath of fresh air for COD for almost a decade, so yeah, people are hyped for it's sequel.
yeah, i got mw2019 because they acutally updated the game, then saw cold war was just mw2019 reskinned with new wepaons and maps
I'm indifferent to cod. The last cod I played was MW3 mostly because I got it alongside my PS3. But I hope the cod hype doesnt hurt 2042 even more.
Tbh CW plays nothing like MW19. Vangaurd on the the other hand
then vanguard was a mess of forcing ww2 era weapons to have mw level of customization when the most actual customization people had then was a bayonet or a fixed sniper scope
yes, rumors said 18 months before the release, so during development status
Cold war wasn't a reskin, it was made on the old engine. Vanguard is what you are talking about lol.
Oh boy cold war was so bad. the customization was horrid, put tapes on a 30rd mag, gain extra 20 rounds
yeah but it still has the gun smith and class creator
It's impossible it won't have an affect on 2042, just look at how MW19 affected BFV, killed the game's hype until DICE gave us the revival in the form of the Pacific update.
That's like saying BF2042 is a reskin of BF5 because it has vehicles and destruction
Of course a COD game will have create a class
activision will not get through their thick skull that they can sell a dlc bundle or make cod a live service game and gain much more players
Game was rushed to hell, put together at the last minute because sledgehammer needed more time for vanguard. 
And even after getting another year they did even worse lmao
I regretted buying cold war honestly, and I pre-ordered homefront revolution
You also preordered 2042
I was looking forward to CW because I thought it was going to build upon what MW19 done but how wrong I was
no i mean there is nothing new in the core gameplay, its all the same class options but instead they slapped on a cold war era skin to the items
yeah I guess that's true
I knew it was going to be bad the second I saw it wasn't going to be built on the new engine
i ended up getting cold war because someone talked me into buying it for zombies and boy is the multiplayer just the same
Yeah when I seen it was on the older engine I was very disappointed
My man i been askin since 2020 why no memes channel
an obvious way to tell cold war and vanguard were reskins is the fact they were just added to warzone without issue
cold war mp is soooo bad, they went for semi realistic mw to looney toon anti-aircraft desert eagle skillstreak
They should release Ghost 2. The campaign ended in a cliffhanger.
Yeah the CW MP is trash compared to MW19
i really think cold war should have been dlc for mw2019
Ghost was so hated though. I can't see them doing that
make you able to buy cw and get all the cw weapons and characters and they are just added to mw19 mp
It would of been better if they did since it would of been on the same engine and had actual good gameplay
I'm pretty sure IW was going to do ghosts 2 before they decided on doing something completely new with Infinite Warfare
Most of the hate came from the fact that the game wasn't about Albert Ghost or whatever the Modern Warfare guy is called.
Which it's campaign was very good, multiplayer, awful
Advanced warfare was based
I mean Ghost MP was pretty bad
👀 #other-games 👀
i find it hillarious because mw had the issue of people not able to use blueprint attachment skins and added it 6 months later... then cw had the exact same issue and added blueprnt attachments 6 months later just like mw19
i thought advanced warfare was hated on because people died in 2 shots from any smg
Never played Ghost MP. I bought it because the story trailer looked interesting. The main selling point was that it was written by an Oscar-winning writer.
guys so uh bf2042 is pretty cool, right?
ttk was so fast you had to do a line of coke to be able to react
Not really lol
No, this is a call of duty nostalgia channel now.
yeah back to bf 2042, im trying to keap expectations low for season1 so anything extra is gonna make me happy
Ok I was kidding 🥺
what is season 1
I hope they add Morbius as a specialist
frl though, if you wish to discuss COD or w/e please use #other-games 🙂
so wait, was the new specialist leaked?
yeah it's Morbius

I saw a leak of Sundance being morbed mid-air.
i wonder if we will see existing specialists get a complete different gadget
if the game lives long enough
remember when they trashed the specialist feature from bf5?
Would be hilarious if they brought back Falck syrette pistol long range revive from the alpha.
what was bf5 specialists feature?
Combat roles.
do you mean the classes?
Specialists in 2042 is basically combat roles from BFV expanded further.
basically the same thing
Nah, combat roles were basically passive abilities for each classes. Like recon snipers were able to spot people by supressing or hitting them, field medics ran faster if they tagged a downed teammate, combat medics ran faster if they were at critical health.
Then there were assault vehicle busters that got extra squad points from destroying vehicles etc.
i still think the most we will get from a specialist rework is them adding class restrictions to specialists
I hope not. Unrestricted loadout is the silver lining with specialists. I no longer have to pick a specific class just for the weapons.
Besides, there are only 23 weapons in AOW, not enough to restrict behind classes.
you say that but 90% of the 2042 cry babies complain about the fact its specialists instead of classes
well assuming they end up porting over most of the weapons from portal that number is a lot bigger
I swear, people don't even know why they dislike specialists. They just decided its a dealbreaker.
I can never get a consice argument against specialists. It's always some bad take like 'muh teamplay' or 'hero shooter bad'.
Like, you will never convince me that 2042 has a teamplay problem that didn't exist in previous games.
i can see them adding a vast majority of the bf3 weapons into 2042
as in the portal bf3
I hope they rework the weapons first. It's a vastly different gunplay.
you say that but the scar is already in 2042 but has fixed gl always
specialists should of been like the elites in bfv, just cosmetic
Like, BC2 and BF3 gunplay heavily relies on understanding how your gun and movements affects your spread, whilst 2042 has a more simplified and modern-esque gunplay that relies on understanding the guns recoil pattern.
i can see them doing a balance pass to fit attachments tho
they’ve already said the portal guns will have updated stats/handling to be in line with 2042 gunplay
i do think would have been nicer if the specialists were not named characters, instead its the casper class ect
as well as attachments
part of the reason i live dozer is he fits the masked soldier athetic
plus adding masks ect helps remove the feeling of clone army
Yeah, like Sundance being 'Wingsuit Assault' etc
you get me
And Boris being 'Insufferable Camper'
don't be sad this is just how it works out sometimes
winged assault, shield barer, grappler, wall builder, turret opperator, recon droner, distance hacker, motion tracker, stim healer, ammo support
or even use the existing code names as a class name and remove named things like irish
Problem is that wallbuilder is a guy that everyone recognizes from BF4's campaign.
so they can have irish be a legendary skin and replace the standard models to just have a face cover
btw, wonder if they would make cannon ending to bf4 be player was the one that went down
What do I do when it doesn't say "connecting to online servers" when I'm trying to launch the game? It only shows the ship sailing but not the connecting to online servers
What's funny is that there is a bug that briefly changes Angel's name in the hud to 'Trauma Specialist' after he revives someone. This was obviously his placeholder name before they went with Angel.
The issue with calling them all that is it doesn't really roll of the tongue easily
Restart?
tried many times
Nah, Recker survives all 3 endings.
oh i thought there was 3 options, and the 4th being waiting too long
in the bottom right? that’s just something that happens for all specialists when their trait is active
What about when the game keeps saying "searching for people"?
It's either Irish, Pac, or Hanna that dies. And given that Pac and Irish are alive in the cinematic, Hanna dying was the cannon ending.
Then the game is probably struggling to find players
It literally says it needs 31 more people and I don't know what to even do
Bruh it's been like this since yesterday. Every single time I try to find a round.
wait who is pac?
The guy with the Beanie.
A lot of people have given up on the game so it will be harder to find full matches now and again
It randomly started doing this and it's always 31. If it's always exactly 31 then that probably means that I'm literally the only one in a server.
tbh all i remember was irish and hanna
Probably. A lot of the servers are dead
Pac was the guy who died saving Irish's kid in the 2042 short movie.
Every single day I am waiting for the announcement
so checking the leaked stuff and it says lis's gadget is a guided rocket launcher
Medics can be anti-tank and give out ammo. I don't think I even need to elaborate on that.
There are no sacrifices with specialist, and this has lead the majority of players (in my experience) to focus on solo play rather than support roles. Sacrifices are needed in a game like BF, to help teamplay flow. When that is gone, it becomes very self focused.
Lots of the specialist gadgets are very selfish too, or promote bad habits (camping), teamplay wasn't in the design tables.
Classes do a far better job at giving people roles and promoting teamplay, without them, we get what we have now. You may prefer a loadout system, but classes are needed for BF imo.
and just... that would be so broken if its true
We're getting SRAW back 😎
i would much rather them just add laser guided rocket as regular gadget
so far people already can just run full sundance squad and all throw tracking nades at a tank
I agree to some extent, but you generally don't get these well thought out clarifications from the 'no teamplay' crowd.
Honestly the fact that specialists can use any gadget doesn't irk me as much.
But I prefer a game that's balanced from the ground up with good gadgets and weapons per side.
Bf5 did that right.
i do remember when things were specialist locked, everyone got 2 gadgets
Will be fun to carry SRAW and Carl Gustav at the same time. Gonna be hell for ground vehicles.
Eh reload is gonna be a pain.
Just run the SRAW with C5 and you have a bf5 assault.
Or SRAW with a repair tool and you'll be a bf4 engineer.
That is cool.
If they have classes dedicated to original classes so people can use what they know.
so a medic can run first aid kit and defib
I don't like the repair tool in 2042 tbh. Why did they make it so that it can overheat??
They've always overheated.
Well, Mostly.
Bf1 and 5 is where they don't overheat.
It's a balance decision.
Overheating happens way too quickly imo
Yeah it'd be nice if took a bit longer to but eh.
I know for a fact that it didn't in BF1 or BFV, but I don't remember if that was the case in BF3 and BF4.
If you run SRAW and medkit, you'll have a bizarre mix of BF3/4 assault and BF1/V assault.
What's up?
I wish we had anti tank bundles like BF1 and V
Those were fun finishers.
One of the most satisfying anti vehicle gadgets to use
imagine they added BF1 elite classes into portal
i want the files to battlefield 1942 but all the websites doesnt give me the right files
so i was wondering if one of yall had it
They hit 20 against tanks on direct hit in BFV, and they detonated dynamite on impact. Was a fun way to assassinate tanks without 3 dynamites.
The game files?
they can copy paste the stats but reskin them for each era
yes
Vehicle hit response in BFV was done near perfectly imo
You could even tell how much damage you've done based on the sound
Nearly everything about vehicles in BFV was done so well
I guess you'd have to install the game and look through the folder. I don't have any experience when it comes to game files tbh.
ok thanks
Yeah and typical DICE going backwards trying to reinvent the wheel with 2042
I agree. Although the general consensus in the community was that vehicle softspots were bad and they hated things like glancing blow.
Not really? Dmg models on the tanks were never majorly criticized afaik
They improved tank combat significantly
I guess it's purely anecdotal on my part, but all I saw were complaints.
But then again, people (at least on Reddit) really enjoyed whining about every aspect of BFV, even the good ones.
Tanks are so damn easy to take out in BFV, but people die once to them in a 25 minute round and scream "dice nerf the broken tanks"
having some kind of angular damagge bonus / penalty was a good thing, but I felt like there should be a set minmum you could do. To my knowledge and through watching people test, 2042 has no damage multiplier based on the angle, it's entirely dependant on what side of the tank you hit. While I do find glancing blows to be annoying, having like a minimum damage value of say, 17 and a maximum that is achieved by a 90 degree shot could be good
Tanks that knew what they were doing were really hard to get rid of. Tanks that rolled around 1000m away from their team were easy to combo out.
Then there were these weird map designs that allowed tanks to camp from their base (AKA out of bounds area for you), like Mercury, Twisted Steel and Aerodrome.
One common misconception I saw in the community though is that they thought glancing blows were randomized
DICE could have done a far better job at explaining the dmg models in-game
Like, why did they add highground positions inside bases in some maps? That was such a weird design decision.
People will blame the tanks though lol
True
And then vehicles get nerfed into the ground, like 2042
It's so weird at how little players can differentiate bad level design and genuinely op vehicles
Ground vehicles feel really weak in 2042 compared to its predecessors. The only exception would be Bolte, but only because you were able to spawn a ton of them due to their transport category.
Like, now that Bolte is in heavy armor category, its detrimental to your team to spawn them. It was the amount of boltes ingame that was the problem, not that boltes were exceptionally good.
DICE can't realize that which is the problem
Unfortunately yeah
They have been horrible at self reflection for a long, long time now, even with their good games
I think it boils down to their inability to take in proper feedback. They have a tendency to listen to the loud minority of people with bad gamesense.
Mmmh... which is the problem to you?
This can actually be a good question, Battlefield 2042 has a lot of problem but which is the most problematic problem for the game?
That's kind of a broad question don't you think?
So many core parts in 2042 are issues so that's a hard one to say which one is the biggest
Confused Tank destroyer Wildcat noises
i really hope they add sometime in the future the below radar feature to air vehicles
i'm tired of getting killed across the map by AA missiles
Someone can say the new classes system, someone can say the Specialists, someone can say the maps, someone can say the new gameplay, someone can say the shitty gunplay, someone can say everything about that game
There are so many different perspectives regarding the state of this game's balance it's crazy
on one hand you've got people who feel like jets are underpowered, others who think they shouldn't exist and are too strong. Some people think AA is strong, others think weak
i have yet to see a jet player do well
so cant really say if theyre just bad players or jets are bad
Jets are bad
both tbh
i only see jet players using AA missiles. cannon doesn't exist for them
- jet are clunky asf
ive seen some try hovering and dying instantly
cannon is beyond pointless, the only power they have come from agms that are just noob tubes
Nah lots of players in 2042 are bad and won't hit anything in the air without guided missiles.
sure, the aa missiles should serve a purpose but they shouldn't kill faster than the skill driven weapon
exactly
Where season 1 ?
this month
there's so much drag and drift in jets too, kills all your speed when turning
and there's also no direction indicator like in 4. In 4 id didn;t matter much because the physics ensured your jet almost always moved in the direction it was pointing
but now it simply glides away and pulls your crosshair and bullets away from where you are facing, which makes aiming inconsistent and unresponsive
Ikr it’s such a fucking pain
I spend more time turning around then I do actually firing at the enemy
Well I still prefer 2042 Jet Gameplay over 5 Planes at the moment just for the one reason that there are no AA Gun campers that will make your plane completely useless as they will kill you the moment you leave spawn.
And Wildcats don't focus you for the entire round after you kill one person a single time
Also the Map Design even though it's not that good at least made it easier to attack one without having to fight in the enemy spawn
that was something right ?
Angel does it again!
this game is dead RIP
there are SO LOW PLAYERS i can't get a single game today!!
"waiting for 31 players to join"
most likely a bug
lol i don't think so
ive had no problems all day and all night yesterday
if the there is only a few thousand players globally, there wouldn't be more than a few dozen in my region
according to steam stats rn
Not dead in OCE or the US.
steam isnt accurate
Not dead in EU
i'm in OCE, me and my friends can't get a game
It probably has to do with the dumb decision of making exodus conquest the default
What are you searching for Ryan cause literally just had a match of Exodus conquest.
What are you trying to play too.
Cause breakthrough has less of a population.
Conquest, multiplayer, 128 players
🛌
It's literally the primary game mode everyone's playing.
rip game, epic fail
It seems that people prefer 64 players and Battlefield V scale maps
Big but not too much
I don't think so
it makes sense to me since other modes kinda dead
I mean, yes 128p conquest is cool. But it should be managed better, in fact Dice is changing the position of the objectives because the maps are too big even for 128 players
While the management of the maps for 64 players is much better managed and much more performing
This is why people plays Exodus and not Conquest
oh my gosh why is it so empty here
game is so dead i can't get a game
like literally dead
tried all night, time to uninstall
deadish game deadish discord. plus its early NA time
This doesn't makes sense... or maybe yes
Good luck
and then it times out and goes back to main menu, and just loops
Weird.
1 hour now
Play solos, is the only way
all my friends have same thing, so it's not just me
EU?
AU
Mmh yeah AU servers are pretty ded
I'm literally in a game right now and we're in the same region. What is wrong with your own game.
Conquest 128 is most likely dead.
I mean in EU I can still play it whit 64 vs 64
EU I think is the most popolated in Battlefield 2042
Do yall think this game is going to get better ?
Yes and no
Yes
For many, the problem of the game is the foundations of the gameplay that will never be changed, so I say no. But I say yes because there will be many improvements that will make the game much more playable and also much more complete and balanced for the players, plus there will be new content that could certainly interest people.
Anyone know when they’re going to drop the trailer for season 1?
this month
Yeah Oceanic servers are dead
EU and NA are really the only regions with active servers
I’ve seen something that they we’re supposed to drop one today
the ultimate noobs farm mode
@slow krakenYou need to get the ||drugs||out of your body
You need to get the ||drug ||sout of your body
@slow krakenyou are ultimately cursed
Vpn goes brr
I'm juiced up baby
connecting from OCE to EU without a vpn would get you about 300 ping, with a vpn it's even worse
I know the pain, I moved from NZ to Italy, playing games with my NZ friends is a struggle
Remember when Valve invented some insane method to reduce latency to the minimum for gaming across the world and internet service providers ganged up and prevented them from releasing it?
PowerPlay it was called.
@foggy halo
@slow kraken
@slow krakenyour brain started to rot and I feel sorry for you
slow painful death
no respect, no honor, just ||drugs||
gib patchie
Poopoo 😩
Finally, 7000 kills with the SCAR.
No longer an ultra niche gun, A genuinely good assault rifle.
SFAR for life
They fix the shit maps, Give us persistent lobbies with a proper server browser alongside squad management this game will be in a much better state.
worse name, better gun
Well not just in a much better state, Actually playable.
New ambient is so cool and immersive
Would have been nice if they added metro for S1
Making a metro is impossible as Battlefield 2042 is based on large scale maps, it would be nice to make a map with a metro.
If the rumors are true, we may see the trailers tomorrow
would love to see persistent servers with server browser returning
Just... how?
I've barely gotten to play it since the "rotation" is trash, but does Arica Harbor in Exodus have attack aircraft?
It's the best rotation in the game, They remove hour glass and it's even better lol.
Since it's 2042, All sides have air vehicles which shouldn't be a thing.
wonder when will s1 drop this month
Disable hinds, condors, AT helis and scout helis, Give both sides an in world spawn with a Black hawk.
Much better balanced.
I ask because I downloaded the last gen version and played a bit yesterday, and besides the actual gameplay feeling even worse than the current gen version (it was like I was on ice skates idk what the fuck was going on) I got a game on Arica and it didn't have attack aircraft
tbh they just need to make helis 2 shot with rockets
Transports? Sorta yeah.
not 4 lol
It should take 3 to take them down.
or that, but 4 is like a frikkin tank lol
It pretty much may as well be.
they legit flyin tanks with more firepower
The closest thing that should be a tank is the AC 130.
...To a degree.
But yeah.
They're much better than actual attack craft at the moment.
They need to nerf that 50MM cannon the same way they nerfed the 57MM, Make it best at anti armour but suck at killing infantry.
that 50 mm is just insane
Even the most "armored" aircraft barely qualifies to use the word armored
It's anti everything really. That's the problem.
And the 50mm needs to do less damage to vehicles than the 57mm. Right now it does more, much more
The grenade launcher could use a tweak on the transports.
More accuracy, etc.
But actually have it work closer up.
Risk vs reward.
also planes are bein ez shot down by helis
There's nothing more pathetic than seeing an Orbit bombing attack helicopter/transport.
like helis have same height ceiling like planes which is funny
AA and AT missile lock on range for helos needs decreased and AA missile lock on range for Wildcats needs increased
Jets should easily have 200M more airspace than hellis and that.
You mean the AGMs? They're pretty close range as is.
Stinger ignoring height would be a massive boon.
Imo we need an AA infantry weapon like the fliegerfaust
also flares should take longer to reset
Talking about TR helis.
A close range popper for air vehicles to keep them away would be fine.
tbh he said fair point lol
ooo so tomorrow
YO.
they gonna say all about s1 ?
guys game is fixed, they changed color
I just witnessed a really bizarre bug where the entire enemy team suddenly got 3d-spotted out of nowhere. Has anyone seen this before?
myb someone with drone?
Drones dont 3d spot
paik?
Season trailer tomorrow.
Mackay.
Could be a bug relating to paik.
no no meant teammate as paik
By the way.
And I still don't have much confidence in the game. I want that to change honestly.
Have you decreased deadzones at all Henry?
Not sure. But Paik's 3d spot only shows for her, and it isn't constant like it was here.
it's not a glitch, the metal detectors 3d spot enemies if your team controls them
wuuuut...
THAT'S BUSTED.
Wait really? That's a really cool detail.
https://twitter.com/Battlefield/status/1533826409382170626?t=2GaT2Q5dbL4gRSg3omTbuw&s=19
this shit is gonna get overshadowed to oblivion by the mw22 reveal loool
they're all along those doorways so if people are coming out like in that situation then they'll get spotted
That's awesome wdym that's a great incentive to take literally 1 second to hold E on a button
Unfortunately yeah.
Let the people who bought the game enjoy it.
they should've timed it better
😂 agree
the remaining 10 loyal bf2042 players will probably be watching the mw22 reveal instead
niice
way too few people take just a couple seconds to go control doorways, had no clue at all about those detectors
That’s definetely an attack heli in that clip
I knew you could take control of them but I thought they'd just go off when the enemy team went through them.
looks like Temporyal was right for his season leaks
No it's more than just that instead with the detectors.
Ye he's a bit right here and there.
oh bruh june 7th? This game is getting utterly mauled by MW22. Couldn't have picked a worse time
Still not with the season unless they fix a elephant in the room for me.
Nooo I'm legit hyped for S1, I'm honestly having loads of fun in the game and have most of the time so far.. just need the content to drop. Moving portal maps into AOW was clutch to freshen things up. Totally serious with this comment as well.. I've been playing 2042 this whole time pretty contentedly.
Imo if MWII has Ground War again (64p+ Conquest-lite) 2042 gets deleted from my SSD.
im ngl i dont see an inkling of hype around mw22
I wouldn't spend ~500 hours in a game I hate lol
I just hope temporal's leaks about AI being squadmates is true. That's the only slight hope I have left at seeing progression being fixed.
Tbf though, the only people who would be interested in the trailer are the bf fans who stuck around. Realistically I doubt it would have mattered if the date was different
Cod will be cod. It's not like you're missing out from the yearly release, This will be different I know but still.
I bet MW2 will go the way of Vanguard, meaning a lot of hype for a bad game.
condor best vehicle
my condolences
haven't been looking around the right places then, it's the most hype we've had since MW19
2042 is actual fun now.
To a degree.
It can still be shit but Exodus has increased my enjoyment immensely.
But why that reply though? I'm having fun in a game, you don't, which is also fine.
it is but you gotta say that 😉 saying otherwise would get ya role removed lol
Same here!
hmm
anything is fun really, but theres a fine line between fun and good
Even though Exodus is better it still has so many fucking issues
Unless AOW is fixed and Solo/Co-op is uncapped I'm still not very interested in the game
😬
should i reinstall game now or wait for s1
If its still capped when the season starts then I've got no hope left.
wait
Like every map except Caspian and Noshahr just having 3 "sectors". I absolutely hate that
Get ready for the first season of Battlefield 2042. Catch the Season 1: Zero Hour gameplay trailer on June 7th for a first look.
Battlefield 2042 is a first-person shooter made up of three distinct multiplayer experiences – All-Out Warfare features the next generation of fan-favorite modes Conquest and Breakthrough; Battlefield™ Portal allowing...
10th of june would've been a better day for reveal
havent played since launch - what the hell is exodus, isnt that the short film name?
After mw22 does its thing
cool so theyre going to be doing seasons now instead of bringing back original content?
Mw2 isn't that game breaking, no need to exaggerate. GTA 6 reveal is much bigger
it's essentially the game's second release, it has to get new players' attention otherwise the playerbase will never get large again. Putting out a trailer the day before a competitor in a much better position than you isn't smart
they were from the start lmao
Its funny. 7th of June, Population One is finally addressing bot mode progression for their game. Will 2042 do the same remotely?
Imagine conquest 64 but with four of the portal maps.
you cant compare those lmao
my point exactly
I did
oh so thats what they called it, ok cool thanks
mw22 is MUCH more hyped than 2042 season 1
Noshahr Canals, Caspian border, Arica harbour and Valparaiso.
i knew about that and i read each announcement just missed the name
Its not even a fair comparison really
Trailer confirmed set for tomorrow
Battlefield 2042 is chock full of things that need to be tweaked because they are not only badly done but also make the game unbalanced
gta 6 hype has been brewing for nearly 10 years now lol
i mean no shit, it's a game release vs a content drop
It shouldn't be time limited
Arica's new Conquest setup is trash
It's fine. :)
cod is just average game dude lol even rainbow six is better fps
Well it should be permanent.
They expanded Valparaiso a ton, why couldn't they do the same for Arica? The entire highway is unused in Conquest
cod is like the mcdonalds of fps
cod is so boring imo i stopped playing after bo3
No in the description of the mode it is specified that it is for a limited time
That's a completely different section SG.
and battlefield is the burger king lmao
and returned for warzone for a year and stopped mid coldwar warzone
And BF is the Long John Silver's now.
Barely hanging in there
Hey I will always prefer a fish dinner over a soggy bun lol
I swear it's permanent rip. Maybe they just didn't update the description cause to be fair, Breakthrough and conquest 64 were listed as LTM's and they've been that way until now LMAO.
As it stands, the campaign for COD MW2 ought to be good. Hopefully whatever PvE option they bring in whether its Spec Ops or maybe something new I'm looking forward to it a bit more than 2042
honestly more than half of the people who will play cod will be playing warzone 2 only and ditch mw2
cods have nothing new ever, same stuff over and over, oh apart from unlocking the doors lol
It's time limited, see the description in-game https://i.gyazo.com/a9d13e1bfc4a69a10432b2b5b1cf1e50.jpg
Wait, I don't understand these references, in Italy McDonald's and Burger King don't make much difference, there is no particular fast food culture
I thankfully have game share so I know a family member will get it so I don't have to buy it
Right, and the entire upper portion of Valparaiso between the two upper HQs is brand new. There is a lot of space between the highway and the bridge they could've expanded on in Arica
i'm hyped for the impending collapse of the Western game industry
Talking about fast food, I Had a dream that hungry jacks, Australian burger king was in Georgia.
For my comment I meant it as: Everywhere, Never going away, Fills you up but overall quality... meh
give Japan, China and South Korea a chance for once
both are the generic fast food places, though mcdonalds is usually regarded as better in most ways. Point being that both cod and bf are long running franchises that are roughly competing, but bf has gotten itself into a hard spot as of late
Who's to say that its not happening already?
Don't ask me why I had a dream being in an American state.
Man...that they put a countdown on the reveal trailer for S1 is kinda hilarious to me. At least we know exactly when it's coming out/reveal is supposed to happen, I guess.
MW2 and battlefield 2042 what a time to be a live
wdym japan has most famous games and studios lol
In before the trailer is just a operator showing off their ability, new weapons, map and maybe some of the cosmetics and then that's it.
Everyone has their dreams, where they want to go, what they want to do.
LMAO I wanna go to the Netherlands.
Don't go to Georgia even in your dreams lolol
I was in a car, Don't blame me.
japan has biggest game industry then any country i believe
You're welcome here haha
Which will have the most player do you guys think? Mw2 or Warzone 2?
The only reason to go to Georgia is to burn it down
warzone 2 coz its free
the best selling console of all time is japanese lmao asia is practically where it began
I had to go to some birthday party and it involved a paintball arena.
i think it's an LTM in the sense that they were like "ok we'll label it that way and have it there to gauge the reception" rather than "this is here for a few days"
Yeah I think like that.
if it's negative, get rid of it.
If it's good well. Don't update and keep it.
warzone because BRs are the trend
plus free
i mean... yeah? idk what else it would really be considering it's a season trailer
"What a time to be alive" I think was one of the first signs that it would have made it clear that the game was going to be a boor but I'm happy that they are transforming it from "What a Time to be alive" to "Charlie Foxtrot here we come"
The top 8 best selling game consoles are Japanese lmao, it takes to number 9 to get to the 360.
I remember the chapter 6 trailer how we saw that flaggy boi outfit for the japanese.
What if mw2 flop 💀💀
Yeah but I mean they do it in a pace where almost nothing gets shown.
It won't, It's COD.
funniest shit
Other than the miniscule bits and pieces
it wont bcs cod can sell anything and players will praise it
all they gonna do for mw2 is a serious season 1 and anime season 2 skins
what I meant with "give Japan, China and South Korea a chance" is that only video game companies in these countries should be making video games while Western ones are on timeout for about a year or so
Well what else should they show, probably tomorrow there will also be patch notes but the season trailer will be based on the content of the season
realistically mw2 won't flop because CoD games are basically immune to flopping by nature of having a massive fanbase who will just buy whatever
ignoring the significant amount of criticism vanguard and cold war got lol
If there's patch notes, that's good. But I somewhat doubt that may happen.
even infinite warfare, a flop by CoD standards, outsold bf1 whilst it was the current game
You all in here acting like COD isn't enjoyable to play for tons of people
check how many ppl play it tho
If it does, cool. If not, then don't expect me to be surprised.
Maybe mw2 wont flop cuz of people who just want to preorder anyways
cod just manages to capture lots of casual gamers, which realistically do not care nearly as much as dedicated players. Battlefield tried to be more generic and hop on trends but it obviously backfired because the core game was shit
Weeeeeee
Only good thing about CoD Cold War was the foundation for Zombies. Not Outbreak but the core gameplay mechs of it was great
thing is u cant compare those 2, cod is lesser league then rainbow six
i mean it isn't
patch notes are generally a couple days before the release so it really just depends when the season is scheduled to release - if it's next week then i'd probably expect the notes to be next tuesday or so
Well actually the Battlefield fanbase is much more "severe" if we can define it that way. The fact is that Battlefield has always kept a serious tone in its games while Battlefield 2042 feels like a large-scale circus with 128 cloned clowns, so it's only fitting that the fanbase got pissed off.
The rarity weapon system, no perk cap, the field powers. It was all fun.
i better see some explosions
The COD/BF rivalry has always been stupid and the gatekeeping "COD players are just casuals" nonsense is really telling on yourself.
COD and BF are very different games with different goals and audiences and its entirely possible to equally enjoy both.
personally I view IW trying to be Titanfall but instead brought dishonor to itself.
Cloned clowns 💀💀💀
I mean, gatekeeping is everywhere. Even on both sides.
You won't say anything about CSGO skins?
There was a time where you couldn't unlock weapons in CoD Cold War zombies and people were against letting people do that.
oh really? tell me points where cod is better then rainbow six, what does it have more then it? like in rainbow u have much more options to do in game while cod is just generic fps shooter which had no major improvements in gameplay since its start
Luckily Treyarch actually listened. Even though it took em 3 seasons to do that.
Black ops 2 was the bomb.
the fact is that the majority of any game's playerbase are "casuals", doesn't matter if anybody likes it or not. Dedicated players that bother to interact on forums will always be a minority and captivating casual players will always be a game's priority
never really played csgo
I miss that game.
WHAT THE FUCK
@soft swallow
You ok Mat.
oh so it's your opinion, yeah don't really care then
I feel like games generally need to be inclusive to everybody. Not gatekeeping others.
Angel vs angel if you know what I mean
nah its facts lol so you can say arguments which u dont have lol
so what about content for portal?
Lol my discord is broken help
are there going to be new battlefield titles for portal?
Nothing for now
Good for you, it's kinda boring to me
MW2022 isn't gonna be generic
you talk all that shit on an opinion lmao i'm not going back and forth because it won't get anywhere
Counter strike 1.5>>>cs:go
if you want to talk numbers you can say that again
It's sad to see that angel was only good because of his broken ass armour.
we'll see... I think it's clear not in S1 but there were lots of questions on the survey about what type of updates could go into Portal so it's on the table at least. There weren't any questions around HZ so that tracks with their actual decision making.
He could have been much better balanced.
well it'll be MW2019 but with new story and better graphics
As someone who tolerates CoD for what it is, I'm sorry but it probably will be.
I doubt there will be more, but it would be cool to see something from Battlefield 2, Battlefield 2142, Battlefield BC and Battlefield 1943
And there's nothing wrong with that. Its just how CoD is.
and same OG MW2 maps
Karkand when? 🙂
Bf2>>>>
i asked u nicely, tell me what options u have in game of cod that surpass the rainbow six? cod made door able to be open after 20 years lol
Fucking BF3 remake
Unless they actually try bringing really new stuff to the table.
It's more fun, and of the discussion
Putting armor in BF is like number 4 on the list of gigantic mistakes DICE made with 2042, after no classes, no server browser, and no input based discrimination.
DMZ mode
Like modern zombies or something of the sort.
To be fair their games have always had armour.
u obviously havent played rainbow lol
What, you mean that PvPvE Tarkov mode?
Now yes, I do enjoy 2042 but THIS would be the winning decision for sure.
like i said, i'm not going to have this conversation because you will literally never agree
CQB vs Zombies
But that's a Battlefield 3 DLC
bf2
just admit u got nothing to say and its fine , we move on 🙂
I did and it was cool, but Cod I enjoyed it more than Rainbow
Off brand but BFH even had the armoured insert that would reduce damage to the chest by 50% pre patch, This was reduced to 25 and armour tracer rounds would completely invalidate it.
well thats fine for you, best customer for cod lol
i've got plenty, just not to you
sure you do 🙂
selling DICE to Bandai Namco or Tencent would be the real winning decision tbh
imagine the next Battlefield being the first one without a shitty launch
Just knock it off you two.
CoD better
EA wants to get bought I doubt they would carve DICE out in a separate M&A prior to being acquired
Imagine not accepting the opinions of others like a kindergarten child
Imagine Battlefield Strangereal
why would i accept your opinion? i ask black on white, by what is cod better then rb6?
OMG i cant wait to buy all sexy skins in season 1 BATCHEST
I said my opinion, it's more fun, what I have to say?
Cuz he think it is, he's suited for it
thats good for you lol but pure sentimental opinion
Did Exodus boost the playercount? It's insane how easy it is to find full games with crossplay off. I played during monday morning, and I didn't see a single AI.
I've got Bo Burnham's "Welcome to the internet" on repeat in my head watching this conversation
Ohh man I miss BF3 vs MW3 lol
Anecdotally, it largely seems to have centralized players to that single mode.
it was never a contest lol
A better comparison would be bloody black ops 2 and bf3 in all honesty.
Both were actually pretty good games,.
Yeah, that might be it. Players are less divided between PORTAL and AOW.
But FUCK black ops 2 was almost a decade ago. -.-
comparing a game where u can just run and shoot to a game u can fly vehicles, drive em, destroy anything with bigger maps is just LOL
Games like Rainbow are the ones that definitely appeal to me the least, I prefer a game where there is a lot of fast action rather than tactical ... and in fact I don't even know why I play Arma but the fact is that I like that game a lot
"battlefield better and realistic cuz of destruction!"
"No, CoD Better!"
soon it will be 10 years old
Yeah I know that's why I wrote almost!
and it's your "sentimental opinion" that siege is better. You ask people to tell you why they prefer cod and then belittle their opinions, should go elsewhere if you want to bait arguments
I remember being hyped for that.
bcs none said why lol
Just a damn good game with good balance.
i really wish i played bo2
Can you two just move on? Thunder and Kato.
Menendez!
Anyone who says Battlefield is realistic is a bit deluded. It is certainly one of the least realistic war games that a person can play
im movin on
MW3 is one of like 3 CODs I skipped because as a poor college sophomore at the time I could only get one, BF3 or MW3.
For a console
bf is more realistic but at least its not milsim realism
bro bf started as a pc only franchise
I got it on pc on my craptop, Could barely run it well. My mum got me it for the 360 on the same weekend I got hit by a car and went to town on that game.
thing is bf lets u do much more in a game with bigger maps
good lord
there are degrees of realism. Battlefield is certainly more realistic than cod in most departments, but it's still merely an arcade game compared to arma or even squad
It's interesting to consider how Arma will go with the newest one I just can't quite wrap my head around controller in Arma with the 5k keybinds you need on PC
The most realistic thing battlefield had I guess would be more realistic bullet ballistics. But now both games use it and both are just as unrealistic as each other.
as for 2010s Battlefield Games did the realism far more than CoDs
because CoD aims for fun over realism, as does BF.
In Cod and battlefield your soldier has unlimited sprint, They're fit as hell since they can run an infinite distance with a loaded MG.
Future ARMA games will require you to have 3 keyboards to play it.
CoD never focuses on realism until MW2019 came out lol
I will grow a third arm in that case.
Battlefield and Cod have 2 completely different gameplay formulas, but that doesn't mean one is worse than the other. Making similar comparisons is nothing stupid, especially since they are two games that have the same intention, that is to handle war in a completely different way from the real one.
One hand for each keyboard.
Its hard to elucidate how incredible BFV's gunplay is, but imo the only games that comes close to as satisfying is MW19 and Vanguard. 2042 isn't even in the running and I'm really annoyed with DICE for that.
True
Gunplay for 2042 is alright but it certainly could be a bit less floaty. It's weird to describe.
I feel people conflate "realism" with "immersion" though... not sure BF has ever had "realism" as a focus beyond gunplay
Western games are mid these days tbh
Can we seriously get an Ace Combat x Battlefield?
it's that damn engine. It's marvelous, both MW19 and Vanguard used it. Can't wait to see what the new one is like
tbh it isnt fair to compare CoD and BF in terms pf realism
No need to have Ace Combat x BF when Air Superiority exist.
Yeah, I don't get it. Maybe it's ADAD spam or something but I find it much harder to keep on target in 2042. It's like the game pushes my crosshair off of enemies
The weapons have absolutely nothing to do with those of reality, but it is right because the gunplay is based on the player's comfort and on the balance for each weapon
That's your slowdown.
1.0 tomorrow?
finally vehicle kill assists. Might start playing more often now
Imagine Tauberg Map in Battlefield 😳
So the leaks were true. AI squadmates are now a thing
You cant compare cod and r6 tbh, other than being shooters
But the progression is STILL CAPPED ARE YOU KIDDING ME DICE.
I've tried it both completely off and at like 50%, still happens either way
Yeah turn it off.
https://twitter.com/BattlefieldComm/status/1533834150209282052 HOLY SHIT THEY FIGURED OUT VECHICLE ASSIST XP WHAT A FUCKING TIME TO BE ALIVE
Dude portal and HZ died on launch, forget it
It's true the actual weapons traits fully agreed.. was thinking more about ballistics and such but even there are massive compromises to simply keep the game fun, otherwise hardcore should be the only game mode.
Max seriously we just see you whining about the same thing over and over, Know when to actually stop.
season 1 hype
No it was literally fine on launch! Then the farmers on portal ruined it for everyone
ur brainwashed by cod lol open your eyes, bigger maps, land, air and sea vehicles, destruction, graphics every time and so on, more players per map etc
wait...so update tomorrow but that's not the start of S1?
This better be the king of season 1s for a live service game. Like too much content.
Because it wasnt fine, not thoughtout enough, ofc people were making boosting lobbies if its possible
correct. its just gameplay and trailer
1 new map and a few guns so far
a mini update before S1, hmm
Boosting lobbies were made way too easy with Bots.
"Damaging an enemy vehicle now triggers an XP event" - 8 months later we're slowly crawling back to the scoring system from BFV
I got the game free with the origin membership and have enjoyed my time so far 🤷♂️
Game was rushed, Edge.
Yeah on portal
I'm glad they're doing something about that.
some of those new guns are from portal lmao
Not AOW. AOW solo/co-op had no reason to be touched period
Hopefully we get soldier damage score too.
But I heard it was way ahead of schedule and we just needed to trust them, fam.
Maybe I'm just getting old but engagement distances for non-snipers are way longer in 2042 than previous games and it's actually a bit difficult to see enemies sometimes at these distances.
Though honestly when I get killed at these huge distances from non-snipers it's always a PC player so I assume it's another KB&M advantage.
yesss, been asking since the beta
There needs to be skins, weapons, dog tags, melee animations, like tons.
if it's to be trusted. It was said by someone who had no idea what they're talking about.
They better add the AS Val from BF3 into 2042 with Sp6 and SPP rounds
Lmao guess recycling counts as content
But that's a whatever.
Some higher up said that, not a dev themselves
YES_ been asking for "assist counts as kill" for ages on both inf+veh... except I'll always be proud of grinding my recoilless the hard way lolol
nah you're right, with the bigger maps everything happens at longer ranges and the game just doesn't feel very well configured for that
Dont say that to destiny players
Eh that doesn't really help the game if it doesn't improve the state its in
Actual map yes?
It's why I fell off destiny 2
Man, next time I'll just wait 12+ months for DICE to take the time to actually finish core development on the next BF game. Seems like they never have enough time even with extra studios helping and another year to build it. This is hilarious and sad.
good idea hah
The SCAR H is what the STG 44 from bf5 wants to be.
It’s true. Ideally more maps, and maybe factions (I still hate specialists but that’s me). The game still needs a LOT of work obviously. That Bf3 feel is what I’m after.
You want melee animations? We got them, check this out! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enIVk-fQqcw
plz nerf the k30 and the super hind...
Imo BFV launched feature complete with excellent gameplay, just not enough content.
I wish they were at least a but more humble about the fact that they're still finishing core development on a rushed game they told us a bunch of dishonest bullshit about.
is it 3rd person animations???
You're chasing the dragon I see lol
2042 launched feature incomplete and with not enough content, so DICE has regressed
Its 4D
dice humble??? LMAO bro they rather develope the game and sell it to us and rather than admit anything
what could improve BF2042 is selling EA to Nintendo (because I personally don't trust Western game companies to make anything right anymore points at No Man's Sky, Fallout 76, Cyberpunk 2077 launches) and letting that company continue working on the game and Apex etc. yes I'm serious
I still want suppressing fire back in game. That was 🔥 I’m trying to send 300 rounds down range and disperse the whole team. Lol