#battlefield-2042
1 messages · Page 4470 of 1
Some of the highest ranked players in 2042 were people who quit matchnaking until they could play attack on 128 bkthrough just so they could farm
I play Breakthrough 99% of the time
this change to breakthrough will probably drop the player count even more...
I haven’t played 2042 in a couple of months
DICE being too lazy to fix their own game so instead of balancing the map the decision is to remove one of the key game modes of the game
What a fucking circus of a game studio
Who gives a shit about some losers, the mode was still good and really doesn’t have a reason to be outright removed. Tweaked? Sure. Removed? lmao no
Maybe they will later but drawing people to a better experience for now is the better choice
128 breakthrough was cancer and caused a lot of bad opinions and impressions of the game because casuals would get put on defense and go 1-20 and lose by 675 tickets then hate the game
hire this man into the map modeling team https://www.reddit.com/r/battlefield2042/comments/us0x18/my_ideas_for_reworking_the_a_tower_on_kaleidoscope/
Breakthrough 128 was more easy for attackers than playing against bots dude it was worthless and dumb
So instead of fixing it, the solution is to throw in the towel and nuke it completely?
most people like the chaotic 128bt.
This is exactly what I think about it being removed
Yes the mode was utter trash
my sweet 128bt
NOT FOR SOME, I PLAYED IT EXCLUSIVELY
128 player BT wasn’t enjoyable
Your experience is completely different from mine 128bt was the only mode that felt like a bf game to me. like 64 is fine but the maps are too big
If you spent time playing breakthrough 128 you might as well have been playing solo co op because defenders were completely irrelevant
It was a mess and it didn’t fit the maps
Well i hope they atleast add frontline so i can have some fun. im not playing conquest.
prolly needs time to rework - map design was a little poor for BT128. New maps might address that, and the upcoming map redesigns
People getting upset because they can't just farm helpless defenders isn't a legitimate complaint
honestly i would be kind of interested to see the 128 player versions of the maps that are staying as that on next gen be ported to last gen, since they're now used for 64 players there's in theory no reason it shouldn't be able to be used on last gen other than maybe performance if the maps are massively bigger
but to my knowledge it shouldn't be anything that can't be handled
The whole game should have 128 player modes removed
spudbug is absolutely right
None of your criticism is universal though
It's fucking astonishing how low standards DICE shills have
It is the #1 issue that caused almost all the problems with this game
64 players doesn't fix the issue
Bruh get over it. People have different opinions
128 players was a huge mistake and it caused the bad map design
Like my 128 player breakthrough experience does not match yours at fucking all and you’re acting like every defending team you’ve ever played is complete fucking morons
tell that to Spud lmao
hopefully 32v32 will be fun but i doubt it for me personally. itll be good if it brings players back tho.
I’m no shill but I actually agree with him
This game was advertised as a 128 PLAYER GAME. REMOVING 50% OF THAT EXPERIENCE IS REASON TO BE UPSET
So Anghel can still revive with armor?
this is true
new update don't care since honkai update is coming too and am pretty excited for it over bf2042
And what is complaining in all caps gonna do?
That’s fine but “people gave different opinions get over it”
i got several T1's by shooting A.I bots in break through 128 man. the mode is a joke. the server doesn't even fill up most the time until half the game is already over.
Was? Is still advertised with 128p breakthrough. And I'd be surprised if DICE updates all their marketing materials to remove those mentions. Gonna be a lot of disappointed folks finding out a mode they just bought the game to play doesn't exist anymore.
sentry gun nerf thank fuck
That’s a problem with nobody playing the game not 128 player breakthrough lol
I had bots in 64 player conquest for fucks sake
so the reason to get rid of 128bt is because there aren't enough players??
i don't have that problem in conquest 128 man
no i can kill an easy killable object even easier 
Did Bush do 9/11?
probably due to performance and just general flow. The game has more than enough players to fill a server
I had bots in 64 breakthrough too!
sad...
128 breakthrough was the worst way to play this game and was the source of most of the complaints about vehicle spam and caused a ton of negative impressions by people who get thrown on defense over and over and lose by 680 tickets
yeah, there's bots in 64man but it doesn't take half the match to fill up with real players, unlike 128 player matches
yeah i think it did need a nerf but it feels a bit heavy handed, most of the issues for me came from when you've got people boosting it with turret operator since you could literally just walk forwards in a straight line and it wouldn't hit you (when unbuffed)
At the end of the day DICE has to balance between maintaining a healthy player base for the players that are remaining vs. what they initially advertised (which yes, does indeed advertise 128 players for Breakthrough).
It sucks, and is obviously the result of poor pre-production on the game, but at the end of the day I feel like DICE also has an obligation to try to improve the experience for the players who have been sticking around, and if that means consolidating the available modes, I think it just has to happen.
128p conquest is equally as responsible for all of this and the “worst to play the game” is flat out subjective
I think it’s more like a mistaken attempt to please the people complaining about map design
Lol, barely got T1 on the M5A3 on that round 
Then offer everyone partial refunds/store credit for removing a major gamplay mode and selling point for the game.
Ok im hoping at least to create a portal server with 128 players
Or, alternatively, nobody cares how "hard" it is for DICE to deliver us the game they promised us. I want the game that DICE sold us, not the incomplete mess they actually released that they're continually trying to drop support for.
Im fine with killing more turrets. I used to headhunt them bc most of the time i had brain dead teammates that forget you can shoot it and kill it with 10-12 shots. free exp for me 
what is this gonna do to help that other than just generate more bad press. Why is 128p Bt getting removed before fucking Hazard Zone, which barely anyone plays?
128p breakthrough is the only mode that takes 10 minutes to join most days, every other game mode doesn't even take half that, if not just instant join. people are dropping 128player breakthrough like a bad habit
I mean you can investigate a class action if you really feel that's worth it. I'd honestly say it probably isn't worth it - but that's just me
hope this doesn't go overboard again

im finna kiss so many tracks
It's not worth a class action and I'm not an internet lawyer. I'm just saying DICE is doing us dirty and we legit just have to lie down and take it.
You act like its outright cancelled forever, when with each patch thus far has played around with different aspects of the game
it should've never been nerfed to begin with
Nothing is gonna truly help this game at this point until they either announce a sequel or complete rework/revamp with the new leadership
it was broken as hell initially, it needed a nerf
Then DICE can tell us that they're planning to bring it back once they learn how to design maps. Otherwise it's gone for good until they say otherwise.
ignores turret
"hey why am i being shot by this turret? why does no one do anything about it
"
announcing a sequel is the last thing they should do
In asian servers, there hasn't been a single 128p breakthrough match since Feb. Everyone plays 128p conquest and idk why
I mean, yeah it's a shitty scenario either way. Let that inform your further decision making behavior for future DICE/EA titles.
will be keeping a close eye on how our changes help to improve the experience ahead of the start of Season 1.
"hey we know this game is shit so what we're gonna do is flash another game in your face and hope you forget how badly we fucked you"
they kinda did
It has informed, but didn't need to. I already know I'm done giving DICE money after the horse shit they've pulled with 2042.
the next bf game got delayed so
People bringing up lawsuits are funny
"Huh whats that beeping sound? must be nothing 6 seconds later oh wow i got killed by this thing so op. i didnt even hear it."
Well, it may be a reboot of 2042.... but at the end of the day there needs to be SOME sort of reset. 2042 as is just has too much negative stigma around it and I don't think that changes until there is some push to redefine it entirely, be it a "2.0" or a new game down the road
That doesn't say what you think it says.
Imagine being able to sue whenever you don’t like something
i'm in the same boat, i like conquest far more, it's BF main game mode and always has been, breakthrough is fun but only when it's 64man in my personal opinion, apparently the devs have seen the light too.
I love the assumption is that these changes are going to help
Also lets not forget DICE pulled the plug on bfv and swbf2 for 2042
Yes, S1 is the "relaunch" in this situation. But I don't think DICE are remotely set up for success with it, especially if it's set for early june (which is a DOGSHIT time to push this out with how busy the industry is with major announcements at the time)
it doesn't say what you think it says either
in fairness it was kinda dumb once you had someone sitting in the radius, but i think a few tweaks to its usual state and then just nerfing the turret operator buff would have sufficed
You guys act like they shouldn’t make new games. Yes this game sucked but they should still at least try to produce new ones…
HZ flopped harder than Firestorm honestly
Everyone's gonna be salivating over newly announced titles and titles getting launch date announcements in early June (even without E3). Nobody's gonna give a shit about a bad game trying to relaunch itself and shed it's well-earned dogshit reputation.
This is unironically the first time since the buggy-ass launch that I’m truly fucking angry at the game when I’d come back to play 128bt is what I would play
you prolly right. bc all the complaints ive seen in here have been "i hate turret when boris lays there with pkp" and "it spots me through walls"
ah but remember there's a petition as well
that makes all the difference
Now that I see people getting mad about bt128 change they might switch it back.
What weird to me is that the turret is a PKP that shoots in bursts 
DICE just cannot stop from shooting themselves in the fuckin foot and making god-awful, backwards-ass decisions that will result in them killing this game/franchise.
wouldn't be a big issue if the game didn't turn out so badly. BFV and SWBF2 were at their peak and got pulled off life support so we could get... whatever this is
Maybe, I'm not even convinced if S1 is the reboot. Has there truly been enough time between the new leadership coming in and S1's release? I know it's been a LONG time, but to entirely change the franchise it would require some fast movement.
Maybe it's possible, but there would need to be some significant design philosophy changes to indicate it's a reboot
Lmao right?
If bf went all in on hazard zone it’d be a turning point.
What happened to all the petition reddit boys? did they finally realize petitions dont do anything 
damn dude
My point is S1 needs to be the reboot. There's no other opportunity afterwards short of them delaying seasons again and trying to do a big marketing push then. S1 is their relaunch, it's when they'll spend big on marketing. It's their relaunch. It's gonna be a disaster at this point.
probably got laughed at by the first lawyer they approached, if they got to that stage
@velvet sand I imagine S1 will just be the same game with some more content. A reboot would be Zampella coming out and saying "ok here's how we're going to change what went wrong - we're making 6 new maps, we're going F2P, and we're changing how classes/specialists are handled
And right, to your point, which is why "the next" BF game under Zampella might be the reboot instead
I am sad my sweet 128 is going
ill still try the game and see if i enjoy it for a week or so.
Why should I come back at all after this? 64 players bt is ok but the maps are not adjusted for it at all and conquest in this game is complete trash
What makes you think they’d sink $$$ into marketing lol…they’ve made their money. They’re just gonna make the game “decent” and move on to the next title
I'm not saying it would be good, but poor leadership is why 2042 failed and did not have a clear direction, so I'm curious to see how and if new leadership will help
Weren’t they asking for money?
thats what i'm thinking
Gotta spend money to make money. S1 is when monetization starts so they'll be spending to win-back lapsed players and bring in new palyers to buy the battle passes and cosmetics.
Ingenious way to scam people
Reddit boys: Help we have this petition to sue EA for false advertising.
Lawyer:
EA?
yeah 
I think they’ll do the bare minimum
The petition was always well intentioned copium, it was dumb.
128bt on these terrible maps made it more interesting but pulling back on it just leaves you these boring maps
lol e-petitions
If it did anything right it drummed up a lot of bad press for 2042 to compound its bad word of mouth
Got the exact product that was advertised
”fAlSe AdVeRtIsInG”

the false advertising claims were hilarious, except now they're actually starting to remove things that were advertised lol
64p Conquest uses like a badly chosen third of the map were the blatant waste of most of the map is pretty clear
maybe in a year 2042 will be a scuffed bf4
who cares about false advertising. The expectation wasn't meant here so why bother supporting them if they shill out this mess
There’s still 128 players, no? They just removed a mode
advertised 128 bt, removed 128 bt
My hunch was correct, tho i was doubting as well as there were no news more than one day before the patch.
yeah, that's true but it's easier for dice to make it 64 player than to adjust every map in the game. that would mean they would actually have to work.
not saying it's grounds to sue, but the whole situation is just painfully ironic
didnt they only make breakthrough 64 anyway
Way easier. if this how they fix issues I can't image the future for this game.
I think one potential avenue Zampella could take is to reboot 2042 as something closer to BF4, where character skins are customization options for classes, and then they just make a bunch of really good maps. That's essentially designing a new game from scratch though, so I don't see it happening.
I'm curious as to if they are going to try to save 2042 and rebuild it long-term, or abandon it and focus on the next BF plan
128BT
Does anyone actually disagree with 128bt being broken?
Im betting that vince is letting the original management scramble to work on 2042 while he leads a team on concepting the next bf
i only play portal so i can't comment, but last i checked 128 bt was too chaotic
it is broken but it's not the player count. it's the map design and balancing that messed it up.
Thats my guess too.
Honestly if it was me, I'd say focus on the next BF, make it F2P and a true live service with a healthy content stream ready to go (plenty of maps and weapons), and give everyone who bought 2042 the first year of season passes for free as a courtesy
It do needs to be ironed out since this is the first time they implemented it. Once they get the experience maybe theyll do better with the next battlefield or towards the end of 2042 life. *for 128
and have the BF game just represent the BEST of BF's history: BF2/3/4 etc.
Honestly...I don't think DICE is legitimately capable of proper live-service support for any games at this point.
Trying to join a match right now. Like 45 minutes now
With their previous leadership, definitely not. If they have good leadership I think they can do it
It's definitely something DICE has always struggled with
that depends on your region.
Servers are a cemetery
Ah but this is ea, not a charity case lol
and making 2042 f2p wouldnt save it because content couldnt come out fast enough for people
Right, I'm saying make the next BF F2P, not 2042
all the A.I bots in 128p breakthrough was fucking ridiculous, this was my main problem the maps were always 2nd to me
Maybe. Vince supposedly had to re-teach DICE that you're supposed to make games to be fun and retool tehir internal processes. But I'm not remotely confident at this point given the years of attempts and failures to do live-service right (outside of spending years slowly getting a game into a good state).
I’m MST in the US. No reason why I shouldn’t be able to find a match unless the game playerbase is buried 6 feet under
oh the next one. Ya that would just kill any hype behind it i think. no one looks at a f2p shooter and goes ya thats going to have a good live service
It's a huge undertaking for sure. I'm confident in Vince, but it's hard to change an entire studio's culture and mindset - and it can't be done overnight
weird I just found a game after 10 seconds
But they need to actually not release the next BF, if it's to be live service, until the first 2 seasons of content are already "In the bag ready to go"
it is also crazy that they released the bomb ass 4.0 update then got ready to clotheslines us with 128 removal.
so they can actually keep up with the content demand. If they produce a fun game with healthy content stream, the $$$ will follow
Conquest? I’ve been trying to get into a BT match
What is even stupider is that they announced this in a god damned patch, no community feedback session about whether it needs to be removed or whether such a radical change is necessary, it’s just gone, fuck you and what you think. Barely any reasoning for why it’s gone either
yeah BT 128
Glad to see the NTW-50 is back, it should do even less damage to players and even more to vehicles IMO
wtf 💀
Or until they just finally finish basic-ass development and do a proper bugfix patch so their game isn't a completely unplayable nightmare at launch. Something they haven't achieved in like a decade+
I found two games so far on two different maps
they probably cant. they couldnt with V and that was with 64p maps. now they have to make maps for 128p
yeah the vehicle damage nerf was a little too much.
Yeah I’m pretty sure the matchmaking is bugged. I can find a conquest match with zero problems
I’m playing rn
yeah they had the same leadership back then though I think as 2042
This update feels like a low effort compared to last update...
ha you'd think. I suppose they could also do a full early access period, but the issue with that is people sometimes get burnt out
if leadership is getting in the way of getting content out the door then dice is even more fucked than i thought
yeah it's a more minor dot update. My guess is the S1 update next month will be bigger - likely not enough to save the game, but it makes sense why this month would be smaller
Also wheres the damn specialist feedback? are they trying to memory-hole it?
Early Access for a AAA game is both a massive embarrassment and completely undermining the point of Early Access.
removing 128bt was the cherry on top
I think they've been seeking feedback for that on a handful of platforms if Im not mistaken
Last bit of QoL before Major 1.0 update - makes sense dev wise
Probably hoping we all forget about it. I'm not expecting it even by the start of S1. Just another DICE lie/mistruth they've given us.
Ah yes twitter, the best place for feedback. not like they were gonna look at reddit cuz its too "toxic"
No, they haven't. Feedback loops are separate from the surveys they sent out. They're supposed to be like the map one, and the specialist one was supposed to start legit over 1 month ago.
it doesn't though cause the specialist were suppose to get a overhaul. not just tweaks
Game needs more than "last bit of QoL" to prep for S1...legit none of the design related problems have even been touched, just bugfixing and some polish
Overhauls are typically released in Major/Minor updates and not small patches like this 0.4.1
They have a billion platforms for feedback between social and their forums and their surveys. At the end of the day though if they were to completely change specialists, I don't think they'd be able to rush into that. I'll stand by my statement that Specialists are not the reason why 2042 failed.
If removing core game modes is a “last bit of QOL” this game is fucked
I mentioned before if it were to fail or suceeed it'd be for all of the other reasons: gameplay, content stream, bugs, etc.
so removing 128bt was QOL?
They committed to these feedback loops in the Feb update. They said the specialist loop was coming "in a few weeks" around 7 weeks ago, there were supposed to be multiple feedback loops. There has been one.
its definitely a pillar of why it failed. the others being shit maps and shit ton of bugs
yeah i wouldve never went back to reddit after death threats.
so i dont blame them
They have the metrics to decide that
I truly think if the game was genuinely good and supported with content I don't think we'd be having the same conversation about Specialists
Because twitter definitely isn’t known for doxxing and death threats
twitter trash too.
I think we would because too a lot of people they dont belong in a bf
metrics aren't the solution. common sense is.
We would. Specialists impact every aspect of how this game plays and are directly responsible for huge aspects of the grossly uneven and inconsistent balance problems.
So they turn to uhhh checks notes twitter, which is definitely not known for death threats
reddit = allchan people
twitter = complain/cancel culture people.
Even hardline was closer to baseline bf experience than 2042
Perhaps - I would have preferred the traditional class system myself, but I also didn't mind having more variety on how to play. Again, it wasn't a dealbreaker for me
Man, are we still bitching aboutr reddit? DICE has official forums, you know?
Thats fine but if dice only listened to the people that stayed then 2042 would die
imagine if weapon licenses from hardline made it's way to bf2042 lmao
To be honest it has nothing to do with death threats, the community sub Reddit just fucking hates the game even if constructive actual feedback is provided, it’s just ignored because community managers don’t want to do their job on there
metrics detail areas that need reworks and tweaks. Pulling BT128 before S1 could mean that some updates are planned for when after S1 drops to keep things smooth
Guys literally make full on prototype graphics for systems dice could use to fix the game but the comment section is mean so fuck the whole place
Couldn't we declare that 2042 is dead already? Ha
I mean we are carrying its coffin but we'll see if s1 puts it 6ft under
Again: I think 2042 has some fun moments. I still enjoy playing once a week - but honestly I find myself having more fun on the Legacy maps ha
S1 would need to do some seriously wild stuff - the issue as time goes on, the bar for S1 gets set so high to a point where it likely is impossible to reach
Which is a uniquely DICE problem that's of their own making.
I'm a consumer, i don't care how shitty of a spot DICE positioned themselves with terrible planning and execution. I want the product they marketed to us.
dice hasnt had enough time to do anything wild with s1 probably. and im sure the bar has been lowering for everyone since the announced delay
Agreed. This shows the value of pre-production and having a solid vision prior to launch. It ALL comes down to pre-pro, so many creative mediums do
I just can't see it being a positive..
Sure, but that's the past. We're in the now, now. I don't care how hard it is to fix their mistakes from the past. Fix them or just drop the game, fuck off, and hope people will buy the next game and for some reason trust the studio won't repeat all their same mistakes while being shitty and arrogant as hell again.
everyone knows those death treats were from literal teenagers, but californians still live in mortal fear of the flu so of course they are hiding from means words
Californian here. We don't. Fuck off.
K
death threats are still death threats dude.
True, I mean more for the future. That the next BF game needs to value that pre-production process, and I hope they do
and nobody gives a shit
lol the vision was combined arms warfare and they delivered but thats not what the playerbase wanted lol. the removal of 128p BT tells me they know most people don't like fighting vehicles so they're catering to the infantry crowd
maybe all your friends at 9chan dont give a shit. clown
Jesus you seem miserable. death threats are bad regardless of if they're unserious shit from edgelord teens or not.
californian here, california sucks ass. that is all
"ahaha its just kids saying these things. nothing will happen" haha
/yawn
/block
i'm surprised you didn't say 4chan
these edgelords are something else bro. lmao. what community they come from before battlefield. unless battlefield community always been this trash
Death threats bad but I’m tired of people using them as an excuse to ignore constructive feedback or just more simple but reasonable outrage. Which is far from unique to DICE but still
Always been this trash, every large fandom is.
i really dont think defending 4chan is a good idea especially rn
This ^
is blocked boy defending 4chan i knew it.
Yo is the ntw 50 finally relevant now??
put him on a watch list
yes it is
Ayy
and no-one here is
I just had to google what 4 Chan is
Unfortunate this shit has to derail actual conversation, then again, that's the internet I suppose
get out of there mag. you dont need to go there.
Honestly I’m kinda happy 128 player breakthrough is gone
Is this some “<insert social media site here> was responsible for violence” bullshit
That shit is too chaotic
ok i guess im counting death threats as part of that because excusing those is actually worse and more accurate to what i meant
What’s diff between 4chan and Reddit I don’t get it #, other than presentation
exactly 
discord is responsible for 84723805 killings in the past 2 hours (source; i googled it!!!! 😱)
4chan has radical idiots, Reddit has idiots
4chan has more -ism
Lack of moderation, so edgier userbase
4chan is more like the wild west with little to no moderation vs reddit
You are far more likely to find some batshit crazy stuff on 4chan
Ah I see
Reddit you have to look for it
Not gonna lie I’m gonna go check it out lol
4chan is the asshole of the internet
whatever you do don't go on /pol/
Is pol politics im guessing
Reddit is run by downright tyrants and 4chan has basically no one at all. So the problems are opposite
worlds greatest advice
The only bad ones are pol and b i think
everything else is relatiely fine

le epin 4hour channel boogie man!! 😱 guise i went on that scary deep dark nret web site and it gave me scary feefees!!!
tbh /b/ isn't terrible all the time, but the rate at which you find fucked up stuff is more common than other boards
God I must be old not knowing this shit, I mean I was around when live leaks and stuff was big
i mean tahts kinda the point with it being the random board though isnt it
4chan is old
That's...kinda young : |
allchans are pretty old
Im 37, never heard of it lol
Im surprised you didnt hear about 4chan after things like we will not be divided or the fappening
4chan is 2 years older than reddit yeah
Thank gooey_bonbon for derailing chat KEK
its discord
Ok I’ll report back with findings off i go

No it’s “politically incorrect” it’s basically filled with [National Socialist German Workers Party]s. Actual ones, too not media slander ones
oh god
godspeed mag
RIP mag

This is like that dont look billy meme
mother whats thatpoints at 4chan
dont look billy
its too late mother
ZOMG GUISE HE IS GO TO 4 CHANNEL SO BRAVE ITS SCARY WEBSITE!!!!
42M get?
Wow
that was fast
That’s quite a lot of in depth racism there
ah went to pol i see

Real talk though it's all just layered irony, baitposting, feds, shills, baiters pretending to be shills, and idiots who only see it at face value and think everything ever posted there is truthful.
Lemme guess, about India vs Pakistan? Or the Romani
And here I was worried about my kids growing up with YouTube and tik tok, meanwhile there’s shit like 4chan lol
To be fair you need to be careful about all the social media
Especially kids on Discord
it's been around since 04 and social media is dangerously worse
"Our leading change is the removal of the 128 player version of Breakthrough." does this mean they are removing the mode all together?
well some psycho took it seriously over the weekend in buffalo
It's going to 64 player only
There used to be worse shit back then, but theyve slowly been shut down over the years.
yup i think its gone just 128p
some psychos took Qanon seriously 
People be crazy.
Unless DICE thinks words have different meanings now yes
Although specifically of note, the new 64 Player BT on current gen (PS5/XSX/PC) will have a mix of the 128 + 64p map ***sizes ***for BT, based on what map it is
Yes, if you bougt the game for that mode DICE doesn't want you anymore.
sad..... I missed that when reading them
you can quickly find which boards to abandon and which are fine
I’ll just steer clear I think. I work with fucking nutcases for a living don’t need to be reading that shite lol
People are making the same arguments about the Reddit subs he frequented, which included Twitch and r/memes ffs. The guy clearly had issues other than browsing certain social media
you can also easily find which threads are clearly bait and which aren't. Probably easier to just accept everything as truthful though, huh? Nobody would evert tell a lie on the internet, they made that illegal
he used discord to post his manifesto, I guess you're sus now too, huh?
lol are you serious
This conversation is going fun places : |
its funny cuz he mentions in his manifesto that he was a commie but then started shifting to the right. he is the horseshoe theory personified lol
thats enougjh
Just ban the whole internet by all this logic
Can we get back to being mad at DICE for killing a major game mode yet? Or happy that DICE is making some otherwise good changes in the patch?
further discussion is a mute
Lol

dice killed 128p bt because the community didn't like 128p
Let's get back to halo 👊

its not hard to understand
Yes let us get back to DICE being stupid
Did I miss the poll on that?
I'm honestly happy to see Bolte and MAV get reassigned. The reassignment of the Night Bird was I think, one of the better changes in last patch
That game mode sucked ass wdym?
Yeah I don’t remember that community feedback session
There were previous surveys sent out on that I think
Curious
CQ sucks ass, please remove it DICE. I don't enjoy it.
they read feedback online too
lol, good joke
DICE obviously has a larger data set than any of us can see individually.
I think I was more excited for hazard zone to be a success than conquest. Seems it’s been totally abandoned now. Dice could have made a killing on a AAA arcadey tarkov
And aren't doing anything with it. Also, design-by-metrics is some absolute smoothbrained shit.
its actually hilarious to see the subreddit change its mind on 128p the second dice touches it
https://www.playscavengers.com/ here you go. if you wanted HZ here is the game they copied for it.
Hazard zone was doomed from the beginning they threw that shit in half-assed
Thats what I hope it would have been closer to. Extract anytime you want, more AI, etc.
Good riddance to 128 breakthrough
Is this a decent game?
The sub Reddit has always been relatively positive on breakthrough to be honest
Design-by-metrics yes, but feedback-by-metrics, probably better. When people say "why isn't DICE listening to the community?" they need to quantify that feedback in some form.
Savengers just got maintence moded so...probably not.
WTF they removing semi auto for ak. BARE SHITE
Nope
*you might like it tho if you like HZ
the subreddit is just an angry about dice cutting content
What’s the point of angel going to be now
the subreddit is just an angry about dice
Mobile ammo resupply. 20 bonus armor on revive.
Just ammo?
The cycle frontier was good
I thought they cut the armor?
Just like Falck was a mobile med-kit. Their abilities are now closer to parity.
Just a meme
Either DICE has to quantify the data with surveys/etc. or they have to choose specific people to listen to (influencers, etc.), unfortunately "Listen to me because my idea is best" doesn't actually work 😆
armor from his ability, I think it's still ther efrom his revive
I really wish that would come to console. I played the original on PC a little bit and enjoyed it
For as many people who are complaining about BT128 going away in this server right now, I'd have to assume the data was overwhelmingly in support of favoring BT64
I mean, I'd love for them to show some of that data/feedback. Their explanation in the notes are all about "we think" and "we feel" from DICE.
“128p is bad and should be removed”
“That’s a nice argument senator why don’t you back it up with a source?”
“My source is that I made it the fuck up!”
I can’t see it coming to console anytime soon. But I got a pc 6 months ago to get to play games like this.
Tarkov is just too much effort for me to commit
Yes, but why? That's the big problem with design-by-metrics. More folks are playing 64...but why? Is it because 128 runs like ass? Is it because they can't find 128 matches? Is it because 128 maps are garbage? Is it because they just like 64p?
I think their update is them sharing that. It wouldn't make sense for EA to disclose responses in full.
cheaters killed it for me. im on a few wipe break rn. prolly wont go back not sure yet.
Bf3 has amazing fighting and it didn’t need 128 players. Same for bfV breakthrough which I love
I genuinely can’t be bothered to learn the maps lol
Not saying "disclose responses in full", but there's literally no explanation about why they removed it beyond "we don't think it fits anymore" which like...I get it DICE, it's your game and all, but y'all sold us on this mode. Fix that shit or give us somethign in return for removing a key selling point.
i mean we were outright told that anything over 64p had diminishing returns
Those are probably some reasons yes - but everyone has their own opinion. So even if you disagree with the rationale, if the majority of players are enjoying and preferring it, thats what it likely will be
imo 32-64 is about right, varying by game mode ofc
dice wants more players to play and they wouldn't cut a game mode unless they felt that would bring in more players than they lose
its not too bad. whats bad is trying to remember spawns i still never learned that. only the jist of where people should come from.
32-32 means more likely to fill with human players
hear me out. 48v48 
Man, at this point just kill 128 players overall. Cap the game at 64 and admit that they were incompetent and their leads were fuckin dumb as fuck and they can't hack it with matches that size.
*"In this update, we’re making multiple updates to the All-Out Warfare rotations. Our leading change is the removal of the 128 player version of Breakthrough. When reviewing the available experiences in All-Out Warfare, we felt that the 128 player modes are better suited for Conquest where gameplay spaces are larger, and where you have a more natural fit for sandbox gameplay.
In Breakthrough’s 128 player mode, we feel that the value and impact of an individual player, and squad is reduced due to the increased intensity and chaos of the combat.
When reviewing Breakthrough, we noted that the 64 player version represented a more tactical experience. Reducing our player count here helps to remove some of the chaos from the experience, and in combination with the reductions that we have made to the number of available combat vehicles, it means players are better able to hold frontlines more effectively. Players will also find more space to work together and fulfill their individual roles
As a result, squads in Breakthrough 64 have a better opportunity to work together, to flank the enemy, place a spawn beacon, use their plus menu to attach suppressors, then clear, and hold a point - one squad helping turn the tide as an example. We believe that the move to 64 players will bring back the pacing that helps celebrate these moments of teamwork and PTFOing, and will be keeping a close eye on how our changes help to improve the experience ahead of the start of Season 1."*
128p conquest is always full so they don't touch that
Welcome to the other side of the coin.
50+v50+ or bust
I like the way HLL has it. 50v50. This should be the standard.
I'd have to imagine that rationale is supported by some degree of metrics in favor of BT64 and thus why the change is being made
I've read their explanation, hence why I cited them using lots of "we think" and "we feel" and nothing about "We've received lots of feedback.." Additionally, again, design-by-metrics is absolutely smoothbrained shit.
My issue with the game is that having a live map showing your location and extracts wouldn’t cheapen the experience. Struggling to know where/how to escape is annoying. Hunt and the cycle did navigation better IMO but obv they’re more casual
hll is also a completely different game that's hardly comparable to battlefield
dice says "we feel" to substitute in for all the metrics and feedback they get since the community gets super butthurt if they're blamed for anything
I mean it could also be that dice has no idea what they are doing. this is the same dice that decided that what V needed was a competitive 5v5 in the middle of a content drought
I agree but i was talking in player count only.
DICE FEELS LMAO
metrics will kill this game..
so.
64v64 bad
32v32 good but people want more players
32÷2=16
32+16=48
then 48v48 good.
i
I mean...it's pretty clear that they don't know what the fuck they're doing and are still struggling for a coherent vision of the future for this game. Just like they lacked a coherent vision for this game during development.
i have no idea how people think 96p is that different from 128p
Good conspiracy theory. It might actually work.
I'd have to assume that they wouldn't have bothered pursuing this change unless there was meaningful feedback or data to bother with it. They did surveys and I know I've seen plenty of posts saying people prefer BT64 to BT128. I don't have that data though.
You're right, DICE could be just pulling it out of their ass, but at the end of the day this is the decision they made. I dont know what to tell you.
Give us 128v128 you cowards!
shush. No more players for you 

That's a bold assumption given DICE regularly doing dumb shit. Why are you giving them the expectation of baseline competence when they've shown nothing of the sort?
I guess my issue is the update does not make me want to play.
I honestly think it’s to have servers appear full with 32-32
Im sure that's a factor
Don’t use metric system in this game, to have more players by calculating it, it will hurt this game
Seems something like DICE would do to look good.
I mean id stop playing a game that was full of AI
Because I don't necessarily assume everyone is a moron even if BF2042 did not launch as a good game. If anything I think studios are prone to making corrections and improvements over time rather than making things worse. The same could be said about BF3, BF4, BFV, which all seemed to improve over time
128 conquest gets filled easily while bt struggles and that's a good gameplay reason to make the change
Which is why they only have 3 game modes rotations.
Let me toss this back to you @velvet sand - do you think it would be better for DICE just to leave it the way it is and not bother? Would that be a better solution? Or would people complain that "DICE isn't listening and bothering to make changes to their shit game"?
i don't think assuming dice will simply make the worse decision is a productive mindset lol
Which is so shit.‘I was excited for bf gunplay and never touch another cod for yearsssss, but here we are
I rolled the dice when I bought this game
Imagine is DICE decided to make the player count smaller in Pearl Market because the map is too small for 64 players.
Bf2042 pearl market would be awesome
dice's original sin was allowing 64 players on metro
The solution is to spend more time tweaking maps, capture points, and working on specialist/vehicle balance to make 128 players actually fun to play. But that requires time and effort and DICE is in short supply of both, apparently.
guys what if they made bt count smaller to keep mapsize but increase the enviromental assets?

Well looks like mw2 is getting its reveal on june 8th, a week before season 1 so both trailers are gonna release around the same time. cant wait to see which gets more hype
Productive? Probably not. Realistic based on history? Absolutely.
Make better map designs to fit 128 player BT than to lower the player count.
I guess you can say we really ROLLED THE DICE when. Come on people, are any of you paying attention to these amazing jokes?
Is anyone writing this stuff down!?
You make me go inverted

Unless the direction is a drastic departure from MW19, MWII is gonna kill that easily
its not like their current performance is devEAting from the norm
2042 is gonna be driven into the ground again, can't wait
Thank you !
I don't disagree, but I don't know what DICE's envrionment is like. For all we know they are planning how to exit 2042 as quickly as possible
Yup just like bfV
DICE gonna blame MW2 for the bad s1 launch
I mean if that’s true than the franchise is fucked. they can’t just put this game under the rug make a new one and hope for the best
at least this time the blame will be more relevant lol
We literally just got through with that and we got the 2nd worst launch in BF history
Which, if true, shoudl result in their subsequent games selling like shit and the studio closing. Which I very much do not want to see.
I wish they had maybe tried here. Instead of just dropping 4.1 they could have done like a Road to Season 1 announcement with some fanfare. Even if Season 1 is amazing they are not acting like it will be.
Star wars battlefront was able to recover cos it had sheer volume of content to tweak, 2042 doesn’t
Sure they can, ha. I think the franchise has more staying power than we think. It truly comes down to game quality. If the new leadership released an amazing BF game next, the franchise would be fine
A fair sacrifice
here's a patch...guess maybe you'll see a season in June
communication? GEt outta here with that, that's a brutal expectation from DICE.
I think it comes down to if they make a good game or not. It always comes down to that
BattleFront did a very detailed get better plan that really helped them get back
Expecting dice to communicate effectively is like expecting the second coming of Christ at this point. And this isn’t a 2042 problem this was a problem They’ve had forever
I get the sense S1 is going to be pretty lackluster compared to how much time has passed, so I imagine they aren't going to be putting too much highlight on it. Yes, it's definitely an indicator of concern for S1
Agreed
THE WHOLE STUDIO IS WORKING ON THE GAME, HAVE FAITH, FAM!
If you had all of this fun new content coming to S1, you'd start teasing it. I don't think S1 is going to have more than 1 map and like 3 new weapons, plus a bunch of cosmetics of course.
You look at how Bungie hypes up new content and then compare it to this...it's just depressing
It's going to be underwhelming, so start bracing yourself for that
I wish 2042 can be recover just like battlefront 2 did, season 1 update better give us something good and if the devs wants to make a comeback for 2042, then do the same thing like battlefront 2 except without the loot box situation.
They could very well have a massive amount of awesome shit for S1. But DICE sucks at communication and always has. You're probably right in that they don't, but their silence isn't honestly an indicator either way.
To be fair bungies marketing department has been able to dress up some pretty bad content as looking pretty decent. Obviously it’s not always bad but even the garbage seasons had good trailers
I dont think so seeing as its gonna take until season 2 to modify a few launch maps. if it takes that long to modify imagine how long it takes them to make a fresh new map
DICE has always been playing catchup with 2042 considering the pre-production shift. Even BF4 had DLC1 pretty much done before launch, hence why it was able to come so soon.
I mean, remember when weekly missions stopped for 1 week (not including the RU chopper skin) and didn't return until the next patch? I literally think that's because they ran out of cosmetics bundled in the patch
they did
They literally needed the new patch to add another set of 12 weekly missions or something. Remember, seasons were supposed to be 3 month cycles (12 weeks) and the original PreSeason content got delayed a week after Wk12
we're about to hit Week 24 of PS, I wouldnt be surprised if 4.1 includes more cosmetics
By the way they’re still keeping the 128 player sizes of the maps for Breakthrough on Discarded, Manifest, Orbital, and kaleidoscope
yup
Fucking why those are gonna be the most empty things now
I was pretty hyped up even when it was a turd
Yeah I have no clue how that will play. Makes you wonder why they'd ditch the 64p versions, are they THAT bad? If so, why the heck do the last gen consoles even have them ha
Again, that goes back to poor map design and pre-production
Oh they removed AK-24’s semi auto? Fucking WHY
"Way ahead of schedule." "Have faith, fam."
haha yeah nobody should ever believe anything is ever ahead of schedule for any game dev
again though: wasn't that leadership? Whats his name...
I just thought of something now that angel has less armor at his disposal, we will see more irish on the map lol. This is why im not a big fan of teh armor Irish armor will stack up. I wish they just made the armor health stay at +5 instead of +20 too much!!
It's just bad leadership through and through and it sucks because I bet there are talented line-level devs at DICE who just got absolutely fucked by all of this
The leadership wouldn’t of said it if dice didn’t tell them that
Agreed. No public data = BS reasons to make changes. This sucks because 90% of the time I played BT128. Moving forward I'll give BT64 an honest try, but I may just switch to CQ128 or quit.
have faith that MW2 will bring us a game that is worth to play
maybe their DMZ mode, but that's it
Sure Andrew Wilson could lie about it but he’s more likely to just say the game with is progressing on schedule rather than boldly claiming it’s ahead without dice saying so
No expectations, but at this point I'm open to going back to CoD if the new one is good. At least play something competently designed and with actual AAA production values.
That’s what I want to succeed
The last Modern Warfare was pretty good so I hope they can keep it up
Its a bummer that 2042 was so bad, I've always preferred BF to CoD ever since after the ORIGINAL MW2 (last one I got was MW3 and despised it), but it makes me wonder if at some point I should try CoD again. I hear it has its share of problems too though
If they can make ground war better that would be a massive W
I liked it in modern warfare 2019 but the maps were pretty bad aside from like two
I've always preferred the way BF feels to play, even with 2042 - it's just such a bummer all of the supporting elements (maps, lack of content, etc.) just make it a less enjoyable BF than past
even the vehicle balance and gameplay seemed off from previous BF games
I hope they add live counter for weekly task ect.. like in bf5
Like 1 /50 kills done ect
That's another 6 months of development you've just added onto the game, thanks.
This assumes there even will be more weekly tasks than 1
Ideally, yes a season pass has multiple ways to earn progression. Season challenges, tasks, assignments (remember those). We have no reason to assume S1 will have any of that
Hell I'm inclined to be skeptical if DICE will even get the "Free and Premium battle passes" correct
Wow, okay
128 breakthrough is going extinct
they better after all this time. A lot of people have put money on that promise
if they go back on it can't imagine what the backlash will be like
Not happy with 128 BT going bye bye. It was the only BT experience I liked.
And we get nothing for them killing off a mode that is why many of us actually bought the game.
Same. Only thing I played whenever I revisited the game
If they at least couched the removal with, "This will allow us to add a bunch of new content and do more to make up for the content we just removed." that'd be alright, but instead it's just, "We can't hack it so we're removing a key selling point we thought was good but realized we don't have the talent or competence to make fun."
So I’m actually pretty mad atm. I’ve complained and criticized but I really haven’t been genuinely angry at 2042 since launch
Technically they key selling point is there so i cant really be mad at it, but damn
I mean, I play conquest as a main mode. But BT 128 was fun occasionally. A great mode for grinding kills/specialist stuff
They really can't win
I guess when you think about it though it was inevitable
I do feel like, the removal of 128 BT was just them giving up on making the mode fun.
They literally just conceded
I worded that poorly. I think we'll GET it, I mean though that it likely will be lackluster compared to competition
I mean 128 conquest is okay but personally Ive never really been a fan of conquest in general. It can get really dragged out
I mean the same logic they’re using to justify the removal is equally applicable to conquest 128, with addition of being boring and spaced out unless you actively spawn on only certain objectives
So I have to wonder how long it is until that’s on the chopping block
Like: 50 tiers (instead of a 100) and, with 25 of them being less meaningful (like virtual currency)
they really did
I think 128 CQ is great. And can only get better. If that gets removed I’m actually gonna be pissed.
Nah, they cant do that otherwise we’re all getting our 60+ back
I think it's here to stay. I actually preferred BT128 actually, it was insane, but it was a nice contrast to CQ I felt
The 64 versions of the base maps suck ass.
'Chaos' is fun anyway, if what someone quoted earlier was official. Definitely not one of the reasons people play BF.
They really can. Make a good game. Or give a bad game good support. Communicate with the community. It's not hard, but apparently seems impossible for DICE.,
Yeah 64 doesn’t really work on em
When they added the 64 player versions I only played them if I was really bored lol
I played each of them once when 64 was added. They’re awful
Breakthrough is really going to be boring once they make 64 only.
They’re not made with 64 players in mind. It is just tacked on
Digging into that, though, they did not make a good game. They then took months to bring back table stakes things like VOIP and scoreboards. Communication can be great but they just are not moving at any appreciable speed.
From 128 BT to 64 is gonna be quite a transition
Exactly. DICE is failing across the board when they have every resource to succeed as a AAA studio with hundreds of staff and multiple support studios.
Monthly updates worked 9 years ago. They don’t work anymore
it really is and defeats the meaning of All out warfare.
This game ain't gettin No Mans Sky'd or Cyperpunked, it's getting slowly killed off one mode at a time.
They still don't have a server browser
Im still suprised they even pulled the card
Part of the issue is that they tried something new and didn't even make it work.
they are going to drive this game into the ground with these changes.
I'm not really. it's typical DICE move
They didn't even listen to the old DICE that said trying to make 128 players fun was super hard and they chose not to. They felt more confident than old DICE, who were objectively filled with better quality developers and especially leads in the studio.
At least they had the sense to keep 128cq for now. But now I’m worried that it can be on the chopping block any day now.
None of that matters if what you design is a turd. It's really unfortunate. I think people still want an updated modern BF.
why fix the issue and make a fun gamemode when we can just remove half the lobby and leave you with some plain maps
I always like to point out that BF2 (2005) had a more aggressive content release cadence than 2042
Im just disappointed... But the only good thing that came out of this was the Angel memes 
at this point we already had BF2:SF which had what, 9 new maps? tons of new weapons, gadgets
pretty much
bf4 and bf1 had alot of good content too.
Like, can DICE just can 2042 and commit to remaking BF4 and just give that to all 2042 owners for free? That way we can at least play a competently designed BF game made by a team that initially knew what the hell they were doing? (yes, it was unplayably buggy at launch but the core is very solid and it turned out fantastically)
Its mostly their map design sucks ass
man they weren't kidding when they said this franchise is dead..
The only good reason to remove 128 players in my mind after you’ve already built the whole fucking game about it is to try and improve the performance but that’s not a reason they mentioned and that logic also means Conquest is on the chopping block too
Absolutely! It's funny that a 2005 game though, prior to most "live services" at least for FPS games, provided more content at a faster pace
My favorite thing about 1 was the class looks
And how many factions were in game, as well
That and all the factions
128p Conquest was fun in Portal on Caspain Border, Valparaiso, and Bulge
it's cause those maps were good
Games are too short though
yup
I doub dice is stupid enough to do that to conquest. A mode that people actually play.
I'd honestly be pretty freakin embarrassed to be working on 2042 right now, lol.
I’ll pass. BF4 maps are doodoo
i usually prioritize gameplay in a game..
That’s cool
The biggest issue with this game is how bad the new maps are.
factions are essentially skins
I also liked the gameplay of 1 if we talk about that lol
Not a single 2042 map is even close to being good
So the update after the 4.1 is season 1
Manifest is good.
I honestly believe this. I dont think the problem lies on 128 players. Its just bad map design.
yeah but this patch i'm not sure if it will be good...
manifest, discarded and orbital are pretty damn solid
FINALLY BORIS IS NERFED . ALL THE NOOBS THAT WERE CAMPING WITH THE BORIS TURRETS
Oh and specialists are bad too.
aside from returning maps because they forgot why those were good in the first place
Whenever 4s maps get mentioned, I can only think of Golmud and locker, the only two maps i really enjoyed anyways
Not the worst idea. I think most people are just sick of the DICE game lifecycle. Especially when the wheels are completely off the cart before it even launches.
that fact that 128 can be fun on the older maps and not the new ones proves that its map design that is the issue
Good thing I T1’d him already 
Solid by 2042 standards is still traah
128 on El Alamien and Bulge was enjoyable
ill never understand this "2042 is bad so EVERYTHING about it is bad" perspective...
I hope the community manager understand how bad of idea it is to remove 128 BT
Its true though
I don’t even think Manifest is just “good by 2042 standards”. It’s just a good map
Not everything. Portal is the only good thing.
its not though...
Nothing about 2042 is better than even BFV
lol, expecting the CM's to do anything beyond collect paychecks and post patch notes/bi-monthly blog posts,.
The season1 is gonna be "early june" i hope its the first days of the month not like 19 or 20
Manifest is a decent mix of everything you can do in battlefield. Probably my favorite map
2042 does nothing better than any previous BF game
For real but they wont have jobs after they burn the franchise to a crisp..
I expect mid june
And it does pretty much everything worse
what logic is that? to make this simple, if everything in bfv is 7/10 and everything in 2042 is 6/10, that doesnt default to BAD which is less than 4/10
Because you don't see the issue
Manifest is the best of the 2042 maps, especially it being during teh evening to highlight explosions and tracer rounds.
Same
I'm sure Tom Henderson knows
Reason I say decent mix is because im considering how a lot of maps tend to appeal over to the vehicles
this makes absolutely no sense...
Imagine having 2042 on your resume 
I think the franchise still has a shot, if new leadership can make a truly good BF game, the one everyone wanted
You can get a job as a UX designer at Ubi with that kind of experience : 3
LMAO
If not, and it fails 2 leadership teams back to back, especially with Zampella who is well-credited, then that is definitely a sign of concern and EA may drop the franchise
To simplify it, 2042 failed at the basic premise of a Battlefield game
Every time I hear maybe the next game will be good I just remember this has been said over and over across the releases for years
Its easy bro. Remake b3/4 maps up to date with current gen graphics
100%, doesnt mean everything about the game is bad...
It makes a lot of sense, if you can't see the issues then nothing is wrong, even if it's terrible.
Ha they should just do that with 2042 while they make a truly new BF game that represents that
Add bf4 to portal , bam game good
it will be held back by this games reputation so I'm sure about that.
Took out most of the legacy features
I’m sorry but this sentence doesn’t make sense
For sure, but reputations change easily. If the next BF game is genuinely good, word will spread
What holds the next BF back is potentially EA not willing to put faith in their creatives
Depends on what genuinely good even means since nobody can agree on the ideal game
never said nothing is wrong... found another person that thinks if youre not absolutely shitting on 2042 they think your think its perfect...
Not really. Fallout 76 is actually a fantastic little game now (still flawed) and has some good updates coming up but it still carries the absolute dogshit reputation it earned from it's hilariously horrible launhc.
I'm sure EA's influence caused a lot of the muck of 2042's pre-production
This is their second time doing a rug pull. I'm not sure if people will forgive them. even if the game is good
true but that is also the same game, there's something about a total rebrand or a new game that is enough to convince people
Unlikely, all reporting on the current way EA handles things is that they're fairly hands-off and let studios do their thing. BW's problems with ME:A/Anthem were purely on BW leadership, EA wasn't the source of any of those problems.
With the Respawn guy in charge of Battlefield now things could even get worse if Apex/COD/TF design philosophies are allowed to directly inform development
They better make sure the next game is fucking fantastic if they do that because oh my God
Maybe, time will tell. We'd need a good game for that to happen first 😆
me "2042 is 6/10 at best"
randoms "you really think the game doesnt have flaws?"
lulwut
2042 is a 1/10
Eh, it’s very mid
He's not in charge of design and sitting in design meetings, he's in charge of the frranchise chich means overseeing its direction and putting good leads in place. It's managerial, not development/creative.
you dont even know what a 1/10 game is
2/10 because portal good and has potental.
I'm willing to give Zampella more credit than that, and assume he'd just "turn BF into Apex". If that was his plan, I don't think it'd work
If I'm not mistaken, Zampella was involved on some of the original BF titles right?
First BFV. now BF2042. This is like Halo transition to 343 from Bungie...
highest id go for 2042 maybe 7-7.5/10
Nope
No classes = automatically loses 4 points.
So how does pretending it's not that bad help? It seems to be just as useless as the everything is bad stance.
💀 I'm literally saying it's easy for some people to pretend it's actually decent despite all it's problems
who am I thinking of then haha
This is exactly what i think
2042 isn't a 1/10 game i'd give it a 6/10
He was involved in Medal of Honor and Call of Duty since the beginning but not BF
Otherwise 2042 might be a 5/10, but no class system makes it not a Battlefield game
Medal of honor allied assault was his big break
@brittle forge there was someone who was a CoD-person who had a history with BF
now I can't remember oh well
6/10 for a beta sure. I can agree.
that game was hands down amazing. I wish they do a remaster.
lets at least agree the game isnt finished yet.
either way, he has the chops to understand what a game like CoD and BF were successful AT
i honestly don’t know who you are talking about unfortunately
its ironic you say that because youre seemingly supporting people pretending things are worse than they actually are.. the original topic is the guy saying all 2042 maps are terrible, a few maps are actually pretty good, most are bad, thats closer to the truth than "they all suck"
It has a class system... If you use portal and make only non 2042.
I'll have to look it up
6/10 as of now but at launch i'd say 1/10 for sure
Yeah the launch was pretty bad
It's weird, because the game has definitely improved leaps and bounds from launch...but especially with things like the removal of 128p breakthrough I almost feel like it's worse than it was at launch given that it's been 8 months and we're still slowly crawling out of a beta state.
Oribital is what a 2042 map should be for 128 players. Not too big. Has tornado. Has a levelution. Has enough capture points.
Don't use Portal to defend 2042. They are for all intents and purposes separate games made by separate studios
I think the issue is most people don't care about the maps because the whole package is frustrating. At some point you give up worrying about the good spots. If we were getting regular feedback loops we could actually talk about the tug of war of good and bad design choices.
Only BF4’s launch was worse and better than BF4 is an abysmal bar
launch = 4/10
1/10 when i couldnt get into game because of the couldnt connect to ea problem
And that was more technical in nature, not "we literally fucked up the core of the game."
i dont get the point of this comment.. the topic was maps, we were talking about maps. maps arent suddenly bad because the rest of the game is bad.. that just doesnt make sense and thats been my whole point from the beginning...
I mean technically 2042 is still the second worst simply because you couldn’t play the game for like two days due to all the persistence errors
BF4 launch was just as bad as 2042 launch but at least bf4 had lots of content to start with.
Also, at least BF4 had more content at launch and more immediately following. BF2042 has...minimal content at launch and nothing new 8 months out.
I couldn't join a large Conquest game of BF4 for like 5 months after launch without it crashing and it was a better experience than 2042
Well then I guess we'll agree to disagree. All good, right?
thats not what you said though, and youre suggesting this to me when i openly acknowledge the flaws of the game, i just dont apply a general blanket of "bad" to the game..
@brittle forge I figured it out, it was David Vonderhaar (https://twitter.com/davidvonderhaar/status/1402842092326375424?lang=en)
if thats what you want to call it sure, i dont think youre following the original conversation and what im saying at all though..
Oh he was with BF? Oh shit I actually didn’t know that
I knew there was some prominent CoD-figure who had a BF background, just wasn't Zampella!
BF4 was weird in that it was broken but what did work was really compelling.
could you imagine having your game broken for 6 months and releasing dlc for it in todays gaming culture...
I followed dave Vonderhaar for a while to
Yup! BF2 was a good time. Back when maps COULD be empty because weapons couldn't hit damn sit haha. Even that had Karkand, Sharqi though, etc.
bf4 launch issues were more related to bugs and instability tbh, 2042 is much better in that regards, but the design choices made in 2042 the other hand..
Sure. But I'd also hope that DICE have improved over the past decade in terms of actually finishing games by the time they launch them. But apparently that hasn't happened still, so here we are.
2042's maps (64p size) would have made great BF2 maps, they just don't work in a modern shooter
I agree but to be fair BF4’s better mechanics don’t really mean anything if you can’t play the game. I literally couldn’t play it for six months. As bad as it is 2042 was more or less playable after two weeks
id still rather take something functional though. make this comparison to a car and anyone would take the working car that has dumb choices in it vs the car that doesnt work but has potential...
Or you know... listening to the community that wants to improve the game free of charge.
And we mean that generally they didn't go through well with a lot of things. Everyone was hyped on the weather system and hoped that major destruction and such would also come back. Instead we get... "haha spinny wind" for two seconds and near zero destruction, not even craters. Vehicle gameplay is meh, but there's definitely a balance issue with guns which would be fine if every gun was good in their own ways, but instead you get some that are pretty... Mid, and then there's things like the AC-42.
yup, bf4 issue was that people couldn't play, bf2042 issue is that people can play it but don't like it most of the time
I'd rather just have a working car that I paid for, but I guess that's still unreasonable 😐
.. thats literally 2042 though...
do you not understand the comparison made there?
No, and they're removing one of the wheels for this car in the patch so I'll ahve a 3 wheeled car.
youre the only person that doesnt get it..
2042 is playable but it still has some crashing issues here and there.
The only issue I had with launch 4 was that Dawnbreaker always crashed
They removed the single fire from the AK why the fuck did they do that honestly
I get it. I don't want either the car with bad decisions or the totally unifinished car. I want the finished car that was marketed to me.
OCD?
Having to replay single player to get the unlocks over and over sucked bad.
technically 2042 wasnt marketed any different than what you got.. if anything it was accurate since the maps were full of bots xD
I was honestly my favorite way to use the AK 24 since it’s recoil was actually controllable at distance
Alot of these minor patches dont make sense.
If you mean the guns, all you had to do was the final mission
I mean...128p breakthrough getting removed. Lied about the open beta being "months old" when there were minimal changes between then an launch (and the game was arguably worse at launch). Delayed live-service to fix their busted ass game that's still nowhere near fixed since they haven't even begun the design work on maps or specialists or anything else. Naw, not really.
yeah almost everything that was in the trailer is ingame
Earlier on you lost progress IIRC. I remember having to play it 3-4 times before I actually never needed to go back there.
someone, somewhere that probably doesn't even play the game wanted this change.
those are pretty shitty points...
Huh. I don't remember that being a thing, could be a version difference since I originally had it on 360.
I mean the open beta was months old, that wasn’t a lie, technically. it was just a really limp dick excuse because every beta is an old build and nobody should have bought into that shit
How so? Was it that DICE is removing content they marketed the game on that's shitty? Was it that DICE released a game so bad that the 3 months of time they built in (smartly) to address issues wasn't enough and they've had to delay the start of live-service for 3 months?
Hold on, since when did so many people actually use single fire on the AK?? I just tap fired from full auto lmao
PS4 version so maybe it was "next-gen" lol
I have legitimately used single fire or burst in the AK the majority of time outside of CQC. Not kidding or exaggerating
would you be mad if dice removed specialists, which they also marketed heavily ?
I tap fire single on AK all the time, I wish they had removed burst instead since it's just annoying to toggle through it
If it was in response to direct feedback? No. But where's the direct feedback that nobody wants 128p breakthrough?
removing content is really your only viable complaint, delta addressed the open beta part, and content being delayed from expectations isnt them lying about marketing.. even if your 3 points were 100% valid, thats literally like 1% of the entire package, so youre really gonna try to say they lied about marketing when 99% of the rest of the game came as they marketed?
all the people complaining about bad performance, chaotic battles, and lack of player agency in a match
128p BT is an easy culprit
Then why does 128p CQ exist?
it plays better
Not me, but that's because I prefer customization over being forced to look like a fat old man who probably shouldn't be in war
If it's down to the size of the match, then surely they'd have to remove CQ since it similarly has performance issues and can be extremely chaotic.
because BT and CQ play different.. this isnt hard to understand
The problem I have with the reasoning you just laid out there is because dice didn’t mention any of that when they talked about removing 128 player breakthrough
I just want frontline to come back
Yes, and a lot of us like the chaos of breakthrough 128p and it was a ton of fun. Connecting the dots between vague, general feedback and a specific mode is quite a leap.
they didn't because their communication skills clearly suck, but i'm pretty sure that's why
Well, the bad performance anyway. The chaos they did talk about
when edge doesnt understand that BT puts all 128 people into 1-2 objectives and CQ spreads them out amongst 10...
3 CM's and multiple global comms folks and DICE still can't communicate effectively in the rare instances that they come down from their ivory tower to give us a message lol.
some dumb ass streamer probably complained about the single fire AK so dice just removed it. this is a common thing in online games
that's another issue entirely on which we agree, but the playlist change was needed IMO
Frontlines was pretty great. I unironically the BF1 frontlines matches that were bugged to have no time limit
Chaos being a thing people enjoy about BF
we asked for 64p CQ/BT and we got it, it was supposed to be limited and they extended it indefinitely
Obviously it couldn’t have stayed without a time limit forever but I had a lot of fun
So does this mean that new gamemodes will be 64 players instead of 128?
yeah, probably
I wouldn't expect any new gamemodes haha
Yeah I don’t think it’s a valid excuse to get rid of a mode but people were talking about all the vehicle spam and stuff so they technically did have that in mind
Other than Portal, of course
no official info, but most likely yes
I honestly want my Santa Boris skin. Just give me my skin and let me enjoy 2042
ew
i want santa boris and christmas tank 
santa borris was bad ass
what a clown show
The thing that annoys me the most is that previous dice games have had game modes that died after like two weeks and they were never ever removed but now we got to remove stuff now
i want altyn boris
Santa Boris begin
Dont 4get christmas tree Casper
Like obliteration from BF4 I never saw a Server after the launch for
you know what wwe got instead of a christmas tank?
a fucking black bolte. on christmas week. 
give me Christmas tree Casper
well there was a huge community backlash too
Conquest is the only mode that is really needed in Battlefield
I saw it get played a bit, did your filters exempt it? I even got a match for it roughly 2-3 years ago
It’s a dumb skin tbh but the game did have bigger problems. I think people mainly dunked on it because of how tone deaf it was when you already had things like the specialist quips
Everything else is fluff
Conquest gets old after awhile
Not if it's well designed
I would see it for like a week after every major DLC update but other than that I couldn’t really find one consistently
I still think its funny they dropped a lunar new year weapon skin and nobody cared.
that was also back when they wanted the art department to fix bugs not do their job. so i want to say that didnt count 
with these maps it's not
Well yeah, 2042 isn't worth playing at all anyway
true
If the game didn’t have other atmospheric issues they probably could’ve gotten away with Santa Boris but with all the other stuff it was just another nail in the coffin
people cared but most of the playerbase had already quit by then
Wish we could rent servers in BFV. I'd host a Wake Island Conquest 24/7 server
this would be cheating.
I think most people would look the other way
his t1 skin already bad enough 
No one would be able to find him in the Orbital forest.
get sniped >sniped by Christmas tree
How?? its good camaflouge. Just make a map with alot of pine trees
See? we are giving dice some good feedback
snow map*
also fits the tone of the game
The Christmas trees speak South African
I wish we see more of this.
Santa don't surf
Anyone else just get another survey for battlefield 2042
I love the smell of gingerbread in the morning
no i got an email about apex legends mobile tho
Yep, going to tear into it even though I haven't played since December lmao
thats awesome 
Shout out to Rising Storm 2 for having like a Christmas toy soldiers mode but with all the graphic violence and screaming/shouting of the base game
🎄
They really ROLLED THE DICE
Nice
hitman 3 IS good
It doesn’t change the fact that it’s really scummy that Hitman 2 is still $60
wait until you hear about nintendo
In the words of RussianBadger
Why the fuck is Black Ops 2 still 60 fucking dollars?!
Like these games are great, we know that
But damn, it’s not gonna hurt you to lower the price
Legend of Zelda Breath of the Wild is still 60 bucks
The Arkham collection is $40 and that’s 4 amazing games
lower price = lower money
But if you lower the price, you might sell more copies
Best deal
When is 2042 prices gonna lower?
They already have
i expect it to be on eaplay after szn 1
Survey has a question about a map editor for Portal
i expect f2p next year
I mean BFV had a few free weekends
And a question about a server rental program
So we paid them so they can let us use their map tools
Yeah but you can play all of the Hitman 1 & 2 maps in Hitman 3 with the $20 pass.
Almost same as the last survey
Here's a survey: Are you fucking serious? [yes] or [no]
Also I don’t think we ever got an answer for 2042 lore
What the fuck happened to Venice
And the Netherlands
I too would like to go in depth with the lore
what happens in Venice stays in Venice
What if there is no Venice
I don't think people will miss it that much
Half of Florida is underwater in 2042
Venice?! They thought you were talking about Dennis!
Easier to stay quiet about it then 😄
Y’all remember when Florida wasn’t known for batshit crazy people and a dumbass state government
No
Pepperridge farms remembers
You mean before it was a state?
Was that before the Europeans sailed here?
I was just there for Miami F1. Interesting place. Managed to get Covid for the first time there.
I mean we got Disney World and Universal Studios
Breakthrough. Not conquest
Why do they call it medium rare? Seems pretty common to cook it like that
you really rolled the DICE with that joke
Season 1 early june confirmed. Good news finally!
where?
I swear man if they screw up season 1

@grizzled whale angel will no longer provide armour 😡
Don’t be sad
He is now early tier 2 he will supply armour plate box (this is how it just works out sometime)
He needs a entire rework, especially with the loadout crate
you know what. why did he have armour and a crate 
Spawning the crate is fun but it could have a better function
I like the idea of the crate. I will say that. thats like the ultimate team ability
I feel like it should give a large area ammo refil
Why
you tell me 
It has a large ammo refill, small health refill, and repairs vehicles slowly
does it repair vehicles or is that something you want. bc that would be dope
sounds op
It's something I want. For the reason to make it not just another ammo crate or health crate
Also no recharge
Get it back after dying and despawns the previous one when placing another.
Because snipers and sentry turret will haras people so he will provide armour 😡
i c5 drone sniper campers. same as out of bounds vehicle campers 
if you don't want to get shot, just avoided the bullets.

I want a mortar specialist and a placable shield station gun specialist
Like the ones in bfv
buildable cover in bfv was dope too. same as reinforcements for vehicles
Love them or hate them, mortars had help a team win games
air strikes would be good too.
Actually if you look at the lore angel does good with vehicle repair
It would make sense for him to repair faster than other specialist
ohhh that would be a cool passive if its in the lore (i dont pay attention to lore) if his repair tool was faster.
falck faster revive, angel faster repair
I think it would be best to make the specialist stand out with their abilities
Make them do well with some guns but worst in others
I got to write this shit down when we get to the discussion of specialist changes that dice will make
Motar specialist 🤔 she should be tier 1.2 her name should be Monica bombarding girl she will be equipped with auto targeting motar it will be a big one which she will call in form the sky like angels loadout crate it will two shot hind and condor 😱 kon the sali hacker sali kohi nahi
tru
Could work
I still think there needs to be an explosive specialist. m5 takes so long to reload and damage is poopy. so an explosive specialist would be good to focus on just anti vehicles. m5 really only good with recon since m5 is more pen than explosive.
oh and AA rocket is an absolute joke
takes 25 years to life to lock on just for the enemy to use flare to run and hide until they have it charged again.
only get lucky when there is an over confident helo user that thinks they are immune to everything so that stay in attack mode.
Looked back on the lore for angel, his dad was a mechanic, and he loved to build things, take them apart, and rebuilding them again
So making his abilities more on repairing vehicles is a good idea
Casper, that sniper guy should have abilities that keep him hidden. Can't be spotted, can't be seen by the turret or dog, and only do well with sniper themed guns, does worst with any other types
Anyone got tips for getting kills with the big sniper?
Deadass trying to get close range kills because I can’t get any at all
There should also be a specialist his name should be lokesh rajdharm 2 (angels big brother) his gadget ballistic head armour with 500 hp to many snipers around
It’s getting a buff lol
dont camp buildings, ur useless to teams then
Are u violet thunder
are you green cracer @frank rain
I use to be green then I became yellow then I got angry 😡 and became red now I am scary and I am purple 💜 there is poision in me and I will become green 💚 🍏 again
Are u getting poisoned @honest comet
A minor update after all this time, rip. But it's something
“Im 14 and this is deep”
LMAO
what I said to my uncle
Im glad they at least confirmed season 1 will launch early june and not later
lolololol
Early June so middle of June
early for me mean in beginning of june, not middle or later
But hey, is DICE we are talking about. We will never know excactly
Or we do cause they preponed the season
It was early summer, which now became early june
I checked the lore he had great grandfather he was in battlefield 5 he was an ex engineer may be he should be our new specialist 🤔 the great grandfather had a stoneage guy he's gadgets was predator bow auto head shot kill and xp farm straight 1000 lvl by killing 500 lvl 2 guy he's name was yogesh the poty hacker
Lol
😡
Tell more about specialist dice is gonna rework it I hate class system
If specialist are going to be in the game they better fucking commit.
the lag is real atm
Can't change a franchise fundamentals and not be committed
is this the "early summer" claim?
y
atleast they said the next update is finally Season 1, in early June
You know a guy working in dice is a Ukraine and Russia war specialist took a armour plate from angel before the update
I hope they drop some video trailer for upcoming season 1
ah didnt know they actually gave an update on season 1
I think this time they worded it "were aiming for early june" i could be wrong tho
"currently set for release in early june" close enough
Up next in our update schedule is the release of Season 1, currently set for release in early June. We’ll be back with a full overview and Update Notes closer to its release.
june 1st "where update"
not that again pls
About 2-3 weeks?
it comes when it comes
this reminds me of the people that look down the street for the bus, like thats gonna make it come faster
Stand up as soon as the plane lands, it helps it move quicker
Bruh why they removed 128 breakthrough that was the only fun thing in aow
welcome to the celebration of life of 128 BT storm
It is not a plane it a space and common people who are sky talk thru it it was never a plane
Look at DM noob
They dont get it 128 is not the problem, the maps are when you run 300meters wihtout covers and just plain you need bodies since theres no shit to take cover bruh
Fuck you dice! Taking away 128 breakthrough
Who is excited for the new conte... I mean bug fix update yayyyy
im pretty excited to jump in. angel doesnt have armor skill and boris turret even easier to kill now
We always have battlefield 4 and 1 so who cares anyways

And 3 ofc
pass hard 
4.1 still needs to do more than just those changes
But hopefully we'll see another update shortly.
I like the cchanges other than 128, but ill have to see how enjoyable 64 is since ive never played it. and they said they are set for early june so thats soonish
People getting poisoned because angel has no armour now
idk what this means
besides small stealth fixes/changes - this was always going to be a QoL patch before S1
People poisioning me because I play battlefield 2042 and smoke cigarettes
Still needs to sort out this awful progression system honestly
this made me not know what youre talking about even more
I'm curious what S1 will bring, hopefully after all this time we get more than just 1 map
Press x to doubt
map specialist, and i think map changes but could be wrong. as for other content we have zero idea
its like people dont think for 2 seconds...
i just hope battle pass wont be trash, and skin shop with actually good skins. any skins at this point. what we have is trash except night op skin.
why would 4.1 be more than that when content is coming in less than a month?

